JP3263318B2 - Diagnosis method of wall peeling - Google Patents
Diagnosis method of wall peelingInfo
- Publication number
- JP3263318B2 JP3263318B2 JP23036296A JP23036296A JP3263318B2 JP 3263318 B2 JP3263318 B2 JP 3263318B2 JP 23036296 A JP23036296 A JP 23036296A JP 23036296 A JP23036296 A JP 23036296A JP 3263318 B2 JP3263318 B2 JP 3263318B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- peeling
- wall surface
- area
- waveform
- peak
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 14
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 title description 18
- 206010040844 Skin exfoliation Diseases 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010183 spectrum analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009527 percussion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004299 exfoliation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】この発明は、壁面の剥離状態
を、打診器を用いて壁面を打撃したときに発生する打撃
音を集音することにより診断するようにした壁面の剥離
診断方法に関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface by diagnosing a peeling state of the wall surface by collecting a striking sound generated when the wall surface is hit with a percussion instrument. It is.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来、例えばタイル壁面の剥離状態を診
断する方法として、ハンマー等で壁面を打撃したときに
発生する打撃音を耳で聞き判定する打診方法が一般的に
行われている。しかしながら、このように、打撃音を耳
で聞き判定する方法では判定する人によって個人差が生
じ、剥離状態を正確に求めることができない。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a method for diagnosing a peeling state of a tile wall surface, for example, a percussion method for judging a sound of striking a wall surface with a hammer or the like has been generally performed. However, in the method of hearing and judging the impact sound as described above, there is an individual difference between persons who judge, and it is not possible to accurately determine the peeling state.
【0003】図8は上述した点に鑑み剥離状態を個人差
によらず確実に判定するようにした従来例に係るタイル
壁面の剥離診断装置を説明する構成図で、同図(a)は
剥離診断装置の構成図、同図(b)は剥離診断装置の接
触部の構成図、同図(c)は剥離診断装置の診断方法を
示す説明図である。FIG. 8 is a block diagram for explaining a conventional tile wall peeling diagnosis apparatus in which the peeling state is reliably determined regardless of individual differences in view of the above points. FIG. FIG. 2B is a configuration diagram of the diagnosis device, FIG. 2B is a configuration diagram of a contact portion of the separation diagnosis device, and FIG. 2C is an explanatory diagram illustrating a diagnosis method of the separation diagnosis device.
【0004】図8において、1は被測定壁面6の剥離状
態を診断するための剥離診断装置を示し、この剥離診断
装置1の先端には被測定壁面6に当てる壁面接触部2が
設けられ、該壁面接触部2に壁面を打撃するための打撃
球3及び打撃音を集音する集音マイク4が備えられてい
る。5はその打撃球3を被測定壁面6に打撃するための
投入用のスイッチである。In FIG. 8, reference numeral 1 denotes a peeling diagnosis device for diagnosing the peeling state of the wall surface 6 to be measured. A wall contact portion 2 for contacting the wall surface 6 to be measured is provided at the tip of the peeling diagnosis device 1. The wall contact portion 2 is provided with a hitting ball 3 for hitting the wall surface and a sound collecting microphone 4 for collecting a hitting sound. Reference numeral 5 denotes an input switch for hitting the hitting ball 3 against the wall surface 6 to be measured.
【0005】7a,7b,7cは上記打撃球3が被測定
壁面6を打撃した際に発生する打撃音を集音マイク4に
よって集音しその結果が図示しない解析装置によって解
析されて壁面の接着強度を表示するようにされた3色の
発光ダイオードを示し、接着強度が4kg/cm2以上
であれば青色の発光ダイオード7a、1〜4kg/cm
2であれば黄色の発光ダイオード7c、0〜1g/cm2
であれば赤色の発光ダイオード7bによってそれぞれ表
R>示するようになっている。[0005] 7a, 7b, 7c collects the impact sound generated when the impact ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured by the sound collecting microphone 4, and the result is analyzed by an analyzing device (not shown) to bond the wall surface. 3 shows light-emitting diodes of three colors adapted to display intensity; if the adhesive strength is 4 kg / cm 2 or more, blue light-emitting diodes 7a, 1-4 kg / cm
If it is 2 , the yellow light emitting diode 7c, 0 to 1 g / cm 2
In this case, each is indicated by the red light emitting diode 7b.
R> as shown.
【0006】したがって、上記構成に係る剥離診断装置
1の先端に設けられた壁面接触部2を被測定壁面6に当
ててスイッチ5を投入することにより、打撃球3が被測
定壁面6を打撃することになり、その際、発生する打撃
音が集音マイク4に集音され解析装置によってその打撃
音が解析されて、被測定壁面6の接着強度を3つの発光
ダイオード7aないし7cによって表示することがで
き、剥離状態を判定して部分補修することにより、経費
の節減、リフォームの安全性を高めることができる。Accordingly, the hitting ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured by applying the switch 5 with the wall surface contact portion 2 provided at the tip of the peeling diagnosis apparatus 1 having the above-mentioned configuration being applied to the wall surface 6 to be measured. That is, at that time, the hitting sound generated is collected by the sound collecting microphone 4, and the hitting sound is analyzed by the analyzer, and the adhesive strength of the measured wall 6 is displayed by the three light emitting diodes 7a to 7c. By performing the partial repair by judging the peeling state, it is possible to reduce the cost and enhance the safety of the reform.
【0007】[0007]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上述し
た従来の壁面の剥離診断装置においては、被測定壁面6
の接着強度を3色の発光ダイオード7aないし7cによ
って識別することができても、剥離の深さ等剥離の程度
を正確に検知することができなかった。However, in the above-described conventional apparatus for diagnosing wall peeling, the wall surface to be measured 6
However, even if the adhesive strength could be identified by the light emitting diodes 7a to 7c of three colors, the degree of peeling such as the depth of peeling could not be detected accurately.
【0008】この発明は、上記のような従来例の問題点
を解消するためになされたもので、剥離の深さ等剥離状
態を正確に診断することができる壁面の剥離診断方法を
得ることを目的とする。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method of diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface capable of accurately diagnosing a peeling state such as a peeling depth. Aim.
【0009】[0009]
【課題を解決するための手段】この発明に係る壁面の剥
離診断方法は、被測定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音を集音
して該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワース
ペクトル密度に基づいて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定する
ようにした壁面の剥離診断方法において、スペクトル波
形の特徴量として、横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共
に縦軸の上限をスペクトル波形のピーク点としその下限
を0として描かれたパワースペクトル波形と前記ピーク
点を通り横軸に平行な直線との間で挟まれる面積中、ス
ペクトル波形の前記ピーク点に対応する共振周波数と周
波数範囲の下限値との間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波
形の前記ピーク点に対応する共振周波数と周波数範囲の
上限値との間の第2の面積と、第1と第2の面積比とを
抽出し、これら抽出された特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判
定することを特徴とするものである。A method of diagnosing separation of a wall surface according to the present invention collects a striking sound when striking a wall surface to be measured, analyzes the waveform of the striking sound, and analyzes the power spectrum density. In a method of diagnosing a peeling of a wall surface based on which a peeling portion of a measured wall surface is determined, as a characteristic amount of a spectral waveform, the horizontal axis is a predetermined frequency range and the upper limit of the vertical axis is a peak point of the spectral waveform. power spectrum waveform and the peak of the lower drawn as a 0
Area was sandwiched between a straight line parallel to the street abscissa point, a first area between the lower limit value of the resonance frequency and the frequency range corresponding to the peak point of the spectrum waveform, the peak of the spectral waveform Extracting a second area between a resonance frequency corresponding to a point and an upper limit value of a frequency range and a first to second area ratio, and determining a peeling portion based on the extracted feature amount; It is characterized by the following.
【0010】また、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変
移に基づいて剥離部の深さの度合いを判定することを特
徴とするものである。Further, the present invention is characterized in that the degree of the depth of the peeled portion is determined based on the frequency shift of the first and second area ratios.
【0011】[0011]
実施の形態1.以下、この発明の実施の形態を図に基づ
いて説明する。図1はこの発明で用いる壁面の剥離診断
装置を示す構成図である。図示構成の剥離診断装置10
は、図8に示す従来例と基本的に同様な構成を備える
が、集音マイク4は装置本体側に取り付けられると共
に、この集音マイク4に信号処理器8が接続され、信号
処理器8は、被測定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音の集音結
果から該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワー
スペクトル密度に基づいてスペクトル波形の特徴量を抽
出し、この抽出された特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判定す
るようになされ、その判定結果を表示板9により表示す
るようになっている。Embodiment 1 FIG. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a wall peeling diagnosis device used in the present invention. Exfoliation diagnostic apparatus 10 of illustrated configuration
Has a configuration basically similar to that of the conventional example shown in FIG. 8, but the sound collecting microphone 4 is attached to the apparatus main body side, and a signal processor 8 is connected to the sound collecting microphone 4, Performs a spectrum analysis of a waveform of the striking sound from a sound collection result of the striking sound when striking the measured wall surface, and extracts a characteristic amount of a spectral waveform based on the power spectral density. The peeled portion is determined based on the information, and the result of the determination is displayed on the display panel 9.
