JPH0629422B2 - Material for consolidation - Google Patents

Material for consolidation

Info

Publication number
JPH0629422B2
JPH0629422B2 JP63011504A JP1150488A JPH0629422B2 JP H0629422 B2 JPH0629422 B2 JP H0629422B2 JP 63011504 A JP63011504 A JP 63011504A JP 1150488 A JP1150488 A JP 1150488A JP H0629422 B2 JPH0629422 B2 JP H0629422B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
water glass
molar ratio
sio
long
lime
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP63011504A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH01188581A (en
Inventor
健二 栢原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kyokado Engineering Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Kyokado Engineering Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kyokado Engineering Co Ltd filed Critical Kyokado Engineering Co Ltd
Priority to JP63011504A priority Critical patent/JPH0629422B2/en
Publication of JPH01188581A publication Critical patent/JPH01188581A/en
Publication of JPH0629422B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0629422B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B28/00Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements
    • C04B28/24Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing alkyl, ammonium or metal silicates; containing silica sols
    • C04B28/26Silicates of the alkali metals

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)
  • Silicon Compounds (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Alkaline-Earth Elements, Aluminum Or Rare-Earth Metals (AREA)
  • Soil Conditioners And Soil-Stabilizing Materials (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は水ガラスと石灰を含有し、主として地盤注入用
薬材として利用される固結用材料に係り、特に長いゲル
化時間でも高強度を得、しかも長期固結強度に優れた固
結用材料に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Industrial field of application] The present invention relates to a consolidating material containing water glass and lime, which is mainly used as a ground injection chemical, and has a high strength even at a long gelation time. And a solidifying material excellent in long-term solidifying strength.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

地盤注入用薬材として、従来、水ガラスにセメントのよ
うな懸濁性反応剤を加えてなる水ガラスグラウト(懸濁
型グラウト)、あるいは水ガラスに有機系反応剤や、無
機の塩のような溶液性反応剤を加えてなる水ガラスグラ
ウトが知られている。
Conventionally, as a ground injection drug, water glass grout (suspension type grout), which is a mixture of water glass and a suspending reaction agent such as cement, or water glass, such as an organic reaction agent or an inorganic salt, is used. A water glass grout to which a solution-type reactive agent is added is known.

このうち、溶液性反応剤を用いた水ガラスグラウトは懸
濁性反応剤を用いたものよりも浸透性に優れているとい
う利点を有するが、強度が低く、特にゲル化時間を長く
調整する場合には反応剤を少なくすることになり、した
がって水ガラス中に未反応のSiO分が多く残存し、
このため強度が一層低くなり、かつ長期固結用強度も得
られないという問題があった。
Among them, water-glass grout using a solution-type reactive agent has an advantage that it has better permeability than that using a suspension-type reactive agent, but has low strength, especially when adjusting the gelation time for a long time. In this case, the amount of the reaction agent is reduced, so that a large amount of unreacted SiO 2 remains in the water glass,
For this reason, there is a problem that the strength is further lowered and the long-term consolidation strength cannot be obtained.

さらに、セメントを用いる懸濁型グラウトもまた、ゲル
化時間を長く調整した場合には前述の同様の問題が生じ
た。
Further, the suspension type grout using cement also has the same problem as described above when the gelation time is adjusted to be long.

