JP2006047660A - Lesson evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a lesson evaluation system with which a questionnaire is carried out in high accuracy by eliminating improper input while assuring anonymity. <P>SOLUTION: The lesson evaluation system 2 receives an answer data which is transmitted from a mobile phone owned by a student via a communication control section 12 and stores it in a storing section 18. Then, a seat number which is included in the questionnaire being newly stored in the data storing section 18, that is, the number of a seat in which the student attending a class is seated, is collated with the seat number included in the answer data which is already stored in the data storing section 18. Then, a keyword showing the content of the lesson included in the answer data which is newly stored, is collated with the keyword which is inputted beforehand via an input section 14 and stored in the data storing section 18. The answer data in which the seat number is mismatched in the collating and the keyword is matched in the collating are summarized and a summarized result is displayed in a display section 20. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a lesson evaluation system for evaluating lessons by conducting questionnaires on lessons for students at a junior college or university.

  Conventionally, a questionnaire for a predetermined product or service has been carried out by distributing a questionnaire sheet to a customer or the like, and a questionnaire operator or the like collecting the questionnaire sheet in which the customer or the like has entered predetermined information later. In addition, with the widespread use of mobile phones with a function for connecting to networks such as the Internet, questionnaires that allow customers to answer questionnaire questions by connecting to predetermined websites using mobile phones A collection system is described in Patent Document 1.

  In the questionnaire collection system described in Patent Document 1, a mobile phone user acquires questionnaire data from the questionnaire collection system, inputs response data for questionnaire items, and transmits the questionnaire data to the questionnaire collection system. Has been recovered.

  In recent years, in junior colleges, universities, etc., class evaluations by students are conducted by conducting questionnaires with the aim of improving classes (see Non-Patent Document 1 and Non-Patent Document 2). That is, a class is evaluated by conducting a questionnaire including predetermined questions about the class for students who have taken the class.

JP 2002-56150 A http://www-molsys.mls.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/nagayama/jyouhou/web_hyouka/web_hyouka1.html http://news.goo.ne.jp/news/asahi/shakai/20040616/K0016201911005.html

  By the way, when a questionnaire for evaluating a class at a university or the like is used for evaluating a person (lecturer) who conducts a class in addition to improving the contents of the class, the questionnaire must be carried out with high accuracy. In other words, it is necessary to prevent duplicate input such that the same student inputs answers to a questionnaire related to the same class multiple times, and illegal input such as answers to questionnaires of students who are not actually participating in the class. For example, there is a personal authentication mechanism that uses a combination of a user ID and password as a method of eliminating illegal input such as duplicate input. However, when a personal authentication mechanism is introduced, it is difficult to collect student's real intentions. Problems arise. That is, in order to collect the students' real intentions, it is necessary to ensure anonymity so that the questionnaire can be answered anonymously.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a class evaluation system that can ensure anonymity, eliminate illegal input, and perform a questionnaire with high accuracy.

  The lesson evaluation system according to claim 1 includes: questionnaire data storage means for storing questionnaire data including predetermined items; and a questionnaire data storage means in the portable terminal in response to a transmission request from a portable terminal held by a student. Transmission means for transmitting stored questionnaire data; keyword storage means for storing keywords relating to a predetermined class; responses to the questionnaire transmitted from the mobile terminal; seat number of the seat where the student was seated; and Receiving means for receiving answer data including keywords related to a class attended by the student, answer data storing means for storing answer data received by the receiving means, and answer data newly stored in the answer data storing means And the answer data already stored in the answer data storage means By seat number collating means for collating with the included seat number, keyword collating means for collating the keyword included in the answer data with the keyword stored in the keyword storage means, and the seat number collating means A tally unit for tallying the answer data in which the matching result is a matching mismatch and the matching result by the keyword matching unit is a matching match, and an output unit for outputting the tally result totaled by the tally unit It is characterized by.

  According to the lesson evaluation system according to claim 1, the answer data including the answer to the questionnaire, the seat number, and the keyword relating to the lesson transmitted from the student's mobile terminal is received and included in the newly received answer data. The seat number is matched with the seat number included in the response data already received, the keyword included in the response data is matched with the stored keyword, and the seat number does not match and the keyword matches The response data that have been matched is aggregated and the aggregated result is output. Therefore, by collating the seat numbers included in the answer data, for example, it is possible to prevent duplicate input in which the same student answers a questionnaire for the same class multiple times while ensuring anonymity. That is, when entering the seat number assigned to the classroom seat, unlike the student ID number assigned to each student, which student was seated in which seat, etc. Can not be associated with each other, it is possible to prevent duplicate input while ensuring anonymity. In addition, by performing keyword matching, it is possible to prevent input of answer data by students other than those who actually attended the class. Therefore, appropriate class evaluation can be performed using the result of the questionnaire conducted with high accuracy.

  The class evaluation system according to claim 2, wherein when the collation result by the seat number collating unit is collation match or the collation result by the keyword collating unit is collation mismatch, the seat number is collation match or the keyword is collation. The apparatus further comprises a deletion unit that deletes the mismatched response data from the response data storage unit.

  According to the lesson evaluation system according to claim 2, the seat number is matched, that is, the answer data includes the same seat number as the seat number included in the already stored answer data, the keyword does not match, for example, Answer data including a keyword that does not match a keyword set in advance as a keyword indicating the content of the lesson is deleted. That is, since the answer data having a high possibility of illegal input is excluded, the accuracy of the questionnaire can be kept high.

  The class evaluation system according to claim 3 further comprises a receivable time zone setting means for setting a receivable time zone for the answer data, and the deleting means is a receivable set by the receivable time zone setting means. In addition to the time zone, when the response data transmitted from the portable terminal is received by the receiving means, the received response data is deleted.

  According to the lesson evaluation system according to the third aspect, the receivable time zone for receiving the answer data is set, and the response data received outside the set receivable time zone is deleted. Therefore, since the class can be evaluated using the answers to the questionnaires conducted while the impression of the class was clear after the class was completed, the result of counting the response data as a useful document when conducting an appropriate class evaluation Can be used.

  The lesson evaluation system according to claim 4 further comprises a receivable number setting means for setting the receivable number of the answer data, and the deleting means is a receivable number set by the receivable number setting means. After the answer data is received, when the answer data transmitted from the portable terminal is received by the receiving means, the received answer data is deleted.

  According to the lesson evaluation system described in claim 4, the number of receivable answer data is set, and the received answer data is deleted after receiving the preset receivable number. Therefore, for example, there are 50 students who have registered for the course, but if there are 30 students who attended the class, the number of receivables can be set to 30 so that students who have not attended the class The survey data can be appropriately excluded and the questionnaire can be conducted with high accuracy.

  According to this invention, the matching between the seat number included in the newly received answer data and the seat number included in the already received answer data, and the keyword included in the answer data and the stored keyword The collation is performed, and the answer data in which the seat number does not match and the keyword matches the collation is tabulated, and the tabulated result is output. Therefore, by collating seat numbers, it is possible to prevent duplicate input while ensuring anonymity, and by collating keywords, it is possible to prevent input of answer data by students who are not attending classes. . In other words, duplicate input is prevented while ensuring anonymity without performing identity authentication, so students' opinions about the class can be collected and attended to the class by keyword matching. In addition to the answers of students who have not been attended, it is possible to exclude the answer data from serious students who attended the class but have not heard the class, and aggregate the answer data. Therefore, the total result of the answer data, which is the result of the questionnaire conducted with high accuracy, can be used as useful data when appropriately evaluating the lesson.

  Hereinafter, a lesson evaluation system according to the best embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following, a case where a mobile phone is used as the mobile terminal will be described as an example.

  FIG. 1 is a block configuration diagram of the entire system including a lesson evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the class evaluation system 2 is connected to mobile phones 6 a, 6 b, 6 c via a network 4.

  FIG. 2 is a block configuration diagram of the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the lesson evaluation system 2 includes a data control unit 10 that controls data processing in the lesson evaluation system 2. The data control unit 10 is connected to a communication control unit 12 that controls communication with the mobile phones 6a, 6b, and 6c, and an input unit 14 that inputs keywords related to classes. The data control unit 10 also stores a questionnaire data storage unit 16 that stores questionnaire data (questionnaire data) and the like that are used when evaluating a lesson, and a data storage that stores keywords and the like input via the input unit 14. The display part 20 which displays the result etc. which totaled the answer with respect to the part 18 and a questionnaire is connected.

  The questionnaire data storage unit 16 stores questionnaire data including predetermined items, for example, questionnaire data including items such as questions regarding class contents. The questionnaire data storage unit 16 stores a receipt message for notifying the student that the answer data has been received, an error message for notifying the student of a predetermined error, and the like.

  Further, the data storage unit 18 stores keywords, that is, keywords input through the input unit 14 and keywords related to a class to be evaluated, for example, a specific keyword indicating class content. The This keyword is input in advance via the input unit 14 and stored in the data storage unit 18 before the questionnaire is conducted by, for example, a lecturer in charge of the class or an administrator who manages the class evaluation system 2. Is done. In addition, the data storage unit 18 can receive the response data transmitted from the student's mobile phone and received via the communication control unit 12, the reception time period for the preset response data, and the preset response data. Numbers etc. are stored.

  Here, the receivable time zone is a time zone during which answer data for the questionnaire can be received, and a predetermined time zone is input via the input unit 14 and stored in the data storage unit 18. For example, if the class ends at “11:30 am”, enter a time zone such as “11:30 am to 1:30 pm” and set the receivable time zone as “11:30 am to 1:30 pm”. Can be set. Further, the receivable number is a number capable of receiving the answer data for the questionnaire, and a predetermined number is input in advance via the input unit 14 and stored in the data storage unit 18. For example, if the number of students registered for registration is “50” and the number of students attending the evaluation target class is “30”, “30” may be set as the receivable number. it can.

  FIG. 3 is a block configuration diagram of the mobile phone according to the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the mobile phone 6a includes a data control unit 30 that controls processing of data in the mobile phone 6a. Connected to the data control unit 30 are an antenna 32 for transmitting and receiving signals to and from the class evaluation system 2 and a speaker 34 for outputting the voice of the other party. Further, the data control unit 30 collects the voice of the user of the mobile phone 6a and the display unit 36 that displays the date and time, the transmission history, and the like, the input unit 38 that includes each numeric button and the power button. The microphone 40 is connected. The data control unit 30 is connected to a data storage unit 42 that stores a transmission history and the like. Since the configurations of the mobile phones 6b and 6c are the same as the configuration of the mobile phone 6a, detailed description thereof is omitted.

  Next, a questionnaire implementation process by the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following, a case where a student who has the mobile phone 6a answers a questionnaire will be described as an example.

  First, the mobile phone 6a requests the lesson evaluation system 2 to transmit questionnaire data including items such as questions regarding lesson contents. For example, a student who has participated in a class inputs a predetermined URL (Uniform Resource Locators), that is, a URL notified during the class, to the mobile phone 6a via the input unit 38 after the class is completed, whereby the class evaluation system 2 is connected via the network 4 to request transmission of questionnaire data.

  In the lesson evaluation system 2, the questionnaire data is transmitted to the mobile phone 6a in response to the questionnaire data transmission request from the mobile phone 6a (step S10, see FIG. 4). That is, a questionnaire data transmission request is received via the communication control unit 12, and in response to the received questionnaire data transmission request, the questionnaire data stored in the questionnaire data storage unit 16 is transmitted at the transmission request transmission source. It transmits to a certain mobile phone 6a.

  In the mobile phone 6a, the questionnaire data transmitted from the lesson evaluation system 2 is received, and the received questionnaire data is stored in the data storage unit. Based on the questionnaire data stored in the data storage unit 42, the questionnaire is displayed on the display unit 36. Therefore, the student who has the mobile phone 6 a inputs an answer to the questionnaire item displayed on the display unit 36 via the input unit 38.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a questionnaire displayed on the mobile phone according to the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, the questionnaire shows the date of study, subject name, lecturer name, seat number, questions 1 to 6 and all items except for question 4 are required input items. That is, as question 1 "Did you understand the lecture content?", As question 2 "How was the speed of the lecture?", As question 3 "Was the lecture content useful?" Please fill in the reason you answered in "", Q5 "Please give me a keyword that impressed me in today's lecture", and Q6 "I couldn't understand in today's lecture" . "Is displayed. In addition, a “Send” button for sending an answer to the class evaluation system 2, a “Clear” button for deleting the inputted answer, and the like are displayed. The range displayed as one screen on the display unit 36 of the mobile phone 6a is a fixed range as shown by the arrows in FIG. 5, and the screen is displayed by operating a predetermined button constituting the input unit 38. The display range can be shifted sequentially by scrolling.

  Answers to each item are input via the input unit 38. For example, for the subject name and lecturer name, select the corresponding subject name and lecturer name from the subject name and lecturer name displayed in a pull-down format, respectively. It is input by doing. The seat number is a number assigned to the seat that the student was seated when taking the class, and the number is input via the input unit 38. Questions 1 to 3 are input by selecting one of the answers displayed in a pull-down format. In other words, the answers to “Question 1 Did you understand the content of the lecture?” Are, for example, “1. I understood very well”, “2. I understood so well”, “3. And “4. I didn't understand much” is displayed and entered by selecting one of the answers. The answers to “Q2 How was the speed of the lecture?” Are, for example, “1. Too early”, “2. Slightly fast”, “3. Just right” and “4. Slightly slow”. Answers to "Question 3 Was the lecture content useful?" Are, for example, "1. Very useful", "2. Moderately useful", "3. Neither" and "4. “Not very useful” is displayed and input by selecting the corresponding answer from the displayed answers. For questions 4 to 6, the student can input arbitrary comments or the like via the input unit 38.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of an answer to the questionnaire according to the embodiment of the present invention. In the mobile phone 6 a, when an answer is input on the screen shown in FIG. 5 and the “Send” button is selected and selected, a confirmation screen shown in FIG. 6 is displayed on the display unit 36. That is, as shown in FIG. 6, the message “Are you sure you want to send the following contents?” Or “If you want to correct, please return to the previous screen and enter again.” The answer is displayed. As shown in FIG. 6, an item “return to previous” used when returning to the previous screen is displayed together with a “send” button at the bottom of the screen.

  The student who has the mobile phone 6a inputs an answer on the screen shown in FIG. 5, confirms the answer entered on the screen shown in FIG. 6, and designates a “Send” button displayed on the screen shown in FIG. The selected answer data is transmitted to the lesson evaluation system 2 by making a selection.

  In the class evaluation system 2, the response data transmitted from the mobile phone 6a via the network 4 is received via the communication control unit 12 (see step S11, FIG. 4). Then, the received answer data is stored in the data storage unit 18 (step S12).

  Next, it is determined whether or not the reception time of the response data received in step S11 is within a preset receivable time zone (step S13). That is, it is determined whether or not the time when the answer data is received is within a receivable time zone set in advance, for example, within 2 hours from the class end time. The receivable time zone can be set in advance for each predetermined period based on a timetable or the like. If it is determined that it is outside the receivable time zone (step S14), the process proceeds to step S22 to be described later, and a predetermined process is performed.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that it is within the receivable time zone (step S14), it is determined whether or not the number of received answer data has reached a preset receivable number (step S15). ). That is, it is determined whether or not the number of response data reaching the receivable number has already been stored in the data storage unit 18. Note that the number of receivables is an arbitrary number based on attendance confirmation performed at the start of a lesson, etc., for example, by an instructor who has conducted a lesson or an administrator who manages the lesson evaluation system 2 14 and stored in the data storage unit 18. If it is determined that the number of receivables has already been reached (step S16), the process proceeds to step S22 described later, and a predetermined process is performed.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the receivable number has not been reached (step S16), the seat number is verified (step S17). That is, in order to prevent duplicate input for the same class by the same student, the seat number included in the answer data newly stored in the data storage unit 18 and the answer data already stored in the data storage unit 18 are included. The seat number is checked. If the seat number matches the collation (step S18), the process proceeds to step S22 described later, and a predetermined process is performed.

  On the other hand, when the seat numbers do not match (step S18), the predetermined keyword included in the answer data is compared with a predetermined keyword set in advance (step S19). In other words, when the answer data including the same seat number as the seat number included in the newly stored answer data is not stored in the data storage unit 18, the answer by the student who does not attend the class is excluded. Therefore, the keyword input as an answer to “Question 5” is compared with the keyword stored in the data storage unit 18. This keyword is input in advance via the input unit 14 by, for example, a lecturer who conducts a lesson, and is stored in the data storage unit 18. Here, in the case where a plurality of words are stored as keywords in the data storage unit 18, by searching whether or not a keyword that matches the keyword included in the answer data is stored in the data storage unit 18. , Keyword matching is performed. If the keyword does not match (step S20), the process proceeds to step S22 described later, and a predetermined process is performed.

  On the other hand, if the keyword is matched (step S20), a receipt message notifying that the answer data has been received is transmitted to the mobile phone 6a (step S21). That is, the receipt message stored in the questionnaire data storage unit 16 is transmitted to the mobile phone 6a via the communication control unit 12.

  The mobile phone 6a receives the receipt message transmitted from the lesson evaluation system 2, and displays the received receipt message on the display unit 36. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, a message such as “The questionnaire has been sent. Thank you for your cooperation.” Is displayed on the display unit 36.

  Here, when the reception time of the response data is outside the receivable time zone (step S14), when the response data is received after reaching the receivable number (step S16), the seat number is matched. In the case (step S18) and the case where the keyword does not match (step S20), the answer data newly stored in the data storage unit 18 is deleted (step S22). That is, answer data corresponding to any of the above cases is deleted from the data storage unit 18.

  Next, the error message stored in the questionnaire data storage unit 16 is transmitted to the mobile phone 6a via the communication control unit 12 (step S23). For example, when it is outside the receivable time zone, “it is not a receivable time zone”, etc., and after reaching the receivable number, “answer acceptance has been terminated”, etc. If the seat number matches the match, send an error message to the mobile phone 6a such as “Keyword does not match.” If the keyword does not match, such as “Seat number is duplicated.” To do. In the mobile phone 6a, the error message transmitted from the lesson evaluation system 2 is received and displayed on the display unit 36.

  Next, referring to the drawings, a description will be given of a process of counting response data performed in the class evaluation system 2 after acceptance of responses to the questionnaire is completed.

  First, the answer data stored in the data storage unit 18 is totaled (step S30, see FIG. 8), and the totaling result is stored in the data storage unit 18 (step S31). That is, the answer data from which illegal input has been eliminated is aggregated and stored in the data storage unit 18. And the total result memorize | stored in the data storage part 18 is displayed on the display part 20 (step S32).

  FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of the answer data tabulation result according to the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 9, the total result of the answer data is displayed together with the subject name, date, and number of answers, and the total result of the respondents for each question. For example, as a result of summing up the answer data for Question 1, “8 people” who selected “1. I understood very well”, “15 people” who selected “2. It is displayed that “4 students” have selected “3. I understand about half” and “3” students have selected “4. I did not understand so much”. Answers to question 2 and question 3 are displayed in the same manner as in question 1. Further, the text data and keywords input as answers to the questions 4 to 6 are displayed as they are as shown in FIG.

  According to the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, when answer data is received outside a preset receivable time zone, the received answer data is deleted. Therefore, after the class is completed, the student can be encouraged to input an answer to the questionnaire while the impression on the class is clear, and the questionnaire can be performed with high accuracy.

  Further, according to the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, when answer data is received after the preset number of receivables is achieved, the received answer data is deleted. For example, if there are 50 students who have taken a certain subject but 30 students attended the class, the number of students who actually participated in the class can be set by setting the number of receivables to 30. It is possible to prevent the above answer data from being received and to conduct a questionnaire with high accuracy.

  Further, according to the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, the seat number included in the newly received answer data matches the seat number included in the already received answer data. In this case, the newly received answer data is deleted. In other words, by making the seat number an indispensable input item, the same student can appropriately prevent duplicate input that inputs multiple answers to the questionnaire related to the same class, so the questionnaire is conducted with high accuracy can do.

  In addition, according to the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, when the keyword included in the newly received answer data and the keyword registered in advance do not match, it is newly received. Deleted response data. That is, by making the keyword indicating the content of the lesson an essential input item, unauthorized input by students who have not attended the lesson can be appropriately prevented. Moreover, since it is difficult to answer the keyword indicating the content of the class not only taking the class but also listening to the class, it is possible to conduct a questionnaire with high accuracy.

  Moreover, according to the lesson evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention, the unauthorized input is excluded using the seat number and the keyword. Therefore, while ensuring anonymity in the questionnaire, appropriate class evaluation is performed using the results of the questionnaire conducted with high accuracy, which correctly eliminates illegal input such as duplicate input and input of students who do not participate in the class It can be carried out.

  In the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, the instructor who conducted the lesson browses the aggregation result by displaying the aggregation result in the lesson evaluation system, but the aggregation is performed at the terminal owned by the instructor. The result may be displayed. For example, it is possible to connect to a lesson evaluation system via a network, acquire a count result stored in the lesson evaluation system, and display the acquired count result on a terminal.

  Further, when the instructor browses the count result, the user may be authenticated. That is, you may enable it to browse a total result by logging in to a lesson evaluation system using the user name and password registered previously. In addition, for example, an authority to access the counting result may be provided for each user such as a lecturer, the president, or the secretariat. That is, each lecturer can browse only the counting results for his / her class, and the president and the secretariat may browse the counting results for all the lecturers' classes.

  In addition, in the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, unauthorized input is prevented based on the seat number and the answer to Question 5, but further, unauthorized input is prevented using the answer to Question 6. It may be. For example, in a lesson evaluation system, a dictionary data storage unit that stores dictionary data, for example, morpheme, part of speech of morpheme, meaning, type of utilization, utilization form, and the like, and a dictionary stored in the dictionary data storage unit The answer to question 6 may be analyzed using data, and inappropriate answer data may be excluded based on the analysis result. That is, processing such as morphological analysis and syntax analysis is performed on the answer to question 6 using dictionary data stored in the dictionary data storage unit. Then, when content that is clearly inconsistent with the content of the lesson is input as an answer, the answer data including the answer may be excluded as an unauthorized input by a student who does not participate in the lesson.

  Moreover, in the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, a keyword indicating the content of the lesson is set in advance, but a keyword unrelated to the content of the lesson may be set. For example, the instructor makes an announcement such as “Please enter XX as a keyword in the questionnaire for today's class” in the class, and the student who participated in the class enters the keyword announced and answers the questionnaire May be performed.

  Moreover, in the lesson evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention, a mobile phone is used as a mobile terminal, but a simple mobile phone (PHS: Personal Handy-phone System) or a personal digital assistant (PDA: Personal Digital). Assistance) or the like may be used.

It is a block block diagram of the whole system containing the lesson evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a block block diagram of the lesson evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. 1 is a block configuration diagram of a mobile phone according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the implementation process of the questionnaire in the lesson evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the questionnaire displayed on the mobile telephone which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the reply data based on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the receipt message which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the totaling process of the reply data which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the reply data total result which concerns on embodiment of this invention.

Explanation of symbols

  2 ... lesson evaluation system, 4 ... network, 6a, 6b, 6c ... mobile phone, 10 ... data control unit, 12 ... communication control unit, 14 ... input unit, 16. ..Questionnaire data storage unit, 18... Data storage unit, 20.

Claims (4)

Questionnaire data storage means for storing questionnaire data including predetermined items;
A transmission means for transmitting questionnaire data stored in the questionnaire data storage means to the portable terminal in response to a transmission request from the portable terminal held by the student;
Keyword storage means for storing keywords related to a predetermined class;
Receiving means for receiving answer data sent from the mobile terminal, the answer data including the answer to the questionnaire, the seat number of the seat where the student was seated, and the keyword related to the class attended by the student;
Answer data storage means for storing the answer data received by the receiving means;
A seat number collating unit for collating a seat number included in the answer data newly stored in the answer data storing unit and a seat number included in the answer data already stored in the answer data storing unit;
Keyword matching means for matching keywords included in the answer data with keywords stored in the keyword storage means;
A counting means for counting the answer data in which the matching result by the seat number matching means is non-matching and the matching result by the keyword matching means is matching;
A class evaluation system comprising: an output unit that outputs a totaling result totaled by the totaling unit.   When the collation result by the seat number collating means is collation match or the collation result by the keyword collating means is collation disagreement, the answer data storage means stores the answer data in which the seat number is collation coincident or the keyword does not collate The class evaluation system according to claim 1, further comprising deletion means for deleting from the class. A receivable time zone setting means for setting a receivable time zone of the answer data;
The deleting means is
In addition to the receivable time zone set by the receivable time zone setting unit, when the response data transmitted from the mobile terminal is received by the receiving unit, the received response data is deleted. The class evaluation system according to claim 2, wherein the class evaluation system is characterized. A receivable number setting means for setting the receivable number of the answer data;
The deleting means is
After receiving the response data for the receivable number set by the receivable number setting means, when the response data transmitted from the portable terminal is received by the receiving means, the received response data is The class evaluation system according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the class evaluation system is deleted.

Images