JP2011111058A - Operation arrangement support device and operation arrangement system using the device - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an operation arrangement support device for displaying an operation arrangement plan that satisfies an operation instruction person without defining an evaluation measure by using history of the past operation arrangement. <P>SOLUTION: The operation arrangement support device includes an operation arrangement history storage part 6 storing operation arrangement history data that matches each train delay data in the past to each operation arrangement plan executed for each train delay data, an input part 2 in which information regarding actual train delay that has occurred is input, a delay time predicting part 3 generating information regarding predicted train delay for entire train diagram based on the input information regarding actual train delay, an operation arrangement history search part 4 searching the operation arrangement history data in the operation arrangement history storage part 6 based on the information regarding actual train delay and the information regarding predicted train delay, and a display 9 displaying the search result. An operation arrangement plan for restoring disorder of the train diagram due to train delay is searched from the past operation arrangement history data to be displayed, thus supporting the operation arrangement work. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a driving arrangement support device that supports a driving arrangement work by proposing a driving arrangement plan for recovering a disturbance of a diagram to a normal state, and a driving arrangement system that performs driving arrangement using the driving arrangement support device. About.

  At present, the operation commander (hereinafter referred to as the commander) is mainly responsible for the operation arrangement work for returning the disturbance of the diamond caused by the train delay caused by the weather, the earthquake, or the accident to the normal state. This operation arrangement work has many uncertain factors (for example, the scale of accidents and failures, location of occurrence, train type, operation date, time zone, weather, etc.). This is known as a very difficult task because it is necessary to swiftly consider an operation arrangement plan for returning the disordered diamond to a normal state. For this reason, there is an increasing need for computer assistance for operation arrangement work, and it is considered that an operation arrangement plan is automatically created and proposed using a computer.

  As a technique for automatically proposing a conventional operation arrangement plan, there are techniques described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 and the like. The operation arrangement support technology described in Patent Document 1 creates a prediction diagram from a plan diagram and an actual diagram, detects a portion delayed by a predetermined time or more by comparing the created prediction diagram with the plan diagram, and detects A condition formula that applies to each train delay portion is extracted, and an operation arrangement plan that is uniquely determined for the conditional expression extracted from the operation arrangement plans stored in advance is proposed. In addition, the operation arrangement support technology described in Patent Document 2 corrects the plan diagram according to the train delay that has occurred, and creates an operation arrangement plan for eliminating the customer dissatisfaction in the corrected diagram, Is treated as a combinatorial optimization problem using a network composed of and arcs, and the prepared operation arrangement plan is evaluated using the degree of dissatisfaction of the user as an evaluation scale, and an operation arrangement plan that minimizes the degree of dissatisfaction of the user is proposed It is.

JP-A-8-58592 JP 2004-224113 A

  However, since the technique described in Patent Document 1 partially detects a delay expected in the prediction diagram and proposes a driving arrangement plan based on the detected delay portion, the proposed driving arrangement plan is used in the prediction diagram. It was not judged from the whole. For this reason, when the proposed driving arrangement plan eliminates the delay of the detected delay portion, there is a possibility that a new delay may be caused when viewed in the entire diagram. Moreover, since the technique described in Patent Document 2 proposes a driving arrangement plan with high evaluation based on a predefined evaluation scale, it is necessary to define the evaluation scale in advance. There are various evaluation scales that must be taken into consideration in preparing the operation arrangement plan, for example, the degree of dissatisfaction of the users defined in Patent Document 2 and the return time to the planned schedule. Depending on the conditions such as the degree of diamond disturbance, occurrence time zone (whether it is commuting time, etc.), driving days (weekdays and holidays), etc., it is possible that the evaluation scales that are regarded as important in the preparation of the driving arrangement plan are different. Therefore, it is difficult to unambiguously define an evaluation scale for proposing an appropriate operation arrangement plan for any timetable disturbance situation. For this reason, in the driving arrangement support technology described in Patent Document 2, there is a possibility that a driving arrangement plan that satisfies the commander cannot be proposed depending on the situation when the disturbance of the schedule occurs due to the delay of the train.

  The present invention has been made paying attention to the above problems, and by using a history of past driving arrangements, a driving arrangement supporting apparatus capable of presenting a driving arrangement plan that satisfies the commander without defining an evaluation scale. The purpose is to provide. Moreover, it aims at providing the driving | running | working arrangement | positioning system which performs driving | operation arrangement | working using this driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus.

  Therefore, the present invention is a driving arrangement support device that supports the driving arrangement work by presenting the driving arrangement plan for recovering the disturbance of the diagram caused by the train delay, each past train delay data, An operation arrangement history storage unit that stores operation arrangement history data that associates each operation arrangement plan that has been performed with respect to each train delay data, and searches the operation arrangement history data based on the acquired train delay information, And a driving arrangement history presentation unit that presents the driving arrangement plan associated with the searched train delay data.

  In such a configuration, the driving arrangement history presentation unit generates driving arrangement history data in which each past train delay data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit and each implemented driving arrangement plan are associated with each other based on the train delay information. It is possible to satisfy the commander by searching and presenting the operation arrangement plan implemented in the past.

  According to a second aspect of the present invention, the operation arrangement history presentation unit may search for train delay data that matches the train delay information from the operation arrangement history data and present the operation arrangement plan. In this case, as in claim 3, when the matching train delay data does not exist in the operation arrangement history data, the train arrangement data similar to the train delay information is searched from the operation arrangement history data and the It may be configured to present a driving arrangement plan.

  A virtual driving arrangement history generating unit that generates virtual driving arrangement history data based on the driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit as in claim 4, and generating the generated virtual driving arrangement history data The operation arrangement history data may be added as operation arrangement history data in the operation arrangement history storage unit.

  The evaluation data for evaluating each operation arrangement plan of the operation arrangement history data is stored in the operation arrangement history storage unit in association with each operation arrangement plan, and is searched by the operation arrangement history presentation unit. The operation arrangement plan may be evaluated based on the evaluation data associated with the operation arrangement plan, and an operation arrangement plan that satisfies a preset evaluation criterion may be presented.

  According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, when presenting the driving arrangement plan, the driving arrangement history presentation unit predicts the train delay situation of the entire diagram when the driving arrangement plan is implemented, and displays the prediction result as the driving arrangement. It is good to present it with a draft

  When the information of the generated train delay is input as in claim 7, the train delay situation of the entire diagram caused by the train delay is predicted based on the input train delay information, and the obtained prediction It is preferable that the train delay information can be presented.

  As in claim 8, when correction information for the proposed driving arrangement plan is input, the train delay situation of the entire diagram when the corrected driving arrangement plan corrected based on the correction information is implemented is predicted and It is preferable that the prediction result be presented.

  It is good to set it as the structure which displays presentation content on a display part like Claim 9.

  The operation management system according to the invention of claim 10 predicts by predicting the train delay situation of the entire diagram based on the input unit to which train delay information generated for the planned diagram is input and the input train delay information. When the train delay prediction unit that generates train delay information, the first determination unit that determines whether or not operation adjustment is necessary based on the predicted train delay information, and when the first determination unit determines that operation adjustment is necessary A driving arrangement plan presenting section for presenting the driving arrangement plan to the second, a second determining section for determining whether or not to adopt the driving arrangement plan presented by the driving arrangement plan presenting section, A driving arrangement execution unit that executes driving arrangement based on the determined driving arrangement plan, and the driving arrangement support device according to claim 1 is used for the driving arrangement plan presentation unit.

According to the driving arrangement support device of the present invention, since the driving arrangement plan based on the driving arrangement plan previously implemented by the commander can be presented, it is possible to present the driving arrangement plan that the commander can satisfy. As a result, the burden on the commander is reduced, and the efficiency of the operation adjustment work can be improved.
According to the operation arrangement system of the present invention, when a train delay occurs and it is determined that the operation arrangement is necessary, an operation arrangement plan that can be satisfied by the commander using the operation arrangement support device is presented, and the presented operation arrangement is presented. Since the plan is executed, it is possible to improve the efficiency of the operation arrangement work.

The block diagram which shows the structure of 1st Embodiment of the driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus which concerns on this invention. Explanatory drawing of the diamond data storage part of 1st Embodiment. Explanatory drawing of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence history memory | storage part of 1st Embodiment. Explanatory drawing of the data storage part for delay time prediction of 1st Embodiment. The flowchart explaining the operation | movement presentation plan operation | movement of 1st Embodiment. The block diagram which shows the structure of 2nd Embodiment of the driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus which concerns on this invention. The flowchart explaining operation | movement presentation of the driving arrangement plan of 2nd Embodiment. The block diagram which shows the structure of 3rd Embodiment of the driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus which concerns on this invention. The flowchart explaining the production | generation operation | movement of the virtual driving | operation arrangement | working historical data of 3rd Embodiment. The block diagram which shows the structure of 4th Embodiment of the driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus which concerns on this invention. Explanatory drawing of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence history data of 4th Embodiment. The flowchart explaining operation | movement presentation of the driving arrangement plan of 4th Embodiment. The block diagram which shows the structure of 1st Embodiment of the driving | running | working control system which concerns on this invention. The flowchart explaining the driving | operation arrangement | positioning operation | movement of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence system of 1st Embodiment. The block diagram which shows the structure of 2nd Embodiment of the driving | running | working control system which concerns on this invention. The flowchart explaining the driving | operation arrangement | positioning operation | movement of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence system of 2nd Embodiment.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the first embodiment of the driving arrangement support device according to the present invention.
In FIG. 1, this driving arrangement support device 1 includes an input unit 2, a delay time prediction unit 3, a driving arrangement history search unit 4, a diagram data storage unit 5, an operation arrangement history storage unit 6, and a delay time prediction. A data storage unit 7, a temporary storage unit 8, and a display unit 9 are provided.

  The input unit 2 inputs train delay information actually generated to the schedule diagram (hereinafter referred to as actual train delay information), and the actual train delay information is stored in the temporary storage unit 8. . The actual train delay information may be input manually by a commander who monitors the operation status of the train, or automatically using train monitoring information of a train operation management device (not shown). May be. As shown in FIG. 3, the actual train delay information includes, for example, a train number, a station number, and a delay time. The train number and station number indicate the train and station where the delay actually occurred.

  The delay time prediction unit 3 predicts the train delay situation of the entire diagram caused by the train delay that has occurred. The plan diagram data and the actual diagram data stored in the diagram data storage unit 5 and the delay time prediction data storage. From the various data for delay time prediction to be described later stored in the unit 7 and the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8, using a predetermined conditional expression, the entire diagram generated by the generated train delay Train delay time is calculated to generate predicted train delay information. This predicted train delay information is composed of the train number, the station number, and the predicted delay time in the same manner as the actual train delay information. Further, the operation arrangement plan searched by the operation arrangement history search unit 4, the plan diagram data and the actual diagram data of the diagram data storage unit 5, the delay time prediction data of the delay time prediction data storage unit 7, and the temporary storage The train delay time of the entire diagram after execution of the retrieved operation arrangement plan is calculated from the actual train delay information stored in the section 8 using a predetermined conditional expression, and the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan is calculated. Predictive train delay situation is also predicted.

  The operation organizing history search unit 4 uses the input actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram generated by the delay time predicting unit 3 based on the actual train delay information to train for the operation organizing plan search. Obtained as delay information and searched for train delay data that matches the acquired train delay information from the later described operation organization history data stored in the operation organization history storage unit 6 based on the train delay information. Search for arrangement plans.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the diagram data storage unit 5 stores planned diagram data and actual diagram data. The plan diagram data is determined in advance for the time at which each train arrives at each station and the time at which it departs. For example, the plan diagram data includes train number, station number, arrival time, and departure time data. The actual schedule records the actual arrival time and departure time of the train in operation at each station, and is composed of the train number, station number, arrival time, and departure time data, similar to the planned diagram data. ing. These track record data may be automatically input using the train monitoring information of the train operation management device, or may be manually input by a commander.

  The operation arrangement history storage unit 6 stores operation arrangement history data in which each past train delay data and each past operation arrangement plan implemented for each train delay data are associated with each other in a database. As shown in FIG. 3, the operation arrangement history database is configured by assigning a history number for each train delay data to an operation arrangement history in which the operation arrangement plan implemented at that time is associated with past train delay data. They are stored in order. When there are a plurality of operation arrangement plans implemented for one train delay data, a plurality of operation arrangement plans are stored in association with one train delay data, and a plurality of operation arrangement plans are stored with the same history number. There may be an arrangement plan. The train delay data and the operation arrangement plan may be associated with each other on a one-to-one basis and may be stored with different history numbers. As shown in FIG. 3, the train delay data (denoted as “delay data” in the figure) stored in the operation organization history storage unit 6 is the past actual train delay data (train number, station number and delay time). ) And predicted train delay data (train number, station number, and predicted delay time) of the entire diagram predicted in the same manner as the prediction processing of the delay time prediction unit 3 based on the actual train delay data. As shown in FIG. 3, the operation arrangement plan includes, for example, an arrangement method such as suspension and order change, a target train, and an execution station.

  The delay time prediction data storage unit 7 stores various data for predicting the train delay time of the entire diagram. As the data, as shown in FIG. 4, for example, inter-station travel time data, stop time data, etc. In addition, station-to-station use order data, use vehicle order data, station-to-station block data, and time interval data are stored. Here, the inter-station travel time data is data defining a minimum travel time for each station for each train. The stop time data is data that defines the minimum stop time at each station for each train. Inter-station use order data is data that defines the order of trains used between stations for each station. The used vehicle order data is data that defines a train number in a diagram that uses the train-organized vehicle for each train-organized vehicle. Inter-station block data is data indicating the number of blocks between stations. The time interval data is data defining each time interval (steadily, arrival, arrival, arrival, departure, departure, departure, departure, arrival, departure, passage, return) for each station.

  The temporary storage unit 8 temporarily stores input information and processing results obtained by each processing of search and prediction.

  The display unit 9 displays, for example, a commander by displaying the searched operation arrangement history data, the prediction result by the delay time prediction unit 3, and the like. Here, the display unit 9 and the operation arrangement history search unit 4 constitute an operation arrangement history presentation unit.

  Next, the operation adjustment history search operation by the operation adjustment support device 1 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

  In step 1 (indicated by S1 in the figure, the same applies hereinafter), actual train delay information (train number, station number, delay time) actually generated from the input unit 2 is input and stored in the temporary storage unit 8. .

  In step 2, the delay time prediction unit 3 stores the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8, the planned diagram data and the actual diagram data in the diagram data storage unit 5, and the data in the delay time prediction data storage unit 7 (stations). Estimated train delay information (train number, station) by calculating the train delay time for the entire diagram from inter-time travel time data, stop time data, inter-station use order data, use vehicle order data, inter-station block data and interval data Number and predicted delay time) are generated and stored in the temporary storage unit 8. The actual schedule data is generated by a trainer who monitors the train operation status manually inputs the train operation results manually or sequentially from the train monitoring information of the train operation management device.

  In step 3, the operation arrangement history search unit 4 searches the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 for train delay data that matches the actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8.

  In step 4, it is determined whether or not there is a matched train delay data. If there is (YES), the process proceeds to step 5, and if not (NO), it is presented by, for example, a display of no operation arrangement plan to be presented. The commander is informed that there is no operation arrangement plan and the process is terminated.

  In step 5, the history number of the matched train delay data is stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and the operation arrangement history data of the stored history number is displayed on the display unit 9 and presented. If a plurality of operation arrangement plans exist in the retrieved history number, all of the operation arrangement plans are displayed.

  When displaying the driving arrangement history data, the delay time prediction unit 3 stores the predicted train delay time of the entire diagram when the driving arrangement plan in the searched driving arrangement history data is implemented in the temporary storage unit 8. Calculates using the input actual train delay information, operation arrangement plan, plan diagram data, actual diagram data, and delay time prediction data, and predicts the predicted train delay situation of the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan Then, the prediction result may be stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and the stored prediction result may be simultaneously displayed in association with the driving arrangement plan of the driving arrangement history data. According to such a configuration, the commander can check the train delay state after the operation arrangement is performed, so that it is easy to determine whether or not to adopt the presented operation arrangement plan. In this case, a driving arrangement history presentation unit is configured including the display unit 9, the driving arrangement history search unit 4, and the delay time prediction unit 3.

  For the presentation of the prediction result of the predicted train delay of the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan, the prediction process described above is executed when the commander inputs the history number of the operation arrangement plan displayed on the display unit 9. You may make it display on the display part 9. FIG.

  When a new operation arrangement plan other than the presented operation arrangement plan is implemented, in the operation arrangement support device 1 of the present embodiment, a new operation arrangement plan executed by the instructor is input by the input unit 2 to newly It is possible to save it as simple driving arrangement history data. That is, the driving arrangement support device 1 sets a new driving arrangement history data by setting the inputted new driving arrangement plan and the actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8 at that time. And a new history number is added to the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 to update the operation arrangement history data.

  According to the driving arrangement support device 1 of the present embodiment, the driving arrangement plan presented by the driving arrangement support device 1 is an operation arrangement plan that has been actually implemented by the commander in the past. An arrangement plan can be presented. For this reason, it is possible to reduce the burden on the commander's operation adjustment work, and to improve the efficiency of the operation adjustment work.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the second embodiment of the driving arrangement support device of the present invention. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same element as 1st Embodiment, and description is abbreviate | omitted.
When searching only the matched items in the driving arrangement history as in the first embodiment, if the number of driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 is small, the matching operation arrangement history data exists. In many cases, there is a high possibility that the operation arrangement plan cannot be presented. The driving arrangement support device 10 according to the present embodiment shown in FIG. 6 solves this problem. By searching not only for matching but also similar driving arrangement history data, the search range of the driving arrangement history data to be searched can be set. The situation where the operation arrangement plan cannot be presented even when the operation arrangement history data stored in the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 is small is minimized. In the case of such a configuration, when similar driving arrangement history data is presented, there is a possibility that a slight fine correction may be required, and it is preferable that a corrected driving arrangement plan can be presented.

  For this reason, as shown in FIG. 6, the driving arrangement support device 10 of the present embodiment is configured by adding a corrected driving arrangement plan generator 11 to the configuration of the first embodiment of FIG. When the correction information is input to the presented driving arrangement plan, the corrected driving arrangement plan generating unit 11 corrects the presented driving arrangement plan based on the correction information to generate a new corrected driving arrangement plan. To create.

  When the train arrangement support device 10 of the present embodiment has no train delay data that matches the acquired train delay information (the input actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information predicted by the time delay prediction unit 3). The train delay data similar to the acquired train delay information is retrieved and presented. In this case, when a similar operation arrangement plan for train delay data is presented, there is a possibility that the commander may make a fine correction. For this reason, the driving arrangement support device 10 is provided with a corrected driving arrangement plan generation unit 11 so that the corrected driving arrangement plan generation unit 11 creates a corrected driving arrangement plan when correction information is input.

With reference to the flowchart of FIG. 7, the search operation | movement of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence log by the driving | operation arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus 10 of this embodiment is demonstrated.
Since Steps 11 to 15 are the same as the operations of Steps 1 to 5 of the first embodiment, description thereof is omitted.
If it is determined in step 14 that there is no matching train delay data (NO), the process proceeds to step 16 to determine whether similar train delay data exists, and if it exists (YES), step 17. If not (NO), the commander is informed that there is no operation arrangement plan to be presented, and the process is terminated. Here, the similar determination is made, for example, when the delay time of the actual train delay data is within a predetermined time, or when the delay time of the actual train delay data is the same and the predicted delay time of the predicted train delay data is different. What should I do? Note that similar determination criteria are not limited to these.

  In step 17, the history number of similar train delay data is stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and the operation arrangement history data of the stored history number is displayed on the display unit 9 and presented.

  According to the driving arrangement support device 10 of the present embodiment, the search range of the driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 is expanded, so the driving arrangement stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 is expanded. Even when the history data is small, it is possible to minimize the situation in which the operation arrangement plan cannot be presented.

  When the instructor makes a fine correction to the proposed operation arrangement plan of the similar operation arrangement history data presented, the operation arrangement support device 10 of the present embodiment has its correction information (for example, the train number to be corrected and the details of the correction ( By inputting “cancellation cancellation etc.)”, the corrected operation arrangement plan generating unit 11 can create a corrected operation arrangement plan, and the displayed corrected operation arrangement plan can be displayed on the display unit 9 and presented. Thereby, the corrected operation arrangement plan can be easily confirmed. Further, the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram when the corrected operation arrangement plan is implemented can be generated and displayed by the delay time prediction unit 3. Thereby, the effect of the driving arrangement by the corrected driving arrangement plan can be confirmed.

  The driving arrangement support device 10 of the present embodiment operates not only when a new driving arrangement plan is implemented, but also when a driving arrangement plan of similar presented driving arrangement history data is implemented regardless of whether or not there is a correction. Organize history data can be updated. When an instruction to update the operation organization history data is given by the commander, the operation organization plan of the similar operation organization history data that is stored in the temporary storage unit 8, the actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information at that time are displayed. As a set, a new history number is assigned and written in the operation organization history storage unit 6 to update the operation organization history data. Further, when the operation arrangement plan of the implemented similar operation arrangement history data has been corrected, the corrected operation arrangement plan already stored in the temporary storage unit 8, the actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information at that time , Set a new history number, write it in the operation organization history storage unit 6, and update the operation organization history data.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the third embodiment of the driving arrangement support device of the present invention. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same element as 2nd Embodiment, and description is abbreviate | omitted.
Similar to the second embodiment, the driving arrangement support device 20 of the present embodiment is for solving the problem when the number of driving arrangement history data in the first embodiment described above is small, and virtual driving arrangement history data Is generated to increase the driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6. Even in such a configuration, when the virtual driving arrangement history data is presented, there is a possibility that a slight fine correction may be required, and it is preferable that the corrected driving arrangement plan can be presented.

  For this reason, as shown in FIG. 8, the driving arrangement support device 20 of the present embodiment is configured by adding a virtual driving arrangement history generation unit 21 to the configuration of the second embodiment of FIG. The virtual driving arrangement history generation unit 21 generates virtual driving arrangement history data based on the driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6.

The operation of generating the virtual driving arrangement history data of the driving arrangement supporting apparatus 20 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In step 21, the virtual operation organization history generation unit 21 analyzes the train delay data of the operation organization history data stored in the operation organization history storage unit 6 to check the nonexistent train delay data, and the actual that has the closest delay time. From the operation arrangement history data, virtual operation arrangement history data having train delay data that does not exist is generated and stored in the temporary storage unit 8.

  In step 22, the virtual driving arrangement history data stored in the temporary storage unit 8 is stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 with a history number. The generated virtual operation organization history data may not be stored in the temporary storage unit 8 but may be directly stored in the operation organization history storage unit 6 with a history number.

  According to the driving arrangement support apparatus 20 of the present embodiment, when the past driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 is small, the driving arrangement history data can be substantially increased. The situation where the operation arrangement plan cannot be presented can be reduced as much as possible.

  Since the operation arrangement plan presenting operation and the data updating operation of the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 are the same as those in the second embodiment, description thereof will be omitted. The presentation of the operation arrangement plan after the fine correction when the operation arrangement plan of the virtual operation arrangement history data is selected is handled and processed in the same manner as the similar operation arrangement plan of the second embodiment. The operation arrangement plan presenting operation when the virtual operation arrangement history data is generated in the first embodiment is the same as that in the second embodiment, except that the virtually generated operation arrangement history data is increased. .

FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the fourth embodiment of the driving arrangement support device of the present invention. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same element as 1st Embodiment, and description is abbreviate | omitted.
In the first to third embodiments described above, when a plurality of driving arrangement histories are presented, it is difficult to select an effective driving arrangement history for the generated train delay. The driving arrangement support device 30 of the present embodiment shown in FIG. 10 evaluates each driving arrangement plan based on the evaluation data, and automatically selects and presents the high evaluation driving arrangement plan, thereby causing the train delay that has occurred. This makes it easy to select an effective driving arrangement history.

  The driving arrangement support device 30 of the present embodiment of FIG. 10 shows a case where it is applied to the first embodiment of FIG. 1, and the driving arrangement history selecting unit 31 and the driving arrangement history are added to the configuration of the first embodiment of FIG. An evaluation generation unit 32, an operation arrangement history evaluation update unit 33, and an operation arrangement history selection condition storage unit 34 are additionally provided. In addition, as shown in FIG. 11, the operation arrangement history data in the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 of the present embodiment includes the operation arrangement plan for each operation arrangement plan of the operation arrangement history data described in the first embodiment. It is configured by adding evaluation data. The evaluation data is composed of items such as a score, the number of selections, the last selection date, the number of operation arrangement methods (for example, the number of suspension or order change), and the number of suspensions. The “score” is input by the commander, and is, for example, an average score. “Number of selections” indicates the number of times that the operation arrangement plan is selected. “Last selection date” indicates the date when the operation arrangement plan was last selected. “Number of operation arrangement methods” indicates the number of operation techniques implemented in the operation arrangement plan. “Number of suspended trains” indicates the number of suspended trains implemented in the operation arrangement plan. The items of the evaluation data are not limited to the items and the number of items shown in the present embodiment as long as the operation arrangement plan can be appropriately evaluated.

  The operation arrangement history selection unit 31 stores an evaluation value calculated from the evaluation data for a plurality of operation arrangement plans searched for the actual train delay generated in an operation arrangement history selection condition storage unit 34 described later. The operation arrangement plan that satisfies the preset evaluation criteria is automatically selected.

  When an operation arrangement plan that is not stored in the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 is implemented, the operation arrangement history evaluation generation unit 32 performs the operation arrangement plan before saving the new operation arrangement plan as history data. The evaluation data is generated for.

  The operation arrangement history evaluation update unit 33 is a process for updating the evaluation data of the operation arrangement plan when the operation arrangement plan of the operation arrangement history data searched and presented for the actual train delay generated is selected and executed. I do.

  The operation arrangement history selection condition storage unit 34 stores the above-described evaluation criteria for selecting an operation arrangement plan. As the evaluation criteria, for example, “the total value of the score and the number of selections which are items of the driving arrangement history evaluation data is XX points or more” is determined. The total value of the score and the number of selections is an evaluation value. Here, when evaluating the driving arrangement plan from the evaluation data of the present embodiment, the larger the numerical value for the score and the number of selections, the higher the evaluation, and the lower the numerical value for the number of driving arrangement methods and the number of suspensions, the higher the evaluation. Regarding the final selection date, the newer the date, the higher the evaluation.

With reference to the flowchart of FIG. 12, the operation arrangement | sequence search operation | movement by the driving arrangement | sequence assistance apparatus 30 of this embodiment is demonstrated.
The operations in steps 31 to 34 are the same as the operations in steps 1 to 4 of the first embodiment shown in FIG.

  In step 35, if YES is determined in step 34, it is determined whether or not there are a plurality of driving arrangement plans. If there are a plurality of driving arrangement plans, the process proceeds to step 36. If one is present (NO), the process proceeds to step 38 described later.

  In step 36, the operation arrangement history selection unit 31 calculates an evaluation value from the evaluation data associated with each operation arrangement plan, and the calculated evaluation value is stored in advance in the operation arrangement history selection condition storage unit 34. Compare with the evaluation criteria set from the selection conditions, and select an operation arrangement plan with an evaluation value equal to or higher than the evaluation criteria.

  In step 37, it is determined whether or not there is a driving arrangement plan equal to or higher than the evaluation standard. If it exists (YES), the process proceeds to step 38, and if it does not exist (NO), the process proceeds to step 39.

  In step 38, if it is determined in step 35 that there is only one driving arrangement plan, or if it is determined in step 37 that there is an operating arrangement plan exceeding the evaluation standard, the history number of the driving arrangement history data including the driving arrangement plan is set. The operation arrangement plan of the operation arrangement history data of the stored history number is stored in the temporary storage unit 8 and displayed on the display unit 9 for presentation.

  Further, in step 39, it is displayed that there is no driving arrangement plan exceeding the evaluation standard, the history number of the searched driving arrangement history data is stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and all of the operation arrangement history data of the stored history number is stored. Are displayed on the display unit 9 and presented.

  According to the driving arrangement support device 30 of the present embodiment, even when a plurality of driving arrangement plans are searched, the presentation of the driving arrangement plan with a low evaluation is omitted based on the evaluation data, and only the driving arrangement plan with a high evaluation is obtained. Since it is displayed, it becomes easy for the commander to select an effective operation arrangement plan for the actual train delay that has occurred.

  When the presented driving arrangement plan is implemented, the driving arrangement support device 30 of the present embodiment, for example, about the evaluation data of the selected driving arrangement plan stored in the temporary storage unit 8, for example, the score, the number of selections, and the last selection date, An update process is performed by the operation arrangement history evaluation update unit 33. For example, with respect to the score, the past average score including the input score is calculated and the score data is updated. The score is updated by adding +1, and the final selection date is set as the implementation date. When a new driving arrangement plan is implemented, when a score is input from the input unit 2 by the commander as an evaluation of the driving arrangement plan and the commander for the driving arrangement plan, the driving arrangement history evaluation generation unit 32 The evaluation data of the operation arrangement plan is generated and stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and the history number is assigned by setting the actual train delay information, the operation arrangement plan and the generated evaluation data already stored in the temporary storage unit 8 as a set. And stored in the operation arrangement history storage unit 6.

  In each of the first to fourth embodiments, the train delay data in the operation control history data is configured by past actual train delay data and predicted train delay data of the entire diagram based on the actual train delay data. Only actual train delay data may be used. However, if the train delay data in the operation control history data is composed of the past actual train delay data and the predicted train delay data of the entire diagram based on the actual train delay data, the amount of data is large, and the operation control satisfies the commander It is possible to increase the frequency of searching for ideas.

  In the fourth embodiment, the configuration in which the evaluation data is used in the driving arrangement support device of the first embodiment has been described. Needless to say, the configuration can be applied to the driving arrangement support device of the second and third embodiments.

Next, a driving arrangement system using the driving arrangement support apparatus of the present invention will be described.
FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the first embodiment of the driving arrangement system according to the present invention, which is an example using the driving arrangement support apparatus 1 shown in FIG. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same element as embodiment of FIG. 1, and description is abbreviate | omitted.

  The operation arrangement system 50 of the present embodiment predicts the train delay situation of the entire diagram based on the input unit to which the train delay information generated for the planned diagram is input, and the input train delay information. A train delay prediction unit that generates information, a first determination unit that determines whether or not driving arrangement is necessary based on the generated predicted train delay information, and a driving arrangement plan that is presented when driving arrangement is required A driving arrangement plan presenting section, a second determining section that determines whether or not to adopt the presented driving arrangement plan, a driving arrangement execution section that executes driving arrangement based on the driving arrangement plan determined to be adopted, . Here, the driving arrangement support device 1 of FIG. 1 is used as the driving arrangement plan presentation unit, and the input unit 2 and the delay time prediction unit 3 of the driving arrangement support device 1 are used as the input unit and the train delay prediction unit. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 13, the driving arrangement system 50 according to the present embodiment includes the driving arrangement support device 1, the first determination unit 51, the second determination unit 52, and the driving arrangement execution unit 53.

  In the delay time prediction unit 3, the first determination unit 51 generates the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8 via the input unit 2, and each diagram data stored in the diagram data storage unit 5. It is determined whether or not driving arrangement is necessary based on the predicted train delay information generated by the driving arrangement assistance device 1 using the delay time prediction data stored in the delay time prediction data storage unit 7. is there.

  The second determination unit 52 determines whether to adopt the driving arrangement plan of the driving arrangement history data searched by the driving arrangement history search unit 4. Specifically, the second determination unit 52 generates the delay in the delay time prediction unit 3. Whether or not to adopt the operation arrangement plan is determined based on the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan of the retrieved operation arrangement history data.

  The operation arrangement execution unit 53 executes the operation arrangement plan determined to be adopted by the second determination unit 52. As an operation operation of the operation arrangement plan, for example, the contents of the operation arrangement plan are transferred to a train operation management device or a central guide. Send to device etc.

Next, the operation arrangement operation of the operation arrangement system of this embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In step 51, the generated actual train delay information is acquired and stored in the temporary storage unit 8. The actual train delay information acquisition method may be input from the train operation management device via the input unit 2 or may be manually input by the commander.

  In step 52, the delay time prediction unit 3 predicts the train delay of the entire diagram based on the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8, generates predicted train delay information, and temporarily stores the generated predicted train delay information. The data is stored in the unit 8 and displayed on the display unit 9.

  In step 53, based on the predicted train delay information generated in step 52, the first determination unit 51 determines whether or not driving arrangement is necessary. If it is determined that it is necessary (YES), the process proceeds to step 54 and is not necessary. If it is determined (NO), the driving arrangement operation is terminated. Note that the commander may determine the necessity of operation arrangement from the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram displayed on the display unit 9.

  In step 54, the operation arrangement history data having train delay information that matches the actual train delay information and the predicted train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8 is retrieved by the operation arrangement support device 1, and the matching operation arrangement history data is matched. If there is, all are displayed on the display unit 9, and if there is no matching history data, it is displayed that there is no corresponding data.

  In step 55, the presence / absence of search history data is determined. If it is determined that there is data (YES), the process proceeds to step 56. If it is determined that there is no search history data (NO), the process proceeds to step 59.

  In step 56, predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan of the searched operation arrangement history data is generated by the delay time prediction unit 3, stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and displayed on the display unit 9.

  In step 57, the second determination unit 52 determines whether or not to adopt the driving arrangement plan based on the predicted train delay information generated in step 56. If it is determined to be adopted (YES), the process proceeds to step 58. Then, the driving arrangement execution unit 53 transmits the driving arrangement contents to execute the driving arrangement plan, and the process ends. If it is determined not to be adopted (NO), the process proceeds to step 59. It should be noted that the commander may determine whether to adopt or not to be employed based on the predicted train result displayed on the display unit 9. In this case, if the commander determines that it has not been adopted, the commander may determine a new operation arrangement plan. If it is determined to be adopted, the operation organizer may be executed by directly instructing an operation arrangement plan to be executed by the commander.

  In step 59, by obtaining a new operation arrangement plan, the delay time prediction unit 3 creates predicted train delay information for the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan, and this operation arrangement based on the predicted train delay information. Execute after examining the details of the train delay situation.

  In step 60, the new driving arrangement plan executed in step 59 is combined with the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8 and the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram generated in step 52, and the new driving arrangement plan is set. It stores in the operation arrangement history storage unit 6 as arrangement history data, and the process ends.

  When there are a plurality of driving arrangement history data searched by the driving arrangement support apparatus 1, one of the plurality of searched driving arrangement history data is selected, the process of step 56 is executed, and not adopted at step 57. If it is determined, another driving arrangement history data is selected, and the operations in steps 56 and 57 are repeated again. The operations in steps 56 and 57 are repeated until the determination in step 57 becomes YES. If it is determined NO in step 57 for all search operation arrangement history data, the process proceeds to step 59. Further, in the search processing of step 54, predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the driving arrangement plan of the searched driving arrangement history data may be generated and displayed together with the driving arrangement history data. In this case, after step 55, the determination operation of step 57 is executed.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the second embodiment of the driving arrangement system according to the present invention, which is an example using the driving arrangement support apparatus 10 shown in FIG. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same element as embodiment of FIG.6 and FIG.13, and description is abbreviate | omitted.
The driving arrangement system 60 of the present embodiment is the same as the configuration of the driving arrangement system 50 of FIG. 13 except that the driving arrangement support device 10 is used and a third determination unit 54 is added.
The third determination unit 54 determines whether or not a fine correction is necessary when the operation arrangement plan determined to be adopted by the second determination unit 52 is a similar operation arrangement plan, and considers the correction contents. It is also determined whether or not re-correction is necessary based on the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the corrected operation arrangement plan.

Hereinafter, the driving arrangement operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
The operations in steps 71 to 75 are the same as those in steps 51 to 55 in FIG. If the determination in step 75 is NO, the process proceeds to step 76 and the same processing as in steps 59 and 60 in FIG. 14 is performed.

  In step 77, it is determined whether or not the search history data is similar history data. If the search history data is similar operation arrangement history data (YES), the process proceeds to step 79. If it is coincident operation arrangement history data (NO), the process proceeds to step 78 and the same processing as in steps 56 to 60 in FIG. 14 is performed.

  In step 79, predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the operation arrangement plan of the retrieved similar operation arrangement history data is generated by the delay time prediction unit 3, stored in the temporary storage unit 8, and displayed on the display unit 9.

  In step 80, the second determination unit 52 determines whether or not to adopt the similar operation arrangement plan based on the generated predicted train delay information. If it is determined to be adopted (YES), the process proceeds to step 81. If it is determined that it has not been adopted (NO), the process proceeds to step 86 and the same processing as in steps 59 and 60 in FIG. 14 is performed. The commander may determine whether to adopt or reject the job based on the displayed predicted train result.

  In step 81, the third determining unit 54 determines whether or not a fine correction is necessary. When it is determined that it is necessary (YES), the process proceeds to step 82, and when it is determined that a fine correction is not necessary (NO). Then, the process proceeds to step 84 described later.

  In step 82, the correction content is stored in the temporary storage unit via the input unit 2, and based on the correction content, the delay time prediction unit 3 creates predicted train delay information for the entire diagram after execution of the corrected operation arrangement plan. The prediction result is displayed on the display unit 9.

  In step 83, the third determination unit 54 determines again whether or not re-correction is necessary based on the prediction result. If necessary (YES), the process returns to step 82, and the delay time is again determined based on the correction content of the fine correction. The prediction unit 3 creates predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the re-correction operation arrangement plan, and displays the prediction result on the display unit 9. If it is determined that recorrection is unnecessary (NO), the process proceeds to step 84.

  In step 84, the driving arrangement execution unit 53 transmits the corrected driving arrangement contents to execute the driving arrangement plan, and the process ends.

  In Step 85, the revised operation arrangement plan executed in Step 84 is set as a set together with the actual train delay information stored in the temporary storage unit 8 and the predicted train delay information of the entire diagram generated in Step 72, and a new operation arrangement is performed. The history data is stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6 and the process is terminated.

  If there are a plurality of similar operation organization history data searched by the operation organization support device 10, as in the case of the coincidence search, one of the plurality of similar operation organization history data is selected and the process of step 79 is performed. When it is determined that the operation is not adopted in step 80, another operation arrangement history data is selected, and the operations in steps 79 and 80 are repeated again, and all similar operation arrangement history data searched and displayed are displayed. On the other hand, if NO is determined in step 80, the process proceeds to step 86. Further, in the search processing of step 74, predicted train delay information of the entire diagram after execution of the driving arrangement plan of the searched driving arrangement history data may be generated and displayed together with the driving arrangement history data. In this case, after step 77, the determination operation of step 80 is executed.

  The driving arrangement support system 20 of the present invention can be configured by applying the driving arrangement support apparatus 20 shown in FIG. 8 or the driving arrangement support apparatus 30 shown in FIG.

  In the driving arrangement system to which the driving arrangement support device 20 of FIG. 8 is applied, the virtual driving arrangement history data generated by the driving arrangement support device 20 is added to the driving arrangement history data to be searched stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit 6. Is added. The operation arrangement operation is substantially the same as the operation of the operation arrangement system 60 shown in FIG. In the driving arrangement system to which the driving arrangement support device 20 is applied, the driving arrangement history data retrieved and displayed by the driving arrangement assistance device 20 based on the actual train delay information generated is not only similar but also a virtual driving arrangement history. Also in the case of data, the operation after step 79 is performed.

  In the driving arrangement system to which the driving arrangement support device 30 of FIG. 10 is applied, the driving arrangement history data searched by the evaluation value calculated based on the evaluation data is ranked, and the driving arrangement history data exceeding the evaluation standard is displayed. Therefore, the only difference from the operation arrangement systems 50 and 60 of FIGS. 13 and 15 is the display form of the search results. In other words, all of the retrieved driving arrangement history data are displayed in the driving arrangement system 50 in FIG. 13 and the driving arrangement system 60 in FIG. 15, but in the driving arrangement system to which the driving arrangement support device 30 in FIG. Only the operation control history data exceeding the evaluation standard is displayed. Other operations are the same as those of the operation arrangement system 50 in FIG. 13 and the operation arrangement system 60 in FIG. 15.

  In addition, as a driving arrangement system, it is conceivable that the commander performs driving arrangement using the driving arrangement support apparatus 1, 10, 20, 30 or the like of the present invention. In this case, for example, the operation arrangement support apparatus 10 is used. Briefly described.

  When a train delay occurs, the commander inputs the generated actual train delay information to the operation arrangement support device 10 via the input unit 2. The driving arrangement support device 10 generates the predicted train delay information by predicting the train delay of the entire diagram based on the actual train delay information input by the delay time prediction unit 3, and displays the prediction result on the display unit 9. . When the commander determines from the displayed predicted train delay information whether or not the operation adjustment is necessary and determines that it is necessary, the commander searches the operation adjustment history data by the operation adjustment support device 10. If the search result is confirmed on the display unit 9 and there is no coincidence or similar operation arrangement history data, the commander creates an operation arrangement plan, and the operation arrangement plan created by the operation arrangement support device 10 is a diagram after the arrangement plan is implemented. The overall forecast train delay situation is confirmed, and if it can be adopted, the commander executes the operation arrangement plan. After the execution, the commander stores the execution operation arrangement plan in the operation arrangement support device 10 as history data. The input to the driving arrangement support device 10 may be manually input by a commander or may be automatically input using the temporary storage unit 8, for example.

  On the other hand, when the coincidence or similar operation arrangement history data is displayed, the commander confirms and adopts the predicted train delay state of the entire diagram after the operation arrangement plan is implemented on the display unit 9 of the operation arrangement support device 10. Determine whether or not. In the case of adoption, if it is similar driving arrangement history data, the commander determines whether or not fine correction is necessary, and if it is determined that fine correction is necessary, the correction content is input to the driving support device 10 and corrected. The predicted train delay situation after the operation arrangement plan is confirmed, and if it is determined that re-correction is necessary as a result of the confirmation, the correction content is input again to the driving support device 10 to check the predicted train delay situation after the implementation. If it is possible to confirm the predicted train delay after implementation and adopt it, the commander executes the operation arrangement plan. If the executed operation arrangement history data is similar history data, the commander saves the execution operation arrangement plan as history data in the operation arrangement support device 10.

1, 10, 20, 30 Driving Arrangement Support Device 2 Input Unit 3 Delay Time Prediction Unit 4 Operation Arrangement History Search Unit 5 Diamond Data Storage Unit 6 Operation Arrangement History Storage Unit 7 Delay Time Prediction Data Storage Unit 8 Temporary Storage Unit 9 Display Unit 11 Corrected Operation Arrangement Proposal Generation Unit 21 Virtual Operation Arrangement History Generation Unit 31 Operation Arrangement History Selection Unit 32 Operation Arrangement History Evaluation Generation Unit 33 Operation Arrangement History Evaluation Update Unit 34 Operation Arrangement History Selection Condition Storage Unit 50, 60 Operation Arrangement System 51 First determination unit 52 Second determination unit 53 Operation arrangement execution unit

Claims (10)

An operation arrangement support device that supports operation arrangement work by presenting an operation arrangement plan for recovering the turbulence of a diagram caused by a train delay,
An operation arrangement history storage unit for storing operation arrangement history data in which each past train delay data is associated with each operation arrangement plan implemented for each train delay data,
An operation arrangement history presentation unit that searches the operation arrangement history data based on the acquired train delay information and presents the operation arrangement plan associated with the searched train delay data;
A driving arrangement support device characterized by comprising the above.   The operation arrangement support device according to claim 1, wherein the operation arrangement history presentation unit is configured to search the operation arrangement history data for train delay data that matches the train delay information and present the operation arrangement plan. .   The operation arrangement history presentation unit searches the operation arrangement history data for train delay data similar to the train delay information when the matching train delay data does not exist in the operation arrangement history data. The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus of Claim 2 which is a structure which shows a plan.   A virtual driving arrangement history generation unit that generates virtual driving arrangement history data based on the driving arrangement history data stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit is provided, and the generated virtual driving arrangement history data is stored in the driving arrangement history storage unit. The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-3 made into the structure added as driving | operation arrangement | sequence history data.   Evaluation data for evaluating each operation arrangement plan of the operation arrangement history data is stored in the operation arrangement history storage unit in association with each operation arrangement plan, and the operation arrangement plan searched by the operation arrangement history presentation unit is The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-4 made into the structure which evaluates based on the said evaluation data matched with the driving arrangement plan, and showed the driving arrangement plan which satisfy | fills the preset evaluation criteria. .   When presenting the operation arrangement plan, the operation arrangement history presentation unit predicts the train delay situation of the entire diagram when the operation arrangement plan is implemented, and presents the prediction result together with the operation arrangement plan. The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-5.   When the information on the generated train delay is input, the train delay situation of the entire diagram caused by the train delay can be predicted based on the input train delay information, and the obtained predicted train delay information can be presented. The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-6 made into a structure.   A configuration that predicts the train delay situation of the entire diagram when the revised driving arrangement plan corrected based on the corrected information is input when the correction information for the presented driving arrangement plan is input, and presents the prediction result The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 3-7.   The driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-8 made into the structure which displays a presentation content on a display part. An input unit for inputting train delay information generated for the planning schedule;
A train delay prediction unit that generates predicted train delay information by predicting a train delay situation of the entire diagram based on the input train delay information;
A first determination unit that determines whether or not driving arrangement is necessary based on the predicted train delay information;
A driving arrangement plan presenting section for presenting a driving arrangement plan when it is determined by the first judging section that driving arrangement is necessary;
A second determination unit that determines whether or not to adopt the operation arrangement plan presented by the operation arrangement plan presentation unit;
A driving arrangement execution unit that executes driving arrangement based on the driving arrangement plan determined to be adopted by the second determination unit;
With
The driving arrangement | positioning system which uses the driving arrangement | positioning assistance apparatus of Claim 1 for a driving arrangement plan presentation part.

Images