JP5013731B2 - Pneumatic tire - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5013731B2
JP5013731B2 JP2006096530A JP2006096530A JP5013731B2 JP 5013731 B2 JP5013731 B2 JP 5013731B2 JP 2006096530 A JP2006096530 A JP 2006096530A JP 2006096530 A JP2006096530 A JP 2006096530A JP 5013731 B2 JP5013731 B2 JP 5013731B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
air chamber
pneumatic tire
tire
resonator
neck
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2006096530A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007269144A (en
Inventor
文男 高橋
清二 石川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bridgestone Corp
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bridgestone Corp filed Critical Bridgestone Corp
Priority to JP2006096530A priority Critical patent/JP5013731B2/en
Publication of JP2007269144A publication Critical patent/JP2007269144A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5013731B2 publication Critical patent/JP5013731B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60CVEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C11/00Tyre tread bands; Tread patterns; Anti-skid inserts
    • B60C11/03Tread patterns
    • B60C11/032Patterns comprising isolated recesses
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60CVEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C11/00Tyre tread bands; Tread patterns; Anti-skid inserts
    • B60C11/03Tread patterns
    • B60C11/032Patterns comprising isolated recesses
    • B60C11/0323Patterns comprising isolated recesses tread comprising channels under the tread surface, e.g. for draining water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60CVEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C11/00Tyre tread bands; Tread patterns; Anti-skid inserts
    • B60C11/03Tread patterns
    • B60C11/12Tread patterns characterised by the use of narrow slits or incisions, e.g. sipes
    • B60C11/1272Width of the sipe
    • B60C11/1281Width of the sipe different within the same sipe, i.e. enlarged width portion at sipe bottom or along its length

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Description

本発明は、周溝の気柱共鳴を抑制するヘルムホルツ型の共鳴器を有する空気入りタイヤに関し、特に、陸部剛性の低下を防止することができるものに関する。   The present invention relates to a pneumatic tire having a Helmholtz type resonator that suppresses air column resonance in a circumferential groove, and more particularly to a tire that can prevent a decrease in land portion rigidity.

気柱共鳴音とは、トレッド踏面の周方向に連続して延びる周溝と、トレッド踏面接地域内の路面とによって囲繞される管内の空気の共鳴によって発生される騒音であり、この気柱共鳴音の周波数は、一般的な乗用車では800〜1200Hz程度に観測されることが多く、ピークの音圧レベルが高く、周波数帯域が広いことから、タイヤの発生騒音の大きな部分を占めることになる。   The air column resonance sound is noise generated by resonance of the air in the pipe surrounded by the circumferential groove extending continuously in the circumferential direction of the tread surface and the road surface in the tread surface area. The sound frequency is often observed at about 800 to 1200 Hz in a general passenger car, and since the peak sound pressure level is high and the frequency band is wide, it occupies a large part of the noise generated by the tire.

また、人間の聴覚は、上記の周波数帯域でとくに敏感であるので、フィーリング面での静粛性を向上させる上においても、気柱共鳴音の低減は有効である。   In addition, since human hearing is particularly sensitive in the above frequency band, reduction of air column resonance is effective in improving the quietness of the feeling surface.

そこで、気柱共鳴音の低減する方法の一つとして、前記周溝に開口して陸部内で終了する共鳴器を設け、この共鳴器を、陸部表面に開口する気室と、気室と周溝との連通をもたらす狭窄ネックとで構成した、いわゆる、ヘルムホルツ共鳴器によって、気柱共鳴音の共鳴周波数付近のエネルギーを吸収する技術が提案されている。
特開平5−338411号公報
Therefore, as one of the methods for reducing air column resonance, a resonator is provided that opens in the circumferential groove and ends in the land portion. The resonator is provided with an air chamber that opens on the land surface, an air chamber, There has been proposed a technique of absorbing energy in the vicinity of the resonance frequency of the air column resonance sound by a so-called Helmholtz resonator constituted by a constricted neck that provides communication with the circumferential groove.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-338411

このような共鳴器は、タイヤ踏面内に常時一つ以上あることが好ましく、この数をさらに増やせば気柱共鳴の抑制効果を高めることができ、そのためには周方向に密に前記共鳴器を配置すればよいが、しかしながら、これを密にすれば陸部の剛性を低下させ、また、共鳴器の打音等による騒音が大きくなるという問題を生じる。   It is preferable that there is always one or more such resonators in the tire tread surface, and if this number is further increased, the effect of suppressing air column resonance can be enhanced. For this purpose, the resonators are closely packed in the circumferential direction. However, if this is made dense, there is a problem that the rigidity of the land portion is lowered and noise due to the hitting sound of the resonator is increased.

本発明は、このような問題を鑑みてなされたものであり、ヘルムホルツ共鳴器の、周溝の気柱共鳴に対する抑制効果を犠牲にすることなく、陸部剛性の低下や気柱共鳴以外の騒音の増大を防止することのできる空気入りタイヤを提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of such a problem, and without sacrificing the suppression effect of the Helmholtz resonator on the air column resonance of the circumferential groove, noise other than the decrease in land rigidity and noise other than the air column resonance. It is an object of the present invention to provide a pneumatic tire that can prevent an increase in tire pressure.

<1>は、トレッド踏面に、周方向に連続して延びる周溝を設けるとともに、周溝から離れた位置で陸部表面に開口する気室と、この気室を前記周溝に連通させる狭窄ネックとよりなる共鳴器を配設したタイヤにおいて、
相互に隣接する周溝の間に配置された前記共鳴器の少なくとも一つは、前記狭窄ネックを2本以上有し、これらの狭窄ネックの少なくとも2本は、異なる周溝に開口してなり、
トレッド踏面外側より見たときの、前記狭窄ネックの幅の合計を、前記気室の幅の3〜20%としてなる空気入りタイヤである。
<1> is a constriction that provides a circumferential groove continuously extending in the circumferential direction on the tread surface, opens an air chamber on the surface of the land portion at a position away from the circumferential groove, and communicates the air chamber with the circumferential groove. In the tire which arranged the resonator which consists of a neck,
At least one of the resonators disposed between the circumferential grooves adjacent to each other has two or more of the narrowing necks, and at least two of the narrowing necks are opened to different circumferential grooves,
A pneumatic tire in which the total width of the narrowed neck when viewed from the outside of the tread surface is 3 to 20% of the width of the air chamber .

<2>は、<1>において、ピッチバリエーションを付与したトレッドパターンを有するトレッド踏面で、少なくとも一つのピッチ長さ内に、共鳴周波数が700〜1800Hzの範囲内の共鳴器を一個以上配設してなる空気入りタイヤである。   <2> is a tread surface having a tread pattern to which pitch variations are given in <1>, and at least one resonator having a resonance frequency in a range of 700 to 1800 Hz is disposed within at least one pitch length. This is a pneumatic tire.

<3>は、<1>もしくは<2>において、前記気室の、陸部表面への開口面積を50〜600mm2の範囲としてなる空気入りタイヤである。 <3> is a pneumatic tire according to <1> or <2>, wherein an opening area of the air chamber to the land surface is in a range of 50 to 600 mm 2 .

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、狭窄ネックの深さ寸法を、気室の最大深さの70%以下としてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 4 > is a pneumatic tire according to any one of <1> to < 3 >, wherein the depth of the narrowed neck is 70% or less of the maximum depth of the air chamber.

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、気室の、陸部表面からの最大深さを、トレッド踏面に陸部を区画する溝の最大深さの20〜90%としてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 5 > In any one of <1> to < 4 >, the maximum depth of the air chamber from the land surface is 20 to 90% of the maximum depth of the groove that divides the land portion on the tread surface. It is a pneumatic tire.

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、気室の底壁に、1.6mm以上の高さの凹凸を設けてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 6 > is a pneumatic tire according to any one of <1> to < 5 >, wherein the bottom wall of the air chamber is provided with irregularities having a height of 1.6 mm or more.

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、共鳴器の狭窄ネックをサイプにより形成する空気入りタイヤである。 < 7 > is a pneumatic tire according to any one of <1> to < 6 >, wherein a narrowed neck of the resonator is formed by sipe.

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を曲線輪郭形状としてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 8 > is a pneumatic tire according to any one of <1> to < 7 >, wherein the opening shape of the air chamber to the land surface is a curved contour shape.

>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を四辺形状としてなる請求項1〜8のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤである。 < 9 > is the pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the opening shape of the air chamber to the land surface is a quadrilateral shape in any one of <1> to < 7 >.

10>は、<1>〜<>のいずれかにおいて、適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、常に一個以上の共鳴器が完全に含まれるよう構成されてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 10 > is the state in any one of <1> to < 9 >, in which the tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with a specified air pressure and a load corresponding to 80% of the specified mass is applied to the tire. Thus, the pneumatic tire is configured such that one or more resonators are always completely included in the ground plane.

11>は、<1>〜<10>のいずれかにおいて、適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、共鳴周波数の異なる複数個の共鳴器が常に完全に含まれるよう構成されてなる空気入りタイヤである。 < 11 > is a state in which the tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with a prescribed air pressure and a load corresponding to 80% of the prescribed mass is applied to the tire in any one of <1> to < 10 >. Thus, the pneumatic tire is configured such that a plurality of resonators having different resonance frequencies are always completely included in the ground plane.

<1>によれば、相互に隣接する周溝の間に配置された前記共鳴器の少なくとも一つは、前記狭窄ネックを2本以上有し、これらの狭窄ネックの少なくとも2本は、異なる周溝に開口しているので、一つの気室で隣接する2本の周溝の気柱共鳴を低減することができ、陸部剛性を大きく低下させることなく、また、気柱共鳴以外の騒音の増大を招くことなく気柱共鳴抑制効果を発現することができる。
なおかつ、トレッド踏面外側より見たときの、前記狭窄ネックの幅の合計を、前記気室の幅の3〜20%としたので、共鳴器を、理想的なヘルムホルツ共鳴器のモデルに近づけることができ、周溝の気柱共鳴抑制効果を高めることができる。
According to <1>, at least one of the resonators arranged between adjacent circumferential grooves has two or more constriction necks, and at least two of these constriction necks have different circumferences. Since it opens in the groove, the air column resonance of two adjacent circumferential grooves can be reduced in one air chamber, and the rigidity of the land portion is not greatly reduced, and noise other than the air column resonance can be reduced. The air column resonance suppression effect can be expressed without causing an increase.
In addition, since the total width of the narrowed neck when viewed from the tread tread surface is 3 to 20% of the width of the air chamber, the resonator can be brought closer to an ideal Helmholtz resonator model. This can increase the air column resonance suppression effect of the circumferential groove.

<2>によれば、ピッチバリエーションを付与したトレッドパターンを有するトレッド踏面で、各ピッチ長さ内に、共鳴周波数が700〜1800Hzの範囲内の共鳴器を一個以上配設したので、共鳴器が接地面内に完全に入り込んだとき、ドライバーに不快な騒音として認識されることの多い、1/3オクターブバンドで800〜1250Hzの帯域の周溝気柱共鳴音に有効に対処させることができ、また、高周波ノイズと称される、1000〜2000Hzの高音域の騒音に対する不快感の低減に有利に寄与させることができる。   <2> According to <2>, since one or more resonators having a resonance frequency in the range of 700 to 1800 Hz are disposed in each pitch length on the tread surface having a tread pattern to which pitch variation is given, the resonator is When fully entering the ground surface, the driver can effectively deal with circumferential air column resonance in the 1/3 octave band, which is often recognized as an unpleasant noise in the 1/3 octave band, Moreover, it can be made to contribute advantageously to the reduction of the discomfort with respect to the high frequency noise of 1000-2000Hz called high frequency noise.

<3>によれば、前記気室の、陸部表面への開口面積を50〜600mm2の範囲としたので、タイヤからの騒音を効果的に抑えることができ、開口面積を50mm2未満とした場合には、気室に前記共鳴周波数領域に対応する容積を確保するためには気室深さを深くしなければならず気室の形状が長細くなり、これに加えてさらに細長いネック部を必要とするため、溝が閉じてしまう可能性があり、このため共鳴器として作用しにくくなってしまい、一方、これを600mm2を超える物とした場合には、開口縁の長さが長くなる事に起因する、路面衝突音の顕在化、早期の偏摩耗の発生が危惧される。 According to <3>, of the air chamber, since the opening area of the land portion surface is in the range of 50~600Mm 2, it is possible to suppress the noise from the tire effectively, and the opening area less than 50 mm 2 In this case, in order to secure a volume corresponding to the resonance frequency region in the air chamber, the air chamber depth must be deepened, and the shape of the air chamber becomes long, and in addition to this, a further elongated neck portion requires a, there is a possibility that closed grooves Therefore becomes hard to act as a resonator, whereas, this in case of a material of more than 600 mm 2, the length of the opening edge is long There is a concern that road surface impact noise will become apparent and early uneven wear will occur.

>によれば、狭窄ネックの深さ寸法を、気室の最大深さの70%以下としたので、気柱共鳴抑制効果を高めることができ、これが70%を超えると、理想的なヘルムホルツ共鳴器の形状から離れるので共鳴抑制効果が低下する。 < 4 > According to < 4 >, since the depth dimension of the stenosis neck is set to 70% or less of the maximum depth of the air chamber, the air column resonance suppression effect can be enhanced. Since it is away from the shape of the Helmholtz resonator, the resonance suppression effect is reduced.

>によれば、陸部表面からの最大深さを、トレッド踏面に陸部を区画する溝の最大深さの20〜90%としたので、気室の陸部開口面積と関連する十分な気室容積を確保して、その気室を共鳴室として有効に機能させることができる。 < 5 > According to < 5 >, the maximum depth from the land surface is 20 to 90% of the maximum depth of the groove that divides the land on the tread surface. A sufficient air chamber volume can be secured, and the air chamber can effectively function as a resonance chamber.

>によれば、気室の底壁に、1.6mm以上の高さの凹凸を設けたので、気室への石噛を有利に防止することができる。 According to < 6 >, since the irregularities with a height of 1.6 mm or more are provided on the bottom wall of the air chamber, it is possible to advantageously prevent stone biting into the air chamber.

>によれば、共鳴器の狭窄ネックを、陸部表面に開口するサイプにより形成するようにしたので、サイプ形成用のブレードを金型に取り付けることによって狭窄ネックの部分を容易に成型することができ、このような狭窄ネックを有するタイヤの製造における生産性を高めることができる。 According to < 7 >, the narrowed neck of the resonator is formed by a sipe that opens on the surface of the land portion. Therefore, the portion of the narrowed neck is easily molded by attaching the sipe forming blade to the mold. Therefore, productivity in manufacturing a tire having such a narrowed neck can be increased.

>によれば、気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を円形、楕円形等の曲線輪郭形状としたので、開口部縁に一方向に延在する直線部がないことによって、ピッチノイズの発生を有利に抑制し、また、開口縁部分への偏摩耗の発生を抑制し得る利点がある。 According to < 8 >, since the opening shape of the air chamber to the surface of the land portion is a curved contour shape such as a circle or an ellipse, there is no straight portion extending in one direction on the edge of the opening. There is an advantage that the generation of noise can be advantageously suppressed and the occurrence of uneven wear on the opening edge portion can be suppressed.

>によれば、気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を四辺形状としたので、形状が単純なことにより気室設計を的確にかつ容易に行うことができ、また、直線エッジ成分を接地ラインと平行にならないよう開口形状を設計することによりピッチノイズを抑えたパターン設計を簡易なものとすることができる。 According to < 9 >, since the opening shape of the air chamber to the land surface is a quadrilateral shape, the air chamber design can be performed accurately and easily due to the simple shape, and the linear edge component By designing the opening shape so as not to be parallel to the ground line, the pattern design with reduced pitch noise can be simplified.

10>によれば、適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、常に一個以上の共鳴器が完全に含まれるよう構成したので、タイヤの回転位置にかかわらず、少なくともどれか1個の共鳴器を、機能させることができ、気柱共鳴を一層有利に抑制することができる。 < 10 > According to < 10 >, the tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with the prescribed air pressure, and a load corresponding to 80% of the prescribed mass is applied to the tire. Therefore, regardless of the rotational position of the tire, at least one of the resonators can function, and air column resonance can be more advantageously suppressed.

11>によれば、適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、共鳴周波数の異なる複数個の共鳴器が常に完全に含まれるよう構成されているので、共鳴抑制効果を広い周波数範囲に対して作用させることができる。 According to < 11 >, the tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with a specified air pressure, and a load corresponding to 80% of the specified mass is applied to the tire. Since a plurality of different resonators are always included completely, the resonance suppression effect can be applied to a wide frequency range.

図1は、この発明の実施の形態を模式的に示す図であり、図中、1はトレッド踏面、なかでも、適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で路面に接地する接地面2を示し、3は、その接地面2上を、周方向へ、たとえば直線状に連続して延びて、全体として円環形状をなす周溝を示す。   FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing an embodiment of the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes a tread tread, in particular, a tire mounted on an applicable rim is filled with a prescribed air pressure, and the tire has a prescribed air pressure. A grounding surface 2 that contacts the road surface in a state where a load corresponding to 80% of the mass is applied is shown. 3 extends continuously on the grounding surface 2 in the circumferential direction, for example, in a straight line. A circumferential groove having an annular shape is shown.

この場合、「適用リム」とは、タイヤのサイズに応じて下記の規格に規定されたリムを、「規定の空気圧」とは、下記の規格において、最大負荷能力に対応して規定される空気圧をいい、最大負荷能力とは、下記の規格で、タイヤに負荷することが許容される最大の質量をいう。また「規定の質量」とは、上記の最大負荷能力をいう。なお、ここでいう空気は、窒素ガス等の不活性ガスその他に置換することも可能である。   In this case, “applicable rim” refers to the rim specified in the following standards according to the tire size, and “specified air pressure” refers to the air pressure specified in accordance with the maximum load capacity in the following standards. The maximum load capacity refers to the maximum mass allowed to be loaded on the tire according to the following standards. The “specified mass” refers to the above maximum load capacity. The air here can be replaced with an inert gas such as nitrogen gas or the like.

そして規格とは、タイヤが生産または使用される地域に有効な産業規格によって決められたものであり、たとえば、アメリカ合衆国では、"THE TIRE AND RIM ASSOCIATION INC.のYEAR BOOK"であり、欧州では、THE European Tyre and Rim Technical OrganisationのSTANDARDS MANUAL"であり、日本では日本自動車タイヤ協会の"JATMA YEAR BOOK"である。   The standard is determined by an industrial standard effective in the region where the tire is produced or used. For example, in the United States, it is "THE TIRE AND RIM ASSOCIATION INC. YEAR BOOK", and in Europe, the THE It is “STANDARDS MANUAL” of European Tire and Rim Technical Organization, and “JATMA YEAR BOOK” of Japan Automobile Tire Association in Japan.

隣接する2本の周溝3A、3Bに挟まれた陸部4には、これらの周溝3A、3Bから離れた位置で陸部4表面に開口する気室6と、この気室6をこれらの周溝3A、3Bに連通させるそれぞれの狭窄ネック7A、7Bとよりなる共鳴器5が配設されている。このように本発明の特徴は、気室6から異なる周溝3A、3Bの両方にそれぞれ連通する少なくとも合計2本の狭窄ネック7A、7Bを具えている点にあり、この構成により、一つの気室6によって2本の周溝3A、3Bに対して気柱共鳴を抑制する効果を奏することができ、特に、周溝3A、3Bが、同じ共鳴周波数を有する場合、それぞれの周溝3A、3Bに対して個別に最適の共鳴器を取り付けた場合とほぼ同等の気柱共鳴抑制効果を発現することができる。   The land portion 4 sandwiched between two adjacent circumferential grooves 3A and 3B includes an air chamber 6 that opens on the surface of the land portion 4 at a position away from the circumferential grooves 3A and 3B, and the air chamber 6 that includes these air chambers 6. Resonators 5 each having constricted necks 7A and 7B communicating with the circumferential grooves 3A and 3B are disposed. As described above, the present invention is characterized in that it includes at least two constricted necks 7A and 7B communicating from the air chamber 6 to both the different circumferential grooves 3A and 3B, respectively. The chamber 6 can exert an effect of suppressing air column resonance with respect to the two circumferential grooves 3A and 3B. In particular, when the circumferential grooves 3A and 3B have the same resonance frequency, the circumferential grooves 3A and 3B have the same resonance frequency. On the other hand, almost the same air column resonance suppression effect as when the optimum resonator is individually attached can be exhibited.

一般的に、図2(a)に模式的に示すような、1個の気室6に対して1本の狭窄ネック7が設けられたヘルムホルツタイプの共鳴器の場合、気室6の陸部開口および狭窄ネック7がともに、路面によって密閉された状態の下では、共鳴周波数f0は、狭窄ネック7の半径をr、長さをl0、ネック断面積をSとし、気室容積をV、音速をcとしたとき、式(1)で表すことができる。

Figure 0005013731
In general, in the case of a Helmholtz type resonator in which one narrowed neck 7 is provided for one air chamber 6 as schematically shown in FIG. Under the condition that both the opening and the stenosis neck 7 are sealed by the road surface, the resonance frequency f 0 is r, the length of the stenosis neck 7 is l 0 , the neck cross-sectional area is S, and the air volume is V When the sound speed is c, it can be expressed by equation (1).
Figure 0005013731

また、図2(b)に模式的に示すような、1個の気室6に対して2本の狭窄ネック7A、7Bが設けられたヘルムホルツタイプの共鳴器5の場合における共鳴周波数f0は、同様に、狭窄ネック7A、7Bのそれぞれの半径をr1、r2、長さをl01、l02、ネック断面積をS1、S2とし、気室容積をV、音速をcとしたとき、式(2)で表すことができる。

Figure 0005013731
In addition, the resonance frequency f 0 in the case of a Helmholtz type resonator 5 in which two narrowed necks 7A and 7B are provided for one air chamber 6 as schematically shown in FIG. Similarly, the stenosis necks 7A and 7B have radii r 1 and r 2 , lengths l 01 and l 02, neck cross sections S 1 and S 2 , air chamber volume V and sound velocity c Then, it can be expressed by the formula (2).
Figure 0005013731

従って、共鳴器5の共鳴周波数(f0)は、ネック断面積(S1、S2)、気室容積(V)等を選択することで、所要に応じて変化させることができるが、タイヤの周溝から発生する一般的な周波数帯域の気柱共鳴を抑制する目的のためには、共鳴器5の具えるべき共鳴周波数として、f0を700〜1800Hzとするのが好ましく、さらには、これを、700〜1400Hzとするのがより好ましく、これらの範囲の周波数を得るべく共鳴器の諸寸法を設定するのがよい。 Accordingly, the resonance frequency (f 0 ) of the resonator 5 can be changed as required by selecting the neck cross-sectional areas (S 1 , S 2 ), the air chamber volume (V), etc. For the purpose of suppressing air column resonance in a general frequency band generated from the peripheral groove of the resonator 5, it is preferable that f 0 be 700 to 1800 Hz as a resonance frequency to be included in the resonator 5. This is more preferably 700 to 1400 Hz, and the dimensions of the resonator should be set to obtain frequencies in these ranges.

なお、(1)および(2)の式において、r、r1、r2にそれぞれかかる係数1.3は、文献により異なり、一般的に実験式から求められることが多く、本明細書においては、この係数を1.3とした。 In the equations (1) and (2), the coefficient 1.3 relating to r, r 1 , and r 2 varies depending on the literature and is generally obtained from an empirical equation. In this specification, The coefficient was 1.3.

また、式(2)に狭窄ネックが2本の場合を例にとって示すように、狭窄ネックが複数本ある場合は、これら複数の狭窄ネックの断面積を合計した断面積を有し、複数の狭窄ネックの平均長を長さとする1本の狭窄ネックと等価であると見なして計算を行うことで実用上問題ないことが分かっている。   Further, as shown in the example of the case where there are two stenosis necks in the formula (2), when there are a plurality of stenosis necks, the cross-sectional area of the plurality of stenosis necks is the sum of the cross-sectional areas. It has been found that there is no practical problem by performing the calculation assuming that it is equivalent to one stenosis neck whose length is the average length of the neck.

ここで、気室6の、タイヤへの無負荷状態の下での、陸部表面への開口面積を50〜600mm2、より好ましくは100〜360mm2とする。 Here, the opening area of the air chamber 6 to the land surface under a no-load state on the tire is set to 50 to 600 mm 2 , more preferably 100 to 360 mm 2 .

ところで、このタイヤでは、共鳴器5の気室6を、陸部4表面に開口させて形成しているので、生タイヤに対する加硫成形を、金型部分の、その気室相当部分への入り込みをもって行う場合でも、製品タイヤの気室6からのその金型部分の抜き出しを、気室6の横断面積が、それの深さ方向で幾分変化すると否とにかかわらず、常に円滑かつ確実なものとすることができ、この結果として、タイヤの製造を、共鳴器を有しない従来の一般的なタイヤと同様にして行うことができる。   By the way, in this tire, since the air chamber 6 of the resonator 5 is formed by opening the surface of the land portion 4, the vulcanization molding for the raw tire is performed so that the mold portion enters the portion corresponding to the air chamber. Even if it is carried out, the extraction of the mold part from the air chamber 6 of the product tire is always smooth and reliable regardless of whether the cross-sectional area of the air chamber 6 changes somewhat in the depth direction. As a result, the tire can be manufactured in the same manner as a conventional tire without a resonator.

なお、陸部4表面に開口するこのような気室6も、トレッド踏面1の接地面2内では、路面による開口の閉止下で、密閉空間を画成することになるので、その気室6に、共鳴室としての機能を十分に発揮させることができる。   Note that such an air chamber 6 that opens on the surface of the land portion 4 also defines a sealed space in the ground contact surface 2 of the tread tread 1 under the closed condition of the opening by the road surface. In addition, the function as a resonance chamber can be sufficiently exhibited.

また、気室6の、陸部表面と平行な断面内での横断面積および輪郭形状は、その気室6の底壁側に向けて、陸部開口のそれらと同一にできることはもちろん、加硫成形を終えたタイヤの気室6からの、金型部分の抜き出しが拘束されることのない程度に漸増させることもでき、逆に、漸次減少させることもできる。   In addition, the cross-sectional area and the contour shape of the air chamber 6 in the cross section parallel to the land surface can be made the same as those of the land opening toward the bottom wall side of the air chamber 6. It can be gradually increased from the air chamber 6 of the molded tire to the extent that the extraction of the mold portion is not restricted, and conversely, it can be gradually decreased.

なお、気室6の、陸部表面への開口形状は、楕円形その他の曲線輪郭形状とすることもでき、また、四角形その他の多角形状とすることもできる。   In addition, the opening shape to the land part surface of the air chamber 6 can also be made into an elliptical shape and other curved outline shapes, and can also be made into a square or other polygonal shapes.

このような共鳴器5において、狭窄ネック7は、図3(a)に要部斜視図で例示するように、陸部4、ここではブロック4a内に埋め込み配置したトンネル状のものとすることができる他、図3(b)に示すように、ブロック4a表面に開口したものとすることもできる。ここで、後者のような開口ネック7A、7Bを、たとえば、加硫金型のブレードその他の押し込み等によって形成するときは、気室6に加えて、狭窄ネック7A、7Bをもまた簡易に形成することができる。   In such a resonator 5, the constriction neck 7 has a tunnel shape embedded in the land portion 4, here the block 4 a, as illustrated in the perspective view of the main part in FIG. In addition, as shown in FIG. 3B, the surface of the block 4a can be opened. Here, when the open necks 7A and 7B, such as the latter, are formed by, for example, pressing a blade of a vulcanization mold or the like, the narrow necks 7A and 7B are also easily formed in addition to the air chamber 6. can do.

そしてこの場合は、狭窄ネック7をサイプによっても形成することができる。このとき、サイプの形状を、図3(c)に例示するように、底部に拡大空間部を有する、いわゆるフラスコ状とし、たとえば、拡大空間部以外の部分は、接地面内でサイプ壁が相互に接触する程度の狭幅部とすることにより、狭窄ネック7A、7Bの各種の寸法を、図3(a)に示す場合と同様に常に一定のものとすることができる。   In this case, the narrowed neck 7 can also be formed by sipe. At this time, as illustrated in FIG. 3C, the shape of the sipe is a so-called flask-like shape having an enlarged space portion at the bottom. For example, portions other than the enlarged space portion have sipe walls in the ground plane. By making the narrow portion so as to be in contact with each other, the various dimensions of the constriction necks 7A and 7B can be always constant as in the case shown in FIG.

このような共鳴器5においてより好ましくは、気室6の、陸部表面、図ではブロック表面からの最大深さhを、トレッド踏面1に陸部4、図ではブロック4aを区画する溝、たとえば周溝3の最大深さHの20%以上、とくには40〜80%とし、また好ましくは、狭窄ネック7の、深さ方向最大寸法dを、気室6の最大深さhの70%以下、とくには50%以下とする。   More preferably, in such a resonator 5, the maximum depth h of the air chamber 6 from the surface of the land, in the drawing, from the block surface, the groove that defines the land 4 in the tread tread 1, and the block 4a in the drawing, for example, 20% or more of the maximum depth H of the circumferential groove 3, particularly 40 to 80%. Preferably, the maximum dimension d in the depth direction of the constriction neck 7 is 70% or less of the maximum depth h of the air chamber 6. Especially 50% or less.

また、一つの気室6に連通する複数の狭窄ネック(上記実施形態の場合は2本の狭窄ネック7A、7B)の断面積および長さは、相互に同にすること、また、異ならせることもできる。   Also, the cross-sectional areas and lengths of a plurality of constriction necks (two constriction necks 7A and 7B in the case of the above embodiment) communicating with one air chamber 6 should be the same or different from each other. You can also.

以上に述べたところにおいて、気室6の底壁は、平坦面とすることの他、それの開口側に向けて凸もしくは凹となる曲面とすることもできるが、より好ましくは、図4に、図3(a)のY−Y線に沿う断面図を拡大して示すように、気室6への石噛みを抑制することを目的として、その底壁に、上方に向けて凸となる突部6aを一個以上設け、この結果として生じる凹凸差δを1.6mm以上、一層好ましくは3.0mm以上とする。ただし、凹凸差δの上限は、気室6を分断せずに共鳴させる必要があることより、気室最大深さよりも小さく、より好ましくは、(気室最大深さ−2mm)より小さいのがよい。   In the above description, the bottom wall of the air chamber 6 can be a flat surface, or a curved surface that is convex or concave toward the opening side thereof. As shown in an enlarged cross-sectional view along the line Y-Y in FIG. 3A, the bottom wall is convex upward for the purpose of suppressing stone biting into the air chamber 6. One or more protrusions 6a are provided, and the resulting unevenness difference δ is 1.6 mm or more, more preferably 3.0 mm or more. However, the upper limit of the unevenness difference δ is smaller than the maximum depth of the air chamber, more preferably smaller than (maximum depth of the air chamber−2 mm) because the air chamber 6 needs to be resonated without being divided. Good.

なおこの場合の突部6aは、気室側壁に突出形成されて、底壁からは独立するもの、いいかえれば、底壁からは分離されたものとすることもできる。   In this case, the protrusion 6a may be formed so as to protrude from the side wall of the air chamber and be independent from the bottom wall, in other words, separated from the bottom wall.

このような構成を有する共鳴器5の、周溝3に対する配置態様は、1本および複数本の周溝を形成した場合において、図1について述べた条件の下での接地面2内に、少なくともいずれか一本の周溝3に設けた共鳴器5の一個以上が常に完全に含まれる態様とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは、図5に例示するように複数本の周溝3の各々につき、共鳴器5の一個以上が接地面2内に常に完全に含まれる態様とする。   The arrangement of the resonator 5 having such a configuration with respect to the circumferential groove 3 is such that at least one circumferential groove is formed in the ground plane 2 under the conditions described with reference to FIG. It is preferable that one or more of the resonators 5 provided in any one of the circumferential grooves 3 is always completely included, and more preferably, each of the plurality of circumferential grooves 3 as illustrated in FIG. One or more resonators 5 are always completely included in the ground plane 2.

そしてさらに好ましくは、複数個の共鳴器の配置態様を、図6に例示するように、前述したと同一の条件の下で接地する接地面2内に、共鳴周波数の異なる複数個の共鳴器5a,5b,5cのそれぞれが常に含まれる態様とする。   More preferably, a plurality of resonators 5a having different resonance frequencies are disposed in the ground plane 2 that is grounded under the same conditions as described above, as illustrated in FIG. , 5b, 5c are always included.

なお図6に示すところでは、接地面2内に延在する全ての周溝3のそれぞれについて、複数個の共鳴器が接地面2内に含まれることとしているも、複数本の周溝3のうち、少なくとも一本の周溝3に設けた複数個の共鳴器だけが接地面2内に含まれる配置態様とすることもできる。   In FIG. 6, for each of all the circumferential grooves 3 extending in the ground plane 2, a plurality of resonators are included in the ground plane 2. Of these, only a plurality of resonators provided in at least one circumferential groove 3 may be included in the ground plane 2.

図7および図8は、本発明の実施形態の変形例のタイヤについて、図1について説明したのと同様の状態におけるトレッド面の接地面を示す概念図であり、図7に示した共鳴器15Aのように、気室16の開口部を長方形とし、狭窄ネック17A、27Aを、気室16のタイヤ周方向両端面に接続させて、これらを互いに異なる周溝3に導くこともでき、また、共鳴器15Bのように、気室26の開口部をタイヤ周方向に傾斜した楕円形とし、狭窄ネック17B、27Bを、気室26からタイヤ周方向に向かったあとタイヤ幅方向に向きを変えて周溝3に連通するように構成することもできる。   FIGS. 7 and 8 are conceptual diagrams showing the ground contact surface of the tread surface in the same state as that described with reference to FIG. 1 for the tire of the modified example of the embodiment of the present invention, and the resonator 15A shown in FIG. As described above, the opening of the air chamber 16 has a rectangular shape, and the constriction necks 17A and 27A are connected to both end surfaces in the tire circumferential direction of the air chamber 16, and these can be guided to different circumferential grooves 3. Like the resonator 15B, the opening of the air chamber 26 is formed into an elliptical shape inclined in the tire circumferential direction, and the narrowed necks 17B and 27B are directed from the air chamber 26 in the tire circumferential direction and then changed in the tire width direction. It can also be configured to communicate with the circumferential groove 3.

さらに、図8に示した共鳴器15Cのように、長方形の開口部を有する気室16の角部から、タイヤ周方向に傾斜して互いに反対向きに延在する直線で狭窄ネック17C、27Cを構成したり、共鳴器15Dのように、楕円形の気室26から、一方の狭窄ネック17Dはタイヤ幅方向に延在させ、他方に狭窄ネック27Dを、タイヤ周方向に延在したあとタイヤ幅方向に方向転換させて延在させたりすることもできる。   Further, as in the resonator 15C shown in FIG. 8, the constricted necks 17C and 27C are linearly inclined from the corner of the air chamber 16 having a rectangular opening and extend in opposite directions to each other in the tire circumferential direction. As shown in the resonator 15D, one narrowed neck 17D extends in the tire width direction and the other narrowed neck 27D extends in the tire circumferential direction from the elliptical air chamber 26, and then the tire width. It can also be changed in direction and extended.

本発明の実施形態に係る実施例のタイヤを試作し、以下に示す実験1〜10を行った。 The tire of the Example which concerns on embodiment of this invention was made as an experiment, and Experiment 1-10 shown below was conducted.

[実験1]
図9に示した形状および配置で構成された共鳴器15Cを有する、サイズが195/65R15のタイヤを実施例1として、6JJのリムに装着し、空気圧を210kPaとした状態で、室内ドラム試験機により、4.47kNの荷重の作用下で80km/hの速度で負荷転動させ、このときのタイヤの側方音をJASO C606に定める条件に従って測定し、1/3オクターブバンドで、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域のオーバオール値を求めた。
[Experiment 1]
A tire with a size of 195 / 65R15 having a resonator 15C having the shape and arrangement shown in FIG. 9 was mounted on a 6JJ rim as Example 1 and the air pressure was 210 kPa. , And rolling at a speed of 80 km / h under the action of a load of 4.47 kN, and measuring the side sound of the tire at this time according to the conditions specified in JASO C606, with a center frequency of 800− in 1/3 octave band The overall value of 1000Hz-1250Hz band was obtained.

ここで、共鳴器15Cを構成する気室16および狭窄ネック17C、27Cは図9に示す通り、トレッド面に開口しており、気室16は、タイヤ周方向長さaを36mm、タイヤ幅方向幅wを6mm、深さhを4mmとする直方体形状をなし、したがってその容積Vは864mm3であり、また、狭窄ネック17C、27Cは、その延在方向に直交する断面は、幅tを0.5mm、深さdを2mmとする長方形(断面積S=1mm2)をなしその延在長さl0は6mmであった。そして、これらの寸法に対する式(3)を用いて求められるヘルムホルツ共鳴器における共鳴周波数f0は1014Hzである。なお、計算に際して、音速cは343.7m/sとした。

Figure 0005013731
Here, the air chamber 16 and the constricted necks 17C and 27C constituting the resonator 15C are opened in the tread surface as shown in FIG. 9, and the air chamber 16 has a tire circumferential direction length a of 36 mm and a tire width direction. It has a rectangular parallelepiped shape with a width w of 6 mm and a depth h of 4 mm. Therefore, its volume V is 864 mm 3 , and the constriction necks 17C and 27C have a width t of 0.5 in the cross section perpendicular to the extending direction. A rectangular shape (cross-sectional area S = 1 mm 2 ) with mm and depth d of 2 mm was formed, and its extended length l 0 was 6 mm. The resonance frequency f 0 in the Helmholtz resonator obtained by using the equation (3) for these dimensions is 1014 Hz. In the calculation, the sound velocity c was 343.7 m / s.
Figure 0005013731

ここで、上記式(3)は、図2(b)で示したように、気室6に2本の狭窄ネック7A、7Bを連通させた共鳴器5において、狭窄ネック7A、7Bの断面積S1、S2をともにSとし、断面の半径をr1、r2をともにrとし、延在長さl01、l02をともにl0として求めたものであり、2本の同じ寸法の狭窄ネックを有する場合の共鳴周波数f0を求める場合に有効である。 Here, as shown in FIG. 2 (b), the above equation (3) is the cross-sectional area of the stenosis necks 7A and 7B in the resonator 5 in which the two stenosis necks 7A and 7B are communicated with the air chamber 6. S 1 and S 2 are both S, the cross-sectional radii are r 1 and r 2 are both r, and the extended lengths l 01 and l 02 are both l 0 . This is effective for obtaining the resonance frequency f 0 in the case of having a constriction neck.

また、実施例1のタイヤはピッチバリエーションを有し、ピッチサイズに応じて共鳴器15Cの周方向ピッチも異なるが、共鳴器15Cの、全周にわたる平均周方向ピッチpは54mmであり、一方、上記条件にてリムに装着されたタイヤを、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させたときの接地部における、周溝接地平均長さLtは140mmである。 Further, the tire of Example 1 has a pitch variation, and the circumferential pitch of the resonator 15C varies depending on the pitch size, but the average circumferential pitch p of the resonator 15C over the entire circumference is 54 mm, the tire mounted on the rim under the above conditions, at the ground portion when allowed to act corresponding load to 80% of the prescribed mass, circumferential groove ground average length L t is 140 mm.

また、周溝3の断面は、いずれも、深さ8mm、幅8mmであった。   Further, each of the cross sections of the circumferential groove 3 had a depth of 8 mm and a width of 8 mm.

そして、上記実施例のタイヤの評価に加えて、実施例1のものに対して、トレッド面上に共鳴器を全く有さない点だけが実施例のものと異なるタイヤを従来例1とし、トレッド面上に配置された共鳴器15Cの、一方の狭窄ネック17Cがない点、および、狭窄ネック17Cをなくしたことよって共鳴周波数が変化しないよう狭窄ネック27Cの幅を2倍にした点だけが実施例のものと異なるタイヤ(図10参照)を従来例2とし、これらについても実施例1と同様の評価を行い比較した。結果は、改良効果として、従来例1に対する、前記帯域のオーバオール値の差の絶対値で表した。数値が大きい方が改良効果大きい。   Further, in addition to the evaluation of the tire of the above example, a tire different from that of the example only in that it has no resonator on the tread surface with respect to that of Example 1 is referred to as Conventional Example 1, and the tread Only the point of the resonator 15C arranged on the surface without one of the constricted necks 17C and the point that the width of the constricted neck 27C is doubled so that the resonance frequency does not change by eliminating the constricted neck 17C. A tire different from the example (see FIG. 10) was defined as Conventional Example 2, and these were also evaluated and compared in the same manner as in Example 1. The result was expressed as an absolute value of the difference in the overall value of the band with respect to Conventional Example 1 as an improvement effect. The larger the value, the greater the improvement effect.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表1から明らかなように、実施例1のタイヤは、共鳴音抑制効果が従来例1に対してはもちろん、従来例2のタイヤに対しても優れていることを示しており、このことは、本発明のタイヤは、共鳴器の周方向ピッチを、気室のサイズは同じであるが1本の周溝のみに開口するよう構成された共鳴器を有する従来のタイヤに対して広げても、同等の共鳴音抑制効果を発現できることを意味している。   As is clear from Table 1, the tire of Example 1 shows that the resonance noise suppression effect is superior to that of Conventional Example 1 as well as that of Conventional Example 2, which means that The tire according to the present invention can extend the circumferential pitch of the resonator relative to a conventional tire having a resonator having the same air chamber size but having only one circumferential groove. This means that an equivalent resonance suppression effect can be exhibited.

[実験2]
共鳴周波数と共鳴音抑制の改良効果との関係を調べるため、実施例1とは、気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法だけが異なる実施例2−1〜実施例2−12のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 2]
In order to investigate the relationship between the resonance frequency and the improvement effect of resonance noise suppression, the tires of Example 2-1 to Example 2-12 differing from Example 1 only in the dimensions of the air chamber 16 or the constriction necks 17C and 27C. The prototype is measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, and the overall value of the 1/3 octave band in the band of the center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz is determined. The improvement effect in suppression [dB] was taken (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例のタイヤにおける気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法[mm]、式(3)を用いて求めた共鳴周波数f0[Hz]、および改良効果[dB]を表2に示す。また、共鳴周波数と改良効果との関係を図11にグラフとして示した。なお、改良効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。 Table 2 shows the dimensions [mm] of the air chamber 16 or the constricted necks 17C and 27C, the resonance frequency f 0 [Hz] obtained using the equation (3), and the improvement effect [dB] in the tires of the examples. The relationship between the resonance frequency and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. As a preferable range of the improvement effect, the suppression effect [dB] is set to a range of 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表2、図11から明らかなように、共鳴周波数が700〜1800Hzで効果が大きく、特に、700〜1400Hzでは、さらに大きな改良効果を得ることができ、好ましい。   As apparent from Table 2 and FIG. 11, the effect is large when the resonance frequency is 700 to 1800 Hz, and particularly when 700 to 1400 Hz, an even greater improvement effect can be obtained, which is preferable.

[実験3]
気室の、陸部表面への開口面積と共鳴音抑制の改良効果との関係を調べるため、実施例1とは、気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法だけが異なる実施例3−1〜実施例3−10のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 3]
In order to investigate the relationship between the opening area of the air chamber to the surface of the land and the improvement effect of resonance noise suppression, Example 3-1 differs from Example 1 only in the dimensions of the air chamber 16 or the constriction necks 17C and 27C. The tire of Example 3-10 was prototyped and measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1 to obtain an overall value of 1/3 octave band in the band of the center frequency 800-1000 Hz-1250 Hz. The difference from Conventional Example 1 was defined as an improvement effect [dB] in suppressing resonance noise (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例のタイヤにおける気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法[mm]、式(3)を用いて求めた共鳴周波数f0[Hz]、および改良効果[dB]を表3に示す。また、開口面積と改良効果との関係を図12にグラフとして示した。なお、抑制効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。 Table 3 shows the dimensions [mm] of the air chamber 16 or the constricted necks 17C and 27C, the resonance frequency f 0 [Hz] obtained using the equation (3), and the improvement effect [dB] in the tires of the examples. The relationship between the opening area and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. A preferable range of the suppression effect is a range where the suppression effect [dB] is 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表3、図12から明らかなように、気室の、陸部表面への開口面積として、50〜600mm2を好ましい範囲とすることができる。 As is apparent from Table 3 and FIG. 12, the opening area of the air chamber to the land surface can be set to a preferable range of 50 to 600 mm 2 .

[実験4]
気室の幅に対する狭窄ネックの幅の比と、共鳴音抑制の改良効果との関係を調べるため、実施例1とは、気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法だけが異なる実施例4−1〜実施例4−3および比較例4−1、4−2のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 4]
In order to investigate the relationship between the ratio of the width of the stenosis neck to the width of the air chamber and the effect of improving the resonance suppression, Example 4 differs from Example 1 only in the dimensions of the air chamber 16 or the stenosis necks 17C and 27C. 1 to Example 4-3 and Comparative Examples 4-1 and 4-2 were made on a trial basis, measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, and the 1/3 octave band in the band of the center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz. The overall value was obtained, and the difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was defined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance noise (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例および比較例のタイヤにおける気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法[mm]、式(3)を用いて求めた共鳴周波数f0[Hz]、および改良効果[dB]を表4に示す。また、気室の幅に対する狭窄ネックの幅の比と改良効果との関係を図13にグラフとして示した。なお、抑制効果の必須の範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が3以上の範囲とした。 Table 4 shows the dimensions [mm] of the air chamber 16 or the narrowed necks 17C and 27C, the resonance frequency f 0 [Hz] obtained by using the equation (3), and the improvement effect [dB] in the tires of the examples and comparative examples. Shown in Further, the relationship between the ratio of the narrowed neck width to the air chamber width and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. In addition, as an indispensable range of the suppression effect, the suppression effect [dB] is set to a range of 3 or more in consideration of a general human sound pressure difference detection power.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表4、図13から明らかなように、気室に対する狭窄ネックの幅の比として、共鳴音抑制における改良効果の点で、3〜20%を必須の範囲とすることができる。 As is apparent from Table 4 and FIG. 13, the ratio of the width of the stenosis neck to the air chamber can be in the essential range of 3 to 20 % in terms of the improvement effect in suppressing resonance noise.

[実験5]
気室の最大深さに対する狭窄ネックの深さ方向最大寸法の比と、共鳴音抑制の改良効果との関係を調べるため、実施例1とは、気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法だけが異なる実施例5−1〜実施例5−5のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 5]
In order to investigate the relationship between the ratio of the maximum dimension in the depth direction of the stenosis neck to the maximum depth of the air chamber and the improvement effect of resonance sound suppression, the first embodiment is only the dimension of the air chamber 16 or the stenosis necks 17C and 27C. The tires of Example 5-1 to Example 5-5 with different values were made on a trial basis, measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, and the overall value of the 1/3 octave band in the band of the center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz was obtained. The difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was determined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance noise (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例のタイヤにおける気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法[mm]、式(3)を用いて求めた共鳴周波数f0[Hz]、および改良効果[dB]を表5に示す。また、気室の最大深さに対する狭窄ネックの深さ方向最大寸法の比と改良効果との関係を図14にグラフとして示した。なお、抑制効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。 Table 5 shows the dimensions [mm] of the air chamber 16 or the constricted necks 17C and 27C, the resonance frequency f 0 [Hz] obtained using the equation (3), and the improvement effect [dB] in the tires of the examples. Further, the relationship between the ratio of the maximum dimension in the depth direction of the stenosis neck to the maximum depth of the air chamber and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. A preferable range of the suppression effect is a range where the suppression effect [dB] is 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表5、図14から明らかなように、気室の最大深さに対する狭窄ネックの深さ方向最大寸法の比として、共鳴音抑制における改良効果の点で、70%以下を好ましい範囲とすることができる。   As is clear from Table 5 and FIG. 14, the ratio of the maximum dimension of the stenosis neck in the depth direction to the maximum depth of the air chamber is preferably set to 70% or less in terms of an improvement effect in resonance noise suppression. it can.

[実験6]
周溝の最大深さに対する、気室の最大深さの比と、共鳴音抑制の改良効果との関係を調べるため、実施例1とは、気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法だけが異なる実施例6−1〜実施例6−5のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 6]
In order to investigate the relationship between the ratio of the maximum depth of the air chamber to the maximum depth of the circumferential groove and the effect of improving the resonance noise suppression, only the dimensions of the air chamber 16 or the constriction necks 17C and 27C are used in Example 1. Trial tires of different Example 6-1 to Example 6-5 were prototyped and measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1 to obtain an overall value of 1/3 octave band in the band of center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz. The difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was defined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance noise (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例のタイヤにおける気室16もしくは狭窄ネック17C、27Cの寸法[mm]、式(3)を用いて求めた共鳴周波数f0[Hz]、および改良効果[dB]を表6に示す。また、周溝の最大深さに対する、気室の最大深さの比と改良効果との関係を図15にグラフとして示した。なお、抑制効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。 Table 6 shows the dimensions [mm] of the air chamber 16 or the constricted necks 17C and 27C, the resonance frequency f 0 [Hz] obtained using the equation (3), and the improvement effect [dB] in the tires of the examples. Moreover, the relationship between the ratio of the maximum depth of the air chamber to the maximum depth of the circumferential groove and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. A preferable range of the suppression effect is a range where the suppression effect [dB] is 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表6、図15から明らかなように、周溝の最大深さに対する、気室の最大深さの比として、共鳴音抑制における改良効果の点で、20〜90%を好ましい範囲とすることができる。
20〜90%
As is clear from Table 6 and FIG. 15, the ratio of the maximum depth of the air chamber to the maximum depth of the circumferential groove is preferably 20 to 90% in terms of the improvement effect in resonance noise suppression. it can.
20-90%

[実験7]
気室の底壁に突起を設けた場合の、石噛みの有無と、共鳴音抑制における改良効果とについて調べるため、突起のない実施例1のタイヤの他、底壁に高さの異なる突起を設けた点だけが実施例1と異なる実施例7―1〜7−3のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 7]
In order to investigate the presence or absence of a stone bite and the improvement effect in resonance noise suppression when a protrusion is provided on the bottom wall of the air chamber, in addition to the tire of Example 1 having no protrusion, protrusions having different heights are provided on the bottom wall. The tires of Examples 7-1 to 7-3, which differ from Example 1 only in the points provided, were prototyped, measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, and 1/3 octave in the band of center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz. The overall value of the band was obtained, and the difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was defined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance (the larger the value, the greater the improvement effect).

各実施例のタイヤにおける石噛みの有無、および改良効果[dB]を表7に示す。また、周溝の最大深さに対する、気室の最大深さの比と改良効果との関係を図16にグラフとして示した。なお、抑制効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。   Table 7 shows the presence or absence of stone biting and the improvement effect [dB] in the tire of each example. Moreover, the relationship between the ratio of the maximum depth of the air chamber to the maximum depth of the circumferential groove and the improvement effect is shown as a graph in FIG. A preferable range of the suppression effect is a range where the suppression effect [dB] is 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

また、石噛みの有無は、テストコースにて砂利道を走行し5km走行後に目視にて判定した。なお、突起は、実施例7―1〜7−3の場合も気室の長さ方向に2mmのピッチで配置した。   Also, the presence or absence of stone biting was judged visually by running on a gravel road on a test course and running 5 km. The protrusions were arranged at a pitch of 2 mm in the length direction of the air chambers also in Examples 7-1 to 7-3.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表7および図16から明らかなように、石噛みを防止するには突起の高さを1.6mm以上とするのが好ましく、これが多少大きくても共鳴音抑制の効果を大きく阻害することはない。   As is clear from Table 7 and FIG. 16, it is preferable to set the height of the protrusions to 1.6 mm or more in order to prevent stone biting, and even if this is somewhat large, the effect of suppressing the resonance is not significantly inhibited.

[実験8]
気室16の陸部における開口部形状と共鳴音抑制における改良効果とを調べるため、実施例1のタイヤとは気室16の開口面積が同じで、開口形状が四辺形とする変わりに円形とした点だけが実施例1とことなる実施例8のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 8]
In order to investigate the opening shape in the land portion of the air chamber 16 and the improvement effect in suppressing the resonance noise, the tire of the first embodiment has the same opening area of the air chamber 16 as the tire, and the opening shape is a circle instead of a quadrilateral. The tire of Example 8, which is different from Example 1 only, was measured and measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, and the overall value of 1/3 octave band in the band of center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz was obtained. The difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was determined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance noise (the larger this value, the greater the improvement effect).

結果を表8に示す。なお、抑制効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。   The results are shown in Table 8. A preferable range of the suppression effect is a range where the suppression effect [dB] is 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

[実験9]
接地面内の共鳴器の数と、共鳴音抑制における改良効果とを調べるため、実施例1のタイヤとは共鳴器の形状は同じでありが、周上の共鳴器の数をともに実施例1の半分とした点だけが実施例1と異なる実施例9−1と9−2のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 9]
In order to investigate the number of resonators in the ground plane and the improvement effect in suppressing the resonance noise, the shape of the resonator is the same as that of the tire of Example 1, but the number of resonators on the circumference is the same as Example 1. The tires of Examples 9-1 and 9-2, which differ from Example 1 only in terms of the half of this, were prototyped and measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1. 1 / in the band of the center frequency 800-1000Hz-1250Hz The overall value of the 3 octave band was obtained, and the difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 was defined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance (the larger the value, the greater the improvement effect).

ここで、実施例9−1と9−2とは共鳴器のタイヤ周方向の配置が異なり、実施例9−1は、タイヤ半周上(半周における共鳴器の周方向ピッチは実施例1と同じく54mm)にのみ共鳴器を配置し、実施例9−2は、全周(共鳴器の周方向ピッチは実施例1の2倍の108mm)に均等に配置した。なお、接地面周方向長さは、実施例1と同じくいずれも140mmである。   Here, Example 9-1 and 9-2 differ in the arrangement of the resonator in the tire circumferential direction, and Example 9-1 is on the tire half circumference (the circumferential pitch of the resonator in the half circumference is the same as in Example 1). In Example 9-2, the resonators were arranged uniformly over the entire circumference (the pitch in the circumferential direction of the resonators was 108 mm, which is twice that of Example 1). Note that the length in the circumferential direction of the contact surface is 140 mm as in the first embodiment.

結果を表9に示す。なお、改良効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。   The results are shown in Table 9. As a preferable range of the improvement effect, the suppression effect [dB] is set to a range of 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表9から明らかなように、接地面に共鳴器がいつも存在するようこれを配置するのが好ましい。   As can be seen from Table 9, it is preferred to arrange this so that there is always a resonator on the ground plane.

[実験10]
共鳴器の種類の数と、共鳴音抑制における改良効果とを調べるため、実施例1のタイヤとは別に、表11に示した寸法の気室を有する3種類の共鳴器1〜3を、同じものが隣接しないよう順番に周方向に配置した点だけが実施例1のタイヤとは異なる実施例10のタイヤを試作し、実験1と同様の条件で測定を行い、中心周波数800−1000Hz−1250Hzの帯域における1/3オクターブバンドのオーバオール値を求め、このオーバオール値の従来例1との差を共鳴音抑制における改良効果[dB]とした(この数値が大きい方が改良効果は大きい)。
[Experiment 10]
In order to examine the number of types of resonators and the improvement effect in suppressing resonance noise, the three types of resonators 1 to 3 having the air chambers with the dimensions shown in Table 11 are the same as the tires of Example 1. A tire of Example 10 which is different from the tire of Example 1 only in that the tires are arranged in the circumferential direction in order so as not to be adjacent to each other is experimentally manufactured and measured under the same conditions as in Experiment 1. The center frequency is 800-1000 Hz-1250 Hz. The overall value of the 1/3 octave band in the band is determined, and the difference between the overall value and the conventional example 1 is defined as the improvement effect [dB] in suppressing the resonance (the larger the value, the greater the improvement effect) .

結果を表10に示す。なお、改良効果の好ましい範囲としては、一般的な人の音圧差の検知力を考慮して、抑制効果[dB]が2以上の範囲とした。   The results are shown in Table 10. As a preferable range of the improvement effect, the suppression effect [dB] is set to a range of 2 or more in consideration of detection power of a general human sound pressure difference.

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

Figure 0005013731
Figure 0005013731

表10、表11から明らかなように、共鳴周波数の異なる共鳴器を複数個、混在させることによって一層優れた共鳴音抑制効果を得ることができる。   As is clear from Tables 10 and 11, a more excellent resonance suppression effect can be obtained by mixing a plurality of resonators having different resonance frequencies.

この発明の実施の形態を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure showing typically an embodiment of this invention. ヘルムホルツタイプの共鳴器を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically a Helmholtz type resonator. 共鳴器の形成態様を例示する要部斜視図である。It is a principal part perspective view which illustrates the formation aspect of a resonator. 図3(a)のY−Y線に沿う気室底壁の拡大断面図である。It is an expanded sectional view of the air chamber bottom wall which follows the YY line of Fig.3 (a). 接地面内への、共鳴器の好適配置例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of suitable arrangement | positioning of the resonator in a ground plane. 共鳴器のさらに好適な配置例を、接地面について示す図である。It is a figure which shows the further suitable example of arrangement | positioning of a resonator about a ground plane. 実施形態の変形例を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the modification of embodiment. 他の変形例を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows another modification. 実施例のタイヤの接地面を示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows the contact surface of the tire of an Example. 従来例2のタイヤの接地面を示す平面図である。FIG. 6 is a plan view showing a contact surface of a tire of Conventional Example 2. 共鳴周波数と改良効果との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between a resonant frequency and an improvement effect. 開口面積と改良効果との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between an opening area and an improvement effect. 気室の幅に対する狭窄ネックの幅の比と改良効果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the ratio of the width | variety of a constriction neck with respect to the width | variety of an air chamber, and the improvement effect. 気室の最大深さに対する狭窄ネックの深さ方向最大寸法の比と改良効果との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between ratio of the depth direction maximum dimension of the constriction neck with respect to the maximum depth of an air chamber, and the improvement effect. 周溝の最大深さに対する、気室の最大深さの比と改良効果との関係をThe relationship between the ratio of the maximum depth of the air chamber to the maximum depth of the circumferential groove and the improvement effect 気室の底溝の突起の高さと改良効果との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the height of the processus | protrusion of the bottom groove | channel of an air chamber, and the improvement effect.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 トレッド踏面
2 接地面
3、3A、3B 周溝
4 陸部
4a ブロック
5、5a,5b,5c 共鳴器
6 気室
6a 突部
7、7A、7B 狭窄ネック
15A、15B、15C、15D 共鳴器
16 気室
17A、17B、17C、17D 狭窄ネック
26 気室
27A、27B、27C、27D 狭窄ネック
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Tread tread surface 2 Ground surface 3, 3A, 3B Circumferential groove 4 Land part 4a Block 5, 5a, 5b, 5c Resonator 6 Air chamber 6a Protrusion part 7, 7A, 7B Constriction neck 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D Resonator 16 Air chamber 17A, 17B, 17C, 17D Stenosis neck 26 Air chamber 27A, 27B, 27C, 27D Stenosis neck

Claims (11)

トレッド踏面に、周方向に連続して延びる周溝を設けるとともに、周溝から離れた位置で陸部表面に開口する気室と、この気室を前記周溝に連通させる狭窄ネックとよりなる共鳴器を配設したタイヤにおいて、
相互に隣接する周溝の間に配置された前記共鳴器の少なくとも一つは、前記狭窄ネックを2本以上有し、これらの狭窄ネックの少なくとも2本は、異なる周溝に開口してな
トレッド踏面外側より見たときの、前記狭窄ネックの幅の合計を、前記気室の幅の3〜20%としてなる空気入りタイヤ。
The tread surface is provided with a circumferential groove extending continuously in the circumferential direction, and an air chamber that opens to the land surface at a position away from the circumferential groove and a constriction neck that communicates the air chamber with the circumferential groove. In the tire with the container,
At least one disposed between the circumferential grooves adjacent to each other the resonator has the narrowed neck 2 or more, at least two of these narrowed neck is Ri greens open to different circumferential grooves ,
A pneumatic tire in which the total width of the narrowed neck when viewed from the outside of the tread surface is 3 to 20% of the width of the air chamber .
ピッチバリエーションを付与したトレッドパターンを有するトレッド踏面で、少なくとも一つのピッチ長さ内に、共鳴周波数が700〜1800Hzの範囲内の共鳴器を一個以上配設してなる請求項1に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tread according to claim 1, wherein at least one resonator having a resonance frequency in a range of 700 to 1800 Hz is disposed within at least one pitch length in a tread surface having a tread pattern to which pitch variation is given. tire. 前記気室の、陸部表面への開口面積を50〜600mm2の範囲としてなる請求項1もしくは2に記載の空気入りタイヤ。 Wherein the air chamber, the pneumatic tire according to claim 1 or 2 comprising an opening area of the land portion surface as a range of 50~600Mm 2. 狭窄ネックの深さ寸法を、気室の最大深さの70%以下としてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein a depth dimension of the narrowed neck is 70% or less of a maximum depth of the air chamber. 気室の、陸部表面からの最大深さを、トレッド踏面に陸部を区画する溝の最大深さの20〜90%としてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the maximum depth of the air chamber from the land surface is 20 to 90% of the maximum depth of the groove that divides the land portion on the tread surface. 気室の底壁に、1.6mm以上の高さの凹凸を設けてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein the bottom wall of the air chamber is provided with irregularities having a height of 1.6 mm or more. 共鳴器の狭窄ネックをサイプにより形成する請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 6 forming a narrowed neck of the resonator by sipes. 気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を曲線輪郭形状としてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 7 , wherein an opening shape of the air chamber to the land surface is a curved contour shape. 気室の、陸部表面への開口形状を四辺形状としてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 7 , wherein an opening shape of the air chamber to the land surface is a quadrilateral shape. 適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、常に一個以上の共鳴器が完全に含まれるよう構成されてなる請求項1〜のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 The tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with the specified air pressure and a load corresponding to 80% of the specified mass is applied to the tire. The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 9 , wherein the pneumatic tire is configured as described above. 適用リムに装着したタイヤに規定の空気圧を充填し、そのタイヤに、規定の質量の80%に対応する負荷を作用させた状態で、接地面内に、共鳴周波数の異なる複数個の共鳴器が常に完全に含まれるよう構成されてなる請求項1〜10のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤ。 A tire mounted on the applicable rim is filled with the specified air pressure, and a load corresponding to 80% of the specified mass is applied to the tire. The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 10 , wherein the pneumatic tire is always included completely.
JP2006096530A 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Pneumatic tire Active JP5013731B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006096530A JP5013731B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Pneumatic tire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006096530A JP5013731B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Pneumatic tire

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007269144A JP2007269144A (en) 2007-10-18
JP5013731B2 true JP5013731B2 (en) 2012-08-29

Family

ID=38672380

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006096530A Active JP5013731B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Pneumatic tire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5013731B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106132728A (en) * 2014-04-04 2016-11-16 株式会社普利司通 Tire

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5288946B2 (en) * 2008-08-25 2013-09-11 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP4613995B2 (en) 2008-10-31 2011-01-19 横浜ゴム株式会社 Pneumatic tire
FR2943275B1 (en) * 2009-03-18 2015-05-15 Michelin Soc Tech PNEUMATIC WITH PROTECTION WALLS
FR2943274B1 (en) * 2009-03-18 2015-05-15 Michelin Soc Tech PNEUMATIC WITH COLORED APPLES
JP5350874B2 (en) * 2009-04-30 2013-11-27 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP5346673B2 (en) * 2009-04-30 2013-11-20 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP5495812B2 (en) * 2010-01-22 2014-05-21 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP5313322B2 (en) * 2011-11-21 2013-10-09 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire
JP6076137B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2017-02-08 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP6166913B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2017-07-19 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP5507735B1 (en) * 2013-04-25 2014-05-28 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP6043237B2 (en) * 2013-04-25 2016-12-14 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP5657773B1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-01-21 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP5809305B2 (en) 2014-03-11 2015-11-10 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
JP5740025B2 (en) * 2014-03-19 2015-06-24 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
WO2016082948A1 (en) * 2014-11-24 2016-06-02 Continental Reifen Deutschland Gmbh Pneumatic vehicle tyres
JP6334441B2 (en) * 2015-03-13 2018-05-30 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
EP3725556B1 (en) * 2017-12-13 2023-09-06 Bridgestone Corporation Pneumatic tire
EP3725555B1 (en) * 2017-12-13 2024-02-21 Bridgestone Corporation Pneumatic tire
JP7091232B2 (en) * 2018-11-27 2022-06-27 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP7139288B2 (en) * 2019-06-11 2022-09-20 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
KR102267902B1 (en) * 2019-11-12 2021-06-24 한국타이어앤테크놀로지 주식회사 Tires with resonators for noise reduction
JP7306976B2 (en) * 2019-12-05 2023-07-11 株式会社ブリヂストン pneumatic tire
JP7405686B2 (en) 2020-05-08 2023-12-26 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
CN115515801A (en) * 2020-05-08 2022-12-23 株式会社普利司通 Tyre for vehicle wheels
US20230219375A1 (en) * 2020-05-08 2023-07-13 Bridgestone Corporation Tire
JP7365292B2 (en) * 2020-05-08 2023-10-19 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP7365290B2 (en) * 2020-05-08 2023-10-19 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
JP7365291B2 (en) * 2020-05-08 2023-10-19 株式会社ブリヂストン tire
CN111619292B (en) * 2020-06-05 2022-03-15 合肥工业大学 Low-noise pneumatic tire tread pattern
JP7088234B2 (en) * 2020-07-15 2022-06-21 住友ゴム工業株式会社 tire

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05338411A (en) * 1992-06-10 1993-12-21 Hino Motors Ltd Low noise rib tire
JP2804218B2 (en) * 1993-06-17 1998-09-24 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire
JPH0717217A (en) * 1993-06-22 1995-01-20 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP3563534B2 (en) * 1996-06-26 2004-09-08 株式会社ブリヂストン Pneumatic tire
EP0989000A3 (en) * 1998-09-24 2002-02-06 Continental Aktiengesellschaft Tyre with noise damping properties
JP2001239809A (en) * 1999-12-21 2001-09-04 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic low-noise tire

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106132728A (en) * 2014-04-04 2016-11-16 株式会社普利司通 Tire
US10632793B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2020-04-28 Bridgestone Corporation Tire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007269144A (en) 2007-10-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5013731B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5366539B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
KR101096965B1 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7091232B2 (en) tire
JP5475476B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6125142B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4939979B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6166913B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JPWO2009084666A1 (en) tire
JP2008155798A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7095280B2 (en) tire
JP7069710B2 (en) tire
US8511356B2 (en) Pneumatic tire with tread having trapezoidal shape oblong holes in sidewall of main groove
JP5307215B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5313322B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4895790B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6251082B2 (en) tire
JP7069709B2 (en) tire
JP5980548B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2009126312A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7085427B2 (en) Pneumatic tires
JP5523358B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5121251B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5072345B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5039376B2 (en) Pneumatic tire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090326

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110808

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110816

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20110912

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111017

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20111017

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120508

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120605

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150615

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 5013731

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250