JP2012063403A - Inner focus type macro lens with vibration isolating function - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an inner focus type macro lens with a vibration isolating function that corrects an image blur sufficiently even when the maximum photographic magnification is nearly the same magnification, and also corrects various aberrations excellently over the entire photographic area.SOLUTION: The inner focus type macro lens consists of a first lens group L1 with positive refracting power, a second lens group L2 with negative refracting power, a third lens group L3 with positive refracting power, a fourth lens group L4 with negative refracting power, a fifth lens group L5 with negative refracting power, and a sixth lens group L6 with positive refracting power. For focusing from an infinite object to a short-range object, the first lens group L1 is fixed with respect to an image plane, the third lens group L3 moves to an object side while the second lens group L2 moves to an image plane side, and the fifth lens group L5 moves in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis to move an image in the direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis. Further, predetermined conditional expressions are satisfied.

Description

  The present invention adopts an inner focus type, makes it possible to obtain a magnification equal to that of an object at infinity, and has an anti-vibration function for correcting image blur due to camera shake or the like, particularly a digital camera, a silver salt camera, and a video camera. The present invention relates to a suitable optical system.

  In an inner focus type macro lens with anti-vibration function, the features of the anti-vibration lens group to make the arrangement of the anti-vibration lens group advantageous are that it does not move in the optical axis direction during focusing, the lens diameter is small, It is mentioned that there is little movement amount at the time.

  Further, when the amount of camera shake is the same, the amount of image blur when the shooting magnification is near the same magnification is larger than the amount of image blur at the time of shooting at infinity, so the shooting distance not called a macro lens is from infinity to the shooting magnification of 0.3. It is necessary to increase the image stabilization coefficient, which is the ratio of the amount of change in the image to the amount of movement of the image stabilization lens group, compared to a lens that is less than double.

  For example, Patent Documents 1 to 4 listed below can be cited as inner focus type macro lenses having an anti-vibration function considered to be advantageous in the arrangement of the anti-vibration lens group.

JP 2006-106112 A

JP 2009-175202 A

JP 2009-288384 A

JP 2010-002790 A

  The lenses in Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3 are advantageous in disposing the anti-vibration lens group because the anti-vibration lens group does not move in the optical axis direction during focusing and the outer diameter of the anti-vibration lens is small. However, since the image stabilization coefficient is small, it is necessary to increase the amount of movement of the image stabilization lens during image stabilization. For this reason, there is a problem that the vibration isolation unit is increased in size and the outer diameter of the product is increased. Also, if the amount of movement of the anti-vibration lens is reduced to reduce the outer diameter of the product, the amount of camera shake correction when the shooting magnification is near the same magnification will be smaller than when shooting at infinity. Less effective.

  On the other hand, in the lens of Patent Document 4, as in Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3, the image stabilizing lens group does not move in the optical axis direction during focusing, and the outer diameter of the image stabilizing lens is small, which is advantageous for the arrangement of the image stabilizing lens group. Furthermore, the image stabilization coefficient is large compared to Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3, and the image blur correction amount when the absolute value of the photographing magnification is 1.0 times is easy to increase. However, compared with Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3, coma aberration and lateral chromatic aberration are deteriorated, so that the performance deterioration during image stabilization is large.

  The present invention is advantageous in the arrangement of the anti-vibration lens group, enables sufficient image blur correction even when the maximum photographing magnification is close to the same magnification, and corrects various aberrations well in the entire photographing region. An object of the present invention is to provide an inner focus type macro lens having a vibration function.

In order from the object side, a first lens unit L1 having a positive refractive power, a second lens unit L2 having a negative refractive power, a third lens unit L3 having a positive refractive power, and a fourth lens having a negative refractive power The lens unit includes a group L4, a fifth lens unit L5 having a negative refractive power, and a sixth lens unit L6 having a positive refractive power, and the first lens unit L1 is focused upon focusing from an object at infinity to a near object. Is fixed with respect to the image plane. At the same time the second lens unit L2 moves to the image plane side, the third lens unit L3 moves to the object side, and the fifth lens unit L5 moves in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis. Thus, the image can be moved in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis, and the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(1) 0.05 <| f3 / f4 | <1.00
(2) 0.30 <| f5 / f456 | <1.10
(3) 0.50 <| f6 / f456 | <1.30
(4) 1.00 <| (1 -β 5) × β 6 | <2.50
f3: focal length of the third lens unit L3 f4: focal length of the fourth lens unit L4 f5: focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 f6: focal length of the sixth lens unit L6 f456: fourth lens unit L4, fifth Composite focal length β _{5 of} the lens group L5 and the sixth lens group L6: Lateral magnification when the fifth lens group L5 is focused at infinity β ₆ : Lateral magnification when the sixth lens group L6 is focused at infinity

Further, the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(5) 0.05 <| Δx3 / f | <0.17
(6) 60 <P1ν
(7) 55 <P3ν <85
Δx3: Amount of movement of the third lens unit L3 when focusing from an object at infinity to a near object f: Focal length P1ν of all lens systems when focusing at infinity: All positive lenses of the first lens unit L1 Average Abbe number for d-line P3ν: Average Abbe number for d-line of all positive lenses in third lens unit L3

Further, the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(8) 0.35 <f1 / f <0.65
(9) 0.25 <| f2 / f | <0.50
(10) 0.20 <f3 / f <0.40
(11) 0.30 <| f456 / f | <0.60
f: focal length of all lens systems at the time of focusing on infinity f1: focal length of first lens unit L1 f2: focal length of second lens unit L2 f3: focal length of third lens unit L3 f456: fourth lens unit L4, the combined focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 and the sixth lens unit L6

  Furthermore, the aperture stop, the fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens unit L5, and the sixth lens unit L6 are fixed with respect to the image plane during focusing from an infinitely distant object to a close object. .

  By satisfying the above conditions, the present invention is advantageous in the arrangement of the anti-vibration lens group, can perform sufficient image blur correction even when the maximum photographing magnification is near the same magnification, and has various aberrations in the entire photographing region. It is possible to provide an inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function in which the above is corrected satisfactorily.

It is a lens block diagram of Example 1 of the present invention. These are various aberrations at the shooting distance infinite in Example 1 of the present invention. These are various aberrations at the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at an imaging distance of infinity according to Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction at an imaging distance of infinity according to Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction when the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 1 of the present invention. It is a lens block diagram of Example 2 of this invention. These are various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 2 of the present invention. These are various aberrations at the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 2 of the present invention. It is a lateral aberration figure of the standard state in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 2 of this invention. It is a lateral aberration figure at the time of 0.30 degree camera-shake correction | amendment in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 2 of this invention. FIG. 10 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at a photographing magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 2 of the present invention. FIG. 12 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction when the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 2 of the present invention. It is a lens block diagram of Example 3 of the present invention. These are various aberrations at the shooting distance infinite in Example 3 of the present invention. These are various aberrations at the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 3 of the present invention. It is a transverse aberration figure of the standard state in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 3 of the present invention. It is a lateral aberration figure at the time of 0.30 degree camera shake correction | amendment in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 3 of this invention. FIG. 10 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 3 of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction in the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 3 of the present invention. It is a lens block diagram of Example 4 of this invention. These are various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 4 of the present invention. Aberrations at shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 4 of the present invention. It is a lateral aberration figure of the standard state in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 4 of this invention. It is a lateral aberration figure at the time of 0.30 degree camera shake correction | amendment in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 4 of this invention. FIG. 10 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at a shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 4 of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction in the shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 4 of the present invention. It is a lens block diagram of Example 5 of this invention. These are various aberrations at the shooting distance of infinity in Example 5 of the present invention. Aberrations at photographing magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 5 of the present invention. It is a transverse aberration figure of the standard state in the photographing distance infinity of Example 5 of the present invention. It is a lateral aberration figure at the time of 0.30 degree camera shake correction | amendment in the shooting distance infinite distance of Example 5 of this invention. FIG. 10 is a transverse aberration diagram in a standard state at a shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 in Example 5 of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction in the shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 5 of the present invention. It is the figure which extracted a part of lens structure in order to demonstrate the predominance of arrangement | positioning of the 4th lens group L4, and is a case where an anti-vibration coefficient is small. It is the figure which extracted a part of lens structure in order to demonstrate the predominance of arrangement of the 4th lens group L4, and is a case where a vibration proof coefficient is large. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a part of the lens configuration in order to explain the superiority of the arrangement of the fourth lens unit L4, in a case where the light ray height of the image side lens is lowered from the anti-vibration lens unit with a large anti-vibration coefficient. is there. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a part of the lens configuration for explaining the superiority of the arrangement of the fourth lens unit L4, in which a negative lens unit is added to the object side of the image stabilizing lens unit.

  The inner focus type macro lens having the image stabilization function according to the present invention includes, in order from the object side, a first lens unit L1 having a positive refractive power, a second lens unit L2 having a negative refractive power, and a positive refractive power. A third lens unit L3 having negative refractive power, a fourth lens unit L4 having negative refractive power, a fifth lens unit L5 having negative refractive power, and a sixth lens unit L6 having positive refractive power.

  Further, in the inner focus type macro lens having the image stabilization function according to the present invention, the first lens unit L1 is fixed with respect to the image plane when focusing from an object at infinity to an object at a short distance. At the same time as the lens unit L2 moves to the image plane side, the third lens unit L3 moves to the object side. Further, the fifth lens unit L5 moves in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis, whereby the image can be moved in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis.

  FIG. 1 shows a lens configuration diagram of an inner focus type macro lens having an image stabilization function of Example 1 of the present invention, FIG. 2 shows various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 1, and FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating various aberrations in Example 1 at an imaging magnification of | β | = 1.0.

  FIG. 4 is a transverse aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 1, FIG. 5 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of infinite imaging distance of Example 1 at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction, and FIG. FIG. 7 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at a photographing magnification | β | = 1.0 of FIG. 1, and FIG. 7 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction at the photographing magnification | β | = 1.0 of the first embodiment. is there.

  In each aberration diagram, d-line, g-line, and C-line are aberrations with respect to respective wavelengths, ΔS indicates a sagittal image plane, and ΔM indicates a meridional image plane. The same applies to the subsequent aberration diagrams.

  FIG. 8 shows a lens configuration diagram of an inner focus type macro lens having an image stabilization function according to Example 2 of the present invention, FIG. 9 shows various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 2, and FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating various aberrations in Example 2 at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0.

  FIG. 11 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 2. FIG. 12 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction in Example 2 at an imaging distance of infinity. FIG. FIG. 14 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of FIG. 2, and FIG. 14 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction at the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 2. is there.

  FIG. 15 shows a lens configuration diagram of an inner focus type macro lens having an image stabilization function according to Example 3 of the present invention, FIG. 16 shows various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 3, and FIG. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating various aberrations in Example 3 at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0.

  FIG. 18 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 3, FIG. 19 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of infinite imaging distance of Example 3 at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction, and FIG. 20 is an example. FIG. 21 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at a shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 of FIG. 3, and FIG. 21 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction at the shooting magnification | β | = 1.0 of the third embodiment. is there.

  FIG. 22 shows a lens configuration diagram of an inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function according to Example 4 of the present invention. FIG. 23 shows various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity according to Example 4, and FIG. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating various aberrations in Example 4 at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0.

  FIG. 25 is a transverse aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 4, FIG. 26 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of infinite imaging distance of Example 4 at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction, and FIG. 27 is an example. FIG. 28 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of FIG. 4, and FIG. 28 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction at the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 4. is there.

  FIG. 29 shows a lens configuration diagram of an inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function according to Example 5 of the present invention. FIG. 30 shows various aberrations at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 5, and FIG. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating various aberrations in Example 5 at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0.

  FIG. 32 is a transverse aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging distance of infinity in Example 5, FIG. 33 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of infinite imaging distance of Example 5 at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction, and FIG. FIG. 35 is a lateral aberration diagram in the standard state at an imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of FIG. 5, and FIG. 35 is a lateral aberration diagram at the time of 0.30 ° camera shake correction in the imaging magnification | β | = 1.0 of Example 5. is there.

The inner focus type macro lens having the image stabilization function according to the present invention is further configured to satisfy the following conditional expression.
(1) 0.05 <| f3 / f4 | <1.00
(2) 0.30 <| f5 / f456 | <1.10
(3) 0.50 <| f6 / f456 | <1.30
(4) 1.00 <| (1 -β 5) × β 6 | <2.50

Here, f3 is the focal length of the third lens unit L3, f4 is the focal length of the fourth lens unit L4, f5 is the focal length of the fifth lens unit L5, f6 is the focal length of the sixth lens unit L6, and f456 is the first. fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens group L5, the combined focal length of the sixth lens group L6, beta ₅ is the lateral magnification upon focusing on infinity in the fifth lens group L5, beta ₆ is infinity of the sixth lens unit L6 The lateral magnification at the time of focusing and f is the focal length of all the lens systems at the time of focusing on infinity.

  Conditional expression (1) defines the relationship between the focal length of the third lens unit L3 and the focal length of the fourth lens unit L4, and relates to the effect of the fourth lens unit L4.

  First, the superiority of the arrangement of the fourth lens unit L4 will be described with reference to FIGS.

  When the camera shake correction angle at the time of image stabilization is constant and there is no lens group corresponding to the fourth lens unit L4, the lens unit located on the object side of the image stabilization lens unit is La, the image stabilization lens unit is Los, and the image stabilization lens When the lens group on the image side of the lens group is Lb, in order to reduce the amount of movement of the image stabilizing lens unit Los during image stabilization, the refractive power of the image stabilizing lens unit Los must be increased and the image stabilization coefficient increased. I must. For this reason, the light beam on the image plane side becomes higher than the image stabilizing lens group Los, and the diameter of the lens group Lb is increased, thereby increasing the outer diameter of the product (FIGS. 36 and 37).

  In order to suppress this, it is necessary to lower the ray height on the object side from the image stabilizing lens group Los, and it is necessary to increase the positive refractive power on the object side from the image stabilizing lens group using the lens group La. Yes (Figure 38).

  However, doing so makes it difficult to correct the eccentric coma aberration because the incident angle of the peripheral ray reaching the vibration-proof lens group Los becomes tight, and it is also difficult to correct the curvature of field in the off-axis ray. By disposing the lens unit Lc having a negative refractive power in front of the anti-vibration lens unit Los, the incident angle of the peripheral ray reaching the anti-vibration lens unit Los can be relaxed, and good aberration correction can be performed (FIG. 39). In the present invention, the fourth lens unit L4 corresponds to the lens unit Lc having a negative refractive power in front of the anti-vibration lens unit Los.

  When the upper limit of conditional expression (1) is exceeded, the focal length of the fourth lens unit L4 becomes shorter and the refractive power becomes stronger. Therefore, coma aberration and astigmatism occurring in the fourth lens unit L4 increase, and aberration balance This is not preferable. If the lower limit is exceeded, the angle of incidence of the marginal ray incident on the image stabilizing lens group becomes stiff, making it particularly difficult to correct coma and astigmatism occurring in the fifth lens group L5. It is not preferable because aberration and field curvature are deteriorated.

  Conditional expressions (2) and (3) define the focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 and the focal length of the sixth lens unit L6, and relate to the image stabilization coefficient.

  If the upper limit of conditional expression (2) is exceeded, the focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 increases and the refractive power decreases, making it difficult to increase the image stabilization coefficient and increasing the amount of movement required during image stabilization. It is not preferable because the outer diameter of the product becomes large. Alternatively, if the required anti-vibration coefficient condition is satisfied, the aberration balance deteriorates, which is not preferable.

  When the lower limit of conditional expression (2) is exceeded, the focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 is shortened and the refractive power is increased, so that the image stabilization coefficient can be easily increased, but coma and astigmatism are deteriorated. Since the eccentric coma aberration and the curvature of field at the time deteriorate, it is not preferable.

  When the upper limit of conditional expression (3) is exceeded, the focal length of the sixth lens unit L6 becomes long and it is difficult to increase the image stabilization coefficient. An attempt to satisfy the necessary anti-vibration coefficient condition is not preferable because the balance of aberration correction deteriorates.

  When the lower limit of conditional expression (3) is exceeded, the focal length of the sixth lens unit L6 is shortened and the image stabilization coefficient is easily increased, but it is difficult to ensure the back focus. Further, since the spherical aberration is increased, the balance of aberration correction is deteriorated, which is not preferable.

  Conditional expression (4) defines a good range of the image stabilization coefficient and relates to the lens movement amount during image stabilization.

  The image stabilization coefficient k is a ratio of the movement amount Δx of the image stabilization lens group to the image change amount ΔH, and can be expressed as k = ΔH / Δx. The image stabilization coefficient k is k = (1−βos) × βr, where βos is the lateral magnification of the image stabilization lens group, and βr is the combined lateral magnification of all lens groups on the image side of the image stabilization lens group. It can be expressed as

  When the upper limit of the conditional expression (4) is exceeded, the image stabilization coefficient is increased, which is advantageous for reducing the outer diameter of the product. For this purpose, it is necessary to increase the refractive power of each lens group. In particular, as the refractive power of the fifth lens unit L5 increases, coma aberration, astigmatism, decentration coma during image stabilization, field curvature, and chromatic aberration of magnification increase, making it difficult to correct aberrations. Therefore, it is not preferable.

  Exceeding the lower limit of conditional expression (4) is advantageous for aberration correction. However, since the image stabilization coefficient becomes smaller, the amount of movement required during image stabilization increases and the product outer diameter increases, which is not preferable. In order to more effectively suppress the outer diameter of the product, it is more desirable to set the lower limit to about 1.3.

Although the object of the present invention can be achieved by the above configuration, it is more preferable that the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(5) 0.05 <| Δx3 / f | <0.17
(6) 60 <P1ν
(7) 55 <P3ν <85

  Here, Δx3 is the amount of movement of the third lens unit L3 when focusing from an object at infinity to an object whose photographing magnification is near the same magnification, f is the focal length of all the lens systems when focusing at infinity, and P1ν is The average Abbe number of all positive lenses of the first lens unit L1 with respect to the d-line, and P3ν is the average value of Abbe numbers of all positive lenses of the third lens unit L3 with respect to the d-line.

  Conditional expression (5) relates to the focus movement amount and aberration correction of the third lens unit L3.

  Exceeding the upper limit of conditional expression (5) is not preferable because the amount of focus movement of the third lens unit L3 becomes long and the entire length of the lens system is extended. In order to suppress the overall length of the lens system, it is necessary to shorten the focal length of the second lens unit L2. This increases the refractive power of the second lens unit L2, thereby particularly deteriorating coma aberration, increasing fluctuations in coma when moving the focus group, and making it difficult to perform good aberration correction. Absent.

  When the lower limit of conditional expression (5) is exceeded, the focus movement amount of the third lens unit L3 is shortened, and mainly the refractive power of the third lens unit L3 is increased. As a result, the balance of refractive power with the front and rear groups is lost, making it difficult to correct aberrations. In particular, it is not preferable because the spherical aberration of the third lens unit L3 deteriorates and it becomes difficult to perform good aberration correction.

  Conditional expressions (6) and (7) relate to chromatic aberration correction.

  Exceeding the lower limit of conditional expression (6) is not preferable because the axial chromatic aberration generated in the first lens unit L1 deteriorates, and it becomes difficult to correct the chromatic aberration of magnification on the other group. In order to more effectively suppress axial chromatic aberration, it is more desirable to set the lower limit to about 65.

  When the upper limit of conditional expression (7) is exceeded, a relatively low refractive index medium is used. For this reason, the spherical aberration of the third lens unit L3 is deteriorated, and the aberration variation during the movement of the focus unit is increased. This makes it difficult to perform good aberration correction, which is not preferable. Exceeding the lower limit of conditional expression (7) is not preferable because the chromatic aberration of magnification is deteriorated and the chromatic aberration of magnification is deteriorated on the axis when the focus group is moved.

More preferably, the following conditional expression should be satisfied.
(8) 0.35 <f1 / f <0.65
(9) 0.25 <| f2 / f | <0.50
(10) 0.20 <f3 / f <0.40
(11) 0.30 <| f456 / f | <0.60

  Here, f is the focal length of the entire lens system at the time of focusing on infinity, f1 is the focal length of the first lens unit L1, f2 is the focal length of the second lens unit L2, and f3 is the focal length of the third lens unit L3. , F456 is a combined focal length of the fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens unit L5, and the sixth lens unit L6.

  Conditional expression (8) defines the focal length of the first lens unit L1 with respect to the focal length of the entire system, and relates to aberration correction and the total product length.

  When the upper limit of the conditional expression (8) is exceeded, the focal length of the first lens unit L1 becomes long and works favorably for aberration correction, but it is not preferable because the total length of the lens system is extended and disadvantageous for shortening the total product length. If the lower limit of conditional expression (8) is exceeded, the focal length of the first lens unit L1 will be shortened and various aberrations such as spherical aberration and axial chromatic aberration will deteriorate, and it will be difficult to correct spherical aberration especially at infinity shooting. Therefore, it is not preferable.

  Conditional expression (9) defines the focal length of the second lens unit L2 with respect to the focal length of the entire system, and relates to aberration correction when the focus group is moved.

  When the upper limit of conditional expression (9) is exceeded, the focal length of the second lens unit L2 becomes longer, and the amount of focus group movement required until the same magnification photographing is increased. This undesirably increases the overall length of the lens system. When the lower limit of conditional expression (9) is exceeded, the focal length of the second lens unit L2 becomes shorter, especially coma becomes worse and fluctuations in coma during movement of the focus group become larger, so that satisfactory aberration correction is achieved. This is not preferable because it is difficult to perform.

  Conditional expression (10) defines the focal length of the third lens unit L3 with respect to the focal length of the entire system, and relates to aberration correction when the focus group is moved.

  When the upper limit of conditional expression (10) is exceeded, the focal length of the third lens unit L3 becomes longer, and the amount of focus group movement required until the same magnification photographing is increased. This undesirably increases the overall length of the lens system. When the lower limit of conditional expression (10) is exceeded, the focal length of the third lens unit L3 is shortened, and the refractive power is increased, so that the balance of refractive power with the front and rear groups is lost, and aberration correction becomes difficult. In particular, spherical aberration is deteriorated and it is difficult to perform good aberration correction.

  Conditional expression (11) defines the combined focal length of the fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens unit L5, and the sixth lens unit L6 with respect to the focal length of the entire system, and relates to the total length of the product and the outer diameter. is there.

  Exceeding the upper limit of conditional expression (11) is not preferable because the telephoto ratio increases as the combined focal length increases, and the lens system extends. Further, the exit pupil moves toward the object side, and the ray height at the maximum field angle in the sixth lens unit L6 increases. Accordingly, it is not preferable to secure a sufficient amount of peripheral light because the outer diameter of the product increases.

  When the lower limit of conditional expression (11) is exceeded, the back focal length of the lens system is shortened by shortening the combined focal length, causing problems such as mirror interference when attached to a single-lens reflex camera. In addition, spherical aberration is excessively corrected, and the balance of aberration correction is deteriorated.

  More preferably, the following requirements should be satisfied. That is, the aperture stop, the fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens unit L5, and the sixth lens unit L6 are fixed with respect to the image plane when focusing from an object at infinity to an object at a short distance.

  As a result, electrical parts and mechanical parts for operating and controlling the anti-vibration lens group become immobile when the focus group moves, and the arrangement of the anti-vibration lens group can be advantageously performed. Moreover, the manufacturing error of the product can be further reduced.

  Further, it is desirable to set the inner diameter of the lens mirror chamber or to make the aperture diameter variable so that the aperture diameter becomes smaller when focusing from an object at infinity to an object at a short distance. Thereby, in order to maintain good aberration correction when focusing from an object at infinity to an object at a short distance, it can be set to a predetermined F number.

  Moreover, it is desirable to use a low dispersion medium having anomalous partial dispersion for any of the positive lenses in the third lens unit L3. Thereby, the axial chromatic aberration at the entire shooting distance and the chromatic aberration of magnification at the time of shooting at infinity can be corrected well.

  In addition, it is desirable to use a low dispersion medium having abnormal partial dispersion for some positive lenses in the first lens unit L1. This makes it possible to satisfactorily correct axial chromatic aberration and chromatic aberration of magnification at the entire shooting distance.

  In addition, it is desirable that the most object side surface of the sixth lens unit L6 be convex toward the object side so as to reduce the height of off-axis rays. Thereby, an increase in the height of the off-axis light beam by the fifth lens unit L5 having strong refractive power can be suppressed, and the outer diameter of the product can be suppressed.

  Hereinafter, numerical examples corresponding to the first to fifth embodiments will be described.

  In [Overall Specifications], f represents the focal length, Fno represents the F number, and Y represents the maximum image height from the optical axis.

  In the [lens specifications], the number of the first column is the lens surface number from the object side, the second column r is the radius of curvature of the lens surface, the third column d is the lens surface interval, and the fourth column nd is the d line ( The refractive index for the wavelength λ = 587.56 mm), the fifth column νd is the Abbe number for the d-line. “Aperture” in the second column represents the diaphragm surface, and Bf in the third column represents the back focus.

  [Variable interval] indicates the value of the variable interval.

  [Lens Group Data] indicates the focal length of each lens group.

  Further, “value corresponding to the conditional expression” indicates the value of each conditional expression of the present invention in each numerical example.

  In all the following values of specifications, “mm” is used as the focal length f, radius of curvature r, lens surface interval d, and other length units unless otherwise specified. However, since the same optical performance can be obtained in proportional enlargement and proportional reduction, it is not limited to this. These symbols are the same in the other embodiments below, and the description thereof is omitted.

[Numerical Example 1]
[Overall specifications]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
f 147.46 106.21 78.58
Fno 2.92 4.36 5.82
Y 21.63 21.63 21.63

[Lens specifications]
r d nd νd
[1] 172.8574 6.1500 1.65844 50.85
[2] -235.6130 0.2000
[3] 112.5713 8.0000 1.49700 81.61
[4] -112.5713 1.8000 1.80518 25.46
[5] ∞ 0.2000
[6] 54.2824 9.8000 1.49700 81.61
[7] -123.1553 1.7000 1.77250 49.62
[8] 316.9267 d8
[9] 271.0617 1.3000 1.72916 54.67
[10] 55.9022 3.7400
[11] -1000.0000 4.3000 1.84666 23.78
[12] -63.5280 1.2000 1.48749 70.44
[13] 93.4605 2.7400
[14] 1026.8535 1.2000 1.72916 54.67
[15] 110.9706 d15
[16] Aperture d16
[17] 100.5015 4.7700 1.72916 54.67
[18] -77.3089 0.1500
[19] 59.2968 5.7100 1.49700 81.61
[20] -59.2968 1.3000 1.80518 25.46
[21] -489.1568 d21
[22] -114.3680 1.2000 1.53172 48.84
[23] 231.3033 3.5000
[24] 241.0084 3.3000 1.80518 25.46
[25] -56.2213 0.9500 1.72916 54.67
[26] 34.6735 3.4300
[27] -86.8556 0.9500 1.72916 54.67
[28] 139.5220 2.5000
[29] 65.1284 6.5000 1.80420 46.50
[30] -84.6669 0.4600
[31] -397.5440 2.0000 1.78472 25.72
[32] 41.3949 5.7600 1.83400 37.35
[33] 521.4793 Bf

[Variable interval]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
d8 2.7700 11.5375 21.9179
d15 25.7700 17.0025 6.6221
d16 21.9400 11.8572 2.5000
d21 2.5800 12.6628 22.0200

[Lens group data]
Group number Front surface Group focal length
1 1 76.7515
2 9 -58.0304
3 17 46.4457
4 22 -143.7530
5 24 -32.7958
6 29 51.8585
4,5,6 22 -68.1672

[Conditional expression values]
Example 1
Conditional expression (1) 0.32
Conditional expression (2) 0.48
Conditional expression (3) 0.76
Conditional expression (4) 1.85
Conditional expression (5) 0.13
Conditional expression (6) 71.36
Conditional expression (7) 68.14
Conditional expression (8) 0.52
Conditional expression (9) 0.39
Conditional expression (10) 0.31
Conditional expression (11) 0.46

[Numerical Example 2]
[Overall specifications]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
f 150.00 106.51 78.23
Fno 2.92 4.37 5.83
Y 21.63 21.63 21.63

[Lens specifications]
r d nd νd
[1] 172.3015 6.2500 1.65844 50.85
[2] -240.1703 0.6000
[3] 117.3228 7.8700 1.49700 81.61
[4] -117.3228 1.8000 1.80518 25.46
[5] ∞ 0.2000
[6] 51.3542 10.3700 1.49700 81.61
[7] -118.7741 1.7000 1.77250 49.62
[8] 303.8511 d8
[9] 171.2605 1.3000 1.72916 54.67
[10] 49.9070 4.2000
[11] -944.6684 4.4500 1.84666 23.78
[12] -60.4640 1.2000 1.48749 70.44
[13] 303.9765 2.2100
[14] -315.1893 1.2000 1.72916 54.67
[15] 86.6671 d15
[16] Aperture d16
[17] 99.4050 4.8500 1.72916 54.67
[18] -76.1692 0.1500
[19] 59.6187 5.8000 1.49700 81.61
[20] -59.6187 1.2000 1.80518 25.46
[21] -592.3620 d21
[22] -132.8024 1.2000 1.68893 31.16
[23] 307.7510 3.0000
[24] 107.4042 3.5000 1.80518 25.46
[25] -67.3066 0.9500 1.72916 54.67
[26] 32.7082 3.6300
[27] -82.6498 0.9500 1.71300 53.94
[28] 110.3321 2.5000
[29] 67.0168 6.3500 1.80611 40.73
[30] -87.1218 0.7200
[31] -228.2708 1.5500 1.75520 27.53
[32] 33.1513 6.6200 1.83400 37.35
[33] 581.2078 Bf

[Variable interval]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
d8 2.4200 10.5359 20.1009
d15 24.6600 16.5441 6.9791
d16 22.5200 12.0489 2.5000
d21 2.5500 13.0211 22.5700

[Lens group data]
Group number Front surface Group focal length
1 1 75.3347
2 9 -54.5958
3 17 46.5515
4 22 -134.5084
5 24 -34.6534
6 29 53.3397
4,5,6 22 -68.0556

[Conditional expression values]
Example 2
Conditional expression (1) 0.35
Conditional expression (2) 0.51
Conditional expression (3) 0.78
Conditional expression (4) 1.76
Conditional expression (5) 0.13
Conditional expression (6) 71.36
Conditional expression (7) 68.14
Conditional expression (8) 0.50
Conditional expression (9) 0.36
Conditional expression (10) 0.31
Conditional expression (11) 0.45

[Numerical Example 3]
[Overall specifications]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
f 145.55 105.14 77.74
Fno 2.92 4.37 5.83
Y 21.63 21.63 21.63

[Lens specifications]
r d nd νd
[1] 167.5839 6.0000 1.65844 50.85
[2] -251.8143 0.2000
[3] 115.7602 7.7000 1.49700 81.61
[4] -115.7602 1.8000 1.80518 25.46
[5] ∞ 0.2000
[6] 54.3555 9.8500 1.49700 81.61
[7] -112.5151 1.7000 1.77250 49.62
[8] 391.6986 d8
[9] 258.3442 1.3000 1.72916 54.67
[10] 57.6938 3.6900
[11] -862.1512 4.2400 1.84666 23.78
[12] -64.3349 1.2000 1.48749 70.44
[13] 106.6494 2.4200
[14] 615.4091 1.2000 1.72916 54.67
[15] 89.6157 d15
[16] Aperture d16
[17] 105.1738 4.7500 1.72916 54.67
[18] -76.6488 0.1500
[19] 60.3732 5.6500 1.49700 81.61
[20] -60.3732 1.2000 1.80518 25.46
[21] -480.5250 d21
[22] -126.4582 1.2000 1.68893 31.16
[23] 163.8536 3.0000
[24] 83.9198 3.8500 1.80518 25.46
[25] -80.7029 0.9500 1.72916 54.67
[26] 32.2459 3.7000
[27] -79.7819 0.9500 1.71300 53.94
[28] 115.3757 2.5200
[29] 65.3628 6.4500 1.80611 40.73
[30] -84.9715 0.7500
[31] -198.7778 1.3000 1.75520 27.53
[32] 32.2918 6.7000 1.83400 37.35
[33] 521.3975 Bf

[Variable interval]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
d8 2.3000 11.1885 21.5813
d15 26.2200 17.3315 6.9387
d16 22.0600 11.9094 2.5006
d21 2.5000 12.6506 22.0594

[Lens group data]
Group number Front surface
1 1 76.2551
2 9 -57.6335
3 17 47.0426
4 22 -118.0983
5 24 -37.1256
6 29 54.0399
4,5,6 22 -68.7533

[Conditional expression values]
Example 3
Conditional expression (1) 0.40
Conditional expression (2) 0.54
Conditional expression (3) 0.79
Conditional expression (4) 1.65
Conditional expression (5) 0.13
Conditional expression (6) 71.36
Conditional expression (7) 68.14
Conditional expression (8) 0.52
Conditional expression (9) 0.40
Conditional expression (10) 0.32
Conditional expression (11) 0.47

[Numerical Example 4]
[Overall specifications]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
f 150.00 110.38 81.92
Fno 2.92 4.37 5.85
Y 21.63 21.63 21.63

[Lens specifications]
r d nd νd
[1] 110.1005 7.3000 1.58913 61.25
[2] -334.3556 0.2000
[3] 95.8862 1.8000 1.67270 32.17
[4] 59.2389 7.7300 1.49700 81.61
[5] 436.3191 0.2000
[6] 53.0246 9.1000 1.49700 81.61
[7] -140.2128 1.6000 1.83400 37.35
[8] 149.0724 d8
[9] 144.3289 1.3000 1.71300 53.94
[10] 45.2358 3.8900
[11] 964.9900 1.2000 1.56384 60.83
[12] 32.9256 4.5900 1.84666 23.78
[13] 56.9258 d13
[14] Aperture d14
[15] 108.9916 4.4800 1.72916 54.67
[16] -87.9894 0.1500
[17] 60.6020 5.8800 1.49700 81.61
[18] -57.0139 1.2000 1.80518 25.46
[19] -182.4864 d19
[20] -210.0706 1.2000 1.69895 30.05
[21] 153.0289 3.2900
[22] 103.6003 3.0600 1.80518 25.46
[23] -111.8029 0.8500 1.56384 60.83
[24] 28.9364 4.2500
[25] -66.9219 0.8500 1.72916 54.67
[26] 92.4549 3.2300
[27] 63.0365 4.2600 1.72916 54.67
[28] -262.8279 0.8700
[29] 466.8804 1.3000 1.84666 23.78
[30] 123.9887 4.2000 1.77250 49.62
[31] -225.2904 Bf

[Variable interval]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
d8 3.0000 12.8271 24.3397
d13 29.8200 19.9929 8.4803
d14 21.6600 11.5327 2.0002
d19 2.0000 12.1273 21.6598

[Lens group data]
Group number Front surface Group focal length
1 1 81.6540
2 9 -59.6260
3 15 45.5861
4 20 -126.4960
5 22 -35.1241
6 27 53.8809
4,5,6 20 -70.2213

[Conditional expression values]
Example 4
Conditional expression (1) 0.36
Conditional expression (2) 0.50
Conditional expression (3) 0.77
Conditional expression (4) 1.76
Conditional expression (5) 0.13
Conditional expression (6) 74.82
Conditional expression (7) 68.14
Conditional expression (8) 0.54
Conditional expression (9) 0.40
Conditional expression (10) 0.30
Conditional expression (11) 0.47

[Numerical Example 5]
[Overall specifications]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
f 150.00 110.47 82.21
Fno 2.92 4.37 5.82
Y 21.63 21.63 21.63

[Lens specifications]
r d nd νd
[1] 117.7006 6.0000 1.77250 49.62
[2] -1364.1695 0.2000
[3] 109.6048 1.8000 1.72825 28.32
[4] 64.2152 8.1000 1.45860 90.19
[5] -1279.0416 0.2000
[6] 52.7127 9.0000 1.49700 81.61
[7] -145.8681 1.6000 1.83400 37.35
[8] 142.3900 d8
[9] 141.1378 1.3000 1.71300 53.94
[10] 48.6529 3.5900
[11] 749.5201 1.2000 1.58913 61.25
[12] 33.7721 4.5400 1.84666 23.78
[13] 58.2608 d13
[14] Aperture d14
[15] 116.2118 4.1900 1.77250 49.62
[16] -97.4614 0.5600
[17] 64.6532 5.6300 1.59282 68.62
[18] -57.9634 1.2000 1.80518 25.46
[19] -357.8029 d19
[20] -308.8472 1.2000 1.83400 37.35
[21] 92.4220 3.6300
[22] 98.5724 3.1000 1.80518 25.46
[23] -110.6194 0.8500 1.51680 64.20
[24] 30.8101 4.6500
[25] -74.5307 0.8500 1.72916 54.67
[26] 84.3267 3.2500
[27] 64.7996 5.1200 1.72916 54.67
[28] -251.4259 0.7200
[29] 166.5131 1.3000 1.84666 23.78
[30] 71.0597 4.6600 1.71300 53.94
[31] -480.6700 Bf

[Variable interval]
INF | β | = 0.5 | β | = 1.0
d8 3.0000 13.2735 25.6349
d13 31.1000 20.8265 8.4651
d14 21.0000 11.1804 2.0000
d19 2.0200 11.8396 21.0200

[Lens group data]
Group number Front surface Group focal length
1 1 83.1675
2 9 -62.7787
3 15 45.2342
4 20 -85.1778
5 22 -41.1289
6 27 54.1256
4,5,6 20 -69.4821

[Conditional expression values]
Example 5
Conditional expression (1) 0.53
Conditional expression (2) 0.59
Conditional expression (3) 0.78
Conditional expression (4) 1.50
Conditional expression (5) 0.13
Conditional expression (6) 73.81
Conditional expression (7) 59.12
Conditional expression (8) 0.55
Conditional expression (9) 0.42
Conditional expression (10) 0.30
Conditional expression (11) 0.46

S: aperture stop I: image plane L1: first lens group L2: second lens group L3: third lens group L4: fourth lens group L5: fifth lens group L6: sixth lens group CC line (wavelength λ = 656.3 nm)
dd line (wavelength λ = 587.6 nm)
g g line (wavelength λ = 435.8 nm)
Y Image height ΔS Sagittal image plane ΔM Medianal image plane

Claims (4)

In order from the object side, a first lens unit L1 having a positive refractive power, a second lens unit L2 having a negative refractive power, a third lens unit L3 having a positive refractive power, and a fourth lens having a negative refractive power A group L4, a fifth lens unit L5 having a negative refractive power, and a sixth lens unit L6 having a positive refractive power;
When focusing from an object at infinity to an object at a short distance, the first lens unit L1 is fixed with respect to the image plane, and at the same time the second lens unit L2 moves to the image plane side, the third lens unit L3. Moves to the object side,
By moving the fifth lens unit L5 in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis, it is possible to move the image in a direction substantially perpendicular to the optical axis,
An inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function characterized by satisfying the following conditional expression:
(1) 0.05 <| f3 / f4 | <1.00
(2) 0.30 <| f5 / f456 | <1.10
(3) 0.50 <| f6 / f456 | <1.30
(4) 1.00 <| (1 -β 5) × β 6 | <2.50
f3: focal length of the third lens unit L3 f4: focal length of the fourth lens unit L4 f5: focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 f6: focal length of the sixth lens unit L6 f456: fourth lens unit L4, fifth Composite focal length β _{5 of} the lens group L5 and the sixth lens group L6: Lateral magnification when the fifth lens group L5 is focused at infinity β ₆ : Lateral magnification when the sixth lens group L6 is focused at infinity 2. The inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(5) 0.05 <| Δx3 / f | <0.17
(6) 60 <P1ν
(7) 55 <P3ν <85
Δx3: Amount of movement of the third lens unit L3 when focusing from an object at infinity to a near object f: Focal length P1ν of all lens systems when focusing at infinity: All positive lenses of the first lens unit L1 Average Abbe number for d-line P3ν: Average Abbe number for d-line of all positive lenses in third lens unit L3 The inner focus type macro lens having an image stabilization function according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the following conditional expression is satisfied.
(8) 0.35 <f1 / f <0.65
(9) 0.25 <| f2 / f | <0.50
(10) 0.20 <f3 / f <0.40
(11) 0.30 <| f456 / f | <0.60
f: focal length of all lens systems at the time of focusing on infinity f1: focal length of first lens unit L1 f2: focal length of second lens unit L2 f3: focal length of third lens unit L3 f456: fourth lens unit L4, the combined focal length of the fifth lens unit L5 and the sixth lens unit L6   An aperture stop, the fourth lens unit L4, the fifth lens unit L5, and the sixth lens unit L6 are fixed with respect to the image plane during focusing from an infinitely distant object to a close object. An inner focus type macro lens having an anti-vibration function according to any one of claims 1 to 3.

Images