JP2010085379A - Test result display apparatus, test result display system, test result display method, and computer program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a test result display apparatus, a test result display system, a test result display method, and a computer program, capable of displaying the results of a test on an analyte together with the decision conditions under which the results of the test are determined and thereby enable visual confirmation of whether a further test is necessary. <P>SOLUTION: As the results of a test on an analyte, multiple measurement data are acquired from among a group of pieces of measurement data obtained in association with predetermined measurement items. Input of a group of parameters for the decision conditions under which to judge, for each measurement item, whether the plurality of pieces of measurement data thus acquired fall within a proper range is accepted. The plurality of pieces of measurement data thus acquired and the decision conditions corresponding to the group of parameters are displayed in the same display area. When a change is made to the decision conditions, the change is also displayed. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a test result display device, a test result display system, a test result display method, and a computer program that can display a test result of a sample together with determination conditions for the test result.

  In recent years, various tests have been performed using a plurality of sample processing apparatuses represented by blood analyzers, urine analyzers, and the like. In these tests, if a measurement result that deviates significantly from the average measurement result of a healthy person is obtained, the cause of the disease important for the patient may be included, and the result is more careful. Therefore, it is desirable to re-examine the specimen and determine again whether the measurement result is within the appropriate range.

  Whether or not the measurement result is within an appropriate range is determined based on various determination conditions such as whether or not the measurement value is within the upper and lower limits of a predetermined measurement item, rules, and the like. Depending on the determination result, a more accurate test result can be obtained by retesting the specimen.

  When the ratio of the retesting of the specimen increases, the time and cost required for the specimen testing increase, which is not preferable. On the other hand, if the criteria, rules, etc. for conducting reexamination are relaxed, the test results will be submitted without reexamination despite showing abnormal values, and the patient's health will be maintained Contrary to the purpose of the inspection.

  In order to solve such a problem, for example, in Patent Document 1, the upper and lower limit values of predetermined measurement items, the measurement limit value check, the correlation check between items, the previous measurement value check for comparing with the previous measurement value of the same sample, and There is disclosed an automatic analyzer that executes a combination check for checking a sample mix in real time.

Patent Document 2 discloses an automatic analyzer that automatically changes analysis conditions according to the age, sex, collection time of a test sample, type of test sample, history of the test sample, and the like. Then, an automatic analyzer that performs data check in three stages, that is, an alarm check of the main body of the apparatus, a comparison between the previous value data of the patient and the current value data, and a comparison between the patient data and the data measured immediately before the patient data is disclosed. Has been.
JP-A-61-235753 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 6-027117 JP-A-7-120471

 However, all of the above-mentioned patent documents have an essential feature in automatically checking the judgment conditions, and how much is determined by what judgment conditions and rules for each inspection facility. It is not possible to grasp whether re-examination is necessary at the rate of. Therefore, there is a problem in that it is impossible to obtain information for determining what level of determination conditions can be changed.

  On the other hand, since reinspection significantly impairs inspection efficiency, avoiding unnecessary reinspection is indispensable from the viewpoint of speeding up inspection work and improving the accuracy of inspection results.

  The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and a test result display device and test that can visually check whether or not a retest is necessary by displaying a test result of a specimen together with a determination condition of the test result. An object is to provide a result display system, a test result display method, and a computer program.

  In order to achieve the above object, the test result display device according to the first aspect of the present invention obtains measurement data as a test result of a sample from a measurement data group obtained in association with a predetermined measurement item. Means, a parameter group receiving means for receiving an input of a parameter group related to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of acquired measurement data are within an appropriate range for each measurement item, and the plurality of acquired measurement data And a display unit that displays the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group that has received the input in the same display area, and when the parameter group receiving unit receives a change input of the parameter group, the display unit The determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the received change input is displayed.

  The test result display device according to the second invention is the test data group according to the first invention, wherein the measurement data acquisition means stores the measurement data group obtained as the test result of the sample in association with a predetermined measurement item. Storage means and measurement data reading means for searching and reading out a plurality of measurement data from the stored measurement data group based on a predetermined search condition.

  According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first or second aspect of the invention, the inspection result display device further comprises a search condition receiving means for receiving the setting of the predetermined search condition.

  According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided the inspection result display device according to any one of the first to third aspects of the present invention, an extraction unit that extracts a plurality of measurement data that matches the determination condition, and a plurality of extracted measurement data. And a display format changing means for changing the display format to a display format different from the display formats of the other plurality of measurement data.

  According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a test result display apparatus according to any one of the first to fourth aspects, wherein the measurement data designation accepting means accepts designation of one measurement data from among a plurality of displayed measurement data. And detailed information display means for displaying details of the information acquired for each measurement item of the measurement data for which the designation has been received.

  An inspection result display device according to a sixth aspect of the present invention includes the probability distribution calculating means for calculating a probability distribution indicating a degree of distribution of the plurality of measurement data according to any one of the first to fifth aspects, The display means displays the probability distribution calculated instead of the plurality of measurement data.

  Next, in order to achieve the above object, a test result display system according to a seventh aspect of the present invention is connected to a central device that stores a test result of a specimen and is capable of data communication with the central device. In the test result display system including a display terminal device for displaying a result, the central device includes measurement data group storage means for storing a measurement data group obtained as a test result of the sample in association with a predetermined measurement item. The display terminal device has a measurement data reading means for reading a plurality of measurement data from the measurement data group stored in the central device, and the plurality of read measurement data are within an appropriate range for each measurement item. A parameter group receiving means for receiving an input of a parameter group related to a determination condition for determining whether or not it exists, and a plurality of acquired measurement data and inputs received Display means for displaying the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group in the same display area, and when the parameter group accepting means accepts the change input of the parameter group, the display means accepts the change input received The determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to is displayed.

  Next, in order to achieve the above object, the test result display method according to the eighth invention is such that the central device for storing the test result of the sample and the display terminal device for displaying the test result can be connected in data communication. In the test result display method that can be executed by the test result display system, the central device stores a measurement data group obtained as a test result of the sample in association with a predetermined measurement item, and displays the display The terminal device reads a plurality of measurement data from the measurement data group stored in the central device, and determines whether or not the plurality of read measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item The input of the parameter group related to the determination condition is received, and the plurality of obtained measurement data and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group that has received the input are displayed in the same display area. When receiving a change input the parameter group, and displaying the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group according to the received change input.

  In order to achieve the above object, a computer program according to a ninth aspect of the present invention is a computer program that can be executed by a computer, wherein the computer is obtained as a test result of a sample and is associated with a predetermined measurement item. Measurement data acquisition means for acquiring a plurality of measurement data from the data group, and receiving an input of a parameter group relating to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of acquired measurement data are within an appropriate range for each measurement item A parameter group receiving unit that functions as a display unit that displays the plurality of acquired measurement data and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group that has received an input in the same display area; When the change input is received, the display means displays the parameter related to the received change input. Characterized in that to function as means for displaying the determination condition corresponding to the meter unit.

  In the first invention, the seventh invention, the eighth invention, and the ninth invention, the central apparatus stores the measurement data group obtained as the test result of the specimen in association with the predetermined measurement item. The display terminal device reads a plurality of measurement data from the measurement data group stored in the central device, and a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of read measurement data exist within an appropriate range for each measurement item The input of the parameter group concerning is accepted. The determination conditions corresponding to the plurality of acquired measurement data and the parameter group that has received the input are displayed in the same display area. When a change input of a parameter group is received, a measurement data group that does not match the measurement data group that matches the determination condition can be displayed by displaying a determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the received change input. Can be clearly distinguished on the screen, and it is also possible to easily simulate on the screen which measurement data changes due to a change in the determination conditions. Therefore, it is possible to easily specify measurement data that really needs to be reinspected, and it is expected to improve inspection efficiency by avoiding reinspection of unnecessary measurement data.

  In the second invention, the measurement data group obtained as a test result of the specimen is stored in association with a predetermined measurement item, and the measurement data is retrieved from the stored measurement data group based on a predetermined search condition and read out. Thus, measurement data to be displayed as an inspection result can be acquired.

  In the third aspect of the invention, it is possible to search for desired measurement data to be displayed by receiving the setting of a predetermined search condition.

  In the fourth invention, measurement data that meets the determination condition is extracted, and the display format of the extracted measurement data is changed to a display format that is different from the display format of other measurement data, thereby eliminating the need for reexamination. And necessary measurement data can be clearly distinguished visually. The display format to be changed is not particularly limited, such as display color, display method (flashing, brightness change, etc.), and any display format can be used as long as both can be distinguished.

  In the fifth invention, the specification of one measurement data among the displayed measurement data is accepted, and the details of the information acquired for each measurement item of the measurement data for which the designation is accepted are displayed, so that each measurement data The determination condition can be changed while confirming the details of the information for each measurement item, and the parameter group can be appropriately determined.

  In the sixth invention, by calculating a probability distribution indicating the degree of distribution of the measurement data, and displaying the calculated probability distribution instead of the measurement data, the specific measurement data can be easily identified visually, It is possible to visually determine whether or not re-examination is necessary.

  According to the above configuration, the measurement data searched under the predetermined search condition and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group are displayed in the same display area, so that the measurement data group that does not match the determination condition is displayed. The data group can be clearly distinguished on the screen, and it is also possible to easily simulate on the screen which measurement data is changed by changing the determination condition. Therefore, it is possible to easily specify measurement data that really needs to be reinspected, and it is expected to improve inspection efficiency by avoiding reinspection of unnecessary measurement data.

  Hereinafter, an inspection result display system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to the drawings. In the following embodiments, an inspection result display system composed of a central device in which a computer program is introduced to a computer system and a display terminal device will be described. A similar function can be realized as a configured inspection result display device. In addition, the present invention can be implemented as a computer program that can be partially executed by a computer. Therefore, the present invention can take an embodiment of hardware as an inspection result display device, an embodiment of software, or an embodiment of a combination of software and hardware. The computer program can be recorded on any computer-readable recording medium such as a hard disk, DVD, CD, optical storage device, magnetic storage device or the like.

(Embodiment 1)
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an inspection result display system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the test result display system according to the first embodiment is configured such that a plurality of display terminal devices (test result display devices) 3, 3,. Connected to be possible. One or a plurality of inspection devices 4, 4,... Are connected to the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3.

  The inspection devices 4, 4,... Are analyzers such as blood cell analyzers, urinary component analyzers, immune analyzers, biochemical analyzers, etc., which collect patient samples and display measurement data It transmits to the apparatus (inspection result display apparatus) 3. One display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 may be connected to the same type of inspection device 4, 4,..., Or a plurality of types of inspection devices 4, 4,. May be. The measurement data in each inspection device 4 is collected in the central device 1 via the connected display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3.

  The central device 1 includes at least a CPU (central processing unit) 11, a RAM 12, a storage device 13, an input device 14, an output device 15, a portable disk drive 16, a communication device 17, and an internal bus 18 that connects the hardware described above. It is configured. The CPU 11 is connected to the above-described hardware units of the central device 1 via the internal bus 18 and controls the operation of the above-described hardware units, and in accordance with a computer program stored in the storage device 13. Perform various software functions.

  The RAM 12 includes an SRAM, a flash memory, and the like. The load module is expanded when the computer program is executed, and stores temporary data generated when the computer program is executed. Of course, the computer program may be stored in the storage device 13 in advance.

  The storage device 13 includes a built-in fixed storage device (hard disk), a ROM, and the like. The computer program stored in the storage device 13 is downloaded by a portable disk drive 16 from a portable recording medium such as a DVD or CD-ROM in which information such as programs and data is recorded. It is expanded and executed. Of course, it may be a computer program downloaded from an external computer via the communication device 17.

  The storage device 13 includes a measurement data group storage unit 131 that stores measurement data groups and a master data storage unit 132 that stores information related to determination conditions. FIG. 2 is an exemplary diagram of a data configuration stored in the measurement data group storage unit 131. As shown in FIG. 2, information on the measurement date and time, and information for identifying a patient, for example, measurement data for each predetermined measurement item in association with a patient name, patient ID, etc. Remember. By adopting such a configuration, it is possible to compare measurement data related to the same measurement item of the same patient on a date and time basis.

  FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram of a data configuration stored in the master data storage unit 132. As shown in FIG. 3, the master data storage unit 132 stores an upper limit value and a lower limit value that serve as a reference for determining whether or not the measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item, and the previous measurement data. The tolerance or the tolerance ratio with the previous measurement data is stored. As the upper limit value and the lower limit value, a numerical value that is the current determination criterion and a numerical value that is the previous determination criterion may be stored separately. By storing these numerical values, whether the current measurement data exists between the upper limit value and the lower limit value, the difference between the current measurement data and the previous measurement data is within the tolerance range. Whether or not the measurement data is within the appropriate range for each measurement item based on whether or not the ratio between the current measurement data and the previous measurement data is within the allowable ratio range Can be judged.

  The communication device 17 is connected to an internal bus 18, and is connected to an external network 2 such as the Internet, a LAN, or a WAN, so that data can be transmitted / received to / from an external computer or the like. That is, the above-described storage device 13 is not limited to the configuration built in the central device 1, and may be an external recording medium such as an external storage connected via the communication device 17.

  The input device 14 is a data input medium such as a keyboard and a mouse. The output device 15 is a display device such as a CRT monitor or LCD, or a printing device such as a laser printer or an inkjet printer.

  FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 of the inspection result display system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. The display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 includes at least a CPU (central processing unit) 31, a RAM 32, a storage device 33, an input device 34, a display device 35, a portable disk drive 36, a communication device 37, and the hardware described above. The internal bus 38 is connected. The CPU 31 is connected to the above-described hardware units of the central apparatus 1 via the internal bus 38, controls the operation of the above-described hardware units, and follows the computer program 100 stored in the storage device 33. Perform various software functions.

  The RAM 32 includes an SRAM, a flash memory, and the like. The load module is expanded when the computer program 100 is executed, and temporary data generated when the computer program 100 is executed is stored. Of course, the computer program 100 may be stored in the storage device 33 in advance.

  The storage device 33 includes a built-in fixed storage device (hard disk), a ROM, and the like. The computer program 100 stored in the storage device 33 is downloaded by a portable disk drive 36 from a portable recording medium 90 such as a DVD or CD-ROM in which information such as programs and data is recorded. To RAM 32 and executed. Of course, the computer program 100 may be downloaded from an external computer via the communication device 37.

  When used as the display terminal device 3, the storage device 33 does not store information on the measurement data group and the determination condition. On the other hand, when used as the inspection result display device 3, the storage device 33 stores information related to the measurement data group and the determination conditions by downloading or the like.

  The communication device 37 is connected to an internal bus 38, and is connected to an external network 2 such as the Internet, a LAN, or a WAN, so that data can be transmitted / received to / from an external computer or the like. That is, the storage device 33 described above is not limited to the configuration built in the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3, but an external recording medium such as an external storage connected via the communication device 37. It may be.

  The input device 34 is a data input medium such as a keyboard and a mouse. The display device 35 is a display device such as a CRT monitor or LCD.

  FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to the first embodiment has the measurement data stored in the measurement data group storage unit 131 of the storage device 13 in association with a predetermined measurement item. A measurement data acquisition unit 51 is provided for acquiring measurement data searched under a predetermined search condition from the group. The measurement data acquisition unit 51 includes a search condition reception unit 511 that receives measurement data search conditions, and a measurement data read unit 512 that reads measurement data to be displayed from the stored measurement data group.

  The search condition reception unit 511 receives a predetermined search condition setting via the input device 34 such as a mouse or a keyboard. The search conditions to be set are, for example, specific information of the inspection device 4 connected to the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3, inspection item information including measurement items, information on the inspection date and time, and the like. Thereby, for example, it is possible to execute a process for determining whether measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item.

  The measurement data reading unit 512 searches for measurement data that matches the conditions from the measurement data group stored in the measurement data group storage unit 131 of the storage device 13 of the central device 1 based on the search condition for which the setting has been received, It transmits to the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3. Thereby, for example, it can be visually determined on the screen whether or not the measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item.

  The parameter group reception unit 52 receives an input of a parameter group for specifying a determination condition for determining whether or not the acquired measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item. The parameter group includes, for example, an upper limit value and a lower limit value of measurement data for each measurement item, a tolerance with the previous measurement data, an allowable ratio with the previous measurement data, and the like.

  The display unit 53 displays determination conditions corresponding to the acquired measurement data and parameter group in the same display area. For example, the distribution of measurement data can be grasped by sampling the previous measurement data on the horizontal axis and the current measurement data on the vertical axis. By drawing the determination condition for the same coordinate axis as the sampled measurement data, it is possible to easily visually confirm which measurement data is appropriate and which measurement data is abnormal.

  The extraction unit 54 extracts measurement data that matches the determination condition. The display format changing unit 55 changes the display format of the measurement data extracted by the extraction unit 54 to a display format different from the display format of other measurement data. For example, by changing the display color of the measurement data that matches the determination condition from other measurement data, the measurement data that matches the determination condition and the measurement data that does not match can be easily distinguished visually.

  The measurement data designation accepting unit 56 accepts designation of one measurement data from the displayed measurement data by the input device 34 such as a mouse. The detailed information display unit 57 displays details of information for each measurement item of the measurement data for which designation is accepted. For example, by accepting designation of measurement data that has not been extracted by the extraction unit 54, that is, one measurement data whose display color has not been changed by the display format changing unit 55, each measurement item of measurement data that does not match the determination condition is received. Immediately confirm the details of the information, for example, not only the previous and current measurement data, but also information on whether or not re-examination is necessary, information on the result of re-examination, information on whether or not an error has occurred, etc. Can do. Therefore, it is possible to reliably determine whether or not the determination condition needs to be changed.

  A processing procedure in the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 of the inspection result display system having the above-described configuration will be described. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

  In FIG. 6, the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 accepts a search condition for measurement data (step S <b> 601), and sets the search condition from the measurement data group stored in the storage device 13 of the central device 1. The matching measurement data is read (step S602). The CPU 31 accepts the setting or change of the parameter group for specifying the determination condition for determining whether or not the measurement data exists within the appropriate range for each measurement item (step S603).

  FIG. 7 is an exemplary view of a display screen of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to the first embodiment. Search conditions are input in the date information reception area 71 and the device / item information reception area 72. For example, the date information reception area 71 receives an input of a date range, and the apparatus / item information reception area 72 receives information for identifying the inspection apparatuses 4, 4,.

  The parameter group receives input in the parameter group reception area 73. Specifically, the upper limit value and lower limit value of the reference value, the upper limit value and lower limit value of the previous value, the upper limit value and lower limit value of the current value, and the difference or ratio between the previous value and the current value are accepted for each item. Further, selection of a method for calculating the ratio between the previous value and the current value may be accepted. For example, the selection of whether the denominator of the ratio calculation is the previous value or the average value is accepted.

  Returning to FIG. 6, the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 displays the obtained measurement data and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group in the same display area (step S604). For example, by sampling the previous measurement data on the horizontal axis and the current measurement data on the vertical axis, a distribution map of the measurement data can be displayed. By drawing the determination condition for the same coordinate axis as the sampled measurement data, it is possible to easily visually confirm which measurement data is appropriate and which measurement data is abnormal.

  The display screen on the display device 35 is the same as that shown in FIG. That is, the setting of the maximum value and the minimum value displayed in the display scale setting area 75 is accepted, and the measurement data is sampled and displayed in the measurement data display area 76. At the same time, information related to the measurement data sampled and displayed, for example, the total number of plots, the number of measurement data that matches each determination condition, the number of measurement data that does not match, or the ratio thereof is displayed in the detailed information display area 77.

  The CPU 31 selects one measurement data (step S605) and determines whether or not the determination condition is met (step S606). When the CPU 31 determines that the determination condition is met (step S606: YES), the CPU 31 changes the display format of the selected measurement data to a display format different from the display format of other measurement data (step S607). Of the display formats, for example, the display color may be changed. In this case, by changing the display color of the measurement data that matches the judgment condition to a display format that is different from the other measurement data, the measurement data that matches the judgment condition and the measurement data that does not match can be easily distinguished visually. be able to. It goes without saying that the display format to be changed is not limited to the display color.

  The procedure for determining whether or not the determination condition is met is not particularly limited. For example, the determination is made according to the following procedure using the upper limit value, the lower limit value, and the allowable ratio with the previous measurement data. Hereinafter, an example of the determination procedure when the adult male ALT is measured data, the upper limit value is “42”, the lower limit value is “8”, and the allowable ratio is “39%” will be described.

  FIG. 8 is a graph showing an outline of the current measurement data determination process. If the current ALT value, which is the current measurement data, is present in the area 81 between the upper limit value “42” and the lower limit value “8”, it is determined that the measurement data is not subject to re-examination. On the other hand, if the current ALT value, which is the current measurement data, is present in the region 82 that is larger than the upper limit value '42' and the region 83 that is smaller than the lower limit value '8', the measurement data is determined to be subject to re-examination. .

  FIG. 9 is a graph showing an outline of the determination process based on the allowable ratio of the current measurement data. If the allowable ratio is 39% and the current ALT value, which is the current measurement data, is within the allowable ratio of 39% with respect to the previous ALT value, which is the previous measurement data, the measurement data is not subject to re-examination. to decide. For example, when the previous ALT value is “10”, the current ALT value is “6.1” or more and “13.9” or less. Therefore, the measurement data exists in the area 91 above the straight line connecting the ALT value '6.1' and the origin, and below the straight line connecting the ALT value '13 .9 'and the origin. Is determined not to be subject to re-examination.

  On the other hand, when the current ALT value, which is the current measurement data, is larger than the allowable ratio 39% with respect to the previous ALT value, which is the previous measurement data, it is determined that the measurement data is subject to re-examination. For example, when the previous ALT value is “10”, the current ALT value is less than 6.1 or more than 13.9. Therefore, the measurement data existing in the area 92 below the straight line connecting the ALT value '6.1' and the origin or the area 93 above the straight line connecting the ALT value '13 .9 'and the origin is Judged to be subject to reexamination.

  FIG. 10 is a graph showing an overview of the previous measurement data determination process. If the previous ALT value, which is the previous measurement data, is present in the region 101 between the upper limit value “42” and the lower limit value “8”, it is determined that the measurement data is not subject to re-examination. On the other hand, if the previous ALT value, which is the previous measurement data, is present in the region 102 greater than the upper limit value '42' and the region 103 smaller than the lower limit value '8', the measurement data is determined to be subject to re-examination. .

  FIG. 11 is a graph in which an appropriate region that is not subject to reexamination is obtained from FIGS. 8 to 10. As shown in FIG. 11, the graphs of FIGS. 8 to 10 are overlapped, and the common area of the areas 81, 91, 101 that are not subject to re-examination is obtained as the appropriate area 111.

  Note that a category input can be received in the category reception area 74 of the screen of FIG. This is because, even with the same item, for example, an ALT value, the judgment conditions should be slightly changed between, for example, an ordinary time and an emergency, and an adult and a child. FIG. 12 is an exemplary diagram in which the appropriate region 111 obtained as a determination condition varies depending on the category. As shown in FIG. 12A, even when the appropriate area 111 that does not need to be re-inspected is specified, for example, when the category is “emergency”, the ALT value is increased as a whole. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 12B, the appropriate area 111 is shifted to the upper right as a whole. Further, when the category is “child”, the upper limit value of the ALT value becomes lower as a whole, and therefore, only the upper limit value of the appropriate area 111 is lowered as shown in FIG. By doing in this way, it can be judged more accurately whether an inspection result is in an appropriate range for every measurement item.

  Returning to FIG. 6, when the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 determines that the determination condition is not satisfied (step S606: NO), the CPU 31 skips step S607 and stores all measurement data. It is determined whether or not it has been selected (step S608). If the CPU 31 determines that there is measurement data that has not yet been selected (step S608: NO), the CPU 31 selects the next measurement data (step S609), returns the process to step S606, and performs the above-described process. repeat.

  If the CPU 31 determines that all measurement data has been selected (step S608: YES), has the CPU 31 received designation of one measurement data from the displayed measurement data by the input device 34 such as a mouse? It is determined whether or not (step S610). When the CPU 31 determines that the designation is not accepted (step S610: NO), the CPU 31 enters a designation acceptance waiting state. When the CPU 31 determines that the designation has been accepted (step S610: YES), the CPU 31 displays details of information for each measurement item of the measurement data that has accepted the designation (step S611). For example, it is possible to immediately confirm the details of information for each measurement item of measurement data that does not match the judgment condition by accepting the designation of one measurement data that is judged not to meet the judgment condition and the display color is not changed it can. Therefore, it is possible to reliably determine whether or not the determination condition needs to be changed.

  FIG. 13 is an exemplary diagram of a measurement data instruction on the display screen, and FIG. 14 is an exemplary diagram of an information display screen for each measurement item of the specified measurement data. As shown in FIG. 13, a cursor such as a mouse is overlaid on the displayed measurement data 133 in the measurement data display area 76 where the measurement data is sampled and displayed. When the cursor overlaps or when selection by the mouse or the like is accepted, the x value and y value in the measurement data display area 76, that is, the previous ALT value and the current ALT value are displayed in the pop-up area 134 on the same screen. . Then, when the measurement data 133 is selected by a mouse or the like with the cursor overlapped, the original inspection result data of the selected measurement data 133 is read from the storage device 13 of the central device 1 as shown in FIG. The inspection result display screen 135 is newly activated and displayed. This helps, for example, comprehensively determine whether or not the measurement data is unique.

  In addition, since the determination condition and the measurement data are displayed at the same time, it can be easily confirmed visually which measurement data matches the determination condition. Therefore, when the parameter group for specifying the determination condition for determining whether or not the measurement data received by the parameter group receiving unit 52 is within the appropriate range for each measurement item is changed once before By continuing to display the specified determination conditions, it is possible to clearly visually confirm which measurement data has been affected by the change of the determination conditions.

  FIG. 15 is an exemplary view of a screen displayed in the measurement data display area 76 when the parameter group setting is changed. FIG. 15 shows an example of changing the lower limit setting between the previous value and the current value in the parameter group. In the previous display, the boundary lines 151 and 151 indicating the previous determination condition were displayed, but in FIG. 15, the boundary lines 152 and 152 indicating the current determination condition are also displayed in an overlapping manner. Therefore, it is possible to visually confirm which measurement data has been excluded from the reinspection object due to the current determination condition change, and it is possible to avoid unnecessary reinspection.

  As described above, according to the first embodiment, measurement data that matches the determination condition is displayed by displaying the measurement data searched under the predetermined search condition and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group in the same display area. A group of measurement data that does not match the group can be clearly distinguished on the screen, and it is also possible to easily simulate on the screen which measurement data changes due to a change in the determination condition. Therefore, it is possible to easily specify measurement data that really needs to be reinspected, and it is expected to improve inspection efficiency by avoiding reinspection of unnecessary measurement data.

(Embodiment 2)
Since the configuration of the test result display system and the configuration of the display terminal device (test result display device) according to the second embodiment of the present invention are the same as those of the first embodiment, detailed description will be given by attaching the same reference numerals. Is omitted. The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that a probability distribution indicating the degree of distribution of the measurement data searched under the search condition is calculated and displayed instead of the measurement data.

  FIG. 16 is a functional block diagram of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 16, the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to the second embodiment has measurement data stored in the measurement data group storage unit 131 of the storage device 13 in association with a predetermined measurement item. A measurement data acquisition unit 51 is provided for acquiring measurement data searched under a predetermined search condition from the group. The measurement data acquisition unit 51 includes a search condition reception unit 511 that receives measurement data search conditions, and a measurement data read unit 512 that reads measurement data to be displayed from the stored measurement data group.

  The search condition reception unit 511 receives a predetermined search condition setting via the input device 34 such as a mouse or a keyboard. The search conditions to be set are, for example, specific information of the inspection device 4 connected to the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3, inspection item information including measurement items, information on the inspection date and time, and the like. Thereby, for example, it can be determined for each measurement item whether or not the measurement data is within an appropriate range.

  The measurement data reading unit 512 searches for measurement data that matches the conditions from the measurement data group stored in the measurement data group storage unit 131 of the storage device 13 of the central device 1 based on the search condition for which the setting has been received, It transmits to the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3. Thereby, for example, it can be visually determined on the screen whether or not the measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item.

  The parameter group reception unit 52 receives an input of a parameter group for specifying a determination condition for determining whether or not the acquired measurement data exists within an appropriate range for each measurement item. The parameter group includes, for example, an upper limit value and a lower limit value of measurement data for each measurement item, a tolerance with the previous measurement data, an allowable ratio with the previous measurement data, and the like.

  The probability distribution calculation unit 161 calculates the probability distribution of the measurement data based on the acquired frequency distribution of the measurement data. In the second embodiment, the distribution frequency in the case where the maximum frequency is 100% is expressed as a percentage, and is substituted for the probability distribution value. Of course, the present invention is not limited to this, and a probability distribution may be obtained by calculating a normal distribution.

  The display unit 53 displays the determination condition corresponding to the calculated probability distribution and parameter group in the same display area. For example, the distribution of measurement data can be grasped stochastically by sampling the previous measurement data on the horizontal axis and the current measurement data on the vertical axis. By drawing the determination condition for the same coordinate axis as the displayed probability distribution, it is possible to easily visually confirm how the probability distribution changes when the determination condition is changed.

  A processing procedure in the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 of the inspection result display system having the above-described configuration will be described. FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure of the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

  In FIG. 17, the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 accepts a search condition for measurement data (step S <b> 1701), and sets the search condition from the measurement data group stored in the storage device 13 of the central device 1. The matching measurement data is read (step S1702). The CPU 31 accepts the setting or change of the parameter group for specifying the determination condition for determining whether or not the measurement data exists within the appropriate range for each measurement item (step S1703).

  The display screen layout of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to the second embodiment is basically the same as that of the first embodiment. The only difference is that what is displayed in the measurement data display area 76 is not the sampling data of the measurement data but the data indicating the calculated probability distribution.

  The CPU 31 calculates a probability distribution based on the acquired measurement data (step S1704), and displays the calculated probability distribution and determination conditions corresponding to the parameter group in the same display area (step S1705). For example, it is possible to display the distribution area weighted by the probability distribution by the display color or the like with the previous measurement data on the horizontal axis and the current measurement data on the vertical axis. By drawing the determination condition for the same coordinate axis as the sampled measurement data, it is possible to easily visually confirm which measurement data is appropriate and which measurement data is abnormal.

  The calculation method of the probability distribution is not particularly limited. In the second embodiment, the display area of measurement data is divided into small areas of a predetermined size, and the frequency of the number of measurement data belonging to each area is counted. And it is judged whether it is a reexamination object according to frequency.

  FIG. 18 is a flowchart showing a probability distribution calculation processing procedure of the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. In FIG. 18, the CPU 31 of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) 3 divides the measurement data display area 76 into a plurality of small areas (step S1801).

  The CPU 31 counts the number of measurement data belonging to each small area (step S1802) and specifies the maximum value of the number of measurement data (step S1803). The CPU 31 calculates the distribution ratio as the probability distribution of the measurement data for all the small areas with the maximum value of the number of measurement data as 100% (step S1804). For example, when the maximum value is ‘3000’, the distribution ratio of the small region whose measurement data number is ‘300’ is calculated as (300/3000 × 100 =) 10%.

  FIG. 19 is an exemplary diagram showing an overview of the probability distribution calculation method according to the second embodiment. The measurement data as shown in FIG. 19A is sampled with the previous measurement data on the horizontal axis and the current measurement data on the vertical axis in the same manner as in the first embodiment, thereby displaying a distribution map of the measurement data. . Then, as shown in FIG. 19B, the measurement data display area 76 is divided into 8 × 8 small areas 191, 191... And the number of measurement data belonging to each area is counted. FIG. 19B shows a state in which the distribution ratio of the number of measured data in each region is calculated and displayed when the maximum value of the counted number of measured data is 100.

  The determination condition in the second embodiment is a lower limit value of the distribution ratio of the number of measurement data. For example, if the determination condition is specified that re-examination is necessary when the distribution ratio is 5% or less, the CPU 31 has the determination condition based on the distribution ratio of the number of measurement data shown in FIG. Judge whether to do.

  FIG. 20 is an exemplary diagram of display data generation processing. In FIG. 20A, based on the distribution ratio of the number of measurement data and the determination condition shown in FIG. 19B, the small area determined as not requiring re-inspection is indicated by a circle and it is determined that re-inspection is necessary. It is the schematic diagram which represented the made small area | region by x mark. Since it is sufficient to display the outline of the small area determined to be unnecessary for re-examination, the appropriate area 201 is identified by connecting the outermost small areas marked with a circle as shown in FIG. can do.

  However, since it cannot be displayed as a smooth curve due to the outline of the small area 191 alone, a smooth appropriate area 201 as shown in FIG. 20C is obtained by executing a smoothing process including the outline. Can be specified. Of course, the smoothing process may be executed after the blobing process is executed in order to prevent the regions from being separated.

  Moreover, the display of measurement data is not limited to what is displayed two-dimensionally, but may be displayed three-dimensionally. FIG. 21 is an exemplary view showing a probability distribution of cholinesterase on a three-dimensional space. As shown in FIG. 21A, by providing a frequency axis on the z-axis, the degree to which the measurement data is dispersed in the three-dimensional space can be displayed.

  FIG. 21 (b) shows the probability distribution of the appropriate range of the measurement data when the sample requiring reexamination is set to be 10% of the maximum frequency, and FIG. 21 (c) shows the reexamination. The probability distribution of the appropriate range of the measurement data when the required specimen is set to be 20% of the maximum frequency is shown. As is clear from a comparison between FIG. 21A and FIG. 21C, the region included in the appropriate range of the measurement item is displayed as a three-dimensional space, and the region is shown in FIG. 21A to FIG. It turns out that it narrows gradually as it goes to (c). By displaying in the three-dimensional space in this way, it becomes easy to visually grasp an appropriate range that does not require re-examination.

  As described above, according to the second embodiment, the probability distribution of the measurement data searched under the predetermined search condition and the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group are displayed in the same display area, so that the unique measurement data can be visually checked. Thus, it is possible to easily identify the image and to visually determine whether or not re-examination is necessary.

  In addition, the above-described embodiment can be changed without departing from the gist of the present invention. For example, the display device 35 may be provided in the central device 1 to have the same function as the display terminal device 3, or the display terminal devices 3 connected to the inspection devices 4, 4,. For example, the display terminal device 3 alone may have the same function by collecting measurement data.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the test result display system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is an illustration figure of the data structure memorize | stored in a measurement data group memory | storage part. It is an illustration figure of the data structure memorize | stored in a master data storage part. It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the display terminal device (test result display apparatus) of the test result display system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a functional block diagram of the display terminal device (inspection result display device) according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of CPU of the display terminal device (test | inspection result display apparatus) which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is an illustration figure of the display screen of the display terminal device (examination result display device) concerning this Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a graph which shows the outline | summary of the judgment process of this measurement data. It is a graph which shows the outline | summary of the judgment process based on the allowable ratio of this measurement data. It is a graph which shows the outline | summary of the judgment process of the last measurement data. It is the graph which calculated | required the appropriate area | region used as the object of a reexamination. It is an illustration figure in which the appropriate area | region calculated | required as determination conditions by the difference in a category fluctuates. It is an illustration figure of the measurement data instruction | indication on a display screen. It is an illustration figure of the display screen of the information for every measurement item. It is an illustration figure of the screen displayed on the measurement data display area at the time of changing the setting of a parameter group. It is a functional block diagram of a display terminal device (test result display device) according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of CPU of the display terminal apparatus (test result display apparatus) which concerns on Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the calculation processing procedure of probability distribution of CPU of the display terminal device (test result display apparatus) which concerns on Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is an illustration figure which shows the outline | summary of the probability distribution calculation method which concerns on this Embodiment 2. It is an illustration figure of the production | generation process of display data. It is the example figure which displayed the probability distribution of choline estrase on the three-dimensional space.

Explanation of symbols

1 Central device 2 Network 3 Display terminal device (test result display device)
4 Inspection device 11, 31 CPU
12, 32 RAM
13, 33 Storage device 14, 34 Input device 15 Output device 16, 36 Portable disk drive 17, 37 Communication device 18, 38 Internal bus 35 Display device 90 Portable recording medium 100 Computer program 131 Measurement data group storage unit 132 Master data Memory

Claims (9)

Measurement data acquisition means for acquiring a plurality of measurement data from a measurement data group obtained in association with a predetermined measurement item as a test result of the sample,
A parameter group receiving means for receiving an input of a parameter group related to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of acquired measurement data are within an appropriate range for each measurement item;
Display means for displaying, in the same display area, the determination conditions corresponding to the plurality of acquired measurement data and the parameter group that has received the input;
When the parameter group accepting unit accepts the change input of the parameter group, the display unit displays the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the accepted change input. Result display device. The measurement data acquisition means includes
A measurement data group storage means for storing a measurement data group obtained as a test result of the sample in association with a predetermined measurement item;
2. The inspection result display device according to claim 1, further comprising measurement data reading means for searching and reading out a plurality of measurement data from the stored measurement data group based on a predetermined search condition.   3. The examination result display device according to claim 1, further comprising search condition receiving means for receiving the setting of the predetermined search condition. Extraction means for extracting a plurality of measurement data that matches the determination condition;
The display format changing means for changing the display format of the plurality of extracted measurement data to a display format different from the display format of the other plurality of measurement data. The test result display device described. A measurement data designation accepting means for accepting designation of one measurement data from a plurality of displayed measurement data;
The inspection result display device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising: detailed information display means for displaying details of information acquired for each measurement item of measurement data for which designation has been received. Probability distribution calculating means for calculating a probability distribution indicating the degree of distribution of the plurality of measurement data,
6. The examination result display device according to claim 1, wherein the display unit displays the probability distribution calculated instead of a plurality of the measurement data. In a test result display system comprising a central device for storing a test result of a specimen, and a display terminal device connected to the central device so as to be able to perform data communication and displaying the test result,
The central device is
A measurement data group storage means for storing a measurement data group obtained as a test result of the sample in association with a predetermined measurement item;
The display terminal device
Measurement data reading means for reading a plurality of measurement data from the measurement data group stored in the central device;
A parameter group receiving means for receiving an input of a parameter group relating to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of read measurement data are present in an appropriate range for each measurement item;
Display means for displaying, in the same display area, the determination conditions corresponding to the plurality of acquired measurement data and the parameter group that has received the input;
When the parameter group accepting unit accepts the change input of the parameter group, the display unit displays the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the accepted change input. Result display system. In a test result display method that can be executed by a test result display system connected so that data communication is possible between a central device that stores test results of a specimen and a display terminal device that displays test results,
The central device is
A measurement data group obtained as a test result of the specimen is stored in association with a predetermined measurement item,
The display terminal device
Reading a plurality of measurement data from the measurement data group stored in the central device,
Accepting an input of a parameter group relating to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of read measurement data are present in an appropriate range for each measurement item,
Displaying the determination conditions corresponding to the plurality of acquired measurement data and the parameter group that received the input in the same display area,
An inspection result display method characterized by displaying the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the received change input when the change input of the parameter group is received. In a computer program that can be executed on a computer,
The computer,
Measurement data acquisition means for acquiring a plurality of measurement data from a measurement data group obtained in association with a predetermined measurement item as a test result of the specimen,
A parameter group receiving means for receiving an input of a parameter group related to a determination condition for determining whether or not the plurality of acquired measurement data are within an appropriate range for each measurement item;
A plurality of the measurement data acquired and function as display means for displaying the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group that has received the input in the same display area;
When the parameter group receiving means receives a change input of the parameter group, the computer causes the display means to function as means for displaying the determination condition corresponding to the parameter group related to the received change input. program.

Images