JP5241119B2 - Non-aqueous electrolyte battery - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a nonaqueous electrolyte battery and its manufacturing method excellent in cycle characteristics and preservation characteristics at high temperature and capable of exerting high reliability even in a battery structure featuring high capacity. <P>SOLUTION: In the nonaqueous electrolyte battery provided with n electrode consisting of a cathode with a cathode active material layer containing a cathode active material, an anode with an anode active material, and a separator intercalated between these electrodes, and nonaqueous electrolyte impregnated in the electrode, the cathode active material contains at least cobalt or manganese, and a coating layer containing filler particles and a binder is formed on the surface of the cathode active material layer. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&amp;INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an improvement in a non-aqueous electrolyte battery such as a lithium ion battery or a polymer battery and a method for producing the same, and particularly excellent in cycle characteristics and storage characteristics at high temperatures, and exhibits high reliability even in a battery configuration characterized by high capacity. It is related with the battery structure etc. which can be performed.

  In recent years, mobile information terminals such as mobile phones, notebook personal computers, and PDAs have been rapidly reduced in size and weight, and batteries as drive power sources are required to have higher capacities. Lithium ion batteries that charge and discharge when lithium ions move between the positive and negative electrodes along with charge and discharge have high energy density and high capacity. Widely used.

  Here, the mobile information terminal has a tendency to further increase the power consumption with enhancement of functions such as a video playback function and a game function. As a purpose, further increase in capacity and performance are strongly desired.

  Under these circumstances, in order to increase the capacity of lithium ion batteries, battery cans, separators, and positive and negative current collectors (aluminum foil and copper foil) that are not involved in power generation elements are made thinner (for example, the following patent documents) 1) and higher packing of active materials (improvement of electrode packing density) have been researched and developed, but these measures are almost approaching the limit. Essential improvements such as changes are required. However, in the increase in capacity by changing both the positive and negative active materials, although the negative electrode active material is expected to be an alloy-based negative electrode such as Si or Sn, the positive electrode active material has a capacity exceeding the current lithium cobalt oxide, and There is almost no material with the same or better performance.

  Under these circumstances, we have increased the capacity of the battery using lithium cobaltate as the positive electrode active material by increasing the depth of use (charging depth) in the region above the current 4.2 V. A possible battery was developed. The reason why the capacity can be increased by increasing the depth of use in this way will be briefly explained. The theoretical capacity of lithium cobaltate is about 273 mAh / g, but the battery of 4.2V specification (with a charge end voltage of 4.2V). This is because only about 160 mAh / g is used in the battery, and it is possible to use up to about 200 mAh / g by raising the end-of-charge voltage to 4.4V. In this way, by raising the end-of-charge voltage to 4.4 V, a high capacity of about 10% can be achieved as a whole battery.

  However, when lithium cobaltate is used at a high voltage as described above, the oxidization power of the charged positive electrode active material is strengthened and the decomposition of the electrolytic solution is accelerated, and the delithiated positive electrode active material itself The stability of the crystal structure was lost, and cycle deterioration and storage deterioration due to crystal collapse were the biggest problems. As a result of our investigation, it has been found that by adding zirconia, aluminum, and magnesium to lithium cobaltate, a performance similar to 4.2 V can be obtained under high-voltage room temperature conditions. It is essential to ensure the performance under high-temperature driving conditions such as the power consumption of the start-up terminal and the ability to withstand continuous use in a high-temperature environment. In this sense, technology that can ensure reliability not only at room temperature but also at high temperatures The development of was urgent.

JP 2002-141042 A

  As described above, it was found that in the positive electrode of the battery with improved end-of-charge voltage, the stability of the crystal structure was lost, and the battery performance deteriorated particularly at high temperatures. The detailed cause of this phenomenon is unknown, but as far as analysis results are concerned, elution of elements from the decomposition product of the electrolyte and the positive electrode active material (cobalt elution when lithium cobaltate is used) It is speculated that this is the main factor that deteriorates cycle characteristics and storage characteristics at high temperatures.

  In particular, in battery systems using a positive electrode active material such as lithium cobaltate, lithium manganate, or nickel-cobalt-manganese lithium composite oxide, cobalt and manganese are ionized and eluted from the positive electrode when stored at high temperatures. When these elements are reduced at the negative electrode, they are deposited on the negative electrode and the separator, which causes problems such as an increase in battery internal resistance and a corresponding decrease in capacity. Furthermore, as described above, when the end-of-charge voltage of a lithium ion battery is increased, the instability of the crystal structure increases, and the above problems become more apparent. These phenomena tend to be strengthened even at temperatures around 50 ° C. where there was no slag. In addition, when a separator having a thin film thickness and a low porosity is used, these phenomena tend to become stronger.

  For example, in a battery having a specification of 4.4 V, lithium cobaltate is used as a positive electrode active material, graphite is used as a negative electrode active material, and a storage test (the test conditions are a charge end voltage of 4.4 V, a storage temperature of 60 ° C., a storage period of 5 days). If done, the remaining capacity after storage is significantly reduced, sometimes to nearly zero. Therefore, when this battery was disassembled, a large amount of cobalt was detected from the negative electrode and the separator. Therefore, it is considered that the deterioration mode was accelerated by the cobalt element eluted from the positive electrode. This is because a layered positive electrode active material such as lithium cobaltate increases in valence due to extraction of lithium ions, but tetravalent cobalt is unstable, so the crystal itself is not stable and changes to a stable structure. This is presumed to be due to the fact that cobalt ions are likely to elute from the crystal. Further, when spinel type lithium manganate is used as the positive electrode active material, generally, trivalent manganese is disproportionated and eluted with divalent ions, and is the same as when lithium cobaltate is used as the positive electrode active material. It is known that this problem will occur.

  Thus, when the structure of the charged positive electrode active material is unstable, there is a tendency for storage deterioration and cycle deterioration particularly at high temperatures to become remarkable. Since this tendency has been found to occur more easily as the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is higher, a problem with a battery having a high capacity design becomes significant. The reason for being involved not only in the negative electrode but also in the physical properties of the separator is that the reaction by-product in the positive and negative electrodes moves to the opposite electrode through the separator and further causes a secondary reaction there. It is presumed that the ease of movement and distance are greatly involved.

  As measures for these, attempts are made to suppress elution of cobalt or the like from the positive electrode by physically coating the surface of the positive electrode active material particles with an inorganic substance or chemically coating the surface of the positive electrode active material particles with an organic substance. Has been made. However, since the positive electrode active material repeatedly expands and contracts due to charging and discharging, when physically coated as described above, there is a concern that the inorganic material and the like may fall off and the coating effect may be lost. On the other hand, when chemically coated, it is difficult to control the thickness of the coating film, and when the thickness of the coating layer is large, it is difficult to achieve the original performance due to an increase in the internal resistance of the battery, resulting in a decrease in battery capacity. Moreover, since it is difficult to completely coat the entire particle, there remains a problem that the coating effect is limited. Therefore, an alternative method is necessary.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a non-aqueous electrolyte battery that is excellent in cycle characteristics and storage characteristics at high temperatures, and that can exhibit high reliability even in a battery configuration characterized by high capacity, and a method for manufacturing the same.

To achieve the above object, the present invention provides an electrode body comprising a positive electrode having a positive electrode active material layer containing a positive electrode active material, a negative electrode having a negative electrode active material, and a separator interposed between the two electrodes, and the electrode body. A non-aqueous electrolyte battery comprising a non-aqueous electrolyte impregnated with a solvent and an electrolyte salt, wherein the positive electrode active material contains at least cobalt or manganese, and the positive electrode active material layer and the separator A coating layer containing filler particles and a binder is formed therebetween.

  If the coating layer having the above configuration is provided, the binder contained in the coating layer disposed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer absorbs the electrolytic solution and swells, so that the filler particles swell appropriately. The covering layer that is buried and contains filler particles and a binder exhibits an appropriate filter function. Accordingly, it is possible to suppress cobalt ions and manganese ions eluted from the decomposition product of the electrolytic solution reacted at the positive electrode and the positive electrode active material from being trapped by the coating layer, and depositing cobalt and manganese at the separator and the negative electrode. Thereby, since the damage which a negative electrode and a separator receive is reduced, deterioration of cycling characteristics at high temperature and deterioration of storage characteristics at high temperature can be suppressed. Further, since the binder particles and the coating layer and the positive electrode active material layer are firmly bonded to each other by the binder, it is possible to prevent the coating layer from falling off from the positive electrode active material layer, and the above effect is maintained for a long time. The

When cobalt or the like is included in the positive electrode active material, the following effects can be obtained if the filler particles are composed of inorganic particles containing magnesia.
When the coating layer does not contain magnesia and is exposed to a highly oxidizing atmosphere, a solvent such as ethylene carbonate (EC) contained in the electrolytic solution is decomposed to generate water, and this water is lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF). ₆ ) Hydrofluoric acid is generated by reacting with an electrolyte salt such as, and as a result, cobalt and the like contained in the positive electrode active material react with hydrofluoric acid to dissolve the cobalt and the like. On the other hand, when magnesia is included in the coating layer, even if water is generated by exposure to a highly oxidizing atmosphere, the water and magnesia are hydrolyzed and become alkaline, so that acidic hydrofluoric acid is generated. However, this can be neutralized, and as a result, dissolution of cobalt or the like from the positive electrode active material can be suppressed. That is, if it is the said structure, not only a physical trap effect (filter effect), such as cobalt by providing a coating layer, but the chemical trap effect by including a magnesia in a coating layer can be acquired.

It is desirable that the filler particles include inorganic particles other than the magnesia, and the ratio of the magnesia to the total amount of the filler particles is 1% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less.
Since magnesia has a low tap density, it becomes bulky and it is difficult to form a thin coating layer. Therefore, in order to increase the battery capacity by reducing the thickness of the coating layer, it is desirable that the filler particles contain inorganic particles other than magnesia.
Further, when considering the effect of the present invention, it is presumed that the greater the proportion of magnesia, the higher the effect, but because magnesia has very poor adhesion to the binder, the proportion of magnesia relative to the total amount of filler particles When the content exceeds 10% by mass, the coating layer slides off from the positive electrode active material layer, and the function and effect as the coating layer may not be sufficiently exhibited. Therefore, the ratio of magnesia to the total amount of filler particles is desirably 10% by mass or less. On the other hand, the ratio of magnesia to the total amount of filler particles is desirably 1% by mass or more, because when the ratio is less than 1% by mass, the above-described effect of adding magnesia may not be sufficiently exhibited. It is.

The inorganic particles other than magnesia are preferably made of rutile-type titania and / or alumina.
The reason for this limitation is that these are excellent in stability in the battery (reactivity with lithium) and are low in cost. Also, rutile-structured titania, anatase-structured titania is capable of inserting and removing lithium ions, and depending on the environmental atmosphere and potential, it absorbs lithium and expresses electronic conductivity. This is because there is a risk of short circuit.
However, inorganic particles other than magnesia are not limited to these, and may be zirconia or the like.

The coating layer is preferably formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer or on the surface of the separator on the positive electrode side.
Although it is conceivable that the coating layer is produced alone and disposed between the positive electrode and the separator, it is difficult to handle the thin coating layer, and the positive electrode, the separator, and the coating layer are difficult to handle during battery production. Positioning becomes difficult. Therefore, the coating layer is preferably formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer or the positive electrode side of the separator. Among them, as described above, in order to sufficiently exhibit the action of causing hydrolysis of water and magnesia, it is preferable that the positive electrode active material layer is sufficiently in close contact with the positive electrode active material layer. It is more desirable to do so.

The coating layer is preferably formed on the entire surface of the positive electrode active material layer or the entire surface of the separator on the positive electrode side.
This is because with such a configuration, the physical trapping effect due to the presence of the coating layer described above is further exhibited.

The binder is preferably an organic solvent binder.
If an aqueous solvent is used as the binder, magnesia and water react with each other to cause hydrolysis and the solvent becomes alkaline and the slurry gels. Therefore, it is desirable to use an organic solvent as the binder.

It is desirable that the average particle size of the filler particles be regulated so as to be larger than the average pore size of the separator.
In this way, if the average particle size of the filler particles is smaller than the average pore size of the separator, a part of the separator may penetrate when the battery is crushed, and the separator may be damaged greatly. In addition, the filler particles may enter the micropores of the separator to deteriorate various characteristics of the battery, so that these disadvantages are avoided.
The average particle size of the filler particles is preferably 1 μm or less, and in consideration of the dispersibility of the slurry, those having a surface treatment with aluminum, silicon, or titanium are preferable.

When the thickness of the separator is x (μm) and the porosity of the separator is y (%), it is preferably 800 (μm ·%) or less and the thickness of the separator is 16 μm or less. .
The separator pore volume is regulated to be 800 (μm ·%) or less because the smaller the pore volume of the separator is, the more easily affected by precipitates and side reactants, and the characteristic deterioration becomes significant. This is because a remarkable effect can be exhibited by applying the present invention to a battery having a separator thus regulated.
Moreover, since such a battery can achieve a thinner separator, the energy density of the battery can also be improved.

The coating layer preferably has a thickness of 1 μm to 4 μm, particularly 1 μm to 2 μm.
Although the above-described effects are exhibited as the thickness of the coating layer increases, if the thickness of the coating layer becomes too large, the load characteristics decrease due to an increase in the internal resistance of the battery, or the amount of positive and negative active materials This is because the battery energy density is reduced due to the decrease of the battery. Moreover, although it is effective even if it is thin, it is better not to be too thin to obtain a sufficient effect. In addition, since the coating layer is complicated and complicated, the trapping effect is sufficiently exhibited even when the thickness is small. Moreover, the thickness of the said coating layer shall mean the thickness in one side.

The binder concentration relative to the filler particles is preferably regulated to 30% by mass or less, and more preferably 1% by mass or more.
The upper limit is determined in this way because if the binder concentration is too high, the permeability of lithium ions to the active material layer is extremely reduced, and the resistance between the electrodes is increased, leading to a reduction in charge / discharge capacity. Because. On the other hand, the lower limit is determined because if the amount of the binder is too small, a network composed of filler particles and binder in the coating layer is difficult to form, and the trapping effect in the coating layer is reduced.

The packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is preferably 3.40 g / cc or more.
In this way, when the packing density is less than 3.40 g / cc, the reaction at the positive electrode reacts as a whole rather than a local reaction, so the deterioration at the positive electrode also proceeds uniformly. There is not much influence on the charge / discharge reaction after storage. On the other hand, when the packing density is 3.40 g / cc or more, the reaction at the positive electrode is limited to the local reaction at the outermost surface layer. Deterioration is central. For this reason, since the penetration | invasion of lithium ion in the positive electrode active material at the time of discharge and a spreading | diffusion become rate control, the grade of deterioration becomes large. From this, when the filling density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.40 g / cc or more, the effects of the present invention are sufficiently exhibited.

It is preferable that the positive electrode be charged until it becomes 4.30 V or higher, preferably 4.40 V or higher, particularly preferably 4.45 V or higher with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential.
This is because, in a battery having a configuration in which the positive electrode is charged at less than 4.30 V with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential, there is not much difference in high-temperature characteristics depending on the presence or absence of the coating layer, but the positive electrode is in relation to the lithium reference electrode potential. This is because, in a battery that is charged at 4.30 V or more, a difference in high-temperature characteristics appears remarkably depending on the presence or absence of a coating layer. In particular, in a battery in which the positive electrode is charged at 4.40 V or more, or 4.45 V or more with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential, this difference appears remarkably.

The positive electrode active material preferably includes at least lithium cobaltate in which aluminum or magnesium is dissolved, and zirconia is preferably fixed to the surface of the lithium cobaltate.
The reason for such a structure is as follows. That is, when lithium cobaltate is used as the positive electrode active material, the crystal structure becomes unstable as the charging depth increases, and the deterioration is accelerated in a high temperature atmosphere. Thus, aluminum or magnesium is dissolved in the positive electrode active material (inside the crystal) to reduce crystal distortion in the positive electrode. However, although these elements greatly contribute to the stabilization of the crystal structure, the initial charge / discharge efficiency is lowered and the discharge operating voltage is lowered. Therefore, in order to alleviate such a problem, zirconia is fixed to the lithium cobalt oxide surface.

It is desirable to apply to a battery that may be used in an atmosphere of 50 ° C or higher.
This is because the battery is rapidly deteriorated when used in an atmosphere of 50 ° C. or higher, so that the effect of applying the present invention is great.

  In order to achieve the above object, the present invention includes a filler particle composed of inorganic particles containing magnesia and a binder on the surface of a positive electrode active material layer including a positive electrode active material containing at least cobalt or manganese. Forming a coating layer to form a positive electrode; arranging a separator between the positive electrode and the negative electrode to produce an electrode body; and impregnating the electrode body with a nonaqueous electrolyte containing a solvent and an electrolyte salt And a step.

Furthermore, in order to achieve the above object, the present invention includes a step of forming a coating layer containing filler particles composed of inorganic particles containing magnesia and a binder on one surface of a separator, and at least cobalt or manganese. A step of producing an electrode body by arranging a separator so that the coating layer is located on the positive electrode side between a positive electrode provided with a positive electrode active material and a negative electrode; and a non-contained solution containing a solvent and an electrolyte salt in the electrode body And impregnating with a water electrolyte.
Since the nonaqueous electrolyte battery described above can be manufactured by such a manufacturing method, the above-described effects can be exhibited.

In the step of forming the coating layer on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer, it is preferable to use a gravure coating method or a die coating method as a method for forming the coating layer.
If a gravure coating method or a die coating method is used, intermittent coating can be carried out, so that a decrease in energy density can be suppressed to a minimum, and with this method, the binder concentration in the slurry is reduced (solid) By reducing the partial concentration as much as possible, the thin film layer can be applied with high accuracy and the solvent can be removed before the slurry component penetrates into the positive electrode active material layer, thus suppressing the increase in the internal resistance of the positive electrode. Because it can be done.

  According to the present invention, since magnesia is contained in the coating layer, it is possible to suppress dissolution of cobalt and the like from the positive electrode active material, and the coating layer disposed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer is moderate. Since the filter function is exhibited, the decomposition product of the electrolyte reacted at the positive electrode and the cobalt ions and manganese ions eluted from the positive electrode active material are trapped by the coating layer, thereby suppressing the precipitation of cobalt and manganese at the negative electrode and separator. it can. Thereby, since the damage which a negative electrode and a separator receive is reduced, there exists an outstanding effect that the deterioration of the cycling characteristics at high temperature and the deterioration of the storage characteristics at high temperature can be suppressed. Further, since the filler particles and the coating layer and the positive electrode active material are firmly bonded to each other by the binder, it is possible to suppress the coating layer from dropping from the positive electrode active material layer.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail. However, the present invention is not limited to the following best modes, and can be appropriately modified and implemented without departing from the scope of the present invention.

[Production of positive electrode]
First, lithium cobalt oxide as a positive electrode active material (one in which Al and Mg are solid-dissolved in 1.0 mol% and Zr is fixed on the surface of 0.05 mol%) and acetylene black as a carbon conductive agent And PVDF as a binder are mixed at a mass ratio of 95: 2.5: 2.5, and NMP (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone) is used as a solvent, and a special machine combination mix is used. Were mixed to prepare a positive electrode mixture slurry. Next, this positive electrode mixture slurry was applied to both surfaces of an aluminum foil as a positive electrode current collector, and further dried and rolled to form positive electrode active material layers on both surfaces of the aluminum foil. The packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.60 g / cc.

Next, NMP as a solvent was mixed with filler particles [titanium oxide (rutile type, particle size 0.38 μm, KR380 manufactured by Titanium Industry Co., Ltd.) and magnesia (particle size 0.1 μm, manufactured by Kyowa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. 500 -04R) and a copolymer (rubber-like polymer) containing an acrylonitrile structure (unit) with respect to filler particles. 7.5% by mass was mixed, and mixed and dispersed using a special machine made Filmics, to prepare a slurry in which TiO ₂ and MgO were dispersed. Next, the slurry was applied to the entire surface of one surface of the positive electrode active material layer using a die coating method, and then the solvent was dried and removed to form a coating layer on one surface of the positive electrode active material layer. . Next, in the same manner as this, a coating layer was formed on the entire other surface of the positive electrode active material layer, thereby producing a positive electrode. In addition, the thickness of the said coating layer is 4 micrometers on both surfaces (one side 2 micrometers).

(Production of negative electrode)
A carbon material (artificial graphite), CMC (carboxymethylcellulose sodium), and SBR (styrene butadiene rubber) were mixed in an aqueous solution at a mass ratio of 98: 1: 1 to prepare a negative electrode slurry. A negative electrode slurry was applied to both surfaces of a copper foil as an electric body, and further, dried and rolled to produce a negative electrode. The filling density of the negative electrode active material layer was 1.60 g / cc.

(Preparation of non-aqueous electrolyte)
LiPF ₆ was mainly dissolved at a ratio of 1.0 mol / liter in a mixed solvent in which ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) were mixed at a volume ratio of 3: 7.

[Separator type]
As the separator, a microporous membrane (thickness: 18 μm, average pore diameter 0.6 μm, porosity 45%) made of polyethylene (hereinafter sometimes abbreviated as PE) was used.

[Battery assembly]
A lead terminal is attached to each of the positive and negative electrodes, and a spiral wound electrode is pressed through a separator to produce a flattened electrode body, and then a storage space for an aluminum laminate film as a battery exterior body An electrode body was disposed therein, and a nonaqueous electrolyte solution was poured into the space, and then an aluminum laminate film was welded and sealed to prepare a battery. In this battery design, by adjusting the amount of active material of both positive and negative electrodes, it is specified that the end-of-charge voltage is 4.4 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes (the initial charge capacity of the negative electrode) at this potential. / The initial charge capacity of the positive electrode) was defined to be 1.08. The design capacity of the battery is 780 mAh.

[Preliminary experiment 1]
Since the type of binder used in the production of the separator coating layer and the dispersion treatment method were changed, and what kind of binder and the dispersion treatment method were used were investigated, the dispersion of the binder in the slurry was excellent. The results are shown in Table 1.

(Binder used and dispersion treatment method)
[1] Used binder PVDF (KF1100 manufactured by Kureha Chemical Industry, which is usually used for a positive electrode for a lithium ion battery. Hereinafter, it may be abbreviated as PVDF for positive electrode) and PVDF for gel polymer electrolyte (PVDF- HFP-PTFE copolymer (hereinafter sometimes abbreviated as PVDF for gel electrolyte) and three kinds of rubber-like polymers containing acrylonitrile units were used.

[2] Dispersion treatment method Disperse dispersion treatment method (at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes), special machine Filmics dispersion treatment method (40 m / min for 30 seconds), and bead mill dispersion treatment method (at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes) It was. For reference, untreated samples were also examined.

(Details of the experiment)
The treatment was carried out by the dispersion treatment method while changing the kind and addition concentration of the binder, and the precipitation state of filler particles (here, titanium oxide [TiO ₂ ] particles) after one day was judged.

(Experimental result)
[1] Experimental results regarding the type of binder As is apparent from Table 1, both PVDFs (PVDF for positive electrode and PVDF for gel electrolyte) tend to be more difficult to precipitate as the addition amount increases, but include acrylonitrile units. It was recognized that it tends to precipitate more easily than the rubbery polymer. Therefore, it is preferable to use a rubbery polymer containing an acrylonitrile unit as a binder. The reason for this will be described below.

  In order to exhibit the effects of the present invention, it is preferable to form a coating layer as dense as possible, and in that sense, it is preferable to use filler particles of submicron or less. However, although it depends on the particle size, the filler particles easily aggregate and it is necessary to prevent reaggregation after the particles are crushed (dispersed).

On the other hand, in order to exhibit this effect, the following functions or characteristics are required as a binder.
(I) Function to ensure binding ability to withstand battery manufacturing process (II) Function to fill gaps between filler particles due to swelling after absorbing electrolyte (III) Function to ensure dispersibility of filler particles ( (Re-aggregation prevention function)
(IV) Characteristic of less elution into the electrolyte

  Here, when inorganic particles made of titania, alumina or the like used as filler particles are used, the affinity with those having an acrylonitrile molecular structure is higher, and the binder having these groups (molecular structure) is better. High dispersibility. Therefore, a binder (acrylic acid) containing an acrylonitrile unit that can satisfy the functions (I) and (II), satisfy the functions (IV) and satisfy the functions (III) even when added in a small amount. Polymer) is desirable. In consideration of flexibility after bonding to the positive electrode active material layer (in order to ensure strength that does not easily break), a rubbery polymer is preferable. From the above, the rubbery polymer containing an acrylonitrile unit is most preferable.

[2] Experimental results on dispersion method As is clear from Table 1, when disintegrating (dispersing) particles in submicron units, precipitation is almost always generated in the disper dispersion method. In the pulverization (dispersion) method (dispersion method generally used in the paint industry) such as the Filmics method and the bead mill method, it is recognized that precipitation does not occur in most cases. In particular, in order to perform uniform coating on the positive electrode active material layer, it is desirable to use a dispersion treatment method such as a Filmics method or a bead mill method in consideration of ensuring the dispersibility of the slurry. Although not shown in Table 1, it was confirmed that sufficient dispersion performance was not obtained when dispersion was performed by the ultrasonic method.

[Preliminary experiment 2]
The coating method for forming the coating layer by applying slurry to the positive electrode active material layer was changed, and what kind of coating method should be considered.
(Coating method used)
The slurry was applied to both surfaces of the positive electrode active material layer using a dip coating method, a gravure coating method, a die coating method, and a transfer method.

(Experimental result)
In order to minimize the decrease in energy density while maximizing the effects of the present invention, a method capable of performing intermittent coating is desirable, but among the above coating methods, intermittent coating is performed in the dip coating method. It is difficult. Therefore, it is desirable to employ a gravure coating method, a die coating method, a transfer method, or a spray coating method as a coating method.

Since the filler particle-containing slurry to be coated is relatively excellent in heat resistance, the solvent removal conditions such as the drying temperature are not particularly limited. However, the binder and the solvent contained in the slurry penetrate into the positive electrode active material layer, increase the electrode plate resistance due to an increase in the binder concentration, and damage to the positive electrode (the binder used in preparing the positive electrode active material layer). This greatly affects the decrease in the adhesive strength of the positive electrode active material layer due to melting. These problems can be avoided by increasing the solid content concentration in the slurry (increasing the slurry viscosity), but it is not practical because it is difficult to apply the essential components. Therefore, as a coating method, by reducing the binder concentration in the slurry and reducing the solid content concentration as much as possible, a situation where it is easy to apply a thin film is formed, and the slurry component is further in the internal direction of the positive electrode active material layer. It is desirable to be able to remove the solvent before it penetrates. In consideration of this, the gravure coating method and the die coating method are particularly desirable. In addition, if it is the said method, the advantage that a thin film layer can be coated with sufficient precision can also be exhibited.
In addition, the solvent for dispersing the filler particles may be NMP or the like generally used in batteries, but in view of the above, a highly volatile solvent is particularly preferable. Examples of such are water, acetone, cyclohexane and the like.

[Preliminary experiment 3]
We examined the particle size of filler particles (here, titanium oxide [TiO ₂ ] particles) in the slurry used when forming the coating layer by changing the pore size of the separator. It shows in Table 2. For reference, Table 2 also shows the results for the case where no coating layer was formed.
(Separator used)
Separators having an average pore diameter of 0.1 μm and 0.6 μm were used.

(Details of the experiment)
A separator was disposed between the positive electrode having the coating layer and the negative electrode, and these were wound, and then the cross section of the separator was observed with an SEM. The average particle diameter of the titanium oxide particles in the slurry is 0.38 μm.
In addition, an actual laminate type battery was manufactured (however, a non-aqueous electrolyte was not injected), and a withstand voltage test was performed in which 200 V was applied to each battery to check whether there was a short circuit inside the battery.
(Experimental result)

  When the cross section of each separator was observed with an SEM, when the average particle size of the filler particles was smaller than the average pore size of the separator (the separator had an average pore size of 0.6 μm), the separator was peeled off from the coating layer in the manufacturing process. Due to the factors presumed to be due to the filler particles, it was confirmed that the filler particles invaded considerably from the surface layer of the separator to the inside. On the other hand, when the average particle size of the filler particles is larger than the average pore size of the separator (the average pore size of the separator is 0.1 μm), the filler particles hardly enter the separator.

Further, as apparent from Table 2, as a result of the pressure resistance test, those having an average particle size of filler particles smaller than the average pore size of the separator have a higher defect rate than those having no coating layer formed. On the other hand, when the average particle size of the filler particles is larger than the average pore size of the separator, it was found that the defect rate is equivalent (no defect) compared to the case where the coating layer is not formed. . This is because, in the former case, the influence of the winding tension and a part where the resistance is low by partially penetrating the separator at the time of crushing are partially formed. This is presumably because the filler particles hardly penetrate into the separator and thus the penetration of the separator is suppressed. In this preliminary experiment 3, an experiment was performed using a laminate battery. However, in a cylindrical battery and a square battery, the winding tension and crushing conditions are more severe than in a laminate battery, so these phenomena are more difficult. It is thought that it becomes easy to happen.
From the above, it can be seen that the average particle size of the filler particles is desirably regulated to be larger than the average pore size of the separator, and in particular, it is desirable to regulate in this manner for cylindrical batteries and prismatic batteries.
The average particle size of the filler particles is a value measured by a particle size distribution method.

[Preliminary experiment 4]
In order to investigate how much the air permeability of the separator differs depending on the type of the separator, the air permeability was measured.
(Separator used)
In carrying out this experiment, a separator (consisting of a microporous film made of PE) in which the average pore diameter, the film thickness, and the porosity were changed was used.

(Details of the experiment)
[1] Measurement of Separator Porosity Prior to measuring the air permeability of the following separator, the porosity of the separator was measured as follows.
First, a film (separator) is cut into a square shape having a side length of 10 cm, and the mass (Wg) and thickness (Dcm) are measured. Further, the mass of each material in the sample is calculated, the mass of each material [Wi (i = 1 to n)] is divided by the true specific gravity, and the volume of each material is assumed. The porosity (%) is calculated by the formula.
Porosity (%) = 100 − {(W1 / true specific gravity 1) + (W2 / true specific gravity 2) + ... + (Wn / true specific gravity n)} × 100 / (100D) (1)

However, since the separator in this specification is comprised only from PE, it is computable by following (2) Formula.
Porosity (%) =
100-{(PE mass / PE true specific gravity)} × 100 / (100D) (2)

[2] Air Permeability Measurement of Separator This measurement was performed according to JIS P8177, and a B-type Gurley Densometer (manufactured by Toyo Seiki Co., Ltd.) was used as a measuring device.
Specifically, a sample piece is fastened to a circular hole (diameter 28.6 mm, area 645 mm ² ) of the inner cylinder (mass 567 g), and air (100 cc) in the outer cylinder is transmitted from the test tube circular hole to the outside of the cylinder. The time required for this was measured, and this was taken as the air permeability.
(Experimental result)

  As is apparent from Table 3, when the average pore size of the separator is decreased, it is recognized that the air permeability is decreased (for example, separators S2 to S4). However, even if the average pore diameter of the separator is small, a decrease in air permeability is suppressed if the porosity is large (comparison between the separator S2 and the separator S3). It is also recognized that the air permeability decreases as the thickness of the separator increases (comparison between the separator S5 and the separator S6).

[Preliminary experiment 5]
As described in the background section above, it is preferable to use lithium cobalt oxide as the positive electrode active material in order to increase the capacity of the battery, but there are also problems. Therefore, in order to solve and alleviate the problem, various elements were added to lithium cobalt oxide to investigate what elements are preferable.

(Premises for selecting additive elements)
In selecting the additive element, first, the crystal structure of lithium cobaltate was analyzed, and the results are shown in FIG. Ozuku et. al, J. et al. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 141, 2972 (1994)].
As is clear from FIG. 1, when the positive electrode is charged to about 4.5 V or higher than the lithium reference electrode potential (4.4 V because the battery voltage is 0.1 V lower than the lithium reference electrode potential), the crystal structure (particularly , The crystal structure in the c-axis) was found to collapse significantly. Therefore, in lithium cobaltate, it was recognized that the crystal structure became unstable as the charging depth increased, and further, it was also found that deterioration is accelerated more when exposed to a high temperature atmosphere.

(Specific contents of additive element selection)
As a result of intensive studies to alleviate the collapse of the crystal structure, it has been found that it is very effective to dissolve Mg or Al in the crystal. The effects of both are substantially the same, but Mg has a smaller influence on the reduction rate of other characteristics described later. Therefore, it is more preferable to dissolve Mg in solid solution.

  However, although these elements greatly contribute to the stabilization of the crystal structure, they may cause a decrease in initial charge / discharge efficiency and a decrease in discharge operating voltage. In order to alleviate these problems, the present inventor conducted extensive experiments and found that the discharge operating voltage was greatly improved by adding tetravalent or pentavalent elements such as Zr, Sn, Ti, and Nb. I found out. Therefore, when lithium cobaltate to which a tetravalent or pentavalent element was added was analyzed, these elements were present on the surface of the lithium cobaltate particles and basically not dissolved in lithium cobaltate, It was kept in direct contact with lithium cobaltate. Although there are many unclear points in detail, these elements greatly reduce the interfacial charge transfer resistance, which is the resistance at the interface between lithium cobalt oxide and the electrolyte, which contributes to the improvement of the discharge operating voltage. It is guessed.

  However, in order to ensure that the lithium cobaltate and the element are in direct contact with each other, it is necessary to perform firing after adding the element material. In this case, Sn, Ti, Nb, etc. among the above elements usually work to inhibit the crystal growth of lithium cobalt oxide, so that the safety of lithium cobalt oxide itself tends to decrease (if the crystallite is small) Safety is declining). Under these circumstances, it has been found that Zr is excellent in that the discharge operating voltage can be improved without inhibiting the crystal growth of lithium cobalt oxide.

From the above, when lithium cobaltate is used at a lithium reference electrode potential of 4.3 V or higher, particularly 4.4 V or higher, Al or Mg is dissolved in the lithium cobaltate crystal so that lithium cobaltate It was found that Zr is preferably a structure that is fixed to the lithium cobaltate particle surface in order to stabilize the crystal structure and to compensate for the deterioration in characteristics caused by dissolving these elements in solid solution.
In addition, the addition ratio of Al, Mg, and Zr is not particularly limited.

[Operating environment]
As described in the background section above, in recent years, portable devices have increased in capacity and output. In particular, mobile phones are required to have high functionality such as color video, video, and use in games, and power consumption tends to increase further. Currently, with the enhancement of the functions of these high-function mobile phones, it is desired to increase the capacity of the battery, which is the power source, but since the battery performance has not improved so far, the user needs to charge it. However, it is often used for watching TV or playing games. Under such circumstances, the battery is always used at full charge, and often has a specification environment of 50 to 60 ° C. due to the effect of increased power consumption.

  In this way, the usage environment has changed greatly from the conventional usage environment for calls and e-mails as mobile devices such as movies and games have become highly functional, so the battery operates in a wide range from room temperature to around 50-60 ° C. It has become necessary to guarantee the temperature range. In particular, higher capacity and higher output generate more heat inside the battery, and the operating environment of the battery is also getting higher, and it is necessary to ensure reliability at high temperatures.

  In consideration of this, we are focusing on improving performance through cycle tests in a 40-60 ° C. environment and storage tests in a 60 ° C. atmosphere. Specifically, the conventional storage test had a strong implication of an accelerated test at room temperature, but with the performance of the battery, the ability to reach the limit level of the material may be brought out. The test implications have gradually faded and are moving to tests that are close to the durability test at the actual use level. In view of these circumstances, this time, the charge storage test (the higher the end-of-charge voltage of the manufactured battery, the more severe the condition of deterioration, so the battery with 4.2V design is at 80 ° C for 4 days, and the battery with more design is not It was decided to study the difference from the prior art with an emphasis on comparison at 60 ° C. for 5 days.

[First embodiment]
Example 1
As Example 1, the battery shown in the best mode was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as the present invention battery E1.

(Example 2)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the filler particles used had a mass ratio of titanium oxide to magnesia of 5/5.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as the present invention battery E2.

(Example 3)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the filler particles consisted only of magnesia were used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as the present invention battery E3.

(Comparative Example 1)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the filler particles consisted only of titanium oxide.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as a comparative battery V1.

(Comparative Example 2)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the coating layer was not provided on the positive electrode.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery V2.

(Experiment)
Table 4 shows the results obtained by examining the charge storage characteristics (remaining capacity after charge storage), the high temperature cycle characteristics, and the adhesion of the coating layers of the inventive batteries E1 to E3 and the comparative batteries V1 and V2.

[Charging / discharging conditions]
-Charging conditions After a constant current charge at a current of 1.0 It (750 mA) until the battery voltage becomes a set voltage (battery design voltage, 4.40 V in all batteries in this experiment), the set voltage And charging until the current value becomes 1/20 It (37.5 mA).
-Discharge condition The condition that constant current discharge is performed up to a battery voltage of 2.75 V at a current of 1.0 It (750 mA).
The charging / discharging interval is 10 minutes.

[Charge storage characteristics]
-Storage conditions It is the conditions that charge / discharge is performed once under the above-mentioned charging / discharging conditions, and the battery charged to the set voltage under the above-mentioned charging conditions is left at 60 ° C. for 5 days.
・ Calculation of remaining capacity The battery is cooled to room temperature, discharged under the same conditions as the above discharge conditions, the remaining capacity is measured, and the first discharge capacity after the storage test and the discharge capacity before the storage test are used. The remaining capacity was calculated from the following equation (3).
Remaining capacity (%) =
First discharge capacity after storage test / Discharge capacity before storage test x 100 (3)

[High temperature cycle characteristics]
This is a condition that the battery is repeatedly charged and discharged under the charge and discharge conditions in a 45 ° C. atmosphere. The capacity retention rate was calculated from the following equation (4) using the discharge capacity at the first cycle and the discharge capacity at the 150th cycle.
Capacity maintenance ratio (%) = discharge capacity at 150th cycle / discharge capacity at the first cycle (4)
[Adhesiveness of coating layer]
Each battery after completion of the high temperature cycle characteristics was disassembled and examined visually.

[Discussion]
As is clear from Table 4, the batteries E1 to E3 of the present invention in which the coating layer containing magnesia (MgO) as filler particles is formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer has titanium oxide (TiO ₂ ) as filler particles. Compared with the comparative battery V1 in which the coating layer used alone (the coating layer not containing magnesia as filler particles) or the comparative battery V2 in which the coating layer is not formed, the remaining capacity after charge storage is increased. It is recognized that
This is considered to be due to the following reasons. In addition, as above-mentioned, the kind of positive electrode active material of this invention battery E1-E3 and comparative battery V1, V2 is the same, and it demonstrates on the assumption that the positive electrode active material of all the batteries contains Co. To do.

In the comparative battery V1 that does not include MgO in the coating layer and the comparative battery V2 that does not include the coating layer, when exposed to a highly oxidizing atmosphere, ethylene carbonate (EC) or the like contained in the electrolytic solution is decomposed and H _2. O is generated, and this H ₂ O reacts with LiPF ₆ that is an electrolyte salt to generate HF. As a result, Co and HF contained in the positive electrode active material react to dissolve Co. On the other hand, in the present invention batteries E1 to E3 containing MgO in the coating layer, even when H ₂ O is generated by exposure to a highly oxidizing atmosphere, the H ₂ O and MgO cause hydrolysis and become alkaline. Therefore, even if acidic HF is generated, it can be neutralized, and as a result, it is possible to suppress dissolution of Co from the positive electrode active material. Thus, in the batteries E1 to E3 of the present invention, not only the physical trapping effect (filter effect) of Co by providing the coating layer but also the chemical trapping effect by including MgO in the coating layer can be obtained. it can.

However, even when the coating layer contains MgO, the present battery E1 in which the ratio of MgO to the total amount of filler particles is 10% by mass (mass ratio, TiO ₂ / MgO = 9/1) The present invention battery E2 in which the ratio of MgO to the total amount is 50% by mass (mass ratio, TiO ₂ / MgO = 5/5) and the present invention battery E3 in which all filler particles are MgO have superior high-temperature cycle characteristics. It is recognized that

This is considered to be due to the following reasons. That is, when considering the effect of the present invention, it is estimated that the effect is higher as the proportion of MgO increases, but MgO has very poor adhesion to the binder. Therefore, as is clear from Table 4, in the present invention battery E2 having a large proportion of MgO with respect to the total amount of filler particles and the present invention battery E3 in which the filler particles are all MgO, the coating layer slipped from the positive electrode active material layer in the middle of the cycle. Thus, the effect of the coating layer cannot be sufficiently exhibited, whereas in the battery E1 of the present invention, the proportion of MgO with respect to the total amount of filler particles is small. . From the above, it is preferable to use a mixture of MgO alone and other inorganic particles such as TiO ₂ as filler particles, and the ratio of MgO to the total amount of filler particles is 10% by mass. The following is preferable. On the other hand, regarding the lower limit of the ratio of MgO to the total amount of filler particles, even if MgO is contained even in a very small amount, the effect of adding MgO can be exhibited, but in order to obtain a sufficient addition effect, the total amount of filler particles The ratio of MgO to is preferably 1% by mass or more.
Moreover, since MgO has a low tap density, it becomes bulky and it is difficult to form a thin microporous layer. Therefore, it is preferable to mix with filler particles such as TiO ₂ from the viewpoint of increasing the battery capacity by thinning the coating layer.

In consideration of the fact that MgO has the effect of neutralizing HF that dissolves Co in the positive electrode active material as described above, the coating layer containing MgO is provided between the positive electrode and the separator (particularly on the positive electrode surface). It can be seen that it is preferable to arrange the
Further, although not shown in Table 4, when used as aqueous solvent in the binder, MgO and H ₂ O is causing the hydrolyzing reaction solvent is alkaline, the slurry resulting in gelation. Therefore, it was found that it is preferable to use an organic solvent type binder.

[Prerequisites for conducting experiments described later]
The configuration of the present invention was examined from the viewpoints of end-of-charge voltage, packing density of the positive electrode active material layer, physical properties of the coating layer formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer, and physical properties of the separator.
In order to highlight the advantages of providing the coating layer, the experiment was conducted without chemical trapping (that is, the filler particles do not contain MgO). Therefore, although the battery has a coating layer, the configuration is slightly different from that of the present invention. Therefore, the name of such a battery is used as a reference battery (the following reference battery is a battery similar to the comparative battery V1). However, the following experimental data are considered to be applicable to the present invention because they are the same as the present invention except that chemical trapping is not performed.
A battery without a coating layer was a comparative battery as described above.

[First Reference Example]
The end-of-charge voltage is 4.40 V, the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.60 g / cc, and the physical properties of the coating layer formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer (the binder concentration with respect to titanium oxide and the thickness of the coating layer) are fixed. On the other hand, the relationship between the physical properties of the separator and the charge storage characteristics was examined by changing the separator, and the results are shown below.
(Reference Example 1)
A copolymer that uses acetone as a solvent, uses only titanium oxide as filler particles, defines the ratio of the filler particles to acetone to 10% by mass, and contains an acrylonitrile structure (unit) as a binder ( A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Example 1 of the first example except that a rubber-like polymer) mixed at a ratio of 10% by mass with respect to the filler particles was used as a slurry for the coating layer. .
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery A1.

(Reference Example 2)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Reference Example 1 except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.1 μm, a film thickness of 12 μm, and a porosity of 38% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery A2.

(Reference Example 3)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Reference Example 1, except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.6 μm, a film thickness of 23 μm, and a porosity of 48% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery A3.

(Comparative Example 1)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2 of the first example except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.1 μm, a film thickness of 12 μm, and a porosity of 38% was used.
The battery thus manufactured is hereinafter referred to as a comparative battery Z1.

(Comparative Example 2)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.1 μm, a film thickness of 16 μm, and a porosity of 47% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as a comparative battery Z2.

(Comparative Example 3)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.05 μm, a film thickness of 20 μm, and a porosity of 38% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Z3.

(Comparative Example 4)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.6 μm, a film thickness of 23 μm, and a porosity of 48% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Z4.

(Comparative Example 5)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that a separator having an average pore diameter of 0.6 μm, a film thickness of 27 μm, and a porosity of 52% was used.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Z5.

(Experiment)
Since the charge storage characteristics (remaining capacity after charge storage) of the reference batteries A1 to A3 and the comparative batteries Z1 to Z5 were examined, the results are shown in Table 5. Table 5 also shows the experimental results of the comparative battery V2 shown in the first embodiment. Further, based on the results obtained here, the correlation between the physical properties of the separator and the remaining capacity after charge storage was examined, and the results are shown in FIG. The charge / discharge conditions, the storage conditions, and the remaining capacity calculation method are the same as those in the experiment of the first embodiment.

[Discussion]
(1) Consideration concerning advantages of providing a coating layer As is clear from the results of Table 5, in all batteries, the design voltage of the battery was 4.40 V, and the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.60 g / cc. Nevertheless, it can be seen that the remaining capacity of the reference batteries A1 to A3 in which the coating layer is formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer is greatly improved as compared with the comparative batteries Z1 to Z5 and V2. The reason for such experimental results will be described in detail below.

There are several possible causes for the deterioration of the charge storage characteristics, but the positive electrode active material is used up to 4.50V (battery voltage is 0.1V lower than this, 4.40V) based on the lithium reference electrode standard. If you consider
The main factors are considered to be (I) decomposition of the electrolyte in a strong oxidizing atmosphere due to an increase in the charging potential of the positive electrode, and (II) deterioration due to destabilization of the structure of the charged positive electrode active material.

  These not only cause the problem of deterioration of the positive electrode and the electrolytic solution, but particularly, due to the decomposition of the electrolytic solution considered to be caused by (I) and (II) and the elution of elements from the positive electrode active material. This is considered to affect the clogging of the separator and the deterioration of the negative electrode active material due to deposition on the negative electrode. Although details will be described later, it is considered that the influence on the latter separator and the negative electrode is particularly large in consideration of this result.

  In particular, in a battery using a separator having a small pore volume (comparative batteries Z1 and Z2), if these by-products are clogged even in a small amount, the performance of the separator is greatly reduced, and the positive electrode is connected to the negative electrode through the separator. It is thought that the rate at which these reactants move is high and increases, and as a result, the degree of deterioration is considered to have increased. Therefore, the degree of deterioration of the battery is considered to depend on the pore volume of the separator.

  The reason why the charge storage performance is improved in the reference batteries A1 to A3 having the positive electrode on which the coating layer is formed is that the electrolytic solution decomposed on the positive electrode, Co eluted from the positive electrode is trapped by the coating layer, and the separator or the negative electrode It is presumed that deposition → reaction (deterioration) and clogging are suppressed, that is, the coating layer exhibits a filter function.

  The binder of the coating layer does not inhibit the air permeability at the time of producing the separator, but many of them swell about twice or more after injecting the electrolytic solution, and thereby the filler particles of the coating layer are appropriately filled. . This coating layer is complicated and the filler particles are firmly bonded to each other by the binder component, so that the strength is improved and the filter effect is sufficiently exhibited (the complicated structure even if the thickness is small). And the trapping effect is increased). The determination index of the electrolyte absorbability is difficult, but it can be roughly grasped by the time required for dropping one drop of PC to disappear.

  In addition, even if the filter layer is formed only with the polymer layer, the charge storage characteristics are improved to some extent. However, in this case, the filter effect depends on the thickness of the polymer layer, so the effect is sufficient if the thickness of the polymer layer is not increased. In addition, the function of the filter is reduced if the polymer is not completely porous due to swelling of the polymer. Furthermore, since the entire surface of the positive electrode is covered, the permeability of the electrolytic solution to the positive electrode is deteriorated, and adverse effects such as a reduction in load characteristics are increased. Therefore, in order to minimize the influence on other properties while exhibiting the filter effect, the coating layer containing filler particles (in this example, titanium oxide) rather than simply forming the filter layer with a polymer alone. It is advantageous to form a (filter layer).

  Considering the above, in a battery equipped with a positive electrode with a coating layer formed, the degree of deterioration is almost the same regardless of the type of separator. The deterioration factors are the deterioration of the electrolyte and the positive electrode itself. It can be considered that this is due to damage.

・ Reason that the effect of improving the charge storage characteristics is the above filter effect After disassembling the battery after the above test and observing discoloration of the separator and the negative electrode surface, in the comparative battery without the coating layer, The separator was discolored brownish and deposits could be confirmed on the negative electrode as well, whereas in the battery of the present invention in which the coating layer was formed, deposits and discoloration on the separator and negative electrode surfaces were not observed. The coating layer was discolored. From this result, it is estimated that the damage of the separator and the negative electrode is reduced by suppressing the movement of the reaction product at the positive electrode in the coating layer.
In addition, these reactants are reduced by moving to the negative electrode, and are more likely to develop into cyclic side reactions such as self-discharge in which the next reaction proceeds, but by being trapped near the positive electrode, In addition to being able to suppress the circulatory reaction of the reactant, there is a possibility that the reactant itself exhibits an effect as a film forming agent.

(2) Consideration regarding the separator Further, as described above, in the reference batteries A1 to A3 using the positive electrode having the coating layer, the charge storage characteristics are improved, but the improvement rate is higher as the thickness of the separator is smaller. Furthermore, when the pore volume (film thickness x porosity), which is one of the physical properties of the separator and greatly affects the film thickness, is used as an index, as shown in FIG. 2, about 800 (unit: μm ·%) It has been found that the effect of the present invention appears remarkably at the boundary.

  Here, in the comparative batteries Z1 to Z5 and V2 using the positive electrode on which the coating layer is not formed, the correlation with the film thickness of the separator does not completely match, but as a tendency, the film thickness of the separator is reduced. In such a case, the degree of storage deterioration becomes very large. In general, the separator needs to be strong enough to withstand the steps in manufacturing the battery, in addition to ensuring insulation inside the battery. When the separator film thickness is reduced, the energy density of the battery is improved, but the membrane strength (tensile strength and piercing strength) is reduced, so that the average pore diameter of the micropores must be reduced. The rate decreases. On the other hand, when the thickness of the separator is large, the strength of the film can be secured to some extent, so that the average pore diameter and porosity of the microporous can be selected relatively freely.

  However, as described above, increasing the film thickness directly leads to a decrease in the energy density of the battery. Therefore, by maintaining a certain thickness (generally around 20 μm) and increasing the average pore diameter, It is generally preferred to increase the porosity. However, when the coating layer is provided on the positive electrode while increasing the average pore diameter of the microporous material, as described above, the defect rate of the battery tends to increase due to the penetration of the filler particles into the microporous material. Specifically, it is necessary to increase the porosity while reducing the hole diameter.

As a result of diligent investigation in view of these circumstances, as a separator that can be used when using a positive electrode with a coating layer,
(I) The film thickness is sufficient to ensure the energy density. (II) Fine enough to reduce battery defects due to the penetration of filler particles that have fallen from the coating layer formed on the positive electrode into the microporous interior. From the three points of having a porous average pore diameter (III) having a porosity that can maintain the strength of the separator, the pore volume of the separator to which the present invention can be applied is calculated by film thickness × porosity. It has been found that it is desirable to be 1500 (unit: μm ·%) or less.

(3) Summary From the above results, in the 4.4V specification battery, regardless of the material of the separator and the like, the battery having the positive electrode with the coating layer has greatly improved charge storage characteristics. When (film thickness × porosity) is 1500 (unit: μm ·%) or less, particularly 800 (unit: μm ·%) or less, the effect can be remarkably exhibited.

[Second Embodiment]
Two types of separators were used (S1 and S2), the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.60 g / cc, and the physical properties of the coating layer formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer (the binder concentration with respect to titanium oxide and the coating layer) The thickness was fixed, and the charge end voltage was changed, and the relationship between the charge end voltage and the charge storage characteristics was examined. The results are shown below.
(Reference Example 1)
The battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.20V, and the positive / negative capacity ratio was designed to be 1.08 at this potential, in the same manner as in Reference Example 1 of the first reference example. A battery was produced.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery B1.

(Reference Example 2)
The battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.20 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes was designed to be 1.08 at this potential, as in Reference Example 2 of the first reference example. A battery was produced.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery B2.

(Comparative Examples 1 and 2)
Batteries were produced in the same manner as in Reference Examples 1 and 2, respectively, except that no coating layer was formed on the positive electrode.
The batteries thus produced are hereinafter referred to as comparative batteries Y1 and Y2, respectively.

(Comparative Example 3)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that the battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.30 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes was 1.08 at this potential.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Y3.

(Comparative Example 4)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2 except that the battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.30 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes was 1.08 at this potential.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Y4.

(Comparative Example 5)
A battery was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that the battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.35 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes was 1.08 at this potential.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Y5.

(Comparative Example 6)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2 except that the battery was designed so that the end-of-charge voltage was 4.35 V, and the capacity ratio of positive and negative electrodes was 1.08 at this potential.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery Y6.

(Experiment)
Since the charge storage characteristics (remaining capacity after charge storage) of the reference batteries B1 and B2 and the comparative batteries Y1 to Y6 were examined, the results are shown in Tables 6 and 7. The table also shows the results of the reference batteries A1 and A2 and the comparative batteries V2 and Z1.
Also, as a representative example, since the charge / discharge characteristics of the comparative battery Z1 and the reference battery A2 were compared, the former characteristics are shown in FIG. 3, and the latter characteristics are shown in FIG.
In addition, charging / discharging conditions and storage conditions are as follows.

[Charging / discharging conditions]
The conditions are the same as in the experiment of the first embodiment.
[Storage conditions]
The reference batteries A1, A2 and the comparative batteries V2, Z1, Y3 to Y6 have the same conditions as the experiment of the first embodiment, and the reference batteries B1, B2 and the comparative batteries Y1, Y2 are 4 days at 80 ° C. The condition is to leave it alone.

[Calculation of remaining capacity]
Calculation was performed in the same manner as in the experiment of the first example.

[Discussion]
As is clear from Tables 6 and 7, in the charge storage test, the reference battery in which the coating layer was formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer had no coating layer even though the separators were the same. It is recognized that the remaining capacity after charge storage is significantly improved as compared with the comparative battery (for example, when the reference battery B1 is compared with the comparative battery Y1, or when the reference battery B2 is compared with the comparative battery Y2). In particular, in the comparative batteries Y4, Y6, and Z1 in which the separator void volume is smaller than 800 μm ·% and the charge end voltage is 4.30 V or more, the degree of deterioration of charge storage characteristics tends to be very large. On the other hand, in the reference battery A2 in which the coating layer is provided on the positive electrode, it is recognized that the deterioration of the charge storage characteristics is suppressed.

  Further, as apparent from Table 6, in comparative batteries Y4, Y6, and Z1, in which the separator pore volume is smaller than 800 μm ·% and the end-of-charge voltage is 4.30 V or more, when recharging after confirming the remaining capacity, In addition, it was confirmed that the charging curve meanders and the charge amount greatly increases (see the meandering portion 1 in FIG. 3 showing the charge / discharge characteristics of the comparative battery Z1). On the other hand, in the reference battery A2 provided with a coating layer on the positive electrode, the above behavior was not confirmed (see FIG. 4 showing the charge / discharge characteristics of the reference battery A2).

  Furthermore, when the pore volume of the separator exceeded 800 μm ·%, the above behavior was not confirmed in the comparison batteries Y3 and Y5 with the charge end voltages of 4.30V and 4.35V, but the charge end voltage However, the above behavior was confirmed in the comparative battery V2 of 4.40V. On the other hand, in the reference battery A1 in which the coating layer was provided on the positive electrode, the above behavior was not confirmed. When the end-of-charge voltage was 4.20 V, the above behavior was not confirmed regardless of the pore volume of the separator (in the case of not only the comparative battery Y1 but also the comparative battery Y2).

  The above results indicate that the smaller the pore volume of the separator, the greater the degree of deterioration. Moreover, although it has also shown that the degree of deterioration becomes so remarkable that the charge storage voltage of a battery is high, as long as the behavior with a charge end voltage of 4.20V and a charge end voltage of 4.30V is compared, both of them are shown. It can be seen that the deterioration modes are greatly different, and the degree of deterioration is clearly noticeable when the end-of-charge voltage is 4.30V.

  Although this does not go beyond the scope of estimation, in the storage test where the end-of-charge voltage is 4.20 V, the structure of the positive electrode is not so much loaded, and although there is an influence due to the decomposition of the electrolyte, the positive electrode It is presumed that the influence of elution of Co, etc. from is small. Therefore, the degree of improvement effect due to the presence or absence of the coating layer remains low to some extent. In contrast, the higher the end-of-charge voltage (storage voltage) of the battery, the lower the stability of the crystal structure of the charged positive electrode, and the acid resistance of cyclic carbonates and chain carbonates generally used in lithium ion batteries. Because it approaches the limit of the conversion potential, decomposition of side reactions and electrolytes progressed more than expected at the voltage at which lithium ion batteries have been used so far, resulting in increased damage to the negative electrode and separator It is guessed.

  The details of the abnormal charging behavior are unknown, but considering the disappearance of the behavior after several cycles, it is not due to conduction due to precipitation of Li, Co, Mn, etc., or damage to the separator, Presumed to be caused by a kind of shuttle reaction (generation of a shuttle substance as a side reaction product) due to a highly oxidized atmosphere or a charge / discharge failure due to clogging of the separator (a side reaction generated at a battery voltage of 4.30 V or more) Redox reaction). The basis of this behavior is presumed to be caused by the oxidation-reduction reaction between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, and the coating layer exhibits a filter effect, thereby suppressing the movement of products and the like from the positive electrode to the negative electrode. It can be improved so that it does not occur.

  From the above results, this effect is particularly effective when the pore volume of the separator is 800 μm ·% or less, and the charge storage voltage is 4.30 V or more (the positive electrode potential is 4.40 V with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential). In particular, the discharge operating voltage is 4.35 V or more (positive electrode potential with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential is 4.45 V or more), and more particularly 4.40 V or more (positive electrode potential with respect to the lithium reference electrode potential is 4.50 V or more). It is effective in that it can improve battery life, improve the remaining / recovery rate, and eliminate abnormal charging behavior.

[Third reference example]
The end-of-charge voltage is 4.40 V, the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.60 g / cc, and the separator is fixed to S1, while the physical properties of the coating layer formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer (type of filler particles and The relationship between the physical properties of the coating layer and the charge storage characteristics was examined by changing the binder concentration, and the results are shown below.

(Reference Examples 1-4)
The first reference is the same as that used in forming the positive electrode coating layer except that the binder concentration with respect to the filler particles (titanium oxide) is 30% by mass, 20% by mass, 15% by mass, and 5% by mass, respectively. A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Reference Example 1 of the example.
The batteries thus produced are hereinafter referred to as reference batteries C1 to C4, respectively.

(Reference Example 5)
The battery was the same as in Reference Example 1 of the first reference example, except that aluminum oxide (particle size 0.64 μm, AKP-3000 manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical) was used as filler particles in the slurry used for forming the coating layer of the positive electrode. Was made.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery C5.

(Reference Examples 6 and 7)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Reference Example 1 of the first reference example, except that the thickness of the coating layer of the positive electrode was 1 μm and 2 μm on both sides (0.5 μm and 1 μm on one side, respectively). Produced.
The batteries thus produced are hereinafter referred to as reference batteries C6 and C7.

(Experiment)
Since the charge storage characteristics (remaining capacity after charge storage) of the reference batteries C1 to C7 were examined, the results are shown in Table 8. The table also shows the results of the reference battery A1 and the comparative battery V2.
The charge / discharge conditions, the storage conditions, and the remaining capacity calculation method are the same as those in the experiment of the first embodiment.

[Discussion]
(1) Overall Consideration As is apparent from Table 8, in the charge storage test, the reference batteries A1, C1 to C7 in which the coating layer was formed on the surface of the positive electrode active material layer were the comparative batteries V2 in which the coating layer was not formed. It can be seen that the remaining capacity after storage after charging is greatly improved.
This is considered to be due to the same reason as shown in the experiment of the first embodiment.

(2) Consideration about binder concentration with respect to filler particles (titanium oxide) When comparing reference batteries A1 and C1 to C4, the remaining capacity after charge storage varies slightly depending on the amount of binder contained in the coating layer. In addition, it is recognized that the reference batteries A1 and C1 to C3 having a binder amount of 10% by mass to 30% by mass have a larger remaining capacity after charge storage than the reference battery C4 having a binder amount of 5% by mass. .

  Considering the effects of the present invention, it is presumed that the greater the thickness of the coating layer and the higher the concentration of the binder, the higher the function of the filter. However, these increase the resistance between the electrodes (distance and lithium). Although not shown in Table 8, when the binder concentration with respect to the filler particles exceeds 50% by mass, the battery is charged / discharged only about half of the designed capacity. It was not possible, and it turned out that the function as a battery falls significantly. This is presumably because the permeability of lithium ions was extremely lowered because the binder was filled between the filler particles of the coating layer, or the binder covered a part of the surface of the positive electrode active material layer.

  From experience, when the method of the present invention is used, the battery characteristics may be deteriorated when the amount of the binder exceeds 30% by mass, particularly 50% by mass. Moreover, even if the amount of the binder is 1% by mass, the binder is fairly uniformly dispersed in the coating layer by the above-described dispersion treatment method such as the Filmics method. It was found that the function of is very high. The binder amount is preferably as small as possible, but considering the physical strength that can withstand the processing during battery production, the effect of the filter, ensuring the dispersibility of the inorganic particles in the slurry, etc., 1 to the filler particles It is preferable to restrict to the range of 30% by mass.

(3) Consideration about the type of filler particles When the reference battery A1 and the reference battery C5 are compared, it is recognized that there is almost no difference between the two in terms of the remaining capacity after charge storage. Therefore, it turns out that it is not influenced so much by the kind of filler particle mixed with MgO.

(4) Consideration about the thickness of the coating layer When the reference battery A1 and the reference battery C6 are compared with the reference battery C7, the reference battery A1 and the reference battery C6 having a coating layer thickness of 2 μm or more on both sides (1 μm or more on one side). It can be seen that the remaining capacity after charge storage is increased compared to the reference battery C7 having a coating layer thickness of 1 μm on both sides (0.5 μm on one side). However, when the thickness of the coating layer becomes too large, although not shown in Table 8, the load characteristics of the battery and the energy density are reduced. Considering these things, it is preferable to regulate the thickness of the coating layer to 4 μm or less, particularly 2 μm or less, more desirably 1 μm to 2 μm on one side. In the reference battery A1 and the reference batteries C6 and C7, the thickness of the coating layer on one side is 1/2 of the thickness on both sides (that is, the thickness of the coating layer on one side and the thickness of the coating layer on the other side). However, the present invention is not limited to such a configuration, and the thickness of the coating layer on one surface may be different from the thickness of the coating layer on the other surface. However, also in this case, the thickness of each coating layer is preferably within the above range.

[Fourth Reference Example]
Because the end-of-charge voltage was 4.40 V, the coating layer thickness was 4 μm, S2 was used as the separator, the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was changed, and the relationship between the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer and the charge storage characteristics was investigated. The results are shown below.

(Reference Example 1)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Reference Example 2 of the first reference example, except that the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.20 g / cc.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as reference battery D1.

(Comparative Example 1)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 of the first reference example except that the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.20 g / cc.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery X1.

(Comparative Example 2)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 of the first reference example, except that the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.40 g / cc.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery X2.

(Comparative Example 3)
A battery was fabricated in the same manner as Comparative Example 1 of the first reference example except that the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was 3.80 g / cc.
The battery thus produced is hereinafter referred to as comparative battery X3.

(Experiment)
The charge storage characteristics (remaining capacity after charge storage) of the reference battery D1 and the comparative batteries X1 to X3 were examined, and the results are shown in Table 9. The table also shows the results of the reference battery A2 and the comparative battery Z1.
The charge / discharge conditions, the storage conditions, and the remaining capacity calculation method are the same as those in the experiment of the first embodiment.

  As is apparent from Table 9, when the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.20 g / cc, it is recognized that not only the reference battery D1 but also the comparative battery X1 has a certain remaining capacity. When the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.40 g / cc or more, it is recognized that the reference battery A2 has a certain remaining capacity, but the comparative batteries Z1, X2, and X3 have extremely low remaining capacity. It is recognized that This is presumed to be a phenomenon caused by the problem of the surface area in contact with the electrolyte and the degree of deterioration at the site where the side reaction occurs.

  Specifically, when the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is low (less than 3.40 g / cc), the deterioration proceeds uniformly, not locally, so the charge after storage is not increased. There is no significant effect on the discharge reaction. Therefore, capacity deterioration is suppressed to some extent not only in the reference battery D1 but also in the comparative battery X1. On the other hand, when the packing density is high (in the case of 3.40 g / cc or more), the deterioration at the outermost surface layer is the center. In comparative batteries Z1, X2, and X3, While the penetration and diffusion of lithium ions are rate-limiting and the degree of deterioration increases, the presence of the coating layer in the reference battery A2 suppresses deterioration at the outermost surface layer, so It is presumed that the penetration / diffusion of lithium ions is not rate-limiting and the degree of deterioration is reduced.

  In addition, when the packing density of the positive electrode active material is low, when the filler particle slurry is coated on the surface of the positive electrode during the production of the positive electrode, the slurry easily penetrates into the positive electrode, and as a result, the binder concentration in the positive electrode is reduced. It becomes too high and the electrode plate resistance of the positive electrode tends to increase. Therefore, it is preferable that the positive electrode has a high packing density in forming the coating layer.

In addition, when the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer was fixed and the packing density of the negative electrode active material layer was changed from 1.30 g / cc to 1.80 g / cc, there was no difference as much as the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer. I couldn't. Essentially, the side reaction product or dissolved product generated on the positive electrode is trapped by the coating layer and is prevented from moving to the separator or the negative electrode, so that the packing density of the negative electrode active material layer is effective. Do not depend. The negative electrode only contributes to the reduction reaction of by-products and dissolved substances, and is not limited to graphite as long as it is a substance capable of causing a redox reaction.
From the above results, it is particularly effective when the packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.40 g / cc or more. The packing density of the negative electrode active material layer and the type of active material are not particularly limited.

[Other matters]
(1) The binder material is not limited to a copolymer containing an acrylonitrile unit, but PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride), PAN (polyacrylonitrile), SBR (styrene butadiene rubber). Etc., modified products and derivatives thereof, polyacrylic acid derivatives and the like. However, a copolymer or polyacrylic acid derivative containing an acrylonitrile unit is preferable in order to exhibit the effect as a binder with a small amount of addition.

(2) The positive electrode active material is not limited to the above lithium cobaltate, but is a cobalt-nickel-manganese lithium composite oxide, an aluminum-nickel-manganese lithium composite oxide, and an aluminum-nickel-cobalt composite oxide. A lithium composite oxide containing cobalt or manganese such as spinel-type lithium manganate may be used. Preferably, it is a positive electrode active material whose capacity increases by further charging with respect to a specific capacity of 4.3 V at the lithium reference electrode potential, and preferably has a layered structure. Moreover, these positive electrode active materials may be used independently and may be mixed with the other positive electrode active material.

(3) The method of mixing the positive electrode mixture is not limited to the wet mixing method, and is a method in which the positive electrode active material and the conductive agent are dry mixed in advance, and then PVDF and NMP are mixed and stirred. Also good.

(4) The negative electrode active material is not limited to the above graphite, and any material that can insert and desorb lithium ions, such as graphite, coke, tin oxide, metallic lithium, silicon, and mixtures thereof. Any type.

(5) The lithium salt of the electrolytic solution is not limited to the above LiPF ₆ , and LiBF ₄ , LiN (SO ₂ CF ₃ ) ₂ , LiN (SO ₂ C ₂ F ₅ ) ₂ , LiPF _6-X ( C _n F _{2n + 1} ) _X [where 1 <x <6, n = 1 or 2], etc., or a mixture of two or more of these may be used. The concentration of the lithium salt is not particularly limited, but is preferably regulated to 0.8 to 1.5 mol per liter of the electrolyte. Further, the solvent of the electrolytic solution is not limited to ethylene carbonate (EC) or diethyl carbonate (DEC), but propylene carbonate (PC), γ-butyrolactone (GBL), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), dimethyl carbonate. A carbonate-based solvent such as (DMC) is preferable, and a combination of a cyclic carbonate and a chain carbonate is more preferable.

(6) The present invention is not limited to a liquid battery, but can be applied to a gel polymer battery. Examples of the polymer material in this case include polyether solid polymer, polycarbonate solid polymer, polyacrylonitrile solid polymer, oxetane polymer, epoxy polymer, a copolymer composed of two or more of these, or a crosslinked polymer. A molecule or PVDF is exemplified, and a solid electrolyte in which this polymer material, a lithium salt, and an electrolyte are combined into a gel can be used.

  The present invention can be applied to a drive power source of a mobile information terminal such as a mobile phone, a notebook personal computer, and a PDA, for example, in applications that require a particularly high capacity. In addition, it can be expected to be used in high output applications that require continuous driving at high temperatures and applications where the battery operating environment is severe, such as HEVs and electric tools.

It is a graph which shows the relationship between the change of the crystal structure of lithium cobaltate, and electric potential. It is a graph which shows the relationship between the residual capacity | capacitance after charge storage, and the void | hole volume of a separator. It is a graph which shows the relationship between the charging / discharging capacity | capacitance and battery voltage in the comparison battery Z1. It is a graph which shows the relationship between charging / discharging capacity | capacitance and battery voltage in reference battery A2.

Explanation of symbols

    1 Meandering part

Claims (16)

An electrode body composed of a positive electrode having a positive electrode active material layer containing a positive electrode active material, a negative electrode having a negative electrode active material, and a separator interposed between the two electrodes, and impregnating the electrode body, and containing a solvent and an electrolyte salt In a non-aqueous electrolyte battery comprising a non-aqueous electrolyte,
The positive electrode active material contains at least cobalt or manganese, and a coating layer containing filler particles and a binder is formed on the positive electrode side surface of the separator,
When the thickness of the separator is x (μm) and the porosity of the separator is y (%), a value obtained by multiplying x and y is 800 (μm ·%) or less, A non-aqueous electrolyte battery having a thickness of 16 μm or less .   The non-aqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein the filler particles include inorganic particles. The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 2, wherein the inorganic particles include rutile type titania and / or alumina.   The non-aqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 2, wherein the inorganic particles include magnesia.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 4, wherein a ratio of the magnesia to the total amount of the filler particles is 1% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the coating layer is formed on the entire surface of the positive electrode side of the separator.   The non-aqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein the binder is an organic solvent-based binder.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein an average particle diameter of the filler particles is larger than an average pore diameter of the separator.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein the coating layer has a thickness of 1 μm or more and 4 μm or less.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein a concentration of the binder with respect to the filler particles is 30% by mass or less.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 10, wherein a concentration of the binder with respect to the filler particles is 1% by mass or more.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to claim 1, wherein a packing density of the positive electrode active material layer is 3.40 g / cc or more.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the positive electrode is charged until it becomes 4.30 V or higher with respect to a lithium reference electrode potential.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the positive electrode is charged until it becomes 4.40 V or higher with respect to a lithium reference electrode potential.   The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the positive electrode is charged until it becomes 4.45 V or higher with respect to a lithium reference electrode potential.   The positive electrode active material contains at least lithium cobaltate in which aluminum or magnesium is dissolved, and zirconia is fixed to the lithium cobaltate surface. The nonaqueous electrolyte battery according to item.