JPH1084197A - Mounted product planning system - Google Patents

Mounted product planning system

Info

Publication number
JPH1084197A
JPH1084197A JP23764896A JP23764896A JPH1084197A JP H1084197 A JPH1084197 A JP H1084197A JP 23764896 A JP23764896 A JP 23764896A JP 23764896 A JP23764896 A JP 23764896A JP H1084197 A JPH1084197 A JP H1084197A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mounting
cost
algorithm
study
database
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP23764896A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3705870B2 (en
Inventor
Yasuhiro Okada
康弘 岡田
Kenichi Sato
健一 佐藤
Takeshi Obara
健 小原
Koichi Kanematsu
宏一 兼松
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP23764896A priority Critical patent/JP3705870B2/en
Publication of JPH1084197A publication Critical patent/JPH1084197A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3705870B2 publication Critical patent/JP3705870B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To study a mounted product plan in which all the factors in the production are totally evaluated, and avoid a large management loss and a large plant operation loss when the actual production is started. SOLUTION: In a stage in which a mounting method and a mounting board construction are studied in accordance with a mounting method data base 2, a mounting method study algorithm 5 and a mounting board construction study algorithm 6, the proper mounting costs of the respective types of components are multiplied by the mounting numbers of the respective components in accordance with a mounting cost data base 3 and a mounting cost study algorithm 7 to obtain a total mounting cost. Then, proper mounting tacts for the respective types of the components are multiplied by the mounting numbers of the respective components in accordance with a machine characteristics data base 4 and a production capability study algorithm 8, and divided by the proper mounting capabilities of machines to obtain the production capability. Thus, the total mounting cost and the production capability are simultaneously studied.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、実装工場において
基板に部品を実装してなる実装商品の企画検討を支援す
る実装商品企画検討システムに関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a mounting product planning and reviewing system that supports planning and studying of a mounting product in which components are mounted on a board in a mounting factory.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、実装商品を企画決定する際には図
11に示すような方法が取られていた。まず、検討内容
の内で最も影響の大きい実装工法及び実装基板構成の検
討に関して、実装工法については、既に実績のある商品
が挿入工法をとっていればそのまま挿入工法を、表面実
装工法をとっていればそのまま表面実装工法を採用し、
実装基板構成については、既に実績のある商品の面積、
枚数、実装部品、及び層数を基本に設計者の勘と経験に
よって検討して決定されていた。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a method as shown in FIG. 11 has been adopted when planning and deciding a product to be mounted. First, regarding the mounting method and the mounting board configuration that have the greatest impact on the contents of the study, regarding the mounting method, if a proven product has already taken the insertion method, the insertion method is used as it is, and the surface mounting method is used. If so, adopt the surface mounting method as it is,
Regarding the mounting board configuration, the area of products already proven,
It has been determined based on the intuition and experience of the designer based on the number of sheets, mounted components, and the number of layers.

【0003】また、実装工場経営を大きく左右する実装
コストの検討については、標準的で実装が容易な角チッ
プ部品から異形で実装が難しいQFPやコネクタまで一
律の標準実装コストに総実装点数を乗ずることにより行
なわれていた。
[0003] Regarding the study of mounting costs that greatly affect the management of the mounting factory, the total number of mounting points is multiplied by the uniform standard mounting cost from standard and easy-to-mount square chip parts to odd-shaped and difficult to mount QFPs and connectors. It was done by.

【0004】また、実装工場運営を大きく左右する生産
能力の検討については、異種の実装部品すべてに対して
設定された標準実装タクトに総実装点数を乗じたもの
を、本来は実装対象部品や実装難易度に対するマシン生
産性等により変動しうる実装能力を一律にマシン標準実
装能力で代表させて除したもので行なっていた。
[0004] In addition, regarding the study of the production capacity that greatly affects the operation of a mounting factory, the standard mounting tact set for all the different types of mounting parts is multiplied by the total mounting points, and the parts to be mounted and the mounting parts are originally determined. This is done by dividing the mounting capability that can vary depending on the machine productivity or the like with respect to the difficulty level by uniformly representing the standard mounting capability of the machine.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記従
来の方法では、まず最初に実装工法、実装基板構成を決
める必要があり、実装コスト、生産能力等の生産におけ
る全要素をトータルで評価していないので、必ずしも最
適な実装工法、実装基板構成になっていないという問題
があった。
However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, it is necessary to first determine a mounting method and a mounting board configuration, and all elements in production such as mounting cost and production capacity are not totally evaluated. Therefore, there is a problem that the mounting method and the mounting board configuration are not always optimal.

【0006】また、実装コストの検討では、すべての部
品を同一の標準実装コストで試算しているために精度が
悪く、実生産時に大きな経営ロスを発生させるリスクが
大きいという問題があった。
In the study of mounting costs, there is a problem that accuracy is poor because all components are estimated at the same standard mounting cost, and there is a large risk of causing a large management loss during actual production.

【0007】また、生産能力の検討では、すべての部品
を同一の標準実装タクトで計算していることによって精
度が悪く、実生産時に大きな実装工場運営ロスを発生さ
せるリスクが大きいという問題があった。
[0007] Further, in the study of the production capacity, there is a problem in that since all parts are calculated using the same standard mounting tact, accuracy is poor, and there is a large risk of causing a large mounting factory operation loss during actual production. .

【0008】本発明は、上記従来の問題点に鑑み、実装
工法、実装基板構成を検討する段階で、精度の良い総実
装コストと精度の良い生産能力を同時に検討することに
より、生産における全要素をトータルで評価した実装商
品企画を検討でき、実生産時に大きな経営ロスや工場運
営ロスを発生しない実装商品企画検討システムを提供す
ることを目的としている。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above-mentioned conventional problems, the present invention considers both the total mounting cost and the accurate production capacity at the stage of examining the mounting method and the structure of the mounting board at the same time. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a mounting product planning and review system that can examine mounting product planning that totally evaluates and does not cause a large management loss or factory operation loss during actual production.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の実装商品企画検
討システムは、最適な実装工法、最適な実装基板構成を
決定し、実装コストや必要生産能力を予測して実装商品
の企画検討を行うシステムであって、実装工法データベ
ースと、実装コストデータベースと、マシン特性データ
ベースと、実装工法検討アルゴリズムと、実装基板構成
検討アルゴリズムと、実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、
生産能力検討アルゴリズムとを備え、実装工法データベ
ースと実装工法検討アルゴリズムと実装基板構成検討ア
ルゴリズムにて実装工法と実装基板構成を検討する段階
で、実装コストデータベースと実装コスト検討アルゴリ
ズムにて部品の種類毎の適正な実装コストにそれぞれの
部品実装点数を乗じて得る総実装コストと、マシン特性
データベースと生産能力検討アルゴリズムにて部品の種
類毎に適正な実装タクトにそれぞれの部品の実装点数を
乗じ、マシンの特性を加味した適正なマシン実装能力で
除して得る生産能力とを同時に検討するようにしたもの
であり、実装工法と実装基板構成を検討する段階で精度
の良い総実装コストと精度の良い生産能力とを同時に検
討することにより、生産における全要素をトータルで評
価した最適な実装商品企画を検討できるようにしてい
る。
The mounting product planning and examination system of the present invention determines an optimal mounting method and an optimal mounting board configuration, and estimates and evaluates a mounting cost and a required production capacity to plan and examine a mounting product. A system, a mounting method database, a mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a mounting method study algorithm, a mounting board configuration study algorithm, a mounting cost study algorithm,
Equipped with a production capacity examination algorithm, and at the stage of examining the mounting method and the board configuration using the mounting method database, the mounting method examination algorithm, and the mounting board configuration examination algorithm, each type of component was determined using the mounting cost database and the mounting cost examination algorithm. The total mounting cost obtained by multiplying the appropriate mounting cost of each component by the number of each component mounting point, and the appropriate mounting tact for each type of component by the machine characteristic database and the production capacity review algorithm are multiplied by the mounting point of each component. The production capacity obtained by dividing by the proper machine mounting capacity taking into account the characteristics of the mounting process is considered at the same time. Optimal implementation that evaluates all factors in production in total by considering production capacity at the same time And to be able to examine the goods planning.

【0010】[0010]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実装商品企画検討
システムの一実施形態を図1〜図10を参照して説明す
る。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of a system for studying and planning a mounted product according to the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.

【0011】実装商品の企画においては、商品要求仕
様、企画台数に対して、実装工法、実装基板構成の決
定、実装コスト試算、生産能力の確保という課題があ
り、図1に示すように、商品要求仕様、基板部品構成
表、企画台数を実装商品企画検討システム1に入力する
ことにより、実装工法、実装基板構成、実装コスト予
想、生産能力予想を出力するように構成されている。
In the planning of mounted products, there are problems of mounting method, determination of mounting board configuration, mounting cost estimation, and securing of production capacity with respect to required product specifications and planned number. As shown in FIG. By inputting the required specifications, the board component configuration table, and the planned number of units into the mounting product planning and reviewing system 1, a mounting method, a mounting board configuration, a mounting cost estimate, and a production capacity estimate are output.

【0012】実装商品企画検討システム1は、実装工法
データベース2と、実装コストデータベース3と、マシ
ン特性データベース4と、図5に示すような実装工法検
討アルゴリズム5と、図6に示すような実装基板構成検
討アルゴリズム6と、図7に示すような実装コスト検討
アルゴリズム7と、図8に示すような生産能力検討アル
ゴリズム8にて構成されている。
The mounting product planning and reviewing system 1 includes a mounting method database 2, a mounting cost database 3, a machine characteristic database 4, a mounting method review algorithm 5 as shown in FIG. 5, and a mounting board as shown in FIG. It is composed of a configuration study algorithm 6, an implementation cost study algorithm 7 as shown in FIG. 7, and a production capacity study algorithm 8 as shown in FIG.

【0013】実装工法データベース2は、例えば図2に
示すように、挿入、装着、半導体実装等の工法ごとに、
実装コスト、必要とする基板面積、基板コスト、部品コ
スト、品質(不良率)等の項目を示したテーブルや、基
板の層数に対応する基板面積と基板コストのテーブル
や、部品点数と実装密度により決まる基板面積を示すテ
ーブル等を備えている。実装コストデータベース3は、
例えば図3に示すように、部品コストデータベース、設
備費データベース、人件費データベース等を備えてい
る。また、マシン特性データベース4は、例えば図4に
示すように、マシンの機種A〜F毎に各部品の実装の可
否と実装するのに要する時間及び投資額等を示したテー
ブルを備えている。
As shown in FIG. 2, for example, as shown in FIG.
A table showing items such as mounting cost, required board area, board cost, component cost, quality (defective rate), a board area and board cost table corresponding to the number of board layers, a component count and a mounting density. And a table indicating the substrate area determined by the above. The mounting cost database 3
For example, as shown in FIG. 3, a component cost database, a facility cost database, a personnel cost database, and the like are provided. Further, as shown in FIG. 4, for example, the machine characteristic database 4 includes a table indicating whether or not each component can be mounted for each machine type A to F, a time required for mounting, an investment amount, and the like.

【0014】実装商品の企画検討に際しては、図5に示
す実装工法検討アルゴリズム5によってまず商品要求仕
様を満たす工法を実装工法データベース2からすべて選
択する。次に、図6に示す実装基板構成検討アルゴリズ
ム6を適用して基板部品構成表と選択された工法からそ
れぞれの工法毎に可能な実装基板構成をすべて選択す
る。次に、項目ウェイト表に基づいて工法毎及び実装基
板構成毎にそれぞれ評価値を計算し、評価値が最大の工
法及び基板構成を最適実装工法及び最適基板構成として
決定する。
When planning and examining a mounting product, first, a mounting method that satisfies product requirements is selected from the mounting method database 2 by a mounting method study algorithm 5 shown in FIG. Next, the mounting board configuration study algorithm 6 shown in FIG. 6 is applied to select all possible mounting board configurations for each of the methods from the board component configuration table and the selected method. Next, based on the item weight table, an evaluation value is calculated for each construction method and each mounting board configuration, and the construction method and the board configuration with the largest evaluation value are determined as the optimal mounting method and the optimum board configuration.

【0015】次に、それぞれの工法と基板構成毎に、図
3に示す実装コストデータベース3と図7に示す実装コ
スト検討アルゴリズム7により実装コストを算出する。
実装コスト検討アルゴリズム7においては、総実装コス
トは総部品コストと総設備コストと総人件費の和で与え
られ、総部品コストは、挿入や装着の場合のそれぞれに
ついて部品単価と部品数の積で与えられ、総設備コスト
は、挿入や装着の場合のそれぞれについて時間レートと
実装時間の積にメンテ・スペアパーツ費と不良修理費を
和して与えられ、人件費は時間レートと実装時間によっ
て与えられる。
Next, the mounting cost is calculated by the mounting cost database 3 shown in FIG. 3 and the mounting cost study algorithm 7 shown in FIG. 7 for each construction method and board configuration.
In the mounting cost study algorithm 7, the total mounting cost is given by the sum of the total component cost, the total equipment cost, and the total labor cost, and the total component cost is the product of the component unit price and the number of components for each of insertion and mounting. The total equipment cost is given by the product of the time rate and the mounting time for each case of insertion and installation, plus the maintenance / spare parts cost and the defect repair cost, and the labor cost is given by the time rate and the mounting time. Can be

【0016】また図4に示すマシン特性データベース4
と図8に示す生産能力検討アルゴリズム8により生産能
力を算出する。生産能力検討アルゴリズム8において
は、生産能力は、例えばライン毎に、1日当たり8時間
稼働・2シフトで、月間20日間稼働として、それを総
実装タクトで除することによって得られる月産能力の総
和として与えられ、総実装タクトは、例えば設備Aと設
備Dのマシンをそれぞれ備えた2つのラインで生産する
モデルの場合には機種毎のそれぞれの実装タクトと部品
数の積にローディング時間を和した時間の最大値で与え
られる。こうして、それぞれ求まった実装コスト、生産
能力により、各実装工法、実装基板構成の評価値を計算
し、評価値が最大となるものを決定する。
A machine characteristic database 4 shown in FIG.
And the production capacity is calculated by the production capacity examination algorithm 8 shown in FIG. In the production capacity examination algorithm 8, the production capacity is, for example, the total of the monthly production capacities obtained by dividing the product by the total mounting tact assuming that the operation is performed for 20 hours a month for 8 hours per day and 2 shifts per line. The total mounting tact is, for example, in the case of a model that is produced on two lines each having the machines of the facilities A and D, the loading time is added to the product of the mounting tact and the number of parts for each model. Given as the maximum value of time. The evaluation value of each mounting method and mounting board configuration is calculated based on the mounting cost and the production capacity thus obtained, and the one having the maximum evaluation value is determined.

【0017】以上のようにして商品仕様を満たしかつ最
大に合理的な実装工法および最適な実装基板構成を企画
することができる。
As described above, it is possible to plan the most reasonable mounting method and the optimum mounting board configuration satisfying the product specifications.

【0018】図9に本実施形態での商品企画検討条件入
力インターフェースの例を、また図10に商品企画検討
結果出力インターフェースの例を示す。
FIG. 9 shows an example of an interface for inputting product planning consideration conditions in this embodiment, and FIG. 10 shows an example of an interface for outputting product planning consideration results.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の効果】本発明の実装商品企画検討システムによ
れば、以上の説明から明らかなように、実装工法データ
ベースと、実装コストデータベースと、マシン特性デー
タベースと、実装工法検討アルゴリズムと、実装基板構
成検討アルゴリズムと、実装コスト検討アルゴリズム
と、生産能力検討アルゴリズムとを備え、実装工法デー
タベースと実装工法検討アルゴリズムと実装基板構成検
討アルゴリズムにて実装工法と実装基板構成を検討する
段階で、実装コストデータベースと実装コスト検討アル
ゴリズムによって、部品の種類毎の適正な実装コストに
それぞれの部品実装点数を乗じた総実装コストと、マシ
ン特性データベースと生産能力検討アルゴリズムによっ
て、部品の種類毎に適正な実装タクトにそれぞれの部品
の実装点数を乗じ、マシンの特性を加味した適正なマシ
ン実装能力で除した生産能力とを同時に検討するように
しているので、実装工法と実装基板構成を検討する段階
で、精度の良い総実装コストと精度の良い生産能力とを
同時に検討することができて、生産における全要素をト
ータルで評価した最適な実装商品企画を検討することが
でき、経営ロスを最小にすることができる。
According to the mounting product planning and reviewing system of the present invention, as apparent from the above description, a mounting method database, a mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a mounting method review algorithm, and a mounting board configuration A study algorithm, a mounting cost study algorithm, and a production capacity study algorithm are provided, and at the stage of examining the mounting technique and the board configuration using the mounting method database, The total mounting cost, which is obtained by multiplying the appropriate mounting cost for each component type by the number of component mounting points, using the mounting cost study algorithm, and the proper mounting tact for each component type, using the machine characteristic database and production capacity study algorithm. Multiplied by the number of mounting parts Since the production capacity divided by the proper machine mounting capacity taking into account the characteristics of thin is considered simultaneously, at the stage of examining the mounting method and the mounting board configuration, accurate total mounting cost and accurate production Capability can be considered at the same time, and an optimal package planning that evaluates all elements in production in total can be studied, and management loss can be minimized.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実装商品企画検討システムの一実施形
態の構成を示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of a mounted product planning and reviewing system according to the present invention.

【図2】同実施形態の実装工法データベースの説明図で
ある。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting method database of the embodiment.

【図3】同実施形態の実装コストデータベースの説明図
である。
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting cost database according to the embodiment;

【図4】同実施形態のマシン特性データベースの説明図
である。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a machine characteristic database of the embodiment.

【図5】同実施形態の実装工法検討アルゴリズムの説明
図である。
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting method study algorithm according to the embodiment;

【図6】同実施形態の実装基板構成検討アルゴリズムの
説明図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting board configuration study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図7】同実施形態の実装コスト検討アルゴリズムの説
明図である。
FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting cost study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図8】同実施形態の生産能力検討アルゴリズムの説明
図である。
FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a production capacity study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図9】同実施形態の商品企画検討条件入力インターフ
ェースの例の説明図である。
FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of an example of a product planning study condition input interface of the embodiment.

【図10】同実施形態の商品企画検討結果出力インター
フェースの例の説明図である。
FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram of an example of a product planning examination result output interface according to the embodiment;

【図11】従来例の実装商品企画検討方法の説明図であ
る。
FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a conventional method of studying a plan for a mounted product.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 実装商品企画検討システム 2 実装工法データベース 3 実装コストデータベース 4 マシン特性データベース 5 実装工法検討アルゴリズム 6 実装基板構成検討アルゴリズム 7 実装コスト検討アルゴリズム 8 生産能力検討アルゴリズム REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 mounting product planning and review system 2 mounting method database 3 mounting cost database 4 machine characteristic database 5 mounting method review algorithm 6 mounting board configuration review algorithm 7 mounting cost review algorithm 8 production capacity review algorithm

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 兼松 宏一 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Koichi Kanematsu 1006 Kazuma Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 最適な実装工法、最適な実装基板構成を
決定し、実装コストや必要生産能力を予測して実装商品
の企画検討を行うシステムであって、実装工法データベ
ースと、実装コストテータベースと、マシン特性データ
ベースと、実装工法検討アルゴリズムと、実装基板構成
検討アルゴリズムと、実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、
生産能力検討アルゴリズムとを備え、実装工法データベ
ースと実装工法検討アルゴリズムと実装基板構成検討ア
ルゴリズムにて、実装工法と実装基板構成を検討する段
階で、実装コストデータベースと実装コスト検討アルゴ
リズムにて部品の種類毎の適正な実装コストにそれぞれ
の部品実装点数を乗じて得る総実装コストと、マシン特
性データベースと生産能力検討アルゴリズムにて部品の
種類毎に適正な実装タクトにそれぞれの部品の実装点数
を乗じ、マシンの特性を加味した適正なマシン実装能力
で除して得る生産能力とを同時に検討するようにしたこ
とを特徴とする実装商品企画検討システム。
1. A system for determining an optimal mounting method and an optimal mounting board configuration, and planning and examining mounting products by estimating mounting costs and required production capacity. A mounting method database and a mounting cost database , Machine characteristic database, mounting method study algorithm, mounting board configuration study algorithm, mounting cost study algorithm,
Equipped with a production capacity review algorithm, the mounting method database, the mounting method review algorithm, and the mounting board configuration study algorithm use the mounting cost database and the mounting cost study algorithm at the stage of studying the mounting method and component types. The total mounting cost obtained by multiplying the appropriate mounting cost for each component by the number of component mounting points, and the appropriate mounting tact for each type of component by the machine characteristic database and the production capacity study algorithm are multiplied by the mounting point of each component, A mounting product planning / examination system characterized by simultaneously examining a production capacity obtained by dividing by an appropriate machine mounting ability taking into account machine characteristics.
JP23764896A 1996-09-09 1996-09-09 Mounting product planning review system Expired - Fee Related JP3705870B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23764896A JP3705870B2 (en) 1996-09-09 1996-09-09 Mounting product planning review system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23764896A JP3705870B2 (en) 1996-09-09 1996-09-09 Mounting product planning review system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH1084197A true JPH1084197A (en) 1998-03-31
JP3705870B2 JP3705870B2 (en) 2005-10-12

Family

ID=17018443

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP23764896A Expired - Fee Related JP3705870B2 (en) 1996-09-09 1996-09-09 Mounting product planning review system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3705870B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10984357B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2021-04-20 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for estimating production capacity

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10984357B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2021-04-20 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for estimating production capacity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3705870B2 (en) 2005-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH09282374A (en) Mounting factory management support system
Howell et al. Operating Controls in the New Manufacturing Environment (Part 3)[2]
US6356797B1 (en) Method for automatic scheduling of production plan
US6577972B2 (en) Sampling inspection managing system
Savsar Simulation analysis of a pull-push system for an electronic assembly line
Gan et al. Interval charting schemes for joint monitoring of process mean and variance
JP3537267B2 (en) Equipment operation method
JPH1084197A (en) Mounted product planning system
CN1660587A (en) Anti stiffness system and method in bar code printing
JPH10190299A (en) Electronic-component mounting line and electronic-component mounting method
JPH10207954A (en) Method and device for holding and calculating standard production cost price information
JPH0946094A (en) Component mounting method
US20040078310A1 (en) System and method for determining a return-on-investment in a semiconductor or data storage fabrication facility
CN1979500A (en) Part arrangement automatical checking system and method
JP4184590B2 (en) Circuit board mounting cost evaluation method and apparatus
JPH0862275A (en) Preparation of mounting inspection data
JP4544888B2 (en) Mounting factory monitoring management method
JP3707501B2 (en) Printed circuit board production management device
WO2023157697A1 (en) Production management system, production management method, and program
JPH10326816A (en) Method and system for estimating yield-reduction factor
JP3258792B2 (en) Component mounting device
JPH0722774A (en) Arranging method for component in mounting line
JP3218571B2 (en) Lot splitting / merging device and lot splitting / merging method
JPH1079599A (en) Packaging plant diagnostic system
JPH11326119A (en) Method and device for inspecting color filter common unevenness defect

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20050315

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20050412

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050613

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20050712

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20050727

R150 Certificate of patent (=grant) or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080805

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090805

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090805

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100805

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110805

Year of fee payment: 6

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees