IE64483B1 - Process for the preparation of a water-resistant fuel agglomerate - Google Patents

Abstract

Process for the preparation of a water-resistant fuel agglomerate, characterized by the fact: - that there are employed a finely divided fuel material, an organic binder and an oxidizing agent, - that the oxidizing agent is mixed with either the fuel material, or the organic binder, or with one or other of these products or their mixture, - that the mixture so obtained is subjected to an agglomeration treatment, and - that the agglomerate obtained at the end of the agglomeration treatment is subjected to a stoving treatment.

Description

PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A WATER-RESISTANT FUEL AGGLOMERATE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to a process for the preparation of a water resistant fuel agglomerate. It is directed also to the composition of matter employed in this process.

By the term water-resistant in relation to fuel agglomerates is meant that the fuel agglomerates do not disaggregate in the presence of water, and that they substantially retain their mechanical strength after immersion in cold water.

By the expression fuel agglomerates, is meant any physical presentation of finely divided fuel materials which are easily handled and useful for domestic or industrial purposes. By way of example may be mentioned nuts, briquets and pellets.

The finally divided fuel materials concerned by the present invention may be any substance^ rich in carbon, like for example coal fines or dusts, wood fines, coal coke fines, fines of petroleum coke or a mixture of these products. These materials and in particular coal fines and dusts are produced in large amounts by modern methods of extraction and washing, particularly of coal.

Among the value-enhancing uses of these materials, may be mentioned more particularly their use in the form of fuel agglomerates.

Different techniques of agglomeration of these fines or dusts, generally employing additives or binders suitable for ensuring sufficient cohesion, have already been proposed.

Among these additives or binders, the most employed currently are tar from coal, from wood or from petroleum,, lignosulfonates, clays. polysaccharides among which In particular are starches and starch derivatives.

The most used of these binders Is Incontestably coal tar, but the exigencies as regards protection of the environment becoming more and more strict, lta use today shows a certain recession.

In fact, lta use makes lt necessary to submit the agglomerates so obtained to a heat treatment or fume reduction treatment in order to lower the concentration of phenolic compounds, Now this treatment results In a non negligible atmospheric pollution. Moreover, the fume reduction treatment not being complete, the combustion of these agglomerates** at the time of their use causes a release of smoke noxious to man.

These drawbacks have led certain countries to forbid their use.

The drawbacks Inherent In the use of tar reoccur during the use of bitumen as hinder.

To overcome these drawbacks, lt has been proposed to resort, as hinder, to lignosulfonates, In particular that of ammonium.

The scientific literature relating to the use of these products Is extremely abundant and there may be mentioned hy way of example patents SU 983.147, SU 1.010.146 and su 1.137.103, patents EP 0 097 486 and DE 3.277,395 or again patents DD 224.331 and US 4.666.522.

It happens that the technique of agglomeration with lignosulfonates is complex and its performance requires considerable mastery. In particular, lt Is necessary to dry the fines to a precise moisture content so that the lignosulfonates-fines mixture may (« to be agglomerated,an excess or a lack of moisture making this operation impossible.

On the other hand, in the heat treatment, to polymerise the llgnosulfonates and thus to confer on the agglomerates a good resistance to water, there is produced a disengagement of noxious fumes rich in sulfuric acid, a non negligible cause of atmospheric pollution.

It has been proposed to resolve this pollution problem by applying different arrangements to the installations concerned, and particularly by providing pmoke condensing devices. But such devices have only had the result of displacing the pollution problem to a corrosion problem vhich it is knovn to have been extremely difficult to control especially vhen it is a matter of treating condensates rich in sulfuric acid, even by employing . special steel as constituent material of the agglomeration installations» In any event and whatever the solutions envisaged, the drawbacks associated vith the use of llgnosulfonates make it a laborious technique.

Moreover, the agglomerates manufactured according to this technique shov the drawback of generating, during their combustion, sulfurous residues which are again found particularly in the smoke.

Processes have been proposed not showing the above mentioned drawbacks associated with pitch, with tar and with the llgnosulfonates, in which the hinders are replaced by clays particularly by bentonite (US 4.025.596 and DE 1.671.365). However, the agglomerates obtained according to these techniques do not all show the required physical properties; in particular, their mechanical strength is insufficient end their behaviour vith vater mediocre. Consequently these processes have not been developed In practice.

It has also been proposed to resort, as binder, to starch vhich, used alone or In a mixture vith other binders, as taught, for example* by patents US 3.726.652 end DE 3.227.395 or again patent EP 0 097 486, shows numerous advantages.

A comparative study on pelletisation done in 1982 at the University of Berkeley (thesis of K.V.S. SASTSY and D.H. FUERSTENAU), shoved that, vith respect to an asphalt emulsion, or to bentonite, starch led to better results on the scores: - of resistance to mechanical compression, - of abrasion resistance, - of lmpect resistance.

Moreover, starch may be used vithout limitation in industrial plants initially designed in the use of tar or bitumen vhich are the binders most used currently, its employment hence not requiring an additional Investment; in addition, maintenance of the plants is reduced.

Finally, combustion of agglomerates bound vith starch does not generate a toxic and/or polluting smoke.

However, and thia constitutes a major drawback, agglomerates based on starch, just as those based on bentonite, show a very distinct sensitivity to water, making their storage in the open air impossible.

It has been proposed, to overcome this drawback, to associate starch with tar, with asphalt or with bitumen or again to Ineolublllxe the starch with realna of the urea-formol, phenol-formol, melamineformol, ketone-formol type or their admixture.

None of the solutions Is satisfactory since all rest on the problem of release of toxic and polluting smoke during the combustion of the agglomerates so obtained.

It has also been proposed (see patent US 1.507.673), to render these fuel agglomerates based on carbohydrates water resistant, to Incorporate therein a strong acid In proportions which are not negligible, among which are in particular phosphoric acid,and to treat said agglomerates at a temperature comprised at a temperature comprised between 200 and 54O*C.

This solution is not satisfactory since; during the treatment, there remains, as for the lignosulfonatee, the problem of release of corrosive fumes. In addition, the handling of strong acid is always a delicate and hence constraining operation.

It has also been proposed to coat the agglomerates with a water-repellent sheet or film obtained by the application of an emulsified wax. Although original, such a solution is laborious through the amount of wax employed and the protection against moisture so conferred on the agglomerates may be altered if these agglomerates undergo, In the course of their transportation, Impacts resulting In a deterioration of the protective sheet.

It has lastly been proposed (see patent EP 89 400071) to prepare water resistant fuel agglomerates comprising, distributed within their constituent mass, on the one hand, a carbohydrate as binder and, on the other hand, an organoalllclc agent ae a water repellent agent.

Such agglomerates, although having suitable resistance to bad weather have the drawback of having a relatively fragile surface condition when they -are moist. Such sensitivity is manifested by a well known deterioration of their skin during their handling, thus generating dust in non negligible amount.

Consequently, none of the existing processes enable the production, under economically and ecologically acceptable conditions, of fuel agglomerates having simultaneously satisfactory mechanical properties and behaviour to water.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION It is accordingly an object of the invention to overcome the drawbacks of the prior art and to provide a fuel agglomerate responding better than those pre-existing to the various exigencies or practice.

Applicants have had the merit of discovering that this objective was obtained by agglomerating a finely divided fuel material with an organic binder and an oxidizing agent and by subjecting the agglomerate thus obtained to stoving treatment.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a water-resistant fuel agglomerate, comprising: - selecting a finely divided fuel material and an organic binder, - mixing the said fuel material and the said organic binder with an oxidising agent, - subjecting the mixture so obtained to an agglomeration treatment, and - subjecting the agglomerate obtained at the end of the agglomeration treatment to a stoving treatment.

According to an advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention, the organic binder is selected from the group comprising molasses, celluloses, hemiculluloses, flours, proteins, starches, derivatives of these products and their mixtures, starches and derivatives of starch being preferred.

According to another advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention, the oxidizing agent ia a water-soluble oxidizing agent selected from the group comprising hypochlorides, perborates, persulfates, percarbonates, brom&tes, peroxides and their mixtures, persulfates being preferred, ammonium persulfate being particularly preferred.

It may he interesting to . associate with the action of these oxidizing agents that of duly selected metal ions recognized for their catalytic power with respect to oxidation reactions. May be mentioned by way of example, copper, zinc, iron and other bivalent metal ions.

When the organic binder entering into the process according to the Invention ia a starch or a starch derivative, by these terms are meant, • aa regards the starch, native starches of any origin, natural or hybrid starches derived, for example, from potato, manioc, corn,, waxy corn, maize with a high amylose content, wheat and granulometric fractions which may be made therefrom, barley and sorghum, - as regards the starch derivative, physically and/or chemically modified starches.

Advantageously, the organic binder is a native starch, possibly rendered soluble in cold vater by the physical treatment of cooking-extrusion and/or of gelatinizatlon on a drum.

With respect to the weights of finely divided fuel materials, there are employed In the process according to the Invention: - a proportion of 0,2 to 25% hy weight of organic hinder, preferably from 1 to 15% by weight and, more preferably still, from 2 to 7% hy weight, - a proportion of 0.01 to 10% hy weight of oxidizing agent, preferably from 0,025 to 5% by weight and, more preferably still, from 0,05 to 3% hy weight.

According to an advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention, the water-soluble oxidizing agent may be added in powder form to the finely divided fuel material and/or to the organic binder and/or to the mixture of both.

According to another preferred embodiment, the oxidizing agent may be added in aqueous solution to the fuel material and/or to the mixture of said material and the organic binder.

According to the process relating to the invention, the agglomeration technique employed is selected from the group comprising pelletisation, pressure-compacting, extrusion and molding; these techniques are In themselves known and described in the patent EP 097 486.

In addition, still according to the ahovesald process, the agglomerate obtained at the end of the agglomeration treatment is subjected to a stoving treatment under temperature conditions generally comprised between about 150*C and 500’C, preferably, between 170’C and 300*C and, still more preferably, between 190’C and 250’C.

According to another advantageous embodiment of the process according the invention, at least one organoelliclc water-proofing agent is added to the finely divided fuel material, to the organic binder, to the oxidizing agent or their mixtures in order to llmite possible risks of taking up water again by capillarity of the fuel agglomerates obtained following the process according to the invention during their exposure to bad weather.

Preferably, the organosilic water-proofing agent is a compound whose structural unit is represented by the formula: R I - Si - 0 - (I) I »1 in which R and Rj, which may he identical or different from one another, are organic radicals, said compound being preferably selected froa the group comprising non-reactive silicone oils, silicone resins, reactive silicone oils, particularly hydroxyleted, alkylated, eryleted, hydroalky la ted, hydroarylated as well as mixtures of these products and the emulsions which may be prepared from these products.

Or again, compounds selected from the group of sillconates of the general formula: (II) In vhich - R2is a alkyl, alkenyl or aryl group, - X Is an alkali or alkaline-earth metal and - Η 10, potassium slllconate being preferred.

The composition of matter employed In this advantageous embodiment of the process according to the Invention constitutes, vithin the scope of this particular application, a novel Industrial product under the same title as the fuel agglomerates so obtained.

According to another embodiment of the Invention, it is possible to Include vith the agglomerates other constituents like, for example, carbonates, quick or slaked lime, dolomite, alkaline silicates, clays, latex, borax, polyphosphates, phosphates, concentrated milk and/or vhey, cement, polyvinyl alcohols and thermo-setting resins. The proportion of these constituents may reach 15% by velght vith respect to the velght of finely divided materials; the granulometric distribution of these constituents must be preferably close to that of the finely material.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The Invention vill be better understood by means of the examples vhich follov and vhich relate to advantageous embodiments.

EXAMPLE 1 Mute based on charcoal dusts/Control Into a mixer, ere introduced, on one hand, 50 kg of coal dusts having a granulometry leas than 1 mm and, on the other hand, 3 kg of native wheat starch. This mixture is heated to 50* C and there is then Introduced therein 4.5 liters of water. The mixture so obtained is malaxated for a quarter of an hour with heating raising the temperature to 909 C; the final humidity measured by means of a moisture balance known under the name CENCO is then 8.5Z. The mixture is Λ agglomerated by pression-compactlng on a press of the SAHUT CONREUR type; among the parameters of the treatment, the temperature of the mixture, which at the time of agglomeration, la about 709 C, the pressure of adjustment of the presses is 16.7 105 N/m linear, the speed of the rolls of the press is 5 rpm and the power of the press is 6 kW.

In this manner coal nuts are obtained showing sufficient cohesion when freshly prepared to be able to withstand transportation.

The strength of these nuts, determined by means of a counterweight compresslometer developed by the SAHUT CONREUR Company, showed the following values: - freshly prepared ..... 294.3 N - after 24 hours drying at amblant temperature ..... 686.7 N - after atoving for one hour at 1009 C followed by atoving for one hour at 1309 C 1765.8 N These nuts are then immersed in cold water. It is observed that they disintegrate very rapidly. After some minutes, the agglomerate shows no cohesion.

These results illustrate the possibility, by using only a binder of the starch type, of producing agglomerates of coal dusts having good mechanical properties hut which do not withstand water.

EXAMPLE 2 Nuts of coal dusts according to the invention.

In a mixer, 50 kg of coal dust with characteristics identical with those of the dust of • < · Example 1 and 2.5 kg of native wheat starch were intimately mixed.

The mixture obtained was heated under kneading to a temperature of 509 C. Then 25 grams of ammonium persulfate diluted ln 2.5 liters of water were added. This mixture was kneaded for a quarter of an hour bringing the temperature of the mixture to 90* C; the final humidity was then 82. The alxture was then subjected to an agglomeration treatment by pressurecompacting under the same conditions as in Example 1.

In thia .way, coal dust nuts are obtained having sufficient cohesion when fresh to he able to undergo transportion. The latter are then subjected to stoving for a period of two hours at a temperature of 220* C.

The strength of these nuts,' measured as in Example 1, shows the following values: - when fresh ..... 200 N - after stoving for two hours at 220* C ..... 1300 N These nuts are then Immersed ln cold water. No disagregation was observed even after several hours of Immersion.

The mechanical strength of the nuts remained unchanged after their dwell in water and no degradation of their surface condition was observed during their handling after immersion.

This example shows that the addition of 5X of native starch and 0.05X of ammonium persulfate hy dry weight with respect to the weight of fuel dust, enables agglomerates to be obtained satisfying the requirements of the technique from the point of view of mechanical strength and behaviour to water.

EXAMPLE 3 Coal dust nuts according to the invention.

To a mixture of coal dust and starch identical with that of Example 2 and this under the same conditions, 50 g of eodium perborate was added. Then the mixture was subjected to the same treatment ae the mixture of Example 2. The final humidity of the mixture was identical with that of Example 2.

In this way coal dust fines were obtained having sufficient cohesion when fresh to undergo transportion. These nuts were then subjected to stoving for two hours at a temperature of 220C.

The strength of these nuts, measured as in Example 1, showed the following values: - vhen fresh ....350 N - after stoving for two hours at 220*C ....1100 N.

These nuts were then immersed in cold water. No dlsagregation was observed even after several months* immersion.

Their mechanical strength remained unchanged after their dwell in water and after simple drainage.

No degradation of their surface condition vas observed.

This exanple shovs that the addition of 52 of native starch and 0.12 of sodiuo perborate by dry velght vith respect to the velght of fuel dust enables agglomerates to be obtained satisfying the requirements of the technique both from the point of vlev of mechanical strength and behaviour to vater. EXAMPLE 4 Coal dust nuts according to the invention To a mixture of coal dust, starch and ammonium persulfate identical vith that of Example 2 vere added * 100 g of vater-proofing agent of the RHODORSIL SILICONATE 51 Ϊ type (potassium slllconate marketed by RHONE-POULENC vith about 492 of dry matter).

The mixture vas subjected to the same treatments as the mixture of Example 2. In this vay nuts of coal diust vere obtained having a sufficient cohesion vhen fresh to undergo transportion. These nuts vere then subjected to stoving for tvo hours at a temperature of 230· C.

The strength of these nuts, measured es in Example 1, had the follovlng values: - vhen fresh .... 200 N - after stoving for tvo hours at 230· C .... 1400 N.

These nuts vere then immersed in cold vater for . one hour. After this dvell, their take-up of vater again vas only 1.62.

The mechanical strength of the nuts remained unchanged after their dvell In vater and no degradation of their surface condition vas observed during their handling after immersion.

* Trademark Thia example shows that the addition of 5% of native starch and 0.05% of ammonium persulfate and of 0.1% of potassium alllconate by dry weight with respect to the weight of fuel dust enabled agglomerates to he obtained satisfying the requirements of the technology from the point of view of mechanical strength and behaviour to water, and enabled also the retake-up of water of these agglomerates to he considerably limited when the latter ia undesirable.

Claims (5)

CLAIMS: 1. - 1 < n < 10. 17 . A process according to claim 1 for the preparation of a water-resistant fuel agglomerate, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified. 1 θ compound whose structural unit is represented by the formula R I — Si-o- (I) I R, in which R and R t , vhich may be identical or different from one another, are organic radicals, or a compound selected from the group of siliconates of the general formula: in which (Π) - R 2 is an alkyl, alkenyl or aryl group, - X is an alkali or alkaline earth metal atom and

1.* 1. Process for the preparation of a water-resistant fuel agglomerate, comprising: n - selecting a finely divided fuel material and an 5 organic binder, - mixing the said fuel material and the said organic binder with an oxidising agent, - subjecting the mixture so obtained to an agglomeration treatment, and 10 “ subjecting the agglomerate obtained at the end of the agglomeration treatment to a stoving treatment.

2. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact the the organic binder is selected from the group 15 consisting of molasses, celluloses, hemicelluloses, flours, proteins, starches, derivatives of these products and their mixtures.

3. Process according to claim 2, wherein the organic binder is selected from the group consisting of starches 20 and derivatives of starch. *

4. Process according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the oxidizing agent is a water soluble oxidizing agent selected from the group comprising hydrochlorides, perborates, persulfates, percarbonates, bromates, peroxides and their mixtures. » t I 5. Process according to clain 4, wherein the oxidizing agent is selected fron the group consisting of persulfates. 6. Process according to clain 5, wherein the oxidizing 5 agent is ammonium persulfate. 7. Process according to one of claims 1 to 6, characterized by the fact that the agglomeration technique used is selected from the group comprising pelletization, pressure-compacting, extrusion and molding. 10 8. Process according to one of claims 1 to 7, characterized by the fact that the temperature conditions inherent in the stoving treatment are comprised between 150’C and 500*C. 9. Process according to claim 8, wherein the 15 temperature conditions in the stoving treatment are comprised between 170*C and 300*C. 10. Process according to claim 9, wherein the temperature conditions in the stoving treatment are comprised between 190*C and 250*C. 20 ii. Process according to one of claims 1 to 10, characterized by the fact that the organic binder is a native starch possibly rendered soluble in cold water by physical treatment of cooking-extrusion and/or of gelatinization on a drum. 12. Process according to one of claims 1 to ll, characterized by the fact that with respect to the weight of finely divided fuel material, there are employed: - a proportion of 0.2 to 25% by weight of organic binder, - a proportion of 0.01 to 10% by weight of oxidizing agent. 13. Process according to claim 12, characterized by the fact that, with respect to the weight of finely divided fuel material, there are employed: - a proportion of 1 to 15% by weight of organic binder, - a proportion of 0.025 to 5% by weight of oxidizing agent. 14. Process according to claim 13, characterized by the fact that, with respect to the weight of finely divided fuel material, there are employed: - a proportion of 2 to 7% by weight of organic binder. - a proportion of 0.05 to 3% by weight of oxidizing agent. 15. Process according to one of claims 1 to 14, characterized by the fact that at least one organosilicic 5 water-proofing agent is added to the finely divided fuel material, to the organic binder, to the oxidizing agent or to the mixture. 16. Process according to claim 15, characterized by the fact that the organosilicic water-proofing agent is a

5. 18· A water-resistant fuel agglomerate, whenever prepared by a process claimed in a preceding claim.