WO2021152665A1 - Screen output program, screen output method, information processing apparatus, and monitoring system - Google Patents

Abstract

In the invention, a monitor apparatus acquires, every time the monitor apparatus receives a first input or a second input from each of a plurality of referees during a fighting game, information that can distinguish a referee who performed input, a distinction of the input, and which fighting player was input. The monitor apparatus inputs, for every medium area allocated to each player, an index that shows the distinction of the input on a first screen in which small areas allocated to respective referees are aligned in a specified order along a time line showing a lapse of the game, at a position determined by the specified player and the referee, and an acquisition timing. The monitor apparatus generates aggregate results for each of the plurality of referees on the basis of information about the input by each of the plurality of referees. The monitor apparatus displays an aggregate result relating to a first referee and outputs a second screen for receiving correction of the aggregate result to the first referee. When receiving correction of the aggregate result from the first referee, the monitor apparatus stores, in addition to the aggregate result before correction, a corrected aggregate result in association with the first referee.

Description

Screen output program, screen output method, information processing device and monitoring system

The present invention relates to a screen output program, a screen output method, an information processing device, and a monitoring system.

The victory or defeat of a match in a competitive competition is often determined by counting the effective points such as effective attacks and defenses by multiple referees and using the counting results of each referee. For example, in boxing, the referee counts the final number of effective hits for each player at the end of each round by pushing the counter when each player A and B is hit effectively during the match. The aggregation system is used. Also, in boxing in recent years, each referee uses the input device at hand to give 10 points to the dominant player and 10 points to the other player at the end of the round according to the 10-point mast rule. A scoring system that scores less than is used.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2011-104192

By the way, in the above technique, the score of each player is determined by the subjective evaluation of the referee, but it is difficult for the referee to grasp the grounds for giving such a score, and the judgment result is incorrect or unfair. The feeling may remain.

For example, in the above scoring system, in boxing, the superiority of any player is judged for each round, and 10 points are given to the superior player. At this time, as the grounds for awarding points, for example, in the offense and defense between players, an effective hit was decided, a defense to prevent an effective hit occurred, and which player advanced the match at each point in time. Whether or not it is a valid judgment (point) to be added. However, these valid judgments are determined by the subjectivity of each referee, and only the score (10-9, 10-8, etc.), which is the final judgment result of each referee, is input to the scoring system. It is difficult to confirm the biased judgment of a certain referee for a certain player after the match.

For this reason, the transparency of judgments and scoring can be improved by aggregating and displaying the timing at which each referee added points as a valid judgment during the round, during the match, after the end of the round, or after the end of the match. A monitoring technology to be secured has been proposed. For example, the monitoring technology generates a screen in which an area is assigned to each referee for each second of each round for each opponent, and the area of the referee who presses the button after judging that it is a valid hit is lit in real time. By letting the referee know which referee judged the effective hit at what timing, the senior referee is presented in real time. The senior referee is a referee who supervises and supervises multiple referees. Monitoring techniques can help senior referees monitor the legitimacy of each referee and the bias of the referee's judgment.

However, with the above monitoring technology, pursuing accuracy and real-time performance may increase the psychological bias of the referee and reduce the accuracy of the referee's judgment. For example, each referee is required to instantly judge an effective hit during a match while there is a high degree of tension that the judgment timing etc. is being viewed by a senior referee or the like. It is possible to make a mistake. At this time, if the state in which the judgment cannot be corrected is maintained, each referee may count many effective hits to the player opposite to the player who mistakenly judges the effective hit in an attempt to match the book during the match. , I can't concentrate on the game, and I get a "psychological bias". Then, as a result, there is a risk that an accurate judge cannot be made.

One aspect is to provide a screen output program, screen output method, information processing device and monitoring system that can reduce the psychological bias of the referee when monitoring the judgment status of the referee in real time. And.

In the first proposal, the screen output program inputs the first input or the second input to the computer each time the first input or the second input is received from each of the plurality of referees during the match of the competitive competition. The process of acquiring identifiable information is executed for each of the first input, the second input, and the plurality of players in the match. The screen output program was provided on the computer in a state in which the small areas assigned to each referee were arranged in a specific order and along the timeline showing the progress of the match for each medium area assigned to each player. On the first screen, the distinction between the first input and the second input can be seen at the position determined by the athlete and the referee specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. The first screen to which the index is added is generated in response to the acquisition, and the process of outputting the generated first screen is executed. The screen output program causes the computer to execute a process of generating the first aggregation result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees. The screen output program displays on the computer the first tabulation result relating to the first referee among the plurality of referees, and displays the second screen for accepting the correction of the first tabulation result. The process of outputting to the referee terminal associated with the first referee is executed. When the screen output program receives the correction of the first aggregation result from the referee terminal to the computer, in addition to the first aggregation result relating to the first referee, the modified second The process of associating the tabulation result with the first referee and storing it is executed.

According to one embodiment, it is possible to reduce the psychological bias of the referee when monitoring the judgment status of the referee in real time.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overall configuration example of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing a functional configuration of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of conversion information. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of output conversion information. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of collected information. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of terminal information. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a judge monitoring screen. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a memo screen. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a display example of the judge monitoring screen. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of count correction. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of reflecting the count correction. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of updating the memo screen. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a result screen. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a destination for using the collected information. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the flow of real-time display processing. FIG. 16 is a sequence diagram showing the flow of the correction process. FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing the flow of the result display processing. FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating another example of the memo screen. FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating another example of the memo screen. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example.

Hereinafter, examples of the screen output program, screen output method, information processing apparatus, and monitoring system according to the present invention will be described in detail based on the drawings. The present invention is not limited to this embodiment. In addition, each embodiment can be appropriately combined within a consistent range.

[overall structure]
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overall configuration example of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, in Example 1, the process of refereeing by five referees (hereinafter, may be simply referred to as “referee”) is described by taking boxing, which is an example of competitive competition, as an example. An example of a senior referee monitoring five referees using a monitoring screen will be described.

As shown in FIG. 1, the judge monitoring system includes an input device 1, an input device 5, a relay device 10, a video camera 100, a tablet terminal 200 corresponding to a referee terminal, and a monitor device 20. Each device is connected via a network, and various networks can be adopted as the network regardless of whether it is wired or wireless.

As an example of each of the input devices 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, there is an input pad installed in each of the seats of the referees A, B, C, D, and E. The relay device 10 is a switch or the like that connects each input device and the monitor device 20. The video camera 100 captures the entire ring from the start of the boxing match to the end of the match, and captures a moving image or a still image of the match. The tablet terminal 200 is an example of a computer device used by each referee. The monitoring device 20 is an example of a computer device used by a senior referee who monitors the judgment result of each referee.

In general, boxing is scored by a scoring system (ten point mast system) in which each referee gives the dominant player 10 points and the other player less than 10 points at the end of the round. Is being used. Further, in recent years, a monitoring technique has been used that visualizes the timing at which the referee adds points as a valid judgment and ensures the transparency of the judgment and scoring by the referee.

By using monitoring technology for such a scoring system, the transparency of scoring is guaranteed, which leads to the legitimacy of each referee, the improvement of each referee's skill, and the improvement of the value of the match itself. In addition, by displaying the timing at which each referee adds points as a valid judgment to each referee or spectator, it is possible to improve the sense of presence of the spectator or viewer and improve the entertainment property.

However, each referee is required to instantly judge the effective hit during the match with a high degree of tension that the judgment timing etc. is being viewed by the spectators, senior referees, etc., so the effective hit It is possible that the judgment of is wrong. Then, each referee is subject to "psychological bias" if the state in which the judgment cannot be corrected is maintained.

For example, suppose a referee mistakenly counts a punch for player A during a round. Normally, the referee notices the mistake, but the round continues, so it is not desirable for the referee to correct the input result on the spot because the operation becomes complicated for the referee. On the other hand, when it becomes impossible to cancel, the referee notices that he made a mistake, and after he realizes that he has made a mistake, there is a "psychological bias" that tries to offset the mistake by putting a lot of punches in the opposite player B in order to adjust the book. It takes. Then, as a result, there is a risk that an accurate judge cannot be made.

Therefore, the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment provides a judge monitoring screen for senior referees and the like that displays the judgment timing of each referee in real time, and also for the tablet terminal 200 used by each referee. Therefore, the referee himself provides a memo screen for making a memo of the count number of effective hits. The referee himself can refer to the memo screen when making the final scoring (points such as 10-9 and 10-8 in the Ten Point mast rule). By referring to the memo screen, the referee can score more accurately than the scoring based on the sense or the effective hit count manually.

Specifically, each referee presses the corresponding button on the input device at hand when an effective hit occurs. For example, the input device 1 has a red button 1A, a yellow button 1B, a blue button 1C, and a yellow button 1D. The red button 1A and the yellow button 1B are buttons associated with the player in the red corner, and the button 1A is associated with a normal hit (normal hit) which is an effective attack such as a jab, and the button 1B is associated with a normal hit (normal hit). , Strong hits (strong hits), which are powerful and effective hits that lead to the down of the opponent player, are associated.

Similarly, the blue button 1C and the yellow button 1D are buttons associated with the players in the blue corner, the button 1C is associated with a normal batting, and the button 1D is associated with a strong batting. In the following embodiment, an example of a combination of an input indicating a normal impact as the first input and an input indicating a strong impact as the second input will be described. In addition to the combination, a combination of an input indicating a blow as the first input, an input indicating a defense as the second input, and the like may be used. The first and second inputs are multiple elemental inputs that can be the basis for the final scoring result by the referee. For example, the first element is a strong blow and the second element is a normal blow.

That is, the referee A presses button 1A when counting the normal hits of player X in the red corner, and presses button 1D when counting the strong hits of player Y in the blue corner. Similarly, the referee A presses button 1B when counting the strong hits of player X in the red corner, and presses button 1C when counting the normal hits of player Y in the blue corner.

Then, the monitor device 20 used by the senior referee acquires the button pressing result from each input device via the relay device 10, and displays the button pressing status of each referee, that is, the status of the validity judgment in real time.

For example, the monitoring device 20 arranges a small area assigned to each referee for each medium area assigned to each player, and a judge having a small area divided along the timeline for each referee. A monitoring screen 40 (exemplified in FIG. 6 described later) is generated. Then, when the referee A presses the red button 1A at the time t, the monitor device 20 has a small area of the referee A in the middle area assigned to the player X in the red corner, which corresponds to the time t. Is displayed in red. Further, in the monitoring device 20, when the referee C presses the yellow button 1D at the time t + 1, the area corresponding to the time t + 1 among the small areas of the referee C in the middle area assigned to the player Y in the blue corner. Is displayed in yellow. Further, in each of the middle areas, the arrangement order of the small areas assigned to each referee is the same. That is, when the small areas of each referee are arranged in the order of referees A, B, C, D, E in the middle area for the player X, the referees A, B are placed in the middle area for the player Y. , C, D, E are arranged in the order of each referee's small area.

In this way, the monitoring device 20 collects the timings determined to be effective by each referee in real time and displays them in real time, so that the senior referee can compare and examine the judgment status of each referee. Provides an interface.

Further, the monitor device 20 displays the count status of effective hits only for the referee himself on the tablet terminal 200 used by each referee during the match, and provides a memo screen which is an interface for correcting each count number.

Specifically, the monitoring device 20 generates the first aggregation result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees. Then, the monitoring device 20 displays the first tabulation result of the referee A among the plurality of referees, and displays a memo screen for accepting the correction of the first tabulation result on the tablet associated with the referee A. Output to the terminal 200. After that, when the monitoring device 20 receives the correction of the first tabulation result from the tablet terminal 200, the referee A receives the revised second tabulation result in addition to the first tabulation result related to the referee A. Remember by associating with.

That is, the monitoring device 20 provides each referee with a memo screen for correcting the count number, in addition to the judge monitoring screen 40 for senior referees. As a result, each referee can recognize that the count number can be corrected even after the round by using this memo screen. In other words, even if the referee in the round mistakenly counts the effective hits for player A, there is a sense of security that he can finally correct it. You can proceed.

On the other hand, senior referees also need to check the input status of each referee in real time during the round. Therefore, the monitoring device 20 visualizes to the senior referee the timing when each referee determines that each player is an effective hit by generating the judge monitoring screen 40, and the display is displayed by pressing a button. Since the situation should be shown as the fact that the button was pressed, the display of the judge monitoring screen 40 once displayed is not changed even if the count number is corrected by the referee. In this way, from the viewpoint of monitoring by senior referees, a mechanism for managing corrections on individual screens is provided separately from the input results in real time.

[Functional configuration]
Next, the functional configuration of each device constituting the judge monitoring system will be described. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing a functional configuration of the judge monitoring system according to the first embodiment. Since the tablet terminal used by each referee has the same configuration, the tablet terminal 200 will be described here.

(Functional configuration of relay device 10)
As shown in FIG. 2, the relay device 10 includes an input unit 11, a communication unit 12, a storage unit 13, an acquisition unit 15, and a notification unit 16. The relay device 10 is an example of a computer device that notifies the monitor device 20 of the process of the referee performed by each referee using each input device. The acquisition unit 15 and the notification unit 16 can be realized by a hardware circuit or an electronic circuit included in the processor, or can be realized as a process executed by the processor.

The input unit 11 is a processing unit connected to each of the input devices 1 to 5 used by each referee, and is, for example, an input device having a plurality of input / output ports (PINs). For example, the input unit 11 connects to the input device 1 using PIN1 to PIN4, connects to the input device 2 using PIN5 to PIN8, connects to the input device 3 using PIN9 to PIN12, and connects PIN13 to PIN16. It is used to connect to the input device 4, and PIN17 to PIN20 are used to connect to the input device 5. Each PIN is connected to each button of each input device.

Here, each input device will be described. Each input device has four buttons in which a display color to be displayed by the monitor device 20 is set. For example, each input device has a red button A pressed during a normal hit by a player in the red corner, a yellow button B pressed during a strong hit, and a blue button C pressed during a normal hit by a player in the blue corner. And a yellow button D that is pressed when a strong hit is made. Further, since each button is connected to the input / output port of the input unit 11 of the relay device 10, the relay device can specify which button of which input device is pressed.

Returning to FIG. 2, the communication unit 12 is a processing unit that controls communication with other devices such as the monitor device 20, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 12 transmits a signal corresponding to the input from each input device to the monitor device 20.

The storage unit 13 stores programs, data, etc., and is realized by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. For example, the storage unit 13 stores the conversion information 14.

The conversion information 14 is information used when converting the input from each input device into a signal to be transmitted to the monitoring device 20. The output signal obtained by converting the input from the input device is either the referee who made the input, the first input indicating a normal hit or the second input indicating a strong hit, or multiple players in the match. Is identifiable information.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of conversion information 14. As shown in FIG. 3, the conversion information 14 is information in which a “PIN number” and a “signal” are associated with each other. The “PIN number” stored here indicates an input / output port, and the “signal” is information for specifying a signal to be transmitted to the monitoring device 20. In the example of FIG. 3, when the input signal is received via the PIN1 connected to the button 1A of the input device 1, it is converted into the signal "a" and is converted into the signal "a" via the PIN2 connected to the button 1B of the input device 1. When the input signal is received, it indicates that it is converted into the signal "b".

The acquisition unit 15 is a processing unit that acquires an input signal from the input device via the input unit 11. For example, when the acquisition unit 15 receives an input signal via each PIN, the acquisition unit 15 outputs the PIN number for which the input signal is received to the notification unit 16.

The notification unit 16 is a processing unit that transmits an output signal corresponding to the input input signal to the monitoring device 20. Specifically, the notification unit 16 converts the input signal input to the input unit 11 into an output signal and transmits it according to the conversion information 14. For example, when the acquisition unit 15 notifies PIN1, the notification unit 16 identifies the signal a according to the conversion information 14, and transmits the signal a to the monitoring device 20.

(Functional configuration of monitor device 20)
As shown in FIG. 2, the monitoring device 20 includes a communication unit 21, a display unit 22, a storage unit 23, and a control unit 30. The monitoring device 20 generates a judge monitoring screen 40, and displays and outputs in real time the results of each referee determining that each of player X (red corner) and player Y (blue corner) is a normal hit or a strong hit. This is an example of a computer device.

The communication unit 21 is a processing unit connected to a device such as a relay device 10, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 21 receives a signal a or the like from the relay device 10. Further, the communication unit 21 may receive the moving image information captured by the video camera 100. Further, the communication unit 21 can also transmit various information such as a screen generated by the control unit 30 to an external device.

The display unit 22 is a processing unit that displays various information, and is realized by, for example, a display, a monitor, a touch panel, or the like. For example, the display unit 22 displays various information such as a screen generated by the control unit 30.

The storage unit 23 stores data, a program executed by the control unit 30, and the like, and is realized by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. The storage unit 23 stores output conversion information 24, collection information 25, moving image information 26, association list 27, and terminal information 28.

The output conversion information 24 is information that converts the information relayed from the relay device 10 in order to output it to the judge monitoring screen 40. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of the output conversion information 24. As shown in FIG. 4, the output conversion information 24 stores the “item number”, “signal”, “output position”, and “display color” in association with each other. In this embodiment, one of the referee who made the input and a plurality of players in the match is specified by the output position. In addition, the display color specifies whether the first input indicates a normal impact or the second input indicates a strong impact.

The "item number" stored here is an identifier that identifies each piece of information, and the "signal" indicates a signal input from the relay device 10. The “output position” indicates a position on the judge monitoring screen 40, and the “display color” indicates a color to be displayed on the judge monitoring screen 40. Item 1 of FIG. 4 indicates that the signal a input from the relay device 10 is displayed in red on the display line 1 of the judge monitoring screen 40. Item No. 2 indicates that the signal b input from the relay device 10 is displayed in yellow on the display line 1 of the judge monitoring screen 40. The details of the output position will be described later. Further, the output conversion information 24 is information defined in advance by the user.

The collected information 25 is information input from the relay device 10. That is, the collected information 25 is a list of judgment results of each referee. The information stored here is generated by the control unit 30. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the collected information 25. As shown in FIG. 5, the collected information 25 is information in which real-time information and correction information are associated with each round.

Real-time information is information that is updated in real time during the match, indicates the number of button presses (effective hits) by the referee, and is not corrected once it is recorded. Specifically, the real-time information is for each round timeline (each second), the number of times each referee judges a normal hit, the number of times a strong hit is judged, and each count for each of the red corner and the blue corner. Record the total value. The total value corresponds to the first aggregation result.

The correction information is information for correcting the information aggregated in real time, and is information that is updated at any time by the memo screen of each referee, which will be described later. Specifically, the correction information records a value for correcting the total value of the real-time information (correction value) and a final value (final value) for which the total value is corrected by the correction value. Further, the final value is appropriately updated by using the corrected value each time the total value is updated by the real-time count. The final value corresponds to the second aggregation result and the third aggregation result.

That is, in the collected information 25, the count number received in real time and the input timing of each referee are recorded, and the newly corrected count number is also recorded. In the judge monitoring screen 40 for senior referees created from the real-time information of the collected information 25, the count number before the correction is maintained, while the memo screen 50 for each referee is generated in the corrected state.

In the example of FIG. 5, in the timeline 1 (1 second) immediately after the start of the first round (hereinafter, it may be simply referred to as “round 1”), the referee A is regarded as a normal hit in the red corner. Indicates that 0 times, referee B counted 0 times, referee C counted 0 times, referee D counted 0 times, and referee E counted 2 times. In addition, in the timeline 1 (1 second) immediately after the start of round 1, it is shown that only referee C counted once as a strong blow in the red corner. It also indicates that no amendments have been made by any of the referees. The timeline is set slightly longer than the match time in order to allow an error. For example, if one round is 3 minutes, the timeline is set to 190 seconds (180 seconds + α), which is longer than 3 minutes (180 seconds). α is an arbitrary numerical value.

The moving image information 26 is a game image captured by the video camera 100. The moving image information 26 is managed by a time stamp similar to the time stamp of the collected information 25.

The correspondence list 27 is information that can identify which hit of which player was counted by which referee from the signal. For example, the association list 27 is information in which the signal, the hit type, and the referee are associated with each other. More specifically, the correspondence list 27 shows "Signal a, red corner, normal hit, referee A", "signal b, red corner, strong hit, referee" as "signal, corner, hit type, referee". "A", "Signal c, blue corner, normal hit, referee A", "traffic light d, blue corner, strong hit, referee A" and the like.

The terminal information 28 is information that defines the correspondence between each referee and the computer used by each referee. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of terminal information 28. As shown in FIG. 6, the terminal information 28 is information in which the “referee”, the “input device”, and the “tablet terminal” are associated with each other. Here, the "referee" is information for identifying each referee, the "input device" indicates an input device used by each referee, and the "tablet terminal" is a tablet terminal used by each referee. Shows 200. In the example of FIG. 6, the referee A has an input device 1 to which "ID = A" is assigned, and a tablet terminal AA to which "ID = A" and "XXXX" are assigned as IP addresses. It is defined to use and indicates that each terminal is linked by "ID = A".

The control unit 30 is a processing unit that controls the entire monitoring device 20, and is realized by, for example, a processor. The control unit 30 includes an acquisition unit 31, a counting unit 32, a real-time processing unit 33, a memo processing unit 34, and a result display unit 35. The acquisition unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, and the result display unit 35 can also be realized as an electronic circuit included in the processor or a process executed by the processor.

The acquisition unit 31 is a processing unit that receives a signal from the relay device 10 via the communication unit 21. For example, the acquisition unit 31 receives a signal corresponding to the pressed button via the relay device 10 each time the button of each input device is pressed. Then, the acquisition unit 31 outputs the received signal to the count unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, and the result display unit 35. The signal is information that can identify any of the referee who made the input, the first input indicating the normal hit or the second input indicating the strong hit, and a plurality of players in the match. .. In addition, a signal indicating the referee who made the input, a signal indicating another of the first input indicating a normal hit or a second input indicating a strong hit, and a signal indicating one of a plurality of players in the match are individually displayed. You may get it in.