【0012】上記剥離診断装置10による一連の動作の
流れを図2を参照して説明する。まず、被測定壁面6に
壁面接触部2を当てスイッチ5を入れると、打撃球3が
被測定壁面6を打診する(ステップS1)。その打撃音
を集音マイク4で集音する(ステップS2)。その音響
はアナログ波形のため、信号処理器8は、処理しやすい
応答波形を得るようにデジタル変換して収録する(ステ
ップS3)。信号処理器8は、得られた応答波形を周波
数スペクトル分析し(スペクトルS4)、パターン認識
する(ステップS5)。A flow of a series of operations by the peeling diagnosis apparatus 10 will be described with reference to FIG. First, when the switch 5 is turned on by applying the wall contact portion 2 to the wall surface 6 to be measured, the hitting ball 3 hits the wall surface 6 to be measured (step S1). The striking sound is collected by the sound collecting microphone 4 (step S2). Since the sound is an analog waveform, the signal processor 8 digitally converts and records the response waveform so as to obtain a response waveform that is easy to process (step S3). The signal processor 8 analyzes the frequency spectrum of the obtained response waveform (spectrum S4) and recognizes the pattern (step S5).
【0013】上記信号処理器8によるパターン認識は、
図3に示すように、パワースペクトル密度からスペクト
ル波形の特徴量を抽出して抽出された特徴量に基づいて
剥離部を判定する。ここで、スペクトル波形の面積は
1.0puになるように正規化されており、周波数範囲
の下限値fminは0Hz、上限値fmaxは人間の官
能試験との整合性を取るため可聴周波数の上限値である
12,000Hzとしている。図3に示すスペクトル波
形のピーク値は、打撃音の周波数が尖鋭なほど大きくな
り、したがって、図3に斜線で示す周波数範囲が共振周
波数と周波数範囲の下限値との間の面積A、同じく周波
数範囲が共振周波数と周波数範囲の上限値との間の面積
B共に大きくなる。主たる共振周波数f0 が低いほど面
積Aは小さく、面積Bは大きくなる。The pattern recognition by the signal processor 8 is as follows.
As shown in FIG. 3, the characteristic amount of the spectrum waveform is extracted from the power spectral density, and the peeling portion is determined based on the extracted characteristic amount. Here, the area of the spectrum waveform is normalized so as to be 1.0 pu, the lower limit value fmin of the frequency range is 0 Hz, and the upper limit value fmax is the upper limit value of the audible frequency in order to obtain consistency with the human sensory test. 12,000 Hz. The peak value of the spectrum waveform shown in FIG. 3 increases as the frequency of the striking sound becomes sharper. Therefore, the frequency range indicated by hatching in FIG. 3 is the area A between the resonance frequency and the lower limit of the frequency range. The range increases with the area B between the resonance frequency and the upper limit of the frequency range. The area A is smaller and the area B is larger as the main resonance frequency f 0 is lower.
【0014】上記信号処理器8は、図3に示すパワース
ペクトル密度からスペクトル波形の特徴量として、面積
A、面積B及びそれらの面積比(共振周波数f0 の位
置)の3種類の特徴量を抽出し、抽出された特徴量に基
づいて剥離部を判定し、その結果を表示板9に表示、保
存する(ステップS6)。また、上記信号処理器8は、
図4に示すように、面積比の周波数変移に基づいて剥離
部の深さの度合いを判定し、その結果を表示板9に表
示、保存する(ステップS6)。すなわち、同図(a)
は剥離部の深さが15mm、同図(b)は剥離部の深さ
が20mm、同図(c)は剥離部の深さが30mm、同
図(d)は正常な場合をそれぞれ示し、剥離部の深さが
増すほど周波数のピーク点が右側に変移することが理解
されよう。このように、剥離部の深さが増すほどピーク
点(主共振周波数)が周波数の高い右側へ変移している
理由は、剥離部が深くなるほど、剥離部の厚さが大きく
剛性が大きくなるため、打撃音の周波数が高くなるため
である。The signal processor 8 uses the power spectrum density shown in FIG. 3 to calculate three types of characteristic quantities of the area A, the area B and their area ratio (the position of the resonance frequency f 0 ) as the characteristic quantities of the spectrum waveform. The extracted portion is determined based on the extracted feature amount, and the result is displayed and stored on the display panel 9 (step S6). Further, the signal processor 8 includes:
As shown in FIG. 4, the degree of the depth of the peeled portion is determined based on the frequency shift of the area ratio, and the result is displayed and stored on the display panel 9 (step S6). That is, FIG.
Is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 15 mm, FIG. 4B is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 20 mm, FIG. 4C is a case where the depth of the peeled portion is 30 mm, and FIG. It can be seen that the peak of the frequency shifts to the right as the depth of the peeled portion increases. As described above, the reason why the peak point (main resonance frequency) shifts to the right side where the frequency is higher as the depth of the peeled portion increases is that the deeper the peeled portion, the greater the thickness of the peeled portion and the greater the rigidity. This is because the frequency of the impact sound increases.
【0015】このような特徴量に基づき剥離部の状態を
どの程度判定できるかを調べた結果、3種類の特徴量に
基づく判定がファジイ理論において最も正答率が高いこ
とが実験結果により判明された。すなわち、図5は特徴
量として面積A、面積B、それらの面積比A/Bの3種
類の特徴量を取った場合、図6は特徴量として面積A、
面積Bの2種類の特徴量を取った場合、図7は特徴量と
してピーク点の周波数、ピーク点のPSDの2種類の特
徴量を取った場合における「深さ及び面積」についての
正答率、「深さ」についての正答率、「健全であるか剥
離状態であるか」についての正答率をそれぞれ示したも
ので、これら図から理解されるように、図5に示す3種
類の特徴量に基づく剥離診断が深さや大きさの異なる剥
離部の診断に最も好ましいものであることが確認され
た。As a result of examining the extent to which the state of the peeled portion can be determined based on such characteristic amounts, it was found from experimental results that the determination based on three types of characteristic amounts has the highest correct answer rate in fuzzy logic. . That is, FIG. 5 shows three types of feature amounts, that is, area A, area B, and their area ratio A / B as feature amounts. FIG.
FIG. 7 shows a case where two kinds of feature amounts of the area B are taken, and FIG. 7 shows the correct answer rate of “depth and area” when two kinds of feature amounts of the peak point PSD and the peak point are taken as the feature amounts. The correct answer rate for "depth" and the correct answer rate for "whether sound or peeled" are shown. As can be understood from these figures, the three types of feature quantities shown in FIG. It was confirmed that the peeling diagnosis based on the peeling was the most preferable for the diagnosis of the peeled portions having different depths and sizes.
【0016】[0016]
【発明の効果】以上のように、この発明によれば、被測
定壁面を打撃した際の打撃音を集音して該打撃音の波形
をスペクトル分析し、そのパワースペクトル密度に基づ
いて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定するようにした壁面の剥
離診断方法において、スペクトル波形の特徴量として、
横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共に縦軸の上限をスペ
クトル波形のピーク点としその下限を0として描かれた
パワースペクトル波形と前記ピーク点を通り横軸に平行
な直線との間で挟まれる面積中、スペクトル波形の前記
ピーク点に対応する共振周波数と周波数範囲の下限値と
の間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波形の前記ピーク点に
対応する共振周波数と周波数範囲の上限値との間の第2
の面積と、第1と第2の面積比とを抽出し、これら抽出
された特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判定することにより、
深さや大きさの異なる剥離部の剥離状態を正確に診断す
ることができる。As described above, according to the present invention, a striking sound when a striking wall surface is measured is collected, the waveform of the striking sound is analyzed, and the measured sound is measured based on the power spectrum density. In the method of diagnosing the peeling of the wall surface to determine the peeling portion of the wall surface,
The upper limit of the vertical axis is the peak point of the spectrum waveform is the lower limit drawn as a 0 as well as the horizontal axis and the predetermined frequency range
Parallel to the horizontal axis passing through the power spectrum waveform and the peak point
Area was sandwiched between a straight line, the spectral waveform
A first area between the lower limit value of the resonance frequency and the frequency range corresponding to the peak point, the peak point of the spectrum waveform
The second between the corresponding resonance frequency and the upper limit of the frequency range
And the first and second area ratios are extracted, and the peeling portion is determined based on the extracted feature amounts,
It is possible to accurately diagnose the peeled state of the peeled portions having different depths and sizes.
【0017】また、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変
移に基づいて剥離部の深さの度合いを正確に判定するこ
とができる。Further, the degree of the depth of the peeled portion can be accurately determined based on the frequency shift of the first and second area ratios.
【図1】 この発明で用いる壁面の剥離診断装置を示す
全体構成図である。FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram showing a wall peeling diagnosis apparatus used in the present invention.
【図2】 図1の剥離診断装置による動作を説明する流
れ図である。FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an operation of the peeling diagnosis apparatus of FIG. 1;
【図3】 パターン認識のために正規化されたスペクト
ル波形と特徴量を説明するための波形図である。FIG. 3 is a waveform chart for explaining a spectrum waveform and a feature amount normalized for pattern recognition.
【図4】 剥離部の深さの判定についての説明図であ
る。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram for determining the depth of a peeled portion.
【図5】 特徴量として面積A、面積B、それらの面積
比A/Bの3種類の特徴量を取った場合の正答率を示す
説明図である。FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when three types of feature amounts of an area A, an area B, and an area ratio A / B thereof are taken as the feature amounts;
【図6】 特徴量として面積A、面積Bの2種類の特徴
量を取った場合の正答率を示す説明図である。FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when two types of feature amounts, area A and area B, are taken as feature amounts;
【図7】 特徴量としてピーク点の周波数、ピーク点の
PSDの2種類の特徴量を取った場合の正答率を示す説
明図である。FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing a correct answer rate when two types of feature amounts, a peak point frequency and a peak point PSD, are taken as feature amounts;
【図8】 従来例に係るタイル壁面の剥離診断装置の説
明図である。FIG. 8 is an explanatory view of a tile wall peeling diagnosis apparatus according to a conventional example.
10 剥離診断装置、2 壁面接触部、3 打撃球、4
集音マイク、8 信号処理器、9 表示板。10 Peeling diagnosis device, 2 wall contact part, 3 impact ball, 4
Sound collecting microphone, 8 signal processor, 9 display board.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 川田明、林重雄,ニューラルネットワ ークによる壁画剥離診断法,技苑,日 本,80号,16−20頁 (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G01N 29/00 - 29/28 JICSTファイル(JOIS)────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (56) References Akira Kawada, Shigeo Hayashi, Diagnosis method of wall painting with neural network, Gi-en, Japan, No. 80, pp. 16-20 (58) Fields surveyed (Int. Cl 7, DB name) G01N 29/00 -. 29/28 JICST file (JOIS)
Claims (2)
して該打撃音の波形をスペクトル分析し、そのパワース
ペクトル密度に基づいて被測定壁面の剥離部を判定する
ようにした壁面の剥離診断方法において、スペクトル波
形の特徴量として、横軸を所定の周波数範囲とすると共
に縦軸の上限をスペクトル波形のピーク点としその下限
を0として描かれたパワースペクトル波形と前記ピーク
点を通り横軸に平行な直線との間で挟まれる面積中、ス
ペクトル波形の前記ピーク点に対応する共振周波数と周
波数範囲の下限値との間の第1の面積と、スペクトル波
形の前記ピーク点に対応する共振周波数と周波数範囲の
上限値との間の第2の面積と、第1と第2の面積比とを
抽出し、これら抽出された特徴量に基づいて剥離部を判
定することを特徴とする壁面の剥離診断方法。1. A wall surface which collects a striking sound when striking a wall surface to be measured, performs a spectrum analysis of a waveform of the striking sound, and determines a peeling portion of the wall surface to be measured based on its power spectrum density. in the peeling diagnostic method, as a feature of the spectrum waveform, the peak upper limit of the vertical axis the peak point of the spectrum waveform and power spectrum waveform drawn the lower limit set to 0 as well as the horizontal axis and the predetermined frequency range
Area was sandwiched between a straight line parallel to the street abscissa point, a first area between the lower limit value of the resonance frequency and the frequency range corresponding to the peak point of the spectrum waveform, the peak of the spectral waveform Extracting a second area between a resonance frequency corresponding to a point and an upper limit value of a frequency range and a first to second area ratio, and determining a peeling portion based on the extracted feature amount; A method for diagnosing peeling of a wall surface, characterized in that:
いて、上記第1と第2の面積比の周波数変移に基づいて
剥離部の深さの度合いを判定することを特徴とする壁面
の剥離診断方法。2. The method for diagnosing wall separation according to claim 1, wherein the degree of the depth of the separation portion is determined based on a frequency shift of the first and second area ratios. Diagnostic method.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23036296A JP3263318B2 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1996-08-30 | Diagnosis method of wall peeling |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23036296A JP3263318B2 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1996-08-30 | Diagnosis method of wall peeling |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH1073573A JPH1073573A (en) | 1998-03-17 |
JP3263318B2 true JP3263318B2 (en) | 2002-03-04 |
Family
ID=16906676
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP23036296A Expired - Fee Related JP3263318B2 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1996-08-30 | Diagnosis method of wall peeling |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3263318B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1674974A3 (en) | 1994-06-07 | 2007-03-21 | Hitachi, Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd. | Information storing device |
JP4162967B2 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2008-10-08 | 積水化学工業株式会社 | Inspection method for reinforced concrete pipes |
US7360462B2 (en) | 2002-05-08 | 2008-04-22 | Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. | Method and equipment for inspecting reinforced concrete pipe |
JP4952054B2 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2012-06-13 | 株式会社大林組 | Tile adhesion surface peeling diagnosis method, tile adhesion surface peeling diagnosis device |
JP5372701B2 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2013-12-18 | アプライドリサーチ株式会社 | Microphone for wearing hammer |
JP6494903B2 (en) | 2013-02-14 | 2019-04-03 | ソニー株式会社 | Analysis system, analysis program, and analysis method |
JP6487181B2 (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2019-03-20 | 株式会社ネクスコ東日本エンジニアリング | Inspection support apparatus, inspection support method, inspection support program, and inspection support system |
CN105021700B (en) * | 2015-07-21 | 2018-08-24 | 上海建工七建集团有限公司 | Steel core concrete column compactness detection device |
JP6793378B2 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2020-12-02 | 株式会社昭和テックス | Installation inspection device for rail-mounted articles |
JP6837641B2 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2021-03-03 | 株式会社昭和テックス | Installation inspection device for rail-mounted articles |
CN110568068B (en) * | 2019-09-02 | 2022-05-27 | 黑龙江省龙丰公路工程检测有限责任公司 | Steel core concrete column compactness detects frock |
-
1996
- 1996-08-30 JP JP23036296A patent/JP3263318B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
川田明、林重雄,ニューラルネットワークによる壁画剥離診断法,技苑,日本,80号,16−20頁 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH1073573A (en) | 1998-03-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP3263318B2 (en) | Diagnosis method of wall peeling | |
CN100413463C (en) | Refusing pseudoimage by impulse quality | |
US4313445A (en) | Electronic sphygmomanometer | |
US7560634B2 (en) | Electronic musical instrument having tuning device | |
AU2004240149A1 (en) | Method for quantifying psychological stress levels using voice pattern samples | |
US6827687B2 (en) | Blood-pressure measuring apparatus having waveform analyzing function | |
EP1300110A3 (en) | Method of and apparatus for deriving indices characterising atrial arrhythmias | |
JP4857580B2 (en) | Work characteristic evaluation apparatus, work characteristic evaluation method and program | |
JP2829828B2 (en) | Finished surface peeling diagnosis device | |
JPH07376A (en) | Cough recording system | |
JPH0668486B2 (en) | Method for diagnosing peeling on finished surfaces of buildings | |
JPH09257765A (en) | Apparatus for diagnosing peeling of wall surface | |
JPS60211360A (en) | Peeling detector for wall surface tile or the like | |
JP4844049B2 (en) | Trunk cavity state estimation device | |
JP3523352B2 (en) | Impact detection device | |
JP3857389B2 (en) | Tire noise evaluation method | |
JPH11304773A (en) | Method for discriminating peeling of external wall tile | |
JP7062582B2 (en) | Inspection hammer device and inspection method using it | |
JP2941150B2 (en) | Rock property measurement device | |
JP2004144586A (en) | Integrity diagnostic method of concrete-based structure | |
JPH06235719A (en) | Exfoliation diagnostic system for wall face | |
US6719707B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for performing musical perception sound analysis on a system | |
EP1057450A3 (en) | Apparatus for evaluating cardiac function of living subject | |
CA2242847A1 (en) | Respiratory test apparatus | |
JP2000074889A (en) | Hammering determining device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071221 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081221 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081221 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091221 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091221 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101221 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101221 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111221 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111221 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121221 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |