EP3985385A1 - Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégrité d'un agencement de câble métallique - Google Patents
Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégrité d'un agencement de câble métallique Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3985385A1 EP3985385A1 EP21200353.7A EP21200353A EP3985385A1 EP 3985385 A1 EP3985385 A1 EP 3985385A1 EP 21200353 A EP21200353 A EP 21200353A EP 3985385 A1 EP3985385 A1 EP 3985385A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- wire rope
- sensor device
- integrity
- sensor
- measure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004393 prognosis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000454 anti-cipatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/72—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating magnetic variables
- G01N27/82—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating magnetic variables for investigating the presence of flaws
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61B12/00—Component parts, details or accessories not provided for in groups B61B7/00 - B61B11/00
- B61B12/06—Safety devices or measures against cable fracture
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61B12/00—Component parts, details or accessories not provided for in groups B61B7/00 - B61B11/00
- B61B12/10—Cable traction drives
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D19/00—Structural or constructional details of bridges
- E01D19/16—Suspension cables; Cable clamps for suspension cables ; Pre- or post-stressed cables
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D11/00—Suspension or cable-stayed bridges
- E01D11/02—Suspension bridges
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a device for monitoring the integrity of a wire rope in a wire rope assembly and a wire rope assembly with such a device.
- Wire ropes are often used to carry or tie down heavy loads and consist of a multitude of wires, usually twisted into strands or strands. These are usually in turn beaten by an insert, the so-called soul.
- the wires can also be arranged parallel to one another without being twisted. In this case, the wires are usually pressed together with cable clamps.
- a method for monitoring the integrity of a wire rope in a wire rope arrangement (i) the wire rope is moved past a sensor device, (ii) the sensor device is used to generate a sensor signal which indicates a magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the Sensor device characterized wire rope moved past, and (iii) based on the generated sensor signal, a measure of the integrity of the wire rope, hereinafter occasionally referred to as integrity measure, determined.
- integrity measure a measure of the integrity of the wire rope
- One aspect of the invention is based on the approach of using a magnet-based detection method to generate or provide information about the state of a wire rope of a wire rope arrangement, specifically preferably during normal or control operation of the wire rope arrangement.
- the wire rope arrangement for example a cable car system or a lifting system such as a crane, can (continue to) be operated unimpaired, in particular without interruption, during a measurement of at least one variable, on the basis of which the integrity of the wire rope can be assessed.
- the wire rope is preferably moved past a preferably stationary sensor device in such a way, for example guided in sections through or along the sensor device, that the sensor device generates a sensor signal.
- the wire rope can be monitored essentially continuously. In this way, in particular, a high level of operational reliability is made possible.
- the wire rope arrangement can also be operated particularly economically since no downtimes are required for maintenance purposes.
- the sensor device can be integrated into a component of the wire rope arrangement, for example.
- the sensor device can be designed as a component of the wire cable arrangement.
- the sensor device can be integrated into a cable sheave or a cable drum, for example, or can be designed as such.
- the wire rope can be moved past the sensor device in a simple manner, independently of the operating state of the wire rope arrangement, in order to generate the sensor signal.
- the sensor signal preferably characterizes a magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the moving wire rope, in particular its strength.
- the strength of the interaction or the corresponding sensor signal can serve as a starting point or at least as a point of reference for the integrity of the wire rope, for example for its composition, particularly in the invisible inner part of the wire rope, ie within its sheath.
- it can be assessed whether a wire of the wire rope is broken or at least damaged.
- the magnetic interaction can be detected using an inductance sensor, for example, which generates the corresponding sensor signal.
- the inductance sensor is then expediently set up to measure the inductances of the cable, for example by means of a magnetic field acting on the cable, also referred to as a "test field".
- the magnetic interaction can also be detected with a magnetic sensor, for example a Hall sensor.
- the magnetic sensor is then expediently set up to measure the magnetic field strength of a magnetic field generated or influenced by the wire rope.
- the integrity of the wire rope, or a measure thereof, can also be determined magnetically inductively with the aid of the sensor device.
- the sensor device can be used to carry out a magneto-inductive measurement on the wire rope.
- a saturation magnetization of the wire rope is preferably generated and the magnetic flux is determined through the cross section of the wire rope.
- the sensor device can have a stray field coil or a Hall arrangement (Hall sensor) for detecting a stray field, from which the magnetic flux can in turn be derived.
- the sensor signal can be a magnetic signal which characterizes the magnetic flux through the cross section of the wire rope.
- a probe coil also referred to as a probe
- the pick-up coil is preferably around a permanent magnet wound to generate the magnetic field.
- the sensor signal can be an inductive signal that characterizes a strength of the detected change.
- the wire rope is moved past the sensor device in a curved manner.
- the wire rope in the area of the sensor device i. H. in a section adjacent to the sensor device.
- the wire rope can be guided over a rope pulley in the area of the sensor device.
- the wire rope can curve around the sensor device at least in sections, for example if the sensor device is integrated into the cable pulley or is therefore designed as such.
- the curvature of the wire rope makes it possible to determine information regarding the integrity of the wire rope in a particularly loaded state, i. H. at a point of particularly high stress. Since it can be assumed that the integrity of the rope is impaired precisely at such points of heavy loading, the risk of the overall condition of the wire rope being incorrectly assessed, in particular as too good, can at least be reduced.
- a position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device is detected and used as a basis for determining the measure of the integrity of the wire rope.
- a position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device is preferably defined by the section that is currently located in the area of the sensor device is or is advanced to it. i.e. the position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device can change when the wire rope is moved past the sensor device.
- the detected position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device allows a particularly differentiated assessment of the state of the wire rope.
- the detected position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device can be used to determine how often a section of the wire rope currently detected by the sensor device has already run over a wire rope bearing, such as a sheave, and has been bent or bent and thus particularly stressed.
- a wire rope bearing such as a sheave
- conclusions can be drawn about the state of the wire rope from the number of corresponding changes in curvature or bending, as well as from the magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the wire rope.
- the wire rope integrity can be assessed even more comprehensively, for example by combining, for example offsetting, the determined number of curvature or bending changes with a strength of the magnetic interaction characterized by the sensor signal.
- the determined integrity measure can also be assigned to a section of the wire rope by detecting the position of the wire rope.
- a change in the magnetic interaction over time can be detected, in particular tracked, and used as a basis for determining the integrity measure.
- the position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device can be detected, for example, using a position encoder of a wire rope bearing, in particular a sheave.
- a position encoder can, for example, record an acceleration, a (rotational) speed and/or an orientation or position of the wire rope bearing. The number of revolutions of the wire rope bearing thus detected can then be transferred to the position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device.
- the sensor device is designed as a wire rope bearing.
- the acceleration, the (rotational) speed and/or the orientation or position of the sensor device can be recorded and used as a basis for determining the measure of the integrity of the wire rope.
- the sensor signal generated in particular the measure determined for the integrity of the wire rope, is assigned to the detected position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device.
- the section of the wire rope currently being moved past the sensor device can be assigned to the generated sensor signal. This makes it possible to understand, for example, how often the wire rope or the section was moved past the sensor device, i. H. how often the integrity measure has already been determined for this section.
- the integrity measure can be linked to a usage period or usage cycles. This allows a particularly precise assessment of the condition of the wire rope.
- the measure of the integrity of the wire rope can also be determined on the basis of the assignment of the sensor signal to the position of the wire rope relative to the sensor device.
- the number of bends in the area of a wire rope bearing is determined based on the position of the wire rope and, in addition to the sensor signal, is used as a basis for determining the integrity measure.
- mechanical wear of the wire rope can be taken into account, even if this has little or no effect on the sensor signal.
- a prognosis for the development of the integrity of the wire rope is made on the basis of the measure determined for the integrity of the wire rope. For example, it can be estimated for how many operating cycles the wire rope can still be used without hesitation, ie for example without its integrity meeting a specified replacement criterion.
- a number of the still acceptable bending cycles of the wire rope for example occurring when being guided over a sheave, can be predicted.
- spare parts can thus be ordered and/or maintenance work can be planned at an early stage.
- the determined measure of the integrity of the wire rope is recorded, i. H. a history or a progression of the integrity measure is recorded.
- a particularly differentiated and precise prognosis can be made on the basis of this log or the history.
- a check is carried out, in particular in an automated manner, as to whether the determined measure of the integrity of the wire rope satisfies an exchange criterion.
- An exchange signal is preferably output based on the result of the test. In this case, it is expediently checked whether the ascertained measure of integrity reaches or falls below a predetermined integrity threshold value. If this is the case, the output signal, for example an acoustic and/or visual warning signal, can be output. This allows timely decommissioning of the wireline assembly, i. H. for example before the wire rope breaks completely, in a particularly reliable manner.
- the exchange signal in particular as an acoustic and/or visual warning signal, can be output to a user, for example to operating or maintenance personnel of the cable arrangement.
- the exchange signal in particular as a digital or control signal, can be output to a control device which is set up to control the wire cable arrangement. This allows the wire rope arrangement to be shut down automatically if necessary.
- the measure of the integrity of the wire rope is determined using artificial intelligence.
- the artificial intelligence such as a neural network, is or will preferably be trained to recognize the generated sensor signal, in particular changes in the Sensor signal to compare with a specified sensor signal and to draw conclusions about the wire rope integrity from the comparison.
- the artificial intelligence can be or will be trained, for example, by machine learning. With the help of artificial intelligence, patterns in the sensor signal, for example patterns that occur over time, can be recognized and the determination of the integrity measure can be used as a basis. In this way, the information contained in the sensor signal, in particular in its course over time, can be used particularly efficiently and comprehensively. This also makes it possible to increase the meaningfulness of the integrity measure.
- the determined measure of the integrity of the wire rope is provided via an interface of the sensor device in a network.
- the integrity measure can, for example, be communicated via the Internet of Things or can be called up by devices that are connected to this network. It is thus possible for these devices, for example, to influence the operation of the wire rope arrangement and/or to further process the information provided and to initiate processes based thereon. It is conceivable, for example, that forecasts about the cable requirements and/or maintenance plans can be created in this way. This allows a far-reaching and efficient use of the determined information related to the wire rope.
- the wire rope arrangement is operated, in particular automatically, depending on the determined measure of the integrity of the wire rope.
- the wire rope arrangement can be controlled on the basis of the determined measure of integrity.
- the operation of the cable assembly can be stopped or at least be interrupted if the determined integrity measure meets a predetermined exchange criterion.
- the determined integrity measure can be processed by a control device for controlling a cable drive and the control can be used as a basis.
- At least one sensor unit of the sensor device configured to generate the sensor signal moves relative to a stationary component of the wire rope arrangement.
- the at least one sensor unit can, for example, rotate relative to a wire rope bearing, in particular a rope pulley.
- the at least one sensor unit can in particular rotate relative to the sensor device if the sensor unit is designed as a pulley.
- the sensor device embodied as a cable pulley can have a plurality of sensor units arranged along the circumference of the cable pulley, each of which is mounted such that it can rotate about an axis of rotation relative to the cable pulley.
- the sensor units preferably each include a means for generating a magnetic field and thus the magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the wire rope, and an inductance or magnetic field sensor for detecting the interaction and generating the sensor signal.
- the sensor units can be rotated actively or passively, for For example, by gravity with eccentric mounting around the axis of rotation or by a corresponding drive, such as a gear for translating the rotary movement of the cable pulley to each of the sensor units.
- a device for monitoring the integrity of a wire rope in a wire rope arrangement has a sensor device that is set up to generate a sensor signal that characterizes a magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the wire rope moved past the sensor device.
- the wire rope arrangement also has a stationary component in which the sensor device is integrated. It is expedient here for the sensor device to be designed as a component part of the cable arrangement, i. H. the component embodies.
- a stationary component within the meaning of the invention is in particular a stationary component that does not move in a translatory manner during normal operation of the cable arrangement. However, it cannot be ruled out that the component at least partially performs a different movement, for example rotating.
- the device has a control device which is set up to determine a measure of the integrity of the wire rope on the basis of the generated sensor signal.
- the stationary component is a wire rope bearing.
- the component is preferably set up to support the wire rope at least in sections.
- the component can in particular be set up to support or carry the wire rope at least in sections.
- the wire rope can be guided past the sensor device for generating the sensor signal based on the magnetic interaction during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement.
- it can thereby be ensured that the degree of integrity determined corresponds to a section of the wire rope in which the load on the wire rope is particularly high, in particular at a maximum.
- the wire rope bearing is preferably designed as a rope pulley or rope drum.
- the wire rope can move under load at least in sections along a cheek of the rope sheave or rope drum.
- a strength of the magnetic interaction characterized by the sensor signal for example the magnetic flux through the cross section of the wire rope, can be determined.
- the sensor device has a plurality of sensor units for generating the sensor signal, which are arranged along a circumference of the wire rope bearing.
- the sensor units preferably each have a means for generating a magnetic field, in particular for generating a saturation magnetization in the wire rope, and/or a stray field coil for detecting the magnetic flux through a cross section of the wire rope.
- the sensor units can be repeatedly brought into close proximity to the wire rope by rotating it, for example to magnetically saturate it at least in sections and to generate a corresponding sensor signal by detecting the resulting stray field and the magnetic flux through the cross section of the wire rope.
- the sensor units in particular the means for generating the magnetic field, can be arranged in at least one side of the sheave, in particular in the area of a groove designed to guide the wire rope of the sensor device designed as a wire rope bearing.
- Such means for generating the magnetic field can, for example, be permanent magnets, in particular bar magnets, which can be accommodated particularly easily in the cheeks of the wire rope bearing, for example in corresponding recesses.
- figure 1 shows a first example of a wire rope arrangement 10 with a wire rope 2 and a device 1 for monitoring the integrity of the wire rope 2 in a side view.
- the device 1 has a sensor device 3 for generating a sensor signal, which is based on a magnetic interaction between the sensor device 3 and the wire rope 2 of the wire rope arrangement 10 that is moved past the sensor device 3, and a control device 4 for determining a measure of the integrity of the wire rope 2 Based on the sensor signal.
- the wire rope arrangement 10 also has a rope drive 5 for moving the wire rope 2 in normal operation of the wire rope arrangement 10 and several, three in the example shown, wire rope bearings 6a, 6b, 6c.
- the wire rope 2 is clamped between the rope drive 5 and a first of the wire rope bearings 6a and is guided through a second and a third of the wire rope bearings 6b, 6c.
- the wire rope arrangement 10 is designed as a cable car system with a load 11 in the form of a cabin, which is carried by the wire rope 2 and is attached to the wire rope 2 .
- the cabin can be moved together with the cable 2 by the cable drive 5 .
- the wire rope bearings 6a, 6b and 6c are designed as rope pulleys over which the wire rope 2 runs at least in sections during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement 10 .
- the first wire rope bearing 6a is essentially rotated through 90° relative to the second and third wire rope bearing 6b, 6c, so that its axis of rotation runs in the example shown in the plane of the figure.
- the cable 2 is designed as an endless cable that runs from the cable drive 5 to the first cable bearing 6a and back again.
- the cable drive 5 can have a further cable bearing driven by a motor, over which the cable 2 is guided (not shown).
- the return section of the wire rope 2, which runs essentially parallel to the outgoing section, is in figure 1 not shown for reasons of clarity.
- the wire rope bearings 6a, 6b and 6c are preferably stationary components of the wire rope arrangement 10, which are essentially not subjected to any translational movement during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement 10.
- the wire rope bearings 6a, 6b and 6c are rotatably mounted, they are essentially arranged or mounted in a stationary manner.
- the sensor device 3 is preferably integrated into the third wire rope bearing 6c.
- the sensor device 3 is designed in the form of a wire rope bearing, so that it can be used as a third wire rope bearing 6c. Since the wire rope 2 thus repeatedly runs past the sensor device 3 during normal operation, the integrity of the wire rope 2 can also be monitored during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement 10 . It is not necessary to provide an additional, external test device, nor is it necessary to shut down the cable assembly 10 for maintenance purposes.
- control device 4 In addition to determining the degree of integrity, the control device 4 is also set up to control the cable drive 5 and thus the movement of the cable 2 or the load 11 in the form of the cabin. In order to increase the operational reliability, the control device 4 can be set up to check whether the integrity measure determined satisfies a specified exchange criterion. If this is the case, i. H. If the determined degree of integrity reaches or falls below a predetermined integrity threshold value, for example, the control device 4 can stop the operation of the wire rope arrangement 10 until the wire rope 2 has been replaced or at least subjected to further maintenance and/or repaired.
- FIG 2 shows a second example of a wire rope arrangement 10 with a wire rope 2 and a device 1 for monitoring the integrity of the wire rope 2 in a side view.
- the wire rope arrangement 10 is designed as a lifting system that is set up to lift a load 11 attached to the wire rope 2 .
- the device 1 has a sensor device 3 for generating a sensor signal which is based on a magnetic interaction between the sensor device 3 and the sensor device 3 wire rope 2 of the wire rope arrangement 10 that is moved past, and a control device 4 for determining a measure of the integrity of the wire rope 2 on the basis of the sensor signal.
- the wire rope arrangement 10 also has a rope drive 5 for moving the wire rope 2 when the wire rope arrangement 10 is in normal operation.
- the sensor device 3 is integrated into a wire rope bearing 6 of the wire rope arrangement 10 .
- the wire rope 2 can be guided past the sensor device 3 during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement 10 .
- lifting system it can be, for example, a crane.
- the wire rope bearing 6 with the sensor device 3 can also be part of a storage system, for example a block and tackle or the like.
- control device 4 can be used to control the cable drive 5 on the basis of the determined integrity measure.
- figure 3 shows a sensor device 3 designed as a cable pulley 6 for monitoring a cable 2 of a cable arrangement from a first perspective.
- the side surface of the pulley 6 runs in the plane of the figure.
- the sensor device 3 is set up to guide the wire rope 2 at least in sections along its circumference.
- the sensor device 3 has a groove 7 running along its circumference for at least partially accommodating the wire cable 2 .
- the bottom of the groove is in figure 2 shown as a dashed line.
- the sensor device 3 guides the cable 2 at least in sections with the aid of the groove 7 , the cable 2 is guided past the sensor device 3 in normal operation of the cable arrangement.
- the wire rope 2 is curved or bent in the section in which it contacts the sensor device 3 .
- the sensor device 3 is set up to generate a sensor signal based on a magnetic interaction between the sensor device 3 and the wire rope 2 moved past the sensor device 3, on the basis of which a measure of the integrity of the wire rope 2 can be determined.
- the sensor device 3 can have a plurality of sensor units 8 arranged along its circumference, with the aid of which the sensor device 3 can carry out magnetic-inductive measurements on the wire cable 2, for example.
- the sensor units 8 each have a means 8a for generating a magnetic field, for example in the form of a permanent magnet, and a leakage field coil 8b for this purpose.
- a saturation magnetization of the wire rope 2 can be achieved in the area of the respective means 8a.
- the stray field coils 8b are expediently set up in each case to detect the magnetic flux generated in the process through the cross section of the wire cable 2 . If some of the wires from which the wire cable 2 is wound or braided are damaged or even broken, the magnetic flux running through the cross section decreases.
- the electrical signals generated by the stray field traces 8b when the magnetic flux is detected can therefore be used as a basis for determining a measure of the integrity of the wire rope 2 .
- the sensor units 8 can also be part of a position encoder of the cable pulley 6 or sensor device 3 , which is set up to detect the orientation or the position of the cable pulley 6 or sensor device 3 .
- the sensor units 8 can have, for example, acceleration and/or speed sensors (not shown), with the aid of which an acceleration or speed of the cable pulley 6 or sensor device 3 can be determined.
- the orientation or position of the rope pulley 6 or sensor device 3 can then be derived from the detected acceleration or speed. For example, the number of revolutions performed by the cable pulley 6 or sensor device 3 can be counted. This information corresponds to the position of the wire rope 2 relative to the sensor device 3, in particular a section of the wire rope 2.
- figure 4 shows the sensor device 3 embodied as a pulley 6 figure 3 from a second viewing angle that is 90° different from the first viewing angle.
- the side surface of the pulley 6 runs perpendicular to the plane of the figure.
- the wire rope is in figure 4 not shown.
- the sensor units 8 are arranged in the area of the groove 7 of the sensor device 3, i.e. in a radially outer area of the sensor device 3.
- the sensor units 8 are embedded in the opposing cheeks 9, which laterally delimit the groove 7, of the cable pulley 6 formed by the sensor device 3 in order to generate the magnetic field passing through the cross section of the wire cable accommodated in the groove 7.
- FIG 5 shows an example of a sensor device 3 designed as a pulley 6 with rotatably mounted sensor units 8.
- the sensor device 3 is set up to guide a wire rope 2 at least in sections along its circumference. During normal operation of a corresponding wire rope arrangement, the wire rope is guided past the sensor device 3 and is curved or bent in the section in which it contacts the sensor device 3 .
- the sensor device 3 is set up to generate a sensor signal based on a magnetic interaction between the sensor device 3 and the wire rope 2, on the basis of which a measure of the integrity of the wire rope 2 can be determined.
- sensor units 8 arranged along the circumference of the sensor device 3 each have a means 8a for generating a magnetic field and a stray field coil 8b for detecting a magnetic flux through the cross section of the wire rope 2 generated using the means 8a.
- the present sensor units 8 are each rotatably mounted about an axis of rotation R.
- the means 8a and stray field coils 8b can, for example, be mounted on appropriately rotatable supports.
- the sensor units 8, in particular the means 8a for generating a magnetic field can also be moved relative to the cable 2, in particular even when the pulley 6 is stationary Sheave 6 in the section of the wire rope 2 located in the area of the sensor device 3, a magnetic interaction characteristic of the integrity of the wire rope 2 due to a changing magnetic field, for example an inductance, can be detected, but advantageously also with a slowly rotating rope sheave 6.
- the sensor units 8 can be designed to be rotatable actively or passively relative to the sensor device 3 or to the cable pulley 6 .
- the sensor units 8 can, for example, be mounted such that they can rotate freely, so that they rotate automatically due to gravity when the sensor device 3 rotates about the axis of rotation R rotating with the sensor device 3 .
- the sensor units 8 can be actively rotated about the axes of rotation R with the aid of a corresponding drive. Compared to passive rotation, this has the advantage that the rotational speed of the sensor units 8 and thus, for example, the change in the magnetic flux generated in the wire cable 2 with the aid of the means 8a can be controlled. If necessary, this allows the magnetic interaction between the sensor device 3, in particular the sensor units 8, to be amplified in such a way that a low-noise signal can be generated.
- figure 6 10 shows an example of a method 100 for monitoring a wire rope of a wire rope assembly.
- the wire rope is moved past a sensor device in a method step S1, specifically during normal operation of the wire rope arrangement.
- the sensor device can be integrated into a stationary component of the cable arrangement, which is preferably set up to carry or guide the cable, or even form this component.
- the sensor device is used to generate a sensor signal that characterizes a magnetic interaction between the sensor device and the wire rope that is moved past the sensor device.
- a magnetic flux can be detected through a cross section of the wire rope in the area of the sensor device and a corresponding signal, also known as magneto-inductive, can be generated.
- a change in a magnetic field penetrated by the wire rope can be detected and a corresponding signal, also known as inductive, can be generated.
- a measure of the integrity of the wire rope is determined, for example with the aid of a control device, on the basis of the sensor signal generated.
- This integrity measure can, for example, be used as a basis for the control of the cable arrangement.
- maintenance work or repairs to the wire rope arrangement, in particular the wire rope can also be planned with the aid of the integrity measure, in particular a development over time or history of the integrity measure preferably recorded for this purpose.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)
- Ropes Or Cables (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102020127250.2A DE102020127250A1 (de) | 2020-10-15 | 2020-10-15 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Integrität einer Drahtseilanordnung |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3985385A1 true EP3985385A1 (fr) | 2022-04-20 |
EP3985385C0 EP3985385C0 (fr) | 2024-05-29 |
EP3985385B1 EP3985385B1 (fr) | 2024-05-29 |
Family
ID=78371754
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP21200353.7A Active EP3985385B1 (fr) | 2020-10-15 | 2021-09-30 | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégrité d'un agencement de câble métallique |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220120711A1 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP3985385B1 (fr) |
CN (1) | CN114371215A (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102020127250A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT522584B1 (de) * | 2019-05-28 | 2020-12-15 | Innova Patent Gmbh | Verfahren zum Erfassen eines Verschleißes einer Seilrolle einer Seilbahnanlage |
CN117248448B (zh) * | 2023-11-14 | 2024-01-23 | 贵州省公路工程集团有限公司 | 一种可检测缆索磨损的支索器及其工作方法 |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0757829A1 (fr) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-02-12 | Doppelmayr Seilbahn-Vertriebs-GmbH. | Systeme de controle de securite pour telepherique |
US20070090834A1 (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2007-04-26 | Toshiba Elevator Kabushiki Kaisha | Wire rope flaw detector for elevator |
CN105929018A (zh) * | 2016-05-31 | 2016-09-07 | 武汉华宇目检测装备有限公司 | 一种轮式钢丝绳漏磁检测探头 |
US20160297455A1 (en) * | 2015-04-13 | 2016-10-13 | Fatzer Ag Drahtseilfabrik | Inspection and monitoring system for a cable railway, in particular for the urban transportation of people and goods, and a method of operating the latter |
US20190202666A1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2019-07-04 | Kone Corporation | Method and arrangement for condition monitoring of a rope of a hoisting apparatus |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5804964A (en) * | 1996-11-29 | 1998-09-08 | Noranda Inc. | Wire rope damage index monitoring device |
JP6145573B2 (ja) * | 2014-04-28 | 2017-06-14 | 東京製綱株式会社 | ワイヤロープの検査装置 |
US12084313B2 (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2024-09-10 | Cortland Industrial LLC | Apparatus and method for measuring properties of a rope |
US11358836B2 (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2022-06-14 | Shimadzu Corporation | Wire rope inspection device, wire rope inspection system, and wire rope inspection method |
DE102019205463A1 (de) * | 2019-04-16 | 2020-10-22 | Aktiebolaget Skf | Sensorlagereinheit, Anordnungsverfahren der Einheit und Verfahren zum Anordnen der Sensorlagereinheit an der Welle |
-
2020
- 2020-10-15 DE DE102020127250.2A patent/DE102020127250A1/de active Pending
-
2021
- 2021-09-30 EP EP21200353.7A patent/EP3985385B1/fr active Active
- 2021-10-05 CN CN202111172960.2A patent/CN114371215A/zh active Pending
- 2021-10-12 US US17/499,247 patent/US20220120711A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0757829A1 (fr) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-02-12 | Doppelmayr Seilbahn-Vertriebs-GmbH. | Systeme de controle de securite pour telepherique |
US20070090834A1 (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2007-04-26 | Toshiba Elevator Kabushiki Kaisha | Wire rope flaw detector for elevator |
US20160297455A1 (en) * | 2015-04-13 | 2016-10-13 | Fatzer Ag Drahtseilfabrik | Inspection and monitoring system for a cable railway, in particular for the urban transportation of people and goods, and a method of operating the latter |
CN105929018A (zh) * | 2016-05-31 | 2016-09-07 | 武汉华宇目检测装备有限公司 | 一种轮式钢丝绳漏磁检测探头 |
US20190202666A1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2019-07-04 | Kone Corporation | Method and arrangement for condition monitoring of a rope of a hoisting apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20220120711A1 (en) | 2022-04-21 |
EP3985385C0 (fr) | 2024-05-29 |
EP3985385B1 (fr) | 2024-05-29 |
DE102020127250A1 (de) | 2022-04-21 |
CN114371215A (zh) | 2022-04-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3985385B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégrité d'un agencement de câble métallique | |
EP2367747B1 (fr) | Procédé destiné à la surveillance d'un moyen de portage d'ascenseur, dispositif de surveillance d'un moyen de portage d'ascenseur et installation d'ascenseur dotée d'un tel dispositif de surveillance | |
DE10362095B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Verringern von Aufzugsschwingungen | |
EP2383566B1 (fr) | Procédé et système pour tester des câbles | |
DE102009033137A1 (de) | Linearführung und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Mess- und Auswertesystems | |
DE102008015035A1 (de) | Verschleißüberwachungssystem, seilbetriebene Transportanlage und Verfahren zur Überwachung von Verschleißteilen derselben | |
EP3774630B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance des propriétés d'un dispositif de suspension dans une installation d'ascenseur | |
WO2021105347A1 (fr) | Procédé de détermination d'un état d'usure de composants d'un agencement de moyen de suspension d'un système d'ascenseur | |
DE112017006819T5 (de) | Brucherfassungsvorrichtung | |
DE112016003550T5 (de) | Bruch-detektionseinrichtung | |
DE19702234A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Überwachung und Qualitätsbeurteilung von sich bewegenden und/oder rotierenden Maschinenteilen insbesondere von Maschinenlagern | |
DE102005023205A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung des Verschleißes und des Schädigungsgrades von Wälz- oder Gleitlagerungen | |
DE102017217830A1 (de) | Verschleißüberwachungssystem und Verfahren zur Überwachung von Zustandsgrößen einer seilbetriebenen Transportanlage | |
WO2011088935A1 (fr) | Procédé de surveillance de l'état d'une machine, et dispositif de surveillance associé | |
WO2016062454A1 (fr) | Installation d'élévation | |
EP3502013B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé de détermination d'une valeur de moment de dépose pour une bandoulière à fils éléctroconducteurs intégrés | |
EP1197415A2 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de détection d'un palier à roulement défectueux d'un véhicule ferroviaire | |
DE102008047026A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Verschleißzustandes von Lagern | |
WO2019057352A1 (fr) | Système d'entraînement pour un système d'ascenseur ainsi que système d'ascenseur | |
DE102017007978A1 (de) | Numerische Steuervorrichtung | |
DE102018117687A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum optischen Überwachen der Anordnung wenigstens eines Zugmittels sowie Verwendung | |
LU100882B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum optischen Überwachen der Anordnung wenigstens eines Zugmittels sowie Verwendung | |
DE102022118101A1 (de) | Aufzugsanlage sowie Verfahren zum Erkennen von Fehlerzuständen | |
DE102019107242A1 (de) | Diagnoseverfahren, Diagnosesystem und Kraftfahrzeug | |
EP3628631B1 (fr) | Procédé de détection de l'état des moyens porteurs |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20220720 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20230413 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref document number: 502021003844 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G01N0027820000 Ipc: B61B0012100000 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B61B 12/10 20060101AFI20240402BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20240419 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502021003844 Country of ref document: DE |
|
U01 | Request for unitary effect filed |
Effective date: 20240603 |
|
U07 | Unitary effect registered |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG DE DK EE FI FR IT LT LU LV MT NL PT SE SI Effective date: 20240619 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240529 |