JP5310692B2 - Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device - Google Patents

Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5310692B2
JP5310692B2 JP2010225600A JP2010225600A JP5310692B2 JP 5310692 B2 JP5310692 B2 JP 5310692B2 JP 2010225600 A JP2010225600 A JP 2010225600A JP 2010225600 A JP2010225600 A JP 2010225600A JP 5310692 B2 JP5310692 B2 JP 5310692B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
electric wire
wire
deterioration diagnosis
measurement target
hardness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2010225600A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2012078283A (en
Inventor
晃 前田
美子 藤間
保彦 河合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP2010225600A priority Critical patent/JP5310692B2/en
Publication of JP2012078283A publication Critical patent/JP2012078283A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5310692B2 publication Critical patent/JP5310692B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、電線劣化診断装置に係り、特に、表面硬度を指標として電線やケーブルなどの劣化を非破壊的に診断する電線劣化診断装置に関する。   The present invention relates to an electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus, and more particularly, to an electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus that nondestructively diagnoses deterioration of electric wires, cables, and the like using surface hardness as an index.

従来、電線等のケーブルの劣化を非破壊的に診断する方法として、ケーブル表面の絶縁体またはシースの表面硬度を利用する方法が知られている。この方法では、ケーブル表面の表面硬度を超音波や反発力を用いて測定し、同仕様の新しいケーブルのそれと比較することにより劣化の度合いを診断する。   Conventionally, as a method for nondestructively diagnosing deterioration of a cable such as an electric wire, a method using the surface hardness of an insulator or sheath on the surface of the cable is known. In this method, the surface hardness of the cable surface is measured using ultrasonic waves and repulsive force, and the degree of deterioration is diagnosed by comparing it with that of a new cable of the same specification.

例えば、特許文献1には、電線・ケーブルの表面に向けて衝撃体を衝突させ、その衝撃体の衝突直前の速度と反発直後の速度との関係からシースの表面硬度を測定する装置が開示されている。この装置のように、ケーブルの反発力を用いるタイプの硬度計では、硬度計の測定部とケーブルとの接触条件(位置、角度、押圧力等)を同条件にしないと測定結果にバラツキが生じてしまう。そこで、この装置では、ケーブルを所望の位置に固定するために硬度測定用治具を用いていることとしている。具体的には、この硬度測定用治具は、対向する把持溝を有する把持部と、把持溝間に電線・ケーブルを配置させたときこれを常時把持方向に付勢する付勢部材とを具備し、把持部には、硬度計の衝撃体収容部材の端部を固定する固定部と、衝撃体が通過可能な通過孔とが設けられている。このような治具構成によれば、衝撃体とケーブルとの接触条件のバラツキが抑制される。   For example, Patent Document 1 discloses an apparatus that causes an impactor to collide against the surface of an electric wire / cable and measures the surface hardness of the sheath from the relationship between the speed immediately before the impactor and the speed immediately after rebound. ing. In this type of hardness tester that uses the repulsive force of the cable, the measurement results will vary unless the contact conditions (position, angle, pressing force, etc.) between the measurement part of the hardness tester and the cable are the same. End up. Therefore, in this apparatus, a hardness measuring jig is used to fix the cable at a desired position. Specifically, the hardness measurement jig includes a gripping portion having opposing gripping grooves and a biasing member that constantly biases the wire / cable in the gripping direction when the wire / cable is disposed between the gripping grooves. The gripping portion is provided with a fixing portion for fixing the end of the impactor housing member of the hardness meter and a passage hole through which the impactor can pass. According to such a jig configuration, variation in the contact condition between the impact body and the cable is suppressed.

また、特許文献2には、ケーブル被覆材の劣化診断装置に用いられる探触子固定具が開示されている。この探触子固定具では、丸型のケーブルを載せるために、該ケーブルの長手方向と平行な2本のローラからなるケーブル支持体が設置されている。この固定具によれば、ケーブルをケーブル支持体の上に配置したときに、探触子をケーブル中心に向かう角度でケーブルの外周に固定することができる。   Patent Document 2 discloses a probe fixture used in a cable covering material deterioration diagnosis device. In this probe fixture, a cable support made of two rollers parallel to the longitudinal direction of the cable is installed in order to place a round cable. According to this fixture, when the cable is disposed on the cable support, the probe can be fixed to the outer periphery of the cable at an angle toward the center of the cable.

特許第3014947号公報Japanese Patent No. 3014947 特開平10−54827号公報JP-A-10-54827

しかしながら、上記従来の装置における硬度測定用治具では、ケーブルの形状によっては測定部とケーブルとの接触条件のバラツキが大きくなる。すなわち、上記従来の硬度測定用治具では、丸型形状のケーブルでは常にケーブル中心付近が測定部と接触するが、平型形状のケーブルでは、そのケーブル接触面の僅かな傾きによって接触条件にバラツキが発生する。このため、劣化等によって非対称に変形した平型ケーブル等を上記従来の硬度測定用治具の固定方法で固定する場合には、ケーブルの表面硬度を精度よく測定できないおそれがある。   However, in the hardness measuring jig in the above-described conventional apparatus, the variation in the contact condition between the measurement unit and the cable increases depending on the shape of the cable. That is, in the above conventional hardness measurement jig, in the round shape cable, the vicinity of the center of the cable is always in contact with the measurement part, but in the flat shape cable, the contact condition varies due to a slight inclination of the cable contact surface. Will occur. For this reason, when a flat cable or the like deformed asymmetrically due to deterioration or the like is fixed by the conventional method for fixing a hardness measuring jig, the surface hardness of the cable may not be measured with high accuracy.

本発明は、上述のような課題を解決するためになされたもので、簡易な構成で電線等のケーブル表面の硬度を精度よく測定することのできる電線劣化診断装置を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus that can accurately measure the hardness of a cable surface such as an electric wire with a simple configuration. .

本発明に係る電線劣化診断装置は、平坦な加圧面と、加圧面から突出して設けられた押針とを有し、押針を測定対象電線の測定領域に押圧することで硬度を測定するゴム硬度計と、測定対象電線を加圧面との間で挟持する挟持部と、加圧面と挟持部とを、前記測定対象電線を挟持する方向に付勢する付勢機構と、挟持部における測定対象電線を挟持する側の面に設けられた突起部と、を備え、突起部は、測定対象電線を挟持した状態での押針の中心軸上に当該突起部の最凸部が位置するように配置されていることを特徴とするものである。 The electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to the present invention has a flat pressure surface and a push needle provided so as to protrude from the pressure surface, and measures the hardness by pressing the push needle against the measurement region of the measurement target electric wire. A hardness meter, a clamping part that clamps the measurement target electric wire between the pressing surface, a biasing mechanism that biases the pressing surface and the clamping part in the direction of clamping the measurement target electric wire, and a measurement target in the clamping unit and a protrusion provided on the surface on the side for holding the wire, protrusions, so that the most protruding portion of the protruding portion is positioned on the central axis of the indentor in while holding the measurement target wire and it is characterized in that it is disposed.

本発明の電線劣化診断装置によれば、簡易な構成で電線等のケーブル表面の硬度を精度よく測定することのできるので、電線の劣化診断の信頼度が向上するばかりでなく、幅広く使用されることが期待できる。   According to the electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus of the present invention, the hardness of the surface of a cable such as an electric wire can be accurately measured with a simple configuration, so that the reliability of the electric wire deterioration diagnosis is improved and widely used. I can expect that.

本発明の実施の形態1で用いるゴム硬度計の概略を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the outline of the rubber hardness meter used in Embodiment 1 of this invention. 本発明の実施の形態1で用いる電線劣化診断装置を示す概略図である。It is the schematic which shows the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus used in Embodiment 1 of this invention. 測定サンプルとしての電線の一例を示す図であって、図中(A)は電線の側面図を、(B)は断面図をそれぞれ示している。It is a figure which shows an example of the electric wire as a measurement sample, Comprising: In the figure, (A) has shown the side view of the electric wire, and (B) has shown sectional drawing, respectively. ゴム硬度計を用いて電線サンプルの硬度を測定する方法を説明するための図であって、図中(A)は硬度測定前の状態を、(B)は硬度測定中の状態を、それぞれ示している。It is a figure for demonstrating the method of measuring the hardness of an electric wire sample using a rubber hardness meter, Comprising: (A) in a figure shows the state before hardness measurement, (B) shows the state under hardness measurement, respectively. ing. 電線劣化診断装置を用いて電線サンプルの硬度を測定する前の状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the state before measuring the hardness of an electric wire sample using an electric wire degradation diagnostic apparatus. 電線劣化診断装置に電線サンプルを配置した状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the state which has arrange | positioned the electric wire sample to the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus. 電線劣化診断装置を用いて電線サンプルの硬度を測定している状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the state which is measuring the hardness of an electric wire sample using an electric wire degradation diagnostic apparatus. 本発明の実施の形態1で用いる電線劣化診断装置の変形例を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the modification of the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus used in Embodiment 1 of this invention. 本評価試験で実施される絶縁抵抗値の測定方法を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the measuring method of the insulation resistance value implemented by this evaluation test.

以下、図面を参照して本発明の実施の形態について説明する。尚、この実施の形態により本発明が限定されるものではない。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. In addition, this invention is not limited by this embodiment.

実施の形態1.
[本実施の形態の構成]
先ず、図1を参照して本実施の形態で用いるゴム硬度計の構成について説明する。図1は、本発明の実施の形態1で用いるゴム硬度計1の概略を示す図である。この図に示すとおり、ゴム硬度計1は、硬度を示す文字盤2と、取り付け部3と、接触板4と、測定ツールとしての押針5と、から構成されている。接触板4は、測定するサンプルに当てる平坦な加圧面6を有しており、該加圧面6の中央部付近から押針5が突出するように設けられている。このようなゴム硬度計1としては、例えば、高分子計器(株)製のAL型ゴム硬度計を用いることができる。
Embodiment 1 FIG.
[Configuration of this embodiment]
First, the configuration of the rubber hardness meter used in the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a rubber hardness meter 1 used in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. As shown in this figure, the rubber hardness meter 1 includes a dial 2 indicating hardness, an attachment portion 3, a contact plate 4, and a push needle 5 as a measurement tool. The contact plate 4 has a flat pressure surface 6 applied to a sample to be measured, and is provided so that the push needle 5 protrudes from the vicinity of the center of the pressure surface 6. As such a rubber hardness meter 1, for example, an AL type rubber hardness meter manufactured by Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd. can be used.

次に、図2を参照して、本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置の構成について説明する。図2は、本発明の実施の形態1で用いる電線劣化診断装置10を示す概略図である。この図に示すとおり、電線劣化診断装置10は、クランク型に形成された板材として、第1の部材11と第2の部材12とを備えている。第1の部材11と第2の部材12とは互いに交差するように配置され、その交差部はピン13によって回動自在に接合されている。このような構成によれば、第1の部材11および第2の部材12の一端側に外力を入力することで、他端側を動作させることができる。以下の説明では、第1の部材11および第2の部材12における外力入力側を入力部111および121と称し、他端側を挟持部112および122と称することとする。   Next, with reference to FIG. 2, the structure of the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus of this Embodiment is demonstrated. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 used in the first embodiment of the present invention. As shown in this figure, the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 includes a first member 11 and a second member 12 as plate members formed in a crank shape. The first member 11 and the second member 12 are arranged so as to intersect with each other, and the intersecting portion is rotatably joined by a pin 13. According to such a configuration, the other end can be operated by inputting an external force to one end of the first member 11 and the second member 12. In the following description, the external force input side of the first member 11 and the second member 12 will be referred to as the input portions 111 and 121, and the other end side will be referred to as the clamping portions 112 and 122.

本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置10は、ゴム硬度計1を備えている。ゴム硬度計1は、その取り付け部3が第1の部材11の挟持部112に固定されることにより、加圧面6が第2の部材12の挟持部122と対向するように配設される。また、第2の部材12の挟持部122には、測定対象電線を所定の測定位置に配置するためのガイド部14が設置されている。ガイド部14は、測定対象電線の幅方向の位置決めを行うための突起物であって、押針5の中心軸Cを中心として電線幅の溝が形成されるように設けられている。   The electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 according to the present embodiment includes a rubber hardness meter 1. The rubber hardness scale 1 is disposed so that the pressing surface 6 faces the sandwiching portion 122 of the second member 12 by fixing the attachment portion 3 to the sandwiching portion 112 of the first member 11. Moreover, the guide part 14 for arrange | positioning a measuring object electric wire in a predetermined | prescribed measurement position is installed in the clamping part 122 of the 2nd member 12. FIG. The guide portion 14 is a protrusion for positioning the measurement target electric wire in the width direction, and is provided so that a wire width groove is formed around the central axis C of the push needle 5.

第1の部材11の入力部111と第2の部材12の入力部121との間にはスプリング15が取り付けられている。スプリング15は、加圧面6と挟持部122とを測定対象電線が挟持される方向に常時付勢するためのものである。このため、この図に示すとおり、外力を装置に入力しない状態においては、加圧面6とガイド部14の上面とが接触した状態に維持される。   A spring 15 is attached between the input part 111 of the first member 11 and the input part 121 of the second member 12. The spring 15 is for constantly urging the pressing surface 6 and the clamping part 122 in the direction in which the measurement target electric wire is clamped. For this reason, as shown in this figure, when the external force is not input to the apparatus, the pressure surface 6 and the upper surface of the guide portion 14 are maintained in contact with each other.

また、第2の部材12の挟持部122には、球状の先端形状を有する突起部16が設置されている。突起部16は、その中心軸が測定対象電線を挟持した状態での押針5の中心軸Cと一致する位置に設置されている。突起部16の高さおよびガイド部14の高さは、測定対象電線を挟持した場合に該電線の測定面がガイド部14よりも若干高くなり、且つ測定対象電線を配置していない場合に押針5と突起部16とが接触しない高さに設定されている。   A projecting portion 16 having a spherical tip shape is provided on the sandwiching portion 122 of the second member 12. The protrusion 16 is installed at a position where the center axis thereof coincides with the center axis C of the push needle 5 in a state where the measurement target electric wire is sandwiched. The height of the protrusion 16 and the height of the guide portion 14 are pressed when the measurement target electric wire is clamped when the measurement surface of the electric wire is slightly higher than the guide portion 14 and the measurement target electric wire is not arranged. The height is set such that the needle 5 and the protrusion 16 do not contact each other.

[本実施の形態の特徴的動作]
次に、図3乃至図7を参照して、本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置10の特徴的動作について説明する。本実施の形態では、上記電線劣化診断装置10を用いて電線の硬度を測定する。図3は、測定サンプルとしての電線の一例を示す図である。尚、この図中の(A)は、サンプルとしての電線の側面図を、(B)は(A)に示す電線を延在方向に垂直な方向に切断した場合の断面図を、それぞれ示している。この図に示すとおり、電線サンプル20は、銅線21を各色(白、赤、黒)の絶縁層22で被覆した導線を、さらに塩化ビニルなどの絶縁性のシース層23で被覆して構成されている。一般に、電線に電極端子などを接続する際には、図2中の(A)のように、端部の絶縁層22およびシース層23を剥いて、銅線21と電極端子とを接続して用いる。以下、測定対象電線として電線サンプル20を用いて説明するが、電線劣化診断装置10で硬度測定が可能な電線はこれに限られない。
[Characteristic operation of this embodiment]
Next, with reference to FIG. 3 thru | or FIG. 7, the characteristic operation | movement of the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus 10 of this Embodiment is demonstrated. In the present embodiment, the hardness of the electric wire is measured using the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of an electric wire as a measurement sample. In addition, (A) in this figure shows a side view of the electric wire as a sample, and (B) shows a cross-sectional view when the electric wire shown in (A) is cut in a direction perpendicular to the extending direction. Yes. As shown in this figure, the electric wire sample 20 is configured by covering a conductive wire in which a copper wire 21 is covered with an insulating layer 22 of each color (white, red, black), and further with an insulating sheath layer 23 such as vinyl chloride. ing. In general, when connecting an electrode terminal or the like to an electric wire, as shown in FIG. 2A, the end insulating layer 22 and the sheath layer 23 are peeled off, and the copper wire 21 and the electrode terminal are connected. Use. Hereinafter, although it demonstrates using the electric wire sample 20 as a measurement object electric wire, the electric wire which can measure hardness with the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus 10 is not restricted to this.

次に、図4を参照して、本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置10で用いるゴム硬度計1の基本動作について説明する。図4は、ゴム硬度計1を用いて電線サンプル20の硬度を測定する方法を説明するための図である。尚、この図中(A)は硬度測定前の状態を、(B)は硬度測定中の状態を、それぞれ示している。この図に示すとおり、硬度を測定する際には、ゴム硬度計1の押針5の先端で電線サンプル20の測定面(シース層23)を押圧する。この際、押針5の中心軸が電線サンプル20の測定面に対して垂直となる方向(すなわち図中の矢印Fの方向)に押圧する。そして、ゴム硬度計1の加圧面6が電線サンプル20の測定面と接触した時点で文字盤2の針が示す値を、その測定部の硬度として取得する。尚、ゴム硬度計1の内部には、JIS K6253に準拠したバネ定数を有するスプリングが内蔵されており、このスプリングに対する反発力を硬度と定義している。ゴム硬度計1は、JIS K6253に従って、異なるゴム硬度のサンプルを測定できるが、シース表面硬さの点からはA型、またはAL型が望ましい。また、電線サンプル20のシース層23の硬度は一般に78〜84で、熱や紫外線、酸化や湿度の影響でシース層23が硬化した場合は、90以上となる。   Next, with reference to FIG. 4, the basic operation of the rubber hardness meter 1 used in the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 of the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 4 is a view for explaining a method of measuring the hardness of the electric wire sample 20 using the rubber hardness meter 1. In this figure, (A) shows the state before the hardness measurement, and (B) shows the state during the hardness measurement. As shown in this figure, when measuring the hardness, the measurement surface (sheath layer 23) of the wire sample 20 is pressed with the tip of the push needle 5 of the rubber hardness meter 1. At this time, the center axis of the push needle 5 is pressed in a direction perpendicular to the measurement surface of the wire sample 20 (that is, in the direction of arrow F in the figure). And the value which the needle | hook of the dial 2 shows when the pressurization surface 6 of the rubber hardness meter 1 contacts the measurement surface of the electric wire sample 20 is acquired as the hardness of the measurement part. In addition, a spring having a spring constant conforming to JIS K6253 is built in the rubber hardness meter 1, and the repulsive force against this spring is defined as hardness. The rubber hardness tester 1 can measure samples with different rubber hardnesses according to JIS K6253, but the A type or AL type is desirable from the viewpoint of the sheath surface hardness. Moreover, the hardness of the sheath layer 23 of the electric wire sample 20 is generally 78 to 84, and becomes 90 or more when the sheath layer 23 is cured by the influence of heat, ultraviolet rays, oxidation, or humidity.

次に、本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置10を用いて電線サンプル20の表面硬度を測定する方法について説明する。図5は、電線劣化診断装置10を用いて電線サンプル20の硬度を測定する前の状態を示す図である。電線サンプル20の硬度を測定する際には、先ず、この図に示すとおり、挟持部112と122とが離反するように図中のT方向に外力を加える。これにより、挟持部122のガイド部14に接していたゴム硬度計1の加圧面6が上方へと移動する。   Next, a method for measuring the surface hardness of the wire sample 20 using the wire deterioration diagnostic device 10 of the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a state before the hardness of the wire sample 20 is measured using the wire deterioration diagnosis device 10. When measuring the hardness of the wire sample 20, first, as shown in this figure, an external force is applied in the T direction in the figure so that the clamping parts 112 and 122 are separated from each other. Thereby, the pressing surface 6 of the rubber hardness meter 1 that has been in contact with the guide portion 14 of the clamping portion 122 moves upward.

次に、電線サンプル20を配置する。図6は、電線劣化診断装置10に電線サンプル20を配置した状態を示す図である。この図に示すとおり、挟持部122におけるガイド部14の間に電線サンプル20が配置される。これにより、電線サンプル20は、その下面が突起部16で支持されるとともに、電線の側面がガイド部14により支持される。尚、上述したとおり、電線サンプル20の上面(測定面)は、ガイド部14よりも若干高くなる。これにより、電線サンプル20の幅方向の位置決めを行いつつ、測定時に加圧面6を電線サンプル20の上面に有効に接触させることが可能となる。   Next, the wire sample 20 is disposed. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a state in which the wire sample 20 is arranged in the wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus 10. As shown in this figure, the wire sample 20 is disposed between the guide portions 14 in the sandwiching portion 122. Thereby, the lower surface of the wire sample 20 is supported by the protrusions 16, and the side surfaces of the wires are supported by the guide portions 14. As described above, the upper surface (measurement surface) of the wire sample 20 is slightly higher than the guide portion 14. Thereby, it is possible to effectively bring the pressing surface 6 into contact with the upper surface of the wire sample 20 during measurement while positioning the wire sample 20 in the width direction.

次に、電線サンプル20の硬度を測定する。図7は、電線劣化診断装置10を用いて電線サンプル20の硬度を測定している状態を示す図である。この図に示すとおり、入力部111,112に加えていた外力を抜くと、ゴム硬度計1が電線サンプル20に向かって降下し、押針5が電線サンプル20の上面(測定面)を押圧するとともに、加圧面6が電線サンプル20の上面(測定面)に接触する。電線サンプル20はその下面が突起部16によって一点支持されている。このため、電線サンプル20の測定面は、加圧面6に密着する方向(すなわち加圧面6と平行になる方向)にその向きが補正される。これにより、常に同じ条件で電線サンプル20の測定面に押針5を押圧させることができるので、測定バラツキが有効に抑制される。このように、本実施の形態の電線劣化診断装置10によれば、平型の電線や劣化等により変形した電線であっても、高精度に硬度を測定することができる。   Next, the hardness of the wire sample 20 is measured. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a state in which the hardness of the wire sample 20 is measured using the wire deterioration diagnosis device 10. As shown in this figure, when the external force applied to the input units 111 and 112 is removed, the rubber hardness meter 1 descends toward the wire sample 20 and the push needle 5 presses the upper surface (measurement surface) of the wire sample 20. At the same time, the pressing surface 6 contacts the upper surface (measurement surface) of the wire sample 20. The lower surface of the wire sample 20 is supported at one point by the protrusion 16. For this reason, the direction of the measurement surface of the electric wire sample 20 is corrected in a direction in close contact with the pressure surface 6 (that is, a direction parallel to the pressure surface 6). Thereby, since the push needle 5 can be always pressed on the measurement surface of the electric wire sample 20 on the same conditions, measurement variation is suppressed effectively. Thus, according to the electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus 10 of the present embodiment, the hardness can be measured with high accuracy even for a flat electric wire or an electric wire deformed due to deterioration or the like.

ところで、上述した実施の形態1では、第1の部材11および第2の部材12として板材を用いることとしているが、これらの部材は板である必要ははく、測定に問題ない強度を有する線材を折り曲げ加工や溶接することで同様の機能を持たせてもよい。これにより、軽量化および小型化を図ることが可能となるため、より使い勝手のよい電線劣化診断装置を提供することが可能となる。   By the way, in Embodiment 1 mentioned above, although it is supposed that a board | plate material will be used as the 1st member 11 and the 2nd member 12, these members do not need to be a board and have the intensity | strength which does not have a problem in a measurement. The same function may be given by bending or welding. As a result, it is possible to reduce the weight and size, and thus it is possible to provide a more convenient wire deterioration diagnosis device.

また、上述した実施の形態1では、第1の部材11と第2の部材12とを交差させてピン13で結合することとしているが、電線劣化診断装置10としての構成はこれに限られない。図8は、本発明の実施の形態1で用いる電線劣化診断装置の変形例を説明するための図である。この図に示す装置では、第1の部材11と第2の部材12とは、交差せずにピン13で結合されている。また、スプリング15は、加圧面6と挟持部122とを測定対象電線が挟持される方向、すなわち入力部121と122とを離反する方向に常に付勢するためのものが使用される。このように構成された電線劣化診断装置によれば、入力部121と入力部122とを手で握る動作で該装置の挟持部112,122を離反させることができるので、使い勝手が向上する。   Moreover, in Embodiment 1 mentioned above, although it is supposed that the 1st member 11 and the 2nd member 12 cross | intersect and couple | bond with the pin 13, the structure as the electric wire deterioration diagnostic apparatus 10 is not restricted to this. . FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining a modification of the electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus used in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. In the apparatus shown in this figure, the first member 11 and the second member 12 are coupled by a pin 13 without intersecting. The spring 15 is used to constantly urge the pressing surface 6 and the clamping part 122 in the direction in which the measurement target electric wire is clamped, that is, the direction in which the input parts 121 and 122 are separated from each other. According to the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device configured as described above, the holding portions 112 and 122 of the device can be separated by an operation of grasping the input unit 121 and the input unit 122 with a hand, so that the usability is improved.

[評価実験]
次に、本実施の形態1の電線劣化診断装置10を用いた評価実験について説明する。本評価試験では、ゴム硬度計1として、高分子計器(株)製のAL型ゴム硬度計を用いた。また、電線サンプル20としては、矢崎電線工業(株)製の塩化ビニル被覆、塩化ビニルシース電線、銅線7の径φ1.6mm、絶縁層8の色が、端から赤(R)、白(W)および黒(B)の3芯で、シース9が灰色のものを用意し、シース9の長さを20cm、両端部の絶縁層8の長さを3cm、銅線7の長さを1cmとなるように切断したものを18本作成した。本実施の形態1の電線劣化診断装置10を用いて電線サンプル20の硬度を測定した結果を表1に示す。
[Evaluation experiment]
Next, an evaluation experiment using the electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus 10 according to the first embodiment will be described. In this evaluation test, an AL type rubber hardness meter manufactured by Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd. was used as the rubber hardness meter 1. Moreover, as the electric wire sample 20, as for the color of the vinyl chloride coating | cover, a vinyl chloride sheath electric wire, copper wire 7 diameter φ1.6mm, and the insulating layer 8 by Yazaki Electric Wire Industry Co., Ltd., red (R), white (W ) And black (B), and the sheath 9 is gray, the length of the sheath 9 is 20 cm, the length of the insulating layer 8 at both ends is 3 cm, and the length of the copper wire 7 is 1 cm. 18 pieces were cut so as to be. Table 1 shows the results of measuring the hardness of the wire sample 20 using the wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 of the first embodiment.

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

表1に示す結果より、シース9の表面硬度は79〜81と測定された。一方、比較例として、本発明の電線劣化診断装置10を用いずに、ゴム硬度計1を直接手で保持して同様の測定を行った。ここでは、具体的には、テーブル上に電線サンプルを置き、ゴム硬度計1の押針5を同サンプルのシース表面に手動で押し当てて測定した。比較例の測定結果を表2に示す。   From the results shown in Table 1, the surface hardness of the sheath 9 was measured as 79 to 81. On the other hand, as a comparative example, the same measurement was performed by directly holding the rubber hardness meter 1 by hand without using the wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 of the present invention. Here, specifically, an electric wire sample was placed on a table, and the push needle 5 of the rubber hardness meter 1 was manually pressed against the sheath surface of the sample, and measurement was performed. The measurement results of the comparative example are shown in Table 2.

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

表2に示す結果より、シース9の表面硬度は、72〜81とバラツキが大きくなり、特に低めの硬度が多数測定された。これは、電線サンプルが比較的軟らかく、また一様に平坦な形状ではないために、押針5をシース表面に対して常に同条件で接触させることができないことが原因と推測される。以上により、本発明の電線劣化診断装置10が、測定バラツキ少なく、高精度に電線サンプルの表面硬度を測定できることが示された。   From the results shown in Table 2, the surface hardness of the sheath 9 varied widely from 72 to 81, and many lower hardnesses were measured. This is presumed to be because the wire sample is relatively soft and does not have a uniformly flat shape, so that the push needle 5 cannot always be brought into contact with the sheath surface under the same conditions. From the above, it was shown that the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 of the present invention can measure the surface hardness of the electric wire sample with high accuracy with little measurement variation.

次に、電線サンプル20を8本用意し、100℃に設定した高温槽の中で0、100、250、および1000時間保持した後の表面硬度および絶縁抵抗値を測定した。尚、絶縁抵抗値は、電線の劣化度を示す指標として使用することができる。これは、熱や紫外線、湿度や酸化などで絶縁層またはシースが硬化する際、絶縁性能も低下し、絶縁抵抗値が低下するからである。本評価試験において、電線サンプル20の絶縁抵抗値は、以下の方法で測定した。図9は、本評価試験で実施される絶縁抵抗値の測定方法を説明するための図である。この図に示すとおり、今回の測定では、電線サンプル20の一端側の赤線(R)と他端側の白線(W)とを接続し、絶縁抵抗計(例えば、ヒューレットパッカード(株)製 4339A)を用いて、所定プローブで前記銅線部を挟んで電圧をかけることにより測定した。尚、電圧は500Vとし、測定時間をロングモードにセットして、測定開始後30秒後の絶縁抵抗値R1を測定した。測定結果を、それぞれ表3、表4、表5、および表6に示す。   Next, eight electric wire samples 20 were prepared, and the surface hardness and insulation resistance value after being held in a high-temperature tank set at 100 ° C. for 0, 100, 250, and 1000 hours were measured. The insulation resistance value can be used as an index indicating the degree of deterioration of the electric wire. This is because when the insulating layer or the sheath is cured by heat, ultraviolet rays, humidity, oxidation, etc., the insulation performance is also lowered and the insulation resistance value is lowered. In this evaluation test, the insulation resistance value of the wire sample 20 was measured by the following method. FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a method of measuring an insulation resistance value performed in this evaluation test. As shown in this figure, in this measurement, the red wire (R) on one end side of the electric wire sample 20 and the white wire (W) on the other end side are connected, and an insulation resistance meter (for example, 4339A manufactured by Hewlett-Packard Co., Ltd.) is connected. ) And applying a voltage across the copper wire portion with a predetermined probe. The voltage was 500 V, the measurement time was set to the long mode, and the insulation resistance value R1 30 seconds after the start of measurement was measured. The measurement results are shown in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6, respectively.

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

Figure 0005310692
Figure 0005310692

表3乃至表6に示す結果より、電線の硬度は熱処理時間の増加に伴い上昇するが、硬度が94以上になると絶縁抵抗が顕著に低下することがわかる。以上より、本発明によって、電線サンプルのシース表面硬度の測定精度が向上し、これによって電線の劣化度も高精度に推定できることが示された。   From the results shown in Tables 3 to 6, it can be seen that the hardness of the electric wire increases with an increase in the heat treatment time, but when the hardness is 94 or more, the insulation resistance is significantly reduced. From the above, it has been shown that according to the present invention, the measurement accuracy of the sheath surface hardness of the wire sample is improved, and thereby the deterioration degree of the wire can be estimated with high accuracy.

実施の形態2.
本実施の形態2では、上述した実施の形態1で示した電線劣化診断装置10を、板材ではなく、線材を曲げたり溶接することにより作製し、同様の評価試験を行った。その結果、電線サンプル20の硬度測定結果は、実施の形態1で得られたものと全く同様となった。本実施の形態2の電線劣化診断装置10では、装置の重量が軽くなったことから、電線サンプル20をセットする時間を短縮することが可能となり、その効果は、電線サンプルを20本測定するのに要する時間を約1/2まで短縮することができた。以上より、装置重量を軽くすることにより、測定精度の向上を図りつつ作業効率を有効に高めることができることが示された。
Embodiment 2. FIG.
In the second embodiment, the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 shown in the first embodiment described above was produced by bending or welding a wire instead of a plate material, and the same evaluation test was performed. As a result, the hardness measurement result of the wire sample 20 was exactly the same as that obtained in the first embodiment. In the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device 10 according to the second embodiment, since the weight of the device is reduced, the time for setting the electric wire sample 20 can be shortened, and the effect is that 20 electric wire samples are measured. The time required for the process can be reduced to about ½. From the above, it has been shown that by reducing the weight of the apparatus, it is possible to effectively increase the working efficiency while improving the measurement accuracy.

実施の形態3.
本実施の形態3では、上記実施の形態2で行った評価試験を、電線サンプルの種類を増やして実施した。その例として、同じ矢崎電線製の銅線径がφ2.0mmの3芯線、古河電工、住電日立の同様のφ2.0mmの3芯線と4芯線、さらに、シース材を塩化ビニルだけでなく、エコ電線(各社各様で材料等詳細不明)、ゴム、架橋ポリエステルなど変えて実施した。さらに、電線サンプルの処理条件を、85℃高温放置、85℃、85%RHの高温高湿処理などに変えて、同様の評価を行った。
Embodiment 3 FIG.
In this Embodiment 3, the evaluation test performed in the said Embodiment 2 was implemented by increasing the kind of electric wire sample. For example, the same Yazaki Electric Co., Ltd., 3-core wire with a diameter of φ2.0 mm, Furukawa Electric, and Sumiden-Hitachi's similar 3-core wires and 4-core wires with φ2.0 mm, as well as the sheath material not only vinyl chloride, It was carried out by changing eco-electric wires (details of materials etc. are unknown for each company), rubber, cross-linked polyester, etc. Furthermore, the same evaluation was performed by changing the processing conditions of the wire sample to 85 ° C. high temperature standing, 85 ° C. and 85% RH high temperature and high humidity processing.

その結果、シース材のゴム硬度と絶縁抵抗値との関係は、硬度が90以上の場合に、絶縁抵抗値が10−11以下になっていることを確認した。この結果から、シース材のゴム硬度が90以上の場合にNGと判定することで、劣化している電線と判定できることが示された。また、実際に工事現場で、シース材の表面硬度と絶縁抵抗との関係について調査を行った結果、同様の結果を得た。このように、電線の硬度は劣化の程度に密接に関連している。したがって、各種電線毎にNGを判定すべき硬度を予め特定しておき、測定した硬度が特定された所定値よりも高いか否かを判定する劣化診断手段を備えることで、電線の劣化有無を精度よく判定することができる。   As a result, it was confirmed that the relationship between the rubber hardness of the sheath material and the insulation resistance value was 10-11 or less when the hardness was 90 or more. From this result, it was shown that it can be determined that the electric wire has deteriorated by determining NG when the rubber hardness of the sheath material is 90 or more. Moreover, as a result of actually investigating the relationship between the surface hardness of the sheath material and the insulation resistance at the construction site, similar results were obtained. Thus, the hardness of the electric wire is closely related to the degree of deterioration. Therefore, the presence / absence of the deterioration of the electric wire can be determined by providing the deterioration diagnosis means for determining whether the NG should be determined for each electric wire in advance and determining whether the measured hardness is higher than the specified predetermined value. It can be determined with high accuracy.

本発明をベースに、例えばゴム硬度計1の押針5の形状を、表面を平坦化し、電線の径以下の径とすることにより、さらに高信頼化が可能である。すなわち、ゴム硬度計1は現段階ではJISで、押針5の形状や、内蔵されているバネの強度(バネ定数)が規定されており、電線のシースや絶縁層の硬化度によっては適当でない状態になるが、押針5の形状や内蔵されているバネ定数を使用電線に応じて変えることにより、高信頼化が可能となる。しかし、現段階ではJIS規格から外れるため、データの汎用性から考えると、A型、またはAL型が最も望ましい。   Based on the present invention, for example, the shape of the push needle 5 of the rubber hardness tester 1 can be made more reliable by flattening the surface to a diameter equal to or smaller than the diameter of the electric wire. In other words, the rubber hardness tester 1 is JIS at this stage, and the shape of the push needle 5 and the strength of the built-in spring (spring constant) are specified, which is not appropriate depending on the degree of cure of the sheath of the electric wire or the insulating layer. However, high reliability can be achieved by changing the shape of the push needle 5 and the built-in spring constant according to the electric wire used. However, since it deviates from the JIS standard at this stage, the A type or the AL type is most desirable in view of the versatility of data.

1 ゴム硬度計
5 押針
6 加圧面
11 第1の部材(付勢機構)
12 第2の部材(付勢機構)
122 挟持部
13 ピン(付勢機構)
14 ガイド部
15 スプリング(弾性部材,付勢機構)
16 突起部
20 電線サンプル(測定対象電線)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Rubber hardness meter 5 Push needle 6 Pressurization surface 11 1st member (biasing mechanism)
12 Second member (biasing mechanism)
122 clamping part 13 pin (biasing mechanism)
14 Guide 15 Spring (elastic member, biasing mechanism)
16 Protrusion 20 Wire sample (Measurement target wire)

Claims (6)

平坦な加圧面と、前記加圧面から突出して設けられた押針とを有し、前記押針を測定対象電線の測定領域に押圧することで硬度を測定するゴム硬度計と、
前記測定対象電線を前記加圧面との間で挟持する挟持部と、
前記加圧面と前記挟持部とを、前記測定対象電線を挟持する方向に付勢する付勢機構と、
前記挟持部における前記測定対象電線を挟持する側の面に設けられた突起部と、を備え、
前記突起部は、前記測定対象電線を挟持した状態での前記押針の中心軸上に当該突起部の最凸部が位置するように配置されていることを特徴とする電線劣化診断装置。
A rubber hardness meter that has a flat pressure surface and a push needle provided so as to protrude from the pressure surface, and measures hardness by pressing the push needle against a measurement region of a measurement target wire;
A clamping part for clamping the measurement target electric wire between the pressing surface;
An urging mechanism that urges the pressing surface and the clamping portion in a direction of clamping the measurement target electric wire;
A projection provided on a surface of the clamping unit on the side of clamping the measurement target electric wire,
The protrusion of the previous SL wire degradation diagnostic apparatus characterized by outermost projections are arranged such that the position of the projections on the center axis of said indentor of the measured electric wire in a state of sandwiching.
前記突起部はその先端形状が球状に形成されていることを特徴とする請求項1記載の電線劣化診断装置。  The wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a tip shape of the protrusion is spherical. 前記付勢機構は、
一端側に前記ゴム硬度計が配設され、他端側に外力を入力するための入力部を備えた第1の部材と、
一端側に前記挟持部が配設され、他端側に外力を入力するための入力部を備えた第2の部材と、
前記第1の部材と前記第2の部材とを回動自在に連結するピンと、
前記第1の部材と前記第2の部材とを前記測定対象電線を挟持する方向に付勢する弾性部材と、
を含むことを特徴とする請求項1または2記載の電線劣化診断装置。
The biasing mechanism is
The rubber hardness meter is disposed on one end side, and a first member having an input portion for inputting external force on the other end side;
A second member provided with an input part for inputting an external force on the other end side, wherein the clamping part is disposed on one end side;
A pin for rotatably connecting the first member and the second member;
An elastic member that urges the first member and the second member in a direction to sandwich the measurement target electric wire;
The wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1 or 2 , characterized in that
前記挟持部に設けられ、前記測定対象電線の幅方向の位置決めを行うガイド部を更に備え、前記ガイド部の高さは、前記測定対象電線を挟持したときに前記加圧面と接触しない高さに設定されていることを特徴とする請求項1乃至3の何れか1項記載の電線劣化診断装置。 The guide unit further includes a guide unit that is positioned in the clamping unit and performs positioning in the width direction of the measurement target electric wire, and the height of the guide unit is a height that does not contact the pressing surface when the measurement target electric wire is clamped. The electric wire deterioration diagnosis device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the electric wire deterioration diagnosis device is set. 前記電線劣化診断装置は、大きさ、重量、および強度が、片手で操作可能な範囲に調整されていることを特徴とする請求項1乃至の何れか1項記載の電線劣化診断装置。 The electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the electric wire deterioration diagnosis apparatus is adjusted in size, weight, and strength to a range that can be operated with one hand. 前記ゴム硬度計で測定された硬度が所定値よりも高い場合に、前記測定対象電線が劣化していることを判定する劣化診断手段を更に備えることを特徴とする請求項1乃至の何れか1項記載の電線劣化診断装置。 When the hardness measured at a rubber hardness meter is higher than a predetermined value, any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the measurement target wire is characterized, further comprising a deterioration diagnosis means determines that the deteriorated The electric wire deterioration diagnosis device according to item 1.
JP2010225600A 2010-10-05 2010-10-05 Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device Expired - Fee Related JP5310692B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010225600A JP5310692B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2010-10-05 Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010225600A JP5310692B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2010-10-05 Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012078283A JP2012078283A (en) 2012-04-19
JP5310692B2 true JP5310692B2 (en) 2013-10-09

Family

ID=46238684

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2010225600A Expired - Fee Related JP5310692B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2010-10-05 Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5310692B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60173439A (en) * 1984-02-17 1985-09-06 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Deciding method of deterioration of covering body of electric wire and deciding device for deterioration degree
JPS62132146A (en) * 1985-12-04 1987-06-15 Mitsubishi Cable Ind Ltd Measurement for deterioration of wire cover
JPS6296549U (en) * 1985-12-04 1987-06-19
JPH0238947A (en) * 1988-07-29 1990-02-08 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Deterioration degree deciding method for covering material, or the like, of electric cable
JP3014947B2 (en) * 1995-05-17 2000-02-28 昭和電線電纜株式会社 Electric wire / cable deterioration diagnosis method and jig used for the method
JPH1054827A (en) * 1996-08-12 1998-02-24 Mitsubishi Cable Ind Ltd Probe fixing tool
JP2001099776A (en) * 1999-09-28 2001-04-13 Chubu Electric Power Co Inc Device and method for diagnosing clad electric wire degradation
JP5220649B2 (en) * 2009-02-13 2013-06-26 積水ハウス株式会社 Portable hardness measuring apparatus and hardness measuring method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2012078283A (en) 2012-04-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2000338131A (en) Probe for probe card and manufacture thereof
JP5042565B2 (en) Clamp sensor
KR101704188B1 (en) Probe Card with Wire Probes
KR101958353B1 (en) A test device
JP2005315691A (en) Bending testing device and bending test method
KR102159086B1 (en) Wire testing apparatus
JP4951355B2 (en) Dimension measuring method and dimension measuring device for terminal fitting
CN109564880A (en) The calibration method and lead wire connecting apparatus of lead clamping device
WO1995028613A1 (en) Dedicated crimp measuring gauge
JP5310692B2 (en) Electric wire deterioration diagnosis device
US7564252B2 (en) Semiconductor inspection apparatus
JP2012078297A (en) Jig for wire probe, and inspection device and inspection method using the same
CN109964110A (en) Jig is used in the production method of CTOD test film and plastic strain adjustment
JP5893397B2 (en) Probe unit and inspection device
JP2007322179A (en) Jig for substrate inspection and substrate inspection apparatus equipped with same
CN111798780A (en) Test device and test method
JP3045626B2 (en) Degradation diagnosis method for laminated products
CN210665946U (en) Testing device for testing chip on-resistance value
TWI775649B (en) Probe assembly
CN215641647U (en) Test shell fragment and testing arrangement
CN218037201U (en) Chip testing device
CN215525886U (en) Combined resistance test fixture
JP2000046726A (en) Exfoliation testing apparatus
CN218412705U (en) Flexible joint conductor wire pre-detection device
CN215894846U (en) Test piece and test mechanism

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20121031

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130115

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130220

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130604

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130617

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 5310692

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees