JPS60126161A - Odor masking deodorant - Google Patents

Abstract

(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a deodorizing agent, and more particularly to a deodorizing agent useful in the food field.

Deodorants and deodorants are used in various fields,
Development in the food field is insufficient, and dimethylaminoallyl sulfonate, acrylamide, glucosamine, etc. are effective (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 48-23946), and a bad breath remover containing cyclodextrin as an active ingredient (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 122709-1982). No. 1), etc. have been proposed, and deodorizing products with excellent safety and good effects have been proposed.
The emergence of deodorizing agents is strongly desired.

An object of the present invention is to provide a deodorizing agent that can meet the above demands.

That is, the present invention relates to a deodorizing agent containing crushed sake lees as an active ingredient.

Sake lees is the residue left after separating sake from moromi, and generally contains about 8 to 12% alcohol.

In this Zomei, a crushed product of this sake lees is used, but preferably the sake lees is coarsely crushed, dried, and then crushed. Drying at 30-50℃
It may be carried out at a temperature of 10 to 24 hours. Next, the powdered sake lees is pulverized by an appropriate means to obtain a powdered sake lees having a diameter of between o and ol to 2.

The crushed sake lees obtained in this way can be deodorized and
It can be used as a deodorizer, but depending on the purpose of use, propylene cream: I-le,! It may be used by dissolving or suspending it in an organic solvent that is acceptable as a food additive such as lycerin or ethanol, or water, and diluting it as appropriate.

The deodorizing/deodorizing agent of the present invention has a wide range of effects, and has excellent deodorizing effects on unpleasant odor substances such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, triethylamine, and methyl mercaptan. Moreover, since the deodorizing agent of the present invention is derived from natural products, there is no need to worry about safety when using it. Therefore, the deodorizing agent of the present invention can be suitably used by adding it to various foods such as soy milk and sausages containing fish and poultry meat, or by adding it to chewing gum and mouthwash.

Next, the present invention will be explained in detail with reference to examples.

Example 100 g of commercially available sake lees was coarsely ground and dried at 70°C for 24 hours. Thereafter, this was ground in a coffee mill to obtain a white powder. This powder has a more fragrant aroma and rich amino acid taste than unprocessed sake lees. This sake lees powder was dissolved in glopylene glycol to obtain a 10% solution of a deodorizing agent. A deodorization test was conducted using this.

(1,) Prepare the ammonia removal test sample so that it contains only one sample, collect it in a 100ml vial, and seal it tightly. A gas containing 2.1 g of ammonia is injected into the aforementioned vial using a gas-tight syringe. This is left at room temperature, and after a predetermined period of time, 0.3 mJ of gas in the vial is collected and injected into a gas chromatograph. On the other hand, as a control, a standard gas is injected into an empty, sealed vial, and the gas in the vial is similarly sampled over time to calculate the ammonia removal rate (H) by the gas chromatography material. In addition, the operating conditions of the gas chromatograph are as follows.・ Filler: “Ohromosorb 103 J (s
o/ioo) Separation tube: Inner diameter 3 mlB + length 27
FL + glass Temperature: Separation tube 140℃, injection port 150
'C, Detector 150''C Carrier gas: Helium 2
kit/cm” Electrometer: ATTENUA
TION2.0URRJiiN'F 100mA recording paper feed speed: 10m5/min.

Model: Shimadzu Go-7A Detector: TOD The results are shown in Table 1. For comparison, activated carbon (Kimco), which is used as a deodorizing agent for refrigerators.

Table 1 also shows the results of a similar test using 1 g of American Drac Corporation fi).

Table 1 Invention products 31 52 62 85 92 Activated carbon 12
25 40 52 60 controls 8 12 12 28 32 *Propylene glycol C2 notriethylamine removal test Prepare one sample of the original substance, collect in a 100 d vial, and seal. Triethylamine 169~
Inject the gas containing the into the vial using a gas-tight syringe. The following procedure is carried out in the same manner as the ammonia removal rate measurement method. In addition, the operating conditions of the gas chromatograph are as follows.

Filler: f-Ohromosorb 103 J
(80/100) Separation tube: inner diameter 3MIK, length 2tr
t', Glass Temperature: Separation tube 180"C, Inlet 25
0"C, detector 250"C key'r97-Gas: Nitrogen 2
kg/crrL"Gas pressure: Hydrogen 0-6 kg/cm"
, Air 0.5 kg 7 cm 2 Electrometer: A
TπNIJATION 32. RANGE 102 Recording paper feed speed: 10 iui/min.

Machine: Shimadzu Go-7A Detector: :FID The results are shown in Table 2. For comparison, the results for activated carbon are also shown in the table, similar to the ammonia removal test.

Table 2 Inventive product 5875100 Activated carbon 8 31 52 70 86 Control 12 15 15 27 31*Propylene glycol (3) Hydrogen sulfide removal test Sample was prepared to be 1 q in bulk and placed in a 100 go vial. Collect and seal tightly. Inject the gas containing 1.7 d of hydrogen sulfide into the vial mentioned above using a gas-tight syringe. The following procedure is carried out in the same manner as the ammonia removal rate measurement method. The operating conditions for the gas chromatograph are as follows. That's right.

Filler: 30% TC! IP on Ohromos
orb wAw (60/80) Separation tube: Inner diameter 31m
, length 3m, made of glass Temperature: Separation tube 45°C 2 Inlet 100°C 1 Detector 100"C Carrier gas: Helium 0.8cm 7cm Electrometer: A'l'
TENUA'l'ION 8. CURRIiiNT 1
25mA recording paper feed speed: 10mJmin.