The counting unit 32 is a processing unit that counts each signal based on the acquisition result acquired by the acquisition unit 31. That is, the counting unit 32 collects the judgment results of each referee, records them in the collected information 25, and generates the collected results.

For example, when the signal a is input from the acquisition unit 31 at the timing of the timeline 1 (1 second after the start of the match) of the round 1, the count unit 32 refers to the correspondence list 27 and the referee A is in the red corner. Identify that the player's normal hits have been counted. Then, the counting unit 32 increments the count number of the referee A for the red corner of the normal hit on the timeline 1 (1 second) of the round 1 of the collected information 25.

In addition, the counting unit 32 calculates and registers the total value of the normal hits and the strong hits of each referee each time the hits are counted. Further, when the modified value of the collected information 25 is registered, the counting unit 32 registers the result of modifying the total value based on the modified value as the final value.

The real-time processing unit 33 has a screen generation unit 33a and an output control unit 33b, and is a processing unit that generates a judgment result of each referee as a judge monitoring screen 40 and outputs it to the display unit 22 in real time.

The screen generation unit 33a is a processing unit that generates the judge monitoring screen 40. Here, the details of the judge monitoring screen 40 generated by the screen generation unit 33a will be described. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of the judge monitoring screen 40. As shown in FIG. 7, the screen generation unit 33a displays the determination result for the player in the blue corner, the area 41 for displaying the information for identifying the current round, the middle area 42 for displaying the determination result for the player in the red corner, and the determination result for the player in the blue corner. A judge monitoring screen 40 having a medium area 43 to be displayed is generated.

Further, the screen generation unit 33a generates a small area 44 assigned to each of the referees A to the referee E in each of the middle area 42 and the middle area 43. Further, the screen generation unit 33a generates a scale 45 (timeline) representing the time width from the start timing to the end timing of the match in the small area 44 of each referee. Here, the scale 45 is divided into 190 seconds, which is 180 seconds (3 minutes), which is the time of one round, plus, for example, 10 seconds as a predetermined time length, every second. In the following description, each interval divided every second on the timeline is referred to as a time cell. That is, the judgment result for the first second after the start of round 1 corresponds to the first line (timeline 1) of the scale 45, and the judgment result for the second second of the round 1 corresponds to the second line (timeline 2) of the scale 45. Corresponds to. The system designer may appropriately change how much a predetermined time length is added to the time length of one round.

Here, the screen generation unit 33a generates a screen in which the arrangement order of the small areas 44 to be displayed in each of the middle area 42 and the middle area 43 is the same. For example, if the five small areas provided in the middle area 42 are arranged in the order of referees A to E, the small areas provided in the middle area 43 are also arranged in the order of the referees A to E. By grouping the display areas for each player as the middle area instead of grouping the areas to be displayed for each referee, it is possible to make the display easy to grasp the difference in the judgment of each referee for the same player. Further, by making the arrangement order of the small areas the same in both middle areas, it is possible to display the tendency of judgment for each referee in an easy-to-understand manner. For example, in FIG. 6, in the timeline 14, as a result of displaying red on the scale 45 corresponding to any referee in the middle region 42, it looks as if one red line is displayed. There is. By visually recognizing such a display, senior referees can judge whether multiple referees make the same judgment, or whether only some referees make different judgments. It becomes possible to easily grasp the difference in the judgment of. From the line of referee A in the red corner to the line of referee E in the blue corner, the display line 1, the display line 2, the display line 3, ..., The display line 10 are used in this order. The judge monitoring screen 40 corresponds to the first screen.

The output control unit 33b is a processing unit that displays the judgment results of each referee in real time on the judge monitoring screen 40 generated by the screen generation unit 33a. Specifically, each time the output control unit 33b receives the signal input from the acquisition unit 31, the output control unit 33b specifies the output position and the display color according to the output conversion information 24, and the scale 45 (timeline) on the corresponding screen. ), The output corresponding to the signal is displayed.

For example, it is assumed that the output control unit 33b receives the signal a 11 seconds after the start of round 1. In this case, the output control unit 33b refers to the output conversion information 24 and specifies the output position (display line 1) and the display color (red) associated with the signal a. Then, the output control unit 33b outputs red to the 11th scale (timeline 11) of the scale 45 of the small area 44 of the corresponding referee A.

If one referee counts the same player multiple times during the same timeline, the number of times the real-time information of the collected information 25 is counted is counted, but the display is only once. do. For example, the output control unit 33b executes only the display for the first signal a even when the signal a is received 11 seconds after the start of the game and then the signal a is further received during the same 11 seconds. , Only the display for the last signal a is executed, or the display is overwritten each time the signal is received, so that only one display is output.

However, even if one referee counts the same player multiple times during the same timeline, yellow will be displayed preferentially. For example, the output control unit 33b outputs a red color corresponding to the signal a when the signal a is received 8 seconds after the start of the game, but when the signal b is further received within the same 8 seconds, the signal b is output. The yellow output corresponding to b is preferentially output. The output destination of the output control unit 33b is not limited to the display unit 22, and the settings can be arbitrarily changed to a large monitor (not shown) installed at the match venue, a tablet terminal 200 of each referee, a television, an internet broadcast, or the like. be able to.

Returning to FIG. 2, the memo processing unit 34 has a memo display unit 34a and a correction reflection unit 34b, generates a memo screen 50 for counting correction for the tablet terminal 200 of each referee, and is displayed on the memo screen 50. It is a processing unit that reflects the correction operation by.

The memo display unit 34a is a processing unit that generates and outputs a memo screen 50 for the referee himself to make a memo of the count number of effective hits. Here, the details of the memo screen 50 generated by the memo display unit 34a will be described. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the memo screen 50. As shown in FIG. 8, the memo display unit 34a generates a memo screen 50 having an update button 51, a send button 52, and an area 53 for displaying the count number in response to a request from each referee, and generates a memo screen 50 of the request source. It is transmitted to the referee's tablet terminal 200. The destination can be specified by using the terminal information 28.

Note that the memo display unit 34a generates and transmits an updated memo screen 50 in the area 53 when the update button 51 is selected, and receives the correction content when the send button 52 is selected. The memo display unit 54a also displays radio buttons for selecting the dominance, competitiveness, and violation of the game on the memo screen 50. Not limited to radio buttons, other formats such as check buttons can also be adopted.

Then, in the area 53, the count number of strong hits and the count number of normal hits in each round, and the total number of strong hits and the total number of normal hits in the entire game are displayed for each of the red corner and the blue corner. NS. For example, when the memo screen 50 of the referee A is generated, the memo display unit 34a refers to the collected information 25, reads out the normal hit and the final value “14” to the red corner of the referee A, and makes a referee. A strong hit to the red corner of member A and the final value of "3" are read out, and a memo screen 50 is generated in which each is set as the number of rounds 1.

Further, the memo display unit 34a displays an increase / decrease button 53a for increasing / decreasing the count number in the vicinity of the count number displayed in the area 53 in the memo screen 50. When the increase / decrease button 53a is selected, the count number is increased / decreased by one. That is, the judge can correct the count number by operating the increase / decrease button 53a. The memo screen 50 corresponds to the second screen.

Returning to FIG. 2, the correction reflection unit 34b is a processing unit that receives the correction operation on the memo screen 50 displayed to each referee by the memo display unit 34a and reflects it in the collected information 25. Specifically, when the referee selects the transmission button 52 on the memo screen 50, the correction reflection unit 34b receives the count number displayed in the area 53 and the selection result of each radio button. Then, the correction reflection unit 34b compares each count number acquired from the memo screen 50 with the total value of the collected information 25, registers the difference in the correction value, and registers each count number acquired from the memo screen 50. Register to the final value. At this time, the correction information of the collected information 25 is reflected, but the correction is not reflected in the real-time information, and the information counted in real time remains. The correction reflection unit 34b also registers the selection result of the radio button in the storage unit 23.

The result display unit 35 is a processing unit that generates and displays the determination result determined by each referee for each selection. Although the details will be described later, the result display unit 35 determines the number of strong hits, the number of normal hits, the dominance, etc. after the correction is completed for each of the red corner and the blue corner of each round of each referee. A result screen 60 (see FIG. 13) including the result and the like and the total result for each round is generated. Then, the result display unit 35 outputs the result screen 60 to the monitor device 20 of the senior referee, the tablet terminal 200 of each referee, and the like.

(Functional configuration of tablet terminal 200)
As shown in FIG. 2, the tablet terminal 200 has a communication unit 201, a display unit 202, a storage unit 203, and a control unit 204. This tablet terminal 200 is used to display a memo screen 50 for each referee and make a memo when counting effective hits such as strong hits and normal hits, and for each referee to check his / her own count. This is an example of a computer device.

The communication unit 201 is a processing unit connected to a device such as a monitor device 20, and is, for example, a communication interface. For example, the communication unit 201 receives the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 from the monitor device 20 using a Web browser, a dedicated screen tool, or the like, and transmits the correction contents to the monitor device 20.

The display unit 202 is a processing unit that displays various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a display, a monitor, a touch panel, or the like. For example, the display unit 202 displays various information such as the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 received from the monitor device 20.

The storage unit 203 stores data, a program executed by the control unit 204, and the like, and is realized by, for example, a memory or a hard disk. The storage unit 203 temporarily stores various information transmitted from the monitoring device 20.

The control unit 204 is a processing unit that controls the entire tablet terminal 200, and is realized by, for example, a processor. The control unit 204 has a screen display unit 204a and a correction unit 204b. The screen display unit 204a and the correction unit 204b can also be realized as an electronic circuit included in the processor or a process executed by the processor.

The screen display unit 204a is a processing unit that receives and displays the memo screen 50 and the result screen 60 from the monitor device 20. For example, when the screen display unit 204a receives the request for the memo screen from the referee, the screen display unit 204a transmits the request for the memo screen 50 and the ID of the referee to the monitor device 20. Then, the screen display unit 204a displays the memo screen 50 for the referee on the display unit 202. Further, the screen display unit 204a displays the result screen 60 received from the monitoring device 20 on the display unit 202 in response to a request from the referee or a request from the senior referee.

The correction unit 204b is a processing unit that accepts correction of the count on the memo screen 50. For example, when the correction unit 204b receives the operation of the increase / decrease button 53a of the memo screen 50 shown in FIG. 8, the correction unit 204b increases / decreases the count according to the operation. Then, when the transmission button 52 of the memo screen 50 is selected, the correction unit 204b transmits information regarding each count of each round displayed in the area 53 at the time of selection to the monitoring device 20 to request the reflection of the correction. ..

Further, when the update button 51 of the memo screen 50 is selected, the correction unit 204b requests the monitor device 20 to update the screen in order to display the latest count information. Further, the correction unit 204b can also transmit the state when the transmission button 52 is selected to the monitoring device 20 for each check button such as domination, and transmits only once for each round. , It can be updated every time it is transmitted, and the transmission conditions and transmission timing can be set arbitrarily.

[Control example of each screen]
Next, the details of the judge monitoring screen 40, the memo screen 50, and the result screen 60 transmitted by the monitoring device 20 to the corresponding device will be described.

(Specific example of judge monitoring screen 40)
First, a display example of the judge monitoring screen 40 will be described. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a display example of the judge monitoring screen 40. As shown in FIG. 9, when the referee A presses the red button 1A of the input device 1 eight seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 is in the red corner in the judge monitoring screen 40. The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 of the small area 44 of the referee A in the area 42 is updated to red (S1).

Further, if the blue button 3C of the input device 3 is pressed by the referee C 8 seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 is the referee in the middle region 43 of the blue corner in the judge monitoring screen 40. The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 in the small area 44 of C is updated to blue (S2).

Similarly, if the referee E presses the blue button 5C of the input device 5 eight seconds after the start of the round 1, the real-time processing unit 33 judges the middle region 43 of the blue corner in the judge monitoring screen 40. The scale 45 corresponding to the timeline 8 of the small area 44 of the member E is updated to blue (S3).

(Display variation of judge monitoring screen 40)
Further, the real-time processing unit 33 preferentially displays yellow over red. For example, when the referee A presses the red button 1A of the input device 1, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the scale corresponding to the corresponding timeline to red, but at the same time, the referee A updates the scale. When the yellow button 1B is pressed, the scale is updated from red to yellow. On the contrary, when the yellow button 1B of the input device 1 is pressed by the referee A, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the scale corresponding to the corresponding timeline to yellow, and at the same time, the referee A updates the scale. The scale remains yellow even when the red button 1A is pressed. Further, when a certain scale (timeline) on the judge monitoring screen 40 is selected, the real-time processing unit 33 can also display a moving image captured at the same time as the timeline.

(Specific example of correction by memo screen 50)
Next, the count correction by each referee will be described. FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of count correction, and FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining a reflection example of count correction. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of updating the memo screen 50. Here, referee A will be described as an example.

As shown in FIG. 10, when the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 receives the request for the memo screen 50 from the tablet terminal 200 of the referee A, the memo processing unit 34 generates the memo screen 50 by the method described with reference to FIG. It is transmitted to the tablet terminal 200 of the member A. On the memo screen 50 transmitted here, the strong hit "3" and the normal hit "14" in the red corner are displayed, and the strong hit "3" and the normal hit "6" in the blue corner are displayed for round 1. ing. Further, on the memo screen 50, the strong hit "5" and the normal hit "10" in the red corner are displayed, and the strong hit "8" and the normal hit "20" in the blue corner are displayed for the round 2. Round 3 is not displayed.

Subsequently, the screen display unit 204a of the tablet terminal 200 displays the received memo screen 50, and the correction unit 204b of the increase / decrease button 53a with respect to the count number “14” of the normal hits in the red corner of the memo screen 50. Accepts the operation and updates to "13". After that, when the transmission button 52 on the memo screen 50 is pressed, the tablet terminal 200 transmits a correction request including the displayed count number to the monitoring device 20. Specifically, the correction unit 204b of the tablet terminal 200 has a strong hit "3" and a normal hit "13" in the red corner of round 1, a strong hit "3" and a normal hit "6" in the blue corner of round 1, Round 2 red corner strong hit "5" and normal hit "10", round 2 blue corner strong hit "8" and normal hit "20", round 3 all counts "0" monitored It is transmitted to the device 20.

After that, as shown in FIG. 11, when the correction reflection unit 34b of the monitoring device 20 receives the correction request including the corrected counts from the tablet terminal 200, each of the counts and the collected information 25 included in the correction request is received. By this comparison, which compares with the total value, the correction reflection unit 34b identifies that the normal hit of the red corner in round 1 is "13" and the total value "14" of the collected information 25 is one less. Then, the correction reflection unit 34b determines that the normal hit of the red corner of round 1 has been corrected by "-1", and registers "-1" as the correction value of the normal hit of the red corner of round 1 in the collected information 25. do. Then, the correction reflection unit 34b registers "13" calculated by "total value (14) + correction value (-1)" as the final value of the normal hit in the red corner of the round 1 in the collected information 25.

In this way, the monitoring device 20 receives the correction content and updates only the correction information of the collected information 25 by the correction operation using the memo screen 50 on the tablet terminal 200, but corrects the real-time information of the collected information 25. do not. That is, the real-time information of the collected information 25 is recorded and maintained as the number itself counted by each referee during the match, and the correction information is information that each referee judges as a judgment error and is individually corrected at any time. Recorded.

After that, as shown in FIG. 12, when the update button 51 of the memo screen 50 is pressed by the tablet terminal 200, the monitor device 20 updates the memo screen 50 based on the latest collected information 25, and the updated memo. The screen 50 is transmitted to the tablet terminal 200. For example, when updating the memo screen 50 of the referee A, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 refers to the collected information 25 and hits the red corner of the referee A normally and is the final value “13”. Is read, the referee A's strong hit to the red corner and the final value "3" is read, and a memo screen 50 is generated in which each is set as the number of rounds 1. The memo screen 50 updated in this way is transmitted only to the tablet terminal 200 requesting the update from the monitoring device 20, and the updated memo screen 50 is displayed on the tablet terminal 200. The above-mentioned process is executed for each tablet terminal 200, and the correction operation and correction history of a certain referee are not displayed on the tablet terminal 200 of another judge.

(Specific example of result screen 60)
Next, a result screen 60 for displaying the final result whose count has been corrected by each referee will be described. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the result screen 60.

As shown in FIG. 13, the result display unit 35 of the monitor device 20 uses each final value of the collected information 25 and a selection result such as dominance transmitted from each tablet terminal 200 to display a result screen. 60 is generated and displayed. Specifically, the result display unit 35 has "judgment information" composed of "strong, normal, DOM., COM., VIO.", "Round 1 result", and "round 1 result" for each round and each referee. A result screen 60 including "Round 2 result", "Round 3 result", and "Total" is generated.

"Strong" is the number of times the referee finally decides to hit the strong, and is the information set in the "final value" of the collected information 25. “Normal” is the number of times the referee finally determines that the hit is normal, and is information set in the “final value” of the collected information 25. "DOM." Is the selection result of Domination, "COM." Is the selection result of Competitive, and "VIO." Is the selection result of Violation. Is set to "1" for the selected player.

"Round 1 result" is the total of the count values of each referee in Round 1, and is the result counted for each of the strong hit and the normal hit. The "Round 2 result" is the total of the count values of each referee in Round 2, and is the result counted for each of the strong hit and the normal hit. The "Round 3 result" is the total of the count values of each referee in Round 3, and is the result counted for each of the strong hit and the normal hit. The "total" is the total of the count values of each referee in rounds 1 to 3, and is the result of counting for each of the strong hit and the normal hit.

Explaining round 1 of FIG. 13 as a specific example, referee A counts "3 times" as a strong hit in the red corner and "13" times as a normal hit, and "3 times" as a strong hit in the blue corner. It shows that "6" times were counted as a normal hit. In addition, referee A has determined that the player in the red corner has "dominance" and "has a foul", and has determined that the player in the blue corner has "aggressiveness".

Next, the results of each round will be described using "Round 1 results" as an example. In the "Round 1 result" of FIG. 13, as a strong blow in the red corner, "Referee A (3) + Referee B (2) + Referee C (1) + Referee D (3) + Referee E ( 1) = 10 ”, as a normal hit in the red corner,“ Referee A (13) + Referee B (9) + Referee C (10) + Referee D (9) + Referee E (13) = 54 Is set.

Similarly, in the "Round 1 result" of FIG. 13, as a strong blow in the blue corner, "Referee A (3) + Referee B (2) + Referee C (1) + Referee D (1) + Referee Member E (3) = 10 ", as a normal hit in the blue corner," Referee A (6) + Referee B (5) + Referee C (10) + Referee D (15) + Referee E (13) ) = 49 ”is set.

In addition, "Round 1 result (10) + Round 2 result (8) + Round 3 result (3) = 21" is set in "Strong" of "Total", and "Round 1 result" is set in "Normal". (54) + round 2 result (45) + round 3 result (32) = 131 ”is set.

As described above, the result display unit 35 of the monitoring device 20 is not the real-time information of the collected information 25 that is collected in real time and is not allowed to be modified, but the collected information 25 that is collected in real time and is allowed to be modified. The result screen 60 is generated based on the correction information of.

(Use of collected information 25)
As described above, the monitoring device 20 generates the collected information 25 based on the information acquired from the input device of each referee. Then, the monitoring device 20 generates the judge monitoring screen 40 and the memo screen 50 by using the collected information 25, and corrects the collected information 25 according to the correction by the referee using the memo screen 50.

FIG. 14 is a diagram for explaining the usage destination of the collected information 25. As shown in FIG. 14, the real-time information of the collected information 25 is updated in real time by the counting unit 32 with the information received from the input device of each referee. Further, the real-time information is used by the real-time processing unit 33 to generate the judge monitoring screen 40. That is, the real-time information is information for the senior referee to confirm the input status by each referee in real time during the round, and is not easily corrected once it is collected.

On the other hand, the correction information of the collected information 25 is used for the memo screen 50 for making a memo so that each referee can correct the mistake later in a state of high tension for instantly determining the effective hit during the match. .. That is, the correction information is provided to reduce the psychological bias of the referee, and can be updated at an arbitrary timing by using the memo screen 50. Further, since the final value of the correction information can be considered as the final judgment of each referee, it is used on the result screen 60 showing the final result to be viewed after the end of the match.

[Processing flow]
Next, each process executed by the judge monitoring system will be described. Here, the real-time display process related to the judge monitoring screen 40, the correction process related to the memo screen 50, and the result display process related to the result screen 60 will be described.

(Real-time display processing)
FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the flow of real-time display processing. As shown in FIG. 15, when the processing is started, the real-time processing unit 33 displays the judge monitoring screen 40 in the initial state in which the colors of red, blue, and yellow are not displayed on any of the scales 45 ( S101: Yes), when the signal is received (S102: Yes), the output position and the display color are specified according to the output conversion information 24 (S103).

Then, the real-time processing unit 33 identifies the time cell corresponding to the timing at which the first input or the second input is acquired in the timeline corresponding to the display position (row corresponding to the small area) determined in S103. (S104).

Subsequently, the real-time processing unit 33 updates the real-time information of the collected information 25 (S105). That is, the real-time processing unit 33 identifies the round, the referee, the player, and the hit type from the signal, and increments the corresponding number of times.

Then, when the real-time processing unit 33 does not output anything to the corresponding time cell and is not displayed (S106: Yes), the time specified in S104 in the timeline corresponding to the display position specified in S103. The cell is updated with the display color specified in S103 (S107). That is, a particular time cell is updated from gray to one of the colors red, blue, and yellow.

On the other hand, when the real-time processing unit 33 has already displayed the information for the corresponding time cell (S106: No), the real-time processing unit 33 determines whether or not the display target specified in S103 has a higher priority than the displayed information ( S108).

Here, in the real-time processing unit 33, when the display target specified in S103 has a higher priority (S108: Yes). The time cell specified in S104 in the timeline corresponding to the display position specified in S103 is updated with the display color specified in S103 (S109). On the other hand, when the display target specified in S103 has a lower priority (S108: No), the real-time processing unit 33 maintains the already displayed state (S110).

That is, when there are a plurality of inputs in one second and any of red, blue, and yellow colors is already displayed in the same time cell, the real-time processing unit 33 newly sets the time cell. Update to the color corresponding to the signal received in. However, when it is desired to preferentially display yellow, the real-time processing unit 33 does not update to another color when the already displayed color is yellow.

After that, until the match ends (S111: No), the real-time processing unit 33 repeatedly executes S102 and subsequent steps, and when the match ends (S111: Yes), the process ends.

(Flow of correction process)
FIG. 16 is a sequence diagram showing the flow of the correction process. As shown in FIG. 16, when the screen display unit 204a of the tablet terminal 200 receives a correction operation, a memo screen request, or the like from the referee, it transmits a memo screen provision request to the monitor device 20 (S201 and S202).

Then, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 refers to the collected information 25, acquires each final value of the corresponding referee (S203), generates the memo screen 50 (S204), and requests the memo screen 50. Display and output to the original tablet terminal 200 (S205 and S206).

Subsequently, the correction unit 204b of the tablet terminal 200 receives the correction content on the memo screen 50 displayed on the display unit 202 by the screen display unit 204a (S207). Then, when the transmission button 52 on the memo screen 50 is pressed, the correction unit 204b requests the monitoring device 20 to reflect the correction content (S208 and S209).

After that, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 acquires each count value from the memo screen 50, compares it with the total value of the collected information 25, and updates the correction value by the difference (S210). Subsequently, the memo processing unit 34 updates the final value of the collected information 25 by using the updated correction value and the total value (S211).

After that, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 updates the memo screen 50 with the corrected contents, and displays and outputs the updated memo screen 50 to the requesting tablet terminal 200 (S212 and S213). The memo processing unit 34 can also update and provide the memo screen 50 at the timing when the correction is completed, and update and provide the memo screen 50 at the timing when the update request is received from the tablet terminal 200. You can also.

(Flow of result display processing)
FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing the flow of the result display processing. As shown in FIG. 17, when the result display unit 35 of the monitor device 20 receives a request for display of the result from the senior referee or each referee (S301: Yes), the result display unit 35 refers to the collected information 25 and refers to each referee. The final value of each hit of each player in each round is acquired (S302). In addition, the result display unit 35 acquires the judgment result of each referee such as the positiveness acquired from the memo screen 50 (S303).

Subsequently, the result display unit 35 calculates the result of each round and the total value of all rounds (S304), and generates the result screen 60 using the acquired information and the calculated information (S305). After that, the result display unit 35 displays and outputs the generated result screen 60 to the monitor device 20 and each tablet terminal 200 (S306).

[effect]
As described above, the judge monitoring system provides the judge monitoring screen 40 for senior referees, and for each referee, the referee who presses the button after each round and during each round corrects the count number. A memo screen 50 for each referee can be provided.

By providing the memo screen 50 to each referee, it is possible to reduce the psychological bias of the referee when visualizing the battle situation in real time. That is, if the referee recognizes that the number of hits can be corrected even after the round using the memo screen 50, even if the referee in the round mistakenly counts the number of hits to player A. From the sense of security that can be finally corrected, the judge can proceed during the subsequent match without any psychological bias. In addition, each referee can make a final judge of the round by referring to the memo screen 50 for the number of hits after the correction.

By the way, although the examples of the present invention have been described so far, the present invention may be implemented in various different forms other than the above-mentioned examples.

[Memo screen example]
For example, the monitoring device 20 can also generate a memo screen 50 that displays an increase / decrease value together with a count value. 18 and 19 are views for explaining another example of the memo screen. As shown in FIG. 18, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 generates a memo screen 50 that displays the number of corrections in addition to the number of strong batting counts and the number of normal batting counts for each player in each round. You can also.

Further, as shown in FIG. 19, the memo processing unit 34 of the monitor device 20 displays a memo screen 50 for displaying the count number and correction number of strong batting for each player and the count number and correction number of normal batting for each player. It can also be generated.

In the examples of FIGS. 18 and 19, it is shown that "3" is currently counted as a result of the correction of "-1" for the strong hit of the red corner counted in round 1. Similarly, it is shown that "8" is currently counted as a result of the correction of "+1" for the strong hit of the blue corner counted in Round 2.

In the above embodiment, the memo processing unit 34 has described an example in which the memo screen 50 that does not display the total value of the collected information 25 that is not the correction target is generated and output, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the memo processing unit 34 can also generate a memo screen 50 displaying the total value and the final value so that the referee can know the increase / decrease status and the wrong number of times. Further, the memo processing unit 34 may automatically generate a memo screen 50 after each round and output it to the tablet terminal 200 of each referee. Further, the count number on the memo screen 50 may be automatically updated according to the pressing of the button by each referee during the round.

[Numerical values, competition examples, etc.]
The numerical examples, display examples, threshold values, and the like used in the above examples are merely examples and can be arbitrarily changed. Further, in the above embodiment, boxing is illustrated as an example of the competitive competition, but the present invention is not limited to this, and is not limited to this, and is used for competitive competitions involving hits, which are judged by a plurality of referees, such as karate, taekwondo, and judo. Can be applied. The display of the timeline is not limited to every second, but can be arbitrarily changed such as displaying every two seconds.

[Button mapping]
In the above embodiment, an example in which a normal hit and a strong hit are associated with each button has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, striking and defense can be associated with each button, and striking and domination can be associated with each button. For example, in addition to the combination of the input indicating normal hitting as the first input and the input indicating strong hitting as the second input, as the combination of the input indicating hitting as the first input and the input indicating defense as the second input. Is also good. In addition, the number of buttons is not two for each player, but three for each player, for a total of six. The number of buttons and the contents associated with the buttons can be arbitrarily changed for each competition and each referee.

[system]
Information including processing procedures, control procedures, specific names, various data and parameters shown in the above documents and drawings can be arbitrarily changed unless otherwise specified. The acquisition unit 15 corresponds to the reception unit, and the notification unit 16 corresponds to the transmission unit. Further, the acquisition unit 31 and the count unit 32 correspond to the specific unit, and the real-time processing unit 33 corresponds to the first generation unit and the first output unit. Further, the memo processing unit 34 corresponds to the second generation unit, the second output unit, and the storage control unit. Further, the screen display unit 204a corresponds to the reception unit, and the correction unit 204b corresponds to the request unit.

Further, each component of each device shown in the figure is a functional concept, and does not necessarily have to be physically configured as shown in the figure. That is, the specific forms of distribution and integration of each device are not limited to those shown in the figure. That is, all or a part thereof can be functionally or physically distributed / integrated in any unit according to various loads, usage conditions, and the like. For example, the monitor device 20 may have a built-in relay device 10.

Further, each processing function performed by each device can be realized by a CPU and a program that is analyzed and executed by the CPU, or can be realized as hardware by wired logic.

[hardware]
Next, the hardware configuration of each device of the judge monitoring system will be described. Here, the monitoring device 20 will be described as an example, but other devices have the same configuration. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example. As shown in FIG. 20, the monitoring device 20 includes a communication device 20a, an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 20b, a memory 20c, and a processor 20d. Further, the parts shown in FIG. 20 are connected to each other by a bus or the like.

The communication device 20a is a network interface card or the like, and communicates with other servers. The HDD 20b stores a program or DB that operates the function shown in FIG.

The processor 20d reads a program that executes the same processing as each processing unit shown in FIG. 2 from the HDD 20b or the like and expands it in the memory 20c to operate a process that executes each function described in FIG. 2 or the like. For example, this process executes the same function as each processing unit of the monitoring device 20. Specifically, the processor 20d reads a program having the same functions as the acquisition unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, the result display unit 35, and the like from the HDD 10b and the like. Then, the processor 10d executes a process of executing the same processing as the acquisition unit 31, the counting unit 32, the real-time processing unit 33, the memo processing unit 34, the result display unit 35, and the like.

In this way, the monitor device 20 operates as an information processing device that executes the output control method by reading and executing the program. Further, the monitoring device 20 can realize the same function as that of the above-described embodiment by reading the program from the recording medium by the medium reading device and executing the read program. The program referred to in the other embodiment is not limited to being executed by the monitoring device 20. For example, the present invention can be similarly applied when another computer or server executes a program, or when they execute a program in cooperation with each other.

10 Relay device 11 Input unit 12 Communication unit 13 Storage unit 14 Conversion information 15 Acquisition unit 16 Notification unit 20 Monitor device 21 Communication unit 22 Display unit 23 Storage unit 24 Output conversion information 25 Collected information 26 Video information 27 Correspondence list 28 Terminal information 30 Control unit 31 Acquisition unit 32 Count unit 33 Real-time processing unit 33a Screen generation unit 33b Output control unit 34 Memo processing unit 34a Memo display unit 34b Correction reflection unit 35 Result display unit 200 Tablet terminal 201 Communication unit 202 Display unit 203 Storage unit 204 Control unit 204a Screen display unit 204b Correction unit

Claims (9)

1. On the computer
   Each time a first or second input is received from each of multiple referees during a competitive match
   Obtain information that can identify the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input is different, or a plurality of players in the match.
   This is the first screen provided in which the small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order and along the timeline showing the progress of the match for each medium area assigned to each player. The first screen in which an index for distinguishing between the first input and the second input is added to a position determined by the athletes and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. Is generated according to the above acquisition,
   Output the generated initial screen and output
   Based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees, the first aggregation result is generated for each of the plurality of referees.
   The second screen for displaying the first tabulation result relating to the first referee among the plurality of referees and accepting the correction of the first tabulation result is linked to the first referee. Output to the referee terminal
   When the correction of the first tabulation result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first tabulation result related to the first referee, the revised second tabulation result is added to the first tabulation result. A screen output program characterized by having the referee execute a process of associating and storing it.
2. The output process displays the second tabulation result for the first referee when a correction request for the second tabulation result occurs, and displays the second screen on the first screen. Output to the referee terminal linked to the referee,
   In the process of storing, when the correction of the second aggregation result is received from the referee terminal, the first referee does not modify the first aggregation result related to the first referee. The screen output program according to claim 1, wherein the second aggregation result stored in association with is modified to a modified third aggregation result.
3. The output process includes the second tabulation result, the first tabulation result, and the second tabulation result for the first referee when a correction request for the second tabulation result occurs. The second screen according to claim 2, wherein the second screen for displaying the difference value between the and the second screen is generated, and the generated second screen is output to the referee terminal associated with the first referee. Screen output program.
4. When the storage unit receives the correction of the first tabulation result from the referee terminal, the first input or the first input obtained from the input devices of the plurality of referees is used. The second tabulation result accompanying the amendment received from the referee terminal is updated to the third tabulation result in accordance with the new amendment without modifying the tabulation result of the above. Item 2. The screen output program according to item 2.
5. The first input is an input indicating the first element that can be the basis of the scoring result by each of the plurality of referees.
   The screen output program according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the second input is an input indicating a second element different from the first element.
6. The competitive competition is a competition that involves a blow,
   The first factor is a strong blow,
   The screen output program according to claim 5, wherein the second element is a hit other than the strong hit.
7. The computer
   Each time a first or second input is received from each of multiple referees during a competitive match
   Obtain information that can identify the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input is different, or a plurality of players in the match.
   This is the first screen provided in which the small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order and along the timeline showing the progress of the match for each medium area assigned to each player. The first screen in which an index for distinguishing between the first input and the second input is added to a position determined by the athletes and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. Is generated according to the above acquisition,
   Output the generated initial screen and output
   Based on the information regarding the input by each of the plurality of referees, the first aggregation result is generated for each of the plurality of referees.
   The second screen for displaying the first tabulation result relating to the first referee among the plurality of referees and accepting the correction of the first tabulation result is linked to the first referee. Output to the referee terminal
   When the revision of the first tabulation result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first tabulation result related to the first referee, the revised second tabulation result is added to the first tabulation result. A screen output method characterized by executing a process of associating with a referee and storing it.
8. Each time a first or second input is received from each of multiple referees during a competitive match
   An acquisition unit that acquires information that can identify the referee who made the input, whether the first input or the second input is different, or a plurality of players in a match.
   This is the first screen provided in which the small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order and along the timeline showing the progress of the match for each medium area assigned to each player. The first screen in which an index for distinguishing between the first input and the second input is added to a position determined by the athletes and referees specified according to the acquisition and the timing according to the acquisition. With the first generation unit that is generated in response to the acquisition.
   The first output unit that outputs the generated first screen and
   A second generation unit that generates a first aggregation result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding input by each of the plurality of referees.
   The second screen for displaying the first tabulation result relating to the first referee among the plurality of referees and accepting the correction of the first tabulation result is linked to the first referee. The second output unit that outputs to the referee terminal and
   When the correction of the first tabulation result is received from the referee terminal, in addition to the first tabulation result related to the first referee, the revised second tabulation result is added to the first tabulation result. An information processing device characterized by having a memory control unit that stores data in association with a referee.
9. A plurality of input devices used by each of the plurality of referees who referee the competition, a plurality of tablet terminals associated with each of the plurality of input devices, and a monitoring device used by a senior referee who monitors the plurality of referees. In a monitoring system with
   Each of the plurality of input devices
   For each player, the reception department that accepts the input corresponding to each item that is the subject of the referee,
   It has a transmission unit that receives input from the referee and transmits information specifying the received input to the monitor device.
   The monitoring device is
   Each time the information identifying the input is received from each of the plurality of input devices during the match of the competitive competition.
   According to the received information that identifies the input, the referee who made the input, the type of the input, and any of a plurality of players in the match are identified by a specific unit that identifies information that can be identified.
   This is the first screen provided in which the small areas assigned to each referee are arranged in a specific order and along the timeline showing the progress of the match for each medium area assigned to each player. A first generation unit that generates the first screen by adding an index that shows the type of the input to a position determined by the player and the referee to be input and the timing at which the input is generated.
   The first output unit that outputs the generated first screen and
   A second generation unit that generates a first aggregation result for each of the plurality of referees based on the information regarding input by each of the plurality of referees.
   The tablet of the first referee displays the second screen for displaying the first tabulation result relating to the first referee among the plurality of referees and accepting the correction of the first tabulation result. The second output section that outputs to the terminal and
   When the correction of the first tabulation result is received from the tablet terminal, in addition to the first tabulation result pertaining to the first referee, the revised second tabulation result is added to the first referee. It has a memory control unit that associates with members and stores them.
   Each of the plurality of tablet terminals
   A reception unit that receives and displays the second screen from the monitoring device and receives the correction contents of the first aggregation result on the second screen.
   A monitoring system comprising: a requesting unit that transmits the correction contents of the first aggregation result to the monitoring device and requests the reflection of the correction contents.

Images