JP2009198366A - Soundness diagnosis method of structure - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a soundness diagnosis method of a structure having a foundation on the back. <P>SOLUTION: A structure such as a retaining wall 3 is vibrated in a horizontal direction which is vertical to the retaining wall direction by an exciter 7, and the vibration is measured by a sensor 11. Measured vibration data are recorded by a data collection processing device 15, and a characteristic frequency measured value is determined by comparing an input value with a response value. The characteristic frequency measured value is compared with a characteristic frequency measured value determined beforehand, to thereby diagnose soundness of the structure. Further, the structure is modeled, and a characteristic frequency analysis value is determined by characteristic value analysis of the model, and the result is compared with the characteristic frequency measured value, to thereby diagnose soundness of the structure. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a method for diagnosing the soundness of a structure by applying vibration to the structure having a ground behind it.

  Conventionally, in a railway bridge, there is a method of diagnosing the soundness of a railway bridge by hitting the structure horizontally with a weight and measuring the natural frequency of the structure by recording and analyzing the vibration response due to the impact. It has been proposed (see Non-Patent Document 1).

Akihiko Nishimura, Shiro Tanamura, “Study on soundness judgment method for existing bridge piers”, Railway Research Institute report, Railway Technical Research Institute, August 1989, Volume 3, Issue 8, p41-49

  However, the weight is heavy, and there is a problem in installing the weight in work. Further, as shown in FIG. 9, when the conventional method is applied to a structure having a ground behind a retaining wall or an abutment having a banking on the back and an abutment and a concrete slope, hitting by the weight 27 is It is only in the back direction of the retaining wall 3 (in the direction of the arrow in the figure), and the ground on the back side absorbs the impact, so that significant vibration cannot be detected and it is difficult to grasp the soundness level. There was a problem.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and an object thereof is to provide a soundness diagnosis method capable of evaluating the soundness of a structure having a ground behind an abutment or a retaining wall.

  In order to achieve the above-described object, the first invention includes a step (a) in which a vibrator installed at the top of a structure having a ground behind vibrates the building in a horizontal direction, The step (b) of measuring vibration data generated in the structure, the step (c) of calculating the actual natural frequency value of the structure from the vibration data, and the actual natural frequency measurement value, And (d) for evaluating the soundness of the structure. A method for diagnosing the soundness of the structure.

  In the step (d), the measured natural frequency calculated in the step (c) is compared with the measured natural frequency of the same structure previously calculated, and the natural frequency is compared. When the actual measurement value is smaller than the previous natural frequency actual measurement value, it is preferable to determine that the soundness of the structure is deteriorated.

  On the other hand, the method further includes a step (e) of calculating a natural frequency analysis value of the structure from a model based on the design information of the structure between the step (c) and the step (d). d) comparing the measured natural frequency value with the analyzed natural frequency value, and when the measured natural frequency value is smaller than the analyzed natural frequency value, the soundness of the structure deteriorates. 2. The method for diagnosing the soundness level of a structure according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the structure is in good condition.

  According to the structural soundness diagnosis method of the present invention, it is possible to diagnose the soundness of a structure having a ground behind it, and it is possible to obtain a guideline for repair / reinforcement of the structure.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a soundness diagnosis system 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. A vibration generator 7 is provided at the top end of the retaining wall 3 that holds the ground 5. The vibrator 7 is controlled by the control device 9 and vibrates the retaining wall 3 in both the back direction and the front direction (arrow direction in the figure). A sensor 11 is provided at the top end of the retaining wall 3, and vibrations received by the sensor 11 are collected and processed by the data collection processing device 15 via the cable 13.

  The vibrator 7 is easier to carry and install than the weight 27. Further, since the vibrator 7 vibrates both in the back direction and in the front direction of the retaining wall 3, the natural frequency of the retaining wall 3 is compared with the impact of the weight 27 only in the back direction of the retaining wall 3. Is easy to identify.

  A plurality of sensors 11 may be installed, or a single sensor or a plurality of sensors 11 may be installed on the slope of the retaining wall 3.

  In order to analyze the measurement data of these sensors 11, a data collection processing device 15 is installed. The sensor 11 is connected to the data collection processing device 15 via, for example, a cable 13. Further, by providing the sensor 11 with a wireless transmission function and the data collection processing device 15 with a wireless reception function, measurement data may be transmitted and received by wireless communication without being connected by the cable 13.

Next, the hardware configuration of the vibrator 7 and the control device 9 will be described.
As long as the vibrator 7 can vibrate the retaining wall 3 in the horizontal direction, a commonly used vibrator and vibrator can be used. For example, a combination of a permanent magnet and a moving coil can be used. The vibrator 7 can ensure the performance of vibrating the structure, and is preferably small and lightweight.

  The control device 9 can be configured by a computer system such as a personal computer. The control device 9 can communicate with the exciter 7 and controls the excitation force, displacement, speed, acceleration, frequency, and the like of the vibration of the exciter 7.

Next, the hardware configuration of the sensor 11 and the data collection processing device 15 will be described with reference to FIG.
The sensor 11 includes a speedometer 31, an amplifier 33, an A / D converter 35, and a communication interface 37. The speedometer 31 measures the vibration of the retaining wall 3 by the vibrator 7 as a speed signal. The measured speed signal is amplified by the amplifier 33 and quantized by the A / D converter 35. The vibration data converted into digital data is sent to the data collection processing device 15 via the communication interface 37 and the cable 13.

  On the other hand, the data collection processing device 15 can be configured by a computer system such as a personal computer. As an example, the control unit 39, the storage unit 41, the communication control unit 43, the printing unit 45, the input unit 47, the display unit 49, the media input / output unit 51, and the like are connected to the system bus 53. .

The control unit 39 includes a central control unit (CPU), a random access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), and the like, and executes a program stored in the ROM or the storage unit 41. The storage unit 41 is a hard disk device or the like, and stores programs, data, and the like. The communication control unit 43 is a communication interface with the outside, and includes a communication interface such as RS-232C input / output, wireless communication, and a modem. The printing unit 45 includes a printer.
Further, the input unit 47 includes an input device such as a keyboard and a mouse, the display unit 49 includes a display device, and the media input / output unit 51 includes an input / output device such as a CD-ROM and a memory card.

A program used for data recording, data analysis, and soundness diagnosis in the soundness diagnosis system 1 of the retaining wall 3 according to the present embodiment is supplied by a medium such as a CD-ROM, for example. Input from the output unit 51, stored in the storage unit 41, and executed by the control unit 39.
The vibration data measured by the sensor 11 is transmitted to the data collection processing device 15 via the communication interface 37 of the sensor 11 and the cable 13, stored in the storage unit 41 via the communication control unit 43, and described later. It is analyzed by a program for analysis.

  At this time, by using the communication interface 37 of the sensor 11 as a wireless communication interface and using the wireless communication control of the communication control unit 43 of the data collection processing device 15, vibration data is transmitted and received by wireless communication without using the cable 13. It is also possible to do.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a software configuration of the data collection processing device 15.
The vibration data measured by the sensor 11 is received by the cable 13 or wirelessly, and stored in the storage unit 41. The data collection unit 55 stores the vibration data stored in the storage unit 41 by the data collection unit 55. From the natural frequency actual value calculation means 56, the natural frequency actual value storage means 57 for storing the natural frequency actual value obtained by the natural frequency actual value calculation means 56 in the storage unit 41, and the natural frequency actual value. A soundness evaluation means 59 for evaluating soundness and a structure such as a retaining wall 3 are modeled, and a natural frequency analysis value calculation means 58 based on a model for calculating an analysis value of the natural frequency of the structure from the model.

  These means are programs, which are stored in the storage unit 41 of the data collection processing device 15 and executed by the control unit 39. The natural frequency analysis value calculation means 58 based on the model should execute a model based on the design drawing of the structure as data separately from the vibration test on the structure such as the retaining wall 3 of the vibrator 7. Is possible.

The soundness level evaluation means 59 includes the natural frequency actual measurement value obtained by the natural frequency actual measurement value calculation means 56 and the previous natural frequency actual measurement value previously stored in the storage unit 41 by the natural frequency actual measurement value storage means 57. And the natural frequency analysis value and the natural frequency actual measurement value obtained by the natural frequency analysis value calculation means 58 based on a model obtained by modeling a structure such as the retaining wall 3. There is a method for evaluating the soundness level by comparing.
Details of the processing flow of the above method will be described later.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of soundness diagnosis processing by an impact vibration test. In the process shown in the figure, a method for obtaining the actual measured actual frequency value will be described.
First, a rough processing flow will be described.
Prior to the impact vibration test, installation of the vibrator 7 and setup of the control device 9, installation of the sensor 11 and setup of the data collection processing device 15 are performed. Thereafter, the vibration generator 7 oscillates, and vibration data measured by the sensor 11 is received by the data collection means 55 of the data collection processing device 15 and stored in the storage unit 41. The measurement is performed N times (for example, 10 times), and vibration data of each time is stored in the storage unit 41 (steps 101 to 107).
In addition, it is preferable that the vibrator 7 generates vibration without being influenced by the natural frequency of the structure.

Next, the natural frequency actual value calculation means 56 calculates the natural frequency actual value based on the vibration data stored in the storage unit 41 (steps 108 to 111). The obtained natural frequency actual value is stored in the storage unit 41 by the natural frequency actual value storage means 57 (step 112).
Next, process A or process B described later is performed (step 113).

Next, processing of each step will be described.
First, in the data collection means 55, the vibration data measurement count n is set to 1 (step 101). And it vibrates to a structure with the vibrator 7 (step 102). The horizontal vibration generated in the structure by the vibrator 7 is measured by the speedometer 31 of the sensor 11, amplified by the amplifier 33, converted into digital data by the A / D converter 35, the communication interface 37, the cable. 13 to the data collection processing device 15 (step 103). The data collection means 55 stores the vibration data received via the communication control unit 43 in the storage unit 41 (step 104).

  Through the above processing, vibration data of the structure by one excitation of the vibrator 7 is stored in the storage unit 41. Generally, in order to eliminate noise and the like, excitation and vibration data collection are performed a plurality of times (N times), for example, N = 10. Therefore, the process of steps 102-106 is repeated N times. As a result, vibration data for N times is stored in the storage unit 41.

  Next, N times of vibration data overlay processing is executed (step 107). By superimposing vibration data for N times obtained as a time series, there is an effect of suppressing a noise component that occurs only in one vibration. The vibration data after the overlay processing is displayed on the display unit 49 and stored in the storage unit 41 (step 108).

Next, the natural frequency actual value calculation means 56 obtains the natural frequency of the vibration data after the overlay processing.
That is, the vibration data after the overlay processing stored in the storage unit 41 is read out and compared with the input data to obtain a response magnification (step 109). The obtained response magnification is displayed on the display unit 49 (step 110).

  FIG. 5 is an example of a resonance curve for vibration data. A natural frequency actual measurement value is calculated from this resonance curve (step 111). The natural frequency actual measurement value 17 can be obtained as a frequency at which the response magnification shows the peak 19. Further, the natural frequency measurement value 17 can be obtained by obtaining the phase from the vibration data and considering the frequency indicating the phase change point. Is possible. The calculated actual natural frequency value is stored in the storage unit 41 by the natural frequency actual value storage means 57.

Through the above processing, the actual natural frequency measurement value of the structure due to the vibration of the vibrator 7 was obtained. Next, the soundness level is evaluated by the soundness level evaluation means 59.
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of soundness diagnosis processing (Process A) for comparing the previous natural frequency actual measurement value stored by the previous natural frequency actual measurement value storage means 57 with the current natural frequency actual measurement value. It is.

  First, the current measured natural frequency value is read from the storage unit 41 (step 201). Next, the measured natural frequency obtained by the previous shock vibration test is called (step 202). Next, the measured natural frequency value obtained this time is compared with the measured natural frequency value obtained previously (step 203). When the current natural frequency actual measurement value is greater than or equal to the previous natural frequency actual measurement value (Yes in Step 203), it is determined that the soundness level has not deteriorated. On the other hand, when the actual frequency measurement value obtained this time is smaller than the previous natural frequency measurement value (No in step 203), it is determined that the soundness level has deteriorated.

  The method for diagnosing the soundness of the structure described above compares the measured natural frequency with the measured natural frequency previously measured, and evaluates the state of change in the soundness. It is a method of diagnosis.

Next, a method for diagnosing the soundness of the structure by analyzing the natural frequency based on the model of the structure and comparing the natural frequency analysis value with the natural frequency actual measurement value will be described.
That is, in FIG. 3, the natural frequency analysis value of the structure is obtained by the natural frequency analysis value calculation means 58 based on the model, and based on the natural frequency measurement value obtained by the natural frequency measurement value calculation means 56. The soundness evaluation means 59 is a method for evaluating the soundness.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of the soundness level diagnosis process (process B) based on the natural frequency of the model.
First, the natural frequency analysis value of the structure is obtained by the model natural frequency analysis value calculation means 58 (steps 301 to 303).
Thereafter, the soundness evaluation means 59 evaluates the soundness of the structure by comparing the measured natural frequency and the analyzed natural frequency (steps 304 to 307).

First, a model of the retaining wall 3 is created from the design drawing of the retaining wall 3 (step 301).
FIG. 8 is a conceptual diagram of modeling of the retaining wall 3.
As shown to Fig.8 (a), the retaining wall 3 consists of the base part 17 in the lower part from the ground 5, and the retaining wall 3 constructed | assembled on it.

  As shown in FIG. 8 (b), such a retaining wall 3 can be modeled into an analysis model of a multi-mass system consisting of a plurality of mass points, elasto-plastic beam elements connecting them, ground springs of the foundation portion, and the like. it can. That is, based on the design drawing of each retaining wall, the load distribution of each part applied to the retaining wall 3 is placed at each mass point, and the elastic-plastic beam element connecting them is the bending rigidity EI of the retaining wall 3 (E is the Young's modulus of concrete or the like) , I is the cross-sectional secondary moment I), and the ground spring is obtained from the N value of the ground survey, and multiplied by a coefficient determined in advance according to the type of the foundation portion 17 (pile foundation, caisson foundation, direct foundation, etc.).

  As described above, the natural frequency analysis value of the retaining wall 3 is calculated by performing the eigenvalue analysis using the model in which the dead load of each part of the retaining wall 3 is set as the mass point (step 302). This eigenvalue analysis is performed by executing an existing eigenvalue analysis program stored in the storage unit 41 and the control unit 39.

  Next, a process for evaluating the soundness is performed by comparing the natural frequency analysis value of the structure obtained in step 302 with the actually measured natural frequency value of the same structure obtained in steps 101 to 111 in FIG. .

  First, the measured natural frequency value is read from the storage unit 41 (step 304), and this value is compared with the natural frequency analysis value (step 305). When the measured natural frequency is larger than the natural frequency analysis value (yes in step 305), it is determined that the soundness of the structure is sufficient (step 306). On the other hand, when the actual natural frequency measurement value is smaller than the natural frequency analysis value (no in step 305), it is determined that the soundness of the structure is not sufficient (step 307).

  The soundness of the structure such as the retaining wall 3 can be determined by the structure soundness diagnostic method described above.

  The present invention is not limited to the embodiment described above, and various modifications are possible, and these are also included in the technical scope of the present invention. For example, in the structure soundness diagnosis method of the present embodiment, the retaining wall 3 has been described as an example of the structure. However, the object for diagnosing the soundness is not limited to the retaining wall, and includes other structures. . For example, it may be an abutment.

The block diagram of the soundness diagnostic system 1 concerning embodiment of this invention. The hardware block diagram of the sensor 11 and the data collection processing apparatus 15 of the soundness diagnostic system 1. FIG. The conceptual block diagram of the data collection processing apparatus 15. FIG. The flowchart which shows the flow of a soundness diagnostic process. The figure explaining the Fourier spectrum of vibration data. The flowchart which shows the flow of the soundness diagnosis process by the previous natural frequency actual value. The flowchart which shows the flow of the soundness diagnostic process by the natural frequency of a model. The figure explaining the concept of modeling of the retaining wall. The figure explaining the conventional impact vibration test by a weight.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ......... Structure diagnostic system 3 ......... Retaining wall 5 ......... Ground 7 ......... Vibrator 9 ......... Control device 11 ... …… Sensor 13 ......... Cable (or wireless)
15 ......... Data collection processing device 17 ......... Natural frequency 19 ......... Peak 21 ......... Base 23 ...... Mass 25 ......... Ground spring 27 ......... Weight

Claims (3)

(A) vibrating the building in a horizontal direction using a vibrator installed at the top of the structure having a ground behind;
A step (b) of measuring vibration data generated in the structure;
A step (c) of calculating a measured natural frequency value of the structure from the vibration data;
A step (d) of evaluating the soundness of the structure based on the measured natural frequency; and
A method for diagnosing the degree of soundness of a structure, comprising:   In the step (d), the actual frequency actual value calculated in the step (c) is compared with the natural frequency actual value calculated for the same structure previously calculated, and the natural frequency actual value is compared. 2. The structural soundness diagnosis method according to claim 1, wherein the structural soundness of the structure is deteriorated when the measured natural frequency is smaller than the previous natural frequency measurement value. A step (e) of calculating a natural frequency analysis value of the structure from a model based on design information of the structure between the step (c) and the step (d);
The step (d) compares the natural frequency actual measurement value with the natural frequency analysis value, and when the natural frequency actual measurement value is smaller than the natural frequency analysis value, the soundness of the structure 2. The method for diagnosing the soundness of a structure according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the condition is deteriorated.

Images