Model: Takashi Go-7A Detector: TOD The results are shown in Table 3. For comparison, the results for activated carbon are also shown in the table, similar to the ammonia removal test.

Table 3 Invention products 17 32 45 62 81 Activated carbon 7
20 35 58 60 * Control 12 12 14 27 29 * Propylene glycol (4) Methyl mercaptan removal test sample is prepared so that the original concentration is 19, collected in a 100a vial and sealed. Methyl mercaptan 0.8
A gas containing 9■ is injected into the aforementioned vial using a gas-tight syringe. The following procedure is carried out in the same manner as the ammonia removal rate measurement method. In addition, the operating conditions of the gas chromatograph are as follows.

Filler: 30% TOEP on Ohromosorb
wAw (60/80) separation tube: inner diameter 311IE,
Length 2m, made of glass Temperature: Separation tube 120"C, Inlet 250'C, Detector 250'CC Carrier gas: Nitrogen 0te7: Ruri) o7!-ter: RANGE 32, 5EN
SITIVITY 102 Recording paper feed speed: 1o/
min. Model: Takashi Go-40M Detector: FID The results are shown in Table 4. For comparison, the results for activated carbon are also shown in the table, similar to the ammonia removal test.

Table 4 Invention product 32 62- 65 80 85 Activated carbon 1
0 10 12 28 45* Control 11 12 17 20 21 Propylene Glycol Application Example 1 Chewing gum was manufactured according to the following formulation using a 10% thipropylene glycol solution of the sake lees powder obtained in Example. A sensory test for bad breath was conducted on this chewing gum. As a result, it was found that it had good effects as shown in Table 5. In addition, the sensory evaluation of the bad breath removal effect was performed by the following method.

In order to comprehensively examine the halitosis removal effect, a 1nvitro sensory test was conducted on artificial halitosis, tobacco odor, and garlic odor. Artificial bad breath was prepared using hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl sulfide, which are the three major components of bad breath, in the following manner.

■Blow hydrogen sulfide gas into 200ml of pure water at 15°C for about 1 hour to saturate the hydrogen sulfide.

(2) 200 g of dimethyl sulfide and 200 g of methyl mercaptan were added to 100 ml of a saturated hydrogen chloride solution and mixed well to prepare an artificial bad breath solution.

Dilute the artificial bad breath liquid 100 times with pure water, gargle with the diluted solution for 1 minute, and immediately collect the breath 31 in a 3-capacity back bag (manufactured by Omi Ord Air Service @), and get a score of 0.
After that, chewing gum containing various active ingredients was chewed for 3 minutes, and 3 breaths were taken and evaluated.

For tobacco odor, remove 3 highlights from the base of the filter.
Same friend holder up to 1m long (Lotte Electronics)
Co., Ltd.), smoked 3 cigarettes in 3 minutes, and the exhaled air 31
It was considered beautiful and was given an evaluation score of 0. Thereafter, chewing gum containing various active ingredients was chewed for 3 minutes, and 3 breaths were taken for evaluation.

Garlic (in the back is garlic mink (after slicing garlic, drying it and crushing it into 2-3 diameter pieces) 509 in a mortar, add 200ml of warm water (approx. 40°C) and rub it well for 10 minutes. A garlic extract of 1609 was obtained by pureeing with gauze, and this extract was diluted 20 times with pure water, and after holding 10 Inl in the mouth for 5 minutes, 3 breaths were taken as a sample, and a score of O was given. Thereafter, chewing gum containing various active ingredients was chewed for 3 minutes, and the exhaled air 31 was taken into the inner bag again for evaluation.

The deodorizing effect was evaluated by 5 expert panelists according to the evaluation method shown below, using a score scale of 5.

1 1/10 concentration of 0 Storage odor 2 1 of 0. /100 concentration Gum base 20% Sugar 60% Water Candy 15% Water 4% Deodorant/Deodorant 1% Table 5 Products of the present invention -2,93,12,6 * Control 2.4 2.6 1.3 This chewing gum does not contain deodorizing or dehydrating agents and contains 5% water and 5% water.
Application example 2 Sake lees powder of Example (10 thipropylene glycol solution)
Sardine fish balls were made using the following recipe and a sensory test was conducted by a panel.

Prescription for Sardine Fishballs Sardines (boneless/headless) 200g Flour 20ml 1 egg Deodorant/deodorizer 109 Salt 1.5g The ingredients of the above recipe were thoroughly minced, placed in boiling water in portions of 209, and boiled for 5 minutes. As a control, 10 g of propylene glycol was used instead of the deodorizing agent.

The evaluation was performed by 10 expert panelists according to the evaluation method shown below, using a 4-point scale in comparison with a control product.

The fish odor (sardine odor) has completely disappeared.
It has almost disappeared. ---2 It has become a little thinner.
−−−1 No difference from control −−−−−.

The evaluation results are shown in Table 6. As is clear from the table, it was found that by adding 3% of the deodorizing/deodorizing agent of the present invention, the sardine odor was almost eliminated and the taste was improved at the same time.

Table 6 Product of the Invention 3 3233332222.6 Application Example 3 A mouthwash was manufactured according to the following formulation using the 10-thipropylene glycol solution of the sake lees powder obtained in Example.

Prescription water for mouthwash: 80% deodorant/deodorant: 10% ethanol: 10% The above mouthwash was evaluated in the same manner as the evaluation method shown in Application Example 1. The results are shown in Table 7.

Table 7 Invention product 2.8 2. '5 2.6 * Comparison L6 1.0 1.2 *Propylene glycol only Patent applicant: Takasago Fragrance Industries Co., Ltd.

Claims (1)

[Claims] A deodorizing agent whose active ingredient is crushed sake lees.