JPH0253303B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0253303B2
JPH0253303B2 JP22370786A JP22370786A JPH0253303B2 JP H0253303 B2 JPH0253303 B2 JP H0253303B2 JP 22370786 A JP22370786 A JP 22370786A JP 22370786 A JP22370786 A JP 22370786A JP H0253303 B2 JPH0253303 B2 JP H0253303B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
thickness
score
steel
aluminum
eoe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP22370786A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS6382945A (en
Inventor
Keiichi Shimizu
Junichi Tanabe
Tsuneo Inui
Yoshikazu Kondo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyo Kohan Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Toyo Kohan Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyo Kohan Co Ltd filed Critical Toyo Kohan Co Ltd
Priority to JP22370786A priority Critical patent/JPS6382945A/en
Publication of JPS6382945A publication Critical patent/JPS6382945A/en
Publication of JPH0253303B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0253303B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Rigid Containers With Two Or More Constituent Elements (AREA)
  • Containers Opened By Tearing Frangible Portions (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

(産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、ぶりき、電解クロム酸処理鋼板に代
表される表面処理鋼板を缶胴とする、食缶、飲料
缶等の容器に用いるイージーオープンエンド(以
下EOEと称する)用複合金属体に関する。 (従来の技術) 最近、各種食品容器等には適宜な形状の切り込
み(スコア)を刻印し、取つ手(タブ)を取りつ
けた蓋、すなわちEOEが簡便に開口できるとい
うことから広く利用されている。そしてその材料
としては、アルミニウムおよびスチールが用いら
れている。アルミニウム製EOE、スチール製
EOEとも一長一短を有し、その長所、短所を考
慮して実用に供されている。アルミニウム製
EOEの場合は、開缶しやすい、すなわち小さな
力で開缶しうるということ、また蓋外面の耐錆性
が優れているといつた長所を有する反面、塩素イ
オンを含む内容物に対しては孔食を起こしやすい
ということ、また缶胴がスチール製の場合は、蓋
と缶胴が異種金属であるということにより電池を
形成し腐食が急速に進行するといつた短所(バイ
メタル腐食)を併せ持つている。一方スチール製
EOEの場合は、塩素イオンを含む内容物に対し
ての耐食性は優れるものの、またスチール製缶胴
との電池の形成を生じないものの、開缶性が少し
劣る、すなわち開缶に大きな力を要するというこ
と、そして蓋外面、主として巻締部に錆を生じ易
いといつた短所を有している。なお、スチール製
EOEの内容物に対する耐食性は、スコア加工等
のEOE加工後、蓋内面に補正塗装を施してはじ
めて優れたものとなり、またアルミニウム製
EOEの、塩素イオンを含む内容物に対する腐食、
電池の形成による腐食(バイメタル腐食)の問題
は、補正塗装を施しても塗膜欠陥が皆無とならな
いため、改善はされるものの依然重大な問題とし
て残つている。EOEに加工後、蓋内面に施す補
正塗装は、蓋の製造コストの大幅増をもたらして
おり、安価にEOEを製造するという観点から、
補正塗装の省略が強く望まれている。 補正塗装の省略という点から、特開昭58−
220729に開示の製造方法によるポリエステル樹脂
フイルム被覆アルミニウム板および鋼板をEOE
に適用することを検討されているが、依然、スコ
ア加工時の有機皮膜の疵つき(損傷)は解決され
ていない。 (発明が解決しようとする問題点) 現在、実用に供されているEOE用材料におい
て、耐外面錆性、バイメタル腐食の回避、塩素イ
オンを含む内容物中での耐食性、開缶性および内
面補正塗装の省略というEOEに要求されるこれ
ら特性すべてを同時に満足するものはなく、これ
ら同時に満足する材料は、優れたEOE用材料と
なりうるものである。 (問題点を解決するための手段) EOEに必要な耐外面錆性、バイメタル腐食の
回避、塩素イオンを含む内容物中での耐食性、開
缶性および経済的メリツトの大きな内面補正塗装
の省略、これら5点を同時に満足するEOE材料
を得ることを目的として、スチールの改質、アル
ミニウムの改質、表面処理の検討、その他多くの
研究を実施したが、厚みが30〜180μmの鋼板の
片面に、50〜250μmのアルミ板を接合し、蓋の
内面側となるもう一方の面に、JIS C2318による
伸び、及び(伸び(%)/100+1)×破断強度が
各々10〜1000%、20〜80Kg/mm2で、かつ厚みが5
〜100μmの有機皮膜を被覆した複合金属体が、
目的に適うことを見い出した。本発明複合金属体
を詳細に説明するに先立ちその理解をより明確な
ものとするため第1図に本発明複合金属体にスコ
ア加工した1態様を示す。第1図中1で示す有機
皮膜は、二軸延伸ポリエチレンテレフタレートフ
イルム(厚み30μm)、第1図中2は、鋼板(厚
み75μm)、第1図中3はアルミニウム板(厚み
155μm)である。次に前記のごとく、複合金属
体の構成を限定する理由について説明する。まず
鋼板の蓋の内面側に配置し、アルミニウム板を蓋
の外面側に配置する理由について説明する。鋼板
を内面側に配置することにより大きくは2つの目
的を達成することができる。1点は、缶胴とのバ
イメタル腐食の回避であり、もう1点は、塩素イ
オンを含む内容物中での孔食の防止である。また
アルミニウム板を外面側に配置することにより3
つの目的を達成することができる。1点は外面錆
防止であり、1点は蓋の最内面の有機皮膜の疵つ
き防止、すなわち蓋の内面補正塗装の省略であ
り、もう1点は開缶性の改善(開缶力の低減)で
ある。まず内面補正塗装の省略が可能となる理由
ついて第2図により説明する。スコアは、蓋の外
面側から加工(刻印)されるが、その時、蓋の内
面側の有機皮膜にはスコア加工のプレス圧が作用
し、かつ塑性歪も生じる。すなわち、スコアの刃
4とアンビル5にはさまれた有機皮膜1には、第
2図において矢印6で示すような圧縮の力が作用
する。このプレス圧は、スコア加工されている材
料の変形強度に比例し、変形強度が小さいアルミ
ニウムが加工される時は、プレス圧は小さいが、
アルミニウムに比べ変形強度の大きな鋼が加工さ
れる時は、プレス圧は大きくなる。また変形強度
の小さなアルミニウムが加工されている時、その
内面側に接合された変形強度の大きな鋼板2の塑
性歪は小さく、そしてその結果鋼板に被覆された
有機皮膜の塑性歪も小さなものとなる。以上のよ
うに、スコア加工される部分の主体を変形強度の
小さいアルミニウム板3とし、残余の部分を鋼板
2とすることにより、蓋の最内面の有機皮膜1の
うける塑性歪は小さく、またプレス圧も軽減され
る。なおこのように塑性歪が小さくなり、プレス
圧が軽減されても、従来用いられている内面塗膜
(エポキシ・フエノール樹脂系)では、伸びおよ
び破断強度を破断時の断面積で除した真の破断強
度すなわち(伸び(%)/100+1)×破断強度が
不充分でありスコア加工時塗膜は損傷する。それ
ゆえ各々が10%以上、20Kg/mm2以上の有機皮膜を
配置する必要がある。なお伸びが大きすぎると開
缶時の有機皮膜の破断状態が外観上好ましくなく
その上限を1000%とした。また(伸び(%)/
100+1)×破断強度が大きすぎると開缶力を高め
るため、その上限を80Kg/mm2とした。この内面補
正塗装の省略は、アルミニウムを外面に配置した
ことによる効果もさることながら、単ににそれだ
けによるものではなく鋼板との組み合せ効果、お
よび有機皮膜の特性を限定することによつてはじ
めて果しうるものである。なお、有機皮膜が耐食
性、酸素透過性、透湿性等の点から2種以上の積
層体である場合は、積層体の特性が前記特性範囲
を満足することにより本願の目的に適合する。次
にアルミニウム板を外面側に配置することにより
開缶性が改善されるがその理由、すなわちより小
さな力で開缶できる理由について説明する。第1
図に従い説明する。第1図は、スコア加工がより
深くまで進み、スコア残厚7が鋼板2の厚み以下
になつた状態を示すが、この場合、スコア残部8
には、アルミニウムが、厚みにしてスコア残厚7
の約1/2程度残存している。このように破断強度
の小さいアルミニウムがスコア残部8に残存する
ことにより、開缶力は大幅に改善されるものと考
えられる。次に、鋼板、アルミニウム板、有機皮
膜の厚みを限定する理由について述べる。鋼板の
厚みを30〜180μmとするのは以下の理由にもと
づく。通常EOEのスコア残厚はプレス精度の点
から、45μm程度で管理されているが、鋼板の厚
みを30μm以下とした場合、スコア加工の影響が
鋼板まで及ばず、開缶力が若干高くなる場合があ
るということ、またアルミニウム板と鋼板の接着
強度が不十分な場合は、その接着界面で時として
剥離が生じるということ、および板厚が30μm以
下の鋼板の製造おいては製造コストが大きく増大
するということ等から下限を30μmとした。また
板厚が、180μm以上になれば、スコア加工にお
いて、鋼板の加工量が増大し、内面の有機皮膜に
負荷されるプレス圧、塑性歪が増大し、有機皮膜
の損傷をもたらすからである。またアルミニウム
板の厚みは、蓋として要求される強度、そして組
み合される鋼板の厚みと密接に関連するが、スコ
ア残部に一定量アルミニウムを残存させ開缶性の
改善を果すという点からその下限50μmとした。
また上限を250μmとしたのは、鋼板の厚みがそ
の下限の30μmの場合でも、アルミニウム板を
250μmとすれば、蓋としての強度を十分確保し
うるからである。次に、有機皮膜の厚みを5〜
100μmとする理由について説明する。厚みが5μ
m以下の場合は、伸びおよび(伸び(%)/100
+1)×破断強度を適切なものとしても、塵埃、
アンビル5のキズ、凹凸などの影響をうけやす
く、有機皮膜は傷つきやすくなる。その点から下
限を5μmとした。一方スコア加工時の皮膜の変
形量は皮膜厚みに比例して大きくなるため、厚み
が厚くなれば、スコア残厚を精度よく管理するこ
とが難しくなり、また厚くなれば、開缶時の皮膜
の破断外観も悪化する。それゆえ上限を100μm
とした。以上、本発明複合金属体の構成を限定す
る理由について述べた。なおアルミニウム板と鋼
板の接合、鋼板への有機皮膜の被覆に関しては、
その方法を限定するものではなく、アルミニウム
板と鋼板の接着に関しては、ポリウタレン系、エ
ポキシ系、アクリル系、ポリエステル系、オレフ
イン系、ポリアミド系等の接着剤による接着ある
いは、拡散接合により必要な接着強度を得ること
ができる。また鋼板への有機皮膜の被覆に関して
は、有機皮膜の種類は、前記特性を満足するもの
であれば良く、例えば二軸延伸ポリエチレンテレ
フタレート、二軸延伸ポリプロピレン、無延伸ポ
リプロピレン、ナイロン等およびこれらの積層体
が適合し、フイルムのラミネート、粉体塗装等に
より、被覆することが可能である。次に本発明の
実施例について説明する。 実施例 1 組成がC:0.04%、Mn:0.25%、P:0.02%、
Al:0.055%、その他不可避的な不純物からなる
鋼を転炉で溶製後、連続鋳造によりスラブとし、
熱間圧延により、板厚2.0mmの熱延板とした。そ
の後冷間圧延により、板厚0.23mm、0.15mm、0.12
mm、0.075mmとし、箱型焼鈍を行つた。いずれも
箱型焼鈍後、スキンパスを行い、軟質な鋼板(以
下なまし材と称する)とした。また板厚0.23mmの
ものについては、箱型焼鈍後DR圧延も実施し、
板厚0.15mm、0.12mm、0.075mmの硬質な鋼板(以下
圧延材と称する)を作成した。これら鋼板に電解
クロム酸処理を行い、その鋼板の片面に、ウタレ
ン系接着剤にて、厚み30μmの2軸延伸ポリエチ
レンテレフタレートフイルムをラミネートし、内
面皮膜とした。そして、鋼板(板厚0.15mm、0.12
mm、0.075mm)のもう一方の面に、鋼板とアルミ
ニウム板の板厚の和が、0.23mmとなるような厚み
のアルミニウム板をウレタン系接着剤で接着し
た。また、市販のアルミニウム板(合金記号およ
び質別:5052H38板厚0.23mmの片面に、2軸延伸
ポリエチレンテレフタレートフイルムをラミネー
トしたものを比較材とした。そして211(直径65.4
mm缶用)の蓋に加工後、211のフルオープンエン
ドと同じスコア(直径58mm)を、フイルムをラミ
ネートした反対面側から刻印し、開缶性、外面
錆、ラミネートフイルム(内面有機皮膜)の疵つ
き性、塩素イオンを含む内容物中での耐食性、バ
イメタル腐食を試験した。開缶性の評価は、蓋外
面の一定位置にタブを接着により取りつけ、初期
開口(スコアブレイク)後、つづいて引きおこす
力(スコアテア値:ST値)の大小でもつて評価
した。ラミネートフイルムの疵つき性にに関する
優劣は、フイルムに傷が入りはじめるスコア残厚
(スコア残部8の金属厚み)の大小で評価した。
また、外面錆については、蓋を缶胴に巻締後、塩
水噴霧試験を行い評価した。またバイメタル腐
食、塩素イオンを含む内容物中での耐食性は、蓋
内面側のラミネートフイルムに一定量の疵をつ
け、各々クエン酸系溶液、食塩水を内容物として
実缶試験を行い評価した。その結果を第1表に示
す。
(Industrial Application Field) The present invention relates to an easy open end (hereinafter referred to as EOE) used for containers such as food cans and beverage cans whose can bodies are made of surface-treated steel sheets such as tinplate and electrolytic chromic acid treated steel sheets. ) related to composite metal objects. (Prior art) Recently, various food containers, etc., have been widely used as lids with notches (scores) engraved with appropriate shapes and lids with handles (tabs) attached, that is, EOEs, because they can be opened easily. There is. The materials used are aluminum and steel. aluminum EOE, steel
Both EOE and EOE have advantages and disadvantages, and they are put into practical use by taking these advantages and disadvantages into consideration. aluminum
EOE has the advantages of being easy to open, that is, it can be opened with a small amount of force, and the outer surface of the lid has excellent rust resistance, but on the other hand, it is resistant to contents containing chlorine ions. It also has the disadvantage of being susceptible to pitting corrosion, and if the can body is made of steel, the lid and can body are made of dissimilar metals, forming a battery and causing rapid corrosion (bimetallic corrosion). There is. Made of steel on the other hand
In the case of EOE, although it has excellent corrosion resistance against contents containing chlorine ions, and does not form a battery with the steel can body, its opening performance is slightly inferior, meaning that it requires a large amount of force to open the can. Another drawback is that rust is likely to form on the outer surface of the lid, mainly on the seam. In addition, made of steel
The corrosion resistance of EOE to the contents becomes excellent only after EOE processing such as score processing and correction coating is applied to the inner surface of the lid.
Corrosion of EOE to contents containing chloride ions,
The problem of corrosion due to battery formation (bimetallic corrosion) still remains a serious problem, even though it has been improved, since paint film defects cannot be completely eliminated even with correction coating. The correction coating applied to the inner surface of the lid after processing the EOE significantly increases the manufacturing cost of the lid, so from the perspective of manufacturing EOE at a low cost,
It is strongly desired to eliminate correction painting. From the point of omitting correction painting, JP-A-58-
EOE of polyester resin film-coated aluminum plates and steel plates manufactured by the manufacturing method disclosed in No. 220729.
However, the problem of scratches (damage) on the organic film during score processing remains unsolved. (Problems to be solved by the invention) EOE materials currently in practical use include external rust resistance, avoidance of bimetallic corrosion, corrosion resistance in contents containing chlorine ions, can openability, and internal correction. There is no material that simultaneously satisfies all of these characteristics required for EOE, such as eliminating the need for painting, and a material that satisfies them at the same time can be an excellent material for EOE. (Means to solve the problem) External rust resistance necessary for EOE, avoidance of bimetallic corrosion, corrosion resistance in contents containing chlorine ions, can opening ability, and omission of internal correction coating which has great economic benefits. With the aim of obtaining an EOE material that satisfies these five points at the same time, we conducted many other studies such as steel modification, aluminum modification, and surface treatment. , 50 to 250 μm aluminum plate is bonded to the other surface, which is the inner surface of the lid, and the elongation according to JIS C2318 and (elongation (%) / 100 + 1) x breaking strength are 10 to 1000% and 20 to 80 kg, respectively. / mm2 and thickness is 5
A composite metal body coated with an organic film of ~100 μm is
I found it fit the purpose. Before explaining the composite metal body of the present invention in detail, in order to make the understanding clearer, FIG. 1 shows one aspect of the composite metal body of the present invention subjected to score processing. The organic film indicated by 1 in Figure 1 is a biaxially stretched polyethylene terephthalate film (30 μm thick), 2 in Figure 1 is a steel plate (75 μm thick), and 3 in Figure 1 is an aluminum plate (thickness 30 μm).
155 μm). Next, the reason for limiting the configuration of the composite metal body as described above will be explained. First, the reason for arranging the steel plate on the inner surface of the lid and the aluminum plate on the outer surface of the lid will be explained. By arranging the steel plate on the inner surface side, two main purposes can be achieved. One point is to avoid bimetal corrosion with the can body, and the other point is to prevent pitting corrosion in the contents containing chlorine ions. In addition, by placing the aluminum plate on the outer surface, 3
One purpose can be achieved. One point is prevention of external rust, one point is prevention of scratches on the organic film on the innermost surface of the lid, which means omitting the inner surface correction coating of the lid, and the other point is improvement of can opening performance (reduction of can opening force). ). First, the reason why the inner surface correction painting can be omitted will be explained with reference to FIG. The score is processed (engraved) from the outer surface of the lid, but at this time, the press pressure of score processing acts on the organic film on the inner surface of the lid, and plastic strain is also generated. That is, a compressive force as shown by the arrow 6 in FIG. 2 acts on the organic film 1 sandwiched between the score blade 4 and the anvil 5. This press pressure is proportional to the deformation strength of the material being scored, and when aluminum, which has low deformation strength, is processed, the press pressure is small, but
When steel, which has a higher deformation strength than aluminum, is processed, the press pressure increases. Furthermore, when aluminum with low deformation strength is processed, the plastic strain of the steel plate 2 with high deformation strength bonded to the inner surface of the aluminum is small, and as a result, the plastic strain of the organic film coated on the steel plate is also small. . As described above, by using the aluminum plate 3 with low deformation strength as the main part of the part to be scored and using the steel plate 2 as the remaining part, the plastic strain on the organic coating 1 on the innermost surface of the lid is small, and Pressure is also reduced. Even if the plastic strain is reduced and the press pressure is reduced in this way, with the conventionally used inner coating (epoxy/phenolic resin), the true value of elongation and breaking strength divided by the cross-sectional area at break is The breaking strength, ie (elongation (%)/100+1) x breaking strength, is insufficient and the coating film is damaged during scoring. Therefore, it is necessary to arrange an organic film each having a weight of 10% or more and 20Kg/mm 2 or more. Note that if the elongation is too large, the organic film will break when the can is opened, resulting in an unfavorable appearance, and the upper limit was set at 1000%. Also (elongation (%)/
100+1)×breaking strength increases the opening force, so the upper limit was set to 80 Kg/mm 2 . This omission of inner surface correction painting is not only possible due to the effect of arranging aluminum on the outer surface, but is also achieved not only by the effect of the combination with the steel plate, but also by limiting the characteristics of the organic coating. It's watery. In addition, in the case where the organic film is a laminate of two or more types in terms of corrosion resistance, oxygen permeability, moisture permeability, etc., the object of the present application is met if the characteristics of the laminate satisfy the above-mentioned characteristic range. Next, the reason why the can opening performance is improved by arranging the aluminum plate on the outer surface side, that is, the reason why the can can be opened with a smaller force will be explained. 1st
This will be explained according to the diagram. FIG. 1 shows a state in which the score processing has progressed deeper and the score remaining thickness 7 has become less than the thickness of the steel plate 2. In this case, the score remaining thickness 8
The aluminum has a thickness score of 7
Approximately 1/2 of the original remains. It is considered that the can-opening force is significantly improved by the aluminum having low breaking strength remaining in the score remainder 8. Next, the reason for limiting the thickness of the steel plate, aluminum plate, and organic film will be described. The reason why the thickness of the steel plate is set to 30 to 180 μm is based on the following reasons. Normally, the score remaining thickness of EOE is controlled at around 45μm from the viewpoint of press accuracy, but if the thickness of the steel plate is set to 30μm or less, the score processing will not affect the steel plate and the can opening force will be slightly higher. In addition, if the adhesive strength between the aluminum plate and the steel plate is insufficient, peeling may sometimes occur at the adhesive interface, and the manufacturing cost increases significantly when manufacturing steel plates with a thickness of 30 μm or less. For this reason, the lower limit was set at 30 μm. Moreover, if the plate thickness is 180 μm or more, the amount of processing of the steel plate increases during score processing, and the press pressure and plastic strain applied to the inner organic film increase, resulting in damage to the organic film. In addition, the thickness of the aluminum plate is closely related to the strength required for the lid and the thickness of the steel plate to be assembled, but the lower limit is 50 μm from the point of view of leaving a certain amount of aluminum in the remaining part of the score and improving the openability of the can. did.
In addition, the upper limit was set at 250μm, even if the thickness of the steel plate is the lower limit of 30μm, the aluminum plate cannot be used.
This is because if the thickness is 250 μm, sufficient strength as a lid can be ensured. Next, the thickness of the organic film is 5~
The reason for setting it to 100 μm will be explained. Thickness is 5μ
m or less, elongation and (elongation (%)/100
+1) Even if the breaking strength is appropriate, dust,
It is easily affected by scratches and unevenness on the anvil 5, and the organic film is easily damaged. From this point, the lower limit was set to 5 μm. On the other hand, the amount of deformation of the film during scoring increases in proportion to the film thickness, so the thicker the film, the more difficult it becomes to accurately manage the remaining score thickness. The appearance of the fracture also deteriorates. Therefore, the upper limit is 100μm
And so. The reasons for limiting the structure of the composite metal body of the present invention have been described above. Regarding joining aluminum plates and steel plates, and coating steel plates with organic films,
The method is not limited, but the adhesive strength required for bonding aluminum plates and steel plates is adhesives such as polyurethane, epoxy, acrylic, polyester, olefin, polyamide, etc., or diffusion bonding. can be obtained. Regarding the coating of an organic film on a steel plate, the type of organic film may be one that satisfies the above characteristics, such as biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate, biaxially oriented polypropylene, unoriented polypropylene, nylon, etc., and laminated layers thereof. The body is compatible and can be covered by film lamination, powder coating, etc. Next, examples of the present invention will be described. Example 1 Composition is C: 0.04%, Mn: 0.25%, P: 0.02%,
After melting steel containing Al: 0.055% and other unavoidable impurities in a converter, it is made into a slab by continuous casting.
A hot-rolled plate with a thickness of 2.0 mm was obtained by hot rolling. After that, by cold rolling, the plate thickness is 0.23mm, 0.15mm, 0.12mm.
mm and 0.075 mm, and box-type annealing was performed. After box-shaped annealing, a skin pass was performed in each case to obtain a soft steel plate (hereinafter referred to as annealed material). In addition, for plates with a thickness of 0.23 mm, DR rolling is also performed after box annealing.
Hard steel plates (hereinafter referred to as rolled materials) with thicknesses of 0.15 mm, 0.12 mm, and 0.075 mm were created. These steel plates were subjected to electrolytic chromic acid treatment, and a biaxially stretched polyethylene terephthalate film with a thickness of 30 μm was laminated on one side of the steel plate with a Uthalene adhesive to form an inner surface coating. And steel plate (thickness 0.15mm, 0.12
An aluminum plate with a thickness such that the sum of the thicknesses of the steel plate and aluminum plate was 0.23 mm was adhered to the other side of the aluminum plate using urethane adhesive. In addition, a commercially available aluminum plate (alloy code and temper: 5052H38, 0.23 mm thick, laminated with biaxially stretched polyethylene terephthalate film on one side) was used as a comparative material.
After processing the lid of the 211 full open end (diameter 58 mm), the same score as 211 full open end is engraved from the opposite side where the film is laminated. Scratch resistance, corrosion resistance in contents containing chloride ions, and bimetallic corrosion were tested. Can openability was evaluated by attaching a tab to a fixed position on the outer surface of the lid with adhesive, and evaluating the magnitude of the force (score tear value: ST value) that was applied to the can after the initial opening (score break). The quality of the scratch resistance of the laminate film was evaluated based on the score residual thickness (metal thickness of the score remainder 8) at which scratches begin to appear on the film.
In addition, external rust was evaluated by performing a salt spray test after tightening the lid onto the can body. Bimetal corrosion and corrosion resistance in contents containing chlorine ions were evaluated by making a certain amount of scratches on the laminate film on the inner surface of the lid, and conducting actual can tests using a citric acid solution and a saline solution as contents. The results are shown in Table 1.

【表】 内面皮膜のキズつき性:スコア加工により内面皮
膜にクラツクが入りはじめるスコア残厚
[Table] Scratch resistance of inner surface film: Remaining score thickness at which cracks begin to appear on the inner surface film due to score processing

【表】 実施例 2 実施例1と同じ工程で作成した板厚0.075mm
(なまし材)の電解クロム酸処理鋼板の片面に、
第2表に示す有機皮膜を被覆し、鋼板のもう一方
の面にエポキシ系接着剤で、アルミニウム板(板
厚0.155mm)を接合したものについて、実施例1
と同じ方法で、スコア加工時の有機皮膜の疵つき
性を試験した。その結果を第2表に示す。 (発明の効果) 実施例に示すように、本発明の複合金属体によ
るEOEは、鋼製EOEよりも、開缶性、外面錆の
点ですぐれ、内面皮膜の疵つき性、バイメタル腐
食、塩素イオンを含む内容物中での耐食性におい
てアルミニウム製EOEよりも優れたものとなつ
ている。
[Table] Example 2 Plate thickness 0.075mm created using the same process as Example 1
On one side of the electrolytic chromic acid treated steel plate (annealed material),
Example 1: An aluminum plate (thickness: 0.155 mm) was coated with the organic film shown in Table 2 and bonded to the other side of the steel plate with an epoxy adhesive.
The scratch resistance of the organic film during score processing was tested using the same method as above. The results are shown in Table 2. (Effects of the Invention) As shown in the examples, the EOE made of the composite metal body of the present invention is superior to the steel EOE in terms of can openability and external surface rust, and is superior to the steel EOE in terms of scratch resistance of the internal coating, bimetallic corrosion, and chlorine. Its corrosion resistance in contents containing ions is superior to that of aluminum EOE.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は、本発明複合金属体にスコア加工した
時の断面状態を示す模式図である。第2図は、ス
コア加工の状態を示す模式図である。 1:有機皮膜、2:鋼板、3:アルミニウム
板、4:スコアの刃、5:アンビル、6:スコア
加工時有機皮膜に作用する圧縮力の方向、7:ス
コア残厚、8:スコア残部。
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a cross-sectional state when a composite metal body of the present invention is subjected to score processing. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the state of score processing. 1: organic film, 2: steel plate, 3: aluminum plate, 4: score blade, 5: anvil, 6: direction of compressive force acting on the organic film during score processing, 7: score remaining thickness, 8: score remainder.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 厚みが30〜180μmの鋼板の片面に、50〜
250μmのアルミ板を接合し、蓋の内面側となる
もう一方の面に、JIS C2318による伸び、及び
(伸び(%)/100+1)×破断強度が各々10〜
1000%、20〜80Kg/mm2で、かつ厚みが5〜100μ
mの有機被膜を被覆したことを特徴とし、スチー
ル製缶胴と組み合わされ缶体を形成するイージー
オープンエンド用複合金属体。
1. On one side of a steel plate with a thickness of 30 to 180 μm,
A 250 μm aluminum plate is bonded, and the other surface, which is the inner surface of the lid, has elongation according to JIS C2318 and (elongation (%) / 100 + 1) x breaking strength of 10 ~
1000%, 20~80Kg/ mm2 , and thickness 5~100μ
A composite metal body for an easy open end, which is characterized by being coated with an organic film of m and is combined with a steel can body to form a can body.
JP22370786A 1986-09-24 1986-09-24 Composite metallic body for easy-open end Granted JPS6382945A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22370786A JPS6382945A (en) 1986-09-24 1986-09-24 Composite metallic body for easy-open end

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22370786A JPS6382945A (en) 1986-09-24 1986-09-24 Composite metallic body for easy-open end

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6382945A JPS6382945A (en) 1988-04-13
JPH0253303B2 true JPH0253303B2 (en) 1990-11-16

Family

ID=16802401

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP22370786A Granted JPS6382945A (en) 1986-09-24 1986-09-24 Composite metallic body for easy-open end

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6382945A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0570805U (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-24 和武 中谷 Cutting edge chips

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0570805U (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-24 和武 中谷 Cutting edge chips

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6382945A (en) 1988-04-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0209393A2 (en) Deep-draw-formed vessel and process for preparation thereof
WO2023095859A1 (en) Can lid for food or drink
US6837093B2 (en) Methods for making an easy-opening can end
JPH085159B2 (en) Laminated steel sheet having a two-layer coating structure and method for producing the same
US20120244384A1 (en) Stress Corrosion Resistant Aluminum Beverage End Closure
US4762245A (en) Easy-open can lid
JP5804195B2 (en) High-strength, high-workability steel sheet and manufacturing method
EP1627820B1 (en) Laminated steel sheet
JPH0253303B2 (en)
JP2534589B2 (en) Polyester resin coated steel plate and original plate for thinned deep drawn can
JP2711947B2 (en) Method for producing resin-coated tin-plated steel sheet for thinned deep drawn cans with excellent processing corrosion resistance
CA1333667C (en) Steel foil for drawing container with organic film coat
JPH0394040A (en) Aluminum alloy composite material for can end having bending part
JP2937788B2 (en) Manufacturing method of resin-coated steel sheet for dry drawing and ironing can
JP2003277886A (en) Resin-coated steel sheet for shear spun can, method of producing resin-coated steel sheet for shear spun can and shear spun can produced by using the same
JPH04187741A (en) Steel sheet for can, its manufacture and manufacture of three-piece can
JPS6032707B2 (en) Steel plate for easy open lid
JP2000302127A (en) Easy-openable can cap made of resin-coated steel plate and manufacture thereof
JP2625499B2 (en) Hot-dip aluminized steel sheet for container, manufacturing method and can body
JP2000233247A (en) Manufacture of easy-open lid, and lid
JPH0230526A (en) Steel sheet for can and can lid, can body and can lid
JPH0890119A (en) Lightweight steel can having excellent flange formability and strength
JPH05287488A (en) Hot dip aluminum plated steel sheet excellent in workability and its production
JP2625498B2 (en) Hot-dip aluminized steel sheet for can lid with excellent corrosion resistance
JPH10138389A (en) Resin coated metal sheet