ES2408105B1 - MATRIUSKOS ANTISEISM SPRINGS, POTENTIATED - Google Patents

Abstract

The anti-seismic matriuskos springs, enhanced, are characterized by being concentric springs, that is, springs of different diameters, which are introduced inside each other, so that a great resistance to weight is achieved with them, and, this makes them optimal for architecture, and, the construction of houses protected against earthquakes. What further enhances the resistance to weight that characterizes these springs (1) is that, between the spire and spire of each spring (1), a set of other small matriuskos springs (2) is added.

Description

Docks Matriuskos Antiseísmos, enhanced.

Object of the invention

The main objective of the present invention is to increase as much as possible the resistance to the weight of the matriuskos springs and their ability to absorb vibrations, so that they can fulfill their function much better when they are intended for the foundations of a building protected against earthquakes These Matriuskos Anti-Seismic Springs are capable of absorbing most of the seismic waves that may occur that do not exceed ten points of the Richter scale.

Background of the invention

These Matriuskos anti-seismic springs, enhanced, constitute a considerable improvement in the performance of the Springs-springs that I have previously presented in Patent No. P200801343, entitled: Springs-anti-seism springs, These Springs-springs were concentric springs of different diameters that were introduced the ones inside the others, and, little more. In the invention I present today, I add a set of small spring-springs (2), between the turns of the large springs (1), and, I bend the ends of all the springs so that they form an angle of (90º). In this way, the small concentric springs (2) can be fitted well between the turns of the large springs (1). And, likewise, the large springs (1) can be fitted well at their destination. The small springs (2) are also matriuskos springs, that is, concentric springs, or, spring-springs.

Description of the invention

The Matriuskos Anti-Seismic springs, boosted, are concentric springs (1) of different diameters, introduced into the interior of the other. Between a spiral and a spiral of these large concentric springs (1), a set of other small-sized Matriuskos springs (2) are installed that greatly increase the resistance to the weight of the large springs (1), thus achieving a high absorption capacity of vibrations, whatever they are. These special qualities make them suitable for use in the field of Architecture and Construction because, with them, you can achieve a lot of resistance to weight, in a very small space. This implies that, these Matriuskos Docks will be able to hold a building well, without their turns completely crushing against each other, which makes them very capable of absorbing very intense waves, and, also, very frequent waves. In this way, in addition to their application in Architecture, these Matriuskos Docks can be applied in many other areas, such as electromagnetic waves, while they can stop a frequency wave front in the event that they reach manufacture these matriuskos springs of nanometric size. Another of these applications is to build Anti-impact Cubes, both projectiles and bombs, as well as effective bulletproof vests. They can also be used in armored car panels,

-

as well as in armor of fighter jets and other vehicles - against the impacts of the ammunition of other airplanes or of anti-aircraft guns. Date of the invention: ((04-15) .07.11).

Description of the figures

Figure nº 1: Side view of a Matriusko Anti-Seismic Dock, Enhanced, in which the position of the small springs (2), located between the turns (1) of the large spring is appreciated. In the oblique stretch of loop that joins every two turns, small springs (2) have not been drawn so that the figure maintains greater visual comfort. At the upper and lower ends of the figure, the ends (3) of the turns of the large spring (1) are observed, which are located vertically and perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the loop.

Figure 2: Plan view of the Matriuskos Docks themselves, which are Concentric Mulles, located inside each other, which is allowed by the differences in their diameters. In the upper loop of these springs, the holes (4) for the perpendicular fixing ends (3) of the small springs (2) are observed. And, the perpendicular ends (3) of the upper loop of each of the concentric springs are also observed.

Figure No. 1 -2: 4) Holes for perpendicular ends

one)

Spirals of the large docks

2)

Small spring turns

3)

Perpendicular ends of the springs

Description of a preferred embodiment

The Matriuskos Anti-Seismic springs, enhanced, are characterized by being concentric springs of different diameters, which are introduced inside each other to achieve a great capacity for resistance to weight, using a very small space. This makes them optimal for use in the construction of houses, chalets, buildings, cathedrals, museums, etc ... thus constituting a very effective protection against seismic movements, given their great capacity for absorption of waves and vibrations.

In the improvement that is presented today, this capacity for vibration absorption is greatly enhanced, as well as its capacity to resist weight is greatly increased, and, that makes them even more optimal for their main function in the domain of Architecture and of the Construction. This variant constitutes a considerable improvement in the performance of what we can also call "Springs-crossbows", as I have presented previously in Patent No. P200801343, entitled: Springs-anti-seism crossbows. The way to achieve this increase in performance in the anti-seism spring-springs, is to add a set of small springs (2), - also concentric, such as large (1) -, between the turns of the large springs (1) of each of the Matriuskos Docks. In this way we achieve that the resistance to the weight of this type of concentric springs is enormous. These small springs (2), are also, therefore, matriuskos springs, that is, concentric springs, or springs-crossbows. Note that the ends of all the springs involved in this invention have the same shape, all have the ends (3) of their turns forming an angle of (90 °) with respect to the horizontal plane of said turns. This has a special utility for fixing the small springs (2), between spiral and spiral of each large spring (1). And, in addition, the large springs (1) can also be fixed better in the position in which they will be intended, in the foundations of the corresponding building. In figure 2 you can see the holes (4) that cross perpendicular to all the turns of the large springs (1), to couple and fix in them the perpendicular ends (3) of the turns of the small springs (2) ).

Claims (2)

1. Enhanced Matriuskos Docks, characterized by being concentric springs of different diameters, which are introduced into each other. Between spiral and spiral, in these concentric springs 5 (1) of different diameters, a set of small springs (2), - also concentric, such as large ones (1) is added. The ends of all the springs involved in this invention always have the same shape: they all have the ends (3) of their outer turns forming an angle of (90 °) with respect to the horizontal plane of said turns, for fixing the small springs ( 2), between turn and turn of each large spring (1). In the turns of the large springs (1) are the holes (4) that cross perpendicular to all the turns of the springs 10 large (1), to fit and fix in them the perpendicular ends (3) of the turns of the small springs (2). SPANISH OFFICE OF THE PATENTS AND BRAND Application no .: 201100840 SPAIN Date of submission of the application: 07.15.2011 Priority Date: REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE 51 Int. Cl.: See Additional Sheet RELEVANT DOCUMENTS

Category

56 Documents cited Claims Affected

TO

DE 3630549 A1 (MUELLER BBM GMBH) 10.03.1988, one

Figures 1-4 & Summary of the WPI database. Recovered from EPOQUE; AN -1988-071831.

TO

EP 0539955 A1 (TOGO SEISAKUSHO KK) 05.05.1993, one

column 1, line 1 - column 4, line 31.

TO

FR 407850 A (ALBERT FELIX DEVY) 11.03.1910, one

pages 1-2; Figures 1-4.

TO

DE 19506422 A1 (SCHWENK OSKAR GMBH & CO KG) 29.08.1996, one

Figures 1-2 & Summary of the WPI database. Recovered from EPOQUE; AN-1996-394045.

TO

EP 0477464 A2 (VDO SCHINDLING) 01.04.1992, one

Figures 1-2 & Summary of the WPI database. Recovered from EPOQUE; AN -1992-105970.

TO

WO 2010038723 A1 (TOGO SEISAKUSHO KK et al.) 08.04.2010, one

Figures 1-11 & Summary of the WPI database. Recovered from EPOQUE;

AN -2010-E01172.

Category of the documents cited X: of particular relevance Y: of particular relevance combined with other / s of the same category A: reflects the state of the art O: refers to unwritten disclosure P: published between the priority date and the date of priority submission of the application E: previous document, but published after the date of submission of the application

This report has been prepared • for all claims • for claims no:

Date of realization of the report 11.06.2013

Examiner M. R. Revuelta Pollán Page 1/4

REPORT OF THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE Application number: 201100840 CLASSIFICATION OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION E04B1 / 98 (2006.01) F16F3 / 04 (2006.01) F16F7 / 00 (2006.01) Minimum documentation sought (classification system followed by classification symbols) F16F Electronic databases consulted during the search (name of the database and, if possible, terms of search used) INVENTIONS, EPODOC State of the Art Report Page 2/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201100840 Date of Completion of Written Opinion: 06.11.2013 Statement

Novelty (Art. 6.1 LP 11/1986)

Claims Claims one IF NOT

Inventive activity (Art. 8.1 LP11 / 1986)

Claims Claims one IF NOT

The application is considered to comply with the industrial application requirement. This requirement was evaluated during the formal and technical examination phase of the application (Article 31.2 Law 11/1986).  Opinion Base.- This opinion has been made on the basis of the patent application as published. State of the Art Report Page 3/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201100840  1. Documents considered.- The documents belonging to the state of the art taken into consideration for the realization of this opinion are listed below.

Document

Publication or Identification Number publication date

D01

DE 3630549 A1 (MUELLER BBM GMBH) 10.03.1988

D02

EP 0539955 A1 (TOGO SEISAKUSHO KK) 05.05.1993

D03

FR 407850 A (ALBERT FELIX DEVY) 11.03.1910

D04

DE 19506422 A1 (SCHWENK OSKAR GMBH & CO KG) 29.08.1996

D05

EP 0477464 A2 (VDO SCHINDLING) 01.04.1992

D06

WO 2010038723 A1 (TOGO SEISAKUSHO KK et al.) 08.04.2010

 2. Statement motivated according to articles 29.6 and 29.7 of the Regulations for the execution of Law 11/1986, of March 20, on Patents on novelty and inventive activity; quotes and explanations in support of this statement The patent under study describes springs for building foundations, capable of absorbing earthquake vibrations. Said spring docks are characterized mainly by being concentric springs of different sizes, which are introduced into each other. Between spirals and turns, other smaller springs are placed. In the turns of the large springs are the holes that pass perpendicular to the turns of the large springs, to couple and fix the ends of the turns of the small springs in them. Documents D01 to D06 show different arrangements of springs, in which some springs are related to others, however, in none of them the relationship is exercised by placing smaller springs between turn and turn as described in claim 1 of the patent under study Furthermore, it is not considered obvious that one skilled in the art obtains the invention from the documents mentioned above. Accordingly, claim 1 of the patent under study is considered to be new and has inventive activity. State of the Art Report Page 4/4