JPH074744B2 - Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works - Google Patents

Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works

Info

Publication number
JPH074744B2
JPH074744B2 JP18995388A JP18995388A JPH074744B2 JP H074744 B2 JPH074744 B2 JP H074744B2 JP 18995388 A JP18995388 A JP 18995388A JP 18995388 A JP18995388 A JP 18995388A JP H074744 B2 JPH074744 B2 JP H074744B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
work
time
priority order
priority
evaluation value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP18995388A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0241857A (en
Inventor
克己 井上
Original Assignee
株式会社グリーン・システム
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社グリーン・システム filed Critical 株式会社グリーン・システム
Priority to JP18995388A priority Critical patent/JPH074744B2/en
Publication of JPH0241857A publication Critical patent/JPH0241857A/en
Publication of JPH074744B2 publication Critical patent/JPH074744B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Multi-Process Working Machines And Systems (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 産業上の利用分野 本発明は、単一の手段によって複数の作業を重複しない
ように行う作業において、各作業の適正な作業開始予定
時期を決定するとともに、この各作業の作業開始予定時
期の決定を、各作業が開始され、または終了する毎に行
う方法及び装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention determines an appropriate scheduled work start time for each work in a work for performing a plurality of works by a single means so as not to overlap each work, and The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining the scheduled work start time each time each work is started or finished.

従来の技術 一般に、この種の作業においては、複数の作業を単一の
手段によって重複しないように行う場合は、事前に計画
をたてて、作業時間を調整する必要がある。従来は、こ
の計画をたてるうえで、計画の作成を容易にするため
に、作業時間に余裕を持たせたり、適宜数の作業毎に調
整用の待機時間を設定している。例えば、一般にメッキ
作業においては、20〜30槽に浸漬する作業を経て完成さ
れるが、その作業の順番と浸漬時間はメッキの品種によ
り全て異なり、多種のメッキ物を並行して生産させる場
合、作業時間に余裕を持たせたり、待機時間を設定する
ために、前記槽の中には必ず待機用のバッファ槽を設け
ている。
2. Description of the Related Art Generally, in this type of work, when a plurality of works are performed so as not to overlap by a single means, it is necessary to plan in advance and adjust the work time. Conventionally, in making this plan, in order to facilitate the creation of the plan, a work time is given a margin, or a waiting time for adjustment is set for every appropriate number of works. For example, generally in plating work, it is completed through the work of immersing in 20 to 30 tanks, but the order of the work and the immersion time are all different depending on the type of plating, and when various types of plated products are produced in parallel, A buffer buffer tank is always provided in the tank in order to allow a sufficient working time and set a waiting time.

発明が解決しようとする課題 したがって、従来の作業によると、作業時間の他に無駄
な余裕時間を各作業毎あるいは適宜数の作業毎に設定し
ておく必要があり、また、前記余裕時間は作業前に一旦
設定すると作業が完了するまで不変であるから、作業中
における内的、外的要因による突発的な変動に柔軟に適
応することができず、作業能率が極めて劣るという欠点
がある。また、作業が極めて多数の場合には、上述のご
とき余裕時間を設定することによる調整は作業時間が極
めて長時間化し、実際上不可能となったり、各作業中の
変動により当初の計画とは異なる作業になってしまうと
いう欠点がある。さらに、バッファ槽等の待機用の空間
を確保する必要があるので、装置が大型化し占有面積も
大きくなるという欠点がある。
Therefore, according to the conventional work, in addition to the work time, it is necessary to set a wasteful spare time for each work or for each appropriate number of works. Once set before, it does not change until the work is completed, so it is not possible to flexibly adapt to sudden changes due to internal and external factors during the work, and there is a drawback that the work efficiency is extremely poor. Also, when the number of operations is extremely large, the adjustment by setting the allowance time as described above makes the operation time extremely long, which makes it practically impossible. It has the drawback of being a different task. Furthermore, since it is necessary to secure a standby space such as a buffer tank, there is a drawback that the device becomes large and the occupied area becomes large.

本発明はこれらの欠点を解消した複数作業における適正
な作業時期の決定方法及び装置を提供することを目的と
する。
An object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for determining an appropriate work time in a plurality of works in which these drawbacks are solved.

課題を解決するための手段 まず、各作業毎にあらかじめ定められた作業開始希望時
間に対する許容誤差範囲と、その前後の作業の作業開始
希望時間との相関関係とに基づいて、当該作業の作業開
始時期に関する優先順位を決定し、この優先順位にした
がって各作業が重複しないように作業開始予定時期を決
定する。
Means for Solving the Problem First, the work start of the work is started based on the allowable error range with respect to the predetermined work start time predetermined for each work and the correlation with the work start desired time of the work before and after the work. The priority order regarding the time is determined, and the scheduled work start time is determined so that the respective works do not overlap according to this priority order.

例えば第4図に示すような作業開始希望時期とその許容
誤差範囲とがあらかじめ定められたA〜Dの作業につい
て、第5図(a)に示すように、Y軸に作業A〜Dをと
り、X軸に各作業対象物の作業時間がそれぞれ0.5分の
作業における現時点を基準とした作業開始希望時期をと
って、各作業対象物A〜D毎に、前記作業開始希望時期
(三角形の頂点のX座標値)と前記許容誤差範囲(三角
形の底辺の長さ)とを図示し、X軸上にこの作業での作
業時間を四角形で示すと、作業AとB,及び作業BとDの
作業時間が重複していることがわかる。本発明において
は、第4図に示すように、例えば、前後の相関関係とし
て作業開始希望時期の時差をとるとともに、時差の最小
値と自己の許容誤差範囲とを加えたものを評価値とし、
その小さいものから作業開始時期を割り当てることによ
り、優先順位をB,C,A,Dの順と決定する。これによっ
て、第5図(b)に示すように、前記優先順位にしたが
って作業開始時期を決定することにより、作業開始予定
時期を各作業の許容範囲内で、互いに重複することなく
配列できる。
For example, as shown in FIG. 4, for the works A to D in which the desired work start time and the allowable error range thereof are predetermined, as shown in FIG. 5 (a), the works A to D are assigned to the Y axis. , X-axis is the desired work start time based on the present time in the work time of 0.5 minutes for each work object, and the desired work start time (top of the triangle) is set for each work object A to D. X-axis value) and the allowable error range (length of the base of the triangle) are shown in the figure, and when the work time in this work is shown by a rectangle on the X-axis, work A and B, and work B and D It can be seen that the work time overlaps. In the present invention, as shown in FIG. 4, for example, the time difference of the desired start time of work is taken as the front-rear correlation, and a value obtained by adding the minimum value of the time difference and the own allowable error range is set as the evaluation value.
By assigning the work start time from the smallest one, the priority order is determined as B, C, A, D. Thus, as shown in FIG. 5 (b), by determining the work start timing according to the priority order, the scheduled work start timings can be arranged within the allowable range of each work without overlapping each other.

このような各作業の作業開始予定時期の決定を、各作業
が開始され、または終了する毎に、次の作業の開始、ま
たは終了に先立って事前に行うものである。
The work start scheduled time for each work is determined in advance each time the work is started or completed, prior to the start or end of the next work.

例えば、第6図及び第7図(a)に示すように、上述し
た例の第5図(a)状態から2分経過して、作業Cが終
了し、またその時点で、作業開始希望時期が1分後であ
る新たな作業Eが予定された場合には、上述したと同様
にして各作業A,B,D,Eの作業開始希望時期ついての優先
順位が、新たにB,A,E,Dの順に決定される。これによっ
て、上述したと同様に第7図(b)に示すように、前記
優先順位にしたがって作業開始予定時期を決定すること
により、作業開始予定時期を各作業の許容範囲内で、互
いに重複することなく配列できる。
For example, as shown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 (a), work C is completed after 2 minutes have passed from the state of FIG. If a new work E that is one minute after is scheduled, the priority of each work A, B, D, E for the desired work start time is newly set to B, A, in the same manner as described above. It is decided in the order of E and D. As a result, as described above, as shown in FIG. 7B, by determining the scheduled work start time according to the priority order, the scheduled work start times overlap each other within the allowable range of each work. You can arrange without.

また、このような作業開始予定時期の決定は、ある作業
が開始され、または終了したことを検出する検出部と、
この検出部からの検出信号が入力されると、各作業毎に
あらかじめ定められた各作業における作業開始希望時期
に対する許容誤差範囲と、その前後の作業の作業開始希
望時期との相関関係とに基づいて、当該作業の作業開始
希望時期に関する評価値を演算する演算部と、この演算
部でなされた評価値に基づいて作業の作業開始希望時期
に関する優先順位を決定する優先順位決定部と、この優
先順位決定部で決定された優先順位にしたがって各作業
が重複しないように作業開始予定時期を決定する作業時
期配列決定部と、を備えてなる装置で行うことができ
る。
Further, such a work start scheduled time is determined by a detection unit that detects that a work is started or ended,
When the detection signal from this detection unit is input, it is based on the allowable error range with respect to the desired work start time in each work and the correlation between the desired work start time of the work before and after the work. A calculation unit that calculates an evaluation value regarding the desired start time of the work, a priority determination unit that determines the priority order regarding the desired start time of the work based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation unit, and the priority determination unit. It can be performed by an apparatus provided with a work time arrangement determining unit that determines a scheduled work start time so that the works do not overlap according to the priority determined by the order determining unit.

作用 ある作業が開始され、または終了したことが検出される
と、あらかじめ定められた各作業における作業開始希望
時期に対する許容誤差範囲と、その前後の作業の作業開
始希望時期との相関関係とに基づいて、当該作業の作業
開始希望時期に関する評価値を演算し、この演算結果に
基づいて作業の作業開始時期に関する優先順位を決定
し、この優先順位にしたがって各作業が重複しないよう
に作業開始予定時期を決定するとともに、この作業開始
予定時期の決定は、各作業が開始され、または終了する
毎にこれを更新する。
When it is detected that a work has started or finished, it is based on the correlation between the allowable error range for the desired work start time for each predetermined work and the desired work start time before and after the work. Then, the evaluation value for the desired work start time of the work is calculated, the priority regarding the work start time of the work is determined based on this calculation result, and the scheduled work start time is determined according to this priority order so that each work does not overlap. The work start scheduled time is updated every time each work is started or finished.

実施例 以下、本発明をメッキ処理作業におけるメッキ処理物の
搬送作業適用した場合の好適な実施例について説明す
る。本実施例における作業は、第3図に示すように、一
つの搬送キャリアTがメッキ処理物(図示せず)を浸漬
中の各別の処理槽a,b,c,d・・・から他の処理槽へ搬出
する作業を指すものとする。また、前記搬出キャリアT
がメッキ処理物を搬送する処理槽a,b,c,d・・・は、品
種毎に作業順及び作業時間が決まっている。
Examples Hereinafter, preferred examples in which the present invention is applied to a work for transporting a plated product in a plating process will be described. As shown in FIG. 3, the work in this embodiment is carried out from each of the different processing tanks a, b, c, d ... In which one transport carrier T is immersing a plated product (not shown). It means the work to carry out to the processing tank. In addition, the carry-out carrier T
In the processing tanks a, b, c, d, etc. for transporting the plated products, the work order and work time are determined for each product type.

まず、作業開始時期の決定を行う装置の構成を第1図に
基づいて説明する。
First, the configuration of the device for determining the work start time will be described with reference to FIG.

検出部1は搬送キャリアTがある処理槽a,b,c,d・・・
にメッキ処理物を搬入、あるいは搬出したことを検出す
るもので、検出がなされると検出信号を演算部2へ送
る。演算部2はあらかじめ操作部3から入力し、登録さ
れている各メッキ処理物の処理槽内における浸漬完了希
望時期、すなわち搬送キャリアTによる浸漬中の処理槽
からの搬出作業開始希望時期とその許容誤差範囲に基づ
き評価値を演算するもので、演算結果は優先順位決定部
4へ送られる。優先順位決定部4は前記演算結果に基づ
き各メッキ処理物の搬出作業開始時期に関する優先順位
を決定するもので、その結果は作業配列決定部5へ送ら
れる。作業配列決定部5は前記優先順位に基づいて搬出
作業開始予定時期を決定するもので、この結果は作業時
期監視部6に送られる。作業時期監視部6は各メッキ処
理物ごとに決定された搬送キャリアTの搬出作業開始予
定時期の到来を監視するもので、この到来を検出すると
駆動制御部7に動作指令信号を送る。駆動制御部8は動
作指令信号を受けると、あらかじめ組み込まれたプログ
ラムに従って駆動制御信号を搬送キャリアTの駆動部に
出力するもので、前記駆動制御信号によって、搬送キャ
リアTは目的のメッキ処理物を処理槽、例えば処理槽a
から搬出して別の新たな処理槽例えば処理槽dへ搬入す
るよう移動する。
The detection unit 1 includes processing tanks a, b, c, d ...
It is to detect that the plated object is carried in or out, and when the detection is made, a detection signal is sent to the arithmetic unit 2. The arithmetic unit 2 is input from the operating unit 3 in advance, and the desired completion time of the immersion of each registered plated product in the processing tank, that is, the desired start time of the unloading operation from the processing tank being immersed by the carrier T and its allowance The evaluation value is calculated based on the error range, and the calculation result is sent to the priority order determination unit 4. The priority order determination unit 4 determines the priority order regarding the start time of the work of unloading each plated product based on the calculation result, and the result is sent to the work arrangement determination unit 5. The work arrangement determination unit 5 determines the scheduled start time of the unloading work based on the priority order, and the result is sent to the work time monitoring unit 6. The work time monitoring unit 6 monitors the arrival of the scheduled start time of the work to carry out the carrier T determined for each plated product, and when detecting the arrival, it sends an operation command signal to the drive control unit 7. When the drive control unit 8 receives the operation command signal, it outputs a drive control signal to the drive unit of the carrier T in accordance with a pre-installed program. The drive control signal causes the carrier T to target the object to be plated. Processing tank, for example processing tank a
Then, it is moved to be loaded into another new processing tank, for example, processing tank d.

続いて第2図に示したフローチャートにより、上述した
装置による作業開始時期決定方法を説明する。
Next, the method for determining the work start time by the above-mentioned apparatus will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

所定のイニシャル処理がなされて、搬送キャリアTがメ
ッキ処理物をある処理槽に搬入したことが検出部1によ
って検出されると(ステップ101)、演算部2におい
て、前記搬送キャリアTが搬送すべき各メッキ処理物に
ついてあらかじめ操作部3から入力された処理槽からの
搬出作業開始希望時期とその許容誤差範囲とから評価値
を演算する(ステップ102,第3図参照)。また、前記ス
テップ101で搬送キャリアTによる作業対象物の処理槽
への搬入がない場合には待機状態を継続する。上述の演
算が終了すると、ステップ103に進み、前記演算結果に
基づき優先順位決定部4において、各メッキ処理物の搬
出作業開始時期に関する優先順位を決定する(第4図参
照)。次にステップ104に進んで、決定された優先順位
にしたがって作業配列決定部5において搬出作業開始予
定時期を決定していく。このとき、作業時間が重複する
メッキ処理物どうしについては、優先順の劣るものの搬
出作業開始予定時期をずらせて、その誤差許容範囲内に
おいてできる限り搬出開始希望時期に近く、かつ、なる
べく早い時期に設定し、優先順位が同じであれば両メッ
キ処理物ともに作業時間が重ならない時期までずらす。
このようにして各メッキ処理物の搬出作業開始予定時期
が決定すると、ステップ105に進んで、決定された搬出
作業開始予定時期の到来を作業時期監視部6によって監
視する。そして、前記ステップ105において搬出作業開
始予定時期が到来したと判断されると、ステップ106に
進んで作業時期監視部6から動作指令信号が駆動制御部
7に送られ、この駆動制御部7からの制御信号によっ
て、搬送キャリアTは所定の処理槽に移動して浸漬され
ているメッキ処理物を搬出し、あらかじめ決められてい
る他の処理槽へ搬送する。この搬出作業は検出部1によ
って検出され、上述したのと同様の動作を繰り返すもの
である。
When the detection unit 1 detects that the transport carrier T has carried the plated product into a certain processing tank after a predetermined initial process is performed (step 101), the transport carrier T should be transported in the calculation unit 2. For each plated product, an evaluation value is calculated from the desired start time of the work to be carried out from the processing tank and the permissible error range input from the operation unit 3 in advance (step 102, see FIG. 3). Further, in step 101, when the work carrier does not carry the work object into the processing tank, the standby state is continued. When the above calculation is completed, the process proceeds to step 103, and the priority determining unit 4 determines the priority regarding the unloading start time of each plated product based on the calculation result (see FIG. 4). Next, in step 104, the work arrangement determining unit 5 determines the scheduled start time of the unloading work in accordance with the determined priority. At this time, for plated products that overlap in work time, although the priority order is inferior, the scheduled start time for unloading work is shifted so that it is as close as possible to the desired start time for unloading within the error tolerance range, and as early as possible. If the same priority is set, both plating products are shifted until the work time does not overlap.
When the scheduled unloading operation start time of each plated product is determined in this way, the process proceeds to step 105, and the operation timing monitoring unit 6 monitors the arrival of the determined unloading operation start scheduled time. When it is determined in step 105 that the scheduled start time of unloading work has come, the process proceeds to step 106, in which an operation command signal is sent from the work time monitoring unit 6 to the drive control unit 7, and the drive control unit 7 outputs the operation command signal. In response to the control signal, the carrier T moves to a predetermined processing tank, carries out the immersed plated product, and carries it to another predetermined processing tank. This carry-out work is detected by the detection unit 1, and the same operation as described above is repeated.

なお、上述した実施例はメッキ処理作業における搬送キ
ャリアTの搬出作業について説明したが、本発明におけ
る作業が前記搬出作業に限らないことはもちろんであ
る。
In addition, although the above-mentioned embodiment explained the unloading work of the carrier T in the plating work, it goes without saying that the work in the present invention is not limited to the unloading work.

効果 以上、詳細に説明したところで明らかなように、本発明
によれば、作業開始希望時期に最も近い許容誤差範囲内
において各作業が開始されるので、一連の作業における
作業効率を向上させることができるとともに、無駄な作
業が不要となってそのためのスペースも不要となるの
で、装置の小型化が可能となって占有面積を減少させる
ことができ、さらには、適正作業を行えるので品質が向
上するという効果を奏するものである。
Effects As will be apparent from the detailed description above, according to the present invention, each work is started within the allowable error range that is closest to the desired start time of work. Therefore, work efficiency in a series of works can be improved. In addition, unnecessary work is not required and space for it is not required. Therefore, the size of the device can be reduced, the occupied area can be reduced, and moreover, proper work can be performed to improve quality. That is the effect.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は本発明の一実施例における装置のブロック図、
第2図は同じく決定方法を示すフローチャート、第3図
は搬送キャリアが作業を行うメッキ処理槽を示す概略
図、第4図は評価値の演算法とその結果に基づく優先順
の決定を示す表、第5図(a),(b)は作業開始希望
時期と優先順位に基づく作業時間の配置状態を示すグラ
フ、第6図は評価値の演算法とその結果に基づく優先順
の決定を示す表、第7図(a),(b)は作業開始希望
時期と優先順位に基づく作業時間の配置状態を示すグラ
フである。 1……検出部、2……演算部、4……優先順位決定部、
5……作業配列決定部、6……作業時期監視部、T……
搬送キャリア
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention,
FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the same determination method, FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a plating treatment tank in which the carrier carries out work, and FIG. 4 is a table showing the calculation method of evaluation values and the determination of priority order based on the results. 5 (a) and 5 (b) are graphs showing the arrangement state of the work time based on the desired work start time and the priority order, and FIG. 6 shows the calculation method of the evaluation value and the determination of the priority order based on the result. Tables (a) and (b) of FIG. 7 are graphs showing the arrangement state of the work time based on the desired work start time and the priority order. 1 ... Detection unit, 2 ... Calculation unit, 4 ... Priority determination unit,
5 ... Work sequence determination unit, 6 ... Work time monitoring unit, T ...
Carrier

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】単一の手段によって複数の作業を重複しな
いように行う作業において、各作業毎にあらかじめ定め
られた作業開始希望時期に対する許容誤差範囲と、その
前後の作業の作業開始希望時期との時差の最小値とを加
えてなる評価値に基づいて、評価値が小さい作業の順位
が優先するように、当該作業の作業開始希望時期に関す
る優先順位を決定し、この優先順位にしたがって各作業
が重複しないように各作業の作業開始予定時期を決定す
るとともに、この各作業の作業開始予定時期の決定を、
各作業が開始され、または終了する毎に、次の作業の開
始に先立って事前に行うことを特徴とする複数作業にお
ける適性作業時期決定方法。
1. A work for performing a plurality of works by a single means so as not to overlap with each other, an allowable error range with respect to a predetermined work start desired time for each work, and a work start desired time before and after the work. Based on the evaluation value obtained by adding the minimum value of the time difference, the priority order for the work start desired time of the work is determined so that the priority of the work with the smaller evaluation value has priority, and each work is performed according to this priority order. The work start scheduled time of each work is determined so that there is no overlap, and the work start scheduled time of each work is determined.
A method for determining an appropriate work time in a plurality of works, which is performed each time each work is started or finished before the start of the next work.
【請求項2】単一の手段によって複数の作業を重複しな
いように行う作業において各作業の適性作業時期を決定
する装置であって、ある作業が開始され、または終了し
たことを検出する検出部と、この検出部からの検出信号
が入力されると、各作業毎にあらかじめ定められた作業
開始希望時期に対する許容誤差範囲と、その前後の作業
の作業開始希望時期との時差の最小値とを加えて、当該
作業の作業開始希望時期に関する評価値を演算する演算
部と、この演算部でなされた評価値に基づいて、評価値
が小さい作業の順位が優先するように、作業の作業開始
希望時期に関する優先順位を決定する優先順位決定部
と、この優先順位決定部で決定された優先順位に基づい
て各作業が重複しないように各作業の作業開始予定時期
を決定する作業配列決定部と、を備えてなることを特徴
とする複数作業における適性作業時期決定装置。
2. A device for determining an appropriate work time of each work in a work in which a plurality of works are performed by a single means so as not to overlap with each other, and a detection unit for detecting the start or end of a work. When a detection signal from this detection unit is input, a permissible error range with respect to a predetermined work start desired time for each work and a minimum value of the time difference between the work start desired time of the work before and after the work In addition, based on the evaluation value calculated by this operation unit and the operation unit that calculates the evaluation value related to the desired start time of the work, the operation start request of the operation is requested so that the order of the work with the lowest evaluation value has priority. A priority order determination unit that determines the priority order regarding the timing, and a work sequence that determines the scheduled work start time of each work based on the priority order determined by this priority order determination unit so that each work does not overlap. Suitability working time determination device in a plurality work characterized by comprising comprises a tough, the.
JP18995388A 1988-07-29 1988-07-29 Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works Expired - Fee Related JPH074744B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP18995388A JPH074744B2 (en) 1988-07-29 1988-07-29 Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP18995388A JPH074744B2 (en) 1988-07-29 1988-07-29 Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0241857A JPH0241857A (en) 1990-02-13
JPH074744B2 true JPH074744B2 (en) 1995-01-25

Family

ID=16249960

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP18995388A Expired - Fee Related JPH074744B2 (en) 1988-07-29 1988-07-29 Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH074744B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2523964B2 (en) * 1990-08-22 1996-08-14 松下電器産業株式会社 Schedule making device
JP2590581Y2 (en) * 1992-05-11 1999-02-17 株式会社ミツバ Wiper drive
US6112393A (en) * 1998-10-02 2000-09-05 General Electric Company Process for the assembly of engines

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6228159A (en) * 1985-07-30 1987-02-06 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Physical distribution control device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0241857A (en) 1990-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH074744B2 (en) Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works
JPH06132696A (en) Substrate carrier
JP2002526850A (en) Method for controlling a continuous machining unit
JP2521939B2 (en) Processing equipment
JPH09205295A (en) Substrate carrying method and device
JP3246360B2 (en) Automatic processing device and automatic processing method
JPS60207749A (en) Supply-order determining apparatus
JPH06291006A (en) Production of semiconductor wafer
JPH074669Y2 (en) Interrupt request processing circuit
JPH06309421A (en) Picture processor
JPS5973287A (en) Automatic production facility device
JPS5848300B2 (en) Workpiece conveyance device
EP0422246A1 (en) Programmable controller
JPH01216755A (en) Device for controlling production line
JPH08309646A (en) Method and device for production control
JPH04362741A (en) Interruption control method
JPH09192713A (en) Process simulator
JPH04312131A (en) Job executing control system
JP2001100802A (en) Acceleration/deceleration controller
JPH0793017A (en) Controller for numerically controlled machine tool group
JPH058156A (en) Control of work schedule to multiple works on pallet in machining center
JPS6148108B2 (en)
JPH05204668A (en) Operating system for computer
JPH02190241A (en) Process installation with scheduling function
JPS63111538A (en) Control system for program translation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees