JP4160947B2 - Magnetic head and magnetic recording apparatus - Google Patents

Description

This invention relates to magnetic recording apparatus that records information on a magnetic recording medium by perpendicular magnetic recording system.

  In recent years, in the field of magnetic recording devices such as hard disk drives (HDDs), there has been an increasing demand for miniaturization and large capacity, and recording tracks have been increased in density. In particular, a perpendicular magnetic recording type magnetic recording apparatus that combines a single-pole head (magnetic head) and a double-layer medium for perpendicular magnetic recording having a soft magnetic underlayer has a “recording blur” and “thermal stability”. From the point of view, it is advantageous for high-density recording, and research and development are actively underway.

  FIG. 9 shows a simplified configuration example of a main part of a conventional magnetic recording apparatus in which a single magnetic pole head and a two-layer film medium are combined. As shown in FIG. 9, the single magnetic pole head 4 has a main magnetic pole 1, a return yoke (not shown here), and an exciting coil 3. The double-layer film medium 6 has a recording layer 16 overlaid on the soft magnetic backing layer 15. The single magnetic pole head 4 is disposed to face the recording layer 16 of the double-layer film medium 6. The magnetic circuit in this magnetic recording apparatus is formed by the main pole 1, the soft magnetic backing layer 15, and a return yoke (not shown). Note that the width (hereinafter referred to as the recording width) MWW of the magnetization signal (recording bit) magnetically saturated and recorded on the recording layer 16 of the double-layer film medium 6 is generally the width of the tip of the main pole 1 (hereinafter referred to as the main width). Determined by the magnetic pole width TWW).

When information is recorded on the recording layer 16 of the two-layer film medium 6 using this apparatus, a current is passed through the exciting coil 3 to form a recording magnetic field from the tip of the main magnetic pole 1. A recording magnetic field equal to or higher than the saturation magnetic field (H _S ) of the recording layer 16 of the double-layer film medium 6 is required immediately below the magnetic pole 1. Further, the leakage magnetic field acting on the track adjacent to the recording track opposed to the main magnetic pole 1 (hereinafter referred to as the adjacent track) must be equal to or less than the inversion magnetic domain generation magnetic field (H _N ) of the two-layer film medium 6. If a leakage magnetic field exceeds H _N, it erases the information recorded on the adjacent tracks. Note that H 2 _S and H 2 _N of the two-layer film medium 6 depend on the time change of the recording magnetic field.

Moreover, focusing on the two-layer film medium 6, the volume of the recording layer 16 occupying the higher 1 bit becomes a high-density recording becomes small, the holding force of the recording layer 16 in order to overcome the thermal magnetic relaxation of (H _C) increased must, H _S inevitably recording layer 16 is increased. For this reason, in order to achieve high-density recording with this magnetic recording apparatus, a steep magnetic field is formed immediately below the main magnetic pole 1 and an extremely high recording magnetic field is required.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing the relationship between the magnetic field strength of the single magnetic pole head 4 calculated using the two-dimensional finite element method and the excitation current. Here, it is assumed that the main pole width TWW along the track width direction is 64 [nm], the throat height TH is 100 [nm], and the taper portion tilt angle θ is 45 [°]. The magnetic spacing MS between the tip of the main pole and the recording layer 16 of the double-layer film medium 6 is 10 [nm], the thickness of the recording layer 16 is 14 [nm], and the thickness of the soft magnetic backing layer 15 is The perpendicular magnetic field component was calculated at the center in the thickness direction of the recording layer 16 with 300 [nm]. The magnetic permeability of the recording layer 16 is 1, and the saturation magnetic flux density (B _S ) and anisotropic magnetic field (H _K ) of the single pole head 4 and the soft magnetic underlayer 15 are 2.4 [Tesla] and 12 [Oe, respectively. ]. The recording magnetic field was evaluated at the center of the main magnetic pole 1, and the leakage magnetic field was evaluated at a position 27 [nm] away from the edge of the main magnetic pole 1. In addition, only the vertical component of these magnetic fields was considered.

  According to this, the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field increase in proportion to the excitation current up to about 200 [mA], but both increase tend to saturate due to the magnetic saturation of the head material. I understand. Further, the difference in magnetic field strength between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field increases in proportion to the excitation current until the head material is saturated, but it becomes a substantially constant value even if the excitation current is further increased. Note that the absolute values of the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field change if the excitation current is changed. Further, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field is determined by the design of a magnetic circuit such as a head. Therefore, a large difference between the recording magnetic field peak and the leakage magnetic field as the head magnetic field is important in designing a magnetic recording apparatus adopting the perpendicular magnetic recording system.

In two-layer film medium 6, the H _S or more field saturated recorded, discussion of the thermal magnetic relaxation in a magnetic field of less than H _N does not affect the magnetization state of the recording layer 16 as separate. That is, in a magnetic field of H _N or more and less than H 2 _S , unsaturated recording is performed, and the area of the recording layer 16 recorded with the magnetic field becomes a noise source. Therefore, when considering the head magnetic field distribution in the off-track direction, it is desirable that the distance between H _S and H _N is shorter. In general terms, a large magnetic field gradient in the track width direction is desirable as the head magnetic field.

  As described above, when the distribution in the track width direction of the optimum head magnetic field for achieving high-density recording is considered, the following three items are advantageous characteristics for high-density recording.

(1) The recording magnetic field intensity directly under the main magnetic pole is large.

(2) The difference between the peak of the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field between adjacent tracks is large.

(3) The magnetic field gradient in the track width direction is large.

  By the way, conventionally, there has been known an apparatus in which side shields are provided on both sides in the track width direction of the main pole 1 for the purpose of reducing a leakage magnetic field in an adjacent track (see, for example, Non-Patent Document 1). By providing side shields on both sides of the main magnetic pole, it is possible to expect the effect of shielding the leakage magnetic field and preventing erroneous erasure of data on adjacent tracks.

  However, in this document, there is no general discussion about the desirable characteristics (1), (2), and (3) described above, and it is clear that the recording magnetic field is lowered by providing at least a side shield. is there. Further, in this document, the design guideline for a single pole head having a side shield is not clarified.

  FIG. 11 is a graph showing changes in magnetic field strength when the distance between the main pole 1 and the side shield is variously changed in a single pole head provided with a side shield. Here, a device in which a side shield with a thickness of 20 [nm] was provided on the single magnetic pole head 4 described above was prepared, and the magnetic field strength was calculated using a two-dimensional finite element method. The leakage magnetic field was evaluated at a position away from the tip of the main magnetic pole 1 by 27 [nm]. The side shield had the same magnetic characteristics as the single-pole head 4, and the excitation current was 400 [mA].

  According to this, as the side shield is brought closer to the main magnetic pole 1, the leakage magnetic field becomes smaller, but at the same time, the recording magnetic field also decreases. Further, it can be seen that the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field is maximum when the distance between the main magnetic pole and the shield is 35 [nm]. Furthermore, the maximum magnetic field gradient in the track width direction is maximum when the distance between the main magnetic pole and the shield is 30 [nm].

In other words, the conventional device in which the side shield is simply provided cannot satisfy the above-mentioned desirable characteristics (1), (2), and (3) simultaneously and sufficiently. For example, the above-described conventional document does not clearly describe how to design the distance between the main magnetic pole and the shield, and the desirable characteristics (1) and (1) described above based on the technical contents described in this document ( 2) and (3) cannot be satisfied at the same time.
“One Terabit per Square Inch Perpendicular Recording Conceptual Design”, M. Mallary, A. Torabi, and M. Benakli, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 38, 1719, 2002

The purpose of the invention is to provide a magnetic recording device that can increase the recording density.

In order to achieve the above object, a magnetic recording apparatus of the present invention comprises a two-layer film medium having a recording layer superimposed on a soft magnetic underlayer, a main pole having a tip facing the recording track of the recording layer, and the recording A single-pole head having a side shield provided away from the tip along the width direction of the track, and the distance between the tip and the side shield is the difference between the pitch of the recording track and the width of the tip Equally, the soft magnetic backing layer has a land-and-groove structure having a land having a width narrower than the width of the tip.

  The magnetic recording apparatus of the present invention includes a double-layer film medium having a recording layer superimposed on a soft magnetic backing layer, a main pole having a tip facing the recording track of the recording layer, and a width direction of the recording track. And a single pole head having a side shield provided at a distance from the tip, and an edge facing the tip of the side shield is an edge of an adjacent track adjacent to the recording track with the tip facing The soft magnetic underlayer has a land-and-groove structure having lands with a width smaller than the width of the tip.

  According to the above invention, a side shield is provided on a single magnetic pole head and a recording magnetic field can be increased by combining with a two-layer film medium having a soft magnetic underlayer having a land-and-groove structure. Can be increased, the magnetic field gradient can be increased, and the recording density can be increased.

Magnetic recording apparatus of the invention has a configuration and operation as described above, can increase the recording density.

  More specifically, the design guidelines for the single-pole head with side shield and the double-layer film medium when the track pitch is constant can be clarified, the recording magnetic field can be increased, and the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field can be increased. The magnetic field gradient in the width direction can be increased, and the recording density can be increased.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 schematically shows the structure of the main part of a magnetic recording apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

  The magnetic recording apparatus has a single magnetic pole head 4 (magnetic head) having a side shield 2 and a double-layer film medium 6 (magnetic disk). In addition to the side shield 2, the single magnetic pole head 4 has a main magnetic pole 1, an exciting coil 3, and a return yoke (not shown).

  The main magnetic pole 1 has a front end surface 11 facing the two-layer film medium 6, and has a side surface 12 rising vertically from the edge of the front end surface 11. And it has the inclined surface 13 inclined and extended from the end edge of the side surface 12. As shown in FIG. Here, the width along the track width direction (left and right direction in the figure) of the tip surface 11 (hereinafter, this width is referred to as the main magnetic pole width) is TWW, and the height of the side surface 12 extending from both sides of the tip surface 11 is the height. Let TH (throat height) be the inclination angle of the inclined surface 13 with respect to the vertical axis.

  The side shield 2 is formed of a plate-like body having a constant thickness, and is disposed at a position sandwiching the front end surface 11 of the main pole 1 along the track width direction. The edges of the side shield 2 facing the main pole 1 are set at positions away from the main pole 1 by a certain distance. The side shield 2 extends along a plane substantially parallel to the double-layer film medium 6 and the same surface as the tip surface 11 of the main pole 1.

  On the other hand, the two-layer film medium 6 is formed by overlapping a recording layer 16 on a soft magnetic backing layer 15. The recording layer 16 has a plurality of recording tracks 17 extending in the track direction (paper surface direction in FIG. 1) and spaced apart from each other in the track width direction. As shown in FIG. 2, the soft magnetic backing layer 15 has a plurality of lands 18 that are separated from each other in the track width direction and extend in the track direction, and a plurality of grooves 19 are provided between the lands 18. Each land 18 protrudes toward the recording layer 16 and is provided in one-to-one correspondence with the recording track 17, and each groove 19 forms a recess recessed in a direction away from the recording layer 16.

  In the following description, the distance between the main magnetic pole 1 and the side shield 2 is PSS, the distance between the tip surface 11 of the main magnetic pole 1 and the double-layer film medium 6 is MS, and the distance between adjacent recording tracks 17 is The distance is TP (track pitch), and the recording width of the magnetization signal (recording bit) magnetically recorded on the recording track 17 is MWW. For simplicity of explanation, it is assumed that the main magnetic pole width TWW and the recording width MWW are equal.

  As described in the above [Background Art], if the single magnetic pole head 4 is provided with the side shield 2, the leakage magnetic field leaking from right below the main magnetic pole 1 to both sides in the track width direction can be suppressed, and erroneous erasure of data with respect to the adjacent track 17a. However, it is known that the recording magnetic field acting on the recording layer 16 of the two-layer film medium 6 also decreases.

FIG. 3 shows a comparison of the calculation results of the magnetic field strength H ₁ of the single pole head without the side shield 2 and the magnetic field strength H ₂ of the single pole head with the side shield 2. Here, the above-mentioned [Background Art] model was adopted, and the magnetic field strength was calculated at each position separated from the center C of the main pole 1 in the track width direction. FIG. 3 shows the difference (H ₁ −H ₂ ) between the magnetic field strengths H ₁ and H ₂ at each point.

According to this, it can be seen that when the side shield 2 is provided, the magnetic field strength is certainly reduced at each point. Further, when the difference in magnetic field intensity (H ₁ −H ₂ ) is observed, a peak is seen at a certain point away from the center C of the main magnetic pole 1. Further, it can be seen that the position of this peak coincides with the position of the edge close to the main magnetic pole 1 of the side shield 2.

FIG. 4 shows a difference (H ₁ −H ₂ ) between the magnetic field strength H ₁ of the single-pole head without the side shield 2 and the magnetic field strength H ₂ of the single-pole head with the side shield 2, that is, the side shield 2. 6 shows the result of examining the amount of decrease in the magnetic field when PSS (position of the edge of the side shield 2 with respect to the main pole 1) is used as a parameter. Here, as described with reference to FIG. 3, peaks are observed at certain points apart from the center of the main magnetic pole 1. FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the position where these peaks are seen and the distance from the center of the main pole 1 to the edge of the side shield 2. According to this, it turns out that both are substantially in agreement.

  That is, when the intensity distribution of the leakage magnetic field is considered, the maximum leakage magnetic field acts on the edge of the adjacent track 17a close to the main magnetic pole 1, so that the adjacent track 17a can be effectively effectively reduced without reducing the recording magnetic field directly under the main magnetic pole as much as possible. It is most effective to make the edge of the adjacent track 17a coincide with the edge of the side shield 2 in order to reduce the leakage magnetic field acting on the side. Since the recording width MWW of the bit recorded on the double-layer film medium 6 is approximately equal to the main magnetic pole width TWW, when the track pitch is TP, the edge of the side shield 2 is positioned so as to satisfy the following formula: The difference between the peak of the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field can be maximized.

PSS = TP-TWW
Actually, the recording width MWW is slightly larger than the main magnetic pole width TWW because of the gap MS between the front end face 11 of the main magnetic pole 1 and the double-layer film medium 6. Therefore, strictly speaking, the above expression can be rewritten as the following expression.

PSS = TP-MWW
Next, the optimum main magnetic pole width TWW will be considered based on the position of the side shield 2 described above. The recording width MWW of bits recorded on the recording layer 16 of the double-layer film medium 6 increases as the main magnetic pole width TWW increases. Further, as the main magnetic pole width TWW increases, the width of the adjacent track 17a naturally increases. That is, when the track pitch TP, the main magnetic pole width TWW, and the main magnetic pole to side shield distance PSS satisfy the above-described relationship, the side shield 2 must be brought closer to the main magnetic pole 1 when the main magnetic pole width TWW is increased.

  When the main magnetic pole width TWW is extremely large, most of the magnetic flux of the main magnetic pole 1 flows into the side shield 2 and the recording magnetic field immediately below the main magnetic pole 1 decreases. On the other hand, if the main magnetic pole width TWW is extremely narrow, the recording magnetic field decreases due to saturation of the main magnetic pole 1. That is, there is a main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the recording magnetic field.

  FIG. 6 shows the result of calculating the magnetic field strength of the single magnetic pole head 4 in which the edge of the side shield 2 and the edge of the adjacent track 17a coincide with each other using the main magnetic pole width TWW as a parameter. Here, the land-and-groove structure of the soft magnetic underlayer 15 of the double-layer film medium 6 is not adopted, and the recording magnetic field, leakage magnetic field, magnetic field strength difference, and maximum magnetic field when the main magnetic pole width TWW is changed are used. The gradient was examined. At this time, the track pitch TP is set to 91 [nm], and the recording width MWW of the bits recorded on the two-layer film medium 6 recording layer 16 is made the same as the main magnetic pole width TWW for the sake of simplicity of explanation. That is, the distance PSS between the main magnetic pole 1 and the side shield 2 is a difference obtained by subtracting the main magnetic pole width TWW from 91 [nm] as described above. In this case as well, the leakage magnetic field is assumed to be maximum at the edge near the main magnetic pole 1 of the adjacent track 17a.

  As a result, the recording magnetic field, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field, and the magnetic field gradient were maximized when the main magnetic pole width TWW was 60 [nm], 48 [nm], and 72 [nm], respectively. For example, in order to maximize the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field, which are considered to be the most important characteristics of the single magnetic pole head 4, the main magnetic pole width TWW may be set to 48 [nm]. What is necessary is just to set to 40 [%]-60 [%] of track pitch TP.

  Next, a method for further optimizing the recording magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient will be considered based on the optimum edge position of the side shield 2 and the optimum main magnetic pole width TWW.

  FIG. 7 shows the calculation result of the relationship between the main magnetic pole width TWW and the head magnetic field when the land-and-groove structure of the soft magnetic underlayer 15 is adopted. Here, the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land 18 having a width 10 [nm] narrower than the main magnetic pole width TWW was used, and the leakage magnetic field was set to the maximum value on the adjacent track.

  According to this, it can be seen that the recording magnetic field, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field, and the maximum magnetic field gradient in the track width direction are maximum at the main magnetic pole width of 48 [nm]. In other words, the edge of the side shield 2 is made to coincide with the edge of the adjacent track 17a, the main magnetic pole width TWW is set to 40 [%] to 60 [%] of the track pitch TP, and the land 18 is narrower than the main magnetic pole width TWW. By using the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land-and-groove structure, the recording magnetic field can be increased, the difference between the recording magnetic field peak and the leakage magnetic field can be increased, and the magnetic field gradient can be increased. That is, the three characteristics advantageous for high-density recording can be satisfied at the same time.

  The main magnetic pole width TWW at which the recording magnetic field of the single magnetic pole head 4 of the present embodiment is maximized is generally determined by the permeance ratio of the main magnetic pole 1 and the soft magnetic underlayer 15 and the main magnetic pole 1 and the side shield 2. Providing the groove 19 in the soft magnetic backing layer 15 reduces the permeance between the main pole 1 and the soft magnetic backing layer 15. Therefore, the main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the recording magnetic field must be reduced so as to relatively reduce the permeance between the main magnetic pole 1 and the side shield 2 as compared with the case where a flat soft magnetic underlayer is used. . Here, in order to actively reduce the permeance between the main magnetic pole 1 and the soft magnetic underlayer 15, the land 18 of the soft magnetic underlayer 15 must be narrower than the main magnetic pole width TWW. On the other hand, as shown in “Grooved Soft-underlayer for Perpendicular Recording Medium”, S. Takahashi, K. Yamakawa, and K. Ouchi, Digests of PMRC 2004, 75, 2004, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field is Even if a land-and-groove structure is provided on the backing layer 15, there is almost no change. Therefore, the value of the main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the difference between the recording magnetic field and the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field can be substantially matched.

  Further, the magnetic field gradient in the track width direction of the single-pole head without the side shield 2 simply increases as the recording magnetic field increases. The side shield 2 decreases the vertical component by an amount corresponding to the increase in the horizontal component of the magnetic field between the main magnetic pole 1 and the side shield 2, thereby increasing the magnetic field gradient of the vertical component. As shown in FIG. 6, the main magnetic pole width TWW at which the magnetic field gradient in the track width direction is maximum is larger than the main magnetic pole width TWW at which the recording magnetic field is maximum. The land-and-groove structure of the soft magnetic underlayer 15 also increases the magnetic field gradient because the lines of magnetic force emitted from the main magnetic pole 1 do not enter the groove 19 and try to absorb them as much as possible by the land 18. Therefore, when both the side shield 2 and the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land-and-groove structure are present, the effects cancel each other. Here, a larger magnetic field gradient is obtained when the soft magnetic underlayer 15 having the land-and-groove structure is used. Therefore, the main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the magnetic field gradient in the track width direction is a small value so that the side shield 2 is separated from the main magnetic pole 1 as compared with the case where a flat soft magnetic underlayer is used. Therefore, the main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the magnetic field gradient can be substantially matched.

  On the other hand, FIG. 8 shows a calculation result when the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land and groove structure having the same land width as that of the main magnetic pole 1 is used. Except for the land width, the model is the same as that calculated in FIG. According to this, as described above, it can be understood that the main magnetic pole width TWW that maximizes the magnetic field gradient cannot be matched unless the width of the land 18 is narrower than the width of the main magnetic pole 1.

  As described above, according to the present invention, in the single pole head 4 provided with the side shield 2, the edge of the side shield 2 on the side close to the main pole 1 is adjacent to the recording track on which the tip surface 11 of the main pole 1 faces. Since the edge position of the recording bit of the adjacent track 17a is matched, the leakage magnetic field can be effectively suppressed while making the recording magnetic field as large as possible. As a result, a sufficiently strong recording magnetic field can be generated, the leakage magnetic field acting on the adjacent track 17a can be made sufficiently small, and a high recording track density can be achieved.

  Further, according to the present invention, since the width TWW of the main magnetic pole 1 is set to 40 [%] to 60 [%] of the track pitch TP based on the structure described above, the difference between the recording magnetic field peak and the leakage magnetic field is sufficiently large. Could be bigger. This maximized the recording magnetic field.

  In addition, according to the present invention, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field is maximized because the above-described structure is combined with the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land-and-groove structure having the land 18 narrower than the main magnetic pole width TWW. With the main magnetic pole width TWW, the recording magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient can be maximized. That is, the edge of the side shield 2 and the edge of the adjacent track 17a are matched, the main magnetic pole width TWW is set to 40 [%] to 60 [%] of the track pitch TP, and the land width is narrower than the main magnetic pole width TWW. By combining the double-layer film medium 6 having the soft magnetic backing layer 15 having the land and groove structure, the recording magnetic field, the difference between the recording magnetic field and the leakage magnetic field, and the magnetic field gradient can be maximized simultaneously.

  Note that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments as they are, and can be embodied by modifying the constituent elements without departing from the scope of the invention in the implementation stage. Various inventions can be formed by appropriately combining a plurality of constituent elements disclosed in the above-described embodiments. For example, you may delete some components from all the components shown by embodiment mentioned above. Furthermore, you may combine the component covering different embodiment suitably.

1 is a schematic diagram showing the structure of a main part of a magnetic recording apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. The schematic perspective view which shows the land and groove structure of the main pole of FIG. 1, and a soft-magnetic underlayer. The graph for demonstrating the change of the magnetic field intensity at the time of providing a side shield. The graph which shows the relationship between the amount of magnetic field reduction | decrease and the distance from a main magnetic pole center when changing the distance of a main magnetic pole and a side shield. The graph which shows the relationship between the peak of magnetic field reduction amount, and the edge position of a side shield. The graph which shows the relationship between the width | variety of a main pole, and magnetic field intensity at the time of overlapping the edge of a side shield on the edge of an adjacent track. The graph which shows the relationship between the main pole width and magnetic field intensity at the time of combining the double-layer film medium which has a soft-magnetic underlayer of a land and groove structure. The graph which shows the relationship between the main pole width and magnetic field intensity when making the land width and the main pole width equal. FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing the structure of the main part of an apparatus in which a conventional single-pole head is combined with a two-layer film medium having a soft magnetic underlayer without a land-and-groove structure. The graph which shows the relationship between the excitation current and magnetic field intensity of a single pole head. The graph which shows the relationship between the distance between a main magnetic pole and a shield at the time of providing a side shield, and magnetic field intensity.

Explanation of symbols

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Main magnetic pole, 2 ... Third shield, 3 ... Excitation coil, 4 ... Single magnetic pole head, 6 ... Double-layer film medium, 11 ... Front end surface, 12 ... Side surface, 13 ... Inclined surface, 15 ... Soft magnetic backing layer, 16 ... Recording layer, 17 ... Recording track, 17a ... Adjacent track, 18 ... Land, 19 ... Groove, MS ... Magnetic spacing, MWW ... Recording width, PSS ... Main pole-shield distance, TH ... Throat height, TP ... Track Pitch, TWW ... Main magnetic pole width.

Claims (3)

A two-layer film medium having a recording layer superimposed on a soft magnetic backing layer;
A main pole having a tip facing the recording track of the recording layer, and a single pole head having a side shield provided away from the tip along the width direction of the recording track,
The distance between the tip and the side shield is equal to the difference between the pitch of the recording track and the width of the tip,
The magnetic recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the soft magnetic backing layer has a land-and-groove structure having a land having a width narrower than a width of the tip. A two-layer film medium having a recording layer superimposed on a soft magnetic backing layer;
A main pole having a tip facing the recording track of the recording layer, and a single pole head having a side shield provided away from the tip along the width direction of the recording track,
The edge facing the tip of the side shield is provided at a position that coincides with the edge of an adjacent track adjacent to the recording track that the tip faces.
The magnetic recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the soft magnetic backing layer has a land-and-groove structure having a land having a width narrower than a width of the tip. The magnetic recording apparatus according to claim 1 or claim 2 the width of the main magnetic pole is characterized in that it is a 40% to 60%] of the pitch of the recording track.

Images