JPH1015127A - Putter head - Google Patents
Putter headInfo
- Publication number
- JPH1015127A JPH1015127A JP8193876A JP19387696A JPH1015127A JP H1015127 A JPH1015127 A JP H1015127A JP 8193876 A JP8193876 A JP 8193876A JP 19387696 A JP19387696 A JP 19387696A JP H1015127 A JPH1015127 A JP H1015127A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- feeling
- head
- wall thickness
- putter
- face
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Golf Clubs (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、ゴルフクラブとし
てのパター用の金属製ヘッドに関する。The present invention relates to a metal head for a putter as a golf club.
【0002】[0002]
【発明の背景】ゴルフクラブの中で、パターは他のウッ
ドやアイアンとは異なった機能が要求される。即ち、飛
距離と方向性が重視される(パター以外の)他のクラブ
に対して、パターの場合は、方向性と共に“微妙な距離
感の出し易さ”が非常に重要である。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Among golf clubs, putters are required to function differently from other woods and irons. In other words, with respect to other clubs in which the flight distance and the directionality are emphasized (other than the putter), in the case of the putter, the "easiness of giving a delicate sense of distance" is very important together with the directionality.
【0003】グリーン上において最もよくみられ、かつ
プレーヤーに大きなショックと動揺を与えるミスが、い
わゆる「スリーパット」をはじめとする3打以上をパッ
ティングに費やしてしまうことである。そしてこのミス
の最大の原因は、ファーストパットの距離感が合わない
ためであるといえる。[0003] The most common mistake on the green that causes the player to experience great shock and upset is that they spend more than three strokes on putting, including so-called "three-patts". It can be said that the biggest cause of this mistake is that the sense of distance of the first put does not match.
【0004】パッティングの距離感を合わすためには、
非常に繊細な感覚を必要とするが、この感覚を創出する
のに欠かせないのが“ソフトな打球感”である。In order to match the sense of distance in putting,
A very delicate feeling is required, but the “soft feel” is indispensable for creating this feeling.
【0005】[0005]
【従来の技術及び発明が解決しようとする課題】そのた
めに、最近、パターヘッドの素材として比較的柔らかい
アルミ系の金属を使用したパターが開発され、注目を集
めているが、充分な効果があがっていない。その原因の
ひとつとして、アルミヘッドの場合、素材の比重が非常
に小さいため、ヘッド重量を確保するため、ヘッド体積
を大きくする必要から、いわゆるマレットタイプ(カマ
ボコ型)と呼ばれる形状のものが多く、打球面の肉厚が
大であったためと考えられる(図7と図8参照)。2. Description of the Related Art Recently, a putter using a relatively soft aluminum-based metal as a material for a putter head has been developed and has attracted attention. Not. One of the causes is that the aluminum head has a very small specific gravity, so it is necessary to increase the head volume in order to secure the head weight, so there are many so-called mallet type (Kamaboko type), It is considered that the thickness of the hitting surface was large (see FIGS. 7 and 8).
【0006】また、金属製パターのフェース面(打球部
位)に、軟質の樹脂を埋め込んで、ソフトな打球感を得
ようとしたパターも提案されているが、異種素材を埋め
込む構造のため、製作に手間とコストを要し、かつ、樹
脂の部分は傷が付き易く、耐久性に劣るという問題、及
び、温度変化による変形等の問題もあった。Also, a putter has been proposed in which a soft resin is buried in the face surface (ball hitting portion) of a metal putter to obtain a soft feel of hitting. In addition, there is a problem that it takes time and cost, the resin portion is easily scratched, the durability is poor, and there are problems such as deformation due to temperature change.
【0007】さらに、近年の傾向として、使用するボー
ルに関しては、従来の糸巻き構造のものから、ツーピー
ス構造のものに変更するプレーヤーが多くなりつつある
が、ツーピースボールは糸巻きボールに比べて、打球感
が硬く、フィーリングが出しにくいものが多く、プレー
ヤーはパッティングで距離感を合わせることが一層困難
となっていた。[0007] Further, in recent years, the number of players who change the ball to be used from the conventional thread-wound structure to the two-piece structure has been increasing, but the two-piece ball has a better shot feeling than the wound ball. However, many players were hard and did not feel well, making it more difficult for players to adjust the sense of distance by putting.
【0008】本発明の目的は、このような従来の問題を
解決して、打球感を改善し、微妙な距離感を出し易いパ
ターを提供することにある。[0008] An object of the present invention is to solve such a conventional problem and to provide a putter which improves shot feeling and easily gives a delicate sense of distance.
【0009】[0009]
【課題を解決するための手段】そこで、本発明に係るパ
ターヘッドは、フェース面の少なくとも一部の壁肉厚
を、 0.5mm〜 2.0mmに設定した。Therefore, in the putter head according to the present invention, the wall thickness of at least a part of the face surface is set to 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm.
【0010】また、ヘッド背面側の中央部に凹窪部を形
成して、フェース面の中央部の壁肉厚を、 0.5mm〜 2.0
mmに設定した。Further, a concave portion is formed at the center portion on the back side of the head, and the wall thickness at the center portion of the face surface is set to 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm.
mm.
【0011】また、全体がブロック型であって、フェー
ス面から 0.5mm〜 2.0mmの後方にスリット部を切欠形成
して、フェース面の少なくとも一部の壁肉厚が、 0.5mm
〜 2.0mmであるように形成した。[0011] Further, the whole is of a block type, and a slit portion is cut out 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm rearward from the face surface so that the wall thickness of at least a part of the face surface is 0.5 mm.
Formed to be ~ 2.0 mm.
【0012】[0012]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、図示の実施の形態に基づき
本発明を詳説する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described below in detail based on the illustrated embodiments.
【0013】図1は本発明の実施の一形態を示す金属製
パターヘッドの背面(裏面)図であって、図2又は図3
はそのA−A断面図である。この図1と図2,図3に於
て、フェース面1の中央部の壁肉厚Tを、 0.5mm〜 2.0
mmとして、(従来よりも十分に)薄肉に形成する。FIG. 1 is a rear (rear) view of a metal putter head showing one embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 or FIG.
Is a sectional view taken along the line A-A. In FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, the wall thickness T at the center of the face surface 1 is set to 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm.
mm so that it is thinner (sufficiently than before).
【0014】2はヘッド本体部であり、トウ3とヒール
4を除く中央部に凹窪部5を(ヘッド背面6側に於て)
形成し、フェース面1の中央部の壁肉厚Tを、薄く形成
している。つまり、ヘッド背面6側では、凹窪部5は上
下左右の突隆壁部に包囲形成されている。特に、ソール
7側は十分な厚さとして後方へ突出している。Reference numeral 2 denotes a head main body, which is provided with a concave recess 5 at the center except the toe 3 and the heel 4 (on the side of the head back surface 6).
The wall thickness T at the center of the face surface 1 is formed thin. That is, on the head back surface 6 side, the concave recessed portion 5 is formed so as to be surrounded by upper, lower, left and right raised wall portions. In particular, the sole 7 has a sufficient thickness and projects rearward.
【0015】なお、図2は壁肉厚Tが約2mmの場合、図
3は約 0.5mmの場合を示している。上述の図1〜図3の
形状では、その材質は、ステンレス鋼、軟鋼、チタン、
その他の金属とする。FIG. 2 shows a case where the wall thickness T is about 2 mm, and FIG. 3 shows a case where the wall thickness T is about 0.5 mm. In the shapes of FIGS. 1 to 3 described above, the material is stainless steel, mild steel, titanium,
Other metals.
【0016】次に、図4と図5は本発明の実施の他の形
態を示し、パターヘッド全体がカマボコ型等のブロック
型であって、フェース面1から、 0.5mm〜 2.0mmの後方
に、上下に開口するスリット部8を切欠形成して、フェ
ース面1の少なくとも中央部の壁肉厚Tを、 0.5mm〜
2.0mmに形成する。Next, FIGS. 4 and 5 show another embodiment of the present invention, in which the whole putter head is a block type such as a kamaboko type, and is 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm behind the face surface 1. The slit portion 8 which opens vertically is cut out, and the wall thickness T of at least the central portion of the face surface 1 is set to 0.5 mm to
Form to 2.0mm.
【0017】即ち、シャフト9が連結されるヒール4
側、及び、(先端の)トウ3側を残して、左右方向に十
分な幅寸法で、かつ、間隔寸法が、 1.0mm〜 7.0mmのス
リット部8を切欠形成する。That is, the heel 4 to which the shaft 9 is connected
A slit portion 8 having a sufficient width dimension in the left-right direction and an interval dimension of 1.0 mm to 7.0 mm is cut out except for the side and the toe 3 side (at the tip).
【0018】特に、アルミニウムやアルミ合金等の軽金
属製の場合に、パターヘッド全体の重量を確保しつつ、
フェース面1の壁肉厚Tを十分に薄く製作できて、外観
上も異和感のない形状となる利点がある。Particularly, in the case of a light metal such as aluminum or aluminum alloy, the weight of the whole putter head is secured while
There is an advantage that the wall thickness T of the face surface 1 can be manufactured to be sufficiently thin, and the external appearance has a shape that does not cause any strange feeling.
【0019】なお、このスリット部8を上下一方側にの
み開口させるも好ましい(図示省略)。また、図4に於
て、トウ3とヒール4でのみフェース面1の肉薄壁が後
方残部と連結されているが、左右中間で部分的に、リブ
状に連結を追加しても良い(図示省略)。It is preferable that the slit 8 is opened only on one of the upper and lower sides (not shown). Further, in FIG. 4, the thin wall of the face surface 1 is connected only to the toe 3 and the heel 4 with the rear portion, but a rib-shaped connection may be added partially in the middle between the left and right ( Not shown).
【0020】なお、上述の(図1〜図5の)いずれの実
施の形態に於ても、壁肉厚Tが 0.5mm未満では、強度が
不足して、打球時の衝撃で破損する虞があり、逆に、
2.0mmを越えると、ソフトな打球感が損なわれ、かつ、
微妙な距離感を出し難くなる。In any of the above-described embodiments (FIGS. 1 to 5), if the wall thickness T is less than 0.5 mm, the strength is insufficient and the ball may be damaged by an impact at the time of hitting a ball. Yes, conversely,
If it exceeds 2.0 mm, the soft feel at impact is impaired, and
It is difficult to give a delicate sense of distance.
【0021】ところで、パター以外のクラブの場合、打
球時の衝撃が大きいので打球面の強度的に肉厚をそれほ
ど薄くすることはできず、例えばアイアンヘッドで用い
られるステンレスや軟鉄等の金属の場合でも 2.5mm以上
の肉厚が必要である。しかしながら幸いにして、パター
の場合はこれらのクラブに比べて打球時のヘッドスピー
ドが格段に遅いので、従来品のヘッド素材と同じである
ステンレスや軟鉄、アルミ等の素材で肉厚を薄くしても
強度的に充分耐えることができた。By the way, in the case of a club other than a putter, the impact at the time of hitting the ball is large, so that the thickness of the hitting ball cannot be reduced so much in terms of strength. For example, even a metal such as stainless steel or soft iron used in an iron head is used. A thickness of 2.5 mm or more is required. Fortunately, in the case of putters, the head speed at the time of hitting is much slower than these clubs, so reduce the wall thickness with the same material as the conventional head material such as stainless steel, soft iron, aluminum etc. Was able to withstand sufficient strength.
【0022】[0022]
【実施例】次に、本発明の実施例を、従来例と共に、表
1に示す。Next, Table 1 shows examples of the present invention together with conventional examples.
【0023】[0023]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0024】ここで、従来例1は図6に示した形状であ
り肉厚Tが 3.0mmであり、従来例2は図7と図8に示し
たカマボコ型であって、肉厚T′が50.0mmと大きいもの
である。従来例3は図6に示した形状であって肉厚Tが
5.0mmのものである。Here, the conventional example 1 has the shape shown in FIG. 6 and the thickness T is 3.0 mm, and the conventional example 2 has the kamaboko type shown in FIG. 7 and FIG. It is as large as 50.0mm. Conventional example 3 has the shape shown in FIG.
It is 5.0mm.
【0025】また、実施例1〜4については、全て基本
形状が図1と同様であり、素材及びフェース面の壁肉厚
Tを変化させたものであって、実施例1と実施例3は図
2に対応し、実施例2と実施例4は図3に対応する。さ
らに、実施例5は図4と図5に示した形状のものであ
る。Further, in Examples 1 to 4, the basic shapes are all the same as in FIG. 1 and the material and the wall thickness T of the face surface are changed. Embodiment 2 and Embodiment 4 correspond to FIG. 3, and FIG. Further, the fifth embodiment has the shape shown in FIGS.
【0026】上記表1に於て、「打球感評価」とは、テ
スターとしてハンディキャップ5〜25の10名のゴルファ
ーを選び、打球感の柔らかさを5点満点で評価させた点
数の平均値である(5点が最良を示す)。他方、距離感
評価については、同じく10名のテスターに、グリーン上
の、カップから15m〜20mの地点5ケ所から各1回ず
つ、練習無しでパッティングを行ってもらい、残り距離
の平均値が、1m未満ならば5点、 1.0m〜 1.5mなら
ば4点、以下、 0.5m毎に3点、2点、1点とし、3m
以上残った場合は0点としたときのテスター10名分の全
点数の平均値を示す。In Table 1 above, the "evaluation of shot feeling" means the average value of scores obtained by selecting ten golfers with a handicap of 5 to 25 as testers and evaluating the softness of shot feeling on a scale of 1 to 5. (5 points indicate the best). On the other hand, for the sense of distance, ten testers were asked to perform putting once from each of the five points 15m to 20m from the cup on the green without practice, and the average value of the remaining distance was 5 points for less than 1m, 4 points for 1.0m to 1.5m, 3 points for every 0.5m, 2 points, 1 point, 3m
In the case where the above remains, the average value of all the scores of 10 testers when the score is 0 is shown.
【0027】上記表1から次のことが分かる。従来例1
は、従来品としては最も肉厚Tの薄いタイプであるが、
これに対し、実施例1では、同じヘッド素材でも肉厚T
を薄くすることで、打球感評価及び距離感評価がいずれ
も著しく向上している。The following can be seen from Table 1 above. Conventional example 1
Is the thinnest type T as a conventional product,
In contrast, in the first embodiment, the thickness T
By reducing the thickness, both the shot feeling evaluation and the distance feeling evaluation are remarkably improved.
【0028】また、実施例2のようにさらに肉厚Tを減
少して 0.5mmとすることで、各評価は更に良くなってい
ることが分かる。Further, it is understood that each evaluation is further improved by further reducing the thickness T to 0.5 mm as in the second embodiment.
【0029】従来例3と実施例3,4との比較でも、同
様の結果が得られ、フェース面の壁肉厚Tの減少によっ
て、打球時のフィーリングが柔らかくなり、距離感が合
わせ易くなっている。Similar results are obtained in comparison between Conventional Example 3 and Examples 3 and 4, and the reduced wall thickness T of the face surface softens the feel at the time of hitting and makes it easier to match the sense of distance. ing.
【0030】実施例5は、従来例2と比較すれば明白な
如く、スリット部8によって肉厚Tを減少することで、
打球感・距離感が向上していることが分かる。In the fifth embodiment, as is apparent from comparison with the second conventional example, the thickness T is reduced by the slit portion 8,
It can be seen that the shot feeling and the sense of distance are improved.
【0031】なお、いずれの金属の場合も、肉厚Tを
0.5mm未満にすると、強度が不足して、打球時の衝撃で
破損してしまった。It should be noted that the thickness T of any metal is
When the thickness was less than 0.5 mm, the strength was insufficient and the ball was damaged by the impact at the time of hitting the ball.
【0032】また、実施例1〜5のいずれについても、
従来からの製法にて、容易に製作できる。即ち、実施例
1,2は鋳造、実施例3,4は鍛造、実施例5はインゴ
ットからの削り出しによって製造したが、従来の方法と
何ら変わらず製作でき、かつコストも従来と大差ない。Further, in all of Examples 1 to 5,
It can be easily manufactured by a conventional manufacturing method. That is, Examples 1 and 2 were manufactured by casting, Examples 3 and 4 were forged, and Example 5 was manufactured by cutting from an ingot, but could be manufactured without any change from the conventional method, and the cost was not much different from the conventional method.
【0033】[0033]
【発明の効果】本発明は上述の構成にて次のような著大
な効果を奏する。The present invention has the following remarkable effects with the above-described structure.
【0034】 (請求項1,2又は3によれば、)打
球感が柔らかくなり(ソフトなフィーリングとなり)、
パッティングの距離感が合わせ易い。また、製造は従来
と変わらず容易であり、コストも(ほとんど)アップし
ない。(According to claim 1, 2, or 3), the shot feeling is softened (soft feeling),
The feeling of distance of putting is easy to match. Further, the manufacture is as easy as before, and the cost does not increase (almost).
【0035】 (請求項2によれば、)フェース面の
周縁の強度と剛性が適度に維持され、慣性モーメントも
大きくて打球時のフィーリングが良好である。According to the second aspect, the strength and rigidity of the peripheral edge of the face surface are appropriately maintained, the moment of inertia is large, and the feel when hitting the ball is good.
【0036】 (請求項3によれば、)従来のカマボ
コ型のパターヘッドの重量が維持可能であり、かつ、外
観上も異和感が無い。According to the third aspect, the weight of the conventional Kamaboko-shaped putter head can be maintained, and there is no strange feeling in appearance.
【図1】本発明の実施の一形態を示す背面図である。FIG. 1 is a rear view showing an embodiment of the present invention.
【図2】図1のA−A断面図である。FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken along line AA of FIG.
【図3】図2に代わる他の実施例の断面図である。FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment replacing FIG. 2;
【図4】本発明の実施の他の形態を示す正面図である。FIG. 4 is a front view showing another embodiment of the present invention.
【図5】図4のB−B断面図である。FIG. 5 is a sectional view taken along line BB of FIG. 4;
【図6】従来例を示す背面図である。FIG. 6 is a rear view showing a conventional example.
【図7】従来例を示す正面図である。FIG. 7 is a front view showing a conventional example.
【図8】図7のD−D断面図である。8 is a sectional view taken along the line DD of FIG. 7;
1 フェース面 5 凹窪部 6 ヘッド背面 8 スリット部 T (壁)肉厚 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Face surface 5 Concave concave part 6 Head back surface 8 Slit part T (wall) thickness
Claims (3)
Tを、 0.5mm〜 2.0mmに設定したことを特徴とするパタ
ーヘッド。1. A putter head, wherein a wall thickness T of at least a part of the face surface 1 is set to 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm.
成して、フェース面1の中央部の壁肉厚Tを、 0.5mm〜
2.0mmに設定したことを特徴とするパターヘッド。2. A recess 5 is formed at the center of the head back surface 6 so that the wall thickness T at the center of the face 1 is 0.5 mm to
A putter head characterized by setting it to 2.0mm.
1から 0.5mm〜 2.0mmの後方にスリット部8を切欠形成
して、フェース面1の少なくとも一部の壁肉厚Tが、
0.5mm〜 2.0mmであるように形成したことを特徴とする
パターヘッド。3. A block type as a whole, wherein a slit portion 8 is notched behind the face surface 1 by 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm so that a wall thickness T of at least a part of the face surface 1 is reduced.
A putter head formed to be 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP08193876A JP3143588B2 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1996-07-03 | Putter head |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP08193876A JP3143588B2 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1996-07-03 | Putter head |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH1015127A true JPH1015127A (en) | 1998-01-20 |
JP3143588B2 JP3143588B2 (en) | 2001-03-07 |
Family
ID=16315223
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP08193876A Expired - Fee Related JP3143588B2 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1996-07-03 | Putter head |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3143588B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100668894B1 (en) * | 2005-12-12 | 2007-01-12 | 현대자동차주식회사 | A clip for mounting roof moulding in vehicle |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101913724B (en) * | 2010-08-20 | 2012-07-18 | 常州大学 | Device for treating eutrophication water blue algae |
KR101677383B1 (en) * | 2015-08-11 | 2016-11-18 | (주)천일염업사 | Roof rack assembly having solar generating module |
-
1996
- 1996-07-03 JP JP08193876A patent/JP3143588B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100668894B1 (en) * | 2005-12-12 | 2007-01-12 | 현대자동차주식회사 | A clip for mounting roof moulding in vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3143588B2 (en) | 2001-03-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP3658393B2 (en) | Golf club set | |
US4944515A (en) | Hollow golf club head with internal support | |
US7731604B2 (en) | Golf club iron head | |
US20070135232A1 (en) | Traditional putter with elevated mass | |
US9586105B1 (en) | Weighted golf club head | |
JP2003265652A (en) | Golf club head and golf club set | |
JP2000093565A (en) | Metallic hollow golf club head | |
EP2605839B1 (en) | Golf clubs and golf club heads | |
JP2003265653A (en) | Golf club set | |
JP4723397B2 (en) | Golf club head for putter and golf putter | |
JP4400900B2 (en) | Iron golf club head and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP4326065B2 (en) | Iron type golf club head | |
JP3453755B2 (en) | Iron golf club | |
US20010029209A1 (en) | Golf club | |
JP3594515B2 (en) | Iron golf club head | |
JPH09322953A (en) | Golf club head | |
JP2001212272A (en) | Wood type golf club head | |
JPH1119253A (en) | Club head of golf club | |
JP3117935B2 (en) | Iron club head | |
JPH1015127A (en) | Putter head | |
JP2000084126A (en) | Iron club head | |
JP4854117B2 (en) | Golf putter head | |
JPH105378A (en) | Iron golf club | |
JP2929587B2 (en) | Iron type golf club set | |
JP4107526B2 (en) | Golf club head |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113 |
|
R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071222 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081222 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081222 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091222 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091222 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101222 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101222 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111222 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111222 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121222 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121222 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131222 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |