EP3642655A1 - Dispositif pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence, appareil de tomographie par cohérence et système de traitement au laser - Google Patents

Dispositif pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence, appareil de tomographie par cohérence et système de traitement au laser

Info

Publication number
EP3642655A1
EP3642655A1 EP19708262.1A EP19708262A EP3642655A1 EP 3642655 A1 EP3642655 A1 EP 3642655A1 EP 19708262 A EP19708262 A EP 19708262A EP 3642655 A1 EP3642655 A1 EP 3642655A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
optical
coherence tomograph
optical device
geometry
distance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP19708262.1A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Matthias Sauer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Precitec GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Precitec GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Precitec GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Precitec GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP3642655A1 publication Critical patent/EP3642655A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/04—Automatically aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam, e.g. using the back-scattered light
    • B23K26/042—Automatically aligning the laser beam
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/03—Observing, e.g. monitoring, the workpiece
    • B23K26/032—Observing, e.g. monitoring, the workpiece using optical means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/06—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
    • B23K26/064—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms
    • B23K26/0643—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms comprising mirrors
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/14—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring using a fluid stream, e.g. a jet of gas, in conjunction with the laser beam; Nozzles therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/70—Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B23K26/702—Auxiliary equipment
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B9/02—Interferometers
    • G01B9/02055—Reduction or prevention of errors; Testing; Calibration
    • G01B9/0207—Error reduction by correction of the measurement signal based on independently determined error sources, e.g. using a reference interferometer
    • G01B9/02072—Error reduction by correction of the measurement signal based on independently determined error sources, e.g. using a reference interferometer by calibration or testing of interferometer
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B5/00—Optical elements other than lenses
    • G02B5/08—Mirrors
    • G02B5/09—Multifaceted or polygonal mirrors, e.g. polygonal scanning mirrors; Fresnel mirrors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B9/02—Interferometers
    • G01B9/0209—Low-coherence interferometers
    • G01B9/02091—Tomographic interferometers, e.g. based on optical coherence

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to an apparatus for determining a position of an optical device of a coherence tomograph, a coherence tomograph with the same and a laser processing system having such a coherence tomograph.
  • the present disclosure particularly relates to a laser processing head, e.g. a laser welding head comprising an optical coherence tomograph and a device for determining a drift of one or more optical devices of the coherence tomograph, such as a mirror, prism or optical grating.
  • a laser material processing apparatus e.g. In a laser processing head, for example for laser welding or laser cutting, the laser beam exiting from a laser light source or an end of a laser fiber is focused or bundled onto the workpiece to be machined with the aid of beam guidance and focusing optics.
  • a laser processing head with collimator optics and focusing optics is used, the laser light being supplied via an optical fiber, also referred to as a laser source.
  • optical coherence tomography can be used to measure various vinparanieter, such as the distance to the workpiece during laser cutting, the edge position in the flow and the weld depth during a weld and / or the surface topography in the wake.
  • OCT optical coherence tomography
  • an OCT measuring beam can be directed onto the workpiece.
  • the OCT measuring beam can be moved over the workpiece to be machined, for example by means of reflection on at least one movable mirror.
  • the movable mirror is attached eg to a galvanometer and thus forms a Galvanoscanner or a galvanometer scanner.
  • the OCT measured values are used to monitor and control the machining process, the angular position of the galvanometer scanner and thus the position of the measuring spot on the workpiece must be as close as possible to each measured value recorded be known exactly.
  • the monitoring of welding processes by means of the OCT is known, for example, from WO 2014/138939 A1.
  • Galvanometer scanners can have a position detector that measures the actual position of the axis of rotation of the scanner. This can be compared by a control loop with a predetermined desired position and the deviation can be minimized. Theoretically, therefore, in the stationary state, the deviation between the position specified from the outside and the position approached by the scanner should be zero. In real operation, however, cause thermal effects, external interference and deterioration of the position detectors used the galvanometer scanner to a deviation of the real Winkelposi tion of the desired position. The control loop can not correct this deviation because, e.g. the position detector, whose value is controlled, is itself subject to thermal influences and the control circuit can thus not detect small deviation of the actual position from the desired position.
  • This phenomenon is also called the drift of a galvoscanner and is both time- and temperature-dependent. Therefore, the true position of the measurement spot on the workpiece surface can not be determined with sufficient accuracy at all times because the measurement spot position changes with the drift of the scanner even if the target position of the mirror is kept constant.
  • DE 10 2015 012 565 B3 describes a measuring device with a spatially resolving sensor, which is designed to detect a region of the workpiece measured by a measuring beam by means of a sensor beam and to generate spatially resolving information based thereon.
  • This spatially resolving sensor must be additionally introduced into the system who the, thereby increasing the manufacturing cost and the complexity of the system.
  • an apparatus for determining an orientation or a drift of an optical device or an optical element of a coherence tomograph is specified.
  • the optical device or the optical element may be configured to deflect an optical measuring beam of the coherence tomograph.
  • the optical device or the optical element can be movable in particular.
  • the device comprises an optical reference geometry, a deflection optics, which is set up to direct an optical measuring beam of the coherence tomograph deflected or reflected by the optical device onto the optical reference geometry, and an evaluation unit which is set up by a distance between one first reference plane and at least a second reference plane of the optical reference geometry to determine the orientation or drift of the optical device ago direction.
  • Drift may denote a deviation of an orientation of the optical device from a predetermined orientation.
  • the optical Vorrich device or the optical element of the coherence tomograph can be movable.
  • the optical device or the optical element can be configured to deflect an optical measuring beam of the coherence tomograph or to move it on a workpiece surface.
  • the second reference plane is preferably suitable for reflecting or diffusely reflecting the optical measuring beam.
  • the existing OCT measuring technique can be used to determine, for example, the difference between the nominal and actual position of the optical device, for example one or more mirrors of a galvanometer scanner.
  • the use of a additional, spatially resolving detector for determining the orientation or the drift of the optical device can be omitted.
  • the measuring beam is directed to the reference geometry and the distance is measured. From the measured distance or a change of the measured distance with respect to a reference or calibration value, the orientation of the optical device can be determined and preferably corrected subsequently.
  • the evaluation unit may be configured to determine a deviation of the orientation of the optical device from a predetermined orientation, i. For example, a difference between the desired and actual position of the optical device.
  • the deflection optics comprise one or more mirrors.
  • the measuring beam can be deflected by the one or more mirrors to the reference geometry.
  • the deflection optics include a lens configured to focus the optical measurement beam on the reference optical geometry. By focusing the beam size, it is possible to determine changes in distance with increased precision.
  • the deflection optics may comprise at least one semitransparent mirror configured to deflect a portion of the optical measuring beam.
  • the measuring beam can be divided by the partially transmissive mirror, which at the same time a distance measurement with respect to a working plane and the reference geometry he can follow.
  • the evaluation unit is set up to determine a positioning of the optical device. For example, an angular position of one or more mirrors, for example an angular position of a galvanometer scanner, can be determined. For example, the angular position may be based on a difference between a desired and actual Position corrected to compensate for drift.
  • the evaluation unit can be set up to output a correction value for the drift correction, for example to a control unit for aligning the optical device.
  • the evaluation unit is set up to determine a distance between the first reference plane and one, two or more points on the optical reference geometry. By measuring a plurality of points on the reference geometry, a precision of the determination of the orientation of the optical device can be increased.
  • the optical reference geometry preferably has at least one plane, diffusely reflecting surface.
  • the reference geometry is an optical element having a surface that has discontinuities.
  • the reference geometry may have multiple non-parallel planes. Each of the non-parallel planes may provide a respective second reference plane.
  • the optical reference geometry may comprise two or more second reference planes, wherein the two or more second reference planes are each plane, diffusely reflecting surfaces.
  • the two or more second reference planes may include four second reference planes.
  • the four second reference planes may be inclined to each other and coincide at a common point. In other words, four second reference planes can intersect at a common point or a calibration zero point.
  • the reference geometry may have a saddle-like shape of at least four second reference planes.
  • the reference geometry may include a calibration plane and / or a calibration zero point.
  • At least two of the second reference planes are arranged such that, for a deviation of the alignment of the optical device in a first direction, an increase in distance with respect to a calibration position or calibration plane results on the reference geometry.
  • the at least two of the second reference planes may be opposite inclined planes.
  • At least two further second reference planes may be arranged such that a deviation in the distance of a calibration position or calibration plane on the reference geometry results for a deviation of the alignment of the optical device in a second direction.
  • the at least two further of the second reference Reno levels can be opposite inclined planes.
  • the first and second directions may denote a positive and a negative direction along the same coordinate axis (eg, X-axis or Y-axis).
  • the first direction may designate a direction along a first coordinate axis and the second direction a direction along a second coordinate axis perpendicular to the first coordinate axis.
  • a coherence tomography includes an optical device and the device for determining an orientation of the optical device according to the above-described embodiments.
  • the optical device can be configured to deflect an optical measuring beam of the coherence tomograph or to move it on a workpiece surface.
  • the optical device comprises at least one element selected from at least one mirror, at least one optical grating and at least one prism.
  • the opti cal device may be a galvanometer scanner or include such.
  • the optical device, e.g. the at least one mirror may be rotatably mounted about one or more axes, such as an X-axis and a Y-axis, which are oriented orthogonal to each other.
  • two mirrors are provided, one of which is rotatably mounted about the X-axis and the other about the Y-axis.
  • the optical coherence tomograph is arranged to detect a deviation in orientation, i. a drift of the optical device based on the determined distance in one or more spatial dimensions to compensate.
  • a deviation in orientation i. a drift of the optical device based on the determined distance in one or more spatial dimensions to compensate.
  • the angular position of the at least one mirror of the galvanometer scanner can be corrected by rotating about the axes in two spatial dimensions.
  • the two spatial dimensions may be, for example, the X and Y directions.
  • the coherence tomograph comprises a reference arm.
  • the device for determining an alignment of the optical device may be additionally and separately provided from the reference arm.
  • the optical device may comprise a galvano scanner in the reference arm of the coherence tomograph.
  • a laser processing system is specified.
  • the laser processing system comprises a laser device for providing a processing beam, wherein the laser device is arranged to direct the processing beam to a processing region of a workpiece, and the coherence tomograph according to the embodiments described above.
  • a method for determining an alignment of an optical device of a coherence tomograph includes directing an optical measuring beam to an optical reference geometry, determining a distance between a first reference plane and at least a second reference plane of the optical reference geometry, and determining the orientation of the optical device based on the measured distance.
  • FIG. 1 shows a laser processing system according to embodiments of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 shows a laser processing system with a device for determining an orientation of an optical device of a coherence tomograph according to the present disclosure
  • 3 shows a laser processing system with a device for determining an alignment of an optical device of a coherence tomograph according to further embodiments of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 shows a laser processing system with a device for determining an orientation of an optical device of a coherence tomograph according to the present disclosure
  • 3 shows a laser processing system with a device for determining an alignment of an optical device of a coherence tomograph according to further embodiments of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 4 shows a change in length caused by a drift of the optical device
  • FIG. 5 is perspective views of a reference geometry according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 shows a reference geometry without drift
  • FIG. 7 shows a reference geometry and a drift in the X direction
  • FIG. 8 shows a reference geometry and a drift in the Y direction.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic illustration of a laser processing system 100 according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the laser processing system 100 may comprise a laser welding head 101, and in particular a laser welding head for laser deep welding.
  • the laser processing system 100 comprises a laser device 110 for producing a processing beam 10 (also referred to as “laser beam” or “processing laser beam”) and a coherence tomograph 200 according to the embodiments described here.
  • the laser processing system 100 and in particular the coherence tomograph 200, comprises the device for determining an alignment of an optical device of the Coherence tomograph 200. The device is described in more detail with reference to Figures 2 to 8.
  • the laser device 110 is set up to direct the processing beam 10 to a processing region of a workpiece 1.
  • the laser device 110 may include a collimator lens 120 for collimating the processing beam 10.
  • the machining beam 10 is deflected by a suitable optics 220 by approximately 90 ° in the direction of the workpiece 1.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 typically includes a collimator optic 210 configured to collimate the optical measuring beam 13 and a focusing optic 230 configured to focus the optical measuring beam 13 on the workpiece 1.
  • the machining beam 10 and the optical measuring beam 13 may be at least partially coaxial, and in particular may be coaxially superimposed at least in stretches.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 can be set up to couple the optical measuring beam 13 into a beam path of the laser device 110.
  • the merging of the optical measuring beam 13 and the machining beam 10 can take place after the collimator optics 210 and in front of the focusing optics 230.
  • the optic 220 may comprise a semitransparent mirror.
  • the collimator optic 210 and the focusing optic 230 are integrated into the weld head 101.
  • the weld head 101 may include a collimator module 102 integrated into the weld head 101 or mounted to the weld head 101.
  • the focusing optics 230 may be a common focusing optic, such as a focus lens, for the processing beam 10 and the measuring beam 13, for example.
  • the laser processing system 100 or parts thereof, such as the welding head 101 may, according to embodiments, be movable along a machining direction 20.
  • the machining direction 20 may be a cutting or welding direction and / or a direction of movement of the laser processing system 100, such as the welding head 101, relative to the workpiece 1.
  • the machining direction 20 a be horizontal direction.
  • the machining direction 20 may also be referred to as "feed direction”.
  • the principle of distance measurement described here is based on the principle of optical coherence tomography, which makes use of the coherence properties of light with the aid of an interferometer.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 may comprise an evaluation unit 240 with a broadband light source (for example a superluminescent diode, SLD), which couples the measurement light into an optical waveguide 242.
  • a beam splitter 244 which preferably has a fiber coupler, the measuring light is split into a reference arm 246 and a measuring arm, which leads into the welding head 101 via an optical waveguide 248.
  • the collimator optics 210 serves to collimate the measuring light (optical measuring beam 13) emerging from the optical waveguide 248.
  • the optical measuring beam 13 in the welding head 101 with the machining beam 10 are coaxially Göla siege.
  • the processing laser beam 10 and the optical measuring beam 13 can be focused on the workpiece 1 by the focusing optics 230, which may be a common lens or focusing lens.
  • a position of the optical measuring beam 13 on the workpiece 1 can be adjusted by an optical device.
  • the optical device may be a galvanometer scanner.
  • the optical device may comprise at least one mirror (see eg Figures 2 and 3).
  • the optical device may also comprise at least one optical grating or at least one prism.
  • the optical device, such as the at least one mirror may be rotatable about at least one axis, such as an X-axis and / or a Y-axis.
  • the optical device comprises two mirrors, one mirror being mounted for rotation about the X axis and the other mirror for rotation about the Y axis.
  • the optical coherence tomograph 200 may be further configured to correct, based on the determined distance, an angular position of the at least one mirror, prism, or grating of the galvanometer scanner in one or more spatial dimensions to compensate for drift.
  • the optical device can also be arranged in the reference arm of the coherence tomograph.
  • the optical measuring beam 13 can be directed, for example, into a vapor capillary on the workpiece 1.
  • the measuring light reflected back from the vapor capillary is imaged onto the exit / entrance surface of the optical waveguide 248 by the focusing optic 230, superimposed in the fiber coupler 244 with the reflected light from the reference arm 246 and then directed back into the evaluation unit 240.
  • the superimposed light contains information about the path length difference between the reference arm 246 and the measuring arm. This information is evaluated in the evaluation unit 240, whereby the user receives information on the distance between the bottom of the vapor capillary and, for example, the welding head 101 or via a topography of the workpiece surface.
  • the device for determining an alignment of the optical device may additionally and separately be provided by the reference.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 may be configured to measure by means of the optical measuring beam 13 a distance to the workpiece 1, for example with respect to a reference point defined by the coherence tomograph 200 or a reference plane.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 may be configured to measure a change in distance as the welding head 101 moves along the machining direction 20.
  • a depth profile of the Dampfkapilla re created.
  • the topography measurement can be used according to embodiments for error detection and / or control of one or more process input variables.
  • the process inputs may be e.g. a processing speed, a laser power, a laser focus, and / or operating parameters of the laser device include.
  • the coherence tomograph 200 can be set up to perform distance measurements, for example before, during and / or after the laser processing.
  • the optical measuring beam 13 which may be a low-energy measuring beam fed to the processing head via a light guide, collimated and then coaxially superimposed on closing with the high-energy processing beam and be focused by a common Folcusoptik on the workpiece to be machined.
  • Thieves- Tuning the alignment of the optical device of the coherence tomograph 200 and then correcting the alignment allows a distance measurement to the workpiece with increased precision.
  • the determination of the alignment of the optical device can be done during the laser processing or separately in a separate process.
  • FIG. 2 shows a laser processing system with an apparatus 300 for determining an alignment of an optical device 250 of a coherence tomograph according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the deflection of the measurement beam 13 also referred to as "OCT beam" for determining the drift of a galvanometer scanner is shown.
  • the device 300 comprises an optical reference geometry 310, a deflection optics 320 which is set up to direct an optical measuring beam 13 reflected by the optical device 250 onto the optical reference geometry 310, and an evaluation unit which is set up by a distance between a first reference plane A and the opti's reference geometry 310 and one or more second reference planes C of the reference optical geometry 310 to determine the orientation of the optical device 250 to determine.
  • the evaluation unit can be the evaluation unit shown in FIG. 1 and provided with the reference numeral 240 or integrated therein.
  • an OCT light source 301 is either directed onto the workpiece 1 via the optical device 250, which may comprise at least one movable mirror, in order to be able to carry out a measurement on the workpiece 1 (ie measure the distance between the planes A and B), or steered to the deflection optics 320 to measure the distance between the planes A and C.
  • the existing OCT measurement technique may be used to determine the difference between desired and actual position of the optical device 250. The use of an additional, spatially resolving detector is thus eliminated. This allows cheap galvo scanners to be used for high-precision applications.
  • the measuring beam 13 is directed to the reference geometry 310.
  • the measuring beam 13 can be directed to the reference geometries 310, for example by deflection of the optical device 250.
  • the deflection optic 320 includes one or more mirrors 322.
  • the measurement beam 13 may be reflected by a plurality of mirrors 322 multiple times to direct it to the reference geometry 310.
  • the deflection optic 320 includes a lens 324 configured to focus the optical measurement beam 13 on the reference optical geometry 310. By focusing the beam size, it is possible to determine changes in distance with increased precision.
  • the drift can be determined periodically during material processing (and preferably subsequently corrected).
  • the evaluation unit is configured to determine a positioning of the optical device 250. For example, an angular position of one or more mirrors, one or more galvanometer scanners, one or more prisms, or one or more optical gratings or combinations thereof may be determined. For example, the angular position may be corrected based on a difference between the desired and actual positions to compensate for drift caused by thermal effects, external interference, and / or degradation of the position detectors used. For this purpose, the evaluation unit 240 can transmit a correction value for correcting the alignment to the coherence tomograph.
  • the optical coherence tomograph 200 is configured to correct for a deviation of the orientation of the optical device 250 based on the determined distance in one or more, and particularly in two, spatial dimensions.
  • the two spatial dimensions may, for example, be the X and Y directions (see FIGS. 6 to 8).
  • the optical coherence tomograph 200 is configured to correct an angular position of the at least one mirror of a galvanometer scanner in the respective spatial dimensions based on the determined distance between the planes A and C.
  • the first reference plane A may be a reference plane in the measuring arm of the coherence tomograph for the distance measurements to the workpiece 1 and may additionally be used for determining the orientation of the optical device 250.
  • the existing OCT measurement technique can be used to determine the difference between the desired and actual position of the optical device 250 by directing the measurement beam 13 to the reference geometry 310 by means of the optical device 250 .
  • the first reference plane A is the plane of the light source 301 of the coherence tomograph.
  • the optical reference geometry 310 provides one or more second reference planes C.
  • the distance determined by the device according to the invention is defined between the first reference plane A and a corresponding second reference plane C.
  • a distance between the first reference plane A, such as the plane of the light source 301, and the plane of the workpiece 1 (ie the working plane B) corresponds to the distance between the first reference plane A and at least one second reference plane C or a calibration position optical reference geometry 310.
  • the reason for this is that an OCT measuring system usually offers only a small measuring range, eg in the range of about 12 mm. Therefore, if the distances differ by more than the size of the measuring range, only one of the two distances can be measured.
  • the reference arm length can be tracked, but this entails increased effort and costs.
  • the distance between the planes A and C, and in particular between the plane A and the calibration position, is referred to as lo and may be for at least one angle 0o, e.g. When setting up the system, OCT measurement technology can be precisely determined.
  • FIG. 3 shows a laser processing system with an apparatus 300 'for determining an alignment of an optical device 250 of a coherence tomograph according to further embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the laser processing system of FIG. 3 is similar to the laser processing system shown in FIG. 2, and a description of similar and identical merlanals will not be repeated.
  • the deflection optics 320 comprise at least one beam splitter or a partially transmissive mirror 326, which is set up to deflect a part of the optical measuring beam 13.
  • the measuring beam 13 can be divided by the partially transmissive mirror 326, whereby at the same time a distance measurement for Ar beitsebene B and reference geometry 310 can be carried out.
  • Figure 4 shows a change in length by an angle 6 d (drift angle), which is caused by drift.
  • the measured change in length can then be used by a controller to compensate for the drift of the galvanometer scanner, whereby the real position of the measuring spot on the workpiece can be determined more accurately than would be possible without compensation. This makes a measurement by the coherence tomography more accurate.
  • the change in the slip angle 0 can be translated d optically to produce a greater change in length of D1, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the drift determination.
  • the evaluation unit is typically set up in order to determine a distance between the reference plane A and two or more points on the optical reference geometry.
  • more points of the reference geometry can be vennessen at different orientations of the optical device at angles qi, 0 2 ... 0 n during calibration or during setup of the system to the associated lengths li, 1 2 ... l n to determine. These points can be used to more accurately determine the orientation or drift.
  • a precision operation of the determination of the direction, and in particular the drift of the optical device 250 can be increased via an arithmetic operation.
  • Several points on the reference geometry can be measured to compensate for the drift in several dimensions. This is explained in more detail with reference to Figures 6 to 8.
  • FIG. 5 shows perspective views of a reference geometry 500 according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the reference geometry 500 has a plurality of second reference planes 501. Although five second reference planes 501 are shown by way of example, the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and any suitable number of second reference planes may be provided. For example, one, two, three, four, five or more second reference planes may be present. Particularly preferred are four second reference planes that intersect at a common point.
  • the optical reference geometry 500 has at least one flat, diffusely reflecting surface.
  • the flat, diffusely reflecting surface allows the back reflex to be too large for the OCT sensor compared to the back reflection from the process observation and thus the intensity of the source does not have to be reduced.
  • the reference geometry is an optical element having a surface that has discontinuities.
  • the reference geometry may have multiple non-parallel planes.
  • the planes may be inclined surfaces that coincide at a common point 502.
  • the common point 502 may be the lowest point.
  • the non-parallel planes may provide the second reference planes 501.
  • the optical reference geometry may include two or more second reference planes 501, wherein the two or more second reference planes are each plane, diffusely reflective surfaces.
  • the reference geometry 500 may include a calibration plane, calibration position or a calibration point.
  • the distance between the first reference plane and the calibration plane / calibration point is referred to as lo and can be precisely determined for at least one angle Oo when the system is set up by the OCT measurement technique.
  • the four second reference planes shown in FIG. 5 may have four inclined ones Surfaces that meet at common point 502, where point 502 represents the zero point of the calibration (or the calibration position).
  • the reference geometry is shaped such that the type of change in length can be used to calculate in which dimension (e.g., in the X or Y direction) the drift has occurred.
  • the reference geometry is shaped such that the type of change in length can be used to calculate in which dimension (e.g., in the X or Y direction) the drift has occurred.
  • four second reference planes 501 may be arranged such that the four second reference planes 501 intersect at the calibration zero point 502.
  • At least two of the second reference planes 501 may be arranged such that an increase in distance results for a deviation of the alignment of the optical device into a first dimension. At least two further second reference planes can be arranged so that a deviation in distance results for a deviation of the alignment of the optical device into a second dimension. This is explained in more detail with reference to Figures 6 to 8.
  • FIG. 6 shows the reference geometry without drift.
  • the measuring beam strikes the calibration position or the calibration point and the deviation between the actual and desired position of the optical device is equal to zero.
  • Figure 7 shows a drift in the first dimension or direction, which may be an X direction. For a deviation of the alignment of the optical device in the first dimension results in an increase in distance.
  • Figure 8 shows a drift in the second dimension or direction, which may be a Y-direction.
  • the second dimension or Y-direction can be perpendicular to the first dimension or X-direction. For a deviation of the alignment of the optical device in the second dimension results in a distance reduction.
  • the optical coherence tomograph is arranged to compensate for a deviation of the orientation of the optical device based on the determined distance in one or more spatial dimensions.
  • the angular position of the at least one mirror of a galvanometer scanner can be corrected by rotating about the axes in two spatial dimensions. If there is drift in the X direction, the corresponding mirror can be rotated about the X axis to compensate for the drift. If there is drift in the Y direction, the corresponding mirror can be rotated about the Y axis to compensate for the drift.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
  • Microscoopes, Condenser (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un dispositif (300, 300') pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique (250) d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence (200). Le dispositif (300, 300') comprend une géométrie optique de référence (310, 500), une optique de déviation (320), qui est configurée pour guider un faisceau optique de mesure (13) réfléchi par le dispositif optique (250) vers la géométrie optique de référence (310, 500), et une unité d'évaluation (240), qui est configurée pour déterminer une distance entre un premier plan de référence (A) et au moins un deuxième plan de référence (C, 501) de la géométrie optique de référence (310, 500), pour déterminer l'orientation du dispositif optique (250).
EP19708262.1A 2018-03-14 2019-02-25 Dispositif pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence, appareil de tomographie par cohérence et système de traitement au laser Withdrawn EP3642655A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102018105877.2A DE102018105877B3 (de) 2018-03-14 2018-03-14 Vorrichtung für die Bestimmung einer Ausrichtung einer optischen Vorrichtung eines Kohärenztomographen, Kohärenztomograph und Laserbearbeitungssystem
PCT/EP2019/054528 WO2019174895A1 (fr) 2018-03-14 2019-02-25 Dispositif pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence, appareil de tomographie par cohérence et système de traitement au laser

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3642655A1 true EP3642655A1 (fr) 2020-04-29

Family

ID=65321915

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19708262.1A Withdrawn EP3642655A1 (fr) 2018-03-14 2019-02-25 Dispositif pour la détermination d'une orientation d'un dispositif optique d'un appareil de tomographie par cohérence, appareil de tomographie par cohérence et système de traitement au laser

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US11623299B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3642655A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP7005750B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN111065947B (fr)
DE (1) DE102018105877B3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2019174895A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3608625B1 (fr) * 2018-08-07 2023-10-25 Hexagon Technology Center GmbH Système de mesure oct

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019207421B4 (de) * 2019-05-21 2023-05-17 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Verfahren zum Glätten einer Oberfläche eines Bauteils durch Bearbeitung mit energetischer Strahlung
IT201900023214A1 (it) * 2019-12-06 2021-06-06 Adige Spa Procedimento e sistema per la determinazione della posizione locale di almeno un elemento ottico in una macchina per la lavorazione laser di un materiale, tramite tecniche d'interferometria ottica a bassa coerenza
US20220055147A1 (en) * 2020-08-19 2022-02-24 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Laser processing apparatus and laser processing method
CN114178679B (zh) * 2020-09-15 2024-07-02 台达电子工业股份有限公司 激光加工装置
DE102020006652A1 (de) 2020-10-30 2022-05-05 Daimler Ag Verfahren zur Überwachung eines Schweißprozesses
DE102021117524A1 (de) 2021-07-07 2023-01-12 Trumpf Laser Gmbh Verfahren zur Überwachung eines Laserschweißprozesses, Überwachungsvorrichtung und Laserschweißvorrichtung
CN114918195B (zh) * 2022-05-31 2023-08-25 深圳吉阳智能科技有限公司 激光清洗控制方法、系统和可读存储介质
DE102022120834A1 (de) 2022-08-18 2024-02-29 Trumpf Laser Gmbh Verfahren zur Kalibrierung eines Mess-Scanners an einer Laserbearbeitungsoptik

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4504147A (en) * 1981-07-28 1985-03-12 Huang Cheng Chung Angular alignment sensor
JP3088117B2 (ja) 1991-02-21 2000-09-18 エヌイーシーレーザ・オートメーション株式会社 レーザ加工装置
US5465147A (en) * 1991-04-29 1995-11-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for acquiring images using a ccd detector array and no transverse scanner
JP4776473B2 (ja) * 2006-08-25 2011-09-21 株式会社ミツトヨ 光軸偏向型レーザ干渉計、その校正方法、補正方法、及び、測定方法
US20080100848A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Koji Kobayashi Optical tomograph
US8004688B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2011-08-23 Zygo Corporation Scan error correction in low coherence scanning interferometry
DE102011007176B4 (de) * 2011-04-12 2015-06-25 Trumpf Werkzeugmaschinen Gmbh + Co. Kg Vorrichtung zur Fokussierung eines Laserstrahls und Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Laserbearbeitung
DK2972479T3 (da) * 2013-03-13 2020-11-30 Ipg Photonics Canada Inc Fremgangsmåder og systemer til beskrivelse af laserbearbejdningsegenskaber ved at måle keyholedynamik ved hjælp af interferometri
JP6198448B2 (ja) * 2013-05-02 2017-09-20 株式会社トーメーコーポレーション 光断層画像撮影装置
DE102013210078B4 (de) 2013-05-29 2015-04-30 Trumpf Werkzeugmaschinen Gmbh + Co. Kg Vorrichtung, Verfahren und Computerprogrammprodukt zur Bestimmung der Fokusposition eines Hochenergiestrahls
DE102013015656B4 (de) * 2013-09-23 2016-02-18 Precitec Optronik Gmbh Verfahren zum Messen der Eindringtiefe eines Laserstrahls in ein Werkstück, Verfahren zum Bearbeiten eines Werkstücks sowie Laserbearbeitungsvorrichtung
US10967452B2 (en) 2014-10-20 2021-04-06 Precitec Gmbh & Co.Kg Device for measuring the depth of a weld seam in real time
DE102015109984A1 (de) 2015-06-22 2016-12-22 Scanlab Ag Scannerkopf mit integriertem Strahllagesensor sowie Justageanordnung zur Offline-Justage
DE102015012565B3 (de) 2015-09-25 2016-10-27 Lessmüller Lasertechnik GmbH Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Genauigkeit eines OCT-Messsystems für die Lasermaterialbearbeitung
WO2017070178A1 (fr) * 2015-10-19 2017-04-27 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Procédés et appareil permettant une imagerie par cohérence optique dépourvue de chatoiement
WO2017081808A1 (fr) * 2015-11-13 2017-05-18 株式会社日立製作所 Procédé et dispositif de mesure
DE102016204140B3 (de) * 2016-03-14 2017-04-06 pmdtechnologies ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Kalibrierung einer Lichtlaufzeitkamera
DE102016109909A1 (de) 2016-05-30 2017-11-30 Precitec Gmbh & Co. Kg Vorrichtung zur Prozessüberwachung bei der Laserbearbeitung

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3608625B1 (fr) * 2018-08-07 2023-10-25 Hexagon Technology Center GmbH Système de mesure oct

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111065947B (zh) 2022-08-30
CN111065947A (zh) 2020-04-24
US20200198051A1 (en) 2020-06-25
US11623299B2 (en) 2023-04-11
JP7005750B2 (ja) 2022-01-24
DE102018105877B3 (de) 2019-02-28
WO2019174895A1 (fr) 2019-09-19
JP2020532743A (ja) 2020-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102018105877B3 (de) Vorrichtung für die Bestimmung einer Ausrichtung einer optischen Vorrichtung eines Kohärenztomographen, Kohärenztomograph und Laserbearbeitungssystem
EP3469302B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure optique d'une profondeur de soudage
EP3310519B1 (fr) Système d'ajustement pour ajustement hors ligne avec une tête de scanner munie d'un capteur de position du faisceau intégré, et procede correspondant d'ajustement utilisant un tel systeme d'ajustement
DE102014011569B4 (de) Verfahren zum Messen des Abstands zwischen einem Werkstück und einem Bearbeitungskopf einer Laserbearbeitungsvorrichtung
EP3140609B1 (fr) Dispositif de mesure de la profondeur d'un cordon de soudure en temps réel
DE102013008269B4 (de) Bearbeitungskopf für eine Laserbearbeitungsvorrichtung und Verfahren zur Laserbearbeitung eines Werkstücks
DE102013015656B4 (de) Verfahren zum Messen der Eindringtiefe eines Laserstrahls in ein Werkstück, Verfahren zum Bearbeiten eines Werkstücks sowie Laserbearbeitungsvorrichtung
DE102017126867A1 (de) Laserbearbeitungssystem und Verfahren zur Laserbearbeitung
DE19963010B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Laserbearbeitung von Werkstücken
EP3641980B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure de la distance dans un dispositif d'usinage laser et dispositif d'usinage laser
DE102017115922C5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung und Einstellung eines Abstands zwischen einem Bearbeitungskopf und einem Werkstück sowie dazugehöriges Verfahren zur Regelung
DE102017100991B3 (de) Messvorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erfassung wenigstens einer Längenmessgröße
DE102018129407B4 (de) Verfahren zum Schneiden eines Werkstücks mittels eines Laserstrahls und Laserbearbeitungssystem zum Durchführen des Verfahrens
EP3837084B1 (fr) Système de traitement au laser et procédé d'usinage d'une pièce avec un faisceau laser
EP2673590B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de mesurer des surfaces de manière très précise
DE102019120398B3 (de) Laserbearbeitungssystem und Verfahren für eine zentrische Ausrichtung eines Laserstrahls in einem Bearbeitungskopf eines Laserbearbeitungssystems
EP2762832B1 (fr) Mesure optique des points individuels
WO2011036033A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositifs de détermination de l'orientation et de la positon d'un objet
WO2024037828A1 (fr) Procédé d'étalonnage d'un scanner de mesure sur une unité optique de travail au laser

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200108

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220608

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20221019