JP2005202870A - Method, device, and program for selecting person in charge of work - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To achieve selecting answering selector's purpose by allowing a preferential selection condition to be specified when selecting persons in charge of work. <P>SOLUTION: When priorities of selection conditions for persons in charge of work are inputted from a selection condition input part 22, a part 20 for assigning persons in charge of work/development specifies; (1) a relation between work and a person in charge of work, which minimizes a total required time, on the basis of a capability DB 6 and a fundamental estimate DB 16; (2) a relation between work and a person in charge of work, which minimizes total expenses, on the basis of the capability DB 6 and an hour rate DB 8; (3) a relation between work and a person in charge of work, which meets a team condition, on the basis of the fundamental estimate DB 16 and a team condition DB 18; or (4) a relation between work and a person in charge of work, which maximizes total growth points, on the basis of a growing plan DB 10 and the fundamental estimate DB 16, in accordance with a selection constitution to which the highest priority is given. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for selecting a person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of a plurality of kinds of work groups from a plurality of workers.

For example, in order to develop an information system, multiple types of work such as planning the system, determining the specifications and requirements required for the system, designing the system, programming work to create the program, and test work Joint work consisting of groups is required. Usually, a plurality of workers who can perform information system development work are registered, and an appropriate worker corresponding to each work is selected from these. If the person in charge of the work is not properly selected, the work tends to be delayed or the quality is lowered. It is important that the person in charge of the work is properly selected at the start of the collaboration.
In this case, the selection of the person in charge of the work differs depending on the purpose intended by the selection side, such as whether the selection is made with emphasis on the total time required for the joint work or whether the selection is made with importance on the total cost of the joint work.
Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for selecting a person in charge of work so that the work time of each worker is equalized in consideration of the difficulty of work and the ability of the worker.

Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-56997

  The factor to be emphasized when selecting a worker is not limited to one. For example, when developing a certain system, the total development time may be emphasized, and when developing another system, the total development cost may be emphasized. Or you may want to be in charge of unfamiliar work to train workers, or you may want to focus your work on a small number of workers to maintain the quality of your collaborative work. Sometimes the same worker must be in charge. In addition, a plurality of selection conditions may be simultaneously or selectively employed for one collaborative work. There may be a trade-off relationship between these conditions, where priority is given to a certain condition and other conditions cannot be satisfied. There may be a trade-off relationship in which labor costs may increase because priority is given to the condition of minimizing work time, and work time may increase because priority is given to the condition of reducing labor costs. Therefore, when appropriately selecting a worker, it is necessary to determine which selection condition has priority.

  The present invention provides a technique for obtaining a selection that matches a user's intention by making it possible to specify a selection condition that is prioritized when selecting a worker.

(One way to solve the problem)
The present invention can be embodied in an apparatus that selects a person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of a plurality of types of work groups. This apparatus includes a collaborative work database that stores work types and standard durations for each work that constitutes a collaborative work, and a capability database that stores, for each worker, the abilities of each work type of the worker, The unit price database that stores the unit price for each worker's work type for each worker, the other work that should be assigned to the same worker for each work that constitutes the joint work, and that work It has a team condition database that stores the maximum allowable number of persons allowed and a training plan database that stores training points for each work type required for training each worker.
Also, in selecting the person in charge of work, priority is given to minimizing the total time required, priority to minimize the total cost, priority to comply with team conditions, Has a means of identifying the priority of whether to prioritize the highest,
(1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database Use the ability to identify the relationship between the person who has the shortest total time and the person in charge,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database And use the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database to identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database Using the training points, means for specifying the relationship between the work that maximizes the total training points and the person in charge of the work is provided.
The team conditions here are the conditions necessary to maintain the quality and efficiency of collaboration. Depending on the type of work, quality may not be maintained unless only a small number of workers are in charge, and the maximum allowable number of people may be limited. In addition, there is a combination of operations in which the efficiency is significantly reduced unless the same worker is in charge.
Further, the training point refers to the degree of necessity for each work type that the worker wants to experience in order to train each worker, and the higher training point is given to the work type that needs to be experienced.

(The action and effect)
This apparatus has means for specifying the priority order of the selection conditions. Whether prioritizing minimizing the total time required for collaborative work, prioritizing minimizing the total cost of collaborative work, or prioritizing meeting joint team conditions, It is possible to specify whether to give priority to the highest training points. A plurality of databases are prepared in this apparatus so that any one of them can be dealt with.
If the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database are used. The relationship between the work and the person in charge who makes the total required time the shortest is specified. The ability database stores whether the worker has a high or low ability to perform the work type, or whether or not the worker can perform the work type. If the low ability is stored, the time required for the work becomes long, and if the high ability is stored, the time required for the work becomes short. By using the collaborative work database and the capability database, the time required for each work can be calculated, and the total required time can be calculated.
In addition, when minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database, the ability of each worker type stored in the capacity database, Using the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database, the relationship between the work that minimizes the total cost and the person in charge of the work is specified. Each work time can be calculated in consideration of the worker's ability, so it is possible to calculate the cost of each work by multiplying it by the unit price, and it becomes possible to calculate the total cost .
If conformity to team conditions is given top priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database, the abilities for each work type stored in the ability database, and the team Using the team condition stored in the condition database, the relationship between the work that satisfies the team condition and the person in charge of the work is specified. If there is a combination of work that the same worker should be in charge of, it is observed, and if there is a maximum allowable number of people engaged in the same work, it is observed.
Alternatively, if the highest priority is given to the training points, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database, and the training points according to the work types of workers stored in the training plan database Using the, specify the relationship between the person who has the highest total training points and the person in charge. In order to train the worker, the worker in charge is selected to reflect the intention to intentionally take charge of unfamiliar work.
By using this apparatus, it is possible to select a worker person in accordance with the priority order of selection conditions to be emphasized.

(Preferred means for solving the problem)
When the relationship between two or more tasks and a worker is identified according to the selection condition that is given the highest priority, means for identifying one task and the worker in accordance with the next-order selection condition may be added. preferable.
(The action and effect)
There may be a case where two or more relationships between work and a person in charge of the work that satisfy the selection condition set as the highest priority are specified. In this case, it is preferable to specify one work and a person in charge of work according to the selection condition of the next order.
For example, if the relationship between the four tasks and the person in charge is identified under the condition that the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the four candidates are selected according to the condition that the total cost with the next highest priority is minimized. Identify further from the list. Again, if the relationship between the three tasks and the person in charge of the task is identified, the relationship is further identified from the three candidates based on the condition that it matches the team condition with the next highest priority. Again, when the relationship between the two tasks and the person in charge of the task is identified, the relationship is further identified from the two candidates based on the condition that the training point with the next highest priority is the highest. Thereby, it is possible to specify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who matches the purpose intended by the selection side as much as possible.

(One way to solve the problem)
The present invention can be embodied in a method for selecting a person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of a plurality of kinds of work groups. This method
A process for preparing a collaborative work database storing the work type and standard time required for each work constituting the collaborative work in a computer-readable manner;
-For each worker, a process for preparing a computer to read a capability database storing the capabilities of each worker's work type; and
A process for preparing for each worker a unit price database storing the unit price for each worker's work type in a computer-readable manner;
・ For each work that constitutes a joint work, the other work that the same worker should be in charge of, and the process of preparing a team condition database storing the maximum allowable number of people in a computer-readable manner,
-For each worker, a process of preparing a computer-readable training plan database that stores training points for each type of work required for training the worker;
・ In selecting the person in charge, priority is given to minimizing the total time required, priority to minimize the total cost, priority to conform to team conditions, or the best training points Identifying the priority of whether to prioritize, and
-The computer refers to the database,
(1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database Use the ability to identify the relationship between the person who has the shortest total time and the person in charge,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database And use the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database to identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database Using the training points, identifying the relationship between the work that maximizes the total training points and the person in charge,
Have
(The action and effect)
According to this method, it is possible to select a worker in charge that matches a selection condition intended by the selection side.

(One way to solve the problem)
The present invention can also be embodied in a program for selecting a person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of a plurality of types of work groups. This program
・ In selecting the person in charge, priority is given to minimizing the total time required, priority to minimize the total cost, priority to conform to team conditions, or the best training points A process for identifying the priority of whether to give priority to
-A collaborative work database that stores work types and standard durations for each work that constitutes a collaborative work, an ability database that stores the abilities of each worker for each work type, and each worker The unit price database that stores the unit price for each work type, the other work that should be assigned to the same worker for each work that constitutes a joint work, and the maximum permissible number of people for each work that constitutes a joint work Access to the team condition database that stores and the training plan database that stores the training points for each type of work required for training each worker,
・ (1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database To identify the relationship between the worker and the person in charge who minimizes the total time required,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database Using the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database, identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database Using the training points, the process of identifying the relationship between the work that maximizes the total training points and the person in charge,
Is executed on the computer.
(The action and effect)
According to this program, it is possible to select a person in charge who meets the selection condition intended by the selection side.

The best mode for carrying out the invention is listed below.
(Embodiment 1) The work person selecting device is provided with a joint work database that stores work types and standard time required for each work that constitutes a joint work, and each worker's work. Ability database that stores abilities by type, and uses the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database, and the abilities by worker type stored in the capability database. The relationship between the work and the person in charge who makes the total required time the shortest is specified.
(Mode 2) The work person selecting device has a work database and a joint work database storing work types and standard time required for each work constituting the joint work, and each worker's work. A work database stored in the collaborative work database, which includes a capacity database storing capabilities by type and a unit price database storing unit prices for each work type of each worker. Work and work that minimizes the total cost by using the standard duration, the ability of each worker type stored in the capacity database, and the unit price of each work type stored in the unit price database. Identify the relationship of the person in charge.
(Mode 3) The worker selection device stores a collaborative work database that stores a work type and a standard required time for each work, and stores a worker's ability for each work type for each worker. It has a capability database, other tasks that should be assigned to the same worker for each task, and a team condition database that stores the maximum permissible number of people. Then, using the ability of each worker type stored in the ability database and the team condition stored in the team condition database, the relationship between the work that satisfies the team condition and the worker is identified.
(Mode 4) The work person selecting apparatus has a joint work database storing work types and standard required times for each work, and work types required for training the workers for each worker. A training plan database storing different training points; training types stored in the collaborative work database, standard time required, and training points for each worker type stored in the training plan database Using the, specify the relationship between the person who has the highest total training points and the person in charge.

(Embodiment 5) The worker-in-charge selection device includes a joint work database that stores a work type and a standard required time for each work that constitutes a joint work, and each worker's work. Ability database that stores abilities by type, unit price database that stores the unit price for each worker's work type, and the same worker for each work that constitutes joint work. Other work to be done, team condition database that stores the maximum allowable number of people, and a training plan that stores the training points for each worker type required for training each worker Either two of the databases are provided, and according to the database provided, priority is given to the shortest total time required or the lowest total cost to select the person in charge of work. Or Chi Whether to give priority to comply with the conditions, or to identify whether priority to priority to the highest development point can be selected. And (1) When the highest priority is to make the total required time the shortest, the work type and standard required time stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capability database To identify the relationship between the person in charge and the person who has the shortest total time required, and (2) when minimizing the total cost is the top priority, it is stored in the collaborative work database. The total cost is minimized by using the work type and standard time required, the ability of each worker type stored in the capacity database, and the unit price of each work type stored in the unit price database. (3) When the top priority is to meet the team conditions, the work type and standard time required in the collaborative work database and the ability database Been Identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team condition and the person in charge of the work by using the ability of each worker and the team conditions stored in the team condition database. Is given the highest priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the training points for each work type stored in the training plan database are used to determine the total training points. Identify the best work-to-worker relationship.
(Mode 6) The work person selecting device is configured to store a work type and a standard required time for each work that constitutes a joint work, and a work of the worker for each worker. Ability database that stores abilities by type, unit price database that stores the unit price for each worker's work type, and the same worker for each work that constitutes joint work. Other work to be done, team condition database that stores the maximum allowable number of people, and a training plan that stores the training points for each worker type required for training each worker We have any three of the databases, and in order to select the person in charge according to the database, we give priority to the shortest total time required or the lowest total cost. Or Chi Whether to give priority to comply with the conditions, or to identify whether priority to priority to the highest development point can be selected. And (1) When the highest priority is to make the total required time the shortest, the work type and standard required time stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capability database To identify the relationship between the person in charge and the person who has the shortest total time required, and (2) when minimizing the total cost is the top priority, it is stored in the collaborative work database. The total cost is minimized by using the work type and standard time required, the ability of each worker type stored in the capacity database, and the unit price of each work type stored in the unit price database. (3) When the top priority is to meet the team conditions, the work type and standard time required in the collaborative work database and the ability database Been Identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team condition and the person in charge of the work by using the ability of each worker and the team conditions stored in the team condition database. Is the highest priority, using the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the training points for each work type stored in the training plan database. Identify the best work-to-worker relationship.

  In this embodiment, a development person who is most suitable for development of an information system to be developed is selected. The application target of the present invention is not limited to the development of an information system, and can be widely applied to a business in which a plurality of workers are in charge of joint work including a plurality of types of work groups.

First, the system configuration of the development person selecting device will be described with reference to FIG.
The development person selecting device 1 is configured by a computer device, and the hardware configuration is the same as a normal one. This device includes a processing device (CPU), a storage device (an optical storage medium, a magnetic storage medium, or a semiconductor memory such as a RAM or a ROM), an input device, an output device, and the like. Various databases store information that can be used in a computer. Various processing devices are realized by a computer operating in accordance with an installed program.

  From the developer data input unit 2 of the developer selection device 1, data related to all developers is input to the developer information creation / update unit 4. Based on the input data, a capability value database (hereinafter abbreviated as “DB”) 6, an hour rate DB 8, and a breeding plan DB 10 are created.

FIG. 2 shows a data configuration example of the capability value DB 6. Each row in the table is divided according to the process executed in system development. Processes executed in system development include planning, specification / requirement definition, and project management. Necessary processes differ depending on the contents of the system to be developed. Each column of the table is divided according to the level of business execution ability. Level 1 is the lowest level and level 5 is the highest level. A necessary level is appropriately selected depending on the difficulty level of the system to be developed. In this embodiment, the work type is defined by the process and the level.
(A) shows the ability value of developer A, and (B) shows the ability value of developer B by process and level. That is, the ability value for each work type of the developer is shown. The ability value is set according to the judgment of the evaluator. For example, (A) shows that the ability value for the planning process of developer A is set to “0” for all levels. A capability value of “0” means that the task at that level of the process cannot be performed. Also, the ability value for the production (programming) process was set to “1.5” for level 1, “1.3” for level 2, and “1” for level 3 It is shown. If it is determined that each level has the ability to perform a task in a standard time, the ability value is set to “1”. That is, if the ability value is “1.5”, the work can be performed 1.5 times faster than the standard time, and if the ability value is “1.3”, it is 1.3 times faster than the standard time. A business can be performed at a high speed, and a capability value of “1” means that the business can be performed according to standard time.

  FIG. 3 shows a data configuration example of the hour rate DB 8. The hour rate varies from developer to developer. Even the same developer may differ depending on the type of work. For example, developer A has the same hour rate for all processes, whereas developer B has different hour rates depending on the process.

FIG. 4 shows a data configuration example of the breeding plan DB 10. The training plan is a plan for selecting an effective work type in order to train each developer. In addition to the types of work experienced by the developer in the past, there may be cases where the level of work is a more difficult level for training and the types of work in new fields. A high training point is set for the work type that is judged to be highly necessary for training by the evaluator.
(A) shows development points for developer A, and (B) shows development points for developer B by process and level. That is, the development points for each type of work of the developer are shown. For example, (A) shows that the development point in the planning process of developer A is set to “0” for all levels. A training point of “0” means that there is no need to experience the work at that level of the process, and it is already an expert of the process or acquires the work technology of the process. Set when there is no need. Further, it is shown that the training point in the production (programming) process is set to “2” for level 1 and “3” for level 2. Therefore, it can be seen that developer A is more likely to experience level 2 work than level 1 work in the production (programming) process.

  Developer capabilities change over time. Therefore, the latest data is periodically input to the developer data input unit 2 in FIG. Information of each developer at the time of the latest update is stored in the data of the ability value DB 6, the hour rate DB 8, and the breeding plan DB 10.

  The required specification data of the system to be developed is input from the required specification data input unit 12 of FIG. 1 to the development system information creation unit 14. Based on the input data, a basic estimation DB 16 and a team condition DB 18 are created.

FIG. 5 shows a data configuration example of the basic estimation DB 16. The basic estimate is a system development volume calculated from a requirement specification, and a standard time required for each process considered necessary for system development is calculated from past development results. FIG. 5 shows a work type (process × level) that requires collaborative work and its standard time.
In the estimation for the system development of this embodiment, 50 hours are required for the level 2 work type in the project management (domestic) process, and 100 hours are required for the level 2 work type in the design process. ) It is calculated that 200 hours is required for the level 2 work type of the process and 100 hours is required for the level 3 work type of the process.

FIG. 6 shows a data configuration example of the team condition DB 18. In order to advance system development efficiently, the same worker must be in charge of a plurality of work types, or quality cannot be ensured if the same work is divided among many developers. In consideration of this, the team condition sets what kind of team a plurality of developers can develop a system with higher efficiency and higher quality.
In FIG. 6 (1), the dispersion condition is shown for each process necessary for the system development of this embodiment. The distributed condition is a condition for determining whether or not the developers in charge need to be the same. The project management (domestic) process is set so that another developer can be in charge of the design process and production (programming) process. (-Mark). On the other hand, it is set that the same developer must be in charge of the design process and the manufacturing (programming) process (marked with a circle). In FIG. 6 (2), the maximum personnel is shown for each process necessary for the system development of this embodiment. Maximum personnel is the number of developers in charge of the process at the same time. If it is difficult for many developers to manage the quality of the system, it is necessary to keep it below the set maximum personnel. “1” is set in the project management (domestic) process, the design process, and the production (programming) process.

Using the data of these DBs 6, 8, 10, 16, and 18, the work / developer person-in-charge selection unit 20 selects which developer is responsible for which work type and how much time. In this case, the selection is performed according to the selection condition input from the selection condition input unit 22.
The selection result of the work / development person selecting unit 20 is stored in the work / development person DB 24 and displayed on the work / development person display unit 26.

  Next, with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 7, the process from the process of creating a basic estimate to the process of selecting a developer in charge for each process will be described for the system to be developed.

First, in step S2, the development system information creation unit 14 creates a basic estimate based on the required specifications. The created basic estimate is stored in the basic estimate DB 16.
Next, in step S4, with reference to the basic estimation DB 16, the work / developer person-in-charge selection unit 20 selects a developer candidate who can perform the business.
In the basic estimation of FIG. 5, the following work types (process × level) are required.
Project management (domestic) process: Level 2,
Design process: Level 2,
Production (programming) process: Level 2 + Level 3
On the other hand, the level of developer A shown in FIG. 2A and its ability value are as follows.
Project management (domestic) process: ability value of “0” (cannot be performed),
Design process: ability value of “1” at level 2,
Production (programming) process: Ability value of “1.3” at level 2, an ability value of “1” at level 3, and the level and ability value of developer B shown in FIG. It is.
Project management (Domestic) process: Level 2 “2” capability value,
Design process: ability value of “1” at level 2,
Production (programming) process: Ability value of “0” (cannot be performed)
In this embodiment, these A and B are selected as developer candidates, and the person in charge of development of the work type required in the basic estimation is determined.

  In steps S6, S8, and S10 in FIG. 7, processing for creating in advance data that can be used under each selection condition described below is executed.

In step S6, the total time required for system development is calculated for each joint work unit. It can be calculated from the time required for the basic estimation and the ability value for each developer that the developer A and the developer B selected in step S4 can perform which work type in what time. . For example, the level 2 work type in the project management (domestic) process is said to require 50 hours, and only B can take charge. Since the ability value of B is “2”, B can be executed in 50 hours ÷ 2 = 25 hours. The level 2 work type in the design process is said to require 100 hours. The ability value of A is “1” and the ability value of B is also “1”, so both A and B are 100 hours ÷ 1. = 100 hours. It is said that 200 hours is required for the level 2 work type in the production (programming) process, and 100 hours is required for the level 3 work type in the process, and only A can be in charge. Since the ability value of A is “1.3” at level 2 and “1” at level 3, it can be executed in 200 ÷ 1.3 + 100 ÷ 1 = 254 hours.
From the above, the following two cases of joint work can be considered.
<Case 1>
Project management (in Japan): 25 hours for B
Design: A-100 hours,
Production (programming): In A, 154 hours + 100 hours = 254 hours <Case 2>
Project management (in Japan): 25 hours for B
Design: B-100 hours,
Production (programming): In A, 154 hours + 100 hours = 254 hours In this way, the total required time is calculated for all possible collaborative units.

In step S8 in FIG. 7, the total cost required for system development is calculated in units of collaborative work. The total cost can be calculated by multiplying the total required time calculated in step S6 by the hour rate in the hour rate data. From Fig. 3, the design process A has an hour rate of 5000 yen, the production (programming) process has an hour rate of 5000 yen, the project management (in Japan) process B has a cost of 6000 yen, and the design process has an hour rate of 4000 yen. is there. Therefore, the total cost is calculated as follows:
<Case 1>
Project management (in Japan): 25 hours x 6000 yen = 150,000 yen
Design: 100 hours x 5000 yen = 500000 yen,
Production (programming): 254 hours x 5000 yen = 1270000 yen,
Total: 1920000 yen <Case 2>
Project management (in Japan): 25 hours x 6000 yen = 150,000 yen
Design: 100 hours x 4000 yen = 400,000 yen
Production (programming): 254 hours x 5000 yen = 1270000 yen,
Total: 1820000 yen In this way, the total cost is calculated for all units of collaboration.

In step S10 in FIG. 7, the total training points are calculated in units of joint work. From FIG. 4, the total training points are calculated as follows.
<Case 1>
Project management (in Japan): 3 points for B
Design: 3 points for A,
Production (programming): 1 + 3 = 4 points on A,
Total training points: 4 points for A + 3 points for B = 7 points <Case 2>
Project management (in Japan): 3 points for B
Design: 0 points for B
Production (programming): 1 + 4 = 4 points in A
Total training points: 4 points for A + 3 points for B = 7 points In this way, the total training points for each developer are calculated for all units of joint work.

Subsequently, in step S12 to step S36 in FIG. 7, it is specified under what conditions the case is selected. The selection conditions are specified according to the priority order in the order from the priority placed in the target system development.
First, in step S12, the priority order of selection conditions is specified. The priority of the selection condition of whether to meet the team conditions, to minimize the total required time, to minimize the total cost, or to minimize the total training points is specified.
In step S14, it is determined whether or not the selection condition specified with the highest priority is adapted to the team condition. When it determines with YES, the case of the joint work which suits team conditions is selected in step S16. In the case of system development according to the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6A, case 1 is selected because the same developer must be in charge of the design process and the production (programming) process under the distributed condition. Then, it is determined whether or not a case has been selected in step S18 of FIG. For example, if both cases meet the team conditions, the case could not be selected. In that case, the process proceeds to step S20. On the other hand, when a case can be selected as in this example, the process is terminated.

  When the process proceeds to step S20 (when NO is determined at step S14 or S18), the selection condition specified with the highest priority (when NO is determined at step S14) or the selection condition specified at the next level (When it is determined NO in step S18), it is determined whether or not the total required time is to be minimized. When it determines with YES, the case of the joint work whose total required time becomes the shortest in step S22 is selected. In the above step S6, the same total required time was calculated in both cases 1 and 2. Therefore, it is determined as NO in Step S24, and the process proceeds to Step S26.

  When the process proceeds to step S26 (when NO is determined at step S20 or step S24), the selection condition specified with the highest priority (when NO is determined at step S20) or the selection condition specified next. (When determined as NO in step S24), it is determined whether or not the total cost is to be minimized. When it determines with YES, the case of the joint work from which total cost becomes the minimum in step S28 is selected. In step S8, the total cost of case 2 is minimized. Therefore, the case 2 is selected, YES is determined in the step S30, and the process is terminated.

  When the process proceeds to step S32 (when NO is determined at step S26 or S30), the selection condition specified with the highest priority (when NO is determined at step S26) or the selection condition specified at the next level Since (when it is determined NO in step S30) is to minimize the total training point, the case of joint work with the highest total training point is selected. In the above step S10, the same total breeding points were calculated in both cases 1 and 2. Therefore, it is determined as NO in step S34, and finally an arbitrary case is selected in step S36.

  The selected collaborative work case is stored in the work / developer manager DB 24 of FIG. 1 and displayed on the work / developer manager display unit 26.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, an appropriate worker corresponding to the process is selected according to the selection condition preferentially adopted for the target system development. By allowing a plurality of selection conditions to be freely adopted, it is possible to select a developer in charge that matches the intended purpose of the selection side.

Specific examples of the present invention have been described in detail above, but these are merely examples and do not limit the scope of the claims. The technology described in the claims includes various modifications and changes of the specific examples illustrated above.
In the present embodiment, the identified selection conditions are determined in the order of team conditions (step S14), total required time (step S20), total cost (step S26), and total training points (step S32). However, it is not limited to this. The order of determination can be freely changed.
In the present embodiment, the selection conditions are the team conditions, the total required time, the total cost, and the total training points. However, the selection conditions are not limited to these. For example, a database that stores the developer's operating time (6 hours, 8 hours, etc.) and a database that stores the system development delivery date are prepared, and the delivery date is met or the delivery date is minimized. This may be a selection condition.
In addition, the technical elements described in the present specification or the drawings exhibit technical usefulness alone or in various combinations, and are not limited to the combinations described in the claims at the time of filing. In addition, the technology illustrated in the present specification or the drawings achieves a plurality of objects at the same time, and has technical utility by achieving one of the objects.

The figure which shows the system configuration | structure of a development person selection apparatus. The figure which shows the data structural example of capability value DB6. The figure which shows the data structural example of hour rate DB8. The figure which shows the data structural example of training plan DB10. The figure which shows the data structural example of basic estimation DB16. The figure which shows the data structural example of team condition DB18. The flowchart which shows the procedure of the process which a development person selection apparatus performs.

Explanation of symbols

1: Development person selecting device,
2: Developer data input section,
4: Developer information creation / update department,
6: Ability DB
8: Hour rate DB,
10: Training plan DB,
12: Requirement specification data input part,
14: Development system information creation department,
16: Basic estimate DB,
18: Team condition DB
20: Work / developer assignment section,
22: Selection condition input part,
24: Work / Developer DB
26: Work / developer display section

Claims (4)

It is a device that selects the person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of multiple types of work groups,
A collaborative work database that stores work types and standard durations for each work that constitutes a collaborative work,
For each worker, an ability database storing the ability of each worker for each work type,
For each worker, a unit price database storing the unit price for each work type of the worker,
For each work that constitutes a joint work, other work that should be assigned to the same worker, a team condition database that stores the maximum allowable number of people,
For each worker, a training plan database that stores training points for each work type required for training the worker,
In selecting the person in charge, prioritizing the shortest total time, prioritizing minimizing the total cost, prioritizing conforming to the team conditions, Means for identifying the priority of what to do,
(1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database Use the ability to identify the relationship between the person who has the shortest total time and the person in charge,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database And use the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database to identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database A means to identify the relationship between the work that uses the training points and maximizes the total training points and the person in charge,
A worker selection apparatus having   When the relationship between two or more tasks and the worker is specified by the selection condition set as the highest priority, means for specifying the relationship between one task and the worker is added according to the selection condition of the next order. 2. The operator selection device according to claim 1, wherein: It is a method of selecting the person in charge of each work of a joint work consisting of multiple types of work groups,
A process for preparing a computer-readable collaborative work database storing work types and standard durations for each work constituting the collaborative work;
For each worker, a process for preparing a computer-readable ability database storing the ability of each worker for each work type; and
For each worker, a process of preparing a unit price database storing the unit price for each work type of the worker so that the computer can read the data;
For each work that constitutes a collaborative work, the other work that should be assigned to the same worker, and the process of preparing a team condition database that stores the maximum allowable number in a computer-readable manner,
For each worker, a process for preparing a computer-readable training plan database storing training points for each type of work required for training the worker;
In selecting the person in charge, prioritizing the shortest total time, prioritizing minimizing the total cost, prioritizing conforming to the team conditions, Identifying the priority of whether to prioritize
The computer refers to the database,
(1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database Use the ability to identify the relationship between the person who has the shortest total time and the person in charge,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database And use the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database to identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database Using the training points, identifying the relationship between the work that maximizes the total training points and the person in charge,
A method for selecting a worker in charge. It is a program for selecting the person in charge of each work of a joint work composed of multiple types of work groups.
In selecting the person in charge, prioritizing the shortest total time, prioritizing minimizing the total cost, prioritizing conforming to the team conditions, Processing to identify the priority of whether to prioritize
A collaborative work database that stores work types and standard durations for each work that constitutes a collaborative work, an ability database that stores the abilities of each work type of each worker, and each worker The unit price database that stores the unit price for each work type of the worker, other work that should be assigned to the same worker for each work that constitutes the joint work, and the maximum allowable number of people for each work that constitutes the joint work Access the team condition database that is stored and the training plan database that stores the training points for each type of work required for training each worker,
(1) When the highest priority is to minimize the total time required, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the capacity database Use the ability to identify the relationship between the person who has the shortest total time and the person in charge,
(2) When minimizing the total cost is the top priority, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each work type stored in the capacity database And use the unit price for each type of work stored in the unit price database to identify the relationship between the work and the person in charge who minimizes the total cost,
(3) When conformity to team conditions is given the highest priority, the work types and standard durations stored in the collaborative work database and the abilities of each type of work stored in the ability database , Use the team conditions stored in the team condition database to identify the relationship between the work that satisfies the team conditions and the worker,
(4) When the highest priority is given to the highest training point, the work type and standard time required stored in the collaborative work database and the work type of the worker stored in the training plan database Using the training points, the process of identifying the relationship between the work that maximizes the total training points and the person in charge,
A program that causes a computer to execute.

Images