JPH06274507A - Data correction verifying system - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To provide a data correction verifying system capable of reducing burdens at the time of an operation and improving recorrection operation efficiency at the time of recorrecting data. CONSTITUTION:One of plural correction means M1 corrects the data and also a correction accompanying information input means M5 inputs information accompanying the correction of the data. A verifying means M2 verifies the data corrected by the correction means M1 and a recorrection necessity judging means M3 judges whether or not the verified data require recorrection. When the recorrection necessity judging means M3 judges the necessity of the correction, based on the information accompanying the correction inputted by the correction accompanying information input means M5, a recorrection destination deciding means M6 decides one specific correction means M1 from the plural correction means M1. A recorrection data transmission means M4 transmits the data for which the necessity of the correction is judged by the recorrection necessity judging means M3 to the correction means M1 decided by the recorrection destination deciding means M6.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a data correction verification method for correcting predetermined data such as transaction data generated in a financial institution's exchange business and verifying whether the corrected data is correct, In particular, it relates to a data correction verification method when an error is found during verification and correction is required again.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, for example, a financial institution such as a bank has a currency exchange business as one of transaction business, and the following system has been constructed to perform this business. That is, a predetermined staff member writes a serial number or the like on the money order transfer request form entered by the customer, causes the facsimile machine (hereinafter referred to as “FAX”) installed in the sales office to read the information, and transmits it to the district center. In the district center, the FAX transmission / reception control device installed in the district center receives the image data of the money transfer request form transmitted from the FAX of the sales office. Next, after the character recognition device performs character recognition based on the above-mentioned image data and corrects the recognition result by the workstation or the like and verifies the recognition result including the corrected data,
Generate a message for exchange and send it to the host computer. Such a system (hereinafter, referred to as “FAX-OCR system”) can be easily processed because it is sufficient for the sales office to directly read and send the exchange transfer request form to the FAX.

By the way, as described above, in the district center, the character recognition result or the like of the image data of the money transfer request form is corrected or verified by the workstation or the like. There may be a case where an error is found or the data to be corrected is not corrected, that is, the data needs to be corrected again due to missing of the correction. In this case, in order to make the correction again, it is necessary to return the data requiring the re-correction to the correction workstation or the like and have the corrector make the correction again.

[0004]

In the above case,
Consider which workstation should be used to send the data requiring re-correction when there are a plurality of workstations for correction.

For example, at the time of the initial correction, the corrector: (1) When the image data displayed on the workstation is difficult to see, it is confirmed by telephone contact with the clerk of the sales office that has sent the money transfer request form. (2) When the client's name or the recipient's name, whose kanji is complicated or difficult to read, is corrected by kana input. In some cases, the correction may have been made due to complicated circumstances. If you modify such data again,
There is a concern that the re-editor will be as troublesome as the re-editor.

[0006] Further, when re-correcting, it is not clear just by looking at the data why the re-correction is necessary or how it should be re-corrected.
It may take a considerable amount of time for examination, or in some cases, it may be necessary to search for a verifier and confirm it.

The present invention was created in consideration of the above-mentioned circumstances, and provides a data correction verification method capable of reducing the burden of operation and improving the efficiency of recorrection work when recorrecting data. The purpose is to do.

[0008]

[Means for Solving the Problems] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention is as follows. That is, in a data correction verification method for correcting predetermined data and verifying whether the corrected data is correct, a plurality of correction means for correcting the data and information incidental to the correction of the data are input. Correction accompanying information input means, verification means for verifying the data corrected by the correction means, re-correction necessity determination means for determining whether or not the data verified by the verification means needs to be corrected, When it is determined by the re-correction necessity determination means that the correction is necessary, based on the information incidental to the correction input by the correction incidental information input means, a specific one of the plurality of correction means is selected. It is determined that the re-correction destination determining means for determining the correcting means and the re-correction necessity determining means need to correct the correction means determined by the re-correcting destination determining means. And a re-correction data sending means for sending the corrected data, and the verification means includes verification accompanying information input means for inputting information accompanying the verification, and the modifying means comprises: When the re-correction data sending means sends the data, the verification accompanying information output means is provided for outputting the information accompanying the verification input by the verification accompanying information input means.

[0009]

According to the present invention, in a data correction verification method for correcting predetermined data and verifying whether the corrected data is correct or not, while some correction means corrects the data, The correction incidental information input means inputs information incidental to the correction of the data. Next, the verification means verifies the data corrected by the correction means. Regarding the data verified by the verification means by the recorrection necessity determination means,
When it is determined whether or not the correction is necessary, and it is determined that the correction is necessary by the re-correction necessity determination means, based on the information accompanying the correction input by the correction accompanying information input means,
The re-correction destination determination means determines one specific correction means from the plurality of correction means described above. Subsequently, the re-correction data sending means sends the data judged by the re-correction necessity judging means to be corrected to the correction means decided by the re-correction destination deciding means. After that, the correction means re-corrects the data sent by the re-correction data sending means.

Further, the verification associated information input means provided in the verification means inputs the information associated with the verification. When data is sent by the re-correction data sending means, the verification accompanying information output means provided in the correcting means outputs the information accompanying the verification input by the verification accompanying information input means.

[0011]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings. 1 is a conceptual diagram of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a configuration example of a system to which the present invention is applied, FIG. 3 is a hardware configuration diagram of a FAX transmission / reception control device and a main control unit, and FIG. 4 is a hardware configuration diagram of a workstation. , FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the correction process, FIG. 6 is a flowchart of the verification process,
7 is a flowchart of data transmission processing, FIG. 8 is a flowchart of data reception processing, FIG. 9 is a screen display example before correction, FIG. 10 is a screen display example after correction, FIG. 11 is a screen display example before verification, and FIG. Shows a screen display example after verification, and FIG. 13 shows a screen display example before re-correction.

In the present embodiment, the present invention will be described as being applied to a FAX-OCR system used for currency transfer business processing, but it goes without saying that the application of the present invention is limited to currency transfer business processing and FAX-OCR systems. is not.

FIG. 2 shows an example of the configuration of a system to which the present invention is applied. 1 is a terminal control unit 705 in a main control unit 7 described later.
A workstation 2 which is connected via the above and which corrects and verifies the recognition result of the received data, and an automatic transaction device 2 for allowing the customer to operate the transaction by himself / herself by using a transfer card, for example. Reference numeral 3 is a counter device installed in a bank's business office or the like for a dedicated operator such as a bank clerk to carry out transactions such as exchange transfer processing, and 4 is various terminal devices such as an automatic transaction device 2 and a counter device 3. Terminal control device for controlling (hereinafter referred to as "TC"), 5 is a FAX installed in a business office such as a bank, 6 is a FAX 5 of each business office installed in a district center for centrally managing a plurality of business offices FAX transmission / reception control device for controlling the reception operation of the device, processing of received data, and transmission of the data to the FAX 5 of each sales office.
01, a memory 702, a communication control unit 707, a recognition device control unit 708, a terminal control unit 705 and the like, a main control unit 8 communicates with the main control unit 7 and the like via TC4 to perform various transaction operations including exchange operations. It is a host computer a (hereinafter referred to as “HOSTa”) that centralizes data processing, and is installed in an office center or the like belonging to the same bank or the like as each business office. Reference numeral 9 denotes a host computer b (hereinafter referred to as “HOSTb”) owned by another financial institution or the like different from the bank or the like holding the HOSTa 8. 10 is a FAX 5 of each branch, a FAX transmission / reception control device 6, TC 4 and HOST
a8, HOSTa8 and HOSTb9 are communication lines for connecting.

An outline of the operation of the system having the above configuration will be described. First, the sales office receives the money order transfer request form (not shown) filled in by the customer, and after the predetermined business processing such as the sales clerk filling in the transaction serial number on the money order transfer request form, the FAX5 executes the money order transfer request form. Scan and send to district center.

The FAX transmission / reception control device 6 of the district center confirms that the sender FAX 5 has been registered, and receives the image data of the money transfer request form. Next, the received image data is converted by the image conversion unit 607 into image data in a format that can be easily handled by the FAX transmission / reception control device 6 and the main control unit 7, and the disk device (hereinafter
After being stored in the “DK” 606, it is transferred to the main control unit 7 via the communication control unit 603. Based on the transferred image data, the recognition device 709 detects the recognition device control unit 70.
Along with 8, the image data corresponding to the recognition target area of the money transfer request form is cut out, and the characters are recognized and coded.
The processor 701 of the main control unit 7 performs knowledge processing for improving recognition accuracy based on the coded data, and stores the result in the DK 704 together with the image data.
That is, the exchange transfer data is stored in the DK 704 each time the exchange transfer data is received from the FAX 5 of each business store. Therefore, generally, a plurality of currency transfer data are accumulated in the DK 704.

Next, the outline of the procedure for transmitting the currency transfer data accumulated in the DK 704 to the HOSTa 8 will be described below. That is, the operator who is the confirmer (also as the corrector if necessary) is the keyboard 107 of the workstation 1.
In order to confirm the exchange transfer data to be transmitted to the HOSTa 8 and to make corrections as necessary, the exchange transfer data request information is input. The main control unit 7 takes out the currency transfer data stored in the DK 704 or the memory 702 based on the above-mentioned input request information, and transmits this money transfer data to the workstation 1. The workstation 1 receives the money transfer data and displays it on the display unit 108.
The operator of the workstation 1 confirms whether the money transfer data is correct and, if necessary, inputs a correction and a comment regarding the correction, and then corrects the main control unit 7 (if necessary, corrects it). (Including data before modification). At the same time, the identification information of the corrector (hereinafter,
The “ID”) and the WS number, which is an identification number preset in the workstation 1, are also notified. Upon receiving this notification, the main control unit 7 stores the corrected data (including the comment, the corrector ID, and the WS number) in the DK 704 or the memory 702. In general, the operator, who is the confirmer and the corrector, repeats the above operations to obtain the corrected exchange transfer data for a plurality of transactions using DK7.
04 or the memory 702.

Next, the operator who is the verifier (this operator is generally considered to be different from the above-mentioned corrector, but may also be the operator) verifies the currency transfer data to be transmitted to the HOSTa 8 and In order to perform transmission, the above-mentioned DK704
Alternatively, in order to request the confirmed and corrected exchange transfer data stored in the memory 702, the exchange transfer data request information is input from the input unit of the workstation 1. The main control unit 7 uses the DK 704 or the memory 7 based on the request information input by the verifier.
The confirmed money transfer data stored in 02 (including the above-mentioned comment, corrector ID and WS number) is taken out, and this money transfer data is transmitted to the workstation 1. Since the workstation 1 receives the money transfer data and displays it on the display unit 108, the operator who is the verifier of the workstation 1 verifies whether the money transfer data is correct. As a result, if the verifier determines that it is correct, the verifier instructs the main control unit 7 to transmit to the HOSTa 8. In response to this instruction, the main control unit 7 receives from the workstation 1 the currency transfer data and the verifier ID verified as correct by the verifier, performs the necessary processing, and then adds the transaction serial number to the currency transfer data. In addition, if necessary, each ID of the confirmer, the corrector, the verifier and other necessary information are added to assemble a message for exchange and HOS is sent via TC4.
Send to Ta8. As described above, in the FAX-OCR system, the currency transfer data is transmitted to HOSTa8, and if it is addressed to another bank, it is further transmitted to HOSTb9 to perform the currency transfer process.

When the verifier does not judge that the correctness is given, when the verifier gives an instruction to that effect, the main control section 7 causes the operator, who is the corrector, to make a confirmation and correction again. The exchange transfer data (including the comment at the time of correction, the corrector ID and WS number, the comment at the time of verification, the verifier ID and WS number) DK70
4 or the memory 702 to that effect, and at a later time (for example, by detecting that the timer 706 has reached a predetermined time), the workstation 1 is made to perform the correction again by the corrector. Take action such as displaying warning messages and outputting warning sounds and buzzer sounds.

When the corrector determines that there is foreign exchange transfer data to be corrected again, the corrector uses the keyboard 107 as in the case of requesting unconfirmed or uncorrected foreign exchange transfer data.
Enter the information requesting money transfer data. Subsequent processing is the same as the above-described correction processing, and when the above-mentioned request information is input from the workstation 1, the main control unit 7 causes the D
The exchange transfer data that needs to be corrected again, which is stored in the K704 or the memory 702, is taken out, and it is determined based on the corrector ID, WS number, etc. at the time of the correction that is stored together with this exchange transfer data. Processing such as transmission to the workstation 1 is performed. Performing the verification again after the modification is similar to the above-described verification processing.

The process in the case where the above verifier determines that it needs to be corrected again at the time of verification will be described in some detail.

The verifier inputs, from the keyboard 107, a comment indicating, for example, the location of an error or suggestion of how to make a correction, and presses a predetermined key to instruct the correction.
As a result, the main control unit 7 causes the comment and verifier ID described above.
Further, if necessary, the currency transfer data that has been recorrected is received from the workstation 1 and stored in the DK 704 or the memory 702. When the currency transfer data is requested from the correction workstation 1, the recorrection target currency transaction data stored in the DK 704 or the memory 702 is taken out and transmitted to the requesting workstation 1. The method of making a request from the requesting workstation 1 in this case is as follows. That is, there are a method of requesting the data by the corrector by inputting the information clearly indicated as the exchange transaction data to be re-corrected, and a method of inputting only the information requesting the data without making the explicit. The latter is adopted in the present embodiment, and the main control unit 7 determines whether the data to be re-corrected or the new data is transmitted.
, But of course the former may be adopted. When the requesting workstation 1 receives the exchange transaction data that needs re-correction, the comment and the verifier ID transmitted together with the exchange transaction data are edited into a screen in a predetermined format as shown in FIG. 13, for example. Then, it is displayed on the display unit 108. The corrector who operates the request source workstation 1 sees the displayed exchange transaction data and re-corrects the exchange transaction data with reference to the comment from the verifier displayed together. The method of re-correction is the same as the case of the correction already described. When the re-correction is completed, the re-corrected exchange transfer data (including the corrector's comment etc.) is transmitted to the main control unit 7 as in the case of the correction, and the DK 704 and the like are re-verified by the verifier. Memories are made. The stored recorrected currency transfer data is transmitted to the verification workstation 1 for reverification. When an error is further found as a result of the reverification, the same process as the above-mentioned recorrection is performed. The above-mentioned processing is repeated until it is determined to be correct by the verification, and when it is determined to be correct, the foreign exchange message is assembled and transmitted to the HOSTa 8 as described above.

Next, details of the above-mentioned processing will be described with reference to FIGS.
A description will be given centering on the flowchart shown in FIG.

First, the correction process of FIG. 5 will be described.

This process is a correction process when the above-mentioned corrector operates the workstation 1, and is mainly controlled by the processor 101.

When the corrector inputs the corrector ID by, for example, reading the ID card from the magnetic card reading section provided on the keyboard 107 of the workstation 1, the processor 101 reads the corrector ID and the memory 1
02 (step S101). Next, the corrector inputs the money transfer data request information from the keyboard 107, and the processor 101 sends the request information to the step S1.
The corrector ID stored in 01 and the WS number preset in the workstation 1 are sent to the main control unit 7 (step S102). Although the details will be described later, the main control unit 7 transmits the currency transfer data to the workstation 1 based on the transmitted request information and the like, so the workstation 1 receives the transmitted currency transfer data. (Step S103), for example, as shown in FIG. 9, the WS number preset in the own workstation 1 and the corrector ID stored in the memory 102 are edited and displayed in a predetermined format as necessary. It is displayed on the unit 108 (step S104). If the rectifier sees the displayed currency transfer data and determines that there is data that needs to be rectified as a result, rectification is performed (step S
105), if necessary, a comment regarding correction such as which data has been corrected is also input (step S106). Explaining with the example of FIGS. 9 and 10, the corrector has determined that the “bank name” is not correct (image data cannot be recognized) on the screen before the correction, and therefore, “the bank name” cannot be recognized based on the displayed image data. "Bank name" is corrected to correct data (that is, "Nihon"), and "completion of bank name" is input to the input field of the article as a comment.
When the completion of the correction is instructed by the corrector by pressing a predetermined key of the keyboard 107, the processor 101 recognizes that the correction is completed, and the corrected portion of the input field or the like to be corrected is corrected by the corrected data ( If necessary, it is sent together with the data before correction) to the main control unit 7 together with the comment input in step S106 (step S).
107). The correction data and the like transmitted from the workstation 1 are prepared in the main control unit 7 in preparation for the verification process which is the subsequent process.
Are stored in the DK704 or the like.

Although the case of correction has been described above, the case of re-correction, that is, in the step S207 shown in FIG. 6 as will be described later, when the verifier has found an error and instructed that correction is required again. Also performs the same processing. In this case, the exchange transfer data to be corrected is the result of verification, and the exchange transfer data transmitted to the workstation 1 is determined to require correction in step S205 shown in FIG. It should be noted that, together with the above-mentioned currency transfer data, the comment entered by the verifier, the verifier ID, and the workstation 1 on which the verification process has been performed.
WS number is also transmitted. An example of the screen displayed in step S104 is shown in FIG. 13, and "WS4" and "ID5" displayed in the upper left of the screen are the workstation 1 operated by the verifier for the currency transfer data. "WS number" and "verifier ID", and "WS1" and "ID2" displayed in the upper right of the screen are the "WS number" of workstation 1 operated by the corrector who corrects the currency transfer data. And "corrector ID". Further, in the case of displaying, when the verifier has clearly indicated the part to be corrected, the display of the part may be displayed in blinking, color change, or other display mode that is easier for the corrector to discriminate than the other parts.

Next, the verification process of FIG. 6 will be described.

This processing is performed by the verifier on the workstation 1
This is a verification process in the case of operating the, and is mainly controlled by the processor 101.

When the verifier inputs the verifier ID by reading the ID card from the magnetic card reading unit provided on the keyboard 107 of the workstation 1, the processor 101 reads the verifier ID and the memory 1
02 (step S201). Next, when the verifier inputs the money transfer data request information from the keyboard 107, the processor 101 sends the request information to the step S2.
The verifier ID stored in 01 and the WS number preset in the own workstation 1 are transmitted to the main control unit 7 (step S202). Although the details will be described later, the main control unit 7 transmits to the workstation 1 the exchange transfer data (including the comment and the modifier ID) confirmed or modified by the modifier based on the transmitted request information and the like. Therefore, the workstation 1 receives the transmitted money transfer data (step S20).
3) For example, as shown in FIG. 11, it is edited in a predetermined format and displayed on the display unit 108 (step S204). In addition,
"WS4" displayed in the upper left of the screen in FIG.
"WS1" and "ID5" are the "WS number" and "verifier ID" of the workstation 1 operated by the verifier for the exchange transfer data, and "WS1" displayed on the upper right of the screen.
And "ID2" are the "WS" of the workstation 1 that was operated by the corrector who made the correction on the currency transfer data.
It means "number" and "corrector ID". Further, at the time of display, the display of the corrected portion may be displayed in blinking, color change, or another display mode that is easier for the verifier to distinguish from other portions. The verifier sees the displayed money transfer data, and as a result, determines again whether there is data that needs to be corrected (step S205). When the verifier determines that the correction is required, a comment regarding the verification result such as where to correct or information indicating a correction required portion is input from the keyboard 107 as necessary (step S206), and is provided on the keyboard 107. When a predetermined key for instructing re-correction is pressed, the processor 101 recognizes that verification has been completed (however, re-correction is required), and information indicating that re-correction is required (data to be verified, if necessary). Together with the comment input in step S206 together with the comment (step S207). Explaining with the example of FIG. 11 and FIG. 12, the verifier says that the “bank name” is “Nihon” on the screen before verification, but when judging based on the displayed image data, “Nihon” is incorrect. And since I recognized that the correct data is "Nippon",
As a comment, enter the data indicating that the bank name should be corrected correctly in the entry field of the article. Based on the information transmitted from the workstation 1, the main control unit 7 performs a predetermined process to be described later so that the exchange transfer data which is the verification target is corrected again. If the verifier determines in step S205 that the data does not need to be corrected, that is, the data is correct, the processor 101 presses a predetermined key that indicates that the data is correct and that normal processing should be performed. It recognizes that the verification is completed, and transmits information indicating that the verification is normal (together with the verification target data, if necessary) to the main control unit 7 (step S208). Based on the information transmitted from the workstation 1, the main control unit 7 performs processing after completion of normal verification, which will be described later, on the exchange transfer data that has been verified. The same processing as above is performed on the re-corrected currency transfer data.

Next, the data transmission process shown in FIG. 7 will be described.

This processing is mainly controlled by the main controller 7.

The main control unit 7 receives the exchange transfer data received from the FAX 5 via the FAX transmission / reception control device 6 in the order of reception.
It is stored in K704. Also, as will be described later, the exchange transfer data corrected by the data reception process and the exchange transfer data that needs to be re-corrected as a result of the verification are also included in the D
It is stored in K704 (step S301). The exchange transfer data is received and stored in the DK 704 in parallel with the processes of steps S302 to S312 below.

The corrector and verifier are workstation 1
Keyboard transfer data request information (WS
(Including the number and the operator's ID), the workstation 1 sends the information to the main controller 7,
The main control unit 7 receives this information and recognizes that a request for money transfer data has been issued (step S302). Although the request information is input from the workstation 1 in this embodiment as a trigger for taking out the money transfer data, the present invention is not limited to this, and for example, the timer 706.
May be processed assuming that the above-mentioned request information is input at regular time intervals, or the request information is input from the workstation 1 which is not processing as long as the exchange transfer data is accumulated in the DK 704. It may be processed as being processed. Based on the WS number included in the above-mentioned input request information, the main control unit 7 refers to the workstation attribute information stored in advance in association with the WS number, and it is verified that the request information is transmitted. It is determined whether the work station 1 is a work station 1 or a work station 1 (step S303). If it is determined that the data is for correction, the verifier confirms that the data needs to be re-corrected, and the exchange transfer data is DK70.
It is determined whether or not even one is stored in 4 (step S304). If it has been accumulated, it is determined whether or not the exchange transfer data in which the previously corrected corrector ID and the requested corrector ID are present in the DK 704 (step S305). If it exists, it is highly likely that this correction will be made more quickly and easily than if it was done by another corrector because the same corrector has made it before. S
Move to 308. If it does not exist, it is then determined whether or not there is exchange transfer data in which the WS number previously corrected and the WS number requested this time match in the DK 704 (step S306). If so, step S30
Go to 8. If it does not exist, it is determined whether or not at least one foreign exchange transfer data that has not been corrected by the corrector is accumulated in the DK 704 (step S307). If so, the process moves to step S308. If it is not stored, there is no data to be transmitted to the requesting workstation 1, so information indicating that there is no data is set (step S312) and transmitted to the requesting workstation 1 (step S310). Step S
In 308, in accordance with the correction, re-correction, or verification, the currency transfer data accumulated in the DK 704 confirmed to exist in steps S305, S306, and S311 is used as a target in accordance with a predetermined order such as old order. One (step S308),
Information indicating that there is data is added to the data (step S309) and transmitted to the requesting workstation 1 (step S310). The order of taking out the money transfer data and the method of taking out the money transfer data are not limited to those described above. For example, new currency transfer data to be corrected may be prioritized over data requiring re-correction, or regardless of correction or re-correction, the data is unconditionally taken out in the order of accumulation and the workstation 1
It may be determined that the data is to be transmitted, and if it is determined that the data should be transmitted (for example, the data requiring re-correction with the same corrector ID is extracted), the data may be transmitted. In the case of re-correction, the corrector ID may be excluded from the determination target and only the matching of the WS numbers may be set as the extraction condition. In this case, if it is the same workstation 1, there is a high possibility that the corrector who has made the previous correction will be the corrector of this time, and therefore the re-correction is performed more efficiently than when the other workstation 1 is used. Since the possibility increases, it is effective when a system that does not use the modifier ID is constructed.
Conversely, the WS number may be excluded from the determination targets, and only the matching of the corrector IDs may be the extraction condition. Further, the extraction condition is not limited to the matching of the modifier ID or the WS number, and the workstation 1 to be transmitted is determined based on the information at the time of modification, for example, the comment or the modified part input by the modifier. You may. In these cases, for example, if a specific workstation 1 is specified by a comment, or conversely, the specific workstation 1 or the modifier is not specified, it is indicated explicitly or implicitly. Alternatively, the main controller 7 may be provided with information in which the correction location is associated with the re-corrector ID or the workstation 1 in advance, and the information may be followed.

When it is determined in step S303 that the workstation 1 is for verification, it is determined whether or not at least one foreign exchange transaction data to be verified is stored in the DK 704 (step S310). If so, step S3 to retrieve one currency transfer data
Move to 08. If not stored, there is no data to be sent to the requesting workstation 1, so information indicating that there is no data is set (step S31).
2) Send to the requesting workstation 1 (step S310).

Next, the data receiving process shown in FIG. 8 will be described.

This processing is performed by the main control unit 7, receives the transaction data processing result in the workstation 1 shown in FIG. 7, and performs a predetermined processing based on this processing result.

The main control unit 7 receives the currency transfer data (including the comment, the WS number and the operator's ID) which is the processing result transmitted by the workstation 1 in the correction processing and the verification processing (step S401). Next, based on the received processing such as WS, it is determined whether the currency transfer data is transmitted by the correction workstation 1 or the verification workstation 1 (step S402). Workstation for modification 1
If it is determined that the received money transfer data has been corrected by the corrector, the DK70
Processing such as storing in step 4 (step S40)
4). If it is determined that the workstation 1 is for verification, it is determined again whether or not the money transfer data should be corrected by the corrector (step S403). If it is determined that recorrection is required, processing such as accumulating the corrected exchange transfer data including the comment, WS number, and corrector ID in the DK 704 is performed so as to be transmitted to the correction workstation 1 again. (Step S404). If it is judged that re-correction is not required, this means that it is the correct exchange transfer data.
It transmits to HOSTa8 via TC4 (step S40).
6).

[0038]

As described above in detail, according to the present invention, the following effects can be expected. That is, according to the present invention,
When the correction means corrects the data and the correction accompanying information input means inputs the information accompanying the correction of the data, the verification means verifies the correction data. The re-correction necessity determination means determines whether or not the verified data needs to be corrected again. When it is determined that the correction is necessary, the re-correction destination determination means determines one specific correction means from the plurality of correction means based on the information accompanying the correction. The re-correction data sending means sends the correction-needed data to the determined correction means. Since this is done, the data determined to require re-correction will be corrected by the correction means determined based on the information accompanying the correction input at the time of correction. That is, the corrector ID at the time of correction, W
Re-correction will be performed by the workstation operated by the rectifier having the same ID based on the S number, the comment, etc., the workstation used at the time of rectification, and the like. Therefore, the possibility of re-correction by the corrector at the time of correction is increased, and by reflecting information such as the person and condition involved in correction at the time of correction, the burden of re-correction operation can be reduced. The correction work efficiency can be improved.

Further, the verification means comprises verification accompanying information input means for inputting information accompanying the verification, and the correction means is
When the data is re-corrected, it is equipped with a verification incidental information output unit that outputs the information accompanying the above-mentioned verification, so the re-correction work can be performed more easily because the re-correction can be done by referring to the information at the time of verification. Moreover, since the work time can be shortened, the efficiency of the re-correction work is further improved.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a configuration example of a system to which the present invention is applied.

FIG. 3 is a hardware configuration diagram of a FAX transmission / reception control device and a main control unit.

FIG. 4 is a hardware configuration diagram of a workstation.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a correction process.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of verification processing.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a data transmission process.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a data reception process.

FIG. 9 is a screen display example before correction.

FIG. 10 is an example of a screen display after correction.

FIG. 11 is a screen display example before verification.

FIG. 12 is an example of a screen display after verification.

FIG. 13 is a screen display example before re-correction.

[Brief description of reference numerals] 1 workstation 5 facsimile device (FAX) 6 FAX transmission / reception control device 7 main control unit 101, 601, 701 processor 102, 602, 702 memory 106, 606, 704 disk device (DK) 107 keyboard 108 Display unit M1 correction means M2 verification means M3 recorrection necessity determination means M4 recorrection data transmission means M5 correction accompanying information input means M6 recorrection destination determination means

Claims (2)

[Claims] 1. A data correction verification method for correcting predetermined data and verifying whether or not the corrected data is correct, and a plurality of correction means for correcting the data, and information accompanying the correction of the data. Correction accompanying information input means for inputting, correction means for verifying the data corrected by the correction means, and recorrection necessity determination means for determining whether or not the data verified by the verification means needs correction And when it is determined by the re-correction necessity determining unit that the correction is necessary, based on the information associated with the correction input by the correction-accompanying information input unit, a specific one of the plurality of correcting units is specified. Re-correction destination determining means for determining one of the correction means, and the correction means determined by the re-correction destination determining means needs to be corrected by the re-correction necessity determining means. And a re-correction data sending means for sending the data determined to be the data correction verification method. 2. The verification means includes verification accompanying information input means for inputting information accompanying verification, and the correction means, when data is sent by the recorrection data sending means, the verification accompanying information. 2. The data correction verification system according to claim 1, further comprising verification associated information output means for outputting information associated with the verification input by the input means.