JP2003252706A - Algicidal fungicide - Google Patents
Algicidal fungicideInfo
- Publication number
- JP2003252706A JP2003252706A JP2002054718A JP2002054718A JP2003252706A JP 2003252706 A JP2003252706 A JP 2003252706A JP 2002054718 A JP2002054718 A JP 2002054718A JP 2002054718 A JP2002054718 A JP 2002054718A JP 2003252706 A JP2003252706 A JP 2003252706A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- acid
- seaweed
- treatment
- effect
- iron
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Edible Seaweed (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、海苔養殖中に発生する
珪藻・アオノリ等の雑藻類及び赤腐れ菌・壺状菌・付着
細菌等の病害菌を駆除する製剤に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a formulation for exterminating algae such as diatoms and aonori and pathogenic fungi such as red rot fungi, vase-shaped bacteria and adherent bacteria which are generated during seaweed cultivation.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】海苔養殖において、珪藻等の雑藻類が繁
殖し海苔葉体又は海苔網に付着すると海苔の成育を阻害
し、ひいては死滅させてしまうこともある。成育に問題
ない位の珪藻が葉体に付着していても、その原藻を製品
にした場合、黒い乾海苔の中に緑色の斑点が入ってしま
い商品価値が低下してしまう。食べても苦くておいしく
ない海苔になってしまう。又、海苔養殖中に赤腐れ菌・
壺状菌・付着細菌等が発生すると海苔が腐敗し全滅して
しまうことがある。そのため、赤腐れ病等の病害や珪藻
等の雑藻類を駆除を行うために酸処理や干出という作業
が行われている。干出という作業は重労働で作業性が悪
い割に効果が小さいという欠点がある。現在の酸処理に
よる駆除方法は、干出よりも効果が高いが十分な効果と
はなっていない。2. Description of the Related Art In seaweed cultivation, if algae such as diatoms propagate and adhere to the seaweed leaf body or the seaweed net, the growth of the seaweed may be hindered and eventually killed. Even if diatoms that have no problem in growth adhere to the leaves, if the original algae is used as a product, green dry spots will appear in the black dry seaweed and the commercial value will be reduced. Even if you eat it, it will be bitter and not delicious. In addition, red rot bacteria
If vase-shaped bacteria or adherent bacteria are generated, the seaweed may rot and become completely destroyed. Therefore, in order to control diseases such as red rot and weeds such as diatoms, work such as acid treatment and drying is performed. The work of draining has a drawback that it is hard work and poor in workability, but its effect is small. Although the present method of extermination by acid treatment is more effective than drought, it is not sufficient.
【0003】今までに、下記に示すような海苔養殖用の
処理剤が開示されている。特開昭50−121425号
公報には、「炭素数1ないし4の飽和脂肪族モノカルボ
ン酸、炭素数2ないし4の飽和または不飽和ジカルボン
酸、グリコール酸、乳酸、酒石酸、リンゴ酸、クエン酸
から成る群から選ばれた有機カルボン酸の一種又は二種
以上を有効成分として含有する殺藻剤」が記載されてい
る。特開平11−286407号公報には、「乳酸及び
/又は酢酸とパラオキシ安息香酸エステルとを含有する
ことを特徴とするケイソウ駆除用処理剤」が記載されて
いる。特公昭60−13647号公報には、「クエン酸
0.3〜5.0%を含み、pHが1.0〜6.0の処理
液に浸漬させる雑藻、病害の駆除、予防による海苔養殖
法」が記載されている。特公昭60−13648号公報
には、「塩酸、硝酸、硫酸、リン酸などの無機酸を添加
してpH1.0〜4.0とする雑藻、病害の駆除、予防
による海苔養殖法」が記載されている。The following treatment agents for seaweed aquaculture have been disclosed so far. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 50-12125 discloses "Saturated aliphatic monocarboxylic acid having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, saturated or unsaturated dicarboxylic acid having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, glycolic acid, lactic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, citric acid. And an algicidal agent containing one or more organic carboxylic acids selected from the group consisting of as an active ingredient. JP-A No. 11-286407 describes "a treatment agent for diatom control, which contains lactic acid and / or acetic acid and paraoxybenzoic acid ester". Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. Sho 60-13647 discloses "seaweed aquaculture by exterminating and preventing diseased algae, which is dipped in a treatment solution containing citric acid of 0.3 to 5.0% and pH of 1.0 to 6.0. Law "is described. Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 60-13648 discloses "a seaweed aquaculture method for controlling weeds and diseases by adding inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid to adjust the pH to 1.0 to 4.0". Have been described.
【0004】酸処理の方法は、海苔網を1枚ずつ取り外
し酸処理液に10〜30分浸漬し、その後海苔網を張り
直す方法で行われている。最近では、一軒当たりの養殖
枚数が増加したために、1枚当たりの処理に要する時間
を短くせざるを得なくなり、海苔網を固定したまま船を
潜らせて酸処理を行う素通し処理という酸処理方法が採
用されるようになってきている。海苔網を固定したまま
酸処理ができるため、従来の1/5〜1/10の時間で
酸処理を行うことができる。しかし、処理時間が10秒
〜5分と短くなり、従来の0.1〜0.5W/V%酸濃
度では効果がなく、2〜10W/V%という高濃度での
処理となってきている。それでも十分な効果には至って
いない。使用量が激増し経費増・環境汚染負荷の問題も
発生してきている。最近では、酸処理では駆除すること
ができない、海苔に付着する珪藻タビュラリアが発生す
るようになってきている。病害菌の耐酸性も強くなり、
酸だけでは効果が不十分となってきているのである。The acid treatment is carried out by removing the seaweed nets one by one and immersing them in an acid treatment solution for 10 to 30 minutes, and then resealing the seaweed net. Recently, because the number of farms per aquaculture has increased, the time required for treatment per one has to be shortened, and the acid treatment is called acid treatment, in which the ship is dipped while the seaweed net is fixed and the acid treatment is performed. Methods are being adopted. Since the acid treatment can be performed while the seaweed net is fixed, the acid treatment can be performed in 1/5 to 1/10 of the conventional time. However, the treatment time is shortened to 10 seconds to 5 minutes, and the conventional 0.1 to 0.5 W / V% acid concentration has no effect, and the treatment has been performed at a high concentration of 2 to 10 W / V%. . Still, it has not reached the full effect. The amount of use has increased dramatically, and the problems of cost increase and environmental pollution load are occurring. Recently, the diatom Tabularia that adheres to seaweed, which cannot be removed by acid treatment, has been generated. Acid resistance of disease bacteria also becomes stronger,
The effect is becoming insufficient with acid alone.
【0005】そこで、無機塩を添加し浸透圧を高めるこ
とにより酸処理の効果を高めるという方法が報告されて
いる(特開平9−201180号公報)。しかし、比重
を1.030以上にするためには、処理液に数%〜10
%の塩を添加しなければならない。一定の処理効果を得
るためには、処理液の比重を一定に保たねばならない
が、連続作業で行われる作業中に多量の塩を投入してそ
の濃度を一定に保つのはかなり難しい技術であり、作業
効率も悪い。一般的に処理液は約1000L調整し、1
日に40〜100枚の海苔網を処理することになるた
め、塩5%濃度を維持して処理するには、1日に酸性処
理剤20〜40Lと塩200〜400kgが必要とな
る。400kgもの塩を小さな酸処理船上に運びこみ、
一定の比重になるように溶解していくことは困難である
とともに大変な重労働となる。海苔養殖は閉鎖性の高い
内湾で行われているため、海苔養殖者が全員この方法で
酸処理を行うことになれば、海水中の比重が高くなり生
態系を狂わすことにもなりかねない。以上より、安全性
が高く低濃度で効力・作業性に優れた処理剤、処理方法
の開発が切望されているのである。Therefore, a method has been reported in which the effect of acid treatment is enhanced by adding an inorganic salt to increase the osmotic pressure (JP-A-9-201180). However, in order to increase the specific gravity to 1.030 or more, the treatment liquid contains several% to 10%.
% Salt must be added. In order to obtain a constant treatment effect, it is necessary to keep the specific gravity of the treatment liquid constant, but it is a fairly difficult technique to add a large amount of salt during a continuous operation to keep its concentration constant. Yes, work efficiency is poor. Generally, prepare about 1000L of treatment liquid and
Since 40 to 100 seaweed nets are treated daily, 20 to 40 L of the acidic treating agent and 200 to 400 kg of salt are required per day to maintain the salt concentration at 5%. Bring 400 kg of salt onto a small acid-treated ship,
It is difficult and extremely laborious to dissolve them so that the specific gravity becomes constant. Since seaweed cultivation is carried out in a highly closed inner bay, if all seaweed farmers perform acid treatment using this method, the specific gravity in seawater will increase and this may lead to an upset of the ecosystem. From the above, it is earnestly desired to develop a treatment agent and a treatment method which are highly safe and have a low concentration and excellent efficacy and workability.
【0006】[0006]
【本発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明の目的は、海
苔自体に害を与えることなく、珪藻・アオノリ等の雑藻
類及び赤腐れ菌・壺状菌・付着細菌等の病害菌を低濃度
・短時間で駆除できる処理剤・処理方法を提供すること
である。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The object of the present invention is to provide a low concentration of weeds such as diatoms and aonori and pathogenic bacteria such as red-rot fungi, vase-shaped bacteria and adherent bacteria without damaging the seaweed itself. -To provide a treatment agent and a treatment method that can be removed in a short time.
【0007】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段】前記の課題を解決するた
めに鋭意検討した結果、有機酸・無機酸の中の一種以上
と乳酸鉄を含有する処理液を用いることにより、海苔養
殖時に発生する雑藻・病害の駆除予防を低濃度・短時間
で行うことができることを見出した。即ち、本発明は次
の通りである。
(1)有機酸・無機酸の中の一種以上と乳酸鉄を主成分
とすることを特徴とする海苔養殖用の殺藻殺菌剤。
(2)海苔網を処理する時の処理液中の成分が、0.0
1W/V%以上の酸及び、0.001W/V%以上の有
機酸鉄を含有していることを特徴とする(1)記載の海
苔養殖用の殺藻殺菌剤。
(3)請求項(1)〜(2)に記載の処理剤に海苔を浸
漬するか、または海苔処理剤を海苔に散布することを特
徴とする海苔の処理方法。[Means for Solving the Problems] As a result of intensive studies to solve the above problems, the use of a treatment liquid containing one or more of organic acids and inorganic acids and iron lactate causes the occurrence of seaweed cultivation. We have found that we can control disinfestation of weeds and diseases with low concentration and in a short time. That is, the present invention is as follows. (1) An algicidal fungicide for seaweed aquaculture, which comprises one or more of organic acids and inorganic acids and iron lactate as main components. (2) The component in the treatment liquid when treating the seaweed net is 0.0
An algaecide fungicide for seaweed cultivation according to (1), which contains an acid of 1 W / V% or more and an organic acid iron of 0.001 W / V% or more. (3) A method for treating seaweed, which comprises immersing the seaweed in the treatment agent according to any one of claims (1) and (2) or spraying the seaweed treatment agent on the seaweed.
【0008】試験例からわかるように、乳酸鉄単独では
赤腐れ菌・珪藻の駆除効果がなく、酸単独でも効果が弱
いが、酸と有機酸鉄を組み合わせることにより赤腐れ菌
及び珪藻の駆除効果が増大することがわかる。10秒か
ら10分以内の短時間でも低濃度にて赤腐れ菌を駆除す
ることができるのである。As can be seen from the test examples, iron lactate alone does not have the effect of controlling red-rot fungi and diatoms, and acid alone has a weak effect, but the effect of combining acid and organic iron iron is effective against red-rot fungi and diatoms. It can be seen that The red-rot fungus can be exterminated at a low concentration even for a short time within 10 seconds to 10 minutes.
【0009】本発明の殺藻殺菌剤は、有機酸・無機酸の
中の一種以上と有機酸鉄を主成分とする海苔養殖用の殺
藻殺菌剤である。海苔が付着した海苔網を処理する時
は、酸と乳酸鉄の混合製剤を溶解もしくは希釈して使用
する。製剤は、固形状でも液状でも良いが、液状の方が
海水にすぐに溶解し使いやすいので好ましい。酸および
有機酸鉄別々の製剤を、希釈溶解して使用することもで
きる。The algicidal fungicide of the present invention is an algicidal fungicide for seaweed cultivation, which contains at least one of organic acids and inorganic acids and organic acid iron as main components. When treating seaweed nets on which seaweed adheres, dissolve or dilute a mixed preparation of acid and iron lactate before use. The preparation may be in a solid form or a liquid form, but a liquid form is preferable since it dissolves in seawater immediately and is easy to use. Separate preparations of acid and organic acid iron can be used by diluting and dissolving.
【0010】本発明で使用する酸は、有機酸・無機酸の
中の1種以上を使用することができる。酸の種類として
は何ら限定されるものではないが、安全性・環境への負
荷を考えると食品添加物として認められている安全性の
高いクエン酸・リンゴ酸・酒石酸・乳酸・フマル酸・コ
ハク酸・酢酸・グルコン酸・アジピン酸・フィチン酸・
ケトグルタル酸・イタコン酸・リン酸・塩酸・硫酸・硝
酸等の酸を用いることが好ましい。The acid used in the present invention may be at least one selected from organic acids and inorganic acids. Although there is no limitation on the type of acid, citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, fumaric acid, and amber are highly safe and recognized as food additives in view of safety and environmental load. Acid, acetic acid, gluconic acid, adipic acid, phytic acid,
It is preferable to use acids such as ketoglutaric acid, itaconic acid, phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and nitric acid.
【0011】海苔を処理する時の処理液の成分は、酸の
濃度0.01W/V%以上、有機酸鉄の濃度は0.00
1W/V%以上であることが好ましい。希望する処理時
間に合わせて酸濃度及び乳酸鉄の濃度を調整し使用する
ことができる。処理時のpHは0.5〜5.0が好まし
い。When treating seaweed, the components of the treatment liquid include an acid concentration of 0.01 W / V% or more and an organic acid iron concentration of 0.00
It is preferably 1 W / V% or more. The acid concentration and iron lactate concentration can be adjusted and used according to the desired treatment time. The pH during the treatment is preferably 0.5 to 5.0.
【0012】肥料成分として、アミノ酸・塩化アンモニ
ウム・塩化ナトリウム・塩化マグネシウム・塩化カルシ
ウム・塩化カリウム・硝酸ナトリウム・硝酸ソーダ・硝
酸カリウム・リン酸ナトリウム・リン酸アンモニウム・
リン酸カリウム・硝酸アンモニウム・硫酸マグネシウム
・硫酸ナトリウム・糖類を添加することもできる。As fertilizer components, amino acids, ammonium chloride, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, sodium phosphate, ammonium phosphate,
Potassium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and sugar can be added.
【0013】(試験1)乳酸0.3W/V%及び乳酸鉄
を0.001、0.01、0.1、0.3、0.5、
1.0W/V%になるように海水に溶解した液を調整し
た。赤腐れ菌に感染した海苔葉体を20℃にて30秒・
1分・5分処理した後、滅菌海水にて洗浄した。処理2
日後に赤腐れ菌の駆除効果を顕微鏡にて調査した。比較
例として乳酸0.3W/V%、乳酸鉄0.001、0.
01、0.1、0.3、0.5、1.0W/V%の溶液
を調整した。赤腐れ菌駆除効果と海苔の傷害度の評価基
準は、下記のとおりである。結果は表1、表2に示す。
(赤腐れ菌駆除効果)
− :効果なし
+ :20〜50%駆除
++ :50〜80%駆除
+++ :80〜100%駆除
++++:100%駆除
(海苔の傷害度)
− :傷害なし
+ :20〜50%傷害
++:50〜100%傷害(Test 1) Lactic acid 0.3 W / V% and iron lactate 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5,
The liquid dissolved in seawater was adjusted to 1.0 W / V%. Nori leaves infected with red rot bacteria at 20 ° C for 30 seconds
After treatment for 1 minute and 5 minutes, it was washed with sterilized seawater. Process 2
After a day, the control effect of the red-rot fungus was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, lactic acid 0.3 W / V%, iron lactate 0.001, 0.
Solutions of 01, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 W / V% were prepared. The evaluation criteria of the red rot control effect and the damage degree of seaweed are as follows. The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. (Red rot control effect) −: No effect +: 20 to 50% control ++: 50 to 80% control +++: 80 to 100% control ++++: 100% control (damage to seaweed) −: No damage +: 20 -50% injury ++: 50-100% injury
【0014】[0014]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0015】[0015]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0016】(試験2)乳酸0.2W/V%及び乳酸鉄
を0.1、0.3、0.5、1.0W/V%になるよう
に海水に溶解した液を調整した。赤腐れ菌に感染した海
苔葉体を20℃にて30秒・1分処理した後、滅菌海水
にて洗浄した。処理2日後に赤腐れ菌の駆除効果を顕微
鏡にて調査した。比較例として乳酸0.2W/V%の溶
液を調整した。赤腐れ菌駆除効果と海苔の傷害度の評価
基準は、試験1と同様にして行った。結果を表3に示
す。(Test 2) A solution prepared by dissolving 0.2 W / V% lactic acid and iron lactate in seawater to 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 W / V% was prepared. The nori leaf cells infected with red rot fungus were treated at 20 ° C. for 30 seconds and 1 minute, and then washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the control effect of the red rot fungus was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, a 0.2 W / V% lactic acid solution was prepared. The evaluation criteria for the effect of exterminating red rot bacteria and the damage degree of seaweed were the same as in Test 1. The results are shown in Table 3.
【0017】[0017]
【表3】 [Table 3]
【0018】(試験3)乳酸0.1W/V%及び乳酸鉄
を0.1、0.3、0.5、1.0W/V%になるよう
に海水に溶解した液を調整した。赤腐れ菌に感染した海
苔葉体を20℃にて1分、3分処理した後、滅菌海水に
て洗浄した。処理2日後に赤腐れ菌の駆除効果を顕微鏡
にて調査した。比較例として乳酸0.1W/V%の溶液
を調整した。赤腐れ菌駆除効果と海苔の傷害度の評価基
準は、試験1と同様にして行った。結果を表4に示す。(Test 3) A solution prepared by dissolving lactic acid at 0.1 W / V% and iron lactate at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 W / V% in seawater was prepared. The nori leaf cells infected with red rot fungus were treated at 20 ° C. for 1 minute and 3 minutes, and then washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the control effect of the red rot fungus was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, a 0.1 W / V% lactic acid solution was prepared. The evaluation criteria for the effect of exterminating red rot bacteria and the damage degree of seaweed were the same as in Test 1. The results are shown in Table 4.
【0019】[0019]
【表4】 [Table 4]
【0020】(試験4)乳酸鉄0.15W/V%にそれ
ぞれクエン酸0.01、0.1、0.3、1.0、2.
0W/V%なるように海水に溶解した液を調整した。赤
腐れ菌に感染した海苔葉体を20℃にて10秒・20秒
・30秒・1分・3分・5分処理した後、滅菌海水にて
洗浄した。処理2日後に赤腐れ菌の駆除効果を顕微鏡に
て調査した。比較例としてクエン酸0.01、0.1、
0.3、1.0、2.0W/V%の溶液を調整した。赤
腐れ菌駆除効果と海苔の傷害度の評価基準は、試験1と
同様にして行った。結果を表5・表6に示す。(Test 4) Iron lactate 0.15 W / V% and citric acid 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 2.
A solution dissolved in seawater was prepared so as to have 0 W / V%. The nori leaf cells infected with red rot fungus were treated at 20 ° C. for 10 seconds, 20 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and then washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the control effect of the red rot fungus was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, citric acid 0.01, 0.1,
Solutions of 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 W / V% were prepared. The evaluation criteria for the effect of exterminating red rot bacteria and the damage degree of seaweed were the same as in Test 1. The results are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
【0021】[0021]
【表5】 [Table 5]
【0022】[0022]
【表6】 [Table 6]
【0023】(試験5)乳酸鉄0.15W/V%にそれ
ぞれクエン酸・リンゴ酸・酒石酸・リン酸・塩酸が0.
3W/V%なるように海水に溶解した液を調整した。赤
腐れ菌に感染した海苔葉体を20℃にて30秒・1分・
5分処理した後、滅菌海水にて洗浄した。処理2日後に
赤腐れ菌の駆除効果を顕微鏡にて調査した。比較例とし
てクエン酸・リンゴ酸・酒石酸・リン酸・塩酸の0.3
W/V%の溶液を調整した。赤腐れ菌駆除効果と海苔の
傷害度の評価基準は、試験1と同様にして行った。結果
を表7・表8に示す。(Test 5) Iron lactate 0.15 W / V% was supplemented with citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid and hydrochloric acid, respectively.
A solution dissolved in seawater was prepared so as to have a concentration of 3 W / V%. Nori leaves infected with red rot fungus at 20 ℃ for 30 seconds ・ 1 minute ・
After treatment for 5 minutes, it was washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the control effect of the red rot fungus was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, 0.3 of citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid
A W / V% solution was prepared. The evaluation criteria for the effect of exterminating red rot bacteria and the damage degree of seaweed were the same as in Test 1. The results are shown in Tables 7 and 8.
【0024】[0024]
【表7】 [Table 7]
【0025】[0025]
【表8】 [Table 8]
【0026】(試験6)クエン酸0.2、0.5、1.
0W/V%に乳酸鉄をそれぞれ0.15W/V%になる
ように海水に溶解した液を調整した。珪藻(タビュラリ
ア)が付着した海苔葉体を20℃にて5分、10分処理
した後、滅菌海水にて洗浄した。処理2日後に珪藻の駆
除効果を顕微鏡にて調査した。比較例として乳酸鉄0.
15W/V%及びクエン酸0.2、0.5、1.0W/
V%の溶液を調整した。珪藻の駆除効果と海苔の傷害度
の評価基準は、下記のようにして行った。結果を表9に
示す。
(珪藻駆除効果)
− :効果なし
+ :20%以下駆除
++ :20〜80%駆除
+++ :80〜100%駆除
++++:100%駆除
(海苔の傷害度)
− :傷害なし
+ :20〜50%傷害
++:50〜100%傷害(Test 6) Citric acid 0.2, 0.5, 1.
A solution prepared by dissolving iron lactate in seawater to 0 W / V% to 0.15 W / V% was prepared. The seaweed leaf bodies to which the diatom (Tabularia) had adhered were treated at 20 ° C. for 5 minutes and 10 minutes, and then washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the diatom exterminating effect was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, iron lactate 0.
15 W / V% and citric acid 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 W /
A V% solution was prepared. The evaluation criteria for the diatom exterminating effect and the laver damage degree were as follows. The results are shown in Table 9. (Diatom extermination effect)-: No effect +: 20% or less extermination ++: 20-80% extermination +++: 80-100% extermination ++++: 100% extermination (damage to seaweed)-: No injury +: 20-50% Injury ++: 50-100% injury
【0027】[0027]
【表9】 [Table 9]
【0028】(試験7)乳酸0.3W/V%及び乳酸鉄
を0.001、0.01、0.1、1.0W/V%にな
るように海水に溶解した液を調整した。珪藻(リクモフ
ォラ)が付着した海苔葉体を20℃にて30秒、1分処
理した後、滅菌海水にて洗浄した。処理2日後に珪藻の
駆除効果を顕微鏡にて調査した。比較例として乳酸0.
3W/V%、乳酸鉄1.0W/V%の溶液を調整した。
珪藻の駆除効果と海苔の傷害度の評価基準は、試験6と
同様にして行った。結果を表10に示す。(Test 7) A solution prepared by dissolving lactic acid 0.3 W / V% and iron lactate in 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 W / V% was prepared. The seaweed leaf bodies to which the diatom (liquophora) had adhered were treated at 20 ° C. for 30 seconds and 1 minute, and then washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the diatom exterminating effect was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, lactic acid 0.
A solution of 3 W / V% and iron lactate 1.0 W / V% was prepared.
The evaluation criteria for the diatom exterminating effect and laver damage degree were the same as in Test 6. The results are shown in Table 10.
【0029】[0029]
【表10】 [Table 10]
【0030】(試験8)乳酸鉄0.15W/V%にそれ
ぞれ乳酸0.01、0.1、0.3、1.0、2.0W
/V%なるように海水に溶解した液を調整した。珪藻
(リクモフォラ)が付着した海苔葉体を20℃にて30
秒・1分処理した後、滅菌海水にて洗浄した。処理2日
後に珪藻の駆除効果を顕微鏡にて調査した。比較例とし
て乳酸0.01、0.1、0.3、1.0、2.0W/
V%の溶液を調整した。珪藻の駆除効果と海苔の傷害度
の評価基準は、試験6と同様にして行った。結果を表1
1に示す。(Test 8) Iron lactate 0.15 W / V% and lactic acid 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 W respectively
The liquid dissolved in seawater was adjusted to be / V%. Nori leaves with diatoms (Likumophora) attached at 30
After the treatment for 1 second and 1 minute, it was washed with sterilized seawater. Two days after the treatment, the diatom exterminating effect was examined under a microscope. As a comparative example, lactic acid 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0 W /
A V% solution was prepared. The evaluation criteria for the diatom exterminating effect and laver damage degree were the same as in Test 6. The results are shown in Table 1.
Shown in 1.
【0031】[0031]
【表11】 [Table 11]
【0032】[0032]
【発明の効果】有機酸・無機酸の中の一種以上と有機酸
鉄を含有する処理液を用いることにより、海苔養殖時に
発生する雑藻・病害の駆除予防を低濃度・短時間で行う
ことができることを見出した。EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION By using a treatment liquid containing at least one of organic acids and inorganic acids and iron organic acid, it is possible to prevent weeds and diseases that occur during seaweed cultivation at low concentrations and in a short time. I found that I can do it.
Claims (3)
主成分とすることを特徴とする海苔養殖用の殺藻殺菌
剤。1. An algicidal fungicide for seaweed aquaculture, which comprises, as main components, one or more of organic acids and inorganic acids and iron lactate.
0.01W/V%以上の酸及び、0.001W/V%以
上の乳酸鉄を含有していることを特徴とする請求項1記
載の海苔養殖用の殺藻殺菌剤。2. The components in the treatment liquid when treating the seaweed net,
The algaecide bactericidal agent for seaweed cultivation according to claim 1, which contains 0.01 W / V% or more of acid and 0.001 W / V% or more of iron lactate.
するか、または海苔処理剤を海苔に散布することを特徴
とする海苔の処理方法。3. A method for treating seaweed, which comprises immersing the seaweed in the treatment agent according to claim 1 or spraying the seaweed treatment agent onto the seaweed.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002054718A JP4256106B2 (en) | 2002-02-28 | 2002-02-28 | Algicidal fungicide |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002054718A JP4256106B2 (en) | 2002-02-28 | 2002-02-28 | Algicidal fungicide |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2003252706A true JP2003252706A (en) | 2003-09-10 |
JP4256106B2 JP4256106B2 (en) | 2009-04-22 |
Family
ID=28665796
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002054718A Expired - Fee Related JP4256106B2 (en) | 2002-02-28 | 2002-02-28 | Algicidal fungicide |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4256106B2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006248906A (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-21 | Tateho Chem Ind Co Ltd | Algae proofing composition |
JP2016501277A (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2016-01-18 | ケミン、インダストリーズ、インコーポレーテッドKemin Industries, Inc. | Commercial gardening algae control composition |
-
2002
- 2002-02-28 JP JP2002054718A patent/JP4256106B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006248906A (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-21 | Tateho Chem Ind Co Ltd | Algae proofing composition |
JP2016501277A (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2016-01-18 | ケミン、インダストリーズ、インコーポレーテッドKemin Industries, Inc. | Commercial gardening algae control composition |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4256106B2 (en) | 2009-04-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP4176347B2 (en) | Algicidal fungicide | |
JP3490575B2 (en) | Nori quality improver | |
JPH09201180A (en) | Treatment of laver and treatment liquid therefor | |
JP2003252706A (en) | Algicidal fungicide | |
JP4633896B2 (en) | Algicidal fungicide | |
JP4939711B2 (en) | Algicidal fungicide | |
JP3764840B2 (en) | Disease control method for cultured seaweed | |
JP2007055947A (en) | Algicidal and fungicidal treating agent for culturing laver, algicidal and fungicidal treating agent and method for treating cultured laver | |
JP3727965B2 (en) | Red rot control agent for cultured seaweed | |
JP3631466B2 (en) | Cultured laver treatment agent, cultured laver treatment solution, and cultured laver treatment method | |
JP3595012B2 (en) | Red rot control agent for cultured seaweed | |
JP3679842B2 (en) | Disease control agent for cultured seaweed | |
JP4828725B2 (en) | Processing method of nori | |
JP4633899B2 (en) | How to control algae | |
JP4391760B2 (en) | Algicidal fungicide | |
JP4409153B2 (en) | How to control miscellaneous algae generated during seaweed cultivation | |
JP3378630B2 (en) | Red rotten fungicide for cultured seaweed | |
JP3467290B2 (en) | Algae and disease control agent for cultured seaweed | |
JP3121259B2 (en) | Algicidal fungicide for seaweed culture and aquaculture method | |
JP3595004B2 (en) | Red rot control agent for cultured seaweed | |
JP2976853B2 (en) | Potato fungus inhibitor and method of using the same | |
JPH11220963A (en) | Sea laver cultivation | |
JP3349599B2 (en) | Pesticide and method for controlling nori in cultured seaweed | |
JPH0987109A (en) | Brown rot-controlling agent for cultured laver | |
JP3050463B2 (en) | Nori red rot fungicide |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20050228 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20080613 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20080701 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20080828 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821 Effective date: 20080901 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20081125 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20081217 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20090127 |
|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20090129 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120206 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4256106 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130206 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130206 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |