JPH1079599A - Packaging plant diagnostic system - Google Patents

Packaging plant diagnostic system

Info

Publication number
JPH1079599A
JPH1079599A JP8232213A JP23221396A JPH1079599A JP H1079599 A JPH1079599 A JP H1079599A JP 8232213 A JP8232213 A JP 8232213A JP 23221396 A JP23221396 A JP 23221396A JP H1079599 A JPH1079599 A JP H1079599A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mounting
model
cost
factory
production capacity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP8232213A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3634085B2 (en
Inventor
Yasuhiro Okada
康弘 岡田
Kenichi Sato
健一 佐藤
Tadashi Yokomori
正 横森
Koichi Kanematsu
宏一 兼松
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP23221396A priority Critical patent/JP3634085B2/en
Publication of JPH1079599A publication Critical patent/JPH1079599A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3634085B2 publication Critical patent/JP3634085B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To realize a packaging plant diagnostic system which is capable of making an optimal diagnosis for a packaging plant from practical evaluation by a method, wherein the diagnostic system equipped with a packaging cost examination algorithm and the like makes a diagnosis of a packaging plant from the current packaging cost, production capacity, lead time, and ideal model plan operation index. SOLUTION: A current packaging cost and a model packaging cost are compared with each other by the use of a mounting cost data base 2, a packaging cost examination algorithm 5, and a model operation index data base 4 to evaluate a packaging cost. A current production capacity and a model production capacity are compared with each other by the use of a machine characteristic data base 4, a production capacity examination algorithm 6, and a model plant operation index data base 4 to evaluate the production capacity. Furthermore, the current production lead time and model production lead time are compared with each other by the use of a production lead time examination algorithm 7 and model plant operation index data base 4 for evaluating the production lead times.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、基板に部品を実装
する実装工場の診断をする実装工場診断システムに関す
るものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a mounting factory diagnosis system for diagnosing a mounting factory for mounting components on a board.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来の実装工場を診断する場合の方法を
図9に基づいて説明する。図9に示すように、実装工場
の診断は、その工場の実装コスト、生産能力、生産リー
ドタイムの実績値や試算結果と、以前の値との比較や、
課長クラスの勘と経験による判断で行われてきた。
2. Description of the Related Art A conventional method for diagnosing a mounting factory will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 9, the diagnosis of the mounting factory is performed by comparing the actual value or the trial calculation result of the mounting cost, the production capacity, and the production lead time of the factory with the previous value,
The decision was made based on the intuition and experience of the section manager.

【0003】その際の実装コストの実績値は、実装工場
全体の実績値を設備費、材料費、人件費、経費に按分す
ることにより算出していた。また、実装コストの試算
は、標準的で実装が容易な角チップ部品から異形で実装
が難しいQFPやコネクタまで一律の標準実装コストに
総実装点数を乗ずることにより行われてきた。
At that time, the actual value of the mounting cost was calculated by apportioning the actual value of the entire mounting factory into equipment costs, material costs, personnel costs, and expenses. Estimation of the mounting cost has been performed by multiplying the standard mounting cost by a total number of mounting points, from standard and easy-to-mount square chip components to odd-shaped and difficult to mount QFPs and connectors.

【0004】また、生産能力の試算は、過去の実績値、
または、上記異種の実装部品すべてに対して設定された
標準実装タクトと総実装点数を乗じたものを、本来、実
装対象部品や、実装難易度に対するマシン生産性等によ
り変動し得る実装能力を、一律にマシン標準実装能力と
し、このマシン標準実装能力で除したもので行われてき
た。
[0004] Estimation of production capacity is based on past actual values,
Alternatively, the product obtained by multiplying the standard mounting tact set for all of the above different mounting components by the total number of mounting points is, originally, a mounting target component, and a mounting capability that can fluctuate due to machine productivity with respect to mounting difficulty. The standard is the machine standard mounting capability, and this is divided by this machine standard mounting capability.

【0005】また、生産リードタイムは実装工場の実績
値の平均値として計算していた。
[0005] The production lead time has been calculated as an average of the actual values of the mounting factories.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記従
来の方法では、まず、実績値による診断では、生産形態
が大きく変化した場合、例えば、新実装工法を採用した
場合とか、勤務形態が変わった場合には、実装コスト、
生産リードタイムの実績値は大きく変化し、以前の値と
の比較は難しい。また、実装コストの試算では、すべて
の部品を同一の標準実装コストで試算しているために、
精度が悪く、診断の精度も悪いという問題がある。ま
た、生産能力の試算では、すべての部品を同一の標準実
装タクトで計算していることによって精度が悪く、診断
の精度が悪いという問題がある。
However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, first, in the diagnosis based on the actual value, when the production mode changes greatly, for example, when a new mounting method is adopted or when the work mode changes. Includes implementation costs,
The actual value of the production lead time changes greatly, and it is difficult to compare with the previous value. In addition, in the estimation of mounting cost, since all parts were estimated at the same standard mounting cost,
There is a problem that accuracy is poor and diagnosis accuracy is also poor. Further, in the trial calculation of the production capacity, there is a problem that the accuracy is poor due to the calculation of all the components using the same standard mounting tact, and the accuracy of the diagnosis is poor.

【0007】また、生産リードタイムの診断では、生産
リードタイムを実装工法、実装難易度(実装密度、生産
ロット規模等)によらず、同列に診断するために精度が
悪いという問題がある。
In the production lead time diagnosis, there is a problem that accuracy is poor because the production lead time is diagnosed in the same row irrespective of the mounting method and the mounting difficulty (mounting density, production lot scale, etc.).

【0008】本発明は、上記従来の問題点に鑑み、精度
の良い実装コスト計算値と、生産能力計算値と、リード
タイム計算値による実装工場の実状に即した評価値か
ら、最適な実装工場診断を可能とする実装工場診断シス
テムを提供することを目的としている。
In view of the above-mentioned conventional problems, the present invention provides an optimal mounting factory based on an accurate mounting cost calculation value, a production capacity calculation value, and an evaluation value based on a lead time calculation value in accordance with the actual situation of the mounting factory. The purpose is to provide a mounting factory diagnosis system that enables diagnosis.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の実装工場診断シ
ステムは、実装コストデータベースと、マシン特性デー
タベースと、モデル工場経営指標データベースと、実装
コスト検討アルゴリズムと、生産能力検討アルゴリズム
と、リードタイム検討アルゴリズムとを備え、現状の実
装コストや生産能力やリードタイムと理想とするモデル
工場経営指標から実装工場診断を行うようにし、精度の
良い実装工場診断を短時間で得られるようにしたもので
ある。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A mounting factory diagnosis system according to the present invention comprises a mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a model factory management index database, a mounting cost study algorithm, a production capacity study algorithm, and a lead time study algorithm. Algorithms are used to perform mounting factory diagnosis based on the current mounting cost, production capacity, lead time, and ideal model factory management index, so that accurate mounting factory diagnosis can be obtained in a short time. .

【0010】[0010]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実装工場診断シス
テムの一実施形態を図1〜図8を参照して説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of a mounting factory diagnosis system according to the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.

【0011】実装工場においては、常に実装工場のコス
トがどのような状態にあるかを把握し、また適切な指標
により評価を行い、コストがかかりすぎている等の問題
がある部分については改善策を打たなければならないと
いう課題がある。また、実装工場の生産能力がどのよう
な状態にあるかを把握し、適切な指標により評価を行
い、問題がある部分については改善策が打たれなければ
ならないという課題がある。
In a mounting factory, the state of the cost of the mounting factory is always grasped and evaluated by an appropriate index. If there is a problem such as an excessive cost, an improvement measure is taken. There is a problem that must be hit. In addition, there is a problem that it is necessary to grasp the state of the production capacity of the mounting factory, perform evaluation using an appropriate index, and take an improvement measure for a problematic part.

【0012】それに対し、図1に示すように、実装工場
概要、生産基板概要、生産条件概要、現状データリード
タイムなどのデータを、実装工場診断システム1に入力
することにより、実装コスト診断結果、生産能力診断結
果、及びリードタイム診断結果が出力されるように構成
されている。
On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 1, by inputting data such as an outline of a mounting factory, an outline of a production board, an outline of a production condition, and a current data lead time to the mounting factory diagnosis system 1, a mounting cost diagnosis result is obtained. It is configured to output a production capacity diagnosis result and a lead time diagnosis result.

【0013】実装工場診断システム1は、図2に示すよ
うな実装コストデータベース2と、図3に示すようなマ
シン特性データベース3と、図4に示すようなモデル工
場経営指標データベース4と、図5に示すような実装コ
スト検討アルゴリズム5と、図6に示すような生産能力
検討アルゴリズム6と、リードタイム検討アルゴリズム
7にて構成されている。
The mounting factory diagnosis system 1 includes a mounting cost database 2 as shown in FIG. 2, a machine characteristic database 3 as shown in FIG. 3, a model factory management index database 4 as shown in FIG. 6, a production capacity study algorithm 6 shown in FIG. 6, and a lead time study algorithm 7.

【0014】実装工場の診断に際しては、まず図2に示
す実装コストデータベース2と、図5に示す実装コスト
検討アルゴリズム5と、図4に示すモデル工場経営指標
データベース4を用いて、現状の実装コストとモデルと
なる実装コストを比較し、実装コストを評価する。
At the time of diagnosing the mounting factory, first, the mounting cost database 2 shown in FIG. 2, the mounting cost study algorithm 5 shown in FIG. 5, and the model factory management index database 4 shown in FIG. And the implementation cost as a model, and evaluate the implementation cost.

【0015】また、図3に示すマシン特性テータベース
4と、図6に示す生産能力検討アルゴリズム6と、図4
に示すモデル工場経営指標データベース4を用いて、現
状の生産能力と、モデルとなる生産能力を比較し、生産
能力を評価する。
Further, a machine characteristic database 4 shown in FIG. 3, a production capacity examination algorithm 6 shown in FIG.
By using the model factory management index database 4 shown in (1), the current production capacity is compared with the model production capacity to evaluate the production capacity.

【0016】また、図7に示す生産リードタイム検討ア
ルゴリズム7と、図4に示すモデル工場経営指標データ
ベース4を用いて、現状の生産リードタイムと、モデル
となる生産リードタイムを比較し、生産リードタイムを
評価する。
Further, using the production lead time study algorithm 7 shown in FIG. 7 and the model factory management index database 4 shown in FIG. 4, the current production lead time is compared with the model production lead time, and the production lead time is compared. Evaluate the time.

【0017】これらの評価結果から、実装工場が理想と
する工場経営指標に比べて劣っている点を精度良く、容
易に明確化し把握することができ、実装工場の改善を的
確に行うことができる。また、診断を行いたいときにす
ぐに診断結果を得ることが可能なため、実装工場の課題
に対して対策を打つまでに発生するロスを最小にするこ
とができる。図8に具体的な診断結果の出力例を示す。
[0017] From these evaluation results, it is possible to accurately and easily clarify and grasp points that the mounting factory is inferior to the ideal factory management index, and to improve the mounting factory accurately. . Further, since it is possible to obtain a diagnosis result immediately when it is desired to perform a diagnosis, it is possible to minimize the loss that occurs before taking measures against the problem of the mounting factory. FIG. 8 shows a specific output example of the diagnosis result.

【0018】また、以上の構成をとることで、新工法が
開発された場合や、新しいモデル指標が必要になった場
合には、適宜データベース、アルゴリズムを追加改善し
て新しい診断の要求に応えることができる。
By adopting the above configuration, when a new construction method is developed or a new model index is required, the database and algorithm are appropriately added and improved to meet a new diagnosis request. Can be.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の効果】本発明の実装工場診断システムによれ
ば、以上の説明から明らかなように、実装コストデータ
ベースと、マシン特性データベースと、モデル工場経営
指標データベースと、実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、
生産能力検討アルゴリズムと、リードタイム検討アルゴ
リズムとを備えているので、現状の実装コストや生産能
力やリードタイムに関する精度の良い実装工場診断指標
と理想とするモデル工場経営指標から的確な実装工場診
断を短時間で行うことができ、最適な実装工場改善を行
えるという効果が得られる。
According to the mounting factory diagnosis system of the present invention, as apparent from the above description, the mounting cost database, the machine characteristic database, the model factory management index database, the mounting cost examination algorithm,
Since it is equipped with a production capacity examination algorithm and a lead time examination algorithm, accurate mounting factory diagnosis can be performed based on accurate mounting factory diagnosis indexes related to current mounting costs, production capacity and lead time, and ideal model factory management indexes. This can be performed in a short time, and an effect that optimal mounting factory improvement can be performed can be obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実装工場診断検討システムの一実施形
態の構成を示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of a mounting factory diagnosis and examination system of the present invention.

【図2】同実施形態の実装コストデータベースの説明図
である。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting cost database according to the embodiment;

【図3】同実施形態のマシン特性データベースの説明図
である。
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a machine characteristic database of the embodiment.

【図4】同実施形態のモデル工場経営指標データベース
の説明図である。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a model factory management index database of the embodiment.

【図5】同実施形態の実装コスト検討アルゴリズムの説
明図である。
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an implementation cost study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図6】同実施形態の生産能力検討アルゴリズムの説明
図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a production capacity study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図7】同実施形態のリードタイム検討アルゴリズムの
説明図である。
FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of a lead time study algorithm of the embodiment.

【図8】同実施形態での診断結果出力画面の説明図であ
る。
FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a diagnosis result output screen in the embodiment.

【図9】従来例の実装工場診断方法の説明図である。FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of a conventional mounting factory diagnosis method.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 実装工場診断システム 2 実装コストデータベース 3 マシン特性データベース 4 モデル工場経営指標データベース 5 実装コスト検討アルゴリズム 6 生産能力検討アルゴリズム 7 リードタイム検討アルゴリズム REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 mounting factory diagnosis system 2 mounting cost database 3 machine characteristic database 4 model factory management index database 5 mounting cost study algorithm 6 production capacity study algorithm 7 lead time study algorithm

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 兼松 宏一 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Koichi Kanematsu 1006 Kazuma Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 実装コストデータベースと、マシン特性
データベースと、モデル工場経営指標データベースと、
実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、生産能力検討アルゴリ
ズムと、リードタイム検討アルゴリズムとを備え、現状
の実装コストや生産能力やリードタイムと理想とするモ
デル工場経営指標から実装工場診断を行うようにしたこ
とを特徴とする実装工場診断システム。
1. A mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a model factory management index database,
It is equipped with an implementation cost study algorithm, a production capacity study algorithm, and a lead time study algorithm, and performs the implementation factory diagnosis based on the current implementation cost, production capacity, lead time, and ideal model factory management index. And mounting factory diagnostic system.
JP23221396A 1996-09-02 1996-09-02 Mounting factory diagnostic system Expired - Fee Related JP3634085B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23221396A JP3634085B2 (en) 1996-09-02 1996-09-02 Mounting factory diagnostic system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23221396A JP3634085B2 (en) 1996-09-02 1996-09-02 Mounting factory diagnostic system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH1079599A true JPH1079599A (en) 1998-03-24
JP3634085B2 JP3634085B2 (en) 2005-03-30

Family

ID=16935766

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP23221396A Expired - Fee Related JP3634085B2 (en) 1996-09-02 1996-09-02 Mounting factory diagnostic system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3634085B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001100838A (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-04-13 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for evaluating ease of defect occurrence in production workshop, method and device for evaluating quality of product, and recording medium
US6401000B1 (en) 1997-03-31 2002-06-04 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article
US6526326B2 (en) 1997-03-31 2003-02-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article
CN109447453A (en) * 2018-10-24 2019-03-08 湖南工业大学 A kind of method of multi-stage network DEA Model evaluate packaging greenness

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0520334A (en) * 1991-07-16 1993-01-29 Toshiba Corp Production system evaluating device
JPH06149826A (en) * 1992-11-12 1994-05-31 Kao Corp Support device for plant management

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0520334A (en) * 1991-07-16 1993-01-29 Toshiba Corp Production system evaluating device
JPH06149826A (en) * 1992-11-12 1994-05-31 Kao Corp Support device for plant management

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6401000B1 (en) 1997-03-31 2002-06-04 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article
US6526326B2 (en) 1997-03-31 2003-02-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article
US6553273B1 (en) 1997-03-31 2003-04-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method, system for carrying out the same and recording medium
US6895350B2 (en) 1997-03-31 2005-05-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Fraction defective estimating method, system for carrying out the same recording medium
JP2001100838A (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-04-13 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for evaluating ease of defect occurrence in production workshop, method and device for evaluating quality of product, and recording medium
US6625511B1 (en) 1999-09-27 2003-09-23 Hitachi, Ltd. Evaluation method and its apparatus of work shop and product quality
CN109447453A (en) * 2018-10-24 2019-03-08 湖南工业大学 A kind of method of multi-stage network DEA Model evaluate packaging greenness
CN109447453B (en) * 2018-10-24 2022-05-03 湖南工业大学 Method for evaluating packaging greenness through multi-stage network data envelope analysis model

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3634085B2 (en) 2005-03-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1121598C (en) System and method for measuring electricity consumption in refrigerator
TWI435233B (en) Device and method for managing abnormality prediction of semiconductor process equipments
WO2016074429A1 (en) Test method, controller, and test system
US7320124B2 (en) Apparatus and method for analyzing and displaying operations of computer and computer program for the same
JPH1079599A (en) Packaging plant diagnostic system
JP2004505364A (en) Remote diagnosis method of industrial technical process
KR20010032570A (en) Method and apparatus for automotive and other battery testing
CN106443242A (en) Automatic test systematic framework for automobile electronic products and test method
CN109592525A (en) Elevator frequency converter fault diagnosis system and method
US6815943B2 (en) Electric component test system and electric component test method
CN206074778U (en) A kind of LED drive power test machine
JPH08110262A (en) On-line rotary object diagnostic device
JP3645583B2 (en) Mounting quality analysis method
CN115277487B (en) Communication processing system of electronic terminal
JP2937541B2 (en) Quality level verification method for electronic components
JP3295124B2 (en) Device evaluation test apparatus and method
JPH0755602Y2 (en) Control unit inspection device
JPS58148971A (en) Decision device for insulation and conduction of signal line of substrate
SU1466718A1 (en) Method of determining operatorъs working ability
JPS602698B2 (en) Test data automatic generator
CN113189935A (en) Non-invasive production beat prediction method and system based on time sequence power data
JPS63213039A (en) Fault analysis system for diagnosing device
JPH1145108A (en) Operation state monitoring method for plant
JPS63117238A (en) Control system for automobile inspection line
JP3077915B2 (en) Graph display method of harmonic analysis data by wattmeter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040819

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20040914

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20041111

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20041207

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20041222

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080107

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090107

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100107

Year of fee payment: 5

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees