JP2018045394A - Determination device, determination method, and determination program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To determine evaluation of a content properly.SOLUTION: A providing apparatus includes an acquisition unit and a determination unit. The acquisition unit acquires information on a guideline for information display in an e-commerce site, which is a guideline of a provider of the e-commerce, and a content on a product or service provided in the e-commerce. The determination unit determines evaluation of the content, on the basis of the guideline acquired by the acquisition unit. For example, the acquisition unit acquires information on unity of contents displayed in the site, as guideline information.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

  The present invention relates to a determination device, a determination method, and a determination program.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, techniques for determining content evaluation based on various information have been provided. For example, there is provided a technology for generating a flexible electronic catalog that matches the ambiguous product selection behavior of each user.

JP 2002-133291 A

  However, with the above-described conventional technology, it may be difficult to appropriately determine content evaluation. For example, it is difficult to appropriately determine the evaluation of content only based on the selection behavior of each user. For example, in such a case, it may be difficult to appropriately reflect the evaluation from the viewpoint of the content provider in the evaluation of the content.

  The present application has been made in view of the above, and an object thereof is to provide a determination device, a determination method, and a determination program for appropriately determining content evaluation.

  The determination apparatus according to the present application obtains information on a guideline of a provider that provides electronic commerce, information on a guideline for displaying information on the site of the electronic commerce, and content on a product or service provided in the electronic commerce And a determination unit that determines an evaluation of the content based on the guideline acquired by the acquisition unit.

  According to one aspect of the embodiment, there is an effect that it is possible to appropriately determine the evaluation of the content.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a generation process according to the embodiment. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a determination process according to the embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the providing apparatus according to the embodiment. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a user information storage unit according to the embodiment. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the positive example information storage unit according to the embodiment. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a negative example information storage unit according to the embodiment. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a model information storage unit according to the embodiment. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a product information storage unit according to the embodiment. FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the generation process according to the embodiment. FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the determination process according to the embodiment. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of providing the reason for disabling publication according to the embodiment. FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for providing reasons for publishing according to the embodiment. FIG. 13 is a hardware configuration diagram illustrating an example of a computer that realizes the function of the providing apparatus.

  Hereinafter, a determination apparatus, a determination method, and a mode for executing a determination program according to the present application (hereinafter referred to as “embodiment”) will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the determination device, the determination method, and the determination program according to the present application are not limited to the embodiment. In the following embodiments, the same portions are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant description is omitted.

(Embodiment)
[1. Generation process)
First, an example of the generation process according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a generation process according to the embodiment. FIG. 1 illustrates a case where the providing apparatus 100 generates a model based on content that has been given a label by a predetermined editor ED1. For example, the predetermined editor ED1 mentioned here has knowledge about guidelines for displaying information on an electronic commerce site (hereinafter also referred to as “target site”), and how can an appropriate label be given to the content? May be a good editor. For example, the predetermined editor ED1 may be a provider that provides electronic commerce. Note that the content labeled according to the guidelines of the target site is not limited to the content posted on the target site as long as it can be labeled whether the target site guidelines are satisfied. May be. In the following, a case where the target site is a predetermined shop site A is shown as an example.

  Further, the providing apparatus 100 determines an evaluation for product information (content) to be posted on the target site, using the generated model. The product information here means information related to a predetermined product or service (hereinafter collectively referred to as “product”). The product information may include various types of information such as image information (hereinafter also simply referred to as “image”) and character information as long as the information is about the target product. In addition, the providing apparatus 100 provides a service to the user based on the determined evaluation of the content. This point will be described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the providing system 1 includes a terminal device 10 (see FIG. 2), an editor device 50, and a providing device 100. The terminal device 10, the editor device 50, and the providing device 100 are connected to be communicable by wire or wireless via a predetermined communication network (not shown). In addition, the providing system 1 illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 may include a plurality of terminal devices 10, a plurality of editor devices 50, and a plurality of providing devices 100. For example, the providing apparatus 100 is a determination apparatus that determines content evaluation based on a generated model.

  The editor device 50 is an information processing device used by a predetermined editor ED1 that gives a label for content. The editor device 50 is realized by, for example, a smartphone, a tablet terminal, a notebook PC (Personal Computer), a desktop PC, a mobile phone, a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), or the like. FIG. 1 shows a case where the editor device 50 is a notebook PC.

  For example, the predetermined editor ED1 uses the editor device 50 to give a label to each content. For example, a predetermined editor ED1 attaches a positive label to content that satisfies the guidelines of the target site based on information on the guidelines of the target site of e-commerce, and negative to content that does not meet the guidelines of the target site. Label the example. In the following, there is a case where the content with the positive example label is set as the positive example content, and the content with the negative example label is set as the negative example content.

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a positive example label to the content CT101 including the image IM101, character information CH101, and the like (step S11-1). For example, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a positive example label to the content CT101, assuming that the image IM101, character information CH101, and the like included in the content CT101 satisfy the guidelines of the target site.

  As described above, when “content CT * (* is an arbitrary numerical value)” is described, it indicates that the product is content identified by the content ID “CT *”. For example, when “content CT101” is described, the product is the content identified by the content ID “CT101”.

  Further, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a positive example label to the content CT102 including the image IM102, character information CH102, and the like (step S11-2). For example, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a positive example label to the content CT102 on the assumption that the image IM102, character information CH102, etc. included in the content CT102 satisfy the guidelines of the target site.

  Further, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a negative example label to the content CT201 including the image IM201, the character information CH201, and the like (step S12-1). Note that hatching of the image IM201 in FIG. 1 indicates that the background color of the image IM201 is a color that is not recommended for posting on the target site. For example, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a negative example label to the content CT201 because the background color of the image IM201 is a color that is not recommended for posting on the target site, based on the target site guidelines.

  Further, the predetermined editor ED1 assigns a negative example label to the content CT202 including the image IM202, the character information CH202, and the like (step S12-2). For example, since the predetermined editor ED1 is based on the target site guidelines, the “world's best” character string included in the character information CH202 is a character string that is prohibited in posting on the target site, and therefore, the content editor 202 Give a negative example label.

  Note that steps S11-1 and S11-2 are for explaining the processing, and either step S11-1 or S11-2 may be performed first, and hereinafter steps S11-1 and S11- When the description is made without distinguishing the two, they are collectively referred to as step S11. Steps S12-1 and S12-2 are for explaining the processing, and any of steps S12-1 and S12-2 may be performed first. In the description without distinction, they are collectively referred to as step S12. Further, either step S11 or step S12 may be performed first or alternately.

  Then, as illustrated in the positive example group PG1, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content to which the positive example label is assigned in step S11 (step S13-1). Specifically, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT101, the content CT102, and the like to which the positive example label is assigned in step S11.

  Further, as shown in the negative example group NG1, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content to which the negative example label is assigned in step S12 (step S13-2). Specifically, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT201, the content CT202, and the like to which the negative example label is assigned in step S12. Note that steps S13-1 and S13-2 are for explaining the processing, and any of steps S13-1 and S13-2 may be performed first, and steps S13-1 and S13-2 are performed. It may be performed a plurality of times.

  Then, the providing apparatus 100 adds the content included in the positive example group PG1 acquired in step S13-1 as the positive example content (step S14-1). Specifically, providing apparatus 100 adds content CT101, content CT102, and the like to positive example information storage unit 122.

  The providing apparatus 100 adds the content included in the negative example group NG1 acquired in step S13-2 as negative example content (step S14-2). Specifically, the providing apparatus 100 adds content CT201, content CT202, and the like to the negative example information storage unit 123. Note that steps S14-1 and S14-2 are for explaining the processing, and any of steps S14-1 and S14-2 may be performed first, and steps S14-1 and S14-2 are performed. It may be performed a plurality of times.

  The providing apparatus 100 generates a model based on the positive example content and the negative example content (step S15). For example, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model using the contents CT101 and CT102 in the positive example information storage unit 122 as positive examples and the contents CT201 and CT202 in the negative example information storage unit 123 as negative examples.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model so as to output a score equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold when a positive example content is input and to output a score lower than the predetermined threshold when a negative example content is input. To do. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a model that outputs a score of 0 to 1 when content is input. For example, when content is input, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a model that outputs a score of 0 to 1 as a probability value indicating whether the content conforms to a predetermined guideline. For example, when 50 is output when content is input to the model generated by the providing apparatus 100, it indicates that the probability that the content conforms to a predetermined guideline is 50%. Further, for example, when 0.8 is output when content is input to the model generated by the providing apparatus 100, it indicates that the probability that the content follows a predetermined guideline is 80%. Note that the above is an example, and the providing apparatus 100 may generate any model as long as it can be used to determine whether the input content conforms to a predetermined guideline.

  In the example of FIG. 1, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model M1 as shown in the model information storage unit 124. Further, as shown in the model information storage unit 124, the model information related to the model M1 has a feature 1 weight of “0.5”, a feature 2 weight of “−0.4”, and a feature 3 weight of “0. 2 "etc. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines (calculates) a score of 0 to 1 indicating whether the input product information is in accordance with a predetermined guideline by inputting the product information (content) into the model M1.

  As described above, the providing apparatus 100 evaluates the content by learning using the positive example content and the negative example content labeled by the predetermined editor ED1 based on the information on the guideline of the target site of the electronic commerce. A model can be generated that is used to properly determine. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model using information corresponding to the guideline of the target site of the electronic commerce, thereby generating a model that appropriately determines whether the posting policy or the like at the target site is applied. be able to. Therefore, the providing apparatus 100 can appropriately determine the evaluation of content when displayed on the target site, for example, by using the model generated as described above.

  In the example of FIG. 1, the case where the providing apparatus 100 generates a model using the positive example content or the negative example content labeled by the predetermined editor ED1 is shown. The model may be generated using the attached positive example content or negative example content.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who satisfies a predetermined standard (also referred to as “exemplary user”) as the example content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use a user whose demographic attribute or psychographic attribute satisfies a predetermined standard as a model user, and use content selected by the model user as positive content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use a user attribute (for example, 20's, female, etc.) as a model user as a target user of a service provided at the target site, and use the content selected by the model user as an example content. .

  Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who does not satisfy a predetermined standard (also referred to as “non-exemplary user”) as negative content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use a user whose demographic attribute or psychographic attribute does not satisfy a predetermined standard as a non-exemplary user and use content selected by the non-exemplary user as negative content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 uses a user with a user attribute (for example, male, 60s, etc.) outside the target of the service provided at the target site as a non-exemplary user, and uses content selected by the non-exemplary user as negative example content. Also good.

  In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who purchases a product in a predetermined electronic commerce (hereinafter, also referred to as “user with sense”) as the example content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 uses a user who has purchased a product in an electronic commerce transaction X that satisfies predetermined conditions related to a purchase user group, sales, or the like as a sensed user, and uses content selected by the sensed user as positive content. May be. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user corresponding to a user attribute that is a target of a service provided at the target site among sensed users as the positive example content. For example, it is assumed that the electronic commerce X is an electronic commerce service different from the electronic commerce at the target site.

  In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who has not purchased a product in a predetermined electronic commerce (hereinafter also referred to as “user without sense”) as the negative example content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 uses a user who has not purchased a product in the electronic commerce X that satisfies predetermined conditions regarding a purchase user group, sales, or the like as a nonsense user, and uses content selected by the nonsense user as negative content. May be. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use, as negative example content, content selected by a user corresponding to a user attribute that is a target of a service provided at the target site among non-sense users.

  Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who has performed a search using a predetermined keyword (hereinafter also referred to as “high-sensitivity user”) as a positive example content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use a user who performs a search using a predetermined keyword related to a trend such as a buzzword or a buzzword as a high-sensitivity user, and use content selected by the high-sensitivity user as positive content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user corresponding to a user attribute that is a target of a service provided at a target site among high-sensitivity users as a positive example content.

  Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may use content selected by a user who has not performed a search using a predetermined keyword (hereinafter also referred to as “low sensitivity user”) as the negative example content. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use a user who has not performed a search using a predetermined keyword related to a trend such as a buzzword or buzzword as a low-sensitivity user and use content selected by the low-sensitivity user as negative example content. . For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use, as a negative example content, content selected by a user corresponding to a user attribute that is a target of a service provided at the target site among low-sensitivity users.

  Note that the labeling of the positive example content and the negative example content is an example, and the providing apparatus 100 generates a model using the positive example content and the negative example content labeled based on what information. Also good. For example, when content is input to the generated model, the providing apparatus 100 can output a score indicating that the content input by the model may be in accordance with the guidelines of the target site. A model may be generated using positive example content or negative example content labeled based on such information.

[2. Decision process)
An example of the determination process according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a determination process according to the embodiment. FIG. 2 shows a case where the providing apparatus 100 determines a product information score as an evaluation of product information that is content to be posted on the target site. In FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not each product information can be posted on the target site based on the determined product information score, and ranks the product information that is allowed to be posted (hereinafter, “ranking”). ") Is also determined. In the example of FIG. 2, merchandise information about merchandise is shown as an example of content, but the content is not limited to merchandise information, and any content may be used as long as it is content to be posted on the target site.

  The terminal device 10 is an information processing device used by a user. The terminal device 10 is realized by, for example, a smartphone, a tablet terminal, a notebook PC, a desktop PC, a mobile phone, a PDA, or the like. In the example shown in FIG. 2, the case where the terminal device 10 is a smartphone used by the user is shown. Hereinafter, the terminal device 10 may be referred to as a user. That is, hereinafter, the user can be read as the terminal device 10. Specifically, FIG. 2 illustrates a case where the terminal device 10 is a smartphone used by a user identified by the user ID “U1” (hereinafter, may be referred to as “user U1”).

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 2, the terminal device 10 will be described as the terminal devices 10-1 and 10-2 in accordance with the screen display of the terminal device 10. The terminal devices 10-1 and 10-2 are the same terminal device 10. Hereinafter, the terminal devices 10-1 and 10-2 will be referred to as the terminal device 10 when they are not particularly distinguished.

  First, the providing device 100 acquires a list request from the terminal device 10-1 used by the user U1 (step S21). For example, the user U1 transmits a list request to the providing apparatus 100 by performing a predetermined operation on the page W11 of the shop site A displayed on the terminal apparatus 10-1. In the example of FIG. 2, the terminal device 10-1 transmits information indicating that the user U <b> 1 who uses the terminal device 10 is a 20's female to the providing device 100. When the providing apparatus 100 stores user attribute information related to the user U1, the terminal apparatus 10-1 transmits information indicating that the user U1 who uses the terminal apparatus 10 is a female in his 20s to the providing apparatus 100. You don't have to.

  The providing device 100 that has acquired the list request from the terminal device 10 determines the evaluation of the product information that is the content by using the model for calculating the evaluation of the content (step S22). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of each product information stored in the product information storage unit 125 based on the model M1 stored in the model information storage unit 124.

  In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines a score of product information such as each product GD1 to GD7 as shown in the score list SL1. As described above, when “product GD * (* is an arbitrary numerical value)” is described, it indicates that the product is a product identified by the product ID “GD *”. For example, when “product GD1” is described, the product is a product identified by the product ID “GD1”. Hereinafter, the product information of “product GD * (* is an arbitrary numerical value)” may be expressed as “product GD * (* is an arbitrary numerical value)”. For example, hereinafter, the product GD1 can be read as product information of the product GD1.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD1 to be “0.6” based on the product information of the product GD1 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD2 to be “0.7” based on the product information of the product GD2 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD3 to be “0.3” based on the product information of the product GD3 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD4 to be “0.5” based on the product information of the product GD4 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD5 to be “0.2” based on the product information of the product GD5 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD6 to be “0.8” based on the product information of the product GD6 and the model M1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of the product GD7 to be “0.65” based on the product information of the product GD7 and the model M1. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 can appropriately determine the evaluation by using the model M1.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 excludes product information whose score is less than a predetermined threshold (step S23). For example, the providing apparatus 100 narrows down product information that is a candidate to be provided to the user U1 by excluding product information whose score is less than “0.5”. In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 excludes the product GD3, the product GD5, and the like whose scores are less than “0.5” as shown in the score list SL2. As will be described later, when the providing apparatus 100 has submitted content in advance, if it is impossible to submit content whose evaluation is less than a predetermined threshold, the process of step S23 may not be performed.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information based on the score determined in step S22 and the attribute information of the user as the providing destination (step S24). For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines a ranking of product information excluding product information with a score less than “0.5” in step S23. For example, the providing apparatus 100 calculates a correction score obtained by correcting the score of each product information based on the correlation (click rate) between each product information and the user attribute, and each product in descending order of the correction score. Determine the order of information. For example, the providing device 100 corrects the product information score that is higher in the user attribute of the user attribute of the user U1 stored in the user information storage unit 121 than the click rates of other user attributes. Use the score. Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 reduces the score of product information in which the user click rate of the user attribute of the user U1 stored in the user information storage unit 121 is relatively lower than the click rates of other user attributes. The corrected score is used. In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD2 having the highest correction score as the first place. In addition, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD4 having the second highest correction score after the product information of the product GD2 as the second place. In addition, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD7 having the second highest correction score after the product information of the product GD4 as the third place.

  As described above, in the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of each product information as indicated by the ranking information RK11. Note that the above-described determination of ranking is an example, and the providing apparatus 100 may determine the ranking of product information using various information as appropriate. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the ranking higher in order from the highest score determined in step S22. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the ranking in the order of the product GD6, the product GD2, the product GD7, the product GD1, and the product GD4. In addition, for example, when a tag of a target user attribute is given to the product information, the providing apparatus 100 corresponds to the user attribute (20's, female, etc.) of the user U1 from the product information in the score list SL2. You may extract the merchandise information provided with. Then, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the ranking of the extracted product information in order from the highest score.

  Thereafter, the providing device 100 provides the terminal device 10 with a search result based on the ranking determined in step S24 (step S25). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing device 100 provides the ranking information RK11 to the terminal device 10-1.

  The terminal device 10 provided with the ranking information RK11 from the providing device 100 displays the ranking information RK11 (step S26). In the example of FIG. 2, the display is transitioned from the terminal device 10-1 to the terminal device 10-2.

  A page W12 for displaying the search result is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10-2. In the example of FIG. 2, the product information of the product GD2 and the product information of the product GD4 are displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10-2. For example, on the screen of the terminal device 10-2, an image IM2, a title TL2, a description sentence DC2, and the like included in the product information of the product GD2 are displayed. Further, for example, on the screen of the terminal device 10-2, an image IM4, a title TL4, an explanatory note DC4, and the like included in the product information of the product GD4 are displayed. Note that the user U1 who uses the terminal device 10 touches the screen of the terminal device 10 and performs a scroll operation or the like, whereby the product information of the product GD7 and the product information of the product GD1 arranged below the product information of the product GD4. The product information of the product GD6 is sequentially displayed.

  As described above, the providing apparatus 100 appropriately determines the evaluation of each piece of product information based on the model M1 generated using the positive example content and the negative example content labeled according to the guidelines of the target site of the electronic commerce. can do. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 uses the model generated according to the guideline of the target site of the electronic commerce, and based on whether the product policy (content) is adapted to the posting policy or the like on the target site. The evaluation can be determined appropriately. Therefore, the providing apparatus 100 can appropriately determine the evaluation of content when displayed on the target site, for example, by using the model M1 generated as described above. Note that the processing in step S22 may be performed in advance before acquiring the list request in step S21. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the evaluation of the product information that is the content using a model that calculates the evaluation of the content before step S21, and ranks each content based on the evaluation (score) of each content. You may decide. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the ranking (rank) of each content as shown in the ranking information RK11 before step S21. In this case, when the providing apparatus 100 acquires a list request in step S21, the providing apparatus 100 may provide information based on a ranking (rank) of each content determined in advance.

  In the above-described example, the providing apparatus 100 uses the model to determine the evaluation of the content. However, the providing apparatus 100 does not use the model, and various kinds of guidelines related to information display on the target site. Information may be used as appropriate to determine content evaluation. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may determine content evaluation based on various types of information related to content posting on the target site. In the above-described example, when the providing apparatus 100 provides content (product information) in response to a distribution request from the user, the ranking is determined based on the evaluation of the content. , When content submitted as content desired to be displayed on the target site of e-commerce (hereinafter referred to as “submission content”) is determined based on the guidelines for the target site of e-commerce May be. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may determine that the submission of the submitted content is not possible when the evaluation of the submitted content based on the guidelines of the target site of the electronic commerce is less than a predetermined threshold. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 may exclude content that does not satisfy the guidelines of the target site for electronic commerce at the time of submission. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may not perform the exclusion process in step S23.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the evaluation of the content by using information on the sense of unity of the content displayed on the target site as information on the guideline. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire information related to the background color of the content (image) on the target site. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may reduce the evaluation when the content to be evaluated includes a background color that is not recommended in the target site. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may increase the evaluation when the content recommended for evaluation includes a color recommended in the target site in the background color.

  Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire information related to skin exposure in content (images) on the target site. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may reduce the evaluation when a person included in the content (image) to be evaluated exposes skin of a predetermined ratio or more. The providing apparatus 100 may perform extraction of information by recognizing an object (target) such as a person in an image using various conventional techniques as appropriate. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may use image processing using an image recognition technique such as R-CNN (Regions with Convolutional Neural Network). The providing apparatus 100 then exposes the skin included in the image to a predetermined ratio or more based on the ratio (number of pixels) of the skin color component in the area recognized as a person in the image and the number of pixels in the entire image. You may determine whether you are doing. In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may increase the evaluation when a human included in the content (image) to be evaluated does not expose skin of a predetermined ratio or more.

  Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire information related to prohibited characters at the target site. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire list information of prohibited characters at the target site. In this case, the providing apparatus 100 may lower the evaluation when the content to be evaluated (character information) includes a character string that is prohibited from being used at the target site. Further, for example, when the content to be evaluated (character information) includes a character string that is prohibited from being used at the target site, the providing apparatus 100 may determine that the content cannot be posted. In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may increase the evaluation when the content to be evaluated (character information) does not include a character string that is prohibited from being used in the target site. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 may determine the evaluation of the content based on the acquired information on the guideline for displaying information on the target site.

[3. Configuration of providing device]
Next, the configuration of the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the providing apparatus 100 includes a communication unit 110, a storage unit 120, and a control unit 130. The providing device 100 includes an input unit (for example, a keyboard and a mouse) that receives various operations from an administrator of the providing device 100 and a display unit (for example, a liquid crystal display) for displaying various types of information. May be.

(Communication unit 110)
The communication unit 110 is realized by, for example, a NIC (Network Interface Card). The communication unit 110 is connected to the network by wire or wireless, and transmits / receives information to / from the terminal device 10.

(Storage unit 120)
The storage unit 120 is realized by, for example, a semiconductor memory device such as a RAM (Random Access Memory) or a flash memory, or a storage device such as a hard disk or an optical disk. As shown in FIG. 3, the storage unit 120 according to the embodiment includes a user information storage unit 121, a positive example information storage unit 122, a negative example information storage unit 123, a model information storage unit 124, and a product information storage unit. 125.

(User information storage unit 121)
The user information storage unit 121 according to the embodiment stores various types of information regarding the user. For example, the user information storage unit 121 stores various types of information regarding user attributes. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a user information storage unit according to the embodiment. The user information storage unit 121 illustrated in FIG. 4 includes items such as “user ID”, “age”, and “sex”.

  “User ID” indicates identification information for identifying a user. For example, the user identified by the user ID “U1” corresponds to the user U1 illustrated in the example of FIG. “Age” indicates the age of the user identified by the user ID. The “age” may be a specific age of the user identified by the user ID, such as 35 years old. “Gender” indicates the gender of the user identified by the user ID.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 4, the age of the user identified by the user ID “U1” is “20s”, and the gender is “female”. Further, for example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 4, the age of the user identified by the user ID “U2” is “30s”, and the gender is “male”.

  The user information storage unit 121 is not limited to the above, and may store various types of information according to the purpose. For example, the user information storage unit 121 may store other demographic attribute information and psychographic attribute information in addition to age and sex. For example, the user information storage unit 121 may store information such as name, home, work location, interest, family structure, income, lifestyle, and the like.

(Positive example information storage unit 122)
The positive example information storage unit 122 according to the embodiment stores various types of information related to positive examples. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the positive example information storage unit according to the embodiment. For example, the positive example information storage unit 122 stores positive example content used for generating a model. The positive example information storage unit 122 illustrated in FIG. 5 includes items such as “content ID”, “image”, and “character information”.

  “Content ID” indicates identification information for identifying the content. For example, the content identified by the content ID “CT101” corresponds to the content CT101 shown in the example of FIG. “Image” indicates an image of content. FIG. 5 shows an example in which conceptual information such as “IM101” is stored in “image”, but actually image information or a file path name indicating the storage location is stored.

  “Character information” indicates character information of the content. FIG. 5 shows an example in which conceptual information such as “CH101” is stored in “character information”, but in practice, various character information related to the content such as the title and description of the content is stored.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 5, the content (content CT101) identified by the content ID “CT101” includes the image IM101 and character information CH101. Further, for example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 5, the content (content CT102) identified by the content ID “CT102” includes the image IM102 and the character information CH102.

  In addition, the positive example information storage part 122 may memorize | store not only the above but various information according to the objective. For example, the positive example information storage unit 122 may store information related to the date and time when the positive example content was added. Further, for example, the positive example information storage unit 122 may store information indicating what kind of determination process each positive example content has been added. For example, the positive example information storage unit 122 may store information indicating whether each positive example content has been determined by an administrator's selection or the like.

(Negative example information storage unit 123)
The negative example information storage unit 123 according to the embodiment stores various types of information regarding negative examples. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a negative example information storage unit according to the embodiment. For example, the negative example information storage unit 123 stores negative example content used for generating a model. The negative example information storage unit 123 illustrated in FIG. 6 includes items such as “content ID”, “image”, and “character information”.

  “Content ID” indicates identification information for identifying the content. For example, the content identified by the content ID “CT201” corresponds to the content CT201 illustrated in the example of FIG. “Image” indicates an image of content. FIG. 6 shows an example in which conceptual information such as “IM201” is stored in “image”, but actually image information or a file path name indicating the storage location is stored.

  “Character information” indicates character information of the content. FIG. 6 shows an example in which conceptual information such as “CH201” is stored in “character information”, but in actuality, various character information related to the content such as the title and description of the content is stored.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 6, the content identified by the content ID “CT201” (content CT201) includes the image IM201 and character information CH201. Further, for example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 6, the content (content CT202) identified by the content ID “CT202” includes the image IM202 and the character information CH202.

  In addition, the negative example information storage part 123 may memorize | store various information according to the objective not only above. For example, the negative example information storage unit 123 may store information related to the date and time when the negative example content was added. Further, for example, the negative example information storage unit 123 may store information indicating what kind of determination process each negative example content has been added. For example, the negative example information storage unit 123 may store information indicating whether each negative example content is determined by the selection of the administrator.

(Model information storage unit 124)
The model information storage unit 124 according to the embodiment stores information about the model. For example, the model information storage unit 124 stores model information generated by the generation process. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a model information storage unit according to the embodiment. The model information storage unit 124 illustrated in FIG. 7 includes items such as “Feature 1” to “Feature 3” corresponding to each model M1 and the like as model information. In FIG. 7, only the model M1 is illustrated, but a plurality of model information such as models M2 and M3 may be stored.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 7, the model information regarding the model M1 includes feature 1 weight “0.5”, feature 2 weight “−0.4”, feature 3 weight “0.2”, and the like. Indicates that For example, when the feature (feature value) of the model is expressed by an m-dimensional vector, the number of features is m, and the weights of the features 1 to m are stored.

  The model information storage unit 124 is not limited to the above, and may store various model information according to the purpose.

(Product information storage unit 125)
The product information storage unit 125 according to the embodiment stores various types of information related to products. FIG. 8 shows an example of the product information storage unit 125 according to the embodiment. The product information storage unit 125 illustrated in FIG. 8 includes items such as “product ID”, “image”, “title”, and “description”.

  “Product ID” indicates identification information for identifying a product. “Image” indicates an image of product information as content. FIG. 8 shows an example in which conceptual information such as “IM1” is stored in “image”, but actually, image information or a file path name indicating the storage location is stored.

  “Title” indicates a title included in the product information of the product identified by the product ID. The “description” indicates an explanation included in the product information of the product identified by the product ID. In the product information storage unit 125 shown in FIG. 8, the title is indicated by an abstract symbol such as the title “TL1” or the title “TL2”. For example, “new bag A ...”, “free shipping”, etc. As described above, each title is a specific title of the corresponding product. Further, in the product information storage unit 125 shown in FIG. 8, the explanatory text is indicated by an abstract symbol such as an explanatory text “DC1” or an explanatory text “DC2”. It is assumed that each explanatory text is a specific explanatory text of the corresponding product, such as “I will deliver free shipping”.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 8, the image of the product (product GD1) identified by the product ID “GD1” is the image “IM1”. In addition, the title of the product GD1 indicates the title “TL1”. Further, the description of the product GD1 indicates that the description is “DC1”.

  The product information storage unit 125 is not limited to the above, and may store various information according to the purpose. The product information storage unit 125 may store a specific name or the like of the product.

(Control unit 130)
Returning to the description of FIG. 3, the control unit 130 is a controller and is stored in a storage device inside the providing apparatus 100 by, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit), an MPU (Micro Processing Unit), or the like. Various programs (corresponding to an example of a determination program) are implemented by using the RAM as a work area. The control unit 130 is a controller, and is realized by an integrated circuit such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a field programmable gate array (FPGA).

  As illustrated in FIG. 3, the control unit 130 includes an acquisition unit 131, a generation unit 132, a determination unit 133, and a provision unit 134, and implements or executes the information processing functions and operations described below. . Note that the internal configuration of the control unit 130 is not limited to the configuration illustrated in FIG. 3, and may be another configuration as long as the information processing described below is performed.

(Acquisition part 131)
The acquisition unit 131 acquires various types of information. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires various types of information from the user information storage unit 121, the positive example information storage unit 122, the negative example information storage unit 123, the model information storage unit 124, the product information storage unit 125, and the like. The acquisition unit 131 may acquire various types of information from an external information processing apparatus.

  For example, the obtaining unit 131 obtains information on a guideline of a provider that provides electronic commerce, which is related to a guideline for displaying information on an electronic commerce site. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content related to a product or service provided in electronic commerce. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information related to the sense of unity of content displayed on the site as information related to the guideline. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information related to character information whose publication is restricted on the site as information related to the guideline. In addition, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information regarding an image whose posting is restricted on the site as information regarding a guideline.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 includes positive example content that is content that is desirably provided in electronic commerce, negative example content that is content that is desirably not provided in electronic commerce, and To get. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content that satisfies a condition regarding a guideline of a provider that provides electronic commerce as a normal example content. Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content that does not satisfy the conditions regarding the guidelines of the provider that provides electronic commerce as negative content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires positive example content and negative example content for each of a plurality of categories.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content selected by a user who has purchased a product in a predetermined electronic commerce transaction as a normal example content. Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content selected by a user who has not purchased a product in a predetermined electronic commerce transaction as negative content.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content selected by a user who has performed a search using a predetermined keyword as a normal content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content selected by a user who has not performed a search using a predetermined keyword as negative example content. Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires the submitted content submitted as the content desired to be displayed on the site.

  In the example of FIG. 1, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content to which a positive example label is assigned by a predetermined editor ED1, as shown in the positive example group PG1. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires the content CT101, the content CT102, and the like to which the positive example label is assigned.

  In the example of FIG. 1, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content to which a negative example label is assigned by a predetermined editor ED1, as shown in the negative example group NG1. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires content CT201, content CT202, and the like to which a negative example label is assigned.

  In addition, for example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a model user that satisfies a predetermined criterion as a normal example content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire, as an example content, a content selected by the exemplary user with a user whose demographic attribute or psychographic attribute satisfies a predetermined standard as the exemplary user. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire a user attribute (for example, 20's, female, etc.) as a target user of a service provided at the target site as a model user, and acquire the content selected by the model user as a normal content. Good.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a non-exemplary user who does not satisfy a predetermined criterion as negative content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire a user whose demographic attribute or psychographic attribute does not satisfy a predetermined standard as a non-exemplary user, and content selected by the non-exemplary user as a negative example content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires, as a negative example content, a user selected as a non-exemplary user for a user attribute (for example, male, 60s, etc.) outside the target of the service provided at the target site as a non-exemplary user. May be.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a sensed user who has purchased a product in a predetermined electronic commerce transaction as a normal content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires a user who has purchased a product in an electronic commerce transaction X that satisfies predetermined conditions regarding a purchase user group, sales, and the like as a sensed user, and acquires content selected by the sensed user as a normal example content. May be. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a user corresponding to a user attribute that is a target of a service provided on the target site among sensed users as a positive example content.

  For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a nonsense user who has not purchased a product in a predetermined electronic commerce transaction as negative content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 acquires a user who has not purchased a product in the electronic commerce X that satisfies predetermined conditions regarding a purchase user group, sales, or the like as a non-sense user, and acquires content selected by the non-sense user as negative content. May be. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire the content selected by the user corresponding to the user attribute that is the target of the service provided at the target site among the non-sense users as the negative example content.

  Further, for example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a high-sensitivity user who has performed a search using a predetermined keyword as a positive example content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire a user who has performed a search using a predetermined keyword related to a trend such as a buzzword or a buzzword as a high-sensitivity user, and acquire content selected by the high-sensitivity user as positive content. . For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire the content selected by the user corresponding to the user attribute that is the target of the service provided at the target site among the high-sensitivity users as the positive example content.

  For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire content selected by a low-sensitivity user who has not performed a search using a predetermined keyword as negative content. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire a user who has not performed a search using a predetermined keyword related to a trend such as a buzzword or buzzword as a low-sensitivity user, and acquire content selected by the low-sensitivity user as negative example content. Good. For example, the acquisition unit 131 may acquire the content selected by the user corresponding to the user attribute that is the target of the service provided at the target site among the low-sensitivity users as the negative example content.

(Generator 132)
The generation unit 132 generates various types of information. For example, the generation unit 132 generates a model used for evaluation of content provided in electronic commerce based on the positive example content and the negative example content acquired by the acquisition unit 131. For example, the generation unit 132 generates a plurality of models corresponding to each of the plurality of categories based on the positive example content and the negative example content corresponding to each of the plurality of categories acquired by the acquisition unit 131. .

  For example, the generation unit 132 generates a model so as to output a score equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold when positive example content is input, and to output a score lower than the predetermined threshold when negative example content is input. To do. For example, the generation unit 132 may generate a model that outputs a score of 0 to 1 when content is input. For example, when content is input, the generation unit 132 may generate a model that outputs a score of 0 to 1 as a probability value indicating whether the content is content that conforms to a predetermined guideline. For example, when 50 is output when content is input to the model generated by the generation unit 132, it indicates that the probability that the content conforms to a predetermined guideline is 50%. Further, for example, when 0.8 is output when content is input to the model generated by the generation unit 132, it indicates that the probability that the content follows a predetermined guideline is 80%.

  For example, the generation unit 132 generates a model based on positive example content and negative example content. In the example of FIG. 1, the generation unit 132 generates a model using the contents CT101 and CT102 in the positive example information storage unit 122 as positive examples and the contents CT201 and CT202 in the negative example information storage unit 123 as negative examples. To do. In the example of FIG. 1, the generation unit 132 generates a model M1 as shown in the model information storage unit 124. Further, for example, as illustrated in the model information storage unit 124, the generation unit 132 has the feature 1 weight “0.5”, the feature 2 weight “−0.4”, and the feature information about the model M1. A model M1 in which the weight of 3 is “0.2” or the like is generated.

(Determining unit 133)
The determination unit 133 determines various types of information. For example, the determination unit 133 determines content evaluation based on the guideline acquired by the acquisition unit 131. For example, when the evaluation of the content is less than a predetermined threshold, the determination unit 133 determines that the content cannot be displayed on the electronic commerce site. Further, for example, when the evaluation of the submitted content based on the guideline is less than a predetermined threshold, the determining unit 133 determines that the submitted content cannot be submitted.

  For example, the determination unit 133 determines the evaluation of the product information that is the content using a model for calculating the evaluation of the content. In the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 determines the score of each product information stored in the product information storage unit 125 based on the model M1 stored in the model information storage unit 124.

  For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD1 to be “0.6” based on the product information of the product GD1 and the model M1. For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD2 to be “0.7” based on the product information of the product GD2 and the model M1. For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD3 to be “0.3” based on the product information of the product GD3 and the model M1. Further, for example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD4 to be “0.5” based on the product information of the product GD4 and the model M1. For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD5 to be “0.2” based on the product information of the product GD5 and the model M1. For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD6 to be “0.8” based on the product information of the product GD6 and the model M1. For example, the determination unit 133 determines the score of the product GD7 to be “0.65” based on the product information of the product GD7 and the model M1.

  For example, when the content evaluation is less than a predetermined threshold, the determination unit 133 determines that the content cannot be displayed on the target site. In the example of FIG. 1, the determination unit 133 determines to exclude product information whose score is less than a predetermined threshold. For example, the determination unit 133 narrows down product information that is candidates to be provided to the user U1 by determining to exclude product information whose score is less than “0.5”. In the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 excludes the product GD3, the product GD5, and the like whose scores are less than “0.5” as illustrated in the score list SL2.

  For example, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of the content based on the content evaluation (score). For example, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of the product information based on the determined score and the attribute information of the user who is the providing destination. In the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of product information excluding product information with a score less than “0.5”. For example, the determination unit 133 calculates a corrected correction score based on the correlation (click rate) between each piece of product information and user attributes, and ranks each piece of product information in order from the highest correction score. decide. In the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD2 having the highest correction score as the first place. In addition, the determination unit 133 determines the product information rank of the product GD4 having the second highest correction score after the product information of the product GD2 to be second. Further, the determination unit 133 determines the rank of the product information of the product GD7 having the correction score that is the next higher than the product information of the product GD4 to be the third place. In the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of each product information as indicated by the ranking information RK11.

  In addition, for example, the determination unit 133 may determine the ranking of product information using various information as appropriate. For example, the determination unit 133 may determine the higher rank in order from the highest score. In this case, in the example of FIG. 2, the determination unit 133 may determine the ranking in the order of the product GD6, the product GD2, the product GD7, the product GD1, and the product GD4. In the example of FIG. 2, when the tag of the target user attribute is attached to the product information, the determination unit 133 determines the user attribute of the user U1 (20s, women, etc.) from the product information in the score list SL2. You may extract the merchandise information provided with the tag corresponding to. And the determination part 133 may determine a ranking in order from a higher score about extracted product information.

(Providing unit 134)
The providing unit 134 provides various information. For example, the providing unit 134 provides various information to the terminal device 10. For example, the providing unit 134 provides a content-related service based on the content evaluation determined by the determining unit 133. For example, the providing unit 134 provides content list information displayed in the order of content determined by the determining unit 133. For example, the providing unit 134 provides a search result based on the ranking determined by the determining unit 133 to the terminal device 10. In the example of FIG. 2, the providing unit 134 provides the ranking information RK11 to the terminal device 10-1.

  For example, the providing unit 134 provides information regarding the reason that the content cannot be displayed to the providing source that provides the content that is determined not to be displayed by the determining unit 133. In addition, for example, the providing unit 134 provides, to the provider that provides the content that is determined to be non-displayable based on the scores regarding the plurality of non-permitted items regarding the content, among the plurality of non-permitted items, Provide information on permitted items. For example, the providing unit 134 applies the content among the plurality of non-permitted items to the provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable based on the model generated for each of the plurality of non-permitted items related to the content. Provide information on prohibited items. This will be described in detail in FIG.

[4. Generation process flow)
Next, a generation process procedure performed by the providing system 1 according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the generation process according to the embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 9, the providing apparatus 100 acquires a positive example (step S101). In the example of FIG. 1, the providing apparatus 100 acquires content to which a positive example label is assigned by a predetermined editor ED1, as shown in the positive example group PG1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT101, the content CT102, and the like to which the positive example label is assigned.

  The providing apparatus 100 acquires a negative example (step S102). In the example of FIG. 1, the providing apparatus 100 acquires content to which a negative example label is assigned by a predetermined editor ED1, as shown in the negative example group NG1. For example, the providing apparatus 100 acquires content CT201, content CT202, and the like to which a negative example label is assigned. Note that step S102 may be performed prior to step S101, and step S101 and step S102 may be performed a plurality of times.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model based on the positive example and the negative example (step S103). In the example of FIG. 1, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model using the contents CT101 and CT102 in the positive example information storage unit 122 as positive examples and the contents CT201 and CT202 in the negative example information storage unit 123 as negative examples. To do. For example, the providing apparatus 100 generates the model M1 based on positive example content and negative example content.

[5. Decision processing flow)
Next, a generation process procedure performed by the providing system 1 according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the determination process according to the embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 10, the providing apparatus 100 acquires a list request (step S201). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing device 100 acquires a list request from the terminal device 10-1 used by the user U1.

  Further, the providing apparatus 100 determines the evaluation of each content item to be provided using the model (step S202). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score of each product information stored in the product information storage unit 125 based on the model M1 stored in the model information storage unit 124. In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines a score of product information such as each product GD1 to GD7 as shown in the score list SL1.

  Further, the providing apparatus 100 excludes content whose evaluation is less than the threshold (step S203). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 excludes the product GD3, the product GD5, and the like whose scores are less than “0.5” as shown in the score list SL2. As described above, when the providing apparatus 100 has submitted the content in advance, if the content whose evaluation is less than the predetermined threshold is disabled, the providing apparatus 100 does not perform the process of step S203. May be.

  Then, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of each content based on the evaluation and the user information of the provision destination (Step S204). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD2 having the highest correction score as the first place. In addition, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD4 having the second highest correction score after the product information of the product GD2 as the second place. In addition, the providing apparatus 100 determines the ranking of the product information of the product GD7 having the second highest correction score after the product information of the product GD4 as the third place.

  Then, the providing device 100 provides ranking information (step S205). In the example of FIG. 2, the providing device 100 provides the ranking information RK11 to the terminal device 10-1.

[6. (Providing reasons for non-publication)
In the example described above, an example in which a model is used for determining a ranking when the providing apparatus 100 provides product information to a user has been described. However, the providing apparatus 100 may provide various services. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire content from a provider of content desired to be posted on the target site, and may preliminarily determine whether the content can be posted. In this case, for example, when it is determined that the content cannot be posted on the target site, the providing apparatus 100 may feed back the reason why the content cannot be posted on the target site to the content provider. This point will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of providing the reason for disabling publication according to the embodiment. Specifically, in FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT301 from the content creator CM1 who created the content CT301, and determines whether or not the content CT301 can be posted on the target site (for example, the shop site A). First, the model used in FIG. 11 will be described.

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the publication is possible or the reason why the publication is impossible by using the plurality of models M1 to M5 stored in the model information storage unit 124A. The model information storage unit 124A illustrated in FIG. 11 is the same as the model information storage unit 124 in FIG. 1 except that a plurality of models M1 to M5 are stored. A model M1 shown in the model information storage unit 124A in FIG. 11 is the same as the model M1 shown in the model information storage unit 124 in FIG.

  In the example of FIG. 11, as shown in the model information storage unit 124 </ b> A, the model information related to the model M <b> 2 has the feature 1 weight “−0.3”, the feature 2 weight “0.1”, and the feature 3 weight. Is “−0.2” or the like. In the example of FIG. 11, the model M2 is a model used for determining whether the background of the image is in accordance with the conditions regarding the background of the image in the guideline of the target site.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire content (image) satisfying the condition regarding the background of the image as the positive example content among the guidelines of the target site. In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire content (image) that does not satisfy the condition regarding the background of the image as a negative example content among the guidelines of the target site. Further, the providing apparatus 100 may store the positive example content related to the background of the image in the positive example information storage unit 122.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a model used for determining whether a condition regarding the background of the image is satisfied among the guidelines of the target site, using positive example content and negative example content regarding the background of the image. In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model M2 related to the background of the image using positive example content and negative example content related to the background of the image.

  For example, when the content is input, the providing apparatus 100 outputs a score of 0 to 1 as a probability value indicating whether the content is a content that satisfies the conditions regarding the background of the image in the guideline of the target site. A model M2 to be generated is generated. For example, by providing an image (content) to the model M2, the providing apparatus 100 determines a score of 0 to 1 indicating whether the input image is in accordance with the conditions regarding the background of the image in the guideline of the target site ( calculate.

  In the example of FIG. 11, as shown in the model information storage unit 124 </ b> A, the model information regarding the model M <b> 4 has the feature 1 weight “0”, the feature 2 weight “−1.4”, and the feature 3 weight “ -2.2 "and the like. In the example of FIG. 11, the model M4 is a model used to determine whether the character information is in accordance with the conditions regarding the prohibited characters in the guideline of the target site.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire content (character information) that satisfies a condition regarding prohibited characters in the guidelines of the target site as a positive example content. In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 may acquire content (character information) that does not satisfy the condition regarding prohibited characters in the guidelines of the target site as negative content. Further, the providing apparatus 100 may store positive example content related to prohibited characters in the positive example information storage unit 122.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a model used for determining whether a condition regarding a prohibited character is satisfied among the guidelines of the target site, using positive example content and negative example content related to the prohibited character. In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 generates a model M4 related to prohibited characters using positive example content and negative example content related to prohibited characters.

  For example, when the content is input, the providing apparatus 100 outputs a score of 0 to 1 as a probability value indicating whether the content is content that satisfies the conditions regarding the prohibited characters in the guidelines of the target site. A model M4 is generated. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines a score of 0 to 1 indicating whether the input character information is in accordance with the condition regarding the prohibited character in the target site guideline by inputting character information (content) into the model M4. (calculate.

  As described above, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a plurality of models corresponding to each of the plurality of categories based on the positive example content and the negative example content for each of the plurality of categories. Further, the category is not limited to the reason why the content can be posted, but may be the category of the content itself. For example, the providing apparatus 100 may generate a model corresponding to each of various contents such as product information and news articles.

  From here, the flow of whether to publish the content CT301 and the reason notification will be described with reference to FIG.

  First, the content creator CM1 submits the content CT301 including the image IM301, the character information CH301, and the like to the providing device 100 using the creation device 51 (step S31). For example, the content creator CM1 creates the content CT301 including the image IM301, the character information CH301, and the like using the creation device 51, and submits the created content CT301 to the providing device 100. Thereby, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT301 from the creation apparatus 51 used by the content creator CM1.

  The providing apparatus 100 that acquired the content CT301 determines whether or not the content CT301 can be posted on the target site. For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the content CT301 can be posted on the target site using the model M1. In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the content CT301 can be posted on the target site by a process as shown in the process group PS31. In the example of FIG. 11, the providing device 100 determines that the content input to the model M1 cannot be posted on the target site when the score output by the model M1 is less than 0.5.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 inputs the content CT301 into the model M1 (Step S32). The model M1 to which the content CT301 is input outputs a score (step S33). In the example of FIG. 11, the model M1 to which the content CT301 is input outputs a score “0.35” as indicated by the score information SC31.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the content input to the model M1 can be posted on the target site based on the score output by the model M1 (step S34). In the example of FIG. 11, since the score of the content CT301 is “0.35” and less than the threshold value “0.5” as shown in the determination information DT31, it is determined that the content CT301 cannot be posted on the target site.

  Therefore, providing apparatus 100 determines the reason why content CT301 cannot be posted using other models M2 to M5. The providing apparatus 100 provides the creation apparatus 51 with information indicating that the content input to the model M1 can be posted on the target site when the score output by the model M1 is equal to or greater than the threshold “0.5”. Then, the process may be terminated.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 uses the model M2 to determine whether the condition regarding the background of the image is satisfied among the guidelines of the target site. In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether the image IM301 of the content CT301 satisfies the condition regarding the background of the image in the guideline of the target site by the processing as shown in the processing group PS32. In the example of FIG. 11, when the score output by the model M2 is less than 0.3, the providing apparatus 100 relates to the background of the image among the content site (image) input to the model M2 in the target site guidelines. It shall be determined that the condition is not satisfied.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 inputs the image IM301 into the model M2 (Step S35-1). The model M2 to which the image IM301 is input outputs a score (step S36-1). In the example of FIG. 11, the model M2 to which the image IM301 is input outputs a score “0.12” as indicated by the score information SC32.

  Thereafter, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether the content (image) input to the model M2 has an unreasonable reason related to the background of the image among the guidelines of the target site based on the score output by the model M2 (step S37). -1). In the example of FIG. 11, since the score of the image IM301 is “0.12” and less than the threshold value “0.3” as shown in the determination information DT32, the image IM301 is the background of the image in the guideline of the target site. It is determined that there is an impossible reason.

  In addition, for example, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether the condition regarding the exposure of the skin in the image among the guidelines of the target site is satisfied using the model M3. For example, it is assumed that the guidelines for the target site include a condition for disabling publication when a person included in the image exposes a skin with a predetermined ratio or more.

  In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether the image IM301 of the content CT301 satisfies the condition relating to the skin exposure in the image among the guidelines of the target site by the processing as shown in the processing group PS33. In the example of FIG. 11, when the score output by the model M3 is less than 0.4, the providing apparatus 100 uses the content (image) input to the model M3 as the skin of the image in the target site guidelines. It shall be determined that the conditions related to exposure are not satisfied.

  For example, the providing apparatus 100 inputs the image IM301 into the model M3 (Step S35-2). The model M3 to which the image IM301 is input outputs a score (step S36-2). In the example of FIG. 11, the model M3 to which the image IM301 is input outputs a score “0.73” as indicated by the score information SC33.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether the content (image) input to the model M3 has an unreasonable reason related to the skin exposure in the image among the guidelines of the target site based on the score output by the model M3 ( Step S37-2). In the example of FIG. 11, as shown in the determination information DT33, the score of the image IM301 is “0.73” and is equal to or greater than the threshold “0.4”. It is determined that there is no reason why the exposure is not possible.

  Further, the providing apparatus 100 determines the presence / absence of each reason by performing the process as described above for each reason using the models M3 to M5 and the like.

  Thereafter, the providing apparatus 100 provides the content creator CM1 with the reason why the content CT301 cannot be posted (step S38). The providing apparatus 100 transmits the information indicating that the reason why the content CT301 cannot be posted is the background of the image or the use of prohibited characters to the creation apparatus 51, and thereby the reason why the content CT301 cannot be posted. Provide to content creator CM1.

  As a result, the content creator CM1 can change the content CT301 based on the provided unpublishable reason, and thus can create content in accordance with the target site guidelines. As described above, the providing apparatus 100 can promote the creation of content in accordance with the guidelines of the target site.

[7. Decision processing flow)
Next, the procedure of determination processing by the providing system 1 according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for providing reasons for publishing according to the embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 12, the providing apparatus 100 acquires content (step S301). In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 acquires the content CT301 from the creation apparatus 51 used by the content creator CM1.

  Then, providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the content can be posted (step S302). Providing apparatus 100 ends the process when the content can be posted (step S302: YES). In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the content input to the model M1 can be posted on the target site based on the score output by the model M1. In the example of FIG. 11, as indicated by the determination information DT31, the content CT301 has a score of “0.35” and is less than the threshold value “0.5”, so the content CT301 is determined to be unpublishable on the target site. .

  On the other hand, when the content cannot be posted (step S302: NO), the providing apparatus 100 determines the evaluation for each reason using the model for each reason (step S303). For example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score related to the background of the image among the guidelines of the target site by inputting the image IM301 into the model M2. Further, for example, the providing apparatus 100 determines the score relating to the exposure of the skin in the image among the guidelines of the target site by inputting the image IM301 to the model M3.

  Then, the providing apparatus 100 determines the reason why the evaluation is less than the threshold as the reason why the content cannot be posted (step S304). In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 determines that the background of the image or the use of prohibited characters whose score is less than the threshold is the reason why the content CT301 cannot be posted.

  After that, the providing apparatus 100 provides a reason for disabling posting (step S305). In the example of FIG. 11, the providing apparatus 100 transmits information indicating that the reason why the content CT301 cannot be posted is the background of the image or the use of prohibited characters to the creating apparatus 51, whereby the content CT301 is posted. The reason for the failure is provided to the content creator CM1.

[8. effect〕
As described above, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment includes the acquisition unit 131 and the determination unit 133. The obtaining unit 131 obtains information on a guideline of a provider that provides electronic commerce, and information on a guideline for displaying information on an electronic commerce site, and content on a product or service provided in the electronic commerce. Further, the determination unit 133 determines content evaluation based on the guidelines acquired by the acquisition unit 131.

  Accordingly, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment appropriately determines the evaluation of the content based on the information about the guideline in the information display on the site of the electronic commerce, which is a guideline of the provider that provides the electronic commerce. be able to.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information on the sense of unity of content displayed on the site as information on the guideline.

  Thereby, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment can appropriately determine the evaluation of the content based on the information related to the sense of unity of the content displayed on the electronic commerce site.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information on character information whose posting is restricted on the site as information on guidelines.

  Thereby, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment can appropriately determine the evaluation of the content based on the information related to the character information that is restricted from being posted on the electronic commerce site.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the acquisition unit 131 acquires information on an image whose posting is restricted on the site as information on a guideline.

  Thereby, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment can appropriately determine the evaluation of the content based on the information related to the image whose posting is regulated on the electronic commerce site.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the determination unit 133 determines that the content cannot be displayed on the electronic commerce site when the evaluation of the content is less than a predetermined threshold.

  Accordingly, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment may appropriately determine the evaluation of the content by determining that the content cannot be displayed on the electronic commerce site when the evaluation of the content is less than the predetermined threshold. it can.

  In addition, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment includes a providing unit 134. The providing unit 134 provides information regarding the reason why the content cannot be displayed to the providing source that provides the content that is determined not to be displayed by the determining unit 133.

  Accordingly, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment provides information regarding the reason why the content cannot be displayed to the provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable. Information can be provided.

  Moreover, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the providing unit 134 provides the provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable based on the scores regarding the plurality of non-permitted items regarding the content among the plurality of non-permitted items. , Provide information on the prohibited items to which the content corresponds.

  Accordingly, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment provides the provider that provides the content that is determined to be non-displayable based on the scores regarding the plurality of non-permitted items related to the content, among the plurality of non-permitted items. By providing information on the corresponding non-permitted items, it is possible to provide appropriate information to the content provider.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the providing unit 134 provides a plurality of non-permitted items to a provider that provides content that is determined to be non-displayable based on a model generated for each of the plurality of non-permitted items related to the content. Among the permitted items, information on the prohibited items to which the content corresponds is provided.

  Accordingly, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment provides the provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable based on the model generated for each of the plurality of non-permitted items related to the content among the plurality of non-permitted items. By providing information regarding the disallowed items to which the content corresponds, appropriate information can be provided to the content provider.

  In the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the determination unit 133 determines the ranking of the content based on the content evaluation.

  Thereby, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment can appropriately determine the ranking of the content by determining the ranking of the content based on the evaluation of the content.

  Further, in the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the acquisition unit 131 acquires the submitted content that has been submitted as the content desired to be displayed on the site. When the evaluation of the submitted content based on the guideline is less than a predetermined threshold, the determining unit 133 determines that the submitted content cannot be submitted.

  Thus, the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment can appropriately determine whether or not the submitted content can be submitted based on the evaluation of the submitted content based on the guideline.

[9. Hardware configuration)
The providing apparatus 100 according to the above-described embodiment is realized by a computer 1000 configured as shown in FIG. 13, for example. FIG. 13 is a hardware configuration diagram illustrating an example of a computer that realizes the function of the providing apparatus. The computer 1000 includes a CPU 1100, a RAM 1200, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 1300, an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 1400, a communication interface (I / F) 1500, an input / output interface (I / F) 1600, and a media interface (I / F). ) 1700.

  The CPU 1100 operates based on a program stored in the ROM 1300 or the HDD 1400 and controls each unit. The ROM 1300 stores a boot program executed by the CPU 1100 when the computer 1000 is started up, a program depending on the hardware of the computer 1000, and the like.

  The HDD 1400 stores programs executed by the CPU 1100, data used by the programs, and the like. The communication interface 1500 receives data from other devices via the network N and sends the data to the CPU 1100, and transmits data generated by the CPU 1100 to other devices via the network N.

  The CPU 1100 controls an output device such as a display and a printer and an input device such as a keyboard and a mouse via the input / output interface 1600. The CPU 1100 acquires data from the input device via the input / output interface 1600. In addition, the CPU 1100 outputs the generated data to the output device via the input / output interface 1600.

  The media interface 1700 reads a program or data stored in the recording medium 1800 and provides it to the CPU 1100 via the RAM 1200. The CPU 1100 loads such a program from the recording medium 1800 onto the RAM 1200 via the media interface 1700, and executes the loaded program. The recording medium 1800 is, for example, an optical recording medium such as a DVD (Digital Versatile Disc) or PD (Phase change rewritable disk), a magneto-optical recording medium such as an MO (Magneto-Optical disk), a tape medium, a magnetic recording medium, or a semiconductor memory. Etc.

  For example, when the computer 1000 functions as the providing apparatus 100 according to the embodiment, the CPU 1100 of the computer 1000 implements the function of the control unit 130 by executing a program loaded on the RAM 1200. The CPU 1100 of the computer 1000 reads these programs from the recording medium 1800 and executes them. However, as another example, these programs may be acquired from other devices via the network N.

  As described above, some of the embodiments and modifications of the present application have been described in detail with reference to the drawings. However, these are merely examples, and various aspects can be made based on the knowledge of those skilled in the art including the aspects described in the disclosure line of the invention. It is possible to carry out the present invention in other forms that have been modified and improved.

[10. Others]
In addition, among the processes described in the above-described embodiments and modifications, all or a part of the processes described as being automatically performed can be manually performed, or are described as being performed manually. All or part of the processing can be automatically performed by a known method. In addition, the processing procedures, specific names, and information including various data and parameters shown in the document and drawings can be arbitrarily changed unless otherwise specified. For example, the various types of information illustrated in each drawing is not limited to the illustrated information.

  Further, each component of each illustrated apparatus is functionally conceptual, and does not necessarily need to be physically configured as illustrated. In other words, the specific form of distribution / integration of each device is not limited to that shown in the figure, and all or a part thereof may be functionally or physically distributed or arbitrarily distributed in arbitrary units according to various loads or usage conditions. Can be integrated and configured.

  In addition, the above-described embodiments and modifications can be combined as appropriate within a range that does not contradict processing contents.

  In addition, the “section (module, unit)” described above can be read as “means” or “circuit”. For example, the acquisition unit can be read as acquisition means or an acquisition circuit.

1 Providing System 100 Providing Device (Determining Device)
121 user information storage unit 122 positive example information storage unit 123 negative example information storage unit 124 model information storage unit 125 product information storage unit 130 control unit 131 acquisition unit 132 generation unit 133 determination unit 134 provision unit 10 terminal device N network

Claims (12)

A guideline for a provider providing electronic commerce, an acquisition unit for acquiring information on guidelines for displaying information on the site of the electronic commerce, and content related to products or services provided in the electronic commerce,
A determination unit that determines an evaluation of the content based on the guidelines acquired by the acquisition unit;
A determination device comprising: The acquisition unit
The determination apparatus according to claim 1, wherein information regarding a sense of unity of content displayed on the site is acquired as information regarding the guideline. The acquisition unit
The determination apparatus according to claim 2, wherein information related to character information that is restricted from being posted on the site is acquired as information related to the guideline. The acquisition unit
4. The determination device according to claim 2, wherein information relating to an image whose publication is restricted on the site is acquired as information relating to the guideline. 5. The determination unit
5. The determination device according to claim 1, wherein, when the evaluation of the content is less than a predetermined threshold value, the content is determined to be undisplayable at the electronic commerce site. A providing unit that provides information regarding a reason why the content cannot be displayed to a provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable by the determining unit;
The determination apparatus according to claim 5, further comprising: The providing unit includes:
Based on the scores regarding the plurality of non-permitted items related to the content, the information about the non-permitted items corresponding to the content among the plurality of non-permitted items is provided to a provider that provides the content determined to be non-displayable. The determination apparatus according to claim 6. The providing unit includes:
Based on a model generated for each of a plurality of non-permitted items related to the content, a provider that provides the content that is determined to be non-displayable is related to a non-permitted item corresponding to the content among the plurality of non-permitted items. Information is provided. The determination apparatus of Claim 7 characterized by the above-mentioned. The determination unit
The determination apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the content ranking is determined based on the evaluation of the content. The acquisition unit
Get the submitted content submitted as the content you want to display on the site,
The determination unit
The determination according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein when the evaluation of the input content based on the guideline is less than a predetermined threshold, the input of the input content is determined to be impossible. apparatus. A decision method performed by a computer,
A guideline of a provider that provides electronic commerce, an acquisition step of acquiring information on guidelines for displaying information on the site of the electronic commerce, and content related to products or services provided in the electronic commerce,
A determination step of determining an evaluation of the content based on the guidelines acquired by the acquisition step;
A determination method characterized by comprising: A guideline for a provider providing electronic commerce, an acquisition procedure for obtaining information on guidelines for displaying information on the site of the electronic commerce, and content related to products or services provided in the electronic commerce,
A determination procedure for determining an evaluation of the content based on the guidelines acquired by the acquisition procedure;
A determination program characterized by causing a computer to execute.

Images