JP5777430B2 - Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace - Google Patents

Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5777430B2
JP5777430B2 JP2011152752A JP2011152752A JP5777430B2 JP 5777430 B2 JP5777430 B2 JP 5777430B2 JP 2011152752 A JP2011152752 A JP 2011152752A JP 2011152752 A JP2011152752 A JP 2011152752A JP 5777430 B2 JP5777430 B2 JP 5777430B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
furnace
stave
area
region
copper
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2011152752A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2011231409A5 (en
JP2011231409A (en
Inventor
隆志 炭竃
隆志 炭竃
文吾 飯野
文吾 飯野
酒井 敦
敦 酒井
常夫 荒木
常夫 荒木
松浦 正博
正博 松浦
周雄 寺田
周雄 寺田
誠 牛膓
誠 牛膓
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2011152752A priority Critical patent/JP5777430B2/en
Publication of JP2011231409A publication Critical patent/JP2011231409A/en
Publication of JP2011231409A5 publication Critical patent/JP2011231409A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5777430B2 publication Critical patent/JP5777430B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • Y02P10/212

Description

本発明は高炉等のシャフト炉型冶金炉におけるステーブ配置構造に関する。   The present invention relates to a stave arrangement structure in a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace such as a blast furnace.

高炉の炉壁構造は、鉄皮の内側に内部冷却機構を備えたステーブ(クーリングステーブ)を設け、このステーブの内側に炉内側耐火物が保持される構造となっている。通常、高炉を一定期間操業すると炉内側耐火物が破損等によりステーブから脱落し、ステーブが炉内部に直接曝されることが多くなる。したがって、ステーブはこのような炉内側耐火物の脱落後も炉内部の熱負荷に耐え得るものでなければならない。   The furnace wall structure of the blast furnace has a structure in which a stave (cooling stave) provided with an internal cooling mechanism is provided inside the iron shell, and the furnace inner refractory is held inside the stave. Normally, when the blast furnace is operated for a certain period, the refractory inside the furnace falls off the stave due to damage or the like, and the stave is often directly exposed to the inside of the furnace. Therefore, the stave must be able to withstand the heat load inside the furnace even after the refractory inside the furnace falls off.

従来、高炉用のステーブとしては鋳鉄製のものが広く用いられており、またその中でも冷却パイプを鋳鉄で鋳包んだ構造のものが一般的である。しかし、このような鋳鉄製ステーブは鋳鉄の熱伝導度が小さいために冷却能が低い。このため高炉の高熱負荷領域ではステーブ本体内に高い熱応力が発生して亀裂を生じ易く、この亀裂が冷却パイプに伝播して漏水事故を起こし易い。   Conventionally, cast iron is widely used as a blast furnace stave, and among them, a structure in which a cooling pipe is casted with cast iron is generally used. However, such a cast iron stave has a low cooling ability due to the low thermal conductivity of cast iron. For this reason, in the high heat load region of the blast furnace, high thermal stress is easily generated in the stave body, and cracks are easily generated, and the cracks propagate to the cooling pipe and easily cause a water leakage accident.

このような冷却パイプの破損を防止するため、冷却パイプと鋳物部とを非融着にすることが一般化しているが、この構造ではステーブの冷却能がさらに低下してしまう。また、このような冷却能の低下を補うために、例えば、冷却パイプ本数を増加させることで冷却能を高める、ステーブ本体を2重化することで溶損に対応したステーブの長寿命化を図る、鋳鉄製ステーブと銅または銅合金製ステーブと組み合わせ一体化することで冷却能を高める等の対策が試みられているが、これらの対策は冷却水量の増大、ステーブの重量増加、ステーブや炉壁構造の複雑化を伴うため、ステーブの製造コストの増大を招く、冷却水による熱損失が大きくなるためエネルギーロスの増加をもたらす、等の問題を生じる。   In order to prevent such breakage of the cooling pipe, it is common to make the cooling pipe and the casting part non-fused, but this structure further reduces the cooling ability of the stave. In addition, in order to compensate for such a decrease in cooling capacity, for example, the cooling capacity is increased by increasing the number of cooling pipes, and the life of the stave corresponding to melting damage is extended by duplicating the stave body. Measures such as increasing the cooling capacity by combining cast iron stave and copper or copper alloy stave are being tried, but these measures increase the amount of cooling water, increase the weight of the stave, stave and furnace wall Since the structure is complicated, problems such as an increase in stave manufacturing costs and an increase in energy loss due to an increase in heat loss due to cooling water are caused.

特に最近では、高炉の長寿命化、微粉炭大量吹込み等による操業条件の苛酷化に伴いステーブにはより一層の耐久性が求められており、また一方において、省エネルギー化の観点からステーブによる炉の熱損失が極力抑制されるようにすることも重要な課題であると言える。
したがって本発明の目的は、シャフト炉型冶金炉のステーブの耐久性を維持するとともに、ステーブによる炉の熱損失を極力抑制し、さらにステーブ等に要する設備コストの低減化を図ることにある。
In recent years, the durability of the stave has been demanded due to the longer operating life of the blast furnace and the severer operating conditions due to the large amount of pulverized coal injection. On the other hand, the stave furnace is required to save energy. It can be said that it is also an important issue to make the heat loss of the steel as small as possible.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to maintain the durability of the stave of the shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace, to suppress the heat loss of the furnace by the stave as much as possible, and to further reduce the equipment cost required for the stave and the like.

従来のステーブに関する研究は、ステーブ自体の冷却能や耐久性を高めるという観点からその構造の改良に終始してきた。これに対して本発明者らは、高炉等のシャフト炉型冶金炉における炉壁内側の環境、例えば、熱負荷、溶融スラグの存在の有無、炉壁付着物の程度等に炉高方向で大きな差がある点に着目し、これらの環境の違いに応じたステーブの適性について詳細な検討を行った。その結果、これら炉壁内側の環境に応じてそれぞれの領域に最適なステーブを配置することにより、炉全体のステーブの長寿命化とステーブからの抜熱の抑制による省エネルギー化を図ることができ、しかも設備面及び操業面での低コスト化も達成できることを見出した。   The research on the conventional stave has been made from the viewpoint of improving the cooling ability and durability of the stave itself, from the viewpoint of improving its structure. On the other hand, the present inventors are large in the furnace height direction in the environment inside the furnace wall in a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace such as a blast furnace, for example, heat load, presence or absence of molten slag, degree of furnace wall deposits, etc. Focusing on the differences, we examined in detail the suitability of the stave according to these environmental differences. As a result, by arranging the optimum stave in each region according to the environment inside these furnace walls, it is possible to achieve energy savings by extending the life of the stave of the whole furnace and suppressing heat removal from the stave, In addition, it has been found that cost reduction in terms of equipment and operation can also be achieved.

本発明はこのような知見に基づきなされたもので、その特徴は以下の通りである。 The present invention has been made based on such findings, and the features thereof are as follows .

[1]炉高方向で炉下部側から順に朝顔部、切立部およびシャフト部を備え、且つ炉下端側に羽口を備え、羽口から微粉炭吹き込みを行う高炉の炉高方向において、熱負荷が小さい炉上部・中部領域(A)には鋳鉄製ステーブを配置し、それよりも下方の熱負荷の大きい領域であって、溶融スラグ生成開始領域および溶融スラグ存在領域である炉下部領域(B)と溶融スラグ存在領域である炉最下部領域(C)には、ステーブ表面に溶融スラグが接触すると凝固して凝固スラグ層が生成する銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置したステーブ配置構造であって、
前記炉下部領域(B)が、朝顔部の上部領域、切立部の全部領域およびシャフト部の下部領域であり、前記炉最下部領域(C)が、羽口上方における朝顔部の下部領域であることを特徴とする高炉のステーブ配置構造。
[1] Heat load in the furnace height direction of a blast furnace with a morning glory part, an upright part, and a shaft part in the furnace height direction and a tuyere on the lower end side of the furnace and pulverized coal blowing from the tuyere A cast iron stave is disposed in the upper and middle regions (A) where the furnace is small, and the lower region of the furnace (B ) And the lowermost furnace area (C), where molten slag exists, is a stave arrangement structure in which copper or copper alloy staves that solidify and form a solidified slag layer when molten slag contacts the stave surface. ,
The furnace lower area (B) is the upper area of the morning glory part, the entire area of the upright part and the lower area of the shaft part, and the furnace lowermost area (C) is the lower area of the morning glory part above the tuyere. A blast furnace stave arrangement structure characterized by that.

本発明によれば、シャフト炉型冶金炉における炉全体のステーブの耐久性を効果的に維持でき、且つステーブによる炉内からの抜熱も極力抑制することができる。このため炉の高寿命化、エネルギーコストの低減化を合理的に図ることができ、また、個々のステーブの冷却能や耐溶損性を過度に高める必要がないため、設備コストの低減化も図ることができる。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the durability of the stave of the whole furnace in a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace can be maintained effectively, and the heat removal from the inside of a furnace by a stave can also be suppressed as much as possible. For this reason, it is possible to rationally increase the life of the furnace and reduce the energy cost, and it is not necessary to excessively increase the cooling capacity and the erosion resistance of each stave, thereby reducing the equipment cost. be able to.

本発明のステーブ配置構造が適用されたシャフト炉型冶金炉の縦断面図Vertical sectional view of a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace to which the stave arrangement structure of the present invention is applied

本発明者らは、高炉等のシャフト炉型冶金炉における炉壁内側の環境とこの環境下でステーブに要求される適性について詳細な検討を行った。その結果の要点を表1に示す。   The present inventors have conducted a detailed study on the environment inside the furnace wall in a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace such as a blast furnace and the suitability required for the stave in this environment. The main points of the results are shown in Table 1.

Figure 0005777430
Figure 0005777430

すなわち、シャフト炉型冶金炉の炉高方向での各領域(部位)の炉内環境とこれに適用されるステーブの適性について、以下のような点が明らかとなった。
(1)炉上部領域(一般的な高炉の場合の部位:シャフト部の上部):この領域は熱負荷が比較的小さく溶融スラグも存在しないため、ステーブの溶損は生じにくい。また、この領域に冷却能の大きいステーブを配置した場合、炉上部における炉内からの抜熱量が大きくなるため、大きなエネルギーロスを生じて生産量の低下を招くとともに、排ガス中の亜鉛やアルカリ類が炉上部の炉壁に付着し、これが装入物の円滑な降下を妨げるため炉況が不安定となる。
また、この領域では、原料装入面が下降した際に装入原料がステーブに直接当たる恐れがあるため、剛性の高いステーブを使用する必要がある。
したがって、この領域に適用するステーブは、溶損の防止の観点よりも抜熱の抑制と装入原料の衝突による損傷、損耗の防止を主眼とした観点から選定することが好ましい。
That is, the following points were clarified with respect to the furnace environment in each region (part) in the furnace height direction of the shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace and the suitability of the stave applied thereto.
(1) Furnace upper area (site in the case of a typical blast furnace: upper part of the shaft): This area has a relatively small heat load and does not have molten slag, so it is difficult for staves to melt. In addition, if a stave with a large cooling capacity is arranged in this region, the amount of heat removed from the inside of the furnace at the top of the furnace increases, resulting in a large energy loss and a decrease in production volume, as well as zinc and alkalis in the exhaust gas. Adheres to the furnace wall at the top of the furnace, which hinders the smooth descent of the charge, making the furnace condition unstable.
In this region, since the charged raw material may directly hit the stave when the raw material charging surface is lowered, it is necessary to use a stiff stave.
Therefore, it is preferable to select the stave to be applied to this region from the viewpoint of suppressing heat removal and preventing damage and wear due to collision of the charged raw materials, from the viewpoint of preventing melting damage.

(2)炉中部領域(一般的な高炉の場合の部位:シャフト部の中部):この領域も熱負荷が比較的小さく溶融スラグも存在しないため、ステーブの溶損は生じにくい。また、この領域に冷却能の大きいステーブを配置した場合にも、上記炉上部領域の場合と同様の問題を生じる恐れがある。したがって、この領域に適用するステーブは、溶損の防止の観点よりも抜熱の抑制を主眼とした観点から選定することが好ましい。 (2) Furnace middle region (portion in the case of a general blast furnace: middle portion of the shaft): Since this region also has a relatively small heat load and no molten slag, the stab is less susceptible to melting. Further, even when a stave having a large cooling capacity is arranged in this region, the same problem as in the case of the furnace upper region may occur. Therefore, it is preferable to select the stave to be applied to this region from the viewpoint of suppressing heat removal rather than the viewpoint of preventing melting damage.

(3)炉下部領域(一般的な高炉の場合の部位:シャフト部の下部、切立部、朝顔部の上部):この領域は溶融スラグの生成開始領域(シャフト部の下部)及び溶融スラグの常時存在領域(切立部、朝顔部の上部)を含む高熱負荷領域であり、この領域に適用するステーブは、溶損防止を主眼とし、且つ可能な限り抜熱を抑制するという観点から選定することが好ましい。 (3) Furnace lower area (sites for general blast furnaces: lower part of shaft part, upright part, upper part of morning glory part): This area is the area where molten slag starts to be generated (lower part of the shaft part) and the molten slag It is a high heat load area including the existence area (vertical part, upper part of morning glory part), and the stave applied to this area is selected from the viewpoint of preventing heat loss and suppressing heat removal as much as possible. preferable.

(4)炉最下部領域(一般的な高炉の場合の部位:朝顔部の下部):この領域は本来的には溶融スラグが存在する高熱負荷領域であるが、一般の高炉等の場合には炉内壁(ステーブ)に付着したスラグが固化して凝固スラグ層を形成し、且つこの凝固スラグ層は炉壁の安息角のために剥離し難いため、ステーブに作用する実際の熱負荷は比較的小さい。したがって、この領域に適用するステーブは、上記のような一般的な構造を有する炉の場合には、溶損の防止の観点よりも抜熱の抑制を主眼とした観点から選定することが好ましい。一方、炉の構造上、ステーブに付着した凝固スラグ層が剥離しやすい場合等には、溶損防止を主眼とし、可能な限り抜熱を抑制するという観点から選定することが好ましい。 (4) Furnace lowermost area (site in the case of general blast furnace: lower part of morning glory): This area is essentially a high heat load area where molten slag exists, but in the case of ordinary blast furnaces, etc. Since the slag adhering to the furnace inner wall (stave) is solidified to form a solidified slag layer, and this solidified slag layer is difficult to peel due to the angle of repose of the furnace wall, the actual heat load acting on the stave is relatively small. Therefore, in the case of a furnace having the general structure as described above, the stave applied to this region is preferably selected from the viewpoint of mainly suppressing heat removal rather than preventing melting damage. On the other hand, when the solidified slag layer adhering to the stave is easily peeled due to the structure of the furnace, it is preferable to select from the viewpoint of preventing heat loss as much as possible and preventing heat loss as much as possible.

また、以上のような炉高方向の各領域に応じたステーブの適性の検討とともに、使用するステーブの種類とその特性について検討を行った結果、鋳鉄製ステーブは冷却能が低い分、抜熱の抑制を主眼する領域に適用するステーブとして好適であること、一方、溶損防止を主眼とする領域には銅または銅合金製ステーブが好適であり、特に、この銅または銅合金製ステーブは熱伝導度が大きいため本体内部の温度が常に低く維持されるだけでなく、以下のような理由により、高熱負荷領域における長寿命化と炉内からの抜熱抑制に極めて有効なステーブであることが判った。すなわち、銅または銅合金製ステーブは、炉の高熱負荷領域においてステーブ本体から炉内側耐火物が脱落した場合でも、その高い冷却能の故にステーブ表面に溶融スラグが接触するとすぐに凝固し、ステーブ表面に難剥離性の凝固スラグ層が生成する。この凝固スラグ層は熱伝導度が非常に小さいため、炉の高熱負荷からステーブを保護し、且つステーブによる炉内からの抜熱も適切に抑制されるものである。   In addition to examining the suitability of the stave according to each area in the furnace height direction as described above, and investigating the types of staves used and their characteristics, cast iron staves have a low cooling capacity, and therefore heat removal. It is suitable as a stave that is applied to a region that focuses on suppression, while a stave made of copper or copper alloy is suitable for a region that focuses on prevention of melting damage. As a result, the temperature inside the main body is not only kept low, but it is also found to be an extremely effective stave for extending the life in high heat load areas and suppressing heat removal from the furnace for the following reasons. It was. In other words, copper or copper alloy stave solidifies as soon as molten slag comes into contact with the surface of the stave due to its high cooling capacity even if the refractory inside the furnace falls off the stave body in the high heat load region of the furnace. A hard-to-peel solidified slag layer is formed. Since the solidified slag layer has a very low thermal conductivity, the stave is protected from a high heat load of the furnace, and heat removal from the furnace by the stave is appropriately suppressed.

したがって、本発明では以上のような検討結果に基づき、熱負荷が比較的小さく、しかも炉からの抜熱を極力抑制する必要(さらに、炉上部領域については装入原料の衝突によるステーブの損傷、損耗を防止する必要)がある炉上部・中部領域(A)には鋳鉄製ステーブを配置し、それよりも下方の熱負荷の大きい炉下部領域(B)には銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置し、それよりも下方の炉最下部領域(C)には鋳鉄製ステーブまたは銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置する。
図1はシャフト炉型冶金炉の縦断面図であり、上記炉上部・中部領域(A)、炉下部領域(B)及び炉最下部領域(C)を(A)〜(C)で示してある。図において、1はステーブ、2はステーブ本体の冷却稼動面に固定される炉内側耐火物、3は羽口、4は鉄皮である。
Therefore, in the present invention, based on the above examination results, the heat load is relatively small and it is necessary to suppress heat removal from the furnace as much as possible (further, in the upper region of the furnace, damage to the stave due to charging material collision, Cast iron staves are placed in the furnace upper and middle areas (A) where there is a need to prevent wear), and copper or copper alloy staves are placed in the furnace lower area (B) where the heat load is below it In addition, a cast iron stave or a copper or copper alloy stave is disposed in the lowermost region (C) of the furnace below that.
FIG. 1 is a longitudinal sectional view of a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace, in which the furnace upper and middle regions (A), the furnace lower region (B), and the furnace lowermost region (C) are indicated by (A) to (C). is there. In the figure, 1 is a stave, 2 is a furnace inner refractory fixed to the cooling operation surface of the stave body, 3 is a tuyere, and 4 is an iron skin.

このような本発明のステーブの配置構造によれば、炉上部・中部領域(A)に鋳鉄製ステーブを配置することにより炉内からの抜熱が適切に抑制される。この領域は熱負荷が比較的小さく溶融スラグも存在しないため、鋳鉄製ステーブであっても溶損は生じにくい。この領域に鋳鉄製ステーブを配置して炉内からの抜熱を抑制することにより、大きなエネルギーロスを生じて生産量の低下を招くことがなく、また、排ガス中の亜鉛やアルカリ類が炉上部の炉壁に付着して装入物の円滑な降下を妨げることもない。また、炉上部領域においては、原料装入面が下降した際に装入原料がステーブに直接当たる恐れがあるが、剛性の高い鋳鉄製ステーブが配置されているため、ステーブの損傷や摩耗を生じることが少ない。   According to the stave arrangement structure of the present invention, the heat removal from the furnace is appropriately suppressed by arranging the cast iron stave in the upper and middle regions (A) of the furnace. Since this region has a relatively small heat load and no molten slag, even a cast iron stave is unlikely to cause melting. By disposing cast iron staves in this area to suppress heat removal from the furnace, there is no significant energy loss resulting in a decrease in production volume. It will not stick to the furnace wall and prevent the material from falling smoothly. In addition, in the furnace upper area, there is a possibility that the charged raw material directly hits the stave when the raw material charging surface is lowered. However, since the stiff cast iron stave is arranged, the stave is damaged or worn. There are few things.

また、熱負荷が大きく溶融スラグの生成開始領域及び溶融スラグ存在領域である炉下部領域(B)に冷却能が高い銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置することにより、ステーブの溶損等を適切に防止できる。また、銅または銅合金製ステーブは溶融スラグが存在する高熱負荷領域においてその表面に難剥離性の凝固スラグ層が生成し、この凝固スラグ層は熱伝導度が非常に小さいため、炉の高熱負荷からステーブを保護してその耐久性が維持され、しかもステーブによる炉内からの抜熱も適切に抑制される。   In addition, by placing a copper or copper alloy stave with a high cooling capacity in the furnace lower area (B) where the heat load is large and the molten slag generation start area and the molten slag existence area, it is possible to appropriately prevent the stab from being damaged. Can be prevented. Also, copper or copper alloy stave forms a hard-to-peel solidified slag layer on the surface in the high heat load region where molten slag exists, and this solidified slag layer has a very low thermal conductivity. The durability of the stave is protected and the heat removal from the furnace by the stave is appropriately suppressed.

さらに、炉最下部領域(C)に鋳鉄製ステーブを配置することにより、炉内からの抜熱が適切に抑制される。この領域は本来的には溶融スラグが存在する高熱負荷領域であるが、一般の高炉等の場合にはステーブに付着して固化したスラグが凝固スラグ層を形成し、且つこの凝固スラグ層は炉壁の安息角のために剥離し難いため、ステーブに作用する実際の熱負荷は比較的小さい。したがって、一般的な構造を有する炉の場合には、鋳鉄製ステーブを配置しても溶損することはない。また、炉の構造上、ステーブに付着する凝固スラグ層が剥離しやすい場合等には、銅または銅合金製ステーブが配置され、これによりステーブの溶損防止が図られる。   Furthermore, by disposing a cast iron stave in the furnace lowermost region (C), heat removal from the furnace is appropriately suppressed. This region is essentially a high heat load region where molten slag exists, but in the case of a general blast furnace, the solidified slag that adheres to the stave forms a solidified slag layer, and this solidified slag layer is a furnace. The actual heat load acting on the stave is relatively small because it is difficult to peel off due to the angle of repose of the wall. Therefore, in the case of a furnace having a general structure, even if a cast iron stave is arranged, it does not melt. Moreover, when the solidified slag layer adhering to the stave is easily peeled due to the structure of the furnace, a stave made of copper or copper alloy is disposed, thereby preventing the stave from being damaged.

ここで、銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置する前記炉下部領域(B)としては、定常操業時における炉内の主要な溶融スラグ生成開始領域及び溶融スラグ存在領域を少なくとも含む領域であることが好ましい。
また、図1に示すような炉高方向で炉下部側から順に朝顔部、切立部およびシャフト部を備え、且つ炉下端側に羽口を備えた通常のシャフト炉型冶金炉においては、銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置する前記炉下部領域(B)は朝顔部の上部領域、切立部の全部領域およびシャフト部の下部領域となり、鋳鉄製ステーブ若しくは銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置する前記炉最下部領域(C)は羽口上方における朝顔部の下部領域となる。
Here, the furnace lower region (B) in which the copper or copper alloy stave is arranged is preferably a region including at least a main molten slag generation start region and a molten slag existing region in the furnace during steady operation. .
Further, in a normal shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace having a morning glory part, a vertical part and a shaft part in order from the furnace lower side in the furnace height direction as shown in FIG. The furnace lower area (B) in which the copper alloy stave is arranged is the upper area of the morning glory part, the entire area of the upright part, and the lower area of the shaft part, and the furnace top area in which the cast iron stave or the copper or copper alloy stave is arranged. The lower area (C) is the lower area of the morning glory above the tuyere.

このように本発明のステーブ配置構造では、熱負荷が比較的小さく溶融スラグの存在しない炉上部・中部領域(A)や、高熱負荷領域であっても炉壁付着物(凝固スラグ層)のために熱負荷が問題とならない炉最下部領域(C)については、抜熱が少なく且つ安価な鋳鉄製ステーブを配置することで、設備コストの低減化と炉からの抜熱の抑制が図られつつステーブの耐久性が維持され、しかも、炉上部・中部領域においては、抜熱の抑制によって炉壁付着物の生成が抑えられることにより、炉内装入物の円滑な降下を維持できる、装入原料の衝突によるステーブの損傷、損耗を防止できる等の効果も得られる。一方、溶融スラグが存在する高熱負荷領域である炉下部領域(B)については、冷却能が高い銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置することでステーブの溶損等が適切に防止されるとともに、溶融スラグの急冷によりステーブ表面に生成した凝固スラグ層がステーブを保護し且つ炉内からの抜熱も抑制する作用をするため、炉からの抜熱の抑制が図られつつステーブの耐久性が適切に維持される。   Thus, in the stave arrangement structure of the present invention, because of the furnace wall deposit (solidified slag layer) even in the upper and middle regions (A) where the heat load is relatively small and no molten slag exists, or even in the high heat load region. For the furnace bottom area (C), where heat load is not a problem, by placing a cast iron stave with low heat removal and low cost, equipment costs can be reduced and heat removal from the furnace can be suppressed. Stability of the stave is maintained, and furthermore, in the upper and middle regions of the furnace, the generation of furnace wall deposits is suppressed by suppressing heat removal, so that a smooth descent of the furnace interior contents can be maintained. It is also possible to prevent the stave from being damaged or worn out due to the collision. On the other hand, in the furnace lower area (B), which is a high heat load area where molten slag exists, by placing a stave made of copper or copper alloy with high cooling capacity, the stab can be appropriately prevented from being melted and melted. The solidified slag layer generated on the surface of the stave due to the rapid cooling of the slag acts to protect the stave and suppress heat removal from the furnace. Maintained.

このように本発明によれば、鋳鉄製ステーブと銅または銅合金製ステーブとを炉壁内側の環境に応じて使い分けることにより炉全体のステーブの耐久性を適切に維持でき、且つ炉内からの抜熱も極力抑制することができる。このため炉の高寿命化、エネルギーコストの低減化を合理的に図ることができ、また、個々のステーブの冷却能や耐溶損性を過度に高める必要がないため設備コストの低減化も図ることができる。   As described above, according to the present invention, the durability of the stave of the entire furnace can be appropriately maintained by properly using the cast iron stave and the copper or copper alloy stave according to the environment inside the furnace wall, and from the inside of the furnace. Heat extraction can be suppressed as much as possible. For this reason, it is possible to rationally increase the life of the furnace and reduce the energy cost, and also reduce the equipment cost because it is not necessary to excessively increase the cooling capacity and resistance to erosion resistance of each stave. Can do.

銅または銅合金製ステーブには、圧延材等から機械加工して得られるステーブや鋳銅製ステーブ(例えば、冷却パイプを鋳銅で鋳含むタイプのもの等を含む)等があるが、本発明ではいずれの形式のステーブを用いてもよく、構造や材質、製造法等は問わない。但し、鋳銅製ステーブは、機械加工により得られるステーブに較べて熱伝導度は低いものの製造コストが小さく、また、炉プロフィールに応じた製作も自由にできることから、鋳銅製ステーブを用いる方がより好ましい。   The copper or copper alloy stave includes a stave obtained by machining from a rolled material, a cast copper stave (for example, a type in which a cooling pipe is cast with cast copper, etc.), and the like. Any type of stave may be used, and the structure, material, manufacturing method, etc. are not limited. However, the cast copper stave is more preferable to use the cast copper stave because the heat conductivity is lower than the stave obtained by machining, but the manufacturing cost is small, and the production according to the furnace profile can be made freely. .

銅製のステーブとしては、例えばJIS
H 5100に規定されたCuC1、CuC2、CuC3等が用いられ、また、銅合金製のステーブとしては、例えばクロームジルコン銅、ベリリウム銅等の低合金銅が用いられる。
また、本発明のステーブ配置構造は、高炉以外のシャフト炉型冶金炉(例えば、スクラップ溶解炉等)にも適用することができる。
As a copper stave, for example, JIS
CuC1, CuC2, CuC3, etc. defined in H5100 are used, and low alloy coppers such as chrome zircon copper and beryllium copper are used as the copper alloy stave, for example.
The stave arrangement structure of the present invention can also be applied to a shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace (for example, a scrap melting furnace) other than a blast furnace.

なお、上述した理由により炉上部・中部領域(A)に適用すべきステーブとしては鋳鉄製ステーブが最適であることから、本発明ではこれに限定したが、場合によっては、他の素材によるステーブ或いは鋳鉄と他の素材とを組み合わせたステーブであって、鋳鉄製ステーブと略同程度の冷却能を有するステーブがある場合には、これを炉上部・中部領域(A)における鋳鉄製ステーブの一部または全部に代えて用いてもよい。また、同様に鋳鉄製ステーブと略同程度の冷却能を有する冷却函を炉上部・中部領域(A)における鋳鉄製ステーブの一部または全部に代えて用いてもよい。   For the reasons described above, a cast iron stave is optimal as a stave to be applied to the furnace upper / middle region (A), and thus the present invention is limited to this. If there is a stave that is a combination of cast iron and other materials, and has a cooling ability that is almost the same as that of a cast iron stave, this is a part of the cast iron stave in the furnace upper and middle regions (A). Or it may replace with all and may use. Similarly, a cooling box having substantially the same cooling ability as that of a cast iron stave may be used in place of a part or all of the cast iron stave in the upper and middle regions (A) of the furnace.

1 ステーブ
2 炉内側耐火物
3 羽口
4 鉄皮
(A) 炉上部・中部領域
(B) 炉下部領域
(C) 炉最下部領域
1 stave 2 refractory inside the furnace 3 tuyere 4 iron skin
(A) Furnace upper and middle regions
(B) Furnace lower area
(C) Furnace bottom area

Claims (1)

炉高方向で炉下部側から順に朝顔部、切立部およびシャフト部を備え、且つ炉下端側に羽口を備え、羽口から微粉炭吹き込みを行う高炉の炉高方向において、熱負荷が小さい炉上部・中部領域(A)には鋳鉄製ステーブを配置し、それよりも下方の熱負荷の大きい領域であって、溶融スラグ生成開始領域および溶融スラグ存在領域である炉下部領域(B)と溶融スラグ存在領域である炉最下部領域(C)には、ステーブ表面に溶融スラグが接触すると凝固して凝固スラグ層が生成する銅または銅合金製ステーブを配置したステーブ配置構造であって、
前記炉下部領域(B)が、朝顔部の上部領域、切立部の全部領域およびシャフト部の下部領域であり、前記炉最下部領域(C)が、羽口上方における朝顔部の下部領域であることを特徴とする高炉のステーブ配置構造。
Furnace with a small heat load in the furnace height direction of the blast furnace with a morning glory part, a vertical part and a shaft part in the furnace height direction and a tuyere at the lower end of the furnace and pulverized coal blowing from the tuyere Cast iron staves are placed in the upper and middle areas (A), and the area below the area where the heat load is large is the molten slag generation start area and the molten slag existing area and the lower furnace area (B). In the furnace lowermost region (C), which is the slag existence region, is a stave arrangement structure in which a stave made of copper or copper alloy that solidifies when molten slag comes into contact with the surface of the stave to form a solidified slag layer,
The furnace lower area (B) is the upper area of the morning glory part, the entire area of the upright part and the lower area of the shaft part, and the furnace lowermost area (C) is the lower area of the morning glory part above the tuyere. A blast furnace stave arrangement structure characterized by that.
JP2011152752A 2011-07-11 2011-07-11 Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace Expired - Lifetime JP5777430B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011152752A JP5777430B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2011-07-11 Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011152752A JP5777430B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2011-07-11 Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004046333A Division JP2004190143A (en) 2004-02-23 2004-02-23 Structure for arranging stave in shaft type metallurgical furnace

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2014019344A Division JP5825372B2 (en) 2014-02-04 2014-02-04 Blast furnace stave arrangement structure

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011231409A JP2011231409A (en) 2011-11-17
JP2011231409A5 JP2011231409A5 (en) 2012-01-05
JP5777430B2 true JP5777430B2 (en) 2015-09-09

Family

ID=45321014

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011152752A Expired - Lifetime JP5777430B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2011-07-11 Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5777430B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112342330A (en) * 2020-10-27 2021-02-09 中国十九冶集团有限公司 Method for mounting blast furnace cooling wall

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS55164005A (en) * 1979-06-08 1980-12-20 Kawasaki Steel Corp Cooling apparatus for furnace body of a blast furnace
JPS5783150U (en) * 1981-10-12 1982-05-22
JPH06102805B2 (en) * 1989-10-12 1994-12-14 川崎製鉄株式会社 Cooling method for the upper part of furnace shaft of blast furnace
JP2778348B2 (en) * 1992-04-30 1998-07-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Furnace protection wall with slow cooling stove cooler
JP2921414B2 (en) * 1994-11-14 1999-07-19 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Lance position determination method for pulverized coal injection
JP3102626B2 (en) * 1995-03-22 2000-10-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Blast furnace operation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011231409A (en) 2011-11-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2000046561A1 (en) Water-cooling panel for furnace wall and furnace cover of arc furnace
JP5726614B2 (en) Refractory brick cooling structure and method for converter
JP5407460B2 (en) Internal water-cooled blast furnace tuyeres
JP5777430B2 (en) Stave arrangement structure of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace
JP5825372B2 (en) Blast furnace stave arrangement structure
JP2005336588A (en) Hot iron runner and forming method therefor
JP6429190B2 (en) Electric furnace for melting steelmaking slag
JP2010138493A (en) Structure for arranging stave in shaft-type metallurgical furnace
JPH11229012A (en) Structure for arranging stave in shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace
JP2004190143A (en) Structure for arranging stave in shaft type metallurgical furnace
KR101614902B1 (en) Slag Runner Spout
JP5849562B2 (en) Refractory lining structure for steelmaking containers
CN107338361A (en) Energy-saving type heat-preserving external crucible and its application method
JP4757960B2 (en) Blast furnace morning glory structure and design method thereof
JP5491764B2 (en) Furnace wall structure of molten metal manufacturing furnace and method for suppressing wear of furnace wall refractories
JP6540879B2 (en) Gas injection nozzle
CN101254530A (en) Copper alloy antivacuum adding Zircomium engineering technology equipment and technological process thereof
JP2014173164A (en) Stave cooler and blast furnace including the same
JP2000292072A (en) Furnace wall of arc furnace and water-cooled panel for furnace cover
JP4340865B2 (en) Melting ingot, melting method and alloy casting
JP2001049314A (en) Stave cooler
EP3894602B1 (en) Method for protecting an inner wall of a shaft furnace
JP7192360B2 (en) converter
CN108425020A (en) Fuming furnace
JP5369701B2 (en) Block refractory

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111020

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20130725

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130806

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20131004

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20131112

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20140324

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20150126

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20150707

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5777430

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term