JPH06332882A - Point sum-up system for evaluating learning conditions - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To hardly generate the input error of points or the like and to satisfactorily maintain a function and merit as a point sum-up table by the points of view by performing the point input and learning condition evaluation of each learning person through two linked pictures. CONSTITUTION:This system is provided with an input part 1 for inputting the checked point of each learning person and a display part 2 to display the various kinds of information such as the inputted point for learning condition evaluation. Then, the two pictures of an input picture 21 of the point and a point sum-up table picture 22 by the points of view to be displayed through first and second display control means are provided with mutually different display forms and display contents but data (points) in those pictures are organically linked inside. Therefore, even when a teacher or the like simply inputs the point for each point of view of each learning person just like simply putting them in order through the input picture 21 of the points to be displayed by units, the inputted points are satisfactorily reflected and displayed in the respective columns of the other point sum-up table picture 22 by view points as well.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a score totaling system for evaluating a learning situation in which scores of a plurality of learners are automatically totaled by computer support. A problem in which each student is asked to solve a question that is categorized according to the degree of comprehension and expression ability of the relevant learning subject, and the answers are graded to evaluate the learning situation of each student. The present invention relates to an implementation of a score totaling system which is prepared corresponding to a collection, facilitates inputting of the scored scores, and displays the scored values with high visibility in evaluating them.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Hitherto, for children as learners, the learning progress of children in each learning subject such as national language, arithmetic, science, and society has been examined from a plurality of viewpoints according to those learning subjects.
For example, in the case of mathematics, evaluation can be performed separately from the viewpoints of "knowledge / understanding of quantities and figures", "expression / processing of quantities and figures", and "mathematics". Format questions are well known. FIG. 10 shows an example of a score summary table prepared for such a question collection.

The score summary table illustrated in FIG. 10 corresponds to the first semester guidance record of math in the fourth grade of elementary school and corresponds to "1. large number", "2. angle", "3. , Together, ”“ 4. Formulas and calculations, ”“ 5. Division, ”and“ 6. Decimal numbers ”are basically divided into six units, and the“ quantity ”mentioned above is applied to each of these units. "Knowledge / understanding of figures and figures", "Expression / processing of quantities and figures", and "Mathematical thinking"
By introducing one viewpoint and entering the score of each child in the corresponding column, the learning situation can be evaluated according to the introduced viewpoint. For other learning subjects, the format and form of the score list are common, and only the number of units and their contents and viewpoint contents are changed according to the learning subjects, applicable academic year, applicable semester, etc. By the way, in the national language of the 1st semester of the 3rd grade of elementary school, the unit is "1. Kangaroo Boya who found the shadow",
Items such as “2. read poetry”, “3. climbing a tree”, “4. procession”, “5. suspension bridge crossing”, “6. Elmer, meet Tora”, etc. Items such as "ability of expression", "ability of understanding", "knowledge / understanding / skill of language", etc. are provided. Also, 4th grade 1
In the science of the semester, the unit of "1. Seasons and creatures (spring)", "2. Body and exercise of people", "3. Weight and balance of things", "4. Seasons and creatures (summer)", etc. Items are provided, and items such as “scientific thinking”, “skills / expressions of observation / experiment”, “knowledge / understanding of natural phenomena”, etc. are provided as viewpoints.

[0004]

According to the collection of problems and the score summary table as described above, the learning status of each learner (children) for any learning subject can be grasped according to the viewpoint. Although each learner's strengths and weaknesses can be easily determined, and useful information about which viewpoints should be strengthened is certainly obtained, in the past, as described above, after scoring, the teacher himself However, it was necessary to carefully write down the scores in each applicable column of the score summary table, and to calculate the total score of those scores by so-called manual calculation to evaluate the learning situation of each learner. Easy to commit. That is, normally, each time one unit is scored, or even if several units are collected together, the score will be entered in the score summary table for each unit. Since the score summary table itself is divided according to viewpoints as described above, there is a high possibility that the fields to be filled in may be wrong even if they are carefully written. -The work of obtaining the total score for each viewpoint and performing the ranking to evaluate the score is complicated and inefficient. The inconvenience and so on were unavoidable.

Regarding the latter total point calculation and ranking calculation, by introducing a computer and constructing a system that automatically executes these calculations based on the input score, the above-mentioned inconvenience is solved. It will be easy to imagine that it will be done, but while maintaining the above-mentioned functions and advantages as a point-by-point score summary table, it is possible to easily and accurately perform the score input operation etc. with good visibility. When it comes to a scoring system, we have never seen an example.

The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, not only automates the totalization of the above-mentioned scores by computer support, but also maintains the above-mentioned functions and advantages as a viewpoint-specific score totalization table, and It is an object of the present invention to provide a score totaling system for evaluation of a learning situation, which is excellent in both operability and functionality and which is unlikely to cause a score input error.

[0007]

In order to achieve such an object, according to the present invention, (a) an input means for inputting the score of each scored learner. (b) Display means for displaying various information for evaluation of the learning situation including the input score. (c) As the score input screen for each scored learner,
A screen for displaying a list of names of the learners and a list of the viewpoints and urging the learner to input scores in the corresponding columns of the names and the viewpoints of the learners is displayed on the display unit for each unit. Display control means. (d) As the score summary screen for each viewpoint, a list of names of each learner, a list of the units, and a list of the scores input to the corresponding columns of the learner's name and unit And second display control means for displaying on the display means a list of values obtained by total calculation for each learner of the listed scores for each unit. And a score collection system for learning situation evaluation corresponding to the above-mentioned type of problem collection.

[0008]

The two screens such as the above-mentioned score input screen and the above-mentioned viewpoint-specific score summary screen displayed through the first and second display control means are different in display form and display content from each other, but they are different from each other. The data (scores) inside are organically linked internally. Therefore, even if the teacher or the like inputs the scores for each viewpoint of each learner by simply enumerating them through the score input screen displayed for each unit, the input score is On the score summary table screen, the corresponding columns are well reflected and displayed. Therefore, the function and advantage of the point-by-point score tabulation table can be favorably maintained through the viewpoint-by-point score tabulation screen. Moreover, according to the above-mentioned score input screen, it is less likely that a score entry error (input error) or the like, which is a concern in the conventional point-by-point score summary table, will occur.

It should be noted that the selection of whether to selectively display the two screens or to display them at the same time is optional, and is usually determined in consideration of the resolution (screen width) of the display means. To be done. That is, when the resolution of the display means used is low (for example, when the resolution is about 640 × 400 dots), these two screens are arbitrarily switched and displayed by an appropriate screen switching means, and the same resolution is sufficient. If it is very high, it is possible to display these two screens at the same time.

Further, as the second display control means, further, (e) a ranking calculation based on the distribution of the calculated values is executed on the total calculated values for each learner, and the calculated rank values By adopting a type in which the list of points is displayed together with the display means as the point-by-point score tabulation screen, the learning situation evaluation described above through the point-by-point score tabulation screen is further facilitated. Become.

[0011]

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 shows the configuration of an embodiment of a score totaling system according to the present invention. That is, in the system of this embodiment, the input unit 1 is composed of a keyboard or the like, and registers the names of the learners and inputs the scores of the registered learners.
Further, the display section 2 is a section for selecting subjects and switching modes, which will be described later. The display section 2 is composed of a CRT, a liquid crystal display, and the like, and includes a score input screen 21 and a score summary table screen 22 for each viewpoint shown in FIG. Is a portion for visually displaying various predefined screens.

Further, the input / output control unit 3 interprets a command or input contents through the input unit 1 and gives the interpreted contents to the arithmetic processing unit 4, as well as various display commands issued from the arithmetic processing unit 4. Is also a portion that interprets this and functions as a so-called interface that performs display control on the display unit 2.

The arithmetic processing unit 4 is configured to have a CPU and an application program for controlling its operation, and the contents of a command or input through the input unit 1 are given through the input / output control unit 3. Due to
It is a part that executes arithmetic processing and control according to the contents described in advance as the application program while communicating with the normal storage part 5. The execution result is subjected to display control on the display unit 2 or written to the storage unit 5 via the input / output control unit 3.

The storage unit 5 is usually a main memory (RAM).
It has a work area 51 that is supposed to be placed, a data storage area 52 that is supposed to be placed on a secondary storage device such as a disk device (floppy disk, hard disk, magneto-optical disk, etc.), and a screen definition storage area 53. Is configured. Here, the work area 51 is an area which is secured by the arithmetic processing unit 4 when the system is started and in which input data (learner's name and score), arithmetic results, etc. are temporarily stored. , Data storage area 52
Is a region where the data temporarily stored in the work area 51 is semi-permanently stored through the write control by the arithmetic processing unit 4 when a save request is made, and the screen definition storage region Reference numeral 53 is an area in which screen definition information of various screens to be displayed on the display unit 2 as the system is stored in advance. The display unit 2
As described above, at least the score input screen 21 and the point-by-point score tabulation screen 22 shown in FIG. 1 are defined as the screens to be displayed in FIG.

FIGS. 2 to 5 show various processing procedures of the embodiment system centered on the arithmetic processing section 4, and FIGS. 6 to 9 show the screen definition storage area 53.
FIG. 2 shows an example of a screen which is stored in advance in FIG.
5 to FIG. 6 and FIG. 6 to FIG. 9, the operation of the system of this embodiment will be described in more detail.

That is, now, the user of the system, that is, the teacher or the like finishes the scoring of the above-mentioned question book, inputs the scores of the learners (children), and through the point-by-point score summary table, those learners Assuming that the system of the embodiment is started to evaluate the learning situation, the arithmetic processing unit 4 first secures the work area 51 of the storage unit 5 (step S in FIG. 2).
200), and then an initial screen as illustrated in FIG. 6 is read from the screen definition storage area 53 of the storage unit 5 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2). In this initial screen (Fig. 6), the learning subjects ("national language", "math",
"Science" and "Society") can be selected, and learner names (children's names) to be registered can be entered ("Name entry").

In this initial screen (FIG. 6), the input unit 1
When the user inputs and selects "name input" with the arrow keys ("↑" and "↓") and the enter key ("Enter key"), the input / output control unit indicates that fact. 3 is transmitted to the arithmetic processing unit 4, and the system shifts to the "name input mode" shown in FIG. 3 according to the processing procedure defined therein.

In this "name input mode", the arithmetic processing unit 4 reads an appropriate name input screen (not shown) from the screen definition storage area 53 and displays it on the display unit 2 (step S300 in FIG. 3). ), Waits for the user to enter a name. Then, if the user inputs a name (step S301 in FIG. 3), the input contents are echoed back to the display unit 2 and the names of the confirmed operations are sequentially stored in the storage unit 5 in a predetermined storage structure. Register (step S302 in FIG. 3). At this time, the name is registered in the work area 51, and the registered content is semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 only after an appropriate save operation by the user. Also,
The learner (children) name data registered here is commonly used for all selectable learning subjects, the score input screen 21, and the point-by-point score summary table screen 22.

In this "name input mode", if the user performs an appropriate ending operation (step S in FIG. 3).
303), and the arithmetic processing unit 4 which has determined that effect again reads the initial screen (FIG. 6) from the screen definition storage area 53, displays it on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2), and issues a further command from the user. Wait to wait.

On the other hand, when any subject is selected on this initial screen (FIG. 6) (step S220 in FIG. 2),
The arithmetic processing unit 4 sets a flag corresponding to the selected subject in a flag table temporarily built in the work area 51 of the built-in register or the storage unit 5 (step S221 in FIG. 2) and then stores the screen definition. Next, the totalizing mode selection screen (FIG. 7) is read from the area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S222 in FIG. 2). In this tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7), one of the processing modes of the "score input mode" as the first display control means and the "tabulation table display mode" as the second display control means is selected. It shall be selectable.

In this tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7), as in the case of the initial screen, the arrow keys ("↑", "↓") and the enter key ("Enter key") of the input section 1 are selected.
"Score input mode" is selected by the user,
If it is instructed (step S223 in FIG. 2), the fact is transmitted to the arithmetic processing unit 4 via the input / output control unit 3, and the processing procedure defined therein causes the system to operate in the “score input mode” shown in FIG. ".

In the "score input mode", the arithmetic processing unit 4 is based on the set flag and the score input screen 21 corresponding to the selected subject (see FIGS. 1 and 8).
Is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and is read by the display unit 2
(Step S400 in FIG. 4) and waits for the user to input the score.

An example of the screen specifications of the score input screen 21 will be described with reference to FIG. Note that this FIG. 8 is created as a screen corresponding to the “point-by-point score tabulation table” for the first semester of arithmetic in the fourth grade of elementary school illustrated in FIG. 10 above.

As shown in FIG. 8, the score input screen 21 is input and registered in the unit name display area 21a in which the unit name (identification name of the unit, number of times) is displayed, and the above "name input mode". Learner name display area 21b in which learner names (children's names) are displayed in a list, viewpoint display area 21c in which viewpoint items (identification names of the viewpoints) are displayed in a list, learner name display area 21b and viewpoint display A score input region 21d that prompts the input of each corresponding viewpoint-based score in each of the columns intersecting with the region 21c, and the input score is displayed,
Total score display area 2 in which the total score of viewpoints in the unit of each learner is automatically calculated and the calculated value is displayed.
1e, and a point display area 21f in which the points are displayed corresponding to each viewpoint displayed in the viewpoint display area 21c, respectively. For the score input to the score input area 21d, while moving the cursor displayed in the learner name display area 21b with the arrow keys, the learner (children) to input the score is selected and selected. In the learner's field, the scores for each viewpoint are input by inputting the numbers in sequence with the numeric keys.

If the user (teacher or the like) inputs the score (step S401 in FIG. 4), the arithmetic processing unit 4 echoes back the input content to the display unit 2 and confirms the score. Is also sequentially registered in the storage unit 5 with a predetermined storage structure (step S40 in FIG. 4).
2). Further, at this time, the arithmetic processing unit 4 also executes a score check for checking the input score based on the score displayed in the score display area 21f, and when a value exceeding the score is input, an appropriate error notification is given. Is displayed to warn the user, and processing such as urging the re-input of the score is performed.

Further, the calculation processing section 4 executes the total calculation for the selected learners (children) each time the score is inputted, and the corresponding total score display area 21e.
The calculated value is displayed at (step S403 in FIG. 4). The calculated value is also registered in the storage unit 5 in a predetermined storage structure, like the input score. The score or total score calculation value at that time is registered in the work area 51, and the registered content is semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 only after an appropriate save operation by the user. There is "name input mode" of the above
It is similar to the case of.

In this "score input mode", if the user performs an appropriate end operation (step S in FIG. 4).
404), the arithmetic processing unit 4 again reads the above-mentioned aggregation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) from the screen definition storage area 53, displays it on the display unit 2 and stands by (FIG. 2, step S22).
2).

Next, if the user selects and gives an instruction for the "tabulation table display mode" on the tabulation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) (step S224 in FIG. 2), that effect is input via the input / output control unit 3. Is transmitted to the arithmetic processing unit 4, and the system shifts to the “total table display mode” shown in FIG. 5 according to the processing procedure defined therein.

In this "tabulation table display mode", the arithmetic processing section 4 again based on the flag set above, the point-by-point score tabulation screen 2 corresponding to the selected subject.
2 (see FIGS. 1 and 9) is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2 (step S5 in FIG. 5).
00).

Here, an example of the screen specifications of the point-by-point score tabulation screen 22 will be described with reference to FIG.
This FIG. 9 is also created as a screen corresponding to the “point-by-point score tabulation table” for the first semester of arithmetic in the fourth grade of elementary school illustrated in FIG. 10 above.

As shown in FIG. 9, this point-by-point score tabulation screen 22 has a viewpoint display area 22a in which items of viewpoints are displayed, and learner names (children's names registered in the "name input mode" above). Learner name display area 22b in which names are displayed in a list, unit display area 22c in which units (number of times) are displayed in a list according to the above viewpoints, and learner name display area 2
2b and the unit display area 22c are intersected with each other, and the corresponding score for each viewpoint input in the above "score input mode" is displayed in the score display area 22d, and each score for each learner's viewpoint. A total point display area 22e in which the total points through the unit are automatically calculated and the calculated values are displayed, and a ranking operation based on the distribution of the respective calculated values is executed on the total calculated values to calculate the rank values. Evaluation rank display area 22f to be displayed, total point display area 22 for each of the above viewpoints
The total score display area 22g in which the total score of the total calculated values displayed in e is further displayed, and the points in which the points are displayed corresponding to each unit displayed in the unit display area 22c Each display area 22h is provided. Information that cannot be displayed on the screen at one time, that is, in the example of FIG. 9, information regarding the viewpoint “mathematic way of thinking (see FIG. 10)” is displayed through an appropriate screen scroll operation using an arrow key or the like. Shall be done. However, the learner name display areas 22 at the both ends of the screen
The b and the total score display area 22g may be continuously displayed regardless of such screen scrolling in the left-right direction, which is preferable.

Now, the point-by-point score tabulation screen 22
Is read from the screen definition storage area 53 and displayed on the display unit 2, the arithmetic processing unit 4 then sets the above-mentioned score display area 22d on the same point-based score summary table screen 22 in the above “score input mode”. Each corresponding score for each viewpoint that has been input is read from the storage unit 5 and displayed (see step S in FIG. 5).
501), and the total score and total score for each point of view of the displayed scores are calculated for each learner name (child name) and displayed together in the total score display region 22e and the total score display region 22g (FIG. 5 steps S502).

The arithmetic processing unit 4 further executes a ranking operation based on the distribution of the calculated values for the total points for each viewpoint calculated and displayed in the total point display area 22e,
The calculated rank value (A, B, C) is displayed in the evaluation rank display area 22f (step S503 in FIG. 5).
The ranking calculation method is arbitrary. For example, an appropriate score distribution chart (curve) is obtained or stored in advance, and each score (total points by viewpoint) is graded as rank A, B, or C based on the chart (curve). The method of can be considered.

The calculated values thus obtained and displayed are also temporarily registered in the work area 51 in a predetermined storage structure as before, and the registered contents are stored as data based on an appropriate save operation by the user. It is semi-permanently stored in the area 52. However, according to this embodiment, as is clear from the processing procedure shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the screen returns to the input screen (FIG. 8) of the above “score input mode” and the new score of the new unit is newly added. If input or correction input etc. for the score already input is performed, the total points and other calculated values related to them are also automatically updated. If the above-mentioned save operation is performed with the updated contents The contents semi-permanently stored in the data storage area 52 are naturally updated.

The point-by-point score tabulation screen 22 thus controlled for display corresponds to the point-by-point score tabulation table (FIG. 10) that has been used conventionally, and the learner's strengths and weaknesses are judged. Needless to say, it is a summary table that provides useful information about which viewpoints should be strengthened.

Also in this "tabulation table display mode", if the user performs an appropriate ending operation (see FIG. 5).
In step S504), the arithmetic processing unit 4 again reads the above-mentioned aggregation mode selection screen (FIG. 7) from the screen definition storage area 53, displays it on the display unit 2 and stands by (FIG. 2 step S222).

Thereafter, the arithmetic processing unit 4 reads the initial screen (FIG. 6) from the screen definition storage area 53 when the end operation is performed on the total mode selection screen (FIG. 7) (step S225 in FIG. 2). Is displayed on the display unit 2 (step S201 in FIG. 2), and if an end operation is performed on the initial screen (FIG. 6) (step S230 in FIG. 2),
A screen (not shown) asking whether data saving is necessary is displayed on the display unit 2 to request the user to confirm the end.
Then, if an operation for requesting data saving is performed (step S231 in FIG. 2), the contents temporarily constructed in the work area 51 are saved in the data storage area 52 (semi-permanent storage) (FIG. 2). Step S232), work area 5
1 is released and ended (step S233 in FIG. 2), and if an operation to reject the data saving is performed (step S231 in FIG. 2), the contents of the work area 51 are not saved and the operation is ended. Yes (step S23 in FIG. 2)
3).

As described above, according to the system of the embodiment, the score input screen 21 of which a concrete example is shown in FIG. 8 is used to input the score of each learner. For the evaluation of the learning situation, since the viewpoint-based score tabulation screen 22 whose specific example is shown in FIG. 9 is used in direct correspondence with the conventionally-used viewpoint-based score tabulation table (FIG. 10), The functions and advantages of the point-by-point score tabulation are maintained as they are, and inconveniences such as erroneous score entry errors (input errors) that have been a concern in the past can be satisfactorily avoided.

In this embodiment, the score input screen 2 described above is used.
1 and the point-by-point score summary table screen 22 are configured to be selectively displayed on the display unit 2 through the summary mode selection screen (FIG. 7). However, for example, these score input screen 21 and viewpoint-specific score summary table The screen 22 automatically switches between these two screens each time a mode end operation is performed, or the resolution (screen width) of the display unit 2 is a trade-off, but this resolution is sufficiently high (sufficiently). The screen is wide)
However, for example, the configuration and specifications regarding how to display these two screens are arbitrary, such as the configuration in which these two screens are simultaneously displayed through a multi-window system or the like. In short, the score input screen 21 and the point-by-point score summary screen 2
It suffices that the two screens 2 are controlled to be displayed.

Further, as indicated by a broken line in FIG. 1, a printer 6 whose output is controlled through the input / output control unit 3 is further provided, and the two screens of the score input screen 21 and the viewpoint-specific score summary table screen 22 are provided. Of course, the configuration may be such that the print output from the printer 6 is also obtained.

Further, the screen definitions for the two screens of the score input screen 21 and the point-by-point score summary table screen 22 are not limited to those shown in FIG. 8 or FIG. 9 and are arbitrary, for example, score input. Regarding the screen, it may be any screen as long as it is a screen that displays a list of names of learners and a list of viewpoints for each unit and urges the player to input a score in each corresponding column of the learner's name and viewpoint. Also for another score tabulation screen, for each viewpoint, a list of names of each learner, and a list of units, and a list of the scores input to each corresponding column of the learner's name and unit, and Any screen may be used as long as it displays a list of values obtained by performing a total calculation for each learner with respect to the listed scores for each unit.

Furthermore, in the system of the above-mentioned embodiment, the work area is explicitly provided, but the necessity is also arbitrary, and the contents to be input or edited are directly read / written from / to the data storage area. Of course, the configuration may be changed.

[0043]

As described above, according to the present invention,
A list of names of each learner and a list of the viewpoints is displayed separately for each unit, and a score input screen for prompting the score input to each corresponding column of the learner's name and the viewpoint, and for each learner of each viewpoint A list of names, a list of the units, a list of the scores entered in the corresponding fields of the learners' names and units, and a total for each learner of the scores for each listed unit There is concern over the conventional point-by-point score summary table because the scores are entered and the learning status is evaluated by each learner through two linked screens, the point-by-view score summary screen that displays a list of calculated values. Such a score entry error (input error) is unlikely to occur, and the function and advantage of the same point score summary table can be favorably maintained.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of a score totaling system for evaluating a learning situation according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a flow of processing corresponding to various operations by a user as an operation of the entire system of the embodiment shown in FIG.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure particularly in a name input mode of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure in the score input mode of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure particularly in a summary table display mode of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing an example of an initial screen (menu screen) displayed when the system of the embodiment is started.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a tallying mode selection screen of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a score input screen of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a point-by-point score tabulation screen of the system of the embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a schematic view showing an example of a point-by-point score tabulation table that has been conventionally used.

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Input part, 2 ... Display part, 3 ... Input / output control part, 4 ... Arithmetic processing part, 5 ... Storage part, 6 ... Printer, 21 ... Score input screen, 22 ... Point-by-point score tabulation screen, 51 ... Work Area, 5
2 ... data storage area, 53 ... screen definition storage area.

Claims (2)

[Claims] [Claim 1] For a given learning subject, it is divided into a plurality of units according to the progress of the learning, and a question is asked to the learner for each unit from the viewpoints such as the degree of comprehension and expression ability of the learning subject. It is a score counting system for learning situation evaluation that is prepared corresponding to a collection of questions that evaluate the learning situation of each learner by squeezing the answer and automatically evaluating the scores of each learner scored There is an input means for inputting the score of each scored learner, a display means for displaying various information for learning situation evaluation including the input score, and the scored As a screen for inputting each learner's score, a screen that displays a list of names of each learner and a list of the viewpoints, and prompts the score input to each corresponding column of the learner's name and viewpoint, Before the unit The first to be displayed on the display means
Display control means, as a score tabulation screen for each of the viewpoints, a list of names of each learner, a list of the units, and the corresponding fields of the names and units of these learners List of scores,
And a second display control means for displaying on the display means a list of values obtained by performing a total calculation for each learner for the listed scores for each unit, the learning comprising: Score collection system for situation evaluation. 2. The second display control means further executes a ranking calculation based on the distribution of the calculated values for the total calculated values for each learner, and displays a list of the calculated rank values. The score totaling system for learning situation evaluation according to claim 1, wherein the score totalizing screen for each viewpoint is also displayed on the display means.