Classifications

• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42D—BLASTING
  • F42D1/00—Blasting methods or apparatus, e.g. loading or tamping
  • F42D1/04—Arrangements for ignition
  • F42D1/045—Arrangements for electric ignition
  • F42D1/05—Electric circuits for blasting
  • F42D1/055—Electric circuits for blasting specially adapted for firing multiple charges with a time delay

Definitions

• the present invention relates to a method for igniting a set of electronic detonators.
• the invention also relates to an electronic detonator, a transmitting device, and a system for igniting a set of electronic detonators.
• the invention finds its application in the field of pyrotechnic initiation, in any sector where a network of several electronic detonators must traditionally be implemented. Typical examples of use relate to mining, quarrying, seismic exploration, or the building and public works sector.
• the electronic detonators are placed respectively in locations arranged to receive them and loaded with explosives. These locations are for example holes drilled in the ground. The firing of the electronic detonators is then carried out according to a predetermined sequence.
• a firing delay is associated individually with each electronic detonator, and a common firing order is broadcast to the electronic detonator network using a control console.
• This firing order or firing command makes it possible to trigger, in a synchronized manner, the counting of the firing delay for all the electronic detonators. From the reception of the firing order, each electronic detonator manages the counting of the specific delay associated with it, as well as its own firing.
• electronic detonators being of the wired type, they are connected to a control console by electric wires or cables.
• the wiring used to connect the electronic detonators to the control console allows communication between the control console and the electronic detonators, for example to exchange with them commands or messages relating to the diagnosis, and to send them the firing command.
• a firing system comprises several shooting consoles, arranged close to the shooting front, and connected respectively to several sets of electronic detonators.
• Shooting consoles communicate, generally by wireless communication means, with a remote control console.
• This control console sends messages to the fire consoles connected to the electronic detonators, such as the firing control.
• Each firing console in turn sends messages to the set of electronic detonators connected to it.
• the deployment environment of electronic detonators, as well as faults in the connection elements used can be the cause of wiring faults (false contacts, leakage currents, etc.), leading to degradation of the electrical signals transmitted.
• the use of a high number of detonators connected to the same network of cables can induce attenuations and distortions of the modulated electrical signals transmitted on the cables, which can sometimes make it difficult for electronic detonators, the demodulation of messages. received from the control console.
• Wireless electronic detonators are also known which make it possible to dispense with the wiring between the detonator network and the control console, and thus the hazards associated with this wiring.
• Communication between the control console and the electronic detonators can take place, for example, by radio waves.
• the remote control console and the fire consoles connected to the electronic detonators also communicate in general by means of wireless communication.
• the object of the present invention is to propose a method of igniting a set of electronic detonators making it possible to improve the reliability of ignition.
• the present invention relates according to a first aspect to a method of firing a set of electronic detonators, each electronic detonator having an associated firing delay.
• the method comprises the following stages:
• a sequence of firing commands is issued, for example by a control console, so that at least one of the firing commands is received by a receiving device.
• Each firing command has an associated synchronization delay, the duration represented by the synchronization delay count being different for different firing commands. Indeed, the duration represented by the counting of the synchronization delay depends on the instant at which the firing command is issued, compared to the synchronization instant in question.
• the reception device takes into account the moment at which the firing command is received. Indeed, the propagation time of the firing commands being negligible, the instant of emission of a firing command and the instant of reception of the command in the receiving device, are similar.
• the synchronization time is defined as the time at which the synchronization time countdown is finalized and from which the firing delay countdown associated with the electronic detonator is implemented.
• the synchronization delay associated with a firing command makes it possible to obtain the synchronization instant by means of the synchronization delay countdown from the reception of the firing command.
• an execution time (or "Processing" time) elapses between the end of the synchronization delay countdown and the instant at which the firing delay countdown associated with the electronic detonator is implemented.
• This execution time being negligible, in the following description it is considered that the countdown of the delay time associated with the detonator begins when the end of the countdown of the synchronization delay is reached.
• This synchronization instant must be common for the triggering of the firing delay countdown for all of the electronic detonators. Indeed, for the firing of all the detonators to be implemented in a synchronized manner, it is very important that the counting of the firing delays begins in a synchronized manner from this synchronization instant.
• multiplicity of firing commands issued allows the receiving device to increase the probability of receiving at least one firing command.
• the reliability of the reception of the firing information is improved, that is to say that the reliability of the firing of all the electronic detonators is improved, while keeping good synchronization of firing.
• the reception step is carried out by a reception device which is associated with a single electronic detonator and forming an integral part of the electronic detonator, the step of counting the synchronization delay and the step of counting the delay of firing being carried out by the electronic detonator.
• the detonator comprises the reception device, the firing command being received by the electronic detonator. Consequently, the synchronization time corresponds to the time at which the countdown of the synchronization time associated with the received firing command is finalized.
• modules forming the electronic detonator can be placed in the same box or in separate boxes.
• certain modules, such as radio communication modules are placed in a separate housing from the rest of the detonator modules so that the radio communication module can be placed above ground while the rest of the electronic detonator is in a hole drilled in the ground.
• the reception step is carried out by a reception device which is associated with several electronic detonators, the firing method further comprising a reception step by each electronic detonator of the synchronization instant, the step of counting the synchronization delay being carried out by the reception device, and the step of counting the firing delay being carried out by each electronic detonator, after reception of the synchronization instant.
• the reception device addresses the synchronization instant obtained to the associated electronic detonators so that they start counting the delay of Firing.
• the counting of the firing delay in a detonator does not start until the synchronization instant has been received by the detonator. There is thus a slight difference between the synchronization instant determined by the reception device as being the instant at which the synchronization delay countdown is finalized, and the time at which the firing delay countdown begins. As this difference is negligible, it is considered that the counting of the ignition delay begins from the synchronization instant determined by the reception device.
• the firing method includes steps for receiving firing commands from among said sequence of firing commands issued comprising at least two firing commands, the synchronization delay count being set updated on each additional reception of a firing command with the synchronization delay associated with the firing command received.
• the firing method may include a step of receiving a second firing command, the counting of the synchronization delay being updated with the synchronization delay associated with said second firing command received. Consequently, each time a firing command is received, the synchronization delay count is updated with the value of the synchronization delay associated with the last firing command received.
• the time drift in the counting of the synchronization delay is minimized.
• the longer the synchronization delay the greater the temporal drift.
• updating the synchronization delay limits the time drift.
• each firing command comprises a set of characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands.
• each firing command contains the synchronization delay associated with it.
• the reception device is thus configured to extract the synchronization delay upon reception of the firing command.
• the firing method includes a prior step of storing in the receiving device a set of characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands.
• This preliminary storage step allows the receiving device to know characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands issued and the firing commands received.
• each firing command includes information relating to the identity of the command.
• each firing command can be identified in the sequence of firing commands.
• the information relating to the identity of the order includes an identification number making it possible to identify an order among the orders of the sequence.
• the identification number can be a sequence number in the sequence, this sequence number being able to be increasing or decreasing in the sequence of commands according to different embodiments.
• the set of characteristics includes the number of firing commands in the command sequence.
• the set of characteristics comprises synchronization data relating to the sequence of firing commands, said synchronization data allowing the determination of the synchronization times associated respectively with the firing commands.
• the reception device is aware of the synchronization delays which are respectively associated with the firing commands received.
• the synchronization data comprises a list of synchronization delays associated respectively with firing commands.
• the reception device stores a table in which synchronization delays are respectively associated with firing commands.
• each firing command can be identified by an identification number or a serial number in the sequence. This identification number or serial number in the sequence is included in the firing order.
• the reception device receives a firing command, it obtains from the table the synchronization delay associated with the firing command received.
• the synchronization data includes a value of the time interval between the issuance of two consecutive firing commands.
• the reception device knowing the time elapsed between the issuance of consecutive commands can determine the synchronization delay associated with a firing command received, by also knowing the information relating to the identity of the firing command received, and possibly the total number of firing commands present in the sequence to locate the firing command received in the sequence. It will be noted that the value of the time interval is constant between the issue of two firing commands.
• the storage of a single synchronization parameter or data is necessary in this case, this parameter being the time interval between two consecutive transmissions.
• the synchronization data comprises a list of time intervals, each time interval being associated with two consecutive firing commands, the time interval representing the time elapsed between the emission of the two firing commands. consecutive fire.
• the value of the time intervals between the issuance of two consecutive firing commands can be variable.
• the time interval between a first and second firing command may be different from the time interval between a second and a third firing command.
• the reception device knows the time interval associated with two consecutive firing commands and can determine the synchronization delay associated with a received firing command, by also knowing the information relating to the identity of the command, such as the identification number of the firing command received, and possibly the total number of firing commands present in the sequence for locating the firing command received in the sequence.
• the set of characteristics includes the number of firing commands in the firing sequence.
• This feature allows the receiving device to locate the firing command received in the sequence of firing commands.
• the set of characteristics comprises modulation parameters used during the issuance of the firing commands of the sequence.
• the receiving device knowing the parameters used for the modulation of the firing control, can suitably demodulate the firing control.
• the modulation parameters are different for different firing commands.
• the most suitable modulation parameters can be selected to modulate each firing command in the sequence.
• the firing process comprises the steps of:
• the modulation parameters used for the emission of each firing command are adapted as a function of the quality of communication between reception devices and the emitting device emitting the firing commands.
• the emitting device or emitting device can be a control console or a relay device, the relay device can be a firing console or an electronic detonator.
• the step of determining the quality of communication is implemented as a function of messages sent by reception devices to a device for transmitting the firing commands of the firing sequence. According to one characteristic, the step of determining the quality of communication is implemented as a function of messages sent by a device for transmitting firing commands of the firing sequence to receiving devices.
• the time dedicated to determining the quality of communication between the device for issuing firing commands of the firing sequence and the receiving devices is reduced. Indeed, it is not necessary to wait for the reception of a large number of messages coming from each reception device, and allowing to have a reliable statistics of the quality of communication, as in the previous embodiment.
• the firing method comprises a step of emitting by a device for emitting the firing commands of the firing sequence of all the characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands fire.
• the device for issuing firing commands of the firing sequence sends all characteristics to the receiving devices, for example when deploying electronic detonators in the field.
• the firing method comprises steps of emitting by a device for issuing firing commands from the firing sequence of the firing command sequence.
• the device for issuing firing commands for the firing sequence is a control console.
• the firing method comprises steps of transmitting part of the firing commands of the sequence by a command console and steps of emitting a part of the commands of firing of the sequence by a transmitting device other than the control console.
• the present invention aims, according to a second aspect, to an electronic detonator comprising: means for receiving a firing command from a sequence of firing commands issued comprising at least two firing commands, a synchronization delay being associated with each firing command;
• - first counting means configured to count down from the moment of receipt of said at least one firing command, said synchronization delay associated with said firing command received;
• - second counting means configured to count down a firing delay associated with the electronic detonator from a synchronization instant corresponding to the instant at which said count of the synchronization delay is finalized
• the first and second counting means constitute unique counting means which are configured to count down the synchronization time and the firing delay.
• the electronic detonator comprises storage means for storing a set of characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands.
• the present invention aims, according to a third aspect, at a transmitting device comprising transmitting means configured to emit a sequence of firing commands from a set of electronic detonators, said sequence of firing commands comprising at least two commands firing, a synchronization delay being associated with each firing command, used to obtain a synchronization instant from which the firing delay countdown is started for firing electronic detonators .
• the transmitting device may be a control console or a relay device transmitting at least part of the firing commands of a firing sequence.
• a relay device In the case of a relay device, it must be configured to synchronize with the firing control sequence so as to issue some of the firing orders at the appropriate time.
• the present invention relates, according to a fourth aspect, to a firing system comprising a transmitter device according to the invention and a set of electronic detonators according to the invention, the transmitter device being a firing console.
• the electronic detonator, the emitting device and the firing system have characteristics and advantages similar to those described above in relation to the firing process.
• FIG. 1a schematically shows a firing system of several electronic detonators implementing a firing method according to an embodiment of the invention
• Figure 1b is a detail of Figure 1a and illustrates elements of an electronic detonator according to an embodiment of the invention
• FIG. 1 c illustrates parts of a firing system according to a second embodiment
• FIG. 2a and 2b illustrate diagrams representing the emission over time of a sequence of firing commands
• FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a field with elements of a firing system according to an embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the firing process according to an embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 1a schematically represents a firing system 200 of several electronic detonators 1 implementing a firing method in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
• the firing system 200 comprises a control unit or console 2 and a set of detonators 1.
• the control console 2 is connected to the electronic detonators 1 by means of electric wires or cables 4.
• the invention applies to ignition systems in which the control console and the electronic detonators are connected together by means of wireless communication.
• the firing system 200 may include one or more shooting consoles (not shown) generally communicating by radio with the control console 2 in the firing system.
• a single console 2 connected to a set of detonators 1 is shown there. Nevertheless, a firing system 200 may comprise several shooting consoles, being respectively connected to sets of detonators 1.
• the control console 2 transmits messages intended for the shooting consoles, these messages then being addressed by the shooting consoles to the set of electronic detonators 1.
• a control console 2 in accordance with the invention comprises transmission means 20 configured to transmit a sequence of firing commands intended for electronic detonators 1.
• a sequence of firing commands comprises at least two firing commands fire.
• a synchronization delay is associated with each firing command in the sequence. This synchronization delay is used to obtain a synchronization instant from which the firing delay countdown is started for firing the electronic detonators 1.
• FIG. 1b represents elements of an electronic detonator 1 according to one embodiment.
• Each electronic detonator 1 comprises at least the following means, configured to implement the firing process according to the invention.
• An electronic detonator 1 thus comprises reception means 10 configured to receive firing commands originating, for example, from the control console 2.
• the reception means 10 are a reception device configured to receive the firing commands from the sequence of firing commands.
• the receiving means 10 are according to the embodiments, of the wired or wireless type.
• each firing command is associated with a different synchronization delay, so as to obtain at the end of the counting of each synchronization delay a single synchronization instant from which all of the electronic detonators 1 start synchronously, the counting of the firing delay.
• each electronic detonator 1 comprises first count means 11 (also called synchronization delay counter) configured to count down from the moment of reception of a reset command. fire, the synchronization delay associated with the firing command received.
• first count means 11 also called synchronization delay counter
• the electronic detonator 1 also comprises second counting means 12 (also called firing delay counter) configured to count the firing delay associated with the electronic detonator 1.
• second counting means 12 also called firing delay counter
• the firing delay countdown starts from a synchronization instant corresponding to the instant at which said synchronization delay countdown is finalized.
• the counting means may include integrated circuits, known to those skilled in the art, designed to implement time counts. According to embodiments, the first counting means 11 are different from the second counting means 12, or they are implemented by common counting means.
• the electronic detonator 1 further comprises a switch device 13 disposed between firing means or primer head or explosive primer 14 and an energy storage module 15 storing the energy source necessary for firing the electronic detonator 1.
• the switching device 13 is by default in the open position during the phases during which the electronic detonator 1 is not fired.
• the device switch 13 is in the closed position when the electronic detonator 1 is ignited.
• the switch device 13 is controlled in the closed position and the energy contained in the energy storage module 15 is discharged into the primer head 14, causing the electronic detonator to ignite 1.
• Figure 1c shows elements of a firing system according to a second embodiment.
• the firing system includes at least one receiving device 30 ’associated with several electronic detonators 1 a’, 1 b ’.
• the receiving device 30 ’ is connected by wire to one or more electronic detonators 1a’, 1 b ’.
• the receiving device 30 ’and the electronic detonators are not wired but communicate with each other by wireless communication means.
• the receiving device 30 ’ can be a firing console intended to exchange messages with the electronic detonators 1a’, 1 b ’to carry out testing, programming or firing operations.
• the reception device 30 comprises reception means 10’ configured to receive the firing commands of the firing sequence. These reception means 10 ’are similar to those described with reference to FIG. 1b.
• the receiving device 30 'further comprises first counting means 11' similar to those described with reference to Figure 1b.
• the electronic detonator 1 a ', 1 b' includes second counting means 12 ', an energy storage module 15', firing means 14 'and a similar switching device 13' to those described with reference to Figure 1 b.
• an electronic detonator 1 implementing a firing method according to the invention receives one or more firing commands from among the firing commands of a sequence 100 of firing commands fire, emitted for example by a control console 2.
• the sequence 100 of firing commands or sequence of firing 100 includes a variable number of firing commands, the number being at least two.
• the firing sequence 100 includes five firing commands 101, 102, 103, 104, 105.
• each firing command is issued by the control console 2 at a time of transmission Tx1 - Tx5 respectively.
• Tx1 - Tx5 a time of transmission
• Each firing command 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 has an associated synchronization delay.
• the second 102 and fourth 104 firing commands of the sequence 100 have associated synchronization delays referenced t2 and t4.
• the firing delay associated with electronic detonator 1 is counted down, by the second counting means 12.
• the delay in firing trotard is counted down from the synchronization instant Is.
• the synchronization delay t2 is counted down when the second command 102 of the sequence 100 is received at the time of reception Rx2 by the detonator 1.
• the synchronization delay count is updated with the synchronization delay t4 associated with said second firing command received 104 (or fourth firing command in the sequence).
• the fourth firing command 104 of the sequence 100 is received at the time of reception Rx4 by the electronic detonator 1.
• the synchronization time to be counted down, corresponding to the synchronization time t2 associated with the second firing command 102 is updated with the synchronization time t4 associated with the fourth firing command 104.
• Updating the synchronization delay count is optional. In other words, the synchronization delay countdown is implemented from the reception of the first firing command 102.
• the synchronization delay associated with a firing command is part of a set of characteristics relating to the corresponding firing command.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing command comprises synchronization data relating to the sequence of firing commands.
• This synchronization data includes the delay synchronization or data allowing the determination of the synchronization times associated respectively with the firing commands.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing control includes, in addition to the synchronization data, other characteristics relating to the firing control 101 - 105 as will be described below.
• the synchronization data includes a list of synchronization times t1 - 15 associated respectively with firing commands 101 - 105.
• the set of characteristics relating to each firing command 101-105 includes information relating to the identity of the command.
• a firing command 101-105 can be identified in the firing sequence 100 by an identification number.
• the identification number can be a serial number indicating the position of the firing control 101 - 105 in the firing sequence 100.
• the order numbers of the firing commands can be increasing or decreasing according to different embodiments.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing command can be included respectively in the firing commands 101 - 105.
• the synchronization delay t1 - 15 is extracted from the firing command received 102, 104, in order to implement the countdown.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing sequence 100 is previously stored in the electronic detonators 1.
• the synchronization times associated with the firing commands 101 - 105 are stored in the electronic detonator 1.
• the synchronization data comprises a list of synchronization delays associated respectively with firing commands.
• the synchronization data comprises the value of the time interval between the issuance of two consecutive firing commands.
• FIG. 2b represents the case of a firing method in which the synchronization delay associated with a firing command is determined from the values of the time intervals between the issuance of two firing commands 101 '- 109' consecutive.
• the time interval may be the same or different between each transmission of two consecutive commands in the sequence.
• the synchronization data can include a list of time intervals.
• the set of characteristics includes the number of firing commands 101 ’- 109’ in the firing sequence 100 ’.
• the electronic detonator 1 is configured to determine the synchronization delay associated with a firing command 101'-109 'received, knowing the identification number of the firing command received, the number of firing commands 101'-109 'in the firing sequence 100' and the time interval between firing commands 101'-109 '.
• FIG. 2b represents the emission of a sequence 100 ′ of firing commands on a time line t.
• the 100 'sequence includes nine ignition commands 101'— 109 'issued respectively at times of emission Tx1 to Tx9.
• time intervals Dt1 to Dt8 between each emission of two consecutive firing commands, as well as a time interval Dt9 associated with the last emission in this example, were previously stored in the electronic detonator 1.
• the counting of the synchronization delay from the moment of receipt of the firing command comprises several partial delay counts, the partial delays corresponding to the time intervals Dt1 to Dt9.
• the synchronization delay is formed by the sum of the time intervals between times of emission Tx1 to Tx9 of firing commands.
• the firing delay count associated with the electronic detonator 1 is implemented, the firing of the electronic detonator 1 being implemented once the firing delay count has been finalized.
• the electronic detonator 1 must know the number of firing commands 101 ’- 109’ in the firing sequence 100 ’in order to be able to determine the synchronization delay to count down.
• the first firing command received corresponds to the second command 102 'of the sequence.
• This command is received at the time of receipt Rx2.
• the count of partial delay associated with this command Dt2 (corresponding to the time interval between the emissions of the second and third firing commands) is implemented.
• the partial countdown of the time interval associated with this command Dt3 (corresponding to the time interval between the transmissions of the third and fourth firing commands fire) is implemented. It is the same for the reception of the fourth firing command 104 '.
• the time interval Dt5 associated with the fifth firing command 105' is implemented.
• the first counting means 1 1 are updated.
• the electronic detonators 1 implement, before the emission of the firing sequence 100 ′, a step of determining the synchronization times associated respectively with the firing commands 101 ′ - 109 ′ of the sequence 100 '. For this, for each firing command, the sum of the partial delay associated with the firing command and the partial delays associated with the following firing commands in the 100 ’sequence, is determined. At the end of this determination step, in each electronic detonator 1, a synchronization delay is associated with each firing command 101 '- 109' 'in the sequence 100' '.
• the sum of the partial delay Dt2 (delay associated with the second firing command 102 'and the associated partial delays Dt3 to Dt9 to the following firing controls, is implemented.
• each firing command 102 ′, 103 ′, 104 ′, 106 ′, 107 ′ is received by the electronic detonator 1
• the associated synchronization delay determined is counted, by the first counting means 1 1, from the moment of receipt Rx2, Rx3, Rx4, Rx6, Rx7 of the firing command 102 ', 103', 104 ', 106', 107 ' .
• a countdown of a synchronization delay associated with a firing command can be updated with the synchronization delay associated with a firing command received later.
• the storage in the electronic detonators 1 of the set of characteristics relating to the 100 ’sequence of firing commands is implemented during a storage step.
• This storage step can be implemented during the manufacture of electronic detonators 1.
• the set of characteristics can be updated later, during the operation of the firing system.
• the storage step is implemented on receipt of the data containing the set of characteristics, sent for example by the control console 2.
• control console 2 addresses the set of characteristics to each electronic detonator 1.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing command may also include modulation parameters used when issuing the firing commands of the sequence 100, 100 ′.
• the modulation parameters may be identical for the transmission of all the commands of the sequence 100, 100 ′ or may be different depending on the firing command issued.
• modulation parameters is meant the manner in which messages are formed and sent over the transmission channel.
• the modulation parameters include the modulation type, the carrier frequency, the frequency bandwidth, the spectrum spread factor, the modulation order, the type of correction coding.
• the characteristics of the set of characteristics can be determined as a function of the quality of communication between the control console 2, or other transmitting device, and the electronic detonators 1.
• the quality of communication between the control console 2 and the electronic detonators 1 can be determined in different ways.
• characteristics relating to the sequence 100, 100 ′ of firing commands are determined, for example the number of firing commands in the firing sequence 100, 100 'to be used to guarantee the level of reliability of reception of firing commands, the synchronization delay or synchronization data such as the time interval between each firing command, and the modulation format to be used.
• the determination of the quality of communication is implemented as a function of messages exchanged between the control console 2 and the electronic detonators 1.
• the determination of the communication quality is implemented as a function of messages sent by electronic detonators 1 to the control console 2.
• the determination of the quality of communication is implemented as a function of messages sent by the control console 2 to electronic detonators 1.
• This embodiment has the advantage of being implemented more quickly as the mode from previous realization. In fact, in the previous embodiment, it is necessary to wait for the reception of a large number of messages from each electronic detonator 1, and making it possible to have a reliable statistic of the quality of communication.
• the messages used for determining the quality are those sent by the control console 2, only the control console must send a large number of messages.
• each electronic detonator 1 can comprise, according to one embodiment, an element making it possible to carry out statistics on the quality of communication, for example an element making it possible to count the number messages received from the command console 2 correctly. This value can be sent subsequently to command console 2 for example, on a specific request from the latter, so as to calculate the packet error rate (or PER for "Packet Error Rate") for each electronic detonator 1.
• an element making it possible to carry out statistics on the quality of communication for example an element making it possible to count the number messages received from the command console 2 correctly. This value can be sent subsequently to command console 2 for example, on a specific request from the latter, so as to calculate the packet error rate (or PER for "Packet Error Rate”) for each electronic detonator 1.
• the desired probability of failure is less than 10 3 for each electronic detonator 1 and the error rate obtained for the set of electronic detonators is increased by 10 _1 , it is then necessary to repeat the firing command at least 3 times to guarantee the desired reliability.
• a reliability criterion can be an overall probability of failure on the set of electronic detonators that does not exceed a certain threshold. It is also possible to analyze the temporal evolution of the communication channel, for example for radio communications subject to external interference.
• characteristics relating to the firing sequence 100, 100 ′ are determined, for example the number of firing commands to be used to guarantee the level of reliability of receipt of the order firing time, synchronization delay or synchronization data such as the time interval between each firing command, and the modulation format to be used.
• the firing commands are received by the electronic detonators 1 with more or less temporal precision.
• the advantage of having good reception time accuracy is directly linked to the precision of the synchronization of the electronic detonators 1.
• better reception time accuracy is generally obtained at the expense of other criteria, typically the sensitivity of the receiver, that is, the reach or robustness of the communication.
• the 100 ’sequence of firing commands may include groups of firing commands issued with different modulation parameters.
• a first group 100a ’of firing commands is sent with modulation parameters allowing good communication robustness.
• the modulation parameters of this first group are selected in order to guarantee reliability of reception of at least one firing command from this first group 100a ’.
• the selection of these modulation parameters is known to those skilled in the art and does not need to be described here.
• Groups of additional firing commands can be sent later with modulation parameters allowing better temporal precision of reception than the first group of firing commands, in spite of poorer reception reliability.
• a first group of firing commands 100a ′ uses first modulation parameters allowing good reception robustness.
• a second group of firing commands 100b ′ uses second modulation parameters allowing better temporal accuracy of reception but less good reception robustness as the first modulation parameters.
• a third group of firing commands 100c ′ uses third modulation parameters allowing even better reception time accuracy but less good reception robustness than the second modulation parameters.
• the modulation parameters are different for each firing command in the sequence 100, 100 ′ and evolve starting from parameters allowing the best robustness and the least good time reception accuracy to parameters allowing poorer robustness and better temporal accuracy of reception.
• the emission of the firing sequence is implemented by the control console 2.
• the control console 2 can send to the electronic detonators 1 l set of characteristics relating to the 100, 100 ′ sequence of firing commands.
• part of the firing commands of the sequence 100, 100 ' are issued by a control console and other parts of the firing commands of the sequence 100, 100' are issued by one or more transmitting devices other than the control console.
• the firing system includes relay devices configured to send part of the commands of the firing sequence 100, 100 '.
• an electronic detonator can constitute a relay device, that is to say that it comprises the means necessary to implement the emission of the firing commands.
• FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a plot of land on which a firing system 200 ′ is installed according to one embodiment, comprising electronic detonators 1, a control console 2 and relay devices 3.
• the electronic detonators 1 and the control console 2 are those described with reference to Figures 1 a and 1 b. However, the electronic detonators can be connected to one or more shooting consoles, or for example as in the embodiment described with reference to FIG. 1c.
• the control console 2 issues part of the commands in the firing command sequence 100, 100 ’.
• Relay devices 3 on receipt of a firing command, calculate the transmission times Tx1 to Tx5; Tx1 to Tx9 of future firing commands, thanks to the knowledge of the set of characteristics t1 -t5; Dt1 to Dt9 of the firing sequence 100, 100 ’.
• the relay devices 3 each issue in turn part of the firing commands of the firing sequence. For this, the relay 3 devices must have been identified beforehand, and their contribution to the emission of the firing sequence must have been planned beforehand.
• relay devices 3 can each issue in turn a set of firing commands, or else each in turn issue a single firing command, before repeating this succession of emissions d several times. '' a single firing command.
• the control console 2 must necessarily issue at least the first command in the firing sequence, to initiate the sequence.
• the control console 2 and each relay device 3 can issue the firing commands using similar or different modulation parameters.
• FIG 4 is a diagram showing an embodiment of the firing control method. It will be noted that, as described below, certain steps of the method are optional and that, depending on the embodiments, they are or are not implemented. Furthermore, the implementation of the process steps has been described above. The method is described with reference to the first embodiment of a firing system 200 shown in Figures 1a and 1b.
• the method represented in FIG. 4 comprises a step of determining the quality of communication E01 between the reception devices and a transmission device.
• the quality of communication determined corresponds to the quality of communication between the electronic detonators 1 and the control console 2.
• the method then comprises a step of determining at least one characteristic of the set of characteristics E02 as a function of the quality of communication determined in the preceding determination step E01.
• the set of characteristics of the firing sequence is sent to the electronic detonators by the control console.
• the firing method includes a prior step of storing E03 in the electronic detonators 1 of the set of characteristics relating to the sequence of firing commands 100, 100 ’.
• a transmitting device such as the control console 2 implements an emission step E100 of the firing sequence 100, 100 '.
• the firing process includes a step E10 of receiving a firing command.
• This firing command is part of a sequence of firing commands issued comprising at least two firing commands.
• the method On receipt of the firing command, the method implements a step E20 of the synchronization delay associated with the command firing received, implemented from the moment of receiving the firing command.
• the firing process includes steps for receiving additional firing commands in the firing sequence 100, 100 ’.
• the firing method includes a step E11 of receiving a second firing command (for example, fourth firing command 104 in the case shown in FIG. 2a).
• the ignition method comprises a step E21 of updating the countdown of the synchronization delay in progress with the synchronization delay (for example t4 in the case of FIG. 2a) associated with the second firing command received.
• the firing process comprises a step E30 of the ignition delay associated with the electronic detonator 1 from the synchronization instant Is.
• the firing process comprises a firing step E40 of the electronic detonator 1.
• the step of receiving E10 of a firing command and the step of counting E20 of the synchronization delay are carried out by the receiving device (s) 30 '.
• the set of characteristics relating to the firing command sequence 100, 100 ’ is stored in the reception device or devices during the storage step E03.
• the electronic detonators 1, 1 a ’, 1 b’ associated with it each electronic detonator 1, 1 a ’, 1 b’ implements a step of receiving the synchronization instant, followed by a step of counting (E30) the firing delay.
• the characteristics of the firing sequence may not be determined based on the quality of communication.
• these characteristics may not be addressed by the console before the firing sequence is sent.
• characteristics relating to the sequence such as the synchronization times associated with each firing command are included in the firing command.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Air Bags (AREA)
• Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
• Alarm Systems (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=67383810

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (14)

Families Citing this family (1)

Family Cites Families (20)

• 2018
  • 2018-12-17 FR FR1873012A patent/FR3090087B1/fr active Active
• 2019
  • 2019-12-17 PE PE2021000890A patent/PE20212397A1/es unknown
  • 2019-12-17 EA EA202191716A patent/EA202191716A1/ru unknown
  • 2019-12-17 CA CA3122858A patent/CA3122858A1/fr active Pending
  • 2019-12-17 AU AU2019400901A patent/AU2019400901A1/en active Pending
  • 2019-12-17 CN CN201980090250.XA patent/CN113348337B/zh active Active
  • 2019-12-17 EP EP19845770.7A patent/EP3899417B1/de active Active
  • 2019-12-17 US US17/413,811 patent/US20220018644A1/en active Pending
  • 2019-12-17 WO PCT/FR2019/053118 patent/WO2020128300A1/fr unknown
  • 2019-12-17 BR BR112021011697-4A patent/BR112021011697A2/pt unknown
  • 2019-12-17 MX MX2021007137A patent/MX2021007137A/es unknown
• 2021
  • 2021-06-15 CO CONC2021/0007756A patent/CO2021007756A2/es unknown
  • 2021-06-15 CL CL2021001562A patent/CL2021001562A1/es unknown
  • 2021-07-09 ZA ZA2021/04815A patent/ZA202104815B/en unknown

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events