JP2012063842A - Facility inspection system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a facility inspection system capable of judging whether or not each item relevant to a facility for which inspection is implemented is suitably inspected.SOLUTION: A facility inspection system 1 comprises an inspection information DB 11a for associating inspection item information which specifies items to be inspected relative to a facility 2 with inspection identification information which uniquely identifies the inspection items and storing them, and a inspection state judging unit 10a for obtaining the inspection identification information which uniquely identifies inspected items from a RFID tag reader 3 and judging a inspection state at the facility 2 based on the obtained inspection identification information and the inspection item and inspection identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a.

Description

  The present invention relates to an equipment inspection system.

  Various equipment such as elevators, escalators, disaster prevention equipment, etc. need to be inspected regularly in order to maintain and maintain the functions of these equipment. In order to appropriately perform the inspection work of these facilities, specialized knowledge about the structure of the facilities, inspection points, operation procedures, etc. is required. In view of this, a system has been proposed for assisting an operator in appropriately performing maintenance work on equipment.

  For example, an elevator technical support system has been proposed for providing technical support to an operator who installs and maintains an elevator. In this system, a central management device having a technical information file in which technical information of equipment used in an elevator is recorded is provided, and equipment used in the elevator is transferred from a portable terminal owned by an operator to the central management device via a communication line. Is transmitted, the technical information related to the equipment used by the elevator is read from the technical information file and returned to the portable terminal based on the transmitted information (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

JP 2002-205882 A

  By the way, in recent years, the number of inspection items is increasing along with the enhancement of functions of various facilities, but in order to maintain and maintain the facilities, it is required that all inspection items be inspected reliably. The However, in the conventional system as described above, when a request for technical information related to each device used in the elevator is made from the mobile terminal, the technical information is simply read from the technical information file and returned to the mobile terminal. It was difficult for the system to confirm whether or not all inspection items were actually inspected. In addition, it is difficult to determine this on the system side when the inspection is not properly performed, such as missing inspection items or incorrect inspection order.

  This invention is made | formed in view of the above, Comprising: It aims at providing the equipment inspection system which can determine whether each inspection item which should be implemented about equipment was implemented appropriately.

  In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the equipment inspection system according to claim 1 is provided with inspection item information for specifying inspection items to be performed on the equipment, and inspection identification for uniquely identifying the inspection items. Inspection information storage means for storing information in association with each other, inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the inspection items that have been performed is acquired from the inspection terminal, and the acquired inspection identification information and the inspection information storage means are stored in the inspection information storage means. Inspection state determination means for determining an inspection state of the equipment based on the stored inspection item information and the inspection identification information.

  The facility inspection system according to claim 2 is the facility inspection system according to claim 1, wherein the inspection terminal can read the inspection identification information stored in an RFID tag attached to the facility. RFID tag reader.

  Further, the equipment inspection system according to claim 3 is the equipment inspection system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the inspection state determination means is based on inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal. Inspection camouflage determination means for determining the presence or absence of

  The equipment inspection system according to claim 4 is the equipment inspection system according to claim 3, wherein the inspection information storage means stores inspection order information for specifying an order in which the plurality of inspection items should be performed. The inspection camouflage determination means specifies an execution order of inspection items corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination means from the inspection terminal, and is specified by the specified execution order and the inspection order information. Based on the execution order, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment is determined.

  Further, the equipment inspection system according to claim 5 is the equipment inspection system according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the inspection information storage means is an inspection interval between a plurality of the inspection items that are continuously performed. Inspection interval information is stored, and the inspection impersonation determination means acquires inspection time information specifying the time when the inspection terminal acquires the inspection identification information from the inspection terminal, and the acquired inspection time information Based on the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means, the inspection interval between the inspection items carried out continuously is specified, the specified inspection interval, and the inspection interval information The presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment is determined based on the inspection interval specified by the above.

  The facility inspection system according to claim 6 is the facility inspection system according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein the inspection information storage means uniquely identifies an inspector who can inspect the facility. The inspection camouflage determining means stores, from the inspection terminal, equipment information that identifies equipment that has been inspected, and inspector identification information that uniquely identifies the inspector who has performed the inspection. Based on the acquired equipment information, the inspector identification information, and the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information storage means, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment is determined.

  The facility inspection system according to claim 7 is the facility inspection system according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the inspection information storage means stores image information of inspection points for each inspection item. The inspection camouflage determination means corresponds to the image information acquired from the inspection terminal in association with the inspection identification information and the inspection information storage means corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means. The presence or absence of camouflaging in the inspection of the equipment is determined based on the image information stored in the equipment.

  According to the facility inspection system according to claim 1, inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the performed inspection item is acquired from the inspection terminal and stored in the acquired inspection identification information and the inspection information storage means. Since the inspection state of the facility is determined based on the inspection item information and the inspection identification information, it is possible to automatically determine on the system side whether or not each inspection item to be performed on the facility has been appropriately performed.

  According to the facility inspection system according to claim 2, since the inspection terminal is an RFID tag reader capable of reading the inspection identification information stored in the RFID tag attached to the facility, the RFID tag reader does not contact the RFID tag. It is possible to determine whether or not each inspection item to be performed on the facility has been appropriately performed using the inspection identification information easily acquired in (1).

  According to the equipment inspection system according to claim 3, the inspection camouflage determination means determines the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment based on the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination means from the inspection terminal. Identifies that fraudulent acts related to equipment inspections are being carried out, such as pretending that inspections have been carried out in spite of not carrying out inspections, or performing inspections without following appropriate work procedures, A warning to that effect can be output.

  According to the facility inspection system according to claim 4, the inspection camouflage determination means specifies the execution order of the inspection items corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination means from the inspection terminal, and the specified execution order and Because the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of equipment is determined based on the execution order specified by the inspection order information stored in the inspection information storage means, for example, when inspection is performed without following appropriate work procedures In addition, it can be determined that there was a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment.

  According to the facility inspection system of claim 5, the inspection camouflage determination means acquires inspection time information specifying the time when the inspection terminal acquires the inspection identification information from the inspection terminal, and the acquired inspection time information and Based on the inspection identification information obtained from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means, the inspection interval between the inspection items carried out continuously is specified, and the specified inspection interval and the inspection information storage means are stored. The presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of equipment is determined based on the inspection interval specified by the inspection interval information, so that, for example, the necessary work procedure is omitted and the inspection is completed in a short time or unnecessary work is performed. When it is carried out, it can be determined that there has been a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment.

  According to the facility inspection system of claim 6, the inspection camouflage determination means inspects the facility information for identifying the facility that has been inspected and the inspector identification information that uniquely identifies the inspector who has performed the inspection. Based on the acquired equipment information, the inspector identification information, and the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information storage means, the presence / absence of impersonation in the equipment inspection is determined. When inspection is performed by a non-qualified inspector, or when the same inspector is supposed to work on multiple facilities during the same time period, it is determined that there has been a disguise in the inspection of the facility Can do.

  According to the facility inspection system according to claim 7, the inspection camouflage determination means corresponds to the image information acquired from the inspection terminal in association with the inspection identification information and the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means. Therefore, based on the image information stored in the inspection information storage means, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment is determined. For example, the inspection location corresponding to the inspection item is not actually inspected. When the inspection location of the item is not properly photographed, it can be determined that there is a camouflage in the equipment inspection.

It is the schematic which showed the structure of the elevator which is an application object of an equipment inspection system. It is the block diagram which showed functionally the electrical structure of the equipment inspection system which concerns on embodiment. It is the table | surface which illustrated the information stored in inspection information DB. It is the figure which illustrated a mode that the inspection identification information stored in the RFID tag was read by the RFID tag reader. It is the table | surface which illustrated the information stored in the memory | storage means of an RFID tag reader. It is a flowchart of the equipment inspection process performed by the equipment inspection system. It is a flowchart of the equipment inspection process following FIG. It is a figure which shows the display which displayed the flowchart of the work regarding the inspection of an installation. It is a figure which shows the display which displayed the state of each inspection item in the inspection of a "car room."

  Embodiments of an equipment inspection system according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments.

  The facility inspection system according to the embodiment is for performing various controls related to the inspection of facilities. For example, various facilities such as apartments such as apartment buildings, high-rise buildings, commercial facilities, etc., elevators, escalators, disaster prevention facilities, etc. It can be applied to inspection. In the following embodiments, a case where an equipment inspection system is applied to elevator inspection will be described as an example.

(Constitution)
Initially, the structure of the equipment inspection system which concerns on embodiment is demonstrated. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration of an elevator that is an application target of an equipment inspection system. As shown in FIG. 1, the inspection items to be carried out for the elevator include “power receiving panel and control panel” and “winding machine and brake” in the machine room, “speed governor” in the hoistway, and “balance”. "Device", "car door switch" in the car room, and "in-car stop switch", "upper final limit switch" on the car, "door interlock switch (for each floor)", and "balance weight part", There are “buffers and shock absorbers”, “lower final limit switch”, and “cage emergency stop device” in the pit. In addition, the circled numbers in FIG. 1 represent the order in which each inspection item should be performed, and it is necessary to perform each inspection item in the ascending order of each circled number.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram functionally conceptually showing the electrical configuration of the equipment inspection system according to the embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, an RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) tag 20 is attached to the facility 2 (an elevator in the present embodiment) to be inspected. The RFID tag 20 is attached so as to correspond to each inspection item to be performed on the facility 2, and each RFID tag 20 has inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the inspection item corresponding to the RFID tag 20. Stored.

  Inspection identification information stored in each RFID tag 20 can be read by an RFID tag reader 3 as an inspection terminal. The inspection identification information read by the RFID tag reader 3 is input from the RFID tag reader 3 to the upload terminal 40 by connecting the RFID tag reader 3 to the upload terminal 40 of the maintenance company 4. The facility inspection system 1 is connected to the upload terminal 40 via a network 5 such as the Internet, and can communicate with the upload terminal 40. In addition, by concealing the communication method and data structure between the equipment inspection system 1 and the upload terminal 40 and encrypting communication data, unauthorized data is input to the equipment inspection system 1 from terminals other than the upload terminal 40. Can be prevented. A display 12 is connected to the equipment inspection system 1. The display 12 displays and outputs various types of information based on the control of the equipment inspection system 1. For example, a known display such as a liquid crystal display or a plasma display is used.

(Configuration-equipment inspection system)
The equipment inspection system 1 includes a control unit 10 and a data recording unit 11 as shown in FIG.

(Configuration-equipment inspection system-control unit)
The control unit 10 is a control means for controlling the equipment inspection system 1. Specifically, the CPU, various programs interpreted and executed on the CPU (basic control programs such as an OS, and specified by being started on the OS) And an internal memory such as a RAM for storing the program and various data.

  The control unit 10 includes an inspection state determination unit 10a and an inspection camouflage determination unit 10b in terms of functional concept. The inspection state determination unit 10 a is an inspection state determination unit that determines an inspection state in the facility 2. Here, “determination of the inspection state of the facility 2” refers to, for example, determining whether or not work related to the inspection of the facility 2 is appropriately performed, and whether each inspection item to be performed on the facility 2 is performed It shall include determining whether or not. The inspection camouflage determination unit 10b is an inspection camouflage determination unit that determines whether or not the equipment 2 is camouflaged. Here, “impersonation in the inspection of the facility 2” means, for example, pretending that the inspection was performed even though the inspection was not actually performed, or performing the inspection without following appropriate work procedures, etc. It shall indicate an illegal act related to the inspection of the facility 2. Details of processing executed by each component of the control unit 10 will be described later.

(Configuration-Equipment inspection system-Data recording section)
The data recording unit 11 is a recording unit that records a program necessary for control by the control unit 10 and various data, and is configured using, for example, a hard disk (not shown) as an external storage device. However, any other recording medium including a magnetic recording medium such as a magnetic disk or an optical recording medium such as a DVD or a Blu-ray disk can be used instead of or together with the hard disk. The data recording unit 11 includes an inspection information database 11a (hereinafter, the database is abbreviated as DB).

  The inspection information DB 11a is inspection information storage means for storing information related to inspection of the facility 2. FIG. 3 is a table illustrating information stored in the inspection information DB 11a. As shown in FIG. 3, in the inspection information DB 11a, the items “equipment ID”, “equipment type”, “inspector”, “operation”, “inspection item”, “inspection ID”, “inspection order”, “inspection” Information corresponding to “interval” and “image information” is stored in association with each other. Information stored corresponding to the item “equipment ID” is equipment information for specifying the equipment 2 to be inspected (“F001” in FIG. 3). The information stored corresponding to the item “equipment type” is information for specifying the type of each equipment 2 (“elevator type A” in FIG. 3). The information stored corresponding to the item “inspector” is inspector identification information that uniquely identifies an inspector who can inspect each facility 2. For example, qualifications necessary for inspecting each facility 2 are given. The inspector identification information of the inspector having the information is stored (“C0101” in FIG. 3). The information stored in correspondence with the item “operation” is information for specifying the operation related to the inspection of the facility 2, for example, information for specifying the content of the operation (“check worker confirmation” in FIG. 3), each operation The information for specifying the place where the operation is performed ("machine room", "hoistway", etc. in FIG. 3) is stored. The information stored corresponding to the item “inspection item” is inspection item information for specifying an inspection item to be performed on the facility 2. As this inspection item information, for example, information for identifying the object to be inspected for each inspection item (in FIG. 3, “inspector ID”, “power receiving panel and control panel”, “winding machine and brake”, etc.) Used. Information stored corresponding to the item “inspection ID” is inspection identification information for uniquely identifying each inspection item (“0000”, “0001”, etc. in FIG. 3). The information stored corresponding to the item “inspection order” is inspection order information for specifying the order in which a plurality of inspection items should be performed. For example, in FIG. 3, the information stored corresponding to the item “inspection order” is stored. The smaller the number is, the more inspection items should be performed first. The information stored corresponding to the item “inspection interval” is inspection interval information for specifying an inspection interval between a plurality of inspection items that are continuously performed. In FIG. 3, information (for example, “5 minutes”, etc.) for specifying a standard elapsed time from the inspection item in the previous order to the inspection of each inspection item being stored is stored. . The information stored corresponding to the item “image information” is the image information of the inspection location corresponding to each inspection item (in the example of FIG. 3, the file name “0001.jpg” of the image information is stored. ) Each piece of information stored in the inspection information DB 11a is input in advance through, for example, a well-known input unit, the network 5, or the like.

(Flow of equipment inspection)
Next, the flow of equipment inspection will be described. FIG. 4 is a diagram exemplifying how the inspection identification information stored in the RFID tag 20 is read by the RFID tag reader 3. FIG. 4 shows a case where the inspection item “car stop switch” is inspected in the “car room” of the elevator.

  As shown in FIG. 4A, an RFID tag 20 corresponding to the inspection item “in-car stop switch” is attached in the vicinity of the in-car stop switch to be inspected. Here, as shown in FIG. 4B, when the inspector brings the RFID tag reader 3 close to the RFID tag 20, the inspection identification information stored in the RFID tag 20 is read by the RFID tag reader 3. It is stored in the storage means (not shown) of the RFID tag reader 3. Further, based on an input operation or the like via an input means (not shown) provided in the RFID tag reader 3, various types of information relating to inspection are stored in the storage means in association with the inspection identification information.

  FIG. 5 is a table illustrating information stored in the storage unit of the RFID tag reader 3. As shown in FIG. 5, information corresponding to the items “inspector ID”, “facility ID”, “inspection ID”, “date / time”, “mode”, and “image information” is stored in the storage means of the RFID tag reader 3. Are stored in association with each other. The information stored corresponding to the item “inspector ID” is inspector identification information that uniquely identifies the inspector who performed the inspection (“C0113” in FIG. 5). Information stored corresponding to the item “equipment ID” is equipment information that identifies the equipment 2 that has been inspected (“F001” in FIG. 5). Information corresponding to these items “inspector ID” and “equipment ID” is input via the input unit of the RFID tag reader 3 when, for example, the inspection of the equipment 2 to be inspected is started. The information stored corresponding to the item “inspection ID” is inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the inspection item that has been performed (“0001” in FIG. 5), and the inspector can use the RFID tag reader 3 as described above. Is acquired from the RFID tag 20 by bringing it close to the RFID tag 20. However, for the inspection identification information “0000” corresponding to the inspection item for which the RFID tag reader 3 receives the input of the inspector identification information, when the RFID tag reader 3 receives the input of the inspector identification information, the item “inspection ID” Is stored in correspondence with "." The information stored corresponding to the item “date and time” is inspection time information for specifying the time when the RFID tag reader 3 acquires each inspection identification information. For example, when the inspection identification information is acquired from the RFID tag 20, the RFID tag reader 3 Obtained from the internal clock (not shown) of the tag reader 3. The information stored corresponding to the item “mode” is information for specifying the state of each inspection item (“1” in FIG. 5). For example, when acquiring the inspection identification information from the RFID tag 20, the RFID tag reader 3 input means. In the example of FIG. 7, “1” is obtained when the inspection result of the inspection item corresponding to the acquired inspection identification information is normal, and the equipment 2 is adjusted in the inspection of the inspection item corresponding to the acquired inspection identification information. “2” in the case, “3” when the parts of the equipment 2 are replaced in the inspection item corresponding to the acquired inspection identification information, and the inspection result of the inspection item corresponding to the acquired inspection identification information is abnormal. The case where "4" is stored when adjustment of the installation 2 and parts replacement are not performed is illustrated. The information stored corresponding to the item “image information” is image information of the inspection location where the inspection has been performed, for example, image information taken by a built-in camera (not shown) of the RFID tag reader 3 or an external camera. Image information captured by (not shown) and input to the RFID tag reader 3 via a known connection cable or the like (not shown) is stored (“010011.jpg” in FIG. 5). Further, in association with this image information, information specifying the date and time when the image of the image information was taken may be stored in the storage means of the RFID tag reader 3. These pieces of information are sequentially stored in the storage means of the RFID tag reader 3 as shown in FIG. Further, when inspection is performed for different equipment 2, information illustrated in FIG. 5 for each equipment 2 may be stored in the storage unit of the RFID tag reader 3.

  After the inspection work is completed, when the RFID tag reader 3 is connected to the upload terminal 40 of the maintenance company 4, information stored in the storage means of the RFID tag reader 3 is input to the upload terminal 40.

(processing)
Next, processing executed by the equipment inspection system 1 configured as described above will be described. 6 and 7 are flowcharts of equipment inspection processing executed by the equipment inspection system 1 (steps are abbreviated as “S” in the description of each processing below). This equipment inspection process is started, for example, when an instruction input indicating that the equipment inspection process should be executed is made via a known input means (not shown) after the equipment inspection system 1 is turned on. .

  As shown in FIG. 6, when the facility inspection process is started, the control unit 10 acquires information input from the RFID tag reader 3 to the upload terminal 40 via the network 5 (SA1). That is, the control unit 10 acquires information input from the RFID tag reader 3 to the upload terminal 40 after the inspection work is completed via the network 5. In the present embodiment, as an example, information about a series of inspections performed on one facility 2 (information as illustrated in FIG. 5) is acquired from the RFID tag reader 3 via the upload terminal 40 and the network 5. As will be described, information related to inspections performed on a plurality of facilities 2 may be collectively acquired from the upload terminal 40.

  Subsequently, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b identifies the equipment 2 that has been inspected and the inspector who has performed the inspection based on the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 (SA2). Specifically, among the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1, the facility 2 that has been inspected is identified based on the facility information (“F001” in the example of FIG. 5), and the inspector identification information (FIG. 5) is identified. In this example, the inspector who performed the inspection based on “C0113”) is specified.

  Returning to FIG. 6, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines the facility 2 specified in SA2 by the inspector specified in SA2 based on the facility information and the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a illustrated in FIG. It is determined whether or not it is appropriate as an inspector (SA3). In other words, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines that the inspector identification information (“C0113” in the example of FIG. 5) corresponding to the inspector specified in SA2 is the equipment information (in the example of FIG. 5) corresponding to the equipment 2 specified in SA2. The equipment 2 identified in SA2 by the inspector identified in SA2 when included in the inspector identification information stored in association with the item “inspector” in the inspection information DB 11a in association with “F001”) It was determined that it was appropriate as an inspector. In the example of FIG. 3, the inspector identification information “C0113” corresponding to the inspector specified in SA2 is included in the inspector identification information stored corresponding to the item “inspector” in the inspection information DB 11a of FIG. Therefore, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines that the inspector is appropriate.

  Returning to FIG. 6, when the inspector specified in SA2 is not appropriate as the inspector of the facility 2 specified in SA2 (SA3, No), that is, the inspector identification information corresponding to the inspector specified in SA2 is When it is not included in the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a in association with the equipment information corresponding to the equipment 2 specified in SA2, the inspection impersonation determination unit 10b is, for example, by an inspector who does not have appropriate qualifications. It is determined that there has been a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2, such as an inspection has been performed, and information indicating that there has been a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 is output via the display 12 (SA11). After the process of SA11, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  On the other hand, when the inspector specified in SA2 is appropriate as the inspector of the equipment 2 specified in SA2 (SA3, Yes), the inspection impersonation determination unit 10b is based on the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1, It is determined whether or not the inspector specified in SA2 has worked in a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone (SA4). For example, the control unit 10 has acquired the same inspector identification information as the inspector identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of the current equipment inspection process, and has been acquired in SA1 of the equipment inspection process performed in the past. The facility information associated with the inspector identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of the facility inspection process and the inspector identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of the facility inspection process performed in the past. The inspection time specified based on the inspection time information associated with the inspector identification information that is different from the equipment information and is acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of the current equipment inspection processing, and the equipment performed in the past The inspection time specified based on the inspection time information associated with the inspector identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of the inspection processing is within a certain time range (for example, If included in the time limit), inspection impersonation determination unit 10b determines that are supposed to be checker identified in SA2 is working in a plurality of equipment 2 in the same time zone.

  As a result, when the inspector specified in SA2 is supposed to work on a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone (SA4, Yes), the same inspector actually uses a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone. Since it is impossible to perform the inspection work, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines that there is a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2, and displays information indicating that the camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 is present 12 (SA11). Thereafter, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  On the other hand, when the inspector specified in SA2 is not supposed to work on a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone (the inspector specified in SA2 has worked on a single facility 2 in the same time zone) (If SA4, No), the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b identifies the execution order of inspection items based on the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 (SA5). For example, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b sets each inspection identification information included in the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 in ascending or descending order of inspection times specified based on the inspection time information associated with each inspection identification information. By rearranging so as to become, the execution order of inspection items corresponding to each inspection identification information is specified.

  Subsequently, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b performs the inspection execution order based on the execution order specified by the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b in SA5 and the execution order specified by the inspection order information stored in the inspection information DB 11a. Is determined to be appropriate (SA6). That is, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b includes the inspection identification information rearranged in ascending or descending order using the inspection time specified based on the inspection time information as a key in the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1. The order and the order of the inspection identification information rearranged so as to be in ascending order or descending order with the execution order specified by the inspection order information as a key in the information stored in the inspection information DB 11a match each other. It is determined whether or not. For example, when the control unit 10 obtains the information illustrated in FIG. 5 in SA1, the order of the inspection items specified in SA5 based on the information is rearranged in ascending or descending order using the inspection time as a key. The order of inspection identification information) and the execution order specified by the inspection order information stored in the inspection information DB 11a of FIG. 3 in association with the facility information “F001” included in the information (that is, specified by the inspection order information) Compared with the order of inspection identification information rearranged in ascending or descending order using the execution order as a key, the inspection items specified in SA5 correspond to inspection IDs “0006” and “0014” in the execution order. Although the inspection items are not implemented, the execution order of each inspection item itself is based on the inspection order information stored in the inspection information DB 11a of FIG. Due to the consistent as in the order in which they are fixed, inspection impersonation determination unit 10b determines that the order of carrying inspection is appropriate.

  Returning to FIG. 6, if the inspection execution order is not appropriate as a result of the determination in SA6 (SA6, No), it is considered that the inspection work is not performed according to an appropriate work procedure, and therefore the inspection impersonation determination unit 10b. Determines that there has been a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2, and outputs information indicating that there has been a camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 via the display 12 (SA11). Thereafter, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  On the other hand, when the execution order of inspection is appropriate as a result of the determination of SA6 (SA6, Yes), the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b is based on the inspection time information and inspection identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1, The inspection interval between the inspection items carried out continuously is specified (SA7). For example, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b sets the inspection identification information included in the information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 in ascending order of inspection times specified based on the inspection time information associated with the inspection identification information. Then, the inspection interval between inspection items corresponding to each inspection identification information is specified by obtaining a difference between inspection times corresponding to each successive inspection identification information. For example, when the control unit 10 acquires the information illustrated in FIG. 5 in SA1, the inspection interval between the inspection item corresponding to the inspection identification information “0000” and the inspection item corresponding to the inspection identification information “0001” is , “8/26 10:05” and “8/26 10:08” are identified as the difference “3 minutes”.

  Returning to FIG. 6, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b performs a plurality of inspections continuously performed based on the inspection interval specified in SA7 and the inspection interval specified by the inspection interval information stored in the inspection information DB 11a. It is determined whether or not the inspection interval between items is appropriate (SA8). For example, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b associates each inspection interval between the inspection items continuously performed identified in SA7 with the inspection identification information corresponding to the inspection item that has been continuously performed. If the inspection interval between a plurality of inspection items carried out continuously is appropriate when the inspection interval is within a predetermined range (for example, within 5 minutes) from the inspection interval specified by the inspection interval information stored in judge. For example, when the control unit 10 acquires the information illustrated in FIG. 5 in SA1, the inspection interval between the inspection item corresponding to the inspection identification information “0000” and the inspection item corresponding to the inspection identification information “0001” is The difference between “8/26 10:05” and “8/26 10:08” is “3 minutes”, whereas according to the inspection information DB 11a in FIG. The inspection interval from the execution of the inspection item to be performed to the execution of the inspection item corresponding to the inspection identification information “0001” is “5 minutes”, and the difference is 2 minutes. Determines that the inspection interval between a plurality of inspection items performed successively is appropriate.

  Returning to FIG. 6, when the result of the determination of SA8 is that the inspection interval between the plurality of inspection items that are continuously performed is not appropriate (SA8, No), for example, the necessary work procedure is omitted and the time is short. The inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines that the camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 has been camouflaged, and the camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 is performed. Information indicating the presence is output via the display 12 (SA11). Thereafter, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  On the other hand, when the inspection interval between a plurality of inspection items performed continuously is appropriate (SA8, Yes), the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b includes the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1, Based on the image information stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the inspection identification information associated with the image information, it is determined whether or not the inspection location corresponding to each inspection item has been properly photographed (SA9). ). For example, the inspection impersonation determination unit 10b stores, for each inspection item, image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 and image information stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the inspection identification information associated with the image information. Are analyzed using a known image analysis method, and it is determined whether or not both are images obtained by photographing the same object at the same angle. As a result, if the same subject is an image taken at the same angle, it is determined that the inspection location of the inspection item has been properly photographed, and if the same subject is not an image taken at the same angle, It is determined that the inspection location of the inspection item is not properly photographed.

  As a result, if the inspection location corresponding to each inspection item is not properly photographed (SA9, No), for example, the inspection location corresponding to the inspection item may not actually be inspected. The inspection camouflage determination means determines that the camouflage in the inspection of the facility 2 is present, and outputs information indicating that the camouflage in the inspection of the facility 2 is present via the display 12 (SA11). Thereafter, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  On the other hand, when the inspection location corresponding to each inspection item is appropriately photographed (SA9, Yes), the inspection state determination unit 10a is stored in the inspection identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 and the inspection information DB 11a. Based on the inspection item information and the inspection identification information, the inspection state in the facility 2 is determined, and the determination result is output via the display 12 (SA10). Thereafter, the control unit 10 ends the equipment inspection process.

  FIGS. 8 and 9 are diagrams illustrating the display screen of the display 12 in SA10. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the display 12 displaying a flowchart of work related to the inspection of the facility 2. FIG. 9 is a diagram in the inspection of the “car room”. It is a figure which shows the display 12 which displayed the state of each inspection item. For example, when the control unit 10 acquires the information illustrated in FIG. 5 at SA1, the inspection state determination unit 10a includes the inspection identification information acquired by the control unit 10 at SA1 and the facility information acquired by the control unit 10 at SA1. By comparing the inspection identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a in association with the same equipment information, it is determined that the inspection items corresponding to the inspection identification information “0006” and “0014” are not implemented. Further, the inspection state determination unit 10a refers to the inspection information DB 11a of FIG. 3, and the work “car room” including the inspection item “car stop switch” corresponding to the inspection identification information “0006” and the inspection identification information “0014” In the operation “pit” including the inspection item “lower final limit switch” corresponding to “”, it is determined that the inspection item to be performed is not implemented. Then, as information indicating that the inspection items included in these business “car room” and “pit” are not implemented, a flowchart highlighting the business “car room” and “pit” as shown in FIG. To display.

  Further, when the highlighted “car room” is selected via the input means (not shown) on the display screen illustrated in FIG. 8, as shown in FIG. The information indicating the state of each inspection item included in “” is displayed on the display 12. In the example of FIG. 9, information specifying the facility 2 that has been inspected (“facility ID: F001” in FIG. 9), information specifying the inspector who has performed the inspection (in FIG. 9, “inspector ID: C0113”). )), And information for specifying the business to be displayed ("business: car room" in FIG. 9), a table indicating the status of each inspection item is displayed. In this table, the inspection item “car door switch” included in the business “car room” is inspected at 10:33 on August 6th, and the state of the inspection item is mode 3 (part replacement). Information indicating that the inspection has not been performed for the inspection item “in-car stop switch” is displayed.

(effect)
As described above, according to the embodiment, the inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the performed inspection item is acquired from the inspection terminal, the acquired inspection identification information, the inspection item information stored in the inspection information DB 11a, and Since the inspection state in the facility 2 is determined based on the inspection identification information, it can be automatically determined on the system side whether or not each inspection item to be performed on the facility 2 is appropriately performed.

  In particular, since the inspection terminal is the RFID tag reader 3 that can read the inspection identification information stored in the RFID tag 20 attached to the facility 2, the inspection terminal can be easily acquired from the RFID tag 20 by the RFID tag reader 3 without contact. It is possible to determine whether or not each inspection item to be implemented for the facility 2 has been appropriately implemented using the inspection identification information.

  Moreover, since the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b determines the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 based on the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination unit 10a from the inspection terminal, for example, the actual inspection is not performed. Regardless of whether or not an illegal act related to the inspection of the facility 2 is performed, such as making it appear that the inspection has been performed, or performing an inspection without following the appropriate work procedure, a warning to that effect is output. be able to.

  In particular, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b specifies the execution order of inspection items corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination unit 10a from the inspection terminal, and is stored in the specified execution order and the inspection information DB 11a. Since the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 is determined based on the execution order specified by the inspection order information, for example, when inspection is performed without following an appropriate work procedure, impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 is performed. It can be determined that there was.

  Moreover, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b acquires inspection time information specifying the time when the inspection terminal acquires the inspection identification information from the inspection terminal, and the acquired inspection time information and the inspection state determination unit 10a from the inspection terminal. Based on the acquired inspection identification information, the inspection interval between the inspection items performed continuously is specified, and the inspection specified by the specified inspection interval and the inspection interval information stored in the inspection information DB 11a Based on the interval, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the facility 2 is determined. For example, when the inspection is completed in a short time by omitting a necessary work procedure, or when an extra work is performed, It can be determined that there was a camouflage in the inspection.

  Moreover, the inspection camouflage determination unit 10b acquires, from the inspection terminal, facility information that identifies the facility 2 that has been inspected and inspector identification information that uniquely identifies the inspector that has performed the inspection. Based on the information, the inspector identification information, and the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a, the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 is determined. When implemented, or when the same inspector is supposed to work on a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone, it can be determined that there is a disguise in the inspection of the facilities 2.

  The inspection camouflage determination unit 10b is stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the image information acquired from the inspection terminal in association with the inspection identification information and the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination unit 10a. Based on the image information, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2 is determined. For example, the inspection location corresponding to the inspection item is not actually inspected, and the inspection location of the inspection item is appropriately photographed. If not, it can be determined that there is a camouflage in the inspection of the facility 2.

[Modifications to Embodiment]
Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the specific configuration and means of the present invention can be arbitrarily modified and improved within the scope of the technical idea of each invention described in the claims. Can do. Hereinafter, such a modification will be described.

(About problems to be solved and effects of the invention)
First, the problems to be solved by the invention and the effects of the invention are not limited to the above-described contents, and the present invention solves the problems not described above or has the effects not described above. There are also cases where only some of the described problems are solved or only some of the described effects are achieved.

(About distribution and integration)
Further, each of the electrical components described above is functionally conceptual and does not necessarily need to be physically configured as illustrated. In other words, the specific form of distribution / integration of each part is not limited to the one shown in the figure, and all or a part thereof may be functionally or physically distributed / integrated in arbitrary units according to various loads and usage conditions. Can be configured.

(About equipment inspection processing)
In the above-described embodiment, the case where the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 is determined based on the determination results of SA3, SA4, SA6, SA8 in FIG. 6 and SA9 in FIG. Only a part of each of these determinations may be performed, and based on the result, the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the facility 2 may be determined. That is, for example, each process from SA4 in FIG. 6 to SA9 in FIG. 7 is omitted, and the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 is determined based only on the determination result of whether or not the inspector in SA3 in FIG. 6 is appropriate. You may make it do. Further, the order of the determinations of SA3, SA4, SA6, SA8 in FIG. 6 and SA9 in FIG. 7 may be arbitrarily changed. Also, based on a combination of these determination results (for example, based on whether or not there is an impersonation in the inspection of the equipment 2 in two or more of these determinations), there was an impersonation of the inspection It may be determined whether or not to output the information.

  Further, in the above-described embodiment, when it is determined whether or not the inspector is supposed to work on a plurality of facilities 2 in the same time zone in SA4 of FIG. 6, or inspected continuously performed in SA7. In the case of specifying the inspection interval between items, it has been described that the inspection time is specified based on the inspection time information. However, the inspection time may be specified by other methods. For example, when the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 includes information for specifying the shooting time of the image, the inspection time may be specified based on the information.

  Further, in the above-described embodiment, when determining whether or not the inspection location corresponding to the inspection item is appropriately photographed in SA9 in FIG. 7, the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 in FIG. The image information stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the inspection identification information associated with the image information is analyzed using a well-known image analysis method, and both of them photograph the same object at the same angle. Although the case where it is determined as an example whether or not the inspection location is appropriately photographed based on whether or not it is an image has been described as an example, the determination may be performed based on other criteria. For example, the exposure when the image of the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 in FIG. 6 is taken and the image stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the inspection identification information associated with the image information. Based on whether or not the exposure at the time when the image of the information is taken may match, it may be determined whether or not the inspection location has been taken appropriately.

  In the above-described embodiment, in SA10 of FIG. 7, based on the inspection identification information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 of FIG. 6 and the inspection item information and inspection identification information stored in the inspection information DB 11a, Although it has been described that the inspection state in the facility 2 is determined, the inspection state in the facility 2 may be determined based on the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1. For example, the image information acquired by the control unit 10 in SA1 and the image information stored in the inspection information DB 11a corresponding to the inspection identification information associated with the image information are used using a known image analysis method. If there is a difference between the two images after analysis, it may be determined that there is a possibility of failure at a location corresponding to the difference.

(About equipment inspection)
In the above-described embodiment, the case has been described in which the equipment inspection system 1 determines the inspection state of the equipment 2 and the presence / absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment 2, but the equipment inspection system 1 supports the equipment inspection work. May be performed. For example, each piece of information stored in the inspection information DB 11a (for example, inspector identification information of an inspector having a qualification necessary for inspecting each facility 2 and an inspection item for specifying an inspection item to be performed on the facility 2 Information, inspection order information for identifying the order in which a plurality of inspection items should be performed, image information of inspection points corresponding to each inspection item, etc.) may be displayed on a head-up display etc. possessed by the inspector . This makes it possible for the inspector to grasp the qualifications necessary to inspect each facility 2, the inspection items to be performed, the appropriate inspection sequence, the images of the inspection points, etc., and the inspection work can be carried out easily and reliably. You can do support to Moreover, you may provide the information which shows the angle used as the reference | standard which should image | photograph the inspection location. For example, by presenting an image taken from a reference angle for taking an image of an inspection location to an inspector via a head-up display or the like, the image of the inspection location can be taken at the same angle as the image. May be.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Equipment inspection system 2 Equipment 3 RFID tag reader 4 Maintenance company 5 Network 10 Control part 10a Inspection state determination part 10b Inspection camouflage determination part 11 Data recording part 11a Inspection information DB
12 Display 20 RFID tag 40 Upload terminal

Claims (7)

Inspection information storage means for storing inspection item information for specifying inspection items to be implemented on equipment and inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the inspection items, in association with each other;
Inspection identification information for uniquely identifying the inspection item that has been performed is acquired from the inspection terminal, and based on the acquired inspection identification information, the inspection item information and the inspection identification information stored in the inspection information storage means , Inspection state determination means for determining the inspection state in the equipment,
Equipment inspection system comprising. The inspection terminal is an RFID tag reader capable of reading the inspection identification information stored in an RFID tag attached to the facility.
The equipment inspection system according to claim 1. Based on the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means, inspection camouflage determination means for determining the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment,
An equipment inspection system according to claim 1 or 2. The inspection information storage means stores inspection order information that identifies the order in which a plurality of the inspection items should be performed,
The inspection impersonation determination means specifies an execution order of inspection items corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired by the inspection state determination means from the inspection terminal, and is specified by the specified execution order and the inspection order information. Based on the order, determine the presence or absence of camouflage in the inspection of the equipment,
The equipment inspection system according to claim 3. The inspection information storage means stores inspection interval information for specifying an inspection interval between a plurality of the inspection items that are continuously performed,
The inspection camouflage determination means acquires inspection time information specifying the time when the inspection terminal acquires the inspection identification information from the inspection terminal, and the acquired inspection time information and the inspection state determination means include the inspection Based on the inspection identification information acquired from the terminal, specify the inspection interval between the inspection items performed continuously, based on the specified inspection interval and the inspection interval specified by the inspection interval information, Judgment of the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment,
The equipment inspection system according to claim 3 or 4. The inspection information storage means stores inspector identification information that uniquely identifies an inspector who can inspect the equipment.
The inspection camouflage determination means acquires, from the inspection terminal, equipment information that identifies equipment that has been inspected, and inspector identification information that uniquely identifies an inspector who has performed the inspection, and the acquired equipment information, And based on the inspector identification information and the inspector identification information stored in the inspection information storage means, the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment is determined.
The equipment inspection system according to any one of claims 3 to 5. The inspection information storage means stores image information of inspection points for each inspection item,
The inspection camouflage determination means includes
Image information acquired from the inspection terminal in association with the inspection identification information, and the image information stored in the inspection information storage means corresponding to the inspection identification information acquired from the inspection terminal by the inspection state determination means; To determine the presence or absence of impersonation in the inspection of the equipment,
The equipment inspection system according to any one of claims 3 to 6.

Images