JP2012219606A - Building and structure for tsunami protection measure - Google Patents

Building and structure for tsunami protection measure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2012219606A
JP2012219606A JP2011097614A JP2011097614A JP2012219606A JP 2012219606 A JP2012219606 A JP 2012219606A JP 2011097614 A JP2011097614 A JP 2011097614A JP 2011097614 A JP2011097614 A JP 2011097614A JP 2012219606 A JP2012219606 A JP 2012219606A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
building
tsunami
acute angle
disaster prevention
river
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP2011097614A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroshi Kurokawa
宏 黒河
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2011097614A priority Critical patent/JP2012219606A/en
Publication of JP2012219606A publication Critical patent/JP2012219606A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To prevent the collapse of a building and a structure by exerting an effective action on both an incoming tsunami and backwash.SOLUTION: Characteristically, a building or a structure for disaster prevention is apparently constituted as an erected pole that assumes a rhombus or a polygon including two acute angles; the one acute angle is arranged seaward; and the other acute angle is arranged toward a mountain side.

Description

本発明は、津波対策用の建築物ないしは構造物に関するものである。The present invention relates to a building or a structure for tsunami countermeasures.

平成23年3月に発生した東日本では、津波でビルや家屋が倒壊した。多くの鉄筋コンクリート製の防災センターでさえ、倒壊し、避難した多くの人達の命を奪った。 これらの家々が津波に流されたり、津波の引き波で倒壊した映像を見ると、津波の力は巨大で、人間は対処する方法が全く無いように、思われるかもしれない。
50年か、100年に一度、また、巨大津波が押し寄せてきて、同じように、多くの方が亡くなるのはどうしようもないことと、あきらめている方々も多かろう。
でも、それでは、あまりにも、人間の知恵が無さ過ぎる。
考えてみるに、これまでに建設された防災センターで、津波対策を施した防災センターが、1件でも有っただろうか?
そうです。これまでは、我々は、津波対策を熟慮した防災センターや、個人向けの鉄筋コンクリートの家屋を建設して来なかったのです。
知恵出して対策し、英断をもってこれから実行していけば、将来、確実に、多くの命が救える筈です。
これまでは、近くに山がある人は、地震発生で、早めに避難すれば助かることができたが、山や高台が近くにない海岸近くの住人は、命の保障がない状態だったのです。
本特許は、これらのことを考えて、山が近くに無くても、そこえ逃げ込めば、津波が来襲しても、命だけは助かるような防災センター用建築物の提供を目指します。
In East Japan, which occurred in March 2011, buildings and houses were destroyed by the tsunami. Many disaster prevention centers made of reinforced concrete have taken the lives of many people who collapsed and evacuated. If you look at images of these houses being swept away by a tsunami or collapsed by a tsunami, the power of a tsunami might be huge, and it may seem that humans have no way to deal with it.
Many people have given up that once a 50-year or 100-year tsunami rushes in the same way that many people will die.
But then too much human wisdom.
When you think about it, has there been at least one disaster prevention center that has been constructed so far and has taken measures against tsunami?
That's right. Until now, we haven't built a disaster prevention center or a reinforced concrete house for individuals that carefully considers tsunami countermeasures.
If we take wisdom and take measures, and execute it with our judgment, we will surely be able to save many lives in the future.
Until now, people with mountains nearby could have been saved if they evacuated early because of an earthquake, but residents near the coast where mountains and hills were not nearby had no guarantee of life. is.
With this in mind, this patent aims to provide a building for a disaster prevention center that can save lives even if there is no mountain nearby or if it escapes, even if a tsunami strikes.

特開2006−342648 津波などに対する避難用設備並びにその構築方法 この発明は、町内の公園とか広場などの近場を選んで簡単に避難場所を提供できるようにした津波などにたいする非難用設物並びにその構築方法を提供するものである。
土砂や岩石、コンクリート、廃材などを適宜くみあわせて、地盤レベルより高く盛り上がるように造成した人工丘陵の上面に避難場所を設定するものである。
この人工丘陵は、三角形を含む多角錐形でこうせいされ、そのひとつの角部が津波の来襲に対し先行する側に方向付けられている。
本発明との違い
本発明は、人工丘陵ではなく、人が居住できる建築物が主たる対象である。また、人工丘陵の形状が三角錐であるのに対し、本発明は立柱を用いる。同じ面積あたりの避難民の数は、立錐より立柱の方が多く収容できるので、多くの人の命を救出でき、本発明のメリットは大きい。
特開平9−184323 高架式金属建造物 この特許は津波災害に備えた避難棟としての高架式建造物である。
本特許との違い
鋭角の角で津波を受けていない。このため、津波対策が十分とは言えない。
本特許は、海岸よりの津波を鋭角の建造物で受けるので、津波のエネルギーをまともに受けないで、建築物や構造物の倒壊を防ぐことができる。
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2006-342648 Evacuation equipment against tsunami and the like The present invention provides a blame for a tsunami or the like and a method for constructing it, which can easily provide an evacuation site by selecting a nearby place such as a park or a square in the town.
An evacuation site is set on the upper surface of an artificial hill that is constructed so that it rises above the ground level by appropriately combining earth and sand, rocks, concrete, and waste materials.
This artificial hill is shaped like a polygonal pyramid that includes a triangle, and one corner of the hill is directed to the side leading to the tsunami attack.
Difference from the present invention The present invention is mainly intended for buildings where people can live, not artificial hills. In addition, while the shape of the artificial hill is a triangular pyramid, the present invention uses a standing pillar. Since the number of evacuees per area is larger than that of a vertical cone, the number of evacuees can be accommodated, so that the lives of many people can be saved, and the advantages of the present invention are great.
JP-A-9-184323 Elevated metal building This patent is an elevated building as an evacuation wing in preparation for a tsunami disaster.
Unlike this patent, the tsunami was not received at an acute angle. For this reason, tsunami countermeasures are not sufficient.
Since this patent receives the tsunami from the coast in an acute-angle building, it can prevent the collapse of the building or structure without receiving the tsunami energy properly.

津波来襲時および引き波時に、建築物や構造物の倒壊や破損を防ぐ。
そのことにより、建築物に避難してきた人々に、安全な避難場所を提供する。
防災センターがそのひとつの例である。
また、防災センター等の施設は、通常時には、事務所や、住居、駐車場として利用できる。
Prevents buildings and structures from collapsing and breaking during tsunami strikes and waves.
This provides a safe haven for people who have evacuated to buildings.
The Disaster Prevention Center is one example.
In addition, facilities such as disaster prevention centers can be used as offices, residences, and parking lots during normal times.

請求項1.
地下深く杭を打ち、その上に強固に建築物や構造体を配するので、津波が来襲しても押し流されない。
菱形の立柱、ないしは、2つの鋭角を持った多角形の立柱とする。例、六角柱。
また、建築物や構造体の一方の角部の鋭角を津波、が海からないしは川下から押し寄せる方向に向けてある。
このため、津波の来週時に水圧をまともに受けない。
また、津波の引き波、戻り波が来ても、水圧を逃すように、他方の鋭角を、山側ないし陸側、ないしは河川の上流に向けてあるので、引き波時にも水圧の抵抗を減少させ、建築物や構造体の倒壊を免れることができる。
Claim 1.
Because piles are struck deep underground and buildings and structures are firmly placed on top of them, they will not be swept away by the tsunami.
It is a diamond-shaped vertical pole or a polygonal vertical pole with two acute angles. Example, hexagonal column.
Moreover, the acute angle of one corner of the building or structure is directed in the direction in which the tsunami pushes from the sea or from the downstream.
For this reason, the water pressure is not properly received next week after the tsunami.
Also, even if a tsunami pulling wave or return wave comes, the other sharp angle is directed toward the mountain side, land side, or upstream of the river so that the water pressure is released, so the resistance of the water pressure is reduced even during the pulling wave. Can avoid the collapse of buildings and structures.

建築物の側面に窓を設け、通常時は、事務所や居住空間として利用できる。
東日本大地震では、建物の3階くらいまで、津波が押し寄せた。このことより、防災センター等では、5階建てくらいの高さが、安全な避難場所、防災センター用建築物として必要なことが分かる。
Windows are provided on the side of the building, and it can be used as an office or living space in normal times.
The Great East Japan Earthquake caused a tsunami to reach the third floor of the building. From this, it can be seen that disaster prevention centers etc. require a height of about 5 stories as a safe evacuation site and building for disaster prevention centers.

請求項2
東日本大地震では、鉄筋コンクリートのビルが、津波の引き波により倒壊した。
これは、ビルの倒壊した方向を調査して分かったことである。すなわち、津波来襲時より、津波の引き波時のほうがはるかに多大な水圧が掛かることが分かった。
一例の調査では、ビルに3000トンの引き波の水圧が掛かってビルが倒壊したという調査結果がある。
理想的には、建築物や構造物の、海に向けた鋭角も、山に向けた鋭角も、十分急峻にすることが望ましい。30度以下等。
でも、現実には、地面の制約があり、両方とも急峻な鋭角とすることが、難しい場合もあろう。このように、建築物や構造体の地面の長さが十分確保できない場合、該鋭角の角度を津波来襲時用と、引き波時用とで、変えてやることがより安全な建築物や構造体の設計に必要になってくる。
すなわち、津波の引き波時用の該鋭角を、海からの津波来襲時用の該鋭角よりもより急峻にしてやることが、設計上望ましい。
Claim 2
In the Great East Japan Earthquake, a reinforced concrete building collapsed due to the tsunami.
This is the result of investigating the direction in which the building collapsed. In other words, it was found that much more water pressure was applied during the tsunami wave than during the tsunami attack.
In one example survey, there was a survey result that the building collapsed due to the water pressure of 3000 tons of wave.
Ideally, it is desirable that the acute angle toward the sea and the acute angle toward the mountain of the building or structure are sufficiently steep. 30 degrees or less.
However, in reality, there are restrictions on the ground, and it may be difficult to make both sharp angles. In this way, when the length of the ground of the building or structure cannot be secured sufficiently, it is safer to change the acute angle between the time of the tsunami attack and the time of the tsunami. It becomes necessary for the design of the body.
That is, it is desirable in design that the acute angle for the tsunami pulling is made steeper than the acute angle for the tsunami attack from the sea.

請求項3
既に述べたように、建築物ないしは構造体が津波の水圧をできるだけ受けないようにするには、該鋭角をできるだけ急峻にしてやればよい。急峻にするには、細長い地面が必要となる。
場所によっては、細長い土地の確保が難しいこともあろう。
海側に向けた鋭角、山側に向けた鋭角の両方とも急峻な鋭角を敷地のスペースの制約上できない場合は、建築物または構造体の下部に大きな開口部を複数個設け、その開口部を津波の水の流水経路とすることで、建築物や構造体が受ける水圧を減らすことができる。すなわち、建築物が津波の水の流れをそらすのではなくて、建築物の中を通過させることにより、津波の水圧を受け難くするのである。
Claim 3
As described above, in order to prevent the building or structure from receiving the tsunami water pressure as much as possible, the acute angle may be made as steep as possible. To make it steep, an elongated ground surface is required.
Depending on the location, it may be difficult to secure a narrow land.
If both the sharp angle toward the sea side and the sharp angle toward the mountain side are not sharp due to space constraints on the site, multiple large openings are provided at the bottom of the building or structure, and the openings are tsunami By using this water flow path, the water pressure received by buildings and structures can be reduced. That is, the building does not divert the water flow of the tsunami but makes it difficult to receive the water pressure of the tsunami by passing through the building.

請求項1.
建築物の外観の状を菱形の立柱とすることで、狭い占有面積のスペースで、多数の避難者を収容できる。
また建築物の外観の状を六角柱とすることで、大きな防災センター等の建築が可能となる。
Claim 1.
By adopting a diamond-shaped vertical pillar as the exterior appearance of the building, a large number of evacuees can be accommodated in a space with a small occupation area.
Moreover, construction of a large disaster prevention center etc. is attained by making the external shape of a building into a hexagonal column.

津波の水は建築物や構造体の鋭角を含む立柱により掻き分けられ、水圧を受け流すため、津波の水圧の抵抗を小さくできる。よって、建築物や構造物の倒壊を防ぐことができる。The water of the tsunami is scraped by a vertical pillar including the acute angle of the building or structure and receives the water pressure, so that the resistance of the water pressure of the tsunami can be reduced. Therefore, the collapse of a building or a structure can be prevented.

該鋭角をそれぞれ海側と山側の両方にむけることにより、津波の来襲時も、引き波時にも、建築物や構造物の受ける津波の水圧を大幅に減らすことができる。By opening the acute angle to both the sea side and the mountain side, it is possible to greatly reduce the water pressure of the tsunami that the building or structure receives, both during and after the tsunami.

請求項2.
長細い敷地が確保しにくい地面に建築物を構築する場合、海側の該鋭角を、山側の鋭角より緩慢にすることで、それほど細長い土地でなくとも、津波対策用建築物の構築が、可能となる。
Claim 2.
When building a building on the ground where it is difficult to secure a long and narrow site, it is possible to build a tsunami countermeasure building even if it is not so long by making the sharp angle on the sea side slower than the sharp angle on the mountain side. It becomes.

請求項3.
更に、細長い所望の土地が手当てできない場合、建築物の下部に、大きな開口部を設けることにより、開口部に津波の水の一部を通過させることにより、津波の水圧を建築物がそらすことができ、建築物の倒壊を防ぐことができる。
Claim 3.
In addition, if the desired long and narrow land cannot be covered, the building can divert the water pressure of the tsunami by providing a large opening at the bottom of the building and passing a portion of the tsunami water through the opening. And can prevent the collapse of the building.

は、請求項1の説明図Is an explanatory diagram of claim 1 は、その平面図The top view は、請求項1の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 1. は、請求項1の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 1. は、請求項1の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 1. は、その平面図The top view は、請求項1の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 1. は、その平面図The top view は、請求項1の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 1. は、請求項2の実施例の平面図を示す。These show the top view of the Example of Claim 2. FIG. は、請求項2の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 2. は、請求項2の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 2. は、その平面図The top view は、請求項3の実施例を示す。Shows an embodiment of claim 3.

図1は、請求項1に関する建築物、構造体の説明図である。
図2は、その平面図である。
図3は、請求項1の実施例で、外観が菱形の立柱のもの。5階建ての例。
防災センターに最適な実施例である。小規模には、個人の居宅にも適用できる。
出入り口は、水圧をまともに受けさせないために鋭角部を避けて設置するのが好ましい。
図4は、請求項1の実施例で、外観が菱形の立柱のもので、下部にのみに窓がついている。4階と5階は避難用の階で、安全性を考慮して窓をつけていない。
図5は、請求項1の実施例で、外観が六角柱の建築物。
図6は、その平面図
図7は、請求項1の実施例で、外観が五角柱の建築物の例。山の傾斜の方向に合わせて鋭角の方向を設定すると六角形より五角形の方が都合がいい場合がある。
引き波の水圧のかかる方向に、鋭角の方向を一致させることができる場合等に適用する。
図8は、その平面図
図9は、請求項1の実施例で、構造物の例。橋の橋脚に本発明を適用したもの。
この構造体は、六角柱である。
橋脚は、鉄筋コンクリートで作り、本発明の鋭角部分は、欄干の幅の外側に配置する。鋭角部分は、川底より、欄干の下部までの高さを維持して作造する構造物とする。このことにより、津波や暴風雨時を含め、急峻な水流の水圧から、橋脚を守ることができる。
図10は、請求項2の実施例で、平面図を示す。
図11は、請求項2の実施例で、外観が菱形の変形で、立柱の建築物を示す。
図12は、請求項2の実施例で、外観が六角形で、角柱の建築物の例を示す。
図13は、その平面図
図14は、請求項3の説明図で、外観が菱形で角柱の建築物の実施例を示す。
開口部に津波の水が流入、流出して、建物への水圧を減少させている。平常時は、開口部の内部は、駐車場等に利用できる。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of a building and a structure related to claim 1.
FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof.
FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of claim 1, which has a diamond-shaped standing pillar. Example of 5 stories.
This is the most suitable example for a disaster prevention center. On a small scale, it can also be applied to private homes.
The entrance / exit is preferably installed away from sharp corners in order not to receive the water pressure properly.
FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, which has a rhombus-like appearance and has a window only at the bottom. The 4th and 5th floors are for evacuation and are not equipped with windows for safety reasons.
FIG. 5 is an embodiment according to claim 1 and has a hexagonal pillar appearance.
FIG. 6 is a plan view thereof. FIG. 7 is an example of a building whose exterior is a pentagonal column in the embodiment of claim 1. If the acute angle direction is set according to the direction of the slope of the mountain, the pentagon may be more convenient than the hexagon.
This is applied when the direction of the acute angle can be made coincident with the direction in which the water pressure of the pulling wave is applied.
FIG. 8 is a plan view thereof. FIG. 9 is an example of a structure in the embodiment of claim 1. The present invention is applied to a bridge pier.
This structure is a hexagonal column.
The pier is made of reinforced concrete, and the acute angle portion of the present invention is placed outside the width of the balustrade. The acute-angled part shall be constructed to maintain the height from the riverbed to the lower part of the balustrade. This protects the pier from steep water pressures, including during tsunamis and storms.
FIG. 10 is a plan view of an embodiment of the second aspect.
FIG. 11 is an embodiment of claim 2 and shows a standing pillar building with a rhombus-like appearance.
FIG. 12 is an embodiment of claim 2 and shows an example of a prismatic building having a hexagonal appearance.
FIG. 13 is a plan view thereof. FIG. 14 is an explanatory view of claim 3 and shows an embodiment of a building having a rhombus appearance and a prism.
Tsunami water flows into and out of the opening, reducing the water pressure on the building. Under normal conditions, the inside of the opening can be used for a parking lot or the like.

Claims (3)

多数の杭を地中深くに打ち、その上に、それらに強固に固定して、外観がおおむね菱形の立柱、または二つの鋭角をもつ多角形の立柱の、鉄筋コンクリート構造の建築物または構造体を配し、その平面図において、菱形ないしは、多角形の一方の鋭角を、海側ないし低地側、ないしは河川の下流側に向けて配し、他方の鋭角を山側ないし陸地側、ないしは河川の上流側に向けて配することを特徴とする防災用建築物あるいは構造物。A large number of piles are struck deeply into the ground and firmly fixed to them. In the plan view, one acute angle of the diamond or polygon is arranged toward the sea side or lowland side, or downstream of the river, and the other acute angle is mountain side, land side, or upstream of the river. A building or structure for disaster prevention characterized by being placed toward 請求範囲1において、
平面図で、該菱形または該多角形の、山側ないし陸地側、ないしは河川の上流側に向けた該鋭角は、海側ないし低地側、ないしは河川の下流側に向けた該鋭角より急峻であることを特徴とする津波対策用建築物または構造物。
In claim 1,
In the plan view, the acute angle of the rhombus or the polygon toward the mountain side, the land side, or the upstream side of the river is steeper than the acute angle toward the sea side, the lowland side, or the downstream side of the river. A tsunami countermeasure building or structure characterized by
請求項1,2において、
該菱形の立柱または該多角形の立柱の建築物または構造体において、該建築物または構造物の下部の側面に、水の流入、流出用の、複数の大きい開口部を設けることを特徴とする防災用建築物または構造物。
In claims 1 and 2,
In the building or structure of the diamond-shaped standing pillar or the polygonal standing pillar, a plurality of large openings for inflow and outflow of water are provided on a lower side surface of the building or structure. Building or structure for disaster prevention.
JP2011097614A 2011-04-08 2011-04-08 Building and structure for tsunami protection measure Withdrawn JP2012219606A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011097614A JP2012219606A (en) 2011-04-08 2011-04-08 Building and structure for tsunami protection measure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011097614A JP2012219606A (en) 2011-04-08 2011-04-08 Building and structure for tsunami protection measure

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012219606A true JP2012219606A (en) 2012-11-12

Family

ID=47271425

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011097614A Withdrawn JP2012219606A (en) 2011-04-08 2011-04-08 Building and structure for tsunami protection measure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2012219606A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014152462A (en) * 2013-02-06 2014-08-25 Susumu Watanabe Tidal wave evacuation facility having evacuation slope
JP5616508B1 (en) * 2013-09-26 2014-10-29 勝巳 川▲崎▼ Buildings that deal with natural disasters (tsunamis, tornadoes, etc.)
JP2016108901A (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-06-20 純志 吉田 Housing provided with countermeasures against tsunami
EP3722541A1 (en) * 2019-04-08 2020-10-14 Kakhaber Koberidze Water wave resistant building

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014152462A (en) * 2013-02-06 2014-08-25 Susumu Watanabe Tidal wave evacuation facility having evacuation slope
JP5616508B1 (en) * 2013-09-26 2014-10-29 勝巳 川▲崎▼ Buildings that deal with natural disasters (tsunamis, tornadoes, etc.)
JP2016108901A (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-06-20 純志 吉田 Housing provided with countermeasures against tsunami
EP3722541A1 (en) * 2019-04-08 2020-10-14 Kakhaber Koberidze Water wave resistant building

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2006226098A (en) Refuge cage and its work execution method
JP2012219606A (en) Building and structure for tsunami protection measure
JP2007239452A (en) Evacuation device
Dilhani et al. A study of flood risk mitigation strategies in vernacular dwellings of Rathnapura, Sri Lanka
JP2012127177A (en) Protective house building
JP4979040B1 (en) Retreat room for measures against tsunami, storm surge and flood
WO2013190755A1 (en) Building doubling as shelter
JP5782655B2 (en) Protective housing
JP2019100173A (en) Emergency Vertical Evacuation Shelter from Natural and Other Man-made Disasters
JP2016053296A (en) Tsunami shelter
JP3226031U (en) Pyramid-shaped structure resistant to tsunami
CN215593860U (en) Protection platform that bank is stealthy
Candigliota et al. Damage to religious buildings due to the Pianura Padana Emiliana earthquake
CN219753132U (en) Balance weight type flood control dike slurry stone masonry wall body safety vertical net and safety structure
Pacheco Evaluation of tsunami loads and their effect on reinforced concrete buildings
JP2012219452A (en) Lifesaving and disaster preventing urban area system strong against huge tsunami
Chock ASCE 7 and the Development of a Tsunami Building Code for the US
Srihari et al. Impact of natural agents on buildings and remedial approach-An overview
Boen Bengkulu & West Sumatra Earthquakes, September 12, 2007, Structural Damage Report
JP2016050456A (en) Building structure with evacuation space
Mallawaarachchi et al. The effects of cyclones, tsunami and earthquakes on built environments and strategies for reduced damage
JP2016196733A (en) Tsunami evacuation facility
Robertson et al. Building cost implications of tsunami design per ASCE 7-16
JP6019488B2 (en) Tsunami protection device for existing or new wooden houses
Parab et al. Innovations in Disaster-Resistant Construction and Practices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20140701