JPS6055644B2 - Foam-filled fender - Google Patents

Foam-filled fender

Info

Publication number
JPS6055644B2
JPS6055644B2 JP55084438A JP8443880A JPS6055644B2 JP S6055644 B2 JPS6055644 B2 JP S6055644B2 JP 55084438 A JP55084438 A JP 55084438A JP 8443880 A JP8443880 A JP 8443880A JP S6055644 B2 JPS6055644 B2 JP S6055644B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
foam
fender
core
filled
foam layer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP55084438A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5774419A (en
Inventor
誠 桜岡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority to JP55084438A priority Critical patent/JPS6055644B2/en
Publication of JPS5774419A publication Critical patent/JPS5774419A/en
Publication of JPS6055644B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6055644B2/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A30/00Adapting or protecting infrastructure or their operation
    • Y02A30/30Adapting or protecting infrastructure or their operation in transportation, e.g. on roads, waterways or railways

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔発明の適用範囲〕 本発明はフォームフィルド型防舷材の改良に関する。[Detailed description of the invention] [Scope of application of the invention] The present invention relates to improvements in foam-filled fenders.

〔発明の背景〕[Background of the invention]

フォームフィルド型防舷材は、弾性発泡体から成る芯体
(普通は円筒形である)の周囲がゴム質の外皮で覆われ
た防舷材である。
Foam-filled fenders are fenders in which a core (usually cylindrical) made of elastic foam is surrounded by a rubber skin.

この種の防舷材は、繊維コード等で補強されたゴム製外
皮内に空気を充填して成る空気式防舷材と同様に自体浮
遊性であつて、潮位の高低に拘わりなく一定の防眩性能
を発揮するという特徴を有するため、干満差の激しい港
湾やシーバース等における防眩設備及び沖合における船
舶同士の接舷用緩衝材として独特の用途を有し、しかも
先述の空気式防舷材に比べて衝撃吸収能に優れる他、万
一外皮が破損しても防眩能力を失わないこと及び所定空
気圧を保持するための保守管理などの手数がかからない
などの利点を有するため、近年このタイプの防舷材に対
する需要が高まつている。〔解決すべき課題〕 ところで、公知のフォームフィルド型防舷材の芯体は、
これまで全て単一種類(例えば、単一発泡倍率)の弾性
発泡体から作られているので、その性能は当然使用した
発泡体の衝撃吸収能及び反力特性に依存する。
Similar to pneumatic fenders, which are made by filling air inside a rubber shell reinforced with fiber cords, this type of fender is itself floating and provides constant protection regardless of the height of the tide. Because it has the characteristic of exhibiting glare performance, it has unique uses as anti-glare equipment in ports and sea berths with large tidal differences, and as a cushioning material for vessels coming alongside each other offshore, and is also used as a pneumatic fender as mentioned above. In recent years, this type of Demand for fender materials is increasing. [Problems to be solved] By the way, the core of the known form-filled fender is
Since all so far have been made from a single type of elastic foam (eg, single expansion ratio), their performance naturally depends on the shock absorption capacity and reaction force properties of the foam used.

このため、発泡体自身これらの特性の優れた良質のもの
が要求されるので、発泡体のコストが製品コスト中に占
める割合は非常に大きい。従つて、何等かの手段により
単位吸収エネルギー当たりのコストの低い芯体を得るこ
とができれば、メーカー及びユーザーの双方にとつて利
益となるのみならず、製造及び取付用資材量を減少せし
めうる効果により省資源の要請にも協力できることにな
る。〔発明の目的〕 本発明は、従来考慮されたことのない「発泡倍率を異に
する複数の弾性発泡体から芯体を構成する」という新規
な構成により、上述の課題を解決しようとするものであ
る。
For this reason, the foam itself is required to be of high quality with excellent properties, and the cost of the foam occupies a very large proportion of the product cost. Therefore, if it is possible to obtain a core with a low cost per unit of absorbed energy by some means, it will not only be beneficial for both manufacturers and users, but also have the effect of reducing the amount of manufacturing and installation materials. This will enable us to cooperate with requests for resource conservation. [Purpose of the Invention] The present invention attempts to solve the above-mentioned problems by using a novel structure in which the core body is composed of a plurality of elastic foams having different expansion ratios, which has not been considered in the past. It is.

〔具体的構成〕[Specific configuration]

本発明は、弾性発泡体から構成された芯体と、該芯体の
周囲を被覆するゴム弾性体で構成された外皮とから成る
フォームフィルド型防舷材において、前記芯体が発泡倍
率の異なる複数の発泡体層からなると共に、最内方の発
泡体層は1晧以上の発泡倍率とされており、かつ外方の
発泡体層はそれより内方の発泡体層より高発泡倍率とさ
れていることを特徴とする。
The present invention provides a form-filled fender comprising a core made of an elastic foam and an outer skin made of a rubber elastic material covering the periphery of the core, in which the core has different foaming ratios. Consisting of multiple foam layers, the innermost foam layer has a foaming ratio of 1 K or more, and the outer foam layers have a higher foaming ratio than the innermost foam layers. It is characterized by

本発明者は、上記の具体的構成を開発するに先立ち、フ
ォームフィルド型防舷材の性能改善方策につき種々考察
を加えた過程で、1単一組成の芯体ョという既成の観念
に疑問を抱き、断面円形の防舷材が直径方向に圧縮され
る際における部分間の圧縮度の差異に注目した。
Prior to developing the above-mentioned specific configuration, the inventor of the present invention questioned the existing concept of a single composition core material in the process of considering various measures to improve the performance of foam-filled fenders. We focused on the differences in the degree of compression between sections when a fender with a circular cross section is compressed in the diametrical direction.

第1図は、フォームフィルド型防舷材1が剛性面2に対
し圧縮される状態を略示するもので、同図Aの未圧縮状
態のものに対し、同図矢印のように面2に対し直角方向
へ圧縮力を加えると、同図Bのように扁平化するが、こ
の際粗いクロスハッチで示される両端部分1b,1bは
殆んど圧縮変形を受けず、変形によるエネルギーの吸収
と反力は主として中心部分1aに負つていることが判る
。即ち、防舷材1の圧縮方向に平行する両端部分(円弧
と弦により区切られる平凸レンズ形部分)は、あまり緩
衝作用に関与していない。従つて、防舷材の性能は大部
分、中心部分1aの性質に依存していることになる。こ
の考察は一見当然のことのようであるが、本発明の端緒
となつた重要事項である。本発明者は、以上の推定に基
づき第2図に示す4種の試験用防舷材芯体を試作し、そ
の防舷性能を比較した。
Figure 1 schematically shows the state in which the form-filled fender 1 is compressed against the rigid surface 2. On the other hand, when a compressive force is applied in the right angle direction, it becomes flattened as shown in Figure B, but at this time, both end portions 1b, 1b shown by rough crosshatching hardly receive any compressive deformation, and absorb energy due to deformation. It can be seen that the reaction force is mainly exerted on the central portion 1a. That is, both end portions of the fender 1 parallel to the compression direction (plano-convex lens-shaped portions separated by a circular arc and a chord) do not significantly participate in the buffering effect. Therefore, the performance of the fender depends to a large extent on the properties of the central portion 1a. This consideration may seem obvious at first glance, but it is an important matter that led to the invention. Based on the above estimation, the present inventor prototyped four types of test fender core bodies shown in FIG. 2 and compared their fender performance.

因に、本実験に使用した発泡体はポリエチレンを素材と
したもので、発泡倍率は夫々1@(符号F−10)及び
2@(符号F−20)である。各サンプルの諸元は下表
(第1表)の通りであつた。上表の示すように、サンプ
ルAと同Bの発泡倍率は夫々2:1であるので、反力及
びエネルギーは夫々ほぼ1:2の関係を示す。
Incidentally, the foams used in this experiment were made of polyethylene, and the foaming ratios were 1@ (symbol F-10) and 2@ (symbol F-20), respectively. The specifications of each sample were as shown in the table below (Table 1). As shown in the above table, since the expansion ratios of Samples A and B are 2:1, the reaction force and energy each exhibit a relationship of approximately 1:2.

そして高発泡倍こ率の発泡材F−20のみから成るサン
プルAの性能は空気式防舷材と殆ど同様である。しかし
サンプルCは、高率発泡材F−20と低率発泡材F一1
0の体積が夫々同じであるにも拘わらず、それの反力及
び吸収エネルギー値ははサンプルAとB1の平均値より
大きい。即ち、中心部の発泡倍率を周囲部の発泡倍率よ
り低下させた二重構造とすることによつて、単位体積当
たりの特性が向上していることが窺われる。そこで、こ
の事実を明らかにするため、サンプルAの60%圧縮時
の性能を100として各サンプルを比較した結果を以下
第3表として示す。
The performance of sample A, which is made only of foam material F-20 with a high expansion ratio, is almost the same as that of the pneumatic fender material. However, sample C consists of high-rate foam material F-20 and low-rate foam material F-1.
Even though the volumes of samples A and B1 are the same, their reaction force and absorbed energy values are larger than the average values of samples A and B1. In other words, it can be seen that the properties per unit volume are improved by forming a double structure in which the foaming ratio in the center is lower than that in the peripheral region. Therefore, in order to clarify this fact, the results of comparing each sample with the performance of sample A at 60% compression set as 100 are shown in Table 3 below.

なお、対照とした重ね合わせ構造体の構造は第3図とし
て模型的に示される。 2
??? L−j上表において、サンプルA
と同Bは共に単一発泡倍率の弾性発泡材から成る単一構
造体である。
Incidentally, the structure of the stacked structure used as a comparison is schematically shown in FIG. 2
? ? ? L-j In the above table, sample A
and B are both a single structure made of an elastic foam material with a single expansion ratio.

,サンプルCは発泡材F−10とF−20との体積比が
50/50であるが、その右欄に示される同一厚みのF
−10とF−20を重ね合わせたときの理論値をサンプ
ルCと比較すると、反力及び吸収エネルギーのいずれに
おいてもサンプルCの方が優;れている。同様に、サン
プルDとその右側に示された発泡材F−10と同F−2
0の体積比が75/25である重ね合わせ構造体の理論
値と対比しても、やはりサンプルDの性能の方が優れて
おり、二重構造の優位性が立証される。第4図は以上の
二重構造において高率発泡材F−20と低率発泡材F−
10の体積比を段階的に変化させた場合の単位コスト当
たり吸収エネルギー(但し、サンプルA基準)の変化を
示し、このグラフから、F一10とF−20の組合せで
は、重ね合わせ理論値を示す斜めの直線と二重構造の場
合を示す弧状線との間の正の距離が本発明による改良効
果を示すこと、及び改良効果はF−20/F−10の体
積比が60/40ないし50/50の近辺でF−20単
独の場合に比し約10%、F−10単独の場合に比し約
3.5%向上していることが窺知できる。先述した本発
明の具体的構成は、以上の知見に基づくものである。
, Sample C has a volume ratio of foam materials F-10 and F-20 of 50/50, but the same thickness of foam material F-10 and F-20 shown in the right column
Comparing the theoretical values obtained when -10 and F-20 are superimposed with Sample C, Sample C is superior in both reaction force and absorbed energy. Similarly, sample D and the foam materials F-10 and F-2 shown on the right side
Even when compared with the theoretical value of a superimposed structure in which the volume ratio of 0 is 75/25, the performance of sample D is still superior, proving the superiority of the double structure. Figure 4 shows the high-rate foam material F-20 and the low-rate foam material F- in the above double structure.
The graph shows the change in absorbed energy per unit cost (based on sample A) when the volume ratio of F-10 is changed stepwise.From this graph, the theoretical superposition value for the combination of F-10 and F-20 is shown. A positive distance between the diagonal straight line shown and the arcuate line showing the double structure case indicates the improvement effect of the present invention, and the improvement effect is obtained when the volume ratio of F-20/F-10 is 60/40 or It can be seen that in the vicinity of 50/50, there is an improvement of about 10% compared to the case of F-20 alone and about 3.5% compared to the case of F-10 alone. The specific configuration of the present invention described above is based on the above findings.

なお、この構成において発泡倍率の高低という意味は飽
くまで相対的な謂であって、技術的概念上の高低を意味
するものではないから、実質的には外方の発泡体層がそ
れより内方の発泡体層に比べて高発泡倍率であれば足り
る。しかし、防舷材の設計上は先づ吸収エネルギーの値
が大前提となるので、この値と許容量大圧縮率及び防舷
材の寸法(直径、長さ等)などから芯体用材料の発泡倍
率が決定される。但し、最内層の発泡体層は10ff1
以上の発泡倍率とされることを要する。また、本発明の
二重構造体では、単純重ね合わせ理論が当てはまらない
ので、実際の設計は、小型モデルに対する実験の結果に
基づいて行うのが好ましい。本発明に係る防舷材の芯体
材料は、接舷により繰り返して圧縮、変形作用を受ける
ので、充分な機械的強度、殊に繰り返し疲労強度を持つ
ていなければならない。
In addition, in this configuration, the meaning of high or low foaming ratio is strictly relative and does not mean high or low from a technical concept, so in reality, the outer foam layer is It is sufficient if the foaming ratio is higher than that of the foam layer. However, when designing fenders, the value of absorbed energy is the first prerequisite, so the core material is selected based on this value, the allowable large compression ratio, and the fender dimensions (diameter, length, etc.). The foaming ratio is determined. However, the innermost foam layer is 10ff1
It is necessary that the foaming ratio be higher than or equal to the foaming ratio. Furthermore, since the simple superposition theory does not apply to the double structure of the present invention, it is preferable that the actual design be based on the results of experiments on small models. Since the core material of the fender according to the present invention is repeatedly compressed and deformed by coming alongside, it must have sufficient mechanical strength, especially cyclic fatigue strength.

この点、天然ゴム又はウレタンゴム等の合成ゴム類の発
泡体は最も優れている。特にポリウレタンフォームは、
液状のベースポリマーを用いてワンショットで発泡させ
ることができ、単に原料に加水するだけで発泡が起こる
ので、小型のフォームフィルド型防舷材用の芯体材料と
して好適である。なお、以上の天然ゴムや合成ゴム以外
の材料でも、例えばポリスチレン、ポリエチレン、,A
BS,.EVA.sEPRlポリ塩化ビニルなどの弾性
に富む合成樹脂発泡体が任意に使用できる。一方、大型
の防舷材の場合、発泡成形法は金型の価格、発泡の均一
性などに難点があるので、ポリエチレンフォームなどの
比較的安価な発泡体のシートを捲回して円筒状などに成
形する方法は実用性が高い。本発明の防舷材は、芯体が
多層構造である以外Jこれまでのフォームフィルド型防
舷材と同じでよい。
In this respect, foams made of natural rubber or synthetic rubber such as urethane rubber are the best. In particular, polyurethane foam
Since it can be foamed in one shot using a liquid base polymer, and foaming occurs simply by adding water to the raw material, it is suitable as a core material for small form-filled fenders. In addition, materials other than the above natural rubber and synthetic rubber, such as polystyrene, polyethylene, etc.
B.S. EVA. Highly elastic synthetic resin foams such as sEPRl polyvinyl chloride can optionally be used. On the other hand, in the case of large fenders, the foam molding method has drawbacks such as the cost of the mold and the uniformity of foaming, so sheets of relatively inexpensive foam such as polyethylene foam are rolled up into cylindrical shapes. The molding method is highly practical. The fender of the present invention may be the same as conventional form-filled fenders except that the core has a multilayer structure.

この形式の防舷材では、その取付方式によつて中心に軸
管を有し、該軸管に吊下げ用ロッドを挿通する形式のも
のと、外周面を吊下げ用ネットで覆う形式のものとがあ
るが、いずれの形式でも、芯体の外周は強靭な外皮で被
覆されるべきである。
Depending on the installation method, this type of fender has either a shaft pipe in the center and a hanging rod inserted through the shaft pipe, or a type in which the outer circumferential surface is covered with a hanging net. However, in either type, the outer periphery of the core should be covered with a tough outer skin.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

第5図及び第6図は、本発明の一実施例に基づく中心に
軸管を内蔵した形式のフォームフィルド型防舷材の一部
切り欠き縦断面図および横断面図である。
FIGS. 5 and 6 are a partially cutaway longitudinal sectional view and a cross sectional view of a form-filled fender having a built-in shaft tube in the center according to an embodiment of the present invention.

本例防舷材は、円筒形の芯体1の中心部に二重の鍔付き
軸管2が貫通する。前記芯体1は、体積比50/50の
割合に構成された低率発泡体(10倍発泡)の第1発泡
体層1aと高率発泡体(2皓発泡)の第2発泡体層1b
とから成り、両者の周りを非発泡質ゴムの外皮3が被う
。この外皮3の端面部分3aは内側の鍔4を完全に包み
こんて軸管2の両端部外周面と外側の鍔5の内面に密着
する。なお、内側の鍔4の周囲には多数の小孔6,6,
・・・・・・が穿たれており、外皮3の端面部分3aは
これらの小孔6,6,・・・・・・を介して鍔4と一体
化する。外側の鍔5はその中心部に回動自在の鐙7を有
し、鎖、ローブ等の繋留具を用いて桟橋等の設置場所に
繋留される。以上の例示品では、芯体が1C@発泡の第
1発泡体層と2CP.発泡の第2発泡体層との前積比5
0/50の二重構造とされているので、その単位コスト
当りの吸収エネルギーは、托倍発泡の単一発泡体を−用
いた在来品より増大し、従つて割安な防舷材を製作でき
る。なお、本例防舷では、以上の本発明による特有の効
果のほかに、二重鍔付き軸管を有するので、接舷時の剪
断作用による外皮の軸管からの剥離が事実上防止れさる
と共に、軸管内を貫2通する取付用シャフト等の装備が
不要となり、加えて防舷材の端面の軸管開口部付近の損
傷が実質的に防止される等の副次的効果を有する。第7
図及び第8図は無軸管型の二重構造フォームフィルド型
防舷材の例を示す。
In the fender of this example, a double flanged shaft tube 2 passes through the center of a cylindrical core 1. The core body 1 includes a first foam layer 1a made of a low-rate foam (10 times foaming) and a second foam layer 1b made of a high-rate foam (2-layer foam) in a volume ratio of 50/50.
, and a non-foamed rubber outer skin 3 covers both of them. The end surface portion 3a of the outer skin 3 completely surrounds the inner collar 4 and is in close contact with the outer circumferential surface of both ends of the shaft tube 2 and the inner surface of the outer collar 5. In addition, there are many small holes 6, 6, around the inner tsuba 4.
... are bored, and the end surface portion 3a of the outer skin 3 is integrated with the collar 4 through these small holes 6, 6, .... The outer collar 5 has a rotatable stirrup 7 in its center, and is moored to an installation location such as a pier using a mooring device such as a chain or a robe. In the above example product, the core body is the first foam layer of 1C@foam and the core of 2CP@foam. Pre-volume ratio of foam to second foam layer: 5
Since it has a 0/50 double structure, the absorbed energy per unit cost is greater than that of conventional products using a single foam, making it possible to produce fenders that are cheaper. can. In addition to the unique effects of the present invention described above, this example fender has a double-flange shaft tube, so that peeling of the outer skin from the shaft tube due to shearing action when coming alongside is virtually prevented. In addition, it eliminates the need for equipment such as a mounting shaft that passes through the shaft pipe, and has secondary effects such as substantially preventing damage to the end face of the fender in the vicinity of the shaft pipe opening. 7th
The figures and FIG. 8 show an example of a double-structure foam-filled fender of a shaftless tube type.

本例では芯体1:の中心部分に前例における軸管2を備
えていない点を除いて前例のものと同様である。この防
舷材の繋留にはネット(図示せず)を使用する。第9図
に示したものは、高率発泡の第2発泡体層1b上に、同
じく高率発泡の第3発泡体層1cを取り換え可能に積層
した例である。なお、高率発泡体層1bをさらに多くの
層に分割することも可能である。このように本発明にい
う1二重構造ョとは、巨視的な概念であることを理解さ
れるべきである。さらに第5図及び第6図の例示品にお
いて、高率発泡体層1bを低率発泡体層1aから分離可
能な構造とすることもできる。
This example is the same as the previous example except that the central part of the core body 1 is not provided with the shaft tube 2 in the previous example. A net (not shown) is used to anchor this fender. What is shown in FIG. 9 is an example in which a third foam layer 1c, which is also highly foamed, is replaceably laminated on a second foam layer 1b, which is also highly foamed. Note that it is also possible to divide the high-rate foam layer 1b into more layers. As described above, it should be understood that the one-double structure referred to in the present invention is a macroscopic concept. Furthermore, in the examples shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the high-rate foam layer 1b may be separable from the low-rate foam layer 1a.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

以上詳述したように、本発明はよれば、フォームフィル
ド型防舷材の性能を低下させることなしに原料コストを
低下させることができるので、港湾設備上、ひいては省
資源的に大きな価値を有することは明白である。
As detailed above, according to the present invention, the cost of raw materials can be reduced without deteriorating the performance of form-filled fenders, so it has great value in terms of port facilities and resource conservation. That is clear.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明のフォームフィルド型防舷材の原理を説
明する模型図、第2図は本発明のフォームフィルド型防
舷材と従来のフォームフィルド型防舷材の概略構造を示
す模型図、第3図は第3表の重ね合わせ構造E,.Fに
対応する重ね合わせ構造の模式図(同図a(=E)、同
図b(=F)、第4図は二重構造発泡体における体積比
と単位コスト当たりエネルギー吸収量の関係を示すグラ
フ、第5図及び第6図は本発明の一実施例に基づくフォ
ームフィルド型防舷材の一部切り欠き縦断面図及び横断
面図、第7図及び第8図は別な実施例による防舷材の一
部切り欠き縦断面図及ひ横断面図、第9図はさらに別な
実施例を示す一部切り欠き縦断面図てある。 各図中の符号の意味は以下のとおり。DF:防舷材、1
:芯体、1a:第1発泡体層、1b:第2発泡体層、1
c:第3発泡体層、2:軸管、3:外皮、4,5:鍔、
6:小孔、7:鐙。
Fig. 1 is a model diagram explaining the principle of the form-filled fender of the present invention, and Fig. 2 is a model diagram showing the schematic structure of the form-filled fender of the present invention and a conventional form-filled fender. , FIG. 3 shows the overlapping structure E, . Schematic diagram of the overlapping structure corresponding to F (Figure a (=E), Figure b (=F), Figure 4 shows the relationship between volume ratio and energy absorption per unit cost in double structure foam. Graphs, FIGS. 5 and 6 are partially cutaway longitudinal and cross-sectional views of a form-filled fender according to one embodiment of the present invention, and FIGS. 7 and 8 are according to another embodiment. Fig. 9 is a partially cutaway vertical cross-sectional view and a cross-sectional view showing a further embodiment of the fender. The meanings of the symbols in each figure are as follows. DF: fender, 1
: core body, 1a: first foam layer, 1b: second foam layer, 1
c: third foam layer, 2: shaft tube, 3: outer skin, 4, 5: tsuba,
6: small hole, 7: stirrup.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 弾性発泡体から構成された芯体と、該芯体の周囲を
被覆するゴム弾性体で構成された外皮とから成るフォー
ムフィルド型防舷材において、前記芯体が発泡倍率の異
なる複数の発泡体層からなると共に、最内方の発泡体層
は10倍以上の発泡倍率とされており、かつ外方の発泡
体層はそれより内方の発泡体層より高発泡倍率とされて
いることを特徴とするフォームフィルド型防舷材。
1. In a form-filled fender consisting of a core made of an elastic foam and an outer skin made of a rubber elastic material covering the periphery of the core, the core contains a plurality of foams having different expansion ratios. The innermost foam layer has a foaming ratio of 10 times or more, and the outer foam layer has a higher foaming ratio than the innermost foam layer. A foam-filled fender featuring:
JP55084438A 1980-06-20 1980-06-20 Foam-filled fender Expired JPS6055644B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP55084438A JPS6055644B2 (en) 1980-06-20 1980-06-20 Foam-filled fender

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP55084438A JPS6055644B2 (en) 1980-06-20 1980-06-20 Foam-filled fender

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5774419A JPS5774419A (en) 1982-05-10
JPS6055644B2 true JPS6055644B2 (en) 1985-12-06

Family

ID=13830589

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP55084438A Expired JPS6055644B2 (en) 1980-06-20 1980-06-20 Foam-filled fender

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6055644B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6035691A (en) * 1983-08-08 1985-02-23 Bridgestone Corp Suspension metal for side-protection floating member
US4900192A (en) * 1988-09-28 1990-02-13 Wood James E Dock boat well protective bumper
KR200379394Y1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2005-03-17 신용주 Sea guard
CN100387486C (en) * 2006-06-21 2008-05-14 张建明 Solid ball for ship adjoin
KR100840740B1 (en) 2007-02-13 2008-06-23 (주) 군장조선 Ship with an angle protection equipment
KR200454901Y1 (en) 2007-08-01 2011-08-04 김지현 Shock-resistant fender
CN105040644B (en) * 2015-08-03 2017-04-12 中船澄西船舶修造有限公司 Rotary combined type paint damage preventing fender
CN107284619B (en) * 2017-05-27 2022-08-23 青岛鲁航气囊护舷有限公司 Lower-swing type impact-resistant inflatable fender sealing pull ring
CN107298158B (en) * 2017-05-27 2022-08-19 青岛鲁航气囊护舷有限公司 Anti-impact inflatable fender sealing pull ring
GB2599685A (en) * 2020-10-08 2022-04-13 Gtechs Consulting Ltd Marine fenders

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5774419A (en) 1982-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4021589A (en) Buoyancy materials
CA1201250A (en) Core material for automobile bumpers
US3404406A (en) Diving suit
US5118555A (en) Composite article
JPS6055644B2 (en) Foam-filled fender
JP3506709B2 (en) Water sports board
US3622437A (en) Composite buoyancy material
US5529824A (en) Filler body as molded part for sealing poorly accessible hollow spaces
EP1832186A3 (en) Energy absorbing material
CA2608045A1 (en) Ball suitable for water games
CA1233608A (en) Core material for an automobile bumper
US4039363A (en) Method of making floating seat cushion
US4550466A (en) Cleaning elements for inside cleaning of the tubes of tube-type heat exchangers and method of manufacturing same
JP2000080515A (en) Helmet
US4420356A (en) Flotation mattress and method
KR200389744Y1 (en) A buoy with a built-in compressed styrofoam for fishculture
US4055136A (en) Multi-cell gas-filled bag and method for producing the same
US3828715A (en) Air cushion type fender for use with a quay-wall
GB2196717A (en) Fender
CN200985089Y (en) Fill-type rubber fender
US7070730B2 (en) Method of manufacturing foam core boat collars
US4978563A (en) Self repairing elastic bodies
US2404594A (en) Reinforced buoyant rubber disk
CN218594527U (en) Nested multiple shock attenuation fender
JPH08133174A (en) Buoyant material