JP2978364B2 - Score tally system for learning situation evaluation - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a scoring system for learning situation evaluation for automatically summarizing scores of a plurality of learners with computer support, and more particularly, to a plurality of learning subjects corresponding to a learning progress of an arbitrary subject. A problem in which students are asked to answer questions that are divided into individual units and that each unit is questioned in terms of the degree of understanding and expressiveness of the subject, and the answers are scored to evaluate the learning status of each learner. The present invention relates to an implementation of a score totaling system which is prepared corresponding to a collection and facilitates the input of the scored points, and displays the collected values with good visibility in evaluating them.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, learning progress of children in learning subjects such as language, arithmetic, science, society, etc., for children and the like as learners from a plurality of viewpoints corresponding to the learning subjects,
For example, in the case of arithmetic, it is possible to evaluate differently from viewpoints such as "knowledge and understanding of quantities and figures", "expression and processing of quantities and figures", and "mathematical thinking". Formal questions are well known. FIG. 10 shows an example of a score totaling table prepared for such a collection of questions.

[0003] The scoring table illustrated in FIG. 10 corresponds to the semester of the first semester of the mathematics of the 4th grade of elementary school, and is converted into "1. large number", "2. corner", and "3. , Together "," 4. Formulas and calculations "," 5. Division ", and" 6. Decimal numbers "are basically divided into six units, and for each of these units, Knowledge and understanding of figures and figures "," expression and processing of quantities and figures ", and" mathematical thinking "
By introducing two viewpoints and writing the scores of each child in the corresponding columns, the learning situation can be evaluated for each of the introduced viewpoints. Regarding other learning subjects, the format and form of such a score totaling table are common, and only the number of units, their contents and the contents of viewpoints are changed according to the learning subjects, applicable grades, applicable semesters, and the like. By the way, in the Japanese language of the first semester of the third grade of elementary school, as a unit, "1.
Items such as “2. Let's read poetry”, “3. Climbing a tree”, “4. Arrival procession”, “5. Suspension bridge”, “6. Meet Elmer and Tora” are provided. Items such as “expression ability”, “understanding ability”, “language knowledge / understanding / skills” are provided. In addition, fourth grader 1
In the semester of science, units such as “1. Seasons and Creatures (Spring)”, “2. Body and Exercise”, “3. Items are provided, and items such as “scientific thinking”, “observation / experimental skills / expression”, “knowledge / understanding of natural phenomena”, etc. are provided as viewpoints.

[0004]

According to such a collection of problems and a score totaling table, the learning situation of each learner (child) for a given learning subject can be grasped for each viewpoint. Although each learner's strengths and weaknesses can be easily determined, and useful information on which perspectives should be strengthened can be obtained, but in the past, as described above, the teachers themselves However, the score was carefully written in each corresponding column of the score summary table, and the total score was calculated by so-called manual calculation to evaluate the learning situation of each learner. Easy to commit. In other words, usually, each time the scoring of one unit is completed, or even if several units are collectively performed, each unit will enter its score in the score totaling table, Since the score totaling table itself is partitioned according to viewpoints as described above, there is a high possibility that a column to be filled in is mistaken even if it is carefully written. -The work of obtaining a total score for each viewpoint or performing a ranking or the like to evaluate the score is complicated and inefficient. The inconveniences of others could not be avoided.

[0005] Regarding the latter total point calculation and ranking calculation, a computer is introduced to construct a system that automatically executes these calculations based on the input score, thereby eliminating the above-mentioned disadvantages. It is easy to imagine that it will be done, but it is possible to easily and accurately perform the score input operation etc. with good visibility while maintaining the above-mentioned functions and advantages as the score totaling table by viewpoint. Until now, there has been no example of a perfect score totaling system.

[0006] The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and in addition to automating the tallying of the scores with the aid of a computer, maintains the above functions and advantages as a point-by-point score tabulation table, and It is an object of the present invention to provide a score totaling system for evaluating a learning situation, which is less likely to cause a score input error and has excellent operability and functionality.

[0007]

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides: (a) input means for inputting the score of each of the above-listed learners; (b) display means for displaying various information for learning status evaluation including the input score. (c) As an input screen for the score of each learner scored,
A first screen for displaying a list of names of the learners and a list of the viewpoints and prompting the input of a score in each corresponding column of the names and viewpoints of the learners on the display means separately for the unit; Display control means. (d) As the score summary table screen for each viewpoint, a list of the names of each learner, a list of the units, and a list of the scores entered in the corresponding columns of the names and the units of the learners And a second display control means for displaying, on the display means, a list of values obtained by summing up the scores of the listed units for each learner for each learner. And a score totaling system for evaluating a learning situation corresponding to the collection of questions in the above-described format.

[0008]

The two screens, the score input screen and the score totaling table screen for each viewpoint, which are displayed through the first and second display control means, are different from each other in the display form and the display contents, but they are different from each other. The data in (scores) are organically linked internally. For this reason, even if a teacher or the like simply inputs scores for each learner's viewpoint through the score input screen displayed for each unit as if simply listed, the input score is different from that of the other viewpoint. Are also reflected and displayed in the corresponding columns in the respective score summary table screens. Therefore, the function and advantage as the above-mentioned viewpoint totaling table can be maintained well through this viewpoint totaling table screen. In addition, according to the above score input screen, it is unlikely that a score entry error (input error) or the like which is a concern in the conventional viewpoint-based score totaling table will occur.

The selection of whether the two screens are selectively displayed or simultaneously displayed is arbitrary, and is usually determined in consideration of the resolution (screen width) of the display means. Is done. That is, when the resolution of the display means to be used is low (for example, when the resolution is about 640 × 400 dots), these two screens are arbitrarily switched and displayed through appropriate screen switching means, and the resolution is sufficiently high. If these values are too high, these two screens can be displayed simultaneously.

The second display control means may further comprise: (e) executing a ranking operation based on the distribution of the calculated values for the total calculated values for each learner, and calculating the calculated rank values If the list of the points is also displayed as the score totaling table screen for each viewpoint together with the display means, the learning situation evaluation described above through the score totaling table screen for each viewpoint is further facilitated. Become.

[0011]

FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a score totaling system according to the present invention. That is, in the system of this embodiment, the input unit 1 includes a keyboard or the like, and registers the names of the learners, inputs the scores of the registered learners,
The display unit 2 includes a CRT, a liquid crystal display, and the like. The display unit 2 includes a score input screen 21 shown in FIG. This is a portion for visually displaying various predefined screens.

The input / output control unit 3 interprets a command or input contents through the input unit 1 and gives it to the arithmetic processing unit 4, and receives various display commands issued from the arithmetic processing unit 4. Is a part that functions as a so-called interface that interprets this and performs display control on the display unit 2.

The arithmetic processing unit 4 includes a CPU and an application program for controlling the operation of the arithmetic processing unit 4. The instruction or input content through the input unit 1 is given via the input / output control unit 3. By
It is a part that executes arithmetic processing and control in accordance with the contents described in advance as the application program while interacting with the normal storage unit 5. The execution result is displayed on the display unit 2 through the input / output control unit 3 or written in the storage unit 5.

The storage unit 5 is usually a main memory (RAM)
A work area 51, a data storage area 52 on a secondary storage device such as a disk device (floppy disk, hard disk, magneto-optical disk, etc.), and a screen definition storage area 53. It is configured. Here, the work area 51 is an area that is secured by the arithmetic processing unit 4 when the system is activated, and temporarily stores input data (learner's name and score), arithmetic results, and the like. And the data storage area 52
Is an area where the data temporarily stored in the work area 51 is semi-permanently stored through a write control by the arithmetic processing unit 4 when a save request is made, and a screen definition storage area Reference numeral 53 denotes an area in which screen definition information of various screens to be displayed on the display unit 2 as the system is stored in advance. The display unit 2
As described above, at least a score input screen 21 and a viewpoint-based score totaling table screen 22 shown in FIG.

FIGS. 2 to 5 show various processing procedures of the embodiment system centering on the arithmetic processing section 4. FIGS. 6 to 9 show the screen definition storage area 53.
FIG. 2 shows an example of a screen that is stored in advance and that is controlled to be displayed on the display unit 2 in accordance with the processing.
The operation of the system according to the present embodiment will be described in further detail with reference to FIGS. 5 to 5 and FIGS.

That is, the user of the system, that is, a teacher or the like, finishes scoring the above-mentioned collection of questions, and inputs the scores of each learner (child) through the score totaling table for each viewpoint. Assuming that the system according to the present embodiment is started to evaluate the learning situation, the arithmetic processing unit 4 first secures a work area 51 of the storage unit 5 (step S2 in FIG. 2).
200) Then, an initial screen as illustrated in FIG. 6 is read from the screen definition storage area 53 of the storage unit 5 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2). In this initial screen (Fig. 6), the learning subjects ("Japanese", "arithmetic",
"Science" and "Society"), and input of a learner name (child name) to be registered ("Name input").

In this initial screen (FIG. 6), the input unit 1
If "name input" is selected and instructed by the user using the arrow keys ("↓", "↓") and the enter key ("enter key") (step S210 in FIG. 2), the input / output control unit The system is transferred to the "name input mode" shown in FIG.

In the "name input mode", the arithmetic processing section 4 reads an appropriate name input screen (not shown) from the screen definition storage area 53 and displays it on the display section 2 (step S300 in FIG. 3). ), Wait for the user to input the name. When the user inputs a name (step S301 in FIG. 3), the input contents are echoed back to the display unit 2, and the names for which the final operation has been performed are sequentially stored in the storage unit 5 in a predetermined storage structure. It is registered (step S302 in FIG. 3). At this point, the name is registered in the work area 51, and the registered contents are semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 only after an appropriate save operation is performed by the user. Also,
The name data of the learner (child) registered here is assumed to be used in common for all selectable learning subjects and the score input screen 21 and the viewpoint-based score totaling table screen 22.

In this "name input mode", if an appropriate end operation is performed by the user (step S3 in FIG. 3).
303), and the arithmetic processing unit 4 which has determined so reads the above initial screen (FIG. 6) from the screen definition storage area 53 again, displays it on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2), and issues a further instruction by the user. Wait to wait.

On the other hand, if any subject is selected on the initial screen (FIG. 6) (step S220 in FIG. 2),
The arithmetic processing unit 4 sets a flag corresponding to the selected subject in a flag table temporarily built in the built-in register or the work area 51 of the storage unit 5 (step S221 in FIG. 2), and then stores the screen definition. This time, the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) is read from the area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S222 in FIG. 2). On the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7), any one of the "score input mode" as the first display control unit and the "tabulation table display mode" as the second display control unit in the present invention is displayed. Shall be selectable.

In the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7), the arrow keys ("初期", "↓") and the enter key ("Enter key") of the input unit 1 are used as in the case of the initial screen.
Selects the "score input mode" by the user,
If it is instructed (step S223 in FIG. 2), the fact is transmitted to the arithmetic processing unit 4 via the input / output control unit 3, and the processing procedure defined therein causes the system to execute the "score input mode" shown in FIG. ”.

In the "score input mode", the arithmetic processing unit 4 determines the score input screen 21 corresponding to the selected subject based on the set flag (see FIGS. 1 and 8).
Is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2.
(Step S400 in FIG. 4), and waits for the user to input a score.

Here, an example of the screen specification of the score input screen 21 will be described with reference to FIG. Note that FIG. 8 is created as a screen corresponding to the “point-of-view score totaling table” for the first semester of the fourth grade math illustrated in FIG. 10 above.

As shown in FIG. 8, the score input screen 21 is a unit name display area 21a for displaying a unit name (identification name of the unit, the number of times), and is input and registered in the "name input mode". A learner name display area 21b displaying a list of learned learner names (child names), a viewpoint display area 21c displaying a list of viewpoint items (identification names of the viewpoints), a learner name display area 21b and a viewpoint display A score input area 21d for prompting the input of a score for each corresponding viewpoint in a column that intersects with the area 21c and displaying the input score;
Total score display area 2 in which the total score of viewpoints in the unit for each learner is automatically calculated and the calculated value is displayed.
1e, and a point display area 21f in which points are displayed corresponding to the respective viewpoints displayed in the viewpoint display area 21c. The score input to the score input area 21d is performed by selecting a learner (child) whose score is to be input while moving the cursor displayed in the learner name display area 21b with the arrow keys. In the column of the learner, the score for each viewpoint is entered by numerical input sequentially using the numeric keys.

When the user (teacher or the like) inputs a score (step S401 in FIG. 4), the arithmetic processing unit 4 echoes the input content back to the display unit 2 to determine the score for which the final operation has been performed. Are also sequentially registered in the storage unit 5 in a predetermined storage structure (step S40 in FIG. 4).
2). At this time, the arithmetic processing unit 4 also executes a score check for checking the input score based on the score displayed in the score display area 21f. When a value exceeding the score is input, an appropriate error notification is made. Is displayed to give the user's attention and perform processing such as prompting re-input of the score.

The arithmetic processing unit 4 executes a total calculation for the selected learner (child) each time the above-mentioned score is inputted, and displays the corresponding total score display area 21e.
Is displayed (step S403 in FIG. 4). This calculated value is also registered in the storage unit 5 in a predetermined storage structure, similarly to the input score. At this time, the score or the total point calculation value is registered in the work area 51, and the registered contents are semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 only after an appropriate save operation is performed by the user. What is there is the "name input mode"
Is the same as

In the "score input mode", if an appropriate end operation is performed by the user (step S in FIG. 4).
404), the arithmetic processing unit 4 reads again the aggregation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) from the screen definition storage area 53, displays this on the display unit 2, and waits (step S22 in FIG. 2).
2).

Next, on the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7), if the "tabulation table display mode" is selected and instructed by the user (step S224 in FIG. 2), the fact is notified via the input / output control unit 3. The processing is transferred to the arithmetic processing unit 4 and the system shifts to the “summary table display mode” shown in FIG. 5 according to the processing procedure defined therein.

In the "summary table display mode", the arithmetic processing unit 4 also uses the viewpoint-based score total table screen 2 corresponding to the selected subject based on the set flag.
2 (see FIGS. 1 and 9) is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S5 in FIG. 5).
00).

Here, an example of the screen specification of the viewpoint total score table screen 22 will be described with reference to FIG.
This FIG. 9 is also created as a screen corresponding to the “point-of-view score totaling table” for the first semester of the fourth grade elementary math illustrated in FIG. 10 above.

As shown in FIG. 9, the viewpoint totaling table screen 22 has a viewpoint display area 22a in which items of viewpoints are displayed, and a learner name (children) entered and registered in the "name input mode". Name), a learner name display area 22b in which the names (names) are displayed in a list, a unit display area 22c in which the units (number of times) are displayed in a list according to the above viewpoints, and the learner name display areas 2
A score display area 22d in which each corresponding score for each viewpoint input in the above-mentioned "score input mode" is displayed in each intersecting column of the unit display area 22c and the unit display area 22c, and a score for each viewpoint for each learner. A total point display area 22e in which the total points through the unit are automatically calculated and the calculated values are displayed. A ranking calculation based on the distribution of the calculated values is performed on the total calculated values, and the rank values are calculated. Evaluation rank display area 22f to be displayed, total score display area 22 for each of the above viewpoints
e, a total score display area 22g in which a total score obtained by further calculating the total calculated value is displayed, and a point score corresponding to each unit displayed in the unit display area 22c. And a display area 22h. Note that information that cannot be displayed all at once on the screen, that is, information related to the viewpoint “mathematical concept (see FIG. 10)” in the example of FIG. 9 is displayed through an appropriate screen scroll operation using an arrow key or the like. Shall be performed. However, the learner name display area 22 at both ends of the screen
Regarding b and the total score display area 22g, the specification may be such that the display is continued irrespective of the screen scroll in the left and right direction, and it is more preferable.

By the way, the score totaling table screen 22 according to viewpoints is thus obtained.
Is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2, the arithmetic processing unit 4 then displays the above-mentioned score display area 22 d of the score totaling table screen 22 for the same viewpoint in the above “score input mode”. Each corresponding score for each input viewpoint is read out from the storage unit 5 and displayed (step S5 in FIG. 5).
501), and calculates the total score and total score for each of the displayed scores for each learner name (child name) and displays the total score and the total score display region 22e and the total score display region 22g together (FIG. 5 steps S502).

The arithmetic processing section 4 further executes a ranking calculation based on the distribution of the calculated values for the total points for each viewpoint calculated and displayed in the total point display area 22e,
The calculated rank values (A, B, C) are displayed in the evaluation rank display area 22f (step S503 in FIG. 5).
Note that this ranking calculation method is arbitrary. For example, an appropriate score distribution chart (curve) is obtained or stored in advance, and based on the chart (curve), each score (total point for each viewpoint) is graded as rank A, B, or C. The method is conceivable.

The calculated values thus calculated and displayed are also temporarily registered in the work area 51 in a predetermined storage structure as before, and the registered contents are stored in the data based on an appropriate save operation by the user. It is semi-permanently stored in the area 52. However, according to this embodiment, as is clear from the processing procedures shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the screen returns to the input screen of the "score input mode" (FIG. 8), and a new score for the new unit is obtained. If the input or the correction input for the already input score is performed, the total score and other calculated values relating to the input are automatically updated. If the save operation is performed with the updated content, The contents semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 are automatically updated.

The point-by-point score totaling table screen 22 thus displayed and controlled corresponds directly to the conventionally used point-by-point score totaling table (FIG. 10), and the judgment of each learner's strengths and weaknesses is performed. Needless to say, this is a tabulation table that provides useful information on which viewpoint should be strengthened.

Also, in the "summary table display mode", if an appropriate end operation is performed by the user (FIG. 5).
In step S504), the arithmetic processing unit 4 reads again the aggregation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) from the screen definition storage area 53, displays it on the display unit 2, and waits (step S222 in FIG. 2).

Thereafter, when an end operation is performed on the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) (step S225 in FIG. 2), the arithmetic processing section 4 reads the initial screen (FIG. 6) from the screen definition storage area 53. Is displayed on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2), and if an end operation is performed on this initial screen (FIG. 6) (step S230 in FIG. 2),
For example, a screen (not shown) for asking whether data saving is necessary is displayed on the display unit 2 to ask the user to confirm the end.
When an operation for requesting data saving is performed (step S231 in FIG. 2), the contents temporarily constructed in the work area 51 are saved (semi-permanent storage) in the data storage area 52 (FIG. 2). Step S232), work area 5
When the operation for rejecting data saving is performed (step S231 in FIG. 2), the contents of the work area 51 are released without saving and the processing is ended. (Step S23 in FIG. 2)
3).

As described above, according to the system of this embodiment, the score input screen 21 as shown in FIG. 8 is used to input the score of each learner. In the evaluation of the learning situation of the above, the viewpoint-based score totaling table screen 22 whose specific example is shown in FIG. 9 directly corresponding to the conventionally used viewpoint-based totaling table (FIG. 10) is used. While maintaining the functions and advantages of the score totaling table for each viewpoint as they are, inconveniences such as erroneous score entry errors (input mistakes), which have been a concern in the past, can be satisfactorily avoided.

In this embodiment, the score input screen 2
1 and the point-by-view score tabulation screen 22 are selectively displayed on the display unit 2 through the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7). Alternatively, for example, the score input screen 21 and the viewpoint-based score tabulation table may be used. The configuration is such that these two screens are automatically switched each time a mode end operation is performed on the screen 22, or the resolution of the display unit 2 (the width of the screen), but this resolution is sufficiently high (sufficiently). Screen is wide)
For example, the configuration and specifications regarding how to display these two screens are arbitrary, such as a configuration in which these two screens are simultaneously displayed through a multi-window system or the like. The point is that the score input screen 21 and viewpoint-based score tabulation screen 2
It suffices that the two screens 2 and 2 are each displayed and controlled.

Further, as indicated by broken lines in FIG. 1, a printer 6 whose output is controlled through the input / output control unit 3 is further provided. These two screens, a score input screen 21 and a point-by-view score totaling screen 22, are provided. May of course be configured so that the print output by the printer 6 can be obtained.

The screen definition relating to the two screens, the score input screen 21 and the viewpoint-based score tabulation screen 22, is not limited to those illustrated in FIG. 8 or FIG. The screen only needs to be a screen that displays a list of names of learners and a list of viewpoints separately for each unit, and prompts the user to enter scores in the corresponding columns of these learners' names and viewpoints. Regarding the separate score summary table screen, for each viewpoint, a list of names of learners and a list of units, and a list of the scores entered in the corresponding columns of the names and units of these learners, and Any screen may be used as long as it displays a list of values obtained by calculating the total scores for each of the listed scores for each unit.

Further, in the system of the above embodiment, the work area is explicitly provided. However, the necessity of the work area is arbitrary, and contents to be input or edited are directly read and written between the data storage area. Of course, the configuration may be good.

[0043]

As described above, according to the present invention,
A score input screen that displays a list of the names of each learner and the list of viewpoints separately for each unit and prompts the user to input scores in the corresponding columns of these learners' names and viewpoints. A list of names, a list of the units, and a list of the scores entered in the corresponding columns of the names of the learners and the units, and a total of the scores for each of the listed units for each learner Since score input and learning status evaluation of each learner are performed through two linked screens with the score totaling table by viewpoint displaying a list of calculated values, there is a concern in the conventional score totaling table by viewpoint. Such a score entry error (input mistake) is unlikely to occur, and the function and advantage of the score totaling table for the same viewpoint can be maintained well.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment of a score totaling system for learning situation evaluation according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a flow of processing corresponding to various operations by a user as an operation of the entire system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the system of the embodiment, particularly in a name input mode.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the system of the embodiment, particularly in a score input mode.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the system of the embodiment, particularly in a tabulation table display mode.

FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram showing an example of an initial screen (menu screen) displayed when the system of the embodiment is activated.

FIG. 7 is an exemplary diagram showing an example of an aggregation mode selection screen of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagram showing an example of a score input screen of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 9 is an exemplary diagram showing an example of a score totaling table screen for each viewpoint of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a viewpoint-based score totaling table conventionally used.

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Input part, 2 ... Display part, 3 ... Input / output control part, 4 ... Calculation processing part, 5 ... Storage part, 6 ... Printer, 21 ... Score input screen, 22 ... Score table by point of view, 51 ... Work Territory, 5
2. Data storage area 53: Screen definition storage area

Continuation of the front page (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. ⁶ , DB name) G06F 17/00 G09B 7/00 JICST file (JOIS)

Claims (2)

(57) [Claims] Claims: 1. An arbitrary learning subject is divided into a plurality of units according to the progress of the learning, and a problem which is separately asked for each unit from the viewpoint of the degree of understanding and expressive ability of the learning subject is solved to the learner. A score aggregation system for learning situation evaluation is provided corresponding to a collection of questions that evaluates the learning situation of each learner by scoring the answer and automatically summing up the scores of each student who was scored. Input means for inputting the score of each of the scored learners; display means for displaying various information for learning status evaluation including the input score; and As a screen for inputting the score of each learner, a screen that displays a list of names of the learners and a list of the viewpoints and prompts the user to input scores in the corresponding columns of the names and viewpoints of the learners is described above. Before the unit The first to be displayed on the display means
Display control means, and as the score summary table screen for each viewpoint, a list of names of each learner, a list of the units, and the input of the learner's name and the unit into the corresponding columns List of scores,
And a second display control means for displaying, on the display means, a list of values obtained by performing a total operation for each learner on the scores of the listed units for each learner. Score counting system for situation evaluation. 2. The second display control means further executes a ranking calculation based on the distribution of the calculated values for the total calculated values for each of the learners, and displays a list of the calculated rank values. 2. The score totaling system for learning situation evaluation according to claim 1, wherein the score totaling table screen for each viewpoint is also displayed on the display means.