JP6683906B1 - Learning support system and learning support method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a learning support system capable of efficiently performing learning. SOLUTION: An information providing unit 11 provides a learner terminal 2 with, as learning support information for supporting learning, lecture information indicating a lecture and problem information indicating a problem related to the learning content of the lecture. To do. The correctness / incorrectness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires the correctness / incorrectness determination result in which the correctness / incorrectness of the learner's answer to the problem is determined for each question information. The measure execution unit 13 determines whether or not the learner can understand the learning content based on each correctness determination result. When the learner does not understand the learning content, the measure executing unit 13 estimates the cause of not understanding the learning content based on each correctness determination result, and makes the learning content understand according to the cause. Perform the countermeasure process of. [Selection diagram] Figure 1

Description

  The present disclosure relates to techniques that support efficient learning.

  Patent Literature 1 discloses a learning support device that supports learning of a learning target person.

  The learning support device described in Patent Document 1 transmits, for each lecture, problem information for determination used to determine the degree of understanding of the content of the lecture to a terminal device used by a learning target person, and the problem information for determination is transmitted. Get information about answers to. The learning support apparatus determines whether the answer to the question information for determination is correct or incorrect, and emphasizes and reproduces the lecture corresponding to the question information for determination, which is determined to be an incorrect answer, in the terminal device. As a result, it becomes possible for the learning target person to view the lecture whose understanding level is low, so that the learning target person can perform the learning according to the progress status of the learning.

JP, 2005-102556, A

  However, in the technique described in Patent Document 1, when the learning content is not understood, the learning target person is simply made to view the lecture again regardless of the cause of not understanding the learning content. There is a problem that it is difficult to perform learning efficiently.

  An object of the present disclosure is to provide a learning support system and a learning support method capable of efficiently performing learning.

  A learning support system according to an aspect of the present disclosure is a learning support system connected to a learner terminal used by a learner, and a lecture showing a lecture as learning support information for supporting learning to the learner terminal. An information providing unit that provides information and problem information indicating a problem related to the learning content of the lecture, and an acquisition result for each question information, which is an accuracy determination result that determines whether the learner's answer to the problem is correct or incorrect. Part, based on each correctness determination result, determines whether the learner can understand the learning content, if the learner does not understand the learning content, based on each correctness determination result And a measure executing unit that estimates a cause of not understanding the learning content and executes a measure process for understanding the learning content according to the cause.

  According to the present invention, learning can be performed efficiently.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a learning management system according to a first embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration of a learning management system according to a first embodiment of the present disclosure. 5 is a flowchart for explaining an example of providing processing by the learning management system according to the first embodiment of the present disclosure. 9 is a flowchart for explaining another example of the providing process by the learning management system according to the first embodiment of the present disclosure. It is a figure which shows the learning management system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this indication.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings.

(First embodiment)
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a learning management system according to the first embodiment of the present disclosure. The learning management system 1 shown in FIG. 1 is mutually connected to a learner terminal 2 via a network 10 such as the Internet, and provides the learner terminal 2 with learning support information for supporting predetermined learning. In the present embodiment, the predetermined learning is learning for a predetermined main examination such as a national examination, a skill test, an entrance examination, or an academic ability examination.

  The learner terminal 2 is an information terminal used by a learner who performs a predetermined learning. The learner terminal 2 receives the learning support information provided by the learning management system 1 and performs processing according to the learning support information. The process according to the learning support information is, for example, a process of outputting the learning support information, a process of transmitting the information input according to the learning support information to the learning management system 1, or the like. Further, the learner terminal 2 may send various requests to the learning management system 1. The request includes, for example, a request for providing learning support information.

  The learner terminal 2 may be a dedicated information terminal for receiving learning support information, or a general-purpose information terminal such as a PC (Personal Computer), a smart phone, and a tablet terminal. There may be a plurality of learner terminals 2 used by one learner, or a plurality of learners may use one learner terminal 2 jointly. Further, by logging the information terminal into the learning management system 1 using the learner's ID or the like, the information terminal may be the learner terminal 2 during the login.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the learning management system 1 includes an information providing unit 11, a correctness determination acquiring unit 12, and a countermeasure executing unit 13.

  The information providing unit 11 provides the learning support information to the learner terminal 2. The learning support information includes lecture information indicating a lecture viewed by the learner and problem information indicating a problem related to the learning content of the lecture. In addition, the learning support information includes texts related to the learning contents of the lecture (for example, textbooks and supplementary books used in the lecture), a glossary of terms related to the learning contents of the lecture, and understanding of the learning contents of the lecture. It may include an electronic memorization card or the like for confirming the memorization item necessary for performing. It should be noted that the electronic memorization card is an electronic memorization card in which the memorization item and its contents are described on the front and the back of the card.

  It is desirable that the learner learns using the learning support information according to a predetermined learning schedule. In the learning schedule, for example, recommended usage time and order of using the learning support information are defined. The recommended usage time is, for example, the time for watching a lecture based on the lecture information, the time for solving a problem based on the problem information, the time for reading a text carefully, and the time for memorizing a memorization item by using an electronic memorization card.

  The lecture information is provided in response to a request from the learner terminal 2, for example. The lecture information includes, for example, at least one of video data and audio data. The learner terminal 2 that has received the lecture information outputs the lecture information. For example, the learner terminal 2 displays the video data included in the lecture information and outputs the audio data included in the lecture information as a voice.

  There may be a plurality of pieces of lecture information, and each piece of lecture information may be composed of data for a predetermined lecture time (for example, 30 minutes). The order of viewing (or the order of recommending viewing) may be defined for each lecture information. The lecture may be divided into a plurality of learning units (learning range), and one learning unit may be configured by a plurality of lecture information.

  In the present embodiment, the lecture information includes basic lecture information indicating a basic lecture that teaches necessary knowledge for solving a predetermined exam question (for example, exam questions of the main exam) and exam questions (for example, past exam questions). And a solution lecture information showing a solution lecture that teaches how to solve a certain past question). There are multiple pieces of basic lecture information and solution lecture information. Further, the information providing unit 11 provides the solution lecture information after providing all the basic lecture information.

  The problem information may be provided in conjunction with the lecture information, may be provided in response to a request from the learner terminal 2, or both of them may be provided. The question information is, for example, Web information including character information indicating a question and an input form which is an answer column for the question, and causes the learner terminal 2 to display the question and answers to the question input to the learner terminal 2. It is used to judge the correctness of.

  In the present embodiment, the question information includes check test information provided for each lecture information and confirmation test information provided for each learning unit of a plurality of lecture information. The check test information is information indicating a simple problem (check test) for checking whether or not the learning content of the lecture indicated by the lecture information is understood. The confirmation test information is information indicating a problem (confirmation test) having a higher difficulty level than the problem of the check test information for confirming whether or not the learning content related to the learning unit is understood.

  When the lecture information is basic lecture information, the information providing unit 11 provides both the check test information and the confirmation test information in conjunction with the basic lecture information. When the lecture information is the solution lecture information, the solution lecture information is added. Provide only confirmation test information in conjunction. That is, in this embodiment, there is no check test information corresponding to the solution lecture information. There may be check test information corresponding to the solution lecture information.

  In addition, the solution confirmation test information, which is the confirmation test information corresponding to the solution lecture information, is a memorization test showing a memorization question that asks a memorization item (a memorization item necessary to understand the learning content) necessary to solve the test question. It includes information and application test information indicating an application problem to be solved by applying the secret article. The memorization problem is a problem in which, for example, the numbers of laws and regulations (article numbers, issue numbers, etc.), mathematical formulas, historical years, kanji and English words are answered. The applied problems include, for example, legal case problems, mathematical sentence problems, English composition and Japanese translation. An electronic memorization card may be used as the memorization test information.

  Further, the information providing unit 11 repeatedly provides, for each learning unit, a solution confirmation test corresponding to the learning unit at intervals. The timing for providing the solution confirmation test may be the timing requested by the learner terminal 2, or may be the timing when a predetermined period has elapsed since the solution confirmation test was provided last time. In addition, the information providing unit 11 may urge the learner to perform the solution confirmation test again after a predetermined period has elapsed since the solution confirmation test was provided. The solution confirmation test is provided about 5 times, for example. The problems shown by each solution confirmation test are not the same problem, but it is desirable that they have similar difficulty levels.

  The correctness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires, for each question information, a correctness determination result that determines whether the learner's answer to the question indicated by the question information provided by the information providing unit 11 to the learner terminal 2 is correct. For example, every time the information providing unit 11 provides the question information, the correctness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires the learner's answer to the question indicated by the problem information from the learner terminal 2 and determines the correctness of the answer. By doing so, the correctness determination result is acquired. The correctness determination result may show, for example, the correct answer rate of the learner's answer, or may show the sum of the points assigned to the correctly answered questions as a score. In the present embodiment, the correctness determination result indicates the correct answer rate of the learner's answer.

  The measure execution unit 13 determines whether or not the learner can understand the learning content of the lecture information based on the correctness / incorrectness determination result of each question information. When the learner does not understand the learning content, the measure executing unit 13 estimates the non-understanding cause that is the reason why the learner does not understand the learning content, based on the correctness determination result of each problem information, and Depending on the cause of incomprehension, a countermeasure process for understanding the learning content is executed.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the hardware configuration of the learning management system 1. As shown in FIG. 2, the learning management system 1 includes a processor 21, a main memory 22, a recording device 23, an input device 24, and a display device 25, which are connected via a bus 26.

  The recording device 23 is a device that records data in a writable and readable manner, and records a program that defines the operation of the processor 21, learning support information, and the correctness determination result acquired by the correctness determination acquiring unit 12. . The processor 21 reads the program recorded in the recording device 23 into the main memory 22, and uses the main memory 22 to execute processing according to the program. The processor 21 implements the respective units 11 to 13 of the learning management system 1 shown in FIG. The input device 24 is a device to which various information is input from an operator of the learning management system 1 and an external device (not shown), and the information is used for the processing of the processor 21. For example, the learning support information is recorded in the recording device 23 via the input device 24. The display device 25 is a device that displays various information.

  Next, the operation will be described.

  3 and 4 are flowcharts for explaining an example of a providing process for providing learning support information by the learning management system 1. FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining an example of a providing process in the input period for providing basic lecture information, and FIG. 4 is a flowchart for explaining an example of a providing process in the output period for providing solution lecture information. Is.

  When a request for providing lecture information is received from the learner terminal 2 in the input period (see FIG. 3), the information providing unit 11 provides the learner terminal 2 with basic lecture information according to the offer request. Yes (step S301).

  At a predetermined timing in the lecture based on the basic lecture information, the information providing unit 11 provides the learner terminal 2 with the check test information corresponding to the basic lecture information (step S302). The correctness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires the answer of the check test indicated by the check test information provided by the information providing unit 11 from the learner terminal 2, determines whether the answer is correct, and obtains the correctness determination result of the check test information. Yes (step S303). The predetermined timing may be the timing during the lecture or the timing when the lecture is finished.

  In addition, the information providing unit 11 confirms whether or not the lecture related to the learning unit is completed based on the basic lecture information provided in step S301 (step S304).

  When the lecture related to the learning unit has not ended, the information providing unit 11 returns to the process of step S301. On the other hand, when the lecture related to the learning unit is finished, the information providing unit 11 provides the learner terminal 2 with the confirmation test information corresponding to the learning unit (step S305). Then, the correctness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires the answer of the confirmation test indicated by the confirmation test information provided by the information providing unit 11 from the learner terminal 2, determines whether the answer is correct, and determines whether the confirmation test information is correct. Is acquired (step S306).

  Further, the information providing unit 11 determines whether or not all the basic lecture information has been provided (step S307).

  When all the basic lecture information has not been provided, the information providing unit 11 returns to the process of step S301. On the other hand, when all the basic lecture information has been provided, the information providing unit 11 shifts to the output period (step S308) and ends the process.

  In the output period (see FIG. 4), when the request for providing the lecture information is received from the learner terminal 2, the information providing unit 11 causes the learner terminal 2 to provide the solution lecture information according to the offer request. It is provided (step S401).

  When the lecture based on the solution lecture information is completed, the information providing unit 11 confirms whether or not the lecture related to the learning unit is completed based on the solution lecture information provided in step S401 (step S402).

  When the lecture related to the learning unit has not ended, the information providing unit 11 returns to the process of step S401. On the other hand, when the lecture related to the learning unit is completed, the information providing unit 11 provides the learner terminal 2 with the solution confirmation test information, which is the confirmation test information corresponding to the learning unit (step S403). Then, the correctness determination acquisition unit 12 acquires the answer of the confirmation test indicated by the solution confirmation test information provided by the information providing unit 11 from the learner terminal 2, determines whether the answer is correct, and determines whether the solution confirmation test information is correct. The determination result is acquired (step S404).

  Further, the information providing unit 11 determines whether or not the solution confirmation test information corresponding to the learning unit has been provided a predetermined number of times (step S405). If the confirmation test information has not been provided the predetermined number of times, the process returns to step S403. In step S403, the information providing unit 11 provides the solution confirmation test information to the learner terminal 2 when receiving the providing request for providing the solution test information.

  On the other hand, when the confirmation test information is provided a predetermined number of times, it is determined whether all the solution lecture information has been provided (step S406). When not providing all the solution lecture information, the information providing unit 11 returns to the process of step S401. On the other hand, when all the solution lecture information is provided, the information providing unit 11 ends the process.

  In the operation described above, the solution confirmation test is provided for each learning unit a predetermined number of times, and then the solution lecture information of the next learning unit is provided. However, the solution confirmation test of the second and subsequent learning units is performed in another learning unit. The solution lecture information may be provided after the information is provided.

  In addition, the information providing unit 11 may shift to the output period when a predetermined condition is satisfied after all the basic lecture information is provided in the input period. The predetermined condition is, for example, that the correct answer rate indicated by the correctness determination result of the confirmation test information performed in the input period is equal to or higher than a predetermined value (for example, 80%). When the predetermined condition is not satisfied, the information providing unit 11 may repeatedly provide the confirmation test information whose correct answer rate is less than the predetermined value until the predetermined condition is satisfied.

  Next, a specific description will be given of the processing performed by the countermeasure execution unit 13.

  In the input period, the countermeasure execution unit 13 responds to each learning unit whether or not the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the check test information corresponding to the basic lecture information included in the learning unit satisfies a predetermined criterion, and the learning unit. It is determined whether the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the confirmation test information satisfies a predetermined criterion.

  The predetermined criterion may be different or common for each question information. In the present embodiment, the predetermined criterion is common to all question information, and specifically, the accuracy rate indicated by the correctness determination result is a predetermined value (for example, 80%) or more. . When there are a plurality of check test information, the countermeasure execution unit 13 determines that the correctness determination result of the check test information is predetermined when the correctness rate indicated by all the correctness determination results of the plurality of check test information is equal to or more than a predetermined value. May be determined to meet the criteria of the check test information, if the correctness rate indicated by the correctness determination result of a predetermined number or a predetermined ratio or more of the plurality of check test information is a predetermined value or more, the check test information It may be determined that the correctness determination result of (1) satisfies a predetermined criterion.

  When the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the check test information does not satisfy the predetermined standard and the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the confirmation test information does not satisfy the predetermined standard, the countermeasure execution unit 13 is the reason that the learning content cannot be understood. The cause of no understanding is determined to be that the learner does not understand the whole picture of the learning content. In this case, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of urging the learner to re-learn based on the basic lecture information (re-viewing of the basic lecture) in order to make the learner understand the overall image of the learning content. To do. This makes it possible to understand the whole picture of the learning content.

  Further, when the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the check test information satisfies a predetermined standard and the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the confirmation test information does not satisfy the predetermined standard, the countermeasure executing unit 13 causes the learner to determine the cause of the incomprehension. It is judged that the details of the learning contents are not understood. In this case, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of urging the learner to re-learn with a text related to the learning content of the basic lecture information in order to make the learner understand the details of the learning content. This makes it possible to understand the details of the learning content. Note that re-learning by text is, for example, careful reading of text. The text may be text provided by the information providing unit 11 as learning support information or text printed on paper.

  When both the correctness / incorrectness determination results of the check test information and the confirmation test information satisfy predetermined criteria, it is considered that the learner can understand the learning content of the lecture. In addition, if the correctness / incorrectness judgment result of the check test information does not meet the predetermined standard, and the correctness / incorrect judgment result of the confirmation test information satisfies the predetermined standard, the learner should review the content of the lecture and understand at first. It is considered that they have come to understand the learning content that was not done. Therefore, in these cases, the countermeasure executing unit 13 does not perform countermeasure processing in this embodiment.

  In the output period, the countermeasure execution unit 13 determines whether the confirmation test information corresponding to the solution lecture information satisfies a predetermined standard. At this time, the countermeasure executing unit 13 determines whether or not the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the memorization test information in the confirmation test information satisfies a predetermined criterion, and whether the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the application test information in the confirmation test information satisfies a predetermined criterion. Whether or not is determined separately.

  When the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the memorization test information does not satisfy the predetermined standard, the countermeasure executing unit 13 determines that the cause of the incomprehension is that the learner does not remember the memorized item. In this case, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of prompting the learner to memorize the memorized item. Examples of this process include a process in which the measure execution unit 13 urges the information providing unit 11 to use an electronic memorization card provided as learning support information. As a result, it becomes possible to memorize the memorization items necessary for understanding the learning content.

  When the correctness determination result of the applied test information does not satisfy the predetermined criterion, the countermeasure executing unit 13 determines that the cause of the incomprehension is that the learner does not understand how to solve the test question. In this case, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of urging the learner to re-learn by using the solution lecture information (re-viewing of the solution lecture). This makes it possible to learn how to solve the test question.

  If the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the memorization test information satisfies a predetermined criterion and the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the application test information does not satisfy the predetermined criterion, the countermeasure execution unit 13 causes the learner to determine the cause of the incomprehension. You may decide that you do not understand how to solve.

  In addition, the solution confirmation test information is repeatedly provided. Therefore, after the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the solution confirmation test information meets a predetermined criterion once, the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the solution confirmation test information may not be satisfied. In this case, the countermeasure executing unit 13 determines that the cause of non-understanding is that the learner once understood the learning content but forgot it. At this time, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of prompting re-learning (for example, careful reading of the text) with a text related to the basic lecture information. This makes it possible to establish an understanding of the learning content.

  Note that re-viewing of the basic lecture based on the basic lecture information takes time, and it is considered to be inefficient to perform the basic lecture again at this point. Therefore, in the present embodiment, re-viewing of the basic lecture based on the basic lecture information is not prompted. In addition, forgetting the learning content is when re-learning (repetitive learning) is insufficient (for example, only when re-learning is repeated about 0 to 2 times), or when a long time has passed since the previous learning. It is thought to occur in.

  In the countermeasure process of the countermeasure execution unit 13, the process of urging the learner to perform various actions such as the process of urging the learner to re-learn based on the basic lecture information has been exemplified. For example, there is a process of presenting a comment prompting the action to the learner terminal 2. At this time, the countermeasure execution unit 13 may display the comment on the display screen of the learner terminal 2, or send the comment to the learner terminal 2 using a message such as a short message or an email. May be.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, the countermeasure process for understanding the learning content is executed according to the reason why the learning content of the lecture is not understood, so that the learning can be efficiently performed. Become.

  Further, in the present embodiment, the question information includes the check test information provided for each lecture information and the confirmation test information provided for each of the plurality of lecture information related to the learning unit. It is possible to presume the reason why the learning content is not understood based on the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the problem. Therefore, it is possible to more accurately estimate the reason why the learning content is not understood.

  Further, in the present embodiment, since the solution lecture information is provided after all the basic lecture information is provided, it is possible to learn how to solve the exam question after acquiring the knowledge necessary to solve the exam question. It becomes possible to perform learning efficiently.

(Second embodiment)
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a learning management system according to the second embodiment of the present disclosure. The learning management system 1 shown in FIG. 5 differs from the learning management system 1 according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that it further includes an analysis unit 14 and an improvement suggestion unit 15.

  The analysis unit 14 transversely analyzes the correctness determination result acquired by the correctness determination acquisition unit 12. The countermeasure executing unit 13 executes the countermeasure process based on the analysis result of the analyzing unit 14.

  For example, the analysis unit 14 analyzes correctness / incorrectness determination results of a plurality of solution confirmation test information corresponding to a plurality of learning units, and totals correctness / incorrectness determination results of memorization test information and applied test information. Then, the analysis unit 14 determines whether or not the learner is not good at solving the application problem based on the result of the aggregation. For example, when the correctness rate indicated by the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the memorization test information is equal to or higher than a threshold and the correctness rate indicated by the correct / incorrect determination result of the applied test information is less than the threshold, the analysis unit 14 solves the application problem by the learner. It is determined that is not good at.

  The threshold value may be, for example, a statistical value of a correct answer rate of a successful person who is a learner who passed the final exam of the previous year, or a plurality of learners who perform learning by using the learning support information provided by the learning management system 1. Of these, the statistical value of the correct answer rate of the top performers may be used. As the threshold value, the statistical value of the correct answer rate of the high-ranking person may be used in the first year, and the statistical value of the correct answer rate of the successful applicant may be used from the next year. The statistical value is, for example, an average value, a median value, or a minimum value. The high-ranking students are, for example, learners included in 20% of the learners having a higher correct answer rate.

  When it is determined that the learner is not good at solving the application problem, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of prompting an increase in the amount of exercises to solve the problem. It should be noted that this countermeasure process is preferably performed, for example, at a timing when the correctness / incorrectness determination results of the memorization test information and the application test information can be aggregated to some extent.

  Further, the analysis unit 14 analyzes the correctness / wrongness determination result of the solution confirmation test information, and determines whether or not the grade of the problem indicated by the solution confirmation test information tends to decrease. For example, when the correctness rate indicated by the correctness determination result of the solution confirmation test information is lower than the correctness rate indicated by the correctness determination result of the previous solution confirmation test information, the analysis unit 14 determines that the grade is decreasing. In addition, the analysis unit 14 may determine that the grade tends to decrease when the correct answer rate indicated by the correctness determination result of the solution confirmation test information decreases continuously for a predetermined number of times.

  When it is determined that the grade is in a decreasing tendency, the measure execution unit 13 determines that the learner's motivation for learning has decreased, and executes a process for improving the motivation for learning as a measure process. . The process for improving learning motivation is, for example, a process for promoting an action that is expected to improve learning motivation. Actions that are expected to improve the motivation for learning include "learn for the time being", "clean", "take a rest for the time being", "exercise" and "meet people".

  In addition, the analysis unit 14 collects each correctness determination result by the learner for each learning field, and based on the totalized result, determines whether or not there is a weak field which is a learning field that the learner is not good at. For example, when there is a learning field whose correct answer rate indicated by the correctness determination result is less than the threshold value, the analysis unit 14 determines the learning field as a weak field. The threshold value may be, for example, a statistical value of the correct answer rate of the passers in the previous year, or a statistical value of the correct answer rate of the top performers. As the threshold value, the statistical value of the correct answer rate of the high-ranking person may be used in the first year, and the statistical value of the correct answer rate of the successful applicant may be used from the next year.

  If there is a weak field, the measure execution unit 13 executes, as a measure process, a process of promoting learning of the weak field. For example, the countermeasure execution unit 13 executes a process of promoting learning (for example, careful reading) of a portion corresponding to a weak field in the text related to the lecture information.

  The analysis unit 14 also aggregates the usage status of the learning support information by a plurality of learners and creates a usage aggregation result. The analysis unit 14 compares, for each learner, the usage status of the learning support information by the learner and the usage totaling result, and based on the comparison result, teaches the learner how to use the learning support information. You may perform the process to do. Examples of the process of instructing the usage method include a process of presenting a comment indicating a better usage method to the learner terminal 2.

  For example, the analysis unit 14 collects the usage time of the text, the viewing time of the lecture information, the usage time of the electronic memorization card, and the usage time of the glossary as the learning time as the usage status of the learning support information. Then, when the learning time of the learner is less than the statistical value of the learning time of the high-ranking person by the predetermined value or more, the analyzing unit 14 instructs the learning time to be longer. For example, when the usage time of the electronic memorization card is less than the statistical value of the usage time of the electronic memorization card of the high-ranking person by the predetermined value or more, the analysis unit 14 instructs to increase the usage time of the electronic memorization card. In other words, teach them to use electronic memorization cards more often. The viewing time of the lecture information may be divided into a viewing time of the lecture information including the video data and a viewing time of the lecture information including only the audio data without the video data.

  The improvement proposing unit 15 improves or teaches the learning support information and the learning method of the learner based on the correctness determination result acquired by the correctness determination acquiring unit 12.

  For example, the improvement proposing unit 15 totals the correctness determination results by a plurality of learners for each learning field, and proposes improvement of the learning support information based on the totaling result. For example, the improvement suggestion unit 15 determines that there is an improvement point in the learning support information corresponding to the learning field in which the average value of the correct answer rates indicated by the correctness determination result is less than a predetermined value, and a comment prompting the improvement of the learning support information. Is displayed on the display device 25. Improvements include, for example, the lack of text description, the difficulty of understanding the text description, the lack of explanation in the lecture, and the difficulty of understanding the explanation in the lecture. . As a result, the learning support information can be improved, and the learning efficiency can be improved.

  Further, the improvement proposing unit 15 totals the usage status of the learning support information by a plurality of learners and the correctness determination results of the plurality of learners, generates notification information according to the totalized results, and notifies each learner of the result. Notice. As a result, it becomes possible to refer to the learning method of another learner such as a person with a high grade of performance, so that the learning can be efficiently performed.

  For example, the improvement proposing unit 15 collects the usage time of the text, the viewing time of the lecture information, the usage time of the electronic memorization card, and the usage time of the glossary as the learning time as the usage status of the learning support information. The improvement proposing unit 15 identifies a person with a high score based on the total result of the correctness determination results, and generates a statistical value of each learning time of the person with a high grade as notification information. Further, the improvement suggestion unit 15 may compare the learning times of the high-ranking person and the low-ranking person to generate the difference in the learning time of the high-ranking person and the low-ranking person as the notification information. The lower grade students are, for example, learners included in 20% of the whole learners having a low correct answer rate.

  Further, the improvement proposing unit 15 may present each of the plurality of learning methods to different learners based on the correctness determination result by the plurality of learners. In this case, after presenting the learning method, the improvement proposing unit 15 identifies the learning method with the highest score based on the correct / wrong determination result corresponding to the question information provided by the information providing unit 11. This makes it possible to establish an appropriate learning method.

  For example, first, the improvement proposing unit 15 uses the lecture information as a first learning method for a learner whose statistical value of the correct answer rate indicated by the correctness determination result is less than a first value (for example, 70%). Text related to lecture information is presented as a second learning method to a learner who presents that learning is increased and whose statistic value is less than a second value (eg, 80%) larger than the first value. Present to increase re-learning by.

  Subsequently, the improvement proposing unit 15 presents the rate of increase in the correct answer rate of the learner who presented the first learning method and the second learning method based on the correctness determination result after presenting the learning method. The rate of increase in the correct answer rate of the learner is obtained, and the learning method presented to the learner having a large increase rate is specified as the learning method in which the grade is most increased. The rate of increase is, for example, the ratio of the statistical value of the correct answer rate shown by the correctness determination result after presenting the learning method to the statistical value of the correct answer rate shown by the correctness determination result before presenting the learning method.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, it is possible to improve or teach the learning support information and the learning method of the learner by performing the cross-sectional analysis of the correctness determination result, thus supporting efficient learning. It will be possible.

  The above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are examples for describing the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure only to those embodiments. Those skilled in the art can implement the present invention in various other modes without departing from the scope of the present invention.

  1: Learning management system, 2: Learner terminal, 11: Information providing unit, 12: Correctness determination acquisition unit, 13: Countermeasure execution unit, 14: Analysis unit, 15: Improvement suggestion unit

Claims (15)

A learning support system connected to a learner terminal used by a learner,
An information providing unit that provides, to the learner terminal, as learning support information for supporting learning, lecture information indicating a lecture and problem information indicating a problem related to the learning content of the lecture,
An acquisition unit that acquires, for each of the question information, a correctness determination result that determines the correctness of the learner's answer to the problem.
Based on each correctness determination result, it is determined whether the learner can understand the learning content, and if the learner does not understand the learning content, based on each correctness determination result, the learning estimating a cause that does not understand the content, in accordance with the cause, have a, a countermeasure execution unit which executes a countermeasure process to understand the learning content,
The question information includes check test information provided for each of the lecture information, and confirmation test information provided for each of the plurality of lecture information related to a predetermined learning range,
If the correctness determination result of the check test information satisfies a predetermined criterion and the correctness determination result of the confirmation test information does not satisfy a predetermined criterion, the measure execution unit determines that the learner has detailed information about the learning content. A learning support system that determines that the user has not understood the above and prompts re-learning with a text related to the learning content . If the correctness determination result of the check test information does not satisfy a predetermined criterion, and the correctness determination result of the confirmation test information does not satisfy a predetermined criterion, the measure executing unit determines that the learner has and it determined not to understand the whole picture, prompting the relearning by the lecture information, learning support system according to claim 1. The lecture information includes, as the lecture, basic lecture information showing a basic lecture that teaches necessary knowledge for solving a predetermined exam question, and solution lecture information showing a solution lecture showing how to solve the exam question as the lecture. ,
Wherein the information providing unit after providing all the basic lecture information, provides the solution lecture information, learning support system according to claim 1 or 2. The information providing unit repeatedly provides solution confirmation test information, which is the confirmation test information corresponding to the solution lecture information, at intervals.
If the correctness determination result of the solution confirmation test information once satisfies a predetermined criterion and then the correctness determination result of the solution confirmation test information does not satisfy the criterion, the learner performs the learning. The learning support system according to claim 3 , wherein it is determined that the user has once understood the content but has forgotten it, and urges re-learning with a text related to the learning content. The solution confirmation test information, which is the confirmation test information corresponding to the solution lecture information, shows memorization test information indicating a memorization question asking questions necessary to solve the test question and an application question solved by applying the matters. and a application test information, learning support system according to claim 3 or 4. The countermeasure execution unit, when the accuracy determination result of the memorizing test information does not satisfy a predetermined reference, the learner is determined not to remember memorization matters, prompting memorization of the memorization matters in claim 5 The described learning support system. If the correctness determination result of the applied test information does not satisfy a predetermined criterion, the measure execution unit determines that the learner does not understand how to solve the test question, and re-learns using the solution lecture information. prompting, learning support system according to claim 5 or 6. The learner's correctness / incorrectness determination result of the memorization test information and the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the applied test information are aggregated, and based on the aggregated result, it is determined whether the learner is not good at solving the application problem. further comprising a Teisu Ru analyzer,
The learning support system according to any one of claims 5 to 7 , wherein the measure execution unit prompts the learner to increase the time for problem exercises when the learner is not good at solving the applied problem. Based on the correctness determination result of a plurality of the solution confirmation test information, further has an analysis unit for determining whether or not the grade of the question is a decline tendency,
The countermeasure execution unit, when the grades of the downward trend, the learning motivation of the learner is determined to be decreased, a process for improving the learning motivation, according to claim 4 Learning support system. The correctness determination result by the learner is aggregated for each learning field, and based on the aggregation result, further has an analysis unit for determining whether or not there is a weak field that is a learning field that the learner is not good at.
The learning support system according to any one of claims 1 to 9 , wherein the measure execution unit prompts learning in the weak field when the weak field exists. The usage status of the learning support information by a plurality of the learners is aggregated, the usage status by the learner and the aggregation result are compared for each of the learners, and based on the comparison result, the learning support information further comprising an analysis unit for teaching how to use the learning support system according to any one of claims 1 to 1 0. Aggregate the accuracy determination result by the plurality of the learner for each learning areas, based on the counting result, further having improvement proposing unit to propose an improvement of the learning support information, any one of claims 1 to 11 The learning support system described in paragraph. Aggregates and the accuracy determination result usage of the learning support information by a plurality of said learner, further having improvement proposing unit to the information in accordance with the counting result is notified to each learner claims 1 1 2 The learning support system according to any one of 1. Based on the correctness determination result by the plurality of learners, each of the plurality of learning methods is presented to different learners, and the learner's answer to the problem indicated by the question information provided thereafter. based on the correctness of the determined correctness determination result, performance of the problems still having improvement proposing unit that identifies a learning method most elevated, learning support system according to any one of claims 1 to 1 3. A learning management method performed by a learning support system connected to a learner terminal used by a learner,
Provided to the learner terminal, as learning support information for supporting learning, lecture information indicating a lecture and problem information indicating a problem related to the learning content of the lecture,
Acquiring the correctness determination result for each of the question information is determined whether the correct answer of the learner's answer to the problem,
Based on each correctness determination result, it is determined whether the learner can understand the learning content, and if the learner does not understand the learning content, based on each correctness determination result, the learning Estimate the cause of not understanding the content, execute the countermeasure process to understand the learning content according to the cause ,
The problem information includes check test information provided for each of the lecture information and confirmation test information provided for each of the plurality of lecture information related to a predetermined learning range,
In the execution of the countermeasure process, if the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the check test information satisfies a predetermined criterion, and the correctness / incorrectness determination result of the confirmation test information does not satisfy a predetermined criterion, the learner checks the learning content. A learning support method , which judges that the details are not understood and prompts re-learning with a text related to the learning content .

Images