JP7338707B2 - Screen output program, screen output method, information processing device, and monitoring system - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a screen output program, a screen output method, an information processing apparatus, and a monitoring system.

The victory or defeat of a match is often determined by a plurality of referees counting effective points such as effective attacks and defenses, and using the counting results of each referee. For example, in boxing, the referee presses a counter when each of Player A and Player B makes a valid blow during the match, and at the end of each round, tallies the final number of valid blows for each fighter. A tally system is used. Also, in boxing in recent years, each referee uses an input device at hand, and at the end of the round, according to the 10-point must-rule, give 10 points to the fighter who was superior and 10 points to the other fighter. A scoring system is used that gives less than

JP 2011-104192 A

“BOXING SCORING SYSTEM”, <http://www.swisstiming.com/fileadmin/Resources/Data/Datasheets/DOCM_BX_ScoringSystem_1215_EN.pdf>, Swiss Timing LTD

By the way, in the above technology, the score of each player is determined by the referee's subjective evaluation. A feeling may remain.

For example, in the above scoring system, boxing judges the superiority of any fighter throughout the round, and 10 points are awarded to the superior fighter. At this time, as the grounds for awarding points, for example, in the offense and defense between players, the fact that an effective blow was decided, the occurrence of a defense that prevented an effective blow, and which player was dominant at each point in the match. Whether or not there is is a valid judgment (points) for addition. However, these valid judgments are subjectively determined by each referee, and only the score (10-9, 10-8, etc.) that is the final judgment result of each referee is input to the scoring system. And after the match, it is difficult to confirm the biased judgment of a certain referee against a certain player.

For this reason, by aggregating and displaying the timing at which each referee added points as a valid judgment during the round, during the match, after the end of the round, or after the end of the match, the transparency of judgments and scoring will be improved. A security monitoring technique is proposed. For example, the monitoring technology generates a screen that assigns an area to each referee for each second of each round for each opponent, and lights up in real time the area of the referee who presses the button after judging a valid hit. By doing so, the senior umpire is presented in real time which umpire judged the effective hit at what timing. A senior referee is a referee who supervises and supervises multiple referees. Monitoring technology can assist senior referees to monitor the legitimacy of individual referees, bias in referee judgment, and the like.

However, with the above monitoring technology, it is conceivable that the pursuit of accuracy and real-time performance will increase the psychological bias of referees and reduce the accuracy of judgments by referees. For example, each umpire is required to judge effective blows instantaneously during the match in a state of high tension that the decision timing etc. is being viewed by the senior umpire. may be mistaken. At this time, if the judgment cannot be corrected, each referee will try to balance the game during the match by counting more effective blows to the player who is the opposite of the player who was incorrectly judged as an effective blow. , losing concentration in the game or having a "psychological bias". As a result, there is a risk that an accurate judgment cannot be made.

In one aspect, it is an object of providing a screen output program, a screen output method, an information processing device, and a monitoring system that can reduce the psychological bias of the referee when monitoring the referee's decision situation in real time. and

In the first plan, the screen output program causes the computer to receive the first input or the second input from each of a plurality of referees during the match competition, each time the referee who made the input, The first input or the second input causes execution of processing for obtaining information that enables identification of each of the plurality of players in the match. The screen output program provided the computer with medium areas assigned to each player and small areas assigned to each referee arranged in a specific order along a timeline showing the progress of the match. In the first screen, the first input or the second input can be seen at a position determined by the player and referee specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. A process of generating the first screen with the index added according to the acquisition and outputting the generated first screen is executed. The screen output program causes the computer to execute a process of generating a first tabulated result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees. The screen output program causes the computer to display the first tallied result pertaining to a first referee among the plurality of referees, and displays a second screen for accepting correction of the first tallied result as described above. Execute the process of outputting to the referee terminal associated with the first referee. The screen output program causes the computer to, when receiving a correction of the first tabulated result from the referee terminal, add the corrected second tabulated result in addition to the first tabulated result related to the first referee. A process of storing the tabulated result in association with the first referee is executed.

According to one embodiment, it is possible to reduce the psychological bias of the referee when monitoring the referee's judgment status in real time.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overall configuration example of a judge monitoring system according to a first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the functional configuration of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment; FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of conversion information. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of output conversion information. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of collected information. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of terminal information. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a judge monitoring screen. FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining a memo screen. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a display example of the judge monitoring screen. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of count correction. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of reflection of count correction. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of updating the memo screen. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a result screen. FIG. 14 is a diagram for explaining where collected information is used. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the flow of real-time display processing. FIG. 16 is a sequence diagram showing the flow of correction processing. FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing the flow of result display processing. FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating another example of the memo screen. FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating another example of the memo screen. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example.

Exemplary embodiments of a screen output program, a screen output method, an information processing apparatus, and a monitoring system according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. In addition, this invention is not limited by this Example. Moreover, each embodiment can be appropriately combined within a range without contradiction.

[overall structure]
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overall configuration example of a judge monitoring system according to a first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, in Example 1, taking boxing, which is an example of a competition, as an example, the process of refereeing by five referees (hereinafter, sometimes simply referred to as "referees") is as follows: A senior referee explains an example of monitoring five referees using the monitoring screen.

As shown in FIG. 1, the judge monitoring system includes input devices 1 to 5, a relay device 10, a video camera 100, a tablet terminal 200 corresponding to a referee terminal, and a monitor device 20. Each device is connected via a network, and various networks, whether wired or wireless, can be adopted as the network.

An example of each of the input devices 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 is an input pad installed at each of the seats of the referees A, B, C, D and E. The relay device 10 is a switch or the like that connects each input device and the monitor device 20 . The video camera 100 captures the entire ring from the start of the boxing match to the end of the match, capturing moving images and still images of the match. The tablet terminal 200 is an example of a computer device used by each referee. The monitor device 20 is an example of a computer device used by senior referees who monitor the judgment results of each referee.

In general, boxing is scored according to a scoring system (Ten Point Must System), in which each referee gives 10 points to the fighter who had the upper hand at the end of the round and scores less than 10 points to the other fighter. is used. Furthermore, in recent years, monitoring technology has been used that visualizes the timing at which referees add points as valid judgments, and ensures the transparency of judgments and scoring by referees.

By using monitoring technology in such a scoring system, the transparency of scoring is ensured, leading to the legitimacy of each referee, the improvement of each referee's technique, and the improvement of the value of the match itself. In addition, by displaying the timing at which each referee adds points as a valid judgment to each referee and spectators, it is possible to improve the presence of the spectators and viewers and improve entertainment.

However, each umpire is required to judge effective blows instantaneously during the game in a state of high tension, with the judgment timing etc. being viewed by the spectators and senior umpires. It is also conceivable that the judgment of And each referee is subject to "psychological bias" when the state of not being able to correct the judgment is maintained.

For example, suppose a referee incorrectly counts a punch to player A during a round. Normally, although the referee notices the wrong touch, the round continues, so it is not desirable to correct the input result on the spot because the operation becomes complicated for the referee. On the other hand, if it is impossible to cancel, the referee will have a "psychological bias" to try to offset the mistake by punching the opposite player B more often in order to balance the balance after realizing the mistake. It takes. As a result, there is a risk that an accurate judgment cannot be made.

Therefore, the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment provides a judge monitoring screen that displays the judgment timing of each judge in real time for senior judges, etc. Then, a memo screen is provided for the referee himself/herself to make a memo of the number of effective hits counted. The referee himself/herself can refer to the memo screen when giving the final score (points such as 10-9, 10-8 in the ten point must rule). By referring to the memo screen, the referee can score more accurately than scoring based on intuition or manual counting of effective hits.

Specifically, each referee presses a corresponding button on the input device at hand when a valid hit is made. For example, the input device 1 has a red button 1A, a yellow button 1B, a blue button 1C, and a yellow button 1D. A red button 1A and a yellow button 1B are buttons associated with players in the red corner. Button 1A is associated with a normal strike (normal strike), which is an effective attack such as a jab, and button 1B is associated with a normal strike. , is associated with a strong blow (strong blow) that is a powerful and effective blow that leads to knockdown of the opponent player.

Similarly, a blue button 1C and a yellow button 1D are buttons associated with players in the blue corner, the button 1C is associated with normal hitting, and the button 1D is associated with strong hitting. In the following embodiments, an example of a combination of an input indicating normal hitting as the first input and an input indicating strong hitting as the second input will be described. In addition to the combination, the first input may be an input indicating hitting, and the second input may be a combination of an input indicating defense. The first input and the second input are inputs for each of a plurality of elements that can be the basis for the final scoring results by the referee. For example, the first element is a strong hit and the second element is a normal hit.

That is, the referee A presses the button 1A to count the normal hits of player X in the red corner, and presses the button 1D to count the strong hits of player Y in the blue corner. Similarly, the referee A presses the button 1B to count the strong hits of player X in the red corner, and presses the button 1C to count the normal hits of player Y in the blue corner.

Then, the monitor device 20 used by the senior referee acquires the result of pressing the button from each input device via the relay device 10, and displays in real time the button pressing status of each referee, that is, the validity determination status.

For example, the monitor device 20 arranges a small area assigned to each referee in each middle area assigned to each player, and divides each referee's small area along the timeline. A monitoring screen 40 (illustrated in FIG. 6 to be described later) is generated. Then, when the referee A presses the red button 1A at time t, the monitor device 20 displays the area corresponding to the time t in the small area of the referee A in the middle area assigned to the player X in the red corner. is displayed in red. In addition, when referee C presses yellow button 1D at time t+1, monitor device 20 displays the area corresponding to time t+1 among the small areas of referee C in the middle area assigned to athlete Y in the blue corner. is displayed in yellow. Also, in each middle area, the arrangement order of the small areas assigned to each referee is the same. In other words, when referees A, B, C, D, and E are arranged in the order of referees A, B, C, D, and E in the middle area for player X, referees A and B are placed in the middle area for player Y. , C, D, and E are arranged.

In this way, the monitoring device 20 collects in real time the timing at which each referee determines that the results are effective, and displays them in real time, so that the senior referee can compare and examine the judgment status of each referee. provide an interface.

Furthermore, the monitor device 20 displays the count status of effective hits only by the referee on the tablet terminal 200 used by each referee during the game, and provides a memo screen, which is an interface for correcting each count number.

Specifically, the monitor device 20 generates the first tallied result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees. Then, the monitor device 20 displays the first tallied result related to the referee A out of the plurality of referees, and displays a memo screen for accepting correction of the first tallied result on the tablet associated with the referee A. Output to terminal 200 . After that, when the monitor device 20 receives a correction of the first tallied result from the tablet terminal 200, the second tallied result after the correction is added to the first tallied result related to the referee A. be linked to and stored.

In other words, the monitor device 20 provides each referee with a memo screen for correcting the count number, in addition to the judge monitoring screen 40 for senior referees. As a result, each referee can recognize that the count number can be corrected even after the round using this memo screen. In other words, even if the referee in a round mistakenly counts player A's valid strike count, there is a sense of security that it can be corrected in the end. can proceed.

On the other hand, senior referees also need to see real-time input from each referee during the round. For this reason, the monitor device 20 generates the judge monitoring screen 40 so that the senior referee can visualize the timing at which each referee determines that each player has a valid hit. Since it should indicate the fact that the button was pressed, even if the referee corrects the count number, the display of the judge monitoring screen 40 once displayed does not change. In this way, from the viewpoint of monitoring by senior referees, a mechanism is provided for managing corrections on individual screens separately from real-time input results.

[Function configuration]
Next, the functional configuration of each device that constitutes the judge monitoring system will be described. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the functional configuration of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment; Since the tablet terminals used by each referee have the same configuration, the tablet terminal 200 will be described here.

(Functional configuration of relay device 10)
As shown in FIG. 2 , relay device 10 has input unit 11 , communication unit 12 , storage unit 13 , acquisition unit 15 , and notification unit 16 . The relay device 10 is an example of a computer device that notifies the monitor device 20 of the referee process performed by each referee using each input device. Note that the acquisition unit 15 and the notification unit 16 can be realized by a hardware circuit or an electronic circuit possessed by the processor, or can be realized as a process executed by the processor.

The input unit 11 is a processing unit that is connected to each of the input devices 1 to 5 used by each referee, such as an input device having a plurality of input/output ports (PIN). For example, the input unit 11 is connected to the input device 1 using PIN1 to PIN4, connected to the input device 2 using PIN5 to PIN8, connected to the input device 3 using PIN9 to PIN12, and connected to PIN13 to PIN16. to connect to the input device 4 using PIN17 to PIN20 to connect to the input device 5 . Each PIN is connected to each button of each input device.

Here, each input device will be described. Each input device has four buttons for which the display colors used by the monitor device 20 are set. For example, each input device has a red button A that is pressed when the player in the red corner hits normally, a yellow button B that is pressed when the player in the blue corner hits hard, and a blue button C that is pressed when the player in the blue corner hits normally. and a yellow button D that is pressed at the time of strong hitting. Also, since each button is connected to the input/output port of the input unit 11 of the relay device 10, the relay device can identify which button of which input device has been pressed.

Returning to FIG. 2, the communication unit 12 is a processing unit that controls communication with other devices such as the monitor device 20, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 12 transmits signals corresponding to inputs from each input device to the monitor device 20 .

The storage unit 13 stores programs, data, and the like, and is implemented by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. For example, the storage unit 13 stores conversion information 14 .

The conversion information 14 is information used when converting an input from each input device into a signal to be transmitted to the monitor device 20 . The output signal obtained by converting the input from the input device is either the referee who made the input, the first input indicating the normal hitting or the second input indicating the strong hitting, or the multiple players in the match. are each identifiable information.

FIG. 3 is a diagram explaining an example of the conversion information 14. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 3, the conversion information 14 is information in which "PIN number" and "signal" are associated with each other. The “PIN number” stored here indicates an input/output port, and the “signal” is information specifying a signal to be transmitted to the monitor device 20 . In the example of FIG. 3, when an input signal is received via PIN1 connected to button 1A of input device 1, it is converted into signal "a" and is transmitted via PIN2 connected to button 1B of input device 1. If an input signal is received, it will be converted to signal 'b'.

The acquisition unit 15 is a processing unit that acquires an input signal from the input device via the input unit 11 . For example, when receiving an input signal via each PIN, the acquisition unit 15 outputs the PIN number that received the input signal to the notification unit 16 .

The notification unit 16 is a processing unit that transmits an output signal corresponding to the inputted input signal to the monitor device 20 . Specifically, the notification unit 16 converts an input signal input to the input unit 11 into an output signal according to the conversion information 14 and transmits the output signal. For example, when PIN1 is notified from the acquisition unit 15 , the notification unit 16 identifies the signal a according to the conversion information 14 and transmits the signal a to the monitor device 20 .

(Functional configuration of monitor device 20)
As shown in FIG. 2 , the monitor device 20 has a communication section 21 , a display section 22 , a storage section 23 and a control section 30 . This monitor device 20 generates a judge monitoring screen 40, and displays and outputs in real time the results of each referee's determination of player X (red corner) and player Y (blue corner) as normal hitting or strong hitting. 1 is an example of a computer device;

The communication unit 21 is a processing unit connected to a device such as the relay device 10, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 21 receives the signal a or the like from the relay device 10 . Also, the communication unit 21 may receive moving image information captured by the video camera 100 . The communication unit 21 can also transmit various information such as a screen generated by the control unit 30 to an external device.

The display unit 22 is a processing unit that displays various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a display, a monitor, a touch panel, and the like. For example, the display unit 22 displays various information such as screens generated by the control unit 30 .

The storage unit 23 stores data, programs executed by the control unit 30, and the like, and is realized by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. This storage unit 23 stores output conversion information 24 , collection information 25 , moving image information 26 , correspondence list 27 , and terminal information 28 .

The output conversion information 24 is information for converting the information relayed from the relay device 10 in order to output it to the judge monitoring screen 40 . FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of the output conversion information 24. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 4, the output conversion information 24 associates and stores "item number", "signal", "output position", and "display color". In this embodiment, the output position specifies either the referee who made the input or the players in the match. Also, the display color specifies whether the first input indicates a normal hit or the second input indicates a strong hit.

The “item number” stored here is an identifier for identifying each piece of information, and the “signal” indicates a signal input from the relay device 10 . The “output position” indicates the position on the judge monitoring screen 40, and the “display color” indicates the color displayed on the judge monitoring screen 40. FIG. Item number 1 in FIG. 4 indicates that the signal a input from the relay device 10 is displayed in red on the display line 1 of the judge monitoring screen 40 . Item number 2 indicates that the signal b input from the relay device 10 is displayed in yellow on the display line 1 of the judge monitoring screen 40 . Details of the output position will be described later. Also, the output conversion information 24 is information defined in advance by the user.

The collected information 25 is information input from the relay device 10 . That is, the collected information 25 is a list of judgment results of each referee. Note that the information stored here is generated by the control unit 30 . FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of collected information 25. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, the collected information 25 is information in which real-time information and correction information are associated with each other for each round.

The real-time information is information that is updated in real time during the game, indicates the number of button presses (effective hits) by the referee, and is information that is not corrected once recorded. Specifically, the real-time information includes the number of times each referee judged a normal hit and the number of times a strong hit was judged and each count for each red corner and blue corner for each round timeline (each second). Record the total value. Note that the total value corresponds to the first tally result.

The correction information is information for correcting the information aggregated in real time, and is information updated from time to time on the memo screen of each referee, which will be described later. Specifically, the correction information records a value (correction value) for correcting the total value of the real-time information and a final value (final value) obtained by correcting the total value by the correction value. Also, the final value is appropriately updated using the modified value each time the real-time count updates the total value. Note that the final value corresponds to the second aggregated result and the third aggregated result.

In other words, in the collected information 25, the count numbers received in real time and the input timing of each referee are recorded, and the corrected count numbers are also recorded. Note that while the judge monitoring screen 40 for advanced referees created from the real-time information of the collected information 25 maintains the count number before correction, the memo screen 50 for individual referees is generated in a corrected state.

In the example of FIG. 5, in timeline 1 (1 second) immediately after the start of the first round (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as “round 1”), referee A referee B counted 0 times, referee C counted 0 times, referee D counted 0 times, and referee E counted 2 times. It also shows that only referee C counted once as a strong hit at the red corner in timeline 1 (1 second) immediately after round 1 started. It also indicates that no corrections have been made by any referee. Note that the timeline is set slightly longer than the game time in order to allow for errors. For example, if one round lasts 3 minutes, the timeline is set to 190 seconds (180 seconds+α), which is longer than 3 minutes (180 seconds). α is an arbitrary numerical value.

The moving image information 26 is game footage captured by the video camera 100 . The moving image information 26 is managed with time stamps similar to the time stamps of the collected information 25 .

The correspondence list 27 is information that can identify which referee counted which player's which blow from the signal. For example, the correspondence list 27 is information that associates signals, hitting types, and referees. More specifically, the correspondence list 27 includes “signal, corner, hitting type, referee”, “signal a, red corner, normal hit, referee A”, “signal b, red corner, strong hit, referee A", "signal c, blue corner, normal hit, referee A", "signal d, blue corner, strong hit, referee A".

The terminal information 28 is information that defines the correspondence between each referee and the computer used by each referee. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the terminal information 28. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 6, the terminal information 28 is information in which "referee", "input device", and "tablet terminal" are associated with each other. Here, "referee" is information identifying each referee, "input device" indicates an input device used by each referee, and "tablet terminal" is a tablet terminal used by each referee. 200 is shown. In the example of FIG. 6, the referee A uses the input device 1 to which "ID=A" is assigned, and the tablet terminal AA to which "ID=A" and "X.X.X.X" as the IP address are assigned. and indicates that each terminal is associated with "ID=A".

The control unit 30 is a processing unit that controls the entire monitor device 20, and is realized by, for example, a processor. The control unit 30 has an acquisition unit 31 , a counting unit 32 , a real-time processing unit 33 , a memo processing unit 34 and a result display unit 35 . Note that the acquisition unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, and the result display unit 35 can also be realized as electronic circuits possessed by the processor or processes executed by the processor.

Acquisition unit 31 is a processing unit that receives a signal from relay device 10 via communication unit 21 . For example, the acquisition unit 31 receives a signal corresponding to the pressed button via the relay device 10 each time a button of each input device is pressed. Acquisition unit 31 then outputs the received signal to count unit 32 , real-time processing unit 33 , memo processing unit 34 , and result display unit 35 . The signal is information that can identify the referee who made the input, the first input indicating normal hitting or the second input indicating strong hitting, and any of the multiple players in the match. . In addition, a signal indicating the referee who performed the input, a signal indicating whether the first input indicating normal hitting or the second input indicating strong hitting, and a signal indicating any one of a plurality of players in the match may be sent individually. may be obtained at

The counting unit 32 is a processing unit that counts each signal based on the acquisition result obtained by the obtaining unit 31 . That is, the counting unit 32 collects the judgment results of each referee and records them in the collected information 25 to generate the collected results.

For example, when the signal a is input from the acquisition unit 31 at the timing of timeline 1 (one second after the start of the match) of round 1, the counting unit 32 refers to the correspondence list 27 and determines whether the referee A is in the red corner. Specifies that the player's normal strikes were counted. Then, the counting unit 32 increments the count number of the referee A for the red corner of the normal hitting in the timeline 1 (1 second) of the round 1 of the collected information 25 .

In addition, the counting unit 32 calculates and registers the total value of the normal and strong hits of each referee every time each hit is counted. Furthermore, when the corrected value of the collected information 25 is registered, the counting unit 32 registers the result of correcting the total value based on the corrected value as the final value.

The real-time processing unit 33 has a screen generation unit 33a and an output control unit 33b, and is a processing unit that generates judgment results of each referee as a judge monitoring screen 40 and outputs it to the display unit 22 in real time.

The screen generator 33 a is a processor that generates the judge monitoring screen 40 . Details of the judge monitoring screen 40 generated by the screen generator 33a will now be described. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of the judge monitoring screen 40. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 7, the screen generation unit 33a displays an area 41 for displaying information specifying the current round, a middle area 42 for displaying the judgment results for the red corner players, and an area 42 for displaying the judgment results for the blue corner players. A judge monitoring screen 40 having a middle area 43 to be displayed is generated.

In addition, the screen generator 33a generates small areas 44 assigned to referees A to E in each of the middle areas 42 and 43 . Further, the screen generation unit 33a generates a scale 45 (timeline) representing the time width from the start timing to the end timing of the match in the subregion 44 of each referee. Here, the scale 45 is divided into 190 seconds, which is obtained by adding, for example, 10 seconds as a predetermined time length to 180 seconds (3 minutes), which is the time of one round, every second. In the following description, each one-second interval on the timeline is referred to as a time cell. In other words, the judgment result for one second after the start of Round 1 corresponds to the first line of the scale 45 (timeline 1), and the judgment result for the second second of round 1 corresponds to the second line of the scale 45 (timeline 2). correspond to It should be noted that the system designer may arbitrarily change how much predetermined time length is added to the time length of one round to make the timeline.

Here, the screen generator 33a generates a screen in which the small areas 44 displayed in the middle areas 42 and 43 are aligned in the same order. For example, if the five small areas in the middle area 42 are arranged in the order of judgments A to E, the five small areas in the middle area 43 are arranged in the order of judgments A to E. By grouping the display regions for each player as a middle region instead of grouping the display regions for each referee, it is possible to provide a display that makes it easy to grasp the difference in the judgment of each judge for the same player. In addition, by making the arrangement order of the small areas the same in both middle areas, it is possible to make the display easy to understand the judgment tendency for each umpire. For example, in the timeline 14 in FIG. 6, as a result of displaying red on the scale 45 corresponding to any referee in the middle region 42, it looks as if a single red line is displayed. there is Senior referees can see these indications to determine if multiple referees are making the same decision, or if only some referees are making different decisions than others. It becomes possible to easily grasp the difference in the judgment of The row for referee A in the red corner is displayed first, and the row for referee E in the blue corner is designated as display row 1, display row 2, display row 3, . . . Note that the judge monitoring screen 40 corresponds to the first screen.

The output control unit 33b is a processing unit that displays the judgment result of each referee in real time on the judge monitoring screen 40 generated by the screen generation unit 33a. Specifically, every time the output control unit 33b receives a signal input from the acquisition unit 31, the output position and display color are specified according to the output conversion information 24, and the corresponding scale 45 (timeline ) to display the output corresponding to the signal.

For example, assume that the output control unit 33b receives the signal a 11 seconds after the start of the first round. In this case, the output control unit 33b refers to the output conversion information 24 and specifies the output position (display line 1) and the display color (red) associated with the signal a. Then, the output control unit 33b outputs red to the eleventh (timeline 11) of the scale 45 of the small area 44 of the referee A concerned.

Note that if one referee counts the same player multiple times during the same timeline, the number of times the real-time information in the collected information 25 is counted is counted, but only once is displayed. do. For example, when the output control unit 33b receives the signal a 11 seconds after the start of the match and then receives another signal a during the same 11th second, the output control unit 33b only displays the first signal a, or , display only the last signal a, or overwrite display each time it is received, so that only one display is output.

However, even when one referee counts the same athlete multiple times during the same timeline, yellow is displayed preferentially. For example, when the output control unit 33b receives the signal a 8 seconds after the start of the game, it outputs the red color corresponding to the signal a. A yellow output corresponding to b is preferentially output. The output destination of the output control unit 33b is not limited to the display unit 22, but can be changed arbitrarily to a large monitor (not shown) installed at the match hall, the tablet terminals 200 of each referee, TV or Internet broadcasting. be able to.

Returning to FIG. 2, the memo processing unit 34 has a memo display unit 34a and a correction reflection unit 34b, and generates a memo screen 50 for correcting the count for each referee's tablet terminal 200. It is a processing unit that reflects the correction operation by .

The memo display unit 34a is a processing unit that generates and outputs a memo screen 50 for the referee himself/herself to memorize the count number of effective hits. Details of the memo screen 50 generated by the memo display unit 34a will now be described. FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining the memo screen 50. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 8, the memo display unit 34a generates a memo screen 50 having an update button 51, a send button 52, and an area 53 for displaying the count number in response to a request from each referee. It is transmitted to the referee's tablet terminal 200 . Note that the destination can be specified using the terminal information 28 .

When the update button 51 is selected, the memo display unit 34a generates and transmits the memo screen 50 with the area 53 updated, and when the send button 52 is selected, the memo display unit 34a receives the correction contents. The memo display section 54a also displays on the memo screen 50 radio buttons for selecting Domination, Competitiveness, and Violation of the match. It should be noted that not only radio buttons but also other forms such as check buttons can be adopted.

In the area 53, the count number of strong blows and the count number of normal blows in each round and the total number of strong blows and the total number of normal blows in the entire match are displayed for each of the red corner and the blue corner. be. For example, when generating the memo screen 50 of referee A, the memo display unit 34a refers to the collected information 25, reads "14", which is the final value and the normal shot to the red corner of referee A, and A memo screen 50 is generated in which "3", which is the strong blow to the red corner of member A and the final value, is read, and each is set as the number of rounds.

In addition, the memo display unit 34 a displays an increase/decrease button 53 a for increasing or decreasing the count number near the count number displayed in the area 53 in the memo screen 50 . When the increase/decrease button 53a is selected, the count number is increased or decreased by one. That is, the trial judge can correct the count number by operating the increase/decrease button 53a. Note that the memo screen 50 corresponds to the second screen.

Returning to FIG. 2, the correction reflection unit 34b is a processing unit that receives correction operations on the memo screen 50 displayed to each referee by the memo display unit 34a and reflects them in the collected information 25. FIG. Specifically, when the referee selects the send button 52 of the memo screen 50, the correction reflecting unit 34b receives each count displayed in the area 53 and the selection result of each radio button. Then, the correction reflecting unit 34b compares each count number acquired from the memo screen 50 with the total value of the collected information 25, registers the difference as a correction value, and adds each count number acquired from the memo screen 50. Register for the final value. At this time, the correction is reflected in the correction information of the collected information 25, but the correction is not reflected in the real-time information and remains the information counted in real time. Note that the correction reflecting unit 34b also registers the selection result of the radio button in the storage unit 23. FIG.

The result display unit 35 is a processing unit that generates and displays the judgment result of each referee's judgment for each selection. Although the details will be described later, the result display unit 35 determines the count number of strong hits after completion of correction, the count number of normal hits, the dominance, etc. for each of the red corner and the blue corner of each round of each referee. A result screen 60 (see FIG. 13) including the results and the like, as well as the aggregated results for each round, is generated. Then, the result display unit 35 outputs the result screen 60 to the senior referee's monitor device 20, each referee's tablet terminal 200, and the like.

(Functional configuration of tablet terminal 200)
As shown in FIG. 2 , the tablet terminal 200 has a communication section 201 , a display section 202 , a storage section 203 and a control section 204 . This tablet terminal 200 displays a memo screen 50 for each referee, and is used to make notes when counting effective hits such as strong hits and normal hits, and for each referee to check his own count. 1 is an example of a computer device.

The communication unit 201 is a processing unit connected to a device such as the monitor device 20, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 201 receives the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 from the monitor device 20 using a web browser, a dedicated screen tool, or the like, and transmits correction contents to the monitor device 20 .

The display unit 202 is a processing unit that displays various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a display, monitor, touch panel, or the like. For example, the display unit 202 displays various information such as the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 received from the monitor device 20 .

The storage unit 203 stores data, programs executed by the control unit 204, and the like, and is implemented by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. The storage unit 203 temporarily stores various information transmitted from the monitor device 20 .

The control unit 204 is a processing unit that controls the entire tablet terminal 200, and is realized by, for example, a processor. The control unit 204 has a screen display unit 204a and a correction unit 204b. Note that the screen display unit 204a and the correction unit 204b can also be implemented as an electronic circuit of a processor or a process executed by the processor.

The screen display unit 204a is a processing unit that receives and displays the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 from the monitor device 20 . For example, when receiving a request for a memo screen from a referee, the screen display unit 204a transmits a request for a memo screen 50 and the ID of the referee to the monitor device 20 . Then, the screen display unit 204a displays the memo screen 50 for the referee on the display unit 202. FIG. Further, the screen display unit 204a displays the result screen 60 received from the monitor device 20 on the display unit 202 in response to requests from the referees and senior referees.

The correction unit 204b is a processing unit that accepts correction of the count on the memo screen 50. FIG. For example, when receiving an operation of the increase/decrease button 53a on the memo screen 50 shown in FIG. 8, the correction unit 204b increases/decreases the count according to the operation. Then, when the send button 52 of the memo screen 50 is selected, the correction unit 204b sends information about each count of each round displayed in the area 53 at the time of selection to the monitor device 20, and requests reflection of the correction. .

Further, when the update button 51 of the memo screen 50 is selected, the correction unit 204b requests the monitor device 20 to update the screen in order to display the latest count information. In addition, the correction unit 204b can also transmit to the monitor device 20 the state when the transmission button 52 is selected for each check button such as Domination, and can transmit only once for each round. , it can be updated each time it is sent, and the sending conditions and sending timing can be arbitrarily set.

[Control example for each screen]
Next, details of the judge monitoring screen 40, the memo screen 50, and the result screen 60, which are generated by the monitor device 20 and transmitted to the relevant device, will be described.

(Specific example of judge monitoring screen 40)
First, a display example of the judge monitoring screen 40 will be described. FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a display example of the judge monitoring screen 40. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 9, if the referee A presses the red button 1A of the input device 1 8 seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 displays the red corner in the judge monitoring screen 40. The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 in the small area 44 of the referee A in the area 42 is updated to red (S1).

Also, if the blue button 3C of the input device 3 is pressed by the referee C eight seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 of the small area 44 of C is updated to blue (S2).

Similarly, if the blue button 5C of the input device 5 is pressed by the referee E eight seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 displays a referee image in the middle area 43 of the blue corner in the judge monitoring screen 40. The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 in the small area 44 of member E is updated to blue (S3).

(Display variations of the judge monitoring screen 40)
Also, the real-time processing unit 33 preferentially displays yellow over red. For example, when the red button 1A of the input device 1 is pressed by referee A, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the scale corresponding to the corresponding timeline to red. When the yellow button 1B is pressed, the scale is updated from red to yellow. Conversely, when the referee A presses the yellow button 1B of the input device 1, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the scale corresponding to the corresponding timeline to yellow. The scale remains yellow even when the red button 1A is pressed. Further, when a certain scale (timeline) on the judge monitoring screen 40 is selected, the real-time processing section 33 can display a moving image captured at the same time as the timeline.

(Specific example of correction by memo screen 50)
Next, the count correction by each referee will be explained. FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of count correction, and FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining an example of reflection of count correction. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of updating the memo screen 50. As shown in FIG. Here, referee A will be described as an example.

As shown in FIG. 10, when the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 receives a request for the memo screen 50 from the tablet terminal 200 of referee A, it generates the memo screen 50 by the method described in FIG. It is transmitted to the tablet terminal 200 of member A. On the memo screen 50 sent here, for Round 1, the red corner strong blow "3" and normal blow "14" are displayed, and the blue corner strong blow "3" and normal blow "6" are displayed. ing. In addition, the memo screen 50 displays the red corner strong hit "5" and normal hit "10" for round 2, and the blue corner strong hit "8" and normal hit "20". Note that round 3 is not displayed.

Subsequently, the screen display unit 204a of the tablet terminal 200 displays the received memo screen 50, and the correction unit 204b selects the increase/decrease button 53a for the normal hit count "14" of the round 1 in the red corner of the memo screen 50. Accept the operation and update to "13". After that, when the send button 52 on the memo screen 50 is pressed, the tablet terminal 200 sends a correction request including the displayed count number to the monitor device 20 . Specifically, the correction unit 204b of the tablet terminal 200 performs strong blows "3" and normal blows "13" in the red corner of round 1, strong blows "3" and normal blows "6" in the blue corner of round 1, Round 2 red corner strong hits "5" and normal hits "10", round 2 blue corner strong hits "8" and normal hits "20", all counts monitor "0" for round 3 Send to device 20 .

After that, as shown in FIG. 11, when the correction reflecting unit 34b of the monitor device 20 receives a correction request including the corrected count number from the tablet terminal 200, each count number included in the correction request and each of the collected information 25 By this comparison, the correction reflecting unit 34b identifies that the normal shot at the red corner of Round 1 is "13" and the total value "14" of the collected information 25 is one less. Then, the correction reflecting unit 34b determines that the normal hitting at the red corner in Round 1 has been corrected by "-1", and registers "-1" as the correction value for the normal hitting at the red corner in Round 1 in the collected information 25. do. Then, the correction reflecting unit 34b registers “13” calculated by “total value (14)+correction value (−1)” as the final value of the normal hitting at the red corner of Round 1 in the collected information 25 .

In this way, the monitor device 20 receives the correction contents by the correction operation using the memo screen 50 on the tablet terminal 200, and updates only the correction information of the collected information 25, but corrects the real-time information of the collected information 25. do not. In other words, the real-time information of the collected information 25 is recorded and maintained as the number itself counted by each referee during the match, and the correction information is information that each referee has determined as a judgment error and corrected individually as needed. Recorded.

Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 12, when the update button 51 of the memo screen 50 is pressed by the tablet terminal 200, the monitor device 20 updates the memo screen 50 based on the latest collected information 25, and updates the memo screen 50 after updating. The screen 50 is transmitted to the tablet terminal 200 . For example, when the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 updates the memo screen 50 of the referee A, the collected information 25 is referred to, and the normal hit to the red corner of the referee A and the final value of "13" are displayed. , and read out the final value of "3", which is the final value and the strong blow to the red corner of referee A, and generate a memo screen 50 in which each is set as the number of rounds. The memo screen 50 updated in this manner is transmitted from the monitor device 20 only to the tablet terminal 200 that requested the update, and the memo screen 50 after the update is displayed on the tablet terminal 200 . Note that the above-described processing is executed for each tablet terminal 200, and the correction operation and correction history of a certain judge are not displayed on the tablet terminals 200 of other judges.

(Specific example of result screen 60)
Next, the result screen 60 that displays the final result corrected by each referee will be described. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the result screen 60. As shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 13, the result display unit 35 of the monitor device 20 uses each final value of the collected information 25 and selection results such as domination transmitted from each tablet terminal 200 to display the result screen. 60 is generated and displayed. Specifically, the result display unit 35 displays, for each round and each referee, “judgment information” composed of “strong, normal, DOM., COM., VIO.”, “round 1 result”, “ Generates results screen 60 including "Round 2 Results", "Round 3 Results", and "Totals".

“Strong” is the number of times the referee has finally determined that the hit is a strong hit, and is information set in the “final value” of the collected information 25 . “Normal” is the number of times the referee finally decided to hit normal, and is information set as “final value” of the collected information 25 . "DOM." is the selection result of Domination, "COM." is the selection result of Competitiveness, and "VIO." is the selection result of Violation. is set to "1" for the selected player.

"Round 1 result" is the sum of the count values of each referee in Round 1, and is the result counted for each of strong hitting and normal hitting. "Round 2 result" is the sum of the count values of each referee in Round 2, and is the result counted for each of strong hitting and normal hitting. "Round 3 result" is the sum of the count values of each referee in Round 3, and is the result counted for each of strong hitting and normal hitting. "Total" is the sum of the count values of each referee in rounds 1 to 3, and is the result counted for each of the strong hits and normal hits.

Using Round 1 in FIG. 13 as a specific example, referee A counts “three” as strong blows in the red corner and “thirteen” as normal blows, and counts “three” as strong blows in the blue corner. It shows that "6" times were counted as normal blows. It also shows that referee A judged the player in the red corner to be "dominant" and "foul", and the player in the blue corner to be "aggressive".

Next, the results of each round will be described using the "result of round 1" as an example. In the "Round 1 result" of FIG. 13, as a strong hit in the red corner, "Referee A (3) + Referee B (2) + Referee C (1) + Referee D (3) + Referee E ( 1) = 10", as a normal hit in the red corner, "Referee A (13) + Referee B (9) + Referee C (10) + Referee D (9) + Referee E (13) = 54 ” is set.

Similarly, in the "Round 1 result" of FIG. Referee E (3) = 10", as a normal hit in the blue corner, "Referee A (6) + Referee B (5) + Referee C (10) + Referee D (15) + Referee E (13 )=49” is set.

"Strong" of "Total" is set to "Round 1 result (10) + Round 2 result (8) + Round 3 result (3) = 21", and "Normal" is set to "Round 1 result (54) + Round 2 result (45) + Round 3 result (32) = 131" is set.

As described above, the result display unit 35 of the monitor device 20 displays the collected information 25 that is collected in real time and that is permitted to be modified, rather than the collected information 25 that is collected in real time and is not permitted to be modified. A result screen 60 is generated based on the correction information.

(Use of Collected Information 25)
As described above, the monitor device 20 generates the collected information 25 based on the information obtained from each referee's input device. Then, the monitor device 20 uses the collected information 25 to generate the judge monitoring screen 40 and the memo screen 50 , and corrects the collected information 25 according to the correction by the referee using the memo screen 50 .

FIG. 14 is a diagram for explaining where the collected information 25 is used. As shown in FIG. 14, the real-time information of the collected information 25 is updated in real-time by the counting section 32 with the information received from the input device of each referee. Also, the real-time information is used by the real-time processing section 33 to generate the judge monitoring screen 40 . That is, the real-time information is information for the senior referee to check the input status of each referee in real time during the round, and once collected, it cannot be easily modified.

On the other hand, the correction information of the collected information 25 is used in a memo screen 50 for each referee to make a memo so that he/she can correct his/her mistake later in a highly tense state of instantaneously judging an effective hit during a match. . In other words, the correction information is provided to reduce the judge's psychological bias, and can be updated at any timing using the memo screen 50 . Also, since the final value of the correction information can be considered as the final judgment of each referee, it is used in the result screen 60 showing the final result that is viewed after the match ends.

[Process flow]
Next, each process executed by the judge monitoring system will be described. Here, real-time display processing for the judge monitoring screen 40, correction processing for the memo screen 50, and result display processing for the result screen 60 will be described.

(Real-time display processing)
FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the flow of real-time display processing. As shown in FIG. 15, when the process is started, the real-time processing unit 33 displays the judge monitoring screen 40 in an initial state in which none of the scales 45 display red, blue, or yellow ( S101: Yes) When a signal is received (S102: Yes), the output position and display color are specified according to the output conversion information 24 (S103).

Then, the real-time processing unit 33 identifies the time cell corresponding to the timing at which the first input or the second input is acquired in the timeline corresponding to the display position (row corresponding to the small area) determined in S103. (S104).

Subsequently, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the real-time information of the collected information 25 (S105). That is, the real-time processing unit 33 identifies the round, referee, player, and batting type from the signal, and increments the corresponding number of times.

Then, if the corresponding time cell is not displayed and nothing is output (S106: Yes), the real-time processing unit 33 displays the time specified in S104 on the timeline corresponding to the display position specified in S103. The cell is updated with the display color specified in S103 (S107). That is, a particular time cell is updated from gray to one of red, blue, or yellow.

On the other hand, if the corresponding time cell has already been displayed (S106: No), the real-time processing unit 33 determines whether the display target specified in S103 has a higher priority than the displayed information ( S108).

Here, the real-time processing unit 33 determines that the display target identified in S103 has a higher priority (S108: Yes). The time cell specified in S104 in the timeline corresponding to the display position specified in S103 is updated with the display color specified in S103 (S109). On the other hand, if the display target identified in S103 has a lower priority (S108: No), the real-time processing unit 33 maintains the already displayed state (S110).

In other words, if there are multiple inputs within one second, and any one of red, blue, and yellow is already displayed in the same time cell, the real-time processing unit 33 replaces the time cell with a new one. update to the color corresponding to the signal received at However, when it is desired to preferentially display yellow, the real-time processing unit 33 does not update to another color if the already displayed color is yellow.

After that, the real-time processing unit 33 repeatedly executes S102 and subsequent steps until the match ends (S111: No), and ends the process when the match ends (S111: Yes).

(Flow of correction processing)
FIG. 16 is a sequence diagram showing the flow of correction processing. As shown in FIG. 16, when the screen display unit 204a of the tablet terminal 200 receives a correction operation or a request for a memo screen from a referee, the screen display unit 204a transmits a request for providing a memo screen to the monitor device 20 (S201 and S202).

Then, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 refers to the collected information 25, acquires each final value of the corresponding referee (S203), generates the memo screen 50 (S204), and requests the memo screen 50. Display output is performed on the original tablet terminal 200 (S205 and S206).

Subsequently, the correcting unit 204b of the tablet terminal 200 accepts correction contents on the memo screen 50 displayed on the display unit 202 by the screen display unit 204a (S207). Then, when the send button 52 of the memo screen 50 is pressed, the correction unit 204b requests the monitor device 20 to reflect the content of the correction (S208 and S209).

After that, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 acquires each count value from the memo screen 50, compares it with the total value of the collected information 25, and updates the correction value with the difference (S210). Subsequently, the memo processor 34 updates the final value of the collected information 25 using the updated correction value and total value (S211).

After that, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 updates the memo screen 50 with the corrected contents, and displays and outputs the updated memo screen 50 to the tablet terminal 200 that is the source of the request (S212 and S213). Note that the memo processing unit 34 can update and provide the memo screen 50 at the timing when the correction is completed, and can update and provide the memo screen 50 at the timing when the update request is received from the tablet terminal 200 . can also

(Flow of result display processing)
FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing the flow of result display processing. As shown in FIG. 17, when the result display unit 35 of the monitor device 20 receives a result display request from a senior referee or each referee (S301: Yes), the collected information 25 is referred to, and each referee's Obtain the final value of each strike of each player in each round (S302). In addition, the result display unit 35 acquires the determination result of each referee such as aggressiveness acquired from the memo screen 50 (S303).

Subsequently, the result display unit 35 calculates the result of each round and the total value of all rounds (S304), and generates the result screen 60 using the obtained information and the calculated information (S305). Thereafter, the result display unit 35 displays the generated result screen 60 on the monitor device 20 and each tablet terminal 200 (S306).

[effect]
As described above, the judge monitoring system provides the judge monitoring screen 40 for senior judges, and for each judge, the judge who presses the button after each round and during each round corrects the count. A memo screen 50 for each referee can be provided.

By providing each referee with the memo screen 50, it is possible to reduce the referee's psychological bias that accompanies visualization of the competition situation in real time. In other words, if the referee recognizes that the number of hits can be corrected even after the round using the memo screen 50, even if the referee mistakenly counts the number of hits for player A during the round, , allowing subsequent mid-match judging to proceed without psychological bias, with a sense of security that can eventually be corrected. In addition, each referee can refer to the memo screen 50 for the number of hits after correction, etc., to make a final judgment for the round.

Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described so far, the present invention may be implemented in various different forms other than the embodiments described above.

[Example of memo screen]
For example, the monitor device 20 can also generate a memo screen 50 that displays an increase/decrease value along with the count value. 18 and 19 are diagrams for explaining another example of the memo screen. As shown in FIG. 18, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 generates a memo screen 50 that displays the number of corrections in addition to the number of counts of strong and normal blows in each round for each player. can also

Further, as shown in FIG. 19, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 displays a memo screen 50 that displays the count number and correction number of strong blows and the count number and correction number of normal blows in each round for each player. can also be generated.

The examples of FIGS. 18 and 19 show that the red corner strong hits counted in Round 1 are corrected by "-1" and are now counted as "3". Similarly, for the blue corner strong hits counted in round 2, a correction of "+1" has been made, resulting in a current count of "8".

In the above embodiment, the memo processing unit 34 generates and outputs the memo screen 50 that does not display the total value of the collected information 25 that is not to be corrected, but is not limited to this. For example, the memo processing unit 34 can generate a memo screen 50 displaying the total value and the final value so that the referee can see the increase/decrease status and the number of times the referee made an error. Also, the memo processing unit 34 may automatically generate the memo screen 50 after each round and output it to the tablet terminal 200 of each referee. Further, the count number on the memo screen 50 may be automatically updated according to the pressing of a button by each referee during the round.

[Numbers, competition examples, etc.]
Numerical examples, display examples, thresholds, and the like used in the above embodiments are only examples, and can be changed arbitrarily. In the above embodiment, boxing was exemplified as an example of a competitive sport, but it is not limited to this. can be applied. The display of the timeline is not limited to every second, and can be changed arbitrarily, such as displaying every two seconds.

[Button mapping]
In the above embodiment, an example in which normal hits and strong hits are associated with each button has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, hitting and defense can be associated with each button, and hitting and domination can be associated with each button. For example, in addition to the combination of the input indicating normal hitting as the first input and the input indicating strong hitting as the second input, the combination of the input indicating hitting as the first input and the input indicating defense as the second input. Also good. In addition, instead of two buttons for each player, three buttons for a total of six buttons can be associated with each player. The number of buttons and the contents associated with the buttons can be arbitrarily changed for each game and each referee.

[system]
Information including processing procedures, control procedures, specific names, and various data and parameters shown in the above documents and drawings can be arbitrarily changed unless otherwise specified. Note that the acquisition unit 15 corresponds to the reception unit, and the notification unit 16 corresponds to the transmission unit. Also, the acquisition unit 31 and the count unit 32 correspond to the identification unit, and the real-time processing unit 33 corresponds to the first generation unit and the first output unit. Also, the memo processing unit 34 corresponds to the second generation unit, the second output unit, and the storage control unit. The screen display unit 204a corresponds to the reception unit, and the correction unit 204b corresponds to the request unit.

Also, each component of each device illustrated is functionally conceptual, and does not necessarily need to be physically configured as illustrated. That is, the specific forms of distribution and integration of each device are not limited to those shown in the drawings. That is, all or part of them can be functionally or physically distributed and integrated in arbitrary units according to various loads and usage conditions. For example, the monitor device 20 may incorporate the relay device 10 .

Further, each processing function performed by each device may be implemented in whole or in part by a CPU and a program analyzed and executed by the CPU, or implemented as hardware based on wired logic.

[hardware]
Next, the hardware configuration of each device of the judge monitoring system will be described. Here, the monitor device 20 will be described as an example, but other devices have similar configurations. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example. As shown in FIG. 20, the monitor device 20 has a communication device 20a, a HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 20b, a memory 20c, and a processor 20d. 20 are interconnected by a bus or the like.

The communication device 20a is a network interface card or the like, and communicates with other servers. The HDD 20b stores programs and DBs for operating the functions shown in FIG.

The processor 20d reads from the HDD 20b or the like a program for executing processing similar to that of each processing unit shown in FIG. 2 and develops it in the memory 20c, thereby operating processes for executing each function described with reference to FIG. 2 and the like. For example, this process executes the same function as each processing unit of the monitor device 20 . Specifically, the processor 20d reads a program having functions similar to those of the acquiring unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, the result display unit 35, and the like, from the HDD 10b and the like. Then, the processor 10d executes processes similar to those of the acquisition unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, the result display unit 35, and the like.

Thus, the monitor device 20 operates as an information processing device that executes the output control method by reading and executing the program. Also, the monitor device 20 can read the program from the recording medium by the medium reading device and execute the read program, thereby realizing the same function as the above-described embodiment. It should be noted that the programs referred to in other embodiments are not limited to being executed by the monitor device 20 . For example, the present invention can be applied in the same way when another computer or server executes the program, or when they cooperate to execute the program.

10 relay device 11 input unit 12 communication unit 13 storage unit 14 conversion information 15 acquisition unit 16 notification unit 20 monitor device 21 communication unit 22 display unit 23 storage unit 24 output conversion information 25 collected information 26 video information 27 correspondence list 28 terminal information 30 control unit 31 acquisition unit 32 count unit 33 real-time processing unit 33a screen generation unit 33b output control unit 34 memo processing unit 34a memo display unit 34b correction reflection unit 35 result display unit 200 tablet terminal 201 communication unit 202 display unit 203 storage unit 204 Control unit 204a Screen display unit 204b Correction unit

Claims (9)

to the computer,
Each time a first input or a second input is received from each of a plurality of referees during a match competition,
obtaining information from the referee that can identify the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input, and any of the plurality of players in the match, respectively , from the referee ;
A first screen in which small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order along a timeline showing the progress of a game, in each medium area assigned to each player, Said first screen in which an index indicating whether said first input or said second input is added at a position determined by the players and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. is generated in response to said acquisition,
Output the generated first screen,
generating a first aggregated result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information about inputs by each of the plurality of referees;
A second screen that displays the first tallied result related to a first referee among the plurality of referees and accepts correction of the first tallied result is associated with the first referee. output to the referee terminal,
When the correction of the first aggregated result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first aggregated result related to the first referee, the corrected second aggregated result is added to the first aggregated result. A screen output program characterized by causing a referee to execute processing that is linked and stored. When a correction request for the second tallied result occurs, the second tallied result for the first referee is displayed, and the second screen is linked to the first referee. output to the referee terminal,
When the correction of the second tallied result is received from the referee terminal, the first tallied result related to the first referee is stored in association with the first referee without being revised. 2. The screen output program according to claim 1, causing the computer to execute a process of correcting the second tabulated result to a corrected third tabulated result. The process of outputting the second screen to the referee terminal linked to the first referee is performed when a correction request for the second tally result occurs, the second screen for the first referee. generating the second screen displaying the aggregated result and the difference value between the first aggregated result and the second aggregated result, and linking the generated second screen to the first referee; 3. The screen output program according to claim 2, which outputs to a referee terminal. When the correction of the first tallied result is received from the referee terminal, the first tallied result is based on the first input or the second input obtained from the input device of each of the plurality of referees. causes the computer to execute a process of updating the second aggregated result accompanying the correction received from the referee terminal to the third aggregated result in accordance with the new correction received without correcting the 3. The screen output program according to claim 2, characterized by: The first input is an input indicating a first element that can be the basis for scoring results by each of the plurality of referees,
5. The screen output program according to claim 1, wherein said second input is an input indicating a second element different from said first element. The competition competition is a competition involving hitting,
The first element is a strong blow,
6. The screen output program according to claim 5, wherein said second element is a strike other than said strong strike. the computer
Each time a first input or a second input is received from each of a plurality of referees during a match competition,
obtaining information from the referee that can identify the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input, and any of the plurality of players in the match, respectively , from the referee ;
A first screen in which small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order along a timeline showing the progress of a game, in each medium area assigned to each player, Said first screen in which an index indicating whether said first input or said second input is added at a position determined by the players and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. is generated in response to said acquisition,
Output the generated first screen,
generating a first aggregated result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information about inputs by each of the plurality of referees;
A second screen that displays the first tallied result related to a first referee among the plurality of referees and accepts correction of the first tallied result is associated with the first referee. output to the referee terminal,
When the correction of the first aggregated result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first aggregated result related to the first referee, the corrected second aggregated result is added to the first aggregated result. A screen output method characterized by executing a process of memorizing in association with a referee. Each time a first input or a second input is received from each of a plurality of referees during a match competition,
an acquisition unit that acquires from the referee information capable of identifying the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input, or any of the plurality of players in the match, from the referee;
A first screen in which small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order along a timeline showing the progress of a game, in each medium area assigned to each player, Said first screen in which an index indicating whether said first input or said second input is added at a position determined by the players and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. a first generating unit that generates according to the acquisition;
a first output unit that outputs the generated first screen;
a second generating unit that generates a first tallied result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information about the input by each of the plurality of referees;
A second screen that displays the first tallied result related to a first referee among the plurality of referees and accepts correction of the first tallied result is associated with the first referee. a second output unit that outputs to a referee terminal;
When the correction of the first aggregated result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first aggregated result related to the first referee, the corrected second aggregated result is added to the first aggregated result. and a storage control unit that stores information in association with a referee. A plurality of input devices used by each of the plurality of referees who referee the match competition, a plurality of tablet terminals linked to each of the plurality of input devices, and a monitor device used by a senior referee who monitors the plurality of referees. In a monitoring system comprising
Each of the plurality of input devices
a reception unit that receives input from a referee corresponding to each item to be refereeed for each athlete;
a transmitting unit configured to transmit information specifying the received input to the monitor device when input from the referee is received;
The monitor device
Each time information specifying the input is received from each of the plurality of input devices during the match of the competitive competition,
a specifying unit that specifies information that can identify the referee who made the input, the type of the input, or the plurality of players in the match according to the information that specifies the received input;
A first screen provided in a state in which small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order along a timeline showing the progress of a match, for each middle area assigned to each player, a first generation unit that generates the first screen in which an indicator indicating the type of the input is added at a position determined by the player and the referee to be input and the timing at which the input is generated;
a first output unit that outputs the generated first screen;
a second generating unit that generates a first tallied result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information about the input by each of the plurality of referees;
displaying the first tallied result related to a first referee among the plurality of referees and displaying a second screen for accepting correction of the first tallied result on the tablet of the first referee; a second output unit that outputs to a terminal;
When the correction of the first aggregated result is received from the tablet terminal, in addition to the first aggregated result related to the first referee, the corrected second aggregated result is sent to the first referee. a memory control unit that stores in association with a member,
Each of the plurality of tablet terminals,
a reception unit that receives and displays the second screen from the monitor device, and receives correction content of the first tabulated result on the second screen;
A monitoring system, comprising: a request unit that transmits correction content of the first tallied result to the monitoring device and requests reflection of the correction content.

Images