JP2008129003A - Simple method for determining component of steel material - Google Patents

Simple method for determining component of steel material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008129003A
JP2008129003A JP2006345043A JP2006345043A JP2008129003A JP 2008129003 A JP2008129003 A JP 2008129003A JP 2006345043 A JP2006345043 A JP 2006345043A JP 2006345043 A JP2006345043 A JP 2006345043A JP 2008129003 A JP2008129003 A JP 2008129003A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
spark
steel
various components
shapes
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2006345043A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiromichi Kusafuka
博道 草深
Yoshiichi Sakamura
芳一 阪村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SAKAMURA HAITEKKUSU KK
Original Assignee
SAKAMURA HAITEKKUSU KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SAKAMURA HAITEKKUSU KK filed Critical SAKAMURA HAITEKKUSU KK
Priority to JP2006345043A priority Critical patent/JP2008129003A/en
Publication of JP2008129003A publication Critical patent/JP2008129003A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enable an operator to easily determine a steel type by using a spark test, even in the case the operator is not an expert. <P>SOLUTION: An instructional storage medium 2 which is realized by carrying out spark tests while pressing standard test strips of steel materials consisting of various components against a grinder 3 under a fixed condition to send off sparks and then collecting various specific data such as spark shapes, colors, bursting states and the like of the steel materials consisting of the various components, is used by a computer 1, thereby imaging characteristics of the various components such as the spark shapes, colors, bursting states and the like. Furthermore, a spark test is carried out, in which an actual steel product to be determined 5 is pressed against the grinder 3 under the same condition as above standard test strips, and spark shapes, colors, bursting states and the like in that case are photographed by using a camera or a video camera 4, and then photographed images of the spark shapes of the steel product 5 subjected to the spark test actually are compared with images of the spark shapes of the various components in the instructional storage medium 2, and when finding a matching state, such the determination is made that the component of the matched standard test strip is identical to that of the actual steel product to be determined. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は鋼材の簡易成分判定方法に関するものである。    The present invention relates to a simple component determination method for steel.

近年、鋼材では、各種成分の鋼材が開発され、その用途の多技にわたってきている。これらの成分については、素材メーカーの成分シート及び素材に添付されたラベルによってのみ区分されている。しかし、少量多品種の生産体制にかわりつつある現在、その鋼種の区分も益々複雑になり重要度も増してきている現状にある。また、少量多品種になることにより、素材メーカーから入った1枚のラベルの素材からさまざまな形状の加工品へと付加価値を高めていく工程において、製品そのものの成分について管理シートの紛失などのトラブルも発生する。その場合、この鋼種の推定、異材の鑑別についてはあまり時間を要せず簡易的に試験する方法として、JIS G 0566で花火試験方法が規定されている。この方法は図6に示すように調べたい鋼製品(鋼片)HをグラインダーGに一定条件のもとで押し付けて火花を飛ばす火花試験を行い、そのグラインダーGから飛び出る火花形状や色、破裂具合などをその現場にて直接目視により観察しその特徴から鋼種を見分けるようにしている。  In recent years, steel materials having various components have been developed and have been used for various purposes. These components are classified only by component manufacturers' component sheets and labels attached to the materials. However, as the production system of small quantities and many types is changing, the classification of steel types is becoming more and more complex and the importance is increasing. In addition, in the process of increasing the added value from a single label material entered from a material manufacturer to processed products of various shapes by becoming a small quantity and a variety of products, the management sheet is lost for the components of the product itself, etc. Trouble occurs. In that case, a fireworks test method is defined in JIS G 0565 as a simple test method that does not require much time for estimation of this steel type and discrimination of different materials. In this method, as shown in FIG. 6, a spark test is performed in which a steel product (steel piece) H to be examined is pressed against a grinder G under certain conditions and a spark is blown, and the spark shape, color, and rupture condition that pops out from the grinder G Etc. are visually observed directly at the site to distinguish the steel type from the characteristics.

しかし、上記した従来の火花試験方法は、その現場にて直接目視により観察しそのグラインダーGから飛び出る火花形状や色、破裂具合などから鋼種を見分けるために、非常に高度な熟練度を必要とする。そのため、従来、各社ではこの職人呼ばれる熟練人がいたが、現在ではこの技術の伝承が途絶えつつあるという問題が生じていた。  However, the above-described conventional spark test method requires a very high level of skill in order to distinguish the steel type from the spark shape, color, bursting condition, etc. that are observed by visual observation at the site and jump out of the grinder G. . For this reason, there has been a problem that each company has a skilled person called this craftsman.

そこで、本発明は、鋼種を熟練者でなくとも簡単容易に判定できる鋼材の簡易成分判定方法の提供を課題とする。  Then, this invention makes it a subject to provide the simple component determination method of the steel materials which can determine steel type easily and easily even if it is not an expert.

上記した課題を解決するために、本発明は、各種成分の鋼材の標準試験片を一定条件の下でグラインダーに押し付けて火花を飛ばす火花試験を行い、各種成分の鋼特有の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを各種採取し、その採取した動画や静止画をコンピューターにより成分判定の教材として記録媒体に記録させ、その教材用記憶媒体を用いてコンピューターにより各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合などの特性を映像化する一方、判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の火花形状を先の標準試験片の場合と同一条件下でグラインダーに押し付けて火花を飛ばす花火試験を行い、その場合の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを写真機又はビデオカメラにより撮影し、実際に火花試験をした鋼製品の火花形状の撮影画像と教材用記録媒体の各種成分の火花形状の映像画像とを対比して合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の成分とが同じであると判定するようにしたことを特徴とする。  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention performs a spark test in which a standard test piece of steel material of various components is pressed against a grinder under a certain condition to fly a spark, Collect various types of ruptures, record the collected videos and still images on a recording medium as a teaching material for component determination using a computer, and use the teaching material storage medium to create spark shapes, colors, and ruptures of various components. While performing the fireworks test, the spark shape of the actual steel product to be judged is pressed against the grinder under the same conditions as in the case of the standard test piece, and the spark shape and Photographs of the spark shape of steel products that were photographed with a photo camera or video camera, such as color and rupture, and actually tested for sparks, and spark shapes of various components of the recording medium for teaching materials If their by comparing the video image actually a component of the steel product to be determined and their matched components of the standard specimen is characterized in that so as to determined the same.

本発明によれば、上記したように判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の火花形状を先の標準試験片の場合と同一条件下で写真又はビデオにより撮影し、実際に火花試験をした鋼製品の火花形状の撮影画像とコンピューターに写し出された教材用記録媒体の各種成分の火花形状の映像画像とを対比して合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の成分とが同じであると判定するようにしたから、熟練者でなくとも教材用記録媒体に記録されコンピューターにより映像化された各種成分の火花形状と、撮影された実際の鋼製品の火花形状とを対比させ、合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定できるので、熟練者でなくともコンピューターに映像化された画像と実際の鋼製品の撮影画像とをもとに簡単容易にかつ正確に判定することが可能となる。  According to the present invention, the spark shape of the actual steel product to be determined as described above is taken by photography or video under the same conditions as in the case of the previous standard test piece, and the steel product actually subjected to the spark test is taken. The components of the actual steel product to be determined to be the components of the standard specimen that matched the spark-shaped photographed image and the spark-shaped video images of the various components of the teaching material recording medium projected on the computer. Therefore, even if you are not an expert, the spark shapes of the various components recorded on the recording medium for teaching materials and visualized by the computer, and the spark shapes of the actual steel products photographed Compared to each other, it is possible to determine that the components of the matched standard test specimen are the same, so even if you are not an expert, it is easy, easy and accurate based on the images imaged on the computer and the actual steel products. It is possible to determine.

以下、本発明の実施の形態を図面に基づいて説明する。
図1は、鋼材の簡易成分判定方法に用いる器材を示すもので、1はコンピューター、2は各種成分の鋼材の標準試験片を一定条件の下でグラインダーに押し付けて火花を飛ばす火花試験を行い、各種成分の鋼特有の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを各種採取し、その採取した動画や静止画をコンピューターにより成分判定の教材として記録させた教材用記録媒体、3はグラインダー、4はビデオカメラ、5は判定しようとする実際の鋼製品(鋼片)である。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows equipment used for a simple component judgment method for steel materials. 1 is a computer, 2 is a spark test in which standard test pieces of steel materials of various components are pressed against a grinder under certain conditions, and a spark test is performed. Various recording materials such as spark shapes, colors and bursting conditions specific to steel of various components are collected, and the recorded videos and still images are recorded as teaching materials for component determination by a computer. 3 is a grinder, 4 is a video camera Reference numeral 5 denotes an actual steel product (steel piece) to be determined.

具体的には、教材用記録媒体2に各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを記録させる場合、火花の全体、火花の根元、中央、先端の各部にわたり、動画や静止画、拡大画像、スロー動画などで記録させる一方、各種成分の火花を観察したときの特徴、流線の色、明るさ、長さ、角度、太さ、数や、また、破裂を観察したときの特徴、形状、大きさ、花粉の有無、流線の角度などを、上記した動画や静止画、拡大画像、スロー画像と共に音声や画面への文字表示などと合わせて同時に記録させ、これらの両面から学習できるように記録されている。  Specifically, when recording the spark shape, color, and rupture condition of various components on the educational material recording medium 2, the entire spark, the root, the center, and the tip of the spark, moving images, still images, enlarged images, While recording with slow video etc., characteristics when observing sparks of various components, streamline color, brightness, length, angle, thickness, number, and characteristics, shape when rupture is observed, Size, pollen presence, streamline angle, etc. can be recorded simultaneously with the above-mentioned video, still image, enlarged image, slow image, along with voice and text display on the screen, etc. so that you can learn from both It is recorded.

そして、教材用記憶媒体2を用いてコンピューター1により各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合やその特性を映像化し、その映像化された動画や静止画、拡大画像と共に音声や画面への文字表示にて、各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを熟練者でなくとも簡単用容易に学習できるようになされている。  The computer 1 uses the teaching material storage medium 2 to visualize the spark shape, color, rupture condition, and characteristics of each component, and displays the video, still images, and magnified images together with the characters and text on the screen. Therefore, it is possible to easily and easily learn the spark shape, color, and rupture condition of various components without being skilled.

一方、判定しようとする実際の鋼製品5を先の標準試験片の場合と同一条件下でグラインダー3に押し付けて火花を飛ばす花火試験を行い、その場合の火花形状や色や破裂具合などをビデオカメラ4(写真機でもよい。)により撮影する。  On the other hand, an actual steel product 5 to be judged is pressed against the grinder 3 under the same conditions as in the case of the previous standard test piece, and a spark test is performed to fly the spark, and the spark shape, color, and bursting condition in that case are video Take a picture with the camera 4 (may be a camera).

そして、実際に火花試験をした鋼製品5における火花形状の撮影画像と教材用記録媒体2の各種成分の火花形状の映像画像とを対比して合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定しようとする実際の製品の成分とが同じであると判定するようにしたのである。  Then, if the shot image of the spark shape in the steel product 5 actually subjected to the spark test and the video images of the spark shape of various components of the teaching material recording medium 2 are compared and matched, it will be determined that the component of the matched standard test piece. It is determined that the components of the actual product are the same.

具体的には、実際に火花試験をした鋼製品5の撮影画像と教材用記録媒体2の各種成分の映像画像との火花形状を対比観察する場合、それぞれの映像に対して図2に示すように火花の全体、図3に示すように火花の根元、図4に示すように中央、図5に示すように先端の各部にわたり、流線の色、明るさ、長さ、太さ、数を観察し、また、破裂については形状、大きさ、花粉の有無、流線の角度、音手などを注意深く詳細に観察するのであり、そして、その対比観察において合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定しようとする実際の製品の成分とが同じであると判定することができるのである。  Specifically, when the spark shape of the captured image of the steel product 5 actually subjected to the spark test and the video image of various components of the teaching material recording medium 2 is compared and observed, as shown in FIG. The color, brightness, length, thickness, and number of streamlines across the entire spark, the root of the spark as shown in FIG. 3, the center as shown in FIG. 4, and the tip of the tip as shown in FIG. Observe and for rupture, carefully observe in detail the shape, size, pollen presence, streamline angle, pitch, etc. It can be determined that the components of the actual product to be determined are the same.

その場合、判定すべき実際に火花試験をした鋼製品5の撮影した写真又は画像と、コンピューター1の映像画面に写し出された教材用記録媒体2の各種成分の映像画像とを対比したり、或いは判定すべき実際に火花試験をした鋼製品5のビデオ撮影した映像画像をコンピューター1に取り込んでコンピューター1の映像画面にに写し出される映像画像と、コンピューター1の映像画面に写し出される先の教材用記録媒体2の各種成分の映像画像とを対比することになる。また、コンピューターとしては、同一のもの或いは別のものであってもよい。  In that case, a photograph or image of the steel product 5 that has actually been subjected to a spark test to be judged may be compared with video images of various components of the teaching material recording medium 2 projected on the video screen of the computer 1, or The video image of the steel product 5 that has actually undergone a spark test to be judged is taken into the computer 1 and projected onto the video screen of the computer 1, and the previous teaching material record that is projected onto the video screen of the computer 1 The video images of the various components of the medium 2 are compared. The computers may be the same or different.

以上のように、本発明の鋼材の簡易成分判定方法によれば、熟練者でなくとも教材用記録媒体2に記録されコンピューター1により映像化された各種成分の火花形状と、撮影された実際の鋼製品5の火花形状とを詳細に観察対比させ、合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定できるので、熟練者でなくともコンピューター1に映像化された画像と実際の鋼製品5の撮影画像とをもとに簡単容易にかつ正確に判定することができる。  As described above, according to the simple component determination method of the steel material of the present invention, the spark shapes of various components recorded in the teaching material recording medium 2 and visualized by the computer 1, and the actual photographed images, even if not an expert. The spark shape of the steel product 5 can be observed and compared in detail, and if matched, it can be determined that it is a component of the matched standard test piece. It can be easily and accurately determined based on the image.

また、教材用記憶媒体2をもとにコンピューター1により鋼材の各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合などの特性をいつでも映像化して再現できるので、その再現した映像をもとに反復学習することができ、技術者の知識習得などにも用いることができる。  In addition, since the computer 1 can be used to visualize and reproduce the spark shape, color, and rupture characteristics of various components of steel materials at any time based on the teaching material storage medium 2, it is necessary to repeatedly learn based on the reproduced images. It can be used to acquire knowledge of engineers.

本発明に係る鋼材の簡易成分判定方法の概要を示す説明図である。  It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of the simple component determination method of the steel materials which concern on this invention. 同判定方法による火花試験の火花の全体の映像説明図である。  It is video explanatory drawing of the whole spark of the spark test by the same determination method. 同火花の根元部分の各部火花試験の映像説明図である。  It is video explanatory drawing of each part spark test of the root part of the same spark. 同火花の中央部分の映像説明図である。  It is video explanatory drawing of the center part of the same spark. 同火花の先端部分の映像説明図である。  It is video explanatory drawing of the front-end | tip part of the same spark. 従来の説明図である。  It is conventional explanatory drawing.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 コンピューター
2 教材用記憶媒体
3 グラインダー
4 ビデオカメラ
5 判定すべき実際の鋼製品
1 Computer 2 Storage medium for teaching material 3 Grinder 4 Video camera 5 Actual steel product to be judged

Claims (1)

各種成分の鋼材の標準試験片を一定条件の下でグラインダーに押し付けて火花を飛ばす火花試験を行い、各種成分の鋼特有の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを各種採取し、その採取した動画や静止画をコンピューターにより成分判定の教材として記録媒体に記録させ、その教材用記憶媒体を用いてコンピューターにより各種成分の火花形状や色や破裂具合などの特性を映像化する一方、判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の火花形状を先の標準試験片の場合と同一条件下でグラインダーに押し付けて火花を飛ばす花火試験を行い、その場合の火花形状や色や破裂具合などを写真機又はビデオカメラにより撮影し、実際に火花試験をした鋼製品の火花形状の撮影画像と教材用記録媒体の各種成分の火花形状の映像画像とを対比して合えばその一致した標準試験片の成分と判定しようとする実際の鋼製品の成分とが同じであると判定するようにしたことを特徴とする鋼材の簡易成分判定方法。  We conduct a spark test in which standard steel specimens of various components are pressed against a grinder under certain conditions to fly sparks, and various spark shapes, colors and rupture conditions peculiar to steel of various components are collected. A still image is recorded on a recording medium as a component judgment material by a computer, and the characteristics such as the spark shape, color, and rupture condition of each component are visualized by the computer using the teaching material storage medium, while the actual attempt to judge A spark test is performed by pressing the spark shape of the steel product against the grinder under the same conditions as the previous standard test piece, and the spark shape, color, and rupture condition are photographed with a camera or video camera. If the shot images of the spark shape of the steel products actually subjected to the spark test were compared with the image images of the spark shape of the various components of the recording material for teaching materials, the results matched. Simple component determination method of the steel, characterized in that as the actual and components of the steel product to be determined component of quasi specimen is determined to be the same.
JP2006345043A 2006-11-24 2006-11-24 Simple method for determining component of steel material Pending JP2008129003A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006345043A JP2008129003A (en) 2006-11-24 2006-11-24 Simple method for determining component of steel material

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006345043A JP2008129003A (en) 2006-11-24 2006-11-24 Simple method for determining component of steel material

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008129003A true JP2008129003A (en) 2008-06-05

Family

ID=39554944

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006345043A Pending JP2008129003A (en) 2006-11-24 2006-11-24 Simple method for determining component of steel material

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2008129003A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4656550B1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-03-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Steel material judgment device and steel material judgment method
WO2011061971A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 住友金属工業株式会社 Steel material quality determination device and steel material quality determination method

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09120455A (en) * 1995-10-26 1997-05-06 Meidensha Corp Feature discriminating method using neural network

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09120455A (en) * 1995-10-26 1997-05-06 Meidensha Corp Feature discriminating method using neural network

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4656550B1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-03-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Steel material judgment device and steel material judgment method
WO2011061971A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 住友金属工業株式会社 Steel material quality determination device and steel material quality determination method
CN102667443A (en) * 2009-11-20 2012-09-12 住友金属工业株式会社 Steel material quality determination device and steel material quality determination method
US8761444B2 (en) 2009-11-20 2014-06-24 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Apparatus and method for determining kind of steel material

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3597439B2 (en) Diagnosis method for paint deterioration of painted steel
JP2009175334A (en) Microscopic system, image forming method, and program
WO2018034057A1 (en) Defect inspection apparatus, defect inspection method, and program
TWI635462B (en) A method of evaluating the quality of images
JP6675927B2 (en) Structural deterioration inspection device
CN111312023A (en) Device and method for automatically drawing middle school physics circuit experiment circuit diagram
JP2008129003A (en) Simple method for determining component of steel material
JP3981445B2 (en) Inspection device
JP3179118U (en) Simple component judgment device for steel
JP2012032362A (en) Simple component determination method for steel material
CN101408521A (en) Method for increasing defect
JP6479881B2 (en) Inspection support device, inspection support method, and program
JP7194348B2 (en) Image processing device, image processing method and image processing program
JP2009152868A (en) Image processing apparatus and image processing program
JP2006048665A5 (en)
CN113192070A (en) Weld image processing method and system based on computer vision
TWM600842U (en) Integrated system for rapid defect detection of sheet materials
JP3745075B2 (en) Film thickness measuring device
JP4344862B2 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic detection of observation object
WO2018158818A1 (en) Inspection assistance device, inspection assistance method, and recording medium
CN107515224A (en) A kind of printing defects detecting system based on image procossing
JP4898500B2 (en) Pipe inner surface diagnosis method and pipe inner surface diagnosis apparatus
TW202316369A (en) Storage and representation method of machine vision image and system thereof wherein the method includes displaying a non-region of interest image in black
WO2023053728A1 (en) Display processing device, display processing method, and display processing program
Izraeli et al. Computer-aided courtroom presentation of shoeprint comparison

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Effective date: 20091124

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110623

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20111207

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Effective date: 20111213

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20120327