JP2005301909A - Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method therefor, and program causing computer to execute the method - Google Patents

Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method therefor, and program causing computer to execute the method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005301909A
JP2005301909A JP2004120707A JP2004120707A JP2005301909A JP 2005301909 A JP2005301909 A JP 2005301909A JP 2004120707 A JP2004120707 A JP 2004120707A JP 2004120707 A JP2004120707 A JP 2004120707A JP 2005301909 A JP2005301909 A JP 2005301909A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
power generation
reserve
generation amount
insurance
cost
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004120707A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4427376B2 (en
Inventor
Minoru Iino
穣 飯野
Shigeru Matsumoto
茂 松本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP2004120707A priority Critical patent/JP4427376B2/en
Priority to US10/864,896 priority patent/US8069077B2/en
Priority to CNA2004100489194A priority patent/CN1573776A/en
Priority to AU2004202606A priority patent/AU2004202606B2/en
Priority to IT000287A priority patent/ITRM20040287A1/en
Publication of JP2005301909A publication Critical patent/JP2005301909A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4427376B2 publication Critical patent/JP4427376B2/en
Priority to US12/760,275 priority patent/US8219439B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E40/00Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y02E40/70Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
    • Y04S10/54
    • Y04S10/545
    • Y04S10/58
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S50/00Market activities related to the operation of systems integrating technologies related to power network operation or related to communication or information technologies
    • Y04S50/10Energy trading, including energy flowing from end-user application to grid

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To support operation management of a power generation facility to secure spare capacity in a rating over area in order to make the maximum use of capabilities of the power generation facility. <P>SOLUTION: A power generation facility operation management support system 1A is provided with an analysis processing means 15 and an operation plan decision means 16. The means 15 is provided with a lifetime consumption cost calculation part 22 for calculating the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation facility, a spare power price estimation part 23 for estimating a market price of spare power, and a spare power use probability estimation part 24 for estimating a spare power use probability. The means 16 is provided with a power generation earnings calculation part 29 for calculating power generation earnings, an optimum operation condition calculation part 30 for calculating an operation condition which optimizes power generation earnings, and an optimum operation condition output part 31 for outputting the operation condition calculated by the optimum operation condition calculation part 30, as a decided operation plan. The operation plan decision means 16 calculates the operation condition which optimizes power generation earnings, on the basis of information calculated by the analysis processing means 15, and the calculated operation condition is presented to an operator terminal 9 as the decided operation plan. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

設備の運用管理を行うシステム、方法およびその方法を実行させるプログラムに係り、特に、発電設備の運用リスクを考慮しつつ、その発電能力を最大限に活用する運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムに関する。   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a system and method for performing facility operation management, and a program for executing the method. And a program for causing a computer to execute the operation management support method.

一般に、火力発電などの発電設備では、運転(起動、停止)にともなう熱応力や経年変化などの設備寿命を考慮し、寿命消費を最小にする運転がなされている。発電設備の寿命を考慮した運用方法および運用システムの実施例としては、例えば、特公昭61−49481号公報、特公平4−54808号公報または特許第2965989号公報などに掲載されているものがある。   In general, power generation facilities such as thermal power generation are operated to minimize life consumption in consideration of equipment life such as thermal stress and aging due to operation (startup, stop). Examples of operation methods and operation systems that take into account the life of power generation facilities include those described in, for example, Japanese Patent Publication No. 61-49481, Japanese Patent Publication No. 4-54808, or Japanese Patent No. 2996589. .

上記文献に記載される発電設備の寿命を考慮した運用方法および運用システムは、発電設備として備えられるボイラの物理モデルやタービンの物理モデルあるいは物性モデルから想定した運転条件にともなう熱応力を計算し、計算結果が許容値以内となる運転条件を制約条件として求める。そして、発電プラント運転制御系に求めた制約条件を伝達し、運転制御を行うものである。   The operation method and operation system considering the life of the power generation facility described in the above document calculates the thermal stress associated with the operating conditions assumed from the physical model of the boiler, the physical model of the turbine or the physical property model provided as the power generation facility, The operation condition that the calculation result is within the allowable value is obtained as a constraint condition. And the constraint condition calculated | required to the power plant operation control system is transmitted, and operation control is performed.

一方、発電設備は寿命消費に伴い、計画外の設備停止リスクが増大する。売電契約に基づいて発電を行う事業者の場合、計画外設備停止時には、売電契約を履行することできず、売電契約不履行によりペナルティが課せられる。従って、計画外の設備停止は、プラント運用上も事業経営上もリスクとなり得る。このようなリスクを回避あるいはヘッジする手段として保険がある。   On the other hand, the risk of unplanned facility outages increases with the lifetime consumption of power generation facilities. In the case of a business operator that generates power based on a power sale contract, when an unplanned facility is stopped, the power sale contract cannot be fulfilled, and a penalty is imposed due to the failure of the power sale contract. Therefore, an unplanned facility outage can be a risk for both plant operation and business management. Insurance is a way to avoid or hedge such risks.

計画外設備停止に対する保険サービスの仕組みとしては、発電設備に対する監視運転サービスと計画外停止時に不足する電力供給サービスをどのように提供するかを具体化している。計画外設備停止に対する保険サービスの仕組みを具体化した実施例としては、例えば、特開2003−22368号公報に掲載されるようなものがある。
特公昭61−49481号公報 特公平4−54808号公報 特許第2965989号公報 特開2003−22368号公報
The insurance service mechanism for unscheduled facility stoppages embodies how to provide the monitoring operation service for power generation facilities and the power supply service that is insufficient at unplanned stoppages. As an embodiment that embodies an insurance service mechanism for an unplanned facility stop, for example, there is one disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-22368.
Japanese Patent Publication No.61-49481 Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 4-54808 Japanese Patent No. 2965989 JP 2003-22368 A

電力市場取引を前提とした発電設備の運用では、電力の取引価格が市場ニーズに連動してリアルタイムで大きく変動する。従って、市場機会を的確に捉えて取引価格の高いタイミングで最大限の発電を行えば、より大きな発電収益も得られるし、社会的な運用面でも最適となる。また、このような電力市場において、いつでも電力を提供できる待機電力は、市場価値を持つ。従って、市場変動のリスクを考慮して、発電設備の出力の一部を予備力として確保し、待機電力として運用することが望まれている。   In the operation of power generation facilities based on power market transactions, the power transaction price fluctuates in real time in conjunction with market needs. Therefore, if you capture market opportunities accurately and perform maximum power generation at a high transaction price, you can obtain larger power generation profits, which is also optimal in terms of social operations. In such a power market, standby power that can provide power at any time has market value. Therefore, in consideration of the risk of market fluctuations, it is desired to secure a part of the output of the power generation facility as a reserve and operate as standby power.

しかしながら、上述した発電設備の寿命消費を考慮した運用方法および運用システムおよび計画外設備停止に対する保険サービスを適用した運用方法および運用システムでは、発電設備の出力の一部を予備力として確保し、待機電力として運用するには、次のような課題がある。   However, in the operation method and operation system taking into account the lifetime consumption of the power generation facilities described above and the operation method and operation system applying insurance services against unplanned facility stoppage, a part of the output of the power generation facility is reserved as standby power To operate as electric power, there are the following problems.

まず、第一の課題としては、上述した発電設備の寿命消費を考慮した運用方法および運用システムを適用する場合、予備力の市場要求に対し発電設備を最適に運用ができないという課題がある。   First, as a first problem, when the operation method and operation system considering the lifetime consumption of the power generation equipment described above are applied, there is a problem that the power generation equipment cannot be optimally operated with respect to the reserve market demand.

上述した発電設備の寿命消費を考慮した運用方法および運用システムにおいては、発電設備の寿命を第一に優先し、発電設備の運転定格内で予備力を確保しているため、電力取引市場のニーズが高い場合も予め定められた運転制約条件を満たす許容範囲の運用しか許されていない。従って、実際に予備力が使われなかった場合、発電設備における発電量は予備力を差し引いた発電量となり、部分負荷運転を行うことになるので、効率、経済性の面で不利益となる。   In the operation method and operation system considering the lifetime consumption of the power generation equipment described above, the life expectancy of the power generation equipment is given first priority, and reserve power is secured within the operating rating of the power generation equipment. Even in the case of a high value, only an operation within an allowable range that satisfies a predetermined operation constraint condition is allowed. Therefore, when the reserve power is not actually used, the power generation amount in the power generation facility is a power generation amount obtained by subtracting the reserve power, and partial load operation is performed, which is disadvantageous in terms of efficiency and economy.

従って、上述した発電設備の寿命消費を考慮した運用方法および運用システムにおいては、大きな予備力を確保できない、または、予備力確保の犠牲として本来の発電量が低減し、低効率な部分負荷運転を強いられてしまう。その結果として、予備力の市場要求に対し発電設備を最適に運用ができないという課題を招来している。   Therefore, in the operation method and operation system considering the lifetime consumption of the power generation equipment described above, a large reserve capacity cannot be secured, or the original power generation amount is reduced at the expense of securing reserve capacity, and low-efficiency partial load operation is performed. I will be forced. As a result, there is a problem that the power generation equipment cannot be optimally operated in response to the market demand for reserve capacity.

次に、第二の課題としては、上述した計画外設備停止に対する保険サービスの仕組みを取り入れた運用方法および運用システムを適用しても、予備力確保のために発電設備の運用リスクが増大した場合においては、保険サービスの仕組みがリスクヘッジ手段として事業的に適したものとして有効に機能し得ないという課題がある。   Next, as a second issue, even if the operation method and operation system that incorporates the insurance service mechanism for unplanned facility outages described above are applied, the operation risk of the power generation facilities has increased to ensure reserve capacity. However, there is a problem that the insurance service mechanism cannot function effectively as a risk hedging tool.

発電設備で予備力を確保する場合、その予備力が実際に発電される場合とそうでない場合とでは、発電設備に生じるリスクコストが著しく異なる。   When the reserve capacity is secured by the power generation facility, the risk cost generated in the power generation facility differs significantly depending on whether the reserve capacity is actually generated or not.

しかしながら、上述した計画外設備停止に対する保険サービスの仕組みのような一般の保険のしくみでは、その予備力が実際に発電されたか否かを問わず一様に評価しているので、予備力が実際に発電されない(発電設備に生じるリスクコストが小)場合においても、予備力が実際に発電された(発電設備に生じるリスクコストが大)場合に対する保険料金が課せられることとなる。   However, in general insurance systems such as the insurance service mechanism for unplanned equipment outages described above, the reserve power is evaluated evenly regardless of whether the reserve power is actually generated. Even when the power is not generated (the risk cost generated in the power generation facility is small), an insurance fee is charged for the case where the reserve power is actually generated (the risk cost generated in the power generation facility is large).

従って、予備力が実際に発電されない場合には、発電設備が負うリスクコストに対して割高な保険料金が課せられてしまう結果となり、保険を用いても発電設備を運用する上でのリスクヘッジ手段としては、事業的に適したものとして有効に機能し得ていない。   Therefore, if reserve power is not actually generated, a premium insurance fee will be imposed on the risk cost of the power generation equipment, and risk hedging means for operating the power generation equipment even if insurance is used. As such, it has not functioned effectively as a business-friendly one.

そこで、上述した事情に鑑みて、本発明では、電力市場における予備力の市場価値・ニーズを考慮し、発電設備の能力を最大限に活用するために、定格オーバー領域に予備力を確保する支援を行う発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムを提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, in view of the circumstances described above, the present invention considers the market value and needs of reserve capacity in the electric power market, and assists in securing reserve capacity in the over-rated area in order to make maximum use of the capacity of the power generation equipment. It is an object of the present invention to provide a power generation facility operation management support system that performs the above, a method for supporting the operation management, and a program for causing a computer to execute the operation management support method.

また、本発明の他の目的としては、発電設備の能力を最大限に活用するために、定格オーバー領域に予備力を確保する場合においても、予備力が実際に発電されたか否かに応じて変動するリスクコストを考慮した保険サービスを提供し発電設備のより適切な運用を支援する発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムを提供することにある。   Further, as another object of the present invention, in order to make maximum use of the capacity of the power generation equipment, even when reserve capacity is secured in the rated over area, depending on whether or not the reserve capacity is actually generated. To provide a power generation facility operation management support system that provides insurance services in consideration of fluctuating risk costs and supports more appropriate operation of power generation facilities, an operation management support method thereof, and a program that causes a computer to execute the operation management support method It is in.

本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムは、上述した課題を解決するために、請求項1に記載したように、発電設備の運転履歴情報、発電設備の寿命計算式情報、現在の電力市場情報および発電実績情報とを取得して運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理手段と、この解析処理手段が算出した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電設備の運転条件を算出して策定した運転計画として出力する運転計画策定手段とを具備し、前記解析処理手段は、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出部と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定部と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定部とを備える。   In order to solve the above-described problems, the power generation facility operation management support system according to the present invention includes, as described in claim 1, operation history information of the power generation facility, life calculation formula information of the power generation facility, current power market information. And an analysis processing means that obtains power generation result information and calculates operation plan formulation basic information, and an operation plan that is formulated by calculating operation conditions of the power generation facility based on the operation plan development basic information calculated by the analysis processing means Operating plan formulation means for outputting as the above, the analysis processing means, a life consumption cost calculation unit for calculating the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation equipment, a reserve power price estimation unit for estimating the market price of reserve power, A reserve force use probability estimating unit for estimating a force use probability.

上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムは、請求項3に記載したように、前記解析処理手段は、保険サービス業者に支払った保険料金の情報を計画外設備停止リスクコストとして取得する計画外設備停止リスクコスト受付手段を備える。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the power generation facility operation management support system according to the present invention is characterized in that, as described in claim 3, the analysis processing means uses the unplanned facility information on the insurance fee paid to the insurance service provider. An unplanned facility outage risk cost receiving means for obtaining as an outage risk cost is provided.

上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムは、請求項4に記載したように、前記発電設備の計画外設備停止リスクをリスクヘッジする手段として保険サービスを提供する保険サービス提供手段を具備する。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the power generation facility operation management support system according to the present invention provides an insurance service as a means for risk hedging unplanned facility stoppage risk of the power generation facility as described in claim 4 An insurance service providing means is provided.

さらに、上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムは、請求項5および6に記載したように、前記運転計画策定手段は、前記解析処理手段が解析処理した寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報から発電収益を算出する発電収益算出部と、この発電収益算出部が算出した発電収益が最適となる計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvを運転条件として算出する最適運転条件算出部と、この最適運転条件算出部が算出した運転条件を出力する最適運転条件出力部とを備え、前記発電収益算出部は、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能と、発電量のうちの予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pvとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格特性算出機能と、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能と、発電収入Pと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能と、運用リスクコストを加味した発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能と、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出機能とを備えたり、前記運用リスクコストは、寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストであることを特徴とする。   Further, in order to solve the above-described problem, the power generation facility operation management support system according to the present invention is the operation plan formulation means, wherein the operation plan formulation means is the life analyzed by the analysis processing means. A power generation revenue calculation unit that calculates power generation revenue from information on consumption cost, reserve power market price, and reserve power use probability, and a plan-based power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation in which the power generation revenue calculated by the power generation revenue calculation unit is optimal An optimal operating condition calculating unit that calculates the amount Xv as an operating condition, and an optimal operating condition output unit that outputs the operating condition calculated by the optimal operating condition calculating unit, wherein the power generation revenue calculating unit Plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount Xf and the reserve market market price estimate Pf, and the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power in the power generation amount Reserve power generation amount Xv for calculating the relationship with the estimated market transaction price Pv--the market price characteristic calculation function, and reserve power generation amount for calculating the relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) Xv-Reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function, power generation amount [Xf + Xv]-power generation revenue P characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between power generation revenue P and power generation amount [Xf + Xv], and operational risk cost Power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between power generation cost C and power generation amount [Xf + Xv], and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic Power generation revenue expected value Prof, plan base power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation amount Xv for calculating the relationship between plan base power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation amount Xv-power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation function, Risk cost is lifetime consumption cost Characterized in that it is a preliminary unplanned equipment stopped risk cost.

本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援方法は、上述した課題を解決するために、請求項7に記載したように、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備することを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the power generation facility operation management support method according to the present invention includes, as described in claim 7, a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating a life consumption cost of the power generation facility, and a reserve power market. Reserve process price estimation process to estimate the price and reserve capacity use probability estimation process to estimate the reserve capacity use probability, the analysis process process to calculate the operation plan development basic information, and the operation calculated in this analysis process process Power generation revenue calculation process for calculating power generation revenue based on basic planning information, an optimal operation condition calculation process for calculating an operating condition in which the power generation profit calculated in this power generation profit calculation process is optimal, and this optimal operation condition calculation process And an operation plan formulation process including an optimal operation condition presenting process for outputting and presenting the operation condition calculated in (1).

上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援方法は、請求項9および10に記載したように、前記発電収益算出行程は、解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、発電量のうちの予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップと、前記計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入Pと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップと、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストを加味した発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップと、算出した発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップとを備えたり、前記運用リスクコストは、寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストであることを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above-described problems, the power generation facility operation management support method according to the present invention includes, as described in claims 9 and 10, the power generation revenue calculation process, the operation plan formulation basic information acquired in the analysis process process. The plan-based power generation amount Xf—the market price Pf characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount Xf of the power generation amount and the estimated market transaction price Pf of the reserve power, and the reserve power of the power generation amount The relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pf characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between the power generation amount Xv and the reserve transaction market price estimate Pf, and the relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) Reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step, plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, and reserve Power Power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −Power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between power generation revenue P and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] using each characteristic calculated in the power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step And a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between the power generation cost C taking into account the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv], and the calculated power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation Power generation revenue expected value Prof, plan base power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation amount Xv are calculated from revenue P characteristics and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristics. A profit expected value Prof characteristic calculating step, and the operational risk cost is a lifetime consumption cost and an unplanned equipment outage risk cost.

また、上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援方法は、請求項11に記載したように、保険の見積依頼を受け付ける保険受付処理ステップと、保険の見積依頼を受けて提供された保険の対象となる発電設備について過去の運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップと、計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップで評価された計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を見積し見積結果を出力する保険料金見積結果出力ステップと、前記解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、発電量のうちの予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップと、前記計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入Pと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップと、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストを加味した発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップと、算出した発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップと、前記保険料金見積結果出力ステップで見積した保険料金で保険の申込を受け付ける保険申込受付ステップと、保険の申込を受け付けた後、保険料金の初期決済を行う保険料金初期決済処理ステップと、初期決済を行った後に、保険の対象となる発電設備について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップと、計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップで評価した計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を再算定する保険料金再算定ステップと、保険料金再算定ステップで再算定した保険料金と事前保険料金との差額を算出して事後決済を行う事後決済処理ステップとを備えることを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the power generation facility operation management support method according to the present invention includes an insurance reception processing step for receiving an insurance estimate request and an insurance estimate request as described in claim 11. Unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step that evaluates and evaluates unplanned equipment outage risk from past operating history information and unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step Based on the insurance fee estimate result output step for estimating the insurance fee from the equipment outage risk and outputting the estimated result, and the operation plan formulation basic information acquired in the analysis process, the planned base power generation amount Xf and the reserve capacity Plan-based power generation amount Xf for calculating the relationship with the estimated market transaction price value Pf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, and reserve power generation amount Xv of the power generation amount Reserve power generation amount Xv for calculating the relationship between the reserve power market transaction price estimate Pf and the market price Pf characteristic calculation step, and a reserve for calculating the relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) Power generation amount Xv-reserve power usage probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step, plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, and reserve power generation amount Xv A power generation amount [Xf + Xv] for calculating the relationship between the power generation revenue P and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] using each characteristic calculated in the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step; A power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step for calculating a relationship between the power generation cost C and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] in consideration of the lifetime consumption cost and the unplanned facility shutdown risk cost as the operation risk cost Power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -Power generation revenue P characteristic and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -Power generation revenue expected value Prof, plan base power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation amount Xv Reserve power generation amount Xv-power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step, insurance application acceptance step for accepting insurance application at the insurance fee estimated in the insurance fee estimate result output step, and insurance fee after accepting the insurance application Insurance fee initial settlement processing step to make initial settlement of, and after making initial settlement, obtain operation history information after insurance contract for power generation equipment to be insured, and assess and evaluate unplanned equipment outage risk again Insurance fee to re-calculate the insurance fee from the unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step and the unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step A recalculation step, and a post-settlement processing step of performing a post-settlement by calculating a difference between the insurance fee recalculated in the insurance fee re-calculation step and the pre-insurance fee.

本発明に係るプログラムは、上述した課題を解決するために、請求項12に記載したように、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備する運転計画提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させる。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the program according to the present invention includes, as described in claim 12, a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation equipment, and a reserve for estimating the market price of reserve power. Comprising a power price estimation process and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability, the analysis process process for calculating the operation plan development basic information, and the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process process Based on the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit, the optimum operation condition calculation process for calculating the operating condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal, and the operation calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process. The computer is caused to execute an operation plan presentation processing procedure including an operation plan formulation process including an optimum operation condition presentation process for outputting and presenting conditions.

また、上述した課題を解決するために、本発明に係るプログラムは、請求項13に記載したように、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程と、前記発電設備の各々に対し発電量の指令値を与える発電量制御信号発信行程とを具備する運転条件提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させたり、請求項14に記載のように、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備し、前記発電収益算出行程に、前記解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、発電量のうちの予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格推定値Pfとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップと、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップと、前記計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入Pと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップと、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストを加味した発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップと、算出した発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップとを備える運転計画提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させる。   In order to solve the above-described problem, the program according to the present invention estimates the life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation equipment and the market price of the reserve power as described in claim 13. Reserve process price estimation process and reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating reserve capacity use probability, an analysis process process for calculating operation plan formulation basic information, and an operation plan formulation basis calculated in this analysis process process Based on the information, the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit, the optimum operation condition calculation process for calculating the operation condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal, and the optimal operation condition calculation process are calculated. An operation plan formulation process including an optimal operation condition presentation process for outputting and presenting the generated operation conditions, and a power generation amount control signal transmission line for providing a power generation amount command value to each of the power generation facilities The operating condition presentation processing procedure comprising: a life time consumption cost calculating step for calculating the life time consumption cost of the power generation equipment, and a standby time for estimating the market price of reserve power as described in claim 14 Comprising a power price estimation process and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability, the analysis process process for calculating the operation plan development basic information, and the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process process Based on the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit, the optimum operation condition calculation process for calculating the operating condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal, and the operation calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process. An operation plan formulation process including an optimal operation condition presentation process for outputting and presenting conditions, and the operation plan acquired in the analysis process in the power generation revenue calculation process Based on the fixed basic information, the plan-based power generation amount Xf—the market price Pf characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount Xf of the power generation amount and the estimated market transaction price Pf of the reserve power, Reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pf characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between reserve power generation amount Xv and reserve transaction market price estimate value Pf, reserve power generation amount Xv and reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) Reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step, plan base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pf characteristic calculation Step and reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) property generation amount [Xf + Xv]-power generation for calculating the relationship between power generation revenue P and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] using each characteristic calculated in the characteristic calculation step Revenue P characteristic calculation step And a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between the power generation cost C taking into account the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv], and the calculated power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation Power generation revenue expected value Prof, plan base power generation amount Xf and reserve power generation amount Xv are calculated from revenue P characteristics and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristics. The computer is caused to execute an operation plan presentation processing procedure including a profit expected value Prof characteristic calculation step.

さらに、本発明に係るプログラムは、上述した課題を解決するために、請求項15記載のように、保険の見積依頼を受け付ける保険受付処理ステップと、保険の見積依頼を受けて提供された保険の対象となる発電設備について過去の運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップと、計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップで評価された計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を見積し見積結果を出力する保険料金見積結果出力ステップと、この保険料金見積結果出力ステップで見積した保険料金で保険の申込を受け付ける保険申込受付ステップと、保険の申込を受け付けた後、保険料金の初期決済を行う保険料金初期決済処理ステップと、初期決済を行った後に、保険の対象となる発電設備について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップと、計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップで評価した計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を再算定する保険料金再算定ステップと、保険料金再算定ステップで再算定した保険料金と事前保険料金との差額を算出して事後決済を行う事後決済処理ステップとを備える保険サービス提供行程をコンピュータに実行させる。   Further, in order to solve the above-described problem, the program according to the present invention includes an insurance reception processing step for receiving an insurance quote request and an insurance policy provided by receiving the insurance quote request as described in claim 15. Insurance charges based on the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step that assesses and evaluates unplanned equipment outage risk from the past operation history information for the target power generation equipment, and the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluated in the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step An insurance fee estimate result output step for estimating and outputting an estimate result, an insurance application acceptance step for accepting an insurance application with the insurance fee estimated in this insurance fee estimate result output step, and an insurance fee after accepting an insurance application Insurance fee initial settlement processing step to perform initial settlement of the Insurance is obtained from the unplanned equipment outage risk re-evaluation step, in which the operation history information after the contract is obtained, and the unplanned equipment outage risk is assessed and evaluated again, and the unplanned equipment outage risk re-evaluation step. An insurance service provision process comprising an insurance fee recalculation step for recalculating the fee, and a post settlement processing step for calculating the difference between the insurance fee recalculated in the insurance fee recalculation step and the pre-insurance fee and performing post settlement Let the computer run.

本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムによれば、電力市場における予備力の市場価値・ニーズを考慮し、発電設備の能力を最大限に活用するために、定格オーバー領域に予備力を確保することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method, and the program for causing the computer to execute the operation management support method according to the present invention, the capacity of the power generation facility in consideration of the market value and needs of reserve power in the power market In order to make the best use of the power, reserve power can be secured in the rated over region.

より具体的には、定格出力を超過することにより発生する運用リスク(寿命消費コスト、設備計画外停止リスクコスト)と、市場が要求する発電予備力の価値とのトレードオフを考慮した発電設備の最適な運用計画(運転条件)をユーザに提供することができ、長期的視点で経済的にも従来より最適に近い状態で発電設備の運用を実現することができる。   More specifically, the power generation equipment that takes into account the trade-off between the operational risk (life consumption cost, out-of-planned outage risk cost) generated by exceeding the rated output and the value of power reserve required by the market. An optimal operation plan (operating conditions) can be provided to the user, and the operation of the power generation facility can be realized in a long-term viewpoint in an economically close state as compared with the conventional one.

また、発電設備の能力を最大限に活用するために、定格オーバー領域に予備力を確保する場合においても、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力に対し、予備力が実際に発電されたか否かに応じて変動するリスクコストを考慮した保険サービスを提供することで発電設備のより適切な運用を支援することができる。   In addition, in order to make the most of the capacity of the power generation equipment, even when reserve capacity is secured in the over-rated area, reserve capacity cannot be determined unless it is actually the time to generate power. By providing an insurance service that takes into account the risk cost that fluctuates depending on whether or not power is actually generated, it is possible to support more appropriate operation of the power generation equipment.

以下、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムの実施形態について、図面を参照して説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of a power generation facility operation management support system, an operation management support method thereof, and a program for causing a computer to execute the operation management support method according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

[第1の実施形態]
図1に本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aを含めた発電設備2の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図を示す。
[First embodiment]
FIG. 1 schematically shows an operation management example of a power generation facility 2 including a power generation facility operation management support system 1A which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the first embodiment of the present invention. A schematic diagram is shown.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aは、ユーザ(発電設備2を実際に運用する発電設備管理者またはオペレータ等の発電設備運用者)に発電設備2をより低リスクに高効率に運転させるのに最適と考えられる発電設備2の通常の発電量(以下、計画ベース発電量とする)および予備力発電量を運転条件として提示し、発電設備運用者を支援するシステムである。   The power generation facility operation management support system 1A is optimal for allowing a user (a power generation facility manager or a power generation facility operator such as an operator who actually operates the power generation facility 2) to operate the power generation facility 2 with lower risk and high efficiency. This is a system that supports a power generation facility operator by presenting a normal power generation amount (hereinafter referred to as a planned base power generation amount) and a reserve power generation amount of a possible power generation facility 2 as operating conditions.

尚、図では、発電設備2を制御対象である発電設備本体3、発電設備本体3の機器を制御するコントローラ4、発電設備本体3の各機器のプロセス量を検出する複数のセンサー5、センサー5により計測されるプロセス量を時系列データとして記録するデータロガー6とを有するものとして簡略化して示している。   In the figure, a power generation facility body 3 that is a control target of the power generation facility 2, a controller 4 that controls the devices of the power generation facility body 3, a plurality of sensors 5 that detect the process amount of each device of the power generation facility body 3, and a sensor 5 It is shown in a simplified manner as having a data logger 6 that records the process amount measured by the above as time series data.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aは、運用管理対象となる発電設備2から運転履歴情報を取得し、取得した運転履歴情報およびその他情報から発電設備2の寿命消費(以下、寿命消費コストとする)、発電設備の出力の一部を待機電力として確保した電力(以下、予備力とする)の市場価格および予備力を実際に使用する確率(以下、予備力使用確率とする)を解析する。   The power generation facility operation management support system 1A acquires operation history information from the power generation facility 2 to be operated and managed, and uses the acquired operation history information and other information for the lifetime consumption of the power generation facility 2 (hereinafter referred to as lifetime consumption cost), Analyze the market price of power (hereinafter referred to as reserve power) secured as a standby power and a probability of actually using the reserve power (hereinafter referred to as reserve power use probability).

そして、解析結果を考慮し、発電設備2を運用する上でのリスク(以下、単に運用リスクとする)を考慮した上で、電力市場取引の環境下、発電設備2をより低リスクに高効率に運転させるのに最適と考えられる運転条件を電子情報を伝達可能なインターネット網または専用回線等の通信ネットワーク回線8を介して電気的に接続される表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に表示し、ユーザに提示する。   Then, considering the analysis results and taking into account the risk of operating the power generation facility 2 (hereinafter simply referred to as operation risk), the power generation facility 2 is more efficient at lower risk in the power market trading environment. The operating conditions that are considered to be optimal for driving are displayed on an operator terminal 9 as display means electrically connected via a communication network line 8 such as an Internet network or a dedicated line capable of transmitting electronic information, and the user To present.

ユーザが予備力を提供する際には、まず、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)が市場入札手続手段としてのオペレータコンソール10を入力操作して電力市場(以下、単に市場とする)に入札手続きをする。そして、市場において取引が確定すると、確定した予備力分発電量について予備力デマンド受注手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が予備力デマンドを受け取る。   When a user provides reserve power, first, the user (power generation facility operator) inputs and operates the operator console 10 as a market bidding procedure means and performs a bidding procedure in the electric power market (hereinafter simply referred to as a market). . When the transaction is confirmed in the market, the operator console 10 as a reserve demand order receiving means receives the reserve power demand for the determined reserve power generation amount.

次に、ユーザは受け取った予備力デマンドに従い、発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10を入力操作して発電設備2に調整後の発電量(指令値)を与える。ユーザは、指令値を与える際に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aがオペレータ端末9に提示する運転条件としての発電量を参考にすることができる。   Next, the user inputs an adjusted power generation amount (command value) to the power generation facility 2 by operating the operator console 10 as a power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means according to the received reserve power demand. When giving a command value, the user can refer to the power generation amount as an operation condition presented to the operator terminal 9 by the power generation facility operation management support system 1A.

発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が指令値を認識すると、発電量調整指令出力手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が発電設備2に指令値を与えることで、発電設備2に付属されるコントローラ(図1において省略)が指令値への発電量追従制御を行う。   When the operator console 10 as the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means recognizes the command value, the operator console 10 as the power generation amount adjustment command output means gives the command value to the power generation facility 2, thereby the controller attached to the power generation facility 2. (Omitted in FIG. 1) performs power generation follow-up control to the command value.

尚、本実施形態における運用リスクとは、定格オーバー負荷状態で発電設備2を運用することに伴い、発電設備2にかかる過剰な負荷(熱応力等)により生じる寿命消費コストをいう。   Note that the operational risk in the present embodiment refers to a life consumption cost caused by an excessive load (thermal stress or the like) applied to the power generation facility 2 when the power generation facility 2 is operated in a rated overload state.

また、図1に示す発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aは、いわゆる電子計算機(コンピュータ)6が本発明の第1の実施形態に係る運用管理支援方法(運転条件提示処理手順)を実行させるプログラム(以下、第1の運用管理PGとする)12を読み取ることで、電子計算機11(ハードウェア)と第1の運用管理PG12(ソフトウェア)とが協働し、機能構成が実現され、運転条件提示処理手順を実行する。   Further, the power generation facility operation management support system 1A shown in FIG. 1 is a program (hereinafter referred to as a program) that causes a so-called electronic computer (computer) 6 to execute an operation management support method (operation condition presentation processing procedure) according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Reading the first operation management PG 12, the electronic computer 11 (hardware) and the first operation management PG 12 (software) cooperate to realize the functional configuration, and the operating condition presentation processing procedure Execute.

図2に本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図を示す。   FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram schematically showing the functional configuration of the power generation facility operation management support system 1A which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aは、寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率とを考慮して、電力市場取引の環境下で、発電設備をより低リスクに高効率に運転させる運転条件を提示する運転条件提示処理手順を行う。発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aが運転条件提示処理手順を行うことによって発電設備をより低リスクで高効率に運転させることができる。   The power generation facility operation management support system 1A is an operation that operates the power generation facility with lower risk and higher efficiency in the power market transaction environment in consideration of the lifetime consumption cost, the reserve market price, and the reserve use probability. An operation condition presentation processing procedure for presenting conditions is performed. When the power generation facility operation management support system 1A performs the operation condition presentation processing procedure, the power generation facility can be operated with low risk and high efficiency.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aは、図1に示す発電設備2から取得した運転履歴情報等の電子データを記録して格納するデータ記録手段14と、運転計画策定の基礎情報(以下、運転計画策定基礎情報とする)を算出する解析処理手段15と、解析処理手段15が算出した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電設備2の運転条件を算出して策定した運転計画として出力する運転計画策定手段16とを具備する。   The power generation facility operation management support system 1A includes data recording means 14 for recording and storing electronic data such as operation history information acquired from the power generation facility 2 shown in FIG. 1, and basic information for operation plan formulation (hereinafter referred to as operation plan formulation). Analysis processing means 15 for calculating (based on basic information), and operation plan formulation means for calculating the operation condition of the power generation facility 2 based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated by the analysis processing means 15 and outputting the operation plan 16.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aのデータ記録手段14には、解析処理手段15が読み出し可能な電子データが格納される。発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aでは、データ記録手段14に格納される電子データとして、図1に示す発電設備2の運転履歴としてコントローラ4、センサー5、データロガー6からの発電設備2の各種センサー情報、操作情報を蓄積した運転履歴データベース(以下、データベースをDBとする)13と、発電設備の寿命を計算するための物理式、物性式などの寿命計算式情報が格納されたプラントモデルDB19と、過去の電力市場情報および発電実績情報が格納された電力市場DB20とがある。   The data recording means 14 of the power generation facility operation management support system 1A stores electronic data that can be read by the analysis processing means 15. In the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, as the electronic data stored in the data recording means 14, as the operation history of the power generation facility 2 shown in FIG. 1, various sensor information of the power generation facility 2 from the controller 4, the sensor 5, and the data logger 6. An operation history database (hereinafter referred to as DB) 13 that stores operation information, and a plant model DB 19 that stores life calculation formula information such as physical formulas and physical properties formulas for calculating the life of power generation equipment, There is a power market DB 20 in which past power market information and power generation performance information are stored.

解析処理手段15は、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出部22と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定部23と、予備力を実際に使用する確率(以下、予備力使用確率とする)を推定する予備力使用確率推定部24とを備える。寿命消費コスト算出部22、予備力価格推定部23および予備力使用確率推定部24とを備える解析処理手段15は、運転計画策定基礎情報として、発電設備の寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格(推定値)および予備力を実際に使用する確率を算出することができる。   The analysis processing means 15 includes a lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 that calculates the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation equipment, a reserve power price estimation unit 23 that estimates a market price of reserve power, and a probability of actually using the reserve power (hereinafter, A reserve force use probability estimating unit 24 for estimating a reserve force use probability). The analysis processing means 15 provided with the lifetime consumption cost calculating section 22, the reserve capacity price estimating section 23, and the reserve capacity use probability estimating section 24 uses the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation facility, the market price of the reserve capacity ( (Estimated value) and the probability of actually using reserve power can be calculated.

解析処理手段15の寿命消費コスト算出部22は、運転履歴DB18およびプラントモデルDB19を読み出して取得し、取得した情報に基づき発電設備の寿命消費コストの算出を行う。寿命消費コスト算出部22が運転履歴DB18を読み出すことで、寿命消費コスト算出部22は、例えば、出力の定格オーバー量の積算値、起動停止運転の回数、出力急速変更運転の変化率実績値などの情報を取得することができる。また、プラントモデルDB19には、発電設備の寿命を推定するための物理式、物性式が格納される。   The lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 of the analysis processing means 15 reads and acquires the operation history DB 18 and the plant model DB 19 and calculates the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation facility based on the acquired information. The life consumption cost calculation unit 22 reads out the operation history DB 18, so that the life consumption cost calculation unit 22 includes, for example, an integrated value of the output rated over amount, the number of start / stop operations, a change rate actual value of the output rapid change operation, and the like. Information can be acquired. The plant model DB 19 stores physical formulas and physical property formulas for estimating the lifetime of the power generation equipment.

寿命消費コスト算出部22は、運転履歴DB18に格納される発電設備の各種センサー情報および操作情報と、プラントモデルDB19に格納される物理式または物性式とを取得することで、発電設備を構成する個々の構成要素、部品が受ける熱応力を計算することができ、計算結果から任意の運転状態におけるある部品の残り寿命の推定値(以下、余寿命推定値とする)が算出できる。従って、運転前の余寿命推定値と、運転後の余寿命推定値を知ることができれば、消費した余寿命の量(以下、余寿命消費量とする)は、
[数1]
余寿命消費量=運転前の余寿命推定値−運転後の余寿命推定値 ……(1)
により算出できる。
The lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 configures the power generation facility by acquiring various sensor information and operation information of the power generation facility stored in the operation history DB 18 and the physical formula or physical property formula stored in the plant model DB 19. Thermal stress applied to individual components and parts can be calculated, and an estimated value of the remaining life of a part in an arbitrary operation state (hereinafter referred to as an estimated remaining life value) can be calculated from the calculation result. Therefore, if the estimated remaining life before operation and the estimated remaining life after operation can be known, the amount of consumed remaining life (hereinafter referred to as remaining life consumption)
[Equation 1]
Remaining life consumption = Estimated remaining life before operation-Estimated remaining life after operation ...... (1)
Can be calculated.

一方、ある部品を新品時から消耗し交換するまでに必要なコスト(以下、寿命コストとする)の部品消耗に伴う消費量、すなわち、寿命消費コストは、ある部品の寿命コストに対してどれだけの余寿命を消費したかによって決まることから、余寿命を消費した割合(以下、余寿命消費率とする)を用いて、
[数2]
寿命消費コスト=余寿命消費率×寿命コスト ……(2)
で表すことができる。
On the other hand, the amount of consumption associated with the consumption of a part of the cost required to replace a part after it is new (hereinafter referred to as the life cost), that is, how much the life consumption cost is relative to the life cost of a part. Since it depends on whether the remaining life of the product has been consumed, the rate of consumption of the remaining life (hereinafter referred to as the remaining life consumption rate)
[Equation 2]
Lifetime consumption cost = Residual life consumption rate x Lifetime cost (2)
It can be expressed as

尚、余寿命消費率は、部品寿命および余寿命消費量を用いて、
[数3]
余寿命消費率=余寿命消費量/部品寿命 ……(3)
と表されるから、上記式(2)および式(3)より寿命消費コストは、
[数4]
寿命消費コスト=(余寿命消費量/部品寿命)×(部品コスト+部品交換メンテナンスコスト) ……(4)
と表記することができる。
The remaining life consumption rate is calculated using the component life and remaining life consumption.
[Equation 3]
Lifetime consumption rate = Lifetime consumption / Part life ...... (3)
From the above formulas (2) and (3), the lifetime consumption cost is
[Equation 4]
Lifetime consumption cost = (Remaining life consumption / Part life) x (Part cost + Part replacement maintenance cost) ...... (4)
Can be expressed as:

予備力価格推定部23は、予備力の価格推定する基礎情報(以下、予備力価格推定情報とする)を取得し、取得した予備力価格推定情報に基づいて演算処理を行い、予備力の価格を推定する。予備力価格推定部23が取得する予備力価格推定情報には、例えば、現在の電力市場情報、過去の電力市場情報および発電実績情報がある。尚、市場情報とは、電力取引に関して必要な情報の総称であり、少なくとも、日時および市場価格情報を有する。   The reserve price estimation unit 23 acquires basic information for estimating reserve price (hereinafter referred to as reserve price estimate information), performs arithmetic processing based on the acquired reserve price estimate information, and reserve price Is estimated. The reserve power price estimation information acquired by the reserve power price estimation unit 23 includes, for example, current power market information, past power market information, and power generation performance information. Market information is a general term for information necessary for power trading, and includes at least date and market price information.

本実施形態においては、図2に示すように、さらに市場情報取得手段26が予備力価格推定情報のうち、ほぼリアルタイムに取得される現在の電力市場情報を取得する。そして、予備力価格推定部12が現在の電力市場情報を取得する際には、市場情報取得手段26から取得した現在の電力市場情報を受け取る。   In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, the market information acquisition means 26 further acquires the current power market information acquired almost in real time from the reserve power price estimation information. And when the reserve power price estimation part 12 acquires the present electric power market information, the present electric power market information acquired from the market information acquisition means 26 is received.

また、過去の電力市場情報、および発電実績情報については、予備力価格推定部23が市場DB20を読み取ることで情報を取得する。予備力価格推定部23が予備力価格推定情報を取得すると、取得した予備力価格推定情報に基づいて統計処理を行い、現在または今後の予備力の市場価格(例えば、1キロワット時当たりの価格:¥/kWh)を推定する。   Moreover, about the past electric power market information and power generation performance information, the reserve power price estimation part 23 acquires information by reading market DB20. When the reserve price estimation unit 23 acquires the reserve price estimate information, it performs statistical processing based on the acquired reserve price estimate information, and performs a current or future reserve price market price (for example, price per kilowatt hour: ¥ / KWh).

予備力使用確率推定部24は、過去の電力市場情報に基づき、予備力を実際に使用する確率を推定する。過去の電力市場情報は、予備力使用確率推定部24が電力市場DB20から読み出し取得する。そして、取得した過去の電力市場情報から予備力として市場に入札した電力量(以下、予備力市場入札量とする)と、実際に入札を受けて発電した発電量を集計し、予備力市場入札量のうち、実際に発電した発電量の割合を予備力使用確率として求める。   The reserve capacity use probability estimation unit 24 estimates the probability of actually using the reserve capacity based on past power market information. The reserve power use probability estimation unit 24 reads and acquires past power market information from the power market DB 20. Then, the amount of power that has been bid on the market as reserve power from the acquired past power market information (hereinafter referred to as reserve market bid amount) and the amount of power generated by actual bidding are aggregated, and reserve market bid Of the amount, the ratio of the amount of power actually generated is obtained as the reserve power use probability.

予備力使用確率は、
[数5]
予備力使用確率=実際の発電量/予備力市場入札量 ……(5)
で求めることができる。
The reserve use probability is
[Equation 5]
Reserve power use probability = actual power generation amount / reserve power market bid amount (5)
Can be obtained.

運転計画策定手段16は、解析処理手段15が解析処理した寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報から発電収益を算出する発電収益算出部29と、発電収益算出部29が算出した発電収益が最適となる計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を算出する最適運転条件算出部30と、最適運転条件算出部30が算出した運転条件、すなわち、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を出力する最適運転条件出力部31とを備える。   The operation plan formulation unit 16 includes a power generation revenue calculation unit 29 that calculates power generation revenue from information on the lifetime consumption cost, reserve power market price, and reserve power use probability analyzed by the analysis processing unit 15, and a power generation revenue calculation unit 29. The optimal operating condition calculation unit 30 that calculates the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount at which the calculated power generation profit is optimal, and the operation conditions calculated by the optimal operation condition calculation unit 30, that is, the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation And an optimum operating condition output unit 31 for outputting the quantity.

運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29は、計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格(推定値)Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33と、予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格(推定値)Pvとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34と、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能35とを備える。   The power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation means 16 includes a plan base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33 for calculating the relationship between the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve transaction price (estimated value) Pf. The reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34 for calculating the relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv and the market transaction price (estimated value) Pv of the reserve power, and the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob The reserve power generation amount Xv for calculating the relationship with (Xv) −the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function 35 is provided.

また、発電収益算出部29は、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34および予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能35が算出したそれぞれの特性を用いて、発電収入Pと発電量(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xv)との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能37と、発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38と、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出機能40とをさらに備える。   The power generation revenue calculation unit 29 also includes a plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33, a reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34, and a reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv ) Power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic for calculating the relationship between the power generation revenue P and the power generation amount (= plan base power generation amount Xf + reserve power generation amount Xv) using the respective characteristics calculated by the characteristic calculation function 35 The calculation function 37, the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38 for calculating the relationship between the power generation cost C and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv], and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic and power generation amount [Xf + Xv] ] -Planned power generation amount Xf for calculating the relationship between the power generation profit expected value Prof, the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv from the power generation cost C characteristic-Power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation function 40 And more That.

尚、発電収益期待値Profとは、発電収益の期待値であり、発電収入Pから発電コストCを差し引いた分、すなわち、発電収益期待値Prof=発電収入P−発電コストCで表される。   Note that the expected power generation profit value Prof is an expected value of power generation profit, and is expressed by subtracting the power generation cost C from the power generation revenue P, that is, power generation profit expected value Prof = power generation revenue P−power generation cost C.

運転計画策定手段16は、発電収益算出部29が計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性を算出することで、最適運転条件算出部30が寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報に基づいて収益をあげるのに最適と考えられる発電設備2の発電量(例えば、単位をキロワット時とする)、すなわち、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を運転条件として算出する。そして、最適運転条件算出部30が算出した運転条件、すなわち、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を最適運転条件出力部31が最適運転条件算出部30から受け取って出力する。   The operation plan formulation means 16 is such that the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 calculates the plan base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic, so that the optimum operation condition calculation unit 30 calculates the life consumption cost and the reserve power. The amount of power generated by the power generation facility 2 that is considered to be optimal for generating profits based on the market price and reserve capacity use probability (for example, the unit is kilowatt hours), that is, the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount Calculated as operating conditions. The optimum operation condition output unit 31 receives the operation conditions calculated by the optimum operation condition calculation unit 30, that is, the planned base power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount from the optimum operation condition calculation unit 30 and outputs them.

運転計画策定手段16が運転条件として出力される発電設備の計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量は、取得した寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報に基づいて発電収益算出部29および最適運転条件算出部30が幾つかの段階を経て算出する。そして、算出結果が図1に示されるオペレータ端末9に出力され表示される。尚、算出の詳細については、後述する運転計画提示処理手順の説明の中で述べる。   The plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount of the power generation facility output as the operation conditions by the operation plan formulating means 16 calculate the power generation profit based on the acquired information on the lifetime consumption cost, the reserve market price and the reserve power use probability. The unit 29 and the optimum operating condition calculation unit 30 calculate through several stages. Then, the calculation result is output and displayed on the operator terminal 9 shown in FIG. The details of the calculation will be described in the description of the operation plan presentation processing procedure described later.

尚、このように構成される発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいて、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aが算出した運転条件は、表示手段に出力されているとしたが、必ずしもオペレータ端末9等のディスプレイに運転条件が表示されなくても良く、出力先が、例えば、ユーザ所有のプリンタ等の印字手段であっても構わない。すなわち、表示手段とは、ユーザへの運転条件提示手段のことである。   In the power generation facility operation management support system 1A configured as described above, the operating conditions calculated by the power generation facility operation management support system 1A are output to the display means, but are not necessarily displayed on the display of the operator terminal 9 or the like. The operation condition may not be displayed, and the output destination may be a printing means such as a user-owned printer. That is, the display means is means for presenting operating conditions to the user.

また、通信ネットワーク回線8は、必ずしも必要ではない。通信ネットワーク回線8が必要でない場合にはなくても構わない。例えば、通信ネットワーク回線8が必要でない場合としては、電子計算機11がオペレータ端末9を兼ねるように構成されており、発電設備2において、電子計算機11が読み取り可能なデータ記録媒体に運転履歴DB18を記録し、上記データ記録媒体を介して電子計算機11が運転履歴情報を読み出すような場合が考えられる。   Further, the communication network line 8 is not always necessary. If the communication network line 8 is not necessary, it may be omitted. For example, when the communication network line 8 is not necessary, the electronic computer 11 is also configured to serve as the operator terminal 9 and the operation history DB 18 is recorded in a data recording medium readable by the electronic computer 11 in the power generation facility 2. However, there may be a case where the electronic computer 11 reads the operation history information via the data recording medium.

上記の場合では、電子計算機11が表示手段としての役割も担い、運転条件を電子計算機11のディスプレイに表示する構成とすれば、電子計算機11が第1の運用管理PG12を読み出して、運転条件提示処理手順を実行することができ、通信ネットワーク回線8がなくとも発電設備2の運用管理支援を行うことができる。   In the above case, if the electronic computer 11 also serves as a display means and displays the operating condition on the display of the electronic computer 11, the electronic computer 11 reads the first operation management PG 12 and presents the operating condition. The processing procedure can be executed, and the operation management support of the power generation facility 2 can be performed without the communication network line 8.

さらに、本実施形態において、予備力の市場入札および受注は、市場入札手続手段および予備力デマンド受注手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が行っているが、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいて予備力を市場入札および受注を行うようにしても良い。この場合には、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいて、市場入札手続手段および予備力デマンド受注手段をさらに具備させる必要がある。   Further, in this embodiment, the reserve bid market bid and the order are performed by the operator console 10 as the market bid procedure means and the reserve demand demand order means, but the reserve capacity is market bid in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A. Alternatively, an order may be placed. In this case, in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, it is necessary to further include market bidding procedure means and reserve power demand order means.

一方、図2によれば、寿命消費コスト算出部22は、運転履歴DB18およびプラントモデルDB19から情報を取得しているが、図に示されない外部からの入力を受け付けるように構成しても良い。例えば、ユーザが入力受付手段(図外)から入力した運転履歴情報等を寿命消費コスト算出部22が直接取得しても構わない。また、予備力価格推定部23および予備力使用確率推定部24についても寿命消費コスト算出部22と同様に外部からの入力を受け付けるように構成しても構わない。   On the other hand, according to FIG. 2, the lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 acquires information from the operation history DB 18 and the plant model DB 19, but may be configured to accept external input not shown in the figure. For example, the lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 may directly acquire the operation history information and the like input by the user from the input receiving unit (not shown). In addition, the reserve power price estimation unit 23 and the reserve power use probability estimation unit 24 may be configured to accept external input in the same manner as the lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22.

さらに、市場情報取得手段26を現在の電力市場情報を取得する以外にも取得した情報を定期的に書き込んで、電力市場DB20を定期的に更新するように構成しても良い。さらにまた、本実施形態においては、市場情報取得手段26は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに具備されているが、必ずしもその必要はなく、例えば、市場情報取得手段26の代わりに現在の電力市場情報をユーザが直接入力して予備力価格推定部23に与えてやれば、市場情報取得手段26がなくても予備力価格推定部23は現在の電力市場情報を取得できる。   Further, the market information acquisition unit 26 may be configured to periodically write the acquired information in addition to acquiring the current power market information and periodically update the power market DB 20. Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the market information acquisition means 26 is provided in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, but it is not always necessary. For example, instead of the market information acquisition means 26, the current power market If the user directly inputs the information and gives it to the reserve power price estimation unit 23, the reserve power price estimation unit 23 can acquire the current power market information without the market information acquisition means 26.

このように構成される発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aによれば、運転計画策定手段16が、寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報に基づいて収益をあげるのに最適と考えられる発電設備2の運転条件を出力するので、運用リスクとなる寿命消費コストを考慮した発電設備2の運用を実現することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system 1A configured as described above, the operation plan formulating means 16 is optimal for raising profits based on information on lifetime consumption cost, reserve power market price, and reserve power use probability. Since the possible operating conditions of the power generation facility 2 are output, it is possible to realize the operation of the power generation facility 2 in consideration of the lifetime consumption cost that becomes an operation risk.

つまり、予備力の市場価値と運用リスクとなる寿命消費コストとのトレードオフを考慮した上で最適と考えられる発電量配分に基づき市場価値の高い予備力を市場に提供することができるので、経済的または社会的にも従来より最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用することができる。   In other words, it is possible to provide the market with a reserve with a high market value based on the power generation amount distribution that is considered to be optimal after considering the trade-off between the market value of the reserve and the lifetime consumption costs that are operational risks. It is possible to operate the power generation facility 2 in a state that is close to the optimum as compared with the conventional technology and socially.

また、予備力のうち実際に発電される確率(予備力使用確率)を的確に推定し、加味しているので、予備力確保のために必要以上に計画ベース発電量を制限することを防止し、発電設備2を定格運転に近い高効率な状態で運転することができる。さらに、最適と考えられる計画ベース発電量と予備力発電量とを算出し、運転条件として提示することができるので、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)の意思決定を支援することができる。   In addition, since the probability of reserve power generation (probability of use of reserve power) is accurately estimated and taken into account, it is possible to prevent the planned base power generation from being limited more than necessary to secure reserve power. The power generation facility 2 can be operated in a highly efficient state close to the rated operation. Furthermore, since the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount considered to be optimal can be calculated and presented as operating conditions, decision making by the user (power generation facility operator) can be supported.

さらにまた、通信ネットワーク回線8を介して発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと遠隔にある発電設備2とを電気的に接続してリモート環境を用意することにより、複数の発電設備2が各地に散在するような場合にあっても、個々の発電設備2の運用管理支援を発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに集約することができる。   Furthermore, by preparing a remote environment by electrically connecting the power generation facility operation management support system 1A and the remote power generation facility 2 via the communication network line 8, a plurality of power generation facilities 2 are scattered in various places. Even in such a case, the operation management support for the individual power generation facilities 2 can be integrated into the power generation facility operation management support system 1A.

従って、複数の発電設備2の各々について発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aが同時に監視して運転条件を算出し、算出した運転条件を各々の発電設備2の発電設備運用者に提供して運用管理支援するオペレーションアンドメンテナンスサービス(以下、O&Mサービスとする)を提供することができる。   Therefore, the power generation facility operation management support system 1A simultaneously monitors each of the plurality of power generation facilities 2 to calculate the operation condition, and provides the calculated operation condition to the power generation facility operator of each power generation facility 2 to support the operation management. Operation and maintenance service (hereinafter referred to as O & M service) can be provided.

次に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての運転計画提示処理手順について順番を追って説明する。   Next, an operation plan presentation processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A will be described in order.

図3は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての運転計画提示処理手順について順番を追って説明する説明図(処理フロー図)である。   FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram (processing flow diagram) for explaining the operation plan presentation processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A in order.

図3によれば、運転計画提示処理手順は、取得した情報から運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)と、この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電設備の運転条件を出力する運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)とを具備する。   According to FIG. 3, the operation plan presentation processing procedure includes an analysis process step (step S <b> 1 to step S <b> 4) for calculating operation plan formulation basic information from the acquired information, and an operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process step. And an operation plan formulation process (step S5) for outputting the operation conditions of the power generation equipment.

運転計画提示処理手順の解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)は、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程(ステップS1〜ステップS2)と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程(ステップS3)と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程(ステップS4)とを備える。   The analysis process process (steps S1 to S4) of the operation plan presentation process procedure is a process for calculating the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation equipment (step S1 to step S2) and a reserve for estimating the market price of reserve power. A force price estimation step (step S3) and a reserve force use probability estimation step (step S4) for estimating a reserve force use probability are provided.

一方、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)については、より詳細な処理ステップを説明する説明図(処理フロー図)を図4に示す。   On the other hand, regarding the operation plan formulation process (step S5), an explanatory diagram (processing flow diagram) for explaining more detailed processing steps is shown in FIG.

図4によれば、運転計画策定行程は、発電に伴う収支を算出し、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)と、発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を算出する最適運転条件算出行程(ステップS57)と、最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件、すなわち、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程(ステップS58)とを備える。   According to FIG. 4, in the operation plan formulation process, the power generation revenue calculation process (step S51 to step S56) for calculating the income and expenditure associated with power generation and calculating the power generation profit, and the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process are optimal. The optimal operation condition calculation process (step S57) for calculating the planned base power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount and the operation conditions calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process, that is, the plan base power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount are output. And an optimum driving condition presentation process (step S58).

運転計画策定行程の発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)は、解析処理行程で取得したに基づき、計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場取引価格(推定値)Pfとの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ(ステップS51)と、予備力発電量Xvと予備力の市場取引価格(推定値)Pvとの関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップ(ステップS52)と、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係を算出する予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップ(ステップS53)とを備える。   The power generation revenue calculation process (steps S51 to S56) of the operation plan formulation process calculates the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount Xf and the reserve market transaction price (estimated value) Pf based on the acquired in the analysis process process. Plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step (step S51), and reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv for calculating the relationship between reserve power generation amount Xv and reserve power market transaction price (estimated value) Pv A characteristic calculation step (step S52) and a reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve force use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step (step S53) for calculating the relationship between the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv). With.

また、発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)は、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップ(ステップS51〜ステップS53)で算出した各特性を用いて、発電収益期待値Prof(=発電収入P−発電コストC)を算出する処理ステップを備える。   Further, the power generation revenue calculation process (steps S51 to S56) includes a plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic calculation step, a reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic calculation step, and a reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use. A processing step of calculating a power generation revenue expected value Prof (= power generation revenue P-power generation cost C) using each characteristic calculated in the probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step (steps S51 to S53) is provided.

具体的には、発電収入Pと発電量(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xv)との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップ(ステップS54)と、発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係を算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)と、算出した発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係を算出する計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップ(ステップS56)とをさらに備える。   Specifically, a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step (step S54) for calculating the relationship between the power generation revenue P and the power generation amount (= plan base power generation amount Xf + reserve power generation amount Xv), power generation cost Power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S55) for calculating the relationship between C and power generation amount [Xf + Xv], calculated power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic and power generation amount [Xf + Xv]- Calculation base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step (step S56) for calculating the relationship between the power generation cost expected value Prof, the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv from the power generation cost C characteristic ).

図3および図4によれば、運転計画提示処理手順では、最初に解析処理行程がなされ、解析処理行程においては、まず、寿命消費コスト算出行程(ステップS1〜ステップS2)がなされる。そして、寿命消費コスト算出行程(ステップS1〜ステップS2)では、まず、ステップS1で寿命消費コスト算出部22が余寿命消費量算出ステップを行う。   According to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, in the operation plan presentation process procedure, an analysis process step is first performed. In the analysis process step, first, a life consumption cost calculation step (steps S <b> 1 to S <b> 2) is performed. In the life consumption cost calculation process (steps S1 to S2), first, in step S1, the life consumption cost calculation unit 22 performs a remaining life consumption calculation step.

余寿命消費量算出ステップ(ステップS1)では、寿命消費コスト算出部22が運転履歴DB18に格納される発電設備の各種センサー情報および操作情報と、プラントモデルDB19に格納される物理式または物性式とを取得する。そして、発電設備を構成する個々の構成要素、部品が受ける熱応力を計算し、運転前および運転後の運転条件における余寿命推定値を算出し、上述した式(1)を用いて余寿命消費量を算出する。   In the remaining life consumption calculation step (step S1), the life consumption cost calculation unit 22 stores various sensor information and operation information of the power generation equipment stored in the operation history DB 18, and physical or physical properties stored in the plant model DB 19. To get. And the thermal stress which each component and components which comprise a power generation equipment receive is calculated, the remaining life estimated value in the operating condition before a driving | running and after a driving | running is calculated, and a remaining life consumption using Formula (1) mentioned above Calculate the amount.

寿命消費コスト算出部22が余寿命消費量を算出すると、余寿命消費量算出ステップは完了し、続いてステップS2で寿命消費コスト算出ステップがなされる。寿命消費コスト算出ステップ(ステップS2)では、寿命消費コスト算出部22が余寿命消費量算出ステップで算出した余寿命消費量を用いて寿命消費コストを算出する。寿命消費コストの算出は、上述した式(4)により算出することができる。   When the lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 calculates the remaining lifetime consumption, the remaining lifetime consumption calculation step is completed, and then the lifetime consumption cost calculation step is performed in step S2. In the lifetime consumption cost calculating step (step S2), the lifetime consumption cost calculating unit 22 calculates the lifetime consumption cost using the remaining lifetime consumption calculated in the remaining lifetime consumption calculating step. The calculation of the lifetime consumption cost can be performed by the above-described equation (4).

寿命消費コスト算出部22が寿命消費コストを算出すると、寿命消費コスト算出ステップを完了する。そして、寿命消費コスト算出ステップの完了をもって寿命消費コスト算出行程(ステップS1〜ステップS2)の全処理ステップを完了する。寿命消費コスト算出行程が完了すると、次に、ステップS3に進み、ステップS3で予備力価格推定行程がなされる。   When the lifetime consumption cost calculation unit 22 calculates the lifetime consumption cost, the lifetime consumption cost calculation step is completed. Then, upon completion of the lifetime consumption cost calculation step, all processing steps of the lifetime consumption cost calculation process (steps S1 to S2) are completed. When the life consumption cost calculation process is completed, the process proceeds to step S3, and a reserve power price estimation process is performed in step S3.

予備力価格推定行程(ステップS3)では、まず、予備力価格推定部23が予備力価格推定基礎情報として現在の電力市場情報、過去の電力市場情報および発電実績情報を取得する。そして、取得した予備力価格推定情報に基づいて演算処理(統計処理)を行い、予備力の価格を推定する。予備力価格推定部23が予備力の価格を推定すると、予備力価格推定行程を完了する。予備力価格推定行程を完了すると、次に、ステップS4に進み、ステップS4で予備力使用確率推定行程がなされる。   In the reserve power price estimation step (step S3), first, the reserve power price estimation unit 23 acquires current power market information, past power market information, and power generation performance information as reserve power price estimation basic information. Then, calculation processing (statistical processing) is performed based on the acquired reserve capacity price estimation information to estimate the reserve capacity price. When the reserve price estimation unit 23 estimates the reserve price, the reserve price estimation process is completed. When the reserve capacity price estimation process is completed, the process proceeds to step S4, and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process is performed in step S4.

予備力使用確率推定行程(ステップS4)では、予備力使用確率推定部24が電力市場DB20から過去の電力市場情報を取得し、予備力市場入札量と、実際に入札を受けて発電した発電量を集計する。そして、予備力市場入札量のうち、実際に発電した発電量の割合を予備力使用確率として求め、予備力を実際に使用する確率を推定する。予備力使用確率は、上述した式(5)で求めることができる。   In the reserve capacity use probability estimation process (step S4), the reserve capacity utilization probability estimation unit 24 acquires past power market information from the power market DB 20, and reserve capacity market bid amount and the amount of power generated by actually receiving a bid. Is counted. Then, the ratio of the power generation amount actually generated in the reserve market bid amount is obtained as the reserve power use probability, and the probability of actually using the reserve power is estimated. The reserve power use probability can be obtained by the above-described equation (5).

予備力使用確率推定部24が予備力を実際に使用する確率を推定すると、予備力使用確率推定行程を完了する。そして、予備力使用確率推定行程の完了をもって、解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)の全処理行程は完了し、次に、ステップS5に進む。ステップS5では、運転計画策定行程がなされる。   When the reserve capacity use probability estimation unit 24 estimates the probability of actually using the reserve capacity, the reserve capacity utilization probability estimation process is completed. Then, with the completion of the reserve capacity use probability estimation process, the entire process process of the analysis process process (steps S1 to S4) is completed, and then the process proceeds to step S5. In step S5, an operation plan formulation process is performed.

運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)における処理ステップは、図4に示すように、処理行程が開始されると、まず、ステップS51で運転計画策定手段16が計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップを行う。   As shown in FIG. 4, the processing steps in the operation plan formulation process (step S5) are as follows. When the process process is started, the operation plan formulation means 16 first calculates the plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic in step S51. Do step.

計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップでは、運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が解析処理手段15の予備力価格推定部23から予備力の市場価格(推定値)を取得し、発電収益算出部29の計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33が取得した予備力の市場価格(推定値)を用いて計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力の市場価格Pfとの関係(計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性)を算出する。   In the plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation unit 16 acquires the reserve power market price (estimated value) from the reserve power price estimation unit 23 of the analysis processing unit 15. The relationship between the planned base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power market price Pf by using the reserve power market price (estimated value) acquired by the planned power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29. (Plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic) is calculated.

運転計画策定手段16において、発電収益算出部29の計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33が計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性を算出すると、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップは完了し、続いて、ステップS52で予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップがなされる。   When the plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 calculates the plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic in the operation plan formulation means 16, the plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf. The characteristic calculation step is completed, and then, in step S52, a reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation step is performed.

予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップ(ステップS52)では、運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が解析処理手段15の予備力価格推定部23から予備力の市場価格(推定値)を取得し、発電収益算出部29の予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34が取得した予備力の市場価格(推定値)を用いて予備力発電量Xvと市場価格Pvとの関係(予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性)を算出する。   In the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation step (step S52), the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation means 16 receives the reserve power market price (estimated value) from the reserve power price estimation unit 23 of the analysis processing means 15. ) And the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 is used to calculate the reserve power generation amount Xv and the market price Pv. The relationship (reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic) is calculated.

発電収益算出部29の予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34が予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性を算出すると、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップは完了し、続いて、ステップS53で予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップがなされる。   When the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 calculates the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic, the reserve power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation step is completed, Subsequently, in step S53, a reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve force use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step is performed.

予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップ(ステップS53)では、運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が解析処理手段15の予備力使用確率推定部24から予備力使用確率を取得し、発電収益算出部29の予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能35が取得した予備力使用確率を用いて、予備力発電量Xvと予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)との関係(予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性)を算出する。   In the reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step (step S53), the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation unit 16 receives the reserve power from the reserve power use probability estimation unit 24 of the analysis processing unit 15. The use probability is obtained, and the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use amount acquired by the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function 35 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 are used. The relationship with the probability Prob (Xv) (reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve force use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic) is calculated.

発電収益算出部29の予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能35が予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性を算出すると、予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップは完了し、続いて、ステップS54で発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップがなされる。   When the reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function 35 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 calculates the reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic, the reserve power generation amount Xv- The reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step is completed, and subsequently, a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step is performed in step S54.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップ(ステップS54)では、運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて発電収入Pと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係(発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性)を算出する。   In the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step (step S54), the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation means 16 performs the plan base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step and reserve power generation amount Xv- The relationship between the power generation revenue P and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] (power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic) is calculated using each characteristic calculated in the market price Pv characteristic calculation step.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性を算出するにあたっては、まず、発電収入Pを求める必要がある。発電収入Pは、
[数6]
P=Pf(Xf)×Xf+Pv(Xv)×Xv ……(6)
によって求めることができる。
In calculating the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic, it is first necessary to obtain the power generation revenue P. Power generation revenue P is
[Equation 6]
P = Pf (Xf) * Xf + Pv (Xv) * Xv (6)
Can be obtained.

また、発電収入Pは、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの両者の値を用いて求めることから、発電収入Pが求まれば、発電収入Pと計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの和との関係、すなわち、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性を算出することができる。   Further, since the power generation revenue P is obtained using both the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv, if the power generation revenue P is obtained, the power generation revenue P, the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount are obtained. The relationship with the sum of the amount Xv, that is, the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic can be calculated.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性の算出は、発電収益算出部29の発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能37が、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33および予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34から各特性を取得して上述した式(6)を用いて算出を行う。発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能37が発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性を算出すると、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップは完了し、続いて、ステップS55で発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップがなされる。   The power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic is calculated by the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic calculation function 37 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29, the plan base power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33 and the reserve. Each characteristic is acquired from the power generation amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34 and is calculated using the above-described equation (6). When the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristics calculation function 37 calculates the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristics, the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristics calculation step is completed, and then in step S55. A power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step is performed.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)では、運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電コストCと発電量[Xf+Xv]との関係(発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性)を算出する。   In the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S55), the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation unit 16 performs the plan base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv- The relationship between the power generation cost C and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] (power generation amount [Xf + Xv] using the characteristics calculated in the market price Pv characteristic calculation step and the reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step. ] -Power generation cost C characteristic) is calculated.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を算出するにあたっては、まず、発電コストCを求める必要がある。尚、第1の実施形態でいう発電コストCと、後述する第3の実施形態でいう発電コストCとは若干異なる。そこで、次に、第1の実施形態でいう発電コストCについて説明する。   In calculating the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic, first, the power generation cost C needs to be obtained. The power generation cost C in the first embodiment is slightly different from the power generation cost C in a third embodiment described later. Therefore, next, the power generation cost C in the first embodiment will be described.

図5に発電コストと発電出力との関係について説明する説明図(発電コスト−発電出力特性)を示す。   FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram (power generation cost-power generation output characteristic) for explaining the relationship between the power generation cost and the power generation output.

図5に示すように、縦軸に発電コストC[¥/kWh]、横軸に発電出力[kW]をとると、通常(従来)の発電出力−発電コスト特性は、図中のA線に示す曲線となる。   As shown in FIG. 5, when the power generation cost C [¥ / kWh] is plotted on the vertical axis and the power generation output [kW] is plotted on the horizontal axis, the normal (conventional) power generation output-power generation cost characteristic is shown by line A in the figure. It becomes the curve shown.

一般に発電設備2は、定格出力時に最高効率となるように設計されており、発電効率は、定格出力kより低い発電出力(例えば、発電出力がa点にある場合)で発電する部分負荷時においても低下するし、定格出力kより高い発電出力(例えば、発電出力がb点にある場合)で発電する定格オーバー負荷時においても低下する。   In general, the power generation facility 2 is designed to have the highest efficiency at the rated output, and the power generation efficiency is at a partial load that generates power at a power generation output lower than the rated output k (for example, when the power generation output is at point a). And also during a rated overload that generates power at a power generation output higher than the rated output k (for example, when the power generation output is at point b).

従って、発電出力−発電コスト特性(A線)は、図5中のB線に示される理想運転時(効率低下を加味しない場合)の発電出力−発電コスト特性に対して効率低下に伴い生じるコスト分(以下、効率低下コストとする)を上乗せしたものとなっている。部分負荷時に余剰に発生する発電コスト(以下、部分負荷コストとする)は、A線とB線との差分で表され、これが効率低下コストとなる。尚、定格値kから離れるほど効率低下コストが増大しているのは、一般に定格値kから離れるほど効率がより低下する傾向となることに起因している。   Therefore, the power generation output-power generation cost characteristic (A line) is a cost that accompanies a decrease in efficiency with respect to the power generation output-power generation cost characteristic during ideal operation (when efficiency reduction is not taken into account) shown by the line B in FIG. Minutes (hereinafter referred to as efficiency reduction costs) are added. The power generation cost excessively generated at the time of partial load (hereinafter referred to as partial load cost) is represented by the difference between the A line and the B line, and this is the efficiency reduction cost. Note that the efficiency reduction cost increases as the distance from the rated value k increases. Generally, the efficiency tends to decrease as the distance from the rated value k increases.

しかしながら、発電出力が定格オーバー負荷状態(例えば、図中のb点)となると、発電設備2に過剰な負荷を与えることとなり、効率低下に加え、運用リスクをも負うこととなる。従って、定格オーバー負荷時の発電コストは、発電出力が定格オーバー負荷状態となることで余剰に発生する発電コスト(以下、定格オーバーコストとする)として、効率低下コストに加え、運用リスク発生に伴い生じるコスト(以下、運用リスクコストとする)も含めて算出されるべきである。   However, when the power generation output is in a rated overload state (for example, point b in the figure), an excessive load is applied to the power generation facility 2, and an operational risk is also taken in addition to a decrease in efficiency. Therefore, the power generation cost at the time of rated overload is the power generation cost that occurs excessively when the power generation output is in the rated overload state (hereinafter referred to as the rated overcost). It should be calculated including the costs incurred (hereinafter referred to as operational risk costs).

そこで、第1の実施形態でいう発電コストCは、図中に示されるC線のように、従来の発電出力−発電コスト特性(A線)に対して、運用リスクコストとして、定格オーバー負荷状態における寿命消費コストを加算している。   Therefore, the power generation cost C in the first embodiment is a rated overload state as an operation risk cost with respect to the conventional power generation output-power generation cost characteristic (A line) as in the C line shown in the figure. The lifetime consumption cost is added.

尚、図5に示されるD線は、第3の実施形態に係る発電コストCであるが、詳細については、第3の実施形態における説明の中で説明する。また、従来の発電出力−発電コスト特性(A線)における発電コストと、第1の実施形態に係る発電コストCとを明確に区別するため、以下の説明においては、前者の発電コストを発電に伴う発電運用コストとし、後者を発電コストCとして説明する。   The D line shown in FIG. 5 is the power generation cost C according to the third embodiment, and the details will be described in the description of the third embodiment. In order to clearly distinguish the power generation cost in the conventional power generation output-power generation cost characteristic (A line) from the power generation cost C according to the first embodiment, in the following description, the former power generation cost is used for power generation. The power generation operation cost will be described, and the latter will be described as the power generation cost C.

本発明に係る発電コストとは、運用リスクコストを加味して算出するものであり、
[数7]
発電コスト=発電運用コスト+運用リスクコスト ……(7)
で表される。
The power generation cost according to the present invention is calculated taking into account operational risk costs,
[Equation 7]
Power generation cost = Power generation operation cost + Operation risk cost (7)
It is represented by

また、本実施形態に係る発電コストCの算出においては、図5に示す説明図から運用リスクコストとして加味されるのは寿命消費コストであるから、上述した式(7)より、
[数8]
発電コストC=発電運用コスト+寿命消費コスト ……(8)
となる。
Further, in the calculation of the power generation cost C according to this embodiment, since it is the lifetime consumption cost that is added as the operation risk cost from the explanatory diagram shown in FIG.
[Equation 8]
Power generation cost C = Power generation operation cost + Lifetime consumption cost (8)
It becomes.

さらに、実際に予備力として発電する発電量は、予備力発電量Xvとこの予備力発電量Xvにおける予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)とを用いて、
[数9]
∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv ……(9)
と表すことができるから、発電量がXf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXvの時における発電運用コストを
[数10]
発電運用コスト=OpCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv) ……(10)
寿命消費コストを
[数11]
寿命消費コスト=LifeCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv)……(11)
とすれば、
本実施形態における発電コストCは、
[数12]
発電コストC=OpCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv)+
LifeCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv)……(12)
で求めることができる。
Furthermore, the power generation amount actually generated as the reserve power is calculated using the reserve power generation amount Xv and the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) in the reserve power generation amount Xv.
[Equation 9]
∫Xv x Prob (Xv) dXv (9)
Since the power generation amount is Xf + ∫ Xv x Prob (Xv) dXv,
[Equation 10]
Power generation operation cost = OpCost (Xf + ∫ Xv x Prob (Xv) dXv) (10)
Lifetime consumption cost
[Equation 11]
Life consumption cost = LifeCost (Xf + ∫Xv × Prob (Xv) dXv) (11)
given that,
The power generation cost C in this embodiment is
[Equation 12]
Power generation cost C = OpCost (Xf + ∫Xv × Prob (Xv) dXv) +
LifeCost (Xf + ∫Xv × Prob (Xv) dXv) (12)
Can be obtained.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性の算出は、発電収益算出部29の発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38が、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能33、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能34および予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能35から各特性を取得して上述した式(9)〜式(12)を用いて算出を行う。   The power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic is calculated by using the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38 of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29, the plan base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation function 33, The power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic calculation function 34 and the reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power usage probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function 35 are used to obtain the above characteristics and obtain the above-described equations (9) to (12). To calculate.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38が、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を算出すると、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップは完了し、続いて、ステップS56で計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップがなされる。   When the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38 calculates the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic, the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step is completed, and then step S56. Then, the plan-based power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step is performed.

計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップ(ステップS56)では、発電収益算出部29の計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出機能40が、ステップS54で算出された発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性を発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能37から受け取り、ステップS55で算出された発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38から受け取る。   In the planned base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step (step S56), the plan base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic of the power generation revenue calculation unit 29. The calculation function 40 receives the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic calculated in step S54 from the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation revenue P characteristic calculation function 37, and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] − calculated in step S55. The power generation cost C characteristic is received from the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38.

そして、計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出機能40が取得した発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性から計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvに対する発電収益期待値Profを求め、発電収益期待値Prof、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの関係(計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性)を算出する。   Then, the plan base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation function 40 acquired by the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −the power generation revenue P characteristic and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −the power generation cost C characteristic A power generation revenue expectation value Prof for the power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv is obtained, and the relationship between the power generation revenue expectation value Prof, the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv (plan base power generation amount Xf-reserve power generation amount Xv- Calculate power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristics).

計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性は、例えば、図4に示すように、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvに対する2次元平面上に、発電収益期待値Profをプロットした3次元関数(発電収益曲線)として表すことができる。   The plan base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic is, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, on the two-dimensional plane for the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv. It can be expressed as a three-dimensional function (power generation profit curve) in which the value Prof is plotted.

運転計画策定手段16の発電収益算出部29が計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性を算出すると、計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップは完了する。計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップが完了すると、発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)の全処理ステップは完了し、発電収益算出行程が完了すると、次に、ステップS57に進む。そして、ステップS57で最適運転条件算出行程がなされる。   When the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 of the operation plan formulation means 16 calculates the plan base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic, the plan base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value. The Prof characteristic calculation step is completed. When the planned base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step is completed, all processing steps of the power generation revenue calculation process (steps S51 to S56) are completed, and when the power generation revenue calculation process is completed. Then, the process proceeds to step S57. In step S57, an optimum operation condition calculation process is performed.

最適運転条件算出行程(ステップS57)では、運転計画策定手段16の最適運転条件算出部30が、発電収益算出行程で得られた計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性を用いて、発電収益期待値Profが最も高くなる点(最適点)を求め、発電収益期待値Profの最適点を与える計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvの値を算出する。算出結果として得られる計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvが発電収益が最適と考えられる運転条件となる。   In the optimum operation condition calculation process (step S57), the optimum operation condition calculation unit 30 of the operation plan formulation unit 16 calculates the planned base power generation amount Xf, reserve power generation amount Xv, and power generation profit expected value Prof obtained in the power generation profit calculation process. Using the characteristics, a point (optimum point) at which the power generation revenue expected value Prof becomes the highest is obtained, and values of the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv that give the optimal point of the power generation revenue expected value Prof are calculated. The planned base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv obtained as the calculation results are the operating conditions where the power generation profit is considered to be optimal.

発電収益が最適と考えられる運転条件として計画ベース発電量Xfと予備力発電量Xvが算出されると、最適運転条件算出行程は完了し、次に、ステップS58に進む。そして、ステップS58で最適運転条件提示行程がなされる。   When the planned base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv are calculated as the operating conditions in which the power generation profit is considered to be optimal, the optimal operating condition calculation process is completed, and then the process proceeds to step S58. In step S58, an optimum driving condition presentation process is performed.

最適運転条件提示行程(ステップS58)では、運転計画策定手段16の最適運転条件出力部31が最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件、すなわち、計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvを表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に出力して提示(表示)する。運転計画策定手段16の最適運転条件出力部31が運転条件をオペレータ端末9に提示すると、最適運転条件提示行程は完了する(終了)。そして、最適運転条件提示行程の完了をもって運転計画提示処理手順の全処理行程を完了する(END)。   In the optimum operation condition presentation process (step S58), the optimum operation condition output unit 31 of the operation plan formulation unit 16 calculates the operation conditions calculated in the optimum operation condition calculation process, that is, the plan base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv. It is output and presented (displayed) to an operator terminal 9 as a display means. When the optimum operation condition output unit 31 of the operation plan formulation means 16 presents the operation conditions to the operator terminal 9, the optimum operation condition presentation process is completed (end). Then, upon completion of the optimum operation condition presentation process, the entire process process of the operation plan presentation process procedure is completed (END).

尚、運転計画提示処理手順の解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)においては、寿命消費コスト算出行程(ステップS1〜ステップS2)、予備力価格推定行程(ステップS3)および予備力使用確率推定行程(ステップS4)の処理順番は、解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)の範囲内であれば、図3に示す順番に限定されない。   In the analysis process process (step S1 to step S4) of the operation plan presentation process procedure, the life consumption cost calculation process (step S1 to step S2), the reserve power price estimation process (step S3), and the reserve capacity use probability estimation process. The processing order of (Step S4) is not limited to the order shown in FIG. 3 as long as it is within the range of the analysis process (Steps S1 to S4).

例えば、ステップS1で予備力使用確率推定行程、ステップS2で予備力価格推定行程、ステップS3およびステップS4で寿命消費コスト算出行程がなされても良い。また、寿命消費コスト算出行程、予備力価格推定行程および予備力使用確率推定行程の3つの処理行程が同じタイミングで処理(マルチタスク処理)されても構わない。   For example, the reserve capacity use probability estimation process may be performed in step S1, the reserve price estimation process may be performed in step S2, and the lifetime consumption cost calculation process may be performed in steps S3 and S4. Further, the three process steps of the life consumption cost calculation process, the reserve capacity price estimation process, and the reserve capacity use probability estimation process may be processed at the same timing (multitask process).

一方、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)においては、発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)のうち、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップ(ステップS51〜ステップS53)については、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップ(ステップS54)および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)の実行前であれば、その処理順序が図4に示す順番でなくても構わない。   On the other hand, in the operation plan formulation process (step S5), in the power generation revenue calculation process (steps S51 to S56), the plan-based power generation amount Xf−market price Pf characteristic calculation step, the reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic. Regarding the calculation step and the reserve power generation amount Xv−the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step (steps S51 to S53), the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −the power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step (step S54) and the power generation amount [step S54]. Xf + Xv] −power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S55) before execution, the processing order may not be the order shown in FIG.

例えば、ステップS51において予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップまたは予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップがなされても構わないし、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップの3つの処理ステップがマルチタスク処理されても構わない。   For example, the reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic calculation step or the reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step may be performed in step S51. The three processing steps of the Pf characteristic calculation step, the reserve power generation amount Xv−the market price Pv characteristic calculation step, and the reserve power generation amount Xv−the reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step may be subjected to multitask processing.

また、発電収益算出行程の発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出ステップ(ステップS54)および発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)については、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップ(ステップS51〜ステップS53)の処理ステップの完了後、かつ、計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップ(ステップS56)の実行前であれば、その処理順序は図4に示す順番に限定されない。   Further, regarding the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation revenue P characteristic calculation step (step S54) and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S55) in the power generation revenue calculation process, the plan-based power generation amount Xf-market After completion of the processing steps of the price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv−market price Pv characteristic calculation step, and reserve power generation amount Xv−reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step (steps S51 to S53), In addition, the processing order is not limited to the order shown in FIG. 4 as long as it is before the execution of the planned base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step (step S56).

さらに、最適運転条件提示行程(ステップS58)では、運転計画策定手段16が発電収益が最適と考えられる計画ベース発電量Xfおよび予備力発電量Xvをオペレータ端末9に表示してユーザ(発電設備運用者)に提示しているが、計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性(発電収益曲線)を併せて提示しても構わない。   Further, in the optimum operation condition presentation process (step S58), the operation plan formulation means 16 displays the planned base power generation amount Xf and the reserve power generation amount Xv at which the power generation profit is considered to be optimal on the operator terminal 9 and displays the user (power generation facility operation). However, the plan-based power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic (power generation revenue curve) may be presented together.

さらにまた、最適運転条件提示行程(ステップS58)においては、運転条件として計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性(発電収益曲線)をオペレータ端末9に表示しても構わない。この場合、最適運転条件算出行程(ステップS57)は省略しても構わない。   Furthermore, in the optimum operation condition presentation process (step S58), the planned base power generation amount Xf−the reserve power generation amount Xv−the power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic (power generation revenue curve) may be displayed on the operator terminal 9 as the operation conditions. I do not care. In this case, the optimum operation condition calculation process (step S57) may be omitted.

このような発電設備2の運用管理支援方法(運転計画提示処理手順)によれば、寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報に基づいて収益をあげるのに最適と考えられる発電設備2の運転条件をユーザ(発電設備運用者)に提示するので、ユーザの意思決定を支援し、運用リスクとなる寿命消費コストを考慮した発電設備2の運用を実現することができる。   According to such an operation management support method (operation plan presentation processing procedure) for the power generation facility 2, it is considered to be optimal for raising profits based on information on the life consumption cost, the reserve price, and the reserve use probability. Since the operating conditions of the power generation facility 2 are presented to the user (power generation facility operator), it is possible to support the user's decision making and realize the operation of the power generation facility 2 in consideration of the lifetime consumption cost that becomes an operation risk.

また、予備力使用確率を的確に推定し、加味しているので、予備力確保のために必要以上に計画ベース発電量を制限することを防止し、発電設備2を定格運転に近い高効率な状態で運転することができる。   In addition, since the reserve power use probability is accurately estimated and taken into consideration, it is possible to prevent the planned base power generation from being restricted more than necessary to secure the reserve power, and the power generation facility 2 is highly efficient close to the rated operation. You can drive in the state.

本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法(運転条件提示処理手順)およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムによれば、定格オーバー負荷状態における発電コストとして効率低下コストに加え、定格をオーバーして運用することにより生じる運用リスクコストとしての寿命消費コストを加味して発電コストを算出し、算出した発電コストよりも予備力の市場価値(発電収入)が高ければ、積極的に定格オーバー運転を想定した予備力を確保するといった市場ニーズに適合した発電設備2の運用を支援することが可能となる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the operation management support method (operation condition presentation processing procedure) and the program for causing the computer to execute the operation management support method, in a rated overload state The power generation cost is calculated by taking into account the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost generated by operating in excess of the rating in addition to the efficiency reduction cost as the power generation cost. If the revenue) is high, it is possible to support the operation of the power generation facility 2 that meets market needs such as actively securing reserve capacity assuming overrated operation.

また、予備力確保の際には、定格オーバー運転を想定していることから、仮に予備力が実際に発電されなかった場合(発電量が計画ベース発電量となった場合)においても、定格近傍の高効率の運転条件で発電されることとなり、発電設備2の効率の良い運用が確保される。さらに、最適と考えられる計画ベース発電量と予備力発電量とを算出し、運転条件として提示することができるので、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)の意思決定を支援することができる。   In addition, when reserve capacity is secured, rated over operation is assumed, so even if reserve power is not actually generated (when the power generation amount is the planned base power generation amount), it is close to the rating. As a result, the power generation facility 2 is efficiently operated. Furthermore, since the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount considered to be optimal can be calculated and presented as operating conditions, decision making by the user (power generation facility operator) can be supported.

さらにまた、複数の発電設備2が遠隔地に点在する場合においても通信ネットワーク回線8を利用して情報結合し、各発電設備2の最適運用計画の策定(運転条件提示)を1箇所で集約して行うことができる。従って、複数の発電設備2の各々についての運転条件を各々の発電設備2の発電設備運用者に提供して運用管理支援するO&Mサービスを提供することができる。   Furthermore, even when a plurality of power generation facilities 2 are scattered in remote locations, information is combined using the communication network line 8 to formulate the optimum operation plan (presenting operating conditions) for each power generation facility 2 at one location. Can be done. Therefore, it is possible to provide an O & M service that provides operation management support by providing operating conditions for each of the plurality of power generation facilities 2 to a power generation facility operator of each power generation facility 2.

[第2の実施形態]
図6に本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bを含めた発電設備2の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図を示す。
[Second Embodiment]
FIG. 6 schematically shows an operation management example of the power generation facility 2 including the power generation facility operation management support system 1B which is an example of the operation management support system for the power generation facility according to the second embodiment of the present invention. A schematic diagram is shown.

図6に示す本発明の第2の実施形態の適用例によれば、第1の運用管理PG12が第2の運用管理PG42となる点および発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bが具備する構成要素が異なるが、その他の点は本質的に異ならない。従って、第1の実施形態と異ならない箇所については、同一の符号を付して説明を省略する。   According to the application example of the second embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 6, the point that the first operation management PG 12 becomes the second operation management PG 42 and the constituent elements of the power generation facility operation management support system 1B are different. However, the other points are not essentially different. Accordingly, portions that are not different from those of the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals and description thereof is omitted.

図6によれば、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bは、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに対して、市場入札手続手段、予備力デマンド受注手段および発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10をさらに具備する点が異なる。この点の相違から発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bの機能ブロック図も発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aの機能ブロック図に対して相違する。   According to FIG. 6, the power generation facility operation management support system 1B provides an operator console 10 as a market bidding procedure means, reserve power demand order means, and power generation amount adjustment command input reception means to the power generation facility operation management support system 1A. Furthermore, it has different points. Because of this difference, the functional block diagram of the power generation facility operation management support system 1B is also different from the functional block diagram of the power generation facility operation management support system 1A.

図7に本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図を示す。   FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram schematically showing the functional configuration of a power generation facility operation management support system 1B which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bは、市場への入札を行う市場入札手続手段44と、市場から予備力デマンドを受注する予備力デマンド受注手段45と、発電設備2に与える発電量(指令値)を受け付け認識する発電量調整指令入力受付手段46と、発電量調整指令入力受付手段46が認識した指令値に発電量を制御する発電量制御信号を個々の発電設備2に対して発信する発電量制御信号発信手段48とをさらに具備する。   The power generation facility operation management support system 1B includes a market bidding procedure means 44 for bidding on the market, a reserve power demand order means 45 for receiving a reserve power demand from the market, and a power generation amount (command value) to be given to the power generation facility 2. The power generation amount adjustment command input receiving unit 46 that recognizes and recognizes the power generation amount, and the power generation amount control that transmits the power generation amount control signal for controlling the power generation amount to the command value recognized by the power generation amount adjustment command input reception unit 46. And a signal transmission means 48.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに対して付加された市場入札手続手段44、予備力デマンド受注手段45、発電量調整指令入力受付手段46および発電量制御信号発信手段48は、図1に示されるオペレータコンソール10がその役割を担っていたものである。   The market bidding procedure means 44, reserve power demand receiving means 45, power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means 46 and power generation amount control signal transmitting means 48 added to the power generation facility operation management support system 1A are the operators shown in FIG. The console 10 has assumed that role.

このように構成される発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bでは、発電量制御信号発信手段48が個々の発電設備2に対して発電量制御信号を発信し、発電設備2の発電量を個別に制御できるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aが行う発電設備2の運用支援に加え、実際の運転制御も行うことができる。従って、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bは、発電設備2の運転制御までを含めた運用支援サービスの提供を行うことができる発電設備運用管理支援システムとなる。   In the power generation facility operation management support system 1B configured as described above, the power generation amount control signal transmission means 48 can transmit a power generation amount control signal to each power generation facility 2, and can individually control the power generation amount of the power generation facility 2. Therefore, in addition to the operation support of the power generation facility 2 performed by the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, actual operation control can also be performed. Therefore, the power generation facility operation management support system 1B is a power generation facility operation management support system capable of providing an operation support service including the operation control of the power generation facility 2.

尚、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bでは、表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に表示された運転条件を見て、ユーザが発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10を介して複数ある発電設備2の各々に指令値(発電量)を与えているが、ユーザが指令値を入力する代わりに、運転計画策定手段16から出力される運転条件を指令値として直接受け付ける発電量調整指令入力受付手段とすれば、ユーザの入力操作を省略することができる。   Note that in the power generation facility operation management support system 1B, a plurality of power generation facilities 2 are viewed by the user via the operator console 10 as the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means by looking at the operating conditions displayed on the operator terminal 9 as the display means. A command value (power generation amount) is given to each of the power generation amount adjustment command input acceptance means for directly accepting the operation condition output from the operation plan formulation means 16 as the command value instead of the user inputting the command value. If so, the user's input operation can be omitted.

また、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bは、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに対してオペレータコンソール10をさらに具備する構成のため、その機能構成としては、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aの機能構成に加え、市場入札手続手段44と、予備力デマンド受注手段45と、発電量調整指令入力受付手段46と、発電量制御信号発信手段48とをさらに具備しているが、必ずしも、市場入札手続手段44および予備力デマンド受注手段45を具備している必要はない。   Moreover, since the power generation facility operation management support system 1B is configured to further include an operator console 10 with respect to the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, the functional configuration thereof is in addition to the function configuration of the power generation facility operation management support system 1A. The market bidding procedure means 44, the reserve demand order receiving means 45, the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means 46, and the power generation amount control signal transmitting means 48 are further provided. The reserve demand order receiving means 45 is not necessarily provided.

機能構成的な観点から言えば、発電量調整指令入力受付手段46および発電量制御信号発信手段48を具備していれば、発電設備2の実際の運転制御までを含めた運用支援サービスを提供することができる発電設備運用管理支援システムとなる。   From a functional configuration point of view, if the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means 46 and the power generation amount control signal transmission means 48 are provided, an operation support service including the actual operation control of the power generation facility 2 is provided. It becomes a power generation facility operation management support system.

さらに、図6に示されるオペレータ端末9は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bとしての機能構成を実現する電子計算機11と同一であっても良い。   Furthermore, the operator terminal 9 shown in FIG. 6 may be the same as the computer 11 that implements the functional configuration of the power generation facility operation management support system 1B.

一方、図7に示す発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bは、図6に示す電子計算機(コンピュータ)6が本発明の第2の実施形態に係る運用管理支援方法(発電設備運転制御処理手順)を実行させる第2の運用管理PG42を読み取ることで、電子計算機11(ハードウェア)と第2の運用管理PG42(ソフトウェア)とが協働し、機能構成が実現され、発電設備運転制御処理手順を実行している。   On the other hand, in the power generation facility operation management support system 1B shown in FIG. 7, the computer (computer) 6 shown in FIG. 6 executes the operation management support method (power generation facility operation control processing procedure) according to the second embodiment of the present invention. By reading the second operation management PG 42 to be executed, the computer 11 (hardware) and the second operation management PG 42 (software) cooperate to realize a functional configuration and execute the power generation facility operation control processing procedure. ing.

次に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての発電設備運転制御処理手順について順番を追って説明する。   Next, a power generation facility operation control processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1B will be described in order.

図8は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Bにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての発電設備運転制御処理手順について順番を追って説明する説明図(処理フロー図)である。   FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram (processing flow diagram) illustrating the power generation facility operation control processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1B in order.

図8によれば、発電設備運転制御処理手順は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおける運転計画提示処理手順に相当する解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)と、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)とを具備し、さらに、各々の発電設備2に対し発電量の指令値を与える発電量制御信号発信行程(ステップS6)を具備する。従って、本実施形態においては、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおける運転計画提示処理手順に相当するステップS1〜ステップS5については省略し、発電量制御信号発信行程(ステップS6)について説明する。   According to FIG. 8, the power generation facility operation control processing procedure includes an analysis process process (step S1 to step S4) corresponding to an operation plan presentation process procedure in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A and an operation plan formulation process (step S5). And a power generation amount control signal transmission process (step S6) for giving a command value of the power generation amount to each power generation facility 2. Therefore, in the present embodiment, steps S1 to S5 corresponding to the operation plan presentation processing procedure in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A are omitted, and the power generation amount control signal transmission process (step S6) will be described.

ステップS6がなされる前提としては、ステップS5で運転計画策定手段16が算出した運転条件を表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に表示し、表示された運転条件をユーザが確認する。そして、ユーザが発電量調整指令入力受付手段46としてのオペレータコンソール10に指令値を入力する。オペレータコンソール10に制御後の発電量の指令値が与えられると、ステップS6に進み、ステップS6で発電量制御信号発信行程がなされる。   As a premise for performing step S6, the operation condition calculated by the operation plan formulation unit 16 in step S5 is displayed on the operator terminal 9 as a display unit, and the user confirms the displayed operation condition. Then, the user inputs a command value to the operator console 10 as the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means 46. When the command value of the power generation amount after the control is given to the operator console 10, the process proceeds to step S6, and a power generation amount control signal transmission process is performed in step S6.

発電量制御信号発信行程(ステップS6)では、オペレータコンソール10がユーザから入力された発電量の指令値を認識し、発電量制御信号発信手段48としてのオペレータコンソール10が認識した指令値に発電量を制御する発電量制御信号を発信する。オペレータコンソール10が認識した発電量の指令値を制御対象となる発電設備2に対して与えると、発電量制御信号発信行程は完了する(END)。   In the power generation amount control signal transmission process (step S6), the operator console 10 recognizes the command value of the power generation amount input from the user, and the power generation amount is set to the command value recognized by the operator console 10 as the power generation amount control signal transmission means 48. A power generation amount control signal for controlling the power is transmitted. When the command value of the power generation amount recognized by the operator console 10 is given to the power generation facility 2 to be controlled, the power generation amount control signal transmission process is completed (END).

尚、発電設備運転制御処理手順では、ステップS6がなされる前提として、オペレータ端末9に表示された運転条件をユーザが確認して、発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10に指令値を入力しているが、発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が運転条件を運転計画策定手段16から取得できれば、図8に示す発電設備運転制御処理手順の説明図(処理フロー図)において、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)と発電量制御信号発信行程(ステップS6)との間に、発電量調整指令入力受付手段としてのオペレータコンソール10が策定した運転計画、すなわち、算出した運転条件を運転計画策定手段16から取得する策定運転計画取得行程をさらに具備しても良い。   In the power generation facility operation control processing procedure, as a premise that step S6 is performed, the user confirms the operation conditions displayed on the operator terminal 9 and sends a command value to the operator console 10 as a power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means. If the operator console 10 serving as the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means can acquire the operation conditions from the operation plan formulation means 16, in the explanatory diagram (processing flow diagram) of the power generation facility operation control processing procedure shown in FIG. Between the operation plan formulation process (step S5) and the power generation amount control signal transmission process (step S6), the operation plan formulated by the operator console 10 as the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means, that is, the calculated operation condition is You may further comprise the formulation operation plan acquisition process acquired from the operation plan formulation means 16. FIG.

本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法(発電設備運転制御処理手順)およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムによれば、本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにより得られる効果に加え、発電設備2の運転制御も行うことができるので、発電設備2の運用支援サービス提供を行う以外にも、実際の運用サービスについても提供することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method (power generation facility operation control processing procedure), and the program for causing the computer to execute the operation management support method according to the second embodiment of the present invention. In addition to the effects obtained by the power generation facility operation management support system according to the first embodiment, the operation control of the power generation facility 2 can also be performed. Can also be provided.

[第3の実施形態]
図9に本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cを含めた発電設備2の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図を示す。
[Third embodiment]
FIG. 9 schematically shows an operation management example of the power generation facility 2 including the power generation facility operation management support system 1C which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the third embodiment of the present invention. A schematic diagram is shown.

図9に示す本発明の第3の実施形態の適用例によれば、図1に示す第1の実施形態の適用例に対して、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aが発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cとなる点および第1の運用管理PG12が第3の運用管理PG50となる点において異なるが、その他の点は本質的に異ならない。従って、第1の実施形態と異ならない箇所については、同一の符号を付して説明を省略する。   According to the application example of the third embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 9, the power generation facility operation management support system 1A is different from the application example of the first embodiment shown in FIG. And the point that the first operation management PG 12 becomes the third operation management PG 50, but the other points are not essentially different. Accordingly, portions that are not different from those of the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals and description thereof is omitted.

また、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cは、発電設備2の運用管理を行う発電設備運用者が、発電設備2の運用管理を行う際に、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストに加え、予備力確保のために定格をオーバーして運用することにより生じる発電設備2の故障、緊急遮断、その他のトラブルにより発電が続行できなくなることにより生じるコスト(以下、計画外設備停止リスクコストとする)を運用リスクコストとして加味している。   In addition, the power generation facility operation management support system 1C allows the power generation facility operator who manages the operation of the power generation facility 2 to ensure the reserve capacity in addition to the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost when performing the operation management of the power generation facility 2. Operational cost is the cost (hereinafter referred to as unplanned equipment outage risk cost) that occurs when power generation cannot be continued due to failure of the power generation facility 2, operation due to emergency shutdown, or other troubles. As a consideration.

尚、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cでは、計画外設備停止リスクコストの発生を予測または制御することが不可能である点に鑑み、リスクヘッジの手段として保険を用いている。つまり、計画外設備停止リスクコストは、発電設備2の保険サービス業者52に支払う保険料金となる。   In the power generation facility operation management support system 1C, insurance is used as a risk hedging means in view of the fact that it is impossible to predict or control the occurrence of unplanned facility stoppage risk costs. That is, the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost is an insurance fee paid to the insurance service provider 52 of the power generation facility 2.

一方、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cは、いわゆる電子計算機(コンピュータ)6が本発明の第3の実施形態に係る運用管理支援方法(第2の運転計画提示処理手順)を実行させる第3の運用管理PG50を読み取ることで、電子計算機11(ハードウェア)と第3の運用管理PG50(ソフトウェア)とが協働し、機能構成が実現され、第2の運転計画提示処理手順を実行する。   On the other hand, in the power generation facility operation management support system 1C, a third operation in which a so-called computer (computer) 6 executes the operation management support method (second operation plan presentation processing procedure) according to the third embodiment of the present invention. By reading the management PG 50, the electronic computer 11 (hardware) and the third operation management PG 50 (software) cooperate to implement a functional configuration and execute the second operation plan presentation processing procedure.

図10に本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図を示す。   FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram schematically showing a functional configuration of a power generation facility operation management support system 1C which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

図10によれば、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cは、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aに対し、解析処理手段15の代わりに解析処理手段15A、運転計画策定手段16の代わりに運転計画策定手段16Aを具備する点で異なる。すなわち、データ記録手段14と、解析処理手段15Aと、運転計画策定手段16Aとを具備する。   According to FIG. 10, the power generation facility operation management support system 1 </ b> C is compared to the power generation facility operation management support system 1 </ b> A with an analysis processing unit 15 </ b> A instead of the analysis processing unit 15 and an operation plan formulation unit 16 </ b> A instead of the operation plan formulation unit 16. Is different. That is, it comprises data recording means 14, analysis processing means 15A, and operation plan formulation means 16A.

解析処理手段15Aは、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストに加え、計画外設備停止リスクコストを加味して発電コストCを計算するため、計画外設備停止リスクコスト受付手段としての計画外設備停止リスクコスト取得部54を備えており、計画外設備停止リスクコスト取得部54は、計画外設備停止リスクコストとして保険サービス業者52に支払った保険料金の情報をデータ記録手段14に格納される保険料金DB56から取得する。   Since the analysis processing means 15A calculates the power generation cost C in consideration of the unplanned equipment stoppage risk cost in addition to the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost, the unplanned equipment stoppage risk cost as the unplanned equipment stoppage risk cost receiving means The acquisition unit 54 is provided, and the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost acquisition unit 54 stores information on the insurance fee paid to the insurance service provider 52 as the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost from the insurance fee DB 56 stored in the data recording means 14. get.

また、運転計画策定手段16Aは、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出部29Aと、最適運転条件算出部30と、最適運転条件出力部31とを備えている。さらに詳細を見ると、発電収益算出部29Aは、発電収益算出部29に対し、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38の代わりに発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aを備える点で相違しているがその他の点は本質的に相違しない。   In addition, the operation plan formulation unit 16A includes a power generation revenue calculation unit 29A that calculates power generation revenue, an optimum operation condition calculation unit 30, and an optimum operation condition output unit 31. More specifically, the power generation revenue calculation unit 29A gives the power generation revenue calculation unit 29 a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A instead of the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38. However, the other points are essentially the same.

すなわち、運転計画策定手段16Aと運転計画策定手段16との相違は、計画外設備停止リスクコスト取得部54を備える点と、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38の代わりに発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aを備える点とに起因するものであり、この相違によって、計画外設備停止リスクコストを運用リスクコストとして加味した発電コストCを計算し、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を算出することができる。   That is, the difference between the operation plan formulation unit 16A and the operation plan formulation unit 16 is that an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost acquisition unit 54 is provided, and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38 instead of the power generation amount. [Xf + Xv] −Power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A is provided, and due to this difference, the power generation cost C is calculated by taking the unplanned facility outage risk cost as the operation risk cost, and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv ]-The power generation cost C characteristic can be calculated.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aが算出する際に使用する発電コストCは、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコストを加味している。つまり、本実施形態における発電コストCは、図5に示されるD線に相当する部分であり、第1の実施形態の説明時に用いた式(7)を引用すると、
[数13]
発電コストC=発電運用コスト+
寿命消費コスト+計画外設備停止リスクコスト ……(13)
となる。
The power generation cost C used when the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A calculates includes an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost as an operation risk cost. That is, the power generation cost C in the present embodiment is a portion corresponding to the D line shown in FIG. 5, and quoting equation (7) used in the description of the first embodiment,
[Equation 13]
Power generation cost C = Power generation operation cost +
Lifetime consumption cost + Unplanned equipment outage risk cost ...... (13)
It becomes.

ここでは、リスクヘッジ手段として保険を利用していることから、計画外設備停止リスクコストは、保険を利用する際に生じる保険料金であり、この保険料金を
[数14]
保険料金=MFCost(Xf+Xv) ……(14)
とすれば、本実施形態における発電コストCは、
[数15]
発電コストC=OpCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv)+
LifeCost(Xf+∫Xv×Prob(Xv)dXv)+
MFCost(Xf+Xv) ……(15)
で求めることができる。
Here, because insurance is used as a risk hedging instrument, the unplanned equipment outage risk cost is an insurance fee that is incurred when using insurance.
[Equation 14]
Insurance fee = MFCost (Xf + Xv) (14)
Then, the power generation cost C in this embodiment is
[Equation 15]
Power generation cost C = OpCost (Xf + ∫Xv × Prob (Xv) dXv) +
LifeCost (Xf + ∫Xv × Prob (Xv) dXv) +
MFCost (Xf + Xv) (15)
Can be obtained.

このように構成される発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cによれば、リスクヘッジ手段として保険を利用した場合、運転計画策定手段16Aが、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することができるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと比較して、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用する支援を行うことができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system 1C configured as described above, when insurance is used as a risk hedging unit, the operation plan formulation unit 16A takes into account the unplanned facility outage risk cost (insurance fee) as the operation risk cost. Since the power generation cost C can be calculated in this way, it is possible to provide support for operating the power generation facility 2 in a state that is more economically or socially optimal than the power generation facility operation management support system 1A.

尚、計画外設備停止リスクコスト取得部54は、計画外設備停止リスクコストとして保険サービス業者52に支払った保険料金の情報をデータ記録手段14に格納される保険料金DB56から取得しているが、ユーザが直接入力して与えた保険料金を計画外設備停止リスクコストとして取得する構成であっても構わない。この場合、保険料金DB56は不要となる。   The unplanned equipment outage risk cost acquisition unit 54 obtains information on the insurance fee paid to the insurance service provider 52 as the unplanned equipment outage risk cost from the insurance fee DB 56 stored in the data recording unit 14. The configuration may be such that the insurance fee directly input by the user is acquired as the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost. In this case, the insurance fee DB 56 is unnecessary.

次に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての第2の運転計画提示処理手順について順番を追って説明する。   Next, the second operation plan presentation processing procedure as the power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1C will be described in order.

尚、第2の運転計画提示処理手順は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいてなされる運転計画提示処理手順に対し、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)の一処理ステップが異なる以外は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aにおいてなされる運転計画提示処理手順とは本質的に異ならない。   The second operation plan presentation process procedure is different from the operation plan presentation process procedure performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1A except that one process step of the operation plan formulation process (step S5) is different. This is not essentially different from the operation plan presentation processing procedure performed in the management support system 1A.

従って、第2の運転計画提示処理手順においては、第2の運転計画提示処理手順における運転計画策定行程(以下、第2の運転計画策定行程とする)のうち、運転計画提示処理手順の運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)と本質的に異ならない処理ステップについては、同じ処理ステップ番号を付して説明を省略し、異なる処理ステップについて説明する。   Therefore, in the second operation plan presentation process procedure, the operation plan of the operation plan presentation process procedure in the operation plan formulation process in the second operation plan presentation process procedure (hereinafter referred to as the second operation plan formulation process). Process steps that are not essentially different from the formulation process (step S5) will be given the same process step numbers and will not be described, and different process steps will be described.

図11は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての第2の運転計画提示処理手順について順番を追って説明する説明図(処理フロー図)である。   FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram (process flow diagram) illustrating the second operation plan presentation processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1C in order.

図11によれば、第2の運転計画策定行程(ステップS7)は、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)の発電収益算出行程(ステップS51〜ステップS56)に対し、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)の代わりに、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出する発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)を備える点で相違するが、その他の処理ステップは本質的に異ならない。   According to FIG. 11, the second operation plan formulation process (step S7) is the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] −power generation cost with respect to the power generation revenue calculation process (steps S51 to S56) of the operation plan formulation process (step S5). Instead of the C characteristic calculation step (step S55), the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step Although different in that S71) is provided, the other processing steps are not essentially different.

そこで、ステップS51〜ステップS54と、ステップS56については、処理ステップの説明を省略し、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)については、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)との相違点を意識しつつ述べる。   Therefore, the description of the processing steps is omitted for steps S51 to S54 and step S56, and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C is calculated for the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S71). This will be described with the difference from the characteristic calculation step (step S55) in mind.

第2の運転計画提示処理手順では、運転計画提示処理手順と同様に取得した情報から運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程(ステップS1〜ステップS4)がなされた後、次に、第2の運転計画策定行程(ステップS7)がなされる。   In the second operation plan presentation process procedure, after the analysis process (step S1 to step S4) for calculating the operation plan formulation basic information from the acquired information is performed in the same manner as the operation plan presentation process procedure, the second operation plan presentation process is performed. The operation plan formulation process (step S7) is performed.

第2の運転計画策定行程(ステップS7)では、まず、ステップS51の計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップがなされ、順次、ステップS52、ステップS53、ステップS54となされた後、続いて、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)がなされる。   In the second operation plan formulation process (step S7), first, the planned base power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation step of step S51 is performed, and after step S52, step S53, and step S54 are sequentially performed, then. Then, a power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S71) is performed.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)では、運転計画策定手段16Aの発電収益算出部29Aにおける発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aが、計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出ステップで算出された各特性を用いて、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を算出する。   In the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S71), the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A in the power generation revenue calculation unit 29A of the operation plan formulation unit 16A performs the plan-based power generation amount Xf. -Market price Pf characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount Xv-Market price Pv characteristic calculation step and reserve power generation amount Xv-Reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation step [Xf + Xv] −Power generation cost C characteristic is calculated.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aが行う発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)は、発電コストCを算出する際に運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストに加えて計画外設備停止リスクコストをさらに加味している点で、運転計画策定行程(ステップS5)の発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS55)と相違する。   The power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A performs the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S71) in addition to the lifetime consumption cost as an operation risk cost when calculating the power generation cost C. Therefore, it is different from the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S55) in the operation plan formulation process (step S5) in that the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost is further added.

発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能38Aが、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストに加え、計画外設備停止リスクコストをも加味した発電コストCを用いて、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性を算出すると、発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出ステップ(ステップS71)は完了し、続いて、ステップS56に進む。そして、ステップS56で計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出ステップがなされると、第2の運転計画策定行程における発電収益算出行程が完了する。   The power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation function 38A uses the power generation cost C in consideration of the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost in addition to the lifetime consumption cost as the operation risk cost, and the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost When the C characteristic is calculated, the power generation amount [Xf + Xv] -power generation cost C characteristic calculation step (step S71) is completed, and then the process proceeds to step S56. When the planned base power generation amount Xf−reserve power generation amount Xv−power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation step is performed in step S56, the power generation revenue calculation step in the second operation plan formulation step is completed.

この発電収益算出行程が完了した後は、発電収益算出行程で算出された発電収益が最適となる計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を算出する最適運転条件算出行程(ステップS57)と、最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を提示する最適運転条件提示行程(ステップS58)とを経て、第2の運転計画策定行程(ステップS7)は完了する。そして、第2の運転計画策定行程の完了をもって、第2の運転計画提示処理手順は完了する(END)。   After the power generation revenue calculation process is completed, an optimal operation condition calculation process (step S57) for calculating a plan-based power generation amount and a reserve power generation amount at which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation revenue calculation process is optimal, and an optimal operation The second operation plan formulation process (step S7) is completed through the optimum operation condition presentation process (step S58) for presenting the operation conditions calculated in the condition calculation process. Then, upon completion of the second operation plan formulation process, the second operation plan presentation processing procedure is completed (END).

このような発電設備2の運用管理支援方法(第2の運転計画策定処理手順)によれば、寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格、予備力使用確率および計画外設備停止リスクコストの情報に基づいて収益をあげるのに最適と考えられる発電設備2の運転条件をユーザ(発電設備運用者)に提示するので、ユーザの意思決定を支援し、運用リスクとなる寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストを考慮した発電設備2の運用を実現することができる。   According to such an operation management support method (second operation plan formulation processing procedure) of the power generation facility 2, it is based on the information on the life consumption cost, the reserve market price, the reserve use probability, and the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost. Because the operating conditions of the power generation facility 2 that is considered to be optimal for generating profits are presented to the user (power generation facility operator), the user's decision making is supported, and the lifetime consumption costs and unplanned facility outage risks that become operational risks Operation of the power generation facility 2 in consideration of costs can be realized.

本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法(第2の運転計画策定処理手順)およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムによれば、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することができるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと比較して、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method (second operation plan formulation processing procedure) and the program for causing the computer to execute the operation management support method according to the third embodiment of the present invention, the operation risk Since the power generation cost C can be calculated by taking into account the unplanned equipment outage risk cost (insurance fee) as the cost, it is more economically or socially more optimal than the power generation equipment operation management support system 1A. The power generation facility 2 can be operated.

[第4の実施形態]
図12に本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dを含めた発電設備2の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図を示す。
[Fourth Embodiment]
FIG. 12 schematically shows an operation management example of the power generation facility 2 including the power generation facility operation management support system 1D which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention. A schematic diagram is shown.

図12に示す本発明の第4の実施形態の適用例によれば、第3の実施形態の適用例に対して、発電設備2の計画外設備停止リスクをリスクヘッジする手段として保険サービスを提供する処理行程(以下、保険サービス提供処理行程とする)を電子計算機11に実行させる保険サービス提供PG60をさらに備える点で異なるが、その他の点は本質的に異ならない。従って、第3の実施形態と異ならない箇所については、同一の符号を付して説明を省略する。   According to the application example of the fourth embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 12, the insurance service is provided as a means for risk hedging the unplanned facility stoppage risk of the power generation facility 2 with respect to the application example of the third embodiment. This is different in that it further includes an insurance service provision PG 60 that causes the electronic computer 11 to execute a process to be performed (hereinafter referred to as an insurance service provision process), but the other points are essentially not different. Accordingly, portions that are not different from those of the third embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals and description thereof is omitted.

また、図12に示す発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dは、電子計算機(コンピュータ)6が本発明の第4の実施形態に係る運用管理支援方法(総合運用管理支援処理手順)を実行させるプログラム、すなわち、第3の運用管理PG50および保険サービス提供PG60を読み取ることで、電子計算機11(ハードウェア)と第3の運用管理PG50および保険サービス提供PG60(ソフトウェア)とが協働し、機能構成が実現され、総合運用管理支援処理手順を実行する。   Further, the power generation facility operation management support system 1D shown in FIG. 12 is a program that causes the computer (computer) 6 to execute the operation management support method (total operation management support processing procedure) according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention, that is, By reading the third operation management PG 50 and the insurance service provision PG 60, the electronic computer 11 (hardware), the third operation management PG 50 and the insurance service provision PG 60 (software) cooperate, and the functional configuration is realized. Execute the general operation management support processing procedure.

図13に本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備の運用管理支援システムの一実施例である発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図を示す。   FIG. 13 is a functional block diagram schematically showing a functional configuration of a power generation facility operation management support system 1D which is an example of the power generation facility operation management support system according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.

発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dの機能構成は、大別すると、第3の実施形態と本質的に異ならない発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cに相当する機能構成手段(図13において詳細の構成は省略し、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cと示す)と、発電設備2の計画外設備停止リスクをリスクヘッジする手段として保険サービスを提供する機能構成手段(以下、保険サービス提供手段とする)60とを具備している。ここでは、第3の実施形態と異なる保険サービス提供手段65について説明する。   The functional configuration of the power generation facility operation management support system 1D is broadly divided into functional configuration means corresponding to the power generation facility operation management support system 1C that is not essentially different from the third embodiment (detailed configuration is omitted in FIG. 13). Power generation facility operation management support system 1C) and functional component means (hereinafter referred to as insurance service provision means) 60 for providing insurance services as means for risk hedging unplanned facility stoppage risks of power generation facilities 2 doing. Here, an insurance service providing unit 65 different from the third embodiment will be described.

保険サービス提供手段65は、第3の実施形態で説明した保険サービス業者52に相当する保険サービスの提供を行うものである。尚、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dでは、保険サービス提供手段65が、予備力を確保するべく積極的に定格オーバー運転を行う発電設備運用者をより適切な形で支援する保険サービスを提供する。   The insurance service providing unit 65 provides an insurance service corresponding to the insurance service provider 52 described in the third embodiment. In the power generation facility operation management support system 1D, the insurance service providing means 65 provides an insurance service that more appropriately supports the power generation facility operator who actively performs the rated over operation in order to ensure reserve capacity.

より具体的には、従来のように申込時においてのみ決済を行う方法ではなく、申込時に初期決済を行い、申込後のある時期とにおいて少なくとも1度以上の決済(以下、事後決済とする)を行う方法を採用する。これは、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力という市場商品の性質上、申込時(初期決済時)の予備力発電量と実績(事後決済時)の予備力発電量とが乖離することが少なくないこと、また、発電設備2に与えるリスクの大小が、実際の発電の有無、または発電量により大きく変化するためである。   More specifically, instead of the conventional method of making a payment only at the time of application, the initial payment is made at the time of application, and at least once payment (hereinafter referred to as post-settlement) at a certain time after application is made. Adopt the method to do. This is due to the nature of the market product, reserve capacity that cannot be determined until it is time to actually generate electricity, and reserve capacity at the time of application (at the time of initial settlement) and reserve capacity at the time of actual settlement (at the time of subsequent settlement). This is because the amount of generated power often deviates from the amount of power generation, and the magnitude of the risk given to the power generation facility 2 varies greatly depending on whether or not there is actual power generation or the amount of power generation.

図13によれば、保険サービス提供手段65は、保険の見積または申込を受け付ける保険申込受付部68と、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価部69と、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が査定し評価した計画外設備停止リスクから計画外設備停止リスクコストとしての保険料金を算出する保険料金算出部70と、再度、事後的に保険料金を再算定した際に生じた差額を算定し出力する差額算出部71と、保険の決済を実行する保険決済実行部72とを備える。   According to FIG. 13, the insurance service providing means 65 includes an insurance application accepting unit 68 that accepts an estimate or application for insurance, an unplanned facility outage risk evaluation unit 69 that assesses and evaluates an unplanned facility outage risk, and an unplanned facility. Occurs when the insurance fee calculation unit 70 calculates the insurance fee as the unplanned facility shutdown risk cost from the unplanned facility shutdown risk assessed and evaluated by the shutdown risk evaluation unit 69, and when the insurance fee is recalculated afterwards. A difference calculation unit 71 that calculates and outputs the difference, and an insurance settlement execution unit 72 that executes insurance settlement.

保険申込受付部68は、通信ネットワーク回線8を介してユーザ(発電設備運用者)から保険契約の際に必要な保険料金の見積依頼または保険契約の申込を受け付ける。   The insurance application accepting unit 68 accepts an estimate request for an insurance fee or an application for an insurance contract from a user (power generation facility operator) via the communication network line 8 when making an insurance contract.

計画外設備停止リスク評価部69は、発電設備2の寿命消費コストの他に、予備力確保のために定格オーバー運転を施すことによる発電設備2そのもののトラブル、故障、緊急遮断など発電が続行できなくなることによる市場機会損失コスト、運用契約上のペナルティコスト、異常状態からの復帰に必要なコスト、設備補修、メンテナンスのコスト等を含めた発電設備2の計画外設備停止時の損失コストと、発電設備2の計画外設備停止の発生確率とを用いて、発電設備2の計画外設備停止時の損失コストの期待値(以下、損失コスト期待値とする)を求め、求めた損失コスト期待値の大小で計画外設備停止リスクの評価を行う。   The unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 can continue power generation such as trouble, failure, emergency shut-off of the power generation equipment 2 itself by performing over-rated operation to ensure reserve capacity in addition to the lifetime consumption cost of the power generation equipment 2 Loss of market opportunity loss due to loss, cost of penalty for operating contract, cost required for recovery from abnormal condition, cost of repairing equipment, maintenance cost, etc. Using the probability of occurrence of unplanned equipment outage of facility 2, the expected loss cost (hereinafter referred to as loss cost expected value) at the time of unplanned equipment outage of power generation facility 2 is obtained, Evaluate the risk of unplanned equipment outages at large and small.

計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が算出する発電設備2の計画外設備停止時の損失コスト期待値は、
[数16]
損失コスト期待値=計画外設備停止確率×計画外設備停止時損失コスト……(16)
で求めることができ、発電設備2の計画外設備停止時の損失コストおよび発電設備2の計画外設備停止の発生確率は、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が運転履歴DB18から運転履歴情報を取得して、取得した運転履歴情報から求める。
The expected loss cost when the unplanned equipment outage of the power generation equipment 2 calculated by the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 is
[Equation 16]
Expected loss cost = Unplanned equipment outage probability x Unplanned equipment outage loss cost (16)
The non-planned facility outage risk evaluation unit 69 obtains the operation history information from the operation history DB 18 for the loss cost at the time of unplanned facility outage of the power generation facility 2 and the probability of occurrence of the unplanned facility outage of the power generation facility 2. And obtained from the acquired driving history information.

また、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69は、取得した運転履歴情報に基づいて損失コスト期待値を求めるため、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)が保険契約する前(初期決済額算定用)のみならず、保険契約後(事後決済額算定用)であっても、計画外設備停止リスクの評価を行うことができる。   In addition, the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 obtains an expected loss cost value based on the acquired operation history information, so that not only before the user (power generation equipment operator) makes an insurance contract (for initial settlement amount calculation). Even after insurance contracts (for post-settlement calculation), it is possible to evaluate unplanned facility outage risk.

計画外設備停止リスク評価部69は、保険契約用に計画外設備停止リスクとしての損失コスト期待値(以下、事前損失コスト期待値とする)RC1を算出する。事前損失コスト期待値RC1は、保険契約以前の運転履歴情報を運転履歴DB18から取得して算出する。ここで、発電量(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xv)Xf+Xvにおいて、計画外設備停止確率を
[数17]
計画外設備停止確率(Xf+Xv) ……(17)
計画外設備停止時損失コストを
[数18]
計画外設備停止時損失コスト(Xf+Xv) ……(18)
とすれば、上述した式(16)、式(17)および式(18)を用いて、
[数19]
事前損失コスト期待値RC1=計画外設備停止確率(Xf+Xv)×
計画外設備停止時損失コスト(Xf+Xv)……(19)
となる。
The unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 calculates a loss cost expectation value (hereinafter referred to as a prior loss cost expectation value) RC1 as an unplanned equipment outage risk for an insurance contract. The prior loss cost expectation value RC1 is obtained by obtaining the driving history information before the insurance contract from the driving history DB 18. Here, in the power generation amount (= plan base power generation amount Xf + reserve power generation amount Xv) Xf + Xv, the unplanned facility stoppage probability is
[Equation 17]
Unplanned equipment outage probability (Xf + Xv) (17)
Loss costs for unplanned equipment outages
[Equation 18]
Unplanned facility loss cost (Xf + Xv) (18)
Then, using the above-described equation (16), equation (17), and equation (18),
[Equation 19]
Expected prior loss cost RC1 = Unplanned equipment outage probability (Xf + Xv) x
Unplanned equipment loss cost (Xf + Xv) ...... (19)
It becomes.

一方、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69は、発電設備2を運用した後に予備力発電量の実績に応じて、発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスクを事後的に再度評価する。再評価時に算出される損失コスト期待値(以下、事後損失コスト期待値とする)RC2は、発電量(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xvo)Xf+Xvoにおいて、
計画外設備停止確率を
[数20]
計画外設備停止確率(Xf+Xvo) ……(20)
計画外設備停止時損失コストを
[数21]
計画外設備停止時損失コスト(Xf+Xvo) ……(21)
とすれば、上述した式(16)、式(20)および式(21)を用いて、
[数22]
事後損失コスト期待値RC2=計画外設備停止確率(Xf+Xvo)×
計画外設備停止時損失コスト(Xf+Xvo)……(22)
となる。ここで、Xvoは、予備力として確保した発電量のうち実際に発電された発電量であり、0≦Xvo≦Xvとなる変数である。
On the other hand, the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluation unit 69 evaluates again the unplanned facility stoppage risk given to the power generation facility 2 according to the actual amount of reserve power generation after operating the power generation facility 2. The expected loss cost value calculated at the time of re-evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the a posteriori loss cost expectation value) RC2 is the power generation amount (= plan-based power generation amount Xf + reserve power generation amount Xvo) Xf + Xvo.
Unplanned equipment outage probability
[Equation 20]
Unplanned equipment outage probability (Xf + Xvo) (20)
Loss costs for unplanned equipment outages
[Equation 21]
Unplanned equipment loss loss (Xf + Xvo) (21)
Then, using the above-described equation (16), equation (20), and equation (21),
[Equation 22]
Expected loss cost RC2 = Unplanned equipment outage probability (Xf + Xvo) x
Unplanned equipment outage loss cost (Xf + Xvo) (22)
It becomes. Here, Xvo is a power generation amount actually generated out of the power generation amount secured as the reserve power, and is a variable satisfying 0 ≦ Xvo ≦ Xv.

保険料金算出部70は、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が評価した計画外設備停止リスク(例えば、事前損失コスト期待値RC1)を用いて保険料金を算出する。保険料金の算出は、保険料金算出部70が計画外設備停止リスクと保険料金の金額とが対応した保険料金テーブル73を参照することで行う。   The insurance fee calculation unit 70 calculates the insurance fee using the unplanned facility shutdown risk (for example, the prior loss cost expectation value RC1) evaluated by the unplanned facility shutdown risk evaluation unit 69. The insurance fee calculation unit 70 refers to the insurance fee table 73 in which the unplanned facility stoppage risk and the amount of the insurance fee correspond to each other.

保険料金算出部70が保険料金を算出すると、算出した保険料金を表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に出力し、ユーザに提示する。尚、事前損失コスト期待値RC1を用いて算出される保険料金(以下、事前保険料金とする)および再度評価して得られた事後損失コスト期待値RC2を用いて見直した保険料金(以下、事後保険料金とする)は、
[数23]
事前保険料金=BMFCost(Xf+Xv)
[数24]
事後保険料金=AMFCost(Xf+Xvo)
とする。
When the insurance fee calculation unit 70 calculates the insurance fee, the calculated insurance fee is output to the operator terminal 9 as display means and presented to the user. The insurance fee calculated using the expected loss cost RC1 (hereinafter referred to as “pre-insurance fee”) and the insurance fee revised using the expected loss cost RC2 obtained by re-evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the subsequent Insurance fee)
[Equation 23]
Advance insurance fee = BMFCost (Xf + Xv)
[Equation 24]
Subsequent insurance fee = AMFCost (Xf + Xvo)
And

また、保険料金算出部70は、保険料金を算出すると、算出した結果を保険契約料金DB74に記録する。保険契約料金DB74は、例えばデータ記録手段14等のデータ記録手段に格納されており、保険料金算出部70が書き込み可能な状態におかれており、保険料金算出部70が算出した保険料金を発電設備2、算出した日時および保険金額とを関連付けて記録する。   Further, when calculating the insurance fee, the insurance fee calculating unit 70 records the calculated result in the insurance contract fee DB 74. The insurance contract fee DB 74 is stored in the data recording means such as the data recording means 14 and is in a state in which the insurance fee calculation unit 70 is writable, and the insurance fee calculated by the insurance fee calculation unit 70 is generated. The facility 2, the calculated date and time, and the insurance amount are recorded in association with each other.

差額算出部71は、再度評価した場合において、再評価して得られた事後保険料金と事前保険料金との差額を算出する。差額を生じた場合、その金額を保険決済実行部72が受け取り、事後決済を行う。差額を算出する際に必要となる事前保険料金および事後保険料金は、差額算出部71が保険契約料金DB74を読み出して取得する。差額算出部71が差額を算出し、差額を生じている場合には、差額を表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に出力することでユーザに提示するとともに保険決済実行部72に差額の情報を渡す。   The difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference between the post-insurance premium and the pre-insurance premium obtained by re-evaluation when the difference is evaluated again. When a difference is generated, the insurance settlement execution unit 72 receives the amount and performs subsequent settlement. The pre-insurance fee and the post-insurance fee required for calculating the difference are acquired by the difference calculation unit 71 by reading the insurance contract fee DB 74. The difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference, and when the difference is generated, the difference is output to the operator terminal 9 as a display unit to be presented to the user and the difference information is passed to the insurance settlement execution unit 72.

保険決済実行部72は決済を実行する。保険契約時になされる初期決済では、契約の申込があると、ユーザに提示した保険金額、すなわち、事前保険料金の金額で決済を行う。また、契約後、事後的に計画外設備停止リスク(事後損失コスト期待値RC2)を再評価し、事前損失コスト期待値RC1に基づき算出された事前保険料金と事後損失コスト期待値RC2に基づき算出された事後保険料金との間に差額を生じた場合には、差額算出部71が算出した差額を受け取り、事後決済を行う。事後決済時には、差額算出部71が算出した差額が事後決済時にユーザ(保険加入者)にキャッシュバックされる。   The insurance settlement execution unit 72 executes settlement. In the initial settlement performed at the time of insurance contract, when an application for the contract is made, the settlement is made with the amount of insurance presented to the user, that is, the amount of the pre-insurance fee. In addition, after the contract, the unplanned facility outage risk (ex-post loss cost expected value RC2) is re-evaluated and calculated based on the pre-insurance fee calculated based on the pre-loss cost expected value RC1 and the post-loss cost expected value RC2. If there is a difference between the calculated post-mortem insurance fee, the difference calculated by the difference calculating unit 71 is received and post-settlement is performed. At the time of subsequent settlement, the difference calculated by the difference calculation unit 71 is cashed back to the user (insurance subscriber) at the time of subsequent settlement.

このように構成される保険サービス提供手段65によれば、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)が保険を申し込んで初期決済として事前保険料金を支払った後、実際に発電した予備力発電量の実績に応じて、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスク(事後損失コスト期待値RC2)を再評価し、保険料金算出部70が再評価の結果に基づき事後保険料金を再算定した後、事前保険料金と事後保険料金との差額を差額算出部71が算出するので、差額を生じた場合には事後決済を行うことができる。   According to the insurance service providing means 65 configured as described above, after the user (power generation facility operator) applies for insurance and pays the pre-insurance fee as the initial settlement, it responds to the actual amount of reserve power generation actually generated. Then, the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 re-evaluates the unplanned equipment outage risk given to the power generation facility 2 (the posterior loss cost expected value RC2), and the insurance fee calculation unit 70 calculates the posterior insurance fee based on the result of the reevaluation. After the recalculation, the difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference between the pre-insurance premium and the post-insurance premium, so that the post-settlement can be performed when the difference occurs.

事後決済できることで、発電設備2等が実際に負ったリスクと負担する保険料金とが適切なバランスに調整され、従来の申込時に1度だけ決済を行う保険サービス提供方法のように、ユーザが発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスクに対して不当に高額な保険料金コストを負担することがなくなる。   By making subsequent payments, the risk that the power generation facility 2 etc. actually bears and the insurance fee to be borne are adjusted to an appropriate balance, and the user generates power as in the insurance service provision method in which payment is made only once in the conventional application. An unreasonably high insurance premium cost is not borne for the unplanned equipment outage risk given to the equipment 2.

特に、申込当初の事前損失コストRC1と事後評価段階において実際の予備力発電実績から評価される事後損失コスト期待値RC2との間に大きな差が生じる場合には、その効果は大きく、事後決済によって、ユーザの保険料金負担が実際に負っているリスクと妥当なバランスに調整された額となるので、ユーザに対して事業的に非常に有効なリスクヘッジ手段としての保険サービスを提供することができる。   In particular, when there is a large difference between the initial loss cost RC1 at the initial application and the expected loss cost RC2 evaluated from the actual reserve power generation performance at the post-evaluation stage, the effect is significant. Because the user's insurance fee burden is adjusted to a reasonable balance with the risk that the user actually bears, the insurance service can be provided as a risk hedging method that is very effective for the business. .

このような保険サービス提供手段65を具備する発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dによれば、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することができるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと比較して、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system 1D provided with such an insurance service providing means 65, the power generation cost C can be calculated by adding the unplanned facility stoppage risk cost (insurance fee) as the operation risk cost. Compared with the power generation facility operation management support system 1A, the power generation facility 2 can be operated in an economically or socially more optimal state.

また、計画外設備停止リスクコストとしての保険料金は、実際に予備力が生じるか否かで見直しを行い、計画外設備停止リスクの低減分を考慮して見直しの結果を反映した事後決済を行うので、ユーザが実際に負ったリスクと負担する保険料金とを妥当なバランスで調整することができる。   In addition, insurance fees as unplanned equipment outage risk costs are reviewed based on whether reserves are actually generated, and post-payment settlement reflecting the results of the review, taking into account the reduction in unplanned equipment outage risks. Therefore, the risk actually incurred by the user and the insurance fee to be borne can be adjusted with a reasonable balance.

従って、従来の申込時に1度だけ決済を行う保険サービス提供方法のように、ユーザが発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスクに対して不当に高額な保険料金コストを負担することがなくなり、予備力確保の際のリスクヘッジ手段として事業的に有効な保険サービスを提供することができ、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力の確保を前提とした発電設備2の運用を支援することができる。   Therefore, unlike the insurance service provision method in which payment is made only once at the time of the conventional application, there is no need to bear an unreasonably high insurance fee cost for the unplanned equipment outage risk given to the power generation equipment 2. A power generation facility 2 that can provide a business-effective insurance service as a risk hedging means when securing power, and that reserve power cannot be determined unless it is the time to actually generate power Can be supported.

尚、本実施形態では、読み出して電子計算機11が実行するPGは、第3の運用管理PG50と保険サービス提供PG60とであるが、第3の運用管理PG50および保険サービス提供PG60を1つのPGで構成していても差し支えない。   In this embodiment, the PG that is read and executed by the computer 11 is the third operation management PG 50 and the insurance service provision PG 60, but the third operation management PG 50 and the insurance service provision PG 60 are one PG. It can be configured.

また、保険決済実行部72は、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が計画外設備停止リスクを再評価し差額算出部71が差額を算出すると、事後決済を行うとしているが、必ずしも、差額算出部71が差額を算出する度に事後決済することを要しない。最終的には契約期間内に生じた差額の合計を保険決済実行部72が決済していればよいので、例えば、1年契約の保険で事後的に行う再評価を1月毎に計12回実施しつつ、事後決済は保険契約満了日等に再評価時に生じた差額の合計をまとめて1回で決済するようにしても良い。   In addition, the insurance settlement execution unit 72 performs post-settlement when the unplanned facility outage risk evaluation unit 69 re-evaluates the unplanned facility outage risk and the difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference. It is not necessary to make a subsequent settlement each time 71 calculates the difference. Eventually, it is only necessary that the insurance settlement execution unit 72 settles the total difference generated during the contract period, so, for example, a total of 12 re-evaluations performed once a month with insurance for a one-year contract While being implemented, the post-settlement may be settled once by summing up the total difference generated at the time of re-evaluation on the expiration date of the insurance contract.

従って、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が計画外設備停止リスクを再評価する回数(=差額算出部71が差額を算出する回数)と、保険決済実行部72が決済を実行する回数とは必ずしも一致していないし、一致していなくても構わない。   Therefore, the number of times that the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 reevaluates the unplanned equipment outage risk (= the number of times the difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference) and the number of times that the insurance settlement execution unit 72 executes settlement are not necessarily the same. It does not need to match or does not need to match.

さらに、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dは、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Cに相当する機能構成手段と、保険サービス提供手段65とを具備するが、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dを保険サービス提供手段65のみを具備する形態としても良い。この場合、予備力確保の際の事業的に有効なリスクヘッジ手段としての保険サービスを提供することで発電設備2の運用管理を支援する発電設備運用管理支援システムとなる。   Furthermore, the power generation facility operation management support system 1D includes a functional configuration unit corresponding to the power generation facility operation management support system 1C and an insurance service providing unit 65. The power generation facility operation management support system 1D includes the insurance service provision unit 65. It is good also as a form which comprises only. In this case, the power generation facility operation management support system that supports the operation management of the power generation facility 2 by providing an insurance service as a business-effective risk hedging means for securing reserve capacity.

次に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての総合運用管理支援処理手順について説明する。   Next, a comprehensive operation management support processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1D will be described.

図14は、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法としての総合運用管理支援処理手順について順番を追って説明する説明図(処理フロー図)である。   FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram (processing flow diagram) for explaining the overall operation management support processing procedure as a power generation facility operation management support method performed in the power generation facility operation management support system 1D in order.

図14によれば、総合運用管理支援処理手順は、第3の実施形態で説明した第2の運転条件提示処理手順に加えて、保険サービス提供行程(ステップS8)を具備する。従って、本実施形態においては、既に説明済みの第2の運転条件提示処理手順については、説明を省略する。   According to FIG. 14, the comprehensive operation management support processing procedure includes an insurance service provision process (step S8) in addition to the second operating condition presentation processing procedure described in the third embodiment. Therefore, in the present embodiment, the description of the second operating condition presentation processing procedure that has already been described is omitted.

図14によれば、保険サービス提供行程(ステップS8)は、保険の見積依頼を受け付ける保険受付処理ステップ(ステップS81)と、保険の見積依頼を受けて提供された保険の対象となる発電設備2について過去の運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップ(ステップS82)と、計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップで評価された計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を見積し見積結果を出力する保険料金見積結果出力ステップ(ステップS83)と、見積した保険料金(事前保険料金)での保険の申込を受け付ける保険申込受付ステップ(ステップS84)と、保険の申込を受け付けた後、保険料金の初期決済を行う保険料金初期決済処理ステップ(ステップS85)とを備える。   According to FIG. 14, the insurance service provision process (step S8) includes an insurance reception processing step (step S81) for receiving an insurance quote request, and a power generation facility 2 that is the target of insurance provided upon receiving the insurance quote request. An unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step (step S82) for assessing and evaluating unplanned equipment outage risk from past operation history information, and an insurance fee from the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step An insurance fee estimate result output step (step S83) for outputting an estimated estimate result, an insurance application acceptance step (step S84) for accepting an insurance application at the estimated insurance fee (pre-insurance fee), and an insurance application Thereafter, an insurance fee initial settlement processing step (step S85) for performing initial settlement of the insurance fee is provided.

また、保険サービス提供行程(ステップS8)は、初期決済を行った後に、保険の対象となる発電設備2について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップ(ステップS86)と、計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップで評価した計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を再算定する保険料金再算定ステップ(ステップS87)と、保険料金再算定ステップで再算定した保険料金(事後保険料金)と事前保険料金との差額を算出して事後決済を行う事後決済処理ステップ(ステップS88)とをさらに備える。   In the insurance service provision process (step S8), after the initial settlement, the operation history information after the insurance contract is acquired for the power generation equipment 2 to be insured, and the risk of unplanned equipment stoppage is assessed again and evaluated. An unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step (step S86), an insurance fee recalculation step (step S87) for recalculating the insurance fee from the unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step, and an insurance The method further includes a post-settlement processing step (step S88) in which the difference between the insurance premium (post-mortem insurance fee) recalculated in the fee re-calculation step and the pre-insurance premium is calculated and post-settlement is performed.

このような保険サービス提供行程(ステップS8)と第2の運転条件提示処理手順とを具備する総合運用管理支援処理手順は、発電設備2について運転条件の提示および積極的な予備力確保に適したリスクヘッジ手段としての保険サービスの提供を通じて発電設備2の運用管理を総合的に支援することができる。   The comprehensive operation management support processing procedure including the insurance service provision process (step S8) and the second operation condition presentation processing procedure is suitable for presenting the operation conditions and ensuring active reserve for the power generation facility 2. It is possible to comprehensively support the operation management of the power generation facility 2 through provision of insurance services as risk hedging means.

総合運用管理支援処理手順における処理順序を概説すると、最初に保険サービス提供行程(ステップS8)のうちステップS81〜ステップS83までがなされ、保険を申し込む際の保険料金が算出される。次に、第2の運転条件提示処理手順がなされ、計画外設備停止リスクコストとして保険料金を加味して発電設備2をより最適に近い状態で運転するための運転条件がオペレータ端末9に提示される。   When the processing order in the comprehensive operation management support processing procedure is outlined, first, steps S81 to S83 are performed in the insurance service provision process (step S8), and an insurance fee for applying for insurance is calculated. Next, the second operating condition presentation processing procedure is performed, and the operating conditions for operating the power generation facility 2 in a more nearly optimal state taking into account the insurance fee as an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost are presented to the operator terminal 9. The

その次に、ステップS84〜ステップS85がなされ、初期決済が完了する。その後は、ステップS86〜ステップS88がなされ、保険契約満了時等のタイミングで事後的に保険料金の再算定がなされ、再算定額に応じて事後決済が完了する。   Next, steps S84 to S85 are performed, and the initial settlement is completed. Thereafter, Steps S86 to S88 are performed, and the insurance fee is recalculated afterwards at the timing of the expiration of the insurance contract, and the subsequent settlement is completed according to the recalculated amount.

総合運用管理支援処理手順では、まず、保険見積受付ステップで保険申込受付部68がユーザからの保険の見積を受け付ける(ステップS81)。保険の見積を受け付けると、続いて、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が提供された運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクRC1を査定し評価する(ステップS82)。提供された運転履歴情報は、データ記録手段14に運転履歴DB18として格納されており、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69は格納された運転履歴DB18を読み出すことで必要な運転履歴情報を取得する。   In the comprehensive operation management support processing procedure, first, the insurance application receiving unit 68 receives an insurance estimate from the user in the insurance estimate receiving step (step S81). When the insurance estimate is accepted, the unplanned equipment stoppage risk evaluation unit 69 subsequently assesses and evaluates the unplanned equipment stoppage risk RC1 from the provided operation history information (step S82). The provided operation history information is stored as the operation history DB 18 in the data recording unit 14, and the unplanned equipment stoppage risk evaluation unit 69 reads the stored operation history DB 18 to obtain necessary operation history information.

計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が提供された運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクRC1を査定し評価すると、続いて、保険料金算出部70が評価された計画外設備停止リスクRC1から保険料金を見積し、見積された事前保険料金をオペレータ端末9に出力する(ステップS83)。また、この際に、併せて、保険契約料金DB74へのデータ記録がなされる。   If the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 assesses and evaluates the unplanned equipment outage risk RC1 from the provided operation history information, then the insurance fee calculation unit 70 calculates the insurance fee from the unplanned equipment outage risk RC1. Estimate and output the estimated pre-insurance fee to the operator terminal 9 (step S83). At this time, data is recorded in the insurance contract fee DB 74 at the same time.

ユーザは、オペレータ端末9に表示される保険料金の見積金額を見た上で、次に、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dに第2の運転条件提示処理手順を実行させる。第2の運転条件提示処理手順が完了すると、発電設備2をより最適な状態で運用管理するための運転条件がオペレータ端末9に表示される。この時、表示される運転条件、すなわち、発電量(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xv)をユーザは確認した上で、確認した運転条件に対応する保険をオペレータ端末9を介して申し込みを行う。   The user next causes the power generation facility operation management support system 1D to execute the second operating condition presentation processing procedure after seeing the estimated amount of the insurance fee displayed on the operator terminal 9. When the second operating condition presentation processing procedure is completed, operating conditions for operating and managing the power generation facility 2 in a more optimal state are displayed on the operator terminal 9. At this time, the user confirms the displayed operating conditions, that is, the power generation amount (= plan-based power generation amount Xf + reserve power generation amount Xv), and then applies for insurance corresponding to the confirmed operation conditions via the operator terminal 9. I do.

オペレータ端末9でなされた申し込み操作は、通信ネットワーク回線8を介して発電設備運用管理支援システム1Dが受け取り、保険申込受付部68が事前保険料金での保険の申込を受け付ける(ステップS84でYESの場合)。そして、保険決済実行部72が初期決済として事前保険料金の決済を行う(ステップS85)。   The application operation performed at the operator terminal 9 is received by the power generation facility operation management support system 1D via the communication network line 8, and the insurance application reception unit 68 receives an application for insurance at a pre-insurance fee (in the case of YES in step S84) ). Then, the insurance settlement execution unit 72 settles a pre-insurance fee as an initial settlement (step S85).

保険決済実行部72が初期決済を行った後は、計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が保険の対象となる発電設備2について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクRC2を査定し評価する(ステップS86)。計画外設備停止リスクRC2を査定し評価するタイミングは任意であるが、ここでは、一例として、保険契約期間満了日締めで1回行うものとする。   After the insurance settlement execution unit 72 makes the initial settlement, the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluation unit 69 acquires the operation history information after the insurance contract for the power generation facility 2 to be insured, and again unplanned facility stoppage risk. RC2 is assessed and evaluated (step S86). The timing for evaluating and evaluating the unplanned equipment outage risk RC2 is arbitrary, but here, as an example, it is assumed that it is performed once with the expiration date of the insurance contract period.

計画外設備停止リスクRC2が再評価されると、保険料金算出部70が再評価された計画外設備停止リスクRC2に基づいて保険料金の再算定を行う(ステップS87)。保険料金(事後保険料金)が再算定されると、続いて、差額算出部71が事後保険料金と事前保険料金とがいくらであるかを保険契約料金DB74から取得し、両者の差額を算出する。差額算出部71が算出した差額の情報は、保険決済実行部72が受け取り、ユーザ(保険加入者)にキャッシュバック等して還元する事後決済がなされる(ステップS88)。事後決済がなされると、総合運用管理支援処理手順は完了する(END)。   When the unplanned equipment outage risk RC2 is re-evaluated, the insurance fee calculation unit 70 recalculates the insurance fee based on the re-evaluated unplanned equipment outage risk RC2 (step S87). When the insurance fee (post-insurance fee) is recalculated, the difference calculation unit 71 then obtains how much the post-insurance fee and the pre-insurance fee are from the insurance contract fee DB 74 and calculates the difference between the two. . The difference information calculated by the difference calculation unit 71 is received by the insurance settlement execution unit 72, and a subsequent settlement is performed by cashing back to the user (insurance subscriber) (step S88). When the subsequent settlement is made, the comprehensive operation management support processing procedure is completed (END).

尚、ユーザが、表示される運転条件(=計画ベース発電量Xf+予備力発電量Xv)を確認した上で、確認した運転条件に対応する保険をオペレータ端末9を介して申し込まない場合については(ステップS84でNOの場合)、基本的には申込があることを前提としているので、特に決まった処理規定は設けないが、例えば、一定期間経過後に作成したユーザの保険契約料金データを消去する(ステップS89)等の処理を実行する。   In the case where the user confirms the displayed operating condition (= planned base power generation amount Xf + standby power generation amount Xv) and does not apply for insurance corresponding to the confirmed operating condition via the operator terminal 9 ( In the case of NO in step S84), since it is basically assumed that there is an application, there is no specific processing rule, but for example, the user's insurance contract fee data created after a certain period of time is deleted ( Processing such as step S89) is executed.

このような発電設備2の運用管理支援方法(総合運用管理支援処理手順)によれば、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)が保険を申し込み、保険料金初期決済処理ステップ(ステップS85)において、初期決済として事前保険料金が決済した後においても、実際に発電した予備力発電量の実績に応じて、設備停止リスク再評価ステップ(ステップS86)で計画外設備停止リスク評価部69が計画外発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスク(事後損失コスト期待値)RC2を再評価し、保険料金再算定ステップ(ステップS87)で保険料金算出部70が事後保険料金を再算定し、事後決済処理ステップ(ステップS88)で差額算出部71が事前保険料金と事後保険料金との差額を算出し、差額が生じている場合には、保険決済実行部72がその差額を事後決済することができる。   According to such operation management support method (general operation management support processing procedure) of the power generation facility 2, the user (power generation facility operator) applies for insurance, and in the insurance fee initial settlement processing step (step S85), as the initial settlement Even after the pre-insurance fee has been settled, the unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit 69 changes the unplanned power generation equipment 2 in the equipment outage risk re-evaluation step (step S86) according to the actual amount of reserve power generation generated. The unplanned facility outage risk (expected loss cost expected value) RC2 to be given is re-evaluated, and the insurance fee calculation unit 70 recalculates the subsequent insurance fee in the insurance fee recalculation step (step S87), and the subsequent settlement processing step (step S88). ), The difference calculation unit 71 calculates the difference between the pre-insurance premium and the post-insurance premium. If there is a difference, the insurance settlement execution unit 72 The difference can be post-settlement.

事後決済できることで、発電設備2等が実際に負ったリスクと負担する保険料金とが適切なバランスに調整され、従来の申込時に1度だけ決済を行う保険サービス提供方法のように、発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスクに対して不当に高額な保険料金コストを負担することがなくなる。従って、ユーザに対して、事業的に有効なリスクヘッジ手段としての保険サービスが提供でき、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力の確保を前提とした発電設備2の運用を支援することができる。   The ability to make subsequent settlements adjusts the appropriate balance between the risks actually incurred by the power generation facilities 2 and the insurance premiums, and the power generation facilities No unreasonably high insurance premium costs will be incurred against the risk of unplanned equipment outages. Therefore, it is possible to provide a user with an insurance service as a risk hedging means that is effective in business, and the power generation facility 2 is based on the premise of securing reserve power that cannot be determined unless the time is actually generated. Can be supported.

また、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することができるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと比較して、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用することができる。   In addition, since the power generation cost C can be calculated taking into account the unplanned equipment outage risk cost (insurance fee) as the operation risk cost, it is more economically or socially optimal than the power generation equipment operation management support system 1A. The power generation facility 2 can be operated in a state close to.

尚、計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップ(ステップS86)において、計画外設備停止リスクRC2を査定し評価するタイミングは一例として、保険契約期間満了日締めで1回としたが、このタイミングは任意で良い。また、事後決済処理ステップ(ステップS88)は、少なくとも1回以上行われ、保険契約期間中に生じた事前保険料と事後保険料との差額の合計がきちんと決済されれば良い。   In the unplanned equipment outage risk reevaluation step (step S86), the timing for assessing and evaluating the unplanned equipment outage risk RC2 is, for example, once at the expiration date of the insurance contract period, but this timing is optional. good. Further, the post settlement processing step (step S88) is performed at least once, and the total difference between the pre-insurance premium and the post-insurance premium generated during the insurance contract period may be settled properly.

本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法(総合運用管理支援処理手順)および運用管理支援方法を実行させるプログラムによれば、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することができるので、発電設備運用管理支援システム1Aと比較して、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用することができる。   According to the power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method (total operation management support processing procedure), and the program for executing the operation management support method according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention, the unplanned facility is set as the operation risk cost. Since the power generation cost C can be calculated taking into account the outage risk cost (insurance fee), the power generation facility 2 is operated in an economically or socially near optimal state compared to the power generation facility operation management support system 1A. can do.

また、計画外設備停止リスクコストとしての保険料金は、実際に予備力が生じるか否かで見直しを行い、計画外設備停止リスクの低減分を考慮して見直しの結果を反映した事後決済を行うので、ユーザが実際に負ったリスクと負担する保険料金とを妥当なバランスで調整することができる。   In addition, insurance fees as unplanned equipment outage risk costs are reviewed based on whether reserves are actually generated, and post-payment settlement reflecting the results of the review, taking into account the reduction in unplanned equipment outage risks. Therefore, the risk actually incurred by the user and the insurance fee to be borne can be adjusted with a reasonable balance.

従って、従来の申込時に1度だけ決済を行う保険サービス提供方法のように、ユーザが発電設備2に与える計画外設備停止リスクに対して不当に高額な保険料金コストを負担することがなくなり、予備力確保の際のリスクヘッジ手段として事業的に有効な保険サービスを提供することができ、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力の確保を前提とした発電設備2の運用を運転計画および事業的に有効なリスクヘッジ手段(保険サーピス)の提供の両面から総合的に支援することができる。   Therefore, unlike the insurance service provision method in which payment is made only once at the time of the conventional application, there is no need to bear an unreasonably high insurance fee cost for the unplanned equipment outage risk given to the power generation equipment 2. A power generation facility 2 that can provide a business-effective insurance service as a risk hedging means when securing power, and that reserve power cannot be determined unless it is the time to actually generate power Can be comprehensively supported from both aspects of operation planning and provision of business-effective risk hedging means (insurance services).

以上、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムによれば、定格オーバー負荷状態における発電コストとして効率低下コストに加え、定格をオーバーして運用することにより生じる運用リスクコストとしての寿命消費コストを加味して発電コストを算出し、算出した発電コストよりも予備力の市場価値(発電収入)が高ければ、積極的に定格オーバー運転を想定した予備力を確保するといった市場ニーズに適合した発電設備2の運用を支援することが可能となる。   As described above, according to the power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method, and the program for causing the computer to execute the operation management support method according to the present invention, in addition to the efficiency reduction cost as the power generation cost in the rated overload state, the rating is The power generation cost is calculated by taking into consideration the lifetime consumption cost as the operational risk cost caused by over-operation, and if the reserve market value (power generation revenue) is higher than the calculated power generation cost, the rating is positively exceeded It becomes possible to support the operation of the power generation equipment 2 that meets the market needs such as securing reserve capacity assuming operation.

また、予備力確保の際には、定格オーバー運転を想定していることから、仮に予備力が実際に発電されなかった場合(発電量が計画ベース発電量となった場合)においても、定格近傍の高効率の運転条件で発電されることとなり、発電設備2の効率の良い運用が確保される。さらに、最適と考えられる計画ベース発電量と予備力発電量とを算出し、運転条件として提示することができるので、ユーザ(発電設備運用者)の意思決定を支援することができる。   In addition, when reserve capacity is secured, rated over operation is assumed, so even if reserve power is not actually generated (when the power generation amount is the planned base power generation amount), it is close to the rating. As a result, the power generation facility 2 is efficiently operated. Furthermore, since the plan-based power generation amount and the reserve power generation amount considered to be optimal can be calculated and presented as operating conditions, decision making by the user (power generation facility operator) can be supported.

さらにまた、複数の発電設備2が遠隔地に点在する場合においても通信ネットワーク回線8を利用して情報結合し、各発電設備2の最適運用計画の策定(運転条件提示)を1箇所で集約して行うことができる。従って、複数の発電設備2の各々についての運転条件を各々の発電設備2の発電設備運用者に提供して運用管理支援するO&Mサービスを提供することができる。   Furthermore, even when a plurality of power generation facilities 2 are scattered in remote locations, information is combined using the communication network line 8 to formulate the optimum operation plan (presenting operating conditions) for each power generation facility 2 at one location. Can be done. Therefore, it is possible to provide an O & M service that provides operation management support by providing operating conditions for each of the plurality of power generation facilities 2 to a power generation facility operator of each power generation facility 2.

一方、運用リスクコストとして計画外設備停止リスクコスト(保険料金)を加味して発電コストCを算出することもできるので、リスクヘッジ手段として保険を利用した場合にあっても、経済的または社会的により最適に近い状態で発電設備2を運用する支援を行うことができる。   On the other hand, since the power generation cost C can be calculated taking into account the unplanned equipment outage risk cost (insurance fee) as the operation risk cost, even if insurance is used as a risk hedging means, it is economical or social Thus, it is possible to provide support for operating the power generation facility 2 in a state close to optimal.

また、計画外設備停止リスクコストとしての保険料金は、実際に予備力が生じるか否かで見直しを行い、計画外設備停止リスクの低減分を考慮して見直しの結果を反映した事後決済を行うので、ユーザが実際に負ったリスクと負担する保険料金とを妥当なバランスで調整することができる。従って、実際に発電されるか否かがその時刻にならないと判断できない予備力の確保を前提とした発電設備2の運用を運転計画および事業的に有効なリスクヘッジ手段の提供の両面から総合的に支援することができる。   In addition, insurance fees as unplanned equipment outage risk costs are reviewed based on whether reserves are actually generated, and post-payment settlement reflecting the results of the review, taking into account the reduction in unplanned equipment outage risks. Therefore, the risk actually incurred by the user and the insurance fee to be borne can be adjusted with a reasonable balance. Therefore, the operation of the power generation equipment 2 on the premise of securing reserve capacity that cannot be determined unless the actual power generation time comes at that time is comprehensive in terms of both the operation plan and the provision of business-effective risk hedging means. Can help.

尚、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムには、本発明の実施形態を複合的に包含して構成される発電設備運用管理支援システム、その運用管理支援方法およびその運用管理支援方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムも含まれる。   The power generation facility operation management support system, the operation management support method thereof, and the program for causing a computer to execute the operation management support method according to the present invention include a power generation facility configured to include the embodiment of the present invention in a composite manner. An operation management support system, an operation management support method thereof, and a program for causing a computer to execute the operation management support method are also included.

また、本発明に係る発電設備運用管理支援システム1A,1B,1C,1Dにおいて、図1、図6、図9,図12に図示される運用管理対象となる発電設備2、オペレータ端末9、オペレータコンソール10、電子計算機11の個数は、図示した数量に限定されない。例えば、図1において、運用管理対象となる発電設備2は、1つの発電設備しか図示されていないが、複数あっても構わない。   Further, in the power generation facility operation management support systems 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D according to the present invention, the power generation facility 2, the operator terminal 9, and the operator that are the operation management targets illustrated in FIG. 1, FIG. 6, FIG. The numbers of the console 10 and the electronic computer 11 are not limited to the illustrated numbers. For example, in FIG. 1, only one power generation facility is illustrated as the power generation facility 2 to be operated and managed, but there may be a plurality of power generation facilities 2.

さらに、発電設備運用管理支援システム1A,1B,1C,1Dは、発電設備運用管理支援システム1A,1B,1C,1Dが算出した運転条件は、表示手段としてのオペレータ端末9に出力されているが、ユーザに運転条件を提示することのできる手段であれば他の手段でも良い。例えば、オペレータ端末9(表示手段)の代わりにプリンタ等の印字手段であっても構わない。   Furthermore, the power generation facility operation management support systems 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D output the operating conditions calculated by the power generation facility operation management support systems 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D to the operator terminal 9 as display means. Other means may be used as long as they can present operating conditions to the user. For example, printing means such as a printer may be used instead of the operator terminal 9 (display means).

さらにまた、第1の運用管理PG12、運転履歴DB18、プラントモデルDB19および電力市場DB20等の電子データは、電子計算機11が保有するデータ記録手段14に格納されているが、読み出されるPGまたはDBについては、必ずしも電子計算機11が保有するデータ記録手段14である必要はない。例えば、図外のデータ蓄積サーバ等のデータ記録手段でも構わない。   Furthermore, the electronic data such as the first operation management PG 12, the operation history DB 18, the plant model DB 19, and the power market DB 20 are stored in the data recording means 14 held by the electronic computer 11. Is not necessarily the data recording means 14 possessed by the electronic computer 11. For example, data recording means such as a data storage server (not shown) may be used.

要するに、電子計算機11が読み出す電子データについては、読み出し可能なデータ記録手段に格納されていれば良く、書き込みが必要なDBについては、電子計算機11が書き込み可能なデータ記録手段に格納されていればどこでも良い。   In short, the electronic data read by the electronic computer 11 only needs to be stored in the readable data recording means, and the DB that needs to be written is stored in the data recording means writable by the electronic computer 11. Good anywhere.

本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムを含めた発電設備の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図。1 is a schematic configuration diagram schematically showing an operation management example of a power generation facility including a power generation facility operation management support system according to a first embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図。The functional block diagram which showed roughly about the function structure of the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにおいてなされる発電設備運用管理支援方法(運転計画提示処理手順)について説明する説明図(処理フロー図)。Explanatory drawing (processing flow figure) explaining the power generation equipment operation management support method (operation plan presentation process procedure) made in the power generation equipment operation management support system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第1の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにおいてなされる運転計画提示処理手順のうち、運転計画策定行程についてより詳細な処理ステップを説明する説明図(処理フロー図)。Explanatory drawing (processing flow figure) explaining a more detailed process step about an operation plan formulation process among the operation plan presentation process procedures performed in the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 発電コストと発電出力との関係について説明する説明図(発電出力−発電コスト特性)。Explanatory drawing explaining the relationship between a power generation cost and a power generation output (power generation output-power generation cost characteristic). 本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムを含めた発電設備の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図。The structure schematic which showed roughly the example of operation management of the power generation equipment including the power generation equipment operation management support system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図。The functional block diagram which showed roughly about the function structure of the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第2の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにおいてなされる発電設備運転制御処理手順について説明する説明図(処理フロー図)。Explanatory drawing (process flowchart) explaining the power generation equipment operation control processing procedure performed in the power generation equipment operation management support system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムを含めた発電設備の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図。The structure schematic which showed roughly the example of operation management of the power generation equipment including the power generation equipment operation management support system which concerns on the 3rd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図。The functional block diagram which showed roughly about the function structure of the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 3rd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第3の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにおいてなされる第2の運転計画提示処理手順について説明する説明図(処理フロー図)。Explanatory drawing (processing flow figure) explaining the 2nd operation plan presentation process procedure made in the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 3rd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムを含めた発電設備の運用管理例を概略的に示した構成概略図。The structure schematic which showed roughly the example of operation management of the power generation equipment including the power generation equipment operation management support system which concerns on the 4th Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムの機能構成について概略的に示した機能ブロック図。The functional block diagram which showed roughly about the function structure of the power generation facility operation management support system which concerns on the 4th Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第4の実施形態に係る発電設備運用管理支援システムにおいてなされる総合運用管理支援処理手順について説明する説明図(処理フロー図)。Explanatory drawing (process flowchart) explaining the comprehensive operation management assistance processing procedure performed in the power generation facility operation management assistance system which concerns on the 4th Embodiment of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1A,1B,1C,1D…発電設備運用管理支援システム、2…発電設備、3…コントローラ、4…発電設備本体(制御対象)、5…センサー、6…データロガー、8…通信ネットワーク回線、9…オペレータ端末、10…オペレータコンソール、11…電子計算機(コンピュータ)、12…第1の運用管理PG、14…データ記録手段、15…解析処理手段、16,16A…運転計画策定手段、18…運転履歴DB、19…プラントモデルDB、20…電力市場DB、22…寿命消費コスト算出部、23…予備力価格推定部、24…予備力使用確率推定部、26…市場情報取得手段、29,29A…発電収益算出部、30…最適運転条件算出部、31…最適運転条件出力部、33…計画ベース発電量Xf−市場価格Pf特性算出機能、34…予備力発電量Xv−市場価格Pv特性算出機能、35…予備力発電量Xv−予備力使用確率Prob(Xv)特性算出機能、37…発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電収入P特性算出機能、38,38A…発電量[Xf+Xv]−発電コストC特性算出機能、40…計画ベース発電量Xf−予備力発電量Xv−発電収益期待値Prof特性算出機能、42…第2の運用管理PG、44…市場入札手続手段、45…予備力デマンド受注手段、46…発電量調整指令入力受付手段、48…発電量制御信号発信手段、50…第3の運用管理PG、52…保険サービス業者、54…計画外設備停止リスクコスト取得部、56…保険料金DB、60…保険サービス提供PG、65…保険サービス提供手段、68…保険申込受付部、69…計画外設備停止リスク評価部、70…保険料金算出部、71…差額算出部、72…保険決済実行部、73…保険料金テーブル、74…保険契約料金DB。   1A, 1B, 1C, 1D ... Power generation facility operation management support system, 2 ... Power generation facility, 3 ... Controller, 4 ... Power generation facility body (control target), 5 ... Sensor, 6 ... Data logger, 8 ... Communication network line, 9 ... operator terminal, 10 ... operator console, 11 ... electronic computer (computer), 12 ... first operation management PG, 14 ... data recording means, 15 ... analysis processing means, 16, 16A ... operation planning means, 18 ... operation History DB, 19 ... Plant Model DB, 20 ... Electric Power Market DB, 22 ... Life Consumption Cost Calculation Unit, 23 ... Reserve Power Price Estimator, 24 ... Reserve Power Use Probability Estimator, 26 ... Market Information Acquisition Unit, 29, 29A ... Power generation revenue calculation unit, 30 ... Optimal operation condition calculation unit, 31 ... Optimal operation condition output unit, 33 ... Plan-based power generation amount Xf-market price Pf characteristic calculation function, 34 ... Reserve power generation Electricity amount Xv-market price Pv characteristic calculation function, 35 ... reserve power generation amount Xv-reserve power use probability Prob (Xv) characteristic calculation function, 37 ... power generation amount [Xf + Xv]-power generation revenue P characteristic calculation function, 38, 38A ... power generation Amount [Xf + Xv] -Power generation cost C characteristic calculation function, 40 ... Plan-based power generation amount Xf-Reserve power generation amount Xv-Power generation revenue expected value Prof characteristic calculation function, 42 ... Second operation management PG, 44 ... Market bidding procedure means 45 ... Reserve power demand receiving means 46 ... Power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means 48 ... Power generation amount control signal sending means 50 ... Third operation management PG 52 ... Insurance service provider 54 ... Unplanned facility stoppage risk Cost acquisition unit, 56 ... insurance fee DB, 60 ... insurance service provision PG, 65 ... insurance service provision means, 68 ... insurance application reception unit, 69 ... unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation unit, 70 ... insurance fee calculation unit, 71 ... difference Calculating unit, 72 ... insurance settlement execution unit, 73 ... insurance fee table, 74 ... insurance contract fee DB.

Claims (15)

発電設備の運転履歴情報、発電設備の寿命計算式情報、現在の電力市場情報および発電実績情報とを取得して運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理手段と、
この解析処理手段が算出した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電設備の運転条件を算出して策定した運転計画として出力する運転計画策定手段とを具備し、
前記解析処理手段は、発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出部と、
予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定部と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定部とを備えることを特徴とする発電設備運用管理支援システム。
Analysis processing means for obtaining operation history information of power generation equipment, life calculation formula information of power generation equipment, current power market information and power generation performance information and calculating operation plan formulation basic information;
Based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated by the analysis processing means, the operation plan formulation means for calculating the operation condition of the power generation facility and outputting it as the operation plan formulated,
The analysis processing means includes a lifetime consumption cost calculation unit that calculates a lifetime consumption cost of the power generation facility,
A power generation facility operation management support system comprising: a reserve price estimation unit that estimates a market price of reserve capacity; and a reserve capacity use probability estimation unit that estimates a reserve capacity use probability.
前記発電設備に与える発電量指令値を受け付け認識する発電量調整指令入力受付手段と、
この発電量調整指令入力受付手段が認識した指令値に基づき発電量を制御する発電量制御信号を前記発電設備に対して発信する発電量制御信号発信手段とを具備することを特徴とする請求項1記載の発電設備運用管理支援システム。
A power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means for receiving and recognizing a power generation amount command value to be given to the power generation facility;
The power generation amount control signal transmitting means for transmitting to the power generation facility a power generation amount control signal for controlling the power generation amount based on the command value recognized by the power generation amount adjustment command input receiving means. 1. The power generation facility operation management support system according to 1.
前記解析処理手段は、保険サービス業者に支払った保険料金の情報を計画外設備停止リスクコストとして取得する計画外設備停止リスクコスト受付手段を備えることを特徴とする請求項1記載の発電設備運用管理支援システム。 The power generation facility operation management according to claim 1, wherein the analysis processing unit includes an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost receiving unit that acquires information on an insurance fee paid to an insurance service provider as an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost. Support system. 前記発電設備の計画外設備停止リスクをリスクヘッジする手段として保険サービスを提供する保険サービス提供手段を具備することを特徴とする請求項1記載の発電設備運用管理支援システム。 The power generation facility operation management support system according to claim 1, further comprising insurance service providing means for providing an insurance service as means for risk hedging unplanned facility stoppage risk of the power generation facility. 前記運転計画策定手段は、前記解析処理手段が解析処理した寿命消費コスト、予備力の市場価格および予備力使用確率の情報から発電収益を算出する発電収益算出部と、
この発電収益算出部が算出した発電収益が最適となる計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量を運転条件として算出する最適運転条件算出部と、
この最適運転条件算出部が算出した運転条件を出力する最適運転条件出力部とを備え、
前記発電収益算出部は、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出機能と、
発電量のうちの予備力発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出機能と、
予備力発電量と予備力使用確率との関係を算出する予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出機能と、
発電収入と発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電収入特性算出機能と、
運用リスクコストを加味した発電コストと発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電コスト特性算出機能と、
発電量−発電収入特性および発電量−発電コスト特性から発電収益期待値、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量の関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−予備力発電量−発電収益期待値特性算出機能とを備え、前記運用リスクコストは、寿命消費コストであることを特徴とする請求項1記載の発電設備運用管理支援システム。
The operation plan formulation unit includes a power generation revenue calculation unit that calculates power generation revenue from information on the lifetime consumption cost, reserve market price, and reserve power use probability analyzed by the analysis processing unit;
An optimal operating condition calculation unit that calculates a plan-based power generation amount and a reserve power generation amount at which the power generation revenue calculated by the power generation revenue calculation unit is optimal;
An optimum operation condition output unit that outputs the operation condition calculated by the optimum operation condition calculation unit,
The power generation revenue calculation unit includes a plan base power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation function for calculating a relationship between a plan base power generation amount of power generation amount and a market transaction price estimate of reserve power,
A reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation function for calculating a relationship between a reserve power generation amount of the generated power amount and a market transaction price estimate of the reserve power,
Reserve power generation amount-reserve force use probability characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between reserve power generation amount and reserve power use probability;
Power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between power generation revenue and power generation amount,
A power generation amount-power generation cost characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between the power generation cost and the power generation amount taking into account the operational risk cost,
Plan-based power generation amount-reserve power generation amount-power generation revenue expected value characteristic calculation function for calculating the relationship between the power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristics and power generation amount-power generation cost characteristics The power generation facility operation management support system according to claim 1, wherein the operation risk cost is a lifetime consumption cost.
前記運用リスクコストは、計画外設備停止リスクコストを有することを特徴とする請求項5記載の発電設備運用管理支援システム。 6. The power generation facility operation management support system according to claim 5, wherein the operation risk cost includes an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost. 発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、
この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備することを特徴とする発電設備運用管理支援方法。
The operation plan includes a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation facility, a reserve price estimation process for estimating the market price of the reserve capacity, and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability. An analysis process to calculate the basic development information;
Based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process, the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit and the optimum operation condition calculation for calculating the operation condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal A power generation facility operation management support method comprising: an operation plan formulation process including an operation and an optimal operation condition presentation process for outputting and presenting the operation condition calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process.
前記発電設備の各々に対し発電量の指令値を与える発電量制御信号発信行程を具備することを特徴とする請求項7記載の発電設備運用管理支援方法。 The power generation facility operation management support method according to claim 7, further comprising a power generation amount control signal transmission step for giving a power generation amount command value to each of the power generation facilities. 前記発電収益算出行程は、解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、
発電量のうちの予備力発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、
予備力発電量と予備力使用確率との関係を算出する予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップと、
前記計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入と発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電収入特性算出ステップと、
運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストを加味した発電コストと発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電コスト特性算出ステップと、
算出した発電量−発電収入特性および発電量−発電コスト特性から発電収益期待値、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量の関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−予備力発電量−発電収益期待値特性算出ステップとを備えることを特徴とする請求項7記載の発電設備運用管理支援方法。
The power generation revenue calculation process is a plan-based power generation amount for calculating the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount of the power generation amount and the estimated market transaction price of the reserve power based on the operation plan formulation basic information acquired in the analysis process step− Market price characteristic calculation step,
A reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculating step for calculating a relationship between a reserve power generation amount of the generated power amount and a market transaction price estimate of the reserve power;
A reserve power generation amount-reserve force use probability characteristic calculating step for calculating a relationship between the reserve power generation amount and the reserve power use probability;
Using each characteristic calculated in the plan-based power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation step and reserve power generation amount-reserve power use probability characteristic calculation step, Power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristic calculating step for calculating the relationship of
A power generation amount-power generation cost characteristic calculation step for calculating a relationship between a power generation cost and a power generation amount that considers the lifetime consumption cost as an operation risk cost,
Calculated power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristics and power generation amount-power generation cost characteristics Calculated power generation revenue expectation value, plan base power generation amount and reserve power generation amount The power generation facility operation management support method according to claim 7, further comprising a calculation step.
前記運用リスクコストは、計画外設備停止リスクコストをさらに加味していることを特徴とする請求項9記載の発電設備運用管理支援方法。 10. The power generation facility operation management support method according to claim 9, wherein the operation risk cost further takes into account an unplanned facility stoppage risk cost. 保険の見積依頼を受け付ける保険受付処理ステップと、
保険の見積依頼を受けて提供された保険の対象となる発電設備について過去の運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップと、
計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップで評価された計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を見積し見積結果を出力する保険料金見積結果出力ステップと、
前記解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、
発電量のうちの予備力発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、
予備力発電量と予備力使用確率との関係を算出する予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップと、
前記計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入と発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電収入特性算出ステップと、
運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストを加味した発電コストと発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電コスト特性算出ステップと、
算出した発電量−発電収入特性および発電量−発電コスト特性から発電収益期待値、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量の関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−予備力発電量−発電収益期待値特性算出ステップと、
前記保険料金見積結果出力ステップで見積した保険料金で保険の申込を受け付ける保険申込受付ステップと、
保険の申込を受け付けた後、保険料金の初期決済を行う保険料金初期決済処理ステップと、
初期決済を行った後に、保険の対象となる発電設備について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップと、
計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップで評価した計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を再算定する保険料金再算定ステップと、
保険料金再算定ステップで再算定した保険料金と事前保険料金との差額を算出して事後決済を行う事後決済処理ステップとを備えることを特徴とする請求項7記載の発電設備運用管理支援方法。
An insurance reception processing step for receiving an insurance quote request;
An unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step for assessing and evaluating unplanned equipment outage risk from past operation history information for the power generation equipment that is provided in response to an insurance quote request;
An insurance fee estimate result output step for estimating an insurance fee from the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluated in the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluation step and outputting an estimate result;
A plan-based power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation step for calculating a relationship between the plan-based power generation amount of the power generation amount and the estimated market transaction price value of the reserve capacity based on the operation plan formulation basic information acquired in the analysis process step; ,
A reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculating step for calculating a relationship between a reserve power generation amount of the generated power amount and a market transaction price estimate of the reserve power;
A reserve power generation amount-reserve force use probability characteristic calculating step for calculating a relationship between the reserve power generation amount and the reserve power use probability;
Using each characteristic calculated in the plan-based power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculation step, and reserve power generation amount-reserve power use probability characteristic calculation step, Power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristic calculating step for calculating the relationship of
A power generation amount-power generation cost characteristic calculation step for calculating a relationship between a power generation cost and a power generation amount that includes a lifetime consumption cost and an unplanned facility outage risk cost as an operation risk cost,
Calculated power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristics and power generation amount-power generation cost characteristics Calculated power generation revenue expectation value, plan base power generation amount and reserve power generation amount A calculation step;
An insurance application reception step for receiving an application for insurance at the insurance fee estimated in the insurance fee estimate result output step;
After accepting the application for insurance, the insurance fee initial settlement processing step for initial settlement of the insurance fee,
After performing the initial settlement, the operation history information after the insurance contract is obtained for the power generation equipment subject to insurance, and the unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step for assessing and evaluating the unplanned equipment outage risk,
An insurance fee recalculation step for recalculating the insurance premium from the unplanned facility shutdown risk reassessment step;
The power generation facility operation management support method according to claim 7, further comprising a post-settlement processing step of calculating a difference between the insurance premium recalculated in the insurance fee re-calculation step and a pre-insurance fee and performing post-settlement.
発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、
この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備する運転計画提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム。
The operation plan includes a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation facility, a reserve price estimation process for estimating the market price of the reserve capacity, and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability. An analysis process to calculate the basic development information;
Based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process, the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit and the optimum operation condition calculation for calculating the operation condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal A program that causes a computer to execute an operation plan presentation processing procedure that includes an operation plan and an operation plan formulation process that includes an operation condition presentation process that outputs and presents the operation condition calculated in the optimum operation condition calculation process.
発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、
この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程と、
前記発電設備の各々に対し発電量の指令値を与える発電量制御信号発信行程とを具備する運転条件提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム。
The operation plan includes a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation facility, a reserve price estimation process for estimating the market price of the reserve capacity, and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability. An analysis process to calculate the basic development information;
Based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process, the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit and the optimum operation condition calculation for calculating the operation condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal An operation plan formulation process comprising a process and an optimal operation condition presentation process for outputting and presenting the operation condition calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process;
A program for causing a computer to execute an operating condition presentation processing procedure including a power generation amount control signal transmission process for giving a power generation amount command value to each of the power generation facilities.
発電設備の寿命消費コストを算出する寿命消費コスト算出行程と、予備力の市場価格を推定する予備力価格推定行程と、予備力使用確率を推定する予備力使用確率推定行程とを備え、運転計画策定基礎情報を算出する解析処理行程と、
この解析処理行程で算出された運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電収益を算出する発電収益算出行程と、この発電収益算出行程で算出した発電収益が最適となる運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出行程と、この最適運転条件算出行程で算出された運転条件を出力して提示する最適運転条件提示行程とを備える運転計画策定行程とを具備し、
前記発電収益算出行程に、前記解析処理行程で取得した運転計画策定基礎情報に基づき、発電量のうちの計画ベース発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、発電量のうちの予備力発電量と予備力の市場取引価格推定値との関係を算出する予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップと、予備力発電量と予備力使用確率との関係を算出する予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップと、前記計画ベース発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップ、予備力発電量−市場価格特性算出ステップおよび予備力発電量−予備力使用確率特性算出ステップで算出した各特性を用いて、発電収入と発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電収入特性算出ステップと、運用リスクコストとして寿命消費コストおよび計画外設備停止リスクコストを加味した発電コストと発電量との関係を算出する発電量−発電コスト特性算出ステップと、算出した発電量−発電収入特性および発電量−発電コスト特性から発電収益期待値、計画ベース発電量および予備力発電量の関係を算出する計画ベース発電量−予備力発電量−発電収益期待値特性算出ステップとを備える運転計画提示処理手順をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム。
The operation plan includes a life consumption cost calculation process for calculating the life consumption cost of the power generation facility, a reserve price estimation process for estimating the market price of the reserve capacity, and a reserve capacity use probability estimation process for estimating the reserve capacity use probability. An analysis process to calculate the basic development information;
Based on the operation plan formulation basic information calculated in this analysis process, the power generation revenue calculation process for calculating the power generation profit and the optimum operation condition calculation for calculating the operation condition in which the power generation profit calculated in the power generation profit calculation process is optimal An operation plan formulation process comprising a process and an optimal operation condition presenting process for outputting and presenting the operation condition calculated in the optimal operation condition calculation process;
Plan-based power generation amount for calculating the relationship between the plan-based power generation amount of the power generation amount and the estimated market transaction price of reserve power based on the operation plan formulation basic information acquired in the analysis process step in the power generation revenue calculation step -Market price characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount for calculating the relationship between reserve power generation amount of power generation amount and market transaction price estimate of reserve power-market price characteristic calculation step, reserve power generation amount and reserve Reserve power generation amount-reserve power use probability characteristic calculating step for calculating the relationship with the power use probability, the plan-based power generation amount-market price characteristic calculating step, the reserve power generation amount-market price characteristic calculating step, and the reserve power generation amount -Power generation amount for calculating the relationship between power generation revenue and power generation amount using each characteristic calculated in the reserve power use probability characteristic calculation step-Power generation revenue characteristic calculation step and life expectancy as operational risk cost Power generation amount-power generation cost characteristic calculation step for calculating the relationship between power generation cost and power generation amount considering consumption cost and unplanned facility outage risk cost, and power generation from the calculated power generation amount-power generation revenue characteristics and power generation amount-power generation cost characteristics A program for causing a computer to execute an operation plan presentation processing procedure including a plan-based power generation amount—a reserve power generation amount—a power generation revenue expected value characteristic calculation step for calculating a relationship between an expected profit value, a plan-based power generation amount, and a reserve power generation amount.
保険の見積依頼を受け付ける保険受付処理ステップと、
保険の見積依頼を受けて提供された保険の対象となる発電設備について過去の運転履歴情報から計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップと、
計画外設備停止リスク評価ステップで評価された計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を見積し見積結果を出力する保険料金見積結果出力ステップと、
この保険料金見積結果出力ステップで見積した保険料金で保険の申込を受け付ける保険申込受付ステップと、
保険の申込を受け付けた後、保険料金の初期決済を行う保険料金初期決済処理ステップと、
初期決済を行った後に、保険の対象となる発電設備について保険契約後の運転履歴情報を取得し、再度、計画外設備停止リスクを査定し評価する計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップと、
計画外設備停止リスク再評価ステップで評価した計画外設備停止リスクから保険料金を再算定する保険料金再算定ステップと、
保険料金再算定ステップで再算定した保険料金と事前保険料金との差額を算出して事後決済を行う事後決済処理ステップとを備える保険サービス提供行程をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム。
An insurance reception processing step for receiving an insurance quote request;
An unplanned equipment outage risk evaluation step for assessing and evaluating unplanned equipment outage risk from past operation history information for the power generation equipment that is provided in response to an insurance quote request;
An insurance fee estimate result output step for estimating an insurance fee from the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluated in the unplanned facility stoppage risk evaluation step and outputting an estimate result;
An insurance application acceptance step for accepting an insurance application at the insurance fee estimated in the insurance fee estimate result output step;
After accepting the application for insurance, the insurance fee initial settlement processing step for initial settlement of the insurance fee,
After performing the initial settlement, the operation history information after the insurance contract is obtained for the power generation equipment subject to insurance, and the unplanned equipment outage risk reassessment step for assessing and evaluating the unplanned equipment outage risk,
An insurance fee recalculation step for recalculating the insurance premium from the unplanned facility shutdown risk reassessment step;
A program for causing a computer to execute an insurance service provision process including a post-settlement processing step for calculating a difference between the insurance premium recalculated in the insurance fee re-calculation step and a pre-insurance fee and performing post-settlement.
JP2004120707A 2003-06-11 2004-04-15 Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method thereof, and program for causing computer to execute the operation management support method Expired - Fee Related JP4427376B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004120707A JP4427376B2 (en) 2004-04-15 2004-04-15 Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method thereof, and program for causing computer to execute the operation management support method
US10/864,896 US8069077B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2004-06-10 Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program for executing support method, and program for executing operation management support method on computer
CNA2004100489194A CN1573776A (en) 2003-06-11 2004-06-11 Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program
AU2004202606A AU2004202606B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2004-06-11 Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program for executing operation management support method on computer
IT000287A ITRM20040287A1 (en) 2003-06-11 2004-06-11 SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR CALCULATOR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE OPERATIONS OF MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION PLANTS.
US12/760,275 US8219439B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2010-04-14 Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program for executing operation management support method on computer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004120707A JP4427376B2 (en) 2004-04-15 2004-04-15 Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method thereof, and program for causing computer to execute the operation management support method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005301909A true JP2005301909A (en) 2005-10-27
JP4427376B2 JP4427376B2 (en) 2010-03-03

Family

ID=35333319

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004120707A Expired - Fee Related JP4427376B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2004-04-15 Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method thereof, and program for causing computer to execute the operation management support method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4427376B2 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007187079A (en) * 2006-01-13 2007-07-26 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Loss calculating processor
JP2008108085A (en) * 2006-10-26 2008-05-08 Hitachi Ltd Spot price prediction system, spot transaction support system and spot price prediction and transaction support system
KR101135762B1 (en) 2010-09-24 2012-04-16 한국전력공사 Energy control system and method
JP2016073132A (en) * 2014-09-30 2016-05-09 Jfeエンジニアリング株式会社 Optimal operation support system for power generation facility
JP5973096B1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2016-08-23 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis apparatus, plant analysis method, and program
JP6062581B1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-01-18 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis apparatus, plant analysis method, and program
JP2018036679A (en) * 2016-08-29 2018-03-08 川崎重工業株式会社 Plan creation device and plan creation method related to employment of energy demand facility
JP6532614B1 (en) * 2018-03-28 2019-06-19 三菱電機株式会社 Update plan creation support device, update plan creation support system, and update plan creation support method
JP2020190965A (en) * 2019-05-22 2020-11-26 株式会社日立製作所 Power plan assisting device, power plan assisting method, and power plan assisting program
CN113822550A (en) * 2021-09-02 2021-12-21 国网河北省电力有限公司石家庄供电分公司 Comprehensive energy system planning risk assessment application system and method
WO2022168348A1 (en) * 2021-02-05 2022-08-11 株式会社日立製作所 Plan drafting device and plan drafting method
JP7493470B2 (en) 2021-02-05 2024-05-31 株式会社日立製作所 PLANNING DEVICE AND PLANNING METHOD

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0510857A (en) * 1991-07-08 1993-01-19 Hitachi Ltd Life management method and device of generation facility
JPH11127538A (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-05-11 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for estimating frequency characteristic of power system
JP2001086645A (en) * 1999-09-17 2001-03-30 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Method of calculating optimal operation program for power generating facilities and device thereof
JP2001258157A (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-21 Hitachi Ltd Device and method of developing operation plan for generator and recording medium storing operation plan program for generator
JP2001273006A (en) * 2000-03-27 2001-10-05 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Operation evaluation system of energy plant
JP2002297803A (en) * 2001-03-28 2002-10-11 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Machinery maintenance fee setting system and machinery insurance fee setting system
JP2003022368A (en) * 2001-07-09 2003-01-24 Hitachi Ltd Method and system for monitoring and operating service of power generation facility

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0510857A (en) * 1991-07-08 1993-01-19 Hitachi Ltd Life management method and device of generation facility
JPH11127538A (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-05-11 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for estimating frequency characteristic of power system
JP2001086645A (en) * 1999-09-17 2001-03-30 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Method of calculating optimal operation program for power generating facilities and device thereof
JP2001258157A (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-21 Hitachi Ltd Device and method of developing operation plan for generator and recording medium storing operation plan program for generator
JP2001273006A (en) * 2000-03-27 2001-10-05 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Operation evaluation system of energy plant
JP2002297803A (en) * 2001-03-28 2002-10-11 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Machinery maintenance fee setting system and machinery insurance fee setting system
JP2003022368A (en) * 2001-07-09 2003-01-24 Hitachi Ltd Method and system for monitoring and operating service of power generation facility

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
小川 洋: "電力供給計画における供給力不足確率の近似計算法", 電気学会論文誌B, vol. 114, no. 12, JPN6009012004, 20 November 1994 (1994-11-20), JP, ISSN: 0001275874 *

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007187079A (en) * 2006-01-13 2007-07-26 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Loss calculating processor
JP4721911B2 (en) * 2006-01-13 2011-07-13 東京電力株式会社 Loss calculation processor
JP2008108085A (en) * 2006-10-26 2008-05-08 Hitachi Ltd Spot price prediction system, spot transaction support system and spot price prediction and transaction support system
KR101135762B1 (en) 2010-09-24 2012-04-16 한국전력공사 Energy control system and method
JP2016073132A (en) * 2014-09-30 2016-05-09 Jfeエンジニアリング株式会社 Optimal operation support system for power generation facility
WO2017122469A1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-20 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis device, plant analysis method, and program
KR102081573B1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2020-02-26 미츠비시 히타치 파워 시스템즈 가부시키가이샤 Plant Analytical Devices, Plant Analytical Methods, and Programs
JP2017125776A (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-20 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis device, plant analysis method, and program
WO2017122468A1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-20 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis device, plant analysis method, and program
JP2017125456A (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-20 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis device, plant analysis method and program
JP5973096B1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2016-08-23 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis apparatus, plant analysis method, and program
KR20180095579A (en) * 2016-01-14 2018-08-27 미츠비시 히타치 파워 시스템즈 가부시키가이샤 Plant analysis apparatus, plant analysis method, and program
US10990070B2 (en) 2016-01-14 2021-04-27 Mitsubishi Power, Ltd. Plant analyzer, plant analysis method, and program thereof
JP6062581B1 (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-01-18 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 Plant analysis apparatus, plant analysis method, and program
JP2018036679A (en) * 2016-08-29 2018-03-08 川崎重工業株式会社 Plan creation device and plan creation method related to employment of energy demand facility
WO2019186796A1 (en) * 2018-03-28 2019-10-03 三菱電機株式会社 Update plan creation assistance device, update plan creation assistance system, and update plan creation assistance method
JP6532614B1 (en) * 2018-03-28 2019-06-19 三菱電機株式会社 Update plan creation support device, update plan creation support system, and update plan creation support method
JP2020190965A (en) * 2019-05-22 2020-11-26 株式会社日立製作所 Power plan assisting device, power plan assisting method, and power plan assisting program
JP7265931B2 (en) 2019-05-22 2023-04-27 株式会社日立製作所 Power plan support device, power plan support method, and power plan support program
WO2022168348A1 (en) * 2021-02-05 2022-08-11 株式会社日立製作所 Plan drafting device and plan drafting method
JP7493470B2 (en) 2021-02-05 2024-05-31 株式会社日立製作所 PLANNING DEVICE AND PLANNING METHOD
CN113822550A (en) * 2021-09-02 2021-12-21 国网河北省电力有限公司石家庄供电分公司 Comprehensive energy system planning risk assessment application system and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4427376B2 (en) 2010-03-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8069077B2 (en) Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program for executing support method, and program for executing operation management support method on computer
Martin et al. A stochastic two settlement equilibrium model for electricity markets with wind generation
US20030074244A1 (en) Distributed energy technology assurance
US20020194113A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for risk-minimization and mutual insurance relations in meteorology dependent activities
Mays et al. Private risk and social resilience in liberalized electricity markets
JP4154373B2 (en) Power supply business risk management support system
JP4427376B2 (en) Power generation facility operation management support system, operation management support method thereof, and program for causing computer to execute the operation management support method
Schwabe et al. Wind energy finance in the United States: Current practice and opportunities
JP6519215B2 (en) Power transaction support system, power transaction support method and program
JP6977631B2 (en) Controls, control methods and computer programs
JP2017126183A (en) Power transaction support device, power transaction support method, and program
JP2016136313A (en) Optimal transaction amount determination system, optimal transaction amount determination method and program
AU2007202560B2 (en) Electric-power-generating-facility operation management support system, electric-power-generating-facility operation management support method, and program for executing operation management support method on computer
JP2005004435A (en) Support system for operation of generator set
JP4050686B2 (en) Supply power purchase planning system and supply power purchase planning method
JP5468097B2 (en) Pension information management program, annuity information management apparatus and annuity information management method
Prada et al. Pricing reliability: A probabilistic approach
Muthuraman et al. Regulation of natural gas distribution using policy benchmarks
JP2004133663A (en) Operating device and method for power generation facility
Lei PHM-based Predictive Maintenance Scheduling for Wind Farms Managed Using Outcome-based Contracts
WO2024034192A1 (en) Operation plan optimization assistance device and method
JP7480647B2 (en) Driving assistance device, driving assistance method, and driving assistance program
JP7099018B2 (en) Achievement rate display control device, achievement rate display control method and computer program
Zhivov Economics of energy master plan implementation
Pfeifenberger et al. Review of PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model (RPM)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20061201

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090225

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090317

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090518

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090811

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20091013

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20091117

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091214

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121218

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121218

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131218

Year of fee payment: 4

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees