JP2010155601A - Bracket - Google Patents

Bracket Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010155601A
JP2010155601A JP2009101651A JP2009101651A JP2010155601A JP 2010155601 A JP2010155601 A JP 2010155601A JP 2009101651 A JP2009101651 A JP 2009101651A JP 2009101651 A JP2009101651 A JP 2009101651A JP 2010155601 A JP2010155601 A JP 2010155601A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
structural member
flange
bracket
pin hole
side end
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2009101651A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5246008B2 (en
Inventor
Koji Seto
厚司 瀬戸
Takashi Matsuno
崇 松野
Eisaku Sakurada
栄作 桜田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2009101651A priority Critical patent/JP5246008B2/en
Publication of JP2010155601A publication Critical patent/JP2010155601A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5246008B2 publication Critical patent/JP5246008B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
  • Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a bracket that reduces the deflection of a structural member. <P>SOLUTION: The bracket 1 has one or two flanges 2 of a plate shape, and is formed with a pin hole 3 penetrating the flanges 2, and formed by continuously welding a flange end 7 to the structural member 4. The flange end 7 is thicker than a central part 9 in a plate thickness of each side end 8, and assuming a distance up to a welding part 6 from the bottom 3 of the pipe hole as H (mm) and the length of the flange end 7 as W(mm), 2H≤W is obtained. Stress is concentrated on each side end 8, and the structural member 4 is wholly deflected, and a maximum value of the deflection (t) can be reduced. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、構造部材に接合し、構造部材の撓みを低減させるブラケットに関するものである。   The present invention relates to a bracket that is bonded to a structural member and reduces bending of the structural member.

自動車、建設機械、橋梁、建築構造物などの鋼構造物では、軽量化あるいは大型化を実現するためには、ハイテン材と呼ばれる強度の高い高張力鋼を使用して部材の板厚あるいは断面積を小さくする必要がある。しかし、部材の板厚あるいは断面積を小さくすると部材の剛性が低下し、外力に対する変形、すなわち撓みが大きくなって、鋼構造物の安全性が確保出来なくなるという課題があり、部材の剛性を落とさずに板厚あるいは断面積を小さくする技術の出現が切望されている。   For steel structures such as automobiles, construction machinery, bridges, and building structures, in order to reduce weight or size, high-strength steel called high-tensile material is used to make the plate thickness or cross-sectional area of the member. Need to be small. However, if the plate thickness or cross-sectional area of the member is reduced, the rigidity of the member is reduced, and the deformation to the external force, that is, the deflection is increased, which makes it impossible to secure the safety of the steel structure. Therefore, the advent of technology for reducing the plate thickness or cross-sectional area is eagerly desired.

構造部材には、他の部材から荷重を伝達するためにブラケットが接合されるが、このブラケットについては、スラスト荷重を受ける円板を有するベアリングブラケットに設けた内径側円周補強リブの厚みを円板の板厚より厚くする方法が特許文献1に、ステアリングシャフトに取り付けたブラケットにおいて、コラム保持部材を挟持する板部の板厚を車体本体に取り付けられる本体の板厚より薄くしたもの、又は、両者は同じ板厚を有し前記板部に切り欠きを設けたものを有するステアリング装置が特許文献2に、ブームの上面板にアーム駆動用シリンダ取り付けブラケットを取り付けた建設機械の作業機ブームが特許文献3に、一端部に車輪側取付部を有すると共に他端部に第1の車体側取付部を有し、かつ中間部に第2の車体側取付部を有するトランスバースリンク等のリンク本体をアルミニウム押し出し成形で形成し、第2の車体側取付部は円筒部とブラケットを有し、ブラケットとリンク本体との溶接長を円筒部の切断幅より長くしたリンク部材が特許文献4にそれぞれ開示されている。   A bracket is joined to the structural member in order to transmit the load from other members. For this bracket, the thickness of the inner diameter side circumferential reinforcing rib provided on the bearing bracket having a disc that receives the thrust load is circular. Patent Document 1 discloses a method of making the plate thicker than the plate thickness. In the bracket attached to the steering shaft, the plate thickness of the plate portion sandwiching the column holding member is made thinner than the plate thickness of the main body attached to the vehicle body, or A steering device having the same plate thickness and having a notch in the plate portion is disclosed in Patent Document 2, and a work machine boom of a construction machine in which an arm drive cylinder mounting bracket is attached to an upper surface plate of the boom is patented. Document 3 has a wheel-side mounting portion at one end, a first vehicle-side mounting portion at the other end, and a second vehicle-side mounting portion at the intermediate portion. A link body, such as a transverse link, is formed by aluminum extrusion molding, the second vehicle body side mounting portion has a cylindrical portion and a bracket, and the weld length between the bracket and the link main body is longer than the cutting width of the cylindrical portion. The members are disclosed in Patent Document 4, respectively.

特開昭59−191447号公報JP 59-191447 A WO2005−037627号公報WO2005-037627 特開2003−193512号公報JP 2003-193512 A 特開平11−217014号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-2117014

前記開示技術のうち、特許文献1では、ブラケットにピン孔が無く、ピン孔を有するブラケットから構造部材に荷重が作用する場合に、構造部材の撓みを減らせないという問題がある。また補強材の厚みを厚くすることは重量が増加するという問題がある。   Among the disclosed technologies, Patent Document 1 has a problem that the bending of the structural member cannot be reduced when the bracket has no pin hole and a load acts on the structural member from the bracket having the pin hole. Further, increasing the thickness of the reinforcing material has a problem that the weight increases.

また特許文献2では、ピン孔とブラケット端との距離、およびブラケット端の長さとの関係についての記載が無く、またブラケットの板厚を小さくするものの、ブラケット内の板厚変化については記載が無く、ピン孔を有するブラケットから構造部材に荷重が作用する場合に、構造部材の撓みを減らせないという問題がある。   In Patent Document 2, there is no description about the relationship between the distance between the pin hole and the bracket end, and the length of the bracket end, and there is no description about the plate thickness change in the bracket although the thickness of the bracket is reduced. When the load acts on the structural member from the bracket having the pin hole, there is a problem that the bending of the structural member cannot be reduced.

また特許文献3では、建設機械の作業機ブームに取り付けるブラケットにおいて、ブームに溶接するブラケット端の長さがピン孔とブラケット端の距離よりも十分長いアーム駆動用シリンダ取り付けブラケットが記載されているが、ブラケット内の板厚変化についての記載が無く、ピン孔を有するブラケットから構造部材に荷重が作用する場合に、構造部材の撓みを減らせないという問題がある。   Further, Patent Document 3 describes an arm drive cylinder mounting bracket in which a bracket end welded to a boom is sufficiently longer than a distance between a pin hole and a bracket end in a bracket to be attached to a work machine boom of a construction machine. There is no description about the plate thickness change in the bracket, and there is a problem that the bending of the structural member cannot be reduced when a load acts on the structural member from the bracket having the pin holes.

加えて特許文献4では、リンク本体に溶接されるアルミニウム押し出し成形で形成されたブラケットの構造部材側に2つの空洞が見られるが、このブラケットはフランジ端部の両側端以外に中央部にも板厚の厚い部分があるため、ピン孔を有するブラケットから構造部材に荷重が作用する場合に、構造部材の撓みを減らせないという問題がある。   In addition, in Patent Document 4, two cavities can be seen on the structural member side of the bracket formed by aluminum extrusion that is welded to the link body. Since there is a thick part, there is a problem that the bending of the structural member cannot be reduced when a load is applied to the structural member from the bracket having the pin holes.

本発明は、ピン孔を有するブラケットを介して構造部材に荷重が作用する場合に構造部材の撓みを低減させるブラケットを提供することを目的とする。   An object of this invention is to provide the bracket which reduces the bending of a structural member, when a load acts on a structural member via the bracket which has a pin hole.

上記課題を解決するために、本発明は、(1)板状の1枚又は2枚のフランジを有し、前記フランジを貫通するピン孔が形成され、かつフランジ端部が構造部材に連続して溶接されているブラケットにおいて、前記フランジ端部は、両側端部の板厚が中央部より厚く、かつ、前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジと前記構造部材との溶接部までの距離をH(mm)、前記フランジ端部の長さをW(mm)とするとき、2H≦Wとなることを特徴とするブラケットを提供する。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention provides (1) a plate-like one or two flanges, a pin hole penetrating the flange is formed, and the flange end is continuous with the structural member. In the bracket being welded, the flange end portion has a plate thickness at both end portions that is thicker than the center portion, and the distance from the bottom of the pin hole to the weld portion between the flange and the structural member is H ( mm), when the length of the flange end is W (mm), the bracket is characterized in that 2H ≦ W.

また、本発明によれば、(2)前記フランジにおける、前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジ端部の中央部までの一部又は全部の板厚が、前記フランジ端部における両側端部の板厚の0.5〜0.85倍であることを特徴とする前記(1)記載のブラケットが提供される。   Further, according to the present invention, (2) in the flange, a part or all of the plate thickness from the bottom of the pin hole to the center portion of the flange end portion is the plate thickness of both side end portions of the flange end portion. The bracket according to (1) is provided, wherein the bracket is 0.5 to 0.85 times.

さらに、本発明によれば、(3)略くの字の形状から成る1枚又は2枚のフランジを有し、前記フランジを貫通するピン孔が形成され、かつ、フランジ端部の両側端部のみが、それぞれ構造部材に溶接されているブラケットにおいて、前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジと前記構造部材との溶接部までの距離をH(mm)、前記フランジ端部の両側端部の外側同士の間隔をW1(mm)とするとき、2H≦W1となることを特徴とするブラケットが提供される。   Further, according to the present invention, (3) one or two flanges having a substantially U-shape are formed, pin holes penetrating the flanges are formed, and both end portions of the flange end portions In the brackets welded to the structural members only, the distance from the bottom of the pin hole to the welded portion of the flange and the structural member is H (mm), and the outer sides of both end portions of the flange end portions When the distance of W1 is W1 (mm), a bracket is provided that satisfies 2H ≦ W1.

またさらに、本発明によれば、(4)前記フランジ端部の両側端部の外側同士の間隔W1(mm)に対する、前記両側端部の内側同士の間隔W2(mm)の比W2/W1が、0.5〜0.9であることを特徴とする前記(3)記載のブラケットが提供される。   Still further, according to the present invention, (4) the ratio W2 / W1 of the interval W2 (mm) between the inner sides of the both end portions to the interval W1 (mm) between the outer ends of the both end portions of the flange end portion. The bracket according to (3) is provided, which is 0.5 to 0.9.

加えて、本発明によれば、(5)前記フランジ面における前記ピン孔の底を中心として、前記フランジ端部の、前記両側端より板厚の小さい領域または空洞の領域の両側方に外接する2本の直線がなす角度が80〜100°であることを特徴とする前記(1)〜(4)の何れかに記載のブラケットが提供される。   In addition, according to the present invention, (5) around the bottom of the pin hole on the flange surface, the flange end is circumscribed on both sides of a region having a smaller plate thickness than the both side ends or a hollow region. The bracket according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein an angle formed by two straight lines is 80 to 100 °.

さらに、本発明によれば、(6)前記フランジが前記構造部材の片方の固定端に近い位置に接合されているブラケットにおいて、前記フランジの両側端部のうち、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部の断面積が、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が遠い方の側端部の断面積の1.2〜3.0倍であることを特徴とする前記(1)、(3)〜(5)の何れかに記載のブラケットが提供される。   Further, according to the present invention, (6) in the bracket in which the flange is joined at a position close to one fixed end of the structural member, of the both side end portions of the flange, the fixed end of the structural member The cross-sectional area of the side end portion closer to the distance is 1.2 to 3.0 times the cross-sectional area of the side end portion farther from the fixed end of the structural member. A bracket according to any one of 1) and (3) to (5) is provided.

またさらに、本発明によれば、(7)前記フランジが前記構造部材の片方の固定端に近い位置に接合されているブラケットにおいて、前記フランジの両側端部よりも板厚の小さい領域または空洞の領域の両側方に外接する2本の直線のうち、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部の側方に外接する直線と前記溶接部のなす角が、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が遠い方の側端部の側方に外接する直線と前記溶接部のなす角よりも5〜40°大きいことを特徴とする前記(1)〜(6)の何れかに記載のブラケットが提供される。   Still further, according to the present invention, (7) in the bracket where the flange is joined to a position close to one fixed end of the structural member, a region or cavity having a thickness smaller than both end portions of the flange is provided. Of the two straight lines circumscribing both sides of the region, the angle formed by the straight line circumscribing the side of the side end closer to the fixed end of the structural member and the welded portion of the structural member Any one of the above (1) to (6), characterized in that the distance between the fixed end and the welded portion is 5 to 40 degrees larger than the angle formed between the straight line circumscribing the side end portion on the far side and the welded portion. The described bracket is provided.

尚、本発明において、フランジ端部の中央部とは、フランジ端部のうち両側端部を除く部分をいう。即ち、フランジ端部とは、中央部と両側端部からなる。また、ピン孔の底とは、ピン孔の周縁のうち、フランジ端部に最も近い位置を指す。   In addition, in this invention, the center part of a flange edge part means the part except a both-sides edge part among flange edge parts. That is, the flange end portion includes a center portion and both end portions. Moreover, the bottom of a pin hole refers to the position nearest to a flange end part among the peripheral edges of a pin hole.

本発明によれば、構造部材の撓みを低減でき、その工業的意味は大きい。   According to the present invention, the bending of the structural member can be reduced, and its industrial significance is great.

構造部材とブラケットの関係を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the relationship between a structural member and a bracket. 本発明のブラケットの例と構造部材との関係を示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows the relationship between the example of the bracket of this invention, and a structural member. 本発明のブラケットの別の例を示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows another example of the bracket of this invention. 図2のA−A’断面の形状を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the shape of the A-A 'cross section of FIG. 本発明のブラケットの別の例と構造部材との関係を示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows the relationship between another example of the bracket of this invention, and a structural member. 本発明のブラケットの別の例を示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows another example of the bracket of this invention. 本発明のブラケットの例と構造部材との関係において、ピン孔の底を起点として板厚の小さい領域の両側方に外接する直線がなす角度を示す平面図である。In the relationship between the example of the bracket of this invention and a structural member, it is a top view which shows the angle which the straight line circumscribed on the both sides of the area | region where a board | plate thickness is small starts from the bottom of a pin hole. 本発明のブラケットの別の例と構造部材との関係において、ピン孔の底を起点として板厚の小さい領域の両側方に外接する直線がなす角度を示す平面図である。In the relationship between another example of the bracket of the present invention and a structural member, it is a plan view showing an angle formed by a straight line circumscribing both sides of a region having a small plate thickness starting from the bottom of the pin hole. 本発明のブラケットの例と構造部材との関係において、構造部材の片方の固定端の近くにブラケットが接合された例を示す平面図である。In the relationship between the example of the bracket of this invention and a structural member, it is a top view which shows the example in which the bracket was joined near the one fixed end of a structural member. 図9のC−C’断面の形状の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the shape of the C-C 'cross section of FIG. 本発明のブラケットの例と構造部材との関係において、ピン孔の底を起点として板厚の小さい領域の両側方に外接する直線と溶接線のなす角度を説明する平面図である。In the relationship between the example of the bracket of this invention and a structural member, it is a top view explaining the angle which the straight line circumscribed to the both sides of the area | region where a board | plate thickness is small, and the welding line starts from the bottom of a pin hole. 構造部材とブラケットの関係を示した別の例の斜視図である。It is the perspective view of another example which showed the relationship between a structural member and a bracket. 本発明のブラケットの別の例を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows another example of the bracket of this invention. 本発明のブラケットの別の例と構造部材の関係を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the relationship between another example of the bracket of this invention, and a structural member. 図11のB−B’断面の形状を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the shape of the B-B 'cross section of FIG. 本発明の実施例における構造部材を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structural member in the Example of this invention. 本発明の実施例における試験状況と構造部材の撓みを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the test condition and the bending of a structural member in the Example of this invention. 本発明の実施例におけるブラケットの種類を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the kind of bracket in the Example of this invention. 本発明の別の実施例における試験状況と構造部材の撓みを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the test condition in another Example of this invention, and the bending of a structural member.

以下、本発明を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。なお、本明細書および図面において、実質的に同一の機能構成を有する要素においては、同一の符号を付することにより重複説明を省略する。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In the present specification and drawings, elements having substantially the same functional configuration are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant description is omitted.

まず、本発明者らは、図1に示すようにピン孔3を有するブラケット1が接合された構造部材4と、他の構造部材10とが、ピン孔3に挿通されたピン(図示しない)を介して結合され、他の構造部材10からピンを通じて荷重Pが作用する場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを詳細に検討した。   First, as shown in FIG. 1, the present inventors have a pin (not shown) in which a structural member 4 to which a bracket 1 having a pin hole 3 is joined and another structural member 10 are inserted into the pin hole 3. The bending t of the structural member 4 was examined in detail when the load P is applied from the other structural member 10 through the pin.

その結果、構造部材4の撓みtは、ブラケット1を構成するフランジ2から構造部材4に伝達される応力の分布に大きく依存し、構造部材4に溶接されているフランジ端部7は、中央部9の応力が小さく、両側端部8の応力が大きくなるほど、荷重Pの作用方向における構造部材4の撓みtは小さくできることを知見した。すなわち、フランジ端部7の中央部9は構造部材4の固定端14から離れているため、中央部9に応力が集中すると構造部材4は容易に撓むことができ、逆にフランジ端部7の両側端部8に応力が集中するほど構造部材4がより全体的に撓み、撓みtの最大値を小さくすることができることを知見した。   As a result, the deflection t of the structural member 4 greatly depends on the distribution of stress transmitted from the flange 2 constituting the bracket 1 to the structural member 4, and the flange end 7 welded to the structural member 4 has a central portion. It has been found that the deflection t of the structural member 4 in the acting direction of the load P can be reduced as the stress of 9 is smaller and the stress of the side end portions 8 is larger. That is, since the central portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 is separated from the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4, the stress can concentrate on the central portion 9, and the structural member 4 can be easily bent. It has been found that as the stress concentrates on both side end portions 8 of the structure member 4, the structural member 4 is bent more entirely and the maximum value of the bend t can be reduced.

この知見をもとにさらにブラケットの形状を詳細に検討した結果、図2に2枚のフランジのうちの1枚の模式図を示すように、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚を中央部9の板厚より厚くすること、およびフランジ2に形成されているピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離をH(mm)、フランジ端部7の長さをW(mm)とするとき、2H≦Wとすることにより、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。これは、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚を中央部9より厚くすることにより、ピン孔3を通じて加わる荷重Pが中央部9に流れずに両側端部8へ流れること、さらにフランジ端部7の長さWをピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離Hの2倍以上とすることで応力がより広範囲に広がることの両方の効果によるものである。また、2H>Wとなると、フランジ端部7の長さWが十分大きくないためにピン孔3から負荷された荷重Pが広がる幅が無く、構造部材4の限られた範囲に応力が分布する結果、構造部材4の撓みtを十分に低減することが出来ないことが判明した。   As a result of examining the shape of the bracket in detail based on this knowledge, as shown in a schematic diagram of one of the two flanges in FIG. The thickness from the thickness of the central portion 9 is made larger, the distance from the bottom 3a of the pin hole formed in the flange 2 to the welded portion 6 is H (mm), and the length of the flange end 7 is W (mm). Then, it was found that the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced by setting 2H ≦ W. This is because when the plate thickness of both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 is made thicker than the center portion 9, the load P applied through the pin hole 3 flows to the both end portions 8 without flowing to the center portion 9, and further to the flange. This is due to the effect that the stress spreads over a wider range by making the length W of the end 7 at least twice the distance H from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the weld 6. Further, when 2H> W, the length W of the flange end 7 is not sufficiently large, so that the load P loaded from the pin hole 3 does not have a width to spread, and the stress is distributed in a limited range of the structural member 4. As a result, it has been found that the deflection t of the structural member 4 cannot be sufficiently reduced.

また、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚が中央部分9の板厚と同じか小さい場合には、ピン孔3から負荷された荷重Pがフランジ端部7の両側端部8よりも中央部9に集中するため、構造部材4の撓みtは低減されないことが判明した。フランジ端部7の中央部9の、両側端部8よりも板厚の小さい領域5は、例えば図3(a)に示すようにピン孔3の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの一部であっても、あるいは全範囲であっても同様の効果が得られ、さらに、例えば図3(b)、(c)に示すようにフランジ端部7に達していても、そうでなくても良く、また、例えば図3(b)に示すように略三角形であっても図3(d)に示すように略円形であっても差し支えないことを知見した。   Further, when the plate thickness of both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 is the same as or smaller than the plate thickness of the central portion 9, the load P loaded from the pin hole 3 is larger than that of the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7. Since it concentrates on the center part 9, it turned out that the bending t of the structural member 4 is not reduced. The region 5 having a smaller thickness than the side end portions 8 at the center portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 is, for example, from the bottom 3a of the pin hole 3 to the center portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 as shown in FIG. Even if it is a part or all of the range, the same effect can be obtained, and even if it reaches the flange end 7 as shown in FIGS. 3B and 3C, for example, It has been found that there is no need, and for example, it may be a substantially triangular shape as shown in FIG. 3 (b) or a substantially circular shape as shown in FIG. 3 (d).

またさらに、図4は図2のA−A’断面であり、フランジ端部7の断面形状例を示すものである。板厚の小さい領域5は、例えば図4(a)に示すようにフランジ2の両面が窪んで形成されても、図4(b)に示すように片面のみが窪んで形成されても良く、両側端部8と板厚の小さい領域5との境界は、例えば図4(a)、(b)に示すように段差が形成されていても、図4(c)、(d)に示すように滑らかであっても同様の効果が得られることが判明した。   FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line A-A ′ of FIG. 2, and shows an example of the cross-sectional shape of the flange end 7. For example, the region 5 having a small plate thickness may be formed by recessing both surfaces of the flange 2 as shown in FIG. 4 (a), or by forming only one surface as shown in FIG. 4 (b). As shown in FIGS. 4 (c) and 4 (d), the boundary between the side end portions 8 and the region 5 with a small plate thickness is formed with a step as shown in FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b), for example. It has been found that the same effect can be obtained even when smooth.

以上述べたように、フランジ端部7の両側端部8は中央部9より板厚が厚く、2H≦Wとしたブラケットは、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   As described above, it is clear that the side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are thicker than the central portion 9 and the bracket with 2H ≦ W can greatly reduce the bending t of the structural member 4.

次に、本発明者らは、ピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離Hと、フランジ端部7の長さWが、2H≦Wとなるブラケットにおいて、フランジ2におけるピン孔3の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの板厚の範囲を詳細に検討した。   Next, the inventors of the present invention, in the bracket where the distance H from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the welded portion 6 and the length W of the flange end 7 is 2H ≦ W, the bottom of the pin hole 3 in the flange 2 The range of the plate thickness from 3a to the central portion 9 of the flange end 7 was examined in detail.

その結果、ピン孔の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの板厚が、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚の0.5〜0.85倍のときに、構造部材4の撓みtが小さくなることを知見した。ピン孔の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの板厚が、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚の0.5倍より小さい場合には、フランジ2を構造部材4に入熱の大きなアーク溶接等で溶接する際に溶接部6の溶け落ちが生じ、健全な溶接継手が得られない。またフランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚の0.85倍より大きい場合にはフランジ端部7の中央部9に伝達する応力が小さくならず、その結果構造部材4の撓みtは小さくならないことが判明した。以上述べたように、ピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離をH(mm)、フランジ端部7の長さをW(mm)とするとき2H≦Wであり、ピン孔の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの板厚が、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚の0.5〜0.85倍のブラケットは、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかになった。   As a result, when the plate thickness from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the center portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 is 0.5 to 0.85 times the plate thickness of both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7, the structural member It has been found that the deflection t of 4 is reduced. When the plate thickness from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the center portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 is smaller than 0.5 times the plate thickness of both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7, the flange 2 is made into the structural member 4. When welding is performed by arc welding or the like having a large heat input, the welded portion 6 is melted and a sound welded joint cannot be obtained. Further, when the thickness of the flange end 7 is larger than 0.85 times the thickness of the both end portions 8, the stress transmitted to the central portion 9 of the flange end portion 7 is not reduced, and as a result, the bending t of the structural member 4 is small. It turned out not to be. As described above, when the distance from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the welded portion 6 is H (mm) and the length of the flange end 7 is W (mm), 2H ≦ W, and the bottom 3a of the pin hole The thickness of the plate from the flange end 7 to the center 9 of the flange end 7 is 0.5 to 0.85 times the plate thickness of the side ends 8 of the flange end 7 so that the bending t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced. Became clear.

次に本発明者らは、ピン孔の底3aからフランジ端部7の中央部9までの板厚を、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の板厚よりもさらに小さくしたブラケットの形状・寸法を詳細に検討した。   Next, the inventors have made the shape and dimensions of the bracket in which the plate thickness from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the central portion 9 of the flange end 7 is further smaller than the plate thickness of both side ends 8 of the flange end 7. Were examined in detail.

その結果、図5に示すように、フランジ2を貫通するピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離Hと、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の外側同士の間隔W1が、2H≦W1であって、かつ、フランジ2が略くの字の形状から成り、フランジ端部7の両側端部8のみが、それぞれ構造部材4に溶接されているブラケット1は、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。フランジ2が略くの字の形状であってフランジ端部7の両側端部8のみが構造部材4に溶接されることにより、ピン孔3から伝達される荷重は両側端部8を通って構造部材4に負荷されるため、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できる。併せてピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離Hと、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の外側同士の間隔W1が2H≦W1であることにより、荷重は十分な広がりをもって両側端部8に流れることができる。略くの字の形状は、その詳細を特に限定するものではなく、図5に示すフランジ2の他、図6(a)〜(d)に示すような形状であっても全く差し支えなく同様の効果が得られることを知見した。   As a result, as shown in FIG. 5, the distance H from the bottom 3a of the pin hole penetrating the flange 2 to the welded portion 6 and the interval W1 between the outer side ends 8 of the flange end portion 7 are 2H ≦ W1. Further, the bracket 1 in which the flange 2 is formed in a substantially square shape, and only the both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are welded to the structural member 4 respectively, the bending t of the structural member 4 is reduced. We found that it can be greatly reduced. Since the flange 2 has a substantially U-shape and only the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are welded to the structural member 4, the load transmitted from the pin hole 3 passes through the both end portions 8 and is structured. Since the load is applied to the member 4, the bending t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced. At the same time, the distance H from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the welded portion 6 and the interval W1 between the outer side ends 8 of the flange end portion 2 satisfy 2H ≦ W1, so that the load is sufficiently widened. 8 can flow. The shape of the abbreviated letter does not specifically limit the details, and the flange 2 shown in FIG. 5 or the shapes shown in FIGS. It was found that an effect can be obtained.

以上のことから、2H≦W1であって、かつフランジ2が略くの字の形状から成り、フランジ端部7の両側端部8のみが、それぞれ構造部材4に溶接されているブラケット1は、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   From the above, the bracket 1 in which 2H ≦ W1 and the flange 2 has a substantially square shape, and only the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are welded to the structural member 4, respectively, It has been clarified that the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced.

またさらに本発明者らは、略くの字のフランジ2が構造部材4と接合されている両側端部8の寸法を詳細に検討した。その結果、フランジ2が略くの字の形状から成り、フランジ2を貫通するピン孔3が形成され、かつフランジ端部7の両側端部8のみが、それぞれ構造部材4に溶接されているブラケット1において、ピン孔の底3aから溶接部6までの距離Hと、フランジ端部7の両側端部8の外側同士の間隔W1が2H≦W1であって、フランジ2における構造部材4に溶接されているフランジ端部7の両側端部8の外側同士の間隔W1(mm)に対する、両側端部8の内側同士の間隔W2(mm)の比W2/W1が0.5〜0.9であるブラケットは、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。W2/W1が0.5より小さいと、フランジ端部7の両側端部8のそれぞれの幅が大きくなるため、構造部材4に伝達される応力はフランジ端部7の両側端部8の中で幅をもって一様に分布する結果、構造部材4の撓みtを十分に低減できない。またW2/W1が0.9より大きいと、フランジ端部7の両側端部8が狭くなり過ぎ、フランジ2そのものの剛性が低下して撓みが大きくなり、座屈しやすくなる。以上のことから、フランジ2が略くの字の形状から成り、フランジ2を貫通するピン孔3が形成され、かつフランジ端部7の両側端部8のみが、それぞれ構造部材4に溶接されているブラケットにおいて、2H≦W1であって、W2/W1が0.5〜0.9であるブラケット1は、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   Furthermore, the present inventors have examined in detail the dimensions of the side end portions 8 where the substantially U-shaped flange 2 is joined to the structural member 4. As a result, the bracket 2 is formed in a substantially square shape, the pin hole 3 penetrating the flange 2 is formed, and only the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are welded to the structural member 4 respectively. 1, the distance H from the bottom 3a of the pin hole to the welded portion 6 and the interval W1 between the outer side ends 8 of the flange end 7 are 2H ≦ W1 and are welded to the structural member 4 in the flange 2. The ratio W2 / W1 of the interval W2 (mm) between the inner sides of the side end portions 8 to the interval W1 (mm) between the outer sides of the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 is 0.5 to 0.9. It has been found that the bracket can greatly reduce the deflection t of the structural member 4. When W2 / W1 is smaller than 0.5, the widths of the both side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are increased, so that the stress transmitted to the structural member 4 is generated in the side end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7. As a result of the uniform distribution with the width, the deflection t of the structural member 4 cannot be reduced sufficiently. On the other hand, if W2 / W1 is greater than 0.9, both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 become too narrow, the rigidity of the flange 2 itself decreases, the deflection increases, and buckling easily occurs. From the above, the flange 2 is formed in a substantially square shape, the pin hole 3 penetrating the flange 2 is formed, and only the both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7 are welded to the structural member 4 respectively. It is clear that the bracket 1 in which 2H ≦ W1 and W2 / W1 is 0.5 to 0.9 can greatly reduce the bending t of the structural member 4.

加えて本発明者らは、これまで述べてきた特徴のブラケット1において、図7および図8に示すように、フランジ面におけるピン孔の底3aを中心として、中央部9に相当する、フランジ端部7の板厚が両側端部8よりも板厚の小さい領域5または空洞の領域16(図5参照)の両側方に外接する2本の直線がなす角度Rを詳細に検討した。   In addition, in the bracket 1 having the characteristics described so far, the present inventors, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, have flange ends corresponding to the center portion 9 centering on the bottom 3a of the pin hole on the flange surface. The angle R formed by two straight lines circumscribing both sides of the region 5 where the plate thickness of the portion 7 is smaller than the side end portions 8 or the hollow region 16 (see FIG. 5) was examined in detail.

その結果、角度Rが80〜100°である場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。これは、ピン孔3から伝達された荷重によって発生する応力が幅方向に十分広がるためには、ピン孔の底3aを中心として、伝達方向に対して±45°の角度が必要であるためである(伝達方向を0°とし、右回りをプラス、左回りをマイナスとする)。この角度Rが100°より大きいと、ピン孔3から伝達された荷重によって発生する応力が幅方向には十分に広がるが、フランジ端部7の両側端部8で応力の発生しない無駄な部分が生じるとともにフランジ2自体も大きなものになり、重量増および溶接施工時間増を招く。またこの角度Rが80°より小さい場合には、ピン孔3から伝達された荷重によって発生する応力は幅方向には十分に広がらず、構造部材4の撓みtをさほど低減しない。このように、これまで述べてきた特徴のブラケットにおいて、フランジ面におけるピン孔の底3aを中心として、フランジ端部7の板厚が両側端部8よりも板厚の小さい領域5または空洞の領域16に外接する線がなす角度Rを80〜100°としたブラケットは、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   As a result, it has been found that when the angle R is 80 to 100 °, the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced. This is because, in order for the stress generated by the load transmitted from the pin hole 3 to spread sufficiently in the width direction, an angle of ± 45 ° with respect to the transmission direction is required around the bottom 3a of the pin hole. Yes (the transmission direction is 0 °, clockwise is positive, counterclockwise is negative). If this angle R is larger than 100 °, the stress generated by the load transmitted from the pin hole 3 is sufficiently widened in the width direction, but there is a useless portion where no stress is generated at both end portions 8 of the flange end portion 7. As a result, the flange 2 itself becomes large, which increases the weight and welding time. When the angle R is smaller than 80 °, the stress generated by the load transmitted from the pin hole 3 does not sufficiently spread in the width direction, and the bending t of the structural member 4 is not reduced so much. As described above, in the bracket having the characteristics described so far, the region 5 or the cavity region in which the plate thickness of the flange end portion 7 is smaller than the side end portions 8 around the bottom 3a of the pin hole on the flange surface. It has been clarified that the bracket in which the angle R formed by the line circumscribing 16 is 80 to 100 ° can greatly reduce the bending t of the structural member 4.

これまでは、構造部材4の両端の2つの固定端14の中央にブラケット1が接合される場合について述べてきたが、本発明者らは、さらに図9に示すように、構造部材4の片方の固定端14に近い位置にブラケット1が接合される場合のフランジ2の両側端部8の断面積を詳細に検討した。   So far, the case where the bracket 1 is joined to the center of the two fixed ends 14 at both ends of the structural member 4 has been described. However, the present inventors have further described one side of the structural member 4 as shown in FIG. The cross-sectional area of both end portions 8 of the flange 2 when the bracket 1 is joined at a position close to the fixed end 14 was examined in detail.

その結果、フランジ2の両側端部8のうち、図9に示すように構造部材4の固定端14との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.2〜3.0倍である場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。これは、フランジ2の両側端部8a、8bを通じて構造部材4に伝達される荷重のうち、構造部材4の固定端14により近い方の側端部8aから構造部材4に伝達される荷重の割合が大きいほど、構造部材4の撓みtが小さくなるためである。構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aから構造部材4へ伝達される荷重の割合を大きくするには、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの断面積が固定端14に遠い方の側端部8bの断面積よりも大きくすることが必要である。構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.2倍よりも小さいと、両側端部8a、8bから構造部材4に伝達される荷重に大差がなく、構造部材4の撓みtはさほど低減しない。また構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの断面積を、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の3.0倍よりも大きくすると、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aから構造部材4に伝達される荷重は飽和し、それ以上大きくしても構造部材4の撓みtをさらに低減する効果が得られにくい。さらに、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの断面積が遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の3.0倍よりも大きくなると、固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの長さが大きくなり過ぎて荷重の伝達しない無駄な部分が発生するか、あるいは板厚が厚くなり過ぎてブラケットの加工が困難になるなどのコスト増を招く。構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの断面積を大きくする方法としては、図9のC−C’断面の形状を図10(a)に示すように側端部8aの幅を大きくしても、図10(b)に示すように側端部8aの板厚を増加させても良く、いずれも同様に構造部材4の撓みtを低減させることが出来る。このように、フランジ2の両側端部8のうち、構造部材4の固定端14との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.2〜3.0倍である場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   As a result, the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a that is closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 in the both side end portions 8 of the flange 2 is smaller than that of the far side end portion 8b. It has been found that the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced when the cross-sectional area is 1.2 to 3.0 times. This is the ratio of the load transmitted to the structural member 4 from the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 among the loads transmitted to the structural member 4 through the both side end portions 8a and 8b of the flange 2. This is because the deflection t of the structural member 4 becomes smaller as the value of becomes larger. In order to increase the ratio of the load transmitted from the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 to the structural member 4, the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 Needs to be larger than the cross-sectional area of the side end 8b far from the fixed end 14. When the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 is smaller than 1.2 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b, the structural member 4 extends from the side end portions 8a and 8b. There is no great difference in the load transmitted to, and the bending t of the structural member 4 is not reduced so much. Further, if the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 is larger than 3.0 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b, it is close to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4. The load transmitted from the side end 8a to the structural member 4 is saturated, and it is difficult to obtain an effect of further reducing the bending t of the structural member 4 even if the load is increased further. Further, when the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 is larger than 3.0 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b, the side end closer to the fixed end 14 The length of the portion 8a becomes too large, and a useless portion where the load is not transmitted is generated, or the plate thickness becomes too thick and it becomes difficult to process the bracket. As a method for increasing the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4, the shape of the CC ′ cross section of FIG. 9 is as shown in FIG. 10 (a). Even if the width is increased, the plate thickness of the side end portion 8a may be increased as shown in FIG. 10B, and in both cases, the bending t of the structural member 4 can be similarly reduced. Thus, the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 in the both side end portions 8 of the flange 2 is equal to 1. of the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b. It has been clarified that the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced when the ratio is 2 to 3.0 times.

またさらに、本発明者らは、構造部材4の片方の固定端14の近くにブラケット1が接合される場合について、フランジ2の両側端部より板厚の小さい領域5または空洞の領域16の両側方に外接する2本の直線について詳細に検討した。   Furthermore, the inventors of the present invention have found that when the bracket 1 is joined near one fixed end 14 of the structural member 4, both sides of the region 5 or the hollow region 16 having a plate thickness smaller than both end portions of the flange 2. The two straight lines circumscribing the direction were examined in detail.

その結果、図11に示すように、フランジ2の両側端部8a、8bより板厚の小さい領域5または空洞の領域16の両側方に外接する2本の直線のうち、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部6のなす角raが、固定端14との距離が遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接線6のなす角rbよりも5〜40°大きい場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることを知見した。これは、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部6のなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接線6のなす角rbよりも大きいと、固定端14に近い方の側端部8aを通じて構造部材4へ伝達する荷重が、遠い方の側端部8bを通じて構造部材4へ伝達する荷重よりも大きくなり、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できるためである。角raが角rbに比べて大きくても、その差が5°よりも小さい場合には、両側端部8a、8bの断面積が同じであれば、両側端部8a、8bから構造部材4へ伝達する荷重はほぼ同じであり、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減する効果が無い。また、角raが角rbより40°を超えて大きい場合には、固定端14から遠い方の側端部8bから構造部材4へ伝達する荷重が小さくなって無駄な部分が発生するため、ブラケットの加工が複雑になるなどのコスト増を招く。このように、フランジ2の両側端部8a、8bよりも板厚の小さい領域5または空洞の領域16の両側方に外接する2本の直線のうち、構造部材4の固定端14に近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部6のなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接線6のなす角rbよりも5〜40°大きい場合に、構造部材4の撓みtを大きく低減できることが明らかとなった。   As a result, as shown in FIG. 11, the fixed end of the structural member 4 out of the two straight lines circumscribing both sides of the region 5 having a smaller thickness than the both side end portions 8a and 8b of the flange 2 or the region 16 of the cavity. The straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a closer to 14 and the angle ra formed by the welded portion 6 and the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8b far from the fixed end 14 are welded lines. It has been found that the deflection t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced when the angle rb formed by 6 is larger by 5 to 40 °. This is because the straight line circumscribing the side end 8a closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 and the straight line circumscribing the side ra of the far side end 8b is the angle ra formed by the weld 6. When the angle is larger than the angle rb formed by the weld line 6, the load transmitted to the structural member 4 through the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end 14 is larger than the load transmitted to the structural member 4 through the far side end portion 8b. This is because the bending t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced. Even if the angle ra is larger than the angle rb, if the difference is smaller than 5 °, if the cross-sectional areas of the side end portions 8a and 8b are the same, the side end portions 8a and 8b are connected to the structural member 4. The transmitted loads are substantially the same, and there is no effect of greatly reducing the deflection t of the structural member 4. Further, when the angle ra is larger than the angle rb by more than 40 °, the load transmitted from the side end portion 8b far from the fixed end 14 to the structural member 4 is reduced, and a useless portion is generated. This leads to increased costs such as complicated processing. As described above, of the two straight lines circumscribing both sides of the region 5 having a smaller thickness than the both side end portions 8a and 8b of the flange 2 or the cavity region 16, the one closer to the fixed end 14 of the structural member 4 is used. The angle ra formed between the straight line circumscribing the side end 8a and the welded portion 6 is 5 to 40 ° larger than the angle rb formed between the straight line circumscribed to the side end 8b far from the side and the weld line 6. In this case, it became clear that the bending t of the structural member 4 can be greatly reduced.

なお、本発明は、適用されるブラケットの材料の種類には依存せず、鋼材、アルミニウムおよびその合金、チタンおよびその合金、マグネシウムおよびその合金、樹脂など、いずれの材料にも適用可能であり、板材、管材を加工したもの、鋳造・鍛造したものであっても同様の効果が得られる。また、本発明はブラケットの構造を工夫して構造部材の弾性状態の変形量を低減した発明であるので、材料の化学組成、機械的性質等に依らず、相対的に全ての材料に対して有効である。   The present invention does not depend on the type of bracket material applied, and can be applied to any material such as steel, aluminum and its alloys, titanium and its alloys, magnesium and its alloys, and resins. The same effect can be obtained even if a plate material, tube material, or cast / forged material is processed. In addition, the present invention is an invention in which the structure of the bracket is devised to reduce the deformation amount of the elastic state of the structural member, so that it can be applied to all materials relatively regardless of the chemical composition, mechanical properties, etc. of the material. It is valid.

また、本発明のブラケットは、図1に示すように構造部材4の一面に突き合せて溶接するものに限らず、例えば図12に示すように構造部材4の上面及び下面の二面に重ねるようにして溶接されたものでも同様の効果が得られることは言うまでもない。   Further, the bracket of the present invention is not limited to the one that is butted against one surface of the structural member 4 as shown in FIG. 1 and is superposed on two surfaces of the upper surface and the lower surface of the structural member 4 as shown in FIG. Needless to say, the same effect can be obtained even in the case of welding.

本発明ではブラケットを構成するフランジの形状・寸法について述べたが、ブラケットは図1に示すように2枚の独立したフランジ2から成るものであっても、図13に示すように2つのフランジ2がリブ部12を介して繋がった1枚の板からなるものであっても、同様の効果が得られる。さらに図14及び図14のB−B’断面を示す図15のように、構造部材4の一部である下側のフランジ部4aと対をなして、構造部材4の上面に設置(溶接)された1枚のフランジ2から成るブラケット1であっても、構造部材4の撓みを低減することが可能である。   In the present invention, the shape and dimensions of the flange constituting the bracket have been described. Even if the bracket is composed of two independent flanges 2 as shown in FIG. 1, two flanges 2 as shown in FIG. Even if it consists of one plate connected through the rib portion 12, the same effect can be obtained. Further, as shown in FIG. 15 showing the BB ′ cross section of FIGS. 14 and 14, it is installed (welded) on the upper surface of the structural member 4 in a pair with the lower flange portion 4 a which is a part of the structural member 4. Even with the bracket 1 composed of the single flange 2 formed, the bending of the structural member 4 can be reduced.

以上、本発明の好適な実施形態について説明したが、本発明はかかる例に限定されない。当業者であれば、特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想の範疇内において、各種の変更例または修正例に想到しうることは明らかであり、それらについても当然に本発明の技術的範囲に属するものと了解される。   As mentioned above, although preferred embodiment of this invention was described, this invention is not limited to this example. It is obvious for those skilled in the art that various changes or modifications can be conceived within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims. It is understood that it belongs to.

上述の発明をもとに、図16に示す形状の中空角材を構造部材とし、その中央に2枚のフランジ2からなるブラケットを溶接して取り付けた。図17に示すように、この構造部材4の両端を冶具に溶接して固定した状態で、フランジ2に形成されたピン穴3に挿入したピンを介して1000kgfの荷重Pを負荷し、中空角材からなる構造部材4の最大撓みtを測定した。溶接には溶接ワイヤ:JIS−Z3312 YGW12(1.2mm径)、溶接電流210A、アーク電圧23V、溶接速度80cm/min、パス数1パスの条件で炭酸ガスアーク溶接を適用した。ただし、No.11、23、35(表1〜3参照)の試験体は、アーク溶接を適用するとフランジ端部の中央部分が溶け落ちる危険性があるため、パワー8kW、溶接速度8.5m/min、シールドガス:9L/minのアルゴンガスの条件で炭酸ガスレーザー溶接を用いた。ブラケットは、図18(a)〜(f)に示す本発明例と、比較例として図18(g)に示す従来形のブラケットも製作して同様に載荷試験を行った。構造部材4およびブラケット1は全て引張強さ780MPa級鋼材を用いた。構造部材の板厚は、3.0mmとした。   Based on the above-described invention, a hollow square member having the shape shown in FIG. 16 was used as a structural member, and a bracket composed of two flanges 2 was welded to the center thereof. As shown in FIG. 17, with both ends of the structural member 4 welded and fixed to a jig, a load P of 1000 kgf is applied via a pin inserted into a pin hole 3 formed in the flange 2, The maximum deflection t of the structural member 4 made of was measured. For welding, carbon dioxide arc welding was applied under the conditions of a welding wire: JIS-Z3312 YGW12 (1.2 mm diameter), welding current 210A, arc voltage 23V, welding speed 80 cm / min, and the number of passes 1 pass. However, no. The test specimens 11, 23, and 35 (see Tables 1 to 3) have a risk of melting the center portion of the flange end when arc welding is applied. Therefore, power 8 kW, welding speed 8.5 m / min, shielding gas : Carbon dioxide laser welding was used under the condition of argon gas of 9 L / min. As for the bracket, the present invention example shown in FIGS. 18A to 18F and a conventional bracket shown in FIG. 18G as a comparative example were also manufactured and subjected to the same loading test. The structural member 4 and the bracket 1 were all made of 780 MPa class steel material having a tensile strength. The plate thickness of the structural member was 3.0 mm.

その結果を表1〜表6に示す。なお、表中の「撓みの低減率」とは、従来技術の比較例であるNo.37および38の平均値に対する撓み低減の比率である。また、表中、下線を引いた数値は、本発明のうちいずれかの条件を満たさないものを示す。   The results are shown in Tables 1-6. In addition, the “reduction rate of deflection” in the table is No. which is a comparative example of the prior art. The ratio of the deflection reduction to the average value of 37 and 38. Moreover, the numerical value which underlined in the table | surface shows what does not satisfy | fill either conditions among this invention.

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

表1〜表3は、それぞれ本発明のブラケットの実施例であるa、b、cタイプおよび比較例である従来形のgタイプの結果を示している。表1のNo.3〜12、表2のNo.15〜24、表3のNo.27〜36は本発明の請求項1に係わる発明例であり、比較例であるNo.1、2(表1)、13、14(表2)、25、26(表3)および従来形のブラケットであるNo.37、38に比べて撓みが5%以上低減されており、本発明のブラケットが構造部材の撓み低減に効果的であることがわかった。   Tables 1 to 3 show results of a, b, and c types, which are examples of the bracket of the present invention, and a conventional g type, which is a comparative example, respectively. No. in Table 1 3-12, No. 2 in Table 2. 15-24, No. 3 in Table 3. Nos. 27 to 36 are invention examples according to claim 1 of the present invention. 1, 2 (Table 1), 13, 14 (Table 2), 25, 26 (Table 3) and No. 1 which is a conventional bracket. Compared with 37 and 38, the bending was reduced by 5% or more, and it was found that the bracket of the present invention is effective in reducing the bending of the structural member.

このうち、No.4〜10、12(表1)、16〜22、24(表2)、28〜34、36(表3)は、ピン孔の底からフランジ端部の中央部までの一部又は全部の板厚Tcが、フランジ端部の両側端部の板厚Teの0.5〜0.85倍であって、本発明の請求項2に係わる発明の実施例であり、上記の範囲外の実施例No.3、11(表1)、15、23(表2)、27、35(表3)に比べてさらに3%以上低減されている。またさらに、このうちNo.5〜9(表1)、17〜21(表2)は上記の両側端部の板厚Teに対する中央部の板厚Tcの比(Tc/Te)が0.67であり、No.29〜33(表3)は同比が0.70とそれぞれ一定値であって、ピン孔の底を起点として板厚の小さい領域に外接する線がなす角度Rの影響を調べた例であり、これらの中では、本発明の請求項5に係わり、上記角度Rが80〜100°である実施例No.6〜8(表1)、18〜20(表2)、30〜32(表3)の撓み低減率が他の例よりも大きい。以上のように、本発明のブラケットは構造部材の撓みを大きく低減させることが判明した。   Of these, No. 4 to 10, 12 (Table 1), 16 to 22, 24 (Table 2), 28 to 34, and 36 (Table 3) are part or all of the plate from the bottom of the pin hole to the center of the flange end. The thickness Tc is 0.5 to 0.85 times the plate thickness Te of the both end portions of the flange end portion, and is an embodiment of the invention according to claim 2 of the present invention, and an embodiment outside the above range. No. Compared with 3, 11 (Table 1), 15, 23 (Table 2), 27, and 35 (Table 3), it is further reduced by 3% or more. Furthermore, no. Nos. 5 to 9 (Table 1) and 17 to 21 (Table 2) have a ratio (Tc / Te) of the plate thickness Tc of the central portion to the plate thickness Te of the both side end portions as described above. 29 to 33 (Table 3) are examples in which the ratio is a constant value of 0.70, and the influence of the angle R formed by a line circumscribing a region having a small plate thickness starting from the bottom of the pin hole is examined. Among these, according to claim 5 of the present invention, Example No. 5 in which the angle R is 80 to 100 °. The deflection reduction rate of 6-8 (Table 1), 18-20 (Table 2), and 30-32 (Table 3) is larger than the other examples. As described above, it has been found that the bracket of the present invention greatly reduces the bending of the structural member.

表4〜6は、本発明のブラケットの実施例であるd、e、fタイプおよび前掲の比較例である従来形のgタイプの結果を示している。表4のNo.40〜50、表5のNo.52〜62、表6のNo.64〜74は本発明の請求項3に係わる発明例であり、比較例であるNo.39(表4)、51(表5)、63(表6)並びに従来形のブラケットであるNo.37、38に比べて撓みが5%以上低減されており、本発明のブラケットが構造部材の撓み低減に効果的であることがわかる。   Tables 4 to 6 show the results of the d, e, and f types, which are examples of the bracket of the present invention, and the conventional g type, which is a comparative example. No. in Table 4 40 to 50, No. 5 in Table 5. 52-62, No. 6 in Table 6. Nos. 64 to 74 are invention examples according to claim 3 of the present invention. No. 39 (Table 4), 51 (Table 5), 63 (Table 6) and conventional bracket No. The bending is reduced by 5% or more compared to 37 and 38, and it can be seen that the bracket of the present invention is effective in reducing the bending of the structural member.

このうち、No.41〜48、50(表4)、53〜60、62(表5)、65〜72、74(表6)は、構造部材に溶接されている両側端部の外側同士の間隔W1に対する両側端部の内側同士の間隔W2の比(W2/W1)が0.5〜0.9であって、本発明の請求項4に係わる発明の実施例であり、上記の範囲外の実施例No.40、49(表4)、52、61(表5)、64、73(表6)に比べてさらに3%以上低減されている。またさらにこのうちNo.43〜47(表4)、55〜59(表5)、67〜71(表6)は上記の両側端部の外側同士の間隔W1に対する両側端部の内側同士の間隔W2の比W2/W1が、それぞれ0.67、0.68、0.72であって、ピン孔の底を起点として空洞の領域に外接する線がなす角度Rの影響を調べた例であり、これらの中では、本発明の請求項5に係わり上記角度Rが80〜100°である実施例No.44〜46(表4)、56〜58(表5)、68〜70(表6)の撓み低減が他の例よりも大きい。以上のように、本発明のブラケットは構造部材の撓みを大きく低減させることが判明した。   Of these, No. 41 to 48, 50 (Table 4), 53 to 60, 62 (Table 5), 65 to 72, and 74 (Table 6) are both side ends with respect to the interval W1 between the outsides of both side ends welded to the structural member. The ratio (W2 / W1) of the interval W2 between the insides of the portion is 0.5 to 0.9, which is an embodiment of the invention according to claim 4 of the present invention. Compared with 40, 49 (Table 4), 52, 61 (Table 5), 64, and 73 (Table 6), it is further reduced by 3% or more. Furthermore, among these, No. 43 to 47 (Table 4), 55 to 59 (Table 5), and 67 to 71 (Table 6) are ratios W2 / W1 of the interval W2 between the inner sides of the both end portions to the interval W1 between the outer ends of the both end portions. Are 0.67, 0.68, and 0.72, respectively, and are examples in which the influence of the angle R formed by the line circumscribing the cavity region starting from the bottom of the pin hole is examined. According to claim 5 of the present invention, in Example No. 8 wherein the angle R is 80 to 100 °. Deflection reduction of 44 to 46 (Table 4), 56 to 58 (Table 5), and 68 to 70 (Table 6) is larger than the other examples. As described above, it has been found that the bracket of the present invention greatly reduces the bending of the structural member.

以上のように、本発明のブラケットは、構造部材の撓み低減に有効であることが判明した。   As described above, it has been found that the bracket of the present invention is effective in reducing the bending of the structural member.

上述の発明をもとに、実施例1と同じく図16に示す形状の中空角材を構造部材とし、その一方の固定端14aから400mm離れた位置を中心にし、2枚のフランジ2からなるブラケット1を溶接して取り付けた。図19に示すように、この構造部材4の両端を冶具に溶接して固定した状態で、フランジ2に形成されたピン穴3に挿入したピンを介して1000kgfの荷重Pを負荷し、中空角材からなる構造部材4の最大撓みtを測定した。溶接には溶接ワイヤ:JIS−Z3312 YGW12(1.2mm径)、溶接電流210A、アーク電圧23V、溶接速度80cm/min、パス数1パスの条件で炭酸ガスアーク溶接を適用した。ただし、No.96〜98(表7参照)の試験体は、アーク溶接を適用するとフランジ端部の中央部分が溶け落ちる危険性があるため、パワー8kW、溶接速度8.5m/min、シールドガス:9L/minのアルゴンガスの条件で炭酸ガスレーザー溶接を用いた。ブラケットは、図18(a)および(d)に示す本発明例と、比較例として図18(g)に示す従来形のブラケットも製作して同様に載荷試験を行った。構造部材4およびブラケット1は全て引張強さ780MPa級鋼材を用いた。構造部材の板厚は、3.0mmとした。また、本発明のブラケットのうち、両側端部の板厚が異なるものについては、ピン穴を有する中央部で板厚の差による段差が生じないように、滑らかに加工した。   Based on the above-described invention, a hollow square member having the shape shown in FIG. 16 is used as a structural member in the same manner as in the first embodiment, and a bracket 1 composed of two flanges 2 around a position 400 mm away from one fixed end 14a. Were attached by welding. As shown in FIG. 19, a load P of 1000 kgf is applied through a pin inserted into a pin hole 3 formed in the flange 2 with both ends of the structural member 4 welded and fixed to a jig, The maximum deflection t of the structural member 4 made of was measured. For welding, carbon dioxide arc welding was applied under the conditions of a welding wire: JIS-Z3312 YGW12 (1.2 mm diameter), welding current 210A, arc voltage 23V, welding speed 80 cm / min, and the number of passes 1 pass. However, no. Since the specimens of 96 to 98 (see Table 7) have a risk of melting the center part of the flange end when arc welding is applied, the power is 8 kW, the welding speed is 8.5 m / min, and the shielding gas is 9 L / min. Carbon dioxide laser welding was used under the argon gas conditions. For the brackets, the present invention example shown in FIGS. 18A and 18D and a conventional bracket shown in FIG. 18G as a comparative example were also manufactured and subjected to a loading test in the same manner. The structural member 4 and the bracket 1 were all made of 780 MPa class steel material having a tensile strength. The plate thickness of the structural member was 3.0 mm. Further, among the brackets of the present invention, those with different plate thicknesses at both side end portions were processed smoothly so that a step due to the difference in plate thickness would not occur at the central portion having pin holes.

その結果を表7および表8に示す。なお、表中の「撓みの低減率」とは、実施例1と同様に従来技術の比較例であるNo.124および125の平均値に対する撓み低減の比率である。また、表中、下線を引いた数値は、本発明のうちいずれかの条件を満たさないものを示す。   The results are shown in Table 7 and Table 8. In the table, “Deflection reduction rate” is the same as in Example 1, which is a comparative example of the prior art. The ratio of the deflection reduction to the average of 124 and 125. Moreover, the numerical value which underlined in the table | surface shows what does not satisfy | fill either conditions among this invention.

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

Figure 2010155601
Figure 2010155601

表7は、本発明のブラケットの実施例であるaタイプおよび比較例である従来形のgタイプの結果を示している。表7のNo.77〜99は本発明の請求項5に係わる発明例であり、比較例であるNo.75、76および従来形のブラケットであるNo.124、125に比べて撓みが5%以上低減されており、本発明のブラケットが構造部材の撓み低減に効果的であることがわかった。   Table 7 shows the results of the type a which is an example of the bracket of the present invention and the conventional type g which is a comparative example. No. in Table 7 Nos. 77 to 99 are invention examples according to claim 5 of the present invention. 75, 76 and conventional brackets No. Compared with 124 and 125, the bending was reduced by 5% or more, and it was found that the bracket of the present invention is effective in reducing the bending of the structural member.

このうち、No.83〜90、92〜98は、構造部材4の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.2〜3.0倍であって、本発明の請求項6に係わる発明の実施例であり、上記の範囲外の実施例のうちNo.77、78、82、91、99に比べてさらに3%以上低減されている。またさらに、このうちNo.85〜89、93〜97は、上記の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積のそれぞれ2.25倍および2.00倍であって、固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raと、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbとの関係の影響を調べた例であり、これらの中では、本発明の請求項7に係わり、上記固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbより5〜40°大きい実施例No.86〜88、94〜96の撓み低減率が他の例よりも大きい。またさらに、No.77〜82は、いずれも、上記の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.15倍であって、固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raと、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbの関係の影響を調べた例であって、同じく本発明の請求項7に係わる。上記固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbより5〜40°大きい実施例No.79〜81の撓み低減率が、他の例No.77、78、82よりも大きい。以上のように、本発明のブラケットは構造部材の撓みを大きく低減させることが判明した。   Of these, No. 83-90 and 92-98 are 1.2-3.0 times the cross-sectional area of the side end part 8a with the shorter distance from the fixed end of the structural member 4 than the cross-sectional area of the far side end part 8b. In the embodiment of the invention according to claim 6 of the present invention, no. Compared to 77, 78, 82, 91, and 99, it is further reduced by 3% or more. Furthermore, no. 85 to 89 and 93 to 97, the cross-sectional area of the side end 8a closer to the fixed end is 2.25 times and 2.00 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end 8b, respectively. The angle ra formed by the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a closer to the fixed end and the welded part, and the straight line circumscribed to the side of the far side end 8b and the welded part This is an example in which the influence of the relationship with the angle rb formed is investigated. Among these, the invention relates to claim 7 of the present invention, and circumscribes the side of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end. The angle ra formed by the straight line and the welded portion is 5 to 40 ° larger than the angle rb formed by the straight line circumscribed on the side of the far side end portion 8b and the welded portion. The deflection reduction rates of 86 to 88 and 94 to 96 are larger than those of other examples. Furthermore, no. 77 to 82 are all 1.15 times the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8b that is far from the fixed end and the side end portion 8a that is closer to the fixed end, and The effect of the relationship between the straight line circumscribing the side of the side end 8a closer to the distance and the angle ra formed by the weld and the straight line circumscribing the side of the far side 8b and the angle rb formed by the weld. And is also related to claim 7 of the present invention. The angle formed by the welded portion and the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a closer to the fixed end is the angle formed by the welded portion and the straight line circumscribed to the side of the far side end 8b. Example No. 5 to 40 ° larger than rb The deflection reduction ratios of 79 to 81 are the other example Nos. It is larger than 77, 78, 82. As described above, it has been found that the bracket of the present invention greatly reduces the bending of the structural member.

表8は、本発明のブラケットの実施例であるdタイプおよび比較例である従来形のgタイプの結果を示している。表8のNo.101〜123は本発明の請求項5に係わる発明例であり、比較例であるNo.100および従来形のブラケットであるNo.124、125に比べて撓みが5%以上低減されており、本発明のブラケットが構造部材の撓み低減に効果的であることがわかった。   Table 8 shows the results of the d type as an example of the bracket of the present invention and the conventional g type as a comparative example. No. in Table 8 Nos. 101 to 123 are invention examples according to claim 5 of the present invention. 100 and the conventional bracket No. Compared with 124 and 125, the bending was reduced by 5% or more, and it was found that the bracket of the present invention is effective in reducing the bending of the structural member.

このうち、No.107〜114、116〜122は、構造部材4の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.2〜3.0倍であって、本発明の請求項6に係わる発明の実施例であり、上記の範囲外の実施例のうちNo.101、102、106、115、123に比べてさらに3%以上低減されている。またさらに、このうちNo.109〜113、117〜121は上記の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積のそれぞれ2.25倍および2.00倍であって、固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raと、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbとの関係の影響を調べた例であり、これらの中では、本発明の請求項7に係わり、上記固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbより5〜40°大きい実施例No.110〜112、118〜120の撓み低減率が他の例よりも大きい。またさらに、No.102〜106は、いずれも、上記の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの断面積が、遠い方の側端部8bの断面積の1.15倍であって、固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raと、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbの関係の影響を調べた例であって、同じく本発明の請求項7に係わる。上記固定端との距離が近い方の側端部8aの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角raが、遠い方の側端部8bの側方に外接する直線と溶接部がなす角rbより5〜40°大きい実施例No.103〜105の撓み低減率が、他の例No.101、102、106よりも大きい。以上のように、本発明のブラケットは構造部材の撓みを大きく低減させることが判明した。   Of these, No. 107-114 and 116-122 are 1.2-3.0 times the cross-sectional area of the side end part 8a with the shorter distance from the fixed end of the structural member 4 than the cross-sectional area of the far side end part 8b. In the embodiment of the invention according to claim 6 of the present invention, no. Compared to 101, 102, 106, 115, and 123, it is further reduced by 3% or more. Furthermore, no. 109 to 113 and 117 to 121 have a cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end, which is 2.25 times and 2.00 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b, respectively. The angle ra formed by the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a closer to the fixed end and the welded part, and the straight line circumscribed to the side of the far side end 8b and the welded part This is an example in which the influence of the relationship with the angle rb formed is examined. Among these, a straight line that is related to claim 7 of the present invention and circumscribes the side of the side end 8a that is closer to the fixed end. The angle ra formed by the welded portion is 5 to 40 ° larger than the angle rb formed by the straight line circumscribing the side of the far side end portion 8b and the welded portion. The deflection reduction rates of 110 to 112 and 118 to 120 are larger than those of other examples. Furthermore, no. 102 to 106, the cross-sectional area of the side end portion 8a closer to the fixed end is 1.15 times the cross-sectional area of the far side end portion 8b, and the fixed end and The relationship between the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a with the shorter distance and the angle ra formed by the weld, and the straight line circumscribing to the side of the far side 8b and the angle rb formed by the weld. It is the example which investigated the influence, Comprising: Claim 7 of this invention is related similarly. The angle formed by the welded portion and the straight line circumscribing to the side of the side end 8a closer to the fixed end is the angle formed by the welded portion and the straight line circumscribed to the side of the far side end 8b. Example No. 5 to 40 ° larger than rb Deflection reduction rates of 103 to 105 are other examples No. It is larger than 101, 102, 106. As described above, it has been found that the bracket of the present invention greatly reduces the bending of the structural member.

本発明は、他の部材から荷重を伝達するために各種構造部材に接合されるブラケットに適用できる。   The present invention can be applied to a bracket joined to various structural members in order to transmit a load from other members.

1 ブラケット
2 フランジ
3 ピン孔
3a ピン孔の底
4、10 構造部材
5 板厚の小さい領域
6 溶接部
7 フランジ端部
8、8a、8b (フランジ端部の)両側端部
9 (フランジ端部の)中央部
12 リブ部
14 固定端
16 空洞の領域
t 撓み
H ピン孔の底から溶接部までの距離
P 荷重
R 角度
ra、rb (側端部の側方に外接する直線と溶接部のなす)角
W フランジ端部の長さ
W1 フランジ端部の両側端部の外側同士の間隔
W2 フランジ端部の両側端部の内側同士の間隔
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Bracket 2 Flange 3 Pin hole 3a Bottom of pin hole 4, 10 Structural member 5 Thickness area 6 Welded part 7 Flange end part 8, 8a, 8b (Flange end part) Both end parts 9 (Flange end part ) Central part 12 Rib part 14 Fixed end 16 Cavity region t Deflection H Distance from the bottom of the pin hole to the welded part P Load R Angle ra, rb (A straight line circumscribing the side end part and the welded part) Corner W Flange end length W1 Spacing between outer ends of both ends of flange end W2 Spacing between inner sides of both ends of flange end

Claims (7)

板状の1枚又は2枚のフランジを有し、前記フランジを貫通するピン孔が形成され、かつフランジ端部が構造部材に連続して溶接されているブラケットにおいて、
前記フランジ端部は、両側端部の板厚が中央部より厚く、かつ、前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジと前記構造部材との溶接部までの距離をH(mm)、前記フランジ端部の長さをW(mm)とするとき、2H≦Wとなることを特徴とするブラケット。
In a bracket having one or two plate-like flanges, a pin hole penetrating the flange, and a flange end being continuously welded to a structural member,
The flange end portion has a plate thickness at both end portions that is thicker than the center portion, and the distance from the bottom of the pin hole to the welded portion between the flange and the structural member is H (mm). A bracket characterized by satisfying 2H ≦ W when the length is W (mm).
前記フランジにおける、前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジ端部の中央部までの一部又は全部の板厚が、前記フランジ端部における両側端部の板厚の0.5〜0.85倍であることを特徴とする請求項1記載のブラケット。   In the flange, a part or all of the plate thickness from the bottom of the pin hole to the center of the flange end is 0.5 to 0.85 times the plate thickness of both side ends of the flange end. The bracket according to claim 1. 略くの字の形状から成る1枚又は2枚のフランジを有し、前記フランジを貫通するピン孔が形成され、かつ、フランジ端部の両側端部のみが、それぞれ構造部材に溶接されているブラケットにおいて、
前記ピン孔の底から前記フランジと前記構造部材との溶接部までの距離をH(mm)、前記フランジ端部の両側端部の外側同士の間隔をW1(mm)とするとき、2H≦W1となることを特徴とするブラケット。
It has one or two flanges having a substantially U-shape, pin holes are formed through the flanges, and only both end portions of the flange end portions are welded to the structural members. In the bracket,
When the distance from the bottom of the pin hole to the welded portion between the flange and the structural member is H (mm), and the distance between the outer sides of both end portions of the flange end portion is W1 (mm), 2H ≦ W1 Bracket characterized by becoming.
前記フランジ端部の両側端部の外側同士の間隔W1(mm)に対する、前記両側端部の内側同士の間隔W2(mm)の比W2/W1が、0.5〜0.9であることを特徴とする請求項3記載のブラケット。   The ratio W2 / W1 of the interval W2 (mm) between the inner sides of the both end portions to the interval W1 (mm) between the outer sides of the both end portions of the flange end portion is 0.5 to 0.9. The bracket according to claim 3, wherein the bracket is characterized. 前記フランジ面における前記ピン孔の底を中心として、前記フランジ端部の、前記両側端より板厚の小さい領域または空洞の領域の両側方に外接する2本の直線がなす角度が80〜100°であることを特徴とする請求項1〜4の何れか1項に記載のブラケット。   An angle formed by two straight lines circumscribing both sides of a region having a smaller thickness than the both side ends or a hollow region around the bottom of the pin hole on the flange surface is 80 to 100 °. The bracket according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the bracket is any one of the above. 前記フランジが前記構造部材の片方の固定端に近い位置に接合されているブラケットにおいて、
前記フランジの両側端部のうち、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部の断面積が、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が遠い方の側端部の断面積の1.2〜3.0倍であることを特徴とする請求項1、3〜5の何れか1項に記載のブラケット。
In the bracket where the flange is joined at a position close to one fixed end of the structural member,
Of the both side end portions of the flange, the cross-sectional area of the side end portion closer to the fixed end of the structural member is the cross-sectional area of the side end portion farther from the fixed end of the structural member. It is 1.2 to 3.0 times, The bracket of any one of Claims 1 and 3-5 characterized by the above-mentioned.
前記フランジが前記構造部材の片方の固定端に近い位置に接合されているブラケットにおいて、
前記フランジの両側端部よりも板厚の小さい領域または空洞の領域の両側方に外接する2本の直線のうち、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が近い方の側端部の側方に外接する直線と前記溶接部のなす角が、前記構造部材の固定端との距離が遠い方の側端部の側方に外接する直線と前記溶接部のなす角よりも5〜40°大きいことを特徴とする請求項1〜6の何れか1項に記載のブラケット。
In the bracket where the flange is joined at a position close to one fixed end of the structural member,
Of the two straight lines circumscribing both sides of the region having a smaller thickness than the both side end portions of the flange or the hollow region, to the side of the side end portion closer to the fixed end of the structural member. The angle formed between the circumscribed straight line and the welded portion is 5 to 40 ° larger than the angle formed between the straight line circumscribed on the side of the side end portion of the far side with the fixed end of the structural member and the welded portion. The bracket according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
JP2009101651A 2008-12-01 2009-04-20 bracket Active JP5246008B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009101651A JP5246008B2 (en) 2008-12-01 2009-04-20 bracket

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008306123 2008-12-01
JP2008306123 2008-12-01
JP2009101651A JP5246008B2 (en) 2008-12-01 2009-04-20 bracket

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010155601A true JP2010155601A (en) 2010-07-15
JP5246008B2 JP5246008B2 (en) 2013-07-24

Family

ID=42573835

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009101651A Active JP5246008B2 (en) 2008-12-01 2009-04-20 bracket

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5246008B2 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0826133A (en) * 1994-07-19 1996-01-30 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Strength member structure of vehicle body
JPH09210112A (en) * 1996-01-31 1997-08-12 Unisia Jecs Corp Supporting method for hydraulic buffer and installing bracket with supporting member, and supporting structure using the same
JPH10287114A (en) * 1997-04-18 1998-10-27 Mitsubishi Motors Corp Equalizer beam structure for rubber suspension
JP2004169864A (en) * 2002-11-21 2004-06-17 Nippon Steel Corp Bracket
JP2006315445A (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-24 Honda Motor Co Ltd Bodywork of automobile

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0826133A (en) * 1994-07-19 1996-01-30 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Strength member structure of vehicle body
JPH09210112A (en) * 1996-01-31 1997-08-12 Unisia Jecs Corp Supporting method for hydraulic buffer and installing bracket with supporting member, and supporting structure using the same
JPH10287114A (en) * 1997-04-18 1998-10-27 Mitsubishi Motors Corp Equalizer beam structure for rubber suspension
JP2004169864A (en) * 2002-11-21 2004-06-17 Nippon Steel Corp Bracket
JP2006315445A (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-24 Honda Motor Co Ltd Bodywork of automobile

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5246008B2 (en) 2013-07-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4902035B2 (en) Structure
KR101561928B1 (en) Automobile frame
CN110395093B (en) Door beam
WO2017047752A1 (en) Steel sheet lap welding method and lap welded joint
EP2256254A2 (en) Connecting member of construction machine
CN114829236B (en) Instrument board bracket
JP2008114728A (en) Front pillar structure of convertible
WO2017099212A1 (en) Control arm
JP2003205746A (en) Door impact beam for automobile
JP3293120B2 (en) Frame body member connection structure
JP5246008B2 (en) bracket
JP2014181551A (en) Recessed steel pipe joint, joint steel pipe, and joint method of steel pipe
JP6614183B2 (en) Automotive panel materials
JP4616837B2 (en) Steel beam reinforcement bracket
JPH10258765A (en) Joint structure for automobile structure member
JP7331026B2 (en) Vehicle structural member
JP5201010B2 (en) Suspension arm
JP5900189B2 (en) Welded joint of steel and method of forming welded joint
US11059268B2 (en) Adapter component, method for producing an adapter component and connection assembly having an adapter component
JP5874515B2 (en) Steel welded joint structure
JP5267480B2 (en) Deflection reducing method and structural member
US20210394307A1 (en) Method of joining workpieces using high speed laser welding and products formed using the method
JP6921733B2 (en) clip
JP2004262302A (en) Axle case
JP5533705B2 (en) Structure

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110816

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120913

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120918

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121114

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130312

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130325

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 5246008

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160419

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350