JP6717221B2 - Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal - Google Patents

Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6717221B2
JP6717221B2 JP2017023769A JP2017023769A JP6717221B2 JP 6717221 B2 JP6717221 B2 JP 6717221B2 JP 2017023769 A JP2017023769 A JP 2017023769A JP 2017023769 A JP2017023769 A JP 2017023769A JP 6717221 B2 JP6717221 B2 JP 6717221B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
oxygen concentration
silicon crystal
measurement value
calibration curve
gfa
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2017023769A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2018133351A (en
Inventor
純一 石澤
純一 石澤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumco Corp
Original Assignee
Sumco Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumco Corp filed Critical Sumco Corp
Priority to JP2017023769A priority Critical patent/JP6717221B2/en
Publication of JP2018133351A publication Critical patent/JP2018133351A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6717221B2 publication Critical patent/JP6717221B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Crystals, And After-Treatments Of Crystals (AREA)
  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)

Description

本発明は、シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法に関し、特に、GFA(the inert Gas Fusion infrared Absorption method:不活性ガス融解−赤外線吸収法)によるシリコンウェーハ中の酸素濃度評価方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal, and more particularly to a method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon wafer by the GFA (the inert Gas Fusion infrared Absorption method).

シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度の評価方法としては、FT-IR(Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis:フーリエ変換赤外分光分析法)が広く用いられており、ASTM(American Society for Testing and Materials:米国材料試験協会)で標準化されている。この方法は、ウェーハに赤外光を透過させたときのシリコン結晶中の格子間酸素による吸収量を測定するもので、その吸収量から結晶中の酸素を定量化するという原理に基づくものである。光吸収量は、シリコン結晶中の格子間酸素濃度に非常に敏感なため、高感度・高信頼性の評価が可能である。 FT-IR (Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis) is widely used as an evaluation method of oxygen concentration in silicon crystals, and ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials: American Society for Testing and Materials) ) Is standardized. This method measures the amount of absorption by interstitial oxygen in a silicon crystal when infrared light is transmitted through the wafer, and is based on the principle of quantifying oxygen in the crystal from the amount of absorption. .. Since the light absorption amount is very sensitive to the interstitial oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal, it is possible to evaluate with high sensitivity and high reliability.

しかしながら、赤外光をある程度透過する試料でなければFT-IRによる評価自体が不可能である。例えばエピタキシャルウェーハの基板材料として好ましく用いられる、ボロンが高濃度にドープされた低抵抗率(例えば20mΩ・cm以下、特には10mΩ・cm以下)のシリコン単結晶や、ディスクリートデバイス向けの基板材料として好ましく用いられる、リン、砒素、アンチモンが高濃度にドープされた低抵抗率のシリコン単結晶の場合、試料中に大量に含まれる自由電子によって光が吸収され、赤外光を全く通さないため、FT-IRを適用することができないという問題がある。 However, evaluation itself by FT-IR is impossible unless the sample transmits infrared light to some extent. For example, it is preferably used as a substrate material for an epitaxial wafer, a high-concentration boron-doped silicon single crystal having a low resistivity (for example, 20 mΩ·cm or less, particularly 10 mΩ·cm or less), and a substrate material for discrete devices. In the case of a low-resistivity silicon single crystal in which phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony are highly doped, light is absorbed by a large amount of free electrons contained in the sample, and infrared light is not transmitted at all. -There is a problem that IR cannot be applied.

FT-IRでは評価が困難なシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度を評価する方法として、GFAが注目されている(例えば特許文献1〜3参照)。GFAは、試料を高温で融解することで試料中に含まれる酸素をCO、COとしてガス化し、そのガスを化学的に分析して元の試料に含まれていた酸素を定量化するという原理に基づくものである。GFA法は試料の融解を必要とする完全な破壊法であるが、測定装置が比較的安価であり、測定にあまり熟練を要せず短時間で評価が行なえる利点がある。 As a method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal, which is difficult to evaluate by FT-IR, GFA has attracted attention (see Patent Documents 1 to 3, for example). GFA is a principle that oxygen contained in a sample is gasified as CO and CO 2 by melting the sample at a high temperature, and the gas is chemically analyzed to quantify the oxygen contained in the original sample. It is based on. The GFA method is a complete destructive method that requires melting of the sample, but has the advantage that the measuring device is relatively inexpensive and requires very little skill for measurement and can be evaluated in a short time.

GFAによって測定された酸素濃度の値の単位はppmaであるため、これをASTMで標準化された酸素濃度の単位(atoms/cm3)に換算するためには検量線が必要である。この検量線は、FT-IRで測定可能な試料を用意し、当該試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値及びGFA測定値をそれぞれ求めることにより作成することができる。 Since the unit of oxygen concentration value measured by GFA is ppma, a calibration curve is required to convert this to the standardized oxygen concentration unit (atoms/cm 3 ) of ASTM. This calibration curve can be prepared by preparing a sample that can be measured by FT-IR and determining the FT-IR measured value and the GFA measured value of the oxygen concentration of the sample.

特開平11−14543号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-14543 特開平11−201963号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-201963 特開2007−121319号公報JP, 2007-121319, A

上記のように、エピタキシャルウェーハの基板材料として用いられる特定品種のシリコンウェーハでは、所望のゲッタリング能力を確保し、エピタキシャル膜の清浄度を向上させるためにシリコン結晶中のボロン濃度を高め、且つBMD(Bulk Micro Defect)密度を高めるために、これまでよりもさらに高い酸素濃度が要求されるようになってきた。このようにボロンが高濃度にドープされたシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度を唯一測定することが可能なGFAには測定精度及び信頼性のさらなる向上が要求されている。 As described above, in a specific type of silicon wafer used as a substrate material for an epitaxial wafer, the boron concentration in the silicon crystal is increased in order to secure the desired gettering ability and improve the cleanliness of the epitaxial film, and (Bulk Micro Defect) In order to increase the density, a higher oxygen concentration than ever has been required. As described above, the GFA capable of only measuring the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal doped with boron at a high concentration is required to further improve the measurement accuracy and reliability.

しかしながら、そのような酸素濃度が非常に高いシリコン結晶に対しては、GFAによる酸素濃度の分析の確度が低いという問題が生じている。 However, for such a silicon crystal having a very high oxygen concentration, there is a problem that the accuracy of analysis of the oxygen concentration by GFA is low.

また、GFAではガスの化学分析における感度の問題で、試料中に含まれる酸素の絶対量を多くするため、一般的に2〜10mm角の大きな試料が必要とされる。しかし、試料サイズが大きいと、試料内の酸素濃度分布による測定精度低下の問題が発生している。 Further, in GFA, due to the problem of sensitivity in chemical analysis of gas, the absolute amount of oxygen contained in the sample is increased, and therefore a large sample of 2 to 10 mm square is generally required. However, when the sample size is large, there is a problem that the measurement accuracy is deteriorated due to the oxygen concentration distribution in the sample.

したがって、本発明の目的は、GFAによるシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法において酸素濃度分析の確度を高めることにある。 Therefore, an object of the present invention is to improve the accuracy of oxygen concentration analysis in the method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystals by GFA.

上記課題を解決するため、本発明によるシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法は、FT-IRで測定可能なシリコン結晶からなる複数の検量線作成用標準試料を用意し、前記複数の標準試料の各々の酸素濃度をFT-IR及びGFAでそれぞれ測定した後、前記酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)とGFA測定値(ppma)との一対一の関係を示す検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップと、FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶からなる評価用試料を用意し、前記評価用試料の酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記検量線を用いてGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算する酸素濃度評価ステップとを有し、前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も高い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であることを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal according to the present invention provides a plurality of standard samples for preparing a calibration curve composed of a silicon crystal measurable by FT-IR, each of the plurality of standard samples being prepared. After measuring the oxygen concentration of FT-IR and GFA respectively, a calibration curve showing a one-to-one relationship between the FT-IR measured value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the oxygen concentration and the GFA measured value (ppma) is prepared. Preparation of a calibration curve and an evaluation sample made of a silicon crystal that is difficult to measure by FT-IR, the oxygen concentration of the evaluation sample was measured by GFA, and the GFA measurement value was FT- by using the calibration curve. An oxygen concentration evaluation step of converting to an IR measurement value, and the highest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step. Is more than the upper limit of the target range of.

本発明によれば、検量線作成用試料の最も高い水準(高水準側)の酸素濃度が評価対象のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲をカバーしているので、検量線作成用試料に基づいて作成されるGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算するための検量線の質を改善することができる。したがって、評価対象のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度が非常に高い場合であっても当該酸素濃度のGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に正しく換算することができ、FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値を正確に求めることができる。 According to the present invention, the highest level (high-level side) of the oxygen concentration of the calibration curve preparation sample covers the target range of the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal to be evaluated. It is possible to improve the quality of the calibration curve for converting the GFA measurement value created by the above into the FT-IR measurement value. Therefore, even when the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal to be evaluated is very high, the GFA measurement value of the oxygen concentration can be correctly converted into the FT-IR measurement value, and the silicon crystal which is difficult to measure by FT-IR. It is possible to accurately obtain the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration in the inside.

本発明において、前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も高い水準は、15.7×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが好ましく、16×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが特に好ましい。これによれば、シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度が非常に高い評価用試料の酸素濃度分析に用いる検量線の質を向上させることができ、GFAによる酸素濃度分析の確度を向上させることができる。 In the present invention, the highest level of FT-IR measurement value of oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is preferably 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more, and 16×10 17 (atoms/atoms/ It is particularly preferable that the size is not less than cm 3 ). According to this, the quality of the calibration curve used for the oxygen concentration analysis of the evaluation sample in which the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal is very high can be improved, and the accuracy of the oxygen concentration analysis by GFA can be improved.

本発明において、前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も低い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の下限値以下であることが好ましく、8×1017(atoms/cm3)以下であることが特に好ましい。検量線作成用試料の最も低い水準(低水準側)の酸素濃度が評価対象のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲をカバーしているので、検量線作成用試料に基づいて作成されるGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算するための検量線の質を向上させることができる。 In the present invention, the lowest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples may be equal to or lower than the lower limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step. It is particularly preferably 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or less. The lowest level (low level side) oxygen concentration of the calibration curve preparation sample covers the target range of oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal to be evaluated, so GFA measurement made based on the calibration curve preparation sample It is possible to improve the quality of the calibration curve for converting the value into the FT-IR measurement value.

本発明において、前記複数の標準試料は、第1標準試料と、前記第1の標準試料よりも高い酸素濃度を有する第2標準試料と、前記第2標準試料よりも高い酸素濃度を有する第3標準試料とを含み、前記第1標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の下限値以下であり、前記第3標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であることが好ましい。この場合において、前記第1標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、8×1017(atoms/cm3)以下であることが好ましい。また、前記第3標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、15.7×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが好ましく、16×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが特に好ましい。さらにまた、前記第2標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記第1標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値と前記第3標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値との平均値±0.5×1017(atoms/cm3)であることが好ましい。 In the present invention, the plurality of standard samples include a first standard sample, a second standard sample having a higher oxygen concentration than the first standard sample, and a third standard sample having a higher oxygen concentration than the second standard sample. Including a standard sample, the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the first standard sample is less than or equal to the lower limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step, The FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the standard sample is preferably equal to or higher than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step. In this case, the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the first standard sample is preferably 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or less. Further, the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the third standard sample is preferably 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more, and 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more. Is particularly preferable. Furthermore, the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the second standard sample is the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the first standard sample and the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the third standard sample. The average value is preferably ±0.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ).

本発明において、前記評価用試料は、p型ドーパントがドープされた比抵抗が0.2(Ω・cm)以下のシリコン結晶であることが好ましい。この種のシリコン結晶はエピタキシャルウェーハの基板材料として好ましく用いられ、非常に高い酸素濃度が要求される一方で、FT-IRによる酸素濃度の測定が困難であり、本発明の効果が顕著だからである。 In the present invention, the evaluation sample is preferably a silicon crystal doped with a p-type dopant and having a specific resistance of 0.2 (Ω·cm) or less. This type of silicon crystal is preferably used as a substrate material for an epitaxial wafer and requires a very high oxygen concentration, but it is difficult to measure the oxygen concentration by FT-IR and the effect of the present invention is remarkable. ..

本発明において、前記評価用試料は、n型ドーパントがドープされた比抵抗が0.1(Ω・cm)以下のシリコン結晶であることもまた好ましい。この種のシリコン結晶はディスクリートデバイス向けの基板材料として好ましく用いられる一方で、FT-IRによる酸素濃度の測定が困難であり、本発明の効果が顕著だからである。 In the present invention, it is also preferable that the evaluation sample is a silicon crystal doped with an n-type dopant and having a specific resistance of 0.1 (Ω·cm) or less. This type of silicon crystal is preferably used as a substrate material for discrete devices, but it is difficult to measure the oxygen concentration by FT-IR and the effect of the present invention is remarkable.

本発明において、前記標準試料は、前記シリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内ばらつきが±0.05×1017(atoms/cm3)以内の領域から切り出したシリコンチップであることが好ましい。シリコンウェーハ中の酸素濃度の面内ばらつきは酸素濃度が高くなるほど顕著となり、そのようなウェーハからの切り出し位置によっては検量線の質が低下するおそれがある。しかし、酸素濃度の面内ばらつきが小さい領域を切り出して検量線作成用試料とすることにより、検量線の質を向上させることができる。したがって、GFAによる酸素濃度分析の確度を向上させることができる。 In the present invention, it is preferable that the standard sample is a silicon chip cut out from a region where the in-plane variation in oxygen concentration of the silicon wafer is within ±0.05×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). The in-plane variation of the oxygen concentration in the silicon wafer becomes more remarkable as the oxygen concentration increases, and the quality of the calibration curve may deteriorate depending on the cutting position from the wafer. However, the quality of the calibration curve can be improved by cutting out a region where the in-plane variation of the oxygen concentration is small and using it as a sample for preparing the calibration curve. Therefore, the accuracy of oxygen concentration analysis by GFA can be improved.

本発明によれば、GFAによるシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法において酸素濃度分析の確度を高めることができる。 According to the present invention, the accuracy of oxygen concentration analysis can be increased in the method of evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystals by GFA.

図1は、シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法を説明するフローチャートである。FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystals. 図2は、検量線作成ステップを説明するフローチャートである。FIG. 2 is a flowchart for explaining the calibration curve creating step. 図3は、検量線作成用のシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内分布の一例を示すグラフであり、横軸はウェーハの径方向の位置、縦軸は酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)をそれぞれ示している。FIG. 3 is a graph showing an example of in-plane distribution of oxygen concentration of a silicon wafer for creating a calibration curve, where the horizontal axis represents the wafer radial position and the vertical axis represents the oxygen concentration FT-IR measurement value (atoms/ cm 3 ) respectively. 図4は、検量線を引いた酸素濃度分布のグラフである。FIG. 4 is a graph of oxygen concentration distribution with a calibration curve drawn. 図5は、検量線を用いたシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度評価ステップを説明するフローチャートである。FIG. 5 is a flowchart for explaining the oxygen concentration evaluation step of the silicon wafer using the calibration curve. 図6は、高水準の酸素濃度に対する検量線の傾きの一元配置分析結果を示すグラフであり、横軸は高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)、縦軸は検量線の傾きをそれぞれ示している。FIG. 6 is a graph showing the one-way analysis result of the slope of the calibration curve with respect to the high level oxygen concentration, where the horizontal axis is the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the high level oxygen concentration and the vertical axis is the calibration amount. The slope of each line is shown. 図7は、高水準の酸素濃度に対する検量線の切片の一元配置分析結果を示すグラフであり、横軸は高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)、縦軸は検量線の切片をそれぞれ示している。FIG. 7 is a graph showing the one-way analysis result of the intercept of the calibration curve with respect to the high level oxygen concentration, the abscissa is the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the high level oxygen concentration, and the ordinate is the calibration. Each line segment is shown.

以下、添付図面を参照しながら、本発明の好ましい実施の形態について詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

図1は、シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法を説明するフローチャートである。 FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystals.

図1に示すように、このシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法は、FT-IRで酸素濃度を測定可能なシリコン結晶の検量線作成用標準試料を用いて予め検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップS11と、FT-IRで酸素濃度を測定することが困難なシリコン結晶の評価用試料を用意し、この評価用試料の酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、予め作成しておいた検量線を用いて酸素濃度のGFA測定値をFT-IR値に換算する酸素濃度評価ステップS12とを有している。 As shown in FIG. 1, the method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal is a calibration curve creating step in which a calibration curve is created in advance using a standard sample for creating a calibration curve of a silicon crystal capable of measuring the oxygen concentration by FT-IR. Prepare a sample for evaluation of S11 and a silicon crystal whose oxygen concentration is difficult to measure by FT-IR, measure the oxygen concentration of this sample for evaluation by GFA, and then use the calibration curve prepared in advance. And an oxygen concentration evaluation step S12 for converting the GFA measurement value of the oxygen concentration into an FT-IR value.

図2は、検量線作成ステップS11を説明するフローチャートである。 FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the calibration curve creation step S11.

図2に示すように、検量線作成ステップS11では、複数枚のシリコンウェーハを用意し、これらのシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内分布をFT-IRにより測定する(ステップS21)。シリコンウェーハとしては、FT-IRで酸素濃度を測定可能なものが用いられる。したがって、ボロンが高濃度にドープされた低抵抗品種などは使用されない。またシリコンウェーハとしては、検量線の作成に必要な酸素濃度条件を概ね満たすように製造されたものが用意される。なおFT-IRによる酸素濃度の測定はASTM F-121(1979)に従って行われる。 As shown in FIG. 2, in the calibration curve creating step S11, a plurality of silicon wafers are prepared, and the in-plane distribution of oxygen concentration of these silicon wafers is measured by FT-IR (step S21). As the silicon wafer, a wafer whose oxygen concentration can be measured by FT-IR is used. Therefore, low resistance varieties in which boron is highly doped are not used. As the silicon wafer, a silicon wafer that is manufactured so as to substantially satisfy the oxygen concentration conditions required to create the calibration curve is prepared. The oxygen concentration is measured by FT-IR according to ASTM F-121 (1979).

次に、上記FT-IR測定結果から検量線の作成に必要な酸素濃度条件を満たすシリコンウェーハを選別した後、当該シリコンウェーハからシリコンチップを切り出して、シリコン結晶の検量線作成用標準試料を作成する。具体的には、酸素濃度が相対的に低い第1水準(低水準)の標準試料(第1標準試料)と、第1水準よりも酸素濃度が高い第2水準(中間水準)の標準試料(第2標準試料)と、第2水準よりも酸素濃度が高い第3水準(高水準)の標準試料(第3標準試料)をそれぞれ用意する(ステップS22)。 Next, from the FT-IR measurement results, after selecting a silicon wafer that satisfies the oxygen concentration condition required to create a calibration curve, a silicon chip is cut out from the silicon wafer to create a standard sample for creating a calibration curve of a silicon crystal. To do. Specifically, a first level (low level) standard sample (first standard sample) having a relatively low oxygen concentration, and a second level (intermediate level) standard sample (oxygen concentration higher than the first level) A second standard sample) and a third level (high level) standard sample (third standard sample) having an oxygen concentration higher than the second level are prepared (step S22).

ここで、酸素濃度の3水準は、酸素濃度評価ステップS12で評価対象となる一種又は複数品種のシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲をカバーするように設定し、特に、第3標準試料の第3水準の酸素濃度は、ターゲット範囲の上限値以上に設定される。具体的には、第3水準の酸素濃度は15.7×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが好ましく、16×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であることが特に好ましい。また、第1標準試料の第1水準の酸素濃度は、ターゲット範囲の下限値以下に設定される。具体的には、第1水準の酸素濃度は8×1017(atoms/cm3)以下であることが好ましい。さらにまた、第2標準試料の第2水準の酸素濃度は第1水準と第3水準の平均値±0.5×1017(atoms/cm3)であることが好ましい。 Here, the three levels of the oxygen concentration are set so as to cover the target range of the oxygen concentration of one or a plurality of types of silicon crystals to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step S12, and particularly, the third standard sample. The level oxygen concentration is set to be equal to or higher than the upper limit value of the target range. Specifically, the third level oxygen concentration is preferably 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more, and particularly preferably 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more. The first level oxygen concentration of the first standard sample is set to be equal to or lower than the lower limit value of the target range. Specifically, the first level oxygen concentration is preferably 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or less. Furthermore, the second level oxygen concentration of the second standard sample is preferably an average value of the first level and the third level of ±0.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ).

従来、検量線作成用の酸素濃度の3つの水準のうち、高水準側の酸素濃度は、14±0.5×1017(atoms/cm3)程度の比較的低い値が用いられていた。このような高水準側の酸素濃度に基づいて作成された検量線を用いて近年の酸素濃度が非常に高いシリコンウェーハをGFAで評価した場合、測定誤差が大きくなり、本来規格を満たすべきものが規格外として判断されるケースがあり、正しい評価ができなかった。しかし、本実施形態のように検量線作成用標準試料の高水準側の酸素濃度をより高い値とすることにより、検量線の信頼性を高めて酸素濃度の測定誤差を小さくすることが可能となる。 Conventionally, of the three levels of the oxygen concentration for preparing the calibration curve, the oxygen concentration on the high level side is a relatively low value of about 14±0.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). When a silicon wafer with a very high oxygen concentration in recent years is evaluated by GFA using a calibration curve created based on such a high level side oxygen concentration, the measurement error becomes large, and there are those that should originally meet the standard. In some cases, it was judged to be out of standard, and the correct evaluation could not be performed. However, by setting the oxygen concentration on the high-level side of the standard sample for preparing the calibration curve to a higher value as in the present embodiment, it is possible to increase the reliability of the calibration curve and reduce the measurement error of the oxygen concentration. Become.

図3は、検量線作成用のシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内分布の一例を示すグラフであり、横軸はウェーハの径方向の位置、縦軸は酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)をそれぞれ示している。 FIG. 3 is a graph showing an example of in-plane distribution of oxygen concentration of a silicon wafer for creating a calibration curve, where the horizontal axis represents the wafer radial position and the vertical axis represents the oxygen concentration FT-IR measurement value (atoms/ cm 3 ) respectively.

図3に示すように、直径が約200mmのシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度は径方向に変化している。この例では、ウェーハ中心から50mmまでの範囲では酸素濃度の変動は小さく(範囲a参照)、ウェーハ中心から20mmまでの範囲では酸素濃度の変動が特に小さい(範囲b参照)が、50〜100mmの範囲では酸素濃度の変動は大きい。このような傾向はシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度が高いものほど顕著である。酸素濃度の変動が大きい領域を検量線作成用標準試料として用いるとGFAの測定誤差が大きくなり、その結果、GFA測定値に基づいて作成される検量線の質も悪化する。そのため、シリコンウェーハから切り出される標準試料としては、酸素濃度の変動ができるだけ少ない領域を使用することが望ましく、特に酸素濃度の変動幅、つまり標準試料として用いられるシリコンウェーハの特定の領域の酸素濃度の面内ばらつきは±0.05×1017(atoms/cm3)以内であることが好ましい。 As shown in FIG. 3, the oxygen concentration of a silicon wafer having a diameter of about 200 mm changes in the radial direction. In this example, the fluctuation of the oxygen concentration is small in the range from the wafer center to 50 mm (see range a), and the fluctuation of the oxygen concentration is particularly small in the range from the wafer center to 20 mm (see range b), but 50 to 100 mm. The fluctuation of oxygen concentration is large in the range. This tendency is more remarkable as the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal is higher. If an area with a large variation in oxygen concentration is used as a standard sample for preparing a calibration curve, the measurement error of GFA becomes large, and as a result, the quality of the calibration curve prepared based on the GFA measurement value deteriorates. Therefore, as the standard sample cut out from the silicon wafer, it is desirable to use a region in which the fluctuation of oxygen concentration is as small as possible, particularly the fluctuation range of the oxygen concentration, that is, the oxygen concentration of a specific region of the silicon wafer used as the standard sample. The in-plane variation is preferably within ±0.05×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ).

次に、シリコンチップ(標準試料)の酸素濃度をGFAにより測定する(ステップS23)。GFAによる酸素濃度の測定に用いるGFA測定装置は、分析炉内の黒鉛ルツボに測定対象のシリコンチップを投入して加熱・融解することで試料中の酸素含有量を測定する装置であって、試料中の酸素を高温下で黒鉛ルツボと反応させることでCOやCOを発生させ、これらのガスを化学的に分析して元の試料に含まれていた酸素を定量化する。本発明において、GFAによる酸素濃度の詳細な測定方法は特に限定されず、種々の測定方法を採用することができる。 Next, the oxygen concentration of the silicon chip (standard sample) is measured by GFA (step S23). The GFA measuring device used for measuring the oxygen concentration by GFA is a device for measuring the oxygen content in a sample by charging a silicon chip to be measured into a graphite crucible in an analysis furnace and heating and melting the sample. CO and CO 2 are generated by reacting the oxygen in the graphite crucible at a high temperature, and these gases are chemically analyzed to quantify the oxygen contained in the original sample. In the present invention, the detailed measuring method of oxygen concentration by GFA is not particularly limited, and various measuring methods can be adopted.

次に、各標準試料のFT-IR測定値とGFA測定値との一対一の関係から検量線を作成する(ステップS24)。検量線は、例えば最小二乗法の計算による回帰分析を行うことによって求めることができる。 Next, a calibration curve is created from the one-to-one relationship between the FT-IR measurement value and the GFA measurement value of each standard sample (step S24). The calibration curve can be obtained, for example, by performing regression analysis by calculation of the least square method.

図4は、検量線を引いた酸素濃度分布のグラフである。 FIG. 4 is a graph of oxygen concentration distribution with a calibration curve drawn.

図4に示すように、検量線は酸素濃度の3水準(低水準、中間水準及び高水準)のプロット値から求めることができる。本実施形態において、低水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は約8×1017(atoms/cm3)であり、中間水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は約11.5×1017(atoms/cm3)であり、高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は約16×1017(atoms/cm3)である(図中の丸印のプロット値(検討後)参照)。従来、高水準の酸素濃度は約14〜15×1017(atoms/cm3)と低い値(図中の菱形のプロット値(検討前)参照)であったが、高水準の酸素濃度の値を高くすることで検量線の質を改善することができる。したがって、この検量線を用いることで、シリコン結晶中の酸素濃度の任意のGFA測定値(ppma)に対応するFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)を正確に求めることができる。また逆に、任意のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)に対応するGFA測定値(ppma)を求めることも可能である。 As shown in FIG. 4, the calibration curve can be obtained from the plotted values of oxygen concentration at three levels (low level, intermediate level and high level). In the present embodiment, the FT-IR measured value of the low level oxygen concentration is about 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), and the FT-IR measured value of the intermediate level oxygen concentration is about 11.5×10 17. (Atoms/cm 3 ), and the FT-IR measurement value of high-level oxygen concentration is about 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) (see the plotted value with a circle in the figure (after examination)). Conventionally, the high-level oxygen concentration was a low value of approximately 14 to 15×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) (see the diamond-shaped plot value in the figure (before study)), but the high-level oxygen concentration value The higher the value, the better the quality of the calibration curve. Therefore, by using this calibration curve, the FT-IR measured value (atoms/cm 3 ) corresponding to the arbitrary GFA measured value (ppma) of the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal can be accurately obtained. Conversely, it is also possible to obtain a GFA measurement value (ppma) corresponding to an arbitrary FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ).

検量線作成ステップS11は、GFA測定装置を用いて酸素濃度を測定する前に定期的に行われる。すなわち、一つのGFA測定装置に対してその最初の使用時に検量線を一度作成しておけば、何十日間も同じ検量線を使い続けることができるものではなく、数十時間或いは数日間使用したら使用期限となり、新たな検量線の作成が必要となるものである。これは測定環境のわずかな変化によってGFA測定装置の出力も微妙に変動し、新しく検量線を作成しなければ検量線に起因する測定誤差(換算誤差)が大きくなるからである。 The calibration curve creating step S11 is periodically performed before measuring the oxygen concentration using the GFA measuring device. That is, once a calibration curve is created for one GFA measuring device at the time of its first use, it is not possible to continue using the same calibration curve for tens of days. It is the expiration date, and it is necessary to create a new calibration curve. This is because the output of the GFA measuring device slightly changes due to a slight change in the measurement environment, and the measurement error (conversion error) due to the calibration curve becomes large unless a new calibration curve is created.

次に、この検量線を用いた酸素濃度評価ステップS12について説明する。 Next, the oxygen concentration evaluation step S12 using this calibration curve will be described.

図5は、検量線を用いたシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度評価ステップS12を説明するフローチャートである。 FIG. 5 is a flow chart for explaining the oxygen concentration evaluation step S12 of the silicon wafer using the calibration curve.

図5に示すように、GFAによるシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の評価では、まずドーパントが高濃度にドープされたシリコンウェーハなどのFT-IRでは測定が困難なシリコンウェーハを用意する(ステップS31)。例えばボロンなどのp型ドーパントが高濃度にドープされたシリコンウェーハにおいては、比抵抗が0.2(Ω・cm)以下のものを評価対象とすることが好ましい。またリン、砒素、アンチモンなどのn型ドーパントが高濃度にドープされたシリコンウェーハにおいては、比抵抗が0.1(Ω・cm)以下のものを評価対象とすることが好ましい。 As shown in FIG. 5, in the evaluation of the oxygen concentration of a silicon wafer by GFA, first, a silicon wafer that is difficult to measure by FT-IR, such as a silicon wafer doped with a high concentration of dopant, is prepared (step S31). For example, in a silicon wafer that is heavily doped with a p-type dopant such as boron, it is preferable to evaluate a silicon wafer having a specific resistance of 0.2 (Ω·cm) or less. Further, in a silicon wafer that is heavily doped with an n-type dopant such as phosphorus, arsenic, or antimony, it is preferable to evaluate silicon wafers having a specific resistance of 0.1 (Ω·cm) or less.

次に、シリコンウェーハの面内の適所から切り出した複数のシリコンチップ(評価用試料)を用意する。具体的には、ウェーハの径方向に沿って所定の間隔で設定した測定点を含む所定サイズのシリコンチップを作製する(ステップS32)。 Next, a plurality of silicon chips (evaluation samples) cut out from appropriate places on the surface of the silicon wafer are prepared. Specifically, a silicon chip of a predetermined size including measurement points set at predetermined intervals along the radial direction of the wafer is manufactured (step S32).

次に、各シリコンチップの酸素濃度をGFAにより測定する(ステップS33)。GFAによる酸素濃度の測定方法は上述した通りであり、詳細な測定方法は特に限定されない。 Next, the oxygen concentration of each silicon chip is measured by GFA (step S33). The method for measuring the oxygen concentration by GFA is as described above, and the detailed measuring method is not particularly limited.

次に、検量線を用いて各チップの酸素濃度のGFA測定値(ppma)をFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)に換算する(ステップS34)。その後、シリコンウェーハから切り出したシリコンチップの座標位置と関連付けてFT-IR測定値をマッピングすることにより、シリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内分布を求めることができる。 Next, the GFA measurement value (ppma) of the oxygen concentration of each chip is converted into the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) using the calibration curve (step S34). Then, the in-plane distribution of the oxygen concentration of the silicon wafer can be obtained by mapping the FT-IR measurement value in association with the coordinate position of the silicon chip cut out from the silicon wafer.

以上説明したように、本実施形態によるシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法は、シリコン結晶の標準試料の酸素濃度をFT-IR及びGFAでそれぞれ測定し、標準試料の酸素濃度のGFA測定値(ppma)とのFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)との一対一の関係を示す検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップS11において、相対的に高い水準の酸素濃度の値が酸素濃度評価ステップS12で評価対象となるシリコン結晶品種の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上の値であるので、検量線作成ステップS11で作成される検量線の質を改善することができ、GFA測定値(ppma)からFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)への換算精度を高めることができ、GFAによるシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度の測定精度を高めることができる。したがって、FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値を正確に求めることができる。 As described above, the method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal according to the present embodiment measures the oxygen concentration of the standard sample of the silicon crystal by FT-IR and GFA, and measures the oxygen concentration of the standard sample by the GFA measurement value (ppma). ) With the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) in the calibration curve creation step S11 for creating a calibration curve showing a one-to-one relationship, the oxygen concentration evaluation step S12 Since it is a value equal to or higher than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal type to be evaluated in, the quality of the calibration curve created in the calibration curve creation step S11 can be improved, and the GFA measurement value (ppma) The accuracy of conversion from FT-IR measured values (atoms/cm 3 ) can be improved, and the accuracy of measurement of oxygen concentration in silicon crystals by GFA can be improved. Therefore, it is possible to accurately obtain the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal, which is difficult to measure by FT-IR.

以上、本発明の好ましい実施形態について説明したが、本発明は、上記の実施形態に限定されることなく、本発明の主旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々の変更が可能であり、それらも本発明の範囲内に包含されるものであることはいうまでもない。 Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention. It goes without saying that it is included in the range.

例えば、上記実施形態においてはボロンが高濃度にドープされた低抵抗品種のシリコンウェーハの酸素濃度を評価する場合を例に挙げたが、本発明はこのようなシリコンウェーハを評価する場合に限定されるものではなく、FT-IRによって測定困難な種々のシリコンウェーハを対象とすることができる。したがって、リン、砒素又はアンチモンが高濃度にドープされたシリコンウェーハを評価対象としてもよい。またシリコン結晶の形状もウェーハ形状であることは要求されず、種々の形状のものを対象とすることができる。またシリコン単結晶に限定されず、多結晶シリコンを対象としてもよい。 For example, in the above-described embodiment, the case where the oxygen concentration of a low-resistance type silicon wafer in which boron is highly doped is evaluated is described as an example, but the present invention is limited to the case of evaluating such a silicon wafer. However, various silicon wafers that are difficult to measure by FT-IR can be targeted. Therefore, a silicon wafer that is highly doped with phosphorus, arsenic, or antimony may be an evaluation target. Further, the shape of the silicon crystal is not required to be a wafer shape, and various shapes can be targeted. Further, it is not limited to silicon single crystal, and may be polycrystalline silicon.

また上記実施形態においては、検量線作成のために酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値として3水準を用意したが、2水準であってもよく、4水準以上であってもよい。この場合、複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も高い水準が、酸素濃度評価ステップS12で評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であればよく、複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も低い水準が、前記ターゲット範囲の下限値以下であればよい。 Further, in the above embodiment, three levels were prepared as the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration for preparing the calibration curve, but it may be two levels or four or more levels. In this case, the highest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples may be equal to or higher than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step S12. The lowest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the standard sample may be equal to or lower than the lower limit value of the target range.

検量線作成に用いる3水準の酸素濃度のうち、高水準の酸素濃度の値が検量線の傾き並び切片に与える影響について考察した。検量線の作成に用いる低水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は約8×1017(atoms/cm3)とし、中間水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は約11.5×1017(atoms/cm3)とした。そして、高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、約13×1017(atoms/cm3)(比較例1)、約14.5×1017(atoms/cm3)(比較例2)、約16×1017(atoms/cm3)(実施例1)の3種類とした。 Of the three levels of oxygen concentration used to create the calibration curve, the effect of the high level oxygen concentration value on the slope and intercept of the calibration curve was examined. The low level oxygen concentration FT-IR measurement value used to create the calibration curve is about 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), and the intermediate level oxygen concentration FT-IR measurement value is about 11.5×10 17 (Atoms/cm 3 ). Then, the FT-IR measurement value of the high level oxygen concentration is about 13×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) (Comparative example 1), about 14.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) (Comparative example 2). , About 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) (Example 1).

比較例1による検量線のサンプル数は42個、比較例2による検量線のサンプル数は194個、実施例1による検量線のサンプル数は318個とし、各々の検量線の傾き及び切片の値を求め、グラフ化した。 The number of samples of the calibration curve according to Comparative Example 1 was 42, the number of samples of the calibration curve according to Comparative Example 2 was 194, and the number of samples of the calibration curve according to Example 1 was 318, and the slope and intercept values of each calibration curve. Was calculated and graphed.

図6は、高水準の酸素濃度に対する検量線の傾きの一元配置分析結果を示すグラフであり、横軸は高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)、縦軸は検量線の傾きをそれぞれ示している。 FIG. 6 is a graph showing the one-way analysis result of the slope of the calibration curve with respect to the high level oxygen concentration, where the horizontal axis is the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the high level oxygen concentration and the vertical axis is the calibration amount. The slope of each line is shown.

図6の左側プロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約13×1017(atoms/cm3)とした比較例1の検量線の傾きの平均値は約0.479となり、また標準偏差は約0.036となった。また下側95%の値は約0.468となり、上側95%の値は約0.490となった。 As shown in the plot group on the left side of FIG. 6, the average value of the slope of the calibration curve of Comparative Example 1 in which the high level oxygen concentration value was about 13×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) was about 0.479, The standard deviation was about 0.036. The lower 95% value was about 0.468, and the upper 95% value was about 0.490.

また図6の中央のプロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約14.5×1017(atoms/cm3)とした比較例2の検量線の傾きの平均値は約0.493となり、また標準偏差は約0.031となった。また下側95%の値は約0.489となり、上側95%の値は約0.498となった。 Further, as shown in the group of plots in the center of FIG. 6, the average value of the slope of the calibration curve of Comparative Example 2 in which the high level oxygen concentration value was about 14.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), was about 0. It was 0.493 and the standard deviation was about 0.031. The lower 95% value was about 0.489, and the upper 95% value was about 0.498.

また図6の右側のプロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約16×1017(atoms/cm3)とした実施例1の検量線の傾きの平均値は約0.504となり、また標準偏差は約0.021となった。また下側95%の値は約0.501となり、上側95%の値は約0.506となった。 Further, as shown in the group of plots on the right side of FIG. 6, the average value of the slope of the calibration curve of Example 1 in which the value of the high level oxygen concentration was about 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) was about 0.504. And the standard deviation was about 0.021. The lower 95% value was about 0.501, and the upper 95% value was about 0.506.

さらに図6において各水準の平均値を通過する直線を作成したとき、この直線が理論値(0.5)以上となるFT-IR測定値は、約15.7×1017(atoms/cm3)のときである。したがって、検量線の作成に用いる高水準の酸素濃度の値が15.7×1017(atoms/cm3)以上であれば信頼性の高い検量線を作成できることが分かった。 Furthermore, when a straight line that passes the average value of each level is created in FIG. 6, the FT-IR measurement value at which this straight line becomes the theoretical value (0.5) or more is about 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). Therefore, it was found that a highly reliable calibration curve can be prepared if the high-level oxygen concentration value used for preparing the calibration curve is 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) or more.

図7は、高水準の酸素濃度に対する検量線の切片の一元配置分析結果を示すグラフであり、横軸は高水準の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)、縦軸は検量線の切片をそれぞれ示している。 FIG. 7 is a graph showing the one-way analysis result of the intercept of the calibration curve with respect to the high level oxygen concentration, the abscissa is the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the high level oxygen concentration, and the ordinate is the calibration. Each line segment is shown.

また図7の左側プロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約13×1017(atoms/cm3)とした比較例1の検量線の切片の平均値は約1.338となり、また標準偏差は約0.409となった。また下側95%の値は約1.210となり、上側95%の値は約1.465となった。 Further, as shown in the group of plots on the left side of FIG. 7, the average value of the intercepts of the calibration curve of Comparative Example 1 in which the high level oxygen concentration value was about 13×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) was about 1.338. , And the standard deviation was about 0.409. The lower 95% value was about 1.210, and the upper 95% value was about 1.465.

また図7の中央のプロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約14.5×1017(atoms/cm3)とした比較例2の検量線の切片の平均値は約0.911となり、また標準偏差は約0.419となった。また下側95%の値は約0.911となり、上側95%の値は約1.030となった。 Further, as shown in the plot group in the center of FIG. 7, the average value of the intercept of the calibration curve of Comparative Example 2 in which the value of the high level oxygen concentration was about 14.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) was about 0. .911 and the standard deviation was about 0.419. The lower 95% value was about 0.911, and the upper 95% value was about 1.030.

また図7の右側プロット群に示すように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約16×1017(atoms/cm3)とした実施例1の検量線の切片の平均値は約0.656となり、また標準偏差は約0.265となった。また下側95%の値は約0.627となり、上側95%の値は約0.686となった。 Further, as shown in the plot group on the right side of FIG. 7, the average value of the intercept of the calibration curve of Example 1 in which the value of the high level oxygen concentration was about 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) was about 0.656. , And the standard deviation was about 0.265. The lower 95% value was about 0.627, and the upper 95% value was about 0.686.

以上のように、高水準の酸素濃度の値を約16×1017(atoms/cm3)とした実施例1の検量線の切片は、比較例1、2に比べて、ブランク値(0.5)に最も近くなることが分かった。GFA測定装置に試料を投入せず空の状態で測定したときの値は理想的にはゼロになるはずであるが、実際にはゼロにならず、ブランク値(バックグランウンド値)を持っている。したがって、切片の値が0.5前後であればほぼ理論値であると言うことができる。 As described above, the intercept of the calibration curve of Example 1 in which the value of the high level oxygen concentration was about 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ) showed a blank value (0. It turned out to be the closest to 5). The value when measured in an empty state without putting a sample into the GFA measuring device should ideally be zero, but it does not actually become zero and has a blank value (background value). .. Therefore, it can be said that if the intercept value is around 0.5, it is almost a theoretical value.

S11 検量線作成ステップ
S12 酸素濃度評価ステップ
S21 FT-IR測定ステップ
S22 検量線作成用標準試料作成ステップ
S23 GFA測定ステップ
S24 検量線作成ステップ
S31 ウェーハ用意ステップ
S32 評価用試料作成ステップ
S33 GFA測定ステップ
S34 換算ステップ
S11 Calibration curve preparation step S12 Oxygen concentration evaluation step S21 FT-IR measurement step S22 Calibration curve preparation standard sample preparation step S23 GFA measurement step S24 Calibration curve preparation step S31 Wafer preparation step S32 Evaluation sample preparation step S33 GFA measurement step S34 conversion Step

Claims (11)

FT-IRで測定可能なシリコン結晶からなる複数の検量線作成用標準試料を用意し、前記複数の標準試料の各々の酸素濃度をFT-IRで測定し、前記複数の標準試料の各々を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)と前記ガスの酸素濃度のGFA測定値(ppma)との一対一の関係を示す検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップと、
FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶からなる評価用試料を用意し、前記評価用試料を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記検量線を用いてGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算する酸素濃度評価ステップとを有し、
前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も高い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であり、
前記上限値は15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 )であることを特徴とするシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。
Prepare a plurality of calibration curve standard samples made of silicon crystals that can be measured by FT-IR, measure the oxygen concentration of each of the plurality of standard samples by FT-IR, and melt each of the plurality of standard samples. After measuring the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by GFA, the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the oxygen concentration of the standard sample and the GFA measurement value (ppma) of the oxygen concentration of the gas A calibration curve creating step for creating a calibration curve showing a one-to-one relationship,
An evaluation sample made of a silicon crystal that is difficult to measure by FT-IR is prepared, and the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by melting the evaluation sample is measured by GFA, and then the GFA measurement value is obtained by using the calibration curve. And an oxygen concentration evaluation step for converting the FT-IR measurement value to
The highest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is not less than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step ,
The upper limit value is 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), which is an oxygen concentration evaluation method in a silicon crystal.
前記上限値は、16×1017(atoms/cm3である、請求項1に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The upper limit, 16 × a 10 17 (atoms / cm 3) , the oxygen concentration evaluating method in the silicon crystal according to claim 1. 前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も低い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の下限値以下である、請求項1又は2に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The lowest levels of FT-IR measurement of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is less than the lower limit of the target range of oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal to be evaluated by the oxygen concentration evaluating step, according to claim 1 or 2 The method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal according to 1. 前記下限値は、8×1017(atoms/cm3である、請求項3に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal according to claim 3 , wherein the lower limit value is 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). FT-IRで測定可能なシリコン結晶からなる複数の検量線作成用標準試料を用意し、前記複数の標準試料の各々の酸素濃度をFT-IRで測定し、前記複数の標準試料の各々を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm3)と前記ガスの酸素濃度のGFA測定値(ppma)との一対一の関係を示す検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップと、
FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶からなる評価用試料を用意し、前記評価用試料を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記検量線を用いてGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算する酸素濃度評価ステップとを有し、
前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も高い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であり、
前記複数の標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値の最も低い水準は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の下限値以下であり、
前記下限値は、8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 )であることを特徴とするシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。
Prepare a plurality of calibration curve standard samples made of silicon crystals that can be measured by FT-IR, measure the oxygen concentration of each of the plurality of standard samples by FT-IR, and melt each of the plurality of standard samples. After measuring the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by GFA, the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the oxygen concentration of the standard sample and the GFA measurement value (ppma) of the oxygen concentration of the gas A calibration curve creating step for creating a calibration curve showing a one-to-one relationship,
An evaluation sample made of a silicon crystal that is difficult to measure by FT-IR is prepared, and the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by melting the evaluation sample is measured by GFA, and then the GFA measurement value is obtained by using the calibration curve. And an oxygen concentration evaluation step for converting the FT-IR measurement value to
The highest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is not less than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step ,
The lowest level of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the plurality of standard samples is equal to or lower than the lower limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step,
The lower limit value is 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), which is an oxygen concentration evaluation method in a silicon crystal.
FT-IRで測定可能なシリコン結晶からなる複数の検量線作成用標準試料を用意し、前記複数の標準試料の各々の酸素濃度をFT-IRで測定し、前記複数の標準試料の各々を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値(atoms/cm 3 )と前記ガスの酸素濃度のGFA測定値(ppma)との一対一の関係を示す検量線を作成する検量線作成ステップと、
FT-IRで測定困難なシリコン結晶からなる評価用試料を用意し、前記評価用試料を融解することで発生させたガスの酸素濃度をGFAで測定した後、前記検量線を用いてGFA測定値をFT-IR測定値に換算する酸素濃度評価ステップとを有し、
前記複数の標準試料は、第1標準試料と、前記第1標準試料よりも高い酸素濃度を有する第2標準試料と、前記第2標準試料よりも高い酸素濃度を有する第3標準試料とを含み、
前記第1標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の下限値以下であり、
前記第3標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記酸素濃度評価ステップで評価対象となるシリコン結晶の酸素濃度のターゲット範囲の上限値以上であり、
前記下限値は、8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 )であり、
前記上限値は、15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 )であることを特徴とするシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。
Prepare a plurality of calibration curve standard samples made of silicon crystals that can be measured by FT-IR, measure the oxygen concentration of each of the plurality of standard samples by FT-IR, and melt each of the plurality of standard samples. After measuring the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by GFA, the FT-IR measurement value (atoms/cm 3 ) of the oxygen concentration of the standard sample and the GFA measurement value (ppma) of the oxygen concentration of the gas A calibration curve creating step for creating a calibration curve showing a one-to-one relationship,
An evaluation sample made of a silicon crystal that is difficult to measure by FT-IR is prepared, and the oxygen concentration of the gas generated by melting the evaluation sample is measured by GFA, and then the GFA measurement value is obtained by using the calibration curve. And an oxygen concentration evaluation step for converting the FT-IR measurement value to
The plurality of standard samples include a first standard sample, a second standard sample having an oxygen concentration higher than that of the first standard sample, and a third standard sample having an oxygen concentration higher than that of the second standard sample. ,
The FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the first standard sample is equal to or lower than the lower limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step,
The FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the third standard sample is not less than the upper limit value of the target range of the oxygen concentration of the silicon crystal to be evaluated in the oxygen concentration evaluation step ,
The lower limit is 8×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ),
The upper limit value is 15.7×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ), the method for evaluating the oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal.
前記上限値は、16×1017(atoms/cm3である、請求項6に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal according to claim 6 , wherein the upper limit value is 16×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). 前記第2標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値は、前記第1標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値と前記第3標準試料の酸素濃度のFT-IR測定値との平均値±0.5×1017(atoms/cm3)である、請求項6又は7に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the second standard sample is an average value ± of the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the first standard sample and the FT-IR measurement value of the oxygen concentration of the third standard sample. The method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal according to claim 6 or 7 , wherein the oxygen concentration is 0.5×10 17 (atoms/cm 3 ). 前記評価用試料は、p型ドーパントがドープされた比抵抗が0.2(Ω・cm)以下のシリコン結晶である、請求項1乃至8のいずれか一項に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal according to any one of claims 1 to 8 , wherein the evaluation sample is a silicon crystal doped with a p-type dopant and having a specific resistance of 0.2 (Ω·cm) or less. Evaluation method. 前記評価用試料は、n型ドーパントがドープされた比抵抗が0.1(Ω・cm)以下のシリコン結晶である、請求項1乃至8のいずれか一項に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The oxygen concentration in the silicon crystal according to any one of claims 1 to 8 , wherein the evaluation sample is a silicon crystal doped with an n-type dopant and having a specific resistance of 0.1 (Ω·cm) or less. Evaluation method. 前記標準試料は、シリコンウェーハの酸素濃度の面内ばらつきが±0.05×1017(atoms/cm3)以内の領域から切り出したシリコンチップである、請求項1乃至10のいずれか一項に記載のシリコン結晶中の酸素濃度評価方法。 The standard sample in-plane variation of the oxygen concentration of the silicon wafer is a silicon chip cut from a region within ± 0.05 × 10 17 (atoms / cm 3), in any one of claims 1 to 10 A method for evaluating oxygen concentration in a silicon crystal as described.
JP2017023769A 2017-02-13 2017-02-13 Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal Active JP6717221B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017023769A JP6717221B2 (en) 2017-02-13 2017-02-13 Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017023769A JP6717221B2 (en) 2017-02-13 2017-02-13 Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018133351A JP2018133351A (en) 2018-08-23
JP6717221B2 true JP6717221B2 (en) 2020-07-01

Family

ID=63247599

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017023769A Active JP6717221B2 (en) 2017-02-13 2017-02-13 Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6717221B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111257267B (en) * 2020-03-30 2023-03-17 宁波材料所杭州湾研究院 Method for measuring oxygen content in silicon carbide ceramic material
CN111766215A (en) * 2020-07-24 2020-10-13 西安奕斯伟硅片技术有限公司 Calibration method and device of oxygen content detection equipment
CN113984705B (en) * 2021-11-05 2022-06-28 北京科技大学 Method for measuring oxygen content of aluminum nitride crystal lattice
CN115165790B (en) * 2022-05-16 2023-07-25 浙江海纳半导体股份有限公司 Method for improving oxygen content testing efficiency of heavily doped silicon wafer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018133351A (en) 2018-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6717221B2 (en) Method for evaluating oxygen concentration in silicon crystal
JP2013520810A (en) Use of resistivity and corresponding methods to indirectly determine the purity of silane and germane.
JP5678846B2 (en) Method for calculating nitrogen concentration in silicon single crystal and calculating resistance shift amount
CN103605388A (en) Method for detecting temperature of temperature field of epitaxial furnace platform through ion-implanted chip and method for correcting temperature field of epitaxial furnace platform through ion-implanted chip
JP6316798B2 (en) Determination of interstitial oxygen concentration in semiconductor samples.
Webster et al. Measurement of the inhomogeneity in Type B and Land–Jewell noble-metal thermocouples
RU2577389C1 (en) Method of calibrating thermoelectric heat flux sensors
CN111033708B (en) Method for measuring carbon concentration
JP4353121B2 (en) Method for evaluating dopant contamination of semiconductor wafers
CN103094143A (en) Ion implantation monitoring method
JP2011021898A (en) Standard sample for scanning probe microscope and carrier concentration measurement method
CN104362109B (en) Monitoring multicrystalline silicon substrate thermal annealing activation effect and the method manufacturing multicrystalline silicon substrate
JP2005223098A (en) Evaluation method and measuring method of dopant contamination, and managing method of thermal treatment process
Goodarzi et al. Accuracy of interstitial iron measurements on p-type multicrystalline silicon blocks by quasi-steady-state photoconductance
CN111766215A (en) Calibration method and device of oxygen content detection equipment
Nasriddinov Investigation of temperature sensors based on Si< P, Ni>
KR100977194B1 (en) Method for the analysis of impurities using secondary ion mass spectroscopy
JP5545131B2 (en) Quantitative analysis limit determination method in iron concentration analysis in boron-doped p-type silicon
JP6520782B2 (en) Evaluation method and manufacturing method of epitaxial wafer
JP2008060155A (en) Method of manufacturing semiconductor device
Liu et al. Polysilicon and Its Characterization Methods
Pearce et al. EMPRESS: A pan-European project to enhance process efficiency through improved temperature measurement
JP5454298B2 (en) Manufacturing method of semiconductor substrate
JP5130894B2 (en) Management method of ion implantation conditions
CN117405737A (en) Method for detecting actual dopant content in Czochralski silicon

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20190319

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20191106

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20191112

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200109

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20200128

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200401

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20200413

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200512

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200525

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6717221

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250