JP2015066890A - Image forming device, diagnosis of nozzle, and discharge recovery method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To perform appropriate discharge recovery operation depending on the degree of abnormality for each of a plurality of nozzles in an image forming device.SOLUTION: Forming the image of a test pattern on a recording medium, in which an amount of a liquid corresponding to one size among a plurality of kinds of dot sizes is discharged toward a recording medium from a plurality of nozzles, is performed for all of a plurality of kinds of dot sizes, respectively. The image of the test pattern on the recording medium is read by the image sensor, analyzes the image read by the image sensor, and the nozzle discharge state is diagnosed for each of a plurality of nozzles. The discharge recovery operation of a recording head is performed depending on the diagnosis result of the nozzle discharge state. In diagnosing the nozzle discharge state, a first diagnosis is performed to determine the normality and the abnormality for each of the plurality of nozzles, and, based on the first diagnosis results, a second diagnosis is performed for determining the emissions of the liquid emitted from the nozzle in the discharge recovery operation for each of the plurality of nozzles.

Description

  The present invention relates to an image forming apparatus including a recording head having a plurality of nozzles that discharge liquid toward a recording medium. More specifically, the present invention diagnoses the ink ejection state of the nozzles of the image forming apparatus and responds to the diagnosis result. The present invention relates to a technique for performing a discharge recovery operation for recovering a good discharge state of a nozzle.

  Some ink jet image forming apparatuses include a line type recording head in which nozzles are arranged in a direction (main scanning direction) orthogonal to a recording medium conveyance direction (sub scanning direction). The line type recording head can perform printing for one line in the main scanning direction at a time. However, if there are nozzles that do not eject ink droplets or nozzles that vary in the direction and amount of ink droplet ejection, the dots that should be ejected from the nozzles may not be ejected, or the droplet ejection position may shift. Sometimes. As a result, streaks and unevenness in the sub-scanning direction may occur in the image formed on the recording medium, and the image quality may deteriorate. Therefore, a technique for finding a nozzle having a defective ejection state before starting image formation on a recording medium and recovering a good ejection state of the nozzle is known.

  For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a line type recording head in which a print detection unit including an image sensor for imaging a droplet ejection result is provided on the downstream side in the transport direction between the recording heads of each color. . In Patent Document 1, a test pattern for each color is printed on a recording medium by each recording head, an image of this test pattern is read by an image sensor provided immediately after each recording head, and the image of this test pattern is analyzed. As a result, an ejection failure nozzle in each recording head is detected. When an ejection failure nozzle is detected, the recovery operation of the nozzle is performed in the recording head. In the recovery operation, the cap is put on the nozzle, the ink clogged in the nozzle is ejected to the cap, the wiping is performed to clean the nozzle surface, the ink is sucked out from the clogged nozzle by the suction pump, etc. Done.

  The test pattern described in Patent Document 1 is a droplet ejection pattern in which ink droplets are ejected from all nozzles so as to form one line along the scanning direction. The above test pattern is a mode in which dots having a size equal to or smaller than the minimum dot interval are printed. The test is performed by printing dots having a size larger than the minimum dot size and changing the droplet ejection nozzles into a plurality of rows. There is also an aspect in which a pattern is printed.

JP 2006-205742 A

  In the conventional test patterns including the test pattern of Patent Document 1, it is possible to diagnose the presence or absence (that is, ejection / non-ejection) of each nozzle, but the degree of abnormality for each nozzle (that is, how much amount) It is impossible to know the degree of whether the nozzle discharge state can be recovered by discharging the liquid. Therefore, in the nozzle recovery operation, the purge operation is uniformly performed regardless of the degree of abnormality for each nozzle. However, the nozzle discharge state may be recovered by the flushing operation without performing the purge operation. In such a case, excessive liquid is discharged from the nozzles, and unnecessary maintenance time and liquid are consumed by wiping and flushing operations after the purge operation.

  In this specification, the “purge operation” means an operation of forcibly discharging the liquid from the nozzle by applying pressure to the liquid in the nozzle when the nozzle of the recording head is clogged. Further, in this specification, the “flushing operation” means an operation in which liquid is idlely ejected from the nozzles mainly to prevent the nozzles of the recording head from drying. The amount of liquid discharged from the nozzle in the purge operation is larger than the amount of liquid discharged from the nozzle in the flushing operation. Generally, in the purge operation, the nozzle cap, the liquid discharge, and the nozzle uncapping are sequentially performed. Further, after the purge operation, wiping for cleaning the nozzle surface and preliminary flushing operation for preventing the nozzle from drying are performed.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to provide an abnormality for each of a plurality of nozzles in an image forming apparatus including a recording head having a plurality of nozzles that discharge liquid toward a recording medium. It is an object to perform an appropriate discharge recovery operation according to the degree of.

The nozzle diagnosis and discharge recovery method according to the present invention includes:
In an image forming apparatus having a plurality of nozzles and having a recording head capable of ejecting an amount of liquid corresponding to a plurality of types of dot sizes from each of these nozzles, the liquid ejection state of the plurality of nozzles can be diagnosed and good A method for recovering a liquid ejection state,
Forming a test pattern image on the recording medium by discharging an amount of liquid corresponding to one of the plurality of types of dot sizes from the plurality of nozzles toward the recording medium. To do each for all of the dot sizes,
Reading an image of the test pattern on the recording medium with an image sensor;
Analyzing the image read by the image sensor, diagnosing the nozzle discharge state for each of the plurality of nozzles;
Performing an ejection recovery operation of the recording head according to a diagnosis result of the nozzle ejection state,
Diagnosing the nozzle discharge state includes performing a first diagnosis for determining whether each of the plurality of nozzles is normal or abnormal, and determining each of the plurality of nozzles based on a result of the first diagnosis. And performing a second diagnosis for determining the liquid discharge amount discharged from the nozzle in the discharge recovery operation.

An image forming apparatus according to the present invention is
A recording head having a plurality of nozzles and capable of ejecting an amount of liquid corresponding to a plurality of types of dot sizes from each of the nozzles;
Forming a test pattern image on the recording medium by discharging an amount of liquid corresponding to one of the plurality of types of dot sizes from the plurality of nozzles toward the recording medium. Test pattern forming means for operating the recording head to perform for each of all sizes;
An image sensor for reading an image of the test pattern on the recording medium;
A nozzle diagnostic means for analyzing an image read by the image sensor and diagnosing a nozzle discharge state for each of the plurality of nozzles;
A recovery operation control means for controlling the recording head so that the recording head performs an ejection recovery operation according to a diagnosis result of the nozzle discharge state,
The nozzle diagnosing unit performs a discharge recovery operation on each of the plurality of nozzles based on a diagnosis result of the first diagnosis unit that determines normality and abnormality of each of the plurality of nozzles, and a diagnosis result of the first diagnosis unit. A second diagnostic unit that determines the amount of liquid discharged from the nozzle.

  According to the nozzle diagnosis and discharge recovery method and the image forming apparatus, the liquid discharge amount necessary for recovering a good discharge state is determined for each of the plurality of nozzles. In other words, based on the liquid discharge amount determined by the second diagnosis, whether or not the nozzle determined to be abnormal by the first diagnosis can recover the nozzle discharge state by the flushing operation without performing the purge operation. Recognize. Therefore, it is possible to select an appropriate discharge recovery operation (flushing operation or purge operation) according to the degree of abnormality for each of the plurality of nozzles. If the discharge state of the nozzle can be recovered only by the flushing operation, the maintenance time is shortened compared to the case of performing the purge operation, and the liquid (ink) that is discarded without being used for image formation can be reduced.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to perform an appropriate discharge recovery operation according to the degree of abnormality for each of the plurality of nozzles.

1 is a schematic side view showing an internal structure of an ink jet printer according to an embodiment of an image forming apparatus of the present invention. It is a top view which shows the head main body of the head contained in the printer of FIG. FIG. 3 is an enlarged view showing a region surrounded by an alternate long and short dash line in FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view taken along line IV-IV shown in FIG. 3. It is a functional block diagram of a control means. It is a figure which shows the 1st example of a test pattern. It is a figure which shows the 2nd example of a test pattern. It is a flowchart which shows the flow of a 2nd diagnosis. It is a flowchart which shows the flow of a discharge recovery process. 2 shows an example of a flushing image formed on a recording medium.

  Hereinafter, a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described by applying the present invention to an ink jet printer 10 which is an embodiment of an image forming apparatus according to the present invention. FIG. 1 is a schematic side view showing an internal structure of an ink jet printer 10 according to an embodiment of an image forming apparatus of the present invention.

  The printer 10 includes a rectangular parallelepiped housing 11. Inside the housing 11, a transport path 5 is formed from a paper feed unit 23 provided at the lower part of the housing 11 to a paper discharge unit 4 provided at the top of the top plate of the housing 11. The paper feed unit 23 includes a paper feed tray 24 detachably provided on the housing 11, a paper feed roller 25 that contacts a recording medium accommodated in the paper feed tray 24 and sends the recording medium to the conveyance path 5. It is configured.

  The conveyance path 5 conveys the recording medium from the image forming area 52 to the paper discharge section 4, and the supply area 51 for conveying the recording medium from the paper feeding section 23 to the image forming area 52. The discharge area 53 can be divided. The supply area 51 is formed by a plurality of guides 31 and a pair of feed rollers 32. The discharge area 53 is formed by a plurality of guides 33, feed roller pairs 34, 35, and the like.

  The image forming area 52 is formed by the transport mechanism 40. The transport mechanism 40 includes two belt rollers 41 and 42, an endless transport belt 43 wound around the belt rollers 41 and 42, a peeling plate 45, a platen 46, a nip roller 47, and the like. The upper surface of the conveyance belt 43 is an image forming area 52 of the conveyance path 5. The peeling plate 45 is provided between the image forming area 52 and the discharge area 53 of the conveyance path 5, and peels the recording medium that is weakly adhered to the conveyance belt 43 from the conveyance belt 43. The platen 46 is provided between the two belt rollers 41 and 42 and supports the upper loop of the conveyor belt 43 from the inside. The nip roller 47 rotates while pressing the recording medium conveyed from the paper feeding unit 23 against the outer peripheral surface of the conveying belt 43 to send out the recording medium.

  A recording head 1 that discharges black ink is provided above the image forming area 52 in the transport path 5 and at a position facing the platen 46 in the vertical direction. The recording head 1 is supported by the housing 11 via a head holder 15. The lower surface of the recording head 1 is an ejection surface 1a in which a plurality of ejection ports 85 (see FIG. 3) are arranged. The head holder 15 is moved up and down by a head lifting mechanism 39 (see FIG. 5), whereby the recording head 1 is moved up and down between an image forming position and a retracted position. As shown in FIG. 1, in the recording head 1 at the image forming position, a predetermined gap suitable for recording is formed between the ejection surface 1 a and the conveying belt 43. The recording head 1 in the retracted position is separated from the conveying belt 43 at an interval equal to or larger than the image forming position. In the retracted position, a wiper 361 described later can move in the space between the recording head 1 and the conveyance belt 43.

  A paper sensor 26 is provided upstream of the recording head 1 in the transport path 5. The paper sensor 26 detects the leading edge of the recording medium that is transported along the transport path 5. The detection signal of the paper sensor 26 is used for synchronization between the ejection operation of the recording head 1 and the recording medium conveyance operation of the conveyance mechanism 40.

  An image sensor 16 is provided downstream of the recording head 1 in the transport path 5. As the image sensor 16, for example, a contact image sensor (CIS) can be employed. The image sensor 16 reads a test pattern image formed on a recording medium and generates test pattern image data in an ejection recovery process described later. Data of the test pattern image generated by the image sensor 16 is sent to the control means 100 and analyzed.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the wiper unit 36 includes a wiper 361 and a wiper moving mechanism 362. The wiper 361 is obtained by attaching a plate-like elastic member (for example, rubber) slightly longer than the width of the discharge surface 1a to the frame. The wiper moving mechanism 362 is a means for moving the wiper 361 in the main scanning direction below the ejection surface 1a, and includes a motor (not shown) as a drive source.

  The cleaner unit 37 includes a cleaning liquid application member 371, a blade 372, and a moving mechanism 373 (see FIG. 5). The moving mechanism 373 moves the cleaning liquid application member 371 and the blade 372 away from and in contact with the outer peripheral surface of the transport belt 43. The cleaner unit 37 cleans the transport belt 43 by applying a cleaning liquid to the outer peripheral surface of the transport belt 43 and scraping dirt (ink, etc.) together with the cleaning liquid.

  An ink cartridge 22 for storing black ink is detachably attached to the casing 11 at the bottom of the casing 11. The ink cartridge 22 is connected to the recording head 1 via a tube (not shown) and a pump 38 (see FIG. 5).

  Next, the recording head 1 will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. In FIG. 3, for convenience of explanation, the pressure chamber 83, the aperture 84, and the discharge port 85 that are located below the actuator unit 81 and should be drawn with broken lines are drawn with solid lines. The recording head 1 is a laminated body in which a reservoir, a flexible printed circuit board (FPC), a control board, etc. (all not shown) are laminated in addition to the head body 3 shown in FIG. In the reservoir, ink supplied from the ink cartridge 22 through the tube and the pump 38 is stored. The signal adjusted by the control board is converted into a drive signal by a driver IC on the FPC and then output to the actuator unit 81 of the head body 3. When the actuator unit 81 is driven, the ink supplied from the reservoir is ejected from the ejection port 85.

  The head body 3 includes a flow path unit 82 in which an ink flow path including a pressure chamber 83 is formed, and an actuator unit 81 including an actuator that applies discharge pressure to the pressure chamber 83. As shown in FIG. 4, the flow path unit 82 is a laminate of a plurality of metal plates. As shown in FIG. 2, a plurality of ink supply ports 86 b are opened on the upper surface of the flow path unit 82. The ink in the reservoir is supplied into the flow path unit 82 from the ink supply port 86b. Inside the flow path unit 82, a manifold flow path 86 having an ink supply port 86b as one end and a plurality of sub-manifold flow paths 86a branched from the manifold flow path 86 are formed. Furthermore, a plurality of individual ink flow paths 90 are formed from the outlets of the sub-manifold flow paths 86a to the discharge ports 85 through the apertures 84 and the pressure chambers 83. The lower surface of the flow path unit 82 is the discharge surface 1a, and a large number of discharge ports 85 are arranged in a matrix. These discharge ports 85 are arranged at a predetermined distance in the main scanning direction.

  Next, the actuator unit 81 will be described. The actuator unit 81 is fixed to the upper surface of the flow path unit 82. As shown in FIG. 2, four actuator units 81 are provided in one head body 3. Each actuator unit 81 has a trapezoidal planar shape, and is arranged in a staggered pattern in the main scanning direction so as to avoid the ink supply ports 86b. The actuator unit 81 is a piezo actuator and functions as an actuator for each pressure chamber 83 that gives selective ejection energy to the ink in the pressure chamber 83.

  Here, the control means 100 will be described. The control unit 100 controls the operation of each part of the printer 10 and controls the operation of the entire printer 10. The control means 100 is based on a print signal supplied from an external device (such as a PC connected to the printer 10), and performs an image forming operation of the printer 10, that is, a recording medium conveyance operation, and ink synchronized with the recording medium conveyance. Operations related to image formation such as ejection operations are controlled.

  The control unit 100 controls the ejection recovery operation of the recording head 1 of the printer 10. The discharge recovery operation includes an ink discharge operation (liquid discharge operation), a wiping operation of the discharge surface 1a, a cleaning operation of the transport belt 43, and the like. The ink discharge operation includes a purge operation and a flushing operation. In the purging operation, the pump 38 is driven to apply pressure to the ink in the recording head 1 from the ink supply system to the recording head 1 and forcibly discharge the ink in the recording head 1 from the discharge port 85. Purge is performed. In the purge operation, the actuator unit 81 is not driven. On the other hand, in the flushing operation, the actuator unit 81 is driven and ink is ejected from the ejection port 85 in an idle manner.

  In the wiping operation, the ejection surface 1 a of the recording head 1 is wiped by the wiper 361. The wiping operation is performed after the purge operation, and foreign matters such as ink remaining on the ejection surface 1a are removed. In the cleaning operation, the conveyor belt 43 is wiped by the cleaner unit 37. The cleaning operation is performed after the purge operation and the flushing operation, and foreign matters such as ink on the transport belt 43 are removed.

  The control means 100 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), I / F (Interface), I / O (Input / output). Port) and the like (none of them are shown). The ROM stores programs executed by the CPU, various fixed data, and the like. Programs executed by the CPU are stored in various storage media such as a flexible disk, a CD-ROM, and a memory card, and are installed in the ROM from these storage media. The RAM temporarily stores data necessary for program execution. In the ASIC, image data is rewritten and rearranged (for example, signal processing and image processing). The I / F performs data transmission / reception with an external device (such as a personal computer connected to the printer 10). I / O inputs / outputs detection signals of various sensors. The control unit 100 is configured to perform processing for realizing each function of the control unit 100 described below by cooperation of software such as a program stored in the ROM and hardware such as a CPU. . The control unit 100 may execute each process by a single CPU, or may execute each process by a combination of a plurality of CPUs or CPUs and a specific ASIC.

  FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of the control means. As shown in FIG. 5, the control unit 100 has functions as a conveyance control unit 71, an image data storage unit 72, a data writing unit 73, a head control unit 74, and a maintenance control unit 96.

  The conveyance control unit 71 includes a paper feed roller 25, a pair of feed rollers 32, 34, and 35, and a conveyance mechanism so that the recording medium is conveyed to the conveyance path 5 at a predetermined speed based on a print signal received from an external device. 40 operations are controlled.

  The head controller 74 controls driving of each actuator of the actuator unit 81 in order to eject ink from the recording head 1. The head control unit 74 includes a drive data storage unit 741 and a drive unit 742. The drive data storage unit 741 stores drive data (image data and flushing data, which will be described later) instructing the drive mode of each actuator. The drive unit 742 includes a driver IC and outputs a drive signal for driving each actuator based on the drive data. The head controller 74 outputs a drive signal at a timing synchronized with the conveyance of the recording medium based on the output of the paper sensor 26.

  The image data storage unit 72 stores image data included in a print signal from an external device. The image data indicates the dot size (any one of five levels, minimum, small, medium, and large), the dot formation position, and the like for each ejection port 85 over a plurality of printing cycles. One printing cycle is the time required for the recording head 1 and the recording medium to move relative to each other by a unit distance corresponding to the printing resolution in the paper transport direction. In the present embodiment, the dot sizes of large, medium, small, and extremely small are formed with ink of total ejection amounts of 15 pl, 10 pl, 5 pl, and 2.5 pl, respectively.

  The data writing unit 73 writes the image data stored in the image data storage unit 72 to the drive data storage unit 741 of the head control unit 74. When the image data is written in the drive data storage unit 741 as drive data in this way, the head control unit 74 outputs a drive signal for driving each actuator based on the drive data. As a result, each actuator operates, droplets are ejected from the nozzle corresponding to the actuator, and an image is formed on the recording medium.

  The maintenance control unit 96 controls the maintenance operation of the recording head 1. The maintenance control unit 96 further includes a first diagnosis unit 75, a second diagnosis unit 76, a flushing operation control unit 77, a test pattern recording unit 78, an image reading control unit 79, a wiping operation control unit 93, and a cleaning operation control unit 94. , And a function as a purge operation control unit 95.

  The first diagnosis unit 75 performs a first diagnosis for determining whether ejection is normal or abnormal for each of the plurality of nozzles of the recording head 1 based on the test pattern image data.

  Based on the result of the first diagnosis, the second diagnosis unit 76 performs a second diagnosis that determines the liquid discharge amount for ejection recovery for each of the plurality of nozzles. The liquid discharge amount for recovering the discharge is an ink discharge amount required for recovering the nozzle to a desired discharge characteristic in the liquid discharge operation (purge operation or flushing operation) for recovering the discharge performance of the nozzle.

  The flushing operation control unit 77 includes a data generation unit 771 that generates flushing data, and a writing unit 772 that writes the flushing data to the drive data storage unit 741 of the head control unit 74. The flushing data is data for instructing the flushing operation for each nozzle, and includes the liquid discharge amount for each nozzle. Note that the number of times of liquid ejection from each nozzle in the flushing operation is set based on the liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle. In the present embodiment, a small dot size droplet (droplet amount 5 pl) is adopted for each discharge of the flushing operation, and a liquid discharge amount of ink is discharged from the nozzle by increasing or decreasing the number of discharges.

  The test pattern recording unit 78 includes a storage unit 781 that stores predetermined test pattern data, and a writing unit 782 that writes the test pattern data to the drive data storage unit 741 of the head control unit 74. When the test pattern recording unit 78 receives a test pattern printing command, the test pattern recording unit 78 writes the test pattern data stored in the storage unit 781 into the drive data storage unit 741 of the head control unit 74. As a result, the head controller 74 outputs a drive signal for driving each actuator based on the test pattern data. As a result, each actuator operates based on the test pattern data, and ink is ejected from the nozzle corresponding to each actuator.

  Ink is ejected from the recording head 1 based on the test pattern data, and a test pattern image is formed on the recording medium on which the ink has landed. The image reading control unit 79 controls the image sensor 16 so as to read the test pattern image and generate test pattern image data. The test pattern image data generated by the image sensor 16 is temporarily stored in a memory such as a RAM and used for diagnosis described later.

  The wiping operation control unit 93 controls the wiping operation by the wiper unit 36. The cleaning operation control unit 94 controls the cleaning operation by the cleaner unit 37. The purge operation control unit 95 controls the purge operation by the pump 38.

[Test pattern]
Here, the predetermined test pattern will be described. In this specification, “test pattern data” is data for forming a test pattern image on a recording medium.

  FIG. 6 shows a first example of a preferred test pattern, and FIG. 7 shows a second example of a preferred test pattern. The test pattern is data that causes a predetermined number of liquids corresponding to the dot size to be ejected from each nozzle for each of a plurality of types of dot sizes. A recording head of a type that adjusts the dot size of one dot (the size of the liquid on the landed recording medium) by changing the number of liquid balls, and a recording head of a type that adjusts by changing the volume of the liquid balls Is known. In the former case, a plurality of droplets are ejected to form a dot size of 1 dot on the recording medium. In this specification, the plurality of droplets are counted as one droplet. Then, regardless of the number of droplets actually ejected from the nozzles, the ink ejected to form one dot of a large dot size is called a “large droplet” and is used to form one dot in the dot size. The ink ejected to the nozzle is called “medium droplet”, the ink ejected to form one dot with a small dot size is called “small droplet”, and ejected to form one dot with the smallest dot size The ink will be referred to as “very small droplet”.

  The test pattern data according to the first example includes a predetermined number (for example, 20 shots) of small droplets, a predetermined number of medium droplets, a predetermined number of large droplets, and a predetermined number of extremely small droplets from each nozzle of the recording head 1. The image data is ejected in order. The test pattern data according to the second example includes a predetermined number (for example, 20 shots) of large droplets, a predetermined number of medium droplets, a predetermined number of small droplets, and a predetermined number of very small droplets from each nozzle of the recording head 1. The image data is ejected in order.

  In the test pattern data of the first example and the second example, in order to ensure that dots of all kinds of dot sizes can be formed, a large drop, a medium drop, a small drop, and a very small drop (that is, all kinds of dots) from each nozzle. A droplet of an amount corresponding to the size) is discharged.

  In the test pattern data of the first example and the second example, the smallest amount of droplets (minimum droplets) is discharged last. Thereby, the discharge of the small droplet, the medium droplet, and the large droplet so far can be positioned as the liquid discharge for recovery of the discharge of the nozzle. That is, ink ejection for test pattern image formation also serves as ink ejection for nozzle ejection recovery.

  In the test pattern data of the first example and the second example, large droplets, medium droplets, small droplets, so that dots of large, medium, small, and extremely small dots formed on the recording medium can be recognized separately. And small droplets are ejected separately. For example, according to the test pattern data of the first example, 20 small droplets are ejected from one nozzle, 20 medium droplets are ejected, 20 large droplets are ejected, and finally 20 very small droplets are ejected. To do. As a result, an image is formed on the recording medium in the order of a dot group having a large dot size, a dot group having a medium dot size, a dot group having a small dot size, and a dot group having a minimum dot size. Therefore, it is possible to easily determine whether or not droplets have landed (discharged) on the recording medium for each dot size based on the dots formed on the recording medium.

[First diagnosis]
Next, the first diagnosis performed by the first diagnosis unit 75 will be described. In the first diagnosis, normality or abnormality of ejection of each nozzle is determined based on a test pattern image formed on the recording medium, that is, test pattern image data read by the image sensor 16. For this purpose, the first diagnosis unit 75 first determines whether or not each droplet ejected from the nozzle has landed on the recording medium. For example, when nozzle ejection is normal, a predetermined number of dots should be formed on the recording medium when a predetermined number (for example, 20) of droplets are ejected from the nozzle. However, when nozzle ejection is abnormal, even if a predetermined number (for example, 20) of droplets are ejected from the nozzle, fewer dots than the predetermined number are formed on the recording medium. Therefore, the first diagnosis unit 75 determines whether or not the droplets ejected from the recording head 1 have landed on the recording medium, and based on this, the success or failure of landing by dot size (that is, The success or failure of dot formation is determined. The determination of the success or failure of landing for each dot size is performed for each nozzle. The determination result of the success or failure of the landing for each nozzle dot size is temporarily stored in a memory such as a ROM. In Table 1 below, among the 20 droplets ejected from a certain nozzle, those that have landed on the recording medium are indicated by ○, and those that have not landed are indicated by ×, and the success or failure of the landing is determined (a-1 to 5) is shown.

  In the first diagnosis unit 75 according to the present embodiment, among the predetermined number of droplets ejected continuously, the last ejected droplet landed on the recording medium, and the last ejected droplet When N droplets (for example, N = 5) that continue retroactively land on the recording medium, the landing of that dot size is determined to be successful, and otherwise the landing is determined to be unsuccessful. However, the condition for determining the successful landing is not limited to the above.

  In Table 1 above, in Example (a-1), for a certain dot size, the first 12 consecutive droplets do not land on the recording medium, and the last 8 consecutive droplets land on the recording medium. Since the dot is formed, it is determined that the landing of the dot size is successful. Further, in Example (a-2), for another dot size, the first 18 consecutive droplets do not land on the recording medium, and the second half consecutive droplets land on the recording medium and are dot Therefore, landing of another dot size is determined as failure. In this way, the first diagnosis unit 75 determines the success or failure of landing for each nozzle size at each nozzle.

  Further, when it is determined that the landing of all the dot sizes is successful in a certain nozzle, the first diagnosis unit 75 determines that the ejection of the nozzle is normal, and determines that the other is abnormal. In this way, the first diagnosis unit 75 determines whether the nozzle discharge is normal or abnormal for all nozzles.

[Second diagnosis]
Subsequently, the second diagnosis will be described. The second diagnosis unit 76 determines whether or not the landing of each nozzle size is successful for each nozzle, determines the degree of ejection abnormality based on the success or failure of landing for each dot size, and determines the degree of ejection abnormality. Based on this, a liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge is determined.

  The same method as the first diagnosis can be used when determining whether or not the landing is successful for each dot size. Therefore, when the success or failure of the landing for each nozzle size has already been determined for each nozzle in the first diagnosis, the determination of the success or failure of the landing can be omitted.

  When determining the degree of ejection abnormality, the second diagnosis unit 76 determines the degree of abnormality for each nozzle based on the combination of success or failure of landing for each dot size. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the flow of the second diagnosis. The second diagnosis unit 76 performs the second diagnosis for each nozzle. FIG. 8 shows the flow of the second diagnosis performed for one nozzle.

  First, the second diagnosis unit 76 refers to the success or failure of the landing for each dot size stored, and when the landing has succeeded for all types of dot sizes (YES in step S1), the discharge from the nozzle is normal. Therefore, the liquid discharge amount for recovery of ejection is determined to be zero (step S2). Further, when the landing has failed in at least one dot size among all types of dot sizes (NO in step S1), the second diagnosis unit 76 is based on the combination of the success or failure of the landing for each dot size. The degree of abnormality is determined, and the liquid discharge amount for recovery of ejection is determined based on the degree of abnormality. In the present embodiment, as shown in the following Table 2, the degree of abnormality is divided into seven stages of the worst level, levels A to B, and no abnormality, and the liquid for discharge recovery corresponding to each degree of abnormality. Emissions are set. The degree of abnormality is the highest at the worst level, followed by level A, level B, level C, level D, and level E in this order. The degree of abnormality correlates with the size of the clogged area in the opening area of the nozzle outlet, the degree of fixation of the solidified ink, and the like. The liquid discharge amount has a relationship of purge amount> a> b> c> d> preliminary flushing amount. For a to d, for example, a can be a liquid amount of a large droplet, b can be a liquid amount of a medium droplet, c can be a liquid amount of a small droplet, and d can be a liquid amount of a very small droplet. Note that a is the amount of liquid corresponding to 50 medium drops, b is the amount of liquid corresponding to 40 medium drops, c is the amount of liquid corresponding to 30 medium drops, d is the amount of liquid corresponding to 20 medium drops, etc. It is good.

  Specifically, the degree of abnormality and the liquid discharge amount are determined in the next flow. First, referring to the success or failure of landing for each dot size, if landing has failed for all types of dot sizes (YES in step S3), the degree of abnormality is determined to be the worst level, and the liquid discharge amount is a predetermined amount. The purge amount is determined (step S4). Next, referring to the success or failure of the landing of the minimum dot size, if the landing is successful with the minimum dot size (YES in step S5), the degree of abnormality is determined to be level E, and the liquid discharge amount is set to level E. The corresponding preliminary flushing amount is determined (step S6). Subsequently, referring to the success or failure of the landing of the large dot size, if the landing has failed due to the large dot size (NO in step S7), the degree of abnormality is determined as level A, and the liquid discharge amount reaches level A. The corresponding liquid amount a is determined (step S10). If the landing is successful because the dot size is large (YES in step S7), the success or failure of the landing in the dot size is referred (step S8), and if the landing is failed in the dot size (in step S8) NO), the degree of abnormality is determined to be level B, and the liquid discharge amount is determined to be the liquid amount b corresponding to level B (step S10). If the landing is successful within the dot size (YES in step S8), the success or failure of the landing of the small dot size is referred to (step S9), and if the landing has failed due to the small dot size (in step S9) NO), the degree of abnormality is determined to be level C, and the liquid discharge amount is determined to be the liquid amount c corresponding to level C (step S10). If the dot size is small and landing is successful (YES in step S9), the degree of abnormality is determined to be level D, and the liquid discharge amount is determined to be the liquid amount d corresponding to level D (step S13).

  As described above, the minimum dot size that has successfully landed out of the plurality of types of dot sizes, that is, the size of the smallest droplet that has successfully landed on the recording medium out of the plurality of types of droplet sizes, The degree is determined, and the liquid discharge amount for recovery of ejection is determined in accordance with the degree of abnormality.

  Note that if the liquid discharge amount for recovery of ejection is determined to be the purge amount in one or more nozzles, the liquid discharge amount cannot be changed for each nozzle in the purge operation, so that all the nozzles of the recording head 1 can be changed. The amount of liquid discharged is determined as the purge amount. Accordingly, when the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge is determined as the purge amount in one or more nozzles, the purge operation is performed in the discharge recovery operation.

  Further, when the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge is one of the liquid amounts a to d and the preliminary flushing amount, flushing is performed in the discharge recovery operation, and the liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle is discharged. Is done. Therefore, when there is no nozzle in the recording head 1 in which the degree of abnormality is determined to be the worst level, the flushing operation is performed in the ejection recovery operation.

  The second diagnosis unit 76 can determine the degree of abnormality and derive the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge along the above flow. For example, as shown in the following Tables 3 and 4, for each dot size, A lookup table showing the relationship between the combination of success or failure of landing and the degree of abnormality is stored in the storage unit, and with reference to this lookup table, the degree of abnormality for each nozzle and the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge are determined. It can also be determined.

  Table 3 below shows the relationship between the landing success / failure combination for each dot size and the degree of abnormality when the test pattern according to the first example is used. In Table 3, the dot size is shown in the first left column, and the nozzle number is shown in the first row. In this table, ○ indicates successful landing, and X indicates failure of landing.

  The relationship between the success or failure of ejection landing and the degree of abnormality is determined according to the test pattern. Table 4 below shows the relationship between the landing success / failure combinations for each dot size and the degree of abnormality when the test pattern according to the second example is used. In Table 4, the left first column shows the dot size, and the upper first row shows the nozzle number. In this table, ○ indicates successful landing, and X indicates failure of landing.

(Discharge recovery process)
Here, the flow of the discharge recovery process will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing the flow of the discharge recovery process performed by the control means 100. First, the control unit 100 operates the recording head 1 and the transport mechanism 40 so as to form a test pattern image on the recording medium (step S31). Next, the control means 100 reads a test pattern image with the image sensor 16 and creates test pattern image data (step S32). Subsequently, the control unit 100 performs a first diagnosis using the test pattern image data (step S33). In the first diagnosis, whether each of the plurality of nozzles of the recording head 1 is normal or abnormal is determined. If there is a discharge abnormality in any of the nozzles (NO in step S33), the control unit 100 performs a second diagnosis (step S34). In the second diagnosis, the degree of discharge abnormality is determined for each of the plurality of nozzles based on the result of the first diagnosis, and the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge is determined according to the degree of discharge abnormality. The

  If there is no discharge abnormality in all the nozzles (YES in step S33), that is, if the liquid discharge amount for discharge recovery is zero, all the nozzles of the recording head 1 are in a good state, so the discharge recovery operation Is not done.

  In the discharge recovery operation, first, the control unit 100 determines whether the liquid discharge operation for recovery of discharge is a purge operation or a flushing operation. Therefore, the control means 100 refers to the liquid discharge amount of the second diagnosis result, and when the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge is the purge amount (YES in step S35), the liquid for recovery of discharge The discharging operation is determined as the purge operation. In other cases (NO in step S35), the liquid discharge operation for recovery of ejection is determined as the flushing operation.

  When the liquid discharge operation for recovering the ejection is determined to be the purge operation, the control unit 100 operates the printer 10 to perform the purge operation (step S36). In the purge operation, the liquid is discharged from each nozzle, and as a result, the discharge from each nozzle is recovered. The control means 100 controls the pump 38, the head lifting mechanism 39, and the wiper unit 36 so that the wiping operation is performed after the purge operation (step S37).

  When the liquid discharge operation for recovering the discharge is determined to be the flushing operation, the control unit 100 creates flushing data using the second diagnosis result (step S38). The flushing data is created so that each nozzle ejects a liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle in the second diagnosis. The created flushing data is output to the drive data storage unit 741, and a flushing operation is performed based on the flushing data (step S39). In the flushing operation, each nozzle ejects the liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle in the second diagnosis, and as a result, the ejection of each nozzle is recovered.

  In the present embodiment, in the purge operation and the flushing operation, the liquid is discharged from the nozzle toward the conveyance belt 43. Therefore, the control unit 100 performs the cleaning operation of the transport belt 43 after the flushing operation or the purge operation and the wiping operation are performed (step S40). In the cleaning operation, the cleaning liquid applying member 371 and the blade 372 are moved to a position where they come into contact with the conveyor belt 43, and the conveyor belt 43 is caused to travel clockwise. As a result, the cleaning liquid is uniformly applied to the outer peripheral surface of the conveyor belt 43, and foreign matters such as ink on the outer peripheral surface are scraped off by the blade 372 together with the cleaning liquid. Thus, the discharge recovery process by the control unit 100 is completed.

  As described above, in the printer 10 according to the present embodiment, either the flushing operation or the purge operation is selectively executed in the nozzle discharge recovery process according to the degree of nozzle discharge abnormality. As a result, when the flushing operation is selected, the time required for the discharge recovery operation can be reduced as compared with the case where the purge operation is selected. In addition, in the flushing operation, the amount of liquid required for recovery of ejection corresponding to the degree of ejection abnormality is ejected from each nozzle, so compared with the case where the purge operation is performed uniformly in the ejection recovery operation. Thus, the amount of ink consumed for purposes other than image formation can be reduced. In addition, the nozzle discharge recovery process ensures that the discharge of the nozzle is reliably recovered by discharging a liquid amount corresponding to the degree of nozzle discharge abnormality, resulting in stable discharge performance and reduced image quality. Can be suppressed.

  The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above. However, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications can be made as long as they are described in the claims.

  For example, in the second diagnosis, the control unit 100 determines the degree of nozzle discharge abnormality and determines the liquid discharge amount for recovery of discharge. Only determining the amount may be performed.

  Further, for example, in the purge operation and the flushing operation, the liquid is discharged toward the transport belt 43, but a cap that seals the ejection surface 1a is provided below the recording head 1 so that the liquid is discharged into the cap. It may be. In this case, the purge operation may be a suction purge operation in which the ejection surface 1a of the recording head 1 is sealed with a cap, and ink is sucked from the nozzle by making the inside of the cap have a negative pressure.

  Further, for example, in the flushing operation related to the discharge recovery operation, the liquid is discharged toward the transport belt 43, but the liquid may be discharged toward the recording medium transported by the transport mechanism 40. In this case, the discharge recovery may be confirmed in the flushing operation related to the discharge recovery operation. When confirmation of ejection recovery is performed, for example, flushing data is created as follows.

  FIG. 10 shows an image (flushing image) formed on the recording medium at the time when the flushing operation is performed based on the flushing data. The flushing image includes a discharge recovery image 61 formed by each nozzle discharging a liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle in the second diagnosis, and a downstream side of the discharge recovery image. It is composed of a confirmation image 62 formed by discharging a very small liquid droplet from each nozzle. In other words, the flushing data is minimized from each nozzle so that each nozzle discharges the liquid discharge amount determined for each nozzle in the second diagnosis and then checks the discharge state of each nozzle. The data is generated so as to perform the ejection of the liquid droplet.

  When the flushing operation is performed based on the flushing data, the liquid is ejected toward the recording medium conveyed by the conveyance mechanism 40, and the confirmation image is an image formed on the recording medium. It is read by the sensor 16. Then, the confirmation image data is analyzed by the control means 100, and for example, normal or abnormal discharge of the nozzle is determined in the same procedure as the first diagnosis described above, and this determination result is provided in the housing 11. Display on a display unit or the like.

  Note that the present invention can be applied to an image forming apparatus provided with either a line type or serial type recording head 1, and is not limited to a printer, and can also be applied to a facsimile, a copier, and the like. Furthermore, the present invention can also be applied to an image forming apparatus that performs recording by discharging a liquid other than ink. Furthermore, the present invention can be applied regardless of the ink ejection method. For example, although a piezoelectric element is used in this embodiment, a resistance heating method or a capacitance method may be used.

1 Recording head 10 Inkjet printer (image forming apparatus)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 12 Discharge port 16 Image sensor 40 Conveyance mechanism 72 Image data storage part 73 Data writing part 74 Head control part 75 1st diagnostic part 76 2nd diagnostic part 77 Flushing operation control part 78 Test pattern recording part 79 Image reading control part 95 Purge Operation control unit 100 Control means

Claims (12)

In an image forming apparatus having a plurality of nozzles and having a recording head capable of ejecting an amount of liquid corresponding to a plurality of types of dot sizes from each of these nozzles, the liquid ejection state of the plurality of nozzles can be diagnosed and good A method for recovering a liquid ejection state,
Forming a test pattern image on the recording medium by discharging an amount of liquid corresponding to one of the plurality of types of dot sizes from the plurality of nozzles toward the recording medium. To do each for all of the dot sizes,
Reading an image of the test pattern on the recording medium with an image sensor;
Analyzing the image read by the image sensor, diagnosing the nozzle discharge state for each of the plurality of nozzles;
Performing an ejection recovery operation of the recording head according to a diagnosis result of the nozzle ejection state,
Diagnosing the nozzle discharge state includes performing a first diagnosis for determining whether each of the plurality of nozzles is normal or abnormal, and determining each of the plurality of nozzles based on a result of the first diagnosis. A nozzle diagnosis and a discharge recovery method including performing a second diagnosis for determining a liquid discharge amount discharged from the nozzle in the discharge recovery operation. Performing the second diagnosis,
Determining the success or failure of landing on the recording medium with respect to the ejection of each of the plurality of dot sizes; determining the degree of abnormality based on the success or failure of the landing; and determining whether the liquid is based on the degree of abnormality The nozzle diagnosis and discharge recovery method according to claim 1, further comprising: determining a discharge amount. In the second diagnosis, when it is determined that landing failure related to ejection of all sizes of the plurality of types of dot sizes is detected for one or more nozzles of the plurality of nozzles, all of the liquid discharge of the plurality of nozzles is performed. Determine the amount to a predetermined purge amount,
The nozzle diagnosis and discharge recovery method according to claim 2, wherein a purge operation is performed in the discharge recovery operation to discharge the predetermined purge amount of liquid from all of the plurality of nozzles. In the second diagnosis, when it is determined that all of the plurality of nozzles have successfully landed on ejection of any one or more of the plurality of types of dot sizes, the liquid discharge amount is determined for each of the plurality of nozzles. Determine the flushing amount according to the degree of abnormality,
The nozzle diagnosis and discharge recovery method according to claim 2, wherein a flushing operation is performed in the discharge recovery operation, and the corresponding flushing amount of liquid is discharged from each of the plurality of nozzles.   The nozzle diagnosis according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the degree of abnormality is determined based on a size of a minimum amount of ejection that has successfully landed among the plurality of types of dot size ejection. And a discharge recovery method.   The nozzle diagnosis and ejection according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein an image of the last test pattern among the test patterns is formed by ejection of a minimum amount among ejections of the plurality of types of dot sizes. Recovery method. A recording head having a plurality of nozzles and capable of ejecting an amount of liquid corresponding to a plurality of types of dot sizes from each of the nozzles;
Forming a test pattern image on the recording medium by discharging an amount of liquid corresponding to one of the plurality of types of dot sizes from the plurality of nozzles toward the recording medium. Test pattern recording means for operating the recording head to perform each of all sizes;
An image sensor for reading an image of the test pattern on the recording medium;
A nozzle diagnostic means for analyzing an image read by the image sensor and diagnosing a nozzle discharge state for each of the plurality of nozzles;
A recovery operation control means for controlling the recording head so that the recording head performs an ejection recovery operation according to a diagnosis result of the nozzle discharge state,
The nozzle diagnosing unit performs a discharge recovery operation on each of the plurality of nozzles based on a diagnosis result of the first diagnosis unit that determines normality and abnormality of each of the plurality of nozzles, and a diagnosis result of the first diagnosis unit. And a second diagnostic unit that determines a liquid discharge amount discharged from the nozzle.   The second diagnosing unit determines whether or not landing on the recording medium is related to ejection of each of the plurality of types of dot sizes, determines the degree of abnormality based on whether or not the landing is successful, and The image forming apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the liquid discharge amount is determined based on a degree of abnormality. When the second diagnosis unit determines landing failure regarding ejection of all of the plurality of types of dot sizes in one or more of the plurality of nozzles, the liquid discharge of all of the plurality of nozzles is performed. Determine the amount to a predetermined purge amount,
The image forming apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the recording head performs a purge operation in the discharge recovery operation and discharges the predetermined purge amount of liquid from all of the plurality of nozzles. When the second diagnosis unit determines success of landing regarding ejection of any one of the plurality of types of dot sizes in all of the plurality of nozzles, the liquid discharge amount for each of the plurality of nozzles Is determined as a flushing amount according to the degree of abnormality,
The image forming apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the recording head performs a flushing operation in the ejection recovery operation and discharges the corresponding flushing amount of liquid from each of the plurality of nozzles.   The said 2nd diagnostic part discriminate | determines the extent of the said abnormality based on the size of the discharge of the minimum amount of the successful landing among the discharge of the said multiple types of dot size. The image forming apparatus according to one item.   The test pattern recording unit controls the recording head so that an image of the last test pattern among the test patterns is formed by discharging a minimum amount of the plurality of types of dot sizes. The image forming apparatus according to any one of 7 to 11.

Images