JP6147647B2 - Inspection management system, method and program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an inspection management system, method, and program.

  For example, it is necessary not only during the navigation of the ship but also for the ship to navigate in the ship safety law, the law concerning the prevention of marine pollution, etc. The government will inspect that it conforms to the technical standards related to various structures and facilities. In addition, the inspection of the ship is a system in which the ship owner or an inspection application source such as a shipyard on behalf of the ship owner makes an application, an inspection inspection is performed by the inspection organization, and an inspection certificate etc. is issued for the passed ship. It has become.

As an example of a system for managing the schedule of the inspection process, for example, in Patent Document 1 below, ship inspection information is shared online between the inspection application source, the owner, and the inspection organization, and the schedule is adjusted and managed. A system that facilitates this is disclosed.
In addition, as another system for managing the schedule, in Patent Document 2 below, the construction details and success progress information are shared online between the contractor and the owner of a house, a structure, etc., and the schedule adjustment and the presence of the owner are present. A system is disclosed that manages the construction without any comment, manages the comments from the owner, and grasps the entire construction.

JP2013-14559A JP 2001-290866 A

  By the way, in the inspection of a ship, not only the judgment by the shipyard (inspection application source) but also the approval of the ship inspector and the shipowner of the inspection organization must be obtained, and it is very important to manage the results of each judgment It was complicated. In addition, it is known that comments concerning inspections from ship inspectors and ship owners of inspection organizations and comments from ship owners, inspection organizations and shipyards to shipboard equipment manufacturers are very numerous and long-term. , Managing these and dealing with individual comments is very cumbersome, and oversight can lead to serious defects, so it is necessary to manage a large number of inspections and comments. The problem is that the effort and burden are large.

However, in the above-mentioned Patent Document 1, even if the inspection information can be shared among the inspection application source, the shipowner, and the inspection organization, the inspection results of the inspection application source, the shipowner, and the inspection organization over the long-term inspection results and Comments could not be confirmed comprehensively, and management became complicated and the problem of a heavy burden could not be solved.
In addition, in Patent Document 2, although the point of sharing various information between the contractor and the owner is described, the matters to be registered in the construction schedule are not changed between the contractor and the owner. There is no suggestion or disclosure regarding how to manage the inspection results according to the judgments of the shipowner, inspection organization, and shipyard, and the problem that management becomes complicated and burdensome cannot be solved.

  The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and an object thereof is to provide an inspection management system, method, and program that facilitate inspection management of a ship.

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention employs the following means.
In the present invention, at least one of a second user terminal installed in a shipowner and a third user terminal installed in a ship inspection engine and a first user terminal installed in an inspection application source have a communication line. through and being connectable, said vessel an examination management system for managing information relating to the inspection of whether they comply with the technical standards, a display unit, the inspection portion of the marine vessel, of the marine vessel First storage means for storing at least one of an inspection type, an inspection result added to the combination of the inspection location of the ship and the inspection type of the ship, a comment, and a response status to the comment; and An array indicating inspection locations in a predetermined order and an array indicating the order of inspection of the ship's inspection type are displayed in matrix on the display means, the shipowner, the inspection engine, and the It provides a test management system and control means for displaying the inspection information determined in each 査 application source.

  According to the present invention, at least one of the second user terminal installed at the shipowner and the third user terminal installed at the ship inspection engine communicates with the first user terminal installed at the inspection application source. An inspection management system that can be connected via a line and manages information related to the inspection of whether or not a ship complies with the technical standards. The inspection management point of the ship, the inspection type of the ship, At least one of the inspection result, the comment, and the response status of the comment added to the combination of the inspection location and the inspection type of the ship is stored in the first storage means, and the ship read from the first storage means An array showing the inspection locations in a predetermined order and an array shown in the order in which the inspection types of the ships read from the first storage means are inspected are displayed in a matrix. Have been examined result of determination in the original each are shown in the matrix display.

The inspection of whether or not a ship complies with technical standards is an inspection of a large number of items over a long period of time, and because many comments are added by shipowners and inspection organizations (for example, classification societies) Although information to be managed increases, according to the present invention, since the inspection location and inspection type of the ship can be managed in a unified manner by matrix display, the inspection status of the ship can be easily grasped. Conventionally, the inspection is managed for each inspection target apparatus or for each inspection place. However, according to the present invention, the entire inspection can be centrally managed.
The technical standard means that the ship safety law, marine pollution, etc. This is a standard related to the structure, equipment, etc. necessary for a ship to navigate in the laws on prevention, etc., and the inspection of the ship is carried out to ensure compliance. In other words, in order to determine whether the inspection location of the ship and the inspection type of the ship are structures, facilities, etc. that are necessary to maintain the ship's seaworthiness and to ensure the safety of human lives. The items related to the inspection location and inspection type.

  The display means of the inspection management system is preferably provided in the first user terminal and a terminal connected to the first user terminal via the communication line.

  Since the display means is provided in the first user terminal and the second user terminal (or / and the third user terminal), from both the first user terminal and the second user terminal (or / and the third user terminal). Processing is performed by accessing a matrix display of the inspection location and inspection type of the ship, and overall management including both processing can be performed.

  In the inspection management system, the control means adopts the inspection result of the inspection application source as the inspection result by the shipowner when the ship owner is allowed to perform the inspection without the presence of the shipowner. It is good as well.

  If the shipowner approves the reliability of the shipowner and the inspection application source, the shipowner can leave the inspection to the inspection application source and promptly proceed with the inspection by the inspection application source even if the shipowner is absent So it is reasonable.

  In the inspection management system, the control means, when the inspection organization is allowed to carry out the inspection without the presence of the inspection organization, the inspection result by the inspection organization is the inspection result of the inspection application source It is good also as adopting.

  If the inspection body approves the reliability of the inspection body and the inspection application source, the inspection body will leave the inspection to the inspection application source and promptly perform the inspection by the inspection application source without the presence of the inspection body. It is reasonable to be able to proceed.

The first storage means of the inspection management system stores identification information for identifying each of the shipowner and the inspection engine, and information for preventing falsification corresponding to each of the shipowner and the inspection engine. The inspection includes a plurality of inspection types, and when the inspection of one inspection type is completed, the inspection of the next inspection type can be started, and the control means , and the identification information, if the correct combination of the previous SL information for falsification prevention has been detected, it is preferable to determine that the completion status of the test type one.

  Only when the combination of the identification information that can identify the shipowner and the inspection organization matches the information for preventing falsification, the inspection of one inspection type can be completed, so the inspection application for inspection of each inspection type Tampering by the original can be prevented, and reliability from the shipowner side is ensured. As a result, the inspection body permits the inspection to be entrusted to the inspection application source, and the inspection that does not require the presence of the inspection body can be performed more smoothly.

In the inspection management system, at least one of the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the third user terminal has a local second storage unit, and the first user terminal, the second user terminal, Among the user terminal and the third user terminal, those having the local second storage means are connected to the communication line so as to be communicable, and the inspection location of the ship acquired from the first storage means And the information including the inspection type of the ship is stored in the second local storage means, and when the communication line is not communicably connected, the information stored in the second second storage means is stored. reading the test type of inspection point and the vessels of the display unit ship to the matrix display, the matrix display is the test result added to the comment, At least one of the corresponding conditions for fine the comment may be stored in the second storage means.

  As a result, when the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the third user terminal are connected to the communication line and come online, the first user terminal acquires the latest information from the first storage means, and the local second storage means By storing the information in the second storage means, even if the information is not obtained from the first storage means because it is disconnected from the communication line and is offline, The inspection location of the ship and the inspection type of the ship can be displayed in a matrix, and the inspection can proceed smoothly.

In the inspection management system, when an inspection is performed by the inspection organization or the shipowner and the inspection of one inspection type is incompatible, the inspection is performed based on a re-inspection application command by the inspection application source. It is good also as providing the re-inspection application means to apply for a re-inspection to an engine or the said ship owner.
As a result, even if there is a non-conforming inspection, a re-inspection can be performed promptly.

  The said control means of the said inspection management system is good also as acquiring the progress information of the construction process of the said ship, and outputting the said schedule of the said inspection of the said ship to the said display means based on the acquired said progress information.

  If there is an inspection associated with the progress of the construction process of the ship, it is displayed as a state in which the inspection proceeds according to the progress of the construction, so that it is easy to determine whether or not to proceed with the inspection.

In the present invention, at least one of a second user terminal installed in a shipowner and a third user terminal installed in a ship inspection engine and a first user terminal installed in an inspection application source have a communication line. through being communicable connection, a test management method for managing information relating to the inspection of the vessel technical standards determination, inspection points of the ship, exam type of the ship, inspection points of the marine vessel A process of storing at least one of an inspection result, a comment, and a response status corresponding to the comment added to a combination of the inspection type of the ship and an array indicating the inspection points of the ship in a predetermined order the sequences shown in the sequence to check the inspection type of the ship, to a matrix display in Viewing means, the ship owners, the test engine, and is determined by each of the inspection application source inspection It provides a test management method having the steps of indicating the distribution in the matrix display.

In the present invention, at least one of a second user terminal installed in a shipowner and a third user terminal installed in a ship inspection engine and a first user terminal installed in an inspection application source have a communication line. through being communicable connection, a test management program for managing information in which the vessel is related to the examination of whether they comply with the technical standards, inspection points of said vessels, exam type of the ship, A process for storing in the storage means at least one of an inspection result added to the combination of the inspection location of the ship and the inspection type of the ship, a comment, and a response status to the comment, and is read from the storage means The inspection points of the ship are arranged in a predetermined order, the inspection types of the ship read from the storage means are arranged in the order of inspection, and a matrix table is displayed on the display means. It is allowed to provide the owners, the inspection agencies, and inspection management program for executing the processing for indicating the checking information determined by each of the inspection application source to the matrix display on the computer.

  According to the present invention, there is an effect that inspection management of a ship can be facilitated.

It is a figure showing the whole inspection management system composition concerning the present invention. It is the block diagram which showed an example of the hardware constitutions of the test | inspection management apparatus which concerns on this invention. It is the functional block diagram which expanded and showed the function with which the inspection management device concerning the present invention is provided. It is the figure which showed an example of the initial screen shown by the test | inspection management system which concerns on this invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the inspection list of the day shown by the inspection management system concerning the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the inspection application presented by the inspection management system concerning the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the FAT schedule and the FAT test result which are shown by the test management system concerning the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the information of the yard attendance inspection, FAT result management, and comment management which are shown by the inspection management system concerning the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the information of comment management presented by the inspection management system concerning the present invention. It is an example of a screen of a test index presented by the inspection management system according to the present invention. It is an example of a screen which displays in a matrix the examination types and examination locations presented by the examination management system according to the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the inspection schedule shown by the inspection management system concerning the present invention. It is an example of a management screen of nonconformity management presented by the inspection management system according to the present invention. It is the example of a screen which showed the block inspection list shown by the inspection management system concerning the present invention.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of an inspection management system and method and a program according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  The inspection management system according to the present embodiment is a system that manages information related to a conformity judgment inspection (hereinafter simply referred to as “inspection”) as to whether or not a ship conforms to technical standards. Here, the technical standard means that the ship safety law, marine pollution, etc., and maritime disasters, from the ship design / manufacturing stage to the abandoned ship in order to maintain the ship's seaworthiness and ensure the safety of human lives. This is a standard related to the structure, equipment, etc. necessary for a ship to navigate in the law concerning the prevention of accidents, and the inspection of the ship is carried out to ensure compliance.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the inspection management system 1 has at least a first user terminal 2a installed at an inspection application source (for example, a shipyard) and a second user terminal 2b installed at a shipowner's office, There may be a third user terminal 2c installed in a ship inspection organization (for example, a classification society), and there may be fourth and subsequent user terminals for a plurality of inspection organizations. The inspection management system 1 includes a ship inspection management device (hereinafter referred to as “inspection management device”) 3. In FIG. 1, one each of the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c is shown, but the number of installed user terminals is not particularly limited. For example, the first user terminal 2a may be installed in each related department in the inspection application source.

  In the inspection management system 1, at least one of the second user terminal 2b and the third user terminal 2c and the first user terminal 2a can be connected via a predetermined communication line 4 such as the Internet. In the present embodiment, in the inspection management system 1, the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, the third user terminal 2c, and the inspection management device 3 are connected so as to be able to exchange information. Will be described.

  In addition, the inspection management system 1 according to the present embodiment is connected to other devices that handle information related to the inspection of the ship so as to be able to exchange information. For example, the inspection management device 3 manages the inspection support system 5 that adjusts the schedule of inspection of the ship, the self-management system 6 that manages the results of the self-inspection and in-house inspection of the ship, and the progress information of the construction of the ship. The progress management system 7 is connected to a drawing approval system 8 for managing the drawings via the communication line 4.

The first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c are, for example, general-purpose computers such as a personal computer, and each has an input unit (not shown) such as a keyboard and a mouse, and a local local storage unit (not shown). (Second storage means) 37 and a display section (display means) 38 for displaying information related to the examination.
The display unit 38 outputs a matrix display of the inspection location of the vessel and the inspection type of the vessel, which is instructed from the control unit 32 (details will be described later) of the inspection management device 3.
In addition, in this embodiment, although the display part 38 is arrange | positioned at the 1st user terminal 2a, the 2nd user terminal 2b, and the 3rd user terminal 2c, it is good also as providing in the test | inspection management apparatus 3 mentioned later. .

  When the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c are in an electrically connected state and communicable with the inspection management device 3 via the communication line 4 (online), the inspection management is performed. While exchanging information with the apparatus 3, ship inspection information acquired from the inspection management apparatus 3 (for example, ship inspection location, ship inspection type, and inspection results and progress) is locally stored in the local storage unit 37. To store. Further, based on the local data, the display section 38 displays the inspection points of the ship and the inspection types of the ship in a matrix (online state).

In addition, when the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c are electrically disconnected from the inspection management device 3 and cannot communicate (offline), the local local storage unit The inspection information stored in 37 is read out, and the inspection portion of the ship and the inspection type of the ship are displayed in a matrix on the display unit 38 based on the read local data (offline state).
Here, the matrix display means that an array showing the inspection points of the ship in a predetermined order and an array showing the order of inspection of the ship's inspection type are displayed in a matrix, and the inspection corresponding to the intersection is made. It shows the information and situation of the.

In addition, when the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c perform the inspection in an offline state, the inspection result, the comment, the response status for the comment, and the like are temporarily stored locally. The test result stored in the storage unit 37 and then stored in the local storage unit 37 is transmitted to the test management apparatus 3 when the online state is entered.
Note that the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c transmit inspection results to the inspection management device 3 and register the inspection results in the database 31 of the inspection management device 3. It is preferable that each terminal user must be required to input a personal identification number such as a PIN code.

  The terminals of the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c are not particularly limited, but in the present embodiment, these terminals are portable terminals (for example, tablet computers). In the following description, each portable terminal is provided with each function. In addition, the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c may be connected to the communication line 4 by wired connection (for example, Ethernet (registered trademark)), A wireless connection (for example, wireless LAN) may be used, and the communication form is not particularly limited.

  For example, the first user terminal 2a is a user terminal used in a ship, but the ship itself is a material that does not easily propagate radio waves such as iron (or is shielded). If the connection is a wireless connection, it may go offline unintentionally depending on the location. For this reason, the first user terminal 2a is used in an online state in the area where the first user terminal 2a is capable of wireless communication, and the inspection result is temporarily stored in the local storage unit 37 in the area where the wireless communication is not possible. When the first user terminal 2 a moves to an area where wireless communication is possible, the first user terminal 2 a is brought into an online state, and information on the inspection result stored in the local storage unit 37 is transmitted to the inspection management device 3. As described above, by temporarily storing the inspection information and the inspection result in the local storage unit 37, the inspection can be performed even in a situation where the communication environment is not prepared, so that the inspection is smoothly advanced.

The inspection support system 5 includes an inspection support device and an inspection support database.
The inspection support apparatus is an apparatus that supports the inspection of the ship, and particularly supports operations such as inspection application for the ship and adjustment of the schedule of the inspection that has already been registered.
The inspection support database stores, for example, information related to a ship inspection application input from the first user terminal 2a on the inspection application input screen.

The self-management system 6 manages information on processes of self-inspection such as block inspection, pipe inspection, and paint inspection, and inspection before shipping (hereinafter referred to as “in-house inspection”).
The progress management system 7 manages the progress information of the ship construction, and provides the progress information for determining whether or not the inspection management system 1 can proceed with the inspection.
The drawing approval system 8 is a system for managing a drawing approval status (approval approval completed, approval completed, and commented).

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of the inspection management apparatus 3 according to the present embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 2, the inspection management apparatus 3 according to the present embodiment is a computer system (computer system), which includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 11 and a main storage device 12 such as a RAM (Random Access Memory). , An auxiliary storage device 13, an input device 14 such as a keyboard and a mouse, an output device 15 such as a display and a printer, and a communication device 16 that exchanges information by communicating with external devices.
The auxiliary storage device 13 is a computer-readable recording medium, such as a magnetic disk, a magneto-optical disk, a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, or a semiconductor memory. Various programs are stored in the auxiliary storage device 13, and the CPU 11 reads out the programs from the auxiliary storage device 13 to the main storage device 12 and executes them to implement various processes.

  The inspection management apparatus 3 stores a program for managing inspections (inspection management program), and by executing this program, it generates various screens showing the inspection results of the ship, via the communication line 4. The first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, the third user terminal 2c and the like are transmitted to the user terminals that have requested them. Thereby, it is possible to display various screens related to the examination described later on the display unit 38 of the user terminal requested by the first user terminal 2a, the second user terminal 2b, and the third user terminal 2c.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the inspection management apparatus 3 includes a database (first storage unit) 31, a control unit (control unit) 32, a re-inspection application unit (re-inspection application unit) 33, and It has.

  The database 31 stores the inspection location of the ship, the inspection type of the vessel, the inspection result added to the combination of the inspection location of the vessel and the inspection type of the vessel, the comment, the response status to the comment, and the like. For example, the inspection point of the ship and the inspection type of the ship are information input when the inspection application for the ship is applied from the first user terminal 2a or the like, and for the combination of the inspection point of the ship and the inspection type of the ship The comment to be added is information input from the second user terminal 2b or the third user terminal 2c in the case of witness inspection by the shipowner or inspection organization, and the response status to the comment is input from the first user terminal 2a by the shipyard. Information.

Further, the database 31 stores identification information (for example, a user ID and a user's name) for identifying each of the inspection application source, the shipowner, and the inspection organization, and information for preventing falsification corresponding to each. . In the present embodiment, the tampering prevention information is a personal identification number (PIN) code or the like, but is not particularly limited.
In the present embodiment, the database 31 is described as being provided in the inspection management apparatus 3, but may be provided so as to be connected to the inspection management apparatus 3 so as to be able to exchange information.

  The control unit 32 causes the display unit 38 of the user terminal to display a matrix on the display unit 38 of the array indicating the inspection points of the ship in a predetermined order and the array indicating the inspection type of the ship. The display contents in the matrix display are made different according to the inspection result determined by each of the inspection application sources and the progress of the inspection. Matrix display is an array that displays the inspection locations of the ship in a predetermined order and the array that is indicated in the order of inspection of the inspection type of the ship in a matrix, and the corresponding inspection information or It shows the situation.

  Specifically, the inspection results permitted by the shipowner, the inspection organization, and the inspection application source are indicated by a color (for example, green) or a pattern (for example, shaded display) indicating permission, Conditionally permitted inspection results are indicated by a color (for example, yellow) or pattern (for example, hatched) indicating that they are conditional, and the results of inspections rejected (nonconforming) by the shipowner or inspection agency The matrix is being displayed, such as a color (for example, red) or a pattern (for example, a solid color) to be shown, and a test (for example, white) or a pattern (for example, a solid color) that indicates that the inspection has not been performed. The display contents of the progress (intersection points of the matrix display) of each inspection corresponding to the inspection location and inspection type of the ship are made different. Thereby, the matrix display can present a result visually with respect to the user who confirms the display part 38. FIG. In addition, all inspection application numbers and index numbers can be managed in association with each other.

  Moreover, the control part 32 employ | adopts the inspection result of an inspection application origin as a test result by a shipowner, when the ship owner is permitted to implement a test | inspection without the owner's presence. Specifically, the control unit 32 receives information (for example, a PIN code) for preventing falsification for the shipowner for the target inspection that the shipowner performs discretionary processing in the second user terminal 2b in which the shipowner is logged in. When it is detected that the information has been entered, when the information for preventing falsification (for example, PIN code) of the inspection application source (shipyard inspector) is detected in the inspection application form for the inspection, Is in a completed state.

  Similarly, the control unit 32 adopts the inspection result of the inspection application source as the inspection result by the inspection organization when the inspection organization is permitted to perform the inspection without the presence of the inspection organization. Specifically, the control unit 32 performs falsification for the inspection engine with respect to the target inspection that the ship inspector of the inspection engine performs a discretionary process at the third user terminal 2c in which the ship inspector of the inspection engine is logged in. When it is detected that information for prevention (for example, a PIN code) has been input, information for preventing falsification of the inspection application source (shipyard inspector) in the inspection application for the inspection (for example, When the PIN code is detected, the inspection is completed.

  In addition, when the inspection includes a plurality of inspection types, and the inspection of one inspection type is completed, when the inspection of the next inspection type can be started, the control unit 32 Only when the combination of identification information (for example, user ID) for identifying each of the shipowner and the inspection organization and the corresponding anti-tampering information (for example, a PIN code) of the shipowner and the inspection organization is the same The one inspection type is determined as a completed state. Thereby, in the inspection of each inspection type, falsification by the inspection application source can be prevented, and the reliability from the shipowner side is ensured.

  The re-inspection application unit 33 is inspected by the inspection organization or the shipowner, and when the inspection of one inspection type is nonconforming (rejected), the inspection organization Or apply to the shipowner for re-inspection. Specifically, for inspections that have been judged as “nonconforming” by the shipowner or inspection organization, items (for example, buttons on the screen) for requesting reinspection are prepared in the inspection application form. At the stage where repairs and remanufacturing, etc. in preparation for the above are completed, a request for re-inspection can be made to the shipowner or inspection organization by the inspection application source.

  Next, the operation of the inspection management system 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. In the following description, unless otherwise specified, the inspection (operation) is performed via the first user terminal 2a and will be described as an example of a screen displayed on the display unit 38 of the first user terminal 2a. Is not limited thereto, and may be displayed on the display unit 38 of the second user terminal 2b by performing an operation via the second user terminal 2b, or by performing an operation via the third user terminal 2c. It is good also as displaying on the display part 38 of 3 user terminal 2c.

  When an inspector (user) at the shipyard operates the first user terminal 2a to access the URL of the login screen of the inspection management device 3, the display unit 38 of the first user terminal 2a is provided from the inspection management device 3. A login screen to the inspection management system 1 is displayed. On the login screen, an inspector at the shipyard inputs a user ID and password previously assigned to the inspector, and when user authentication is performed, an initial screen as shown in FIG. 4 is displayed.

  In the initial screen, for example, the menu of the current day inspection list display and online / offline inspection result registration as shown in FIG. 4 "Inspection list of the day", the menu of the inspection schedule "Inspection schedule", "Factory shipment inspection" (FAT (Factor Acceptance Test) test results may be described as “FAT results”), inspection test / history / progress management menu “Test Index” etc. by test matrix The user can select a desired menu.

  When applying for an inspection, the user identifies the ship identification information (for example, ship number, ship name, etc.) from the inspection application input screen (not shown) of the inspection support system 5 via the first user terminal 2a, the inspection date. An inspection application including information such as the inspection start time is created, and an application number (identification number) unique to the inspection is given and recorded in the inspection support database. When the recorded inspection application is shared between the shipyard and the inspection witness (owner or inspection organization), the inspection application is read from the inspection support database and read out to the witness. Information for presenting a document (for example, URL (Uniform Resource Locator for storing information for presenting an inspection application)) is notified by e-mail.

In addition, as information for presenting the inspection application to the witness is notified by e-mail, information related to the read inspection application is recorded in the database 31 of the inspection management device 3.
The second user terminal 2b (or the third user terminal 2c) can display the contents of the inspection application form transmitted from the first user terminal 2a based on the information described in the acquired e-mail. Yes.

  Further, the shipowner (or inspection organization) can access the inspection management device 3 based on the acquired inspection application notification mail and confirm the content of the inspection. Although not shown in FIG. 1, an authentication system is preferably provided between the second user terminal 2 b and the third user terminal 2 c and the inspection management device 3.

  In the first user terminal 2a, when “Same Day Inspection List” is selected from the initial screen as shown in FIG. 4, the inspection of the day is performed from the inspection information of the ship registered in the database 31 of the inspection management device 3. The list of examinations on the day as shown in FIG. 5 is displayed on the display unit 38 of the first user terminal 2a. The “inspection list for the day” is for items whose corresponding date is the inspection date in the refinement area 100, and in the list area 101, the ship number, the inspection date, and the yard associated with the application number unique to the inspection. The inspection location, whether or not to perform discretionary processing, the time, the drawing number related to the inspection, the state of the inspection, etc. are shown.

For example, when a desired inspection date is selected from the narrowed down area 100, information on the inspection in which the selected inspection date is input in the “inspection date” column is extracted from the database 31 of the inspection management device 3 and extracted. Information is displayed in the list area 101.
In the “Status” column, re-inspection that requires re-inspection, closed state that has passed, open that has passed conditionally, untested that has not been inspected, etc. Progress status is shown.

When a “factory shipment inspection” (FAT inspection) is performed by an inspector or the like and the result of the FAT inspection is input, the yard column indicates “factory shipment inspection result” (or “FAT”). When the application number is selected and the result of the yard inspection is input, the application number for the result input indicated as “yard *” (inspection place) in the yard column is selected. When the menu is selected, the inspection application screen is activated, so that the inspector can input the inspection result.
For example, when a desired application number is selected from the application number field of “List of inspections of the day” in FIG. 5 (for example, A ***-*** in the first row is clicked), it is shown in FIG. The inspection application form will be displayed, and the inspection result can be entered. When the inspection result is input to the inspection application form via the first user terminal 2a, it is registered in the database 31 of the inspection management device 3.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. 6, detailed information (for example, ship number or name, inspection type, manufacturer, inspection date, administrator) related to the inspection is displayed in the detail column 200, In the comment column 201, a comment by the shipowner (or inspection engine) and a comment by the shipyard can be input. In the database 31 of the inspection management device 3, by registering in advance the comment content that is estimated to be input as a comment, the user can select the comment content from the pull-down menu in the comment field 201 and easily input the comment. You can also.

In the related area 202, a “drawing system” button and a “QA Evidence” button are provided. When the “drawing system” button is selected, a screen for confirming the drawing approval status in the drawing approval system 8 connected to the inspection management apparatus 3 via the communication line 4 is activated. The drawing approval status can be confirmed on the activated screen.
In addition, when the “QA Evidence” button is selected, a screen for displaying a self-inspection result and an in-house inspection result is activated.

  In the attached file area 203, a file related to the inspection can be stored in association with the inspection application form. For example, when a photograph of a non-conforming part found in the inspection is taken with a camera or the like, the captured image can be attached to the inspection application form as an attached file. Thereby, a common attached file can be shared between the inspection application source and the witness.

In the signature area 204, a field for inputting a confirmation signature for the inspection of the displayed inspection application form is provided. For example, when the shipowner inputs the PIN code of the shipowner who will be the signature in the sign field and selects the “sign” button, the inspection by the shipowner is completed and the shipowner is allowed to enter the state.
Only when the correct PIN code corresponding to the login user ID entered on the login screen of the examination management apparatus 3 is entered, the user is authenticated.
In addition, if the inspection is conducted only by the shipyard inspector and the shipowner or the inspection organization is absent, the inspection application will be temporarily stored by selecting the “Absence” button. Alternatively, an inspection application form is stored as a status in which the inspection contents should be confirmed by the inspection organization.

By selecting a “temporary save” button in the button area 205 shown in the upper part of the window in FIG. 6, the information input in the inspection application form can be temporarily saved locally. At this stage, the information of the inspection application form is transmitted to the inspection management device 3 and temporarily stored.
When the “lock” button in the button area 205 is selected and a PIN code is entered, the contents of the inspection application form are temporarily saved locally, the inspection application form cannot be edited, and data for the inspection application form can be entered. Access restrictions can be applied. For example, at the timing when the shipowner or ship inspector of the inspection organization is absent due to a break in the middle of the inspection, the user selects the “lock” button to prevent tampering of the inspection application during the break Can do.

When the “unlock” button is selected and the same PIN code as when the lock is set is input, the inspection application form temporarily saved is read from the local storage unit 37, and the access restriction is thereby released. .
When the lock is set, only the PIN code can be entered, and the inspection application cannot be edited. For this reason, only the user having the correct PIN code can perform the lock release, leading to a security measure.

When the control unit 32 detects that a PIN code has been input by three persons, a shipyard inspector, a shipowner, and a ship inspector of the inspection organization, the “save” button in the button area 205 can be selected. Is done. When the “save” button is selected by the user, information input to the inspection application form from the operated terminal is transmitted to the inspection management apparatus 3, and the contents of the inspection application form are registered in the database 31 of the inspection management apparatus 3. Is done. Thereafter, the inspection application form stored (saved) in the database 31 is in an uneditable state. This prevents falsification of inspection records and enhances security.
In this way, by providing “temporary storage” to be stored locally and “save” to be stored in the inspection management device 3, the inspection is advanced regardless of whether communication with the communication line 4 is possible or not, and the online state is entered. The inspection result can be transmitted to the inspection management device 3.

  In addition, when the discretion process by the shipowner (or inspection organization) is selected in the discretion processing area 102 of the “inspection list of the day” in FIG. 5, the sign area 204 in FIG. Alternatively, the name (for example, user ID) of the ship inspection inspector and the date when the discretion process is accepted is set. With respect to the target inspection that is to be subjected to discretionary processing, the inspection application form can be “stored” when the sign (PIN code) of the shipyard inspector is detected by the control unit 32.

  When the “FAT result” button on the initial screen is selected in the first user terminal 2a, information related to the FAT inspection is read from the database 31 of the inspection management apparatus 3, and the FAT schedule and the information shown in FIG. The inspection result is displayed on the display unit 38. In the FAT schedule and inspection result screen, the application number for the inspection of the corresponding ship is associated with the FAT schedule such as the inspection date of the factory shipment inspection.

  In the drawing approval status 300 in the FAT schedule column, it is possible to confirm whether or not the related drawing corresponding to the test item is approved in the drawing approval system 8. In addition, when there is a comment for an inspection or FAT, the comment is input and registered in the database 31 of the inspection management apparatus 3.

  When the “inspection / FAT comment” button is selected on the initial screen (FIG. 4), a screen including information on yard attendance inspection / FAT result management / comment management as shown in FIG. 8 is displayed. It is possible to register a yard answer to a shipowner / class classification comment at the time of a yard inspection and a maker answer to a shipowner / class classification comment at a FAT inspection, and to perform a ship owner approval process. Also, as shown in the status column of FIG. 8, the comments are divided into a plurality of levels such as “serious” and “not serious”. In this case, it has a function to change the response until the termination, such as termination by a yard reply and a manufacturer reply.

In FIG. 8, when an application form number is selected, the result of the inspection corresponding to the application form number is displayed. FIG. 9 shows an example of a yard answer screen. As shown in FIG. 9, FIG. 9 includes shipowner comments and ship class (inspection engine) comments stored in association with application numbers, and yard answers thereto.
In addition, when there is a reply from the shipyard staff to each comment by e-mail, the inspection management device 3 cooperates with the mailer and is described in the “yard reply” column in FIGS. 8 and 9 in the mail. You may make it take in the answer of a shipyard person in charge. There are a wide range of comments regarding inspections and FATs, and there are a large number of comments. By having such a cooperation function with a mailer, it is possible to reduce the troublesome input by the inspector.

  In addition, as shown in FIG. 8, in the witness inspection, when the inspection is passed by the shipowner or the inspection organization, “passed (with or without comment)” is displayed in the determination column 400, and the owner or the inspection is performed. If the inspection is deemed non-conforming by the institution, “Fail” is displayed. When the inspection application form number displayed as “Fail” in the determination column 400 is selected by the user and the fact that the reason for nonconformity has been resolved is input, the inspection application form is registered in the reinspection list. When the inspection application operation is executed from the re-inspection application screen, the inspection management device 3 is assigned a new inspection-specific application number (identification number) and corresponds to the original application number that was rejected. In addition, it is registered in the database 31 of the inspection management apparatus 3.

The information of the inspection that has been re-inspected in this way is obtained by associating the new application number with the original application number in the “inspection list for the day” as shown in the re-inspection list 103 in FIG. The list is displayed.
In addition, in the narrowing down area 401 of FIG. 8, it is possible to narrow down according to the judgment type. For example, by performing a search as “determination: failure”, a list of examinations to be re-inspected can be simply obtained. can get.

  When the “test index” button is selected on the initial screen (FIG. 4), a list of inspection items for each facility and system is displayed as shown in FIG. In the case of a ship, since the same equipment and system are introduced at a very large number of places, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. It can be done. For example, when “shell door” in FIG. 10 is selected, a plurality of inspection types (in FIG. 11) are shown for each “inspection location” where “shell door” is introduced as shown in FIG. (Horizontal axis) is displayed. In this way, a single facility and system is used at a plurality of locations (inspection locations), and management items such that a plurality of types of inspection are performed on each location are complicated. Also, it can be easily managed by a matrix display as shown in FIG.

  Since each inspection is managed by an inspection application form, an inspection application form specific to the inspection is associated with the intersection between the inspection location and the inspection type in the matrix display of FIG. For example, when the mouse cursor is moved to the intersection of the matrix display, the inspection application number is displayed, and the corresponding inspection application can be displayed by clicking the displayed inspection application number.

  In addition, at the intersection between the inspection location and the inspection type, colors and patterns indicating pass and fail are displayed differently depending on the permitted contents of the shipowner, inspection agency, and inspection application source. . For example, as shown in FIG. 11, the items to be inspected are displayed in white in the column, the inspection types that are not subject to the target inspection location are displayed as dots as N / A (not available), and the inspection location Item03 is the shipowner or inspection organization Since the inspection location Item 04 is permitted by the shipyard, shipowner, and inspection organization, the inspection result column is shaded.

  The inspection management apparatus 3 can exchange information with the progress management system 7 that manages the progress of the construction process. For example, the “test index” screen can be linked with the progress management system 7. Specifically, the control unit 32 acquires the progress information of the construction process of the ship, and outputs a schedule for the inspection of the ship to the display unit 38 based on the acquired progress information. For example, when the completion information on the construction process is acquired from the progress management system 7, the control unit 32 can perform inspection by acquiring the completion information so that the inspection result can be input. The intersection point) is made ready for input (for example, the intersection point is displayed in white). Thereby, if there is an inspection associated with the progress of the construction process of the ship, whether or not the inspection can be performed can be confirmed according to the progress of the construction.

When “inspection schedule” is selected on the initial screen (FIG. 4), an inspection schedule screen as shown in FIG. 12 is displayed. On the inspection schedule screen, the inspection schedule for the specified week, month, year, etc. can be confirmed.
In FIG. 4, when NCR (Non-conformity report) is selected, a non-conformity management screen as shown in FIG. 13 is displayed. Here, the contents of nonconformity management other than yard attendance inspection can be confirmed.
In FIG. 4, when “QA Evidence” is selected, information on self-inspection conducted in advance such as block inspection, painting inspection, pipe inspection, and in-house inspection management as shown in FIG. 14 is displayed. It has become. In this way, self-inspection and in-house inspections such as block inspection, coating inspection, pipe inspection, etc. are performed in advance, and quality can be confirmed before receiving an witness inspection.

  As described above, according to the inspection management system 1 and the method and the program according to the present embodiment, among the second user terminal 2b installed in the shipowner and the third user terminal 2c installed in the ship inspection engine. At least one of them and the first user terminal 2a installed at the inspection application source (shipyard) can be connected via the communication line 4, and it is inspected whether the ship complies with the technical standards. Inspection management system 1 for managing information related to the ship, the inspection point of the ship, the inspection type of the ship, the inspection result added to the combination of the inspection point of the ship and the inspection type of the ship, comments, and comments Are stored in the database 31, and the arrangement of the inspection points of the ship read from the database 31 and the inspection type of the ship are inspected in a predetermined order. Sequences represented in the sequence is a matrix display, owners, inspection agencies, and has been test results determined by the respective inspection application source is shown in the matrix display.

Information to be managed because the inspection to determine whether or not a ship conforms to technical standards is an inspection of a large number of items over a long period of time, and many comments are added by ship owners and inspection organizations. However, according to the present invention, the inspection location and the inspection type of the ship can be centrally managed by the matrix display, so that the inspection status of the ship can be easily grasped. Conventionally, the inspection is managed for each inspection target apparatus or for each inspection place. However, according to the present invention, the entire inspection can be centrally managed.
In addition, it is reasonable because both the shipyard inspector, the shipowner and the ship inspector of the inspection organization can access the information of each inspection and proceed with the processing.
Furthermore, the inspection organization permits the inspection to be entrusted to the inspection application source, and the inspection that does not require the presence of the inspection organization can be performed more smoothly.

  In the above embodiment, the content of the inspection registered in the database 31 of the inspection management device 3 uses information acquired from the inspection support system 5, but is not limited to this. For example, the contents of the inspection may be manually registered in advance in the database 31 of the inspection management apparatus 3, or inspection information may be registered in a batch from an inspection list provided separately.

  In addition, this invention is not limited to embodiment mentioned above, In the range which does not deviate from the summary, it can change suitably.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Inspection management system 2a 1st user terminal 2b 2nd user terminal 2c 3rd user terminal 3 Inspection management apparatus 31 Database (1st memory | storage means)
32 Control part 33 Reexamination application part 37 Local memory | storage part (2nd memory | storage means)
38 display

Claims (10)

At least one of the second user terminal installed at the shipowner and the third user terminal installed at the ship inspection organization can be connected to the first user terminal installed at the inspection application source via a communication line. An inspection management system for managing information related to an inspection of whether or not the ship complies with technical standards,
Display means;
Inspection point of the ship, exam type of the ship, the ship inspection point and the ship exam type and is the test result added to the combination of the stores comments, and at least one of the corresponding conditions for the comment First storage means;
An array showing the inspection points of the ship in a predetermined order and an array showing the order of inspection of the ship inspection type are displayed in a matrix on the display means, and the shipowner, the inspection engine, and the inspection application An inspection management system comprising control means for displaying inspection information determined by each original.   The inspection management system according to claim 1, wherein the display unit is provided in the first user terminal and a terminal connected to the first user terminal via the communication line.   The said control means employ | adopts the inspection result of the said inspection application origin as the inspection result by the said ship owner, when the said owner is permitted to implement the said inspection without the said owner's presence. 2. The inspection management system according to 2.   The said control means employ | adopts the inspection result of the said inspection application origin as an inspection result by the said inspection organization, when the said inspection organization is permitted to implement the said inspection without the presence of the said inspection organization. The inspection management system according to claim 3. The first storage means stores identification information for identifying each of the shipowner and the inspection engine, and information for preventing falsification corresponding to each of the shipowner and the inspection engine,
The inspection includes a plurality of inspection types, and when the inspection of one inspection type is completed, the inspection of the next inspection type can be started.
Said control means, said identification information, when it is detected the correct combination of the previous SL information for falsification prevention to claim 4 the exam type one claims 1 determines that the completion status The inspection management system described. At least one of the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the third user terminal has a local second storage means;
Among the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the third user terminal, the one having the local second storage means is connected to the communication line so that it can communicate with the first storage means. Storing the information including the inspection location of the ship and the inspection type of the ship acquired from the local second storage means,
When not communicably connected to the communication line, information stored in the local second storage means is read, and the inspection part of the ship and the inspection type of the ship are displayed on the display means in the matrix form Let
Said matrix displayed as test result added to the inspection management system as claimed in any one of claims 5, wherein the comment, and stores at least one of the corresponding conditions for the comments in the second storage means .   When the inspection organization or the shipowner witnesses an inspection and the inspection of one inspection type is deemed nonconforming, the inspection organization or the shipowner is re-established based on the reinspection application command by the inspection application source. The inspection management system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, further comprising re-inspection application means for applying for inspection.   The said control means acquires the progress information of the construction process of the said ship, Based on the acquired said progress information, the schedule of the said inspection of the said ship is output to the said display means. Inspection management system described in. At least one of the second user terminal installed at the shipowner and the third user terminal installed at the ship inspection organization and the first user terminal installed at the inspection application source are connected via a communication line. An inspection management method for managing information related to the inspection of the technical standard conformity judgment of the ship,
Inspection point of the ship, exam type of the ship, the ship inspection point and the ship exam type and is the test result added to the combination of the stores comments, and at least one of the corresponding conditions for the comment Process,
A sequence showing the inspection points of the marine vessel in a predetermined order, the sequence shown in the sequence to check the inspection type of the ship, to a matrix display in Viewing means, the ship owners, the test engine, and the inspection application An inspection management method comprising: displaying the inspection information determined by each of the original in the matrix display. At least one of the second user terminal installed at the shipowner and the third user terminal installed at the ship inspection organization and the first user terminal installed at the inspection application source are connected via a communication line. An inspection management program for managing information related to an inspection of whether or not the ship complies with technical standards,
Inspection point of the ship, exam type of the ship, and the test results added to the combination of the examination type of the inspection portion of the marine vessel ship, comments, and at least one storage means corresponding situation for the comment Processing to be stored in
The inspection points of the ship read from the storage means are arranged in a predetermined order, the inspection types of the ship read from the storage means are arranged in the order of inspection, and the matrix is displayed on the display means. An inspection management program for causing a computer to execute the process of displaying the inspection information determined by each of the institution and the inspection application source in the matrix display.

Images