JP4130764B2 - Quality control processing method based on progress - Google Patents

Description

[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a progress management technique in software development work, and more particularly to a quality management processing method based on a progress situation in which the progress situation of each work process is grasped and its quality is appropriately evaluated.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As shown in FIG. 10, in general, the progress of the conventional software development work can be grasped by dividing the target development system into subsystems, creating a development schedule for each created program in the subsystem, and The progress was recorded by filling in the schedule so that the schedule and results can be compared for each work process such as program design), PG (programming), and PT (unit test).
[0003]
In addition, as shown in FIG. 11A, the entire system is managed so that the completed property for each subsystem into which the target development system is divided can be known on a weekly basis. Also, as shown in FIG. 11 (B), the situation can be graphed so that the situation can be grasped, or as shown in FIG. 12 (A) and FIG. There are cases where it is managed at each end. 11 and 12 show the progress of one work process.
[0004]
Further, as a specific technique regarding the progress delay of such development work, there has been a technique related to a project management system that can change the start schedule of the subsequent work when the work delay of the previous work (see, for example, Patent Document 1). .) In addition, when the plan and the actual result are represented in a graph, there is a technique in which the area value on the graph obtained from the number of future tasks and the time until delivery is used as an evaluation value of progress delay (for example, Patent Document 2). reference.).
[0005]
Here, usually, when a delay occurs in the work in the previous process, it is necessary to shorten the work time from the schedule in the subsequent process following the process in order to keep the development delivery time. In order to shorten the work time, the number of personnel and the work time are increased. However, when the work is advanced in such a situation, the quality often deteriorates. When managing progress, it is necessary to manage quality as well as schedule.
[0006]
At present, quality management sets a quality index, which is the standard for quality evaluation of each process, at the start of the project, reviews and tests based on the quality index, and compares the results with the quality index. The quality is evaluated. As a specific technique relating to such quality evaluation, there is a technique for displaying not only the process but also the quality target / result comparison in the progress management of the project (see, for example, Patent Document 3).
[0007]
[Patent Document 1]
JP-A-10-240804
[Patent Document 2]
JP 11-143930 A
[Patent Document 3]
JP-A-6-332911
[0008]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, when performing progress management and quality control in software development work, the above prior art cannot change the quality index of the subsequent process according to the progress up to the previous process. However, the post-process was working with quality indicators such as the number of tests for each process set initially. In particular, even if there is a delay in the first half of the process in the progress situation, if the delay is recovered in the second half, the process proceeds to the subsequent process without considering it as a problem, and the quality index of the subsequent process Was not changed. For this reason, errors are often found in the post-process, and the actualization of the problem tended to be delayed.
[0009]
Each work has a work order, and if the previous work is not completed, the subsequent work cannot be started in many cases, and the weight of the previous work is often large in progress management. If the previous work is extended, the effect is large. In the conventional progress management, for example, when the schedule of each work in a certain work process is shown in FIG. The number of tasks is treated as a management value, each task is counted as 1, and the weekly schedule and results are entered in a table as shown in FIG. 9B, and the accumulation is as shown in FIG. 9C. Because it was managed as a graph, the weight of the previous work was not considered.
[0010]
In some cases, the weight of each work is considered and handled as a management value. However, the calculation is difficult, and it is not realistic as an actual management work, and it is difficult to perform appropriate quality control considering the influence of the previous work. There was a problem of being.
[0011]
An object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, and to provide a method capable of appropriately evaluating the quality of the previous process based on the progress status up to the previous process and changing the quality index of the subsequent process. And
[0012]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to solve the above problems, the present invention first determines the quality evaluation of the performance of the process based on the difference between the work schedule and the work performance. If the work performance is delayed compared to the work schedule at the early stage of the process, there are many cases where the final delivery date of the process is made due to the addition of personnel, overtime, etc., but in this case, the quality of the product deteriorates. There are many cases. Therefore, in the present invention, the difference between the work schedule and the work performance is the difference. , Specifically, the difference in the area between the work schedule and work performance graph (predictive graph) If is large, it is evaluated that the quality in the previous process has deteriorated.
