JP5993605B2 - Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus - Google Patents

Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5993605B2
JP5993605B2 JP2012102259A JP2012102259A JP5993605B2 JP 5993605 B2 JP5993605 B2 JP 5993605B2 JP 2012102259 A JP2012102259 A JP 2012102259A JP 2012102259 A JP2012102259 A JP 2012102259A JP 5993605 B2 JP5993605 B2 JP 5993605B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
membrane
evaluation
flocculant
water
filtration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2012102259A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2013231602A (en
JP2013231602A5 (en
Inventor
吉英 貝谷
吉英 貝谷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Swing Corp
Original Assignee
Swing Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Swing Corp filed Critical Swing Corp
Priority to JP2012102259A priority Critical patent/JP5993605B2/en
Publication of JP2013231602A publication Critical patent/JP2013231602A/en
Publication of JP2013231602A5 publication Critical patent/JP2013231602A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5993605B2 publication Critical patent/JP5993605B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
  • Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)

Description

本発明は凝集剤の凝集能評価方法および凝集処理装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a flocculating ability evaluation method and a flocculating apparatus for a flocculant.

工業排水、下水等の排水を処理する場合、排水に凝集剤を添加して、排水中のイオン類、有機物、懸濁物質等の不純物を凝集し、粗大化させた後、沈殿、浮上等の処理を行って凝集物を除去した後、得られた凝集処理水を膜ろ過装置を用いてろ過して固液分離する方法が、一般に利用されている。   When treating wastewater such as industrial wastewater and sewage, a flocculant is added to the wastewater to agglomerate and coarsen impurities such as ions, organic matter, suspended matter, etc., and then precipitate, float, etc. A method is generally used in which agglomerated water is filtered using a membrane filtration device and solid-liquid separation is performed after removing the agglomerates.

ここで、凝集処理水を精密ろ過膜(MF)、限外ろ過膜(UF)、逆浸透膜(RO)、ナノろ過膜(NF)等を備える膜処理装置を用いてろ過する場合、凝集に利用されなかった凝集剤成分(以下「未利用凝集剤成分」ともいう)が膜ろ過装置における膜の表層の汚染を引き起こし、十分な膜性能が得られないという問題があった。
このような問題を解決することを目的とした従来法として、例えば特許文献1、2に記載の方法が挙げられる。
Here, when the agglomerated water is filtered using a membrane treatment device equipped with a microfiltration membrane (MF), an ultrafiltration membrane (UF), a reverse osmosis membrane (RO), a nanofiltration membrane (NF), etc. The flocculant component that was not used (hereinafter also referred to as “unused flocculant component”) caused contamination of the surface layer of the membrane in the membrane filtration device, and there was a problem that sufficient membrane performance could not be obtained.
As a conventional method aiming at solving such a problem, for example, methods described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 can be cited.

特許文献1には、原水に無機凝集剤を添加して凝集処理する凝集処理方法において、凝集処理水を固液分離して得られる分離液をフィルタで所定の圧力で加圧又は吸引濾過する際に、該分離液の所定量を濾過するに要する濾過時間、又は該分離液を所定時間内に濾過し得る濾過水量で定義される濾過性能と、この濾過性能の経時変化率とを検出し、検出された濾過性能及び濾過性能の経時変化率がそれぞれ予め設定した基準値を満たす場合には、予め定めた基準となる無機凝集剤添加量を維持し、該濾過性能及び濾過性能の経時変化率のうちの少なくとも一方が予め設定した基準値を満たさない場合には無機凝集剤添加量の調整を行うことを特徴とする凝集処理方法が記載されている。   In Patent Document 1, in a coagulation treatment method in which an inorganic coagulant is added to raw water to coagulate, a separation liquid obtained by solid-liquid separation of the coagulation water is pressurized or suction filtered with a filter at a predetermined pressure. In addition, the filtration performance defined by the filtration time required to filter the predetermined amount of the separation liquid, or the amount of filtered water that can filter the separation liquid within the predetermined time, and the rate of change over time of the filtration performance are detected, When the detected filtration performance and the change rate with time of the filtration performance satisfy a preset reference value, the amount of inorganic flocculant added as a predetermined reference is maintained, and the change rate with time of the filtration performance and filtration performance is maintained. There is described an aggregating method characterized in that when at least one of them does not satisfy a preset reference value, the amount of inorganic flocculant added is adjusted.

また、特許文献2には、原水を濾過膜に通水して濾過液を得る膜濾過手段と、該膜濾過手段からの濾過液量を測定するための濾過液量測定手段と、該濾過液量測定手段の測定結果から濾過係数を算出する演算手段とを備えることを特徴とする水質監視装置が記載されている。   Patent Document 2 discloses a membrane filtration means for obtaining a filtrate by passing raw water through a filtration membrane, a filtrate amount measuring means for measuring the amount of filtrate from the membrane filtration means, and the filtrate. There is described a water quality monitoring device comprising an operation means for calculating a filtration coefficient from a measurement result of a quantity measuring means.

特開2006−55804号公報JP 2006-55804 A 特開2007−152192号公報JP 2007-152192 A

上記の特許文献1または2に記載の方法は、排水(被処理水)へ凝集剤を添加し、凝集物を除去して得た凝集処理水について特定のろ過膜(以下、「評価用ろ過膜」ともいう)を用いてろ過し、その閉塞度等を測定して凝集処理水に含まれる未利用凝集剤成分の量等を把握しようとするものである。   The method described in Patent Document 1 or 2 described above is based on a specific filtration membrane (hereinafter referred to as “evaluation filtration membrane”) obtained by adding a flocculant to waste water (treated water) and removing the aggregate. The amount of the unused flocculant component contained in the flocculated water is determined by measuring the degree of blockage and the like.

しかしながら特許文献1または2に記載のような従来法では、凝集処理水を評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過したときに、凝集処理水に含まれる有機性のファウリング物質が評価用ろ過膜を閉塞してしまい、未利用凝集剤成分のみによる膜閉塞度等を正確に測定することができなかった。   However, in the conventional method as described in Patent Document 1 or 2, when the agglomerated treated water is filtered using the evaluation filtration membrane, the organic fouling substance contained in the agglomerated treated water blocks the evaluation filtration membrane. As a result, it was impossible to accurately measure the degree of membrane occlusion due to the unused flocculant component alone.

本発明は上記の課題を解決することを目的とする。
すなわち、本発明は、凝集処理水を評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過した場合に、未利用凝集剤成分のみによる膜閉塞度を正確に測定することができる凝集能評価方法を提供することを目的とする。また、その凝集能評価方法によって凝集処理における凝集剤の最適添加量を把握し、それに基づいてその添加量を最適に制御することによって、凝集剤添加量の過不足を防止して、効率的な凝集処理を行うことができる凝集処理装置を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention aims to solve the above-described problems.
That is, the present invention aims to provide a flocculating ability evaluation method capable of accurately measuring the degree of membrane clogging with only unused flocculant components when flocculated treated water is filtered using a filtration membrane for evaluation. And In addition, by grasping the optimum addition amount of the flocculant in the flocculation process by the aggregation ability evaluation method, and controlling the addition amount optimally based on that, the excess and deficiency of the flocculant addition amount can be prevented and efficient. An object of the present invention is to provide an aggregating apparatus capable of performing an aggregating process.

本発明者は上記の課題を解決するために鋭意検討し、特定の凝集剤を用いる場合に、特定の材料からなる評価用ろ過膜を用いることで、この評価用ろ過膜のファウリング物質による閉塞を防ぎ、未利用凝集剤成分の量を正確に把握できることを見出し、本発明を完成させた。
本発明は以下の(1)〜(4)である。
(1)被処理水へ凝集剤を添加し、凝集物の少なくとも一部を除去して得られた凝集処理水を膜分離装置へ供給する場合における、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価する凝集能評価方法であって、
前記凝集剤はAl系および/またはFe系の凝集剤であり、
前記凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価することで、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価する凝集能評価方法。
(2)前記評価用ろ過膜が酢酸セルロースからなる、上記(1)に記載の凝集能評価方法。
(3)被処理水へ凝集剤を添加する凝集剤添加手段を備える凝集処理装置であって、
前記凝集剤はAl系および/またはFe系の凝集剤であり、
さらに、前記凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価し、その評価結果に基づいて凝集条件を調整するフィードバック手段を備える、凝集処理装置。
(4)前記評価用ろ過膜が酢酸セルロースからなる、上記(3)に記載の凝集処理装置。
The present inventor diligently studied to solve the above problems, and when using a specific flocculant, the evaluation filter membrane made of a specific material is used to block the evaluation filter membrane with a fouling substance. It was found that the amount of the unused flocculant component can be accurately grasped, and the present invention has been completed.
The present invention includes the following (1) to (4).
(1) Aggregation ability for evaluating the aggregating ability of the aggregating agent in the case where the aggregating treatment water obtained by adding the aggregating agent to the water to be treated and removing at least a part of the aggregate is supplied to the membrane separator. An evaluation method,
The flocculant is an Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant,
The aggregation-treated water is made of a material having hydrophilicity, and at least the surface layer is filtered using a filtration membrane for evaluation made of cellulose acetate, and the degree of blockage of the filtration membrane for evaluation is evaluated. A method for evaluating the aggregating ability of an agent.
(2) The method for evaluating aggregating ability according to (1) above, wherein the evaluation filtration membrane is made of cellulose acetate.
(3) A coagulation treatment apparatus comprising a coagulant addition means for adding a coagulant to the water to be treated,
The flocculant is an Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant,
Further, the aggregation-treated water is made of a hydrophilic material, and at least the surface layer is filtered using a filter membrane for evaluation made of cellulose acetate, and the degree of blockage of the filter membrane for evaluation is evaluated. An aggregating apparatus comprising feedback means for adjusting an aggregating condition based on a result.
(4) The aggregation treatment apparatus according to (3), wherein the evaluation filtration membrane is made of cellulose acetate.

本発明によれば、凝集処理水を評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過した場合に、未利用凝集剤成分のみによる膜閉塞度を正確に測定することができる凝集能評価方法を提供することができる。また、その凝集能評価方法によって凝集処理における凝集剤の最適添加量を把握し、それに基づいてその添加量を最適に制御することによって、凝集剤添加量の過不足を防止して、効率的な凝集処理を行うことができる凝集処理装置を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a flocculating ability evaluation method capable of accurately measuring the degree of membrane clogging with only unused flocculant components when flocculated treated water is filtered using a filtration membrane for evaluation. . In addition, by grasping the optimum addition amount of the flocculant in the flocculation process by the aggregation ability evaluation method, and controlling the addition amount optimally based on that, the excess and deficiency of the flocculant addition amount can be prevented and efficient. It is possible to provide an aggregating apparatus that can perform an aggregating process.

本発明の装置の好適態様を示す概略図である。It is the schematic which shows the suitable aspect of the apparatus of this invention.

本発明について説明する。
本発明は、被処理水へ凝集剤を添加し、凝集物の少なくとも一部を除去して得られた凝集処理水を膜分離装置へ供給する場合における、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価する凝集能評価方法であって、前記凝集剤はAl系および/またはFe系の凝集剤であり、前記凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価することで、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価する凝集能評価方法である。
このような凝集能評価方法を、以下では「本発明の評価方法」ともいう。
The present invention will be described.
The present invention relates to an agglomeration for evaluating the aggregating ability of the aggregating agent in the case where an aggregating agent is added to the water to be treated and at least a part of the agglomerated material is removed to supply the agglomerated water to the membrane separator. Evaluation method, wherein the flocculant is an Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant, the flocculated water is made of a material having hydrophilicity, and at least the surface layer is made of cellulose acetate. It is a coagulation ability evaluation method for evaluating the coagulation ability of the coagulant by filtering using a membrane and evaluating the degree of blockage of the evaluation filtration membrane.
Hereinafter, such a coagulation ability evaluation method is also referred to as “the evaluation method of the present invention”.

また、本発明は、被処理水へ凝集剤を添加する凝集剤添加手段を備える凝集処理装置であって、前記凝集剤はAl系および/またはFe系の凝集剤であり、さらに、前記凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価し、その評価結果に基づいて凝集条件を調整するフィードバック手段を備える、凝集処理装置である。
このような凝集処理装置を、以下では「本発明の装置」ともいう。
Further, the present invention is an aggregating apparatus provided with an aggregating agent adding means for adding an aggregating agent to water to be treated, wherein the aggregating agent is an Al-based and / or Fe-based aggregating agent, and further, the aggregating treatment Water is made of a material having hydrophilicity, and at least the surface layer is filtered using a filter membrane for evaluation made of cellulose acetate, the degree of blockage of the filter membrane for evaluation is evaluated, and aggregation is performed based on the evaluation result. It is a coagulation processing apparatus provided with the feedback means which adjusts conditions.
Hereinafter, such an aggregating apparatus is also referred to as “the apparatus of the present invention”.

本発明の装置におけるフィードバック手段は、本発明の評価方法を利用する手段である。   The feedback means in the apparatus of the present invention is means for using the evaluation method of the present invention.

初めに、本発明の評価方法について説明する。   First, the evaluation method of the present invention will be described.

<評価用ろ過膜>
本発明の評価方法における評価用ろ過膜について説明する。
本発明の評価方法において評価用ろ過膜は、親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなるものである。このような態様の評価用ろ過膜を用いて後述する特定の凝集剤を添加した後の凝集処理水をろ過すると、凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質は評価用ろ過膜を閉塞せず、未利用凝集剤成分のみが評価用ろ過膜を閉塞させるので、未利用凝集剤成分のみによる膜閉塞度を正確に測定することができ、その結果、凝集処理水に含まれる未利用凝集剤成分の量を正確に知ることができることを、本発明者は見出した。
<Filtration membrane for evaluation>
The filtration membrane for evaluation in the evaluation method of the present invention will be described.
In the evaluation method of the present invention, the evaluation filtration membrane is made of a material having hydrophilicity, and at least the surface layer is made of cellulose acetate. When the agglomerated treated water after adding a specific flocculant to be described later is filtered using the evaluation filtration membrane of such an embodiment, the fouling substances contained in the agglomerated treated water do not block the evaluation filtration membrane, Since only the used flocculant component clogs the evaluation filtration membrane, the degree of membrane clogging with only the unused flocculant component can be accurately measured, and as a result, the amount of unused flocculant component contained in the flocculated water The present inventor has found that it is possible to know accurately.

親水性を備える材料からなり、かつ、少なくとも表層は酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜として、親水性を備える材料からなるろ過膜の表面に、液体状の酢酸セルロースを塗布して皮膜を形成した態様のものが挙げられる。   An aspect in which a film is formed by applying liquid cellulose acetate to the surface of a filtration membrane made of a material having hydrophilicity, as a filtration membrane for evaluation made of a material having hydrophilicity and at least the surface layer being made of cellulose acetate Can be mentioned.

また、評価用ろ過膜は、表層以外の部分についても酢酸セルロースからなるものであることが好ましい。本発明が鋭意検討したところ、評価用ろ過膜における表層の部分は酢酸セルロースからなり、かつ、表層以外の部分が酢酸セルロース以外の親水性を備える材料からなる場合と比較して、全体が酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜の方が、凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質がより閉塞を生じさせないことがわかった。   Moreover, it is preferable that the filtration membrane for evaluation consists of a cellulose acetate also about parts other than a surface layer. When the present invention has been intensively studied, the surface layer portion in the evaluation filtration membrane is made of cellulose acetate, and the whole portion is made of cellulose acetate compared to the case where the portion other than the surface layer is made of a material having hydrophilicity other than cellulose acetate. It was found that the fouling substance contained in the flocculated water does not cause more clogging in the evaluation filtration membrane comprising

また、評価用ろ過膜は、表層が酢酸セルロースであっても、その他の部分が疎水性材料からなるものであると、凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質がろ過膜を閉塞することを本発明者は見出した。
この理由は明らかではないが、極僅かであっても表面に疎水性を備える材料が存在すると、その部分を起点にして、ファウリング物質が評価用ろ過膜に徐々に堆積していき、閉塞させるのではないかと、本発明者は推定している。
Further, the evaluation filtration membrane according to the present invention indicates that, even if the surface layer is cellulose acetate, the fouling substance contained in the agglomerated treated water blocks the filtration membrane if the other part is made of a hydrophobic material. Found.
The reason for this is not clear, but if there is a material with hydrophobicity on the surface even if very little, the fouling substance gradually accumulates on the filtration membrane for evaluation and clogs it starting from that material. The inventor presumes that this is the case.

ここで「親水性を備える材料」としては、従来公知のものを用いることができる。親水性を備える材料は、使用する時に乾燥/湿潤の繰り返し操作ができる材料と考えることもできる。ここで乾燥した状態とは、35℃で24時間乾燥した後の状態と同じ状態を意味し、湿潤状態とは、乾燥した状態よりも濡れた状態を意味する。   Here, a conventionally known material can be used as the “material having hydrophilicity”. A material having hydrophilicity can also be considered as a material that can be repeatedly dried and wetted when used. Here, the dried state means the same state as that after 24 hours of drying at 35 ° C., and the wet state means a state that is wetter than the dried state.

酢酸セルロースは親水性を備える材料に該当するが、その他の親水性を備える材料としては、ポリアクリルニトリル、ポリビニールアルコール、エチレンビニールアルコール、ポリビニルピロリドンが挙げられる。親水性を備える材料として、酢酸セルロース、ポリアクリルニトリル、ポリビニールアルコール、エチレンビニールアルコールおよびポリビニルピロリドンからなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1つを用いることが好ましい。
なお、ポリテトラフルオロエチレン、ポリフッ化ビニリデンは親水性を備える材料には該当しない。
Cellulose acetate corresponds to a material having hydrophilicity, and other materials having hydrophilicity include polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone. As the material having hydrophilicity, it is preferable to use at least one selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl alcohol, and polyvinyl pyrrolidone.
Polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride do not correspond to materials having hydrophilicity.

なお、例えば硝酸セルロースと酢酸セルロースとの混合物や、硝酸セルロースと酢酸セルロースとが分子レベルで結合した材料からなるろ過膜は、本発明の評価方法で用いる評価用ろ過膜には該当しない。   For example, a filter membrane made of a mixture of cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate or a material in which cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate are combined at the molecular level does not correspond to the evaluation filter membrane used in the evaluation method of the present invention.

評価用ろ過膜は、上記に説明した材質以外の事項については特に限定されず、例えば従来公知のものと同様であってよい。
例えば評価用ろ過膜の厚さは特に限定されず、例えば50〜500μmであってよい。
The filter membrane for evaluation is not particularly limited with respect to matters other than the materials described above, and may be the same as a conventionally known one, for example.
For example, the thickness of the evaluation filtration membrane is not particularly limited, and may be, for example, 50 to 500 μm.

また、評価用ろ過膜の孔径も特に限定されず、例えば0.01〜0.45μmであってよく、0.1〜0.45μmであることが好ましく、0.22〜0.45μmであることがより好ましく、0.22μm程度であることがさらに好ましい。このような好ましい孔径であると、凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質が評価用ろ過膜をより閉塞を生じさせないからである。また、評価用ろ過膜を用いて凝集処理水をろ過した場合に、凝集処理水に含まれる未利用凝集剤成分を捕捉して所定の閉塞状態とするまでの速度が比較的早いからである。   Further, the pore diameter of the evaluation filtration membrane is not particularly limited, and may be, for example, 0.01 to 0.45 μm, preferably 0.1 to 0.45 μm, and preferably 0.22 to 0.45 μm. Is more preferable, and about 0.22 μm is more preferable. This is because the fouling substance contained in the agglomerated treated water does not cause the evaluation filtration membrane to be more clogged with such a preferable pore size. Further, when the agglomerated treated water is filtered using the evaluation filter membrane, the speed until the unused aggregating agent component contained in the agglomerated treated water is captured and brought into a predetermined blocked state is relatively high.

また、評価用ろ過膜の細孔構造は、スポンジ状、スリット状、直円筒状であってよいが、スポンジ状であることがより好ましい。凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質が評価用ろ過膜をより閉塞を生じさせないからである。また、評価用ろ過膜を用いて凝集処理水をろ過した場合に、凝集処理水に含まれる未利用凝集剤成分を捕捉して所定の閉塞状態とするまでの速度が比較的早いからである。
ここで、スポンジ状の細孔構造とは、膜の表から裏までほぼ同一の構造を有し、孔形状としては、網状の構造体が何層も重なった構造を有するものを意味するものとする。
また、スリット状の細孔構造とは、スリット様、カーテンのレース様の構造体が何層も重なった構造を有するものを意味するものとする。
また、直円筒状の細孔構造とは、膜の断面方向に円筒状の孔が平行して通っているものを意味するものとする。
例えば、中尾真一編著、「よくわかる分離膜の基礎」工業調査会、P80には、「酢酸セルロース+ニトロセルロース混合膜」および「ポリフッ化ビニリデン」の膜構造を示す写真が掲載されているが、これらの写真はいずれもスポンジ状の細孔構造を示している。また、同刊行物には「ポリテトラフルオロエチレン」の膜構造を示す写真も掲載されているが、この写真はスリット状の細孔構造を示している。また、同刊行物には「ポリカーボネート」の膜構造を示す写真も掲載されているが、この写真は直円筒状の細孔構造を示している。
The pore structure of the evaluation filtration membrane may be a sponge shape, a slit shape, or a right cylindrical shape, but more preferably a sponge shape. This is because the fouling substance contained in the agglomerated treated water does not cause more clogging of the evaluation filtration membrane. Further, when the agglomerated treated water is filtered using the evaluation filter membrane, the speed until the unused aggregating agent component contained in the agglomerated treated water is captured and brought into a predetermined blocked state is relatively high.
Here, the sponge-like pore structure has almost the same structure from the front to the back of the membrane, and the pore shape means a structure in which a number of layers of network-like structures overlap. To do.
In addition, the slit-like pore structure means a structure in which a plurality of layers of slit-like and curtain-like structures are overlapped.
In addition, a straight cylindrical pore structure means that a cylindrical hole passes in parallel in the cross-sectional direction of the membrane.
For example, Shinichi Nakao, “Fundamentals of separation membranes” by the Industrial Research Committee, P80, photographs showing the membrane structure of “cellulose acetate + nitrocellulose mixed membrane” and “polyvinylidene fluoride” are published. Each of these photographs shows a sponge-like pore structure. The publication also includes a photograph showing the membrane structure of “polytetrafluoroethylene”, which shows a slit-like pore structure. The publication also includes a photograph showing the membrane structure of “polycarbonate”, which shows a right cylindrical pore structure.

イオン類、有機物、懸濁物質等の不純物を含む被処理水へ、後述する特定の凝集剤を添加して前記不純物を凝集処理する操作において、この凝集剤の凝集能を評価する場合に、上記のような評価用ろ過膜を用いると、前記被処理水に含まれるファウリング物質は評価用ろ過膜を閉塞させず、未利用凝集剤成分のみが評価用ろ過膜を閉塞させるので、未利用凝集剤成分のみによる膜閉塞度を正確に測定して、その結果、凝集剤の凝集能を正確に把握することができる。   In the operation of adding the specific flocculant described later to the water to be treated containing impurities such as ions, organic matter, suspended matter, etc., and aggregating the impurities, when evaluating the flocculant ability of the flocculant, When the evaluation filter membrane is used, the fouling substance contained in the water to be treated does not block the filtration membrane for evaluation, and only the unused flocculant component blocks the filtration membrane for evaluation. The degree of membrane occlusion by only the agent component can be accurately measured, and as a result, the aggregating ability of the aggregating agent can be accurately grasped.

<凝集剤>
本発明の評価方法における凝集剤について説明する。
本発明の評価方法では、被処理水へ凝集剤を添加する。そして、被処理水に含まれるイオン類、有機物、懸濁物質等の不純物を凝集させて凝集物とする。
本発明の評価方法における凝集剤は、Al系および/またはFe系の凝集剤である。
<Flocculant>
The flocculant in the evaluation method of the present invention will be described.
In the evaluation method of the present invention, a flocculant is added to the water to be treated. Then, impurities such as ions, organic substances, suspended substances and the like contained in the water to be treated are aggregated to form aggregates.
The flocculant in the evaluation method of the present invention is an Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant.

Al系の凝集剤とは、アルミニウム化合物を主成分とする凝集剤を意味する。
ここで、アルミニウム化合物とはAl原子を含む化合物を意味する。アルミニウム化合物としてはポリ塩化アルミニウム、硫酸ばん土(硫酸アルミニウム)が挙げられる。
The Al-based flocculant means a flocculant mainly composed of an aluminum compound.
Here, the aluminum compound means a compound containing Al atoms. Examples of the aluminum compound include polyaluminum chloride and sulfuric acid clay (aluminum sulfate).

また、主成分とは、含有率が50質量%以上、好ましくは60質量%以上、より好ましくは70質量%以上、より好ましくは80質量%以上、より好ましくは90質量%以上、より好ましくは95質量%以上、より好ましくは98質量%以上、より好ましくは99質量%以上、さらに好ましくは100質量%である(実質的に他の成分を含まない)ことを意味するものとする。ここで「実質的に他の成分を含まない」とは、原料や製造過程から不可避的に含まれる不純物は含まれ得るが、それ以外は含まないことを意味する。
以下、特に断りがない限り、本発明の説明において「主成分」とは、このような意味で用いるものとする。
The main component is a content of 50% by mass or more, preferably 60% by mass or more, more preferably 70% by mass or more, more preferably 80% by mass or more, more preferably 90% by mass or more, more preferably 95% by mass. It means that the content is at least mass%, more preferably at least 98 mass%, more preferably at least 99 mass%, and even more preferably at 100 mass% (substantially does not contain other components). Here, “substantially free of other components” means that impurities that are inevitably included from the raw materials and the production process may be included, but the other components are not included.
In the following description of the present invention, “main component” is used in this sense unless otherwise specified.

Fe系の凝集剤とは、鉄系化合物を主成分とする凝集剤を意味する。
ここで、鉄系化合物とはFe原子を含む化合物を意味する。鉄系化合物としては塩化第二鉄、ポリ硫酸第二鉄が挙げられる。
The Fe-based flocculant means a flocculant mainly composed of an iron-based compound.
Here, the iron-based compound means a compound containing Fe atoms. Examples of iron-based compounds include ferric chloride and polyferric sulfate.

前記凝集剤は粉状の態様のものであってよいし、粉状のアルミニウム系化合物および/または鉄系化合物が液体に分散した態様のものであってもよい。   The flocculant may be in a powdery form, or in a form in which a powdery aluminum-based compound and / or iron-based compound is dispersed in a liquid.

本発明の評価方法では、このようなAl系の凝集剤、Fe系の凝集剤、または両方を主成分として含む凝集剤を被処理水へ添加する。ここで、Al系の凝集剤とFe系の凝集剤との両方を含む凝集剤として用いる場合、これらの混合比は特に限定されない。
本発明の評価方法では、凝集剤としてAl系の凝集剤を用いることが好ましい。
In the evaluation method of the present invention, such an Al-based flocculant, an Fe-based flocculant, or a flocculant containing both as main components is added to the water to be treated. Here, when used as a flocculant containing both an Al-based flocculant and an Fe-based flocculant, the mixing ratio thereof is not particularly limited.
In the evaluation method of the present invention, it is preferable to use an Al-based flocculant as the flocculant.

<被処理水>
本発明の評価方法における被処理水について説明する。
本発明の評価方法において被処理水は、前記凝集剤が添加された場合に凝集し得るイオン類、有機物、懸濁物質等の不純物とファウリング物質とを含む水であれば特に限定されない。ここでイオン類とは、リン酸態リン、アンモニア性窒素、鉄イオン、マンガンイオン、アルミニウムイオン、シリカイオン等である。
また、ファウリング物質とは、膜分離装置による膜分離を継続して行った場合に目詰まりを生じさせ得る有機系の物質であり、フミン質や多糖様物質が該当すると本発明者は考えている。
<Treatment water>
The treated water in the evaluation method of the present invention will be described.
In the evaluation method of the present invention, the water to be treated is not particularly limited as long as it contains water such as ions, organic substances, suspended substances and the like that can aggregate when the flocculant is added and a fouling substance. Here, the ions include phosphorous phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen, iron ions, manganese ions, aluminum ions, silica ions, and the like.
In addition, the fouling substance is an organic substance that can cause clogging when membrane separation by a membrane separation apparatus is continuously performed, and the present inventor considers that humic substances and polysaccharide-like substances are applicable. Yes.

前記被処理水は、さらに病原性微生物等を含むものであってもよい。   The treated water may further contain pathogenic microorganisms and the like.

前記被処理水として、具体的には水道原水(河川水、地下水等)、海水等が挙げられる。
また、前記被処理水は、ここに具体的に挙げた水道原水等を何らかの処理(例えば除渣処理、沈殿処理、生物処理等)を施した後のものであってもよい。
Specific examples of the water to be treated include raw tap water (river water, groundwater, etc.), seawater, and the like.
In addition, the water to be treated may be one obtained by subjecting raw water water or the like specifically mentioned here to some kind of treatment (for example, debris treatment, precipitation treatment, biological treatment, etc.).

<凝集処理水>
本発明の評価方法における凝集処理水について説明する。
本発明の評価方法において凝集処理水は、前記被処理水へ前記凝集剤を添加し、発生した凝集物の少なくとも一部を分離、除去した後に得られるものである。例えば、前記被処理水へ前記凝集剤を添加し、沈殿、浮上等の通常、膜分離装置を用いて処理する際に採用される処理を行って凝集物を分離、除去した上澄み液が、凝集処理水に該当する。
<Aggregated treated water>
The agglomerated water in the evaluation method of the present invention will be described.
In the evaluation method of the present invention, the flocculated water is obtained after adding the flocculating agent to the water to be treated, and separating and removing at least a part of the generated aggregate. For example, the supernatant obtained by adding the flocculant to the water to be treated, separating and removing the agglomerates by carrying out the treatment usually used for processing using a membrane separator such as precipitation and flotation is agglomerated. Corresponds to treated water.

<評価方法>
本発明の評価方法では、前記被処理水へAl系および/またはFe系の前記凝集剤を添加した後の凝集処理水について、特定の評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価することで、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価することができる。
<Evaluation method>
In the evaluation method of the present invention, the aggregated treated water after the addition of the Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant to the treated water is filtered using a specific evaluation filtration membrane, and the evaluation filtration is performed. By evaluating the degree of blockage of the membrane, the aggregating ability of the aggregating agent can be evaluated.

評価方法は、前記凝集処理水を前記評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過して、前記評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度を評価する方法であれば特に限定されない。
例えば、評価用ろ過膜を平膜用フィルターホルダーにセットし、吸引ポンプを用いて吸引圧力を一定にする定圧ろ過を行い、所定量をろ過したときの、吸引速度の低下分によって、評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度の評価することができる。
また、例えば、評価用ろ過膜を、従来公知の撹拌式加圧セルにセットして、定速ろ過を行い、所定量をろ過したときの吸引圧力の上昇分によって、評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度の評価することができる。
The evaluation method is not particularly limited as long as the aggregation treated water is filtered using the evaluation filtration membrane and the degree of blockage of the evaluation filtration membrane is evaluated.
For example, set the filtration membrane for evaluation in a flat membrane filter holder, perform constant pressure filtration using a suction pump to keep the suction pressure constant, and filter the evaluation filter according to the decrease in suction speed when a predetermined amount is filtered. The degree of membrane occlusion can be evaluated.
Also, for example, the evaluation filtration membrane is set in a conventionally known stirring-type pressure cell, subjected to constant speed filtration, and the degree of blockage of the evaluation filtration membrane is determined by the increase in suction pressure when a predetermined amount is filtered. Can be evaluated.

本発明の評価方法では、上記のような評価を行い、その評価結果に基づいて、前記凝集剤の凝集処理水への添加量等を調整することで最適量の凝集剤を凝集処理水へ添加し、その後、膜分離装置へ凝集処理水を供給した場合に、未利用凝集剤による膜分離装置の膜の汚染を防止することができる。   In the evaluation method of the present invention, the above-described evaluation is performed, and based on the evaluation result, the optimum amount of the flocculant is added to the flocculated water by adjusting the amount of the flocculant added to the flocculated water. Then, when the agglomerated water is supplied to the membrane separator, it is possible to prevent the membrane of the membrane separator from being contaminated by the unused flocculant.

本発明の評価方法では膜処理装置として、精密ろ過膜(MF)、限外ろ過膜(UF)、逆浸透膜(RO)、ナノろ過膜(NF)等を利用できる。   In the evaluation method of the present invention, a microfiltration membrane (MF), an ultrafiltration membrane (UF), a reverse osmosis membrane (RO), a nanofiltration membrane (NF) or the like can be used as a membrane treatment apparatus.

次に、本発明の装置について説明する。
本発明の装置は、前述の本発明の評価方法を利用したフィードバック手段を備えるものである。
Next, the apparatus of the present invention will be described.
The apparatus of the present invention includes feedback means using the above-described evaluation method of the present invention.

本発明の装置について、図を用いて説明する。
図1は本発明の装置の好適態様を示す概略図である。
図1において本発明の装置1は、被処理水4へ凝集剤6を添加する凝集剤添加手段としての凝集剤貯留槽7を備える凝集処理装置であって、さらに、フィードバック手段9を備える凝集処理装置である。ここで、凝集剤貯留槽7は切り出し装置を備えるものであり、例えば従来公知の貯留槽の下部に従来公知の切り出し装置を備える態様であってよい。
また、図1に示す本発明の装置1は、さらに、原水2を貯留し、上澄み液を被処理水4として排出する原水槽3と、被処理水4を受け入れて凝集剤6と混合し、上澄み液を凝集処理水8として排出する凝集撹拌槽5と、凝集処理水8を貯留して沈降物を沈殿し、上澄み液を排出する沈殿槽11と、沈殿槽11から排出された上澄み液をろ過するろ過装置13とを備える。
ろ過装置13から排出された凝集処理水は膜分離装置へ供給される。膜分離装置は、本発明の評価方法において用いるものと同様であってよい。
The apparatus of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing a preferred embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention.
In FIG. 1, the apparatus 1 of the present invention is a flocculation processing apparatus including a flocculating agent storage tank 7 as a flocculating agent adding means for adding a flocculating agent 6 to the water 4 to be treated, and further includes a flocculating process including a feedback means 9. Device. Here, the flocculant storage tank 7 is provided with a cutting device, and may be a mode in which, for example, a conventionally known cutting device is provided in a lower portion of a conventionally known storage tank.
Further, the apparatus 1 of the present invention shown in FIG. 1 further stores the raw water 2 and discharges the supernatant liquid as the treated water 4, receives the treated water 4 and mixes it with the flocculant 6, The agitation agitation tank 5 that discharges the supernatant as the agglomerated water 8, the agglomerated water 8 that is stored to precipitate the sediment, the precipitation tank 11 that discharges the supernatant, and the supernatant that is discharged from the precipitation tank 11 And a filtering device 13 for filtering.
The agglomerated water discharged from the filtration device 13 is supplied to the membrane separation device. The membrane separation apparatus may be the same as that used in the evaluation method of the present invention.

フィードバック手段9は凝集処理水8の一部を採取し、本発明の評価方法によって評価し、その結果に基づいて凝集条件を調整する手段である。例えば、評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度が小さすぎる場合は、凝集剤6の凝集撹拌槽5への添加量を多くするように調整する。逆に、例えば、評価用ろ過膜の閉塞度が多きすぎる場合は、凝集剤6の凝集撹拌槽5への添加量を少なくするように調整する。凝集剤6の凝集撹拌槽5への添加量の調整は、例えば、フィードバック手段が制御手段を含んでおり、この制御手段から凝集剤貯留槽7が備える切り出し装置へ電気的な信号を送って行うこともできる。このようなコンピュータ制御を行ってもよいが、人間が介在し、評価結果に基づいて手動で凝集剤6の凝集撹拌槽5への添加量を調整してもよい。   The feedback means 9 is a means for collecting a part of the flocculated water 8 and evaluating it by the evaluation method of the present invention, and adjusting the flocculation conditions based on the result. For example, when the degree of blockage of the evaluation filtration membrane is too small, adjustment is made to increase the amount of the flocculant 6 added to the flocculation agitation tank 5. On the contrary, for example, when the degree of blockage of the evaluation filter membrane is too large, the amount of the flocculant 6 added to the flocculation stirring tank 5 is adjusted to be small. Adjustment of the addition amount of the flocculant 6 to the flocculent stirring tank 5 is performed by sending an electrical signal from the control means to the cutting device provided in the flocculant storage tank 7, for example. You can also. Although such computer control may be performed, humans may intervene and the amount of the coagulant 6 added to the coagulation stirring tank 5 may be manually adjusted based on the evaluation result.

本発明の装置の凝集剤添加手段において用いる凝集剤は、本発明の評価方法において用いた凝集剤と同様に、Al系および/またはFe系の凝集剤である。   The flocculant used in the flocculant addition means of the apparatus of the present invention is an Al-based and / or Fe-based flocculant, similar to the flocculant used in the evaluation method of the present invention.

なお、本発明の装置1が備える原水槽3、凝集撹拌槽5、沈殿槽11、およびろ過装置13は、従来公知のものであってよい。原水槽3および沈殿槽11は例えば従来公知のタンク状の槽であってよく、凝集撹拌槽5はさらに撹拌手段を備える従来公知の態様のものであってよい。また、ろ過装置13は、例えば、砂ろ過装置、複層ろ過装置、繊維ろ過装置であってよい。   In addition, the raw | natural water tank 3, the aggregation stirring tank 5, the precipitation tank 11, and the filtration apparatus 13 with which the apparatus 1 of this invention is provided may be a conventionally well-known thing. The raw water tank 3 and the sedimentation tank 11 may be, for example, a conventionally known tank-shaped tank, and the agglomeration stirring tank 5 may be of a conventionally known aspect further provided with stirring means. Moreover, the filtration apparatus 13 may be a sand filtration apparatus, a multilayer filtration apparatus, and a fiber filtration apparatus, for example.

<実施例1>
酢酸セルロースからなる評価用ろ過膜(直径:25mmの平膜、孔径:0.22μm、細孔構造:スポンジ状)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜A」ともいう。
<Example 1>
A filtration membrane for evaluation made of cellulose acetate (a flat membrane with a diameter of 25 mm, a pore size: 0.22 μm, a pore structure: sponge-like) was prepared. Hereinafter, this evaluation membrane is also referred to as “evaluation membrane A”.

次に、被処理水として江戸川原水を用意した。江戸川原水の組成等は次の通りであった。
pH 7.5
濁度 3.6度
鉄 0.29mg/L
マンガン 0.027mg/L
アルミニウム 0.15mg/L
UVA260(5cm) 0.112
Next, Edogawara water was prepared as treated water. The composition of Edogawara water was as follows.
pH 7.5
Turbidity 3.6 degrees Iron 0.29 mg / L
Manganese 0.027mg / L
Aluminum 0.15mg / L
UV A260 (5cm) 0.112

次に、上記の被処理水へ凝集剤としてポリ塩化アルミニウムを30mg/Lで添加した後、ジャーテスターを用いて撹拌した。ジャーテスターによる撹拌は130rpmで3分撹拌した後、30rpmで10分撹拌し、その後、5分間静置するという条件で行った。
そして、上澄み液を凝集処理水として得た。
Next, after adding polyaluminum chloride as a flocculant to said to-be-processed water at 30 mg / L, it stirred using the jar tester. Stirring with a jar tester was performed under the condition of stirring at 130 rpm for 3 minutes, then stirring at 30 rpm for 10 minutes, and then standing for 5 minutes.
And the supernatant liquid was obtained as aggregation process water.

次に、評価用ろ過膜Aを平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダー(有効膜面積:2.1cm2)にセットし、これを用いてジャーテスターによって撹拌した後の凝集処理水(400mL)をろ過した。ここでろ過の際は吸引ポンプを用い、吸引圧力を一定(92kPa)とする全量定圧ろ過を行った。 Next, the filtration membrane A for evaluation was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder (effective membrane area: 2.1 cm 2 ), and this was used to filter the agglomerated treated water (400 mL) after stirring with a jar tester. . At the time of the filtration, a suction pump was used to perform a constant volume filtration with a constant suction pressure (92 kPa).

そして、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜1の表層に物理的に、不可逆的に堆積した堆積物(すなわち目詰まり物質)について調査した。調査はFTIRとEDXを使いて行った。その結果、堆積物は、全てポリ塩化アルミニウムであり、ファウリング物質は含まれていなかった。   And the deposit (namely, clogging substance) deposited physically and irreversibly on the surface layer of the filter membrane 1 for evaluation after filtering 400 mL of flocculated water was investigated. The survey was conducted using FTIR and EDX. As a result, the deposits were all polyaluminum chloride and contained no fouling material.

<比較例1>
疎水性ポリフッ化ビニリデンからなる評価用ろ過膜(直径:25mmの平膜、孔径:0.22μm、細孔構造:スポンジ状)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜B」ともいう。
次に、評価用ろ過膜Bを実施例1の場合と同様に平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダーにセットし、これを用いて、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した。
そして、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜Bの表層に堆積した堆積物について調査した。
その結果、堆積物には多量のファウリング物質が含まれていた。
<Comparative Example 1>
A filtration membrane for evaluation made of hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (a flat membrane with a diameter of 25 mm, a pore size: 0.22 μm, a pore structure: sponge-like) was prepared. Hereinafter, this evaluation membrane is also referred to as “evaluation membrane B”.
Next, the evaluation filtration membrane B was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder in the same manner as in Example 1, and 400 mL of the agglomerated treated water was filtered using this as in Example 1.
And like Example 1, the deposit deposited on the surface layer of the filter membrane B for evaluation after filtering 400 mL coagulation treated water was investigated.
As a result, the sediment contained a large amount of fouling material.

<比較例2>
疎水性材料であるポリフッ化ビニリデンの表面に親水性ポリマーを塗布した評価用ろ過膜(直径:25mmの平膜、孔径:0.22μm、細孔構造:スポンジ状)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜C」ともいう。
このような評価用ろ過膜Cを実施例1の場合と同様に平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダーにセットし、これを用いて、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した。
そして、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜Cの表層に堆積した堆積物について調査した。
その結果、堆積物には多量のファウリング物質が含まれていた。
<Comparative example 2>
An evaluation filtration membrane (a flat membrane with a diameter of 25 mm, a pore size: 0.22 μm, a pore structure: sponge-like) was prepared by applying a hydrophilic polymer to the surface of polyvinylidene fluoride, which is a hydrophobic material. Hereinafter, this evaluation membrane is also referred to as “evaluation membrane C”.
Such an evaluation filtration membrane C was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder in the same manner as in Example 1, and 400 mL of the agglomerated treated water was filtered in the same manner as in Example 1.
And like Example 1, the deposit deposited on the surface layer of the filter membrane C for evaluation after filtering 400 mL aggregation process water was investigated.
As a result, the sediment contained a large amount of fouling material.

<比較例3>
評価用ろ過膜として、ミリポア社製セルロース混合エステルMF(孔径0.45μm)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜D」ともいう。
なお、評価用ろ過膜Dは硝酸セルロースと酢酸セルロースとが分子レベルで結合した構造を備える材料からなるものであるので、評価用ろ過膜Dの表層は酢酸セルロースのみからなるものではない。
このような評価用ろ過膜Dを実施例1の場合と同様に平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダーにセットし、これを用いて、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した。
そして、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜Dの表層に堆積した堆積物について調査した。
その結果、堆積物には多量のファウリング物質が含まれていた。
<Comparative Example 3>
As a filtration membrane for evaluation, cellulose mixed ester MF (pore diameter 0.45 μm) manufactured by Millipore was prepared. Hereinafter, this evaluation membrane is also referred to as “evaluation membrane D”.
Since the evaluation filtration membrane D is made of a material having a structure in which cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate are bonded at the molecular level, the surface layer of the evaluation filtration membrane D is not made only of cellulose acetate.
Such an evaluation filtration membrane D was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder in the same manner as in Example 1, and 400 mL of the agglomerated treated water was filtered in the same manner as in Example 1.
And like Example 1, the deposit deposited on the surface layer of the filter membrane D for evaluation after filtering 400 mL coagulation treated water was investigated.
As a result, the sediment contained a large amount of fouling material.

<比較例4>
ポリカーボネートからなる評価用ろ過膜(直径:25mmの平膜、孔径:0.22μm、細孔構造:直円筒状)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜E」ともいう。
このような評価用ろ過膜Eを実施例1の場合と同様に平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダーにセットし、これを用いて、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した。
そして、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜Eの表層に堆積した堆積物について調査した。
その結果、堆積物には多量のファウリング物質が含まれていた。
<Comparative example 4>
A filtration membrane for evaluation made of polycarbonate (a flat membrane with a diameter of 25 mm, a pore size: 0.22 μm, a pore structure: a right cylindrical shape) was prepared. Hereinafter, this evaluation filtration membrane is also referred to as “evaluation filtration membrane E”.
Such an evaluation filtration membrane E was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder in the same manner as in Example 1, and 400 mL of the agglomerated treated water was filtered in the same manner as in Example 1.
And like Example 1, the deposit deposited on the surface layer of the filter membrane E for evaluation after filtering 400 mL coagulation treated water was investigated.
As a result, the sediment contained a large amount of fouling material.

<比較例5>
疎水性材料であるポリテトラフルオロエチレンの表面に親水性ポリマーを塗布した評価用ろ過膜(直径:25mmの平膜、孔径:0.22μm、細孔構造:スリット状)を用意した。この評価用ろ過膜を、以下では「評価用ろ過膜F」ともいう。
このような評価用ろ過膜Fを実施例1の場合と同様に平膜用ガラス製フィルターホルダーにセットし、これを用いて、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した。
そして、実施例1と同様に、400mLの凝集処理水をろ過した後の評価用ろ過膜Fの表層に堆積した堆積物について調査した。
その結果、堆積物には多量のファウリング物質が含まれていた。
<Comparative Example 5>
An evaluation filtration membrane (a flat membrane with a diameter of 25 mm, a pore size: 0.22 μm, a pore structure: a slit shape) in which a hydrophilic polymer is applied to the surface of polytetrafluoroethylene, which is a hydrophobic material, was prepared. Hereinafter, this evaluation filtration membrane is also referred to as “evaluation filtration membrane F”.
Such an evaluation filtration membrane F was set in a flat membrane glass filter holder in the same manner as in Example 1, and 400 mL of the agglomerated treated water was filtered in the same manner as in Example 1.
And like Example 1, the deposit deposited on the surface layer of the filter membrane F for evaluation after filtering 400 mL aggregation process water was investigated.
As a result, the sediment contained a large amount of fouling material.

1 本発明の装置
2 原水
3 原水槽
4 被処理水
5 凝集撹拌槽
6 凝集剤
7 凝集剤貯留槽
8 凝集処理水
9 フィードバック手段
11 沈殿槽
13 ろ過装置
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Apparatus of this invention 2 Raw water 3 Raw water tank 4 Water to be treated 5 Coagulation stirring tank 6 Coagulant 7 Coagulant storage tank 8 Coagulated water 9 Feedback means 11 Precipitation tank 13 Filtration apparatus

Claims (4)

被処理水にAl系、Fe系の少なくともいずれかの凝集剤を添加し、
前記凝集剤が添加された凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、厚さが50〜500μm、孔径が0.01〜0.45μm、細孔構造がスポンジ状、スリット状、直円筒状の何れかの評価用ろ過膜を用いてろ過し、
前記凝集剤を添加した後、凝集処理水を前記評価用ろ過膜でろ過し、凝集処理水に含まれるファウリング物質が評価用ろ過膜を閉塞せず、凝集に利用されなかった未利用凝集剤成分のみにより閉塞される該評価用ろ過膜の膜閉塞度を測定し、
前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価することを特徴とする凝集能評価方法。
Add at least one of Al-based and Fe-based flocculants to the water to be treated,
The agglomerated water to which the aggregating agent is added is made of a material having hydrophilicity, has a thickness of 50 to 500 μm, a pore diameter of 0.01 to 0.45 μm, and a pore structure of sponge shape, slit shape, right cylindrical shape Filter using one of the filtration membranes for evaluation,
After the addition of the flocculant, the flocculation treatment water is filtered by the evaluation filtration membrane fouling substances contained in the aggregation treatment water without clogging a filter membrane for the evaluation, unused aggregate that has not been utilized in the cohesive Measure the degree of membrane occlusion of the evaluation filtration membrane blocked only by the agent component,
A method for evaluating aggregating ability, comprising evaluating the aggregating ability of the aggregating agent.
前記評価用ろ過膜は、少なくともその表層が酢酸セルロースからなることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の凝集能評価方法。 The aggregation membrane evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein at least the surface layer of the evaluation filtration membrane is made of cellulose acetate. 被処理水へAl系、Fe系の少なくともいずれかの凝集剤を添加し、凝集処理水を得る凝集剤添加手段と、
前記凝集剤の添加後の凝集処理水を、親水性を備える材料からなり、厚さが50〜500μm、孔径が0.01〜0.45μm、細孔構造がスポンジ状、スリット状、直円筒状の何れかの評価用ろ過膜でろ過し、凝集に利用されなかった未利用凝集剤成分のみによる評価用ろ過膜を閉塞させる膜閉塞度を測定して求め、前記凝集剤の凝集能を評価し、該評価結果に基づいて、前記凝集剤添加手段による前記凝集剤の添加量を調整するフィードバック制御手段と、
前記フィードバック制御手段により前記凝集剤の添加量が調整された凝集処理水をろ過して膜分離装置に供給するろ過装置と、
を備えたことを特徴とする凝集処理装置。
A flocculant addition means for adding a flocculant of at least one of Al-based and Fe-based to the water to be treated to obtain the agglomerated treated water;
The agglomerated water after the addition of the aggregating agent is made of a material having hydrophilicity, has a thickness of 50 to 500 μm, a pore diameter of 0.01 to 0.45 μm, and a pore structure of sponge shape, slit shape, right cylindrical shape. The membrane is filtered through one of the evaluation filtration membranes, and the membrane clogging degree that clogs the filtration membrane for evaluation with only unused flocculant components that have not been used for aggregation is determined by measurement, and the aggregation ability of the flocculant is evaluated. Feedback control means for adjusting the amount of the flocculant added by the flocculant addition means based on the evaluation result;
A filtration device for filtering the agglomerated water whose amount of the flocculant is adjusted by the feedback control means and supplying it to the membrane separator;
An agglomeration processing apparatus comprising:
前記フィードバック制御手段は、
前記評価結果により、前記膜閉塞度が小さい場合は前記添加量を多くし、前記膜閉塞度が大きい場合は前記添加量を少なくする様に、調整することを特徴とする請求項3記載の凝集処理装置。
The feedback control means includes
4. The aggregation according to claim 3, wherein the amount of addition is increased when the degree of membrane occlusion is small, and the amount of addition is reduced when the degree of membrane occlusion is large, according to the evaluation result. Processing equipment.
JP2012102259A 2012-04-27 2012-04-27 Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus Active JP5993605B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012102259A JP5993605B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2012-04-27 Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012102259A JP5993605B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2012-04-27 Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013231602A JP2013231602A (en) 2013-11-14
JP2013231602A5 JP2013231602A5 (en) 2015-02-26
JP5993605B2 true JP5993605B2 (en) 2016-09-14

Family

ID=49678179

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012102259A Active JP5993605B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2012-04-27 Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5993605B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113816464A (en) * 2021-10-09 2021-12-21 中车唐山机车车辆有限公司 Water treatment method and device for reducing membrane pollution

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05168819A (en) * 1991-12-26 1993-07-02 Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd Method for purifying water and device therefor
JP3941607B2 (en) * 2002-06-27 2007-07-04 栗田工業株式会社 Water treatment method and water treatment apparatus
JP2006055804A (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-03-02 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Coagulation device, coagulation method and controller for charging chemical
JP4577122B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2010-11-10 栗田工業株式会社 Advanced treatment method for biologically treated water and coagulation accelerator for biologically treated water
JP2007061683A (en) * 2005-08-29 2007-03-15 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method and apparatus for treating water
JP4661503B2 (en) * 2005-09-29 2011-03-30 栗田工業株式会社 Water treatment method and apparatus
JP2008161809A (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-17 Toshiba Corp Coagulant injection control system
US20110017677A1 (en) * 2009-06-04 2011-01-27 Evans Thomas S Oil field water recycling system and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013231602A (en) 2013-11-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6137176B2 (en) Water treatment method
JP2008173534A (en) Water treatment method and water treatment apparatus
JP4793193B2 (en) Aggregation apparatus and aggregation method
JP2011230038A (en) Water treatment apparatus
JP2015044149A (en) Flocculation treatment method, flocculation treatment device and water treatment apparatus
AU2014235024B2 (en) Process for water treatment prior to reverse osmosis
KR101612219B1 (en) Device and Method for Treating Washing Water using combined coagulation-ceramic ultrafiltration membrane system
JP2008264723A (en) Method and apparatus for coagulating impurity
JP2014128746A (en) Seawater desalination apparatus, seawater desalination method, and flocculant setting for seawater desalination
JP4945461B2 (en) Flocculant injection method during water purification treatment
JP5993605B2 (en) Flocculant evaluation method and flocculant processing apparatus
WO2011030485A1 (en) Flocculation precipitation treatment method
JP6687056B2 (en) Water treatment method and water treatment device
JP6532471B2 (en) Water treatment apparatus and water treatment method
JP5863176B2 (en) Method for evaluating water to be treated, membrane treatment apparatus, water treatment plant, and operation method thereof
US20150144491A1 (en) Solid-liquid separation method
JP6486799B2 (en) MEMBRANE OBSTRUCTION EVALUATION METHOD FOR TREATED WATER, MEMBRANE FILTER APPARATUS USED FOR THE MEMBRANE OBSTRUCTION EVALUATION METHOD, AND MEMBRANE FILTRATION METHOD FOR TREATED WATER WITH DETERMINING MEMBRANE OBSTRUCTION EVALUATION INDEX
EP2137113B1 (en) Method for reducing fouling in microfiltration systems
KR101153772B1 (en) Water treatment process using direct filtration technique and membrane separation technique
JP2008023417A (en) Water purifying apparatus and water purifying method
JP2017136571A (en) Method for determining amount of flocculant added in water treatment equipment
JP2016093789A (en) Water treatment method and water treatment system
JP2018202277A (en) Membrane filtration method and membrane filtration device
JP2014046235A (en) Fresh water generating method
JP5382355B2 (en) Industrial water filtration method and filtration device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20150109

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20150109

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20151027

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20151111

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160108

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20160322

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160519

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20160519

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20160531

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20160606

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160816

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160822

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5993605

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250