JP2021057049A5 - - Google Patents

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2021057049A5
JP2021057049A5 JP2020165517A JP2020165517A JP2021057049A5 JP 2021057049 A5 JP2021057049 A5 JP 2021057049A5 JP 2020165517 A JP2020165517 A JP 2020165517A JP 2020165517 A JP2020165517 A JP 2020165517A JP 2021057049 A5 JP2021057049 A5 JP 2021057049A5
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
seller
information
matching
buyer
company information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2020165517A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2021057049A (en
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Publication of JP2021057049A publication Critical patent/JP2021057049A/en
Publication of JP2021057049A5 publication Critical patent/JP2021057049A5/ja
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Claims (8)

売り手に関する第１の企業情報及び買い手に関する第２の企業情報を取り込む情報入力部と、
前記第１の企業情報と前記第２の企業情報とに基づき、前記売り手と前記買い手との間でマッチング処理を実行するマッチング処理部と、を備え、
前記マッチング処理部は、
前記第１の企業情報及び前記第２の企業情報のうち、主観的かつ定性的な情報に基づいてマッチング処理を実行してマッチング候補を抽出することを特徴とするマッチングシステム。 An information input unit that captures the first company information about the seller and the second company information about the buyer,
A matching processing unit that executes matching processing between the seller and the buyer based on the first company information and the second company information is provided.
The matching processing unit
A matching system characterized in that a matching process is executed based on subjective and qualitative information among the first company information and the second company information to extract matching candidates. 前記主観的かつ定性的な情報には、
前記売り手及び前記買い手が行う事業の少なくとも「弱み」及び「強み」に関する分析情報が含まれ、
前記マッチング処理部は、前記分析情報に基づいて、前記売り手の「弱み」を相殺する「強み」を持つ前記買い手、または前記買い手の「弱み」を相殺する「強み」を持つ前記売り手をマッチング候補として抽出することを特徴とする請求項１に記載のマッチングシステム。 The subjective and qualitative information includes
Includes analytical information about at least the "weaknesses" and "strengths" of the seller and the business conducted by the buyer.
Based on the analysis information, the matching processing unit is a matching candidate for the buyer having "strengths" that offset the "weaknesses" of the seller, or the seller having "strengths" that offset the "weaknesses" of the buyer. The matching system according to claim 1, wherein the matching system is extracted as. 前記分析情報には、複数の所定の項目に対する前記買い手及び前記売り手の「弱み」と「強み」とが含まれ、
前記マッチング処理部は、「弱み」と「強み」とが相殺される前記項目の数が多いほどマッチング度を高く算出することを特徴とする請求項２に記載のマッチングシステム。 The analysis information includes "weaknesses" and "strengths" of the buyer and the seller with respect to a plurality of predetermined items.
The matching system according to claim 2, wherein the matching processing unit calculates a higher degree of matching as the number of the items in which "weaknesses" and "strengths" are offset increases. 複数の前記項目には、少なくとも「人材」、「製品・サービス」、「資産」、「取引先」の項目が含まれることを特徴とする請求項３に記載のマッチングシステム。 The matching system according to claim 3, wherein the plurality of items include at least items of "human resources", "products / services", "assets", and "business partners". 前記分析情報には前記売り手及び前記買い手が記入したテキスト情報が含まれ、
前記マッチング処理部は、
前記テキスト情報から単語を抽出し、
実際に企業買収が成立した場合に、前記売り手が記入した前記テキスト情報から抽出された単語と、前記買い手が記入した前記テキスト情報から抽出された単語との組み合わせを学習することを特徴とする請求項２〜請求項４のいずれか一項に記載のマッチングシステム。 The analysis information includes text information filled in by the seller and the buyer.
The matching processing unit
Extract words from the text information
A claim characterized by learning a combination of a word extracted from the text information entered by the seller and a word extracted from the text information entered by the buyer when the acquisition is actually completed. The matching system according to any one of items 2 to 4. 学習された単語の組み合わせに基づいて、特定の単語の組み合わせを持つ売り手と買い手とをマッチング候補として抽出することを特徴とする請求項５に記載のマッチングシステム。 The matching system according to claim 5, wherein a seller and a buyer having a specific word combination are extracted as matching candidates based on the learned word combination. 売り手に関する第１の企業情報及び買い手に関する第２の企業情報を取り込む情報入力部と、
前記売り手に関する前記第１の企業情報のうちの定量的な情報に対して、数値の信頼性を向上させる信頼性向上部と、
前記第１の企業情報と前記第２の企業情報とに基づき、前記売り手と前記買い手との間でマッチング処理を実行するマッチング処理部と、を備え、
前記定量的な情報には、前記売り手が希望する譲渡希望条件が含まれ、
前記信頼性向上部は、
前記売り手から提供された少なくとも損益計算書に記載された決算上の数値に基づいて、譲渡価格の目安としての適正譲渡価格を算出し、算出された前記適正譲渡価格と前記譲渡希望条件に含まれる想定譲渡金額の範囲とを比較し、前記適正譲渡価格が前記想定譲渡金額の範囲に収まっていないとき、前記売り手に対して前記想定譲渡金額の範囲を修正するよう促すことで、前記定量的な情報の信頼性を高めることを特徴とするマッチングシステム。 An information input unit that captures the first company information about the seller and the second company information about the buyer,
A reliability improvement unit that improves the reliability of numerical values with respect to quantitative information in the first company information regarding the seller.
A matching processing unit that executes matching processing between the seller and the buyer based on the first company information and the second company information is provided.
The quantitative information includes the transfer request conditions desired by the seller.
The reliability improvement unit
The appropriate transfer price as a guideline for the transfer price is calculated based on at least the financial statements stated in the income statement provided by the seller, and is included in the calculated appropriate transfer price and the desired transfer condition. Quantitative by comparing with the range of the assumed transfer amount and urging the seller to correct the range of the assumed transfer amount when the appropriate transfer price is not within the range of the assumed transfer amount. A matching system characterized by increasing the reliability of information. 前記決算上の数値には、純資産及び調整後営業利益の値が含まれ、
前記信頼性向上部は、
前記適正譲渡価格を
適正譲渡価格＝純資産＋調整後営業利益×Ｎ
（Ｎは、今後売り手において調整後営業利益が得られると見込まれる年数）
と算出することを特徴とする請求項７に記載のマッチングシステム。 The figures in the settlement of accounts include the values of net assets and adjusted operating income.
The reliability improvement unit
Appropriate transfer price: Appropriate transfer price = net assets + adjusted operating income x N
(N is the number of years that the seller is expected to obtain adjusted operating profit in the future)
The matching system according to claim 7, wherein the matching system is calculated.
JP2020165517A 2019-09-30 2020-09-30 Matching system Pending JP2021057049A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019178691 2019-09-30
JP2019178691 2019-09-30

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021057049A JP2021057049A (en) 2021-04-08
JP2021057049A5 true JP2021057049A5 (en) 2021-07-26

Family

ID=75270886

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020122268A Active JP6918328B2 (en) 2019-09-30 2020-07-16 Information input device and matching system
JP2020165517A Pending JP2021057049A (en) 2019-09-30 2020-09-30 Matching system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020122268A Active JP6918328B2 (en) 2019-09-30 2020-07-16 Information input device and matching system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (2) JP6918328B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2023162784A (en) * 2022-04-27 2023-11-09 株式会社日立製作所 Company information management device and method for managing company information
JP7396582B1 (en) 2023-09-19 2023-12-12 ゼネリックソリューション株式会社 Examination work document creation support device, examination work document creation support method, and examination work document creation support program

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002049783A (en) * 2000-08-07 2002-02-15 Gci:Kk Business sales mediation system
JP4554121B2 (en) * 2001-07-27 2010-09-29 凸版印刷株式会社 Business brokerage method, server thereof, and server program
JP2003331154A (en) * 2002-05-10 2003-11-21 Nittetsu Gijutsu Joho Center:Kk Technology transfer support system
JP2006202071A (en) * 2005-01-21 2006-08-03 Business Creative Corp System, method and program for supporting construction of business strategy
JPWO2008075744A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2010-04-15 株式会社パテント・リザルト Information processing apparatus, method for generating information for selecting partner, and program
JP5957200B2 (en) * 2011-10-18 2016-07-27 努 金森 Management information integration system
JP2017078985A (en) * 2015-10-21 2017-04-27 株式会社Ｆａｓコンサルティング M&a candidate display method, m & a candidate display device, scoring method and scoring device
US10891430B2 (en) * 2018-02-02 2021-01-12 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Semi-automated methods for translating structured document content to chat-based interaction
JP6369968B1 (en) * 2018-03-15 2018-08-08 横浜信用金庫 Information providing system, information providing method, program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Matthews Risk management and managerial efficiency in Chinese banks: A network DEA framework
Eberhardt et al. Untested assumptions and data slicing: A critical review of firm-level production function estimators
Bhatnagar et al. Assessing the Impact of E-government: A Study of Projects in India
Liu et al. The role of agriculture and foreign remittances in mitigating rural poverty: Empirical evidence from Pakistan
US8554709B2 (en) Entity performance analysis engines
US8335728B1 (en) Method and system for providing real-time financial goal monitoring and analysis
Ciampi et al. Using economic-financial ratios for small enterprise default prediction modeling: An empirical analysis
Modina et al. A default prediction model for Italian SMEs: the relevance of the capital structure
US20190026826A1 (en) Electronic system and method for determining a credit risk score for an online merchant
Le et al. Determinants of financial inclusion: Comparative study of Asian countries
JP2021057049A5 (en)
Do Determinants of innovation commercialization management and anticipated returns: An exploratory typology of SMEs
US20150154529A1 (en) Methods and systems for creating a task
Roman et al. Digital technologies and the performance of small and medium enterprises
Jagwani Efficiency measurement in the Indian banking industry: An application of data envelopment analysis
Adams et al. Firm size and growth in Sweden's life insurance market between 1855 and 1947: A test of Gibrat's law
Bartoloni et al. Financial performance in manufacturing firms: a comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches
Ramzan et al. Impact of asset preferences on firm performance over its life cycle: Is agency theory or neo‐classical theory more relevant?
Ciampi et al. Default prediction modeling for small enterprises: evidence from small manufacturing firms in Northern and Central Italy
Veledinah Impact of official development assistance on economic growth in Kenya
Hossin et al. Capital market performance and Bangladesh’s economy: An empirical study
Ahmad et al. Agricultural trade and ultra-poor in Pakistan: An application of CGE model
Wasan et al. How can banks and finance companies incorporate value chain factors in their risk management strategy? The case of agro‐food firms
Katharakisa et al. SFA vs. DEA for measuring healthcare efficiency: A systematic review
Kar et al. M&A movements: An analysis of patterns of Indian trends