EP4285194A1 - Anomaliedetektion beim betrieb eines fördersystems - Google Patents

Anomaliedetektion beim betrieb eines fördersystems

Info

Publication number
EP4285194A1
EP4285194A1 EP21843945.3A EP21843945A EP4285194A1 EP 4285194 A1 EP4285194 A1 EP 4285194A1 EP 21843945 A EP21843945 A EP 21843945A EP 4285194 A1 EP4285194 A1 EP 4285194A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
carrier
conveyer
sensor
anomaly
detected
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21843945.3A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Vishal Kumar Gupta
Frank König
Christoph Reichelt
Ramon VAZQUEZ RAMO
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Logistics GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens Logistics GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Logistics GmbH filed Critical Siemens Logistics GmbH
Publication of EP4285194A1 publication Critical patent/EP4285194A1/de
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0224Process history based detection method, e.g. whereby history implies the availability of large amounts of data

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for anomaly detection during operation of a conveying system and to a conveying system with anomaly detection according to the independent claims .
  • the present invention relates to the technical field of sorter conveying systems .
  • the invention is applicable to a wide variety of conveying systems , showcased in the following are airport and postal applications .
  • Every conveyer system operator aims to reduce failures to a minimum .
  • Control and operating computer systems monitor and control technical processes and can indicate failures of portions of a conveying system, e . g . when these portions are no longer available .
  • Smaller problems such as interruptions to the flow of materials , e . g . caused by wedged items , can be recti fied in a very rapid manner, meaning that the portion in question can return to the normal operating state .
  • Component failures which are caused by wear or ill installation, however, mostly cannot be recti fied without signi ficant impacts on the availability and capacity of the system . These failures may lead to maj or problems for the operator .
  • preventive maintenance entailing the elaborate preventive maintenance of components at predetermined maintenance intervals on a regular schedule with the target to find problems or identi fy upcoming issues that could lead to system downtime .
  • Maintenance activities take place on individual components which would not yet even actually be necessary .
  • the deterioration of individual , identical components is not uni form, meaning that some components are maintained too frequently, while other components are maintained too late , and that failures nonetheless arise despite regular maintenance intervals .
  • time-based or preventive maintenance programs are increasingly being replaced by a program for corrective maintenance , known as Run-to-Failure (RTF) or reactive maintenance .
  • RTF Run-to-Failure
  • Sorters such as tilt tray and cross belt sorters are highspeed, continuous-loop sortation conveyers that use a technique of tilting a tray of a carrier to slide/drive a belt ( arranged transverse to the conveyer track) of a carrier to unload an obj ect into an unloading station .
  • Those sorters are designed for bi-dimensional unloading allowing the dispatching of items to both sides of the sorter .
  • continuous-loop sortation conveyer design all carriers are linked using a chain principal . The chains are driven by electrical linear motors .
  • Tilt tray and cross belt sorters consist of individual trays travelling in the same direction and can be configured custom-build in various shapes ( curved, straight , inclined and declined sections , ...
  • WO2019242999 discloses a method for wear detection of transport rollers during the operation of a conveying system that is however only applicable to much smaller conveying systems .
  • a position determination can be achieved with suf ficient precision with simple-run-time- measurements where a zero time is set for a sensor at a fixed location and the traveling speed of the sensor is known
  • EP20193378 disclosing a method for measuring chain tension of a conveying system is incorporated by reference into this application .
  • the obj ect underlying the present invention is therefore to speci fy a method for anomaly detection during operation of a conveying system, which detects an anomaly with an indication of the occurring position with little equipment outlay, therefore permitting an anomaly detection to take place as far in advance of a system failure as possible .
  • a conveying system is to be speci fied, in which the aforementioned anomaly detection is reali zed . This obj ect is achieved by the measures speci fied in the independent claims .
  • the solution according to the invention is characteri zed by a method for anomaly detection during operation of a conveying system, especially a sorter, which is formed of at least one carrier running on a conveyer track, especially a conveyer loop, wherein the carrier comprises a sensor unit comprising one or more sensors .
  • Each sensor registers measurements useable for an anomaly detection of the conveying system while the carrier runs on the conveyer track .
  • the position of the carrier is continuously determined . Dividing the conveyer track into sections .
  • the measured data are allocated to a speci fic section based on determined position of the carrier and are then subj ected to an analysis for each section separately before and/or after a transmission to a background system .
  • the data are transmitted wirelessly by the sensor unit to the background system, together with a time stamp and an identity of each sensor .
  • Deviations in the analyzed data transmitted in the method step e ) are detected as an anomaly and signaled by a message by the background system indicating the position with a minimum precision of the section of the anomaly .
  • the order of these method steps is permutable .
  • the solution according to the invention is further related to a conveying system, especially a sorter, which is formed of at least one carrier running on a conveyer track, especially a conveyer loop, wherein the carrier comprises a sensor unit comprising one or more sensors , the conveying system comprising means for performing the method as claimed in one of the method claims .
  • the following advantages may additionally be produced : i ) Anomalies can be detected before a system failure or excessive wear occurs , and targeted maintenance work can be started in a timely manner . Undirected preventative maintenance of the whole conveying system becomes obsolete . ii ) The solution according to the invention is particularly useful for conveying systems in which conveyer tracks are concealed and can only be inspected ( and repaired) by opening covers . Location and type of the detected anomaly is known . iii ) The solution according to the invention is particularly useful for large conveying systems and those with j unctions and several conveyer tracks , where the carrier runs di f ferent paths .
  • the invention refers especially to sorters such as tilt tray, cross belt , sliding shoe etc . with the focus on maintenance prevention and monitoring solution that enable operation and maintenance to locate an anomaly, indicating an upcoming failure precisely, presenting failure tendencies that mani fest in anomalies with the target to enable operation and maintenance to be aware of an upcoming failure in a very early stage , e . g . before an actual break-down .
  • Some imminent failures are easy to repair at initial stage , but i f they are left unrepaired, increase wear and tear enormously leading to greater damage and higher repair costs . Incurred failures are also detected as anomalies .
  • conveyer track ( conveyer line , driving surface , trackway, conveyer belt , ... ) comprises every path which a carrier ( comprising a drive unit or passively transported by the conveyer track) can run .
  • the time stamp comprises at least a relative time in relation to a zero time .
  • a continuous position determination means continuous enough so that every position determination can be mapped to the other measurements , meaning that the sampling rate of the position determination is preferably equal or greater the sampling rate of the other measurements .
  • the sensors and/or devices yielding the position also comprise a time stamp, so the time stamp of the other sensors can be mapped to the time stamps from the position determination .
  • the measured data of each sensor that are transmitted by the sensor unit to the background system are raw data, preanalyzed or completely analyzed by the sensor unit .
  • I f the position determination and dividing into sections is already done in the sensor unit , an identity of the section is also transmitted together with the other data and the time stamp and identity of each sensor .
  • the position determination comprises the orientation of the carrier and based on the determined position of the carrier, an image of the conveyer system shape is automatically created .
  • the conveying system can further comprise one or more additional sensors and/or reference devices locali zed stationary and/or on moving parts of the conveying system, wherein each additional sensor registers further measurements useable for an anomaly detection of the conveying system and transmits the measured data wirelessly to the sensor unit , wherein a position of each additional sensor and/or reference device is precisely known or determinable .
  • the position relative to the sensor unit of a moving additional sensor is known .
  • the position of the carrier can be determined also using the reference device and/or one or more of the sensors can comprise one or more of the following :
  • An orientation sensor such as a gyroscope , especially a gyrometer ; a movement and/or acceleration sensor such as a speedometer ; a pulse encoder .
  • Reference devices may also serve as parts of a triangulation unit .
  • One or several of the reference devices installed close to or on the conveyer track at a reference point and a reference sensor interacting with the reference device comprised by the sensor unit .
  • a temperature sensor can for instance serve as a reference sensor .
  • a stationary sensor locali zed and adapted to determine speed and/or position of the carrier .
  • the position of the carrier can be determined based on the carrier' s distance traveled since passing the reference point , wherein the position of the reference point is known . Combination with the orientation measurements enable the background system to recogni ze bends and straight areas and allow building the conveyer shape .
  • a zero time can be defined on each pass as a result .
  • This reference device therefore has a function of a beacon / position reference device . I f the conveyer system is equipped with a high enough number of position reference devices (such as one reference device per section, involving a lot of installation ef fort ) , they could also be used as the most prominent method of position determination .
  • the sections can be determined by one or more of the following method steps .
  • One or several , especially even multiple , pulse counts (e . g . of the pulse encoder ) determine start and end of a section .
  • the conveyer track is divided in sections of equal length .
  • the conveyer track is divided into sections with distinct profile and/or functionality .
  • the reference device installed at the reference point determines start and/or end of a section . Choosing the sections such that they have a distinct profile could e . g . result in straight , inclined and curved sections
  • the position of the carrier may also be determined using the one or more reference devices , wherein the determination of the sections can take into account input stemming from the position determination of the carrier .
  • an analysis method and/or i f all or only some of the measured data are subj ected to the analysis can be determined individually . This is useful for a variety of reasons such as e . g . in the case of detecting connection misalignments . Sorters are often built with prefabricated, on-site connected segments . It does not make much sense to analyze the measurements of one section that lies entirely on one segment for a connection misalignment . Certain types of wear occur more on sections of a certain profile .
  • the detected anomalies when several anomalies are detected, can be classi fied in a list of detected anomalies in function of a determined anomaly characteristic, wherein said list establishes a ranking among all detected anomalies , said ranking representing an order of inspection according to which the detected anomalies have to be inspected, the classi fication of the detected anomalies in said list being configured for defining said order of inspection for the detected anomalies .
  • Said list can be updated at each new anomaly that is detected such that each newly detected anomaly is thus classi fied in said list comprising previously detected anomalies .
  • Said list and any update of said list might be transmitted in real time to be displayed to the maintenance team indicating to them the first anomaly to be inspected and the following subsequent elements of the list represent the next anomalies to be inspected in the order in which they have to be inspected .
  • the background system is able to classi fy the anomalies to be inspected according to an order that optimi zes the ef ficiency of the inspections of said anomalies by the maintenance team, improving the ef ficiency of the inspections while taking into account the urgency of inspection .
  • For every detected anomaly one , several or all of the characteristics of the list can be displayed in a created conveyer system shape in graphical and/or written form .
  • the background system can display the image of the conveyer shape , possibly indicating the sections , wherein the detected anomaly may be displayed at its position of occurrence with the message and/or a graphical and/or numerical representation of the measurements , wherein the detected anomalies and the conveyer system shape are displayed in the form of an adaptable dashboard wherein the displayed characteristics and how they are displayed can be chosen by an operator .
  • the sections can be visually separated with simple borderlines and/or a color visuali zation .
  • the background system can be integrated into an existing operating system, e . g . a SCADA-system, enabling retrofitting of the method into existing systems with little additional computer related costs - in this case , j ust a software update and the carrier comprising the sensor unit needs to be provided .
  • the type of display can be freely chosen according to preference .
  • a color coding with di f ferent color shades representing the si ze of the deviation, the type of measurement can be chosen . It is possible to indicate numerical values ( absolute or normali zed against a reference value ) in the display .
  • the deviation can be plotted in the displayed image at its position of occurrence .
  • a service technician looking at the image of the conveyer system shape and the analyzed data can then in an instant locali ze the reason for the anomaly in the real conveying system .
  • the deviations can be detected by a statistical comparison with preceding registrations of the same section or by a comparison with a fixed magnitude . This leads to a sel f-consistent analysis without the need for external references or enables a detection of anomalies already at the first pass of the section .
  • the transmission of the data from the sensor unit to the background system can take place via a gateway, wherein the gateway can be installed at a fixed location on to the conveyer track and, each time the carrier passes over it , a zero time is set such that the gateway serves as a reference device and in addition to the measurements , state data of at least one sensor - such as e . g . a remaining battery capacity and temperature - is transmitted .
  • state data of at least one sensor - such as e . g . a remaining battery capacity and temperature - is transmitted .
  • the analyzed data can be combined to determine deviations to detect an anomaly and/or a characteristic of the detected anomaly .
  • the sensors can be adapted to determine one or more of the following : oscillation, vibration, chain tension, temperature , carrier condition, track surface condition, power rail condition .
  • the chain tension can be measured with a force measuring load pin ( see EP20193378 ) . Further determinations and sensors can be chosen according to the speci fic conveying system and the occurring types of wear and errors that need surveillance .
  • the data can be combined to determine deviations to detect an anomaly and/or a characteristic of the detected anomaly .
  • the conveying system can further comprise one or more additional sensors and/or reference devices locali zed stationary and/or on moving parts of the conveying system .
  • Each sensor can register measurements useable for an anomaly detection of the conveying system while the carrier runs on the conveyer track .
  • the sensors can register measurements to determine one or more of the following : oscillation, vibration, chain tension, carrier condition, track surface condition, power rail condition .
  • the position of the carrier is continuously determined .
  • the conveying system is configured for dividing the conveyer track into sections . The measured data are allocated to a speci fic section based on the determined position of the carrier and are then subj ected to an analysis for each section separately before and/or after a transmission to a background system .
  • the data can be transmitted wirelessly by the sensor unit to the background system, together with a time stamp and an identity of each sensor .
  • the background system can be configured to automatically create an image of the conveying system shape based on the determined position of the carrier, wherein the term position comprises orientation . Deviations in the analyzed data previously transmitted can be detected as an anomaly and signaled by a message by the background system indicating the position with a minimum precision of the section of the anomaly .
  • the background system can display the detected anomaly at its position of occurrence in the created conveyer system shape with the message and/or a graphical and/or numerical representation of the measurements .
  • the background system can preferably be configured to display the detected anomalies and the conveyer system shape in the form of an adaptable dashboard wherein the displayed characteristics and how they are displayed can be chosen by an operator .
  • Figure 1 shows a view on a tilt tray conveying system
  • Figure 2 shows wear points on a rail
  • Figure 3 shows a sensor unit attached to a carrier in a view from below the carrier ;
  • Figure 4 shows a plot indicating detected anomalies at their location of occurrence .
  • the exemplary embodiment described in FIG 1 below relates to a tilt tray sorter 2 to which the invention is not restricted, but rather can be applied to any sorter and any kind of conveying system 2 which comprises at least one carrier 4 s with a sensor unit ( comprising one or more sensors 27 ) running on a conveyer track 6 .
  • Cross belt sorters 2 di f fer from tilt tray sorters 2 only in the carrying element ( tilting tray vs . belt ) .
  • the invention is of special interest in the field of airport and postal conveying systems .
  • the conveyer system 2 may comprise j unctions and several conveyer tracks 6 , such that the carrier 4 s can run di f ferent paths 6 .
  • the frequency with which different paths 6 are investigated with the carrier 4s can be adjusted, frequent investigations useful e.g. at high traffic frequency or expected damage in case of breakdown (bottleneck of the conveying system 2 e.g.) .
  • Conveying systems 2 such as sorters 2 vary in length, are custom designed so that they fit in the building space foreseen for the sortation facility.
  • the conveying system 2 of FIG 1 has an oval shape (in contrast to FIG 4 with two bends, kind of a U-shape) and comprises a rail 8 and a line of carriers 4, 4s (loaded at feeding stations 14 by feeding conveyers 12 and discharged at unloading stations 18 onto chutes 16) mounted for travel along the rail 8 along the conveyer track 6 (open or closed loop) .
  • the carriers 4,4s are linked to a chain 10 which is driven by a motor. While (unloaded or loaded with piece goods) the carrier 4s with the sensor unit 26 runs on the conveyer track 6, its sensors 27 register measurements useable for an anomaly detection.
  • the sensor unit 26 and all its sensors 27 are small compared to the carrier 4s, do not disturb the normal process and hence can easily be attached to any normal carrier 4 with a fixation 25 such as a metal clamp or any other kind (FIG 3) .
  • the position of the carrier 4s is continuously determined while running on the conveyer track 6.
  • the conveyer track 6 is divided into sections and the measured data are back-traced to their position and section of occurrence based on the position determination with extremely high precision and are then subjected to an analysis for each section separately before and/or after a transmission to a background system 20.
  • the data (raw and/or pre-analyzed and/or completely analyzed) are transmitted wirelessly by the sensor unit 26 to the background system 20 , together with a time stamp and an identity of each sensor 27 , 22 s , 22m .
  • the sensor unit 26 transmits the data to a gateway 24 each time the carrier 4 s passes over it (step com4 s-24 ) from where it is transmitted to the background system 20 ( step com24-20 ) , reducing data transmission and simultaneously yielding a zero time - the gateway 24 serving double duty as a reference device 24 .
  • the transmission can also be done continuously directly from the sensor unit 26 to the background system 20 .
  • the data analysis of the background system 20 recognizes deviations .
  • the deviations are detected by a statistical comparison with preceding registrations of the same section or by a comparison with a fixed magnitude / standard value .
  • Deviations imply anomalies and are signaled by a message by the background system 20 indicating its position of occurrence with a minimum precision of the section of the anomaly .
  • a detected anomaly, that is located precisely, indicates an upcoming failure early such that maintenance can be planned before a break-down and/or excessive wear occurs without the need to search for the position of occurrence .
  • the urgency and time needed for a repair is often known even before a visual inspection .
  • the position determination of the carrier 4 s comprises an orientation determination .
  • the orientation is measured with one or several orientation sensors 27 .
  • orientation sensors 27 are magnetoresistive orientation sensors 27 such as a gyroscope , especially a gyrometer, that measure the orientation of the carrier relative to the earth magnetic field .
  • Other types of orientation sensors 27 can also be used .
  • the sensor unit 26 comprises at least one orientation sensor 27 .
  • An even more precise determination is achieved with two ( or even more ) symmetrically arranged orientation sensors 27 located close to the left and right transport rollers 7 , where the orientation sensors 27 are comprised in vibration sensors 27b such that the vibration and orientation sensor form a combined structural element 27v ( FIG 3 ) .
  • the position can be determined with a variety of known methods , e . g . a movement sensor 27 such as a speedometer 27 and/or a pulse encoder combined with simple run-time measurement from a known point .
  • the position of the carrier 4 s is back-calculated from its measured speed .
  • Another possibility is to install one reflector 22 s on the track 6 as reference device 22 s and one photosensor 22m on the carrier 4 s ( or any other kind of suitable sender-receiver pair ) wherein their signal is used as the logical zero pile mark .
  • These and other position determination methods suitable for determining the position of the carrier 4 s of a conveying system 2 can also be combined .
  • the orientation sensor data combined with the position data enable the logic of the background system to recogni ze bends and straight sections .
  • This combination of orientation and position measurements enable the background system to automatically create an image of the conveyer shape that can be displayed by a dashboard, optionally indicating the chosen sections ( FIG 4 ) .
  • a pulse position indicator of the transport wheel 7 or another form of incremental encoder can be used to determine logical sections .
  • Each or each n-th pulse defines a section, combined with a zero pile set by a reference device 24 .
  • an image 32p of the conveyer shape can be automatically built by the background system 20 ( FIG 4 ) .
  • Sectioning the track 6 into sections enable the section wise and very precise data analysis that can be proj ected onto the created sorter shape .
  • an analysis method and/or i f all or only some of the measured data are subj ected to the analysis is determined individually .
  • Sections with di f ferent properties can be analyzed with di f ferent analysis methods wherein all or only some of the measured data can be taken into account for a certain analysis method .
  • Some anomalies can be detected from a single data type , whereas other types of anomalies take into account more than one type of data stemming from di f ferent sensor types 22 , 27 . All measured data are useable for analysis .
  • the sections are chosen either such that a section covers a certain profile ( straight , curved, inclined, ... ) .
  • logical sections can for instance be chosen that can be determined by a pulse count such that all sections have the same length .
  • FIG 2 shows wear points V on a surface 9 of the conveyer rail 8 , a typically occurring anomaly .
  • Abrasive wear occurs when there is a solid obj ect 0 with the same or an even greater hardness than the material of the transport rollers 7 or the surface 9 .
  • Adhesive wear occurs due to friction between materials of di f ferent hardness , the softer material is subj ected to shearing and is trans ferred onto the harder material as a result .
  • Debris 0 from cardboard, rubber, carbon, cement , exhaust and other particles can be found on all kinds of surface in plants with conveyer technology .
  • Debris particles 0 between the polymer wheels 7 and conveyer surface 9 act like an adhesion leading to abrasive wear W, visible by scratches on the surface , and material deterioration .
  • Over time and under the influence of debris and atmospheric humidity polymer tend to harden .
  • Wear, on the wheel and metal surface increase i f the polymer hardens .
  • Wear V results on the wheel 7 and on the rail surface 9 .
  • Wear W from debris 0 is detected by track surface condition monitoring .
  • Indication of track wear is a change in distance between running gear 5 and surface 9 ( FIG 2 ) .
  • sections with increased track wear heat up higher than their surroundings , which can be detected with a temperature sensor 27 .
  • a small and not very pronounced distance deviation combined with a temperature change at the same location is a good indication for an anomaly stemming from wear .
  • This distance deviation is measured with laser sensors 271 installed close to the transport wheels 7 ( FIG 3 ) .
  • An additional temperature sensor 27 can be used .
  • connection misalignments wear due to debris , material deterioration, abrasive wear, power rail wear, deviations in the sorter chain tension, wrongly adj usted air gaps between linear motor and stator, mechanical failures .
  • Connection misalignments such as poorly leveled connections and j oints are a common and mostly unnoticed problem for newly installed sorters 2 during the warranty period and a cause of excessive wear, especially wheel 7 wear .
  • Misalignment can be detected with two sensors 22 s , 27 installed with a small gap in between or by simple surface 9 - sensor 27 distance measurement of an infrared or laser distance sensor 271 . A sudden, remaining change in distance d at the connection indicates a misalignment .
  • Power rail wear is common .
  • the characteristic of such failure is that the power rails emits more heat at a point of heavy wear - electrical problems typically develop slowly with concurrent increasing temperatures , also increasing wear of the current collector 28 .
  • This can be observed with temperature sensors 27 , 22 observing the power rail .
  • Three infrared temperature 27 sensors measure the temperature of the metal power rail with the carrier 4 s in motion and a fourth sensor 27 measures the environment temperature as a reference . Gaps at connections and corrosion show high electrical resistance which can be analyzed in order to detect anomalies before the power bus system condition cause unwanted operational downtime .
  • Sorter chain 10 looseness and tightness are anomalies that cause increased wear, e . g . at linear motor stator sections where a precise stator position is essential .
  • Sorter chains 10 adj usted too tight cause higher power consumption and unnecessary force , especially in curves .
  • Sorter designs often use linear motors and stators . In a defined distance , the linear motors are placed on straight sections . Every carrier 4 , 4 s has a stator facing the linear motors . The linear motors convert electrical energy into motion with a magnetic field generating a force on the stator . As every carrier has a stator, the force is relatively constant when no electrical or mechanical failure occurs .
  • Every conveying system 2 generates its own vibration fingerprint and the predominant spectrum characteristic of equipment that has loose components is a display of multiple harmonics of running speed . Curves , sections with inductions , diverter or straight sections have typical vibration pattern . The anomal ( ' failure ' ) pattern deviates from the 'healthy' pattern . The vibration pattern of each section may need several rounds of calibration measurements . For every section, relevant filters can be applied to enable selecting the vibration generated from devices such as mechanical tilt mechanisms or upright stations.
  • the vibration sensor 27 mainly picks up the vibration generated by the rolling wheels 7 on the track 8, those vibrations can be filtered out and/or analyzed separately by the background system 20.
  • FIG 4 shows a 3D-image of a sorter shape 32p in the form of a simplified dashboard.
  • Projected onto the sorter shape 32p are the normalized chain tension, vibration and distance measurements 32' , 32' ' , 32' ' ' of the sensors 22m, 22s, 27.
  • the plotted data lie on the visualized conveying system shape 32p. The larger the deviation, the larger the anomaly.
  • This representation enables a quick and intuitive localization for servicing staff, much more intuitive than only indicating anomalies in the form of a data table.
  • the detected anomalies are classified in a list in function of a determined anomaly characteristic, wherein said list establishes a ranking among all detected anomalies , said ranking representing an order of inspection according to which the detected anomalies have to be inspected, the classi fication of the detected anomalies in said list being configured for defining said order of inspection for the detected anomalies .
  • the characteristics of the list are displayed in the created conveyer system shape at its position of occurrence with a message and/or a graphical and/or numerical representation of the measurements , e . g . in the form of a dashboard .
  • the cursor is pointed on one of the data curves , more information is displayed . The operator can choose which of the data and in which way the data are displayed .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Control Of Conveyors (AREA)
EP21843945.3A 2021-01-29 2021-12-21 Anomaliedetektion beim betrieb eines fördersystems Pending EP4285194A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP21154209.7A EP4036678A1 (de) 2021-01-29 2021-01-29 Anomalieerkennung während des betriebs eines fördersystems
PCT/EP2021/086982 WO2022161708A1 (en) 2021-01-29 2021-12-21 Anomaly detection during operation of a conveying system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4285194A1 true EP4285194A1 (de) 2023-12-06

Family

ID=74418208

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21154209.7A Withdrawn EP4036678A1 (de) 2021-01-29 2021-01-29 Anomalieerkennung während des betriebs eines fördersystems
EP21843945.3A Pending EP4285194A1 (de) 2021-01-29 2021-12-21 Anomaliedetektion beim betrieb eines fördersystems

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21154209.7A Withdrawn EP4036678A1 (de) 2021-01-29 2021-01-29 Anomalieerkennung während des betriebs eines fördersystems

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (2) EP4036678A1 (de)
WO (1) WO2022161708A1 (de)

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE228644T1 (de) * 1997-05-02 2002-12-15 Automation Tooling Syst Modulares fördersystem mit mehreren beweglichen elementen mit unabhängiger steuerung
DE10317946A1 (de) 2003-04-17 2004-11-25 Siemens Ag Vorrichtung zum Erfassen des Verschleißzustandes von Rädern oder Rollen
EP2746882B1 (de) * 2012-12-21 2018-09-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Fördersystem einer Maschine
CN111051224B (zh) * 2017-09-01 2022-03-29 株式会社椿本链条 异常探测系统及异常探测方法
EP3584199A1 (de) 2018-06-19 2019-12-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und system zur verschleisserkennung beim betreiben eines fördersystems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP4036678A1 (de) 2022-08-03
WO2022161708A1 (en) 2022-08-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7353937B2 (en) Method of monitoring belt orientation and/or belt travel of a band belt conveyor apparatus and a band belt conveyor
US8149989B2 (en) Device for destruction-free inspection of a conveyor belt
MAzurkiewicz Computer-aided maintenance and reliability management systems for conveyor belts
EP2171158B1 (de) System und verfahren zur analyse rollender scheibenräder
EP3290364A1 (de) Förderbandverschleissüberwachungssystem
US11279567B2 (en) Method for wear detection, and conveying system with wear detection
KR101051231B1 (ko) 벨트 컨베어의 리턴 롤러 결함 검출 장치 및 그 방법
JP2023061942A (ja) 搬送システム検査装置(ドクター物流)
Koenig et al. Condition monitoring for airport baggage handling in the era of industry 4.0
EP3533734B1 (de) System und verfahren zur überwachung von modularen förderbändern
US20030051979A1 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring and controlling conveyor position
EP4036678A1 (de) Anomalieerkennung während des betriebs eines fördersystems
EP2670697B1 (de) Überwachungssystem und -verfahren
CN116868140A (zh) 输送系统的操作期间的异常检测
DE102007011231A1 (de) Prüfeinrichtung für ein Transportsystem für Stückgutbehälter
CN106489234A (zh) 监测碰撞的方法
GB2437156A (en) Inspection and/or monitoring of points in a points installation
CN105600356B (zh) 烟支输送速度检测装置及方法
US20230339693A1 (en) A method and system for identifying anomalies during operation of a conveyor system, in particular of an airport luggage carousel
JP2018048013A (ja) 天井クレーン設備
KR102131671B1 (ko) 컨베이어 벨트의 손상 정도 검출장치
Allen Preventative maintenance and root cause analysis for critical process conveying equipment
WO2019180487A1 (en) System and method for measuring surfaces of moving objects
JP4145221B2 (ja) 大量生産品の検査装置
Lindström et al. On the Feasibility of Condition Monitoring of Belt Splices in Belt Conveyor Systems Using IoT Devices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230614

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)