JP2006167562A - Blending deciding method of impervious liner material - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a blending deciding method of an impervious liner material placed along wall faces of piling section shore protection, formed by blending at least earth, solidifying material, and rubber chips, having good construction property, impervious performance, and deformation followability to the piling section shore protection. <P>SOLUTION: A target flow value of the impervious liner material, a target permeation factor, and a target allowable deformation amount are set (step 1), and test samples of the impervious liner material satisfying the target flow value for every predetermined strength by combination of the blending ratio of at least solidifying material to rubber chips added to earth (step 2). Water permeation test is performed by applying deformation to the formed test samples to acquire a relation of deformation amount to the permeation factor using the strength and blend ratio as parameters (step 3), and the blend ratio of the solidifying material to rubber chips added to earth is decided so as to satisfy the target permeation factor and the target allowable deformation amount from the acquired relation (step 4). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a method for determining the composition of a water shielding material, and more specifically, blends at least soil placed along the wall surface of a sheet pile revetment, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip, has good workability, and has a water shielding property. The present invention relates to a method for determining the composition of a water shielding material that is excellent in performance and deformation followability to a sheet pile revetment.

  For example, the longitudinal section of the revetment of the management-type waste final disposal site installed on the sea surface has the structure shown in FIG. In this revetment, the steel pipe sheet pile 2 is separated and driven into the ground B, and the inside sand S is filled between the two steel pipe sheet piles 2 to form a double cut-off. Four water-blocking material protection steel plates are installed along the sheet pile 2, and the embankment material M is arranged. As shown in FIG. 8, the cross section on the side where the waste D is stored has a gap between the driven steel pipe sheet piles 2 closed with a joint 3, and a water shielding material in the vertical direction along the steel pipe sheet piles 2. 1 is placed.

  In the disposal site with such a structure, the sheet pile revetment such as the steel pipe sheet pile 2 is deformed by the external force due to the reclamation of the waste D, and also deforms even during an earthquake. In order to maintain and prevent the components of the stored waste D from leaking to the outside, the water shielding material 1 to be used is required to have low water permeability and deformation followability as well as excellent workability.

  Therefore, if the water shielding material is solidified by the solidifying material, it is difficult to follow the deformation of the steel pipe sheet pile 2 and cracks and gaps are generated, making it difficult to maintain water shielding. On the other hand, it has also been proposed to add rubber chips to the water shielding material 1 so as to have followability, but the workability, water permeability, and deformation followability are greatly affected by the amount of the rubber chips and the solidifying material to be added. Therefore, there is a problem that it is difficult to determine the blending ratio.

  As another deformation follow-up type water shielding material used for such a revetment, a material obtained by adding a clay mineral to a marine clay suspension and modifying it into a gel shape has been proposed (see Patent Document 1).

However, since this material is a fluid, it is necessary to take complete measures to prevent leakage, and there is a problem that it must be replenished periodically because it is consolidated by its own weight, and furthermore, it cannot bear the load, There was a problem that it could not be used as a water shielding material on the bottom.
JP 2002-336811 A

  The object of the present invention is to combine at least soil to be cast along the wall of the sheet pile revetment, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip, has good workability, and has excellent water shielding performance and deformation followability to the sheet pile revetment. The object is to provide a method for determining the formulation of a water shielding material.

  In order to achieve the above object, the method for determining the composition of a water-shielding material according to the present invention is to determine the formulation of a water-shielding material comprising at least soil placed along the wall of a sheet pile revetment, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip. A method of setting a target flow value by a combination of a step of setting a target flow value, a target hydraulic conductivity, and a target allowable deformation amount of the water shielding material, at least a solidifying material added to soil, a rubber chip, and a compounding ratio. A step of creating a test sample of a water shielding material satisfying the value for each of a plurality of predetermined strengths, a deformation test is performed on the created test sample, and a water permeability test is performed. Obtaining the relationship between the water permeability and the coefficient of permeability, and determining the blending ratio of the rubber chips and the solidified material to be added to the soil satisfying the target permeability coefficient and the target allowable deformation amount from the acquired relationship; It is characterized in that comprises.

  According to the method for determining the composition of a water shielding material according to the present invention, it is a method for determining the composition of a water shielding material, comprising at least soil placed along the wall surface of a sheet pile revetment, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip. The target flow value is satisfied by a combination of the step of setting the target flow value, the target hydraulic conductivity, and the target allowable deformation amount of the water shielding material, at least the solidifying material added to the soil, the rubber chip, and the blending ratio. A step of creating a test sample of a water shielding material for each of a plurality of predetermined strengths, a deformation test is performed on the created test sample, a water permeability test is performed, and a deformation amount and a water permeability coefficient are set with the strength and the mixing ratio of rubber chips as parameters. And the step of determining the compounding ratio of the solidified material added to the soil satisfying the target hydraulic conductivity and the target allowable deformation amount and the rubber chip from the acquired relationship, The blending ratio of the solidified material added to the soil that satisfies the standard flow value, hydraulic conductivity, and allowable deformation amount, and rubber chips can be determined appropriately according to the test results of the test sample, and workability is improved. Well, it is possible to determine the composition of the water shielding material excellent in the water shielding performance and the deformation followability to the sheet pile revetment.

  Hereinafter, the blending determination method of the water shielding material of the present invention is an embodiment for the water shielding material 1 placed on the sheet pile revetment of the management-type waste final disposal site constructed on the sea shown in FIGS. explain. The structure of this managed waste final treatment plant is as described above.

  In addition, a sheet pile revetment means the revetment which installed the steel sheet pile, the prestressed concrete sheet pile, or the steel pipe sheet pile in single or double.

  The water shielding material 1 contains at least soil, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip, and water is added as necessary. As the soil, dredged soil, construction generated soil and the like can be used, and as the solidifying material, cement, lime and the like can be used. In addition, as the rubber chip, for example, a small crushed old tire can be used, and a rubber chip having a particle size of, for example, 10 mm or less is used. The particle size of 10 mm or less refers to a material that passes through a 10 mm mesh sieve.

  FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the embodiment. First, a target flow value, a target hydraulic conductivity, and a target allowable deformation amount of the water shielding material are set (step 1). Here, the flow value is based on the cylinder method of the Japan Highway Public Corporation Standard JHS A313-1992 “Testing Method for Air Mortar and Air Milk”.

  In this embodiment, since the water shielding material 1 is placed in water in a slurry state, the water shielding material 1 flows and accumulates in the water until it solidifies. However, there is a problem with respect to material separation characteristics in which quality varies in the flow process. Arise. For this reason, when placing in water, it is necessary to drive in such a way that the flow distance of the water shielding material 1 is as small as possible.

  In addition, the flow distance is closely related to the flow value of the water shielding material 1, and if the flow value is large, the flow distance becomes large and the pumpability becomes good, but the quality tends to vary. On the other hand, when the flow value is small, the flow distance becomes small and the pumpability deteriorates, but the quality variation becomes small.

  Since the flow value tends to decrease significantly when the blending ratio of rubber chips exceeds 20-25% (volume ratio), it is necessary to keep the blending ratio of rubber chips below about 25% (volume ratio). There is.

  Thus, considering the workability and the like, it is necessary to set the blending ratio of the rubber chips within the upper limit range and to set the flow value to an appropriate predetermined range. For example, about 12 cm to 18 cm is set as the target flow value.

In order to prevent the component released from the stored waste D from leaking to the outside, the water permeability coefficient is set to a coefficient of a predetermined level or more as a target value based on laws and regulations and the like to ensure water shielding performance. For example, it is set to 1 × 10 ⁻⁶ cm / s or less.

  In this embodiment, the target allowable deformation amount is a deformation necessary for ensuring water shielding without causing cracks or gaps when the steel pipe sheet pile 2 serving as a sheet pile revetment is deformed, following the deformation. It is a quantity. This target value is set based on, for example, a deformation estimation amount when the steel pipe sheet pile 2 undergoes maximum deformation.

As shown in FIG. 2, when the steel pipe sheet pile 2 when the waste D is accommodated in the earthquake, the horizontal direction deformation amount of the upper end TP becomes 24.7 cm, for example, with the base point BP as a fixed point, and the maximum deformation occurs. Based on the calculated estimated curve S, an approximate straight line C is created by connecting the base point BP and the upper end TP with a straight line. From this curve S and straight line C, the distance between the maximum bending moment generation point MP, which is the maximum curvature generation position on the curve S, and the straight line C is set as the target allowable deformation amount δmax. Here, the distance between the intersection F of the orthogonal line from the point MP to the straight line C and the straight line C and the base point BP is defined as L, and the shear strain γ1 is defined as δmax / L. For example, when δmax = 100 mm and L = 14 × 10 ³ mm, the shear strain γ1 = 0.71%.

  Next, a test sample that satisfies the target flow value is created for each of a plurality of predetermined strengths by a combination of at least a solidifying material added to the soil used for the water shielding material 1, a rubber chip, and a compounding ratio (step 2). Here, the strength of the predetermined strength is the strength after the lapse of a predetermined time after mixing and kneading each material, and as this strength, it is easy to use the uniaxial compressive strength of the material age 28 days, and Appropriate formulation decisions can be made.

For example, the approximate uniaxial compressive strength of wood age 28 ^days, so as to ^{200kN / m 2, 400kN / m} 2, 600kN / m 2, determined blending ratio of water and the solidifying material amount (mass), the respective For the blending, rubber chips are added at various blending ratios to prepare test samples having three types of uniaxial compressive strength.

  In addition, the uniaxial compressive strength has carried out the strength test with another sample in which the mixing amount (mass) of the amount of water and the amount of solidified material is changed in advance, By confirming the relationship, it is possible to easily create a test sample having a predetermined strength based on the relationship data. Here, the amount of water is the sum of the amount of water contained in the soil in the natural state and the amount of water added, and there are cases where it is added or not added.

  Next, the created test sample is deformed and a water permeability test is performed to obtain the relationship between the deformation amount and the water permeability coefficient using the strength and the blending ratio of the rubber chips as parameters (step 3).

  In the water permeability test, for example, as shown in FIG. 3 (a), a porous stone 8 is arranged at the bottom of a bottomed cylindrical container 5 having an inner diameter of 20 cm, and saturated Toyoura standard sand having a thickness of 5 cm is placed on the top. The used sand layer 7 is formed, and a test sample 6 having a thickness of 5 cm is placed thereon and cured. First, water is applied to the boundary between the cylindrical container 5 and the test sample 6 before the test sample 6 is deformed, a predetermined water pressure is loaded on the upper surface of the test sample 6, and the sand layer 7 and the porous stone 8 are permeated. Measure the amount of water W.

  Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 3 (b), a load F is applied to the central portion of the upper surface of the test sample 6 by a loading plate 9 having an outer diameter of 4 cm, for example, to give a predetermined amount (predetermined amount of subsidence) and remove it. After loading, a predetermined water pressure is loaded in the same manner as described above, and the amount of water W that passes through the sand layer 7 and the porous stone 8 is measured.

  When applying this deformation, it is preferable to apply shear deformation so that the test sample 6 is in an equal volume state (non-drainage state). Thereby, the outflow of moisture contained in the test sample 6 can be suppressed, and appropriate deformation amount data can be acquired. The loading speed that gives this deformation is, for example, about 15 mm / min.

  By applying a predetermined amount of deformation on the loading plate 9, the test sample 6 is deformed into a shape in which the bottom surface is slightly bulged as shown by a dotted line in FIG. Assuming that this deformation is, for example, a conical shape caused by a predetermined ratio (about 80%) of the volume in which the loading plate 9 has sunk, the distance H from the bottom surface of the test sample 6 to the apex of the conical shape is calculated.

  Here, from the relationship between the radius R of the cylindrical container 5 and the distance H to this apex, the shear strain γ2 generated in the test sample 6 is defined as H / R. A deformation amount X in the test sample 6 equivalent to the target allowable deformation amount is calculated from the shear strain γ2 (= H / R) and the shear strain γ1 (= δmax / L) of the test sample 6. For example, assuming that the shear strain γ1 is 0.71%, the shear strain γ2 is 0.23%, and the settlement amount of the loading plate 9 is 24 mm, the deformation amount X of the test sample 6 is X = 24 mm × (0.23% / 0.71). %) = 7.4 mm.

  Through the above test, the relationship between the deformation amount X and the water permeability can be obtained as exemplified in FIGS. 4 to 6 with the strength and the blending ratio of the rubber chips as parameters.

4, 5, 6, respectively uniaxial compressive strength indicates the relationship between about ^{200kN / m 2, 400kN / m} 2, deformation X and permeability to the test sample 6 of 600 kN / ^{m 2.} In the figure, the graph line that passes through the black circle is 0% rubber compounding ratio, the graph line that passes through the diamond mark is 7.5% (volume ratio) with the rubber chip compounding ratio, and the graph line that passes through the square mark. Indicates that the blending ratio of rubber chips is 10% (volume ratio) as an outer percentage, and the graph line passing through the triangle mark indicates that the blending ratio of rubber chips is 15% (volume ratio) as an outer percentage.

  Next, the blending ratio of the solidified material added to the soil satisfying the target hydraulic conductivity and the target allowable deformation amount and the rubber chip is determined from the relationship between the obtained deformation amount X and the hydraulic conductivity (step 4).

When the target hydraulic conductivity is 1 × 10 ⁻⁶ cm / s or less and the equivalent deformation amount X in the test sample 6 having the target allowable deformation amount is 7.4 mm, there is no blend satisfying this condition in FIG. In FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, this condition is satisfied when the blending ratio of the rubber chips is 7.5%, 10%, and 15%. In FIGS. 5 and 6, since the blending ratio of the solidifying material is determined, the blending ratio of the solidifying material added to the soil and the rubber chip is determined.

  As described above, the test sample 6 can be used to determine the composition of the soil, the solidified material, the rubber chip, and, if necessary, the water satisfying all of the target flow value, the target hydraulic conductivity, and the target allowable deformation amount.

  When there are a plurality of blends that satisfy all of the conditions, it is possible to determine the blend with the lowest cost by cost estimation, and it is possible to determine the blend with emphasis on more necessary performance.

Each target value is set in consideration of a safety factor and an additional factor as appropriate according to construction conditions and the like. For example, when the safety factor of the target allowable deformation amount is 2, the equivalent deformation amount X in the test sample 6 of the target allowable deformation amount is 14.8 mm. In this case, the combination of the solidified material and the rubber chip that satisfies the water permeability of 1 × 10 ⁻⁶ cm / s or less when the deformation amount X is 14.8 mm in FIGS.

It is a flowchart which shows an example of the mixing | blending determination method of the water shielding material of this invention. It is a graph which shows an example which calculates the allowable deformation amount of the water shielding material in this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the water permeability test method in this invention, (a) is before a deformation | transformation, (b) shows the water permeability test after a deformation | transformation. It is a graph which shows the relationship between the water permeability coefficient and deformation amount of a test sample whose uniaxial compressive strength is 200 kN / m ² . It is a graph which shows the relationship between the water permeability coefficient and deformation amount of a test sample whose uniaxial compressive strength is 400 kN / m ² . It is a graph which shows the relationship between the water permeability coefficient and deformation amount of a test sample whose uniaxial compressive strength is 600 kN / m ² . It is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of the revetment of the management-type waste final disposal site where a water shielding material is placed. FIG. 8 is a partially enlarged view of the AA cross section of FIG. 7.

Explanation of symbols

1 Water shielding material 2 Steel pipe sheet pile (sheet pile revetment)
3 Joint 4 Water shielding material protection steel plate 5 Cylindrical container 6 Test sample 7 Toyoura standard sand 8 Porous stone 9 Loading plate

Claims (5)

  A method for determining the composition of a water shielding material comprising at least soil placed along a wall of a sheet pile revetment, a solidifying material, and a rubber chip, the target flow value of the water shielding material and a target permeability coefficient And a step of setting the target allowable deformation amount, and at least a solidified material to be added to the soil, and a test sample of a water shielding material that satisfies the target flow value is created for each of a plurality of predetermined strengths by a combination of rubber chips and a compounding ratio Performing a water permeability test by deforming the created test sample and obtaining a relationship between the amount of deformation and the water permeability coefficient using the strength and the blending ratio of the rubber chips as parameters, and a target from the obtained relationship. A blending determination method for a water shielding material, comprising: a solidifying material added to soil satisfying a water permeability coefficient and a target allowable deformation amount; and a step of determining a blending ratio of rubber chips.   The method according to claim 1, wherein the allowable deformation amount is set based on an estimated deformation amount of the sheet pile revetment.   The method for determining the formulation of a water shielding material according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the strength is uniaxial compressive strength.   The blending ratio of the solidified material with the test sample having a predetermined strength is based on strength data previously confirmed from the relationship between the amount of water and the blending ratio (mass) of the solidified material amount and the strength. A method for determining the formulation of the water shielding material according to any one of the above. The method for determining the formulation of a water shielding material according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the deformation applied to the test sample in the water permeability test is performed with the test sample as an equal volume state.

Images