[0013]
Further, the present invention sets a quality index for the post-process based on the difference between the work schedule and the work performance. It is possible to perform appropriate quality control in development work by tightening the quality index as the quality evaluation standard of the subsequent process according to the difference between the schedule and the actual result (schedule delay) that occurred in the stage up to the previous process. Become.
[0014]
In the present invention , Product Strictly set the quality index of the post-process according to the difference in the area between the work schedule and work performance graph (preliminary graph). With this function, even if the work is forcibly completed according to the delivery date in the previous process, a check is immediately entered in the subsequent process so that the problem cannot be passed on to the future. For example, when a schedule delay occurs, the number of bugs extracted with respect to the number of tests in the subsequent process is increased to improve the test quality. In the present invention, for example, depending on the deterioration of quality, the test content can be changed in a later process to perform a stricter test.
[0015]
In addition, if a delay occurs in the first stage of the previous process, the delay will not be forcibly recovered, and if the test is firmly extended and the schedule is extended, the quality of the process will be It should be better than that. In the present invention, when the schedule is postponed, the work performance graph is corrected. As will be described later, the correction method corrects each measurement point on the work performance line with a period ratio, with the total number of days postponed from the scheduled delivery date at the time of completion of work as 1.
[0016]
Normally, when counting the progress of a work, one work is counted as 1. However, if the subsequent work must start after the previous work is finished, the delay in the previous work is evaluated heavily. Should. For example, when a parent program that is a routine call source is developed in the previous work and a called routine is developed in the later work, the effect on the later work increases as the previous work is delayed.
[0017]
Therefore, according to the present invention, a work having a subsequent work is counted as the number of previous work including the subsequent work. By applying such weighting, it becomes possible to easily check the delay in the previous work, and to appropriately manage the progress in consideration of the influence amount of the previous work.
[0018]
That is, the present invention is a quality management processing method based on progress in software development work, the step of recording the work schedule of each work process, the step of recording the work performance of each work process, and the recorded The method includes a step of calculating a quality evaluation value corresponding to a difference between a work schedule and a work result of each work process, and a step of outputting the calculated quality evaluation value.
[0019]
The present invention also relates to a quality management processing method based on progress in software development work, the step of recording the work schedule of each work process, the step of recording the work performance of each work process, and the recorded A step of calculating a quality evaluation value according to a difference between a work schedule and a work result of each work process, and a quality in which a quality index of each process set in advance according to the calculated quality evaluation value and the quality evaluation value is recorded The method has a step of determining a quality index of the next process based on the index table and a step of outputting the determined quality index.
[0020]
Further, the present invention is characterized in that in the quality management processing method based on the progress situation, there is a step of correcting the work performance according to the number of days of postponement of the work schedule.
[0021]
In the quality control processing method based on the progress status, the present invention includes a step of counting the number of post-workes affected by each work as the number of work and weighting the work schedule and work results of the inputted work processes. It is characterized by having.
[0022]
In the quality management processing method based on the progress status, the present invention corrects the quality index table based on statistical data of results of each work process performed based on the quality index set in the quality index table. It has the step to perform.
[0023]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of a progress management system that implements a quality management processing method based on the progress status of the present invention. 1 is a progress management system, 11 is a schedule input unit that records the work schedule of each input work process in the schedule storage table 20, and 12 is a progress that records the work performance of each input work process in the progress status storage table 21. The status input unit 13 counts the number of operations after each operation affects the number of operations, and weights a work schedule and work results of each work process input to the schedule input unit 11 and the progress input unit 12 , 14 is a correction unit that corrects the work performance according to the number of days to postpone the work schedule.
[0024]
Further, 15 is a quality evaluation unit that calculates a quality evaluation value corresponding to the difference between the work schedule and the work performance of each work process, and 16 is the next process based on the calculated quality evaluation value and the quality index table 19. A quality index setting unit that determines the quality index, 17 is a quality index output unit that outputs the quality index determined by the quality index setting unit 16 to the user terminal 22, and 18 is a quality evaluation value calculated by the quality evaluation unit 15. The quality evaluation value output unit 19 outputs a quality index table 19 in which the quality index of each process is recorded, 20 is a schedule storage table in which the work schedule of each work process is recorded, and 21 records the work results of each work process. The progress status storage table 22 is a user terminal.
[0025]
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described based on FIG. 2 with reference to FIG. 1 and FIGS. 3 to 8. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the progress management processing flow of the present invention. First, the schedule input unit 11 and the progress input unit 12 receive input information of work schedules and work results of each work process from the user terminal 22, and record them in the schedule storage table 20 and the progress status storage table 21, respectively (steps). S1).
[0026]
Next, the weighting unit 13 weights the recorded work schedule and work results of each work process (step S2). Such weighting is performed by counting the number of subsequent tasks affected by each task as the number of each task. For example, when the schedule of each work in a work process is as shown in FIG. 7A, the work scheduled for one day on August 9 has 10 post-work, so FIG. The scheduled number of work on August 9 in the table shown in (B) is 11. The other scheduled work numbers and actual work numbers are similarly weighted. FIG. 7C is a graph in which the scheduled work cumulative number and the work performance cumulative number after weighting are plotted. By applying such weighting, it becomes possible to easily check the delay in the previous work, and to appropriately manage the progress in consideration of the influence amount of the previous work.
[0027]
In the present invention, it is also possible to adopt a configuration in which the weighting unit 13 performs the weighting before the work schedule and work results are recorded in the schedule storage table 20 and the progress status storage table 21. In the present invention, a configuration in which the weighting is not performed can be adopted, and the step S2 can be omitted.
[0028]
Next, the quality evaluation unit 15 calculates a quality evaluation value corresponding to the difference between the work schedule of each work process and the work performance (step S3). In the present invention, the area (planned actual difference area) formed by the planned cumulative line and the actual cumulative line of the progress management graph shown in FIG. 3 and the area (total area) formed by the planned cumulative line with the base line H and the base line V are shown. ) Is calculated as an example of the quality evaluation value. Here, the progress management graph shown in FIG. 3 is a graph including a scheduled cumulative line in which a work schedule in a certain work process is plotted and a performance cumulative line in which the work results are plotted. The horizontal axis is the elapsed days.
[0029]
That is, according to the present invention, the area difference ratio is expressed as
Area difference ratio = Planned actual difference area / Total area x 100%
Calculate using.
[0030]
Of course, the quality evaluation value calculated in the present invention is not limited to the area difference ratio. For example, the quality evaluation value is the ratio between the height difference between the planned cumulative line and the actual cumulative line and the height of the planned cumulative line in FIG. You may calculate as an example of a value.
[0031]
Next, the correction unit 14 corrects the work performance recorded according to the postponement days of the work schedule (step S4). For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the correction of the work performance is obtained by multiplying each measurement elapsed days on the actual cumulative line before correction by multiplying the ratio of the total postponed days to the final elapsed days to obtain the corrected postponed actual cumulative line. Each point is shifted by the number of days of postponement for correction, so that the corrected result cumulative line is obtained. Here, the total postponement days are the days elapsed from the scheduled delivery date on the final completion date of the work, the measurement elapsed days are the elapsed days at each point on the actual cumulative line before correction, and the final elapsed days are the elapsed days on the final completion date of the work. Is the number of days.
[0032]
In other words, the correction unit 14 calculates the number of days of postponement correction as
Correction postponement days = total postponement days x measurement elapsed days / final elapsed days
And the post-correction actual cumulative line is shifted by the determined postponed postponement days to obtain the post-correction actual cumulative line. In the example shown in FIG. 6, the final elapsed days are 119 days, the scheduled delivery date is 91 days, and the total postponed days are 28 days. Therefore, for example, the corrected postponement days for point a whose measured elapsed days on the actual cumulative line before correction is 70 days is
Correction postponement days = 28 × 70/119
= 16.47, and the point a on the uncorrected actual cumulative line is shifted to the point b on the corrected actual cumulative line whose elapsed days are 53.53. Similarly, the other points on the actual accumulation line before correction are shifted by the correction postponement days, thereby correcting the actual accumulation line before correction to the actual performance accumulation line after correction. The present invention can adopt a configuration in which the above correction is not performed, and step S4 can be omitted.
[0033]
Next, the quality index setting unit 16 determines the quality index of the next process based on the calculated quality evaluation value and the quality index table 19 (step S5). In the quality index table 19, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, the number of reviews, the number of tests, the number of extracted items, and the number of returned items are recorded as quality indexes corresponding to the calculated quality evaluation values. Here, the area difference ratio is used as the quality evaluation value, and the value of each quality index is the number of cases per 1 kstep.
[0034]
In FIG. 4, PG, PT, IT, and ST indicate the respective work processes, where PG is programming, PT is a unit test, IT is an integration test, and ST is a system test. The value of the number of reviews is the number of mistakes that should be extracted per 1 kstep of each work process, the value of the number of tests is the number of test cases set per 1 kstep, and the value of the number of extracted cases is 1 kstep. This is the number of obstacles removed. Also, the number of cases returned is the number returned to the process corresponding to each process. Note that “three PT-related cases” in the quality index table 19 shown in FIG. 4 indicates the number of cases returned to the corresponding process when a failure occurs due to the PT process in the IT process, for example.
[0035]
The quality index of the quality index table 19 shown in FIG. 4 is set so that the test quality in the subsequent process becomes severer as the area difference ratio calculated in the end stage of the previous process increases. For example, when the area difference ratio calculated at the end of the PG process is “2%> area difference ratio”, the number of reviews set in the PT process is 2, but “2% ≦ area difference ratio” In the case of <5%, the number of reviews is set to 3. Therefore, when the area difference ratio calculated at the end of the PG process, which is the previous process of the PT process, is “2% ≦ area difference ratio <5%”, the quality index setting unit 16 determines the number of reviews in the PT process. Three cases are decided.
[0036]
When the post-process is performed based on the changed quality index and the quality evaluation value calculated at the end stage of the post-process is improved, the quality index in the subsequent process is changed to a moderate content. . For example, in FIG. 4, even if the area difference ratio calculated at the end of the PG process is “2% ≦ area difference ratio <5%” and the number of tests in the IT process is three cases, If the area difference ratio calculated at the end of the PT process, which is the previous process, is less than 2%, the number of tests in the IT process is 2 cases.
[0037]
In the quality index table 19 shown in FIG. 4, each numerical value of the quality index changes according to the area difference ratio in the previous process, but the quality index table 19 used in the present invention is the quality index table 19 For example, as shown in FIG. 5, fine test contents that change according to the area difference ratio may be set.
[0038]
Finally, the quality evaluation value output unit 18 outputs the quality evaluation value calculated by the quality evaluation unit 15 to the user terminal 22 (step S6), and the quality index output unit 17 is a post-process determined by the quality index setting unit 16 Is output to the user terminal 22 (step S7), and the process is terminated.
[0039]
The user can evaluate the quality in the previous process based on the output quality evaluation value. For example, when the output quality evaluation value increases, it can be evaluated that the quality is deteriorated. In addition, since the test in the subsequent process can be performed based on the output quality index, it is possible to perform appropriate quality control according to the progress status in the previous process.
[0040]
In the present invention, the quality index data set in the quality index table 19 can be automatically corrected based on the result of project performance evaluation. Implement a project consisting of multiple processes according to the initially set quality index, grasp the final delivery delay information and the test quality results (failure occurrence status, etc.) in each process, and look statistically. When the influence on the process is large, the quality index table changing unit 23 of the progress management system 1 corrects the quality index table 19. An example of the correction processing flow of the quality index table 19 is shown in FIG.
[0041]
As shown in FIG. 8, first, the quality index of each process is set in the quality index table 19 (step S11), and the project is executed based on the set quality index (step S12). Then, the quality index table changing unit 23 evaluates the project performance (step S13). In the performance evaluation of such a project, for example, a statistical value of a test quality result in each process is obtained, and it is determined whether the statistical value exceeds a threshold value. If the statistical value does not exceed the threshold value, the process returns to step S12. If the statistical value exceeds the threshold value, the quality index table changing unit 23 corrects the quality index table 19 (step S14), and the process proceeds to step S12. Return.
[0042]
By using the present invention, for example, in a test in which 5 mistakes are to be extracted, when the number of 10 mistakes that have been extracted exceeds a preset threshold, the quality index table changing unit 23 causes the quality index table to be The quality index in 19 is corrected to a test where 10 mistakes should be extracted. Thus, by using the present invention, the quality index table 19 can be corrected based on the project performance evaluation, and the accuracy of the quality index table 19 can be increased.
[0043]
As can be understood from the above, the features of the embodiment of the present invention are described as follows.
[0044]
(Appendix 1) A quality control processing method for supporting software development work by a computer,
Recording the work schedule of each work process;
A step of recording work results of each work process;
Calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
Outputting the calculated quality evaluation value.
A quality management processing method based on a progress situation characterized by the above.
[0045]
(Appendix 2) A quality control processing method for supporting software development work by a computer,
Recording the work schedule of each work process;
A step of recording work results of each work process;
Calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
Determining a quality index of the next process based on the calculated quality evaluation value and a quality index table in which the quality index of each process set in advance according to the quality evaluation value is recorded;
Outputting the determined quality indicator.
A quality management processing method based on a progress situation characterized by the above.
[0046]
(Supplementary note 3) In the quality control processing method based on the progress situation described in Supplementary note 2,
A step of correcting the recorded work performance according to the number of days to postpone the work schedule
A quality management processing method based on a progress situation characterized by the above.
[0047]
(Supplementary note 4) In the quality control processing method based on the progress situation described in Supplementary note 2,
A step of counting the number of operations after each operation affects the number of operations, and weighting the recorded work schedule and work results of each recorded work process
A quality management processing method based on a progress situation characterized by the above.
[0048]
(Supplementary note 5) In the quality control processing method based on the progress situation described in Supplementary note 2,
A step of correcting the quality index table based on statistical data of results of each work process performed based on the quality index set in the quality index table
A quality management processing method based on a progress situation characterized by the above.
[0049]
(Appendix 6) A quality control processing device that supports software development work by a computer,
Means for recording the work schedule of each work process;
Means for recording the work results of each work process;
Means for calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
Means for evaluating the quality in each work process based on the calculated quality evaluation value.
A quality control processing apparatus based on the progress situation characterized by this.
[0050]
(Supplementary note 7) A quality control processing device for supporting software development work by a computer,
Means for recording the work schedule of each work process;
Means for recording the work results of each work process;
Means for calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
Means for storing a quality index table in which the quality index of each process set in advance according to the quality evaluation value is recorded;
Means for determining a quality index for the next process based on the calculated quality evaluation value and the quality index table;
A quality control processing apparatus based on the progress situation characterized by this.
[0051]
(Supplementary Note 8) A quality control processing program for supporting software development work by a computer,
A process of recording the work schedule of each work process;
A process of recording the work results of each work process;
A process of calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
A process of evaluating the quality in each work process based on the calculated quality evaluation value;
A quality control processing program based on the progress status to be executed by a computer.
[0052]
(Supplementary note 9) A quality control processing program for supporting software development work by a computer,
A process of recording the work schedule of each work process;
A process of recording the work results of each work process;
A process of calculating a quality evaluation value according to the difference between the work schedule and work performance of each recorded work process;
A process for determining a quality index for the next process based on the calculated quality evaluation value and a quality index table in which a quality index for each process set in advance according to the quality evaluation value is recorded;
A quality control processing program based on the progress status to be executed by a computer.
[0053]
(Supplementary Note 10) A computer-readable recording medium in which a quality control processing program based on the progress described in Supplementary Note 8 or Supplementary Note 9 is recorded.
[0054]
【The invention's effect】
By using the present invention, even if the previous process is overworked and the schedule is set in time to advance to the subsequent process with inherent quality control problems, the previous process is based on the calculated quality evaluation value. It is possible to grasp the deterioration of quality at an early stage.
[0055]
Further, by using the present invention, the quality index in the subsequent process can be changed based on the quality evaluation value in the previous process, so that appropriate quality management according to the progress status can be performed.
[0056]
In addition, since the present invention is a progress management system that takes into account the impact of delays in performance, the situation can be accurately reflected, and management care can be made accordingly. Since the amount of work is not so large, there is little increase in load due to the increase in the amount of work by the reporter, and there is little possibility of mistakes, so accurate management can be performed with the conventional management system.
[0057]
Furthermore, by using the present invention, it is possible to increase the accuracy of the quality index table by correcting the quality index table based on the evaluation of the performance of the project, so that more appropriate quality management becomes possible.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a progress management system.
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a progress management processing flow.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a progress management graph.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a quality index table.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a quality index table.
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating correction of work results.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating weighting of work schedules and work results.
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a quality index table correction process flow;
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a conventional progress management method.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a conventional progress management method.
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a conventional progress management method.
FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a conventional progress management method.
[Explanation of symbols]
1 progress management system
11 Schedule input section
12 Progress input section
13 Weighting section
14 Correction unit
15 Quality Evaluation Department
16 Quality index setting section
17 Quality index output section
18 Quality evaluation value output section
19 Quality index table
20 Schedule storage table
21 Progress memory table
22 User terminal
23 Quality index table change part

Claims (5)

A quality management processing method executed by a computer supporting software development work, comprising:
A schedule input unit receiving work schedule input information indicating a relationship between each work period in each work process and the number of work schedules from the user terminal, and recording it in a schedule storage table;
Progress input unit receives the input information work record showing the relationship between the working period and the work record number is a number of operations completed in the working period in each working process from the user terminal, the progress status storage table Recording steps;
The quality evaluation unit includes a graph indicating the cumulative number of work results obtained by plotting the number of work results from the work results recorded in the progress storage table for each work period, and the planned work number from the work schedules recorded in the schedule storage table. And a planned cumulative line of the graph indicating the cumulative number of work and a planned cumulative line of the graph indicating the planned cumulative number of work. Calculating an area difference ratio between the actual difference area and the total area formed by the planned cumulative line, the date direction base line H, and the cumulative number direction base line V as a quality evaluation value;
A quality management processing method based on progress, wherein a quality evaluation value output unit includes a step of outputting the calculated quality evaluation value to the user terminal . A quality management processing method executed by a computer supporting software development work, comprising:
A schedule input unit receiving work schedule input information indicating a relationship between each work period in each work process and the number of work schedules from the user terminal, and recording it in a schedule storage table;
Progress input unit receives the input information work record showing the relationship between the working period and the work record number is a number of operations completed in the working period in each working process from the user terminal, the progress status storage table Recording steps;
The quality evaluation unit includes a graph indicating the cumulative number of work results obtained by plotting the number of work results from the work results recorded in the progress storage table for each work period, and the planned work number from the work schedules recorded in the schedule storage table. And a planned cumulative line of the graph indicating the cumulative number of work and a planned cumulative line of the graph indicating the planned cumulative number of work. Calculating an area difference ratio between the actual difference area and the total area formed by the planned cumulative line, the date direction base line H, and the cumulative number direction base line V as a quality evaluation value;
The quality index setting unit refers to the quality index table in which the quality index of each work process set in advance so that the test quality in the next work process becomes severer as the quality evaluation value of the previous work process becomes worse, Determining a quality index for the next work process based on the calculated quality evaluation value;
A quality management processing method based on progress, wherein a quality index output unit includes a step of outputting the determined quality index to the user terminal . In the quality control processing method based on the progress status according to claim 2,
When the work schedule is postponed, the correction unit of the computer causes the work to be performed so that the final point of the graph indicating the actual number of work matches the final point of the graph of the cumulative number of work scheduled based on the original work schedule. Progress comprising the steps of shifting each plot of the graph indicating the number of achievements in the axial direction of the number of days elapsed in proportion to the number of days elapsed and correcting the recorded work results according to the number of days postponed in the work schedule. Quality control processing method based on the situation. In the quality control processing method based on the progress status according to claim 2,
In the progress situation, the weighting unit of the computer has a step of counting the number of work after each work affects each work number and weighting the work schedule and work results of each recorded work process. Quality control processing method based. In the quality control processing method based on the progress status according to claim 2,
The quality index table changing unit of the computer has a step of correcting the quality index table based on statistical data of results of each work process performed based on the quality index set in the quality index table. Quality management processing method based on the progress status.

Images