そこで、ゲル化時間を長く調整する水ガラスグラウトと
して、低モル比の水ガラスを用いるセメント水ガラスグ
ラウトが提案されている。(特公昭51−8486号公
報)。しかし、この場合でも、ゲル化時間はせいぜい数
分から10分程度しか長くならず、これでは水ガラスと反
応剤をミキサー中で充分に撹拌混合してから注入すると
いう事はできず、両者を注入管で合流してそのまま注入
するという手段をとらざるを得なかった。したがって、
このような合流注入では、充分は浸透効果が得られない
のみならず、注入材の混合が不充分であって反応が不完
全となり、このため地盤中の固結物は長期間安定したも
のとはならなかった。
Therefore, a cement water glass grout using water glass with a low molar ratio has been proposed as a water glass grout for adjusting the gelation time to be long. (Japanese Patent Publication No. 51-8486). However, even in this case, the gelation time is increased from a few minutes to about 10 minutes at most, which makes it impossible to stir and mix the water glass and the reactant in the mixer, and then to pour both. I had no choice but to take the means of joining them with a tube and injecting them as they were. Therefore,
In such a combined injection, not only the infiltration effect is not sufficiently obtained, but also the mixing of the injection material is insufficient and the reaction becomes incomplete, so that the solidified matter in the ground is stable for a long period of time. It didn't happen.

また、地盤中にあらかじめ反応剤を注入しておき、その
後この注入個所に低モル比の水ガラスを注入する工法も
提案されているが、この工法では地盤中において両液を
一定の比率で反応させることが事実上不可能であり、こ
のため充分な固結効果あるいは長期固結効果を期待する
ことは困難である。
A method has also been proposed in which the reactant is injected into the ground in advance, and then water glass with a low molar ratio is injected into this injection point.However, in this method, both liquids are reacted at a constant ratio in the ground. It is practically impossible to do so, and thus it is difficult to expect a sufficient consolidation effect or a long-term consolidation effect.

また、ゲル化時間を長く設定するために、まず水ガラス
と少量のセメントを混合し、この上ずみ液を地盤中に注
入する工法、あるいはカルシウム化合物を水と混合して
静置し、その上ずみ液を低モル比の水ガラスと混合して
極めて少量の水溶性カルシウム化合物を含む水ガラスグ
ラウトを地盤中に注入する工法が知られている。
In addition, in order to set a long gelling time, first mix water glass and a small amount of cement, and then pour the above-prepared liquid into the ground, or mix the calcium compound with water and let it stand still. A method is known in which the slurries are mixed with water glass having a low molar ratio and water glass grout containing an extremely small amount of a water-soluble calcium compound is injected into the ground.

しかし、これらの工法に用いられるグラウトは10ミクロ
ン程度のカルシウム化合物の微粒子を含むものの、実質
的には溶液型水ガラスグラウトと同じであり、水ガラス
中に含まれるSiO分に対するカルシウム分が極めて
少なく、このため未反応のSiOが多く残存し、固結
強度が低くなるとともに耐久性にも劣るものである。
However, although the grouts used in these construction methods contain fine particles of calcium compounds of about 10 microns, they are substantially the same as solution-type water glass grouts, and the calcium content relative to the SiO 2 content in the water glass is extremely high. Therefore, a large amount of unreacted SiO 2 remains, resulting in low consolidation strength and poor durability.

〔発明が解決しようとする問題点〕[Problems to be solved by the invention]

上述の従来工法における水ガラスグラウトは水ガラス中
のSiOに対する反応剤の量を少なくしてゲル化時間
を長くするものであり、このため固結強度が小さくな
り、かつ耐久性も劣下することになり、反応剤の量を多
くするとゲル化時間が短くなってしまい、ミキサー中で
の充分な混合ができなくなり、したがって、注入管ロッ
ドで合流するか、あらかじめ水ガラスか反応剤を地盤中
に注入しておいてから、他方をその後に注入して地盤中
で反応させることになり、このため反応が不充分となっ
て固結強度あるいは耐久性が得られなかった。
The water glass grout in the above-mentioned conventional method reduces the amount of the reaction agent with respect to SiO 2 in the water glass and prolongs the gelation time. Therefore, the consolidation strength is reduced and the durability is also deteriorated. Therefore, if the amount of the reactant is increased, the gelation time will be shortened, and it will not be possible to perform sufficient mixing in the mixer. Therefore, the injection pipe rod may be used to join the water glass or the reactant in advance in the ground. After injecting into the soil, the other was injected later to react in the ground, and the reaction was insufficient, and the consolidation strength or durability could not be obtained.

そこで、本発明の目的は水ガラス中のSiO分を反応
せしめるに充分な量の反応剤を用いるにもかかわらず、
水ガラスと反応剤をミキサー中で混合してゆっくりと地
盤中に注入するに充分な長いゲル化時間を保持に得、す
なわち、長いゲル化時間で高固結強度を得、かつ浸透性
ならびに長期間耐久性を保持し、前述の公知技術に存す
る欠点を改良した固結用材料を提供することにある。
Therefore, although the object of the present invention is to use a sufficient amount of the reactant for reacting the SiO 2 content in the water glass,
A long gelling time, which is long enough to mix water glass and a reactant in a mixer and slowly inject it into the ground, is obtained, that is, high gelling strength is obtained with a long gelling time, and permeability and long It is an object of the present invention to provide a consolidation material which retains durability for a certain period of time and has improved the above-mentioned drawbacks existing in the known art.

〔問題点を解決するための手段〕[Means for solving problems]

前述の目的を達成するため、本発明によれば、水ガラス
と、石灰とを含み、以下の要件を満たしてなることを特
徴とする。
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention is characterized by containing water glass and lime, and satisfying the following requirements.

(1)SiO/NaOがモル比で1.5〜2.2の範囲内で
あること。
(1) SiO 2 / Na 2 O is in a molar ratio range of 1.5 to 2.2.

(2)CaO/SiOがモル比で0.2〜2.0の範囲内であ
ること。
(2) The CaO / SiO 2 molar ratio is within the range of 0.2 to 2.0.

(3)SiOの含有量が前記材料100cc当り0.07モル以上
であること。
(3) The content of SiO 2 is 0.07 mol or more per 100 cc of the material.

(4)石灰の含有量が前記材料100cc当り1g以上であるこ
と。
(4) The content of lime must be 1 g or more per 100 cc of the material.

前述の本発明において、水ガラスはモル比が1.5〜2.2の
液状あるいは粉状水ガラス、あるいは液状水ガラスに苛
性ソーダ、炭酸ソーダ等のアルカリを添加して上記モル
比に調整された水ガラス等である。モル比が1.5よりも
低くなるにつれて、水ガラスのシリカ分が反応剤と反応
しないまま析出されやすくなり、安定したグラウトを得
にくくなるのみならず、強度も低下し、カルシウム分を
増やしても固結しにくくなる。また、モル比が2.2より
も高くなるにつれ、長期固結強度が低下し、耐久性が得
られにくくなり、かつ少量のカルシウム分の存在により
ゲル化が速くなり、SiO分との反応に充分な量のカ
ルシウム分を混入できなくなる。
In the present invention described above, the water glass is a liquid or powdery water glass having a molar ratio of 1.5 to 2.2, or a water glass adjusted to the above molar ratio by adding an alkali such as caustic soda or sodium carbonate to the liquid water glass. is there. As the molar ratio becomes lower than 1.5, the silica content of water glass tends to be precipitated without reacting with the reaction agent, not only it becomes difficult to obtain stable grout, but also the strength is lowered and even if the calcium content is increased, it becomes solid. It becomes hard to tie. Also, as the molar ratio becomes higher than 2.2, long-term consolidation strength decreases, durability becomes difficult to obtain, and the presence of a small amount of calcium content accelerates gelation and is sufficient for reaction with SiO 2 content. It becomes impossible to mix in a large amount of calcium.

また、前記石灰は生石灰、消石灰あるいはドロマイト等
の塩基性炭酸カルシウム(CaCO・Ca(O
H))あるいは石灰石から導かれ、Ca(OH)
有効成分とするものである。
Further, the lime is basic calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 .Ca (O) such as quick lime, slaked lime or dolomite.
It is derived from H) 2 ) or limestone and has Ca (OH) 2 as an active ingredient.

以下、本発明を次の実験例によって詳述する。Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail by the following experimental examples.

〔実験−1〕 3号水ガラス(モル比2.94、SiO:28.29%、Na
O:9.94%、比重1.4)と消石灰系のゲル化時間を測
定し、結果を表−1に示す。
Experiment -1] 3 water glass (molar ratio 2.94, SiO 2: 28.29%, Na
2 O: 9.94%, specific gravity 1.4) and slaked lime gelation time were measured, and the results are shown in Table 1.

表−1より、3号水ガラスではCa(OH)のいずれ
の量でもゲル化時間が短いことがわかる。また、強度も
小さく、例えば試料No.3の場合、固結標準砂は30日後
で1.5kg/cm2、1ケ月水中養生後で0.8kg/cm2程度であ
る。
From Table-1, it can be seen that in No. 3 water glass, the gelation time is short with any amount of Ca (OH) 2 . Further, the strength is also small, for example, in the case of Sample No. 3, the consolidated standard sand is about 1.5 kg / cm 2 after 30 days and about 0.8 kg / cm 2 after 1 month of underwater curing.

〔実験−2〕 水ガラス水溶液−セメント系の実験結果を表−2に示
す。
[Experiment-2] Table-2 shows the experimental results of the water glass aqueous solution-cement system.

水ガラス水溶液は実験−1の水ガラスに苛性ソーダを加
えてモル比を調整した。混合液(A液とB液)100cc当
り、SiO含有量は0.165モルである。
The water glass aqueous solution was prepared by adding caustic soda to the water glass of Experiment-1 to adjust the molar ratio. The SiO 2 content was 0.165 mol per 100 cc of the mixed liquid (liquid A and liquid B).

表−2よりモル比が低くなれば、水ガラス−セメント系
はゲル化時間が長くなるが、固結性が極めて悪く、ゲル
化が不安定になる事が判る。
From Table 2, it can be seen that when the molar ratio is low, the gelation time of the water glass-cement system is long, but the consolidation property is extremely poor and the gelation becomes unstable.

〔実験−3〕 モル比2.0あるいは1.0の水ガラス水溶液−セメントある
いは消石灰の上ずみ液系の実験結果を表−3に示す。
[Experiment-3] Table 3 shows the experimental results of the water-glass aqueous solution-cement or slaked lime supernatant liquid system having a molar ratio of 2.0 or 1.0.

なお、水ガラス水溶液は実験−1の水ガラスをA液50cc
当り25cc用い、苛性ソーダを加えてモル比を調整した。
また、セメントあるいは消石灰の上ずみ液を水100ccに
セメントあるいは消石灰をそれぞれ20gづつ混合し、1
時間静止してのち、上ずみ液を50ccとり、B液とした。
In addition, the water glass aqueous solution is the water glass of Experiment-1
25 cc was used per unit, and caustic soda was added to adjust the molar ratio.
In addition, mix the cement or slaked lime supernatant with 100 cc of water and mix 20 g each of the cement or slaked lime.
After standing still for 50 hours, 50 cc of the above-prepared liquid was taken as the liquid B.

表−3における固結標準砂の一軸圧縮強度(kg/cm2
は3日後で、それぞれ、試料No.順に、0.8、0.7、−、
0.5、1カ月後で0.5、0.4、−、0.3を示し、注入目的の
ための強度としては弱すぎることがわかった。
Uniaxial compressive strength (kg / cm 2 ) of consolidated standard sand in Table 3
3 days later, in the order of sample No. 0.8, 0.7,-,
After 0.5 and 1 month, it showed 0.5, 0.4,-, and 0.3, which was found to be too weak for the purpose of injection.

〔実験−4〕 実験−1の3号水ガラスを混合液100cc当り25cc(0.165
モル)配合し、これに苛性ソーダを加えてモル比を調整
した。また、消石灰の添加量を混合液100cc当り0.5g
(0.007モル)〜25g(0.338モル)の範囲で変化させ、
これらについてそれぞれゲル化時間を測定し、結果を表
−4に示した。
[Experiment-4] No. 3 water glass of Experiment-1 was added to 25cc (0.165
Mol), and caustic soda was added thereto to adjust the molar ratio. Also, the amount of slaked lime added is 0.5 g per 100 cc of the mixed solution.
(0.007 mol) to 25 g (0.338 mol) in the range,
The gelation time was measured for each of these and the results are shown in Table 4.

表−4より、混合液100cc当り、Ca(OH)が1g
以上で、かつSiO/NaO(モル比)が2.2〜1.
5、CaO/SiO(モル比)が0.2〜2.0ではゲル化
時間が10秒〜数分はもちろんのこと、数十分〜数100分
の長いゲル化領域が存在することがわかる。
From Table-4, Ca (OH) 2 is 1g per 100cc of the mixed solution.
Or more, and SiO 2 / Na 2 O (mole ratio) 2.2 to 1.
5. When CaO / SiO 2 (molar ratio) is 0.2 to 2.0, it can be seen that there is a gelation time of 10 seconds to several minutes and a long gelation region of several tens of minutes to several hundred minutes.

なお、SiO/NaO(モル比)が1.5以下であっ
ても長いゲル化領域が存在するが、あまりに低モル比と
することは経済的にも、地下水のアルカリ化の理由から
も好ましくなく、また固結性も低下する。
It should be noted that even if the SiO 2 / Na 2 O (molar ratio) is 1.5 or less, there is a long gelation region, but it is preferable to set the molar ratio too low for both economical reasons and the reason for alkalizing groundwater. In addition, the caking property is also reduced.

〔実験−5〕 SiO/NaO(モル比)が2.0、CaO/SiO
(モル比)が1.0の条件下で、混合液100cc当りのSi
の含有量を変化させ、ゲル化実験を行った。また、
SiO/NaO(モル比)1.5に定め、CaO/S
iO(モル比)と混合液100cc当りのSiOの含有
量を変化させ、ゲル化実験を行った。これらの結果を表
−5、表−6および表−7に示す。また、SiO/N
O、CaO/SiOを変化さて長期強度試験を行
い、測定結果を表−8に示す。
Experiment -5] SiO 2 / Na 2 O (mole ratio) is 2.0, CaO / SiO
2 (molar ratio) of 1.0, Si per 100 cc of liquid mixture
The gelation experiment was conducted by changing the content of O 2 . Also,
Set to SiO 2 / Na 2 O (molar ratio) 1.5, CaO / S
Gelation experiments were conducted by changing the contents of SiO 2 (molar ratio) and SiO 2 per 100 cc of the mixed solution. The results are shown in Table-5, Table-6 and Table-7. In addition, SiO 2 / N
A long-term strength test was conducted by changing a 2 O and CaO / SiO 2 , and the measurement results are shown in Table-8.

上述の測定結果から、SiOの含有量が大きい程また
CaO/SiO(モル比)が大きい程、ゲル化時間が
短いことがわかる。特に、SiO/NaO(モル
比)が2.0から1.5において、CaO/SiOの比率が
1前後の充分大きな値にもかかわらず、充分に長いゲル
化時間の領域があることがわかる。すなわち、水ガラス
中のSiOと充分に反応し得る量のCa(OH)
用いて、充分長いゲル化時間が得られるので、大きな固
結強度を得るとともに、耐久性に優れた長期固結強度を
得ることができる。
From the above measurement results, it can be seen that the gelation time is shorter as the content of SiO 2 is larger and the CaO / SiO 2 (molar ratio) is larger. In particular, it can be seen that when the SiO 2 / Na 2 O (molar ratio) is 2.0 to 1.5, there is a region of sufficiently long gelation time despite the CaO / SiO 2 ratio being a sufficiently large value of around 1. That is, a sufficiently long gelling time can be obtained by using Ca (OH) 2 in an amount sufficient to react with SiO 2 in water glass, so that a large consolidation strength is obtained and a long-term solidification excellent in durability is obtained. The binding strength can be obtained.

また、表−5、表−7および表−8より、水ガラスモル
比が低くなると、長期強度が大きくなることがわかる。
さらに、3号水ガラス(モル比2.94)とモル比が2.0の
水ガラスの場合を比較すると、3号水ガラスでは長期強
度が低下するのに対し、モル比2.0の水ガラスでは長期
強度が増加することがわかる。さらにまた、長期強度は
モル比が1.5〜2.2で最も高いこともわかる。
Further, from Table-5, Table-7 and Table-8, it can be seen that the lower the water glass molar ratio, the higher the long-term strength.
Furthermore, comparing No. 3 water glass (molar ratio 2.94) with water glass with a molar ratio of 2.0, long-term strength decreases with No. 3 water glass, whereas long-term strength increases with water ratio of 2.0. I understand that Furthermore, it can be seen that the long-term strength is highest at a molar ratio of 1.5 to 2.2.

なお、本発明は、実験−2における消石灰の上ずみ液を
用いたものと比較すると、大きな強度を得るものである
が、これは消石灰を用いることに依存する。たとえば、
消石灰は比表面積が、ほぼ10,000cm2/gの粉体であ
り、これを充分な量前記水ガラスに懸濁させると、粉状
カルシウム化合物のまわりにSiOが吸着して反応
し、ゲルの内部に強固な構造を形成しながら土粒子間を
填充する。また、消石灰は長期間にわたって水ガラス中
のSiOにCaイオンを供給して珪酸カルシウムを形
成しつづけるため、上ずみ液の場合に比べて強度が大き
く、かつ長期強度に優れた効果を発揮する。
It should be noted that the present invention obtains a greater strength as compared with the one using the slaked lime precipitating liquid in Experiment-2, but this depends on the use of slaked lime. For example,
Slaked lime is a powder having a specific surface area of about 10,000 cm 2 / g, and when this is suspended in a sufficient amount in the water glass, SiO 2 is adsorbed and reacted around the powdery calcium compound to form a gel. Fill the space between soil particles while forming a strong structure inside. Further, since slaked lime continues to form calcium silicate by supplying Ca ions to SiO 2 in water glass for a long period of time, the slaked lime is stronger than the case of the above-prepared liquid and exhibits an excellent long-term strength effect. .

また、水ガラスのモル比に関しては、モル比が2.2にな
ると、これ以上の場合に比べて長期強度が優れるように
なり、さらにモル比が2.0以下になると、消石灰を当量
付近加えても、数十分〜数時間というきわめて長いゲル
化時間を得る特異な領域が出現する。
Regarding the molar ratio of water glass, when the molar ratio becomes 2.2, the long-term strength becomes superior as compared with the case above this, and when the molar ratio becomes 2.0 or less, even if slaked lime is added near the equivalent, A unique region appears that gives an extremely long gelation time of ten to several hours.

〔実験−6〕 水ガラスと、消石灰と、他の反応剤との混合系につい
て、ゲル化時間を測定し、結果を表−9に示した。表−
9において、混合液100cc当りのSiO含有量は0.198
モルである。
[Experiment-6] The gelation time was measured for a mixed system of water glass, slaked lime, and another reactant, and the results are shown in Table-9. Table-
9, the SiO 2 content per 100 cc of the mixed solution was 0.198
It is a mole.

表−9より、CaClのような水溶性カルシウム化合
物は瞬結となってしまい、水ガラスのモル比のいかんに
かかわらず、ゲル化時間を長くし得ず、また、CaCO
は水ガラスのモル比が1付近の高アルカリでなくては
水ガラスと反応し得ず、これに対して消石灰は1.5〜2.2
のモル比の水ガラスとも反応して、注入に最も適したゲ
ル化時間を得ることができ、さらに、消石灰の他のカル
シウム化合物とを併用することにより、モル比が1.5〜
2.2の広範囲の水ガラス領域で充分長いゲル化時間のグ
ラウトを得ることがわかる。
From Table-9, a water-soluble calcium compound such as CaCl 2 is instantly set, the gelation time cannot be lengthened regardless of the molar ratio of water glass, and CaCO
3 cannot react with water glass unless the water glass has a high alkali ratio of about 1, whereas slaked lime is 1.5 to 2.2.
It can also react with water glass with a molar ratio of, to obtain the gelling time most suitable for injection, and by using it in combination with other calcium compounds of slaked lime, the molar ratio is 1.5 to
It can be seen that a grout having a sufficiently long gelation time is obtained in a wide range of water glass of 2.2.

これは消石灰が単に難溶性であることのみならず、溶解
度が最適であることに起因するものと思われる。すなわ
ち、Ca(OH)の溶解度は0.117g/100gであり、C
aCO(溶解度0.0065g/100g)や珪酸カルシウム等
にくらべて比較的大きいものであり、このように、あま
り溶解度が小さすぎても反応性が少なくなり、本発明の
カルシウム化合物として好ましくなくなるものと思われ
る。
This is probably because slaked lime is not only sparingly soluble but also has an optimum solubility. That is, the solubility of Ca (OH) 2 is 0.117 g / 100 g, and C
aCO 3 (solubility 0.0065 g / 100 g) and calcium silicate are relatively large, and thus, even if the solubility is too low, the reactivity becomes low, which is not preferable as the calcium compound of the present invention. Seem.

したがって、消石灰はCaCOよりも少ない水ガラス
のアルカリ量で注入に適したゲル化時間を得ることがで
き、経済的にも、また地盤中のアルカリ度を大きくしな
い点からも極めて優れているものと云うことができる。
Therefore, slaked lime can obtain a gelling time suitable for injection with an alkali amount of water glass smaller than CaCO 3, and is extremely excellent from the economical point of view and also from the point of not increasing the alkalinity in the ground. Can be said.

なお、本発明では、石灰と他の水溶性反応剤を併用して
もかまわない。
In the present invention, lime may be used in combination with other water-soluble reaction agents.

また、本発明は施工に際して、ミキサー中で混合して得
られるが、必要に応じてA液として水ガラス、B液とし
て石灰配合液を用意し、これらA、B液を合流して地盤
中に注入してもよく、また、A液として水ガラスと石灰
の混合液をつくり、これを送液しながら他の反応剤ある
いは任意のモル比の水ガラス(本発明に用いられる水ガ
ラスよりもモル比の高い水ガラスを加えればゲル化時間
は早くなる)を合流して地盤中に注入することもでき
る。
Further, the present invention is obtained by mixing in a mixer at the time of construction, but if necessary, prepare water glass as solution A and a lime compound solution as solution B, and join these solutions A and B into the ground. Alternatively, a mixed solution of water glass and lime may be prepared as solution A, and while feeding this solution, another reactant or water glass having an arbitrary molar ratio (more than the water glass used in the present invention, The gelation time can be shortened by adding water glass with a high ratio), and the resulting mixture can be injected into the ground.

〔作用〕[Action]

本発明は水ガラスに石灰を懸濁状態で存在させて一時に
反応が進行しないようにし、かつ混合液中のSiO
量、石灰量、SiOとNaOのモル比、SiO
とCaOのモル比を前述のような特定の範囲に定めるこ
とにより、従来の低モル比水ガラス−セメントグラウト
では考えられないような長いゲル化時間、高固結強度な
らびに長期耐久性を得る。
In the present invention, lime is allowed to exist in water glass in a suspended state to prevent the reaction from proceeding at a time, and the SiO in the mixed solution is prevented.
2 amount, lime amount, molar ratio of SiO 2 and Na 2 O, SiO 2
By setting the molar ratio of CaO to CaO within the above-mentioned specific range, a long gelling time, high consolidation strength and long-term durability which cannot be considered in the conventional low molar ratio water glass-cement grout can be obtained.

〔発明の効果〕〔The invention's effect〕

以上のとおり、本発明にかかる固結用材料はゲル化時間
を長くしても固結強度を得るとともに長期耐久性にも優
れ、地盤固結用の注入薬液として最適な固結用材料であ
る。
As described above, the caking material according to the present invention is a caking material most suitable as an injectable liquid for ground caking, as it obtains caking strength even if the gelation time is lengthened and has excellent long-term durability. .

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】水ガラスと、石灰とを含み、以下の要件
(1)〜(4)を具備してなる固結用材料。 (1)SiO/NaOがモル比で1.5〜2.2の範囲内で
あること。 (2)CaO/SiOがモル比で0.2〜2.0の範囲内であ
ること。 (3)SiOの含有量が前記材料100cc〜当り0.07モル以
上であること。 (4)石灰の含有量が前記材料100cc当り1g以上であるこ
と。
1. The following requirements including water glass and lime:
A consolidating material comprising (1) to (4). (1) SiO 2 / Na 2 O is in a molar ratio range of 1.5 to 2.2. (2) The CaO / SiO 2 molar ratio is within the range of 0.2 to 2.0. (3) The content of SiO 2 is 0.07 mol or more per 100 cc of the material. (4) The content of lime must be 1 g or more per 100 cc of the material.
【請求項2】請求項第1項に記載の固結用材料におい
て、前記石灰が生石灰または消石灰である固結用材料。
2. The caking material according to claim 1, wherein the lime is quicklime or slaked lime.
JP63011504A 1988-01-21 1988-01-21 Material for consolidation Expired - Fee Related JPH0629422B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63011504A JPH0629422B2 (en) 1988-01-21 1988-01-21 Material for consolidation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63011504A JPH0629422B2 (en) 1988-01-21 1988-01-21 Material for consolidation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01188581A JPH01188581A (en) 1989-07-27
JPH0629422B2 true JPH0629422B2 (en) 1994-04-20

Family

ID=11779851

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP63011504A Expired - Fee Related JPH0629422B2 (en) 1988-01-21 1988-01-21 Material for consolidation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0629422B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07116437B2 (en) * 1988-01-27 1995-12-13 強化土エンジニヤリング株式会社 Material for consolidation
JP5717945B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2015-05-13 電気化学工業株式会社 Injection material, injection material and injection method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5996185A (en) * 1982-11-22 1984-06-02 Kyokado Eng Co Ltd Pouring of grout into ground
JP2705468B2 (en) * 1992-07-13 1998-01-28 日本電気株式会社 Hybrid integrated circuit device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH01188581A (en) 1989-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3545322B2 (en) Ground consolidation method
JP7244971B1 (en) Ground consolidation material and ground grouting method using it
JPH0629422B2 (en) Material for consolidation
JPH0721138B2 (en) Injectable composition for ground consolidation
JPH0580426B2 (en)
JPH07116437B2 (en) Material for consolidation
JPH0598257A (en) Chemical for grouting soil
JPH10324872A (en) Grout for ground and grout injection method
JP3205900B2 (en) Grout material for ground injection
JPS5993787A (en) Solidification of ground
JPH0561219B2 (en)
JP2001098271A (en) Ground solidification material
JPH0563427B2 (en)
JP2808252B2 (en) Ground consolidated material
JPH05140558A (en) Grout for porous substance such as microsand
JPH0753960A (en) Liquid inorganic filler for solidifying or sealing soil
JPH0672222B2 (en) Ground injection material
JPH11181425A (en) Ground-grouting material
JPH05280032A (en) Civil-engineering material
JP3403303B2 (en) Ground injection method
JP2860716B2 (en) Grout injection
JPH08269449A (en) Grout for the ground and method for grouting the ground
JPS58115057A (en) Hydraulic composition
JP2547120B2 (en) Ground injection method
JPS6260436B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees