JP2006244000A - Process management device and process management program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To associate a user executing a generated task to the generated task in consideration of skill of the user improved by executing a task. <P>SOLUTION: This process management device 1 has: a personal skill data cooperation means 21 storing personal skill data 21 wherein a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by digitalizing target skill of the user, and a present value obtained by digitalizing present skill of the user are associated; growth point data 24 wherein a growth value obtained by digitalizing increment of the skill of the user expected after executing the generated task is associated to a task kind of the generated task; and a responsible candidate list display means 14 reading the personal skill data 21 and the growth point data 24, and associating and outputting the target value of the user and an execution value obtained by adding the growth value to the present value of the user with the user identifier as a key. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a process management apparatus and a process management program for associating a user who performs a generated task with a task (hereinafter referred to as “task”) generated in a project or the like.

  In a production activity of a company, there is a process of determining a user such as an employee who performs a task for the task that has occurred. Specifically, in a process management system that manages processes such as production planning, operation planning, and project management related to a company's production activities, the project manager links the generated task with the user who performs this task. . By associating the generated task with the user who performs the task, the company can perform the generated task as planned.

  On the other hand, in a company, a user's skill may be grasped | ascertained, for example by giving a user a test. Specifically, in a skill management system that manages user skills, points obtained by quantifying the user skills are linked to each user and each skill. In this way, points that quantify the user's skill are linked to each user and skill, so that a company or the like can select the optimum user by the skill management system when performing the generated task. .

Specifically, in a device that controls the priority, classification, appropriate allocation, etc. for processing the received work by a programmed computer and instructs each worker, the work acquisition content of the worker in the computer database, Automatic instruction of work, etc. characterized by storing and accumulating processing capacity, special technology, other technical accumulation that can handle work, checking various check items in the database and outputting instructions to each worker There is a method (for example, refer to Patent Document 1). According to the technique described in Patent Document 1, the priority order for processing a given job, the required personnel of the worker, the quality and ability of the worker are analyzed, and the selection of the personnel is performed. be able to.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-171881

  However, in the method described in Patent Document 1 described above, an appropriate user is assigned to the generated task, but the skill that the user acquires by performing the task must be manually updated in the skill management system. In addition, when selecting a user to perform a generated task, if the user's skill is to be improved by performing the task, the user must be assigned based on human processes such as project manager intuition and experience. I had to.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a process management apparatus and a process management program that efficiently associate a user who performs a generated task with a generated task in consideration of user skills improved by performing the task. That is.

  In order to solve the above problems, a first feature of the present invention relates to a process management apparatus that associates a user who performs the generated task with the generated task. In other words, the process management apparatus according to the first aspect of the present invention provides personal skill data in which a user identifier of a user, a target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and a current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill are associated with each other. The personal skill data linkage means for storing the data in the storage device, and the growth point data in which the growth value obtained by quantifying the expected increase in the skill of the user after performing the generated task is stored in the task type of the generated task. Growth point data storage means to be stored in the device, personal skill data and growth point data are read from the storage device, the user identifier is used as a key, the user's target value, and the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the user's current value And a candidate list display means for outputting the information in association with each other.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to associate the user who performs the generated task with the generated task in consideration of the skill of the user who is improved by performing the task.

  The second feature of the present invention relates to a process management apparatus for associating a user who performs the generated task with the generated task. In other words, the process management apparatus according to the second feature of the present invention relates to personal skill data in which a user identifier of a user, a target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and a current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill are associated with each other. Is associated with the personal skill data linkage means that stores in the storage device, the generated task identifier of the generated task, the assignable man-hours that can be allocated to the generated task, and the task weight value considering the load of the generated task Growth point data in which the task data input means for storing the generated task data in the storage device, and the generated task identifier are associated with the growth value obtained by quantifying the expected increase in the skill of the user after performing the generated task, User identification by reading growth point data storage means stored in the storage device, and reading personal skill data and generated task data from the storage device Calculates the estimated man-hours, which is the period required for the user to perform the generated task, taking into account the task weight value every time, and stores the estimated man-hour data in which the user identifier and the generated task identifier are associated with the estimated man-hours in the storage device. Reads the assumed man-hour storage means to store the personal skill data and the growth point data from the storage device, and outputs the target value of the user and the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user in association with the user identifier as a key. And a candidate list display means for handling.

  According to the present invention, the user's skill that can be improved by executing the task by calculating the estimated man-hour that the user can execute the task according to the task weight, and the user who can execute the task within the time limit. By extracting and outputting, it is possible to associate the user who performs the generated task with the generated task.

  A third feature of the present invention relates to a process management program for associating a user who performs the generated task with the generated task. In other words, the process management program according to the third feature of the present invention is the personal skill data in which the user identifier of the user, the target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and the current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill are associated with each other. The personal skill data linkage means for storing the data in the storage device, and the growth point data in which the growth value obtained by quantifying the expected increase in the skill of the user after performing the generated task is stored in the task type of the generated task. Growth point data storage means to be stored in the device, personal skill data and growth point data are read from the storage device, and using the user identifier as a key, the target value of the user and the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user The computer is realized with a candidate list display means for outputting in association with each other.

  A fourth feature of the present invention relates to a process management program for associating a user who performs the generated task with the generated task. In other words, the process management program according to the fourth aspect of the present invention provides a personal skill that associates a user identifier of a user, a target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and a current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill. Association of personal skill data linking means for storing data in the storage device, the generated task identifier of the generated task, the assignable man-hours that can be allocated to the generated task, and the task weight value considering the load of the generated task Growth point data in which the task data input means for storing the generated task data in the storage device and the generated task identifier are associated with the growth value obtained by quantifying the expected increase in the skill of the user after performing the generated task. The growth point data storage means stored in the storage device, the personal skill data and the generated task data are read from the storage device, and the user Calculates the estimated man-hours, which is the period required for the user to perform the generated task, taking into account the task weight value for each identifier, and stores the estimated man-hour data that correlates the user identifier and generated task identifier with the estimated man-hours Assume the man-hour storage means stored in the device, read personal skill data and growth point data from the storage device, and use the user identifier as a key to associate the user's target value with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the user's current value The computer is realized with a candidate list display means for outputting in response.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a process management apparatus and a process management program for efficiently associating a user who performs a generated task with a generated task in consideration of user skills improved by performing the task. Can do.

  Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following description of the drawings, the same or similar parts are denoted by the same or similar reference numerals.

  In the present invention, the “occurrence task” refers to a newly generated task that is a work target to which a process management apparatus according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention assigns a user such as an employee. Here, the “task” includes a production process for manufacturing a product, a project process for building a system, and the like. For example, tasks related to the process of a project for constructing a system include processes such as specification formulation, specification creation, basic design, and programming. On the other hand, the “user” is an activity subject for performing a task, and is generally preferably an employee. The “user” is not limited to an employee, but may be an organization such as a subcontractor or a subcontractor, or an employee belonging to this organization. Further, “skill” is one of parameters serving as a standard for skills provided by the user. Here, the “skill” is managed for each skill type such as document creation ability, negotiation ability, network knowledge, programming knowledge, and database knowledge.

(Best Embodiment)
A process management system 10 according to the best mode of the present invention includes a process management apparatus 1, a skill management system 2, a skill manager terminal 3, and a project manager terminal 4. The process management device 1, the skill management system 2, the skill manager terminal 3, and the project manager terminal 4 are communicably connected to each other via a communication network such as a LAN or an intranet.

  The process management device 1 associates the user who performs the generated task with the generated task in consideration of the skill of the user who is improved by performing the task. This process management device 1 will be described in detail later.

  The skill management system 2 includes a skill management server 201 and personal skill data 202. For example, the personal skill data 202 is stored in a database server to which the skill management server 201 can be connected. The skill management server 201 stores the target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill and the current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill in the personal skill data 202 using the user identifier and skill type as keys. When the skill management system 2 takes the education and takes the test, and when the results and results are input, the current value of the skill of the user is updated according to the input results and results. .

  The skill manager terminal 3 is a terminal used by an administrator of the skill management system 2. The administrator of the skill management system 2 can refer to and update data managed by the skill management system 2 via the skill manager terminal 3. Specifically, the skill manager uses the skill manager terminal 3 to register the target value of the user in the personal skill data 202 of the skill management system 2 in advance via the skill management server 201.

  The project manager terminal 4 is a terminal used by the project manager. The project manager refers to and updates the growth point data 24 and the like managed by the process management apparatus 1 via the project manager terminal 4. More specifically, the project manager terminal 4 registers the increase in skill by performing the task for the generated task in the growth point data 24. Further, the project manager associates the user who performs the generated task based on the output result of the process management apparatus 1 via the project manager terminal 4 and arranges the linked user to execute the generated task. be able to.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the process management apparatus 1 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a central processing control device 101, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 102, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 103, and an input / output interface 109. Are connected via a bus 110. An input device 104, a display device 105, a communication control device 106, a storage device 107, and a removable disk 108 are connected to the input / output interface 109.

  The central processing control device 101 reads and executes a boot program for starting the process management device 1 from the ROM 102 based on an input signal from the input device 104, and further reads an operating system stored in the storage device 107. Further, the central processing control device 101 controls various devices based on input signals from the input device 104, the communication control device 106, etc., and reads programs and data stored in the RAM 103, the storage device 107, etc. into the RAM 103. A processing device that loads and implements a series of processes to be described later, such as data calculation or processing, based on a program command read from the RAM 103.

  The input device 104 includes input devices such as a keyboard and a mouse through which an operator inputs various operations. The input device 104 generates an input signal based on the operation of the operator, and inputs via the input / output interface 109 and the bus 110. It is transmitted to the central processing control apparatus 101. The display device 105 is a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) display, a liquid crystal display, or the like, and receives an output signal to be displayed on the display device 105 from the central processing control device 101 via the bus 110 and the input / output interface 109. It is a device that displays the processing result of the control device 101 and the like. The communication control device 106 is a device such as a LAN card or a modem, and is a device that connects the process management device 1 to a communication network such as the Internet or a LAN. Data transmitted / received to / from the communication network via the communication control device 106 is transmitted / received to / from the central processing control device 101 via the input / output interface 109 and the bus 110 as an input signal or an output signal.

  The storage device 107 is a semiconductor storage device or a magnetic disk device, and stores programs and data executed by the central processing control device 101. The removable disk 108 is an optical disk or a flexible disk, and signals read / written by the disk drive are transmitted / received to / from the central processing control apparatus 101 via the input / output interface 109 and the bus 110.

  The storage device 107 of the process management apparatus 1 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention stores a process management program, personal skill data 21, generated task data 22, assumed man-hour data 23, growth point data 24, Performance value calculation data 25 is stored. Further, the process management program is read and executed by the central processing control apparatus 101 of the process management apparatus 1, so that the individual skill data linkage means 11, task data input means 12, estimated man-hour calculation means 13, candidate candidate list display means 14 is mounted on the process management apparatus 1.

  The personal skill data linking means 11 stores, in the storage device 107, personal skill data 21 in which the user identifier of the user, the target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and the current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill are associated with each other. Remember. The personal skill data cooperation unit 11 acquires the current value and target value of the skill of the desired user from the personal skill data 202 stored in the skill management system 2 via the communication network 5. Here, a skill whose current value does not reach the target value is a skill that the user should develop in the future. The personal skill data 202 is assumed to be synchronized with the personal skill data of the skill management system 2.

  In the personal skill data 21, a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by quantifying the user's target skill, and a current value obtained by quantifying the user's current skill are associated with each other. The personal skill data 21 has a data structure and data shown in FIG. 3, for example. In the example shown in FIG. 3, a skill target value and a current value are stored for each user identifier and skill identifier. For example, for the document creation ability indicated by the skill identifier “S001”, the target value of the user with the user identifier “U001” is set to 100 points, but the current value is 40 points. Therefore, it is necessary for this user to develop 60 points for the document creation ability. On the other hand, for the network knowledge ability indicated by the skill identifier “S003”, the target value of the user with the user identifier “U001” is set to 0 points, but the current value is 30 points. Therefore, it is not necessary for this user to further develop network knowledge.

  Based on an instruction from the input device of the project manager terminal 4, the task data input means 12 stores generated task data in which the task type of the generated task is associated with an assignable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task. Store in device 107.

  In the generated task data 22, an assignable man-hour that is a period that can be assigned to the generated task is associated with the task type of the generated task. The generated task data 22 has, for example, the data structure and data shown in FIG. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the generated task identifier of the generated task stores the task type indicating the type of the generated task, the allocatable man-hours that can be allocated to the generated task, and the allocatable time when the generated task can be allocated. Has been. Specifically, the task with the generated task identifier “P001” is a task with a task type “T111”, an assignable man-hour “3”, and an assignable time “2004/2/1”. Here, the assignable man-hours are indicated by the number of units of time predetermined by, for example, “time”, “day”, “week”, “month”, “year”, and the like. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the unit of man-hour is assumed to be “day”.

  The estimated man-hour calculating means 13 reads the personal skill data 21 and the generated task data 22 from the storage device 107, calculates an estimated man-hour that is a period required for the user to perform the generated task, and determines the user identifier of the user. The assumed man-hour data 23 associated with the assumed man-hour is stored in the storage device 107. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the estimated man-hours necessary for performing the generated task is determined by the task type of the generated task. Therefore, it is preferable that the assumed man-hour calculating unit 13 calculates the assumed man-hour data 23 in advance by batch processing or the like and stores it in the storage device 107.

  The assumed man-hour data 23 is associated with the user identifier of the user. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 5, the user identifier and the task type identifier store the man-hours necessary for the user to perform this task. Specifically, the user with the user identifier “U001” requires an execution period of two man hours when the specification of the task type “T111” is formulated. The man-hours stored in the assumed man-hour data 23 are expressed in the same unit as the assignable man-hours of the generated task data 22 or a convertible unit.

Here, the assumed man-hour calculating process by the assumed man-hour calculating means 13 will be described with reference to FIG.
First, in step S101, the personal skill data 21 is read from the storage device 107, and the generated task data 22 is read from the storage device 107 in step S102.
Next, for the user and task type, an assumed man-hour that is assumed when the user performs the task is calculated. Specifically, in step S103, an evaluation value is calculated based on the personal skill and the task type. This evaluation value is calculated based on the current value of the skill of the user. Based on the evaluation value calculated in step S103, an estimated man-hour assumed when the user performs the task in step S104 is calculated. The estimated man-hour calculated in step S105 is stored in the storage device 107 as the assumed man-hour data 23 using the user identifier and the task type as keys.

  In this way, the estimated man-hour is calculated based on the current value of the individual skill and the attribute value of the task. Therefore, even when the same task is performed, if the skill value of the user is different, the estimated man-hours differ depending on the user. The estimated man-hour is calculated based on a predetermined method known to those skilled in the art. The estimated man-hour data 23 output by the estimated man-hour calculating means 13 is read from the storage device 107 by the assigned candidate list display means 14.

  The candidate list display unit 14 reads the personal skill data 21 and the growth point data 24 from the storage device 107, and uses the user identifier as a key to perform the user's target value and the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the user's current value. Are output in association with each other. Further, the candidate list display means 14 provides an achievement flag with the user identifier as a key. If the achievement value exceeds the target value, true is assigned to the achievement flag, and if the achievement value does not exceed the target value, the achievement candidate is displayed. The flag may be output with false.

  The growth point data 24 is stored in the storage device 107 in association with the task type of the generated task in association with a growth value obtained by quantifying the user skill increase expected after the generated task is performed. The growth point data 24 is stored in advance for each task type based on an instruction from the input device of the project manager terminal 4 from the project manager terminal 4.

  In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a case will be described in which a growth point by executing a generated task is determined by the task type of the generated task regardless of the work amount or difficulty level of the generated task. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 7, the growth value of each skill that increases when the task is executed is stored for each task type and each skill identifier. Specifically, a user who has formulated a specification with the task type “T111” does not increase the skill of the document creation ability of the skill identifier “S001”, but increases the skill of the negotiation ability of the skill identifier “S002” by 50 points. To do.

  Here, the responsible candidate list display means 14 uses the user identifier as the key and the skill identifier as the key, and associates the target value, the current value, the performance value, and the achievement flag to obtain performance value calculation data 25 as shown in FIG. It may be output as a temporary file. The performance value calculation data 25 is output for each generated task. Regarding the document creation ability indicated by the skill identifier “S001”, the target value of the user with the user identifier “U001” is 100 points, the current value is 40 points, and the achievement value that is the skill value after performing the generated task is 40 points. It is. Therefore, even if the generated task is performed for this user, since the performance value does not exceed the target value, “FALSE” is assigned to the achievement flag.

  The responsible candidate list display means 14 displays on the display device of the project manager terminal 4 based on the data stored in the performance value calculation data 25, and the generated task is determined based on the input instruction from the project manager terminal 4. The user to perform can be selected. Here, the candidate list display unit 14 extracts the user identifier of the user whose estimated man-hour stored in the assumed man-hour data 23 is equal to or less than the assignable man-hour stored in the generated task data 22 from the assumed man-hour data 23, Regarding the extracted user identifier of the user, it is preferable to associate the target value of the user with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user and output it to the display device. Specifically, the case where the performance value calculation data 25 shown in FIG. 8 is a task of the generated task type “T111” shown in FIG. 4 will be described. At this time, since the assignable man-hour of the task type “T111” is “3”, the user with the user identifier “U001” having the assumed man-hour “2” of the generated task type “111” and the assumed man-hour “1”. The user with the user identifier “U003” can complete the generated task within allocatable man-hours. Therefore, only the user with the user identifier “U001” and the user with the user identifier “U003” are displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4. On the other hand, the user with the user identifier “U002” whose assumed man-hour is “4” cannot complete the generated task within the allocatable man-hours, and thus is not displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4.

Here, the candidate list display process by the candidate list display unit 14 will be described with reference to FIG.
First, in step S201, a generated task identifier to be processed and a task type are input. For example, the processing shown in FIG. 9 may be executed when the generated task data 22 is generated by the project manager terminal 4 and the task data input means 12, or may be processed from the input device of the project manager terminal 4. May be executed by inputting the task identifier and task type. Here, it is assumed that the task type “T111” is input in step S201. When the task type to be processed is input, in step S202, the assumed man-hour data 23 is read from the storage device 107, and the assumed man-hour of the task type input in step S201 is extracted. Specifically, for the task type “T111”, the assumed man-hour “2” for the user with the user identifier “U001”, the assumed man-hour “4” for the user with the user identifier “U002”, and the user identifier “U003” from the assumed man-hour data 23. The estimated man-hour “1” of the user “” is extracted.

Next, the processing from step S203 to step S210 is executed for all users. Here, the case of processing for the user with the user identifier “U001” will be specifically described.
First, in step S203, the current value and target value for each skill of the user are extracted from the personal skill data 21 using the user identifier of the user as a key. Specifically, the target value and current value for each skill of the user identifier “U001” are extracted from the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG. Here, from the personal skill data 21, the target value of the document creation ability of the skill identifier “S001” associated with the user identifier “U001” is 100 points and the current value is 40 points, and the target value of the negotiation ability of the skill identifier “S002” is 200 points. Point and current value 100 points, skill identifier “S003” network knowledge target value 0 point and current value 30 points, skill identifier “S004” programming knowledge target value 300 points and current value 40 points, skill identifier “S005” The database knowledge target value 0 point and the current value 0 point are extracted.
Next, in step S204, a growth value for each skill is extracted from the growth point data 24 using the task type of the generated task input in step S201 as a key. Specifically, the growth value for each skill of the task type “T111” is extracted from the growth point data 24 shown in FIG. Here, from the growth point data 24, the growth value 0 point of the document creation ability of the skill identifier “S001” associated with the specification of the task type “T111”, the growth value 50 point of the negotiation ability of the skill identifier “S002”, The network knowledge growth value 30 points of the skill identifier “S003”, the programming knowledge growth value 20 points of the skill identifier “S004”, and the database knowledge growth value 20 points of the skill identifier “S005” are extracted.
Next, in step S205, for each skill, the growth value is added to the current value of the personal skill data of the user and the result is output as a performance value. Specifically, for each skill, the growth value of the growth point data 24 shown in FIG. 7 is added to the current value of the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG. Further, in step S206, for each skill, the performance value calculated in step S205 is compared with the target value stored in the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG. If the target value exceeds the performance value as a result of the comparison in step S206, “TRUE” is assigned to the achievement flag of the skill in step S207. Otherwise, in step S208, “FALSE” is given to the achievement flag of the skill.
Here, since the current value is 40 points and the growth value is 0 points for the document creation ability of the skill identifier “S001” of the user identifier “U001”, the performance value of this skill is output as 40 points. Since the target value of this skill is 100 points, “FALSE” is set as the achievement flag. Regarding the negotiation ability of the skill identifier “S002”, since the current value is 100 points and the growth value is 50 points, the performance value of this skill is output as 150 points. Since the target value of this skill is 200 points, “FALSE” is set as the achievement flag. Regarding the network knowledge of the skill identifier “S003”, since the current value is 30 points and the growth value is 30 points, the performance value of this skill is output as 60 points. Since the target value of this skill is 0 points, “TRUE” is set as the achievement flag. Regarding the programming knowledge of the skill identifier “S004”, since the current value is 40 points and the growth value is 20 points, the performance value of this skill is output as 60 points. Since the target value of this skill is 300 points, “FALSE” is set as the achievement flag. Regarding the database knowledge of the skill identifier “S005”, since the current value is 0 point and the growth value is 20 points, the performance value of this skill is output as 20 points. Since the target value of this skill is 0 points, “TRUE” is set as the achievement flag.
Next, in step S209, based on the output results in steps S203, S204, S205, S207, and S208, the user identifier of the user is assumed to be the estimated man-hour of the task type read in step S202, and the target for each skill. A record in which the value, current value, performance value, and achievement flag are associated is created, and the created record is inserted into performance value calculation data 25 and stored in the storage device 107 in step S210.
Execution value calculation data 25 as shown in FIG. 8 is stored in the storage device 107 by executing the processing from step S203 to step S210 for each user. When the performance value calculation data 25 is stored in the storage device 107, the generated task data 22 is read from the storage device 107 in step S211, and the assignable man-hour of the task type input in step S201 is extracted. Here, the assignable man-hour “3” of the generated task identifier “P001” is extracted from the generated task data 22.
Next, in step S212, a record equal to or less than the allocatable man-hours extracted in step S211 is extracted from the performance value calculation data 25. Specifically, a user identifier having an estimated man-hour of “3” or less in the performance value calculation data 25 shown in FIG. 8 is extracted, and a record using the extracted user identifier as a key is extracted. Here, a record using the user identifier “U001” with an assumed man-hour “2” as a key and a record using the user identifier “U003” with an assumed man-hour “1” as a key are extracted.
Furthermore, in step S213, the record extracted in step S212 is displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4. At this time, according to the value assigned to the achievement flag of the achievement value calculation data 25, the cell displaying the skill target value, the current value and the achievement value may be colored. Specifically, the target value, the current value, and the performance value of the skill to which “TRUE” is assigned are colored blue, and the target value and the current value of the skill to which “FALSE” is assigned. The cells displaying performance values are colored red.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 10 and FIG. 11, an example of a screen displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4 by the process management device 1 according to the best embodiment of the present invention will be described.

  When the project manager terminal 4 assigns a user who performs the generated task to the generated task, a task plan list screen P501 as shown in FIG. 10 is displayed. The task plan list screen P501 includes a task plan display unit 501 that associates a generated task with a plan for executing the generated task.

  Specifically, the task with the generated task identifier “P001” shown in FIG. 4 has an assignable man-hour “3” and an assignable time “2005/2/1”, so the generated task identifier “P001”. In a cell corresponding to three days from February 1st to 3rd, 2005, a task selection unit 502a indicating that the generated task can be performed is provided. Similarly, a task selecting unit 502b is provided for the task with the generated task identifier “P002”, and a task selecting unit 502c is provided for the task with the generated task identifier “P003”. The task selection unit 502a may be simply a cell colored or a button may be provided on the cell. The task selection unit 502a can identify the selected generated task based on an instruction from the input device such as a mouse click or cursor selection, and can display a candidate list display screen P502 shown in FIG. If possible, any form may be provided. The same applies to the task selection unit 502b and the task selection unit 502c.

  When the task selection unit 502a is selected by the input device of the project manager terminal 4, a candidate list display screen P502 as shown in FIG. 11 is displayed. The responsible candidate list display screen P502 includes a responsible candidate data display unit 502 that displays information about a user of a user who can perform the selected task with less than the allocatable man-hours.

  In FIG. 11, in order to improve the visibility by the project manager, the relationship between the skill performance value and the target value when the generated task is performed is shown by coloring the cells. Specifically, when the performance value of the skill exceeds the target value, the cell corresponding to the user and the skill is colored red (dark gray in the figure). On the other hand, when the skill performance value is lower than the target value, the cell corresponding to the user and skill is colored blue (light gray in the figure).

  When the user who performs the generated task is selected from the input device of the project manager terminal 4 by the project manager and the user determination button B501 is clicked, the generated task identifier of the generated task is associated with the user identifier. Registered in the project management system. On the other hand, when the cancel button B502 is clicked after the user who performs the generated task is selected from the input device of the project manager terminal 4, the selection of the user is canceled, and the project manager instructs to select a new user. Waits.

  When the user thus determined performs the task and completes the task, the skill of the user in the personal skill data 202 of the skill management system 2 is updated to the performance value calculated by the performance value calculation data 25. .

  As described above, the process management apparatus 1 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention performs the assumed man-hour of the user who is a candidate for performing the task, the target value of each skill, the current value, and the task after the task is generated. Display skill values. Furthermore, the process management apparatus 1 displays the skill that has already reached the target value and the skill that has not reached the target value so that it can be visually discriminated. Thereby, the process management apparatus 1 according to the best embodiment of the present invention enables the project manager to select a user who performs the generated task from a comprehensive viewpoint of process management and skill development. .

  The process management apparatus 1 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention has the individual skill data 21 synchronized with the individual skill data 202 of the skill management system 2 by the individual skill data linkage means 11, thereby The skill management system 2 can process in cooperation. Specifically, the task type and the skill can be associated by storing the task type of the generated task and the performance value of the skill extended by executing the generated task in the growth point data 24 in the form of a matrix.

  In addition, on the screen for selecting the person in charge to perform a certain task, the skill information of each candidate, such as skill target value, current value, performance value after task execution, and the estimated man-hours are quantified, and the project manager Display on the display device of the terminal 4. Here, only candidates who end the generated task within a given construction period may be displayed on the project manager terminal 4. As a result, the project manager can select the person in charge with more certain accuracy based on the numerical data displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4 while considering human resource development and skill optimization. .

(Modification of the best mode of the present invention)
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the case has been described where the assumed man-hour that the user has executed the generated task is calculated based on the type of the generated task and the skill of the user. A case will be described in which the generated task weight and the user skill are calculated, and the growth point data is also calculated based on the generated task weight. Here, the weight of the generated task is a numerical value serving as an index of the load on the user according to the volume, difficulty level, level of detail, etc. of the generated task.

  The process management apparatus 1 according to the modification of the best embodiment of the present invention has the same configuration as the process management apparatus 1 according to the best embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. Is different from the best embodiment of the present invention.

  The task data input means 12 generates generated task data 22a in which an assignable man-hour that is a period assignable to the generated task and a task weight value considering the load of the generated task are associated with the generated task identifier of the generated task. Store in the storage device 107. For example, the task weight value is set so that the load increases as the task weight value increases.

  As shown in FIG. 12, the generated task data 22a according to the modified example of the best embodiment of the present invention includes a generated task identifier of the generated task, a task type and a task weight value considering the load of the generated task, An allocatable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task is associated with an allocatable time when the generated task can be started. Specifically, the task with the generated task identifier “P001” is a task with a task type “T111”, a task weight value “2.5”, an assignable man-hour “3”, and an assignable time “2004/2/1”. is there.

  The estimated man-hour calculating means 13 reads the personal skill data 21 and the generated task data 22a from the storage device 107, and is a period necessary for the user to perform the generated task in consideration of the task weight value for each user identifier. The assumed man-hours are calculated, and the assumed man-hour data 23a in which the user identifier and the generated task identifier are associated with the assumed man-hours is stored in the storage device 107.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the assumed man-hour data 23a according to the modification of the best mode of the present invention stores an assumed man-hour for each user identifier and generated task identifier.

Here, an assumed man-hour calculation process by the assumed man-hour calculating means 13 according to the modification will be described with reference to FIG.
First, in step S301, the personal skill data 21 is read from the storage device 107, and the generated task data 22a is read from the storage device 107 in step S302.
Next, for the user and the generated task, an assumed man-hour that is assumed when the user performs the task is calculated. Specifically, in step S303, an evaluation value is calculated based on the individual skill and the task weight value of the generated task. This evaluation value is calculated based on the current value of the skill of the user and the task weight value. Based on the evaluation value calculated in step S303, an estimated man-hour assumed when the user performs the task in step S304 is calculated. The estimated man-hour calculated in step S305 is stored in the storage device 107 as assumed man-hour data 23a using the user identifier and the generated task identifier as keys.

  As described above, in the modified example, the assumed man-hour is calculated based on the current value of the individual skill and the weight value of the generated task. Therefore, even if the user performs a generated task of the same task type, the estimated man-hours differ depending on the load of the generated task. The estimated man-hour is calculated based on a predetermined method known to those skilled in the art. The assumed man-hour data 23a output by the assumed man-hour calculating means 13 is read from the storage device 107 by the candidate list display means 14 in charge.

  The candidate list display means 14 reads the personal skill data 21 and the growth point data 24a from the storage device 107, and uses the user identifier as a key to perform the target value of the user and the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user. Are output in association with each other. Here, as shown in FIG. 15, in the growth point data 24a, a growth value obtained by quantifying an increase in the skill of the user expected after performing the generated task is associated with the generated task identifier. Specifically, the user who has executed the generated task identifier “P001” does not increase the skill of the document creation ability of the skill identifier “S001”, but increases the skill of the negotiation ability of the skill identifier “S002” by 50 points.

Here, the candidate list display process by the candidate list display unit 14 according to the modification will be described with reference to FIG.
First, in step S401, a generated task identifier and a task type to be processed are input. For example, the processing shown in FIG. 16 may be executed when the generated task data 22a is generated by the project manager terminal 4 and the task data input means 12, or may be processed from the input device of the project manager terminal 4. May be executed by inputting the task identifier and task type. Here, it is assumed that the generated task identifier “P001” is input in step S401. When the task type to be processed is input, in step S402, the estimated man-hour data 23a is read from the storage device 107, and the estimated man-hour of the generated task with the generated task identifier input in step S401 is extracted.

Next, the processing from step S403 to step S410 is executed for all users. Here, the case of processing for the user with the user identifier “U001” will be specifically described.
First, in step S403, the current value and target value for each skill of the user are extracted from the personal skill data 21 using the user identifier of the user as a key. Specifically, the target value and current value for each skill of the user identifier “U001” are extracted from the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG.
Next, in step S404, the growth value for each skill is extracted from the growth point data 24a using the generated task identifier of the generated task input in step S401 as a key.
Next, in step S405, for each skill, the growth value is added to the current value of the personal skill data of the user, and the result is output. Specifically, the growth value of the growth point data 24a shown in FIG. 15 is added to the current value of the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG. 3 for each skill. Further, in step S406, for each skill, the performance value calculated in step S405 is compared with the target value stored in the personal skill data 21 shown in FIG. If the target value exceeds the performance value as a result of the comparison in step S406, “TRUE” is assigned to the achievement flag of the skill in step S407. Otherwise, in step S408, “FALSE” is given to the achievement flag of the skill.
Next, in step S409, based on the output results in steps S403, S404, S405, S407, and S408, the user identifier of the user is added to the assumed man-hour of the generated task identifier read in step S402, for each skill. A record associating the target value, current value, performance value, and achievement flag is created, and the created record is inserted into performance value calculation data 25 and stored in the storage device 107 in step S410.
Execution value calculation data 25 as shown in FIG. 8 is stored in the storage device 107 by executing the processing from step S403 to step S410 for each user. When the performance value calculation data 25 is stored in the storage device 107, the generated task data 22a is read from the storage device 107 in step S411, and the assignable man-hours of the generated task identifier input in step S401 are extracted. Here, the assignable man-hour “3” of the generated task identifier “P001” is extracted from the generated task data 22a.
Next, in step S412, a record equal to or less than the allocatable man-hours extracted in step S411 is extracted from the performance value calculation data 25. Specifically, a user identifier having an estimated man-hour of “3” or less in the performance value calculation data 25 shown in FIG. 8 is extracted, and a record using the extracted user identifier as a key is extracted. Here, a record using the user identifier “U001” with an assumed man-hour “2” as a key and a record using the user identifier “U003” with an assumed man-hour “1” as a key are extracted.
Further, in step S213, the record extracted in step S212 is displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4. At this time, according to the value assigned to the achievement flag of the achievement value calculation data 25, the cell displaying the skill target value, the current value, and the achievement value may be colored. Specifically, the target value, the current value, and the performance value of the skill to which “TRUE” is assigned are colored blue, and the target value and the current value of the skill to which “FALSE” is assigned. The cells displaying the performance values are colored red.

  As described above, in the modification of the best mode of the present invention, when a task with a large load is performed, the estimated man-hour of the user is large, and when a task with a small load is performed, the user is assumed. The man-hour can be set small.

  In the modification of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the growth value of the user who has performed may be set to be larger than that in the case where the generated task with a small load is performed. In this case, the growth point data 24a may be input for each generated task by the project manager. Further, the process management apparatus 1 may include means for realizing a process of dynamically generating the growth point data 24a based on the task weight value set in the generated task data 22a.

(Other embodiments)
As described above, the best mode for carrying out the invention and the modifications thereof have been described. However, it should not be understood that the description and drawings constituting a part of this disclosure limit the present invention. From this disclosure, various alternative embodiments, examples, and operational techniques will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

  For example, the process management apparatus 1 described in the best embodiment of the present invention may be configured on a single piece of hardware as shown in FIG. 1, or a plurality of pieces of hardware depending on the functions and the number of processes. It may be configured above. Further, it may be realized on an existing project management system.

  Further, in the best mode of the present invention, the growth value of each skill in the growth point data 24 depends on the user attribute such as the current value of the skill of the user and the years of experience for each user identifier and task type. It may be calculated. In a modification, the growth value of each skill in the growth point data 24 may be calculated for each user identifier and generated task identifier according to the user attributes such as the current value of the skill of the user and the years of experience. Further, the growth point data 24 may be updated as appropriate by an administrator system in accordance with changes in the times. Further, when the type of task or the type of skill is changed as the technology progresses, it may be updated appropriately by the administrator.

  Further, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention and its modification, the project manager terminal 4 is displayed on the display device of the project manager terminal 4 based on the performance value calculation data 25 to allow the project manager to determine the user who performs the task. However, the method of determining the user who performs the task is not limited to this. Specifically, the user to perform based on predetermined logic may be determined from the performance value calculation data 25. Specifically, the predetermined logic may be a logic that selects a user who is closest to the skill target value by performing the task, or balances a schedule with a plurality of tasks in consideration of other tasks. The logic for selecting the user may be used, or a combination of these may be used. This predetermined logic is implemented in various embodiments by those skilled in the art.

  It goes without saying that the present invention includes various embodiments not described herein. Therefore, the technical scope of the present invention is defined only by the invention specifying matters according to the scope of claims reasonable from the above description.

1 is a system configuration diagram illustrating a functional block of a process management apparatus according to a best embodiment of the present invention and a process management system including the process management apparatus. The hardware block diagram of the process management apparatus which concerns on best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining the data structure of personal skill data of a process management device concerning the best embodiment of the present invention, and an example of data. The figure explaining an example of the data structure and data of generation | occurrence | production task data of the process management apparatus which concerns on best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining an example of the data structure and data of assumption man-hour data of the process management apparatus which concerns on best embodiment of this invention. The flowchart explaining the assumption man-hour calculation process by the assumption man-hour calculation means of the process management apparatus which concerns on best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining the data structure and data example of the growth point data of the process management apparatus which concerns on the best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining an example of the data structure and data of performance value calculation data of the process management apparatus concerning the best embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart explaining the candidate list display process in charge candidate list display means of the process management apparatus according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The figure explaining an example of the task plan list screen which the candidate list display means of a process management apparatus concerning the best embodiment of this invention displays. The figure explaining an example of the charge candidate list display screen which the process management apparatus charge candidate list display means which concerns on the best embodiment of this invention displays. The figure explaining the data structure and example of data of the generation | occurrence | production task data of the process management apparatus which concerns on the modification of the best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining an example of the data structure and data of assumption man-hour data of the process management apparatus which concerns on the modification of the best embodiment of this invention. The flowchart explaining the assumption man-hour calculation process by the assumption man-hour calculation means of the process management apparatus which concerns on the modification of the best embodiment of this invention. The figure explaining the data structure and example of data of the growth point data of the process management apparatus concerning the modification of the best embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart explaining the candidate list display process in charge by the candidate list display means in charge of the process management apparatus according to a modification of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Process management apparatus 2 ... Skill management system 3 ... Skill manager terminal 4 ... Project manager terminal 5 ... Communication network 10 ... Process management system 11 ... Personal skill data cooperation means 12 ... Task data input means 13 ... Expected man-hour calculation means 14 ... Candidate list display means 21 ... Personal skill data 22, 22a ... Generated task data 23, 23a ... Estimated man-hour data 24, 24a ... Growth point data 25 ... Performance value calculation data 101 ... Central processing controller 102 ... ROM
103 ... RAM
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 104 ... Input device 105 ... Display device 106 ... Communication control device 107 ... Storage device 108 ... Removable disk 109 ... Input / output interface 110 ... Bus 201 ... Skill management server 202 ... Personal skill data 501 ... Task plan display part 502 ... Candidate in charge Data display part 502a, 502b, 502c ... Task selection part

Claims (10)

A process management apparatus that associates a user who performs the generated task with the generated task,
Personal skill data linkage means for storing, in a storage device, personal skill data associating a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by quantifying the target skill of the user, and a current value obtained by quantifying the current skill of the user When,
Growth point data storage means for storing, in the storage device, growth point data associating with the task type of the generated task the growth value obtained by quantifying the increment of the user's skill expected after the generated task is performed. ,
The personal skill data and the growth point data are read from the storage device, and the target value of the user is associated with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user using the user identifier as a key. A process management apparatus comprising: a candidate list display means for outputting Task data input means for storing in the storage device generated task data in which an assignable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task is associated with the task type of the generated task;
Reading the personal skill data and the generated task data from the storage device, calculating an estimated man-hour that is a period required for the user to perform the generated task, and the user identifier of the user and the assumed man-hour An assumed man-hour calculation means for storing the assumed man-hour data associated with the storage device in the storage device,
The responsible candidate list display means extracts, from the estimated man-hour data, a user identifier whose estimated man-hour stored in the assumed man-hour data is equal to or less than the allocatable man-hours stored in the generated task data, and this extracted user The process management apparatus according to claim 1, wherein an execution value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user and the target value of the user are output in association with the identifier. The responsible candidate list display means further provides an achievement flag using the user identifier as a key, and assigns true to the achievement flag when the performance value exceeds the target value, and the performance value exceeds the target value. The process management apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when there is no output, the achievement flag is output with false. The skill has multiple types,
The personal skill data linkage means stores the target value of the user and the current value for each identifier of the skill type,
The growth point data storage means stores the growth value of the user for each identifier of the skill type,
The candidate list display means adds the growth value to the target value and the current value for each of the user and the skill type, using the user identifier and the skill type identifier as keys. The process management apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein a value is associated. A process management apparatus that associates a user who performs the generated task with the generated task,
Personal skill data linkage means for storing, in a storage device, personal skill data associating a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by quantifying the target skill of the user, and a current value obtained by quantifying the current skill of the user When,
Stored in the storage device is generated task data that associates the generated task identifier of the generated task with an allocatable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task and a task weight value that considers the load of the generated task. Task data input means;
Growth point data storage means for storing, in the storage device, growth point data in which the generated task identifier is associated with a growth value obtained by quantifying an increase in the skill of the user expected after performing the generated task;
Reading the personal skill data and the generated task data from the storage device, and considering the task weight value for each user identifier, an estimated man-hour that is a period required for the user to perform the generated task An assumed man-hour storage unit that calculates and stores the assumed man-hour data in which the user identifier and the generated task identifier are associated with the assumed man-hour in the storage device;
The personal skill data and the growth point data are read from the storage device, and the target value of the user is associated with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user, using the user identifier as a key. A process management apparatus comprising: a candidate list display means for outputting. A process management program for associating a user who performs the generated task with the generated task,
Personal skill data linkage means for storing, in a storage device, personal skill data associating a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by quantifying the target skill of the user, and a current value obtained by quantifying the current skill of the user When,
Growth point data storage means for storing, in the storage device, growth point data associating with the task type of the generated task the growth value obtained by quantifying the increment of the user's skill expected after the generated task is performed. ,
The personal skill data and the growth point data are read from the storage device, and the target value of the user is associated with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user using the user identifier as a key. A process management program which causes a computer to realize a candidate list display means for outputting in response. Task data input means for storing in the storage device generated task data in which an assignable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task is associated with the task type of the generated task;
Reading the personal skill data and the generated task data from the storage device, calculating an estimated man-hour that is a period required for the user to perform the generated task, and the user identifier of the user and the assumed man-hour The estimated man-hour calculation means for storing the estimated man-hour data associated with
The responsible candidate list display means extracts, from the estimated man-hour data, an identifier of a user whose estimated man-hour stored in the estimated man-hour data is equal to or less than an allocatable man-hour stored in the generated task data. The process management program according to claim 6, wherein an execution value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user and the target value of the user are output in association with the identifier of the user. The responsible candidate list display means further provides an achievement flag using the user identifier as a key, and assigns true to the achievement flag when the performance value exceeds the target value, and the performance value exceeds the target value. The process management program according to claim 6 or 7, wherein if there is not, a false is given to the achievement flag and output. The skill has multiple types,
The personal skill data linkage means stores the target value of the user and the current value for each identifier of the skill type,
The growth point data storage means stores the growth value of the user for each identifier of the skill type,
The candidate list display means adds the growth value to the target value and the current value for each of the user and the skill type, using the user identifier and the skill type identifier as keys. The process management program according to claim 6, wherein the process is associated with a value. A process management program for associating a user who performs the generated task with the generated task,
Personal skill data linkage means for storing, in a storage device, personal skill data associating a user identifier of the user, a target value obtained by quantifying the target skill of the user, and a current value obtained by quantifying the current skill of the user When,
Stored in the storage device is generated task data that associates the generated task identifier of the generated task with an allocatable man-hour that is a period that can be allocated to the generated task and a task weight value that considers the load of the generated task. Task data input means;
Growth point data storage means for storing, in the storage device, growth point data in which the generated task identifier is associated with a growth value obtained by quantifying an increase in the skill of the user expected after performing the generated task;
Reading the personal skill data and the generated task data from the storage device, and considering the task weight value for each user identifier, an estimated man-hour that is a period required for the user to perform the generated task An assumed man-hour storage unit that calculates and stores the assumed man-hour data in which the user identifier and the generated task identifier are associated with the assumed man-hour in the storage device;
The personal skill data and the growth point data are read from the storage device, and the target value of the user is associated with the performance value obtained by adding the growth value to the current value of the user, using the user identifier as a key. A process management program for causing a computer to realize a candidate list display means for outputting.

Images