JP4829988B2 - Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid - Google Patents

Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4829988B2
JP4829988B2 JP2009033222A JP2009033222A JP4829988B2 JP 4829988 B2 JP4829988 B2 JP 4829988B2 JP 2009033222 A JP2009033222 A JP 2009033222A JP 2009033222 A JP2009033222 A JP 2009033222A JP 4829988 B2 JP4829988 B2 JP 4829988B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
aluminum alloy
alloy plate
test
packaging container
heating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2009033222A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009108421A (en
Inventor
正俊 小出
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP2009033222A priority Critical patent/JP4829988B2/en
Publication of JP2009108421A publication Critical patent/JP2009108421A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4829988B2 publication Critical patent/JP4829988B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Description

本発明は、キャンやボトル缶等の包装容器蓋に好適な、成形性および応力緩和性に優れたアルミニウム合金板に関する。   The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy plate excellent in formability and stress relaxation properties, which is suitable for packaging container lids such as cans and bottle cans.

アルミニウム合金製の包装容器として代表的なものに飲料水用のキャンがあるが、通常、これは、成形性に優れた3000系アルミニウム合金板からなるボディ(缶胴)および高強度な5000系アルミニウム合金板からなるエンド(缶蓋)から構成されている。   A typical example of an aluminum alloy packaging container is a can for drinking water. Usually, this is a body (can barrel) made of a 3000 series aluminum alloy plate having excellent formability and a high strength 5000 series aluminum. It is composed of an end (can lid) made of an alloy plate.

近年、PET(Polyethylene Terephthalate)ボトルに代わるものとして前記アルミニウム合金製のボトル缶が注目されているが、これには、次のようなものがある。
(1)従来のキャンと同様に、缶胴部と缶底部が成形性に優れた3000系アルミニウム合金板の一体物からなり、これに3000系或いは5000系アルミニウム合金板からなるキャップ部が設けられたアルミニウム合金製のボトル缶(以下、「2ピースタイプのボトル缶」という。なお、特許文献1には1ピースタイプのボトル缶として記載されている。)が開示されている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。
In recent years, the aluminum alloy bottle cans have attracted attention as an alternative to PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) bottles, which include the following.
(1) Similar to conventional cans, the can body and the bottom of the can are made of a single body of a 3000 series aluminum alloy plate having excellent formability, and a cap section made of a 3000 series or 5000 series aluminum alloy plate is provided on this. An aluminum alloy bottle can (hereinafter referred to as “two-piece type bottle can”, which is described as a one-piece type bottle can in Patent Document 1) is disclosed (for example, Patent Document 1). 1).

(2)また、成形性に優れた3000系アルミニウム合金板からなる缶胴部、高強度な5000系アルミニウム合金板からなる缶底部および3000系或いは5000系アルミニウム合金板からなるキャップ部から構成されるアルミニウム合金製のボトル缶(以下、「3ピースタイプのボトル缶」という。なお、特許文献1には2ピースタイプのボトル缶として記載されている。)が開示されている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。 (2) Further, it is composed of a can body portion made of a 3000 series aluminum alloy plate excellent in formability, a can bottom portion made of a high strength 5000 series aluminum alloy plate, and a cap portion made of a 3000 series or 5000 series aluminum alloy plate. An aluminum alloy bottle can (hereinafter referred to as “three-piece type bottle can”, which is described as a two-piece type bottle can in Patent Document 1) is disclosed (for example, Patent Document 1). reference).

ここで、前記に説明したような包装容器蓋(キャンの缶蓋部や3ピースボトル缶の缶底部をいう。)および包装容器を製造するための一般的な製造工程について説明すると、
<包装容器蓋(缶蓋部)>
(1)前処理工程
包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に、耐食性を確保するためクロメート処理を施す。
(2)塗装・焼付工程
クロメート処理後の表面に塗装・焼付を行う。
(3)シェル成形工程
塗装・焼付、若しくはラミネートされたアルミニウム合金板から所定の形状にブランキングした後、シェル成形を行う。
(4)カーリング成形工程
缶胴部と巻締めするための巻締め部(カール部)を成形する。
(5)コンパウンドライニング工程
巻締め部にラバーを注入する。
(6)コンバージョン成形工程(以下を同一プレスにて成形する)
(i)リベット成形(バブル成形およびボタン成形)
(ii)スコア成形(飲み口部の溝/スコア加工)
(iii)ビード・エンボス成形(凹凸、文字等の加工)
(iv)ステイク成形(タブ付け)
<包装容器>
(7)内容物充填工程(缶胴部)
(8)缶胴部と缶蓋部の巻締め工程
(9)洗浄/殺菌処理工程
という各工程を経て包装容器蓋および包装容器が製造されている。
Here, a general manufacturing process for manufacturing a packaging container lid (referring to a can lid part of a can and a can bottom part of a three-piece bottle can) as described above and a packaging container will be described.
<Packing container lid (can lid)>
(1) Pretreatment process Chromate treatment is applied to the aluminum alloy plate for the packaging container lid to ensure corrosion resistance.
(2) Painting / baking process The surface after chromating is painted and baked.
(3) Shell forming step After blanking into a predetermined shape from a painted, baked or laminated aluminum alloy plate, shell forming is performed.
(4) Curling forming process A can body part and a winding part (curl part) for winding are formed.
(5) Compound drying process Rubber is injected into the winding part.
(6) Conversion molding process (the following is molded by the same press)
(i) Rivet molding (bubble molding and button molding)
(ii) Score shaping (groove in the mouth / score processing)
(iii) Bead emboss molding (processing of irregularities, letters, etc.)
(iv) Stake molding (with tabs)
<Packing container>
(7) Contents filling process (can body part)
(8) Winding process of can body part and can lid part (9) The packaging container lid and the packaging container are manufactured through each process of cleaning / sterilization treatment process.

前記工程中(2)の塗装・焼付工程では、塗装・焼付は、連続熱処理炉により連続で処理されるため、オーブンにおいて250℃前後のピーク温度で、20秒間程度の通板時間で塗装・焼付工程が行われている。
しかし、ハンドリングで包装容器が変形しない、あるいは中味が漏れない等の包装容器としての信頼性を確保する必要があるので、当該塗装・焼付工程による過剰な強度低下は許されない。
In the coating / baking step (2) in the above process, since the coating / baking is continuously performed in a continuous heat treatment furnace, the coating / baking is performed in the oven at a peak temperature of around 250 ° C. for about 20 seconds. The process is being performed.
However, since it is necessary to ensure the reliability of the packaging container such that the packaging container is not deformed by handling or the contents do not leak, excessive strength reduction due to the coating / baking process is not allowed.

さらに、現在、このようなアルミニウム合金製包装容器に関しては低コスト化の要求が強く、包装容器の一層の薄肉化が求められている。同様に、包装容器蓋についても薄肉化が検討されており、これを薄肉化するためには、包装容器蓋としての必要な剛性を保つため、塗装・焼付工程或いはラミネート処理工程後における高強度化が必要であるとともに、アルミニウム合金自体も、薄肉化した場合に、ある程度の耐圧強度を有していることが必要である。かかる耐圧強度を具備するため、包装容器蓋材においては、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板が受ける最高温度であるところの250℃程度で20秒間程度熱処理した後の耐力が、220N/mm2(220MPa)以上であるアルミニウム合金板が求められている。 Furthermore, there is a strong demand for cost reduction for such aluminum alloy packaging containers, and there is a demand for further thinner packaging containers. Similarly, reducing the thickness of the packaging container lid is also under consideration. To reduce the thickness of the packaging container lid, it is necessary to increase the strength after the painting / baking process or laminating process in order to maintain the necessary rigidity as the packaging container lid. In addition, the aluminum alloy itself needs to have a certain degree of pressure resistance when it is thinned. In order to have such pressure resistance, the packaging container lid material has a proof stress of 220 N / mm 2 (220 MPa) after heat treatment for about 20 seconds at about 250 ° C., which is the highest temperature that the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid receives. ) There is a need for an aluminum alloy plate that is above.

特開2002−256366号公報(段落番号0018〜0029、図1〜図3)JP 2002-256366 A (paragraph numbers 0018 to 0029, FIGS. 1 to 3)

従来の組成成分からなるアルミニウム合金板から形成される包装容器においては、前記(9)の殺菌処理工程において、レトルト飲料や乳製品では前述したように内容物充填後、温度条件100〜125℃において30分間程度実施されるが、充填された内容物によっては5kg/cm2(500kPa)を超える圧力が包装容器および包装容器蓋の内壁に加わることもある。このような場合、内容物の圧力によって包装容器蓋は包装容器の外側方向に膨らみ、変形状態となる。このような包装容器蓋の変形状態における変形量をバルジ変形量というが、このバルジ変形量が大きくなると、反転搬送中に蓋がコンベアに引っ掛かり、生産ラインが停滞する等の問題が発生する。また、前記殺菌処理後、アルミニウム合金板に加わる熱が除去された後においては、変形前の定常状態に戻る必要があるが、これら変形した包装容器蓋の中には変形したままの状態が維持され、元の形状に戻らないものもある。 In the packaging container formed from the aluminum alloy plate which consists of a conventional composition component, in the sterilization process of said (9), as above-mentioned in retort drinks and dairy products, after temperature filling at temperature conditions of 100-125 degreeC Although it is carried out for about 30 minutes, depending on the filled contents, a pressure exceeding 5 kg / cm 2 (500 kPa) may be applied to the inner wall of the packaging container and the packaging container lid. In such a case, the packaging container lid swells in the outer direction of the packaging container due to the pressure of the contents, and is deformed. Such deformation amount in the deformed state of the packaging container lid is referred to as a bulge deformation amount. However, when the bulge deformation amount increases, problems such as the lid being caught on the conveyor during reverse conveyance and the production line stagnating. In addition, after the heat applied to the aluminum alloy plate is removed after the sterilization treatment, it is necessary to return to the steady state before the deformation, but the deformed packaging container lid remains in a deformed state. Some of them do not return to their original shape.

また、冬場のホット対応品における50〜70℃程度での保温保管時や、夏場の高温下で車中に放置され直射日光に曝された場合には、包装容器は60℃を超える高温になることもあり、耐圧強度を超えてバックリングしてしまう場合や、さらにはバックリングだけに留まらず、巻き締め部やカウンターシンク部(缶蓋溝部)で破断するといった事態にも繋がっている。   In addition, when the product is kept warm at about 50 to 70 ° C. in a hot-compatible product in winter or when it is left in a car at high temperatures in summer and exposed to direct sunlight, the temperature of the packaging container exceeds 60 ° C. In some cases, the buckling exceeds the pressure strength, or even the buckling portion or the countersink portion (can lid groove portion) breaks in addition to the buckling.

本発明は、前記のような課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、包装容器蓋用として成形性に優れ、かつ、内容物充填後に高温下に曝され包装容器の内圧が上昇し、バックリングした場合であっても破断し難く、また、その形状が変形した場合であっても、熱の除去と共に形状が元の定常状態に戻る、即ち応力緩和性に優れる包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and is excellent in moldability for a packaging container lid, and exposed to a high temperature after the contents are filled, and the internal pressure of the packaging container is increased and buckled. Even if it is a case, it is difficult to break, and even if the shape is deformed, the shape returns to the original steady state upon removal of heat, that is, an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid that is excellent in stress relaxation properties The purpose is to do.

本発明者らは、前記課題を解決するため鋭意研究実験した結果、アルミニウム合金に含まれる組成成分(Cu、Mn、Mg、Si、Fe)を適切な範囲に制御すると共に、これを適切な製造方法によって製造し、得られたアルミニウム合金板が、250℃、20秒間の塗装・焼付相当ベーキング処理後の平行曲げ引張試験の破断限界伸び率が適切なものとなるように規制することで前記課題を解決し得ることを見出し、本発明を創作するに至った。   As a result of diligent research and experiments to solve the above problems, the present inventors have controlled the composition components (Cu, Mn, Mg, Si, Fe) contained in the aluminum alloy to an appropriate range and appropriately manufactured them. The above-mentioned problem is achieved by regulating the aluminum alloy plate produced and produced by the method so that the breaking limit elongation of the parallel bending tensile test after baking at a temperature equivalent to 250 ° C. for 20 seconds is appropriate. The inventors have found that the present invention can be solved, and have created the present invention.

前記課題を解決し得た本発明は、以下のような構成よりなる。
すなわち、請求項1に記載の発明は、Cuを0.05乃至0.3質量%、Mnを0.2乃至0.6質量%、Mgを2.0乃至5.5質量%含有し、さらに、Siを0.05乃至0.3質量%、Feを0.05乃至0.4質量%に規制し、残部がAlと不可避的不純物からなる組成を有するアルミニウム合金鋳塊の均質化熱処理工程を行った後、熱間圧延処理工程および第1の冷間圧延処理工程を行い、前記冷間圧延処理工程で冷間圧延処理された圧延板を100℃/分以上の加熱速度で加熱処理する工程と、この工程により400乃至550℃まで加熱し、加熱直後に100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程か、もしくは、前記400乃至550℃の温度まで加熱した後、10分間以内加熱・保持する工程と、当該工程で保持された圧延板を100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程を行い、前記焼鈍処理工程による焼鈍処理が終了した圧延板の圧延率が50乃至80%となるように冷間圧延処理を1回で行う第2の冷間圧延処理工程を行い、さらに、前記第2の冷間圧延処理工程で冷間圧延処理されたアルミニウム合金板を120乃至150℃の巻取り温度でコイルに巻き取る巻取り工程を行って製造された包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板であり、破断限界伸び率が2%以上の第1条件、応力緩和試験(EMAS−3003)によるたわみ高さが7mm以下の第2条件、球頭張出試験の結果、肌荒れおよび割れが生じない第3条件、開缶性評価の結果、タブ長手方向延長を越えてスコア亀裂が伝播する第4条件について、前記破断限界伸び率は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板をソルトバスによって250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後、当該アルミニウム合金板の圧延方向と直角となる方向が長手方向となるように長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片を作製し、これを先端R0.1mmポンチにて、引張方向が当該試験片の圧延目と直角の方向となるように90度V字型に折り曲げ、当該折り曲げた試験板を2つの平らな板により平板に戻して折り目が付けられた平板とし、当該平板を圧延方向と直角となる方向に引張ることにより破断限界変位量を測定し、標点距離を50mmとして、{(破断限界変位量(mm)/50(mm))×100}で求められ、前記応力緩和試験は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板をソルトバスによって250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後、長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片を作製し、予歪2.5%を与え、120℃の試験温度で3時間保持した後のたわみ高さを測定し、前記球頭張出試験は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板に膜厚が5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、加熱温度250℃、加熱時間20秒の加熱条件にて焼き付けた試験片に対して、球頭直径が6mmφ、張出量が1.5mmの条件で行い、前記開缶性評価は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板に膜厚が5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、加熱温度250℃、加熱時間20秒の加熱条件にて焼き付けた試験片をシェル成形およびコンバージョン成形して厚さ0.30mm、スコア残厚110μmとし、SOT式のタブを取り付けて開缶試験機によりスコア亀裂を発生させるように行うものであり、前記試験および前記評価の結果が、前記第1条件から前記第4条件を満足するように形成されたことを特徴としている。
The present invention that has solved the above-described problems has the following configuration.
That is, the invention according to claim 1 contains 0.05 to 0.3% by mass of Cu, 0.2 to 0.6% by mass of Mn, 2.0 to 5.5% by mass of Mg, And a homogenization heat treatment step of an aluminum alloy ingot having a composition in which Si is regulated to 0.05 to 0.3 mass%, Fe is regulated to 0.05 to 0.4 mass%, and the balance is made of Al and inevitable impurities. And performing the hot rolling treatment step and the first cold rolling treatment step, and heat-treating the rolled sheet cold-rolled in the cold rolling treatment step at a heating rate of 100 ° C./min or more. And an annealing treatment step including heating to 400 to 550 ° C. in this step and cooling to 200 ° C. or less immediately after heating at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or higher, or to a temperature of 400 to 550 ° C. Heat and hold within 10 minutes after heating And a step of cooling the rolled sheet held in the step to 200 ° C. or less at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more, and the annealing process in the annealing process is completed. The second cold rolling treatment step in which the cold rolling treatment is performed once so that the rolling rate of the steel sheet becomes 50 to 80% is performed, and further, the cold rolling treatment is performed in the second cold rolling treatment step. The aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid manufactured by performing a winding process of winding an aluminum alloy plate on a coil at a winding temperature of 120 to 150 ° C. , the first condition with a breaking limit elongation of 2% or more, stress The second condition where the deflection height by the relaxation test (EMAS-3003) is 7mm or less, the result of the ball head overhang test, the third condition where skin roughening and cracking do not occur, the result of the can openability evaluation, the tab lengthwise extension exceeded Score crack Regarding the fourth condition for propagation, the breaking elongation at break is as follows: an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition is produced with a thickness of 0.30 mm, and the aluminum alloy plate is baked with a salt bath at a temperature of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds. After that, a test piece having a length of 100 mm and a width of 20 mm was prepared so that the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the aluminum alloy sheet was the longitudinal direction, and this was tested with a tip R0.1 mm punch and the tensile direction was the test. Folded into a 90-degree V-shape so as to be in a direction perpendicular to the rolling line of the piece, the folded test plate was returned to a flat plate with two flat plates to form a creased plate, and the flat plate was defined as the rolling direction. The breaking limit displacement is measured by pulling in a direction that is perpendicular, and the gauge distance is 50 mm, and {(breaking limit displacement (mm) / 50 (mm)) × 100} is obtained. In the stress relaxation test, an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition was manufactured at a thickness of 0.30 mm, and the aluminum alloy plate was baked with a salt bath at a temperature of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds, and then a length of 100 mm. , A test piece having a width of 20 mm was prepared, a pre-strain of 2.5% was applied, and the deflection height after being held at a test temperature of 120 ° C. for 3 hours was measured. An aluminum alloy plate is manufactured with a thickness of 0.30 mm, and an epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm is applied to both sides of the aluminum alloy plate and baked under heating conditions of a heating temperature of 250 ° C. and a heating time of 20 seconds. The test piece was tested under the conditions of a ball head diameter of 6 mmφ and a protruding amount of 1.5 mm, and the can openability evaluation was performed by manufacturing an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition with a plate thickness of 0.30 mm, This An epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm was applied to both sides of an aluminum alloy plate, and a test piece baked under heating conditions of a heating temperature of 250 ° C. and a heating time of 20 seconds was subjected to shell molding and conversion molding to a thickness of 0. 30 mm, the remaining score is 110 μm, and an SOT-type tab is attached, and a score crack is generated by a can tester. The results of the test and the evaluation are the first condition to the fourth condition. It is characterized by being formed to satisfy

以上のような組成成分および特性を有するように形成されることにより、包装容器蓋用として成形性に優れ、且つ、包装容器の内圧が高まった状態となり、バックリングした場合であっても破断し難く、更に内容物充填後の包装容器に殺菌処理、保温等の熱がかかり、その後冷却した場合にも包装容器蓋の変形が大きく残存しない、あるいは、包装容器蓋の変形が許容し得る変形に抑えることのできる、応力緩和性に優れる包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板とすることができる。   By being formed so as to have the above compositional components and characteristics, it is excellent in moldability for packaging container lids, and the internal pressure of the packaging container is increased, and it breaks even when buckling occurs. It is difficult, and the packaging container after filling the contents is subjected to heat such as sterilization treatment, heat retention, etc., and when it is cooled, the deformation of the packaging container lid does not remain largely, or the deformation of the packaging container lid is acceptable. It can be set as the aluminum alloy board for packaging container lids which is excellent in stress relaxation property.

以上、説明したように、本発明の請求項1に記載する組成成分および特性を有するように形成されることにより、包装容器蓋用として成形性に優れ、且つ、内容物充填後に高温下に曝され、包装容器の内圧が高まった状態となり、バックリングした場合であっても破断し難く、熱の除去と共に変形状態にあった包装容器蓋の形状が元の定常状態に戻る、応力緩和性に優れる包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板とすることができる。   As described above, by being formed so as to have the composition components and characteristics described in claim 1 of the present invention, it is excellent in moldability for packaging container lids and exposed to high temperatures after filling the contents. It is in a state where the internal pressure of the packaging container is increased, it is difficult to break even when buckling, and the shape of the packaging container lid that was in a deformed state returns to the original steady state with the removal of heat. It can be set as the excellent aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids.

本発明の包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法を説明するフローチャートである。It is a flowchart explaining the manufacturing method of the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids of this invention. 平行曲げ引張試験の方法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the method of a parallel bending tension test. 球頭張出成形性試験の断面説明図である。It is a section explanatory view of a ball head overhang formability test. 応力緩和性試験の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of a stress relaxation test. 開缶性試験の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of a can openability test.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について詳細に説明する。なお、本発明はこの実施の形態にのみ限定されるものではなく、本発明の技術的思想に基づく限りにおいて適宜に変更することが可能である。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to this embodiment, and can be appropriately changed as long as it is based on the technical idea of the present invention.

本発明者らは、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板としての成形性、耐割れ性、および高温下での内圧に相当する応力が加わった場合であっても、応力の除去と共に変形状態にあった包装容器蓋が元の定常状態に戻るのに必要な応力緩和性に注目し、これらとアルミニウム合金の成分および製造工程等との関係につき種々実験研究した。
その結果、成形性、耐割れ性および応力緩和性は、アルミニウム合金の成分や冷間圧延後の焼鈍条件等と密接な関係があることを見出した。
The present inventors were in a deformed state along with the removal of the stress even when stress corresponding to the formability as an aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid, crack resistance, and internal pressure at high temperature was applied. Focusing on the stress relaxation required for the packaging container lid to return to its original steady state, various experimental studies were conducted on the relationship between these and the components of the aluminum alloy and the manufacturing process.
As a result, it has been found that the formability, crack resistance and stress relaxation properties are closely related to the components of the aluminum alloy and the annealing conditions after cold rolling.

すなわち、本発明においては、アルミニウム合金に含まれるCu、Mn、Mg、Si、Feの組成成分の含有量およびベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験の破断限界伸び率(特定の組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板をソルトバスによって250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後、当該アルミニウム合金板の圧延方向と直角となる方向が長手方向となるように長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片を作製し、これを先端R0.1mmポンチにて、引張方向が当該試験片の圧延目と直角の方向となるように90度V字型に折り曲げ、当該折り曲げた試験板を2つの平らな板により平板に戻して折り目が付けられた平板とし、当該平板を圧延方向と直角となる方向に引張ることにより破断限界変位量を測定し、標点距離を50mmとして、{(破断限界変位量(mm)/50(mm))×100}で求められる破断限界伸び率をいう。以下同じ。)を適正な範囲内に規制している。そこで、まずこれらの成分の含有量を数値限定した理由およびベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率を規定した理由について説明する。 That is, in the present invention, the content of the compositional components of Cu, Mn, Mg, Si, Fe contained in the aluminum alloy and the breaking limit elongation of the parallel bending tensile test after baking (the aluminum alloy plate having a specific composition) The aluminum alloy plate is manufactured with a thickness of 0.30 mm, and the aluminum alloy plate is baked with a salt bath at a temperature of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds, so that the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the aluminum alloy plate is the longitudinal direction. A test piece having a length of 100 mm and a width of 20 mm was prepared, and this was bent into a 90-degree V-shape with a tip R0.1 mm punch so that the tensile direction was perpendicular to the rolling line of the test piece. the test plate flat plate back to the fold lines attached flat by two flat plates, the pulling the flat plate in a direction in which the rolling direction and at right angles The fracture limit displacement amount is measured, the gauge distance is 50 mm, and {(breakage limit displacement amount (mm) / 50 (mm)) × 100} means the fracture limit elongation obtained by the same; the same shall apply hereinafter). It is regulated within the range. Therefore, the reason why the contents of these components are limited numerically and the reason why the breaking limit elongation in the parallel bending tensile test after baking is specified will be described.

≪組成成分≫
[Cuを0.05乃至0.3質量%とした理由]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるCuは、Mgと共存して時効析出によるベークハード効果を発現する。このため、塗装・焼付或いはラミネート工程で析出硬化性が付与され、包装容器蓋としての剛性を維持する。また、応力緩和性を高める。
Cuが0.05質量%未満では、十分なベークハードの効果および応力緩和性が得られず、また、0.3質量%を超える含有量では、鋳塊割れ、熱間圧延時の割れを引き起こし易くなるばかりか、得られたアルミニウム合金板の耐食性が著しく劣化する。
従って、Cuは、0.05乃至0.3質量%とする。
≪Composition ingredients≫
[Reason for setting Cu to 0.05 to 0.3% by mass]
Cu contained in the aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid according to the present invention coexists with Mg and exhibits a bake hard effect due to aging precipitation. For this reason, precipitation hardenability is provided in the painting / baking or laminating process, and the rigidity as a packaging container lid is maintained. Moreover, stress relaxation property is improved.
If Cu is less than 0.05% by mass, sufficient bake hard effect and stress relaxation cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 0.3% by mass, ingot cracking and cracking during hot rolling are caused. Not only does this become easy, but the corrosion resistance of the obtained aluminum alloy sheet is significantly deteriorated.
Therefore, Cu is 0.05 to 0.3 mass%.

[Mnを0.2乃至0.6質量%とした理由]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるMnは、強度向上により包装容器蓋の剛性維持に効果がある。また、アルミニウム合金結晶粒の微細化により成形性向上にも効果がある。
Mnは、0.2質量%未満では、前記効果が少なく、0.6質量%を超えると粗大なAl−Fe−Mn系金属間化合物を生成し、成形時やバックリング時の割れの起点となるため好ましくない。
従って、Mnは、0.2乃至0.6質量%、さらに望ましくは、0.3乃至0.5質量%とする。
[Reason for setting Mn to 0.2 to 0.6% by mass]
Mn contained in the aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid according to the present invention is effective in maintaining the rigidity of the packaging container lid by improving the strength. Further, the refinement of aluminum alloy crystal grains is effective in improving formability.
When Mn is less than 0.2% by mass, the above-mentioned effect is small, and when it exceeds 0.6% by mass, a coarse Al—Fe—Mn-based intermetallic compound is produced, and the starting point of cracking during molding or buckling Therefore, it is not preferable.
Therefore, Mn is 0.2 to 0.6 mass%, more preferably 0.3 to 0.5 mass%.

[Mgを2.0乃至5.5質量%とした理由]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるMgは、前記のCuと同じく材料強度に寄与する元素である。
Mg含有量が2.0質量%未満では、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板として十分な強度が得られず、また、Mg含有量が5.5質量%を超えると鋳塊割れ、熱間圧延時の割れを引き起こし易くなる。
従って、本発明では、Mgの含有量を2.0乃至5.5質量%とする。
[Reason for setting Mg to 2.0 to 5.5% by mass]
Mg contained in the aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid according to the present invention is an element that contributes to the material strength like Cu.
If the Mg content is less than 2.0% by mass, sufficient strength cannot be obtained as an aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids. If the Mg content exceeds 5.5% by mass, ingot cracking and hot rolling It is easy to cause cracking.
Therefore, in the present invention, the Mg content is set to 2.0 to 5.5% by mass.

[Siを0.05乃至0.3質量%とした理由]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるSiは、開缶性を向上させるMg−Si系金属間化合物の生成および組織の安定化に効果を示す元素である。
Si含有量が0.05質量%未満では、Mg−Si系金属間化合物の生成量が少なく開缶性への効果が低いばかりか、Al地金の純度を高める必要があり、コストアップ要因となることから不適である。
また、Si含有量が0.3質量%を超えると、Mg−Si系金属間化合物の過剰生成により成形性が低下し、また、固溶Mgの減少による材料強度やベークハード性が必要以上に低下するため不適である。
従って、Siは、0.05乃至0.3質量%とする。
[Reason for setting Si to 0.05 to 0.3% by mass]
Si contained in the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids according to the present invention is an element that has an effect on the formation of Mg-Si intermetallic compounds that improve the openability and the stabilization of the structure.
If the Si content is less than 0.05% by mass, not only the production amount of Mg-Si intermetallic compounds is small and the effect on the openability is low, but also the purity of the Al ingot needs to be increased. This is inappropriate.
Further, if the Si content exceeds 0.3% by mass, the formability decreases due to excessive formation of Mg-Si intermetallic compounds, and the material strength and bake hardness due to the decrease in solid solution Mg are more than necessary. It is unsuitable because it decreases.
Accordingly, Si is set to 0.05 to 0.3% by mass.

[Feを0.05乃至0.4質量%とした理由]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるFeは、アルミニウム合金の結晶粒サイズに影響する。Fe含有量が0.05質量%未満では、結晶粒が粗大化し、また、Al地金の純度を上げる必要がありコストアップ要因となる。
また、Fe含有量が0.4質量%を超えると、最大長が20μmを超えるような巨大なAl−Fe−Mn系金属間化合物を生成し、成形性を低下させる。
このため、本発明では、Feの含有量を0.05乃至0.4質量%とする。
[Reason for setting Fe to 0.05 to 0.4 mass%]
Fe contained in the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid according to the present invention affects the crystal grain size of the aluminum alloy. If the Fe content is less than 0.05% by mass, the crystal grains become coarse, and the purity of the Al metal needs to be increased, resulting in an increase in cost.
On the other hand, when the Fe content exceeds 0.4% by mass, a huge Al—Fe—Mn-based intermetallic compound having a maximum length exceeding 20 μm is generated, and the formability is lowered.
For this reason, in this invention, content of Fe shall be 0.05 to 0.4 mass%.

[不可避的不純物]
本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれる不可避的不純物として、Zn:0.2質量%以下、Ti:0.1質量%以下、Zr:0.1質量%以下、B:0.1質量%以下の含有は本発明の効果を妨げるものではなく、このような不可避的不純物の含有は許容される。
[Inevitable impurities]
As unavoidable impurities contained in the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids according to the present invention, Zn: 0.2% by mass or less, Ti: 0.1% by mass or less, Zr: 0.1% by mass or less, B: 0.0. Inclusion of 1% by mass or less does not hinder the effects of the present invention, and such inevitable impurities are allowed to be contained.

[ベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率を2%以上とした理由]
250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率は、アルミニウム合金板の展性や延性などの物性、特に本発明では応力緩和性の評価にも用いることができる。
ベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率が2%未満であると、エンド成形後の巻き締め工程で巻き締め加工部に厳しい曲げ変形が加わったとき延性が低下して破断したり、充填・巻き締め後耐圧強度を超えて内圧がかかりバックリングが発生してエンドカウンターシンク部(曲げ加工部)が曲げ戻される形態で急速に反転したりしたとき、カウンターシンク部近傍で破断する等の不具合が生じるため不適である。
従って、本発明では、ベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率は2%以上とする。
なお、この特性は曲げ成形部の成形性や割れ感受性を示す指標であり、成分・圧延巻取温度をはじめとする製造工程を規定、適正化することにより達成される。
[Reason why the elongation at break in the parallel bending tensile test after baking was 2% or more]
The elongation at break in the parallel bending tensile test after baking for 20 seconds under a temperature condition of 250 ° C. can be used to evaluate physical properties such as malleability and ductility of the aluminum alloy sheet, particularly stress relaxation properties in the present invention. it can.
When the critical elongation at break in the parallel bending tensile test after baking is less than 2%, the ductility decreases when the severed bending deformation is applied to the tightened portion in the tightening process after the end forming, and the material is broken or filled.・ If the end counter sink part (bending part) is rapidly reversed in a form where the internal pressure is applied beyond the pressure strength after winding and buckling occurs and the end counter sink part (bending part) is bent back, it will break near the counter sink part. It is unsuitable because it causes defects.
Therefore, in the present invention, the breaking limit elongation in the parallel bending tensile test after baking is set to 2% or more.
This characteristic is an index indicating the formability and cracking susceptibility of the bend-formed part, and is achieved by defining and optimizing the manufacturing process including components and rolling coiling temperature.

[包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法]
次に、本発明の包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法について図1に示すフローチャートを参照して説明する。
本発明の包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法は、まず、本発明の請求項1に規定する組成成分を含有するアルミニウム合金鋳塊(スラブ)の均質化熱処理工程(S1)を行った後、熱間圧延処理工程(S2)および冷間圧延処理工程(S3)を行い、かかる冷間圧延後の圧延板を100℃/分以上の加熱速度で加熱処理する工程と、この工程により400乃至550℃まで加熱し、加熱直後に100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程(S4)か、もしくは、前記400乃至550℃の温度まで加熱した後、10分間以内加熱・保持する工程と、かかる工程により高温で保持された圧延板を100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程(S4)を行い、当該工程による焼鈍処理が終了した圧延板の圧延率が50乃至80%となるよう冷間圧延処理工程(S5)を行い、さらに、冷間圧延されたアルミニウム合金板を120乃至150℃の巻取り温度でコイルに巻き取る巻取り工程(S6)を行う。以上説明した製造方法とすることで、本発明が目的とするところの成形性および応力緩和性が優れるように包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板を形成することができる。
[Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for packaging container lid]
Next, the manufacturing method of the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids of this invention is demonstrated with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.
The method for producing an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid according to the present invention, first, after performing a homogenization heat treatment step (S1) of an aluminum alloy ingot (slab) containing the composition component defined in claim 1 of the present invention. , A hot rolling treatment step (S2) and a cold rolling treatment step (S3) are performed, and the cold-rolled rolled plate is heated at a heating rate of 100 ° C./min or more, and this step is performed through 400 to After heating to 550 ° C. and immediately after heating, annealing step (S4) having a step of cooling to 200 ° C. or less at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more, or after heating to the temperature of 400 to 550 ° C., An annealing treatment step (S4) is performed which includes a step of heating and holding within 10 minutes and a step of cooling the rolled plate held at a high temperature by such a step to 200 ° C. or less at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more. A cold rolling treatment step (S5) is performed so that the rolling rate of the rolled plate after the annealing treatment in the step is 50 to 80%, and the cold-rolled aluminum alloy plate is wound at 120 to 150 ° C. A winding process (S6) for winding the coil at a temperature is performed. By using the manufacturing method described above, an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid can be formed so that the formability and stress relaxation properties of the present invention are excellent.

すなわち、本発明の包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法のうち、冷間圧延後の焼鈍処理工程(第4工程)において加熱速度、保持時間、冷却速度を規制するので、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板としての成形性および応力緩和性を高めることができる。また、焼鈍後の冷間圧延処理工程(第5工程)において圧延率を規制するので、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の強度を効率的に高めることができる。さらに、冷間圧延後の巻取り工程(第6工程)においてコイルへの巻取り温度を規制するので、アルミニウム合金板のベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率を適切な範囲に保つことができ、かつ、粒界脆化を起こすことがなくなる。   That is, in the manufacturing method of the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid of the present invention, the heating rate, holding time, and cooling rate are regulated in the annealing process step (fourth step) after cold rolling. Formability and stress relaxation as an alloy plate can be improved. Moreover, since a rolling rate is controlled in the cold rolling treatment process (5th process) after annealing, the intensity | strength of the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids can be raised efficiently. Furthermore, since the coiling temperature is regulated in the coiling process after the cold rolling (sixth process), the elongation of the parallel bending tensile test after baking the aluminum alloy sheet can be kept within an appropriate range. And no grain boundary embrittlement occurs.

なお、前記各工程のうち、均質化熱処理工程(S1)、熱間圧延処理工程(S2)および冷間圧延処理工程(S3)については、従来公知の方法で行うことができる。
以下に、前記本発明の製造方法において製造条件を限定した理由について説明する。
In addition, among each said process, it can carry out by a conventionally well-known method about a homogenization heat treatment process (S1), a hot rolling process process (S2), and a cold rolling process process (S3).
The reason why the production conditions are limited in the production method of the present invention will be described below.

≪製造条件≫
[冷間圧延後の焼鈍処理工程(S4)]
包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板としての成形性および応力緩和性を高めるためには、冷間圧延後に焼鈍が必要である。
当該焼鈍処理工程における加熱速度および冷却速度は、アルミニウム合金再結晶粒の結晶粒サイズ、固溶元素(Mg、Cu)の固溶量に影響を及ぼす。
加熱速度が100℃/分未満では、再結晶粒サイズが大きくなり、成形性が低下する。更に、冷却速度が100℃/分未満では、固溶成分の固溶状態を保つことができなくなりベークハードの効果および応力緩和性が得られなくなる。
また、保持温度が400℃未満では、十分な再結晶粒組織を得ることができず、550℃を超えるとアルミニウム合金板表面のバーニング発生等品質的な異常を引き起こす。
また、加熱処理後の保持時間が10分間を超えることは、生産性が著しく低下するため不適である。
従って、加熱速度は100℃/分以上、冷却速度は100℃/分以上、さらに、加熱時の保持温度は400乃至550℃とし、加熱処理後の保持時間は10分間以内であることが必要であるが、保持時間を設けずに加熱処理直後(すなわち、保持時間としては0秒間となる)に冷却処理する工程を行うことがより望ましい。
また、焼鈍処理工程としては、連続焼鈍処理が好ましいが、バッチ式としてもよい。
≪Production conditions≫
[Annealing treatment step after cold rolling (S4)]
In order to improve the formability and stress relaxation as an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid, annealing is required after cold rolling.
The heating rate and cooling rate in the annealing treatment step affect the crystal size of the recrystallized aluminum alloy grains and the solid solution amount of the solid solution elements (Mg, Cu).
When the heating rate is less than 100 ° C./min, the recrystallized grain size increases and the moldability decreases. Further, when the cooling rate is less than 100 ° C./min, the solid solution state of the solid solution component cannot be maintained, and the bake hard effect and the stress relaxation property cannot be obtained.
Further, if the holding temperature is less than 400 ° C, a sufficient recrystallized grain structure cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 550 ° C, quality abnormalities such as burning on the surface of the aluminum alloy plate are caused.
Moreover, it is unsuitable for the holding time after the heat treatment to exceed 10 minutes because the productivity is significantly reduced.
Accordingly, it is necessary that the heating rate is 100 ° C./min or more, the cooling rate is 100 ° C./min or more, the holding temperature during heating is 400 to 550 ° C., and the holding time after the heat treatment is within 10 minutes. However, it is more desirable to perform a cooling process immediately after the heat treatment (that is, the retention time is 0 second) without providing a retention time.
Moreover, as an annealing process process, although a continuous annealing process is preferable, it is good also as a batch type.

[50乃至80%の圧延率での冷間圧延処理工程(S5)]
焼鈍処理工程後の冷間圧延は、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の強度を高めるために必要である。この際、圧延率が50%未満では、十分な強度が得られず、また、80%を超える圧延率では、ベークハードの効果より圧延歪みの熱軟化の程度が上回り、結果として包装容器蓋の応力緩和性が低下してしまう。
従って、冷間圧延率は、50乃至80%とする。
[Cold rolling process step (S5) at a rolling rate of 50 to 80%]
Cold rolling after the annealing process is necessary to increase the strength of the aluminum alloy plate for the packaging container lid. At this time, if the rolling rate is less than 50%, sufficient strength cannot be obtained, and if the rolling rate exceeds 80%, the degree of thermal softening of the rolling strain exceeds the effect of baking hard, and as a result, the packaging container lid Stress relaxation properties are reduced.
Therefore, the cold rolling rate is 50 to 80%.

[120℃乃至150℃の温度での巻取り工程(S6)]
冷間圧延後に120℃未満の温度でコイルに巻き取ると、冷間圧延による加工組織の回復(サブグレイン化)が不十分で不均一変形が生じ易くなり、ベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界伸び率が2%未満となるため、包装容器の巻き締め加工時に巻き締め部が破断する、また内圧変化により包装容器蓋のカウンターシンク部が破断する等の恐れがある。
また、150℃を超える温度でコイルに巻き取ると、結晶粒界にβ相が析出し粒界脆化が起こるため、特に、圧延方向に沿った加工部で割れが発生し易くなる。
従って、冷間圧延後の巻取り温度は、120℃乃至150℃とする必要がある。
なお、当該コイルの温度は、巻き取り直後のコイル側面の円周中心部分および円周外縁部分の2点をポータブル式の接触式温度計にて測定した。
[Winding step at a temperature of 120 ° C. to 150 ° C. (S6)]
If it is wound around a coil at a temperature of less than 120 ° C after cold rolling, the recovery of the processed structure by cold rolling (subgraining) is insufficient and non-uniform deformation is likely to occur, and the fracture in the parallel bending tensile test after baking Since the limit elongation is less than 2%, there is a risk that the tightening portion breaks when the packaging container is tightened, or the countersink portion of the packaging container lid is broken due to a change in internal pressure.
Further, when the coil is wound at a temperature exceeding 150 ° C., a β phase is precipitated at the crystal grain boundary and embrittlement of the grain boundary occurs, so that cracking is particularly likely to occur at the processed portion along the rolling direction.
Therefore, the coiling temperature after cold rolling needs to be 120 ° C to 150 ° C.
In addition, the temperature of the said coil was measured with the portable contact-type thermometer in two points, the circumference center part and circumference outer edge part of the coil side surface immediately after winding.

なお、本発明に係る包装容器用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法においては、S3の冷間圧延処理工程を必要に応じて複数回行ってもよい。また、その他必要に応じて製造方法を種々変更することもでき、こうした製造方法の変更例も本発明の包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法に含まれる。 In addition, in the manufacturing method of the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids which concerns on this invention, you may perform the cold rolling process process of S3 in multiple times as needed. In addition, the manufacturing method can be variously changed as necessary, and such a modified example of the manufacturing method is also included in the method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid of the present invention.

以下、本発明に係る包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板の必要条件を満たす実施例について、本発明の必要条件を満たさない比較例と対比して具体的に説明する。
表1に示す化学成分を有する各アルミニウム合金鋳塊を均質化熱処理工程(S1)後、熱間圧延処理工程(S2)および冷間圧延処理工程(S3)を施し、その後に表1に示す条件で焼鈍処理工程(S4)および冷間圧延処理工程(S5)を行い、板厚0.30mmの各アルミニウム合金板を作製した。
なお、焼鈍処理工程(S4)の焼鈍処理条件は、以下のように設定した。
<焼鈍処理条件>
加熱速度:120℃/分
保持温度:500℃×0秒
冷却速度:150℃/分
Hereinafter, the Example which satisfy | fills the requirements for the aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lids concerning this invention is described concretely compared with the comparative example which does not satisfy the requirements of this invention.
Each aluminum alloy ingot having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 is subjected to a hot rolling treatment step (S2) and a cold rolling treatment step (S3) after the homogenization heat treatment step (S1), and then the conditions shown in Table 1 An annealing treatment step (S4) and a cold rolling treatment step (S5) were carried out to produce each aluminum alloy plate having a plate thickness of 0.30 mm.
In addition, the annealing process conditions of an annealing process process (S4) were set as follows.
<Annealing conditions>
Heating rate: 120 ° C / min Holding temperature: 500 ° C x 0 seconds Cooling rate: 150 ° C / min

Figure 0004829988
Figure 0004829988

その後、前記条件にて作製したアルミニウム合金板について、以下の(1)〜(6)の項目について評価を行った。
(1)平均結晶粒サイズ
各条件で作製したアルミニウム合金板の表面を鏡面とした後、表面をエッチングし、倍率が100倍の金属顕微鏡により金属組織を観察および写真撮影した。
この際、圧延方向に直角な方向に既知の長さの線分(例えば、1mm)を引き、線分により切断された結晶粒の数を求め線分の長さで除することにより、結晶粒1個当たりの結晶粒サイズを求めた(切断法)。場所を変えて同様の測定を繰返し行い(5箇所)、その平均値を平均結晶粒サイズとした。
Then, about the aluminum alloy plate produced on the said conditions, the following items (1)-(6) were evaluated.
(1) Average crystal grain size After making the surface of the aluminum alloy plate produced under each condition a mirror surface, the surface was etched, and the metal structure was observed and photographed with a metal microscope having a magnification of 100 times.
At this time, a line segment of a known length (for example, 1 mm) is drawn in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, and the number of crystal grains cut by the line segment is obtained and divided by the length of the line segment. The crystal grain size per one was determined (cutting method). The same measurement was repeated at different locations (5 locations), and the average value was defined as the average crystal grain size.

(2)耐力
各条件で作製したアルミニウム合金板について、引張り方向が圧延方向と平行になるようにJIS5号による引張り試験片を作製した。その後、包装容器が製造時に受ける最高温度250℃で20秒間、ソルトバスによる塗装・焼付相当処理にてベーキングを行い、JIS Z 2241(金属材料引張試験方法)に準じて引張り試験を行い、耐力を求めた。
(2) Yield strength About the aluminum alloy plate produced on each condition, the tension test piece by JIS5 was produced so that a tension direction might become parallel with a rolling direction. After that, the packaging container is baked for 20 seconds at a maximum temperature of 250 ° C. during the manufacturing process, equivalent to coating and baking with a salt bath, and a tensile test is performed according to JIS Z 2241 (metal material tensile test method). Asked.

(3)平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界変位量
平行曲げ引張試験における破断限界変位量の測定は、図2に示す方法によって行った。すなわち、本発明の条件にて製造されたアルミニウム合金板を250℃、20秒のソルトバスによる塗装・焼付相当ベーキング処理をした後、長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片1を作製し、これを先端R0.1mmポンチ2にて90度V字型に折り曲げ(同図(a))、これを2つの平らな板等により平板に戻し平板3とする(同図(b))。かかるアルミニウム合金板試験片の平板3には折り目が付けられている。そして、かかる平板3を長手方向に引張ることにより、その破断限界変位量を測定する(同図(c))。前記平行曲げ引張試験では、アルミニウム合金板の圧延目に沿って曲げ試験を実施した場合の方がアルミニウム合金板試験片の平板3の伸びが小さいので、アルミニウム合金板の圧延方向と平行となる方向で平板3の曲げ部を形成するように実施した。すなわち、平板3の引張方向はアルミニウム合金板の圧延目と直角の方向となる。
(3) Breaking limit displacement amount in parallel bending tensile test The breaking limit displacement amount in the parallel bending tensile test was measured by the method shown in FIG. That is, after the aluminum alloy plate manufactured under the conditions of the present invention was subjected to coating / baking equivalent baking treatment with a salt bath at 250 ° C. for 20 seconds, a test piece 1 having a length of 100 mm and a width of 20 mm was prepared. It is bent into a 90-degree V-shape by the tip R0.1 mm punch 2 (FIG. (A)), and this is returned to a flat plate by two flat plates or the like to form a flat plate 3 (FIG. (B)). The flat plate 3 of the aluminum alloy plate test piece is creased. And the fracture | rupture limit displacement amount is measured by pulling this flat plate 3 to a longitudinal direction (the figure (c)). In the parallel bending tensile test, since the elongation of the flat plate 3 of the aluminum alloy plate test piece is smaller when the bending test is performed along the rolling line of the aluminum alloy plate, the direction is parallel to the rolling direction of the aluminum alloy plate. It implemented so that the bending part of the flat plate 3 might be formed. That is, the tensile direction of the flat plate 3 is a direction perpendicular to the rolling line of the aluminum alloy plate.

なお、平行曲げ引張試験での破断限界変位量は試験片のサイズ、標点距離により変化してしまうので、標点距離を50mmとした破断限界伸び率によって、これを求めることとした。すなわち、本発明において破断限界伸び率は式(1)で求めることができ、
破断限界伸び率(%)=(破断限界変位量(mm)/50(mm))×100 (1)
本発明においては2%以上の破断限界伸び率を要することから、この場合の破断限界変位量は1mm以上有していることが必要となる。
In addition, since the fracture | rupture limit displacement amount in a parallel bending tension test changes with the size of a test piece and a gauge distance, it decided to obtain this by the fracture limit elongation rate which made the gauge distance 50mm. That is, in the present invention, the breaking elongation at break can be determined by equation (1),
Breaking limit elongation (%) = (breaking limit displacement (mm) / 50 (mm)) × 100 (1)
In the present invention, since the breaking limit elongation of 2% or more is required, the breaking limit displacement in this case needs to be 1 mm or more.

(4)球頭張出成形性
表1に示す各条件にて作製したアルミニウム合金板に所定の前処理を施した後、膜厚が5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、加熱温度250℃、加熱時間20秒の加熱条件にて焼き付けた。
その後、図3に示すように、前記試験片1に、球頭ポンチ4により張り出し成形加工を施して張り出し成形加工性を確認する球頭張出試験(球頭直径:6mmφ、張出量:1.5mm)を実施し、以下の規準にて性能を評価した。張出部に、割れや肌荒れが見られないものを、問題なしとして「○」、張出部5に肌荒れが見られたものを「△」、張出部に割れが見られたものを「×」とした。なお、前記球頭張出試験にあたっては、球頭ポンチ4が被加工材であるアルミニウム合金板の試験片1に接する前に、当該試験片1を工具6で押さえながら行った。
(4) Ball-head overhanging formability After subjecting the aluminum alloy plate produced under the conditions shown in Table 1 to a predetermined pretreatment, an epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm was applied on both sides, and the heating temperature Baking was performed under heating conditions of 250 ° C. and a heating time of 20 seconds.
Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 3, a ball head overhang test (ball head diameter: 6 mmφ, overhang amount: 1) is performed by subjecting the test piece 1 to overhang molding processing using a ball head punch 4. 0.5 mm), and the performance was evaluated according to the following criteria. “No” indicates that there is no crack or rough skin on the overhang, “O” indicates that there is no problem, “△” indicates that the rough surface is seen on the overhang 5, and “No” indicates that the overhang is cracked. × ”. The ball head overhang test was performed while holding the test piece 1 with the tool 6 before the ball head punch 4 was in contact with the test piece 1 of the aluminum alloy plate as the workpiece.

(5)応力緩和性
この評価方法は、日本電子材料工業会で規格化されている手法(応力緩和試験;EMAS−3003)により行った。図4に応力緩和性を評価する手法の概要を示す。試験方法としては、塗装・焼付工程に相当するベーキング処理(温度条件250℃で20秒間加熱処理)を実施後、板厚0.3mm、幅10mm、長さ100mmの試験片1’を作製し、蓋材の変形状態を模擬するため、日本電子材料工業会標準規格EMAS−3003に記載の片持ち梁式によって、缶蓋溝部(カウンターシンク部)加工工程に相当する予歪2.5%(たわみ距離(L):30mm、たわみ高さ(H):10mm(たわみ距離および高さの関係から、負荷応力350MPaに相当))を与え、試験温度120℃、保持時間3時間の所定雰囲気中で弾性的なたわみ変形状態で保持し、応力除去後のたわみ高さ(h)を測定した。なお、試験片のたわみ高さ(h)が大きいほど応力緩和性に劣ることとなる。
本発明においては、たわみ高さ(h)が7mm以下のものは、応力緩和性に優れるとして「○」とし、これを超えるたわみ高さとなる場合には、応力緩和性に劣るとして「×」とした。
(5) Stress relaxation property This evaluation method was carried out by a technique (stress relaxation test; EMAS-3003) standardized by the Japan Electronic Materials Industry Association. FIG. 4 shows an outline of a method for evaluating the stress relaxation property. As a test method, a test piece 1 ′ having a plate thickness of 0.3 mm, a width of 10 mm, and a length of 100 mm was prepared after performing a baking process (heat treatment at a temperature condition of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds) corresponding to the painting and baking process. In order to simulate the deformation state of the lid material, a pre-strain of 2.5% (deflection) corresponding to the can lid groove part (counter sink part) processing step is achieved by the cantilever type described in the Japan Electronic Materials Industry Association Standard EMAS-3003. Distance (L): 30 mm, deflection height (H): 10 mm (corresponding to a load stress of 350 MPa from the relationship between deflection distance and height)), elasticity in a predetermined atmosphere at a test temperature of 120 ° C. and a holding time of 3 hours The bending height (h) after the stress was removed was measured while maintaining a state of bending deformation. In addition, it is inferior to stress relaxation property, so that the deflection height (h) of a test piece is large.
In the present invention, when the deflection height (h) is 7 mm or less, it is “◯” as being excellent in stress relaxation properties, and when the deflection height exceeds this, “x” is assumed as being inferior in stress relaxation properties. did.

(6)開缶性評価
表1の各条件で作製したアルミニウム合金板に所定の前処理を施した後、膜厚5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、250℃の温度条件下で20秒間焼き付けた。
その後、前記塗装板材を前記した包装容器蓋および包装容器についての一般的な製造工程で説明した(3)シェル成形、および、(6)コンバージョン成形し、厚さ0.30mm、スコア残厚110μmとなるように成形した。このように成形した包装容器蓋8にSOT(Stay On Tab)式のタブ9を取り付け、開缶性についての試験を行った(図5参照)。
開缶動作は、図5(a)に示すリード測器製開缶試験機7を用いて行った。開缶試験機7にタブ9を取り付けた包装容器蓋8を取着し、このタブ9の掛止部Pに開缶試験機7の掛止具71を掛止し、掛止具71を水平方向に引張り、タブ9に荷重が掛ったと同時に包装容器蓋8を同図(b)の矢印X方向に90度回転させ元の位置に戻すことによりスコア亀裂を発生させた。
同図(c)に示すタブ長手方向延長Eを越えてスコア亀裂が伝播したものを、問題なく開缶したとして「○」とし、タブ長手方向延長Eまでスコア亀裂が伝播しなかったもの(半開缶)を問題ありとして「×」とした。
表2に前記各評価の結果を示す。
(6) Can openability evaluation After applying a predetermined pretreatment to the aluminum alloy plate produced under each condition shown in Table 1, an epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm was applied on both sides, and the temperature was 250 ° C. Baked for 20 seconds.
After that, (3) Shell molding and (6) Conversion molding explained in the general manufacturing process for the packaging container lid and packaging container described above, the thickness is 0.30 mm, and the remaining score is 110 μm. It shape | molded so that it might become. An SOT (Stay On Tab) type tab 9 was attached to the packaging container lid 8 formed in this manner, and a test for openability was performed (see FIG. 5).
The can opening operation was performed using a reed measuring instrument open can testing machine 7 shown in FIG. A packaging container lid 8 having a tab 9 attached thereto is attached to the can opener tester 7, and a hook 71 of the can opener tester 7 is hooked on a hooking portion P of the tab 9. At the same time that the tab 9 was loaded, the packaging container lid 8 was rotated 90 degrees in the direction of the arrow X in FIG.
The case where the score crack propagated beyond the tab lengthwise extension E shown in FIG. 5C is indicated as “◯” when the can is opened without any problem, and the score crack did not propagate until the tab lengthwise extension E (half open) "X" as a problem.
Table 2 shows the results of each evaluation.

Figure 0004829988
Figure 0004829988

表1に示すように実施例No.1〜4は本発明で規定する必要条件、すなわち組成成分、加熱速度、保持温度、冷却速度、冷間圧延率および巻取り温度のいずれの条件も満たすものであって、かかる条件下で製造されたアルミニウム合金板は、平均結晶粒サイズ、ベーキング後耐力、平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率、球頭張出成形性、応力緩和性および開缶性のいずれの評価も優れた結果を得ることができた。   As shown in Table 1, Example No. 1-4 satisfy the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, that is, the composition components, heating rate, holding temperature, cooling rate, cold rolling rate, and winding temperature, and are manufactured under such conditions. The aluminum alloy sheet can give excellent results in all evaluations of average grain size, yield strength after baking, elongation rate of parallel bending tensile test, ball head overhang formability, stress relaxation and can openability. It was.

一方、比較例No.1〜16は本発明で規定する必要条件のいずれかを満たさないものである。
すなわち、比較例No.1はCuの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、十分なベークハードの効果および応力緩和性を得ることができないので、応力緩和性評価が劣る結果となった(×)。
比較例No.2はCuの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、得られたアルミニウム合金板は鋳塊割れや熱間圧延時の割れが生じ易く、また耐食性が著しく劣化する。すなわち、得られたアルミニウム合金板は機械的強度が脆弱な合金板として製造されたものであり、平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低く、球頭張出成形性について張出部に割れが発生した(×)。
On the other hand, Comparative Example No. 1 to 16 do not satisfy any of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention.
That is, Comparative Example No. Since the content of Cu is outside the lower limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the result of inferior stress relaxation evaluation is obtained because sufficient bake hard effects and stress relaxation cannot be obtained. (×).
Comparative Example No. No. 2 is because the Cu content deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the resulting aluminum alloy sheet is prone to ingot cracking and cracking during hot rolling, and the corrosion resistance is remarkably deteriorated. To do. That is, the obtained aluminum alloy plate was manufactured as an alloy plate with weak mechanical strength, the elongation rate of the parallel bending tensile test was low, and cracks occurred in the overhanging part for ball head overhanging formability. (X).

比較例No.3は、Mnの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、強度向上によるアルミニウム合金板の剛性維持の効果が薄く、開缶性に問題があった(×)。
比較例No.4は、Mnの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、粗大なAl−Fe−Mn系金属間化合物が生成し、成形時やバックリング時の割れの起点が発生するために平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低く、また、球頭張出成形性について張出部に割れが発生した(×)。
Comparative Example No. No. 3 has a problem in can openability because the Mn content deviates from the lower limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, and the effect of maintaining the rigidity of the aluminum alloy sheet due to strength improvement is thin (×) .
Comparative Example No. No. 4, because the Mn content deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, a coarse Al-Fe-Mn intermetallic compound is generated, and the starting point of cracking during molding or buckling Therefore, the elongation rate in the parallel bending tensile test was low, and cracking occurred in the overhanging portion for the ball head overhanging formability (×).

比較例No.5は、Mgの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているので、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板として十分な強度が得られないために、ベーキング耐力が低く、応力緩和性および開缶性の結果も劣るものとなった(×)。
比較例No.6は、Mgの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、鋳塊割れや熱間圧延時の割れが生じ易くなっており、これに起因して、平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低く、また、球頭張出成形性について張出部で割れが発生した(×)。
Comparative Example No. 5, since the Mg content deviates from the lower limit of the requirements defined in the present invention, sufficient strength as an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid cannot be obtained. In addition, the results of the can openability were inferior (×).
Comparative Example No. No. 6, because the Mg content deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, ingot cracking and cracking during hot rolling are likely to occur, and due to this, parallel bending The elongation rate of the tensile test was low, and cracking occurred in the overhanging portion with respect to the ball head overhanging formability (×).

比較例No.7は、Siの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、開缶性を向上させるMg−Si系金属間化合物の生成量が少なく、開缶性への効果が低くなり、開缶性評価において問題があった(×)。
比較例No.8は、Siの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、Mg−Si系金属間化合物の過剰生成による成形性低下および固溶Mgの減少により、材料強度やベークハード効果が必要以上に低下する結果、平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低く、また、球頭張出成形性について張出部に割れが発生した(×)。
Comparative Example No. No. 7, since the Si content is outside the lower limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the production amount of the Mg-Si intermetallic compound for improving the can openability is small, and the effect on the can openability Was low, and there was a problem in the can openability evaluation (×).
Comparative Example No. 8 is because the Si content deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the material strength and the As a result of the Bakehard effect being lowered more than necessary, the elongation rate in the parallel bending tensile test was low, and cracks occurred in the overhanging portion in terms of ball head overhanging formability (×).

比較例No.9は、Feの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板に含まれるアルミニウム合金の結晶粒が粗大化するので、成形性が低下する。従って、球頭張出成形性について張出部に肌荒れが見られた(△)。また、開缶性も問題があった(×)。
比較例No.10は、Feの含有量が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、最大長が20μmを超えるような巨大なAl−Fe−Mn系金属間化合物が生成し、成形性が低下したので、平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低く、また、球頭張出成形性について割れが発生した(×)。
Comparative Example No. No. 9, since the Fe content deviates from the lower limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the crystal grains of the aluminum alloy contained in the aluminum alloy plate for the packaging container lid are coarsened, so the formability is reduced. To do. Therefore, rough skin was seen in the overhanging part (Δ). There was also a problem with can openability (×).
Comparative Example No. No. 10, since the Fe content deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, a huge Al—Fe—Mn intermetallic compound having a maximum length exceeding 20 μm is generated, and the formability Therefore, the elongation rate in the parallel bending tensile test was low, and cracking occurred in the ball head overhanging formability (×).

比較例No.11は、冷間圧延率が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板として十分な強度が得られず、ベーキング後耐力が低く、また、強度が弱いことに起因して応力緩和性も劣り(×)、スコア亀裂伝播が途中で停止し、開缶性も問題があった(×)。
比較例No.12は、冷間圧延率が本発明で規定する必要条件の上限値から外れているために、ベークハードの効果より圧延歪みの熱軟化の程度が上回り、平行曲げ引張試験での伸び率が低くなったので、これに起因して応力緩和量が増大し、応力緩和性が劣る結果となった(×)。
Comparative Example No. No. 11, because the cold rolling rate is out of the lower limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, sufficient strength cannot be obtained as an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid, and the proof strength after baking is low. Due to its weakness, the stress relaxation property was also inferior (x), the propagation of score cracks stopped in the middle, and there was a problem in the openability (×).
Comparative Example No. No. 12, because the cold rolling rate deviates from the upper limit of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the degree of thermal softening of the rolling strain exceeds the effect of the bake hard, and the elongation rate in the parallel bending tensile test is low. As a result, the stress relaxation amount increased due to this, resulting in poor stress relaxation properties (×).

比較例No.13は、巻取り温度が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、ベーキング後の平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低いものとなったので、包装容器の内圧変化により包装容器蓋の巻締め部が破断するおそれがあり、包装容器蓋として用いるには不適なものとなった。   Comparative Example No. No. 13, because the coiling temperature deviates from the lower limit value of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the elongation rate of the parallel bending tensile test after baking was low. There is a possibility that the tightening portion of the lid may be broken, making it unsuitable for use as a packaging container lid.

比較例No.14は、加熱速度が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、アルミニウム合金再結晶粒の結晶粒サイズが大きくなり、成形性が低下し、球頭張出成形性について張出部に肌荒れが見られた(△)。   Comparative Example No. No. 14, because the heating rate deviates from the lower limit value of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, the crystal size of the recrystallized aluminum alloy grains is increased, the formability is lowered, and the ball head overhang formability is increased. Rough skin was seen at the exit (△).

比較例No.15は、保持温度と巻取り温度が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、アルミニウム合金再結晶粒の十分な再結晶粒組織を得ることができず、包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板として必要な強度を得ることができなかった。平行曲げ引張試験の伸び率が低くなったので、球頭張出成形性および応力緩和性も劣る結果となった(×)。   Comparative Example No. No. 15, since the holding temperature and the coiling temperature are out of the lower limit values of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, a sufficient recrystallized grain structure of the aluminum alloy recrystallized grains cannot be obtained. The strength required for an aluminum alloy plate could not be obtained. Since the elongation rate of the parallel bending tensile test was low, the ball head overhanging formability and the stress relaxation property were also inferior (x).

比較例No.16は冷却速度と巻取り温度が本発明で規定する必要条件の下限値から外れているために、固溶成分の固溶状態を保つことができなくなり、十分なベークハードの効果および応力緩和性を得ることができないので、応力緩和性が劣る結果となった(×)。   Comparative Example No. In No. 16, the cooling rate and the coiling temperature are out of the lower limit values of the necessary conditions defined in the present invention, so that the solid solution state of the solid solution component cannot be maintained, and sufficient bake hard effects and stress relaxation properties are achieved. As a result, the stress relaxation property was inferior (x).

Claims (1)

Cuを0.05乃至0.3質量%、Mnを0.2乃至0.6質量%、Mgを2.0乃至5.5質量%含有し、さらに、Siを0.05乃至0.3質量%、Feを0.05乃至0.4質量%に規制し、残部がAlと不可避的不純物からなる組成を有するアルミニウム合金鋳塊の均質化熱処理工程を行った後、熱間圧延処理工程および第1の冷間圧延処理工程を行い、前記冷間圧延処理工程で冷間圧延処理された圧延板を100℃/分以上の加熱速度で加熱処理する工程と、この工程により400乃至550℃まで加熱し、加熱直後に100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程か、もしくは、前記400乃至550℃の温度まで加熱した後、10分間以内加熱・保持する工程と、当該工程で保持された圧延板を100℃/分以上の冷却速度で200℃以下に冷却する工程とを有する焼鈍処理工程を行い、前記焼鈍処理工程による焼鈍処理が終了した圧延板の圧延率が50乃至80%となるように冷間圧延処理を1回で行う第2の冷間圧延処理工程を行い、さらに、前記第2の冷間圧延処理工程で冷間圧延処理されたアルミニウム合金板を120乃至150℃の巻取り温度でコイルに巻き取る巻取り工程を行って製造された包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板であり、
破断限界伸び率が2%以上の第1条件、
応力緩和試験(EMAS−3003)によるたわみ高さが7mm以下の第2条件、
球頭張出試験の結果、肌荒れおよび割れが生じない第3条件、
開缶性評価の結果、タブ長手方向延長を越えてスコア亀裂が伝播する第4条件について、
前記破断限界伸び率は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板をソルトバスによって250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後、当該アルミニウム合金板の圧延方向と直角となる方向が長手方向となるように長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片を作製し、これを先端R0.1mmポンチにて、引張方向が当該試験片の圧延目と直角の方向となるように90度V字型に折り曲げ、当該折り曲げた試験板を2つの平らな板により平板に戻して折り目が付けられた平板とし、当該平板を圧延方向と直角となる方向に引張ることにより破断限界変位量を測定し、標点距離を50mmとして、{(破断限界変位量(mm)/50(mm))×100}で求められ、
前記応力緩和試験は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板をソルトバスによって250℃の温度条件下で20秒間ベーキングした後、長さ100mm、幅20mmの試験片を作製し、予歪2.5%を与え、120℃の試験温度で3時間保持した後のたわみ高さを測定し、
前記球頭張出試験は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板に膜厚が5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、加熱温度250℃、加熱時間20秒の加熱条件にて焼き付けた試験片に対して、球頭直径が6mmφ、張出量が1.5mmの条件で行い、
前記開缶性評価は、前記組成からなるアルミニウム合金板を0.30mmの板厚で製造し、当該アルミニウム合金板に膜厚が5μmのエポキシ系樹脂塗膜を両面に塗装し、加熱温度250℃、加熱時間20秒の加熱条件にて焼き付けた試験片をシェル成形およびコンバージョン成形して厚さ0.30mm、スコア残厚110μmとし、SOT式のタブを取り付けて開缶試験機によりスコア亀裂を発生させるように行うものであり、
前記試験および前記評価の結果が、前記第1条件から前記第4条件を満足するように形成された
ことを特徴とする包装容器蓋用アルミニウム合金板。
0.05 to 0.3% by mass of Cu, 0.2 to 0.6% by mass of Mn, 2.0 to 5.5% by mass of Mg, and 0.05 to 0.3% by mass of Si %, Fe is regulated to 0.05 to 0.4 mass%, and after performing the homogenization heat treatment step of the aluminum alloy ingot having the composition composed of Al and inevitable impurities , the hot rolling treatment step and the second 1 cold rolling treatment step, a step of heat treatment of the rolled sheet cold-rolled in the cold rolling treatment step at a heating rate of 100 ° C./min or more, and heating to 400 to 550 ° C. by this step And an annealing treatment step having a step of cooling to 200 ° C. or less immediately after heating at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or higher, or heating and holding within 10 minutes after heating to the temperature of 400 to 550 ° C. Process and pressure maintained in that process An annealing treatment step having a step of cooling the plate to 200 ° C. or less at a cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more is performed, and the rolling rate of the rolled plate after the annealing treatment by the annealing treatment step is 50 to 80%. A second cold rolling treatment step is performed in which the cold rolling treatment is performed once, and the aluminum alloy plate cold-rolled in the second cold rolling treatment step is wound at 120 to 150 ° C. It is an aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid manufactured by performing a winding process of winding it on a coil at a temperature ,
A first condition in which the breaking limit elongation is 2% or more,
A second condition in which a deflection height by a stress relaxation test (EMAS-3003) is 7 mm or less;
As a result of the ball head overhang test, the third condition in which rough skin and cracks do not occur,
As a result of the can openability evaluation, the fourth condition in which the score crack propagates beyond the extension in the tab longitudinal direction,
The breaking elongation is determined by manufacturing an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition with a thickness of 0.30 mm, baking the aluminum alloy plate with a salt bath at a temperature of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds, and then the aluminum alloy plate. A test piece having a length of 100 mm and a width of 20 mm is prepared so that the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is the longitudinal direction. The test piece is formed with a tip R0.1 mm punch and the tensile direction is perpendicular to the rolling line of the test piece. Folded into a 90-degree V-shape so that the direction is the same, the folded test plate is returned to the flat plate by two flat plates to form a creased flat plate, and the flat plate is pulled in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. The fracture limit displacement is measured by the following, and the gauge distance is 50 mm, and {(breakage limit displacement (mm) / 50 (mm)) × 100} is obtained.
In the stress relaxation test, an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition was manufactured with a thickness of 0.30 mm, and the aluminum alloy plate was baked with a salt bath at a temperature of 250 ° C. for 20 seconds. A test piece of 20 mm was prepared, a pre-strain of 2.5% was given, and the deflection height after being held at a test temperature of 120 ° C. for 3 hours was measured,
In the ball head overhang test, an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition was produced with a thickness of 0.30 mm, an epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm was applied to both sides of the aluminum alloy plate, and a heating temperature of 250 The test piece baked under the heating condition of 20 ° C. for 20 ° C. is performed under the condition that the ball head diameter is 6 mmφ and the overhang is 1.5 mm.
The can openability evaluation was performed by manufacturing an aluminum alloy plate having the above composition with a thickness of 0.30 mm, coating an epoxy resin coating film having a thickness of 5 μm on both sides of the aluminum alloy plate, and a heating temperature of 250 ° C. , Test specimens baked under heating conditions of heating time of 20 seconds are shell-molded and converted to a thickness of 0.30 mm and a remaining score of 110 μm, and an SOT-type tab is attached and score cracks are generated by an open tester To do so,
An aluminum alloy plate for a packaging container lid, characterized in that the results of the test and the evaluation satisfy the first condition to the fourth condition.
JP2009033222A 2009-02-16 2009-02-16 Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid Expired - Fee Related JP4829988B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009033222A JP4829988B2 (en) 2009-02-16 2009-02-16 Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009033222A JP4829988B2 (en) 2009-02-16 2009-02-16 Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003277799A Division JP4291642B2 (en) 2003-07-22 2003-07-22 Method for manufacturing aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009108421A JP2009108421A (en) 2009-05-21
JP4829988B2 true JP4829988B2 (en) 2011-12-07

Family

ID=40777206

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009033222A Expired - Fee Related JP4829988B2 (en) 2009-02-16 2009-02-16 Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4829988B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101550591B1 (en) 2011-09-07 2015-09-07 티디케이가부시기가이샤 Laminated coil component
BR122018017039B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2020-01-21 Ball Corp process for manufacturing a container shaped from a tablet in an impact extrusion manufacturing process
CN105324316B (en) 2013-04-09 2018-01-12 鲍尔公司 The Aluminum Bottle of the impact extrusion with threaded neck manufactured by the aluminium and the alloy of enhancing that recycle
JP2017008388A (en) * 2015-06-24 2017-01-12 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Aluminum alloy sheet for can top
US20180044155A1 (en) 2016-08-12 2018-02-15 Ball Corporation Apparatus and Methods of Capping Metallic Bottles
EP4219780A1 (en) 2016-12-30 2023-08-02 Ball Corporation Aluminum alloy for impact extruded containers and method of making the same
US10875684B2 (en) 2017-02-16 2020-12-29 Ball Corporation Apparatus and methods of forming and applying roll-on pilfer proof closures on the threaded neck of metal containers
JP7046163B2 (en) 2017-09-15 2022-04-01 ボール コーポレイション Equipment and methods for forming metal stoppers for threaded containers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009108421A (en) 2009-05-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4829988B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid
TWI570247B (en) Steel plate for high strength container and method for manufacturing the same
JP6210896B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for can lid and manufacturing method thereof
JP6195012B2 (en) Crown steel plate, method for producing the same, and crown
JP5958630B2 (en) Crown steel plate and manufacturing method thereof
TWI493053B (en) Three-piece can and method for manufacturing same
EP2098312B1 (en) Process for manufacturing deep drawn can for aerosol
JP4943714B2 (en) High strength aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap
JP4291642B2 (en) Method for manufacturing aluminum alloy plate for packaging container lid
WO2016056239A1 (en) Steel plate for cap and method for producing same
KR101975129B1 (en) Steel sheet for crown cap, manufacturing method therefor, and crown cap
JP2007169767A (en) Packing container and its production method
TWI588269B (en) Manufacturing method for cap plate, cap plate and cap plate
JP5480647B2 (en) Aluminum alloy composite plate for packaging container lid and manufacturing method thereof
KR102288712B1 (en) Steel sheet, method of manufacturing same, crown cap, and drawing and redrawing(drd) can
JP4392263B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for packaging container end and manufacturing method thereof
JP6033192B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for negative pressure can lid
JP2023006447A (en) Aluminum alloy coated sheet for tab
JP5699192B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for negative pressure can lid
JP2022114208A (en) Aluminum alloy coated sheet for can lid
KR20190129986A (en) Steel plate and its manufacturing method and crown and DRD can
JP2017095765A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for can top

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090223

A871 Explanation of circumstances concerning accelerated examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A871

Effective date: 20090428

A975 Report on accelerated examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971005

Effective date: 20090521

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090714

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090911

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20091117

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20100219

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110815

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110916

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140922

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4829988

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees