JPH1073573A - Method for diagnosing peeling-off of wall surface - Google Patents

Method for diagnosing peeling-off of wall surface

Info

Publication number
JPH1073573A
JPH1073573A JP8230362A JP23036296A JPH1073573A JP H1073573 A JPH1073573 A JP H1073573A JP 8230362 A JP8230362 A JP 8230362A JP 23036296 A JP23036296 A JP 23036296A JP H1073573 A JPH1073573 A JP H1073573A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
peeling
wall surface
area
waveform
frequency
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP8230362A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3263318B2 (en
Inventor
Shigeo Hayashi
重雄 林
Hiroshi Ueda
浩史 上田
Yasuo Matsui
靖雄 松井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd
Priority to JP23036296A priority Critical patent/JP3263318B2/en
Publication of JPH1073573A publication Critical patent/JPH1073573A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3263318B2 publication Critical patent/JP3263318B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for diagnosing peeling-off of a wall surface by which the state, such as the depth, etc., of the peeling-off section of the wall surface can be diagnosed accurately. SOLUTION: In a method for diagnosing peeling-off of a wall surface, the peeling-off section of the wall surface is discriminated based on the power spectrum density of the waveform of the sounds produced when the wall surface is knocked by knocking the wall surface and collecting the knocking sounds, and then, performing spectrum analysis on the waveform of the sounds. At the time of discriminating the peeling-off section, a prescribed frequency range is set on the axis of abscissa and the peak point and lower limit of the spectral waveform are respectively set as the upper and lower limits of the axis of ordinate, and then, the ratio of the first area of the frequency range between the resonance frequency of the spectral waveform and the lower limit value of the frequency range and the second area of the frequency range between the resonance frequency of the spectral waveform and the upper limit value of the frequency range is extracted as the characteristic amount of the spectral waveform and the peeling-off section is discriminated based on the extracted characteristic value. In addition, the depth of the peeling-off section is discriminated based on the frequency shift of the ratio between the first and second areas.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】この発明は、壁面の剥離状態
を、打診器を用いて壁面を打撃したときに発生する打撃
音を集音することにより診断するようにした壁面の剥離
診断方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface by diagnosing a peeling state of the wall surface by collecting a striking sound generated when the wall surface is hit with a percussion instrument. It is.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、例えばタイル壁面の剥離状態を診
断する方法として、ハンマー等で壁面を打撃したときに
発生する打撃音を耳で聞き判定する打診方法が一般的に
行われている。しかしながら、このように、打撃音を耳
で聞き判定する方法では判定する人によって個人差が生
じ、剥離状態を正確に求めることができない。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a method for diagnosing a peeling state of a tile wall surface, for example, a percussion method for judging a sound of striking a wall surface with a hammer or the like has been generally performed. However, in the method of hearing and judging the impact sound as described above, there is an individual difference between persons who judge, and it is not possible to accurately determine the peeling state.

【0003】図8は上述した点に鑑み剥離状態を個人差
によらず確実に判定するようにした従来例に係るタイル
壁面の剥離診断装置を説明する構成図で、同図(a)は
剥離診断装置の構成図、同図(b)は剥離診断装置の接
触部の構成図、同図(c)は剥離診断装置の診断方法を
示す説明図である。
FIG. 8 is a block diagram for explaining a conventional tile wall peeling diagnosis apparatus in which the peeling state is reliably determined regardless of individual differences in view of the above points. FIG. FIG. 2B is a configuration diagram of the diagnosis device, FIG. 2B is a configuration diagram of a contact portion of the separation diagnosis device, and FIG. 2C is an explanatory diagram illustrating a diagnosis method of the separation diagnosis device.

【0004】図8において、1は被測定壁面6の剥離状
態を診断するための剥離診断装置を示し、この剥離診断
装置1の先端には被測定壁面6に当てる壁面接触部2が
設けられ、該壁面接触部2に壁面を打撃するための打撃
球3及び打撃音を集音する集音マイク4が備えられてい
る。5はその打撃球3を被測定壁面6に打撃するための
投入用のスイッチである。
In FIG. 8, reference numeral 1 denotes a peeling diagnosis device for diagnosing the peeling state of the wall surface 6 to be measured. A wall contact portion 2 for contacting the wall surface 6 to be measured is provided at the tip of the peeling diagnosis device 1. The wall contact portion 2 is provided with a hitting ball 3 for hitting the wall surface and a sound collecting microphone 4 for collecting a hitting sound. Reference numeral 5 denotes an input switch for hitting the hitting ball 3 against the wall surface 6 to be measured.

【0005】7a,7b,7cは上記打撃球3が被測定
壁面6を打撃した際に発生する打撃音を集音マイク4に
よって集音しその結果が図示しない解析装置によって解
析されて壁面の接着強度を表示するようにされた3色の
発光ダイオードを示し、接着強度が4kg/cm2以上
であれば青色の発光ダイオード7a、1〜4kg/cm
2であれば黄色の発光ダイオード7c、0〜1g/cm2
であれば赤色の発光ダイオード7bによってそれぞれ表
示するようになっている。
[0005] 7a, 7b, 7c collects the impact sound generated when the impact ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured by the sound collecting microphone 4, and the result is analyzed by an analyzing device (not shown) to bond the wall surface. 3 shows light-emitting diodes of three colors adapted to display intensity; if the adhesive strength is 4 kg / cm 2 or more, blue light-emitting diodes 7a, 1-4 kg / cm
If it is 2 , the yellow light emitting diode 7c, 0 to 1 g / cm 2
In this case, each is displayed by the red light emitting diode 7b.

【0006】したがって、上記構成に係る剥離診断装置
1の先端に設けられた壁面接触部2を被測定壁面6に当
ててスイッチ5を投入することにより、打撃球3が被測
定壁面6を打撃することになり、その際、発生する打撃
音が集音マイク4に集音され解析装置によってその打撃
音が解析されて、被測定壁面6の接着強度を3つの発光
ダイオード7aないし7cによって表示することがで
き、剥離状態を判定して部分補修することにより、経費
の節減、リフォームの安全性を高めることができる。
Accordingly, the hitting ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured by applying the switch 5 with the wall surface contact portion 2 provided at the tip of the peeling diagnosis apparatus 1 having the above-mentioned configuration being applied to the wall surface 6 to be measured. That is, at that time, the hitting sound generated is collected by the sound collecting microphone 4, and the hitting sound is analyzed by the analyzer, and the adhesive strength of the measured wall 6 is displayed by the three light emitting diodes 7a to 7c. By performing the partial repair by judging the peeling state, it is possible to reduce the cost and enhance the safety of the reform.

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上述し
た従来の壁面の剥離診断装置においては、被測定壁面6
の接着強度を3色の発光ダイオード7aないし7cによ
って識別することができても、剥離の深さ等剥離の程度
を正確に検知することができなかった。
However, in the above-described conventional apparatus for diagnosing wall peeling, the wall surface to be measured 6
However, even if the adhesive strength could be identified by the light emitting diodes 7a to 7c of three colors, the degree of peeling such as the depth of peeling could not be detected accurately.

【0008】この発明は、上記のような従来例の問題点
を解消するためになされたもので、剥離の深さ等剥離状
態を正確に診断することができる壁面の剥離診断方法を
得ることを目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method of diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface capable of accurately diagnosing a peeling state such as a peeling depth. Aim.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】この発明に係る壁面の剥
離診断方法は、被測定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音を集音
して該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワース
ペクトル密度に基づいて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定する
ようにした壁面の剥離診断方法において、スペクトル波
形の特徴量として、横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共
に縦軸の上限をスペクトル波形のピーク点としその下限
を0とする面積中、スペクトル波形の共振周波数と周波
数範囲の下限値との間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波形
の共振周波数と周波数範囲の上限値との間の第2の面積
と、第1と第2の面積比とを抽出し、これら抽出された
特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判定することを特徴とするも
のである。
A method of diagnosing separation of a wall surface according to the present invention collects a striking sound when striking a wall surface to be measured, analyzes the waveform of the striking sound, and analyzes the power spectrum density. In a method of diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface based on which a peeling portion of a measured wall surface is determined, as a characteristic amount of a spectral waveform, the horizontal axis is a predetermined frequency range and the upper limit of the vertical axis is a peak point of the spectral waveform. A first area between the resonance frequency of the spectrum waveform and the lower limit of the frequency range, and a second area between the resonance frequency of the spectrum waveform and the upper limit of the frequency range, The present invention is characterized in that first and second area ratios are extracted, and a peeling portion is determined based on the extracted feature amounts.

【0010】また、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変
移に基づいて剥離部の深さの度合いを判定することを特
徴とするものである。
Further, the present invention is characterized in that the degree of the depth of the peeled portion is determined based on the frequency shift of the first and second area ratios.

【0011】[0011]

【発明の実施の形態】BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

実施の形態1.以下、この発明の実施の形態を図に基づ
いて説明する。図1はこの発明で用いる壁面の剥離診断
装置を示す構成図である。図示構成の剥離診断装置10
は、図8に示す従来例と基本的に同様な構成を備える
が、集音マイク4は装置本体側に取り付けられると共
に、この集音マイク4に信号処理器8が接続され、信号
処理器8は、被測定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音の集音結
果から該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワー
スペクトル密度に基づいてスペクトル波形の特徴量を抽
出し、この抽出された特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判定す
るようになされ、その判定結果を表示板9により表示す
るようになっている。
Embodiment 1 FIG. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a wall peeling diagnosis device used in the present invention. Exfoliation diagnostic apparatus 10 of illustrated configuration
Has a configuration basically similar to that of the conventional example shown in FIG. 8, except that the sound collecting microphone 4 is attached to the apparatus main body side, and a signal processor 8 is connected to the sound collecting microphone 4, Analyzes the spectrum of the waveform of the striking sound from the sound collection result of the striking sound when striking the wall surface to be measured, and extracts the characteristic amount of the spectral waveform based on the power spectral density. The peeled portion is determined based on the information, and the result of the determination is displayed on the display panel 9.

【0012】上記剥離診断装置10による一連の動作の
流れを図2を参照して説明する。まず、被測定壁面6に
壁面接触部2を当てスイッチ5を入れると、打撃球3が
被測定壁面6を打診する(ステップS1)。その打撃音
を集音マイク4で集音する(ステップS2)。その音響
はアナログ波形のため、信号処理器8は、処理しやすい
応答波形を得るようにデジタル変換して収録する(ステ
ップS3)。信号処理器8は、得られた応答波形を周波
数スペクトル分析し(スペクトルS4)、パターン認識
する(ステップS5)。
A flow of a series of operations by the peeling diagnosis apparatus 10 will be described with reference to FIG. First, when the switch 5 is turned on by applying the wall contact portion 2 to the wall surface 6 to be measured, the hitting ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured (step S1). The striking sound is collected by the sound collecting microphone 4 (step S2). Since the sound is an analog waveform, the signal processor 8 digitally converts and records the response waveform so as to obtain a response waveform that is easy to process (step S3). The signal processor 8 analyzes the frequency spectrum of the obtained response waveform (spectrum S4) and recognizes the pattern (step S5).

【0013】上記信号処理器8によるパターン認識は、
図3に示すように、パワースペクトル密度からスペクト
ル波形の特徴量を抽出して抽出された特徴量に基づいて
剥離部を判定する。ここで、スペクトル波形の面積は
1.0puになるように正規化されており、周波数範囲
の下限値fminは0Hz、上限値fmaxは人間の官
能試験との整合性を取るため可聴周波数の上限値である
12,000Hzとしている。図3に示すスペクトル波
形のピーク値は、打撃音の周波数が尖鋭なほど大きくな
り、したがって、図3に斜線で示す周波数範囲が共振周
波数と周波数範囲の下限値との間の面積A、同じく周波
数範囲が共振周波数と周波数範囲の上限値との間の面積
B共に大きくなる。主たる共振周波数f0 が低いほど面
積Aは小さく、面積Bは大きくなる。
The pattern recognition by the signal processor 8 is as follows.
As shown in FIG. 3, the characteristic amount of the spectrum waveform is extracted from the power spectral density, and the peeling portion is determined based on the extracted characteristic amount. Here, the area of the spectrum waveform is normalized so as to be 1.0 pu, the lower limit value fmin of the frequency range is 0 Hz, and the upper limit value fmax is the upper limit value of the audible frequency in order to obtain consistency with the human sensory test. 12,000 Hz. The peak value of the spectrum waveform shown in FIG. 3 increases as the frequency of the striking sound becomes sharper. Therefore, the frequency range indicated by hatching in FIG. 3 is the area A between the resonance frequency and the lower limit of the frequency range. The range increases with the area B between the resonance frequency and the upper limit of the frequency range. The area A is smaller and the area B is larger as the main resonance frequency f 0 is lower.

【0014】上記信号処理器8は、図3に示すパワース
ペクトル密度からスペクトル波形の特徴量として、面積
A、面積B及びそれらの面積比(共振周波数f0 の位
置)の3種類の特徴量を抽出し、抽出された特徴量に基
づいて剥離部を判定し、その結果を表示板9に表示、保
存する(ステップS6)。また、上記信号処理器8は、
図4に示すように、面積比の周波数変移に基づいて剥離
部の深さの度合いを判定し、その結果を表示板9に表
示、保存する(ステップS6)。すなわち、同図(a)
は剥離部の深さが15mm、同図(b)は剥離部の深さ
が20mm、同図(c)は剥離部の深さが30mm、同
図(d)は正常な場合をそれぞれ示し、剥離部の深さが
増すほど周波数のピーク点が右側に変移することが理解
されよう。このように、剥離部の深さが増すほどピーク
点(主共振周波数)が周波数の高い右側へ変移している
理由は、剥離部が深くなるほど、剥離部の厚さが大きく
剛性が大きくなるため、打撃音の周波数が高くなるため
である。
The signal processor 8 uses the power spectrum density shown in FIG. 3 to calculate three types of characteristic quantities of the area A, the area B and their area ratio (the position of the resonance frequency f 0 ) as the characteristic quantities of the spectrum waveform. The extracted portion is determined based on the extracted feature amount, and the result is displayed and stored on the display panel 9 (step S6). Further, the signal processor 8 includes:
As shown in FIG. 4, the degree of the depth of the peeled portion is determined based on the frequency shift of the area ratio, and the result is displayed and stored on the display panel 9 (step S6). That is, FIG.
Is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 15 mm, FIG. 4B is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 20 mm, FIG. 4C is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 30 mm, and FIG. It can be seen that the peak of the frequency shifts to the right as the depth of the peeled portion increases. As described above, the reason why the peak point (main resonance frequency) shifts to the right side where the frequency is higher as the depth of the peeled portion increases is that the deeper the peeled portion, the greater the thickness of the peeled portion and the greater the rigidity. This is because the frequency of the impact sound increases.

【0015】このような特徴量に基づき剥離部の状態を
どの程度判定できるかを調べた結果、3種類の特徴量に
基づく判定がファジイ理論において最も正答率が高いこ
とが実験結果により判明された。すなわち、図5は特徴
量として面積A、面積B、それらの面積比A/Bの3種
類の特徴量を取った場合、図6は特徴量として面積A、
面積Bの2種類の特徴量を取った場合、図7は特徴量と
してピーク点の周波数、ピーク点のPSDの2種類の特
徴量を取った場合における「深さ及び面積」についての
正答率、「深さ」についての正答率、「健全であるか剥
離状態であるか」についての正答率をそれぞれ示したも
ので、これら図から理解されるように、図5に示す3種
類の特徴量に基づく剥離診断が深さや大きさの異なる剥
離部の診断に最も好ましいものであることが確認され
た。
As a result of examining the extent to which the state of the peeled portion can be determined based on such characteristic amounts, it was found from experimental results that the determination based on three types of characteristic amounts has the highest correct answer rate in fuzzy logic. . That is, FIG. 5 shows three types of feature amounts, that is, area A, area B, and their area ratio A / B as feature amounts. FIG.
FIG. 7 shows a case where two kinds of feature amounts of the area B are taken, and FIG. 7 shows the correct answer rate of “depth and area” when two kinds of feature amounts of the peak point PSD and the peak point are taken as the feature amounts. The correct answer rate for "depth" and the correct answer rate for "whether sound or peeled" are shown. As can be understood from these figures, the three types of feature quantities shown in FIG. It was confirmed that the peeling diagnosis based on the peeling was the most preferable for the diagnosis of the peeled portions having different depths and sizes.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の効果】以上のように、この発明によれば、被測
定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音を集音して該打撃音の波形
をスペクトル分析し、そのパワースペクトル密度に基づ
いて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定するようにした壁面の剥
離診断方法において、スペクトル波形の特徴量として、
横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共に縦軸の上限をスペ
クトル波形のピーク点としその下限を0とする面積中、
スペクトル波形の共振周波数と周波数範囲の下限値との
間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波形の共振周波数と周波
数範囲の上限値との間の第2の面積と、第1と第2の面
積比とを抽出し、これら抽出された特徴量に基づいて剥
離部を判定することにより、深さや大きさの異なる剥離
部の剥離状態を正確に診断することができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, a striking sound when a striking wall surface is measured is collected, the waveform of the striking sound is analyzed, and the measured sound is measured based on the power spectrum density. In the method of diagnosing the peeling of the wall surface to determine the peeling portion of the wall surface, as a feature amount of the spectral waveform,
In the area where the horizontal axis is a predetermined frequency range and the upper limit of the vertical axis is the peak point of the spectrum waveform and the lower limit is 0,
A first area between the resonance frequency of the spectrum waveform and the lower limit of the frequency range, a second area between the resonance frequency of the spectrum waveform and the upper limit of the frequency range, and a first to second area ratio Are extracted, and the peeled portion is determined based on the extracted feature amounts, whereby the peeled state of the peeled portions having different depths and sizes can be accurately diagnosed.

【0017】また、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変
移に基づいて剥離部の深さの度合いを正確に判定するこ
とができる。
Further, the degree of the depth of the peeled portion can be accurately determined based on the frequency shift of the first and second area ratios.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 この発明で用いる壁面の剥離診断装置を示す
全体構成図である。
FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram showing a wall peeling diagnosis apparatus used in the present invention.

【図2】 図1の剥離診断装置による動作を説明する流
れ図である。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an operation of the peeling diagnosis apparatus of FIG. 1;

【図3】 パターン認識のために正規化されたスペクト
ル波形と特徴量を説明するための波形図である。
FIG. 3 is a waveform chart for explaining a spectrum waveform and a feature amount normalized for pattern recognition.

【図4】 剥離部の深さの判定についての説明図であ
る。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram for determining the depth of a peeled portion.

【図5】 特徴量として面積A、面積B、それらの面積
比A/Bの3種類の特徴量を取った場合の正答率を示す
説明図である。
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when three types of feature amounts of an area A, an area B, and an area ratio A / B thereof are taken as the feature amounts;

【図6】 特徴量として面積A、面積Bの2種類の特徴
量を取った場合の正答率を示す説明図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when two types of feature amounts, area A and area B, are taken as feature amounts;

【図7】 特徴量としてピーク点の周波数、ピーク点の
PSDの2種類の特徴量を取った場合の正答率を示す説
明図である。
FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when two types of feature amounts, a peak point frequency and a peak point PSD, are taken as feature amounts;

【図8】 従来例に係るタイル壁面の剥離診断装置の説
明図である。
FIG. 8 is an explanatory view of a tile wall peeling diagnosis apparatus according to a conventional example.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

10 剥離診断装置、2 壁面接触部、3 打撃球、4
集音マイク、8 信号処理器、9 表示板。
10 Peeling diagnosis device, 2 wall contact part, 3 impact ball, 4
Sound collecting microphone, 8 signal processor, 9 display board.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 被測定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音を集音
して該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワース
ペクトル密度に基づいて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定する
ようにした壁面の剥離診断方法において、スペクトル波
形の特徴量として、横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共
に縦軸の上限をスペクトル波形のピーク点としその下限
を0とする面積中、スペクトル波形の共振周波数と周波
数範囲の下限値との間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波形
の共振周波数と周波数範囲の上限値との間の第2の面積
と、第1と第2の面積比とを抽出し、これら抽出された
特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判定することを特徴とする壁
面の剥離診断方法。
1. A wall surface which collects a striking sound when striking a wall surface to be measured, performs a spectrum analysis of a waveform of the striking sound, and determines a peeling portion of the wall surface to be measured based on its power spectrum density. In the peeling diagnosis method of the above, the resonance frequency and the frequency of the spectrum waveform in the area where the horizontal axis is a predetermined frequency range, the upper limit of the vertical axis is the peak point of the spectrum waveform, and the lower limit is 0, A first area between the lower limit of the range, a second area between the resonance frequency of the spectrum waveform and the upper limit of the frequency range, and a first to second area ratio are extracted and extracted. A method of diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface, wherein a peeling portion is determined based on the obtained characteristic amount.
【請求項2】 請求項1記載の壁面の剥離診断方法にお
いて、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変移に基づいて
剥離部の深さの度合いを判定することを特徴とする壁面
の剥離診断方法。
2. The method for diagnosing wall separation according to claim 1, wherein the degree of the depth of the separation portion is determined based on a frequency shift of the first and second area ratios. Diagnostic method.
JP23036296A 1996-08-30 1996-08-30 Diagnosis method of wall peeling Expired - Fee Related JP3263318B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23036296A JP3263318B2 (en) 1996-08-30 1996-08-30 Diagnosis method of wall peeling

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23036296A JP3263318B2 (en) 1996-08-30 1996-08-30 Diagnosis method of wall peeling

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH1073573A true JPH1073573A (en) 1998-03-17
JP3263318B2 JP3263318B2 (en) 2002-03-04

Family

ID=16906676

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP23036296A Expired - Fee Related JP3263318B2 (en) 1996-08-30 1996-08-30 Diagnosis method of wall peeling

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3263318B2 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003096007A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-20 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Method and equipment for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe
JP2004028976A (en) * 2001-10-12 2004-01-29 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Method and apparatus for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe
JP2007309827A (en) * 2006-05-19 2007-11-29 Ohbayashi Corp Method and apparatus for diagnosing peeling-off of tiled surface
JP2011095118A (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-12 Applied Research Kk Hammer-mounted microphone
US8345371B2 (en) 1994-06-07 2013-01-01 Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd. Information storing device and method for controlling same to record/reproduce information by selecting one of working modes
JP2014179061A (en) * 2013-02-14 2014-09-25 Sony Corp Analyzing system, analyzing program and analyzing method
CN105021700A (en) * 2015-07-21 2015-11-04 上海建工七建集团有限公司 Concrete filled steel tubular column compactness detection device and detection method
JP2016085089A (en) * 2014-10-24 2016-05-19 株式会社ネクスコ東日本エンジニアリング Inspection support device, inspection support method, inspection support program and inspection support system
JP2018151275A (en) * 2017-03-14 2018-09-27 株式会社昭和テックス Mounting inspection device of rail mounting article
JP2018163049A (en) * 2017-03-27 2018-10-18 株式会社昭和テックス Mounting inspection device of rail mounting article
CN110568068A (en) * 2019-09-02 2019-12-13 李文芳 Steel core concrete column compactness detects frock

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8345371B2 (en) 1994-06-07 2013-01-01 Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd. Information storing device and method for controlling same to record/reproduce information by selecting one of working modes
JP2004028976A (en) * 2001-10-12 2004-01-29 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Method and apparatus for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe
WO2003096007A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-20 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Method and equipment for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe
US7360462B2 (en) 2002-05-08 2008-04-22 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Method and equipment for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe
US7426879B2 (en) 2002-05-08 2008-09-23 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Inspection method and inspection apparatus of reinforced concrete pipe
US7530270B2 (en) 2002-05-08 2009-05-12 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Inspection method and inspection apparatus of reinforced concrete pipe
JP2007309827A (en) * 2006-05-19 2007-11-29 Ohbayashi Corp Method and apparatus for diagnosing peeling-off of tiled surface
JP2011095118A (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-12 Applied Research Kk Hammer-mounted microphone
JP2014179061A (en) * 2013-02-14 2014-09-25 Sony Corp Analyzing system, analyzing program and analyzing method
US10049452B2 (en) 2013-02-14 2018-08-14 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and cell analysis system
US10891734B2 (en) 2013-02-14 2021-01-12 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and cell analysis system
JP2016085089A (en) * 2014-10-24 2016-05-19 株式会社ネクスコ東日本エンジニアリング Inspection support device, inspection support method, inspection support program and inspection support system
CN105021700A (en) * 2015-07-21 2015-11-04 上海建工七建集团有限公司 Concrete filled steel tubular column compactness detection device and detection method
JP2018151275A (en) * 2017-03-14 2018-09-27 株式会社昭和テックス Mounting inspection device of rail mounting article
JP2018163049A (en) * 2017-03-27 2018-10-18 株式会社昭和テックス Mounting inspection device of rail mounting article
CN110568068A (en) * 2019-09-02 2019-12-13 李文芳 Steel core concrete column compactness detects frock

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3263318B2 (en) 2002-03-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3263318B2 (en) Diagnosis method of wall peeling
US7560634B2 (en) Electronic musical instrument having tuning device
EP1933135A2 (en) Nondestructive inspection apparatus
AU2004240149A1 (en) Method for quantifying psychological stress levels using voice pattern samples
JPH0679017B2 (en) Void probe
JPS63168555A (en) Diagnosis of separation for finished surface of building
JPH09257765A (en) Apparatus for diagnosing peeling of wall surface
JPH0254903B2 (en)
JPH09160543A (en) Electronic percussion instrument
JP3922459B2 (en) Separation and cavity detection method and apparatus by percussion method
JP3523352B2 (en) Impact detection device
JP4844049B2 (en) Trunk cavity state estimation device
JPH11304773A (en) Method for discriminating peeling of external wall tile
JP7062582B2 (en) Inspection hammer device and inspection method using it
JPH06235719A (en) Exfoliation diagnostic system for wall face
JP2004144586A (en) Integrity diagnostic method of concrete-based structure
JPH1123357A (en) Evaluation method for noise of tire
JP2000074889A (en) Hammering determining device
US6719707B1 (en) Apparatus and method for performing musical perception sound analysis on a system
JPH0695672A (en) Electronic percussion instrument
JP2526066Y2 (en) Performance information display device
JP2007051991A (en) Method and system for measuring wall thickness of metal pipe
JPH063336A (en) Method for detecting separation of wall finish of building
JP2000131293A (en) Fixed state determination device of tunnel stud
JP2002243708A (en) Diagnostic device for defect

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071221

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081221

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081221

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091221

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091221

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101221

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101221

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111221

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111221

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121221

Year of fee payment: 11

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees