JP2013015399A - Device validation system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To cancel a lag between the progress of a progress bar indicating a progress of work during validation execution and the user's sensitive passage of time and to more accurately notify a user of the remaining time of a check.SOLUTION: If check items of validation and measurement conditions are equal to that of the last validation (S1:Yes), an actual time measured during the last validation execution is set to the required time for each check item (S3) but if not, the required time for each check item is computed from basic time information and measurement conditions (S2). The required time for all designated check items is computed and this is displayed as a remaining time (S5). When the check is started (S6), with the required time for each check item determined in S2 or S3 and the entire required time determined in S5 as criteria, a progress bar for whole items and each item is advanced with the passage of time, and the remaining time for whole items and each item is counted down. Thus, the progress of the progress bar is matched with the sensitive passage of time and the accurate remaining time can also be displayed.

Description

  The present invention relates to an apparatus validation system for periodically performing performance inspections of various analyzers.

  With the strengthening of legal regulations such as GLP and GMP, it is scientifically confirmed that analytical equipment used in the field of research and development or manufacturing and quality control is performing as intended and operating as intended. The work of verification, so-called validation, has become extremely important. For this reason, analysis devices in recent years are often equipped with a validation function for inspecting whether or not the device is functioning normally (see, for example, Patent Document 1). For example, the JIS (K0115) standard “Absorption Spectrophotometry General Rules” includes wavelength accuracy, wavelength reproducibility, photometric accuracy, photometric value reproducibility, decomposition, stray light, and base for confirming the performance of UV-visible spectrophotometers. Nine items such as line stability, baseline flatness and noise level are inspected, and the user periodically inspects each item, for example, once a month or every few months. The inspection results are stored. Thereby, the reliability of the data obtained by the analysis can be ensured.

  As a matter of course, as the number of inspection items increases, the time required for validation increases. For example, when all the above items are inspected, it generally takes 2 to 3 hours or more. Since the target sample cannot be analyzed during validation, the user can easily check the progress of the validation being performed in order to perform the analysis efficiently. It is desirable to begin to analyze the sample. For this purpose, the validation software provided as an option in UVProbe, the control software for UV-visible spectrophotometers of Shimadzu Corporation, is the progress and inspection target for each inspection item. The progress status of all items is displayed on the display screen with a progress bar.

  However, the progress bar displayed on the display screen in the validation system realized by the above-mentioned conventional software does not indicate the degree of progress in time, but the ratio of the number of inspection objects that have been performed to the total number of inspection objects to the last It was only what showed. More specifically, for example, if it is necessary to inspect at one wavelength for one inspection item (for example, wavelength accuracy) at three wavelengths, the progress bar of the inspection item is displayed every time inspection for one wavelength is completed. It increases by about 33%, and the progress bar becomes 100% when the inspection of three wavelengths is completed. Further, if it is necessary to inspect a certain inspection item at 10 wavelengths, the progress bar of the inspection item increases by about 10% every time inspection for one wavelength is completed.

  In this way, the progress of the progress bar reflects the progress of the inspection, but the time required for the inspection varies depending on the contents of the inspection item, the measurement conditions for the inspection, etc. There is a possibility that a large difference may occur between the sensuous time course when viewing the screen and the progress of the actual progress bar. For example, when the progress bar has progressed to 90%, the user feels that the test will be completed in a short time, but if the remaining test takes a long time, the remaining 10% does not progress easily and gives a user a great sense of incongruity. In addition, when there are a plurality of inspection items, the progress bar of the entire inspection item is not updated until the inspection of each item is completed, so the increase in the progress bar is discrete and unnatural. Further, since the progress degree by the progress bar is only expressed as a percentage, it is impossible to know the remaining time until the end of the inspection.

JP 2002-228557 A

  The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and the main purpose of the present invention is to increase the number of progress bars that intuitively indicate the progress of validation with the passage of time. It is an object to provide a device validation system that can eliminate a difference between a sensory time lapse and an increase in progress bar, and can accurately notify a user of the remaining time of validation.

The present invention made to solve the above problems is an apparatus validation system for performing validation for confirming the performance of an analyzer.
a) Time information storage means for preliminarily storing time information as a basis for calculating the time required for inspection for each inspection item of validation;
b) When the inspection items to be validated and the measurement conditions of each inspection item are specified, the time required for the inspection for each inspection item from the measurement conditions and the time information stored in the time information storage means , And time calculation means for calculating the total required time for the entire inspection item,
c) a display control means for displaying a progress bar indicating the progress of validation for each inspection item and the entire designated inspection item and the remaining time on the display screen;
d) progress information generating means for sequentially updating the progress bar and the remaining time as the actual time elapses, based on the required time and total required time for each inspection item calculated by the time calculating means at the time of performing the validation; ,
It is characterized by having.

  The apparatus validation system according to the present invention is a system constructed by using a general-purpose personal computer as hardware resources and operating software (computer program) for executing characteristic control / processing on the personal computer. be able to. In this case, the time information storage means is a memory having an entity in which the time information is stored, and the time calculation means, the display control means, and the progress information generation means are functional means embodied as the computer program is executed. It is.

  The inspection items differ depending on the analysis device to be validated. For example, when the analysis apparatus to be validated is an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer, the inspection items are the nine items described above, that is, wavelength accuracy, wavelength reproducibility, photometric accuracy, photometric value reproducibility, decomposition, stray light, It is preferable to include at least baseline stability, baseline flatness, and noise level.

  In addition, the “time information that is the basis for calculating the time required for inspection” also differs depending on the analyzer. When the analysis apparatus to be validated is an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer, the “time information that is the basis for calculating the time required for inspection” includes, for example, time per unit wavelength for performing baseline correction, and spectrum measurement. Performs time per unit wavelength, time course measurement (time measurement of photometric values at two wavelengths), and photometric measurement (single wavelength, multiple wavelengths, spectrum-based quantification) The time required to perform auto zero, the time required to execute auto-zero, the time required to set the measurement parameter in the apparatus, the time required to turn on the lamp, the time required to move the wavelength, the time required to move the cell, etc. This time information is a value determined to some extent for each model of the device, and individual differences among devices can be almost ignored if the model is the same. Therefore, this time information can be stored in advance in the time information storage means by the manufacturer of this system (or a computer program for constructing this system) before shipment.

  The designated “measurement condition for each inspection item” is the number of wavelength points or the wavelength range of the inspection accompanied by the measurement for a certain inspection item, or the sequence of the inspection.

  In the apparatus validation system according to the present invention, when the inspection items to be validated and the measurement conditions of each inspection item are designated by a user's manual operation or by automatic setting, the time calculation means designates the designated measurement conditions. And the time required for inspection for each inspection item and the total time required for the entire inspection item are calculated based on the time information stored in the time information storage means. Then, when the validation for the specified item is started, the progress information generating means is based on the required time and the total required time for each inspection item calculated by the time calculating means, and the actual time elapses. The displayed progress bar and remaining time display are sequentially updated so that the progress bar increases and the remaining time decreases. Since there is almost no difference between the required time calculated by the time calculating means and the time required for actual validation, the increase in the progress bar and the decrease in the remaining time are in accordance with the user's sensory time course.

  In addition, a preferable aspect of the apparatus validation system according to the present invention further includes an actual inspection time storage unit that stores the inspection item, the measurement condition of each inspection item, and the actual required time when the validation is executed, The calculation means stores the actual inspection time storage means when the specified inspection item and the measurement conditions of each inspection item match the inspection items stored in the actual inspection time storage means and the measurement conditions of each inspection item. A configuration may be adopted in which the required time for inspection for each inspection item and the total required time for the entire inspection item are set based on the actual required time stored.

  In actual sites, validation of the same inspection items and the same measurement conditions is often performed regularly, and in that case, the required time should be almost the same as the previous validation. According to the preferable aspect, since the time information actually measured at the time of the previous validation is used at the time of the next validation, the update accuracy of the progress bar and the remaining time display is further improved.

  According to the apparatus validation system according to the present invention, when validation is performed on a plurality of inspection items, both progress bars for each inspection item and the entire inspection item are displayed as the actual degree of time elapsed. As a result, the progress degree of the progress bar coincides with the user's sensation of time, and it is possible for the user to grasp the progress more intuitively without feeling uncomfortable. Further, according to the apparatus validation system according to the present invention, the remaining time of the validation is also displayed as a numerical value, so that the end time of the validation can be accurately grasped from this display, and another work until then can be performed. It is also easy to leave.

The block diagram of the principal part of one Example of UV measurement system containing the apparatus validation system which concerns on this invention. The flowchart which shows the procedure of validation of the whole inspection item in the UV measurement system of a present Example. The flowchart which shows the procedure of the validation for every inspection item in FIG. The figure which shows the validation execution screen in the UV measurement system of a present Example.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of a UV measurement system including an apparatus validation system according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a UV measurement system according to this embodiment. The UV analysis unit 1 has a function of measuring the absorbance of the sample, and the control / processing unit 2 has a function of controlling the operation of the UV analysis unit 1 and processing data acquired by the UV analysis unit 1. The entity of the control / processing unit 2 to which the operation unit 3 and the display unit 4 are connected is a personal computer, and control / processing is performed by operating dedicated control / processing software installed in the computer in advance on the computer. The function as the unit 2 can be achieved.

  In addition to the control / processing functions for normal analysis, the control / processing unit 2 includes a validation execution unit 21 that executes validation for confirming the performance of the UV analysis unit 1 as a functional block. The validation execution unit 21 includes a time information storage unit 22 in which basic time information necessary for calculating the time required for the inspection for each inspection item is stored in advance, and an actual inspection during the execution of the validation. And a measurement time storage unit 23 for storing the actual time obtained by measuring the required time.

  Basic time information, as will be described later, is basic information for calculating the time required for an inspection when an inspection is performed under a specified condition according to a specified inspection sequence. For example, time per unit wavelength for performing baseline correction, time per unit wavelength for performing spectrum measurement, time required for performing time course (kinetic) measurement, and performing photometric measurement The time required, the time required to execute auto-zero, the time required to set the measurement parameter in the apparatus, the time required to turn on the lamp, the time required to move the wavelength, and the time required to move the cell. In general, for the time information, a value based on a result measured at the factory by the manufacturer of the system can be used. The time course measurement and photometric measurement mentioned here are the names of the data processing functions installed in “UV Probe” of the Shimadzu Corporation mentioned above, but the basic functions corresponding to these are general. It is used.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the validation execution screen 10 displayed on the screen of the display unit 4 when the validation execution unit 21 performs validation. On the left half of the validation execution screen 10, an inspection item list 11 indicating inspection items and the inspection results is displayed. On the right side of the validation execution screen 10, a progress indicating the progress of the work on the current inspection item is displayed. A bar display 13 and a remaining time display 14, and a progress bar display 15 and a remaining time display 16 that indicate the progress of work related to the entire inspection item are arranged. In addition, a start instruction button 17 and a stop instruction button 18 for instructing execution start and stop of the validation are arranged at the upper right end of the screen 10. Each inspection item listed in the inspection item list 11 is determined so that the background color of each column is different so that it is easy to identify whether the inspection item is not yet executed, being processed, or processed.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the validation procedure for the entire inspection item in the UV measurement system of this embodiment, and FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the validation procedure for each inspection item in FIG. With reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, a description will be mainly given of processing related to the display update of the progress bar and the remaining time in the validation work executed by the validation execution unit 21 in the UV measurement system of the present embodiment.

  Prior to executing validation, the user operates the operation unit 3 to check boxes for items to be inspected in the inspection item list 11 on the validation execution screen 10 displayed on the screen of the display unit 4. Check the 12 column and click the start instruction button 17. It should be noted that instead of the user performing an operation one by one, the execution of the validation is automatically started at a predetermined timing (for example, at 8:00 am on the first Monday of every month) for a predetermined inspection item. It can also be. In addition, the measurement conditions and inspection conditions at the time of execution of validation shall be set in detail separately. The measurement conditions and inspection conditions here are the number of wavelengths to be inspected and the wavelength range in the inspection sequence and each inspection item.

  When the validation is started, the validation execution unit 21 first determines whether or not to inspect the same inspection items under the same measurement conditions / inspection conditions as in the previous validation execution (step S1). However, if there is no validation execution record in the past, the determination result in step S1 is forcibly set to No. In step S1, if the inspection items, measurement conditions, etc. are exactly the same, the actual required time stored at the time of the previous validation is read from the measurement time storage unit 23, and this is set as the required time for each inspection item. (Step S3). On the other hand, if it is determined in step S1 that the inspection items, measurement conditions, and the like are not the same, predetermined time information is read from the time information storage unit 22, and the measurement conditions and inspection conditions designated as the time information are read out. The required time of each inspection item is calculated from the above and set for each inspection item (step S2).

  If the time required for each inspection item is determined by the process of step S2 or S3, the progress bar display 15 of the entire inspection item on the validation execution screen 10 is cleared to 0 (step S4). Further, the remaining time of the entire inspection item is calculated from the required time of each inspection item, and the calculated value is displayed numerically on the remaining time display 16 of the entire inspection item (step S5). Then, each inspection item is validated in the order specified in the inspection item list 11 (step S6).

  The processes in steps S1 to S5 are performed before the validation start instruction button 17 is operated, that is, when the check items in the check box 12 of the check item list 11 are checked and the check items are temporarily determined. May be executed. In such a case, the remaining time of the entire inspection item is recalculated each time the check box 12 of the check box 12 of the inspection item list 11 is switched, and the numerical value of the remaining time display 16 is switched. It is possible to determine whether or not to execute after confirming the time required for the inspection.

  In the process of step S6, first, the progress bar display 13 for the current inspection item is cleared to 0 (step S61), and the required time for the inspection item set in step S2 or S3 as the remaining time of the current inspection item. Is numerically displayed on the remaining time display 14 (step S62). Then, a predetermined inspection sequence is executed (step S63). Thereafter, the progress bar display 13 for the current inspection item is increased as the actual time passes (step S64), and the remaining time display 14 for the current inspection item is also counted down as the actual time passes (step S65). ).

  Further, the progress bar display 15 for the entire inspection item is increased as the actual time elapses (step S66), and the remaining time display 16 for the entire inspection item is also counted down as the actual time elapses (step S67). Then, it is determined whether or not all the processes have been completed for the inspection item (step S68), and if not completed, the process returns to step S63. Therefore, by repeating steps S63 to S68, the inspection relating to the inspection item is performed, and the progress bar display 13 for the current inspection item is increased with the progress of the inspection, and the remaining for the current inspection item. The time display 14 also decreases with the passage of time as the examination progresses.

  If there is almost no difference between the time required for each inspection item obtained in step S2 or S3 and the time taken when the inspection is actually executed, the inspection item, for example, the inspection item list 11 shown in FIG. When all the processes related to the first “wavelength accuracy” are completed, the progress bar display 13 of the current inspection item is at the 100% (full) position, and the remaining time display 14 of the current inspection item is 0 minutes. become. At this time, it is determined Yes in step S68, and the process returns to step S7 in FIG. Although not appearing in the flowcharts of FIGS. 2 and 3, the validation execution unit 21 measures the time from the execution of the validation to the end of each inspection item, and the actual time obtained by the measurement is measured. The time information is stored in the measurement time storage unit 23.

  In step S7, the remaining time based on the required time of the inspection item obtained in step S2 or S3 is compared with the remaining time obtained from the actually measured time required for the inspection, and the inspection item is matched with the calculated remaining time of the inspection. The progress of the entire progress bar display 15 is adjusted. Further, the remaining time of the entire inspection item is also calculated from the required time corresponding to the remaining inspection item, and the remaining time display 16 is adjusted (step S8). During the inspection of a certain inspection item, there is a case where the inspection is interrupted halfway according to the user's instruction and the process proceeds to the next inspection item. Since the progress is adjusted, it is possible to prevent a shift in the progress of the remaining time display 16 and the progress bar display 15 even when the inspection is interrupted as described above.

  Thereafter, it is determined whether or not the inspection has been completed for all the inspection items specified first (step S9), and if not completed, the process returns to step S6. On the other hand, if all items have been inspected, the inspection is terminated. At the end of the inspection, the remaining time displays 14 and 16 are zero for each inspection item and the entire inspection item, and the progress bar displays 13 and 15 are 100% (full).

  As described above, when the validation is performed in the UV measurement system according to the present embodiment, the progress bar displays 13 and 15 that graphically indicate the progress of each inspection item and the entire inspection item progress according to the actual passage of time. The remaining time displays 14 and 16 that directly indicate the remaining time as numerical values are counted down as the actual time elapses. Therefore, the sensuous time elapsed when the user sees these displays matches the progress of the progress bar displays 13 and 15 and the decrease of the remaining time displays 14 and 16. In addition, when validation is performed with the same items and conditions as the previous validation execution, the remaining time display and progress bar progress display based on the time actually measured during the previous validation execution is made, so the accuracy of those displays Is further improved.

  It should be noted that the above embodiment is merely an example of the present invention, and it will be understood that the present invention is encompassed by the scope of the claims of the present application, even if appropriate modifications, corrections, additions, etc. are made within the scope of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... UV analysis part 2 ... Control and processing part 21 ... Validation execution part 22 ... Time information storage part 23 ... Measurement time storage part 3 ... Operation part 4 ... Display part 10 ... Validation execution screen 11 ... Inspection item list 12 ... Check Box 13 ... Progress bar display 14 of current inspection item 14 Time remaining display 15 of current inspection item Progress bar display 16 of entire inspection item 16 Time display 17 of entire inspection item 17 Start instruction button 18 Stop instruction button

Claims (2)

In the device validation system that performs validation for the performance check of the analyzer,
a) Time information storage means for preliminarily storing time information as a basis for calculating the time required for inspection for each inspection item of validation;
b) When the inspection items to be validated and the measurement conditions of each inspection item are specified, the time required for the inspection for each inspection item from the measurement conditions and the time information stored in the time information storage means , And time calculation means for calculating the total required time for the entire inspection item,
c) a display control means for displaying a progress bar indicating the progress of validation for each inspection item and the entire designated inspection item and the remaining time on the display screen;
d) progress information generating means for sequentially updating the progress bar and the remaining time as the actual time elapses, based on the required time and total required time for each inspection item calculated by the time calculating means at the time of performing the validation; ,
An apparatus validation system comprising: The apparatus validation system according to claim 1,
When the validation is performed, the inspection apparatus further includes an actual inspection time storage means for storing the inspection items, the measurement conditions of each inspection item, and the actual required time, and the time calculation means includes the specified inspection item and each inspection item. When the measurement conditions match the inspection items stored in the actual inspection time storage means and the measurement conditions of each inspection item, each inspection item is determined based on the actual required time stored in the actual inspection time storage means. An apparatus validation system characterized by setting the required time for inspection and the total required time for the entire inspection item.

Images